The Origin Of Women’s Love For Jerks?

SCIENCE! has given us a glimpse into the possible origins of the renowned human female mate preference for jerkboys of varying jerkitude.

Male sexual aggression: What chimps can reveal about people

Male chimpanzees that wage a campaign of sustained aggression against females sire more offspring than their less violent counterparts, new research finds.

The results suggest that such nasty behavior from males evolved because it gave the meanest males a reproductive advantage, said study co-author Ian Gilby, a primatologist at Arizona State University in Phoenix.

This chimpanzee behavior could also provide some insight into the roots of sexual aggression in men.

“It is possible that in our early ancestors there may have been an adaptive value to male aggression against females,” Gilby said.

Chimps aren’t the only closest living ape relatives of humans (bonobos and gorillas are the others), but their present-day characteristics could help shed light on deeply embedded human sexual behavior that is resistant to shorter term cultural or ecological changes.

But sexual aggression in male chimpanzees isn’t directly parallel to rape, because it typically takes place at times distant from copulation. Female chimps also mate with multiple males anyway, Gilby said..

To understand the roots of this behavior, Gilby and his colleagues recorded instances of male-on-female violence in a troop of chimpanzees living in Gombe Stream National Park in Tanzania. The researchers studied violence that occurred both when the females were sexually receptive, or swollen, and when they were not. The team then compared that information with paternity tests on all the offspring born since 1995.

Chimps have a strict male dominance hierarchy, and more-dominant males generally engage in a greater amount of gendered aggression. But even when taking this into account, the team found that aggression increased a male’s chances of siring offspring — regardless of whether the chimp was more or less dominant.

The sustained intimidation in which chimps engage, which has some parallels to human behaviors such as stalking or domestic violence, is a form of mate guarding. The behavior may make female chimps less likely to sneak off with a partner of her choosing during her most fertile times, Gilby said.

So male aggression isn’t primarily about coercing sex from females. It’s a mate guarding strategy, similar to the violence that lunkhead alpha human males may occasionally visit upon their in-demand hottie girlfriends (cf., Chris Brown). And according to this study, that mate guarding aggression has a genetic payoff, so it would be selected over genes for “niceguy” supplication and everlasting tenderness.

Obviously, this isn’t the whole human story, as niceguys are still with us, and women don’t fall for jerks all the time every time. But there is clearly an observable female preference for jerkboys that has no parallel in a male preference for jerkgirls. Think of a jerkboy bell curve, and place women on it. At the far left, you find good girls who never go for men with even a hint of jerkish characteristics, in the middle are the majority of women who like their men best when they exhibit some jerkboy flair, and at the far right of the bell curve are your women who fall in love with serial killers and prisoners.

There is no such equivalent bell curve for men.

The study explains why men might have evolved a taste for flashing gang signs of intimidating assholery upon lovers, but what about women’s taste for receiving that assholery with open legs? One can surmise that a “jerkboy gene” which improved men’s reproductive fitness (in an environment where reproduction wasn’t thwarted by cheap and easy contraception) would, over generations, ride sidesaddle with a “jerkboy loving gene” in women that improved the reproductive fitness of those women who acquiesced to, or even sought out, the very special lessons in love that jerks are fond of teaching. It’s a variant on the sexy sons hypothesis; call it the sexy sonofabitch hypothesis.





Comments


  1. We nice guys are so fucked. I like to treat my ladies well. I enjoy giving them things and pedastalizing them. But they only like me when I’m the exact type of asshole my mother raised me to hate. I had some real natural friends growing up. One dude fooked every single hot girl in my high school. Another lost his virginity to my girlfriend in my house during my party. I had never even fucked her yet after dating for months.

    Now I just suck it up and strangle them, tie them up, mistreat them, disparage them, abuse them, and I get more sex then I ever thought imaginable.

    I miss my delusions of romance though. Physically dominating women gets old but if it’s how they want it that’s how they’ll get it I suppose. I’ve learned how to get off on strangling, and I never say I love you during sex anymore.

    Sucks being a romantic knowing the harsh reality of things.

    Like


    • on November 14, 2014 at 1:49 pm Joachim Peiper

      PS Jesus was a Jew

      Emphasis on was. They kicked him out of the club for criticizing the money changers and the Sanhedrin- remember? You guys take criticism of your love for money pretty seriously. I guess because that’s your real God.

      Like


    • At least He wasn’t a lawyer, nor owned a newspaper.

      (I figured I’d join in the fun, since the idea of the Son of God being called “a Jew” by a Jew who doesn’t believe in Him to begin with is so, well… lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozlozlozl)

      Like


      • Jesus was of course a Jew, who invented a new religion, derived from Judaism but different from it in various ways.

        His family observed Sopot, they visited temples with rabbis, his uncle Zackariah was a rabbi, he called the Judaist temple in Jerusalem “my father’s temple”, he belonged to the freakin’ Judea tribe.

        Like


      • This was meant in reply to Greg Eliot, odd that it ended up lower on the page. Never mind.

        By the way, according to the Talmud Jesus was the son of a prostitute and a Roman soldier. He was not crucified, says the Talmud. Instead he was a radical rabbi student who was thrown of the school’s rooftop because of his radical ideas. He is currently immersed in a pit of boiling excrement in hell.

        Next time neocon loyals praise Israel, you might want to bring this up. Also, google “quotes about goyim” to find fun Talmudic quotes about non-Jews, called “goyim”, cattle.

        Why are Mormonism, Catholicism, Protestantism and Islam ridiculed in Hollywood shows like South Park and Family Guy, but not Judaism with its wealth of Talmudic statements to show the audience?

        Like


      • Hmm? Looks like the Reply function is broken.

        Like


      • I love South Park, but the other day realised the “Anti-semite” is portrayed as fat, obnoxious, over-blown, ignorant…

        Reading too much into it? Maybe.

        Like


      • My reply was to Arbiter

        Like


      • on November 14, 2014 at 6:14 pm depressed_danny

        Over the years South Park has slowly drifted from an equal opportunity ‘make fun of everyone’ style show toward full blown leftoid faggotry. Remember that painful to watch episode about how hard girls have it, since they have to Photoshop themselves to look hotter than they are in order to get attention? Boo fukkity-hoo. Around 2003-4 is when the show began to enter it’s ‘faggotry phase’, and it has only gotten worse since then.

        I can’t comment on Matt Stone (one of the two South Park creators) but it’s confirmed that his partner, Trey Parker, is a full blown holier than thou libtard leftoid SJW simp – and he writes nearly episode nowadays.

        Like


      • Matt Stones wife is Black!
        😝💏💑

        Liked by 1 person


      • on November 14, 2014 at 10:59 pm Alex Jones SuperFan

        Perhaps he didn’t want to bring another crafty hebe into the world.

        Like


      • That explains a lot, don’t it?

        Like


      • Maybe Trey’s still available.

        Like


      • NCIS was very masculine and pro-America and pro-Western and pro-White, in the beginning, when it was being written by Bellisario and McGill. But slowly the CBS jews moved in and took control, and now it’s all dykes and anti-American and anti-Western and of course anti-White. It’s a pretty common tactic for the jews – cling on to something good about Western Civilization and wait patiently for the shkotzim to let their guard down and then slowly but surely work to degrade the good and corrupt it and destroy it.

        What’s really depressing is seeing the very same NCIS actors and actresses, like Mark Harmon, who used to mouth the “pro-” dialogues, just keep right on dutifully reading their lines when the scripts switched to the “anti-” propaganda.

        Like


      • I think cartman is a vehicle for over the top offensiveness on the part of matt and trey which maintains an air of plausible deniability as the character himself is so repugnant, his views can be excused as little more than extravagant and extreme stereotype.

        Like


      • If Jesus was “a Jew” then why didn’t He turn the loaves and fishes into Lo Mein and Moo Goo Gai Pan?

        Look, any talk of Jesus being “a Jew” is relegating Him to being some sort of mere mortal man whose mission was self-imagined, and whose resurrection never occurred…

        … thus leaving mankind with no Savior, hence, no hope for anything beyond the ever-encroaching dystopia that is Man’s legacy to this mortal coil.

        You guys worship whatever gods or man-made -isms you see fit… as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

        Like


      • The thing that cured my agnosticism once and for all was the realization that the last 2000 years have revolved around Jesus almost completely despite many efforts to quash his teachings. I was an atheist at one point too in my life but always found it wanting from a philosophical standpoint. It didn’t match my experiences in life or of the supernatural either. This, coupled with the trajectory we are all headed on compared to biblical prophecy, convinced me that something is up with the guy. You don’t become the most important figure in recorded history for no reason. I’m with you and Zombie on this question. I’ve heard every argument in contradiction as well, many times over. I recommend Plato’s Timaeus and any Stoic work, especially Epictetus and Seneca as a bridge. Moby Dick is also a profound book on these questions. Most atheists don’t really believe their own talk anyway, they’ve just never been really afraid or had to face death and look him in the eye. I have other reasons too, but most here aren’t capable of appreciating them. Let’s just say the Kabbalah is some powerful shit.

        Like


      • I like to consider myself the furthest thing from a philistine, but I stopped reading after:

        Nothing is as profound as BUDDHA LAW. Of all teachings in the world it is the most wondrous and highest science.

        Like


      • on November 16, 2014 at 5:33 am haunted trilobite

        The very first sentence.. I’ll explain my understanding of what Buddha Law is, if that would help: First of all ‘Buddha’ is an ancient sanskrit word that simply means ‘awakened one’, or ‘one who has become enlightened through cultivation practice’. In Falun Gong, ‘Truthfulness, Compassion, Forbearance’ is presented as Buddha Law, and as the nature of the universe. Beings within the universe can become enlightened by assimilating to ‘Truth,Kindness,Tolerance’.
        If we think of cases in history of how humans have become enlightened through cultivating Buddha Law/principals, there are a host of Christian monks who displayed divine powers, such as levitation, or having bodies that don’t decompose. Ordinary humans became supernormal, through arduous cultivation, sacrifice and adherence to the Laws of Heaven as taught by Christ. I personally consider the words ‘Buddha’ and ‘God’ to be somewhat synonymous, and any laws or principals expressed by a righteous God would essentially be an expression of Buddha (enlightened being) Law. I know some of this nomenclature might jar the sensibilities of Christians, but it in no way demeans the magnificence of Jesus.
        My understanding is limited, and there are far greater Truths in Falun Gong, but I’ve gained a deep appreciation of spiritual cultivation, the development of humanity, from ancient times to the present day, and of Jesus, and I know why we were created in God’s image, to name but a few ways in which I’ve benefited. Falun Gong is a practice of mind and body, and my physical health has improved through practicing the exercises. That’s why I recommend these books.

        Like


      • Matt King isn’t listening any more, Greg.

        Like


      • Matt King isn’t listening any more, Greg.

        Of course he isn’t… he’s too busy talking to you inside yo’ haid.

        Like


      • on November 14, 2014 at 6:51 pm haunted trilobite

        Here’s what I know/guess about the matter. Correct my mistakes if you know or guess better. Jesus didn’t invent a new religion – humans invented the religion. Religion means that people obey religious formalities. For example, building a church so that people congregate to worship together, fasting at certain times of the year, praying in a certain direction, sacrifice of animals/virgins (in the darker religions), a roster with names, baptism, conversion, etc. With the benefit of historical records, I can only speculate as to what Jesus did, while on the earth, but I’d imagine that was to lead his disciples in cultivation of the mind. It wasn’t about going to church at 11am on Sunday. He taught them the laws of his heavenly paradise, so that they could become divine beings, and meet the standards required in his kingdom. St Paul, the Pharisee, never even met him, but he went around on foot, walking more than 10, 000 miles converting gentiles to Jesus. And a big deal was that he could convert them straight from their pagan religions, etc, without first converting them to Judaism. St Paul was a big player in the establishment of Christianity, the religion, replete with all its formalities. Gospels of Matthew Mark Luke and John appeared around 60-100 AD. Judaism was based on the laws taught by Moses, from which the Torah is derived, around 1500 years BC. Then when that religion was in decline, and things like the Kabbalic Talmud appeared while man was veering towards depravity, Jesus appeared.

        Like


    • Shut up, troll. You really are pathetic, posting under someone else’s name.

      Like


    • Another thing too that is tough to succinctly sum up, but essentially in the past peacocking behavior would be ‘tested’ so to say by violence of other males – without physical violence in our lives the ‘peacocking’ looks successful because he is still alive – thus the women flock.

      Like


    • on November 14, 2014 at 5:39 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      Somewhere, deep in their hindbrain, I think women perceive “nice guys” as being nice in order to make up for their lack of “value” in other areas.

      Value; being a combination of a lack of physicality/sexual fitness, status, money/assets etc.

      The nice guy needs to be “nice” because he has to, particularly if that “niceness” does not demand or command respect.

      Be a nice guy without demanding and commanding a significant level of respect from a woman and you are toast. May as well make a regular appointment to hook up with your hand.

      Like


  2. […] The Origin Of Women’s Love For Jerks? […]

    Like


  3. If only white men would exhibit more jerkboy, thug, and terrorist characteristics, instead of trying to be gentlemanly. It’s fucking nauseating. Today, we can’t afford gentlemanly.

    Like


    • Sigh.

      Like


    • on November 14, 2014 at 5:42 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      If you want to see something truly nauseating; watch how young Asian males , particularly the Chinese behave towards women their age.

      Being that Melbourne, Australia is being overrun by a horde of Chinese, I see this on a regular basis and it sickens me.

      Like


      • The true depth of depravity that Asian beta males sink to without realising it is astounding. My girlfriend is half Chinese and she tells me about the current drama with her sister.

        Basically the sister (let’s call her jane) is dating a Chinese dude loaded with money (call him wu), but she’s now dumped wu after going crazy shit testing him (jane drove off in wu’s merc whilst drunk to try to make him angry and chastise her). Wu is now staying with and is crying to my girlfriends mum about how he still really wants jane.

        The mum is trying to patch things up as she knows wu the rich beta would be a great long term prospect for jane, an air headed but very hot chicka. Jane naturally doesn’t want a bar of the crying beta begging her mother to try and salvage the relationship.

        My girlfriend also tells me of all the previous male prospects that have tried to woo her. Some of these dudes are major league wealthy but are also the worst kind of supplicating beta, trying to do the old yawn-and-accidental-arm-hug at the cinemas and concocting half baked plans to try and sleep in the same room as the target of their affections in the hope that simply by sleeping near a girl she’ll somehow reward them with their sex.

        No wonder Chinese guys get angry when they see whites dating their women.

        Like


      • No brain, no resources, no clue about the real world, no value except their fleeting beauty.

        The depravity of hot females, and I am assuming this chinese chick is hot, that guys with loads of cash, throwing themselves at her are still not good enough for her.

        Her hypergamy rules her like no man can.

        I would pay good money for a ppv special to see rich beta males duking it out in a bared wire cage for delusional chicks like these, imagine these dudes trying to go all UFC on each other but in reality bitch slaps abound whille crying out for their Jane’s like momma’s boys

        The pathetic and bloody victor, mainly from the barbed wire, still getting the Commodus thumbs down to the roar of the baying crowd.

        Like


    • NOVEMBER 14–The Tennessee deadbeat who has fathered 26 children with 20 different women has again been ordered by a judge to make child support payments, this time for a two-year-old Arkansas boy, court records show…
      http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/worst-deadbeat-dad-675432

      Like


      • on November 16, 2014 at 4:32 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        Ohhhhhh, HE is the deadbeat.
        All 20 women he knocked up were beautiful, fine, upstanding, hard working, tax paying and god fearing innocents.

        Like


  4. “If only white men would exhibit more jerkboy,……”

    What needs to happen is for more “WHITES” to accept their obvious genetic inferiority vis a vis the Negro ‘ i.e. True Homo Sapiens. ???

    Enslave Negroes – Negroes are fruitful and multiply

    Imprison Negroe Males and separate them from Females at their most fecund ages – Negroes are fruitful and multiply

    Impoverish Negro nations – with IMF-Jew financing
    – Negroes are fruitful and multiply

    Induce famine and war in Negroes nations and communities by flooding them with weapons and propping up strong men and criminals
    – Negroes are fruitful and multiply

    Infect Negroes with diseases such as Ebola and HIV developed in “White” military labs as part of biologicla warfare
    – Negroes are fruitful and multiply

    Now let us look at “WHITES”: …..

    YT has technology, money, armaments, media and collectively enjoys the highest so called living standards in the world and yet….

    – can not reporduce. Low T men, Low egg producing women,
    – inferior immune systems
    -premature aging- osteoperosis
    -allergic to sun – the giver of all life on the planet….
    – poor coordination
    – warped sexuality- prefering sexing with animals, children and same sex,….

    It is plainly obvious that the Negro is your genetic superior. Which makes sense….. he is the alpha and the omega. “Whites” are merely genetic accidents…. likely to go extinct eventually.

    [CH: i read that lewis carroll modeled his chesire cat on a smiling black man standing in a kansas field on a moonless night.]

    Like


    • – warped sexuality- prefering sexing with animals, children and same sex,….

      Hey, I know y’all like going on the down-low, but projection is not a valid method of argument.

      Like


    • HEY!!! Watch that “poor coordination” stuff! 😡

      Like


    • Poor coordination? LOL! http://youtu.be/i1YmBof5r9g

      Like


    • What a bunch of bullshit.
      Blacks are more susceptible than anyone else to the nastiest of killer diseases, so while they may reproduce more quickly than Whites (in topay’s world, anyway, different story 100 years ago), they also die MUCH more quickly. Visit Liberia or your friendly neighbahud ghetto for examples.
      The south- and east Asians are the ones who breed like rabbits. Visit India, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Japan………
      White people’s skin problems re UV rays have only started to make an appearance since they started vacationing in sunny countries in large numbers, clad only in t-shirts, shorts or bikinis. Buttoned-to-the-hilt Victorians had no such problems, not even in Arizona.
      Most skateboarders, ice skaters, surfers and gymnasts are White, no poor coordination there.
      Allegedly, somewhere between 1-5% of any given population have deviant sex drives, this ratio may be higher in the Middle East/ eastern Mediterranean.
      They used to call male pedophilia ‘Greek love’.

      Like


    • Be fruitful and multiply you say? My we’re cherry picky the bible today aren’t we?

      Breeding like rabbits all is just the r-selection shuffle as we head towards a K-shift.

      Like


  5. I am not a biologist, but I did look at chimp studies to see if there was anything to glean about talking to women, there is plenty but the violence I think is clickbait. I learned the chimp sexual behavior changes depending on the tribe. Also, bonobos are nearly identical to chimps and they are quite peaceful. The one thing that is true is that among chimps, it is the alpha male who reproduces. But sheer violence is not really all that distinguishes the alpha male. The alpha male also seems to have a great deal of charm and charisma among the chimps and often must win the approval the of the female chimps. In fact, I believe the females more or less choose who the alpha is. I think a strong parallel to humans is someone like Bill Clinton as an alpha. The man knows how to win hearts and minds. However, I think it is simplistic to rely so heavily on tribal alpha and beta ethology among humans for other biological reasons I won’t get in to.

    [CH: when i use the term jerkboy in the context of game and women, i’m using a broad definition that encompasses the traits of charisma and social awareness. because, in fact, charming men appear jerkish to niceguys who don’t have the balls to tease and even occasionally torment women into higher planes of ecstasy.]

    Like


    • > “In fact, I believe the females more or less choose who the alpha is. I think a strong parallel to humans is someone like Bill Clinton as an alpha.”

      Martin, you’re revisiting ground which a guy named Matthew King used to fight for on this site – that the True Alpha should FIRST strive to be a leader of men AND ONLY THEREAFTER strive to be a leader of women. But in PUA land, Darwinian Nihilism holds that, in the final analysis, only sperm donorship matters. And of course a fundamental tenet of the nihilism of modernity holds that there need no longer be any correlation whatsoever between leadership of men and leadership of women. BTW, Bill Clinton never came within a country mile of winning the men’s vote in the USA – that vote always went in a landslide to {GOP} + {Ross Perot}.

      Like


      • Connecting nihilism with Darwin’s science? Typical Christian propaganda. I can just as well talk about Christian nihilism, because Christians believe in no values for their own sake, only as a way to get an imagined reward after death. Lusting for billions and billions of years – an eternity – of “bliss”, greater than a perpetual orgasm or heroin high, is the reason why Christians follow whatever their priests say a book composed by Catholic monks say.

        A difficult task, to be sure, since the book contradicts itself all the time, as the different texts have different authors. And following it all would be suicidal. Christian denominations are defined by what parts of the Bible they ignore.

        Like


      • I hope you arent advocating nihilism, because that’s a belief encouraged by…well…YKW.

        Like


      • Considering that dipshit Matt King alienated more manosphere/PUA readers with his arrogance, condescension, and bombast than just about anyone else, male or female, I’d think twice before even mentioning him in the same sentence with the words “leader of men.”

        Plus the guy was a religious Jesus-freak nutcase.

        Like


      • > “I hope you arent advocating nihilism”

        No, but PUA obsession leads you into the Dark Triad which leads you into Sociopathy which is the ne plus ultra of Nihilism. And the Darwinians are foolishly idiotic materialists [which is to say, nihilists] – the rabidly pathological Darwinians don’t even allow themselves to imagine that abstractions like Music or Mathematics might actually exist outside of the cerebrum-derived sensations which lead us fantasize our way into pretending to believe in those abstractions. Although Derbyshire seems to be infatuated with Poetry – go figure [what the hell ever an “infatuation” amounts to in the cerebrum or the cerebellum or where the fuck ever].

        Like


      • > “that dipshit Matt King”

        By Chateau standards, MK was a classicist who was trying to argue for a more noble definition of “Alpha”, which probably required that a man must first prove himself to be a leader of men before he could earn the right to try his hand at becoming a leader of women. Whereas one of the fundamental tenets of the nihilism of modernity [and its disassociation of social value from all forms of classical virtue] is that a man needn’t show any nobility of character whatsoever in order to become a leader of carousel-riding whores. In fact, if anything, in the modern world, nobility of character is a tremendous hindrance to [if not an outright disqualification for] dipping your stick on a regular basis.

        Like


      • > “Christian nihilism, because Christians believe in no values for their own sake, only as a way to get an imagined reward after death”

        Arbiter, what you have just written there bears NO RESEMBLANCE WHATSOEVER to what is written in the Gospels and John’s Epistles General. You really ought to read them sometime.

        Like


      • Welcome back Matt

        Like


    • Bonobos are something feminists have started praising. “Look, our ape ancestors live in a peaceful matriarchy!” Only they are on another evolutionary branch, unrelated to humans.

      Peaceful – and living in a tiny area, from which they can’t expand because chimpanzees dominate the nearby area. This is reminiscent of how “cultural anthropologists”, an invention by Tribe member Franz Boas, used to go visit Stone Age tribes and praise them. “Look, they share everything! Look, they don’t have money!” These tribes were also small and perpetually starving. The “cultural anthropologists” forgot that little fact. Only the tribes that have invented private property and commerce have been able to grow.

      When we see private property, commerce, government, war, hierarchy, family and other things repeated among all peoples across the world who have reached above the Stone Age, that shows us that these things are not bad but necessary for progress. This insight is the essence of conservatism.

      Like


    • Humans are as equally distant genetically speaking from bonobos as from chimpanzees. Bonobos are as equally distant genetically speaking from chimpanzees as humans. Chimpanzees are as equally distant from humans as bonobos. of all the males of each species 25% of bonobos do not have offspring, 75% of chimpanzees do not have offspring, and of all the prehistoric men who have ever lived 60% do not have offspring. My opinion is that if even the most peaceful band of chimpanzees crossed from the north side of the Congo River to the south side of the Congo River, that bonobos would either learn to become more warlike in order to survive the chimpanzee onslaught or would become partially or fully extinct. Do not be surprised if male chimpanzees started killing male bonobos and impregnating female bonobos too. It is obvious to me that in many respects humans are the tame domesticated much more hairless and more intelligent cross between bonobos and chimpanzees in many respects but not all because humans in my belief have souls while the other two species do not. Yes I am a CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN. I am sure that there are other differences which can be explained by biologists and not me.

      Like


      • Of course there are reasons for the differences in ethology, chimpanzees have a more harsh environment. But my use of bonobos was to show that picking a certain ape to model humans after is an arbitrary decision. As someone pointed out above, the feminists model humans after bonobos and the manosphere model humans after chimps. Neither of these is entirely useful. Even among chimps, differing in tribe, politics, charm, and charisma play a role in relationships, that is a better starting point than the violence. CH claims that he intended charm and charisma to play a role but I didn’t interpret the article that way.

        Like


      • Martin
        Sorry to respond late as I was busy over the weekend. I agree that picking a certain ape as a model of human behavior is problematic as it is not telling the full story. These apes can be used as imperfect mirrors to our own human behavior though. Humans are in between bonobos and chimpanzees in their sexual behavior, and again that is not the full nor most accurate nuanced statement because it is an overly simplistic and overly generalized statement. However, one needs to have an overly simplistic and overly generalized statement to work with in order to have a paradigm or framework in which to work that is more accurate and true than inaccurate and false. Then one can fill in the details and get a more nuanced realistic view. There is a 15% difference between our ancestor prehistoric homo sapien sapien , human male, ancestors, who never reproduced and chimpanzees because 60% of prehistoric men never reproduced and 75% of chimpanzee males do not reproduce. There is a 35% difference between prehistoric men and bonobos because again 60% of prehistoric men do not have descendants living today while only 25% of bonobo males do not have offspring. I do not regard either Heartiste or you as wrong. Both of you are right in your own way up to a point or degree, However it does seem that men’s sex lives are closer to being chimpanzees than bonobos at least mathematically speaking in some respects as I showed above, Nearly all (over 90%)chimpanzee and bonobo females reproduce offspring upon reaching adulthood, but only 80% of prehistoric females have descendants today.

        Like


  6. Goodluck Heartiste…

    The witch-hunt has banned julien blanc and real social dynamics from entering the Australia and Canada

    Hahahaha

    Like


    • Dude gonna become the most famous most successful coach in history. Kudos to Julian!

      Like


      • so feminists managed to get julien kicked out of two feminist anglo countries. a win?

        just remember, feminists can win battles, but they’ll never win the war. not as long as human nature persists in its present configuration.

        Like


      • I fear they’ve already won the war.

        Anti-feminist activity today is more guerilla warfare by a defeated Army than offensive operations.

        Like


      • Damn right, the war has long been lost. I’d say since the beginning
        Women rule indirectly and have men fight their wars, pay their bills, etc.
        What’s been happening is that men are constantly losing more ground.
        True, that might sound defeatist but it’s only true on the grand scale, individually men are still free.

        Like


      • You know it’s hilarious how many women it takes to deny themselves what they truly want.

        Status, congruent high value mate characteristics (subconsciously) Then Equality… (Consciously)

        I’m 18, building up my inner unshakeable frame control for what is to come.

        Like


    • i think it will only do RSD good in the long run, with this whole julien thing game has sorta gone mainstream again, of course its being spinned unbelievably negatively by the feminists but if guys all over the world are going onto youtube after reading the news and looking at one of rsds videos for curiositys sake, many of them are gonna see the sense in it and be sucked in

      Like


  7. Dunno if my original post sent but yeah, we’re gonna have to adapt to be more indirect…

    Like


  8. This article discusses how promiscuity might be a protective strategy for female primates in hostile environments in which males often kill infants. If males can’t tell if a kid is his or not, he’s less likely to kill it than if he’s certain it’s not. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/science/unraveling-why-some-mammals-kill-off-infants.html?ref=science&_r=1

    Like


    • I’ve known that a long time, but man, I have had some pretty intense vitriol thrown my way when I attempt to explain it to the proles why women would coldly calculate having multiple partners.

      Like


  9. “There is no such equivalent bell curve for men.”

    no but their hamsters make them think there is. there are even books about “why men love bitches.” it’s the stupidest thing.

    a fat college friend of mine said it once. & i said, “that bitch you’re talking about, she’s hot right?” “yes” she admitted. “ok, so guys like her cause she’s hot, they just put up with her bitchiness to bang her.”

    Like


    • I read the book. It’s stupid for many reasons, but the title is misleading. It should be “why men love women who aren’t overly clingy and needy and smothering them to death.” And no, men don’t like that.

      Like


    • “bitch” = being in total control of herself

      Like


      • Ha. As if that was remotely possible on any basis, biological or psychological.

        Women are ruled by chemical reactions as interpreted by their minds at the moment. Aka emotions and feelings.

        Like


      • BITCH=Busy Instigating Trouble Chaos & Heartache …fixed it for ya.

        Like


      • Apparently Kate’s been called a bitch before.

        Like


      • The male reaction to women having their own set of playbooks always makes me chuckle 🙂

        Like


      • ” The male reaction to women having their own set of playbooks always makes me chuckle 🙂

        Female proving a bitch is nothing more than a female that enjoys illiciting reactions in
        males always makes ME chuckle. 😉

        Like


      • Well, er, that wasn’t my intention, but when everybody has fun, everybody wins! 🙂

        Like


      • What makes me chuckle every Halloween is the number of gals who dress up at witches and then proudly exclaim: “I’m going as myself.”

        Like being a bitch is a badge of honour… llzozlzozlzozlzolzolzolzozlozlozlozl.

        Like


      • I went as myself: a Vulcan!

        Like


      • BITCH: “Because Inside Trauma Controls Her.”
        Sad but true. Time for the real heartistes to heal their hearts with the savage soul of love.

        Like


      • Thanks for clarifying… btw your hamster wheel needs grease I can hear it squeaking

        Like


      • We haven’t even bought it yet!

        I’ve actually been reading up on hamster care because my husband and I are getting one for my daughter over Thanksgiving. I was leaning toward short-haired, but then I got to thinking…are short-haired hamsters damaged???

        Like


      • “are short-haired hamsters damaged”

        lol… I admit that’s funny, but why in earn would you consider bringing a stinky varmint into your house? Do your home a favor and avoid having pets. They are more maintenence they are worth: they are antisocial creatures that smell like shit and live just long enough for a child to get well attached so when it dies you will have to deal with heartbreak.

        Like


      • he he 🙂

        Pets are an important childhood experience for learning responsibility, caring for others, and how to deal with some of life’s painful lessons.

        We can’t avoid all that is unpleasant in life, but we can learn how to handle it.

        Like


      • Then get a dog, It will actually care about your child unlike a stinky rodent.

        Like


  10. on November 14, 2014 at 1:21 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    At the far left, you find good girls who never go for men with even a hint of jerkish characteristics

    Oh, they all love jerks, but jerkishness is relative to your social milieu. As T. from The Rawness once wrote, just being a liberal arts major is enough of a rebel for some nerdy Asian chicks. A Duggar girl might get turned on by a guy who uses the word ‘damn’ once in front of her dad when he’s really, really upset about something.

    Like


    • True that. The charming uncaring assholery aka jerkboy game has to adjust to the environment, sitaution and subject.

      Nonetheless the core principal still holds.

      Like


    • I remember fondly a Korean girlfriend calling me “dangerous” and I can’t recall quite why. I know I got angry a few times with her but in a non-beta way. I think it really came down to not being shy about my desire and what I expected. But looking back, I can’t understand why any girl who had any experience would think of me as dangerous, except that the bar was set low for her milieu.

      Like


  11. This ties in nicely with a heartiste post from a little while back. Someone had written about dating an older well off woman whose most recent ex was an abusive firefighter (if memory serves), and how she kept saying it was the most intense relationship she’d had. Some commenters were saying that the firefighter’s behavior struck them as beta insecurity. There is a qualitative difference between beta neediness and asshole mate guarding. Asshole mate guarding is assertive and flaunts the rules (“who the fuck does she think she is?”). Beta neediness comes from a place of weakness and a feeling of unfairness (“how could she do this to me ?”). Asshole mate guarding does something about the situation and women subconsciously respect that. Betas expect everyone else to play by the rules and then when they get cheated (on), they simply complain.

    [CH: i would like to caution that it doesn’t take much mate guarding behavior to begin to turn off women. a little goes a long way. check the archives. there are studies (and field experience) concluding that excessive mate guarding is the province of insecure men and obsessed betas who, through their behavior, signal to women that they don’t truly believe they are worthy of their women. this is why it’s risky to directly extrapolate from chimp to human sexual behavior.]

    Like


    • “this is why it’s risky to directly extrapolate from chimp to human sexual behavior”

      Hey, whuffor you bringin me into this???

      [CH: horrible trolling. F-. let’s do better next time.]

      Like


    • Maybe I’m missing something, but why are we assuming the motive for all this domestic aggression is mate guarding? Maybe it’s to punish the females for bad behavior. There’s a big difference, in terms of how “alpha” it is.

      Like


    • Difference between mate guarding betas and mate guarding alphas? A black eye and a wet vagina. At the bottom of every beta is the idea that she is the one and I’m dead if she leaves or isn’t with me. Alphas don’t give a shit. Some might employ psychological warfare on a chick that acts out and others will throw her down some stairs. The end result is the same for alphas.

      Like


  12. Hard to say what role violence has in human sexual relations. It seems that very few white men are inclined towards domestic violence. I’m not really getting the impression that white men desire to beat their partners but the law is what prevents it. However, male to female violence is very common in the middle east, so it would seem that men also don’t have a strong instinct that prevents them from spousal violence either.

    [CH: humans are domesticated versions of apes. seen that way, the alpha male propensity to violence has evolved into an alpha male propensity to jerkiness, at least among the tamer races.]

    Like


    • It’s about restraint and impulse control. Like most traits, it’s a bell curve. On one end men with a strong propensity to violence and no impulse control. On the other, a pacifist who would never hit anyone. Most men are in the middle. Feminists want to believe most men are on the ultraviolent side, and need DV laws to keep them in check. I say we could eliminate DV laws and still be okay, because I think most men are only violent when necessary and can keep themselves under control.

      Like


      • If men were as violent as Taylor Swift’s YKW-created character in her latest “music” video, the world would be in real trouble and feminists would go ballistic(er). Look at Taylor Swift’s latest video and ask yourself if a man could make such a video.

        Like


    • Confine yourself to commenting on your neon-pink pussy, please.

      Like


  13. on November 14, 2014 at 1:54 pm Joachim Peiper

    Not if he had to wank it to impregnate them. Money =/= pussy.

    Like


  14. Heartiste, what up with this latest batch of comments. I’m reading the first ones at the top and saying to myself, “Damn, whoever these dudes are look to be front loading this post with some outlandish shit on purpose so they can point to it as an example that you are the next one to target. Could be wrong, and you may not care, but I’d just keep an eye out on the whois info for these newer dudes in your admin panel and squash them if need be. The spidey sense in tingling. We’ve got thwack and thwack imposters, ZS imposters and copycats. Shit’s getting annoying.

    [CH: annoying is the key word. may be time to ban thwack et al for a stint. clear the air.]

    Like


    • Ban Thwack, Zombie Shane, and Greg Eliot.

      According to some back-of-the-envelope calculations, these three clowns account for something like 35-40% of ALL comments.

      Unfortunately, 100% of their comments are asinine.

      Like


      • No, I’m not bothered by Twack or ZS. But when other people take handles that resemble them or start posting with their names and it’s not really them, shit gets a bit annoying.

        Like


      • Stillcho, a known sock-puppet under at least two other guises, has the gall to say anyone else’s posts are asinine?

        Now THAT’S chutzpah.

        Avaunt, you thimble… you thread… you fairy.

        Like


      • I prefer Zombia Shane’s alter ego. He doesn’t drone on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about buns in ovens.

        Like


  15. CH, I know you love me. You are addicted to my replicating mechanism. You are addicted to the science that I’ve accidentally produced. But I’m sorry, I don’t love you or any other individual. I have no regard for you. I just churn out victims at my disposal, unvaryingly, because, well, that’s just what I do.

    DNA

    Like


    • “addicted to the science”? Seeing reality is not “love” or “addiction”, it is just seeing reality.

      Like


      • It’s addiction when you see the reality and then accept it, laboring away at its command. Life is an addiction, when viewed outside your own ego, obviously.

        Like


  16. CH, might as well delete the last few posts too, since they’re out of context now that the original troll nonsense was eradicated.

    Like


  17. The clearest way to demonstrate one’s fierceness and the surest route to greater honor within a Yanomamö village, outside the size of one’s lineage, was earning the title of unokai – a man who has killed another man. Since “not all men were willing to endure the risks and expose themselves to the dangers that Yanomamö unokais did,” Chagnon explains, “unokais held a special, earned, and respected status that only some men achieved.”

    The higher status of unokais is reflected in their greater success in attaining wives; Chagnon found that unokais had 2.5 times more wives and 3 times as many offspring as non-unokais.

    http://www.artofmanliness.com/2013/06/10/the-yanomamo-and-the-origins-of-male-honor/

    Like


    • Like Hell’s Angels. The most desired patch to have on one’s vest is the one that says “The Filthy Few”, given to those who have killed for the club.

      Like


  18. OT, but when are you going to have another Moments of Alpha post? I have a good one.

    Like


  19. Why have scientific progress when you could have feminist progress?
    http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/13/7213819/your-bowling-shirt-is-holding-back-progress
    Men landed a spacecraft on a comet. Women were more concerned with his clothes.

    Like


    • on November 16, 2014 at 2:52 am Master Blaster

      We now have Vagina Privelidge in the west.

      I hope the first man that calls it that during the next such occurance has it videod and uploaded so the gnashing, thrashing and howling of the teeny, tiny unwashed feminist clutter, enablers and handlers have full apoplectic meltdowns due to their wild overreach, resulting in the vast awakening of civilization and all the good it brings.

      Like


    • “Men landed a spacecraft on a comet. Women were more concerned with his clothes.”

      Yeah this is actually being eaten up by anti feminists. Exposing the double standard that, “The person deserves the consequences for what they were wearing”

      The real bummer is that the man handed his balls over soaked in his own tears. I’m sure conspiracy theorists will have their own take on that one.

      Like


      • Well, if he didn’t want to get raped, he shouldn’t have dressed like that.

        LZLZLZLZLZOZLOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLOZLOZL

        Like


  20. on November 14, 2014 at 5:48 pm Hammer of Love

    In honor of the upcoming Ferguson verdict, I present to you a story Russian TV is running on their front page, as a representation of modern America. Enjoy your diversity.

    I hope Eastern Europeans take a long hard look at this before even thinking of opening their borders to the simian races.

    http://rt.com/usa/205311-philadelphia-mcdonalds-breakfast-fight/

    Like


  21. on November 14, 2014 at 6:03 pm depressed_danny

    Here’s a study I think y’all will enjoy. Back in the early 1980s, a forest troop of baboons in Kenya suffered a disaster…

    “A tourist lodge was within their range, and the biggest and toughest males in the troop would regularly go to the garbage dump there to forage for food. Subordinate males, however, did not go, because there were regular fights with the Talek Troop of baboons who also patronized the dump. Sow when the brutal and despotic alpha males of Forest Troop all ate meat that was infected with bovine tuberculosis at the dump and promptly died, the less aggressive 50 percent of the group’s males survived. And the troop’s whole culture changed.

    Male baboons are normally so obsessed with status that they are always on a hair-trigger for aggression-and it isn’t just directed at male rivals of equal status. Lower-ranking males routinely get bullied and terrorized, and even females (who weigh half as much as males) are frequently attacked and bitten.

    Yet after the biggest, baddest males of the Forest Troop all died off at once, the whole social atmosphere changed. When it was first studied by primatologists from 1979 to 1982, it was a typical, utterly vicious baboon society, but after the mass die-off of the bullies, the surviving members relaxed and began treating one another more decently. The males still fight even today-they are baboons, after all-but they are much more likely to quarrel with other males of equal rank rather than beating up on social inferiors, and they don’t attack the females at all. Everyone spends much more time in grooming, huddling close together, and other friendly social behaviour, and stress levels even from the lowest ranking individuals (as measured by hormone samples) are far lower than in other baboon troops. Most important of all, these new behaviours have become entrenched in the troops culture; it’s no longer just a bunch of gentle, wimpy individuals who were liberated from their oppressors by accident.

    Male baboons rarely live more than eighteen years: the low-status survivors of the original disaster are all gone now. All the current adult males of the Forest Troop are baboons who joined it as adolescents after 1982. By now the, the range of male personalities in Forest Troop must have returned to the normal distribution, from dominance-oriented alphas to timid and submissive losers who would never normally stand a chance. But the behaviour of the troop has not returned to baboon-normal: levels of aggressiveness remain relatively low and random attacks on social inferiors and females are rare. “We don’t yet understand the mechanism of transmission,” said Robert Sapolsky, a biology and neurology professor at Stanford University who co-authored the 2004 report on the Forest Troop phenomenon, “but the jerky new guys are obviously learning: ‘we don’t do things like that around here.'”

    (Excerpt from Gwynee Dyer’s ‘War: The Lethal Custom’)

    http://www.amazon.ca/War-The-Edition-Gwynne-Dyer/dp/0679313125

    Original Stanford University Forest Troop study:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC387823/

    TL:DR?

    A mass die-off of the thuggish baboons in a baboon troop changed the whole free-for-all culture of violence into one of co-operative peace, where beta males and females live much happier lives and the more alpha baboons only mess with other alpha baboons of equal status.

    Imagine if in, say, America, the most thuggish, despicable elements of society were removed. Imagine how much happier every single person in that country would be. Imagine how much more progress the species could make. Imagine no more SJW’s, no more ghetto trash, no more banksters. A human society free of all those elements wouldn’t be landing probes on asteroids-we’d be landing manned space ships on them. We’d have thriving colonies on Mars. We’d be heading toward being an interstellar species. We would be worshipping scientists instead of Kim Kardashian’s ass.

    Instead we’re a species likely living in the last few centuries of it’s existence. The best of us are constantly fleeing the worst, trying to build refuges in rural areas while in the cities pregnant single mothers attack each other in Wal-Mart over plasma televisions, and ghetto gangstas hunt naive young women and teenage girls and feed them drugs and turn them into prostitutes, and our leaders bomb people all over the world so they and their close personal friends can continue to profit off war and chaos and advance their own private agendas, buying their profit with our tax dollars and the blood of our patriotic youth.

    Humanity can better itself. It can do so permanently, and it can be done within a few generations-if not within a few years. The only problem is that it would involve killing off 40-80% of the species, and good like getting elected on that platform.

    Humans, as a species, suck, because the best of us continue to tolerate the worst. We need to start doing everything within our power to make life very uncomfortable for the scumbags we are currently cursed to co-inhabit this beautiful planet with. It’s either that or we fully accept that tyranny, oppression and horror delivered upon us by these people is our inevitable and continual future.

    Like


  22. Check this out — feminist woman’s description of hostile encounter with (incompetent) ‘PUA’. The hamster is strong in this one:

    http://crookedtimber.org/2014/11/13/jerks-will-be-jerks/

    [CH: file under #coolstorybroad.]

    Like


  23. Off topic question: how do you guys find good wingmen? I live in Seattle and every guy I know here is either a fully indoctrinated feminist, is weak in the knees beta with no interest in changing, or so fed up with the crappy quality of women here that they have given up. I can identify with the third group, but I still want to sex the crappy women anyway.

    I’m not interested in meeting with any PUA groups from the internet, because I think the term PUA is stupid, #1, and that seems really try hard to me. I can’t bring myself to do it.

    I guess the question is, how do I meet people organically that are going to push me and I can grow with together? So far I’ve been going it alone, but I know I’m suffering a lot for it. I also have no interest in going out by myself, although I know some of you will tell me that’s the answer. I just honesty can’t see myself doing that.

    Any ideas?

    Like


    • I used to live there and I was never an indoctrinated feminist, even before I discovered the Chateau. I’d roll with you, dude, if I still lived there. You need to test your male acquaintances and in worst case, find yourself some alpha or greater beta working class men. The working classes do not buy into the bullshit nearly as frequently as the educated or those who pretend to education and ‘class-ing’ up.

      Like


      • I think this is a big part of my problem. I’m deep in the ivory tower because of my occupation and other interests. I come from working class stock, so I know I can relate and avoid the ass-kickings, but I honestly don’t know where to find regular guys around here. I’ll have to start looking.

        Like


    • Grit your teeth, suck it up, and become a LONE WOLF. Set an example for all the losers of how to man up, grow some balls, and pwn teh snatch. Eventually start teaching your followers what it means to be a Lord of the Jungle. And if they won’t follow your example, then to hell with them.

      Places where you might find reliable comradeship: Gun clubs, shooting ranges, Walmart, low-brow hunting and fishing excursions [deer hunting, fishing with bait], stock car racing and drag-racing, turkey shoots & tractor pulls, etc.

      Places where you need to be very careful because of infiltration by sodomites and on-the-down-low “bisexuals” [i.e. sodomites with female wives and biological children as cover]: Churches, GOP organizations, Target, wineries, high-brow hunting and fishing clubs [duck hunting and fly-fishing; think “Brokeback Mountain”], almost all “gyms” and swimming pools, anything involving bicycling.

      I don’t know about “Xtreme” sports [snowmobiles, snowboarding, bridge diving, hang gliding] – it’s possible that the masculine ripped “on the top” aggressor/rapist sodomites could be attracted to the thrill-seeking adrenaline/testosterone rush of that shit [although not the soft flabby “on the bottom” effeminate sodomites].

      Finally, see if you can get in with a tail-gating crew at either the Seahawks games or down south at Eugene watching the Ducks – if the sodomites follow you to the football scene, then you’re in a “Fuck My Life” nightmare.

      PS: In Seattle, you shouldn’t need Night Game and Wingmen – in the Ivory Tower you should be able to get laid all the time with Day Game alone. Make it a point [at a BARE MINIMUM] to grin and say “Hi!” [or if you’re in a talkative mood, “Hello!”] to EVERY female you cross paths with during the day. Converse with all of them. By the end of the week, you’ll have so much poontang you won’t know what to do with it all.

      Like


    • I used to live there. There is a crew there. Go to the next RSD free tour event and exchange numbers with every guy that seems remotely cool. You’ll find a wing.

      Like


    • Join a male dominated ‘city club.’ Most cities have clubs populated by the business, political and legal types.. these guys will be down to smoke cigars, booze, chase tail etc

      Like


    • Wingmen will appear as if from now where out of the sky if you focus on sexxing women rather than meeting men, success seeks out success.

      Like


      • Again, in an artsy craftsy elitist cesspool like “Ivory Tower” Seattle, there’s no need for nighttime prowling whatsoever – if you’ve got half the conversational skillz of day-old fried calamari lying in the dumpster out back behind the restaurant, then Day Game, with a big shitting grin, a “Hi!”, and fifteen minutes of the correct banter, will have her so wet that she’ll be ready for penetration right then and there, lying on the damned sidewalk in full view of the public. Nowadays, the overwhelming majority of dudes in these elitist cesspools are such effete panty-waist losers that the chicks will swoon for any guy who displays the slightest hints of masculinity. Nighttime prowling is strictly for gaming the semi-pros in glorified titty bars where the beers cost $20 a shot.

        Like


      • There is a whole lot of truth to what you are saying here. One of the most common comments I get from girls I do meet (mostly from the interwebs right now) is how refreshing it is to meet a guy who isn’t a pantywaist. I’ll start putting myself out there more during the day.

        Like


  24. Dear feminists:

    Every time you bang a jerk, you scientifically reinforce rape.

    Like


  25. OT: For a red pill night with the t.v. watch “The Affair.” Each episode is split into two parts: the same events are told through the man’s and then the woman’s perspective. Its fun for analysts to note the differences in how they view what happened. Find it on Showtime or for free on http://watchin-it.nu/

    Like


  26. Science that uses evolutionary theory to explain biological diversity between species = Good. If you disagree, you’re a narrow-minded idiot.

    Science that uses evolutionary theory to explain biological diversity between males and females of the same species = Evil. If you disagree, you’re a narrow-minded sexist.

    Like


  27. Based on almost 5 decades of experiences and observations in a few dozen countries on 3 different continents, women love guys who are (get ready) TALL, GOOD-LOOKING, YOUNG, RICH & HIGH STATUS.
    Such men are permitted any behavior they please.
    The same experiences and observations tell me that the myth of women loving jerks (for jerkiness’ sake) is something SHORT, FUG, OLD, POOR & LOW STATUS men tell themselves so they don’t have to face the actual facts.

    Like


    • It’s the degree and context that matter. It was once said here that you have to learn to treat women like a bratty little sister. It works well, especially if you have many of those things you describe. Few of us here are complete losers with women; most just need some coaching and work on our technique. The subliminal signal sent is that you can afford to treat yourself as the prize because you have other options. CH does it right but obnoxious and abusive people don’t. I think that is where you are in disagreement.

      Like


  28. Perhaps it has a reverse-benefit, evolution-wise. The stronger women are able to survive, but only if you act like a jerkboy and tame them into submission, including by demonstrating the benefit of being civilized…(from the Taming of the Shrew, Kate’s final obedience monologue…). http://www.monologuearchive.com/s/shakespeare_020.html

    KATE: …Thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper,
    Thy head, thy sovereign; one that cares for thee
    And for thy maintenance; commits his body
    To painful labor both by sea and land,
    To watch the night in storms, the day in cold,
    Whilst thou li’st warm at home, secure and safe;
    And craves no other tribute at thy hands
    But love, fair looks, and true obedience–

    And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
    And not obedient to his honest will,
    What is she but a foul contending rebel
    And graceless traitor to her loving lord?
    I am ashamed that women are so simple
    To offer war where they should kneel for peace, …

    Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,
    Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,
    But that our soft conditions and our hearts
    Should well agree with our external parts?

    Come, come, you froward and unable worms,
    My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
    My heart as great, my reason haply more,
    To bandy word for word and frown for frown.

    But now I see our lances are but straws,
    Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
    That seeming to be most which we indeed least are.
    Then vail your stomachs, for it is no boot,
    And place your hands below your husband’s foot,
    In token of which duty, if he please,
    My hand is ready, may it do him ease.

    “My hand is ready, may it do him ease.” Heh.

    Like


    • This is a common theme for Shakespeare. From Much Ado About Nothing:
      BEATRICE
      (coming forward)
      What fire is in mine ears? Can this be true?
      Stand I condemned for pride and scorn so much?
      Contempt, farewell, and maiden pride, adieu!
      No glory lives behind the back of such.
      And Benedick, love on; I will requite thee,
      *Taming my wild heart to thy loving hand.*
      If thou dost love, my kindness shall incite thee
      To bind our loves up in a holy band.
      For others say thou dost deserve, and I
      Believe it better than reportingly.

      Liked by 1 person


  29. on November 15, 2014 at 4:24 pm oldfashionedfellow

    If want to know, this woman will tell you.

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/june-tegon/2014/11/why-i-love-men/

    Like


  30. If I may paraphrase a bit from the book “A Billion Wicked Thoughts” there is a theory that in ancient times the guy who was the more aggressive was the better bet. In a primitive environment Mr. sensitive, new-age pajama boy is a lot more likely to end up as dinner for the Saber-Tooth Tiger, thus making him a bad long-term investment.

    Like


  31. I don’t know why women love men who treat them like crap, but I’m glad that they do. I’ve used it to my advantage all of my life, and I’m too old to change now. And if anything, young women are so starved for male attention, that they will pretty much anything you want. I’ve come to appreciate hand-cuffs with the younger women – and they tend to like it too. So it’s win-win…

    Like


  32. 16 year old reading this

    Like


  33. Relevant:
    http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-charles-manson-gets-marriage-license-215524033.html
    In the link, we see a photo of a fairly attractive 26 year old woman who apparently wants to marry Charles Manson, an 80 year old, incarcerated mass murderer with a swastika tattooed on his forehead. Bitches be crazy.

    Like