Ruling Leftoids Increase Their Chokehold On Unauthorized Speech

Sometimes the conspiracy theorists are right.

Mark Fuckersperg — the Facebook CEO who is so beta he cashed in his billions for a fat waifu — was caught on a hot mic promising Angela “Swarthenfreude” Merkel he would do what he could to censor comments on his one billion customer base social media platform that were critical of open borders and the waves of refugee migrants into Europe and America.

We all knew this about Fuckersperg, that he’s an anti-White, pro-mystery meat degenerate equalist leftoid, but now he has let the mask slip completely off.

On cue, amygdala-stunted shitlibs will intone, “Facebook is a private corporation, so it’s not a violation of the First Amendment if they censor unauthorized opinions! It’s well within their right, and if you don’t like it you can just log off.”

How bizarre to listen to nuanced shitlibs so vehemently endorse the letter of the law and the virtue of tolerating ideas that offend!

Yes, it’s true that Fuckersperg can’t be marched to the gallows for censoring speech on his idiotic attention whore enabling website. But what shitlibs who defend the sanitization of Realtalk never grasp is that censorship needn’t be a government-only campaign for millions of American citizens to have their voices effectively silenced. When nearly every major information medium is owned and operated by scorched-earth leftoids (and sniveling cuckservatives) harboring intense hatred for normal, core White Americans, then in practice their coordinated (organic or conspired) attacks on unauthorized speech amount to a society-wide censoring — a disenfranchisement, if you will — of those who don’t toe the Party Line.

Leftoid: “but but durrr you can’t yell fire in a theater, shitlord!”

And that’ll be the end of sensible human communication with the leftoid, and the beginning of slapping him aside with the back of your pimp hand.





Comments


  1. Facebook received their initial funding from the CIA. True fact.

    Like


    • People seemingly complained that they didn’t want corporations or the government to have their privacy invaded through email selling or grocery shopping, etc. Yet they willingly gave, and continue to give, their personal info to FB for free. I never signed up, but the fact that alot of sites require a FB account to merely leave a comment is telling. It would seem that tptb were behind the endeavor. Next, since we law-abiding citizens can’t carry our guns into government buildings, we won’t be able to carry them into ANY buildings because the government will be holding the mortgage. Am I on the right track? Fuck FagBook. Glad I was never a part of it. But, even though I’m against it and didn’t participate, it will still have an effect on my life.

      Like


      • Get the ghostery app for your browser. It stops facebook (and other websites) from tracking your every move.

        Some sites depend so much on these outside factors that they even stop working when you disable these trackers. Quite telling.

        Like


    • Really? Wtf. Do you have a source?

      Like


  2. on October 1, 2015 at 12:21 pm Nataliya Kochergova

    “On cue, amygdala-stunted shitlibs will intone, “Facebook is a private corporation, so it’s not a violation of the First Amendment if they censor unauthorized opinions! It’s well within their right, and if you don’t like it you can just log off.””

    They don’t actually believe that argument, though. They’ll reverse it the moment a social media owner refuses to remove comments they don’t like, or the moment a company owner refuses to remove “offensive” ads. Since when do these types care about freedom for private companies?..

    Like


    • Yeah, shitlibs believe in freedom of association…except for when they don’t. Just try to tell a shitlib that you’re a business owner and won’t hire Tyronese-Americans because they are nothing but lazy troublemakers. Watch the smoke coming out of their ears.

      Like


    • or when talking about drudge report

      Like


    • Yep. Shitlibs have no interest in honest debate, except with people who are gullible enough to concede territory on the rare occasions the shitlibs win (obviously the street does not go in the other direction, as their response to defeats such as Trayvon and the UVA hoax is always to double down on the Big Lies).

      Like


    • the rule is, if a company doesn’t censor what they want censored and not censor what they don’t want censored, it’s either a hostile workplace for its employees of color, or not an equal opportunity employer if it doesn’t have any employees of color. Either way, it’s liable for $$damages$$.

      Like


  3. Fuckersperg’s most loyal customers:

    Like


    • Eh, yeah, I bet all their posts were ‘enjoying exciting game!’

      As an aside, can someone explain this whole Eskimo / eskimo psychiatry thing? I get the jews, but know little about whatever the eskimos are doing.

      Like


      • Eskimo is a code word for j*ws to not trigger the word press filter

        Like


      • ahh, got it. Is the filter some CH has to then approve each comment for?
        I was like ‘eskimo…wtf are they up to?’

        Like


      • It all started when the Eskimos sunk the Titanic.

        Iceberg, Ginsberg, Zuckerberg… they’re all the same.

        Like


      • Evil psychiatry traces back to the frankfurt school and the inception of cultmarx philosophy and it’s social proliferation through contorted intellectual reasoning.

        While there are legit studies of the brain and human behavior (neuro science for example, some psychology that’s rooted in human instincts), psychology/psychiatry became weaponized by cultural marxists as a tool to deconstruct the social framework of Western Christian nuclear family type heritage.

        An example today would be the amount of bullshit ‘psych illnesses’ that are handed out like candy to sell over priced legal pharma drugs.

        This also traces back to mental illness asylums in 18th and 19th centuries as they were big money makers.

        I’m sure Captain Obvious and Greg Eliot could expand more. But just take a look at the brilliant deception of psychiatry today and how much money it makes. Some, very little, does help and is based on good medicine. Most is a scam. Kind of like fast food and corn over production. Their meta sized rackets that chisel away at human health for profit and control. happens so slow nobody notices.

        and Sigmund Freud did too much blow.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2015 at 6:53 am Captain Tautological

        EK, briefly: Already Marx had realized that our womynz were the soft underbelly of our society [search on “Marx and the family”]. Freud invented “Psychoanalysis” so as to fool the crazy shiksa nymphomaniacs into confiding in him what drove their insanity [the [email protected] phantasy leading inexorably to the snuff-film victim phantasy]. Marcuse [out of Frankfurt] took that knowledge and crafted a plan for destroying the West by unleashing female insanity via what we now call “[email protected]”. Then after Sarnoff had destroyed Farnsworth, and secured the television monopoly for the Eskimos, the Eskimos began boiling the frog very slowly with these ideas. I’m not sure who realized that they would also need to destroy Western masculinity [it would have been someone like Alinsky], but a key point in “The War Against Boys” was the “Rural Purge” of circa 1969 to 1972, when all masculine television programming was suddenly replaced with effeminized explicitly anti-masculine television programming.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2015 at 7:12 am Captain Tautological

        Then the spat between Bush-41 and Perot allowed for the ascension of Slick and H!tlery in 1993, and all he11 broke loose when the Eskimos unleashed “Friends” in 1994. Parallel to all of this, within John Dewey’s Gubmint Indoctrination Centers, Feminaziism is unleashing scorched earth warfare upon Our Host’s “Piques of Giddy Pranksterism”, and Weaponized Psychiatry [credit JohnDSee] attacks our budding young Alpha warriors with a new class of Amphetamines [Adderall and Ritalin]. Finally, the Eskimos in Hollyweird notice that a certain kind of shiksa [e.g. a Stanley Ann Dunham] is enthralled by a particularly odious form of the [email protected] phantasy, involving e.g. kneegrows such as Paul Robeson and Sidney Poitier, and then the Eskimos mainstream this abomination with the movie Mandingo [1975 Wexler & Fleischer], thereby institutionalizing a permanent and relentless propaganda campaign to convince the shiksas to mudshark the Wine of Elysian White Beauty into the Sewer of Mystery Meat Brazilianism.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2015 at 7:13 am Captain Tautological

        E/K, the history from 1975 to the present is in m0d.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2015 at 8:14 am Captain Tautological

        By 2009, Eskimo Psychiatry [Ariely, Thaler, Sunstein, Kahneman] is openly gloating in Time Magazine about how they fooled the crazy shiksa cat ladies and the incel gamma shegetz SJWs into voting for Obama. http://web.missouri.edu/~segerti/capstone/change.pdf

        Like


      • on October 2, 2015 at 8:16 am Captain Tautological

        Finally, note that for Weaponized Psychiatry, Ritalin/Adderall [R/A] played the same role in the War Against Boys circa the 1990s that chemical abortifacient Birth Control Pills [BCPs] had played in the War Against Girls circa the 1960s. In particular, if your pediatrician is prescribing BCPs to your daughters, and/or R/A to your sons, then YOUR PEDIATRICIAN IS A PSYCHIATRIC ASSASSIN.

        Like


  4. […] Ruling Leftoids Increase Their Chokehold On Unauthorized Speech […]

    Like


  5. Zuckerberg can do what he wants, Merkel hasn’t learned anything apparently. People must be free to be wrong.

    Like


  6. on October 1, 2015 at 12:45 pm knowItAllLurker

    I hate to be a know it all…but if you ever hear that “fire in a theater” crap you could point out that the supreme court opinion it was based on (U.S. v. Schenck) was overturned over 40 years ago. In fact, the justice that wrote the opinion called it “the worst of his career.” The original case was actually a guy who was arrested protesting US involvement in WW1

    Like


  7. of course you can yell “fire” in a theatre…provided the theatre is on fire, and it’s on fire alright.

    Like


  8. tv lawyer’s hat on:

    “fire in a movie theater” is bad bc the speech in question is a lie, first off, eh? Second, based on belief that ppl are herd like animals ready to fly off handle and kill each other based on hearing speech. Don’t lib lawyers know western civ has a phrase “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”? Yell fire, people would be like “uh dude shut up there’s no smoke”

    Fucking stupid.

    anyway, it’s true. We live in HR-ville. HR decided to be all PC all the time. You can go small and work at home but then the PC’s will sue you for $125K for not baking a cake.

    Like


  9. Facebook, Google and other such behemoths do what the leftist establishment/government tells them to do.

    They may be private companies but they give more power to the government than the government ever had.

    There is ” separation of church and state” but there is much less separation of large companies and state.

    Like


  10. Speaking of ruling leftoids, Google’s news aggregator hilites this hit piece on Trump :

    Does Donald Trump have dementia?

    http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/265291/donald-trump-dementia/

    The next news link calls Neil DeGrasse Tyson “The smartest man on TV”, published by that profound oracle of truth “Rolling Stone” :

    http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/neil-degrasse-tyson-the-smartest-man-on-tv-20151001

    Like


    • This is only going to intensify. The leftist MSM will be hurling all kinds of shit at him…

      I got faith Trump will handle it.

      Like


  11. You absolutely can yell fire in a theater…if there is a fire.

    Like


  12. Gleichschaltung.

    Look it up.

    Like


  13. on October 1, 2015 at 1:27 pm Thin-Skinned Masta-Beta

    If Twitter can not only gag our dear host, Monsieur Heartiste, but send his entire oeuvre that was stored on their “platform in the cloud” down the “memory hole” it’s should already be clear that we should fear the giant media and technology corporations more than the government. We already have to speak in code and cannot mention certain things or utter certain words in English clear text. So it’s “eskimos” YKW N-words and c**** instead. Of course blasphemy against olde tyme Christian religion is not only a-ok but lionized and supported with subsidies. I feel like I understand how the greats of classic Russian literature had to be so careful of not offending the Czar. This little dark reactionary corner where we now exchange is just as endangered as samizdat.

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    Don’t tell the SJWs that the telecom companies, internet providers are private companies too. No doubt they’ll lobby and threaten boycott or blackmail if they don’t implement a sophisticated strict “filter” to thwart any and all reactionary crime think.

    It’ll make the Great Firewall of China look like the home of the free and brave.
    Whatever we are, it ain’t brave if our western “Strong Independent Women” are to cowardly to tolerate a basement dweller harboring any dissenting hate or crimethink.

    Like


  14. on October 1, 2015 at 1:59 pm evilwhitemalempire

    “Facebook received their initial funding from the CIA. True fact.”
    ——————–
    Unsurprising.

    Like


  15. Now we know why Cultural Marxists were willing to let private ownership of the means of production more or less intact. It gives them a measure of plausible deniability. You see, it’s not like the government is censoring free speech, it’s a private company after all, a private company with several links to the government, that must toe the government approved party-line to survive, but still a private company.

    If only Stalin knew that the only thing he needed to collectivize the kulak lands was to give incentives for a few private companies to buy all the land, and that he later could control such companies through political intervention and the appointment of a bunch of commissars, a few million lives could have been saved. That’s something we have to recognize about Western communists, they are subtler than Stalin, at least yet.

    “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control … Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

    So said Larry McDonald. Why we didn’t listen?

    Like


  16. on October 1, 2015 at 3:12 pm Holden Caulfield

    The kinds of things leftoids don’t want the public to know about:

    https://ashtonwblackwell.wordpress.com/2015/06/26/nothing-to-see-here-except-an-assaulted-baby/

    Diversity + Proximity = (Racial) War

    Like


  17. Jap PM Abe says Japan must solve its own problems before accepting any Syria refugees.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/29/us-un-assembly-japan-syria-idUSKCN0RT2WK20150929

    sorry achmed, I’ve got to rearrange my sock drawer.

    Like


  18. on October 1, 2015 at 4:27 pm Dindu Riot Squad

    Deleting comments? Fuck, they’re just straight up banning accounts if you say anything they don’t like. I had one shut down for making comments on some Dindu news site that were contrary to their established pattern of calling white people cracker Devils. I didn’t use any slurs or profanity. Just dissenting opinion

    Like


  19. Fart Cuckersturd is as weeaboo pussy as they come. His betatude makes Richard “Dreyfuth” Dreyfuss look like Conan the fucking barbarian. I visibly cringe at his visage whenever it disgraces my TV screen.

    I have an acquaintance who is probably 5’9 and 115 lbs. He has been the same height and weight since high school. He never went on a single date, and I’ve never known him to have a girlfriend. He is 34. He watches TV, plays video games, and goes to work at a call center where he provides computer customer service support. He goes to bed at 2 am, wakes up at 11, and has zero social life outside a tight group of a few friends.

    He is totally a normal conversationalist and a relaxed person, and the DEFINITION of beta. He’s more weeaboo than herb on the W-H continuum, but thankfully doesn’t watch anime. I can’t imagine what goes through his head as a run of the mill average guy with above average intelligence that causes him to behave this way, but it totally smacks of Cuckerturd to me.

    It’s almost like Cuck has zero interest in women, but has so much money and is so beta that low value women throw themselves at him the same way low value men throw themselves at 6s and 7s thinking they have a shot…so he just ended up with a slant-eyed bitch with low self esteem by default.

    Like


  20. Re: Shooting fire: https://popehat.com/2015/05/19/how-to-spot-and-critique-censorship-tropes-in-the-medias-coverage-of-free-speech-controversies/

    It is actually an old wartime censorship tactic to use that argument. Popehat has spend many words (and words and words) arguing against this remark, and showing where it comes from.

    Basically don’t trust any media (that uses this censorship thrope).

    Like


  21. It is true that freedom of speech does not entail any obligation to provide a forum for views that one dislikes. It merely means that you cannot use the law to shut down opposing views. Those who own private networks or media outlets have no obligation to publish alternative views.

    But leftists are disingenuous when they raise such a defense in these circumstances, as they usually have no respect for private property rights when it doesn’t suit their interests. And they are often in favor of forcing private media outlets to promote alternative views if they perceive those media outlets to be hostile. There have been many calls by leftist parties in various democratic countries to legislate against media bias by those sections of the press that they believe are against them.

    The truth is that for leftists freedom of speech means that others are obligated to provide a forum for leftist views, but the left can use legal action to shut down alternative views.

    Like


    • Yes, and they win because they understand politics and real life: defending others censoring you in the name of some abstract idiocy is the same as some cuckold rationalizing why he’s the real father.

      Like


  22. It’s quite shocking how rare the idea of honest to God free speech actually is. And I’m not referring to non-whites here.

    Like


  23. “The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr. Churchill calls an “iron curtain” between the masses and such facts or arguments as the local political bosses regard as undesirable, totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more effectively than they could have done by the most eloquent denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals.”
    Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

    Like


    • Look up “Dynamic Silence”… a technique well-honored by MSM, academia, etc.

      And as usual, the brainchild of… well… it gets awfully cold when you’re outside of the igloo.

      Like


      • :And as usual, the brainchild of… well… it gets awfully cold when you’re outside of the igloo.”

        Lolz

        Oh vey!

        Like


  24. 1980s sci-fi had a real message between “V” and “They Live”.

    Like


  25. Deleted FB a long time ago…fuck that filthy Jew. Fuck social media…

    Like


  26. The liberals are clearly deranged – but insanity is here no excuse. They should be wiped off the face of the earth, together with their friends – that particular group of people who have always promoted the destruction of Western civilisation.

    Like


  27. An interview idea; an Manuel Ochsenreiter/Tom Sunic/Richard Spencer tag team to discuss Germany’s constitution with its Verfassungssgeschutz and how this spells the end of Germany—what’s going on now is eerily reminicent of Earnest Albert Hooton’s plan for Germany.

    Like


  28. on October 1, 2015 at 11:30 pm Eastside School

    Facebook not only deleted my favorite pro-white page European Traditionalism, it almost instantly replaced it with an evil twin: a page attacking European Civilization. Fortunately, the page owner of the original European Traditionalism knew what was going to happen and has a backup page:

    https://www.facebook.com/European-Traditionalism-2-557560211055803/timeline/

    Here’s an example of the sort of hateful image that gets censored on Facebook:
    https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/11215110_773123459499476_2972010526259338689_n.jpg?oh=661432fd7436125360e9842103400e2c&oe=56922601

    Like


  29. To say he is anti-White is wrong, he is just Jewish.

    What else is Judaism other than a hate cult against White Christians?

    Like


  30. Let’s just turn over the keys(and launch codes) to our muzzy invaders err refugees. Media says they (everyone else really)are morally superior to whites, give em the codes, that will warm some hearts(and melt some igloos.)

    Like


  31. http://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5
    Zuckerberg: People just submitted it.
    Zuckerberg: I don’t know why.
    Zuckerberg: They “trust me”
    Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks.
    http://www.wikihow.com/Permanently-Delete-a-Facebook-Account
    Don’t be ”Dumb fucks”.

    Like


  32. The very unerlying concept of “on-line ‘social netwoking'” offends my taste, for which reason I never have partaken in it, and I doubt I ever shall.

    Like


  33. I say unto you

    Zephaniah 1:11

    Like


  34. on October 4, 2015 at 2:55 pm TenderTruncheon

    Important to note: google’s search algorithims are “neutral”. Google’s SORT algorithims are biased.

    What that means in less spergy terms: Google sees what you like (view the most) and will rank sites based on what other similar users liked (viewed the most) too.

    Many implications here:
    1. A polarizing effect (politically speaking)
    2. Potential for rigging.

    Like


    • on October 4, 2015 at 3:16 pm TenderTruncheon

      Also don’t mean to be alarmist re: above, but Facebook have ways of making you happier or sad.

      Implication: some kind soul on fb could make certain groups of similar minded users, sad, depressed or maybe even suicidal.

      Implication 2. Facebook could implant propaganda. As in it could take a far-Right-leaning population and feed it slightly vanilla-Right information (ie. A passifier)

      It could also take a left-leaning population and feed it far-far-Left leaning information.

      Implication 3:
      It could rig elections

      Implication 4:
      All highly possible today with today’s technology.

      Implication 5:
      I am scared.

      Like


      • on October 4, 2015 at 3:39 pm TenderTruncheon

        For the anti Semites pullease don’t go seeing ZOG in the above (though, yes, Jews may be related)

        It will not be ZOG doing any of the above. It’ll be some beta liberal at Google and his tatted up fatty grrrl friends.

        FACT^^

        Like