Trolling The Exploitative Women Of Friendzoned Betas

A reader came up with an excellent idea: use reverse psychology (the old-fashioned term for trolling) against the women who exploit beta male chumps for money and emotional support without giving the betas any sex in return.

The concept is simple. Whenever you come across an attention whore on social media bragging to anyone who will listen about the asexual lump she keeps around as a “great friend” to “help raise her child (which is not his)”, you slyly imply, or directly state if that’s your style, that she and her beta toy “look like a great couple together!! ❤️❤️

Attention Whoring Beta Exploiting Sociopath: “This is my best friend, Chodester McChode! He buys me stuff!”

Despicable You: “Aw you guys are so cute together! It’s obvious you two are in love.”

Attention Whoring Beta Exploiting Sociopath: “Whaaat? No, we’re not together….”

Despicable You: “Stop trying to be so modest. We get it, you have a real catch, and you don’t want to make your girl friends jealous.”

Attention Whoring Beta Exploiting Sociopath: “No, really… don’t get the wrong idea….. OMG I can’t belive you think that??!”

Despicable You: “Look at you playing coy. Come on, we can all see what a great match he is for you. You’re not going to do better honey!”

Etc, etc, insert shiv, etc. You can dial up the sadism as much as you like, and have fun while doing it. Bonus: I believe this will make a dent in America’s Attention Whoring Beta Exploiting Sociopath population. Or at least a dent in their willingness to humiliate their pet betas online to throngs of cackling cunts.





Comments


  1. on October 23, 2015 at 2:02 pm Dead(white)ManWalking

    … and make it about looks, in that patronizing “everyone is beautiful” tone. Especially if there is a big disparity between their attractiveness, like a 7-8 with her chubby 4-5 computer programmer “buddy.”

    “Oh my! You caught such a good looking, handsome man! You guys are adorable together! Love you!!! 😉

    Like


    • That is evil!

      “I always thought you two would end up together”
      “yeah, looking at you two, it makes sense…good fit.”

      or somehow insinuate that beta is holding out, like

      “come on, Trystan, you don’t think that Bryant’s going to wait forever, do you?”

      Like


      • the problem is is that beta boy will rush to defang any such trollerisms, “no, lol, my best snuffykins friend won’t marry me and that’s fine and she is so much better than me and deserves to get the dick from a guy whose much better than me”

        Like


  2. Haha I could make a full time job trolling women online. It’s almost too easy.

    Like


  3. Well, I’ve tried to enlist the help of the frequent commenters here to RealTalk© comment sections on other sites, to no avail. Maybe CH can suggest specific places to do this each week. Using the ‘flash mob’ tactic of the cultmarx crowd, in comment form. We are allies in the war to save western civilization. On every front imaginable.

    Like


  4. Don’t know if you’ve already seen it or not, Heartiste, but you’ve been mentioned on Radio Derb Oct 16

    http://www.vdare.com/radios/radio-derb-sanders-vs-trump-the-issues-guy-and-the-attitude-guy-etc

    I wonder what kind of traffic you saw from that.

    Like


    • on October 23, 2015 at 11:17 pm Bro Brosterson

      That would be at least the second mention then, because I recall one in an older episode too. Haven’t listened as much lately.

      Like


  5. […] Trolling The Exploitative Women Of Friendzoned Betas […]

    Like


  6. I love this approach! I am all over it starting NOW!

    Like


  7. Haha, funny idea. Worth remembering.

    Like


  8. Some might suggest women flaunt these kind of friendzonings purely for status signalling (look at how much this guy does for me!), and I agree that’s a small part, but how much status can a beta’s love win you anyway?

    I’d say the lion’s share of the reason women do this is essentially a signal to low-investment alphas: Free pussy, prowling alpha! Got the cuck all lined up and everything!

    If that theory is correct you’d see less public friendzoning in a more traditional, restrained sexual market where the costs of sex are less manipulated by the pill, abortion, antibiotics, legal system, etc. But I doubt those factors ever change enough to make this a testable hypothesis.

    [CH: i think you’re onto something. public cucking is like female displays of sluttery: both are dog whistles to charming cads in an r-selected environment that the pussy is open for business.]

    Like


    • on October 23, 2015 at 11:26 pm Captain Tautological

      But what if the cuck goes into female friend mode, and C0CK BLOCKS you as though he were her fugly female friend? If you inadvertently angered him, then a white knight c0ck blocker might be able to knock your teeth out.

      Like


      • on October 23, 2015 at 11:59 pm Facepalm to the Max

        “If you inadvertently angered him, then a white knight c0ck blocker might be able to knock your teeth out.”

        /facepalm

        Have you seen your typical flabby gutted, man titted beta cuck friend?

        Like


      • But he’s not actually her friend, so she’ll never value his opinion about who she fucks. With even a little bit of game, you can magnify that effect, too. And chances are he’s a huge pussy who won’t want to fight.

        Like


    • on October 24, 2015 at 12:09 am Captain Tautological

      > “I’d say the lion’s share of the reason women do this is essentially a signal to low-investment alphas: Free pussy, prowling alpha! Got the cuck all lined up and everything!” ——— She is signalling her fitness for the Alpha’s seed by proving to the Alpha that she’s enough of an Ice Queen to lead a poor Beta cuck around by his metaphorical BDSM nose-ring. If so, then it would be part & parcel of my theory that about a century’s worth of co-edumakashunal higher learning has already assortatively paired up three or four generations of e.g. {Narcissistic Personality Disorder Males} x {Borderline Personality Disorder Females}, and that, as a result, we are now getting a whole lot more genetic psychopaths than our ancestors ever saw.

      Like


  9. Excellent. This sounds like the perfect opportunity for trolling female shitlibs. Thanks.

    Oh, and CH? May I suggest a theme song:

    Like


  10. “You two bring out the best in each other!”

    Like


    • “why haven’t you two kids ever gotten together? You’re perfect for each other?”

      Later that night, beta gets angry drunk thinking about this line, and in a rage puts a move on her and they don’t talk for a month.

      Manipulate them rape!

      Like


  11. You two are well matched.

    Like


  12. Trends in bridal dresses, per NYT.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/fashion/transparent-wedding-dresses-bridal-market-fall-2016.html

    1. Transparency
    2. Sparkle
    3. Short
    4. Plunging
    5. Lingerie
    6. High Concept

    Example:

    Like


  13. Trends in bridal dresses, per NYT.

    1. Transparency
    2. Sparkle
    3. Short
    4. Plunging
    5. Lingerie
    6. High Concept

    Example:

    Like


  14. http://m.pss.sagepub.com/content/25/1/230.full

    Hierarchical Encoding Makes Individuals in a Group Seem More Attractive

    or

    “The Cheerleader Effect”

    Like


  15. @ch you posted about Where are the male friends? earlier; well here you go:

    Single moms and attention whores have the SMV of a homeless chick asking for ride fare at a metro station. Why keep posted about these people who do not matter?

    The QUALITY (1%) girls DESERVE a man who knows how to keep them interested. Isnt that the point of le chateau; to guide, educate and slap some sense into your readers so that we can give these girls the man that they deserve?

    Like


  16. Here are some sample shivs:

    “Called it! People have been wondering for YEARS when you two would tie the knot!”
    -the writing’s on the wall rape!

    “About time (Beta male) settled down and found a nice girl in his league.”
    -comparative value rape! This one probably cuts right to the core.

    Like


  17. This is superb. I don’t know whether I’m still as pleased I have no chance to use it. My social media has already been pruned of this sort of dross

    Like


  18. It’s unbelievable how many dudes are obvious, BLATANT beta orbiters when you’re taking computer science. There is something really sad about it.

    As in, it is abundantly clear that these two aren’t BF/GF, but at the same time, you don’t get the feeling that the beta is perfectly comfortable with this “arrangement”, so orbiter it is.

    Somewhat OT: if you really want to troll women, going after the privates is a good idea. I posted a link to a previous CH post wherein chicks with asshair were maligned. You could just feel the impotent squirming of wimmin in the comment sections, in reaction to the utter disgust displayed by the commenters.. (“HOW DID CAVEMEN MANAGE TO GET IT UP WITH THOSE UNSHAVEN CAVECHICKS, HMMM?!”/snark) The “that bush that spoke to Moses” guy nuked the pussy from the Kuiper Belt. She has nightmares about it, guaranteed.

    I knew a guy who used to troll chicks online by calling them fishing boats. LOZLOZOZOLOLOLZLOZLLOZLOZLOZLOZ

    Then there is this teenie-bopper guy, who had tons of female teenie fans on Vine and was supposedly the next Justin Bieber. In one vlog post, he mentioned what he likes in a girl. After a list of fairly standard traits, he mentioned how he can’t stand chicks with hairy forearms and hairy faces (eg peach fuzz). Guess what happened.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11Rry9hU8ZY 😆

    Finally, the coup de grace, this is what the esteemed gentlemen over at /r9k/ (i.e. Omega Male Central) have come up with.

    Happy trolling, fellas!

    Like


  19. Here’s one: “Wow, it’s really true that couples start to look like each other after they’ve been together long enough!”

    Like


  20. on October 23, 2015 at 5:30 pm Del Gelderman

    You aren’t taking it far enough. Post a comment along the lines of “Oh, that’s odd because Johhnie said you and he got drunk last week and banged the doors off the outhouse?”

    Like


  21. After 6 months on Facebook doing exactly this I can tell you that there is no dialogue. After the first few lines they just ignore you or delete you from their friends list.

    Like


    • Was just about to ask for some field reports from those w/ Facebook for those of us who avoid it like the plague…

      Like


  22. Inverse Boyfriend Destroyer routine!

    This is soooo, good, on so many levels. You have a bulletproof process to get her qualifying to you. She can’t let it stand. If she thinks you’re serious, she’s horrified, if she thinks you are not, then she knows you’re the type of socially ruthless man who would stand directly on top of the dignity of orbiter-guy to get her reactively denying your Trumped up charge of beta-association.

    “Have you now, or ever been…”

    McCarthy game?

    Like


    • on October 24, 2015 at 12:16 am Captain Tautological

      > “Have you now, or ever been…” ——— a receptacle for Beta seed when you were ovulating? Below here, Harland is speculating on how planting into her mind’s eye the specter of actually breeding with the Cuck is gonna send her hamster spinning off into outer space.

      Like


  23. I’m on facebook (yes I have such a thing, yes I know I should get rid of it, but at this point the hassle of deleting overcomes common sense).

    One of my facebook friends is a young girl (23) who is a friend of one of my relatives. A pretty but normal-pretty girl with her makeup on, and in good petite shape.

    Guys, you would not BELIEVE how many photos she posts a day of herself in alluring outfits and poses. At least once a week we get a jogging outfit shot that looks like it should be the beginning of a strip routine rather than a run. It’s mindboggling how attention-whoring she is, even to me, the king of the Heartiste comment boards. Just witnessing her act really does shock you.

    What’s sadder is just how many of her guy “friends” on FB go NUTS over these pics, liking them and commenting on how “utlra hot” and/or “beautiful” she is. She gets about 20 likes, many with “wowwowow” or other type messages about how floored the men are. The thirst is very strong—especially from a couple of the black guys she’s “friends” with—those brothers are over-the-top with their beta thirst. I guess a pretty white girl really is black man’s kryptonite (though she isn’t blond or meaty).

    Guys, its sad that this goes on, and sadder still that dudes still are beta-ing out to it, but even sadder when you witnesses it. Like any good heartiste reader I’ve never liked one of these photos or made a comment…

    well, except once, when I wrote, “so where’s your kid in this photo?”

    Because she’s also a single mom. 😛

    Single mom rape!

    [CH: single mom at 23? what a wreck. btw, my theory is that attention whoring intensifies in societies that are becoming, using a lazy shorthand term, more r-selected. this doesn’t necessarily indicate that women are getting sluttier, or that there is more casual sex going on. but it can indicate that the culture and the social signals that animate peer groups are getting sluttier and more focused on casual short term flings instead of ltrs or marriage.]

    Like


    • There has been an uptick in talk about r/K selection, mostly for good reason, as the conceptual model explains a lot. That said, it can be like noted above, lazy shorthand.

      Another way of looking at Western people is that their r/K distribution is more narrow than assumed I think were ultimately pretty similar to each other, heavily in the K direction. Whatever “r” manifestations we see, are in large part effects of atomization, lack of guidance, false guidance, and mistakes borne of youthful confusion and subsequent doubling-down on one’s folly for reasons of ego.

      [CH: chillingly, there’s another explanation for pardigmatic sexual market shifts: a genetic replacement of the previous population’s characteristics. there’s a theory that dads/cads and maidens/sluts (loosely, K vs r) in a population increase or decrease as a ratio of the total mate pool. briefly, when dads/maidens proliferate, cads/sluts stay “in hiding” but find niches to exploit. the latter’s numbers grow until they have exhausted the available niches and the pendulum swings back.
      now, the problem with this theory, as far as i can tell, is that it takes longer than a generation, maybe longer than ten generations, to effect that kind of massive genetic churn. so i’m not sure how much merit it deserves. i believe (like with a lot of social phenomena) that there are gene/culture interactions, mutually reinforcing, that can explain much of what we observe happening around us.
      btw, there’s a corollary to this theory that Eurasians aren’t so much purely K-selected as they are “K-preferred”, possessing within them genes that code for either r or K lifestyle preferences where one or the other gets activated depending on environmental cues. ergo, in an era of plentiful cheap food and gibsmedats, the r-selection gene would get triggered in a greater share of the population, and more forcefully.]

      Like


      • CH – Got any links so these two topics?

        Like


      • I don’t really believe the genetic theories, I think promiscuity is the norm. If you read history you will find it all over the place. However, in the past, it was harshly publicly punished for all parties involved. Wives cuckolding their husbands were punished most harshly, followed by the cads that tempted them, and finally the husband that allowed this to happen to him was also shamed. I find it really weird that one can be actually arrested for saying ‘insensitive’ things that might ‘hurt someone’s feelings’ but that there is no law that punishes people for romantic betrayal which I imagine is one of the worst things that can happen to people. so iow, anti-promiscuity was heavily enforced by the patriarchy in the past and those laws have been slowly eroded.

        Like


    • It’s all rape all the time with whorefinder .
      That’s funny as hell, don’t care who you is.

      Like


    • r/k are a spectrum of behavior that all humans are on. similar to sexual preference, all humans are capable of one sort of behavior or the other, but the environment will affect it. Take a boy and have someone sexually abuse him at 7 years old and have him grow up in an environment where resources are plentiful and homosexual activities are tolerated and he will “discover” he is gay.

      Take the same abused boy, have him grow up where resources are scarce and heterosexuality is encouraged and homoism not accepted, and he will marry and have children and disdain repeating his childhood antics.

      we have abundant resources, which encourages r-selecgted behavior.

      I look at hardcore “lesbians”, and what I see is a bunch of hard women who, in a previous time, would have married hard-laboring blue-collar men; now, with those jobs gone and environment soft, those women turn to each other, as there isn’t a “manly man” around to put them in line. but if resources suddenly became scarce and hard labor came back in, those women would magically all marry hard lumberjack-type men again.

      r/K rape!

      Like


    • @CH

      “more r-selected. this doesn’t necessarily indicate that women are getting sluttier”

      But doesn’t it though?

      I mean when I think of full K selected on the right hand of the bell curve, it’s a solid nuclear family, with a moral framework with an intact family tree history of traditional gender roles and a succession of healthy offspring perpetuating the cycle.

      Full blown r selected is africa. Or Detroit. Many many kids from a series of different pair bonds. Many std’s. All kinds of extra marital or extra spousal sexual activity. Rape. Increst. Homosex. Complete savage sluttery.

      Right?

      Like


  24. This actually works to get laid in reality at a bar or club. Look for a hot girl with a guy, make small talk end it with ” y’all make a great couple, you picked a good dude”. If they are together she will say “I know” if they are not she will say “we are not together or he is not my boyfriend “. If the girl says the latter MOVE IN WITH AGGRESSION she is good to go. I am 4/10 with girls who reply lik

    Like


  25. Get me out of moderation rape!

    Like


  26. This is the basis of the boyfriend destroyer techniques…plant the seeds of “friendship” in the girl’s mind. Things like “He seems like a nice guy and probably would treat you much better than I would…but you’re the best he’ll ever do so he’ll do everything to keep you…”

    I was banging a 27 year old Cluster B type this year. I would disappear for weeks at a time when I got a sniff of her pulling back. Worked a charm, she’d always come back.

    One time after around 3 weeks of soft-nexting her…I spotted her with some guy walking down the street, clearly it was a date.

    I text her just for the fun of it.

    Me: was that you walking down the promenade? I think I saw you with some nice guy, brother?

    Her: blah blah blah he’s just a friend, omg he’s so gay

    A few days later we were banging again.

    I learned a great lesson with this girl. She was constantly pulling the “lots of guys like me” stuff.

    This type of shit test shows up in many ways. A guy at work has a thing for her. She gets lots of ‘likes’ etc etc. The guy she’s ‘friends’ with has a car…or something I don’t.

    If you’re in any way over-invested you cave. But what I did in this case was agree and amplify or play along with it. “Great, he can pick you up in the morning…better yet make us breakfast THEN drive you home…”

    There is something about this technique that I’ve found always ends up exposing the holes in the girl’s existing relationship. You want to see hypergamy in action, just tell a girl the guy she’s with seems “nice”, a “safe choice”… watch how she reacts.

    Like


    • I remember studying BF destroyer routines from Tyler Durden alt seduction archives years ago.

      it’s good stuff. It basically applies to any hot chic ur talking/texting with as they always shit test and mention ‘this guy I’m dating’ or ‘hanging out with’ blah blah.

      It’s good to know how to maneuver that into your advantage.

      Like


  27. Anybody see this?

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/tucker-max/2015/10/guys-heres-what-its-actually-like-to-be-a-woman/

    [CH: nah i don’t fully buy it. women fear rejection even more than men do, because women have far fewer acceptable mates to choose from. so any one of those alphas rejecting them would hit their egos hard. plus, women are the pricier sex (in their primes). they have a natural expectation that most men will at least entertain them for a night. (the real rejection women fear is lovelessness — when a man loses interest in a woman over time).
    as for the fear of rape and assault… there will be racial differences in this reaction in women. White women have coevolved with their men for thousands of years toward a less violent natural state, so that fear of attack has likely concurrently evolved to be muted in them.
    btw, these two guys — max and miller — are ripping off a lot of CH material. assholes! but chicks dig assholes.
    ps and these two faggots need to stop using the word “guys” when they mean “men”. jeezus whatta coupla of effeminate manlets.]

    Like


    • A woman pretended to be a man and decided being a man is worse because no one gives a shit about you:

      Like


    • his premise on rape/assault is straight up retarded. girls may pick up social cues that lead them to fear a specific man, but they aren’t fucking social retards, 99% of men in bars don’t trigger rape/assault fear. besides, its a non-starter because women are attracted to bigger and stronger men. they enjoy it. its sexual dimorphism. it evolved for a reason.

      and he has a multi-paragraph wordsalad telling the reader to “imagine himself as a gay man”…. dude, what the hell are you talking about? That is not a mental exercise a normal straight man wants to do. Its just weird.

      The manosphere backlash when Tucker Max came out with his dating “advice” thing was a dead-on bullseye: He is taking some spice from the sphere and coating it in feminist, mainstream, blue pill thought-rot. He will get many pats on the head from early-thirties career women in his startup/VC social circles, but he will not help guys find success with the prettiest young women they lust for.

      TLDR: The old Tucker Max is dead, he is now a chode who married a tranny.

      Like


      • I thought Tucker Max was dead. If he married a shim, he should be.
        I’d scream rape, but i have no say in that .

        Like


      • I don’t know much about Tucker Max except that he is, or was, a PUA, but that article reads like the ghosts-of-PUAs-past meets feminism.

        Has he always been like that?

        Like


      • Tucker was never a PUA, he was a dude who wrote some offensive “supposedly true stories” about being a rich, handsome, smart, entitled dick who, the more he acted like a dick, the more ribald his success with women became.

        Most of the stories rang false, and Opie & Anthony had him on their show and basically ripped into him, claiming his tales were fake, and he never really could counter that.

        Now he’s turned a new leaf, the truth is probably he had a few fun adventures, but also had a talent for writing, and so made up some tall tales in books and got famous that way, then moved to Hollywood to do what he really wanted.

        So Tucker’s entire oevre is really about as true as a professional wrestler’s storyline.

        Tucker Max fake rape!

        Like


      • Tucker max is basically a comedy writer and uses college/tween hook up culture as his fodder.

        He’s not a bad writer. Some of his bits in his books are hilarious. But it’s exactly that, stories. Heavily embellished stories of assholery, drunken bar and drunken party hook ups and blah blah…

        He’s not a PUA or seduction guru or anything close….that I’m aware of. My take is he’s just trying to ride his brand out as long as he can for tha dollaz.

        Like


    • @ CH and the gang,

      Going off tangent here: does anybody else have the impression that more brown (less white) chicks are more likely to be cluster-B, or is that just me?

      Like


  28. ROFL REDUCED TO ADVISE RANTS ABOUT TROLLING SOCIAL MEDIA

    12 YEAR OLD BRUH, 12 YEARS OLD

    Like


  29. The revulsion reaction in this case doesn’t really have anything to do with him being a beta orbiter. It’s more to do with the fact that he’s unfit to reproduce with her. For the first time, she has thought about about combining her DNA with his. It repulses her and she says so.

    You can try this with other girls. The next time you see one of life’s winners walking down the street, you know one of those internet atheist types, say to the girl, “I bet your and his kid would look so cute!” Then watch as her face contorts into horror. You’re touching a deep hindbrain reaction as she considers what her DNA would look like mixed with his. You could get a good comedy bit watching disgusted reactions in slow motion.

    Like


    • on October 23, 2015 at 11:53 pm Captain Tautological

      “OMG, look at the two of you! Your kids are gonna be so cute! I call first dibs on being their Godfather at the baptism.”

      Like


    • Even the most ruthless student of Eugenics would stagger at the mating firmware in the average American woman’s hindbrain.

      They can execute the marry/fuck/kill algorithm before Mengele could have even reached for his clipboard.

      There must be a limit somewhere, because these women are driving selection pressures toward even more impossible standards than they now possess.

      Like


  30. CH, I’m gonna have to disagree with you a bit on this. With women who deserve to be trolled, it’s often best to stick the shiv in once and then let them ponder all the meanings of what you left unsaid, because that’s what women do. So when they respond in the way you described, just shrug your shoulders, say “okay” or something non-committal, in an unconvincing way and then let her stew. Or you could say something like (in a confiding tone) “Oh he’s not your boyfriend huh.” and then add “He’s got a girlfriend” as though you think the girl you’re talking to doesn’t quite have to offer what the girlfriend has.

    This gives you plausible deniability and let’s them do the work so you don’t have to.

    Like


  31. Allllllriight. Weirdest thing in the world.

    In med school. Good looking. Confident . The list goes on.

    But why have I noticed that girls (sometimes new groups) walk away after I open them. What is that.

    Ch need your expertise

    Like


    • I’ve spent time around med students and my impression is many of the girls are very shy and some not used to flirtation or “game” of any sort. Don’t overdo it.

      It could also be that you are riding on your status and good looks and not using any charm, playful teasing, etc and they are simply bored.

      Like


    • Need more details – you’re clearly trying too hard somewhere – good looking med student should have troubles keeping his dick dry

      Like


    • Not weird at all. You are hung up on you, not what girls really like, which is emotional manipulation and psychological dominance.

      Is this Will?

      Like


  32. on October 24, 2015 at 12:23 am Days of Broken Arrows

    My mother inadvertently did this to my friendin college. I didn’t have a car freshman year, and he drove me home with his Beta orbitee (is that the word?) a girl named Donna who would have nothing to do with him.

    Well, my Italian mother started doing her usual too-talkative thing, going on and on, saying what a great couple they were, blah blah blah. The girl got more and more uncomfortable, finally saying they weren’t. She said it in such a way that he got pissed off. End of orbiter status. My mom did him a favor.

    In more ways that one, too. I caught up with her about four years later and she’d ballooned into a whale. So she ended up in the end with no looks or personality, like a lot of attention-whores.

    Like


  33. Except the problem is not women, it’s the men for pursuing women that will never give them what they want.

    A better tactic might be to call women put on their passive-aggressive behavior and then message the guy and make him aware of her subtle insult and ask him why he’s continuing to let himself be strung along.

    Like


  34. A $3000 “Leadership seminar for men” run by 3 women in their 50s

    https://www.biv.com/living-working/

    Like


  35. Always amusing to give the ol’ hamster wheel a hard spin or 2…

    Like


  36. […] Trolling The Exploitative Women Of Friendzoned Betas | Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  37. I do believe I’m being marked as spam..

    Like


  38. That is an interesting experiment to be done. I’am gonna try it out and see what will happen.

    http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    Like


  39. ‘you complete each other’

    lozlzolzozlzolzlz

    Like


  40. ” You guys are perfect match ❤ "

    " You two perfectly fit together ❤ "

    I remember, similar trolling mentioned on CH awhile ago. When seeing some helpless bloke and tell chick "You would make a nice couple" or sth similar. The more serious tone, the deeper the shiv impales.

    Like


  41. I have a social media acquaintance who is a female doctor working in the “tech space”. I repeat, a doctor. A health professional. A medical professional. Theoretically making big decisions that impact the well-being of other humans re: treatment, prescriptions, diet, etc.

    She posts a steady stream of gratuitous duckfaced selfies at tech and medical device conferences, pictures of herself in her bikini via her hotel room mirror, pictures of her body in skimpy outfits from music festivals, etc. She is very attractive.

    The comments section is unreal. Half women, with the usual “yowza!”, “hot hot hot!”, “gorgeous! let’s do lunch soon!”…The other half, men. Scientists, codemonkey tech dweebs, and middle aged doctors: “Looking beautiful!”, “wow”, “stunning!”, etc.

    Unreal. Social media enables some of the lamest human behaviors. I wonder what the infirm patients under her care would think? If they are young moms looking for a fountain of youth diet fad “cure”, they’ll likely be jealous but intrigued and want to follow in her footsteps and heed her guidance.

    Dear god. What happened to playing the role of doctor? The basic decorum, the standard of personal conduct?

    [CH: if you didn’t care about protecting privacy, you could send a screenshot of that to the goodbye america blog. perfect fodder to illustrate the decline.]

    Like


    • Hint: Women should not be doctors.

      Like


    • [The other half, men. Scientists, codemonkey tech dweebs, and middle aged doctors: “Looking beautiful!”, “wow”, “stunning!”, etc]

      If just one man wrote “for chrissakes, cover yourself” under a bikini selfie, he’d intrigue her.

      Should go without saying, no smiley face or any other emoticon.

      Like


      • Something I notice on strings of banter that was set off with a girl posting an attention-whoring pic: solid, ever masterful negs by male commenters, but ruined by smiley faces or “j/k”.

        Like


      • The Jumbortron Test concept should be taught to every teenage boy.

        Like


  42. im doing this tonight.!!

    Like


  43. on October 24, 2015 at 3:18 pm frogsubterranean

    What if you’re depressed and are using a girl for emotional support yourself? Does that make you beta? I’m too depressed to have sex but I’d like to have a girl who is kind and affectionate listen to my problems.

    Like


  44. I did this with a guy and a girl on his wall and he became infuriated and she seemed to hint her annoyance.

    Another time, there was a girl from far away, friend of a friend, who flirted with me a lot on Facebook. Having already suffered a long distance, I ruled her out. She kept trying to get me to come visit*. Eventually, she found a boyfriend who commented on her profile picture “ur so beautiful”. I clicked like, and years later, I still have his friend request, neither accepted nor denied. She deleted both of us, so we dont even have a mutual “friend” anymore.

    *On that note, I am reminded of a friend of my ex who on and off has been begging me to return to their town to visit, etc etc. For maybe four years now?

    Like


  45. Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0 and commented:
    Great post going out to my ex wife’s stupid, simp, mangina, beta male, who moved in with her to be the great White knght…She knew this guy in high school and would not even give him the time of day, but when I dumped her and she was flat broke he was her “Mr. Perfect”…what a fucking simp!

    Like