Fortress Vatican

By papal decree, open borders for thee, but not for the Holy See.

Related: Ethnomasochistic Swedes are roaring hypocrites, just like American ethnomasochists.





Comments


  1. Never take advice from an omega.

    Like


    • on September 25, 2015 at 10:13 am Captain Obvious

      O/T, but from a stonemasonry point of view, that is one he11uva sweet wall. Unless those [email protected] cars are only 36 inches high [and we mustn’t rule out that possibility], then the wall itself must be upwards of 40 FEET HIGH. And with the technology from that era, it would then need to be upwards of 10 FEET THICK in order not to fall over. Do the math – volume varies as n^3 – some [email protected] body moved an insane amount of rock and mortar to build that gorgeous bootrifull work of Art. PS: Omegas are NOT stonemasons like that. That wall is pure Alpha sh!tlord.

      Like


      • Go there and see for yourself. I have, it’s an amazing place. The Catholic church carried western culture for centuries. Without it, some of the greatest works of art in existence would not have been patronized.

        That said, fuck the Socialist Pope. Let him welcome in the brown hordes and see what they do to the place. They would burn it down in a heartbeat.

        Like


      • ‘PS: Omegas are NOT stonemasons like that. That wall is pure Alpha sh!tlord.’

        Unless you’re a pope of the Rodrigo Borgia variety, then yes you are most certainly an omega.

        Like


      • The one depicted in the picture is not the Vatican Wall. But it’s near the Vatican. Anyways no, it’s not that high. The actual Vatican wall is higher. (I live just by the wall in the picture)

        Like


      • Post-Vatican II (1962-65) “Catholicism” is omega. It’s an SJW parody and empty shell of the glorious religion it replaced. Vatican II was an SJW revolution, simply put.

        Like


      • on September 25, 2015 at 1:54 pm Captain Obvious

        I’m just saying that 800 or 1000 or 1200 years ago, whoever built that mofo’ing wall was an Alpha SH!TLORD. Can you imagine the scaffolding they had to build, and getting the mule/donkey/horse-drawn carts hauling that stone up a ramp and onto the scaffolding? With serfs, yeah, but without actual slaves?

        Like


      • Captain Obvious, I’m enjoying your enthusiasm for this wall, which instantly recalls my own boyhood obsession with ancient fortifications, about which I happily had some Readers’ Digest Bible guides with lots of illustrations on them to beguile my Middle East conquering fantasies. But 40 ft high and ten feet thick is probably pretty quotidian. Wikipedia’s entry on Nineveh tells us:

        “The ruins of Nineveh are surrounded by the remains of a massive stone and mudbrick wall dating from about 700 BC. About 12 km in length, the wall system consisted of an ashlar stone retaining wall about 6 metres (20 ft) high surmounted by a mudbrick wall about 10 metres (33 ft) high and 15 metres (49 ft) thick. The stone retaining wall had projecting stone towers spaced about every 18 metres (59 ft).”

        Just the smaller half of the Ishtar Gate of Babylon is about 100 feet thick.

        Like


      • I agree with you, Capt’n Obvious, and also agree with trav777 below. Every been to Old San Juan, PR (the only nice area in PR, btw)? There is the fort there, el Morro, which has walls that are very high, and very thick (at some locations, the walls seem to be 20′ thick). An amazing construction accomplishment that took at least 100 years to build the main part of the fort, beginning in the early 1500s (ahhhh…the days of high adventure and exploding dysentery). Anyhow…an amazing place.

        As to religion, I was raised Catholic, but am agnostic. Although I do not go to church or believe the core teachings of the bible, I will say the following:

        * The Old Testament should have no place in the Christian bible. It is a mish-mash of older religions (e.g., Zoroastrianism, which the Jews stole from freely, and revised as necessary, to suit their purposes as “Chosen” beings) , and portrays ‘god’ sometimes as an evil, psychopathic being that smites everyone who looks cross-eyed at the Eskimos, but other times inflicts righteous justice on true perverts (Sodom & Gomorrah). Mostly though, ‘he’ is just petty and vindictive, more like Charles Manson and less like one would picture as the father of Jesus. The 10 Commandments are OK (minus the “worship me” references), but I also realize that they are just a rehash of older codes, such as Hammurabi’s Code. There is also the pre-Christian Roman Law, upon which a Europa empire was formed and held – the Twelve Tables.
        * The New Testament is better, as it portrays the Pharisees as who they really were/are – money hungry, with very little moral scruples, who would rather see an innocent/good man crucified than upset their power structure or hurt business. That said, it is filled with a lot of beta weakness (such as the proverbial, “turn the other cheek” to your enemy).
        * Despite its beta weaknesses, it was actually (in a period of great violence and upheaval in Europe) a great moral foundation for Europeans to use and practice with one another. And it created a unified code, as it spread, making it a religious obligation to love your neighbor, don’t steal, don’t covet your neighbor’s wife, be forgiving, etc. Despite being beta, these teaching helped to build and support large, functioning moral societies, after the Roman Empire started to collapse.
        * In short, unlike the old Roman rule, or the laws of various tribes in Europe, Christianity basically laid the foundation for humanitarian principles – being good and honest with your fellow citizens, and people in general.
        * Of course, these tenets were not always followed, and wars and bloodshed still occurred, but overall Christianity did not necessary cause those things – corrupt and greedy men did. Truly practiced Christianity would have brought peace throughout Europe – between neighbors, and between neighboring nations.
        * Of course, Islam came along, and Christianity rightfully had to wake from its years of humanitarian slumber to realize that it better start to fight or else it would be overrun by less loving hordes of dark moo-slimes. Thus began the Holy wars, which lasted hundreds of years of back-and-forth.
        * Christianity survived, of course, but lost a LOT of territory (e.g., Egypt was Christian at one time), then went back into a mental slumber. Various religious factions arose, which pitted one religion against another. Factionalizing Christianity was a bad thing for Europe, as the common thread that held massive scale wars at bay was frayed and often cut. Thus, Christians fought Christians with the belief that god was on THEIR side.
        * Within nations, and still between nations, a good deal of humanitarianism existed (which explains how the British and Germans could celebrate Christmas together as brothers for a short time, in WWI, but then go back to killing each other as their puppet masters’ commanded).
        * A few powerful Eskimos certainly understood that they could cause or lengthen these deadly, fratricidal wars by playing with national economies and religious differences. War, after all, is not only profitable, but it gets rid of a lot of goyim. Hence many wars in the 1700s, 1800s, and of course, WWI and WWII.
        * These same devious Eskimos, and their communist allies eventually figured out, in the latter half of the 20th Century, that they could use the humanitarian weakness built into Christianity (which works great when applied to in-group populations) to import out-group populations (of vastly different races and religions), as the “we are all God’s children” meme. And so, the enemy, in effect, used our own fists to repeatedly punch us in the face for the last 50 years.
        * At the same time, the Catholic Church and others stopped teaching that the Jews were Christ killers, but instead did a total 180 and started teaching that they are “God’s Chosen” and that they should be protected and held high on a pedestal (and, of course, fight any and all wars that help Israel).
        * Toss in some fake holocaust guilt, and there you have the long-term effect of Judeo-weaponized Christianity.

        Like


      • I wrote a long message, only to have it disappear. In short, Christianity practice in-group (between and amongst White populations in Europe) was/is a very good thing. Ignoring the insanity and Jewyness of the Old Testament, the New Testament laid a solid foundation (after the fall of the Roman Empire) for the Europeans to use to maintain and improve on civilization. However, when used toward out-groups (blacks, Muslims, etc.), its humanitarian principles can be downright suicidal, especially if those out-groups are allowed to migrate to Europe in any significant numbers. And so, realizing this, that is exactly what the Eskimos have been pushing for the last 50 years, when they realized that wars were not doing the job as completely as they had hoped (especially with Germany, their natural enemy). And so, today, what used to be a great Christian religion is now nothing more than Judeo-weaponized humanitarianism. Of course, the popes and other religious leaders permitted that to occur, as the Eskimos knew that most men, even popes, have their price.

        Like


  2. I wonder when the last vestigial culture christer struggling with the inbuilt contradictions of his natural nationalist tendencies with the open borders christinsanity finally understands that since christianity denies race and blood as “myths” (see Mit Brennende Sorge of 1937) it can never coexist with what nationalists are seeking to build: a society fixated on race. Time to dump this levantine cult, people. Today’s multicult christery is in its purest form and it’s not going to roll back as most christians today are already non-white.

    Like


    • What part of the Bible denies race and blood as myths? I don’t care what some 20th century simp said about it, I’m more curious where the *Bible* says it.

      Thanks in advance.

      Like


      • The part where every nigger was created in the image of G’odd, which means that jews and niggers all represent one aspect of divinity. Nothing divine about niggers, buddy. Just a big jewish lie from the start. Christianity is the precursor of Marxism. That’s why it’s called the Bolshevism of the ancient world. Liberal race mixers believe everything the christers do, minus the jewish god part.

        Like


      • So basically you inferred your own meaning and built a nice little hill of hate. Got it. Thanks for answering.

        Like


      • Christian dummy. Thank god this stupid cult is dead in the West.

        Like


      • How quickly the Christ-haters show their asses after an initial attempt at reasoned discussion. 😉

        Like


      • lol at these stupid christer children. Yeah, I hate your jewish “christ” for murdering the soul of Europe, as happens during the baptism when the pagan soul is murdered so the jewish parasite they call “the holy spirit” gets to enter. rofl. Anyway, the cult is dead in Europe and that is what matters.

        [CH: pagan: “I JOIN MY ANCESTORS IN OUR ANCESTRAL RELIGION *ignores the last 43 generations of his ancestors*”]

        Like


      • “In the beginning there was nothing… and then it exploded.”

        Like


      • I’m not a pagan, simply pointing out the ridiculousness of something that needs to murder what is originally there “saving” Europe. It’s laughable. Religions are for small minds and just like women shouldn’t be able to vote, neither should religitards.

        Like


      • In the beginning his head was filled with nothing… nevertheless, his mouth exploded.

        Like


      • Pagan white nationalist: “I hate n1gahs and beleeeve in evolution.” Of course, the evolution story is that whites are the result of African seed.

        Bible: Different tribes and nations should stay in their own lands.

        Like


    • Christianity does nothing of the kind. Denial of race can neither be found in the protestant sola scriptora view or in the catholic church teachings and traditions. Both are highly nationalistic.

      “Do not let them live in your land or they will cause you to sin against me, because the worship of their gods will certainly be a snare to you.”

      And do I really need to remind you of the Inquisition and the Crusades? Both were church actions taken to purge Muslims out of Christendom.

      You are mistaking the SJW infestation of Christian institutions with the institutions themselves.

      Like


      • Your stupid levantine cult didn’t build Europe or fight off non-white hordes. White men and women did. Fuck off back to your jewish heaven.

        Like


      • Both were church actions taken to purge Muslims out of Christendom.

        Muslims started it, they invaded Europe, they were occupying about 80 % of Europe. Then the church simply gave its approval for a war to kick out the Muslim invaders before it was too late. The Church did not start those wars.

        Of course now that the left is the establishment and controls everything including education, history has been rewritten to make white Christians the bad guys.

        but Muslims were the aggressors, Europe and the church simply acted in self defense, it was self preservation.

        [CH: islam has always been a religion of aggression, and muslims continue the tradition to this day.]

        Like


      • I wonder how the myth of tolerant Christians and violent Muslims ever started to exist.

        [CH: reality?]

        As Voltaire said, there were a lot of churches in Islamic lands while no mosques in Christian lands. LOL.

        [christianity began in the middle east. islam did not begin in europe.]

        Also, expelling Muslims doesn’t prove jackshit. Had they all converted to Christianity, they would’ve been welcomed with open arms cf black Christians.

        [well, whatever the reason, it worked out alright. until now.]

        Like


      • I wonder how the myth of tolerant Christians and violent Muslims ever started to exist.

        Don’t start getting disingenuous on us now, ho.

        Like


      • I wonder how the myth of tolerant Christians and violent Muslims ever started to exist.

        Christians allow people to apostasize from their religion without cutting off their heads, for starters.

        Like


      • I wonder how the myth of tolerant Christians and violent Muslims ever started to exist.

        It is not a myth.

        Our reputation for being tolerant probably began many centuries ago when Europeans tolerated Muslim occupiers for centuries.

        Muslims occupied Spain for seven centuries before Spanish people got fed up and kicked them out.

        How many more centuries of this shit would it have taken for you to admit we are the most tolerant of the two?

        As a matter of fact our reputation for being ultra tolerant is so well known that hordes of Muslims are invading us pretending to be refugees.

        Note that those invaders/”refugees” are not trying to move to Muslims nations expecting such tolerance, in fact they are running away from Muslims nations in part to escape from the senseless violence that is part of Islam and has always been.

        Millions of Christians are not migrating to Muslim nations are they?

        Gee I wonder why?…….

        Thank you for playing, better luck next time.

        Like


      • @Canadian Friend

        To quote Pope Urban II
        “Although, O sons of God, you have promised more firmly than ever to keep the peace among yourselves and to preserve the rights of the church, there remains still an important work for you to do. Freshly quickened by the divine correction, you must apply the strength of your righteousness to another matter which concerns you as well as God. For your brethren who live in the east are in urgent need of your help, and you must hasten to give them the aid which has often been promised them. For, as the most of you have heard, the Turks and Arabs have attacked them and have conquered the territory of Romania [the Greek empire] as far west as the shore of the Mediterranean and the Hellespont, which is called the Arm of St. George. They have occupied more and more of the lands of those Christians, and have overcome them in seven battles. They have killed and captured many, and have destroyed the churches and devastated the empire. If you permit them to continue thus for awhile with impurity, the faithful of God will be much more widely attacked by them. On this account I, or rather the Lord, beseech you as Christ’s heralds to publish this everywhere and to persuade all people of whatever rank, foot-soldiers and knights, poor and rich, to carry aid promptly to those Christians and to destroy that vile race from the lands of our friends. I say this to those who are present, it meant also for those who are absent. Moreover, Christ commands it.”

        That’s a bit more than “I won’t stop you”.

        Like


      • Well the Spanish Inquisition’s was not so much interested in Muslims as it was with the perfidious Enemy ‘marranos’.

        Like


      • Canadian Friend- Concisely stated, as usual.

        Like


      • “Muslims started it, they invaded Europe, they were occupying about 80 % of Europe. Then the church simply gave its approval for a war to kick out the Muslim invaders before it was too late. The Church did not start those wars.

        Of course now that the left is the establishment and controls everything including education, history has been rewritten to make white Christians the bad guys.

        but Muslims were the aggressors, Europe and the church simply acted in self defense, it was self preservation.”

        I’m pretty sure Muslims weren’t occupying 80% of Europe in the 1400s. The moors were centuries away from being a genuine threat to Spaniards when the Inquisitors went after the Moriscos and Reconquistadors went after the moors. Or: 8th century =/= 15th century. Spain could’ve let Muslims remain in Spain and wouldn’t have been in danger cuz the attack was done with at that point.

        The crusades are interesting: the Seljuks were obviously strong and dangerous when they happened, but western Europeans cannot claim selfpreservation as a motive, because they themselves were not in danger. They were more like Chechen mujahideen fighting in Bosnia against Serbians. Fighting alongside their brethren, but really not out of SELF-defence.

        Like


      • “Our reputation for being tolerant probably began many centuries ago when Europeans tolerated Muslim occupiers for centuries.

        Muslims occupied Spain for seven centuries before Spanish people got fed up and kicked them out.

        How many more centuries of this shit would it have taken for you to admit we are the most tolerant of the two?

        As a matter of fact our reputation for being ultra tolerant is so well known that hordes of Muslims are invading us pretending to be refugees.

        Note that those invaders/”refugees” are not trying to move to Muslims nations expecting such tolerance, in fact they are running away from Muslims nations in part to escape from the senseless violence that is part of Islam and has always been.

        Millions of Christians are not migrating to Muslim nations are they?

        Gee I wonder why?…….

        Thank you for playing, better luck next time.”

        “Refugees” are coming because you have a lot of money to spare and have lost the backbone to tell freeloaders to fuck off. This is probably a result of LESS Christianity, not more. When the West was at it’s most Christian, only those refugees deserving of the name would’ve bothered to try.

        It’s disingenuous to compare modern Christians to modern Muslims, because many of the former are CINOs (Christians in name only). They aren’t representative of Christianity.

        My post was an attempt to do whats called a “fork” in Chess: make the opponent pick his poison. Either Christian were hardasses that didn’t tolerate alien’s shenanigans or they were tolerant and therefore morally superior to them muzzies. Was probably a bit sloppy, because that seems like a false choice.

        I genuinely am unconvinced that medieval Christians were more tolerant than Muslims, as the poor Merchant had to find out. The difference if mainly that it is less tightly regulated, so that positive developments like the Reformations, Countereformation, Enlightenment, Magna Charta managed to find purchase, unlike Islamic countries. Further, it didn’t have dysgenic, dyscivic cultural practices like Islam, so a superior people emerged.

        But Christendom at it’s peak being tolerant or more tolerant to an appreciable degree? You need to give me a medium level history lesson to grok that.

        Btw, Spaniards didn’t “tolerate” Muslims. It took that long for Christians to take advantage of Moorish disunity and achieve Christian unity and drive them out.

        Like


      • That speech gives me a woody. Its right up there with Marius’ address to his troops prior to embarking on the Jugurthan war. Urban II was asked to send mercenaries to Constantinople by Emperor Alexius II to fight the Turk after losing Asia Minor in the battle of Manzikert. Context is critical.

        Like


    • The wisdom of the OT has been pushed aside by those who have corrupted God’s Word.

      Scripture was always cognizant of unique peoples and separate nations designated to be such… and not bringing everyone together in any sort of “mixed multitude”, as what poured out of Egypt.

      The Towel Of Babel was a primer in this regard, and warnings about foreign women and their wiles to corrupt with false gods are plentiful.

      This does not mean we are to make a fetish of “race” and worship human beings, as such. We are to respect blood with the proper demeanor that God has assigned to it.

      Once again, I repeat that Scripture itself predicts these end times as being full of false prophets, false christs, and a corruption of the churches themselves.

      And I wish you clowns who keep bringing up this canard about Christianity and national boundaries being mutually exclusive would either learn that about which you would pontificate, or just STFU with your disinformation.

      You’re doing Satan’s work for him, spreading falsehoods and encouraging doubt. 😡

      Like


      • If you think the lying and murdering jews of the OT are something to look up to, you should move to Israel. No room in Europe for people who believe that insanity is commendable.

        Like


      • Think in three dimensions, kid… all of Mankind has fallen short of the glory of God, and lying and murdering are not the sole domain of the enemy… on those counts, all people have some ‘splainin’ to do, come the Judgment.

        But a nation could do far worse for its unique identity than to follow the precepts given to the ancient Hebrews in re righteousness.

        Like


    • Ask yourself why the Enemy which has its boot on our collective throats, has tried to destroy the Catholic Church for centuries. It’s work is partially done, but they cannot ultimately win.

      Like


  3. The Vatican has accepted exactly 4 refugees during the current crisis. Syrian Muslims? No. Greek Catholics.

    Like


  4. An anti-American is the President of the USA and and anti-Christian is the Pope.

    Where does this insanity stop?

    Like


  5. Not to mention that Pope Francis gets “advised” by leftist Jeffrey Sachs re the “climate change” agenda. And Sachs is backed by satan (aka Soros). The puppeteer.

    Like


    • 2 Corinthians 11:

      13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

      14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

      Like


      • Well I will not attempt to argue the bible with you Greg as you seem to be the master 😉 but can not prophecy be altered by the will of man? I do believe we live in spiritually degenerate times but that is also because the left has allowed, even encouraged, the fall of the family unit and the anyone who practices religion is basically laughed at by the left. I believe in science too but do not believe it takes the place of spiritual faith that offers a moral baseline a society needs. Soros is just one of these evil doers that exist. There’s more as you know.

        Like


      • but can not prophecy be altered by the will of man?

        It can indeed, because God as the Ultimate Creator came up with that ultimate creation, free will… so magnificent a concept that He Himself can be saddened or surprised, depending upon how Man and Angel decide to put it to use.

        The funny thing about prophecy, though, is that neither Man nor Angel ever seem to get around to altering it, yon, these past thousands of years.

        More’s the pity.

        Like


      • Wise words by the wise man you are Greg. That indeed is true, sadly so.

        Like


      • We need to have some Hamentasches at Carnegies sometime. They’re really German Christmas cookies anyway. My mother used to make similar cookies with raspberry jam.

        Like


    • (((((Jeffrey Sachs)))))

      Like


  6. The third Fatima prophecy warns of a satanic infiltration of the Church, all the way to the top.

    Like


  7. If Martin Luther were alive today to hear this Pope speak, one of his 95 Theses would have looked like this.

    He who gives to the poor of his own free will from his own coffers and opens his own home to the needy does a better deed than the man surrounded by vast wealth and residing in his own private walled city who pontificates in front of a bunch of lying, murdering sociopathic heathen living off the stolen wealth of others about the virtue of state coercion and aggression against the innocent while extorting the innocent to become political cuckolds.

    Like


    • Martin Luther would get an aneurysm over the JQ in the moment.

      Like


    • He who gives to the poor is a fucking idiot. the poor are that way because their innate BEHAVIORS made them so. They are structurally poor, not just “lacking money.” You will not replicate a rich person merely by a larger bank account.

      Geographical magic does not work. Cutting the poor a check does not work. Giving the homeless or the black hordes another home/neighborhood/city to destroy does not work. They revert to their natural tendencies.

      The nation of Syria is that way because of the collective acts of Syrians. This is what culture is. Raising them in someone else’s culture does not change their innate tendencies.

      Even Jebus said don’t cast your pearls before swine.

      Like


      • More a propos, when the Apostles chided the woman for spending money on fine oil to annoint the Lord’s head, when she could have used it to feed the poor, Jesus told them to back off:

        “The poor will always be with us, but the Son Of Man is here but a short time.”

        Like


      • “Even Jebus said don’t cast your pearls before swine.”

        Agreed. Which is why doing the former might be a “better deed,” but it’s not necessarily a “good deed.”

        Like


      • that example is only relevant if you have Jesus to spend money on instead of the poor.

        Paying the poor for being poor ignores why they are poor. The poor aren’t poor merely for lack of money; an entire set of behaviors inexorably LED THEM to that point and, despite your best efforts to enrich them, will invariably LEAD THEM AGAIN to that point.

        Wealth isn’t an accident, be it national or individual. The notion that the poor differ from the rich as a function of solely wealth is a…MARXIST EQUALIST precept. Seriously.

        Almost all this mumbo jumbo shit you read and people believe these days is Marxist at its core. People would be well-served to study who Trofim Lysenko was and understand the all-out hatred by Marxism of genetics.

        Like


      • But… but… I learned in school that, if you be White, money jes’ fall from the sky into yo’ lap… ‘cuz o’ all de bruthas that be workin’ up dere.

        Like


      • Just love the pics of these poor folk….especially the ones where it shows the rats nest of wires charging all their iphones and galaxies.

        Like


      • on September 25, 2015 at 1:49 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

        The culture of Syria is actually secular and pretty modern for the region, as was Iraq, before US intervention. There is a bigger play at work, and it dumbfounded me that so few see it.

        Like


      • @ bobby CF: what would that play be? (Seriously asking)

        Like


  8. The new pope is not making us Catholics look good.

    Like


    • Yeah. One would think he’s an SJW entryist.

      Like


    • Fuck Pope Francis.

      I may not agree with the Catholic Church on everything, but at least it used to have the guts to stand up for its principles. Not anymore.

      For example, say what you will about abortion (and what I say about it these days is that at least it keeps the U.S. black population down) the Catholic Church says that abortion is murder. And therefore tens of millions of innocent babies have been murdered in the U.S. in the past few decades.

      And …

      … the Pope shows up and sucks Obama’s cock prattling on about climate change? About treating foreigners as if they have some “right” to walk into our country and take over? About how we are meanies because we put a dozen or so convicted murderers to death every year?

      Fucking communist, SJW suck-up, cucktard.

      If I did believe in the holo-hoax, the analogy would be like the Pope showing up in Berlin in 1943 to talk about the need to reduce carbon emissions from the concentration camps.

      How do you say “Fuck This Pope” in Latin?

      Like


  9. Speaking of omegas, this was shared unironically on my fb. If anyone can find out if this is real and not some feminist bullshit, this guy is a definite cuck of the year candidate

    http://www.upmoments.com/he-got-divorced-and-said-this/

    [CH: ya know, the more the world fills up with mewling castratos like this cuck, the better it is for narcissistic pricks like myself.]

    Like


    • If there’s any guy next in line for my wife, the only thing I’d send him is a rawhide bone for his seeing-eye dog.

      /she’s standing right behind me, isn’t she?

      Like


    • what a loser…you can read all of the spoiled bitch behaviors in his prose and his advice is to further enable them. Wow.

      Like


    • That’s GOT to be some shill feminist writing the piece as if it came from a man.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like


      • That had to be a feminist or a male writer like CH with the combination of insight, creativity and sarcastic wit needed to perfectly emulate one. If I recall correctly, a recent post supposedly written by a man who let his wife go out and fuck other men turned out to have been written by a woman.

        Like


    • That was truly pathetic

      Like


    • The very first sentence of the article begins with a bald faced lie: “Adam got divorced after many years of a beautiful marriage.”

      So “beautiful” that it ended in divorce.
      The remainder is just a literary emetic. If “Adam” is not the fevered dream of some frustrated, flabby-armed, feminist twat, I’ll eat my hat.

      Like


    • a friend…a natural, even…got divorced (personality defect, instant romance addict).

      He wuz all like, “what about the ex-wife”, who instigated the divorce? “She was all like blah blah blah last time we talked”

      perfect advice given:

      “Dude, who fucking cares?”

      Who bitch dis is? Not mine, next.

      Like


    • Wow, that was so touching and profound, I was sobbing. Even more than when I think about white oppression of black folks and all.

      Like


  10. Mr. Commiepope, Tear Down This Wall.

    Like


    • The Vatican needed walls as Italy was a pretty turbulent place for most of its history, invasions and private armies galore.

      [CH: there’s been a beaner invasion of america going on for thirty years now. ergo, america needs a wall. a trumpenwall.]

      Like


      • on September 25, 2015 at 2:06 pm Captain Obvious

        HM, that’s my point way up above here – whoever built that wall [a millennium ago?] was an Alpha Sh!tlord who wasn’t going to let his people get f*cked by the riff-raff.

        Like


      • I pray that Trump will make Mexicans build the wall with the bodies of Mexicans who refused to build the wall.

        Like


      • on September 25, 2015 at 2:18 pm Captain Obvious

        > “with the bodies of Mexicans who refused to build the wall.” ——— Okay, COMMENT OF THE YEAR. We can all go home now and not re-adjourn until January 1st 2016. LOL’ed.

        Like


      • on September 25, 2015 at 3:50 pm Captain Obvious

        re-adjourn = re-convene

        Like


  11. Walking past a big TV in my office lobby I saw a children’s (boys?) choir in New York, connected with the papal visit. For the three seconds I was exposed to the broadcast, they sounded very nice. But the singers were a melange of races and that always jars me. Is there anyone who honestly likes the aesthetic of multiple races or ethnic looks is an assembly that is meant to represent one nation?

    See various eastern European choirs or musical groups, or western European a few decades back. The heart grows with joy seeing unadulterated members of a nation represent something larger than the sum of its parts when they preform well. Or see any non-mixed national sports team or military formation.

    Schools today mail out ads for class photos. Invariably, the main sample photo shows kids of various colors and now veiled girls too. This phobia of purity of association is the ugliness of our time. And there is a method behind this ugly imagery, and it was articulated by John Lennon in the most inhuman song ever written, slightly paraphrasing here: “Imagine there’s no country. Nothing to live or die for. Just graze, cattle, above you only sky.”

    There is such a thing as a brotherhood of man. It happens when two men of different races meet as equals, each speaking from a position of his own strength. Men like, in fact, meeting and getting to know others. But this only works when every man in question has an identity and a home of his own.

    The mixing of races and nations is an effort to dehumanize all men.

    Like


    • Well-said.

      The mixing of races and nations is an affront to the Most High, who created true diversity for His pleasure, and not some mixed multitude that invariably reverts to the lowest common denominator.

      Like


    • I may create a meme; could use some suggestions here because memes work on their simplicity of words/image, while I tend to overthink. It must be tame enough for blue pill normals to look at and think “hmmm…” So here is my initial concept:

      Upper half of the image is an overcast sky with a likeness of Lennon, and those four lines paraphrased from “Imagine” in my above comment.

      The next image after that is a panorama collage of Miley twerking and other pop culture shit.

      Under that, is a panorama of angry, ugly male refugees rioting in Europe.

      Under that, aling the bottom, is a panorama collage of various globocorp logos.

      Words in small type “#IStandWithHungary” included underneath all that.

      Thoughts?

      Like


      • Given the attention span of the current folk, the only thought I have is: the simpler, the better.

        For example, just the Imagine sky above the ugly male refugees below says it all… even better if a pack of ’em are in the process of terrorizing Whites in the latter’s own country.

        Like


    • “John Lennon in the most inhuman song ever written … Imagine there’s no country. Nothing to live or die for. Just graze, cattle, above you only sky.””

      Thank you, PA. Surely, I thought, I couldn’t be the only one who sensed there a bleak nihilism.

      Like


      • That sort of sentiment is easy to come by, once you have FU money and are lionized by one and all.

        Of course, as he found out, fame does often have its inconveniences.

        Like


    • “John Lennon in the most inhuman song ever written, slightly paraphrasing here: “Imagine there’s no country. Nothing to live or die for. Just graze, cattle, above you only sky.””

      ‘Imagine’ is perhaps the most leftist thing ever written: “Ending conflict is simple, we just have to destroy everything that anyone has ever cared about.”

      [CH: and yet, like a typical hypocritical kumbaya leftoid, old photos of lennon recently surfaced of him making fun of handicapped people.
      not that there’s anything wrong with that.
      but i do just love rubbing transparently self-serving sanctimony in leftoid faces.]

      Like


      • Lennon blieved in national Socialism. *snort* No joke. He gets a D- for that.

        Now, Kurt Cobain….HOMOSEX RULES, FUCK YEAH FEMINISM *molests mentally ill girl* *kills a cat*

        Like


      • But there is something wrong with making fun of handicapped people CH. Do you make fun of people with stutters and hare lips? Because that’s fucking evil. I know you’re not completely dead inside.

        Like


      • “But there is something wrong with making fun of handicapped people CH. Do you make fun of people with stutters and hare lips?”

        A little sport at their expense is better than pity and coddling.

        When I was a kid, the older folks had a way of handling these things that was far superior. You had your “whiteys(an albino)”, “stumpys” and “harelip Stans”. It was right out there. Nobody tiptoed around the subject, a little teasing wasn’t verboten and at the same nobody made a big fucking deal out of it either. Everyone(freaks included) was more at ease about handicaps because there wasn’t the taboo against noticing and resultant awkward interaction and social tension.

        Like


  12. Message from the Vatican “All full here”. But the rest of you should open your borders and take them in.

    Message to the Vatican “GFY”.

    Like


  13. I agree with the spirit of the post.
    As a Roman however let me just say that the picture does not depict the Vatican wall. That’s the so-called “Passetto”, a wall which links Saint Peter’s to Castel Sant’Angelo (Emperor Adrian’s mausoleum – now a castle), that the Pope used to flee the Vatican when under attack.
    It is now located outside the Vatican and it’s part of the Italian State.

    Like


  14. Europe should follow the Vatican’s lead, I’d say. Not that I don’t empathize w the plight of refugees but to have a “come one, come all” policy towards them is insanity. Look at Canada. Strict immigration policies. You have to have a skill they need, a job lines up already that no Canadian can fill, and money in the bank before they will even think about it. Not that Canada is perfect but I say they have the right idea there. Nobody accuses Canada of being haters???

    [CH: canada’s immigration policy is certainly leagues better than the US’s, but ultimately an immigration policy that doesn’t have at its heart the goal of preserving the racial balance of the nation for present citizens and their posterity is a policy with a thermal exhaust port that can and will be exploited by nation- and race-hating leftoids.]

    Like


    • Agreed. This whole thing is freaking me out. Not good, not good at all. 😦

      Like


      • I mean who in their right mind is advocating Europe take in people from countries some are currently at war with, no background checks. Just, “sure, come on in!!!” Insane. Totally insane. 😦

        Like


    • Our immigrants may be a bit more educated and have more money but in the end they are still mostly non-whites who are slowly replacing our culture and replacing us.

      Pay a visit to Toronto you will find so many Pakis your head will spin or Montreal ( the north part ) you will find so many blacks and Muslims you will think you are not in Canada anymore.

      Canada in the past ( especially under the previous Liberal government ) has taken a large number of immigrants ( compared to our small population ) and we also take in many refugees, some of them hide in containers on large ships, we usually do not send them back.

      The present government – Conservative – is less lenient on immigration and refugees ( fake or real ), they closed the gates a little, but we still have too many immigrants coming in.

      It is becoming a growing concern for many Canadians. We see what is happening in Europe with “refugees” ( obviously most are not refugees ) or in the USA with Illegals, we see how many nations have lost control of their own borders and we worry the same thing will happen here soon.

      Liked by 1 person


  15. My admiration for Charles The Hammer grows every day.

    Like


  16. The Pope is a commie. A friend of mine has an uncle who is a Cardinal there and he visited the US last year, and he talked about how the church is having an internal civil war of social justice vs individual liberty/salvation.
    It’s obvious which side is winning that war.

    Like


    • There is a gay lobby within the Catholic Church, and they were the reason why the current Pope was able to squeak out the win in the papal conclave in the first place. Its also why the media has stopped reporting on all the priests diddling little kids anymore, since the existence of this pedo faction is now an open secret.

      Like


      • The Left finally got there guy in. I think Pat Buchanen wrote about it. It’s weird that he never once mentioned Jesus when he spoke to Congress, but talked about social justice bs. It’s very creepy.

        Like


    • I do not know exactly who pulls the strings ( probably eskimos such as Soros, but I’m not so sure it is only them) but both Obama and that new Pope have been ” installed” by very powerful people. Both are some type of Manchurian candidate yet they are aware of why they are there.

      Both are working on the same agenda and say similar things about gays, Muslims and global warming.

      Both are to the far left politically…

      Not a coincidence.

      Like


  17. Key point from the Sweden article: “This does not apply to just any immigrants – immigrants from Europe gives no moving effect, but it is the overseas migrants who have the neighborhood to start moving.”

    There was an article in the NYT a few years back that interviewed Swedes who moved out their towns when the diversity became too high. The women interviewed still said that they thought diversity was a good thing and they felt guilty for moving away from it. The left-wing programming is so powerful that they still support it even when they see the bad effects firsthand.

    Like


  18. This post looks familiar :3

    Like


  19. That wall was actually built to keep out Northmen: the Normans took the Pope hostage in 1106, and used him to rubber stamp their control of the Italian states.

    [CH: ah the days when northmen were a race to be feared and respected. we’ve come a long way baby… a long way down.]

    Like


  20. A wall is a good start. But how are you going to outlast the siege?

    Like


  21. Heh. “Why have the white British left London?”

    “It is a story of aspiration. It is a story of success”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21511904

    Like


    • A woman on the Tube told me yesterday that she liked London because it was so multicultural. I about barfed. A fine looking young man who was reading Kipling gave up his seat to my wife with the stroller, however, and it warmed my heart. I told him about Lords of the Copybook Headings and Tommy Atkins. I’ll be at church Service tomorrow at the BadenPowell house at 1830 at 65-67 Queeensgate Kensington. It’s just off of Cromwell Road about 10 minutes from the Earl’s Court tube station. Join us.

      Like


    • on September 26, 2015 at 3:27 am gunslingergregi

      between the censuses of 2001 and 2011.

      While the capital’s white British population fell by 620,000, the white British population in the rest of England and Wales increased by 220,000. (The overall fall of 400,000 is explained by a low birth rate and emigration.)
      ””””””””

      so 400,000 people unaccounted for from london were they killed or something?

      Like


  22. The wall around the Vatican is called the Leonine Wall after Pope Leo in response to the Muslim sack of the Vatican in the 1100s. The Vatican was outside the walls of Rome and without walls itself, so was laid exposed to the Muslim invaders who struck all over Italy, even setting up little caliphates, here and there. Leo pushed for the wall to be built fast and furious in five years.

    Like