The Point Of Obvious Untruths

“Anonymous” has a great comment explaining the motivation of the Lords of Lies.

As Fabian Saulinsky pointed out over on MPC, “We’re really living in a world that resembles the final years of the Soviet Union, when the State Media existed as little more than a status signaling tool of the elite designed to humiliate and demoralize via punishing repetition of obvious untruths.”

(For Trek nerds, think of the torturer ranting at Picard that there were five lights and demanding Picard agree with him. It wasn’t because the torturer believed it and wanted company in his delusions, it was just another form of abuse.)

However, it seems the Goebbels-lets in charge of Harrison Bergeron’s megaphone, Salon in particular, have broken the first rule of drug dealers everywhere – namely by sneaking hits of their own product – and have succumbed to the inevitable brain damage. They now merely drivel transparent clickbait that can have no purpose but to further enrage sane people. The Onion can no longer parody them effectively because parody would imply coming up with something more ridiculous, more nakedly contemptuous of their audience, than what they happily say already.

Case in point, a year ago they were giggling that it was racist to worry about Ebola. The logical endpoint of their encroaching lunacy would be to state that you’re a racist unless you take out a billboard ad with your home address, begging third world savages to do a Wichita Horror on your family, then deed over your property to whichever of them gets there and does the “job American’s wont do” first.

Who knows, maybe the true believers will take them up on it.

The equalist leftoids who occupy most positions of power in the West are brazen hypocrites; most of them don’t believe their own bullshit, yet they spout it endlessly. The reason is because they want to humiliate you. To see you figuratively on your knees, your will bent in service to repeating their lies as if they were truth, and thus your identity — your soul — stripped of autonomy and coerced into servitude to your putative betters.

Well, CH says fuck that noize. You come here and you’ll learn to rise to your feet, and stare down the leftoids who claim a mantle of moral purity but who are in reality cruelty artists with a sadistic streak a mile wide (but an inch deep).

This is a good time to remind the equalist cruelty artists that there’s one foe who makes you piss your pajama boy pants: another cruelty artist with an additional quality you lack.



  1. Marxism has been defeated before, under worse circumstances, an it can be defeated now. It starts when a few men like Lech Walesa or Vackav Havel ( CH, have you ever written plays?) to stand up and say “We aren’t going to participate in the lies anymore.” I encourage everyone here to look at the work/writing/speeches of late ’80’s Eastern Europe. For Havel, in “The power of the powerless”, it was the grocer who was forced to put a sign in his window that said “Workers of the World Unite”, or he would be outcast, loose his livelihood, his children would lose any opportunity for education. The sign might as well read, “I obey because I am afraid,” but if you put that sign up, it suddenly calls attention to the whole lie. So when you are asked to agree with BLM or Breast Cancer Awareness, or “Welcome Immigrants”, just ask yourself whether you would sign on the real message: “I obey because I am afraid.” If not, laugh it off, treat it all as the power game it is, and refuse to participate.


    • We’re both worse and better off than the people who lived under communist rule. Unlike them, we have more freedom to criticise the regimes we live under. We are also economically more prosperous, and that’s both a curse and a blessing. Having an abundance of consumer goods breeds complacency and a fear that we may lose these things if we rock the boat.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Bingo on that last sentence, Rob.

        Time to be like Heat: Do not attach yourself to anything that you cannot walk away from when the heat is on.

        And Fight Club: the things you own, wind up owning you. (Martha’s polishing the brass on the Titanic. It’s all going down!)

        Liked by 1 person

      • on November 16, 2015 at 5:19 pm Captain Obvious

        You know, when you think about it, there was essentially ZERO immigration INTO any of the Iron Curtain nations. So for 45 years or so – from 1948ish to 1993ish – their genes were protected from the Eskimos’ tactics of multiculturalism and diversity and mass immigrationism as the means to destroy a people.


      • on November 17, 2015 at 6:40 am Captain Obvious

        I wonder what the Ghost of Winston Churchill thinks now, knowing that Stalin assassinated Kirov [who was married to an Eskimo-ess] because Kirov wanted to take communism international, whereas Stalin wanted to keep it confined to Russia; knowing that Stalin instituted the Terror to purge the Eskimos from power; and knowing that the Iron Curtain protected the genes of the people of the East from the Eskimos’ great Multiculti/Diversit!tty/Immigrationist Diarrhea Swarm Wars to destroy the White Race?


      • Captain Obvious: It wasn’t just the immigration they missed out on, they were also insulated from the multicultural propaganda from the “Western” media and entertainment industry. It’s not that they were sealed off completely – they probably had some idea of the content of BBC broadcasts, Hollywood films, etc. It’s just that when you’re living on the poverty line, it concentrates your mind on your immediate problems and you’re less receptive to brainwashing.


      • on November 17, 2015 at 4:31 pm Captain Obvious

        Rob, that’s such an outstanding point. The Eskimos never foresaw the emergence of a Saint like Stalin who could stop them: A year or two back, Vlad the Bad Putin blurted out a stat to the effect that something like 95% of the original delegates to the first Soviet Congress were Eskimos. But because of the emergence of Saint Stalin, the cocoon which the Eskimos had created to DESTROY the People of the East instead became a cocoon which PROTECTED them from the Eskimos.


      • on November 19, 2015 at 6:10 am Captain Obvious

        CH, “The reason is because they want to HUMILIATE you.” ||||| David P Goldman, November 15, 2015, “Unlike the French in Algeria, Israel undid the Intifada entirely without the use of physical stress on prisoners. Israeli interrogation techniques do not require physical stress; HUMILIATION IS A MORE EFFECTIVE TOOL THAN PAIN WITH ARAB SUSPECTS.”


    • have you ever written plays?

      It’s hilarious, alas requires you to be familiar with the spoofed commenters.


    • I encourage everyone here to look at the work/writing/speeches of late ’80’s Eastern Europe.

      There is a protest rock song “Przezyj to Sam” from the era. The title loosely translates to “Be a Part of This.” Here is my translation of a key verse, which deals with having to listen to Leftist lies:

      You saw on the news again yesterday
      Tired people, a roused crowd
      And one detail caught your eye
      The vast sea of human faces

      And the announcer drawled harsh words
      From which you felt surging anger
      And rage grew inside you
      Until quite thought “enough of silence”

      (Ref.) Be a part of this…

      We may be reliving the collapse of Communism.


      • Until YOU thought “enough of silence”


      • Dude unfortunately we are nowhere near the collapse. We are Weimar Germany, pre-World War III. Lotta pain to come in the next decade.


      • Coming soon to a theater near you: the collapse of the U.S. dollar. Freedom fighters, buy durable goods made of metal and plastic while you can. After the collapse, durable goods will have value, but paper dollars will be good only for toilet paper, wallpaper, or starting fires.


    • what about this sign:


    • Wałęsa was a shill. He was propped up by the communist secret service to transform the inevitable system crash into a controlled demolition, wherein the communist nomenklatura would smoothly move to the role of “liberal opposition” and “businessmen”, while the true right-wing opposition would be prevented from gaining any foothold.


      • This !! The Polish uprising of the 80’s, was the first instance and a test run of, what later would be know as a “Color Revolution “. It was organized and financed by Washington.


  2. Pajama Boy is no stranger to feelbadz rhetoric:

    I am a Liberal Fuck,” Krupp wrote in one post. “A Liberal Fuck is not a Democrat, but rather someone who combines political data and theory, extreme leftist views and sarcasm to win any argument while make the opponents feel terrible about themselves. I won every argument but one.”

    Krupp then detailed the only political argument he claimed her ever lost, a drunken encounter he had with a “conservative gay prick.”

    “Gay conservative prick” = never happened. SWJs always lie, and the purpose of that lie was a mix of Vulnerability Game (showing that you are not perfect) and to signal that he knows his place in the intersectionality pecking order vis-à-vis homosexuals.

    — You come here and you’ll learn to rise to your feet

    Sounds like a short history of how Game knowledge leads to political awareness, which leads to identitarian self-assertion.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I wouldn’t be so sure it never happened. There are lots of gays in the Republican party now. Like Milo Yiannopolous, they feel more comfortable being outspoken in an un-p.c. way, because they can’t be shamed in the way straight white guys can.


  3. You know it is bad when The Onion cannot parody anything.

    Reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman sees something so funny, he no longer finds anything funny, laughable.


  4. on November 16, 2015 at 5:16 pm gunslingergregi

    “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

    “I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)


  5. On humiliation as the real purpose of Communist lies:

    In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
    ― Theodore Dalrymple, c. 2004


    • Absolutely. As someone who grew up in a communist country, I can attest that what Dalrymple says is true.


      • Everyone in the United States born after 1972 also grew up in a communist country. Don’t you get it yet? There is no freedom of speech or association for white men. There is affirmative discrimination against men in every area, such as getting into higher education and getting government contracts. Any nation with an out-of-control media as ridiculous as ours is , is a communist. If we are lucky enough to have a job, we sit through “diversity is good “/ White men are bad and other white shaming meetings. Notice, however, that these meetings are run by white and Jewish men from the boomer generation who are still the boss. From the boomer generation. They have not had to endure what they have inflicted on generation X and Y. A big law firm environment would provide a great place to study this phenomenon. The fat cow boomers have been riding high for 40 years, and the younger generation of lawyers who are white men are relegated to underemployment, reviewing documents on a computer screen in between attending diversity meetings.


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:08 pm Captain Obvious

      > “To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way to become evil oneself.” ——— Mr Daniels’s mashiach repeatedly said that it was the greatest Evil of all.


    • How many fingers am I holding up, Mr. Winston?


      • I am holding up one finger, and I use it to rub my jewess masters clit.


      • on November 17, 2015 at 6:48 am Captain Obvious

        Mordecai, just FYI, Eskimo-ess-es tend to have exceptionally sensitive cl!ts – it seems to be a “Princess and the Pea” phenomenon. [Which assumes that you can stomach the putrid stench of the aroused Eskimo-ess nether region, but maybe y’all’s great big hooknoses don’t actually function properly.]


      • on November 17, 2015 at 6:53 am Captain Obvious

        Point being that you don’t want to be sliding that finger down there like it was some [email protected] piece of ultra-coarse sand paper: Light as a feather, my hebe, light as a feather. And smooth as silk. PS: You do moisten your finger first, right?


      • Heh, heh… I would have to say Cap’n Obvious won that round.


      • My jewess masters nether region has been so destroyed by negroid penis that the only enjoyment she gets is from my finger. I love her do i pay for her and her half negroid offspring which I dutifully adopted. I have to plan a negroid train for my wife for tonight. Negroids are sich splendid creatures.


      • A bit too obvious and try-hard… in the future, think more Joel and Ethan Cohen and less Mel Brooks.


    • Just like how the first thing a corrupt bunch of cops does to the new cop in the precinct is tempt or force his hand with a bribe. Get them while they are young, new, not expecting it. Probably why the freaks keep pushing and pushing to get into schools.


    • PA – the Theodore Dalrymple quote sounds like an example of Stanley Milgram’s concept of the “agentic state” in action. You become complicit and thus weaken your sense of agency, and then deal with the cognitive dissonance by mindfucking yourself into believing the agency was never yours in the first place.

      I have noticed the people who are strongly of the dark triad, very much favor this type of interaction, attempting to convert those around them into useful tools. It is the slippery slope. If they can get a person to do one small thing that is against their personal convictions (because the act could be seen by the target person to align with another personal conviction – like be helpful to your brother in need, or some such thing), they will use that event as a way to extrapolate to greater and greater upsurping of agency.

      On a personal note, I have found that in group discussions (which usually don’t include those who are strongly of the dark triad – but you never know for sure when it is just casual acquaintances), or even one on one, there comes a time when if the group comes round to talking points in a discussion, that I don’t agree with, and I can let it go, without feeling I am acquiescing to tacit agreement to something that doesn’t align with my personal convictions, as per playing by the rules of polite public exchange, but only up to a certain point, when you feel the others are crossing the line, and forcing your tacit agreement, if you don’t speak up then, and at this precise point you absolutely must speak up. Once I have learned that I absolutely must respect myself this way always, it has removed alot of psychological problems for me. I am almost never conflicted now. I’m known as someone with alot of personal integrity. People who are predisposed to fucking with others won’t fuck with me now. But you have to iron-willed (a couple of years ago I spent a half-day locked up in one of the local police stations because of this, but this was a much better choice than the alternatives I was faced with at the time, and ultimately that situation with law enforcement resolved itself, in a better way than it otherwise would have. There is dark triad among police as well, of course).

      Men have been conditioned to acquiece to the Feminine Imperative, and as such we have pussified ourselves. Redpill is very necessary for men. If not – it is a slippery slope, it means more than just the quality of pussy one gets – it means the likes of what we see in europe now, and many men making excuses for it.


  6. on November 16, 2015 at 5:19 pm gunslingergregi

    Oath of Office

    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.


  7. on November 16, 2015 at 5:21 pm gunslingergregi

    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.


  8. All this hoodoo about communism is laughably misguided.

    No one currently trying to squelch free speech and punish dissent has read either Marx or Adorno. At most they read some bowdlerized critical theory in college, then returned to shots & pizza.

    Even if they had, it’s patented social constructionism, and if fact mystification, to believe that Soviets and SJW academics both having read Marx (and not the Frankfurt School) is what animates them both, i.e. ideology is what drives men and not selfish interests with ideological proxies.

    Think straight gentlemen lest ye conjure bogeymen.


    • CH is not talking about communism, he’s comparing the oppressive Soviet regime to our oppressive regime.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The rhetoric about it is as slippery at best.

        If the Soviet Union and the modern American are both oppressive totalitarian regimes, this has far more to do with the technical requirements of modern empire than it does with “communism”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • There is no “technical requirement” behind the politically correct lies that people are required to believe, or pretend to believe. Society could function perfectly well — better, in fact — without believing (for example) that black crime and low academic achievement are entirely the fault of white racism, that rate of gun ownership is a major factor in the homicide rate, or that Jihadism is not part of mainstream Islam. PC lies cause huge damage to the efficiency, and even security, of the “modern empire”.


      • @PN

        Good reply.


      • In fact the state is required to bend to PC inasmuch as humans typically operate under the sunk cost fallacy.

        Imagine for a moment all white people including Jews woke up tomorrow and admitted the Black Undertow to themselves and each other.

        First, as soon they made it known, there would massive nationwide chimp-outs. This would take opposing manpower, fuel, etc. to quell. So we’re already spending lots of money.

        Second, when pacified, we have to decide what to do with them. Ship them to Africa? That amounts to invasion as no African nation would welcome millions of greedy African-Americans. So now we’re invading and occupying Africa.

        Or we could put them somewhere and block it off. We’re now spending money on relocation and the like. This is also maximally cruel, short of outright genocide, as we know they are totally improvident and shall starve very quickly.

        I hope you see that there are large associated costs in every course of action and insurmountable psychological traction to begin with. WNs have apparently never thought this through. This is because they’re not social planners, of course.


      • jawohl, I’m guessing you’re a Jew… if I’m wrong, then you’re merely a useful idiot.

        The time is long past when Whites can keep America in toto… and then cleanse it of deleterious elements… any fool knows that.

        A future split up into Ethnostates (a Wilmot Robertson term from a few decades ago) is obviously the best and brightest chance for a White or at least predominantly White homeland. And it’s either going to come to that or Hello, Brazil Nord… without the coffee.

        As far as chasing away the unwanted elements, well… hasn’t that been done, and continues to be done, by the Hispanics in LA (who are sub rosa ethnically-cleansing the negros as we speak) and by the numerous instances of White Flight seen over the past several generations?

        All it will take, if YT has the gumption to still fight for his place on this Earth, is THAT sort of activity.

        No nationwide Ausroten needed, nor possible, so your various scenarios of “no-can-do” serve merely to deflate and/or spread squid ink.

        If you’re a man of good will, then do us and yourself a favor and don’t carry Eeyore fodder for the Cathedral.

        If you’re just another more subtle variety of shill or usual suspect trying to run interference for his own tribe, I won’t blame you, but I will say go back to your handlers and try to come up with a better tactic.

        A future for White children is no longer cause for debate, so I’ve said my piece here.

        If you’re sincere in your concerns, the Northwest Imperative, while not perfect, is at least a start towards a better plan than anything else being discussed these days.


      • Greg,

        There’s no need for any of that. Besides, even if I were a Jew and not a lowly Italian, it wouldn’t change my point – which you sort of acknowledge by brushing it aside with ad hominem.

        I can make it worse though. You admit America must be broken up. That’s big of you – not too many would. But you’re failing to account for one of the first principles in business at every level from mom-and-pop to megacorp: location is everything.

        Any geographer will tell you, probably with some disdain, that people don’t just settle territory at random. They go to a place because has value – hence the concentration of humanity along coasts and rivers and in valleys. Even in mountains, e.g. Nepal and Switzerland, the major historical determinants of settlement are water, fiber (for cloth) and protein.

        In short – the settlement pattern of America isn’t arbitrary, and anything you block off and designate as Wogstan will, unless it be a place where those settled will die in a matter of weeks, take considerable money away from this new all-white rump America.

        Interior? Oil and crops. Coasts? Ports – less trade. Up north? Oil and timber. And this even counting major production facilities, supermax prisons, military installations, grid infrastructure, nuclear waste depots ……

        I hope you’re not so ready to burn nay-sayers at the stake, or perhaps just too crotchety, to see the enormous logistical obstacles involved in the WN thought experiment. Whether it’s a dream of throwing the wogs somewhere, or huddling up together somewhere else, everything depends on something else that is critical to infrastructure. That is the nature of globalism, after all.


      • And just to be clear, I’m all for awakened white men huddling up in Cascadia. I’d have thought there are too many Mexicans already, but whatevs.


    • I would also note that the NSDAP were guilty of pretty much the same tactics against the good sense of German citizens, even if we can identify with their ideology and aims more than the Soviets’. When you study their propaganda in depth you realize it was as deceptive” single-minded, and “politics as usual”, as any other modern totalitarian regime with predictably bad results (massive fratricidal war, indebtedness to America, and annihilation of political will).

      You watch their speeches and you hear the same old shit trotted out to justify Iraq and Afghanistan: we don’t really want war, our existence is at stake, everyone else is lying about us, they arm while we sleep, they started it, etc. Pure political claptrap to pacify the herd as they are led to slaughter.


      • As a student of NS the only untruth I can find was accusations of 58 000 Germans murdered by Poles prior to the invasion. Everything else was bang on. Goebbles once said the best propaganda is the truth. Everything they said has come true.


      • Congratulations then – you’re a true believer.


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:15 pm Vagina dominator

      All ideologies are bullshit in that they all promise ultimate abundance and an end to the need for human competition.

      How could this be possible? Have these liars developed a way to abolish the struggle for life?

      Anyone promising anything like that is the highest danger to society and should be hanged on the spot.


      • Vag dom,

        Well said. Apparently this is beyond the commentariat to comprehend. The Left have their Nazi bogeymen and they have their Cultural Marxist bogeymen. Demonization is fun but you miss the truth: that we’re all surplus feeders competing in the same industrial trough. The ideologies used against us, or we use against others, are just the red capes our own conditioned needs and real constraints wave before us.


      • Right, guys. So it’s a dog-eat-dog world, and it just so happens that white men are the best able to compete. That’s why we invented guns, steel, boats, and planes. So while we are here during these meaningless 85 years or so, we have a right to advocated for making our nations white-only, so that we may be poolside surrounded by beautiful white women as many hours as possible during this life. Get it? The experiment to civilize Africans has failed. We should literally annihilate Africa, or simply cut them off from civilization. No boats or planes in or out of Africa. That would solve a lot, right there.

        We also need to regain control of our government from the communist Jews. A government for the people. The occupied governments of both the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, obviously (except for Hungary) quite clearly do the exact opposite of what 70% of their people want. No need for any killing or gas chambers. We just lawfully take power, get back on a real money system, and get to the business of having men do real work, such as manufacturing durable goods and building bridges, roads, and buildings. While our women are happily barefoot and pregnant, with 3 kids each, and dinner on the table at 6:30 every night.


      • Yeah, well when I’m at the ATM at night, I ain’t looking over my shoulder for any ideology.


      • The Nazis said life was an endless struggle they even wrote a book on it called My Struggle


      • His editor suggested changing the title from the intended original My Inconvenience.


      • on November 17, 2015 at 6:27 pm Vagin dominator

        @ greg eliot re: at the atm

        Exactly my point greg. Your viewpoint is realistic. The first need of any human is self-defense, (even before getting laid!)

        To defend yourself you need to belong to a reliable, cohesive group.

        Unfortunately, our group has been brainwashed into thinking they shouldn’t defend themselves and the chief brainwashing tools are ideologies, all of them.

        Ideologies are designed to have us wasting our time arguing between ourselves and chasing impossible goals.

        There should be only one criteria for our actions: is it good for our race?


    • I dont think they care much about communism. They are more concerned with killing whitey and cracka babys. Pragmatism and opportunism is their method. They could care less about marx tenants or the calipha.


    • You don’t have to have ever even heard of Marx or Adorno or Gramsci to have internalized their messages. After taking over the universities these ideas have been propagated out though the media, lower-level education, and popular culture. It’s not required for people to be intellectuals or even explicit leftists — they get infected with anti-white, anti-western-civilation messages just by listening to popular music, watching movies and tv, and even in Disney movies for kids.

      The old economic/political Marxists would proudly own such a label. No cultural Marxist will ever call himself a cultural Marxist. It’s much more subtle in the way it operates (at least until it achieves a certain critical mass), and more insidious.

      Either way though, whether you want to call it cultural marxism or political correctness or puritanical progressivism or SJWism or whatever, doesn’t particularly matter, it’s still the enemy of all white societies.


  9. on November 16, 2015 at 5:24 pm gunslingergregi

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    so the president is the only one that doesn’t say so help me God


  10. Get ready for Salon’s annual “how to school your racist relatives during Thanksgiving dinner” essays.


  11. […] The Point Of Obvious Untruths […]


  12. I think I know why my comments were coming out of mod as ‘anonymous’. Anyway, the cultmarx crowd tells lies that are both deep and shallow. Think of a pool that is nearly drained; the hole is 10′ deep but the water is 5″ deep. There’s a metaphor there somewhere. Cheers


  13. on November 16, 2015 at 5:28 pm gunslingergregi

    vice president goes back to God
    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God”””””’



  14. on November 16, 2015 at 5:38 pm gunslingergregi

    so if they say not about God they all at some point took an oath that said so help me God


  15. on November 16, 2015 at 5:43 pm skinnylegsandall

    I hope you all will consider reading this thread on posters over there are really taking this fake event apart.


    • You and the other crackpots from that cluesforum don’t have a clue.
      That is the biggest bunch tin-foil-helmet-wearing, mama’s-basement idiots
      gathered in one place at one time. How moronically stupid are you?


      • One thing I noticed since 9/11, is when someone comes out talking like this, and name cslling…you are getting close. This is the Chinese method of exposing corruption too. Poke and prod and whoever screams the loudest, well there you go.
        One huge WTF moment for me was watching the Fox and Friends crew go absolutely apeshit over the no plane theory stuff from September Clues. It’s easy to see why they freakout. They all deserve a hangin’.


      • did I smell schlomo-snark?


  16. on November 16, 2015 at 5:43 pm gunslingergregi

    The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment””””””””’

    hold up is that a spelling error in constitution or am i on the wrong site he he he


    • on November 16, 2015 at 5:46 pm gunslingergregi

      The Senate shall chuse their other Officers,””””

      guess consistant anyway


    • Lots of English words are spelled differently back then. Go read an old copy of either Leviathan or Wealth of Nations (which you should do anyway) and what will strike you first is how many damn words you don’t recognize b/c of the spelling: selfe, kindnesse, panique, finall, beleefe, vertue, joyne, lawes, warre, I could go on….


  17. Amen!


  18. on November 16, 2015 at 5:52 pm gunslingergregi

    1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.


  19. on November 16, 2015 at 5:58 pm gunslingergregi

    1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:01 pm gunslingergregi

      holy shit that is all it takes for treason


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:02 pm gunslingergregi

      define enemy though i guess


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:18 pm Vagina dominator

      Of course that is all it takes greg. To any society built on lies, honesty surely must be treason.

      That’s got to be the first rule.


      • on November 16, 2015 at 6:37 pm gunslingergregi

        Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort”””””””’

        i mean that not your

        To any society built on lies, honesty surely must be treason.””””””’

        apparently built on pretty straightforward words


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:45 pm gunslingergregi

      The motto of the Obama administration seems to be, “He who rules the waves may waive the rules.”

      According to a story published by The Hill, “President Obama has waived federal regulations on U.S. arms sales to begin supplying anti-chemical weapons equipment to rebel forces in Syria.”

      Under applicable (until now) provisions of the Arms Export Control Act, the president may not authorize shipment of any item included in the U.S. Munitions List.
      is that true come on this shit too easy


  20. on November 16, 2015 at 6:19 pm Each Pond Gone

    “equalist cruelty artists”– Men like this do the groundwork in carrying the torch for their such ‘forward-thinking’ egos. They’re part and parcel of the larger tech. imperative demanding cheap shock value to seize a thinning and fleeting ‘publick mind-share.’ I’ve met people on the streets in America who’ll do this shit just for audiences of a handful of… friends, or even in private.


  21. on November 16, 2015 at 6:21 pm gunslingergregi

    so the law just needs to be applied then is the problem


  22. I am going to copy and paste two links. Hopefully one of them comes through here for you all to see. Children and sensitive persons should not watch this video, which is extremely graphic and shows the execution by beheading of numerous captives of ISIS, a group which is widely believed to have established a modus vivendi with world Jewry, and which clearly is involved in the current invasion of Europe. In notable contrast to earlier ISIS productions, the video’s “chants” make use of the Russian language. Its title is “Soon: Very Soon” and it was released just days before today’s attacks in Paris, France.

    The production bears the logo of the ISIS media arm: Al-Hayat Media Center


  23. I had to reread your last paragraph several times. I thought you were outing yourself as Style or that Style was planning something yuge to fight the pajama panzer division.


  24. on November 16, 2015 at 6:34 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

    An interesting re-frame of the issue on Australian mainstream television.

    He does make some interesting and seemingly valid points but ignores the fact that Islam is fundamentally incompatible with the West.


    • Not only Islam, but essentially all muslims. Arabs, Berbers, East African Negroes, Turks, Persians, South East Asians etc are all incompatible with the West. They just happen to share a world dominating ideology.

      Their beliefs don’t matter. Their genes do. And yes, they’re incompatible with the West.

      I don’t get the fuss about Islam. Third World muds could believe anything. It just happens to be Bedouin dreamy madness..


    • on November 16, 2015 at 8:01 pm The Other Anonymous

      Very beguiling … Another brown face telling me how to think.

      One day ISIS is weak and the next day there’s a minaret on Ayers Rock.


    • Love it when us-versus-them sand-nogs are hired by us-versus-them jewsmedia to tell universalist Whites not to acquire any ‘taint’ of us-versus-them thinking.

      Death to all foes of patriotic Whites.


    • Waleed Aly and his cohorts on The Project are real pieces of runny leftoid shit. And they have a big audience of young Australians, that’s the worst part.


  25. Please… “Wichita Horror”??? How many Americans have a clue without Googling that first?

    Probably around 1%.


  26. on November 16, 2015 at 6:58 pm gunslingergregi

    so the constitution makes all this pretty simple and we thought we had to get all riled up and shit
    its allready covered now need to apply


  27. on November 16, 2015 at 7:00 pm gunslingergregi

    Nowadays, Ollie is a bulletproof vest manufacturer, book author, motivational speaker, part-time TV actor, and conservative radio commentator. In 1994, North made a failed bid for the US Senate. And, with the endorsement of Jerry Falwell and other elements of the Christian Right, he very nearly won. Kind of ironic when you consider his perjury conviction. ””””””’

    was he the first test joke though


  28. on November 16, 2015 at 7:15 pm gunslingergregi

    just like france with their leaders and germany with theres pretty sure they have laws on the books to deal with traitors to
    easier in france if the syrians blew up shit in paris and then pres still having more come in


  29. on November 16, 2015 at 7:15 pm gunslingergregi

    it not illegal shit that needs done it is legal shit


  30. A fun game to play: Have someone read the posts on the Salondotcom (Salon parody account) twitter page. Guess which ones are fake and which ones are retweets of actual Salon tweets.


  31. Western Civilization = Darby’s Castle

    The weak and useless have betrayed the noble men of the West and their aspirations, and will bring down in a blink of an eye the beautiful world that took millennia to build. Darby/The West are also to blame because they didn’t keep the bitch/untermenschen in their place.


  32. on November 16, 2015 at 7:44 pm Teatray Von Skittles

    I’m a minority male. What can I do to help the cause?


    • Step ‘n fetch, Gunga Din.


    • Buy 3 icepicks.


    • What would you suggest?

      This reminds me of a mulatto character on another board, who is vanquished, but i was thinking that the question i would ask of him, is what is it that he wanted to achieve or contribute, by participating in the discussion with white advocates.

      Because there is a case to be made, about interests in common. However, because white people in the recent times have made those common interests their god-damned mother-fucking religion – at this point asking white people to make the case for what interests all races have in common, is counter-indicated.

      But the case that there are common interests, might be made by someone who is not white.

      At this point it is up to non-whites to convince white advocates, that non-whites can contribute anything at all, It is up to non-whites to convince White men of race that they have something to offer.

      All this time White people have been making the case of non-whites for them. And now White people with any sense are tired of that losing game. So the case for non-whites will have to be made by non-whites.


    • At this point it is up to non-whites to convince white advocates, that non-whites can contribute anything at all. It is up to non-whites to convince White men of race that non-whites have something to offer.

      All this time White people have been making the case for non-whites. And now White people with any sense are tired of that losing game. So the case for non-whites will have to be made by non-whites.


  33. Aside re: women’s dark sexual fantasies…check out the Tumblr page Third Reich Confessions


  34. I love the site lately. Keep it up. I need somewhere to find truth after dry heaving my way through the msm all day.


  35. “The equalist leftoids who occupy most positions of power in the West”

    The source of the power is coming from the neocons/Pentagon. The so called leftoids are just beta tools.

    “The Pentagon chief says ‘the United States stands with the people of France and its vibrant, multicultural democracy.’

    General Wesley Clark, 1999: ‘There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.'”

    Does anyone notice Pentagon officials boldly dictating policy for other countries?

    Americans blaming “”leftoids” and people of color is like blaming blacks for the utter disintegration of what was the great country of South Africa. Time to get back to personal responsibility and reality. The blacks were always in South Africa but the interventionist neocons were able to force South Africa to submit to a twisted rainbow policy. South Africa lost the war which Russia is fighting right now.

    The problem is that of Inception for the public. If we never figure out where the real evil is then we stand no chance.


  36. most of them don’t believe their own bullshit, yet they spout it endlessly. The reason is because they want to humiliate you.

    Exactly. A lot of leftist propaganda is simply a show of force, and especially when it comes to changing the language. Changing Negro to “African-American” even though the Spanish word for black has been used as a neutral word, simply the real name, of that race for decades, across the world. Or changing Indian to “Native American” even though America didn’t even exist before Whites founded it, and Indians no doubt see themselves as Indians only, never as Americans, the Enemy.

    Likewise, using “they” for a hypothetical person, instead of “he”. For all time, “he” has been used even when the person could be a woman; it is “the gender-neutral pronoun” in that case. Feminists pretend that it is discriminatory against women: “Saying he means you think only men are human!” You could just as easily turn it around and say that not allowing men to have “he” to themselves, when women’s “she” means women only, is discrimination against men.

    It has gone so far that “they” is used in cases even when it is obvious that the hypothetical person must be either a man or a woman. For example, talking to members of an all-girl basketball team: “Turn to the person next to you and tell them what you think they did well in this game.” I have dozens of such examples, gathered from TV shows.

    That this is blatant abuse of the most simple of grammatical rules, to use “they” only for several people, doesn’t concern feminists, and this is typical – they care only about propaganda, no other values. For the record, there is never, ever, a reason to abuse grammar this way. If you simply refuse to use “he” for the hypothetical person you can talk about several hypothetical persons instead. For example, “Put the sign right next to the door so it is the first thing customers (instead of a customer) see when they enter.”

    When it comes to “gay”, it was an explicit propaganda word from the beginning. Take a word that means something positive and apply it to homosexual perverts. Of course, as with the other propaganda words it can only work when Hollywood and media use it every day for years.

    Negative words work the same way. Racialist is changed to “racist”, the word Leon Trotsky used to condemn Western empires. By calling nationalists “racists” the Left puts the focus on one aspect, the one that is the easiest to attack, instead of showing people that there is a whole ideology, an alternative to the ruling orthodoxy. That is why nationalist parties are never, ever called nationalist parties in the media. Even though nationalism is the true word for their ideology. If you use the word nationalist you make yourself a target. Likewise if you say Nazist, the correct short form of National Socialist – it has gone so far that “Nazi”, a slur invented by German communists and picked up by British newspaper owners, is now the word you have to use unless you want to put a target on your back. It is as if everyone would be taught that “commie” is the real word, not a slur, with “communist” being erased from the history books.

    “Capitalist” was an early example of a propaganda word. Karl Marx used it to attack the market economy, by focusing on a single aspect: that those with money, “capital”, invested and could make money that way. The entire, normal, ancient concept of private trade was thereby demonized, as the workers hated the thought of people making money by just sitting behind a desk and writing strange symbols on a piece of paper.

    Forcing people to change their language, to ignore ancient words and to ignore logic in order to bow down to linguistic propaganda, is simply a show of force. It is a daily reminder that the Left is in control. Most people are unable to formulate their thoughts about all this and so keep silent. And speaking up is dangerous. You have a leftist in the group, you become a target if you say “he” instead of “they”. Conservatives to their nature are focused on building, and so want to avoid that confrontation when they are not even talking about politics. Leftists are to their nature focused on attacking – because their goal is to take existing wealth rather than creating new wealth – and so they will not let such dissent go unpunished. Conservatives know this, and to avoid trouble they use the Left’s words. Such a small thing. A small thing that is replicated tens of thousands of times during your lifetime, hammering in the Left’s show of force.


    • Arbiter – to me the left is ruled by the Feminine Imperative. Our women seem incapable of seeing what is really happening. I don’t think men should let that go anymore. In my personal life I don’t.

      What is really surprising is that I am 56 and my views haven’t changed much, but man have the goalposts of the political spectrum, and of those around me ever changed. When I was young I was considered left of center because of my libertarian leanings. Now I am considered quite far right of center, because of my basically unaltered libertarian leanings.


      • “Putin – if the neocons someday achieve their aim of worldwide domination, for whom would that success serve?”

        Wild Man, not sure how to answer your question. Seeking absolute power is no stranger to history. It is almost natural in humans.

        What is baffling is how CLEAR the evidence is yet how confused Americans are. Look at the quotes and actions by the Neocons/Pentagon and NSA.

        And yes the left is ruled by the feminine Imperative handed down by policy.


      • Putin- But you have already made the point that the feminizing influences occurring within the left are part of the neocon strategy, both inside and outside of the U.S.

        So if the neocons succeed with respect to their agenda of world domination, you have to wonder why they are doing it. Even if they do have a proclivity for seeking absolute power, the timelines necessary don’t line up for it being about themselves personally. For a feminized nation they will leave to their son’s? Doesn’t seem to fit. Such sons would just fritter such power away. You have to think that the neocons have to be asking themselves questions like this – this unfolding slowly enough that they would have to be clear in their own minds about their true motivations.

        Captain Obvious, Greg Eliot and others here would say that the neocons are actually is the service of some jewish conspiracy. I have to agree that comes closest to making at least a modicum of preliminary sense, but ultimately doesn’t hold water either.

        People like Steven Pinker (jewish background, and there are many many jews like him) have made careers out of untangling the human condition in a rational way, so as to provide ammunition to CO, GE and others, for some of the evol-psych precepts of their premises. Why would a jewish conspiracy tolerate and support such endeavors (after all – one of the planks of the jewish conspiracy idea is that they control the academics, and have pushed academia to the left to support their agenda)?

        To me therefore, what is going on now, I see it as more of an human propensity to the agentic state (Stanley Milgram-style), bowing to the Feminine Imperative, which is not a vehicle with any innate agency itself (except by default, ideology-style, by way of the real agency given to it by real people). I think you could make good arguments about this Feminine Imperative being a natural darwinian outcome, of so much success in the west, causing less need for masculine traits to meet environmentally conditioned survival-selection-pressures (because these same masculine traits have already done such a fine job of removing these environmentally conditioned survival-selection-pressures), and so this dynamic has upset the balance within the realm of human sexual selection pressures, in such a way to allow the Feminine Imperative to it’s rising ascendancy.

        If I’m right – the next question would be – what to do about this, especially given the new environmental condition of rising power among cultures not subject to the Feminine Imperative to nearly the degree in the west, now strongly challenging the west? Perhaps the neocon strategy is actually a misguided response to this new condition (i.e. – perhaps they actually see what I am seeing, but blundering in their response, as they always seem to have been blundering one way or the other since they rose to some power in the U.S)?

        Your thoughts?


      • Captain Obvious, Greg Eliot and others here would say that the neocons are actually is the service of some jewish conspiracy.

        First of all, don’t put words in my mouth.

        Second of all, a throw-away term like “jewish conspiracy” is merely Cathedralese in an attempt to make those who name the Sanhedrin seem like paranoid outliers. It’s not a conspiracy, no more so than Satan’s activities are a “conspiracy”. A better term would be “strategy and tactics towards power.”

        Third of all, this “neocon” couching term is just so much eyewash… if memory serves, that term first arose to describe the cadre of “hawkish” advisors and their adherents, many of whom just cohencidentally happened to be, well… you-know-who. The whole “our only friend/democracy in the Middle East” was part and parcel of the neocon seminary portion of the Cathedral.

        So if you want to try a new form of shilling, and call it “rational discussion”, that’s certainly your right.

        But don’t try to snow the snowmen.

        And if the time comes when your back is against the wall in the fight for a future for White children, don’t go looking over your shoulder for a neocon.


      • Hello Greg: You are right – it is wrong to put words in someone else’s mouth so to speak, and without a direct quote, I admit I wasn’t careful enough when I wrote the above post and ended up being a bit inappropriately over-reaching. I apologize for that.

        I should have said: “I think Captain Obvious, Greg Eliot and others here would say that the neocons are actually is the service of some jewish conspiracy.”

        I think that would have been the fair way to state it (as I did try to engage you in your precise opinions on this some weeks ago but you disengaged, and decidedly left me with the above impression). I am glad you are engaging now.

        With your current remarks about the Sanhedrin, if by the Sanhedrin you mean the rabid zionist element that largely controls government policy in Israel, – then I agree they are hawkish, contemptuous of the west (including the U.S. of course), controlled by old-school judaic “the chosen people” ideology, duplicitous, and using the larger jewish community in the U.S. as a naive mark to lobby for them. I have already stated so in previous posts over the last weeks. So, if that is what you mean by the Sanhedrin, then you and I are in agreement over that. Do you agree?

        But I would not conflate that dynamic with the majority more secular jews in the U.S. There isn’t good evidence for that (and there is evidence to the contrary – an example of which I provided above). Do you agree?

        Are you also conflating the Sanhedrin with Satan in some way (not clear in your post of you mean this or not), then I need to know exactly what you mean by that in order to make any comment (I have already posted here in the past with regards to me problems with religious ideology of all stripes, so if you read those, you already know my position). Can you delineate your position on this Satan thing more clearly?

        I tend to agree with your depiction of the root identity of the neocons as having the perceptive feel of being a deception, because it is true that their supposed identity (American Patriots) doesn’t seem to result in motivations that line up with their behavior – there is something weird there – but I’m saying this just may appear to be that way, because they may currently be conflicted vis-a-vis the Feminine Imperative, thus continuing to blunder. But I agree that they should not be trusted with U.S foreign policy. They have fucked things up and can only be trusted to continue to do so. I agree with that.

        Your seem to be saying something else about the deeper motivations of neocons though (perhaps infiltration by the Sanhedrin as defined above) – it is an interesting idea, and if true, is treason, can this not then be brought into the light of day in a convincing way, in front of the American People’s eyes?

        I posted to Arbiter last night (but it got dropped) outlining my difficulty with Putin’s representation of the neocons. My points being, basically:

        1) that the neocons have blundered badly from their earliest involvements in the middle east, but perhaps some of the past blundering was at least somewhat excusable from a malevolent intentions criticism, as it occurred within the context of the cold war

        2) but it seems that since just before the first gulf war, a more non-interventionist approach by GB-1, would have been in order to better serve U.S. big-picture interests, i.e. – instead to let Saddam Hussein to continue to wreak his havoc, as meddling there is and was a known hornet’s nest, and the U.S. ends up being drawn in over the past 25 years, with blood on their hands that they don’t want on their hands, because it obviously would result in the current dynamic eventually, with the U.S. and the west now drawn into a holy war that will inevitably settle middle east matters, as a made-in-the-middle-east solution, which is the only one that will ultimately work. Through that the middle easterners will figure out that Islam needs to be heavily secularized as well (which would be a boon to everybody on earth).

        3) that the economic argument for post-cold-war-middle-east-interventionalism really doesn’t make sense either, given the huge military cost, for which funds could have been redirected into the U.S. economy in ways that could have sheltered it from any potential oil price shocks that may have resulted due to a more non-interventionalist stance (but note that, under such scenario the U.S. would have still possessed a might Threat of intervention, and that paired with less incitation of anti-west ideology among the populaces there, would probably have resulted in an average oil price that was entirely sustainable over the last 25 years, given the financial resource redirection).

        4) If my assessment above is correct, then it seems that the U.S neocon motivations for middle east interventions really comes down to Israel.

        5) You could see U.S. (and then neocon) long involvement in the support of the state of Israel as a big blunder as well. If so, how the heck is the U.S. going to untangle itself from this “monkey on back”? Are the powers that control Israeli policy complicit in this “monkey on back” dynamic – very much so I would say, it is at least that, – in fact if you believe it is just a case of U.S. (and Britain) blundering with respect to being conned on Israel, then it is not just complicity, it instead could be criticized as outright deeply narcissistic duplicitousness (the worst kind as it is based in narcissism), by the controlling interests of Israel.

        Greg – I am interested to know, for #5, do you think it is U.S. blundering on Israel, or some U.S. interests complicit with the Israeli controlling interests, or something else? What do you think can be done?


      • America, as it currently stands, is beyond hope or correction. The government and sub rosa powers that be are all in the hip pocket of Israel, Hollywood and the rest of the MSM are firmly in their grasp, and anyone who complains too long or too loud about such a thing never works in this town again, as it were.

        I don’t pretend to know or care about all the relationships and machinations, and obviously they don’t all meet every week to discuss strategy and tactics… they don’t really have to, because even the ones at surface odds with each other (two Jews = three opinions, as the wry maxim goes), are still firmly in the Us versus Them… and Us is the Chosen, not Them…. mentality.

        Christ, in His day, called out the Sanhedrin as children of the Father of Lies, and the lusts of their father they will do… and as we see today, from the filth that pours out of Hollywood to the socio-political skullduggery that has been affecting the world every since the mid-19th century, there has been little change.

        I don’t think there’s any way out of it while America remains in its current geographical and political form. I have no answers on fixing what can’t be fixed until it is either broken down into manageable pieces or the slate wiped clean altogether.

        My faith remains that Christ and Jehovah and Their promises as per Scripture will be what ultimately happens, and all men of good will, be they Jew or Gentile, will be able to live their lives according to the original Will of the Most High, Creator of the Universe, and therefore, the rightful Owner.


      • Wild Man, not sure why this is so hard for people to comprehend. Read this 15 times ans then try to understand what is going on. It is really not as hard to understand as you are making it.

        “General Wesley Clark, 1999: ‘There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.’”

        The heads of the Pentagon have made it clear. Bosnia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine. Ethnic and cultural cleansing has been going on for years. Bosnia Christians were cleansed. Christians in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Egypt have been wiped out. As soon as NATO takes control of a nation like Poland and Ukraine the LGBT agenda is brought into play by the Pentagon. Slick Willy implemented the Cultural diversity into corporate America and if a corporation did not embrace it then there was hell to pay. Obviously it is the male population that tends to rebel as women are more consensus driven.

        Repeat after me…the Eskimos do not run the Pentagon! There are no secret Eskimos dictating policy.

        Listen, do I know what is going in the minds of Ash Carter and McCain?

        WTF, these people are psychopaths. How would I know why they think they have the moral authority to run the world the way they want?


      • Thanks for the response Greg. I’m more hopeful. I think this still can be sorted out. I’m for the egalitarian (a tenet of the western tradition) and I believe many jews are too (and muslims, and blacks, and southeast asians, and hispanics etc.etc.) but many are not, and many of european decent are not.

        I see it more of an ideological conflict, around the idea of the egalitarian, that must be supported if the western cultural tradition is to survive. But the egalitarian seems to be more and more misunderstood and not at all well supported and in conflict with many other ideologies on many conflict-fronts (both internal to the west and from outside as well).

        The Islamic ideology does not aid muslims that want to be more egalitarian. Since secularization, Christianity does a much better job of supporting the egalitarian among it’s followers that are so predisposed. And what has been termed the leftoid Cathedral here, does much to subvert the egalitarian into something it is not – this politically correct doublespeak is just collectivistic coercion pretending it is not, under the auspices of a false egalitarian. That is the most pervasive enemy of the egalitarian at the moment because it is probably unconscious, and is covert subversion.

        You are a Christian I take it, and intelligent, so I assume you appreciate the value of the egalitarian. If so, it seems you and me agree on everything, except as to the extent of the intentional malevolence of the enemies of the egalitarian, and therefore what to do about it.

        If the enemies of the egalitarian on so many different fronts are mainly so predisposed because of reasons such as – misunderstanding, too narcissistic of focus, fear & paranoia, cynicism, or lack of impulse control – then wouldn’t it seem that there is still hope that the day could still be saved, without war in the west, for the U.S. and Europe and the other western nations, (and by extension perhaps all nations some day but perhaps resolved via war for these conflicted nations)? Because all these reasons for predisposition towards the anti-egalitarian are not within the realm of intentional malevolence, and so at least theoretically should be able to be resolved without all-out-killing conflict, if we play (and not just pretend play as the leftoids would have) to our western strengths.

        I’m not arguing that the ranks of the enemies of the egalitarian do not include those that are intentionally malevolent (like I believe some of rabid Israeli zionists, in Israel, might be). But this would be a minority case and therefore hope could remain that there may be another way (but to my way of seeing things, the Israel question is the linchpin to the potential for alot of very very bad stuff to happen – I really don’t know what the solution is, but frankly and reasonably talking about it, in our societies, can only help).

        As for the Islamic enemy of the egalitarian, much more frank and reasonable discussion on this issue in our societies is needed as well. And in the meantime, a much more measured and careful approach immigration-wise, for Europe (as I outlined in another comment within CH’s “France Hits Back” post). As well, the west should cease interventionist activity forthwith in the middle east (they are going to have to sort it out themselves as always should have been the case, and that looks like it will occur via a holy war in which the west must refuse to partake).

        That leaves the leftoid Cathedral enemy of the egalitarian, which I think is actually about gross misunderstandings due to the rising ascendancy of the Feminine Imperative (“Feminine Imperative” as defined by Rollo Tomassi over at The Rational Male). I think there are prescriptions possible to reasonably resolve this as well (I don’t have any ideas about a potential gameplan yet but I have been working towards a good enough understanding of this dynamic, and have been talking to alot of people about it, so as to finally see how we could proceed).

        Greg – I’m in western Canada. The whole world has deep respect for the U.S. despite what some may say. Outside the U.S. there is alot of complaining about the boss-man, but that is only natural. The U.S. is the leading country with respect to the western ideals. It seems to me the U.S. is extremely resilient, and has great capacity for righting itself as it already has done so many times. The U.S. is the giant. It is clear to all that the U.S. has blundered badly here and there, but I don’t think it was due to malicious intent (probably more like the contrary). The U.S. must continue to lead, which it has the great capacity for, but it must fix what I have outlined above.

        Why do we keep talking around the issues on this site? (OK – when I first started reading here, the in your face alpha discourse was a good constant reminder to internalize certain strong masculine frames you can’t find too easily within the culture at large, and is a great mind conditioning tool when combined with redpill knowledge, so I get that, in your face is good for that). But some of us within the comments have gotten way deeper into political discussions and such. Why can’t we as men, rise above cynicism and stay positive about realistically figuring out what the society problems are and how to fix them. Admit it – at the heart of the matter, the redpill and the problems we have been discussing on this site have been about men recognizing the great value in our baser instincts (like aggression), to stop shitting on that but instead celebrating it as an integral part of manhood, but then channeling and managing that for the greater good, be it slaying pussy, improving our relationships with the women in our lives, improving ourselves, not tolerating disrespect, holding ourselves in high self-respect, and being realistic about our abilities and our strengths and weaknesses. That is an aspect of the egalitarian. Another way to say it – the egalitarian outlook shapes a man into a fierce individualist – that is the egalitarian, and it is also the redpill. The positive redpill attitude (fiercely individualistic attitude) is exactly the egalitarian. I sought the redpill to get insights that would help me be a better man, and I am better than I once was. Women need men to be men. They can’t do it. We have to do it. That’s what we are doing here I think. It is only in a smaller measure about white people, brown people, black people, jewish people, muslim people, arab people, chinese people etc. (smaller measure because as men we have to be realistic, that is the men’s job, so it would be foolish to ignore the accuracy of ethnic stereotypes – that PC crap is women’s crap). It is in larger measure about who can be men and who can’t measure up, who can’t become fiercely individualistic because they don’t have what it takes to manage their highly valuable baser instincts into something useful, or refuse to stop shitting on their highly valuable baser instincts.

        This shit is entirely solvable and we just need to get our shit together. And the U.S. has to step up in the right way now. If you are a believer, it may be God’s ultimate plan, but we still need to do our part too. I hope you are with me on this.


    • @Arbiter
      This is one of the main reasons I try to read books published before the cultmarx crowd started running the publishing industry. I put the cutoff sometime during the Eisenhower administration. They were making inroads before then, but the ’50s was the tipping point. Try to get your hands on classic literature published before then. Even basic stuff like Huck Finn starts to get changed in later printings. Abridged or maybe a missing comma or altered paragraph structure. Same with science/math/history books. They start putting their narrative in ever so subtly. You’d have to read them to see what I mean. Of course, scientific advances have made many of the old concepts obsolete, but we here are smart enough to know what is solid. Just part of my personal awakening. Cheers


  37. Field report from Europe:

    I took the family to Europe this summer. Munich was still beautiful in August of this year, but still had a heavy muslim presence in the main centers of the town. It’s gone to shit since. In Prague we visited the Communist museum, ( classic tourist trap next to McDonalds and a Bennetton outlet ) and as I walked through the exhibits, I told my soon to be 18yr old son that the USA was entering the same late stages as the Soviets. I told him Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush were the USA’s equivalent of Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko. Two names mostly forgotten and cursed by history. I have to hope President Trump wont be our Yeltsin. The Czechs remember their history, the Germans have been living in escapist denial. It may be too late for the Germans if they let even half of this latest onslaught into the country permanently.

    Half my family lives in Denmark, and my GF is Danish. The men have mostly woken up to how effed things are. They are pissed off at what their country has become, and yes, it is mainly their bleeding heart women who spout off about how they must be welcoming to the new immigrants. It’s sickening. The only consolation is that Denmark is not as far gone as Sweden. My GF’s sister in law has two young sons, & she is the biggest liberal cheerleader for multi-culti BS. I want to ask her how she thinks her sons will look with their nutsack cut off and stuffed in their mouths in the coming jihad? The GF definitely wasn’t in favor of this conversation ever happening, so I’ll respect that. They will visit us in the USA this summer. I think after seeing Yellowstone and feeding the bears, my older son & I will take them to the local gun range and start their education.

    Oh… and as for the field report, I don’t remember how Roosh rates Germany, but by far the hottest women were in Munich. Then again it was over 100F when I was there, and they were all in bikini’s down by the river. Spectacular genetics on display. The will be in burqas next summer.


    • I think after seeing Yellowstone and feeding them to the bears, my older son & I will take to the local gun range.

      Sounds like a nice vacation.


    • Good field report btw. I only meant to offer a suggestion, not to do anything illegal such as feeding the wildlife. Happy travels.


    • Stuttgart and Saxony have the hottest women. Bavarian women have the biggest tits.


    • Mike – yes it is the western women who are blind to the realities. Western women don’t appreciate what masculine violence is. I have noticed the western women think the masculine violence is of two completely different kinds when in fact it is not. Western women think that the kind that aligns with their needs and desires is the good kind, but they feel it as protection instead of what it truly is – violence. And then they think the kind that does not align with their supposed needs (“supposed” – because they don’t truly grasp what the totality of their needs are) and desires is the bad kind, but they feel it as toxic masculinity. There isn’t two kinds. They are the same. What western women perceive as protection, and as toxic masculinity is exactly the same thing – a positive emotive alignment with aggression within the man. No difference whatsoever.

      Men are not just tools simply to be used to align with women’s supposed needs and desires. Men of course have agency outside of that. Women need to understand this again (like I think they once did).


  38. FU Mattel CEO is Sinclair (likely Eskimo)


    • That commercial makes me rage. Time for tactical sniper teams to take out all the head jews in hollywood, NYC and time to drop nukes on israel.

      Unbelievable they have a young boy acting as a faggot and playing with barbie dolls.

      This shit is disgusting.


    • Yes, Christopher Sinclair.

      Must have been the only Jew at U of Kansas and in Alpha Tau Omega (Virginia based military frat with christian origins).

      Don’t forget about those crypto-jews though! They sneak up on you!


  39. Most of the hostile leftist elite echo. Not pointing this out is a glaring discrepancy in an otherwise good article. Sure, there are some really deluded goyim on board too, but mostly this is being engineered by Barbara Spectre’s handwringing co-ethnics.


  40. I am hardly the best example of a guy who is up to speed on popular culture but…fuck me, I can remember Frank Millers comic book movie epic “Sin City” like it was yesterday.
    One scene: The arch villian(Powers Booth) is pointing a colt 1911 at the head of the “best example of a good guy” to be found in this dystopian, nightmare of a place(Micky O’ruicke).
    Then the villian speaks: ;”Power does not come out of a gun. Power comes from went you get everyone agreeing to what they know in their heart is wrong – that is when you have got them by the balls!!”


  41. Put this caption under every picture of Angela Merkel: “Watching men fight makes my gina tingle. Open borders…yah!!!”


  42. oh snap Charlie Sheen got da aids.

    We’ll file that under totally unsurprising shit. I’ve long thought, and evolutionary theory probably backs me up, that a depozzing of the West may only come about with a sharp rise of sexual transmitted pathogens.

    Even the shittiest status signalling shitlib will start Othering real fast when it fucks with the genitals.

    This is nothing to root for of course, it just is what it is.


  43. Whoever has propaganda superiority has power. You can complain or you can start repeating your own talking points and thereby gain power.


  44. I’ll say this: The last great race victories that the West had over Islam came about because of the unifying force of Christianity. Can a dechristianized atheistic West summon the strength and bond to hammer Islam? Historically speaking, we should have our doubts.

    Shit on it all you like pagans, but without catholicism we’d probably all be brown right now. Your girlfriend’s beautiful blue eyes wouldn’t exist.


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:44 pm gunslingergregi

      we can kill em all should we how bout let them live diferent from how we live and let it be ok


    • Agreed. As an Atheist, I’ll admit that the majority of whites need religion to mobilize themselves against racial threats.


    • Unfortunately, the West then had a huge violent mob of crazy-brave warriors—the Normans—to throw at Islam. The Pope called the Normans down from Northern Europe, where they’d been taking over and ravaging as the Vikings a few hundred years before, and were currently taking over German, French, and English lands—-and used those Normans to take back Sicily from Islam, and then sent them on to he Crusades (the Crusades, in part, were actually supported by the argument that the Pope was going to get all Europe to stop infighting and unite under a common banner).

      We don’t seem to have another violent brave thug group to throw at Islam with the promise of land and wealth if they win. Blacks aren’t brave, and they certainly aren’t as smart as the Normans were, who gave us our current foundations of law and culture, and were brilliant military tacticians. The scourge of the North became the savior of Christendom.

      Norman rape!


    • Muslims didn’t invade by force of arms. Traitors in power LET THEM IN. Those traitors have power because they have propaganda superiority. That’s what you have to deal with.

      Brown Muslims have no power. They’re bioweapons used by the elites to force blend white people out of existence. This is the case whether those Muslims commit terrorist acts or not.


    • Shartiste, as much damage as Christians have done to Pagans, only forgetful neo-pagans are confused about the fact that secularism/pluralism are values that most of the people who died for it in the west were European Christians. More Christians were killed for religious freedom than Jews, Muslims, and Pagans combined until WWII.

      Those of us into Ancestor veneration consider these honored martyrs. My personal favorite is Mary Dyer.

      Still, one can never really know if, without Christianity, Europe could have stood against Muslim invaders. As things are looking now, Christianity couldn’t fight the decadence as well as many Pagan groups fight it within our ranks. New-age-ism is dying within decades of rearing its ugly head. I recommend that you speak to some Asatruar, Rodnoverians, and Dievturi on this matter.


  45. on November 16, 2015 at 10:44 pm Mean Mr. Mustard



    • Japan be rayciss n sheeitt.


    • “Of course, Japan achieved this by some super effective integration policy, through using the most advanced technologies and assigning billions of yen on the building of thousands of mosques and Islamic schools all over Japan, banning pork in all public places, introducing separate hours for boys and girls in swimming pools in all public schools, and Japanese male doctors do not dare touch their female patients, Muslim women get immense social aid each time they have a child, Shari´a courts were introduced in the judicial system of Japan, and the Koran is considered a Holy Book in Japan…

      No, nothing of the kind. What Japan did to avoid problems related to Muslims was much simpler and cheaper; Japan is practically closed to Muslims.”


  46. Borat Hussein Osama is letting in 15,000 Syrian refugees into the US in 2016 :

    I mean, surely 95% of the public is against this. Yet it happens.

    Paris had a terrorist attack just DAYS after Europe let in a lot of refugees…


  47. OT: I think Trump is so good at the sound bite and nasty shiv is because he applies the same principles to himself. Whenever one of his advisers hands him a talking point, he immediately starts to think:

    “Ok, if some loser were saying this, how would I make fun of him?”

    Then, if he can’t think of a good attack, the bullet point stays as is. If he can—and he’s an expert at doing it—-then he changes the wording to something less assailable.

    Trump’s probably working on the term “self-deport.” The term itself is weak; it bespeaks of a hands off, oh-they’ll-just-go-nicely weakness instead of a strong manly “you’re going to do this, baby.” Trump should reframe it to something as “I’m going to make it so bad to break our laws, the illegals will try to run home.” But of course more pithy. I don’t get paid for this Trump.

    Self-deport rape!


  48. I’m an Ohioan. I live elsewhere but that is where I’m from. That is who I am.

    If ISIS types were taking Ohio, executing children, bombing peaceable Christian churches, tossing accused homosexuals off roofs, and stoning women, what would you expect of me?

    Better dead than to leave your motherland to that.

    House the children till they can return. Send the men home to act as MEN.

    But the “refugees” aren’t forming armies like the Free French, are they?


  49. CH: Are you expressing your disagreement with the anonymous poster? The media are not “sneaking hits of their own product”?


  50. on November 17, 2015 at 4:48 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    I could not help but laugh ….


    • I’m not saying this is wrong, but you should all be careful how much you trust former spies. One of the defectors from my country writes pretty much what neocons want to hear and I doubt that’s a coincidence.


  51. Kind of expected that this Paris incident will ignite the cacophony of anti Jewish beta rage here in the chateau. Which reminds me again that there is no future for Jews in Europe or the US, therefore I believe all Jewish fans of heartiste should immigrate to Israel where they can have national pride and will not need to be supplicating all the time to the christians or muslims.

    As for the poor cucks of the European continent, if you can’t fight the “Jewish” left wing ideas, even though the Jews are such a small minority and not all of them are even left wing, how can we expect you to fight the barbarian Arab hordes?
    The last time Europeans tried to fight Jews it ended up with an autistic tantrum of the final solutions and the shame of being so ridiculous drove the Europeans to become a supplicating beta fags.
    The french put a weapon embargo on Israel since 1967 but had no problems to sell weapons to Syria or Iraq, they basically were like the guy who give his pocket money to the bully just so he won’t hit him but then getting slapped anyway.
    Why can’t Europeans just be confident Alpha, if they don’t like “Jewish” ideas just ignore it, or flip it, or amplify, why can’t they just listen to all the good advice in the chateau and walk their own way, confidently without letting every Jewish shit test rustle them or even worst, put the Jews on a pedestal and assign them imaginary powers they don’t even have. All the Jews want is to have fun.


  52. Fuck that noize, indeed!


  53. Interstate 95 heading south just north of Miami was closed for 9 hours yesterday because two dindus were engaged in a gunfight with each other. #blacklivesmatter


  54. on November 17, 2015 at 7:01 am Lev Davidovitch Bronstein

    “The reason is because they want to humiliate you. To see you figuratively on your knees, your will bent in service to repeating their lies as if they were truth, and thus your identity — your soul — stripped of autonomy and coerced into servitude to your putative betters.”

    I disagree. I see it as an effort to stir up an army. The Bolsheviks or “eskimoes” as you guys call them have always struggled to achieve pure political power to accompany their financial and cultural influence because they lack a natural constituency among their host populations. Marxism, for example, was invented to create just such a constituency: Workers of the world, Unite (under our control)! Destroy (under our direction) the hated burgeosie (your fellow ethnic brothers)!

    The Nazis as well as Stalin’s unconcealable reign of terror and purging of the original Bolshevik Eskimos brought the “Global Revolution” to an end in the West. So the Bolsheviks set about creating a new constituency to help bring them absolute power. This is simply the importation of tens of millions of naturally hostile, bloody minded hordes from the global South. This solution is much more effective than Marxism, which sought to create artificial enmity among a homogeneous peoples through the stoking of class envy. The instinctive enmity that exists between distinct tribes when they are forced to dwell together needs no stoking by an unnatural ideology, making the Eskimos’ job that much easier.

    So the insane narrative pushed by the mass media is nothing other than the marshaling and channeling of the Bolsheviks’ new Red Army. Whites are still an overwhelming majority in the Western world and are controlled not by force but by a clever manipulation, so the mass media message cannot be an outright cry of “kill the whites!” at this point. Instead, the propaganda organs consisting of the news media, academia, and entertainment industry sets about crafting an elaborate narrative whose intent is clearly to build up a force of genocidal fury amongst the nonwhite population while at the same time deconstructing whatever feeble defenses remain in the minds of the white sheeple. What will happen when they decide the time is demographically ripe to unleash the pent up hate of their POC brigades? Just look at what happened to the Russian people the last time the Bolshevik boot was planted firmly at their throat.


  55. now, for an unconvenient thought;

    is it that much worse for a Christian to live in a functioning Islamic state (Iraq pre-invasion, Syria pre-destabilization, Egypt) than to live under the current european cult of death?


    • Yes. Europe will not burn me alive for my beliefs. There are still many Christians here as well.


      • And Saddam did?

        Also living in an Islamic country dispossess one of the delusion he is part of the state. And reduces the pressure-to-slut on ones children. Quite the contrary, the occasional family honour killing, serves well pour encourager les autres.


  56. Not on topic for this post, but on topic for the blog:


  57. Here is what will happen when the 30 million armed private sector white men take on the government’s slob military. Alpha dad vs pedophile government employee:



  58. A girl HB6, 21 y.o. was running Bullshit Girl Game on me last Sat. night. Implied that she was flaked on. She wanted her story in my book. She told me:

    1) She won a ballroom competition. She couldn’t dance the basic East Coast Swing step.
    2) She had cancer. Just had a baby. Was out to get drunk.
    3) Said that she once was having sex and her very old partner had a heart attack and died.

    How did I respond? Ignored 1 & 2. For 3, I accused her of being a killer, very dramatically. And of being a mur-der-er, in a Gollum-like voice. Rinse and repeat. She was getting all agitated and defensive, in a fun way. Not withdrawn at all. I pursued. “You ought to have a warning label right here…” (as I tapped her shoulder) “…that says ‘Before you have sex with me, you must be cleared for sex by your physician.'” She added, “I ought to get men to sign waivers.” Then I proceeded to carefully examine her butt and hips (she was seated), walking around her chair. Finally, I told her that I wanted to go see a friend, then left.

    Can we agree and amplify the bullshit that the leftoids are pissing down our necks in a ZFG frame?


  59. This group had the best policy of dealing with Muslims!

    For further reading:


  60. Western women subconsciously want white men who have become effeminate to be replaced by masculine non white men. When the 2001 Afghan war happened I remember reading a woman writing about the sexual warrior power of Osama compared to the beta Bush. Perhaps many a panty was wetted in that Parisian concert hall


  61. When the commenter refers to “the Goebbels-lets in charge of Harrison Bergeron’s megaphone, Salon in particular,” does he realize that Harrison Bergeron was the genius-athlete-Adonis whom the society in the Vonnegut story sought to bring down?


  62. Off topic and will probably get moderated… but here’s a recent Detroit middle school brawl between a teacher and student … in the classroom! This is reality people… this is why shitlib hypocrites like Fatty Matty Yglesias won’t send his kids to black schools.

    If you interchanged the distinctive shrieking of the onlookers with the soundtrack from a national geographic chimpanzee documentary, you wouldn’t notice the difference. Also note the obligatory well meaning nice white lady trying to break up the fight between the science teacher and the 7th grader. Just another day in the Motor City.


  63. on November 18, 2015 at 8:24 am gunslingergregi

    the whites are gentrifying latin america so they can live there rofl
    bush got bunch of land where?
    they made all the bs laws in us
    then moved to a place where everythings legal in mehico its the american way
    isen’t latin america pretty white and prob getting whiter?


  64. Try this with your pathologically altruistic friends and politicians: Loring AFB is a HUGE mothballed airbase in Northern Maine. Functioning high cap airfield, many buildings still intact. Totally devastated town. Hundreds of miles from any major metro area, bordered by Canada.

    The new Ellis Island. Fully quarantine capable. Geographically isolated. Veg the best/brightest, send the rest home when major hostilities cease or a deal is brokered to get them to a neighboring Arab country. Watch liberals seeth with rage as this plan unmasks their resettlement plans. It won’t be enough…it will be inhumane…

    Added benefit of complete fed bankrolling instead if foisting the cost onto local taxpayers, hospitals, housing markets, children at public school, etc…