Suicidally Stupid Shitlibs

The streams of leftoid memes are beginning to cross. One minute, shitlibs are crowing about normal people “fearing Syrian refugees who are widows and orphans”, the next they’re calling Trump a fascist and letting the world know how scared they are of the Rise of His Excellency.

Now that Trump has opened the Overton Window wider than a cuckservative’s anus by promising to close the borders to Muslim immigration until further notice (never), the shitlib circus has rolled into town and pulled out the stops. For instance, here’s The Economist’s latest cover:

Call me crazy, but shooting innocent people in learning disability centers and concert halls falls more squarely in the realm of “playing with fear”. And what Trump proposes – keeping out the sort of people prone to playing with fear – is the exact opposite: a practical solution to reduce fearfulness.

But that’s the thing with suicidally stupid shitlibs claiming with their last breaths to love the idea of importing the third world while paying top dollar to live in gentrified neighborhoods bereft of all their totemic muddy imports: they have to abuse language and deny the meaning of words to get any moral traction with their fellow self-righteousness whores. If they spoke plainly, they wouldn’t be able to hold the positions they do without appearing utterly insane. (they are, regardless)

The shitlib insists closing the borders to groups of people whose culture and race are alien to Western Civ is a sign of fear, when the non-shitlib knows in his gut it’s common sense. It isn’t brave to stand in the path of a speeding train; it’s suicidally stupid. And it isn’t fearful to avoid unnecessary entanglements with hot-headed, ingrate foreigners; it’s prudent.

So for the typical language-mangling shitlib, “prudence” becomes “fear”, and “suicidal stupidity” becomes “nuance”, “tolerance”, or “love“.

Related: IT’S HAPPENING.





Comments


  1. The most amusing part of this shitlib screaming is the group of people they’re taking a stand on. They’re making a final stand on fucking ISLAM, the one religion that goes against basically EVERYTHING the modern Left says society needs more of. Almost everything they’ve ever complained about in Christianity like patriarchy and controlling women and hating gays and being anti-science is worse in Islam.

    Get your rope ready and find some lampposts!

    Liked by 1 person


    • Progratards lurv lurv lurv musloids because they think musloids hate Christians, and so since Progratards hate Christians, it’s a case of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Short-sighted in the extreme, since musloids hate sodomites and any sort of feministing.

      Like


      • I equally respect and despise the “Trump uses fear” tactic because it somewhat ingeniously frames the argument in such a way that it makes Trump synonymous with Hitler (that was only a matter of time before someone made that comparison) but it also, in a really weasely way assumes Libtards don’t use fear.

        Why yes but of course! We shouldn’t fear Muslims or fear losing our jobs for saying such! Who we really need to fear are straight white men, patriarchal hegemony, Christians, The Confederate Flag, gunz, Republicans, Racism, Nationalism, Cultural Appropriation, Homophobia, Online harassment, misogyny and rape-culture.

        Ohh and Trump. We should all fear Trump. He’s practically Hitler.

        And we need to fear all these things so much that we’ve designated Safe Spaces to protect ourselves from all the fear we currently find ourselves in. Life is scary everyone.

        Like


      • Shows true intentions. Islam, like all the other pet issues they stake claim, are just island of misfit toys crap. They rally around garbage issues that sane people contained or left for dead long ago. Stuff that that has a proven track record of being destructive to healthy societies. But that’s the point. Knocking the remaining middle into third world degeneracy.

        Like


      • This is because the entire assemblage of liberal positions only exists to buttress the one true reason liberalism exists–as a Jewish plot to undermine the racial solidarity of whites. If a is true, then be must be true, then c must be true, and hey, while we’re at it, rape has nothing to do with sex, and you have to be TAUGHT that Paris Hilton is more attractive than Whoopie Goldberg. When race denial finally crumbles before the public’s eyes, is anyone going to care about upholding the other ancillary liberal hogwash? Nope. Because it’s all there simply to support race denial and that’s why they give two shits that Muslims want women clitorectomied and burka-ed and gays stoned: because Goddamnit, at least they’re not white.

        Like


      • Because it’s all there simply to support race denial and that’s why they give two shits that Muslims want women clitorectomied and burka-ed and gays stoned: because Goddamnit, at least they’re not white.

        That’s as good a way to “explain” the sickness as any… to put a modicum of logic behind that which makes absolutely no sense, except within the context of hate.

        It’s as Satan’s original hate… damn if he himself has to perish, he’s going to take as much of heaven and earth with him (remember, he already drew away one-third of the angels, so “alpha” was he), because Goddamnit, he wants to be worshiped, even if only for awhile, rather than him lead the worship of the Most High (which was his original task, if memory serves).

        Like


    • on December 11, 2015 at 9:40 pm Captain Obvious

      The Eskimos can’t have White people noticing that the Koran & its followers are pure unadulterated evil, because the next thing you know, White people might wake up and notice that the Ta1mud & its followers are pure unadulterated evil. What gets me, though, are the cucks & the sh!tlibs – the Quakers & Unitardians & Lutherans & Methodists & Jesuits et al, who actually fall for this sh!znat – who take the cultural poisoning at face value, without ever questioning why they’re swallowing it. They just swallow and swallow and swallow…

      Liked by 1 person


      • Here’s a field report:

        Live in DC. Met up with a Tinder chick, Indian, Punjabi. Early 30s, wanna say she was either 30 or 31. Late night match, late night message, hey let’s meet for a drink within an hour of matching. That was Thu night.

        She’s a party loyalist, does PAC work for the GOP. HATES TRUMP.

        Listening to her was illustrative in terms of everything that is wrong with this party. I put it to her as such, if not Trump, who do you have? Crud? Yeb? Rubio???? I laughed. She had no answer. Magic negro Ben “West Point” Carson? Fiorina…wtf…lol.

        The GOP has NO answer. If Trump isn’t their nominee, they cease to exist as a national party. Period. She even claimed all of her party loyalists will go vote Hitlery if Trump is the nominee.

        I told her all kinds of red pill shit, what was her rebuttal, “You *can’t* say that!!” My retort- “oh, I cannot say the TRUTH?” Again, no answer. She had some passing offense because she’s a “brown person” (Punjabis are really more Persian and/or greek than anything else)

        It didn’t matter the topic, the wars, immigration, foreign policy, economics…the GOP has NOTHING. It is a fucking empty shell of a party that has figured out that the equalist bullshit the Democraps peddle is the ONLY ROAD to success and power.

        And know what? It is! Look at Brazil or Mexico…is there such a thing there as a conservative? Marxism has so infected the white mental space that there is no room for anything else. Browns fall for it EVERY time. They aren’t intelligent enough to realize that they aren’t intelligent enough! Dunning-Kruger. Global IQ average is lower than 90 and falling. There’s no hope. ONLY white societies (and I told her this) generate all this shit you love, nobody else does. “You can’t say that!!” So I said this is why your party is failing and Trump is ascendant, because he, among nobody else, is finally telling people the TRUTH instead of pissing on their legs and claiming it’s raining.

        At the end, she insulted me and demanded I kiss her and leave. So what did I do? I got up, put my shoes on, said “no, fuck you” and walked out the fuckin door!

        So I banged her this morning after sleeping at her place last night.

        Curious intersection of politics, not giving a fuck, alpha’ing up, and Trump.

        Like


      • @trav

        Amen brother. I love droppn N bombs from time to time depending on the situation. Of course I tread a lil before to fish out the situation. And if I see an in I’ll drop the ni66er bombs and add some humor.

        “OMG you can’t say that blah blah”

        Lol.

        Like


      • Trav, it’s hilarious in Europe too because young people are further to the right by miles compared to the baby boomers raised on American liberal values. So the status quo is panicking a bit. What I find annoying is that the EU idiots will end up destroying the EU and I like not needing visas to travel and having an open market no matter how much I hate everything else they do.

        Like


      • Maybe the love of muslix from unitards, Quaker oats, methadones, and jesushits is just an anti catholic stratagy?

        Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 10:35 am Captain Obvious

        > “So I banged her this morning after sleeping at her place last night.” ——— Good grief, the COTY candidates keep pouring in, fast and furious. Less than three weeks remaining… It’s almost as though The Trumpening is creating a furious civilizational “singularity” of COTY candidates.

        Like


      • I saw this posted elsewhere are it’s a powerful idea about the Jews, Whitaker says”…their real power comes not from any real loyalty to each other, but from their compulsion to attack any loyalty that is not to them. And that he says is the reason why we cannot ally with them…”

        Like


      • Maybe the love of muslix from unitards, Quaker oats, methadones, and jesushits is just an anti catholic stratagy?

        I don’t think that rings true…

        … I think it’s something within people of otherwise “good will” that sees the outsider as needing more help than one’s own kind, in order to hopefully “bring the light” to said “more unfortunate” outsiders.

        Helping one’s neighbor, one’s own flesh even, is done every day and expected… and let’s face it, most of the time one doesn’t run into too many examples of one’s own kind in dire need.

        But being able to help someone from “out there” living in misery… and hope of hopes, bring them to the Christ, by way of good deeds and “christian example”, well… that’s REALLY something, in’nt it?

        It’s a nice sentiment so far as it goes, and the naivete’ could be forgiven, were not the consequences so dire.

        They don’t see themselves as hurting their own kind… until of course, it’s too late.

        Like


      • @Sam J.

        ”…their real power comes not from any real loyalty to each other, but from their compulsion to attack any loyalty that is not to them. And that he says is the reason why we cannot ally with them…”

        This is good, but I’d add one slight modification:

        The Jews real power comes not from any real loyalty to each other, but from their compulsion to attack any white christian loyalty that might criticize them.

        Like


      • Cap’n, speaking as an atheist, the problem you observe with most Christians grows from their disbelief. Most of what evil can be found in Christian nations comes from men who purport to be Christian, and aren’t, because if a Christian believes the disposition of his soul is at stake, his every action reflects that belief. Better to be cold (ATHEIST) than luke-warm.

        The good that may be found in non-Christian countries results from non-belief in the local demons.

        Like


      • Most of what evil can be found in Christian nations comes from men who purport to be Christian

        Riiiiiiiiight… all those false Christians pushing filth, distraction, and disruption across the MSM… all those church-goers PAC’ing up DC and corrupting our political system… all those Christ-honoring judges and lawyers pushing their agendas in re innocent Dindus, put-upon homosexuals, long-suffering feminists.

        Sometimes the assholery of you atheists does a better shilling job than the most disingenuous JIDF lackey.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


    • The Big Tell of evil is that, taken to it’s logical conclusion, it even destroys itself, along with whoever or whatever else its target happened to be.

      Satan could have repented just about anywhere along the line, and even he knows it’s his ass in the end… but he’s just gonna keep Sataning.

      Melville hit upon this in his Billy Budd… the antagonist (the ship’s captain?) finally drove the long-suffering humble seaman hero to attack him… said villain merely looked up and smiled the moment before he died, happy in knowing that he’d finally taken down the otherwise innocent young man he so maliciously targeted.

      Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 5:44 am Vagina dominator

      The most amusing part of the Economist cover is that it is, itself, “playing on fear”, thereby ironically spitting a big snorting golly right in your dumb goy face.

      How stupid is the average person, in particular those most average of all, who believe they are superior because they read shit-rags like the Rothschild-owned Jewconomist.

      Cut off all of your paid media. Never give them a cent. Mock them in public at every opportunity.

      Like


      • An excellent point… as usual, the Cathedral shills don’t see the irony in projecting their fear by saying the RealTalkers and true patriots of the West are the fear-mongers.

        Like


      • I liked their page on Facebook just to make fun of how bad their journalism is. I got 100+ likes on many of the comments. Lol

        Like


    • H2, I suspect that this is becasue they play to win. In their minds they must, Must, MUST win; there’s either that or abject failure, with no middle ground whatsoever. And they do not want to fail abjectly. Who would want that, after all?

      They are at war – of their own making. And as they say, in war all is fair.

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:51 am Captain Obvious

        MW nailed it. It’s the difference between the White Race, which embraces [and embodies] Universal Principles, versus the Semitic Races [Eskimo & Sunni], which understand only Tribal Values. And to the Tribalist, there is no Good or Evil: There is only Victory or Defeat.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:59 am Captain Obvious

        FEAR FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME:

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:00 am Captain Obvious

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:15 am Captain Obvious

        The only M.E. entities that I know of, which defended some semblance of Universal Principles: The Shiite Kurds, Shiite Assad of Syria [defender of Aramaic Christianity], the Egyptian Military [defenders of Coptic Christianity], and Saddam Hussein of Iraq [defender of Babylonian Christianity]. But they’re all the “enemies” of the [enemy occupied] “USA”…

        Like


      • I’ll just add that Eskimos passionately espouse Universal Principles but act in the most tribal of manners.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:33 am Captain Obvious

        Also, remember that the Semites [Eskimo & Sunni] are strongly R-SELECTED by nature. And the more sit here thinking about it, the more I’m wondering whether K-Selection is the biological foundation [or the biological reflection, or both a biological foundation & a biological reflection] of a people who are devoted to Universal Principles.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:33 am Mandy been here a while

        Captain

        I still don’t understand why those two represent the ultimate Union of evil. I don’t like them but he has been driven from public office. I must be missing something . Can you elaborate ?

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:38 am Captain Obvious

        I.S., the Eskimos will espouse whichever Narrative they perceive to best serve their interest at that particular point in time. And then they will flip on a dime and suddenly espouse a completely contrary Narrative. And then they’ll simultaneously throw two, three, four, umpteen different Narratives at the Shkotzim [e.g. the ostensibly contradictory but in fact perfectly harmonious philosophies of Karl Marx & Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum], all while moving utterly fluidly & effortlessly amongst the ostensibly differing Narratives.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:43 am Captain Obvious

        MBHAW – the Eskimos are never driven from office [and remember, they’re psychopaths, so they experience no shame]. The State Department’s policies on Syria, Egypt, and Libya – to destroy Assad, Mubarak [with whom they were supposed to have had a PEACE TREATY, called “The Camp David Accords”], and Khadafi, were formulated by the ostensibly warring [but secretly united] Sidney Blumenthal and Bill Kristol, and thrust upon H!tlery Rotten Cl!tless by her trusted aide-de-camp [and dyke lover?], Huma Abedin.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:46 am Captain Obvious

        IN 2011 AND 2012, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON RECEIVED AT LEAST 25 MEMOS ABOUT LIBYA FROM SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/what-sidney-blumenthals-memos-to-hillary-clinton-said-and-how-they-were-handled.html

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:47 am Captain Obvious

        BLUMENTHAL EMAILED HILLARY ABOUT ‘SETTING UP SECRET CHANNELS BETWEEN INSURGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS’ http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3354925/posts

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:48 am Captain Obvious

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:51 am Captain Obvious

        Director Tamir Pardo dispatched Sidney Blumenthal to corrupt the mind of the idiot Shiksa whore, H!tlery, and he dispatched Bill Kristol to corrupt the minds of idiot Shegetz losers like Juan McAmnesty and Miss Lindsey Grahmnesty, and he used Prince Anthony Weiner’s royal Princess wife, Huma Abedin, to see that the plans were correctly implemented. Then they smuggled Khadafi’s weapons out of Bengahzi, up through Sunni Turkey, and down into Shiite Syria, in order to create ISIS for the purpose of butchering Christians and Shia.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:02 am Captain Obvious

        Which gets back to the point that I was making with I.S. – there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between [the ostensibly differing] Sidney Blumenthal and Bill Kristol, just like there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between [the ostensibly differing] Karl Marx and Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum. They’re all motivated by one and only one Tribal Imperative: Destroy the Shkotzim, eradicate the Shkotzim, annihilate the Shkotzim.

        Like


      • C.O. It’s even worse than that. They’ll do it at the same time. Consider that EVERY major Eskimo organisation is Europe actively supports the current immivasion. Yet Israel has probably the most racially-based immigration policy in the world.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:17 am Mandy been here a while

        CO

        I’m It’s so evil.

        if our own people didn’t enable them, they would be nothing. I wonder how Bush, Cheney(spitting image of my own dear father) et al sleep at night

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 12:52 pm Captain Obvious

        “Darth” Cheney immediately came out AGAINST The Donald’s proposal. And you wonder why he and Lynn [man’s name?] have a bulldyke daughter…

        Like


      • CO – it is crazy the Cheney speaks out against Trump’s position on this though. Is there anybody left in the US that trusts this Cheney guy? So it is interesting to note that he helps Trump by publicly taking that opinion – won’t people say, if Cheney is against Trump’s viewpoint, then Trump’s viewpoint has to be right, because Cheney was wrong on pretty much everything!

        Maybe I am mis-reading this though. Outside of the US that is public opinion on Cheney. Does Cheney actually have any traction with anybody in the US?

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 4:06 pm Captain Obvious

        W.M., at the end of the Dubya-43 administration, circa 2007/2008, “Darth” Cheney wanted to unleash Holy He11 on the [Persian/Sassanid] Shia of Iran, not on the [Semitic] Sunnis who had attacked us on 9-11, and who fund CAIR. So apparently “Darth” Cheney engorges himself upon The Poz just like all the rest of the Bohemian Grove traitors.

        Like


      • CO – yeah I would agree that there is something truly rotten there with Cheney and his ilk (not sure how much Bush 2 was actually actively involved, beyond as perhaps as a “pawn” – not sure). I gotta admit I still have a hard time seeing through the muck of this. There is jewish influence – of course – you are right that that is there. But there is lot of murky conflicts and alignments of self-interest among all the parties that are so disposed to play risk-of-world-war-3 games.

        Scary shit. I am very very concerned (and have been since the late ’70’s or early ’80’s). But I still can’t see with any clarity all the players. One of the players is clearly Israel, with respect to the extreme fundamental judaic theological dogma that sits as the hidden bedrock of those at the levers of power with respect to Israeli policy. But there are many other evil players too. Hard to see through it all. At this time, I’m not predisposed to name secularized American jews as one of these virulent elements, but there is still an untold story as to what is going on with this so-called jewish exceptionalism in academia, media, and popular artistic endeavors of the kind that shape public opinion. There is evidence both ways. I do not dismiss out of hand what you say in this respect but I have not yet drawn similar conclusion as you have with respect to secularized American jews (and I have to admit I hope you are wrong about secularized American jews)

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 5:10 pm Captain Obvious

        W.M., both Sidney Blumenthal and Bill Kristol are “secularized American” Eskimos, ostensibly of diametrically opposed “political beliefs”, and yet both of them urged EXACTLY THE SAME COURSE OF ACTION during the “Arab Spring”, when the Mossad & the House of Saud were busy creating ISIS [with the Mossad attempting to eradicate both the Coptic & Aramaic Christians].

        Like


      • CO – OK I will look these two guys up and see if a can follow any threads back to a common motivation. Thanks for the info.

        Like


      • CO, could you please stop posting those two hideous mugs? I don’t feel like seeing the same picture of that dick sharing moron and his towel head on every post.

        And you’re right that there’s little difference between Ayn Rand and Marxism. They’re both movements that allegedly want to liberate the individual from any external constraints. What’s amusing is that the philosophical core isn’t alien to any enlightenment movement, but both objectivism and Marxism have a typical Jewish fanaticism to them. What’s comical about Rand is that for someone worshipping logic she was dreadful at applying it. Objectivism is more like fallacism.

        Like


    • I subscribed to The Economist for nearly 30 years continuously. Cancelled the subscription six months ago. I’m glad to see that decision was confirmed.

      Like


    • Let’s not be so hasty to judge… look muslim women are even voting now…

      LOL. would love to see feminist SJW spend one week in SA or Yemen…

      Like


      • A new definition for secret balloting…

        Like


      • The dirty secret about Islam is that it’s a religion for ugly women that reduces SMV for attractive women, encourages hypergamy, and coddles women who are already rich at the expense of the poor. It also encourages closeted homosexuality while retaining the option for public execution of select homosexuals; the pinnacle of hypocrisy.

        It’s ideal for rich old feminist hags.

        CH: You really need to publicize how Islam is an effeminate religion for the pussy-whipped.

        Like


      • CH: You really need to publicize how Islam is an effeminate religion for the pussy-whipped.

        Interesting, but PUA-centric, points…

        It’s awfully hard to sell “effeminate” and “pussy-whipped” when men are willing to take to the streets, and fight and die if necessary, to guard the honor of their chosen god and/or propagate their folk and ways.

        Were that we Christians remembered some of that erstwhile wisdom.

        Like


    • Unfortunately, I think it would take gangs of immigrant Muslims lynching gay people in the streets for some of these liberals to understand that yes, they really do mean it.

      Or, it’s easy to ignore the medievalism of the Muslim world while it remains in the Muslim world.

      Like


  2. The only good muzz is a dead ‘un.
    Yeah, ho i said it .Tell me i’m wrong you ass in the air hajji bitch.

    Liked by 1 person


  3. on December 11, 2015 at 9:20 pm Wrong Side of History

    I wish Trump was a fascist.

    Like


  4. They’re making a final stand on fucking ISLAM, the one religion that goes against basically EVERYTHING the modern Left says society needs more of. Almost everything they’ve ever complained about in Christianity like patriarchy and controlling women and hating gays and being anti-science is worse in Islam.

    The shitlibs claim that all those beliefs were imparted by western colonizers. Not that it matters one fucking bit, though. If you’re bitten by a venomous snake, it doesn’t make a damn bit of difference why the snake did it; you’re royally fucked anyway. The fact is that that those beliefs exist in Islam and Muslims will bring them with them when they immigrate here.

    Shitlibs are fucking insane.

    Like


  5. My observation of higher-grade shitlibs of personal acquaintance: pro-Bernie posturing, sincere pro-Cuckservative clinging.

    They are scared. But their ego won’t let them think straight, so they cleave to GOPe as though to mature adults who can fix this mess. As one misguided lib said to me: “Jeb is just waiting things out until the crazies [Trump and Carson] self-implode.”

    Like


    • on December 11, 2015 at 9:43 pm Captain Obvious

      PA, are they completely incapable of noticing THE PATTERN?!? How can any White person watch J00stream television or J00lyweird movies or take classes at a J00niversity, and not notice THE PATTERN?!?

      Like


      • I can see quite clearly the fact that Liberal and Marxist Jews have massive influence, but what I cannot figure out for the life of me is how Israel could be in support of Islam taking over the so-called Western world. How is it in Israel’s interests to empower Muslims and undermine Christendom at this point? I mean, it ain’t AD 1492 anymore, is it? I know from history that the Jews and the Moslems were in cahoots against Christianity hundreds of years ago for complicated geopolitical reasons, but, do the stupid effing Joos still see things the same way as in the days of Torquemada? If they do, they are pretty effing stupid, as far as I’m concerned.

        Like


      • Always remember that the Big Tell of evil is that it eventually devours itself, given the logical conclusions of its actions.

        Ye are of your father, the Devil… and the lusts of your father you will do, spoke Christ to the Sanhedrin… the “Big Jews” of His day.

        Deep, deep down… like their father… the hate is so fierce, the self-pride so monstrous, that it doesn’t matter if they perish, so long as they take down the hated Christians and all things Western with them.

        It’s the only way to explain it, because as you and many others here have noticed on occasion, it makes no sense otherwise.

        Like


    • CO, as CH notes, the human ego is the strongest force in the universe. I had conversations with libs I had reasons to give a fuck (not my immediate family) when I thought we’re seeing eye to eye… not per my point of view but per impersonal reality, but the next day I see him/her revert to shitlibbism. A shutlib, like a gamma male, must be broken before opening him/herself to the counsel of reality. But I am not n the business of breaking people. I only answer their questions when they ask.

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:11 am Captain Obvious

        > “the human ego” ——— Maybe that’s what distinguishes us in the Manosphere & the Dark Enlightenment : Know thyself, own thyself, and ZFG?

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:13 am Captain Obvious

        Of course, the Eskimo Industrial Complex has spent the last century working 24×7 to eradicate Stoicism and replace it with Hedonism and Narcissism and Cluster B Insanity and outright Psychopathy.

        Like


    • Fantastic vid in the It’s Happening link:

      The women are getting scared… the women are getting scared… they will flee to protection. TRUMP will get a large number of democrat women voters..

      Notice in this video Minka poses the kind of question only a woman can, paraphrase as “It happened [visa infiltration], how can you be sure it won’t happen again”

      Like


      • I came here to post this video. I would love to see CH do a full breakdown/analysis of this.

        Like


      • Yup.

        And guess what all those “smart guys” had…nothing.

        None of them has anything.

        The emperor has no clothes. The PAC chick I banged, I told her, look around you, and wake the fk up. People in this country are arming for civil war. This can’t be stopped. You GOPers want to try to preserve the status quo, it cannot be done. The other side (she admits) *cannot* be reasoned with. I work amongst hardcore libtards, and they CANNOT be convinced of anything.

        Violence is the only ultimate arbiter of “truth.” For women, this is as natural as breathing. It is for men too, we’ve just largely forgotten it. Muslims are a timely reminder.

        Mika is simply having her hamster try to articulate what she’s feeling and this emerging realization that people have that their legs have been pissed on and it’s not really raining. The cognitive dissonance she’s under to risk offending the groupthink and the herd hivemind versus the truth trying to come out of her mouth.

        It turns out that all of the stuff she’s been fed for decades is a lie. The PAC chick got it, but she reverted the same as the libs do. A GOPer is a little more willing to see but they always have to have the security blanket of “the process” and the “system.” They don’t want it to end and they’re scared of what’s coming. But they know.

        People are waking up…you cannot have this many guns and this much ammo selling like this without something coming. I don’t know what they’ll wake up to, but if the GOP or the dems believe they can stop “trump”…lol.

        Trump isn’t Trump. He’s Ron Paul too. The truth is trying to come out like a rat gnawing its way out of a snake that tried to eat it, gnawing its way to the light.

        Like


      • When she says (paraphrasing) “Children are scared”, her voice cracks a little and she seems womanly and sincere to me for the first time ever.
        And then she says, in a tone that is both alarmed and commanding, “Most of us think it will happen again” – cut to all the smug nerds around her looking sheepish with nothing to say. It’s beautiful and hilarious, a rare moment of truth on network TV.

        Like


      • “Trump isn’t Trump. He’s Ron Paul too.”

        Yes.

        Given the existing toxic cultural milieu, I supported Paul, his apparent racial naivete notwithstanding, because I believed nearly everything he advocated would have benefited WNs and disabled the primary instruments of Jwsh pathology and tyranny, such as ending the Fed, supporting the right of free association and, by corollary, the right of disassociation including secession; right of ranchers and farmers abutting the southern border to use lethal force to defend families and private property; cessation of all foreign aid to the ME, including Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia; cessation of endless military interventions in other nations’ internal affairs; bringing the troops home, putting them along the border, and otherwise focusing their capabilities on legitimate self-defense; phased elimination of all welfare programs ( a primary immigrant magnet paid for by working White men), freedom to educate one’s children as one deems best; radical reductions in the federal bureaucracy; and, perhaps most importantly, unfettered RKBA to include elimination of the despicable DEA and BATF.

        It was and remains my conviction that White Men – and only White Men – are able to survive, innovate, and prosper without big government.

        Like Trump’s, Paul’s supporters were obstinately loyal. He was attracting significant converts from the anti-war extreme far left as well, and would have been the GOP’s best shot at defeating BO, IMO.

        Witnessing what his own party did to slander, sabotage, and backstab him and learning of the deep and sinister pervasiveness of Jwsh influence in both parties, owing to their ability to conjure as much illusory money as they please and to channel it to their allies and accomplices, was my first dose of the red pill.

        Though I vowed never again to participate in sham elections, I will re-register this time around in order to cast my Trump vote, even if it is only for the pleasure of my controlled folly.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:33 pm Vagina dominator

        @Trav

        As you imply, the only reasonable political philosophy is one that recognizes that our first duty is to defend ourselves. Without that, there is nothing else.

        And as no lone individual can very long defend himself, he must join a group. But what kind of group can he join? Well, to be attractive to the individual It must be one where there is reciprocation of duties and no free-riding, i.e., where an attack on one is an attack on all.

        But what kind of group reliably offers us that kind of solidarity? Only one, our racial group.

        That is why the only rational politics are racial. You can be the brother of your own race or the slave of another. There are no other choices.

        Like


      • @Emil Claus – Your comments about Ron Paul. That is very interesting (I didn’t have the time to take much of an interest in US politics in 2008 and 2012 so I didn’t make it my business to know this stuff about Ron Paul). I think what you described as his his foreign policy is a wise stance (I am hoping Trump’s bombast doesn’t extend into being too involved in other sovereign nations business, military-wise, unnecessarily).

        Apparently Ron Paul currently thinks Trump is very bad for the GOP, and that Trump will cleave the party in two if he wins the nomination, and therefore would lose the election too. He thinks the GOP establishment would even throw support behind a 3rd party candidate in the eventuality Trump wins the GOP nomination. That is some crazy stuff to say. I am having a hard time seeing that (but I’m in Canada so don’t know all the details re GOP supporters).

        http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/262839-ron-paul-trump-could-leave-gop-severed

        Like


      • Ron Paul needs to slink away and enjoy retirement. I supported him in ’08 and ’12, and was always encouraged by his “racist newsletters” that he “disavowed” wink wink. Plus he was the good sort of libertarian, the kind that sees borders as national security, not just a labor spigot. He hated amnesty and voted for the border fence. So I thought he had a good sense about race. And they claimed he was anti-semitic, too, always a bonus.

        But this downtalk about Trump shows his priorities were all wrong. Liberty uber alles. Come on, man. Though watching Rand get sonned by Trump at the debates might not have helped.

        Plus the fact that he would give even half a shit about the same GOP that fucked him in the ass every chance it got is hilarious. Blowing up the GOP is a benefit, Ron, not a cost.

        Still, I really want to keep liking him which is why I hope he just shuts the fuck up and rides into the sunset.

        Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 10:50 am Captain Obvious

        > “You can be the brother of your own race or the slave of another” ——— VagDom, that gets back to our suicidal altruism. We are the lone K-Selected people of Universal Principles, and we stupidly and suicidally assumed that all other races would likewise be K-Selected people of Universal Principles, rather than vicious R-Selected tribalistic polygamists who want nothing more than to slit our throats and eradicate us.

        Like


      • Wild Man, if what Paul said is true, then he’s a moron of epic proportions. Does he think the GOP would have went along with his nomination then? Or if it’s him, cleaving the party in two is ok? And at this point, nobody cares what the GOP establishment wants because any of the other candidates will be gored by the Democrat due to how little appeal they have to white voters(Romney lost because whites stayed home). Also, doesn’t Paul have a problem with the GOP’s establishment using the party as a political access trading racket? It’s sad because I really liked him in 2008, but I guess he went senile since.

        Like


      • Trump or revolution. Don’t be surprised if the absence of the former generates the latter.

        Like


    • PS: I created a simple pro-Trump graphic, which I just posted on my site. May it be of use to the Identitarian Right.

      Earlier, I also posted an image I created that mocks John Lennon’s “Imagine” and one that mocks the r-selected rabbit response to the Paris Atrocity.

      Like


      • Get on Twitter. It’s a slugfest 🙂 There are so many patriots duking it out, you’ll be inspired. We will look back at this election as a turning point in history, I am certain.

        Join the fray, boys! Young and old, you are needed! Consider this your draft notice and man your posts!

        #PositivePatriarchy #Trump2016 #MakeAmericaStraightAgain

        Like


    • even party loyalists don’t like Yeb. Read my field report above. This from a PAC person, who is die fucking hard GOP to the core. Odd to find a girl in DC like that but here she was.

      I began to lose it when she countered the atrocities we are committing by arming and training ISIS with “but removal of Assad is the policy goal of the USA.” I said, “well then we are evil. We aren’t the good guys. I hope Russia destroys us.”

      Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 10:46 am Captain Obvious

        t777, keep working on her. With an Alpha like you as her guide, there may be hope for her. PS: Tell her to keep her silent about all of this. Tell her you need her to be your eyes and your ears on the inside. Frame it thusly: You’re James Bond the stone cold killer, and she’s the sexy Bond Girl who works inside the villain’s lair, and the Bond Girl has to keep her [email protected] mouth shut about her lover.

        Like


  6. I wonder what Nick Berg would say about all this. Would he embrace Islam if his head was still attached?

    Like


    • Going to go to Iraq. Make some contract money. Make a name for myself. But fucking Islam just cant stop chopping heads. Lets import them here!

      Like


    • was he one of those “I don’t agree with what you say but I will give my life for the right for you to say it” guys?

      Like


  7. ROFL TEETS IS JUST FULL ON BITTER IMPOTENT OLD MAN WHO WATCHES FOX NEWS ALL DAY BRUH U AINT GOTTEN PUSSY SINCE THE W ADMIN I WAGER LOL

    Like


  8. on December 11, 2015 at 9:42 pm Mr Bigglesworth

    All Trump had to do, was say: “We need to massively reduce immigration into the United States from the 3rd world and Islamic territories in particular”.

    It would have virtually won the election. He’d be hugely popular amongst sane Americans, with a natural self preservation instinct, and the shitlibs would be spluttering out their usual hissy fit mock outrage and bullshit platitudes – further alienating themselves from the mood of the general public. After all, he merely wants to *reduce* immigration, surely that’s just common sense?

    Unfortunately, Trump went too far with the language. Saying that ALL Muslims should be barred, has turned him into exactly the Evil White Pariah that leftoids have been craving since Bush left office. He’s officially a fascist, a Nazi, the anti Christ incarnate, and it’s going to be flat out, pedal-to-the-metal open season on his character from this point onwards. The vitriol isn’t even out of first gear.

    In a more balanced universe, where the Left and Right’s propaganda are more evenly matched, Trump survives – even thrives – from the Muslim Scandal.

    But in this world, the airwaves are so comprehensively, overwhelmingly saturated with leftoid unreality, Trump is going to become the bogeyman who’s name must be whispered in hushed tones, to avoid upsetting the children.

    Like


    • “He’s officially a fascist, a Nazi, the anti Christ incarnate,” from you lips to Lucifer’s ears my friend… Let us hope

      Like


    • Agreed.

      That fits neatly with my theory below.

      Like


    • ALL muzzies turds should be be flushed , you fag. Fuck you leftards, Push has come to shove, And you turds are going to be flushed, Mark my words, Dr. Evils pussy.

      Like


      • on December 11, 2015 at 10:23 pm gunslingergregi

        naaa trump doing it right though
        should have own spaces
        whats the prob with that
        two totally diferent groups of people it is a diservice to put them together to have you and him fight like someone playin a game to watch the show
        or is it a test someone took a dollar bet we could live together
        which most prob can and be happy just gonna have to let people be themselves but can’t have that if everyone in an area needs diferent things

        Like


      • on December 11, 2015 at 10:32 pm gunslingergregi

        people seem to be doing it though my fam seems to get along with everyone
        course my uncle used to go out into the wilderness of alaska without a gun
        till his command made him carry one to defend against grizzlies and shit
        he didn’t actually give a shit though
        i used to run the mountains with bears in them never gave a shit either
        look at diamond hill on internet its insane covered with rocks used to run down the hill full speed
        never tripped
        wed roll out there as a family it was a thing to do
        no fear of anything
        had to get taught some kind of almost fear
        allthough yea all white area i suppose rofl
        then did move to diversity and everyone was afraid of shit
        i remember clearly it was so strange to see people afraid of shit
        so foreign to me
        people scared of dogs or whatever
        maybe made your point in a way he he he

        Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 1:49 am Bro Brosterson

      Wrong. He *did* soften his rhetoric right in the initial statement by saying it’ll be a *temporary* ban “until we figure out what’s going on.” That is plenty soft and “nuanced” for soccer moms and mainstreamers all across the US of A.

      Like


    • Bigglesworth, you’re an ass, with your Cathedralese “He’d be hugely popular amongst sane Americans” folderol.

      His numbers in the polls have never been higher and keep rising… the only “sane Americans” who are squealing like stuck pigs are the Cathedral stooges, the cuckistanis, and the usual suspects.

      So… which of the latter group are YOU?

      You fairy.

      Like


      • Meh.
        To the left, ANY Republican/conservative/anyone who isn’t them who comes close to the White House is always a fascist, illegitimate, a Nazi, a dictator, Satan, etc. etc. etc.
        Same with Bush Jr., same with Reagan, don’t know how far back it goes.
        From what I’ve read, they were calling each other all sorts of vicious names back in 1776.

        Like


      • “My good sir, in the years to come, Germany will be unified into one nation, a kingdom ruled by Prussians. In this kingdom will after some time arise a nationalist worker’s leader who will overthrow the old corrupt government and make war on the French, the Englishmen, the Russians and the Jews all over Europe. And I’m afraid you, sir, you are very much like that man! John Brown’s body forever! I’m out.”

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:36 pm gunslingergregi

        In The Truth about the Tribes Chesterton blasted German race theories writing “the essence of Nazi Nationalism is to preserve the purity of a race in a continent where all races are impure””””””’

        quite true
        ever notice what might be the problem is noone but jews has a homeland
        or who else does

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:47 pm gunslingergregi

        why are so many talking about problems with jews
        i was in nyc and met some seemed fine
        but yea seems like they need some sort of let the poison out or something
        what really up let it out
        course then ya get shit on lol
        cause world don’t work like that or some shit
        i’d be jealous of em that i don’t have a powerfull crew to back up my life
        and jealousy is a pretty strong emotion maybe try actually being more equal in your own dealings
        or just say yea shit we worked for the shit we earned it with blood sweat and tears or what not
        but don’t make it to the detriment of others somehow

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:49 pm gunslingergregi

        seems magical to be able to create money out of air
        which is not maybe a bad thing in a way if ya can declare bankrupsy and start over
        it does create real things i suppose
        i think explaining things to the populace and reasones maybe in ways they can understand might help or am i naive in thinking being reasonable might work

        Like


    • ” turned him into exactly the Evil White Pariah that leftoids have been craving”

      But he’s already that!

      Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 1:57 pm Diversity Is Good

      Mister Bigglescuck:
      All Trump had to do, was say: “We need to massively reduce immigration into the United States from the 3rd world and Islamic territories in particular”.

      Fortunately he’s smarter than you are. Now run along to your Bernie Sanders rally, there’s a good cuck.

      Like


  9. I don’t think The Trump actually wants to be president, really. I think he’s saying more and more “outlandish” things in an attempt to end his chances, while still looking strong. Of course, by “outlandish” I mean he shrewdly realises how the simpering hivemind will inevitably react to his words and ideas and the way he articulates them, rather than the words and ideas being inherently whacky or wrong. I think he’s looking for a way out and will continue to do so. Just a hunch.

    Like


    • http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_republican_presidential_primary-3350.html

      Curious strategy for a guy who doesn’t want it no? Leading his rivals from the get go, now by 2x and growing??? Yeah seems like a good time to back out… LOL

      Like


    • on December 11, 2015 at 10:05 pm Mr Bigglesworth

      @ Brad

      Perhaps Trump is a glorified troll, or perhaps he’s the real deal, genuinly trying to save the US.

      Either way, he is handing Leftoids a series of propaganda coups, that they’ll eagerly milk with maximum moral indignation to their full advantage.

      Like


      • he is handing Leftoids a series of propaganda coups

        Shill: 90% probability
        Sincere idiot: 10% probability

        Like


      • He’s handing the MSM and Cathedral lackeys more and more rope by which they will hang themselves…

        … it’s about time someone stepped up and showed John Q. Public how overtly the MSM follows their own agenda, rather than the true will of the people.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 1:59 pm Diversity Is Good

        Bigglescuck – troll, shill or National Review cuckservative?

        Which one? And who cares?

        Like


    • I think Trump wants to be bigger and bigger in the world. That hunger and ‘aloof mastery’ with art of the deal is better than even Hillary if the counting is almost fair. We wins whether he gets elected or not, and he is doing everything right to get elected. It’s not what you think, it’s what you and everyone feels: feeeelzzzzzz rule! This country is clinical and the only outlandishness is denial of the Narrative.

      Like


    • Why the fuck would this guy spend all this time and money campaigning in little towns all over America, out himself as public enemy #1 shitlord which will damage his business interests, future media and international real estate deals, (backlash already seen), just to look for a way out?

      He wants to be president, people. He wants to Make America Great Again. Why is that really so god damn hard to believe?

      Like


      • Exactly. Any non-cucked man can see what’s happening to this country. The Donald said “fuck it”, I should probably do the right thing. He’s a hero.

        Like


      • I seem to recall something about men pledging their resources, their lives… indeed, most important of all, their “sacred honor”… some time ago.

        Say what you will about Trump… it’s HIS ass he’s putting on the line… something we Americans haven’t really witnesses by our elites in quite some time.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 2:09 pm gunslingergregi

        yea think i needed to heal some first before i could be useful

        Like


      • @shartiste; @danindc @ Greg Eliot – 100% right in my view. This guy is heroic. It is just so obvious that Trump scores very high in narcissistic traits, but is not at all psychopathic, or sadistic. To be as narcissistic as he clearly is, but then to be committed to doing what he is now doing, he must have other redeeming traits in spades. I think people are slowly becoming aware of this and are liking him more as time goes on (you know, his charisma is growing which is unusual for the narcissistic-type to pull-off – so there is alot more there than that I think).

        Maybe at this juncture we need someone with Trump’s particular traits, to have the necessary bombast to do what he is doing (moving the national discourse away for PC-speak towards something more rational).

        As time goes on I would like to know more about his views on international affairs though.

        Like


      • Trumps our prize fighter..and were in round 4 or 5. Still a long way to go.

        “Heidi Klum..no longer a 10”
        “Would you want to look at a face like that as POTUS (Fiorini)”
        “…and some i assume are good people..”
        And more, and the list continues but..
        come voting day, hopefully the United States of Amnesia will just basically remember one thing: Trump. Alpha leader.

        Like


      • Lol, none of this damages any of his business interests, unless they’re in Muslim land. If you think people with decision power give a shit about any of this, you’re silly. The only people who take this shit seriously are the leftist plebs. How do you think CEOs can explain to the board that they turned Trump down because of personal dislike? That’s not only idiotic, it’s also most likely illegal. The only petty people he has to deal with are bureaucrats.

        Like


  10. So people like Dick Cheney and Paul Ryan were strong supporters of the Iraq War; a war that led to the deaths of hundred of thousands of people; millions of refugees; the destruction of ancient Christian communities that have been in existence since before the nations of Europe; expanded and exported the Iranian Revolution into Iraq and bankrupted or nation. So this is who we are as a party.

    The great cult of diversity is reacting to their power being threatened, they obviously have no moral scruples.

    Like


    • @tanabear – do you mean the republican party has no moral scruples, because of a history of blundering on the international-conflict- scene? Not sure what you mean?

      Like


  11. Where is the Faggot Within with his soros-approved commentary on this matter? I suppose the 6’2″ Nordic god is too busy with his 5-strong HB9 harem tonight.

    Either that or he got a mad sweet bootleg of the Star Wars movie and is furiously masturbating to his latest sex icon, Dindu the Black Jedi.

    You decide which is more likely to be true. 😀

    Faggot Within rape!

    Like


    • His five strong “harem is its fingers. Like Buggersworth, the best part of them dripped down they momma’s leg.

      Like


      • Actually, his daddy’s wad shot past momma’s face and landed in some of her nearby flower pots… so they wound up raising a blooming idiot.

        Like


      • Greg Elliot you made me laugh. Kudos.

        Like


      • Always gratifying to know that (yet another) jest hasn’t fallen flat. 😉

        Like


      • Greg, that jest was directed a lot better than his father’s wad. Splattered ma keyboard.

        Like


      • @Greg Eliot
        The jest didn’t fall flat because you went lowest common denominator. I’ll bet you feel a bit dirty, even. Hah. Cheers. (this post was rewritten because of an entry error)

        Like


      • The jest didn’t fall flat because you went lowest common denominator.

        Alas, too true… but I… yes, even I, Greg Eliot… occasionally have to deal in coin of the realm.

        Muh Strapon.
        lzozlzolzolzolzolzolozlozlozl

        Like


    • Does anyone masturbate any other way than ‘furiously’? Inquiring minds want to know….

      Like


      • I masturbate leisurely.

        Especially after the body is cooling.

        Masturbation rape!

        Like


      • “Where is the Faggot Within…?”

        Well, the weather outside is frightful,
        But TSW’s new nordic top bf is so delightful,
        Here comes another load in his rear dont-cha-know,
        So let it snow, let it snow, let it snow..

        Like


    • WF/CH, quick question…

      Is jewelry a masculine accessory?

      http://www.break.com/video/ugc/tosh-0-counting-money-1849260

      [CH: male jewelry is peacocking. it’s masculinity depends on form and function. you can use jewelry to instigate shit tests from women, which will open conversational paths.]

      Like


  12. That Economist cover is inspiring. Trump, Le Pen, Orban. The triumvirate that is poised to save Europe and America. May God bless them.

    Like


  13. on December 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm Mr Bigglesworth

    Marie Le Pen is currently facing a criminal trial. Her alleged crime? She publicly compared Muslims in France with an “occupation force” (a reference to the German occupation in WW2). For this statement, she has been arrested and charged. If found guilty she faces up to a year in prison. France has gone batshit insane.

    Like


    • You lying fuck.

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:21 am Lost in Moderation

        While Bigglesworth is a troll, this statement is likely true. The great Oriana Fallaci was facing similar charges in Switzerland (yeah, that place everyone loves) for having written that Mu slims breed like rats in “The Rage and the Fury.” She died before it came to that, but these absurd abuses of power exist in Europe (think what happens to those who raise academic questions concerning the holo caust), and Le Pen would certainly be a juicy target for harassment under these charges.

        Like


      • No, in this instance what he says is true. She has been prosecuted and could in theory end up in the slammer.

        Like


    • I have high hopes for Mesdames Le Pen (Marine & Marion), they might just be able to yank France back from the abyss, provided they have super-extra-good personal protection. If not, Elena Chudinova’s ‘The Mosque of Notre Dame’ – a much better and possibly more realistic book than ‘Submission’ – may come true.
      If you guys have any friends, relatives, acquaintances in Europe, you need to help wake them up, because an America that stands completely alone in a world dominated by Greater Mecca, Greater Moscow and China is not a pretty picture.

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 11:28 am Lost in Moderation

        If “The Mosque of Notre Dame” is the one that was originally serialized online, I read it back in 2005 or so. Brutally dark. Steyn’s “America Alone” contended about the same time that Europe was already lost due to demographics alone–street wars being fought by young men, and there were no young men left in Europe or being born. America wasn’t far behind, demographically, as the “white” numbers were artificially inflated by including Latin Americans in them. Non-latino whites in America reproduce at a rate very similar to European whites, which is on pace to result in the disappearance of the Europeans in only a few more generations, if that.

        White bunz in white ovens. It’s for real.

        Like


  14. Trump should go for the coup de grace. A complete reversal to 1960 level racial demographics. Complete blockade on all non white immigration. Allow only Europeans to immigrate to the US until whites become a supermajority into perpetuity.

    Like


    • on December 11, 2015 at 11:49 pm Mr Bigglesworth

      “Trump should go for the coup de grace. A complete reversal to 1960 level racial demographics. Complete blockade on all non white immigration”.

      Since we’re severing all contact with reality, why doesn’t Trump simply get inside the DeLorean, floor the accelerator to 88mph, and travel back to 1985 – thus enabling him to prevent the last 30 years of mass immigration?

      Sounds about as likely as your plan.

      Like


      • you need to learn how to calibrate if you mean to shill here, son

        Like


      • He’s right, though. It’s one thing to put an end to immigration for a while (desirable and doable) – it’d be something else to come out with specific retro-demographics as a policy: again, not because it wouldn’t be desirable, but because it isn’t great realpolitik. Goals can be met in smart, achievable ways, rather than flailing around with superficially grandiose announcements that may inadvertently help the enemy.

        Like


      • “Brad” is a sockpuppet.

        Like


      • Well, there are a lot of allegedly sincere men of good will who still think White Man’s reason, logic, and temperance still hold sway in re socio-political matters.

        It’s rather poignant, in it’s own way… sort of like keeping the brass polished on the Titanic.

        Wake up, ye of (alleged) good will… the Marquis of Queensberry has left the building. Take off those 16 oz. gloves, it’s bare knuckles from now on.

        Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 10:57 am Mandy been here a while

      Do it softly with babies.

      It’s really easy. I have 8 and We aren’t rich. There is no reason to have less than three

      Like


  15. Drudge is freaking hilarious with that “love” close-up pic of Hilderbeast. It’s down already, unfortunately, but I’m sure it did irreversible damage. lmfao

    Related: Loring Wirbel. queue “him” up for the next round of punchable shitlib

    Like


  16. “Related: IT’S HAPPENING.”

    Frum’s always been pretty outspoken about this stuff. He is after all a long-time personal friend of Peter Brimelow.

    Paleocons and alt-rightists have a hard time squaring that with his neoconservatism, so they keep on forgetting, only to be surprised whenever he publishes a new immigration restrictionist article.

    Like


  17. on December 12, 2015 at 1:42 am Diveersity Heretic

    The editor-in-chief of The Economist is a woman named Zanny. Do you really need to know more?

    Like


    • more like “The Communist”.

      shit magazine.

      Like


    • Just in case someone wanted to know more:

      Beddoes was educated at Moreton Hall School near Oswestry, received an undergraduate degree at Oxford University, where she studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at St Hilda’s College, and earned a master’s degree at Harvard University, as a Kennedy Scholar.[1] After graduation, she was recruited as an adviser to the Minister of Finance in Poland, as part of a small group headed by Professor Jeffrey Sachs of Harvard.

      Always take a peek behind the curtain, boys. 😉

      Like


  18. on December 12, 2015 at 3:46 am Mr Bigglesworth

    Temporary or permanent, it’s placing an immigration ban on a population of over 1 billion people, based exclusively on their religion. Unconstitutional, much?

    It’s embarassingly obvious, to anyone who hasn’t lost radio contact with reality, that it’s completely and utterly unworkable on every front. From passing the domestic legislation, to enforcing the rules on the ground, to maintaining credibility on the international stage, this plan doesn’t even make it to the emergency room. It’s simply DOA.

    There are many terms you can use to describe Trump’s proposal. “Nuanced” isn’t one of them”.

    Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 3:49 am Mr Bigglesworth

      * @ Bro Brosterson *

      Like


    • Lighten up, Eeyore… you’re starting to sound like Strapon’s aide de camp.

      Like


    • Unconstitutional, much?

      That comma makes it even more gay.

      Read the preamble to the Constitution, imbecile.

      Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 6:07 am Diveersity Heretic

      The U.S. Constitution has no applicability outside the United States. A ban on Muslim immigration probably would violate several international or possibly bi-lateral conventions to which the U.S. is a party–that’s a feature, not a bug.

      Like


    • Funny how that piece of paper only gets mentioned and regains its former stature when it can be used against the values of the Founding Fathers… and today’s “middle ‘Murricans”.

      Like


    • Temporary or permanent, it’s placing an immigration ban on a population of over 1 billion people, based exclusively on their religion.
      Unconstitutional, much?

      As far as the law goes, the Constitution applies to citizens, not to the world.

      How many fails you got today? The time machine joke was not the stupidest thing ever.

      Like


    • muh Emma Lazarus

      Like


    • Biggles… you should read up on the basics of US immigration law… you will come to find out for all of our history (until 1965) various races and classes and ethnicities of people have been denied entry, quite explicitly… time and time again as needed.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_immigration_laws

      The best named law IMO was the Chinese Exclusion Act. No mincing any words here…

      So stop being such a faggot troll…

      Like


      • and you dumb fuck… these laws have been found to be legitimate and constitutional with several supreme court decisions rendered.

        Like


    • @pigglesturd: Fool, current law requires that polygamists be excluded. Current law allows a president to do what Trump called for. Unconstitutional? Idiot shill.

      Like


    • lol. you are an idiot.

      Um, no, it is not unconstitutional. At all. Unless Justice Kennedy and Justice Roberts find more penumbras to justify their selling out.

      The courts have long found that 1) the Constitution only applies within U.S. borders; and 2) immigration is an issue to which courts will assiduously defer to the other branches, for it is an international policy concern, not rights.

      Immigration banning anyone by race, religion, or ANY other reason is legal in the U.S., because it stops people from ENTERING u.s territory. Since courts only have power over U.S. territory, there is no court with which an immigrant already outside the U.s. could argue his case, as he is not a citizen petitioning the U.S. government (constitutional rights to petition from abroad are only granted to U.S. citizens), nor is he on U.S. soil. And yes, TSA border checkpoints are not considered U.S. territory—this is why they can strip search even U.S. citizens there.

      What is more, deportation is NOT a criminal matter; it is an administrative/civil matter. So you don’t get a myriad of criminal protections if you get in illegally against this policy. In fact, they can try you anywhere for your deportation hearing, and an illegal doesn’t even have the right for his lawyer to be in the courtroom (they do it by remote video feed in many cases)—meaning (hopefully) Trump and co. would pick up suspected illegals, fly them to a foreign us. military base (such as Honduras and Gitmo), try them quickly there—thus avoiding protests shutting down the proceedings, large sympathetic stories, and attempted breakouts—-and send them home.

      It would be massively quick if well done.

      Idiot lefty rape!

      Like


    • Lol, someone please copy paste that comment with all the precedents for him. Just for extra lulz the law should mandate a couple hundred hours of community service on pig farms for violators.

      Like


  19. The Economist is an absolute fucking disgrace (particularly the online version). I remember when I had a hard copy subscription – the difference now is night and day. Every second article panders to leftist-feminist ideology, usually with the triteness of what qualifies as ‘news’ in these social media focused times.

    Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 6:26 am Mr Bigglesworth

      @ Greg Eliot

      If you truly believe there is a realistic prospect of banning a billion people from the United States based on their religion… if your intellect has, in all sincerity, concluded that such a policy is practical, enforcable and remotely likely to occur in the *real world*… then you have my sympathies.

      Like


      • What are you on about?

        I’ve made no reference as to the “possibility” of anything in these here You-nighted States… I’m merely enjoying this Trump fellow being the only one who seems to notice the emperor is walking around bare-assed.

        As far as what is and isn’t possible, I’m betting you would have said, in the summer of 1988, that the idea of the Iron Curtain falling without a shot being fired was likewise a meat world severe unlikelihood, and any believers therein would also be the beneficiaries of your dubious sympathies.

        Like


      • If you truly believe there is a realistic prospect of banning a billion people from the United States based on their religion…

        Actually, we don’t like their race neither.

        All seriousness aside:

        A billion people want to come?

        Well, then… we’d damn well BETTER ban them from heading this way.

        /Opponent hyperbole rape!

        Like


      • For thousands of years nations have kept foreigners from entering their land.

        Why has it suddenly become an obligation for Western nations to let in every one that shows up at the border?

        And why Western/ white nations only must do that?

        I don’t see Muslim nations bending over backward to welcome and accommodate hundreds of millions of Christians.

        Answer that Mr Bigglesworth.

        Like


      • @Mr Bigglesworth – I would argue that if the issue is looked at by way of properly defining the basis of western values in a way the populace can embrace (as outlined in my long comment below), then there are all kinds of ways to modify interpretation of, and change of, current legislation, in the eventuality that Trump wins the general election.

        Like


      • Actually, it would be easier than you think to screen incoming Muzzies. All you would need to do at checkpoints is put up a sign saying “All entrants must eat some bacon before entering the US.” The members of this cult wouldn’t dare eat it in fear off offending Allah.

        Like


    • Add Foreign Affairs to that list. Any suggestions, besides the obvious ‘read books instead,’ on where to get some quality int’l “news”?

      Like


      • It’s extremely difficult. All the ‘slightly alternative’ such as RT, Press TV and Al Jazeera, while providing a different slant to the whores in the Western MSM nonetheless adhere strictly to the diversity is good/White men bad/Islam religion of peace/White privelege memes.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:48 pm Vagina dominator

        There is no “quality news” available anywhere. All of it is some kind of lie and distortion for one purpose or another – basically to manipulate us. We must accept this as normal. After all, one of the prime evolutionary purposes of language is to enable us to profit by deceit.

        What you require is not more “information” but a solid philosophy and understanding of history and the human and natural world that you can use to assess it.

        For example, whether you are blue pill or red pill makes a very large difference in how you assess the “information” that is offered you are male-female social dynamics, right? You need the same kind of red pill view of any other type of political-economic-social information that is used to manipulate us.

        As to recommending RT, that’s a joke. It is 24/7/365 anti-white and anti-male poz, from top to bottom jews, wogs and security services spooks. Same for al-jezeera. And of course BBC, ABC, whatever.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:49 pm Vagina dominator

        offered you are = offered you about

        Like


      • What I did was learn the bias of each publication and then tune their bullshit out. The problem with the Economist is that it’s 95% bullshit. It depends on the kind of news you read too, but generally you can tell who is lying if you read a range of publications.

        Like


  20. on December 12, 2015 at 6:01 am Beautiful Truths Ignored

    The Economist has taken a turn for the worse, ever since the Rothschilds became part owners earlier this year.

    Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 6:54 pm Vagina dominator

      The rothschilds have owned the economist for decades. Same as they own Pearson, McGraw Hill and almost every other “educational” publisher. The reach and power of the poz is incredibly extensive and thoroughly coordinated.

      Every idea you meet requires a red pill mental health warning:

      “The ideas expressed herein are diseased Poz., intended to manipulate you against your own interests. Expose yourself only through a screen of vigilant, manly sanity. “

      Like


    • You didn’t read it last year. It has been shit for over a decade now.

      Like


  21. http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    The liberals must be extremely afraid if they had to go done to even deeper level, the more they write or say something in public.

    Like


  22. Who is the third man in the row on the Jewconomist cover?

    Like


  23. Wishing Whiskey ”Happy Holidays!”

    Like


  24. Props to CH on knowing about the Overton Window.

    – Is the backlash to PC sensitivity due to the dynamic that the Overton Window has been artificially shifted leftward by media agenda?
    – and is the supposed Overton window on many issues Health Care, Immigration, Defense Policy all artificially leftward from true electorate consensus?

    -Is he DC effect the symptom of pols going to DC getting “mixed up” about what is the true spectrum of discourse due to artificial indoctrination to DC’s version of the Overton Window?

    -Does Trump’s rise indicate that there is going to be a snap back on the Overton Window in key issues?

    -If the snap back occurs what happens to poll daily politicos like Hillary? (OOOPS!)

    I have to applaud Trump he has moved the debate and now basically dictates the field of battle. If he becomes “reasonable” and says “review” then the review becomes the battlefield. If he says “certain countries” that becomes the debate. If he keeps to the “all muslims” he can control that too…but make no mistake Trump controls the debate now… not the manlet in the White house

    Just look at the Economist cover!!!!! OMG what are the chances of Jeb Bush being on the cover of an international magazine… I swear the lib press just can’t help themselves but get this guy elected!!!!

    Trump has also done something strategic. Since he has made this no immigration stand. All the people in southern countries who want to go El Norte are packing as we speak.

    Sure they could gamble if the Dems were going to be in charge but now? No they will be migrating NOW this will turn into a 2016 nightmare for the Dems… I mean it will be a sea of Humanity that even the Press can’t ignore. Disaster for the Dems…

    Also unfortunately if you are a terrorist in the US you will accelerate your plans. Knowing that the hammer will be coming in 2017 will make you go now rather than a soon to be more difficult future. Again I don’t know how this will be played but this is why the lib press is in a twist over Trump. If Trump rhetoric “pushes” terrorist operations to 2016 when they would prefer 2017 when Obummer is safely out of office… well you see the problem.

    Like


  25. (Previous comments stuck in mod)

    Some folks were wondering where Strapon has been lately. Found her:

    (check out 0:15 . . . confirmed “6-foot-2 Nordic” hahaha)

    Like


  26. Saudi Billionaire ‘prince’, who owns 5% of Twatter, and advocates Muslims ‘tolerance and understanding’ on American universities, call Trump a disgrace and tells him to drop out. Trump’s reply: He’s “dopey”! The good ‘prince’ is probably one of many in the area behind a threat on Trump’s life if he had travelled to Israel. Saudi Arabia is our enemy, and should be the number one nation on our terrorist nations list. Instead, a-hole cuckservatives like George Bush walks around holding their hands, and Omumbnuts bows to them.

    http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2015/12/11/saudi-billionaire-prince-demands-donald-trump-exit-2016-race/

    As a side note, it is good to see that my mom’s old kitchen tablecloth has found a home on top of the prince’s head.

    Like


  27. on December 12, 2015 at 9:37 am JenkPac Shakur

    Vote for Trump if it makes you feel better but he’s just as much a Jew toadie as Hilary. AIPAC controls both establishment parties. Whoever “wins” will simply fulfill another aspect of the Jewish agenda which of course will be bad for whites. Trump will “magically” forget about his plan to build a wall to keep the Mexican illegals out were he to “win” so again go ahead and vote for him if it makes you all feel better just don’t expect him to do anything special other than provide you a few laughs now and again as he and his “opponents” play fight to make the goyim believe something legitimate is actually taking place.

    Like


    • Maybe so maybe not.

      It is good that White Americans come closer to having a Voice – and not in Trump but in their support of him.

      Like


    • You’re probably right and I’ve suggested this from the beginning. However he must know what they’re like given all his time in business and he has made a few sly digs, like calling Jon Stewart by his real name.

      Like


    • This is defeatist Tokyo Rose shit. How much is Soros paying you to demoralize the conservative resistance?

      Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 8:31 pm gunslingergregi

      something legitimate is taking place Trump is inspiring people to make America great again and they are doing it with their own hands
      i went a street over and people had all kinds of decorations out and giving away free cocoa
      then they gave me a couple beers he he he
      he was into aquaponics funnily enough rofl
      im meeting a new dude a day that is an expert on my ideas i have had
      first automation now aquaponics
      but anyway my neighbors told me bout the hot chocolate
      had the Christmas music going loud
      partyin baby
      making a diference one person at a time
      and they were talking bout Trump
      he he he

      Like


  28. The Economist has been pushing pro-immigration propaganda for a while now, but they’ve really turned up the rhetoric lately since right-leaning anti-immigration parties recently started winning more parliamentary seats across Europe.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/french-elections-far-right-party-front-national-leads-polls-as-le-pen-secures-historic-breakthrough-a6763041.html

    Like


    • The economist has been a poor toilet paper substitute for over a decade now. Their market is vapid college students who try to appear intellectual without doing any thinking.

      Like


      • I consider The Economist to be the bellweather for the multi-cultural propaganda movement. The fun thing about them is that when they post a pro-immigration article, they tend to get a deluge of commenters effectively saying, “Fuck off. We don’t need any more third world bastards ruining the country.”

        Like


  29. The Economist is owned by the Rothschilds.

    Like


    • Hi irishsavant – the way I think perhaps you and some others here depict jews would be akin to a cuntlib virus within the shitlib bug (terms as defined in my comment below). I think that is what Kevin Macdonald (evol psych) is trying to grasp at as well, when he speaks of group-selected genetic traits for jews vs. not so for other races.

      What Kevin Macdonald theorizes doesn’t really make any sense (because the only way to really understand what he is driving at, would be akin to some sort of species differentiation occurring, and there isn’t any evidence for that vis-a-vis, the Ashkenazi jews, in my view anyway).

      So what is going on with what has been termed jewish exceptionalism? – perhaps the signaling parameters of forebrain dis-inhibition of hindbrain activity (as outlined in #5 of my comments below), are set marginally differently within Ashkenazi ancestry. I think we need jews to help the social science and brain science communities better understand the jewish phenomenon, around this potential factor.

      Like


      • I must admit, of the many ways I’ve seen water carried for the Cathedral, yours is among the most unusual…

        albeit the verbosity factor of your equation, per se, is nothing unique.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • Greg Eliot – not getting the fairy reference.

        Like


      • That’s my usual Glengarry Glen Ross homage shtick… picture Al Pacino (((shakin’ his haid))) over Kevin Spacey talking out of turn.

        Like


      • @Wild Man – evolution has certain overall patterns that apply regardless of whether races or whole phyla are up for discussion. For instance, competition occurs at every level, from firstborn against yet-to-be-conceived sibs to dinosaurs versus mammals. Parasitism is another pattern that can apply at different levels, certainly a racial level can exist and have many parallels to species-level parasitism. That’s the Eskimos.

        Like


      • Wild Man…..an interesting theory. In general I tend to go along with K McD’s thinking and there do seem to be consistent DNA differentiators among Ashkenazis.

        However my main concern is that the Jewish power structure in all White countries operates to our great (and potentially fatal) detriment. Those of us awake to this malevolence should constantly point it out whenever we can. Going into stuff like the pre-frontal cortex would probably act as a distraction from this key requirement.

        Like


      • Greg Eliot – OK – you making me out to be the fucking company man – I have to admit that fairy thing is pretty funny then! (I guess I don’t have to go to the effort of work’in myself up about gettin all offended and shit).

        Like


      • @Sean Fielding – yeah, but making it about parasitism is really making it about species differentiation (unless you mean it metaphorically). The jews are not differentiating as a species vis-a-vis everybody else. Cross-fertilization is very alive and well among secularized jews, in the recent past.

        @irishsavant – “jewish power structure in all White countries operates to our great (and potentially fatal) detriment”. Well I see your point, but history shows that it is more like operating at the jew’s potential fatal detriment. And so, it should be in their interest to finally figure this out. The European psyche is predisposed to as sense of fairplay. When the trust in fairness is broken we eventually freak the fuck out. The jews got kicked out of various European kingdoms and countries about 100 times. I would think this means that whatever they got going on, is a deficit every bit as much as it is an asset (these things always tend to be double-edged swords). It is starting to look like the jews being so overly represented at all kinds of western levers of power is not as based solely on merit as we were lead to believe. People are starting to become aware of this. And this is all wrapped up and hidden within the PC shitlib dynamic. Now, if this PC shitlib dynamic starts to untangle – fuck – not good for the jews – but it is starting to untangle. Look what happened during other historical times it European history (and no we don’t need to refer to Nazi Germany to see this), when whatever the obfuscation flavor that was in style began to untangle.

        Look – I am for a meritocracy – but fuck -northern European men freak the fuck out when they have been sold on a fake meritocracy. That is when the fucking dam of forbearance breaks! Best we calmly and rationally figure this thing out now, instead. That is what I was trying to say above. Jews should be asked to participate in the exploration of the underlying causes.

        Us, humans, we are smarter than being pushed around by this shit (our baser drives) at this point. We need to focus on that.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:51 pm gunslingergregi

        jews think about their land as being theirs forever who else has that it seems kind of simple to diferentiate them on that alone

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:55 pm gunslingergregi

        which is what allows them to not have morals
        when it comes to believing something is yours forever
        then you are now allowed to do anything it takes to keep it right
        nothing is against the grain nothing is wrong in keeping it

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 6:57 pm gunslingergregi

        but who was promised the land
        jews or palistinians

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:02 pm gunslingergregi

        Us, humans, we are smarter than being pushed around by this shit (our baser drives) at this point. We need to focus on that.””””””

        well if the jews intention was in fact genociding whites and not only the intention but there actions and they had the power to do it
        then of course the ones responsible would have to go to hague trials like the ones they had for the germans

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:02 pm gunslingergregi

        wouldn’t be base instinct at all it would just be justice

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:10 pm gunslingergregi

        not all jews got to go to camps but the ones who made it happen yea prob need some attention i would think if it is the case
        considering how much bullshit we had to hear about hitler all these years then if the jews are doing the same dam thing they need to pay right
        condemed by their own philosophy
        and obviously tech is at the point where individuals philosophies can be known

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:13 pm gunslingergregi

        solve all crimes is a good thing but in doing so everyone is a criminal what needs worked on is what are the serious crimes

        Like


      • @WM- Ron Unz (jew) has a piece on this with respect to jewish representation in elite universities vis a vis Asians’ in comparison to representation on NMSQT semifinalist rolls. It’s illuminating.

        What at one point was exceptionalism out of proportion with population has reverted to the mean and been replaced by out and out nepotism and anti-Asian racism.

        the Ivy League is particularly racist. Meritocratic schools such as MIT and the UCal system…I mean, the enrollment demographics are all out there in the open for anyone to look at.

        Suffice it to say that when Cal ended AA due to popular referendum, their enrollment demographics tilted massively.

        Like


      • trav777 – yeah, I saw something on this as well. I made this comment a couple of CH articles ago:

        “I recently saw something Kevin Macdonald (evol psych guy) wrote criticizing Steven Pinker’s (another evol psych guy) criticism of Harvard’s admission policies – Steven Pinker was criticizing Harvard, and probably Ivy-League in general, with respect to warping the admission policies so bad that it is kind of the antithesis of a meritocracy, which is what Ivy League is supposed to represent (you know – the cream of the crop), but Pinker was limiting this criticism to how unfair it is to Asian students. MacDonald then makes the point that Pinker is grouping the white populace (students of jewish background and all other white students combined) all together, when making his points, but when you instead split out the non-jewish white students vs. the jewish white students, it turns out the jewish students get all the breaks without merit (along with black students), and the non-jewish white students are actually something like 14x more penalized, merit vs. admittance, than the jewish students, but the asian students only 7x more penalized, merit vs, admittance than the jewish students.

        I have to drill down on this more. This was apparently an argument of Macdonald vs. Pinker circa 2014, and I don’t know if Pinker has responded. Pinker, I believe is of jewish background from Montreal, but unreligious.

        I always liked Pinker and thought he was fair-minded. But if even he is doing blatant slate of hand to slap non-jewish whites, for this sins of jews, then man – it makes you wonder what the fuck is going on.

        Bottom line might be that Ivy League is just one big machine to ensure the status quo of the primacy of jews in academia, but has nothing at all to do with merit. I don’t like to think this way – so I will look for evidence otherwise, but for now, I’m just saying, I am wondering about it (i.e. – I want to determine for myself whether Kevin Macdonald is unfairly defining what a jewish white student is vs a non-jewish white student within his argument).

        If this jewish thing is true, I am going to be pissed, and not just at jewish leadership, you know, shouldn’t it have been the WASP leadership that ensured their was always demographically-representative WASP representation at the levers of US powers, given the US, in preponderance was (and I think still is) a WASP nation?

        If this jewish thing is true then it is our own ethnic leadership that needs to be answering some tough questions.”

        Like


      • Jews make shit social scientists because of how they parse reality. Basically, they have a dogmatic understanding of everything due to their literal interpretation of things. I’m too lazy to explain, but they’re good abstract thinkers(maths, theoretical physics, law), but they’re dreadful when you put an analysis of reality in the equation(engineering, social science).

        Like


      • I used to feel the same about Pinker but that stunt he pulled (combining Jewish and White students at Harvard to generate an utterly misleading conclusion) destroyed my trust in him.

        Like


  30. on December 12, 2015 at 11:34 am Mandy been here a while

    Rabid sodomite Loring Wirbel wants people to shoot potential Trump voters. I’m sure the Muslims will take his head off for the effort. Oh well

    Like


    • Hey Mbhaw – I just looked up this Loring Wirbel thing, and so by the way I am defining cuntlib vs. shitlib (see my post below), Loring Wirbel = cuntlib.

      I think this nuanced definition of cuntlib vs shitlib actually has alot of descriptive power. I’m going to keep using this differentiation!

      Like


  31. You don’t have to be stupid like them. A new post at Elmer’s Lounge shows you how to use the government to satisfy your needs :

    Check Out the Money-Making Opportunities in the latest SBIR Solicitation

    http://wp.me/p6QFjS-4I

    The pros know how it works.

    Like


  32. Trump’s ban on muslim immigration is brilliantly prophetic. When the next attack occurs, and as I said before it most assuredly will, he will be on the right side of history and the mindset of the majority of Americans. His opponents stupidity and culpability will be revealed. The Marxist media will be unable to hide this.

    As far as it being temporary, it can be made permanent simply by not agreeing on measures to rescind it later. Affirmative Ape-action is going on 40+ years, it was supposed to be temporary, as were most lib policies. The libs won’t let them be voted on again, claim still necessary, or can’t agree on changes. Once the govt sets a course of action, its there. This can be applied to illegals simply by enforcing immigration law. And the first cutting off a sanctuary city will cause a domino effect. If jobs, real jobs for real Americans, better quality of life for all, become reality, all you’ll get is liberal gripes as social status posturing, and nothing more.

    Like


  33. The way I look at this whole thing is that the west is based on an egalitarian ideal, egalitarian = equal existential fundamental worth of individuals = upholding the value of the individual = can only occur within a rational framework of each party in the dynamic seeking the perspective of others = if achieved results in a great deal of self-respect + mutual respect for others occurring within the framework of expectation that others are also of high self-respect and are also seeking mutual respect = more collaborative social behavior instead of more dominance-seeking behavior.

    Of course, this is not all that is going on, our hindbrains don’t care too much about upholding an egalitarian ideal, and hindbrain activity is alot more about frame dominance vs. frame deference (not about frame-sharing).

    This is not that hard to see. Reptiles vs. mammals for example. This is all occurring on a continuum.

    So what I am saying is that for the west, it is about the egalitarian overlay, a predisposition to accentuate the egalitarian within western civilization, over the more win/lose, dominance/submission algorithms that are also always present.

    But the shitlibs fail to see one critical all important factor of the egalitarian. The fact that it of necessity, still is a people-sorting algorithm (i.e. – sorting by ideology). As I have defined it above the egalitarian is contingent on the following factors:

    1) enough brain-power to be able to appreciate an abstract concept like rationality, so as to see that for much of human interface, the win/win is a superior approach then the win/lose

    2) a very high level of self-esteem and therefore self-respect (which itself is contingent in confidence in one’s abilities to see things clearly)

    3) a propensity for seeking the perspective of others

    4) a high enough cognitive ability to make use of the many-perspective-seeking function, within the abstract strategy of win/win, by way of an intuition (by inference on induction) of a self-ego concept, that can be used to hang abstract principles and convictions on, so as to then also be able to intuit an other-ego concept for other people, that is conceptualized as working in the same way as self-analyzed (inferred by induction) for oneself,

    5) Note that #4 requires inhibition of hindbrain function to some degree. But the social egalitarian dynamic also requires enough dis-inhibition of hindbrain function, to be able to see when #4 is not occurring in others, and to let enough self-interest bleed through from hindbrain activity to actually do something about that (culling, in one form or another, of those that can’t or won’t prescribe to the egalitarian)

    It is not hard to see that the egalitarian ideal which is the backbone of much of what western civilization has been based upon, is tenuous. There are alot of moving parts, there is alot than can go wrong.

    One of the things that can go wrong, is a “bug” in the program. There is such a “bug” that was mostly lying rather dormant within the egalitarian algorithm, that has always been there, but due to changing circumstances, started to show it’s destructive power (i.e – it’s power to be destructive to the egalitarian ideal itself), in more recent history – and this bug could be coined “shitlib subversion”. Note that the modern version of the egalitarian is based on some nuanced interpretations of the human experience, circa renaissance and then the enlightenment periods. Fairly recent. Since then, the “shitlib subversion” has been rearing it’s ugly head now and again, but only since the 1960’s did it start it’s mostly unabased rise into strong ascendancy.

    This shitlib subversion “bug” in the egalitarian algorithm is the various forms of failure that can occur within cognitive (and therefore social) functioning of the variables described in #5 above. As well, this egalitarian thing is more or less a masculine abstraction, and so one could argue that many otherwise seemingly psychologically healthy women suffer from various forms of failure occurring within the #4 function. Shorthand, failures within #4 functioning could be coined “cuntlib subversion” and failures within #5 functioning could be coined “shitlib subversion”.

    Of course Trump is right about pretty much everything that is controversial that he campaigns for, at least within the national realm (I don’t know enough about his stance on international matters to comment). But as far as internal US “homeland” matters he prescribes:

    A) control the borders

    B) if economic policy calls for some immigration, make sure potential immigrants are selected based on how superior they are as compared to other immigration-seekers, based on:

    i) appreciation of western values, and ability to act in accordance (i.e – Islam does council against western values, so a Muslim has to be vetted extra heavily in this respect – is he secularized to the necessary degree to actually act in accordance with western values when the chips are down? Can he sufficiently call down and call out his non-secularized brothers in Islam? Is he free of the non-western components of the Islamic ideology to a sufficient degree to actually finally act as a modifying force within Islam itself, that such Islamic-movement requires to survive within the egalitarian cocoon of the west? If the west allows Muslim people that are not sufficiently secularized in, that is akin to letting a trojan horse in, vis-a-vis the egalitarian)

    ii) aptitude to contribute to the economy in a net positive way. If is not net positive then why would the US, or any western nation want that? The western ideal of the egalitarian is not being played out within a world whereby all the other players partake in that ideal. So, in a sense, this is also a form of meta-culling – for the western values to prevail, we must ensure we are not otherwise unfairly penalized vis-a-vis other competing non-egalitarian cultures.

    It is very interesting to me to see how bad the “bug” (within failures of both #5 and #4) within the egalitarian algorithm, has gotten (Trump’s campaign has hi-lighted this fact). I am starting to wonder if there are far fewer people with the right aptitude for this than I once thought. If that is the case then I can see why so many people on both the left and the right think there is some sort of conspiracy being shoved down our throats (because if it is true egalitarian-appreciation is indeed rare, then in a way it is sort of conspiracy-like, the will of the cognitively-able few being imposed on the many, for the good of everybody, with the cognitively-able perhaps not really fully appreciating the deficiencies of everyone else).

    In final analysis, my take on things turns out to be condescending as fuck (and therefore runs the danger of being misinterpreted as shitlib or cuntlib). Tear down my take on things if you can – I would rather it be otherwise (i.e. – not so fucking condescending) – so I think I am open to it being convinced otherwise.

    Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 2:37 pm Diversity Is Good

      tl;dr

      Like


      • Well you missing some good shit then.

        Like


      • Well you missing some good shit then.

        You’re half-right.

        Like


      • I’m more or less with Carlos Danger, – what I was trying to impart above, is a psychological analysis of the precepts of the “basic human dignity” attitude.

        Pwn, Greg Eliot – I call that the egalitarian because that is the accurate definition of the word egalitarian, and in my view it is BS when a perfectly good word that points to virtue gets hijacked and twisted to be made out as something worthy of contempt. That is BS because it is just another version of fucking underhanded subversive use of language (like the shitlibs do with their PC-speak), but this time of the ilk of anti-PC-speak (by way of sort of a weird “white man is god” right-wing anti-PC-speak, it seems, if I got your sentiment right, which I’m not sure I have at this point).

        Greg Eliot – you in particular, if you continue to kneejerk to the same tactics as those that you despise, you are thereby keeping yourself at their level of discourse. Getting fucking angry is the right initial response, but something has to occur beyond that, unless you just want a new version of the same old shit show.

        Greg – I am with you on 90% of where you are coming from I think (as far as the source of your discontent, but not about your inferences with respect to underlying causes). This shitlib/cuntlib thing stinks to high heaven. But come’on Greg – where do you think humanity is going in the long run? We got to run the future of the humanity show as a meritocracy. European man understands meritocracy better than most – don’t you think we need to show some leadership? Do you think every Japanese man is without merit? Every Brazilian man? Every Nigerian man? Every Vietnamese man? Every Algerian man? Every Ashkenazi man? If you think that then you are fucked in the head – like the shitlibs – just a different version of fucked in the head. If that is where you are at then you have to go and start talking to all kinds of people man, to see where you are wrong.

        I am calling for real leadership. Real leadership that understands what a meritocracy is supposed to look like. What do you suppose the right attitude for such a leader to take would be? It would be – “look at the fucking individual, man!” – Egalitarian = uphold the high value of the “individual”.

        Greg – don’t wish for the end of the world. If you are wishing for the end of the world, like a judaic fundamentalist = we are god’s chosen people = we are waiting for (and therefore trying to arrange for the correct circumstances for) our messiah who will come in righteous glory over the goyim; or like an self-made-modern-day-prophet for an Islamic Caliphate that apparently can only come within a righteous blaze of glory (and so they are trying to arrange for the correct circumstances for that); or like an end-times fundamentalist Christian – 2nd coming of Jesus, man – coming in a righteous blaze of glory (who is thereby going along with those of other ilk who are trying to arrange for the correct circumstances for their particular version of the so-called messianic age) – then you are the enemy of the rational man, the enemy of those that want to support the high value of the individual, the enemy of those that believe in human agency as a real abstraction, the enemy of those those that want to organize ourselves based on merit, because if you are one of the 3 main types of Abrahamic religious crazies, you are calling for mankind’s destruction. Wake up man – there can’t be World War 3 – that spells the end (or at least the end of the sublime)!

        Carlos Danger – I know you are a religious man too. I mean no disrespect if you take your religious study as an esoteric endeavor meant for hyper-personal consumption only (and not for a means of dominating others). That is how I view my own religious study (i.e. – as an esoteric endeavor only).

        Like


      • @Wild Man, I think pride is the most difficult sin to guard against. I have been a leader and can lead but prefer to work on myself and set an example rather than control others. I prefer to be around my family and close friends. So you are correct. BTW, anyone who is interested in this subject should look up the Art Bell interviews with father Malachi Martin on Youtube. Father Martin was a universal scholar and an exorcist and has some amazing insights into the metaphysical world.

        Like


      • @Carlos Danger – OK – I will take a look at father Malachi Martin (I do not discount the metaphysical, but much of it I think, I should muster the humility to see my human limitations, for instance, to my mind, the definition of what is meant when people speak of God = beyond human conception, beyond my powers of conception, so I should be very careful how I use this concept)

        Like


    • on December 12, 2015 at 8:43 pm gunslingergregi

      telling the truth is how you make it equal
      and equality of understanding
      like the dude that was getting mad that obama was gonna be getting 500k for life for being president
      i said well he had to do the work to get there and he got the white hair to show for how much pressure he is under so he probably deserves it
      people think leadership might be easy
      for some it may be but also lot of responsibility
      our leaders need to live up to the peoples trust in them
      and the people need to realize that leadership ain’t all roses and cream
      but maybe more talking and being around real people is what is needed from leadership
      the real people talk with them get to know them don’t just be up in the ivory tower where the real day to day people don’t realize you too are just a fallable human being

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 8:46 pm gunslingergregi

        leaders should be talking to the people the laws they make affect and get their input about how it affects real lives
        the disconnect
        i was in dc walked in a hotel and it was all white people in suits
        how the fuck are they gonna have a fucking clue about how other people are living

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 8:48 pm gunslingergregi

        looked like a political gathering
        yea use studies but don’t ONLY use studies
        course prob tough on the soul to see results in real life of what you do
        rather than taking the easy way out and just looking at numbers on a spreadsheet

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 8:52 pm gunslingergregi

        should be a law every polictician must go live in a diverse project for 6 months
        to get in office with no special protection he he he

        dui second more insidious prohibition
        completely wrecked a sense of community
        and just robbing people basically

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:00 pm gunslingergregi

        dui was the wedge that drove between the haves and the have nots
        the haves can afford taxis the have nots can’t
        and small towns might not even have the ability to get a taxi in the first place
        so ya just decided to but you face into average peoples lives and fuck them all up and take away the equality they did have with people that were above average in the name of protecting them from themselves or some shit
        instead of going the middle road like from 10 on friday night till 4 sat morning is ok to drink and drive don’t have your family out
        or dunks stay off the highway
        or whatever why it gotta be zero tolerance on people when you want to fuck up their lives but then tell them to be tolerant of everything it is a giant fucking clustercuck of biblical proportions

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:03 pm gunslingergregi

        i guess the good thing about google cars driving themselves
        when cheap enough is it will make it more equal between the haves and have nots

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 9:11 pm gunslingergregi

        the system is so complex of course it cannot be equal for everyone
        or shit have buses running to clubs at night
        why when people say equal is it always not equal

        Like


    • You’re delusional. Egalitarianism is nothing but an euphemism for a bunch of no value envious shit heads trying to steal other people’s shit and the equal human worth thing is just a rationalization. You’re right about a small segment of equalists but they’re a minority. Most just rationalize their free shit desire.

      Like


    • You’re delusional. Egalitarianism is nothing but an euphemism for a bunch of no value envious shit heads trying to steal other people’s shit and the equal human worth thing is just a rationalization. You’re right about a small segment of equalists but they’re a minority. Most just rationalize their free shit desire. You just have to look at who actually votes for equality.

      Like


      • My impression was blah-blah-blah squid ink…

        … an attempt at a more sophisticated type of shilling.

        Hierarchies always existed and always will, from Nature to the very Heavens… it’s the way God organizes things and a wisdom Man always knew and followed.

        The Babble-On nonsense of relatively recent history is, like you say, just a smokescreen, a rationalization, and an agitprop weapon wielded against all that is sound and proper by those who disguise themselves as angels of light…

        … much like their god, Lucifer.

        Like


    • Not to get all religious on you, but it is the idea of basic human dignity because we are all created in the image of God. It didn’t exist prior to Jesus. It is why Jesus Christ is a revoltonary historical figure and the most important figure of the last 2000 years.

      Like


  34. on December 12, 2015 at 11:58 am Mandy been here a while

    Orban – 5 white children
    Le Pen -3 white children
    Trump – 5 white children

    Like


  35. Speaking of suicidal tendencies, in reading the latest SBIR solicitation I found an interesting topic calling for anatomically realistic female simulators to aid in training combat medics.

    Can we push this viral? Please forward to your favorite journalists.

    Army Prepares for Mass Female Casualties in Wake of DoD Women in Combat Ruling

    http://wp.me/p6QFjS-54

    Like


  36. leftoid memes are beginning to cross

    Saw a thing with Trump in Iowa and afterwards they had a couple of “call-in” numbers, one for Repubs, Demos, and Indies, and I was thinking, ‘now the nutcases come out’. So the majority of callers were actually Demos and Indies and I was floored – they were saying the same thing I think, “this is the only candidate that is talking sense instead of PC bull-sh*t” – you don’t keep doing the same thing when you see there is a problem.

    Now I have no idea of what screening they had, but it’s amazing when you remove the liberal media filter and hear what the average person is thinking. That is why so many DC Demos and Repubs are scared the death of the man – he is the only one talking sense and saying, “if you don’t like it, I don’t care”. That causes them to act like lunatics. And resonates with “normal” people that live in the real world.

    As to the immigration ban – it’s called sanity, deal with it…

    Like


    • @Just saying – yes these are the very people Trump needs to move en-mass into his camp, to go for the big win in the general election. These people are probably egalitarianers, but can’t buy into the cheap throw-away model of the egalitarian anymore, i.e. – the shitlib/cuntlib model (as outlined in my long post above).

      The republican old boys club are fools for thinking that Trump is not their guy for a win in the general election. This group really are cuckservatives.

      Like


  37. Hey Cap, if you see this…re our gun talk…I got to shoot one of these today. Think I’ll stick with the 22 tho 🙂

    Like


    • My son recently bought me a Bersa Thunder 380, which would handle well for a woman and conceals nicely. Also comes in .22 version. It was a tough decision between that and the classic styling of the snubby, shown here for comparison. Ultimately my better accuracy with the Bersa won out :

      Like


      • Elmer that’s definitely more my style…and the 22 feels comfortable but I need to try a few before deciding.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 4:54 pm Captain Obvious

        Vicky, all I’d say is that a pistol [in a generic “1911” form factor] is not as mechanically reliable as a revolver, and if the pistol jams [and if you don’t have the tools handy to un-jam it, which, even with tools, could take five or ten minutes, by which point you’re dead], then a pistol is nothing more than a very expensive paperweight. Also, unless you want to walk around with a bullet in the firing chamber, then a pistol requires an extra motion of “sliding” a round into the firing chamber. Whereas with a revolver, you can leave the one hole empty [for safety purposes], and then two quick pulls of the trigger gets you a guaranteed explosion in the firing chamber.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 4:56 pm Captain Obvious

        tldr; == The 1911 is about the sexiest gun ever invented, whereas a revolver is like a loyal old dawg which will gladly throw itself at a grizzly bear in order to save your life.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 5:00 pm Captain Obvious

        Hey, did we ever learn whether there was still a Mr Vicky in the picture?

        Like


      • Thanks for the input Cap, I need to practice on a few to see of revolver or pistol is the way to go. That seems to be a debate among many.

        Like


      • CO. Dude. Stop.

        A modern jammatic will outperform a revolver in any test of MTBF or reliability.

        You can bury glocks, dig them up a year later and shoot 1000 rounds through them without feed failure. They actually do these kinds of tests. And that’s HARDLY the only modern auto capable of that type of reliability.

        Fuck 1911s, they are outdated junk and the source of all the misinformation about auto reliability. I have seen more range failures of 1911s than any other firearm. Anyone who espouses a 1911 IMO shouldn’t own firearms.

        Like


      • Fuck 1911s, they are outdated junk and the source of all the misinformation about auto reliability. I have seen more range failures of 1911s than any other firearm. Anyone who espouses a 1911 IMO shouldn’t own firearms.

        The Marines are going back to a 1911 update. Sorry Trav, you’re talking shit here. I own a very large number of firearms and spend a lot of time at the range. I’ve never had a 1911 jam. There’s a reason these designs remain popular. AKs will jam before a 1911 will. Jams on a good design are caused by ammunition or poor maintenance anyway. I don’t know anyone who bad mouths 1911s except you. This is honestly the first time. I literally know hundreds of vets and dozens with combat experience.

        Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 12:20 pm Captain Obvious

        Anybody ever have a revolver jam? Serious question. For example, do Smith & Wesson Featherweights jam? If my woman’s life is on the line, I want her to pull the gun out of her purse, squeeze the trigger once [or twice for an empty chamber], and get a dadgum explosion lit in the firing chamber.

        Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 12:23 pm Captain Obvious

        The other option is to get the CC permit, and a much larger purse, and carry an 18″ shotgun with a pistol grip. Although that will require a slide of the magazine “arm” in order to get a round into the firing chamber. And it won’t be “sexy” unless she’s an Amazon like Jennie Finch.

        Like


      • Well I’m not a tiny girl and my bag is big but I’m no Amazon. Thing is getting a carry permit, especially a conceal carry is not easy here.

        Like


      • “Anybody ever have a revolver jam? Serious question.”

        No – never happened to me and I’ve never heard of a revolver jamming; especially not a revolver without an exposed hammer to get caught on anything.

        Use decent quality ammo and a good revolver is sure to go BANG every time.

        Like


      • on December 13, 2015 at 5:00 pm Diversity Is Good

        Capt. Oblivious
        Anybody ever have a revolver jam?

        Yes. Absolutely.

        Serious question.

        Serious answer. Squib load? Stoppage. High primer? Stoppage. Grit or unburned powder under the ejector? Stoppage. Lint or other pocket gunk working into the trigger? Stoppage.

        I have seen every one of these in person, on pistol ranges.

        For example, do Smith & Wesson Featherweights jam?

        They can. They also recoil a lot, are not easy for people with weak hands to shoot. “Weak hands” definitely includes women, dude.

        Like


      • The only thing I’ve ever seen stop a revolver is a broken firing pin or hammer spring… and I’ve only seen THAT n the cheap Sat Night Specials running under $150.

        Like


      • I had a Glock .380 jam on me before I got through the first box of ammo.

        Glocks are overrated.

        Like


    • The FBI has actually studied a lot of outcomes of self defense actions and are now ready to say what they have learned.
      1. Armed self defense only happens when the defender is armed. So carry.
      2. Rimfire pistols are cheap and accurate to fire but there is no way they are as reliable in an auto-pistol as any centerfire round. Spent the money for a good .32 Browning(ACP) if you dislike recoil.
      3. Time at the range is better than time at church. Develop muscle memories for accurate shooting for situations, which, in real life, will always make you pee on yourself.
      4. Train like a life might depend on your skill.

      Like


      • 3. Time at the range is better than time at church.

        Only if it’s to attend your own funeral.

        Otherwise: make time for both.

        Like


      • huh? High end ammo like anything you would wanna shoot in .22LR, Velocitors or Stingers, is not going to fail to bang, dude.

        Anything below .380ACP is unlikely to achieve a stop by force unless you hit the head. Any gun is better than no gun but 9mm should be considered the minimum acceptable caliber for SD purposes.

        Accuracy is more important than caliber but accuracy under the type of duress of a typical SD situation is at a premium. This is why bigger bullets are preferred.

        Like


      • “4. Train like a life might depend on your skill.”

        That’s what I keep hearing. Train. Train. Train. And practice safety of course.

        Also I gotta say, it’s fun as hell.

        Like


      • Depends on the church. A robust Christianity is every bit as important to the future of the West as an armed population.

        Like


    • Too big for CC

      Like


    • No need to bad mouth the venerable 1911. All guns are capable of getting jammed. Be it stovepipe, or limp wrist, or failure to fire, or headspace issues. The fact that there are so many makes and models of the 1911 no doubt contributes to any perceived higher rates of failure. Add to that list, poor maintenance,amateur posers, whatever, and that could explain most failures one sees. Most adults just starting out should opt for the simplicity of the revolver. Specifically chics. Most have a problem comfortably racking slides on guns of a higher caliber than a .22. Cheers

      Like


    • on December 17, 2015 at 8:28 am Concerned Citizen

      Fire from inside the purse, why try to draw it and get it tangled and give the person trying to kill you a warning?

      Like


  38. Beta of the Century Award goes to:

    Like


  39. You know, the more I spin everything around in my head, the more I see all the players involved just want to ration young white pussy in a way that is most beneficial to them. It is, after all, the worlds best natural resource.

    Jews – Lust for the shiksa, and scheme to attain her with money but also gradually want to destroy shiksa with race-mixing so that the jewish women are the only ((white)) women left, which they will have exclusive access to.

    Herrenvolk Men – Hold the moral, biological, and economical claim to white pussy both because their ancestors created it through sexual selection, and because they are the only ones who can replicate its beauty for the future. Uphold traditional morals and othering.

    Traitorous Male Liberals – want to increase the public share of white pussy so they might have a shot, because they get ugly chicks under traditional morals. Want to decrease morals, othering, or anything that encourages white women from being discriminant with their sexual choices.

    Minority Women – Resentful of White Pussy because they can’t compete, happy to cry racism at every turn to decrease its influence. Jews happily complicit.

    Minority Men – Cry racism to knock down traditional moral resistance to race-mixing. Cry racism against white men because your own women prefer them. Jews happily complicit. If still can’t get White pussy, become a rapist, or run of the mill street thug if black, or a rapist and jihadist if Muslim, pay a PUA coach if Indian.

    The main attack point of all groups involved is the morals of White women. Their ability to resist their own destruction has been disappointing because attacks have been designed to appeal to the alpha fucks/beta bucks driver of their evolution. And of course, resisting women are still destroyed with open borders + rape, and a possible coming stealth attack of secretly legal pedophilia for any offender who isn’t a White male.

    Like


    • White males have the highest sexual market value at baseline. However, other races can increase SMV. A fit, charismatic, successful black, although rare, can actually have a higher SMV than an overweight, introverted white. Survival of the fittest.

      Like


      • The fittest has already been decided by the settled order of nature. Black men can’t compete without a confluence of ((propaganda from the media)) and tilted table economics and special protection that keeps them out of mud huts. The black man you’re talking about had whites give him an education, jews give him jobs and loans or promote his sports and music, and still needs a massive arm of ((media and academia)) to shame white women into fucking him.

        Like


    • the master race DNA. Yes everyone wants the traits.

      Like


    • @shartiste – man that is some harsh analysis. Maybe I buy some of it if taken as the overly cynical take (and it is a good exercise to explore ideas via their polarities – in this case the cynical vs. the idealistic – perhaps idealistic as I outlined elsewhere here).

      But your comments do focus my some introspection on my part. I am a man of Northern European mix (Scottish, Irish and English) and I do identify with that and l like very much how awesome that feels. Your comments lead me to introspect with respect to the source of much of my discontent – which is about how Northern European women are mostly so lovely, but completely in denial about precisely how bad-ass their men actually are.

      If I ever broach this issue with such a woman, the women are actually a little horrified. It seems to me, that somewhere back in Northern European history (maybe at the time of the last ice age), gender traits aligned more with differentiating gender roles that called for men to have the capacity for being straight-up psychopathic killers (in the dead of night type thing, against traitor men, not done for braggadocio), whenever the dam of forbearance was broken, for such men, due to deeply broken trust. This was a time when that was the masculine rule of law, and that was the consequence of the masculine rule of law. I think this developed in such a way that it was largely hidden from the sensitivities of the Northern European women – and to this day these women do not fully understand the deep deep well of forbearance within their men, and what lies below the water of the well.

      For me, seeing it metaphorically like that, explains a helleva lot about the pickle we are in now, if you are a man of Northern European decent. I believe this masculine psychic dynamic (forbearance afforded by extreme bad-ass-ness) is one of the cornerstones of what made western civilization possible, and Northern European women are not really capable of understanding, and now that the Feminine Imperative is in rising ascendancy in our western culture, this isn’t just something that is not spoken about in mixed company, now it is something that is openly discouraged as “toxic masculinity”. The Northern European women are like children in this particular respect (but that in part, is what helps make them so lovely).

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:02 pm gunslingergregi

        even the wild west didn’t have that many murders why there are so few known names of outlaws because it was wwf

        ”””””””’Dodge City, Abilene, and the other fabled Kansas cattle towns were only intermittently violent and hardly lawless; they averaged only one and a half adult homicides per cattle-trading season. ”””””””””””’

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 10:08 pm gunslingergregi

        prob cops trying to justify salaries and more relatives gettin hired
        why is the ok corral such a big story when it was and the romantcizing of western life to get the adventurous to settle it

        ok corral with 3 dead

        ”””””””””Although only three people were killed during the gunfight””””””””””

        the real bad guys he he he
        why whites need to use law and order to fix things they don’t seem to know another way

        there are definetly converging trends of tech and what’s been done in past as no longer working
        maybe more underground economy allowed
        and the real economy automated
        who knows whats the ideas other than lets have a war and kill people

        Like


    • @shartiste
      Great insight. Something that you consciously did or more of an epiphany? On the surface, it seems spot on. And I will agree with your analysis. Post this on the ‘diaryofanegress’ blog, make their heads explode.

      Like


      • Good question. My brain fires chaotic thought streams that simmer and take an epiphany to bring them together. Here’s what it was:

        I was at one of these cosmopolitan city bars and watched this buttoned up mystery meat hit on a cute blond chick, who rejected him. I thought rather cavalierly, “These entire world runs on people trying to bang white chicks”, and everything at once clicked in to place.

        As the beige guy of indiscriminant race walked away in clothes designed by White men, to sit in a booth designed by White men, in a building designed by White men, just to look for another White girl to hit on, I thought, “we gotta secure these fucking borders”.

        Like


      • As the beige guy of indiscriminant race walked away in clothes designed by White men, to sit in a booth designed by White men, in a building designed by White men, just to look for another White girl to hit on, I thought, “we gotta secure these fucking borders”.

        That’s film noir material right there… tip o’ the ten gallon on that one.

        Like


      • Remember Blazing Saddles? The idéa used to be obvious for us.

        Like


      • I thought, “we gotta secure these fucking borders”

        And secure those sweet cunts. Fathers, stop sending your daughters to cities that have cosmopolitan bars with dweeby mystery meats on the prowl. Even though White girls shoot them down with extreme prejudice, the mere act of being hit on by a Dark soils them a little.

        Like


      • The problem with this thinking is that White women (all women for that matter) don’t see it this way. They aren’t the iron-clad defenders of race and nation and civilization. They see alpha and they see beta. The only way to secure the “sweet cunts” is to be more alpha than the competition. If White women are the gold standard, then White men will rise to the challenge or lose them.

        Like


      • And if the situation was reversed – if hordes of young slender feminine Thai girls were stealing White men, it would do White women no good to bitch about it. They’d clean up their act, or they’d lose the mating game.

        Like


    • For the record, this explains cuckservatives as well. The cuckservative is a just a liberal who took an economics class.

      Like


    • I actually had an add-on point that I forgot.

      This theory of politics is why people are so resistant to sound, logical arguments. Because their motivations aren’t to find sound, logical policies, it is to increase their SMV. When you describe, piece by piece why borders need to be secure and why we should be a nationalist patriarchy, these people hear you telling them they shouldn’t get laid, deserve a worse genetic legacy, and should basically just put a gun in their mouth.

      They cannot accept logical justice because the truth fucking hurts, they psychologically cannot accept it. You can wake up the people who are merely brainwashed and don’t follow politics too closely, as long as its in the interest of their SMV. But the vast unwashed masses, fat chicks, and omega males will never and can never accept logical political arguments. They will get mad the same way you would if you got cockblocked, for the same reason.

      Like


  40. Supreme court justice attacked by liberals for saying the obvious about black students:
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/justice-scalia-under-fire-comments-about-black-students-n478681

    Like


    • [email protected] the responses.

      Look, if blacks are so magical and powerful, why do they constantly need help from everyone else?

      Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:06 pm Vagina dominator

        Of course Trav. Whitey pays for everything.

        Like everything else today, in the climate change scam, the jew-play (COG is chaired by Laurent Fabius, Big Jew) is to set up a huge money transfer with jews and shabbos goy as the middle men hoovering up fees as the money flows back and forth.

        Ready to pay, whitey?

        £2.3 Trillion: Rich Countries’ Bill For Climate Deal
        Ben Webster, The Times

        Britain and other rich countries face demands for $3.5 trillion (£2.3 trillion) in payments to developing nations to secure a deal in Paris to curb global warming.

        Developing countries have added a clause to the latest draft of the text under which they would be paid the “full costs” of meeting plans to cut emissions.

        An analysis of plans published by 73 developing countries shows that they want $3.5 trillion by 2030. India alone is seeking $2.5 trillion, according to the website Carbon Brief. The amount paid by rich countries is a key unresolved issue at the climate conference in Paris, which is supposed to end tomorrow. The latest version of the text has more than 360 points of disagreement.

        Developed countries have pledged to “mobilise” $100 billion a year by 2020 in public and private finance. This would have to treble to meet the latest demands from developing countries.

        Prakash Javadekar, India’s environment minister, told The Times that Britain and other developed countries would have to “scale up” the $100 billion figure after 2020. He said that the sums paid so far were “not significant”, even though Britain alone has contributed more than £3 billion since 2011.

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:39 pm gunslingergregi

        ya can tell the billion numbers are all bullshit by the actual infrastructure

        Like


      • on December 12, 2015 at 7:40 pm gunslingergregi

        same with powerball jackpots

        Like


      • on December 14, 2015 at 4:27 pm The Spirit Within

        @vagina

        Those monies are intended to offset the climate damage that is occurring in in developing countries — damage that is often caused by developed countries’ fossil fuel use.

        Or do you believe that the 350,000 permanent residents of the Maldives have personally caused the rise in sea levels that is submerging their islands?

        Like


    • Heh, heh… SCALIA UNDER FIRE FOR CALLING A SPADE A SPADE… film at 11.

      Guess we’re going to see now just how secure those lifetime bench appointments sit.

      If Scalia isn’t forced to apologize, grovel, and eventually resign, he just might have Trump to thank… one of the side benefits of having a public figure out there doing some RealTalk and not backing down.

      Like


  41. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CV-mAvfVAAEJC0R.jpg:large

    when is the last time you saw stuff like this ^^^ developing organically like this?

    Like


  42. More game confirmation from !science!:

    http://news.yahoo.com/5-crazy-things-you-can-tell-about-someone-just-by-060336707.html

    First on the list: “What their personality traits are.” Internal game, gents. Internal game.

    Like


  43. Well its good to see the enemy in disarray. I love how they trotted out Dick Cheney and all the media whores purred and said he was so smart, after saying he was a Dark Sith for years. All you need to do to get the Left and the Right hand of evil to work together is have someone represent White people.
    Oh we don’t need any Overton Window now, cause that Alice in Wonderland Looking Glass that distorted everything backwards has cracked. Our enemies have had a good run at ruining all that was Holy and Good, but now its time for these racists who hate Whites to die off so racism, a word they coined, can die too.
    Tickety Tock, the Debt Clock is about to hit midnight, The cow reached the Moon and the rats dig holes to hide from the storm. There’s a storm coming. The future isn’t set, but the NWo is a really bad bet. If it was run by Kevin Nash and Scott Hall it might have had a chance, but Hollywood Hogan was called the only racist in hollywood, and now that dream has just died in their sleep.
    The Red Pill is now unnecessary. Obamacare is like bad medicine. Voodoo economics is expecting a tax base without White people. Join the Mobile Infantry and get citizenship. The bad times are almost over, and we need good men like you. Its an informal group right now. Form your own local unit, and operate independent until the conflict starts. The enemy cannot jail leaders of an informal organization made up of individually formed units.
    We’ll form a heirarchy based on your manosphere creds. Sigma as Caesars, Alpha as Generals, and others looking for rewards like power, money and broads. If you’re a real man those three things are all you need for a happy life. If you don’t find them appealing, you are not Mobile Infantry material.

    Like


  44. What’s preposterous is that the Economist allegedly champions classical liberal values, but they’re for gun control and endorsed Obama in 2012? And some fruity editor of theirs was rambling about their consistent devotion to the same philosophy. I had to ridicule this second rate rag he works for to his face. The economist used to be a neat publication 15 years ago, but now it’s just bullshit with very little economics.

    Like


    • on December 14, 2015 at 3:48 pm Protect Europa

      Most people don’t know this, but “The Economist” didn’t refer to people in the profession of economics, but rather to the mid-18th century ideology of Economism, which was basically a form of classical liberalism.

      Like


  45. Cruz poll #s. ‘All of a sudden Cruz jumps ahead’

    This is some Eskimo spun up shit. Makes no sense. The MSM lie machine is going into overdrive…

    Like


    • This is a ratchet job. The poll is coming from the Des Moine register and being circulated in heavy rotation on the JewSM. NY beta times, NBC, ABC…

      they’re trying to fake the momentum…the articles aren’t pin pointing any event or activity for the surgre in Cruz #s except saying ‘his campaign is doing good in iowa’.

      Ghhhheyyyyyy

      Like


    • of course…it reflects his ability to fill large venues to overflow on two days’ notice.

      Like


  46. It’s funny that their cartoonist is so shit that he need to write the names on the people he drew.

    The people behind magazines like these are having hissing fits because they are being replaced by internet sites and they can’t brainwash as many people as they used to. By way of compensation they are making their propaganda much more blatant, abandoning subtlety entirely.

    Like


  47. This recent concerted push for gun confiscation (total ban/confiscation as in complete civilian disarmament– not control) from the chattering class is the most bizarre thing I’ve seen in my life. Really.

    Once again, I’m bewildered. Not angry, not frightened, just bewildered (and a little amused).

    Someone smarter than I am please explain this one to me. Surely, the adults in charge know that such a thing is flat out impossible without resulting in a civil conflict that will destroy the United States as we know it. Is this really the endgame? If so, it is pure evil madness.

    Is it just the door-in-the-face negotiation technique designed to whittle away yet a little more of the 2d Amendment? If so, surely the adults in charge know that this will backfire exactly the same way similar gambits have backfired for the past dozen years… only bigger.

    Could it really be just frustrated blue state shitlib cowards stamping their feet in a fit of frustration at the realization that they lost this issue?

    Lots of smart guys posting here. I would appreciate some insight.

    Like


    • I have wondered about this also. It is of interest that recent laws in the NE and parts of Cali to compel the registration or turn-ins of certain types guns have met near total non-compliance. How could this not be noticed by the Lib-Progs? What do they think will happen if they double-down on this? If the gentle, civilized folk of New York State refuse to register/turn-in their favorite high quality firearms, how would this go down in Cut and Shoot, Texas? (That is the real name of town, BTW.)

      If you visit any gun range these days, all you see is tactical gear. Lots of night vision scopes and silencers. It so was not like this before the reign of BO.

      The predictable outcome of gun confiscation is an increase in civic disorder. Nothing healthy, at all. So, who would benefit from that?

      The good news is that more and more people are thinking this thru and intend to avoid the traps being set for them.

      Like


      • Shitlibs talk a big game about gun confiscation, but deep down they’re cowards. They don’t have the stones to make a serious (i.e. brutally violent) effort at gun confiscation. So Whites, and minorities who appreciate the White society they live in, will continue to arm themselves and become ever more vigilant against encroaching tyranny.

        Shitlibbery is a paper tiger. There will be no civil war over gun confiscation.

        Like


  48. “Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband carried out the massacre in San Bernardino, Calif., passed three background checks by American immigration officials as she moved to the United States from Pakistan. None uncovered what Ms. Malik had made little effort to hide — that she talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad.

    She said she supported it. And she said she wanted to be a part of it.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/us/san-bernardino-attacks-us-visa-process-tashfeen-maliks-remarks-on-social-media-about-jihad-were-missed.html?_r=0

    Don’t worry – the U.S. government will thoroughly vet all Muslim “refugees” coming from the Middle East.

    Fuck the cuckservatives.

    Fuck the SJW cuntlibs.

    Fuck Israel.

    Fuck the UK.

    Fuck the abstract notion of “our” country. The establishment wants dead Whites.

    Arm up, White man.

    Like


  49. Bernie Sanders, keeping Vermont white!

    Like


  50. Lots of smart guys posting here. I would appreciate some insight.

    Personally I think they want a civil war, because that would be the excuse to bring in U.N. troops and bring them one step closer to totalitarian one-world government. They’ve done everything they can to induce a civil war. They’ve been whipping blacks up into a frenzy while at the same time hamstringing white men. Slowly but surely, a spring is being wound, and I think soon something will be engineered to untie white men’s hands, perhaps an engineered economic collapse that will eviscerate law enforcement. At that point, white men will out in the streets looking for sweet revenge and there will be civil war.

    Like


    • UN troops? The UN doesn’t have any troops, dude. It doesn’t even function as an organization. The Anglo-Zionists have replaced it with NATO to provide “coalition of nations” validity to military actions.

      Like


      • UN troops? The UN doesn’t have any troops, dude.

        Well, OK, then U.N. peacekeepers. That better?

        Like


      • the UN doesn’t have any of those either…the only functional UN units are from NATO countries. We run NATO.

        Like


      • Why the heck would Putin waste his effort? No, currently your political class has undue influence in other nations. The moment they do what you say, they’re done. Not only will they lose all influence America has externally, both in hard and soft power, but power within America will be in the hands of the people fielding the troops if said troops win. Shitlibs are just afraid of guns so they want daddy government to disarm people.

        Like


    • Then you would have Russia supplying said insurgency and sending advisors. I agree with you that they are seeking to start a civil war, but hiring Nigerians or Bangladeshis to put it down would be an even bigger mistake than starting a civil war.

      Like


      • if the UN ever did attempt to occupy the US, it would be awesome because that would be a quick source of military arms for any insurgency. Bangladeshi or Nigerian troops? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

        They would be routed completely within one day. Brown nation armies are dogshit, top to bottom. The only people who can fight cohesively are whites. From when Pizarro took over the entire Inca Empire with 100 illiterate Spaniards to the 100 or so mercs that took over Liberia, white people win always.

        In a war of annihilation, instead of this occupy and hearts n minds shit, whites pwn all

        Like


    • *Tin Foil Hat*

      The elites that are so bent out of shape about climate change want a global war to cull population levels. Easier to manage, considering how much automation is going to take over. Racial unrest in Europe and USA, along with multiple conflicting powers in the Middle East is setting up a bunch of fuses ready to be lit.

      The (((elites))) will of course evacuate and be safe from all this. Just like the rich did in WW2 Europe.

      Like


  51. If anyone has a chance, read Civil War 2 by Thomas Chittum. A fascinating bit of writing. .

    Like


  52. In re the twiitter of Harvard Law professor in “New Yorker:” Majority of men accused of campus rape are minority.

    Well DUH!

    It’s like I’ve been saying all along… the spate of anti-male talk and legislation regarding all things sexual is because of darky manners and mores being imposed upon White women, yon these past two decades or so.

    Sure, the MSM makes it seem like it’s a White Frat Boy issue, but the truth is always otherwise… including the half-assed Cathedral shibboleth about White women seeking out n1ggers and other “exotic” types.

    Truth of the matter is/was/remains: the Others are muh-dik no-accounts who creep out normal White women… and since White men have abrogated their responsibilities… up to and including Night Riding, if need be… for fear of jail, ostracism, and loss of livelihood, the ladies are turning to Big Brother for protection.

    Like


  53. And I’m sure some of you have read that the ACLJew guy wanted to see Trump shot.

    Like


  54. Greg E. – “the ladies are turning to Big Brother for protection.” – The ladies voted in Big Brother for protection a long time ago… and provision, replacement father and husband, Affirmative Action, Title IV, VAWA, Sexual Harassment laws, Domestic Violence Coalitions, WIC, Shelters, Pre-School, Day Care, EBT, Health Insurance…. uh the ladies didn’t just start turning to Big Brother for protection – and certainly not because White Men abrogated their responsibilities… no – white women voted white men out and big brother in for at least the past 50 years. Whatever peril women happen to find themselves in is due solely to women’s choices – reality’s a bitch.

    Like


    • Pay attention if you would comment… this isn’t about merely voting in Dems and socialist programs…

      My comment was specifically about all these calls for anti-male laws regarding sexuality, harassment, etc. That has only been a relatively recent phenomenon, the past two decades or so, with the cries getting the most shrill over the past decade…

      … dovetailing cohencidentally with the rise of nonWhite immigration and the further negrification and jewification of pop culture.

      Like


  55. imo

    Like


    • As if we need more info to hate Zuckerjew anymore.

      By Fuckerberg sponsoring this bill it proves out several things:
      -large corps (Facebook) will benefit from mass low income high tech labor (Muslim Indians, as the article states)
      -this will make jobs for American citizens worth less, and more difficult to get
      -this will strengthen Facebooks position as a media/publisher and be able to further influence popular opinion (more tech labor = more data mining algorithms)
      -more white middle class destabiligation and devaluation = more borrowing to live as wages decrease and living costs rise
      And of course better opportunities for muslim jihad shitskins to terrorize.

      All under the guise of “diversity is good for america”

      Fuck that guy. Fuck him right to hell.

      Like


    • The JQ is an important red pill. Its everywhere, and when people stop at feminism, racism red pills, they will never, ever fully get what is going on with the world. Fuck Moldbug; I’d rather have 100 million SWPL yankees than one jew billionaire.

      Also, daily reminder that if you use Facebook you are a dupe being used for the destruction of western civilization.

      P.S. Don’t forget about the six million.

      Like


  56. This documentary was made by Italians in the 1960’s. Even then, the Africa they portrayed was a tragedy. And that Africa is now migrating to Europe. I urge you to watch it, but be warned, some of the things will be very uncomfortable to see. I mean it.

    Like


  57. on December 14, 2015 at 9:55 am The Spirit Within

    “I have long believed that America is not the “chosen” nation of anyone’s god, and thus not “manifestly destined” to do anything. Instead, I believe that a bunch of Europe’s malcontents fled (or in some cases were shipped) to a new and mysterious continent where 90% of the indigenous people had recently been eliminated by European diseases. There they found a land that is incredibly rich in resources and easy to defend. Then, despite many attempts to avoid it, they were fortunate to receive waves of talented immigrants who contributed greatly to the development of what eventually became the world’s largest economy and most potent military.”

    Couldn’t have said it better myself.

    [CH: of course you couldn’t, because you’re a member of the reptile tribe and a dissembling pissmire.]

    Like


    • And who was the author of THAT antiWhite “just lucky” screed, asshole?

      I’m sure the pioneers who built this nation were sure thankful for being able to just sit on their asses and glean the benefits of all that White privilege.

      Much like you, you pusillanimous pismire… you Cathedral cockbite…

      You fairy.

      Like


    • Strapon’s comment, if sincere, points to a mutation of the Manifest Destiny creed, and of regarding America as God’s special land:

      America is not the home of a particular people whose highest mission is to secure it for their posterity. Rather, America is divine validation of every one of Earth’s nations, an affirmation that they too, by coming here, are human beings in full.

      Like


      • It’s a mutation all right…

        … and sincere only in the snarky neener-neenerism of denigrating the achievements of White folks.

        Let me take a wild guess and say this sentiment, if not the exact words, comes from some “international affairs pundit” whose name and phiz just happen to have a close resemblance to all the other men behind the curtain.

        Like


      • America is divine validation of every one of Earth’s nations

        Love this! Too much truth!

        Like


    • Said by a man who never had to hear a shot fired in anger, nor feel the annoyance of a broken blister…

      … much like your pansy-ass.

      Like


    • Then, despite many attempts to avoid it, they were fortunate to receive waves of talented immigrants who contributed greatly to the development of what eventually became the world’s largest economy and most potent military.”

      All right, kiddies… pay special attention to the statement owners own words here.

      Missing the irony of how, in one breadth, he/she declares the original pioneer (fleeing miscreants, most of ’em) didn’t really earn the land they fought and died over… yet later “waves of talented immigrants”, allegedly unwanted, later showed up and “contributed greatly”.

      The assumption being said immigrants had no racial or cultural similarity to said pioneers?

      Or that the fact that the “road had been cleared” (and a rough road it was) to make room for the subsequent wave of oh-so-talented individuals meant nothing?

      tl;dr translation: the original Anglo-Germanic European settlers lucked into a fat land of milk and honey, and although they resented later more somewhat dusky immigrants coming over to enjoy the fruits of their labors, the latter were just too talented and helped make America the greatest nation in the world.

      Geez, Louise… the irony, along with the comedy, continues to write itself.

      [CH: the slithery reptile within wouldn’t have lasted more than two days if he was among the original anglo pilgrims landing in new england.]

      Like


      • I believe they used to call it keel hauling.

        Like


      • The hell of it is that this attempt to re-write the narrative of the US from a land of freedom seeking, hard-ass pioneers to a “nation of immigrants” works like a charm on the deracinated millennials. The only thing they’ve been taught about their forebears is that they were ignorant bible thumping sexist, racist slave owning murderous psychopaths.

        Who the hell would want to defend that?

        Like


  58. Hey CH, this is a bit of a non-sequitur but it would be awesome if you did a review of Connor Mcgregor’s Alpha game. He’s in the most Alpha sport there is and he destroys the other fighters with ZFG. Legendary shitlord status.

    Like


  59. Testing the mods!

    Like


  60. on December 14, 2015 at 11:16 am The Spirit Within

    “All these adoptions of European styles make it obvious that the Greenlanders paid very close attention to European fashions and followed them in detail. The adoptions carry the unconscious message, “We are Europeans, we are Christians, God forbid that anyone could confuse us with the Inuit.” Just as Australia, when I began visiting it in the 1960s, was more British than Britain itself, Europe’s most remote outpost of Greenland remained emotionally tied to Europe. That would have been innocent if the ties had expressed themselves only in two-sided combs and in the position in which the arms were folded over a corpse. But the insistence on “We are Europeans” becomes more serious when it leads to stubbornly maintaining cows in Greenland’s climate, diverting manpower from the summer hay harvest to the Nordrseta hunt, refusing to adopt useful features of Inuit technology, and starving to death as a result. To us in our secular modern society, the predicament in which the Greenlanders found themselves is difficult to fathom. To them, however, concerned with their social survival as much as with their biological survival, it was out of the question to invest less in churches, to imitate or intermarry with the Inuit, and thereby to face an eternity in Hell just in order to survive another winter on Earth. The Greenlanders’ clinging to their European Christian image may have been a factor in their conservatism that I mentioned above: more European than Europeans themselves, and thereby culturally hampered in making the drastic lifestyle changes that could have helped them survive.”

    -Jared Diamond, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed

    [CH: you’ve been reduced to quoting from a buffoon widely discredited by anybody with a lick of darwin 101 under his belt and an aversion to disingenuous dissembling.]

    Like


    • on December 14, 2015 at 12:55 pm The Spirit Within

      …more sadistic name-calling from Heartiste. Shocker. How do you guys function in daily life? Rage at grocery store clerks?

      It’s an old tactic: When you can’t argue the point, attack the person.

      Like


      • Damn, you are truly one pathetic pissant. Now go stand in the corner with your face to the wall, you dolt.

        Like


      • attack the person

        You are Jared Diamond?

        Like


      • It’s an old tactic: When you can’t argue the point, attack the person.

        Disingenuous ass as usual… when the points aren’t worth addressing, the person deserves nothing but the usual mockery and disdain.

        The “old tactic” is on your end: to squirt a bunch of folderol squid ink and then try to convince your otherwise trusting opponent to spend three-fold an amount of time gainsaying the nonsense…

        … in which case said shill has succeeded in derailing and disrupting the task at hand…

        …. as well as having the opponent distracted and wasting time and energy to dissuade the nonsense…

        … which of course, will then fall into the tl;dr on most ears, most particularly the shill… who will only continue the same squid ink tactic on the next topic and repeat the same folderol days, weeks, and months later.

        Strapon, you’ve been told ad nauseum that your Alinsky shit closes out of town.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


  61. “Trump hits a new high in national poll – The billionaire businessman surges to 41 percent after releasing proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the U.S.”

    http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/poll-trump-new-high-216741

    Like


    • on December 14, 2015 at 12:58 pm The Spirit Within

      You missed the Fox News poll yesterday that put Cruz +2 in Iowa, and the Monmouth poll that put Cruz +14.

      Iowa’s a slingshot. It sends the winner into the stratosphere. Trump’s peaked. His usefulness has been to change the frame of political discourse, not to win an election.

      [CH: your political analysis is all wish fulfillment, no substance. iowa is full of evangelicals moving their carson support over to cruz. trump could come in 2nd there and easily go on to sweep the next four states. but i’ve explained this to you before, so now all i can conclude is that you stick your fingers in your ears and lie like an eskimo because your only true purpose in life is to try and dispirit your enemy: healthy White men. “try” being the operative word here.]

      Like


      • on December 14, 2015 at 3:12 pm The Spirit Within

        Maybe you’re new to politics, Heartiste, so let me introduce you to the phrase “low-information voters”. These people, who make up the majority of voters, typically don’t decide who they’re voting for until less than a week before the primary. They’re highly influenced by whoever seems to be winning at that moment. This is why an Iowa win, especially a surprise one, has an effect multiplied fiftyfold across the nation. See Obama, 2008, who used it as a slingshot to propel himself over the finish line. Until Iowa, he was fighting it out with John Edwards for second place, with less than half of Hilary’s numbers.

        Do you fucking understand that? Pull your fingers out of your ears and understand that this is a well-documented phenomenon. Iowa carries *weight*.

        [CH: iowa has failed to pick the eventual gop nominee 60% of the time:
        http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/29/iowas-record-picking-gop-winners-spotty-despite-caucus-fanfare.html
        and trump’s crowd sizes are yuuuge in des moines county. if crowd size is indicative, trump will win iowa:
        http://theiowarepublican.com/2015/trumps-impact-on-caucus-turnout-could-be-yuuuuge/ ]

        On a unrelated note: You narcissists at Heartiste HQ are super fucked up. The furious hate that you consistently, relentlessly push on this website has burdened your psyches with a dump truck of bad karma. Enjoy becoming termites in your next lives.

        [sounds like butthurt. it is a sweet sound, like the tinkling of broken egos.]

        And that’s the opinion of a healthy white man who’s known too many individuals, from too many different backgrounds, to walk around stabbing his finger in the air and frothing at the mouth at their inferiority.

        [“healthy white man”. that’s a yuuuge backpedal from 6’2″ nordic god with a harem of hotties.]

        Like


      • Since 1976, only Ronbo and W (A/K/A THE SHRUB ) has gone on to win the presidency on the R side, you thumb suckin’ ninny. And they were both were unopposed intheir re-election bids. The Iowa caucuses are far from being guaranteed nomination . But don’t let the facts get in the way of the crapulance you spout , nuh-uh.

        Like


  62. let’s see Hillary run on millions more muslims to the U.S.

    it ought to be good until she sees which way the wind is blowing and tries unconvincingly to move to the right of Trump.

    Like


  63. on December 14, 2015 at 12:36 pm Experienced Father

    CH,

    The Trumpening has hit the American national security bureaucracy,

    The National Security agencies are starting their leak blitzkrieg of “Don’t Blame me” to the guy they see as the new boss. Expect Trump to use it win…and then fire these ass wipes anyway,

    See:

    Secret US Policy Blocks Agents From Looking at Social Media of Visa Applicants, Former Official Says

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-us-policy-blocks-agents-social-media-visa/story?id=35749325

    The New Trump campaign slogan —

    Democrats will get you killed. They are about protecting Islamic terrorists from Americans, not Americans from Islamic terrorists.

    And CH, don’t fall for the media propaganda about Americans turning to Trump because they are _afraid_.

    The American public is turning to Trump because they are _pissed_ and want to kill something.

    They will settle for Democrats if they can’t get Islamic terrorists.

    Like


  64. on December 14, 2015 at 4:51 pm The Target and the Gun

    lzozlzozl Ezra Klein’s tribe has all the power. Why is he always so “scared” of everything?

    http://www.vox.com/2015/12/14/10122890/donald-trump-health-records

    Like


  65. “Don’t cross the streams!”

    Like


  66. barf.

    Like