The Iconic SJW Face

It’s hard to choose one face that stands — or scrunches — above the rest as the iconic social justice warrior (SJW) face. But I believe I have found it.

This Harry Potter tranny was snapped at a Ferguson protest in Portland. Like most SJWs, she is a raving beauty. That knitted brow which will never unknot. Those beady, judgmental eyes. The boycut. The thin, sexless lips pressed into a perpetual Puritan’s scold.

The overall impression one gets is of that fat judge with the testicle chin in Pink Floyd’s ‘The Wall’.

All she(?)’s missing is the pitchfork and torchlit mob, and a witch to burn for heresy against the Church of Anti-Racism.

If only degenerate SJWs could see themselves the way others see them…. I doubt anything would change. Cult religions and their followers are immune to the emotions and sympathies that sway normal people.





Comments


    • she needs to be culturally enriched. I applaud when one of these dumb white broads gets the ultimate enrichment from her buck

      Liked by 1 person


      • Yes, it’s easy to be an anti-white anti-racist when you choose to live in a city like Portland. Why doesn’t this Diversity-lover live in Detroit? I mean, the property prices can’t be beat.

        Liked by 1 person


    • Time for some eye bleach:

      http://allkman.tumblr.com/page/650

      Ah, Allkman. 1500+ pages of female beauty. It is a sobering thought that one of the main motivations of feminism is to destroy this kind of beauty. As a wise man said, envy is one of the strongest forces in politics.

      Like


      • on December 22, 2014 at 9:05 am Hammer of Love

        God Bless You Sir !! Mine eyes hath been cleaned ………….

        Like


      • “one of the main motivations of feminism is to destroy this kind of beauty”… is that how you justify not being able to land a beauty like that yourself? LOL. And there you are gawking over half naked women… yet you wonder why you can’t find one of quality. What a fucken worthless dumbass you are.

        Like


    • would bang. just needs a long wig until her hair grows out and swap the glasses for some nerdy librarian ones. she’s begging to be dressed up fem kink like and turned out. introduce her to alpha and she’d live on her knees. easy pickings.

      Liked by 1 person


      • on December 22, 2014 at 8:09 am The Spirit Within

        truth

        Like


      • Yes, I think the fact that she’s wearing makeup is the tell. That type of girl usually won’t do anything to enhance themselves. She could be saved.

        Grow her hair long, slim down and clear up her skin (water, eat clean, exercise), makeup lesson on how to elongate her eyes and fill in those eyebrows… she could be pretty.

        Like


  1. She needs to loosen up and enjoy a nice, leisurely dinner of foot-long hot dogs served in warm, steamed buns. With relish.

    Like


    • on December 21, 2014 at 9:33 am Whomever Wherever

      Dollars to donuts says she’s into BDSM. There was a NoCal dude at the old iSteve, named Albertosaurus, who might have crossed paths with her. The outfit says dyke BDSM, acting as the Dom, and any of her affairs with the male of the species would involve very painful acts visited upon the man’s testes. Although Doms ought to be sufficiently cynical to know that all of these Frankfurt-School-orchestrated phenomena, like Ferguson, are complete panem-et-circenses charades. Maybe she’s trolling for naive gullible true-believer coeds to serve as her Subs [and maybe her coed Subs could finance her lifestyle via Daddy Warbucks’s VISA card]? If you ever cross paths with her, then slap her titties hard and her pussy even harder.

      Like


      • Dominant women are quite rare–the few that exist can make a living doing it.

        Statistics say she’s probably a sub, and I can confirm there are quite a few self-described feminists who enjoy getting spanked–they’ve convinced themselves it’s ‘transgressive’ rather than following traditional roles.

        If you can say the right words, you can lead them around on leashes and literally crack the whip in the privacy of your own home. 😉 Trust me, folks, if you’ve never spanked a woman with her own copy of ‘Lean In’, I recommend you try it.

        Like


      • on December 22, 2014 at 6:43 am Whomever Wherever

        > “If you can say the right words, you can lead them around on leashes and literally crack the whip in the privacy of your own home.”

        If you wanna see how the crazy broads like it in NoCal, then spend some time perusing the techniques employed at the Armory, aka “kink dot com”. But you’re venturing into some very Dark Triad territory.

        Like


      • on December 22, 2014 at 6:53 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        The nose piercing hints strongly that she is into some sort of kink and is quite likely partial to being slapped around and anal.

        Like


    • on December 21, 2014 at 9:41 am Whomever Wherever

      W_o_r_d_p_r_e_s_s swallowed my *B*D*S*M* komment.

      Like


  2. Great photo! But you had your choice of them from that article(except for the jaboons who were mostly waiting around for someone else to start looting a liquor store or a cellphone store.

    This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago”, showing the idealistic, oh-so-earnest revolutionary and first husband of Lara, Pasha Antipov, played ably by Tom Courtney. That same cold fish fish distant stare gazing only at the future of, not human beings individually, but “humanity”.

    SJWs love humanity, but hate human beings.

    Like


    • Yeah, but Pasha morphed in to Strelnikov. Real men only need one name…
      When I watched that movie, I was young enough for it to seem quite meaningful.

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 9:50 am Whomever Wherever

        We did Fiddler on the Roof as our fifth grade musical. It’s pretty hilarious now to look back on it and realize what it was really about. Same with the old movies like “High Noon” – I remember the first time I saw HN and I was wondering A) Why are the townsfolk behaving so strangely? and B) Why is this dreck supposed to be some sort of a masterpiece of cinema canon?

        Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 2:38 pm touchmethereyeahdontstop

        Re Who/Where doing Fiddler On The Roof. Funny comment;but what was it really about?

        Like


      • “Real men need only one name…”

        Perhaps in honorable places and times.

        But we don’t live in that milieu. Our Chateau-master has several names. So do I and so, it seems, do you.

        Like


      • Virtually all the major figures in the Russian Revolution, etc. came up with bullshit names for themselves that were purposefully adapted to being weaponized as one-word invocations.
        Stalin, Trotsky, Ho Chi Ming, Lenin – they were all made up names.
        In Boris Pasternaks novel,the transition of the beta Pasha Antinov into the blood-drenched “Strelnikov” was almost a parody of this phenomenon. In the story, when Pasha realized that the hottie Julie Christi still wanted the evil, powerful older guy(even after he had rescued and married her), he felt the need to go off and kill a few million people.

        Like


      • Virtually all the major figures in the Russian Revolution, etc. came up with bullshit names for themselves that were purposefully adapted to being weaponized as one-word invocations.

        Yep, I suspect it started as a way for the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership to hide their … “ethnic” names.

        Lev Davidovitch Bronstein. – Trotsky, for example. He had dozens of aliases before he settled for “Trotsky”, which was supposedly the name of “one of his prison guards in Siberia” websites will tell you. This is false, as the “prison” was to walk around freely in a Siberian town and have a job and his own home. Far different from the death camps the communists set up in Siberia later.

        Lenin means “Leader”. Strange how we never hear that. Hitler is ridiculed for using the title Führer, wrongly translated to Leader. In fact it means the one who drives a carriage or other vehicle. But the one who actually used the name Leader, Lenin, is never called on it.

        Stalin means “Steelman”, and we never hear about that either. Khamenev meant “Hammer”, and then there’s Molotov, Zinoviev … so many changed names.

        Much like communists constantly change the names of their organizations so that people won’t be able to connect them to past crimes. This constant change of names and symbols is possible only because their ideology is based on lies, and it takes a special, warped mind to be part of that. For normal people it would feel wrong to constantly change the facade, and people would leave such a group. But for communists that’s what’s in their nature.

        Like


      • “Hitler is ridiculed for using the title Führer, wrongly translated to Leader. In fact it means the one who drives a carriage or other vehicle.”

        ……just stop.

        It’s correct. Seriously, don’t pretend to be smarter than you are. It means the same thing Duce means.

        Like


      • Lenin doesn’t come from the word leader. The closest root word to his name in Russian is лень (len), which means laziness. The name was simply his nom de plume (or guerre, if you prefer).
        Kamenev doesn’t come from the word for hammer, but the word stone.
        Trotsky is said to have gotten his name from a railway worker.

        Like


      • ……just stop.

        It’s correct. Seriously, don’t pretend to be smarter than you are. It means the same thing Duce means.

        Um, no. ……..just stop. Seriously, don’t pretend to be smarter than you are. You just now tried to correct a name and got it wrong, which means you didn’t even try to look it up before you pretended to be superior. Fail. Führer exists in various versions in North Germanic languages, and it means sort of driver, helmsman, pilot. But because of the prevalence of idiots like you, Google Translate proclaims that führer would be “leader”, which is where you no doubt got it from if you bothered to look it up at all.

        Trotsky is said to have gotten his name from a railway worker.
        Nope, he is said to have gotten it from “his jail guard in Siberia”. Ah, it’s Molotov that comes from Hammer, not Khamenev. Big deal.

        Like


      • Arbiter trying to correct a native German speaker. Hiilarity ensues.

        Like


      • “Fahrer” means driver. “Führen” = to lead. Führer = leader.

        Like


      • on December 24, 2014 at 5:48 am Joachim Peiper

        Fuehrer means leader and is used in German in that context- Reisefuehrer- tour guide, Gruppenfuehrer- Squad Leader.

        Like


    • This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago”, showing the idealistic, oh-so-earnest revolutionary and first husband of Lara, Pasha Antipov, played ably by Tom Courtney.

      Nailed it… lozlzozlzozlzozlozlzolzolzol

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 11:04 am Whomever Wherever

        Discussion of Psychiatric Hypnotic techniques: Who is Leading and Financing the Orc Army of the Left? http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/who_is_leading_and_financing_the_orc_army_of_the_left.html

        Like


      • “Who is Leading and Financing the Orc Army of the Left?”

        The link is to American Thinker and they know well who the leaders and financiers are but they avoid the Third Rail like the plague.

        Like


      • “Orc army” is a fitting name. Remember that scene from Mordor where the officers in the army are whipping, beating and shouting at the orcs as they march out to war. And the other scene where two orcs start fighting over the captured Frodo’s possessions. The orcs were always fighting among themselves and had to be watched carefully. They could only be kept in line by the threat of brutal punishment and the promise of loot and blood in the attack on the humans.

        Like


      • I wanted to mention the same thing… all those words, but not one naming the Third Rail.

        Like


      • Leader as an absolute would always be “Anführer”, bever “Führer”. Führer translates to leader, but it is not used in the absolute way like “duce” “leader” or “Anführer”. It usually is connected with a determinant like “Touristenführer” – tourist guide, “Reiseführer” – travel guide. The National Socialists created a number of new military titles for the SS and other organizations to replace foreign terms like general, using -führer in it.

        As for the Soviet names: Stalin – “made of steel” / Molotov – “Hammer” / Kamenev – “made of stone”

        I am a natural German speaker btw.

        Like


    • OlayDave: “This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago…”

      Ha! Couldn’t put my finger on it, but you’re absolutely right. Strelnikov in drag, only uglier and nuttier.

      Like


    • ‘That same cold fish fish distant stare gazing only at the future of, not human beings individually, but “humanity”.’

      Fishbowl glasses really seem to bring that look out.

      i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/01/article-2440732-00080C2300000C1D-798_306x423.jpg

      s1.trrsf.com/blogs/331/files/image/heinrichhimmlerhimmler3-1.jpg

      jasobrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/John-lennon-White-Album.jpg

      Like


    • Führer translates as leader. It is based on the subjunctive form of fuhren, that is, führen. Which means to lead or guide.
      >But because of the prevalence of idiots like you, Google Translate proclaims that führer would be “leader”, which is where you no doubt got it from if you bothered to look it up at all.
      You could simply check the Duden, instead of acting like an idiot.

      Like


  3. Horrifying. That is the face of your executioner.

    What happened to America…

    Like


  4. on December 21, 2014 at 8:37 am When Negroids ATTACK!

    The face of every fucking commissar and Red Guard in history.

    Like


  5. The nose ring.

    Like


  6. Some of you may have heard of Oscar Wilde’s 1938 radio show that was of course complete fiction but that was so damn convincing it made masses of people completely freak out because they thought it was real?

    Well the reason tens of thousands of people are protesting, rioting looting, beating up people in places such as Ferguson and the reason why yesterday one of them shot and killed two New York City police officer is the in the same category as that 1938 radio;

    FICTION.

    COMPLETE FICTION.

    It is complete fiction that white police officers are shooting blacks as if it was a sports. The facts are that statistics show that a larger proportion of whites are being shot by police every year.

    It is complete fiction that blacks are victims of an epidemy of violent crimes committed by racist non-blacks. The facts are that over 90% of the time blacks are murdered by other blacks and not by white police officers.

    It is complete fiction that blacks are mistreated by the police, by whites, by society or that Hollywood should present a more favorable image of blacks. The facts are the exact opposite; blacks are coddled and pampered by the whole system while whites are punished severely ( the media destroys their reputation, they are fired etc etc ) for harmless little unimportant “unpleasant” words,

    and what about Hollywood? The facts are that the whole entertainment business ALWAYS makes black people in every movie tv shows, tv ad the nicest, cleanest, most decent, most brilliant , most respectable person

    Not ONE single damn reason why tens of thousands of people are protesting is anymore real than the tooth fairy is.

    My dear American friends and neighbors, when the civil war breaks out- and it looks like it will in a not too distant future with idiots like Obama and DeBlasio siding with violent savages – get the main stream media first and destroy it completely.

    If I was a religious man I would say the liberal left – and the main stream media which is an arm of the liberal left – are the devil.

    It is the left and their media who have emboldened a man to murder two innocent police officers yesterday

    The left and their main stream media are pure evil.

    PURE EVIL.

    Like


    • I thought it was the other O.W. – Orson Welles.

      Like


    • My enemies cannot speak a truthful word. Their deepest desire is to destroy others. Their talk is foul, like the stench from an open grave. Their tongues are filled with flattery. Psalms 5:9

      Like


      • Nice one.

        I prefer ‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves’ – very relevant as you start to descend through all the purposeful misinformation out there.

        Like


      • +111

        Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 11:08 am Whomever Wherever

        Our man in Florida, Rush Limbaugh, has been throwing down some powerful and deeply intimate confessionals about this shiznat lately – about how in retrospect he should have seen all this coming 20 years ago – the forces who are now aligned to destroy Western Civilization. By far the best [and most passionate] work of his career. Makes “Born Free” Animal Rights Updates look like child’s play by comparison.

        Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 11:10 am Pyjama Wearing Ninja

        @EK: the communists fucked up because they didn’t have fake opposition. And because their system of producing goods is awful.

        Like


      • “the communists fucked up because they didn’t have fake opposition.”

        I am sadly coming to realize they did – the West.

        Like


    • AJ had some kind of apologia show on last night…some nignog was complaining about how he couldn’t get a job or something or other…”when they found out I had a felony.” WTF. And he asks “wtf am I supposed to do??” The “reporter” at no point asked the obvious- “how about NOT commit felonies? Did you ever think of that?” Of course, asking that question would expose him to anger, then rage, then probably more felonies from the group of blacks he was documenting.

      Like


      • Tbh, that advice is meaningless once he’s committed them.

        Like


      • “… that advice is meaningless once he’s committed them…. “

        Are we supposed to believe that blacks who have been part of Western Civilization for a very long time have never ever heard that type of advice?

        Of course they have heard it. They have heard it since they were 4 year old just like every 4 year old in Western Civilization has, and they heard it on radio and they seen it on tv, and they heard it a thousand times from their teachers, preachers, doctors, community organizers…But more importantly they have seen with their own two eyes the serious consequences of a life of crime by watching their friends and family get arrested, get thrown in jail or get murdered by other criminals

        The advice was there.

        It is something in those blacks that is missing.

        Like


    • Police officers that murder a man for selling cigarettes and get away with it are what “emboldened” this particular bad guy.

      There is no substitute for accountability.

      Like


      • Riiiiiights… and that’s why CVS stopped selling cigs… they didn’t want a SWAT team storming the pharmacy counters.

        Like


      • You keep using that word….

        Like


      • Over 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks.

        In large cities blacks commit over 80% of all crimes.

        Where is your opinion on that?

        Like


      • @Canadian: I’d support the cops 100% if the guy had attacked them first, or did a crime bad enough that choking someone to make an arrest isn’t way out of proportion. Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown did attack first, but Garner did not.

        For what it’s worth, I don’t think the cops would have treated Garner any differently if he’d been white.

        Like


      • The police were ordered by Cuomo and deBlasio to crack down on these thieves who were stealing from the public coffers by not paying taxes. These taxes help fund the BIG GOVERNMENT that the libs all say they want.

        So, in reality, this is just a taste of things to come if we sit around and let it happen. The twat pictured above will be your kids principal or worse…

        Like


    • You are absolutely right about the state of things today.

      One thing though: the radio broadcast in 1938 did not make people freak out. That was something the media invented afterward. People interviewed have said they knew perfectly well the radio broadcast was for entertainment, and everyone else around them knew that too. I think the story about people being frightened, without telling us exactly how many those were, is for entertainment value like urban legends. And possibly to make White America look foolish.

      Like


  7. It looks like it wants to be John Lennon

    Like


  8. We align with truth. They align with power. In the long run truth always wins.

    Like


    • “In the long run truth always wins.”

      That isn’t true.

      Like


    • I’d like to think that, but I think even yourself would admit this doesnt happen. Have we not lived at least 300+ years of vast disinformation? Perhaps the most prevalent of recent lies that Germany was the ‘bad guys’ in ww2?

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 11:11 am Pyjama Wearing Ninja

        Whenever a country or another is labeled as the good or bad guys in anything, you’re reading propaganda.

        Like


      • Spot on ER. I think we’re a million miles from ever finding out the truth. As you say WW 2/Germany are classic examples, but add in the Holocau$t, Pearl Harbor, 9/11……the truth of these events will never become generally known.

        Like


      • Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.

        Like


      • Haywood Jablone. Would you like to let us know then who the Good Guys were? Was it the USA, the country that dropped the A Bomb on two defenseless cities? Or Britain and France, the ones that declared war on Germany for invading Poland but became allies of the Soviets who invaded Poland at the same time? Or the broader Allies who pulverised German cities, killing hundreds of thousands and destroying millenia-old buildings….. long after there was any military need?

        Or was it the countries that came up with the Morgenthau Plan the effect of which was to exterminate the German people and turn Germany into a wasteland?

        Yes, please tell who the Good Guys were?

        Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 7:32 pm Whomever Wherever

        The question is not so much about Good Guys and Bad Guys in WWII – it’s much more about A) Who won the war? and B) Who lost the peace? [Hint: They’re trick questions in that they both have the same answer.] Our fate was probably sealed when Sarnoff was able to destroy Farnsworth and prevent the Shkotzim from taking the lead in television. It’s very difficult to overemphasize just how evil Sarnoff really was. That and of course Jekyll Island.

        Like


      • Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.
        ————————————————————————————————
        Axis of Evil?
        You should listen less to FauX News
        The vocabulary betrays a foxtard just needed to add that democracy won
        But we all know who won, the disaster that we see and have to live through is the direct result of the victory
        Idea that the truth always wins in the end is utterly ridiculous, your very statement is the testament to it
        Whole postwar era is nothing but a constant perpetuation of lies, the whole system is based on deception in accordance with true nature of its creators,
        a perfect mirror in which only blinds cannot see the true victors of WW2
        And that is were the ultimate defeat lies- in altering the essence of civilization toward each it was striving for more tan 2000 years
        The essence of striving towards truth, courage and honesty (sometimes successfully or more often unsuccessfully depending on the age) was replaced by different values which reflect the new rulers like above mentioned mirror reflects the ugliness of the creature standing in front of it
        Only in such a world Clintons and their ilk can thrive and be considered as an example to follow by other sociopaths and large brain dead masses which typical sample would cowardly pass by a man being killed on a street turning the head on the other side and quickening the pace

        Like


      • Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.

        Ah, the complete historical ignorance of the brainwashed, who will of course NEVER read up on actual facts because it is forbidden.

        Funny how you guys never mention the little fact that, for example, Poland’s dictator Pilsudski asked France three times for a joint invasion of Germany, which the Germans found out about the second time. Or that the Polish army and police beat Germans in the streets and forced them from their homes as a calculated provocation. Or that they had agreed to start these provocations in a plan together with Britain, after which Britain was supposed to immediately attack Germany and give more German lands to the Poles. Or that Churchill’s massive debts were bought by a group of political-minded Jews, who gave him a monthly retainer. Or that the Soviet Union was massing troops on the border in preparation for an invasion of Germany. Or that Britain and France attacked Germany, not the other way around, and Germany repeatedly asked for peace negotiations and would withdraw from all lands in the West, even when they had just taken France and the British had been sent packing.

        Let’s forget little things like that. Right?

        Like


      • “Axis of Evil?
        You should listen less to FauX News
        The vocabulary betrays a foxtard just needed to add that democracy won”

        ……….

        This has to be COTW for all the wrong reasons.

        Like


      • Axis of evil ? You fool, that’s a Dubya term for camel jockies. Axis refers to axis powers of WWII. Less faux news? Try more history books, shitbird.

        COTW for completely missing the ball, better luck next time slugger.

        Like


      • This has to be COTW for all the wrong reasons.

        Axis of evil ? You fool, that’s a Dubya term for camel jockies. Axis refers to axis powers of WWII. Less faux news? Try more history books, shitbird.

        COTW for completely missing the ball, better luck next time slugger.

        He was obviously making fun of the neocon lover Ja Blo Me by taking his criticism of the Axis and showing how the Jewish side always demonizes. The targets shift over time but it’s all the same tactic by the same crowd. Ho the neocon lover revealing his stupidity again.

        Like


      • Axis of evil ? You fool, that’s a Dubya term for camel jockies. Axis refers to axis powers of WWII. Less faux news? Try more history books, shitbird.
        ————————————————————————————————-
        Foxtard you have to improve your vocabulary
        islamo-facist not camel jockeys
        you neo-cohens fool

        Like


      • “Ho the neocon lover revealing his stupidity again.”

        Anti semite, anti zionist Muslim a neocon lover. LOL.

        Like


  9. Characters like that are quick to call for basketball-orange freight cars once they have significant contact with actual people of color.

    Like


    • Arbiter
      When the Nazis occupied Austria in 1936, Check-land in 1938, and Pole-land in 1939 they systematically killed and imprisoned huge numbers of people. Any individual or group thought of as problem were abused utterly.
      Cuurchill, and some others, understood this. They could read the reports.
      The lesson for clear-thinking non-nazis was simple: If the Nazis get control, they will kill you and everyone like you. Kill, as in ded. Hitler did not understand compromize/live and let live.
      Hitler had shown even before September 1939 that losing to him was very bad news. Indeed, the jnazi plans for Britain, if they had lost, was for major death camps. All AHs blather about friendship with the Brits/Norwegians/Dutch existed inside a personality that talked of abstractions but killed like a machine in real life.
      Hitler in control = You die. Everything else was fantasy.

      Like


      • Tell that to the French.

        Like


      • It’s rare for Rum to come out from under the cloak of his usual weird form of shill tactics, but one can always count on the NAH-ZEES to bring out the man from behind the mask.

        Like


      • Thank you, ho… unless I’ve been misinformed, the German occupation of portions of France during the war would serve as textbook examples of marked restraint in the history of warfare.

        Of course, the imagined death camps of future NAH-ZEE intentions always read more exciting than the actual death-dealings of the Left… except for maybe the romance of the French Revolution… Scarlet Pimpernel and all that, what?

        Like


      • wow this guy is a loser

        Read the Table talk, listen to the speeches, Read the letters from Stalingrad. look at the facts. Hitler’s eugenics ideas are overblown and almost non-existent. If anything he viewed the British as more Aryan than the germans, Hitler had no plan to exterminate brits lol are you jewish?

        Hitler didn’t want war With the UK, but given that they declared war with him, he wanted to defeat the government, unite with the people of GB and ultimately fight a war against the jewSA after the soviet jewnion was taken care of. As he knew the US was the source of much Zionist BS.

        If you read the letters from Stalingrad you would understand, Men who knew they were about to die Arabs, Italians, turks, Belgians, finns, Spaniards. All confirming to their families how proud they are to be Nazis and die fighting communism. 20,000 refused to surrender and fought amongst the rubble until the end….they died as men.

        Like


      • Rum isn’t a mere loser, per se… more like a lapdog for his master’s cause, trying to earn his shekels and a pat on the kopf.

        Like


  10. on December 21, 2014 at 10:03 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    The bangs are a classic SJW bitch tell.

    Like


  11. She only looks like that cause neither Fred, nor Daphne or Shaggy will shack up with her.

    Like


  12. This picture is evil. I saw this shit in my reader and nearly had a fucking seizure. Well played CH, well played.

    Like


  13. That knitted brow which will never unknot.

    +1 on the Taming Of The Shrew reference.

    I’ll take my cookie now. 😉

    Like


  14. Portland. Quelle surprise!

    Like


  15. if only she could get dumped into night of the living undocumented shopping spree…

    Like


  16. Yes, the fact we can pretty accurately determine who is a leftist based on how they look is good evidence that they place a high value or place emphasis on their own social status.

    Like


  17. That or Johnny Depp

    Like


  18. If ever there was a hatchet-faced, volvo-driving, “can make macrame from their armpit hair” face, this is it.

    Like


  19. on December 21, 2014 at 11:09 am Lurking_Gorilla

    Similar

    Like


  20. She looks like Heinrich Himmler with a nose ring.

    Like


  21. This one is more of an enraged feminist with saliva coming out of her mouth
    However the resemblance is striking (small narrow lips betraying luck of femininity )
    The second thing is just possessed with rage that is to say it is in the second stage of empowerment
    No man would touch this even if armed with 6 ft pole

    Like


  22. For a ’60s version try Shulamith Firestone.

    Like


    • on December 21, 2014 at 2:48 pm touchmethereyeahdontstop

      Dude,I read a portrait of this bitch in The New Yorker,(a rare article that was actually readable). Spawn of hell itself. Rigid Ortho-Jew fambly;hates her Hitlerian father.Foul ugly vicious bitch.Had a lover–maybe a nigga,it didn’t say–a bad boy used to beat her senseless. Brother committed suicide. She buried him in a jew cemetery,didnt tell the rabbi he killed himself til later,cuz he wouldn’t have been allowed there if she had,lol. ” She” would make Portland bitch look like J-Law! And a subtext of the article was thateverything these “protesters” did,they were successful. Bitch wrote articles,books? They got published. TV shows? No problem. Press coverage? Great. Academia? Right witcha..etc.

      Like


    • Congoleum Breckenridge

      Like


    • on December 22, 2014 at 1:58 am Zed, Lord of the Brutals

      What do you expect from a thing named after steel belted radials?

      “Yo dawg, got’s a great deal on some Shulamith Firestone 26’s for my whip, nigga!”

      Like


    • on December 22, 2014 at 2:55 am L. Jon Hubbard

      A little-known bit of trivia about Shulamith: her picture in her high school yearbook was encaptioned, “most likely to end up eaten by her cats”.

      Like


  23. What this lady is confuses us for various reasons, but she is as old as the Massachusetts Colony which for some reason went on a witch-hunting binge. One of my ancestors was hanged by the neck at 72 in Salem for basically being deaf at that age and not hearing the judge’s final question. Her name was Rebecca Towne Nurse and the hanging took place early the next morning and her body was flung into a ditch from which her adult children removed her for proper burial.

    I suspect those making charges of witchcraft looked a lot like the lady above. The diverse white American peoples have always been plagued by a small segment of righteous, judgmental, murderous people like her. She may travel under the flag of social justice but this particular lady in these particular times is one of the new white supremacists, the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.

    This lady undoubtedly believes she is an “ally” of the peoples of color, but she is really a witch-hunter seeking whom she may destroy. If readers discount the label of “new white supremacist” for this lady, consider how she seeks to motivate peoples of color to hate the rest of us…how she longs to reenact the Haitian revolution…how she would scoop up blood to cascade over her face.

    And consider how she operates with peoples of color…as “kindly bent to ease them” in the same way missionaries in Africa a century ago worked to interrupt the social and religious ways of those they encountered there to secure a commitment to a new faith (i.e., a new ideology) exactly as she works with peoples of color here today.

    The fun part is how she and her cohort seek personal publicity and front row seats at demonstrations and parades, and then suffer rebuke at the hands of the peoples of color she had pretended to befriend. The ultimate act at her hands is to demand of peoples of color the right to designate those who are not authentic this or that, and thus must be excluded.

    After removing her lip ring (you can see the nasty hole), she came out to judge in a scary way indeed and uphold her new white supremacist role.

    Like


    • Bo Sears: “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.”

      Oh, the irony is rich, here. You pretend that you are attacking the SJW, yet you and her are in perfect agreement where it counts. The real monster is the white separatist under the bed! LOL!

      It is pathetic to falsely conflate the perfectly normal desire of a people (yes, including white people) to have their own sovereignty and achieve their own continuity, with the sick and malevolent destruction desired by the SJW. These two impulses, one toward protection and the other toward destruction, have absolutely nothing to do with one another, except as opposites.

      Bo Sears: “If readers discount the label of “new white supremacist” for this lady…”

      It’s obvious that your ridiculous label should be discounted, as it is fundamentally dishonest. The impulse to destroy is in direct contrast to the impulse to preserve and protect. Your treating them as the same is ludicrous.

      Bo Sears: “One of my ancestors was hanged by the neck at 72 in Salem for basically being deaf at that age and not hearing the judge’s final question.”

      Color me surprised. You’re descended from nutters, self-righteous lunatics searching for witches to burn (one of your “witches” being those evil white separatists – guilty of the crime of wishing that their people survive). That one of your ancestors ended up on the wrong end of the gallows for being hard of hearing changes nothing – you come from sanctimonious madmen.

      The main difference between you and your insane forebears is that they exhibited their nuttiness more or less honestly and forthrightly, whereas you are given to cheap conflation and obfuscation. I suppose the blood has thinned (or did some YKW enter it at some point?), but its impulse towards nastiness remains. I’m sure you saw a white nationalist, or maybe Goody Proctor, with the devil!

      Bo Sears: “After removing her lip ring (you can see the nasty hole), she came out to judge in a scary way indeed and uphold her new white supremacist role.”

      LOL! What a clown you are.

      Like


      • Silly knee jerk response. It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning. Nor is he passing judgement on or even discussing the desire of anyone to live in ethnically homogeneous communities. If your takeaway from that post was some sort of anti-white message, I think you need to read it again without the ideological filter.

        It’s obvious you are heavily invested in the WN narrative, and thus interpret almost everything through that lens, but I would encourage you not to let *any* ideology completely colonize your mind. It really does turn you into a much more shallow and limited thinker.

        Like


      • Waldganger: “It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning.”

        In other words, he wasn’t at all talking about modern white nationalists…except when he was. LOL!

        Waldganger: “If your takeaway from that post was some sort of anti-white message, I think you need to read it again without the ideological filter.”

        No ideological filter is required. He was attempting to conflate white racial consciousness with SJW lunacy, pretending that they both stem from the same mindset. They don’t, and to claim so is dishonest and ridiculous.

        Waldganger: “It’s obvious you are heavily invested in the WN narrative, and thus interpret almost everything through that lens, but I would encourage you not to let *any* ideology completely colonize your mind.”

        I’m heavily invested in the survival of my people, not any particular ideology (unless “survival” qualifies as an ideology). And I’ve been to enough rodeos to be quite familiar with the various cons and obfuscations that are employed by anti-whites. It’s not uncommon to run into the “you’re just like X,” when in fact, we’re nothing like X. If a poster obfuscates a relevant distinction, either by design or by ignorance, then he needs to be called out on it.

        What Bo is doing is attacking SJWs on a blog that he knows is hostile to SJW’s, in order to establish common ground. Then he laces the attack with an anti-white message. There is another commenter here that does the same. Maybe they are the same guy, who knows? All I can go by is the message and general effect of a post, and assume that either the guy is an idiot, or that he intends the message that he sent.

        In any event, either Bo is an anti-white, which is what I would bet, or he needs to develop greater precision in his thinking and writing. If you read his post and conclude that it was helpful to white nationalism, or even neutral toward it, you’re kidding yourself.

        Like


      • Knock off the sock puppy routine, Wald… everyone with an eye to read knows the general message appears pro-White… but the use of those key-word shibboleths leave the majority impression on the audience, and it seems just too coincidental that it’s merely a turn of the phrase, as it were.

        Peddle the apologetics and Cathedral “you’re just narrow-minded” snark elsewhere.

        Like


      • Previous post was eaten, so I’ll take another stab. Bo clearly links white separatism to white supremacism: “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.” He did not have to do this. He goes out of his way to make the link.

        He then spends the rest of the post linking white supremacism to SJW-style destruction, as if they represented the same mentality. They do not. The purpose of Bo’s post was clearly to conflate the SJW impulse to destroy with the white nationalist impulse to protect and secure, even though the two are actually opposites. Either that, or he’s just a very sloppy writer. I’m betting on the former.

        This isn’t rocket science, and we’re not deciphering the Rosetta Stone. It’s all there in the King’s English. But hey, you and the loopy Pyjama Boy below can believe whatever you like. Let’s face it, whites didn’t get in the bind we’re in today by being overly perceptive. Anti-whites, on the other hand, can generally sniff out a pro-white in a New York minute.

        And if this was really a misunderstanding, which I doubt, why didn’t Bo come out and clear it up, and tell us that he is in fact in favor of white survival and continuity? He didn’t because he isn’t.

        Like


      • Silly knee jerk response. It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning.

        Hello, sock puppet. Anyone who uses the slur “white supremacist” has exposed his leftist leanings. Bye.

        Like


    • Great deconstruction, Train…

      Lawdy, if only Matt King would return, we’d have both the Sacred and Secular neo-Menckians, here at the chateau.

      Like


    • It has been said that people fled Europe to the colonies not to escape religious persecution but that they were kicked out for being a damn nuisance to everyone else.

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 5:01 pm Pyjama Wearing Ninja

        Hence why Thanksgiving should be an European holiday too. We should call it Thanksleaving.

        Like


      • It has been said that people fled Europe to the colonies not to escape religious persecution but that they were kicked out for being a damn nuisance to everyone else.

        False.

        Even if you are joking, that kind of quip is meant to spread cynicism and self-loathing.

        Like


    • “Rebecca Towne Nurse”

      Oh. My. God. I have actually dipped it in one of her descendants. Who was drop-dead gorgeous and who came and came and came and came for me. Under different circumstances I would have married her.

      Like


    • I see the parallel with the Salem witch hunt but not the parallel to so called “white supremacism”

      And speaking of which one is a superior race, well…we whites are the only race who tolerates and even finances ( trough such things as welfare) people who openly say they want us dead from Radical Muslims to La Raza to Ferguson rioters.

      Only us whites are that nice to undeserving, ungrateful people.

      it kinds of make us superior by default.

      Don’cha think?…

      Like


  24. There is actually an idiom for this in minland Chinese, or there used to be back in Cultural Revolution days: 阶级斗争脸 (jieji douzheng lian: “class struggle face.”

    Like


    • on December 21, 2014 at 8:12 pm Whomever Wherever

      From the point of view of Biological Calvinism, what fascinates me is the question of fecundity – whether these Nurse Ratcheds ever got around to having any children of their own or whether eventually they just grew old and barren and childless. [I’m thinking of your joke about how the 1-Child Policy has devolved into the Chinese parents begging their daughters for even just one single grandchild.] It seems like eventually either the Rosa Luxemburgs and the Emma Goldmans are going to unbreed themselves right out of existence, or else secretly they are having babies on the sly, and their public personae of anti-human anti-life rigid doctrinaire bulldykery is simply for fooling the poor stupid village girls into going chiildless. Otherwise, Jehovah must have wired some seriously deep-seated insanity into our DNA, if our species keeps spitting out the Nurse Ratched Bulldyke Macbethian Witches via some sort of a random evil-generator.

      Like


      • They’re like deleterious mutations. They pop up from time to time, and have to be bred out. Although given the Zeitgeist, we seem to be getting an extra large helping of this at the moment.

        Like


    • Or, to borrow from Ian Fleming:

      “The tricoteuses of the French Revolution must have had faces like hers, decided Kronsteen…. The thinning orange hair scraped back to the tight, obscene bun; the shiny yellow-brown eyes that stared so coldly at General G. through the sharp-edged squares of glass, the wedge of thickly powdered, large-pored nose; the wet trap of a mouth, that went on opening and shutting as if it was operated by wires under the chin. Those French women, as they sat and knitted and chatted while the guillotine clanged down, must have had the same pale, thick chicken’s skin that scragged in little folds under the eyes and at the corners of the mouth and below the jaws, the same big peasant’s ears, the same tight, hard dimpled fists, like knobkerries, that, in the case of the Russian woman, now lay tightly clenched on the red velvet table-top on either side of the big bundle of bosom.”

      Like


      • That sounds like the SJW with the shiny face, smart girl glasses, and piggy eyes who mau-maued those Oculus gents.

        Like


  25. There is actually an idiom for this in minland Chinese, or there used to be back in Cultural Revolution days: 阶级斗争脸 (jieji douzheng lian): “class struggle face.”

    Like


    • Now that is interesting. I wonder, were Chinese women particularly given to posturing, like this? Or was it somewhat evenly spread among the sexes? I suspect it was not.

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 2:55 pm touchmethereyeahdontstop

        I once read an article (as a kid) in Readers Digest ’bout the Red Guard,written by a white man who got caught up in it. And indeed he did say that the Chinese bitches were especuially virulent.He noted–and this is weird–at one point a group of whitse were being arrested or moved,and had to be brought thru an angry crowd. He said the Chi-bitches would try with great effort to kick the white guys in the balls. Make of it what you will.

        Like


      • I suspect it was not evenly distributed between male and female. Posit: Females respond to, and apply, social pressure based on reputation, whereas males apply it on basis of cooperation. Facial expression among women: powerful motivator. Facial expression among men: yah really. Catch this football, asshole.
        Class struggle face: that begs for more common use in American English.

        Like


  26. You’ve nailed it here CH. She’s just perfect. Your description of her is brilliant.

    Like


    • She should be stuffed and put in a museum for future generations to look at as a warning example.

      Like


      • If you watch old Disney movies, the stories were very clearly warning us about the danger of Intellectual prideful women: Snow white, Sleeping beauty, The Little Mermaid, 101 Dalmations.. Each female villain is a vicious scheming smart lady who envies young and pretty girls and aches to take them down a peg, sound familiar? Likewise the early male Disney villains are typically effeminate scheming men: Jafar, Scar, Captain Hook. The older the Disney movie the more likely this was the case but the newer movies, well…

        I have a post on my blog about the recent Maleficent movie where a Feminist writer saw Maleficent the character in Sleeping Beauty and identified with her but wanted to make her into the hero, which is exactly what she did, while making Men in general, the villain. This has been the trend for around twenty years but it’s accelerated recently: people are stealing the old stories and re-writing them to make SJW women like the one above the new hero and men, especially confident talented men, the villain. Funny thing too, the first Disney movie where the girl is bookish and rejects a hot accomplished guy (who is portrayed as an overconfident oaf) was Beauty and the Beast, written by the same woman who wrote Maleficent.

        Like


  27. Thanks, Trainspotter, for your comments. Perhaps you can try reading what I said slowly and sound out the words.

    Like


    • Don’t worry, Bo. I read it. Didn’t even need to move my lips while I did so.

      In fact, I read it twice before posting, just to make sure you weren’t merely making the obvious point that these white SJW types view non-whites as mere props and pets. We all know that, it’s like saying the sky is blue. You can even call it a particularly sick form of “white supremacy,” but if so it is a form that has nothing to do with white nationalism, separatism, or even just traditional white attitudes about race. The traditional South, for example, was not populated by the type of girl pictured above. It was animated by an entirely different impulse, an entirely different spirit.

      The SJW desire to undermine and destroy has absolutely nothing in common with the white separatist/nationalist desire to preserve and protect. Your post has the effect of dishonestly obscuring this vital distinction.

      I believe that is what you intended to do. You write much like another poster here, who occasionally feigns support while inevitably pushing an anti-white message. But if I’m wrong, you might worry more about the quality and precision of your writing than my reading comprehension.

      Like


      • on December 21, 2014 at 3:00 pm touchmethereyeahdontstop

        Wait a minute,dont romanticize the South. The slaveowner Aristocrats were the lowest back-stabbing class of shit this nation ever produced–outside of the obvious. (That’s right Spirit Within!)They fucked the rednecks 7 ways to Sunday. (Once read this story bout this Mint Julep motherfucker,after manumission,went to BRAZIL to try and own some niggers. Just evil shit. ) whiskey,I think,wrote a good piece in Sailer ’bout Sherman,who,on his march to the sea,sought to spare the lives of the sodbusters. He had many friends in the South before the war. The slaveowners had NO such concerns about the white confederates.

        Like


      • “Wait a minute,dont romanticize the South.”

        But there is much about the South that is romantic.

        “The slaveowner Aristocrats were the lowest back-stabbing class of shit this nation ever produced–outside of the obvious.”

        I wouldn’t go nearly that far about the old Southern aristocracy, but I’ll agree that its flaws were legion. I also agree with your general criticism of backstabbing elites. Today, they plague virtually every white nation, at least in the West. This is why I often say that we need a new elite, one that is committed to the long term survival and development of our people. In the long run, that’s the only way to prevent white genocide.

        In any event, I only brought up the South as an obvious example of “white supremacy” (a concept that I do not support, by the way) that had absolutely nothing in common with the nutty, malevolent SJW mindset. Bo was lamely attempting to conflate the two, but they represent entirely different impulses and mentalities.

        The sick SJW mindset does not trace its roots back to traditional racial attitudes. Instead, in America at least, it comes right out of the nutty Puritan mentality, combined with cultural marxism straight from YKW. A really nasty, vicious mix, it manages to combine the worst of two already nutty and malice-filled worlds, which I suppose is an accomplishment of sorts.

        Like


      • Wait a minute,dont romanticize the South. The slaveowner Aristocrats were the lowest back-stabbing class of shit this nation ever produced–outside of the obvious. (That’s right Spirit Within!)They fucked the rednecks 7 ways to Sunday.

        So why did the “fucked rednecks” elect them as officers? In the Southern army officers were actually elected. I read a long analysis of Northern and Southern armies: the Northerners had to use extreme punishment on a massive scale to whip the unwashed masses into line. The upper classes despised the underclass, quite rightly, and the Northern soldiers hated the officers. By contrast, the Southerners all felt that they were in this together, as they always had. Before the war they also knew that they had a separate culture, a better culture than the corrupt North.

        It was the South’s tariffs that made up most of the federal government’s income, which was then given to the industrialists who bought Northern politicians like Lincoln, the crooked railroad lawyer whose job was to oppose farmers in court when railroads were placed over their lands. (He actually had the “chutzpah” to suggest that instead of compensating farmers for their stolen land and the disruption of their cattle, the farmers should pay the railroads, because surely they would benefit from the railroad blessings.) That is why the Northern industrialists demanded that their boy in politics attack the South, to keep the tariff income. By contrast, one of the very first laws in the independent South was to abolish all tariffs.

        Northern politics consisted of the corrupt allying with the fanatic Puritans, who believed “an ocean of blood” must come over America so that Bible interpretation could be fulfilled and paradise could come for them before they had to die of old age. The South would have none of that. They did not have corrupt leaders, they had an aristocratic society, which is very different. That is leadership that works.

        As for slavery, as Southern President Jefferson Davis said it would inevitably disappear. New changes would make it financially redundant. And had the South been independent the border states would have seen a steady stream of slaves running northward, now that the sending-back agreement was gone, which would make slavery untenable. The Africans could be shipped back to Africa where they would benefit from American tools and training far above what their Stone Age tribes had ever accomplished.

        Like


      • If memory serves, nearly 20% of the South’s officer corps were killed in action… for the North, it was on the low side of single digits.

        Say what you want, the upper classes of the South took their noblesse oblige seriously, and when push came to shove, they put their own asses on the line.

        Like


    • Bo Sears (BS, how a propos… but I digress), don’t try to snow the Snow Man. Learn to lose gracefully.

      Note I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt in re your sincerity… if I find you’re just another mask for the usual suspect Sunstein shills that stink up the chateau, I’ll be giving you one in the yarbles… if’n ya got any.

      Like


  28. Nope need black rimmed glasses

    Like


  29. She looks like her filthy cunt reeks of vinegar mixhed with rotten fish feces.

    Like


  30. Egads. The face of a desexed fraulein overseeing the queued deballing of all the American-born males in line for the slaughterhouse.

    Like


  31. on December 21, 2014 at 2:57 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

    When your face is a boner killer, your personality follows.

    Like


    • on December 21, 2014 at 3:07 pm touchmethereyeahdontstop

      Ya wanna bet she’s got a pack of limp wristed orbiters salivating at the thought of getting a sniff of that fetid crotch?

      Like


      • on December 22, 2014 at 2:28 am Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer

        Dunno mate. That seems a stretch. Although I am constantly surprised, so all bets are off.

        Like


  32. This reminds me of every face in Vermont.

    Like


    • No wonder it has America’s lowest birth rate.

      Like


      • Try being raised by the government schools there. I have to read great works of western philosophy nightly just to keep my conditioned crimethink impulse in check.

        Like


    • As I mentioned a few weeks ago, as Vermont became more liberal this caused serious decay as moving to the left always does to any place;

      […] As unlikely as it may seem, a prime area for heroin users is now the sleepy state of Vermont. On Wednesday, [Democrat] Gov. Peter Shumlin’s entire State of the State address was devoted to what he called Vermont’s “full blown heroin crisis.” Vermont now has the highest rate of illicit drug use in the United States. […]

      http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/01/12/vermont-heroin/

      PS: For what it is worth, when I was a kid my parents owned a summer camp in Vermont on the shore of Lake Champlain. That was decades ago. Vermont was not that fucked up back then.

      Like


  33. We all know that, it’s like saying the sky is blue. You can even call it a particularly sick form of “white supremacy,”…

    I’m 100% sure the allegedly boring 1950s weren’t anywhere near so predictable:

    http://vultureofcritique.wordpress.com/2014/12/22/8chan-reviews-the-movie-wild-adapted-from-an-oprah-book-club-best-seller/

    8chan reviews the movie Wild, adapted from an Oprah Book Club best-seller

    An 8Chan Anon has written:

    >wife reads book
    >asks me to go to a girl hiking movie

    Ok I had no expectations going into this movie and no foreknowledge about it.

    True story Oprah book club #1 best seller
    degeneracy the movie
    >girl raised by single mom
    >single mom dies
    >girl Cheats on loving husband
    >literally fucks million guys
    >does Herion constantly
    >get divorced finally
    >decides to go on a 1k mile hike
    >at the end of the hike accepts that all her fucking around on her husband, being a whore degenerate was ok because she found a new husband and had kids and it worked out ok in the end.

    Like


    • The only bit I like about Oprah is in that flick when a cop smacks her in the face with a pistol butt.

      Like


    • Oprah – now that we whites have given her all that success, money and power – is biting the hand that fed her by promoting anti-white full-of-lies movies, books and by saying the occasional radical comment such as ” old white people must die ”

      Such ingratitude is vomit inducing.

      Like


  34. Couldn’t happen to a better little yid:

    “Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s 17-year-old son was robbed Friday night across the street from his family’s North Side home, leaving him with a chipped tooth and fat lip, a source told the Sun-Times’ Michael Sneed.”

    Like


  35. […] It’s in my long term interest to only dog-whistle on the really interesting issues, lest the social media justice warriors take notice (fuck those people BTW). Trust me, this is a book we want to […]

    Like


    • File this one in the continuously-growing archives of Cap’n Obvious.

      Like


    • One of the witnesses in Ferguson was murdered after the trial. This witness was a Black man who spoke the truth, that the robber had attacked the police officer and tried to take his gun. So other Blacks murdered him.

      And the media are completely silent.

      Like


      • Arbiter if you have a name, a link, I would love to show this story to a few self loathing liberals

        Like


      • Murdered (shot, burned) guy was not a witness to the Brown shooting, was not a witness at the grand jury.

        Arbiter is, predictably, spreading a lie cooked up in order to hasten the restoration of a high trust society, the natural endowment of truth-seeking, truth-telling white people.

        Like


  36. Looks like Edmund Kemper

    Like


  37. Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever before seen the core defining traits of SJWs condensed into such a pure embodiment. A few things leap out at me about this “woman”:
    (1) She looks absolutely miserable. Whatever it is that drives SJWs, the pursuit of happiness certainly isn’t on their list of motivations. They are like ascetics who foresake happiness in this world in exchange for greater glory in the afterlife. Except for SJWs the greater glory is the destruction of their own race. At their core, they are nihilists.
    (2) She looks spring-loaded to react hysterically to whatever it is that her thought-masters deem to be the focus of the Two Minutes Hate (the death of a thug in Ferguson, in this case)
    (3) The smug intolerance on her face is sickening. She knows everything. She knows that whatever it is she believes in, it is right, and that’s all that matters. The facts of the matter aren’t important- if they disagree with her feelings, they aren’t important. This is the face of a zealot.
    (4) It goes without saying, but she looks like a mutant. Like many SJWs, she isn’t content with only having an unpleasant personality.

    Like


  38. That’s a man, baby!

    Like


  39. I am an atheist. But sometimes I read about white supporters of black racism being beaten at these race rallies by their black “friends.” And then I think there just might be a god after all .

    Like


  40. on December 21, 2014 at 8:43 pm Hymen Mingesky

    Johnette Lennon…

    Like


  41. I might be weing, but doesn’t it look as if her glasses have no prescription? As if wearing them so as to appear smart (sane)?

    Just asking.

    Like


  42. According to one rather interesting post on Alpha Game from a few years back, women can quite literally be brainwashed by an alpha male if he so chooses.

    One effect of pussifying America’s men is that the only possible source of alpha male brainwashing comes from: yup, big media and big government.

    Hence, mucho SJW cvnts.

    Like


  43. Very bracing conversation. Unfortunately for Trainspotter (whose posts I read on an English blog years ago if it is the same Trainspotter), he’s wrong on his reading. Waldganger is correct in his analysis.

    My mistake was thinking these ideas would build on other ideas that were well known. I’m representing ResistingDefamation (dot) org which is focused on fighting about who is doing the naming, labeling, defining, and describing of our white American demographic. (Hint: only we can legitimately name ourselves.) We founded Resisting Defamation in 1989, and we’re all over the Internet. Our motive was to counter the tableaux vivants held out to smear us and our children when we discovered the March on Skokie was headed by a “White Supremacist” who was born a Cohen…he later served a prison sentence for child molestation. But the March on Skokie news & agitprop shocked us into action about all this at the time we realized it was a hoax.

    We gave up on the English blog on which Trainspotter or another with that designation posted because it never once linked an idea with an action. We have classes to teach how to attack back, and how to determine whether or not someone’s label for us is degrading. We have four specific projects but I can see that these ideas will have to be presented in bite sizes. But Waldganger got it right.

    Trainspotter, you are right about one thing….we keep our focus on only one of the 20 or 30 major problems confronting the white American peoples at this time.

    Like


    • Bo Sears: “Trainspotter, you are right about one thing….we keep our focus on only one of the 20 or 30 major problems confronting the white American peoples at this time.”

      Um…I never said any such thing, and have no idea what you are talking about. But thanks, I guess. Glad I was right about one thing!

      Bo Sears: “Unfortunately for Trainspotter (whose posts I read on an English blog years ago if it is the same Trainspotter), he’s wrong on his reading. Waldganger is correct in his analysis.”

      Perhaps you are wrong in your writing? I can only go by what you post. You clearly linked white supremacism to white separatism, and then linked it further to the nasty SJW mentality. That’s false link after false link, and it’s right there in plain English. This is grossly inaccurate factually, and awful as propaganda – if you are actually on our side. You wrote lines such as “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.” This is what a pro-white writes and considers an effective message? Really? You have the gall to call that “resisting defamation”…as you defame us?

      Bo Sears: “But the March on Skokie news & agitprop shocked us into action about all this at the time we realized it was a hoax.”

      If you are what you say you are, and perhaps you can forgive me for retaining some doubt, then that’s cool beans. I prefer to reserve my fire for the enemy, but an ineffective fellow traveler invites correction as well, so I’ll give a bit of friendly advice. Linking white racial consciousness in the public mind – in any way – to the sick SJW mentality is a ludicrously bad approach, not to mention factually inaccurate. I’m genuinely shocked that this is not obvious to you. Linking separatism and supremacism is at least as destructive. You did both.

      Further, you say that you focus on only one thing…yet despite making lengthy posts, it is still not clear what that “one thing” is. How do you resist defamation? By lumping us in with supremacists and SJW’s? Here is a hint, Bo: Clarity is a virtue. People shouldn’t have to break out the chicken entrails to divine your meaning.

      Bo Sears: “We gave up on the English blog on which Trainspotter or another with that designation posted because it never once linked an idea with an action.”

      If you mean GW’s site, I think it had genuine value and made a real contribution, and I’m proud of my contribution there, however meager. In any event, it’s easy to criticize a blog, but you say that you’ve been around since 1989, “are all over the internet,” and keep your focus on only one problem. Yet…I have no idea what you’re talking about. So how effective is the message?

      In contrast, a truly effective propaganda group has been BUGS, which develops a clear message, and makes damn sure the reader knows what the message is – again and again. The result is a literal change in the nature of terminology and discourse. You can call that what you will, but I call it effective.

      Like


    • Bo, a much fuller response of mine has disappeared into filter world, and hopefully it will appear soon, but I’ll say this for now:

      You say that you are “resisting defamation.” Yet you defame us by linking us to supremacists and nasty SJW types.

      You say that you are “focused on fighting about who is doing the naming, labeling, defining, and describing of our white American demographic,” yet you attach labels to our cause which we reject, and which do us harm in the public mind.

      You write lines like this: “She may travel under the flag of social justice but this particular lady in these particular times is one of the new white supremacists, the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.”

      This constitutes “resisting defamation?”

      Have you not any sense of irony?

      Like


    • Bo, a (hopefully) final word on this matter. I looked up Resisting Defamation, and while I’m not terribly familiar with it, it appears at first glance to be a good group. Further, you appear to be a good guy, assuming you are actually Bo Sears.

      I stand by my criticisms of your post, consider it really bad propaganda, and hope that you consider some of the points raised. As we win the intellectual debate, we’re going to run into more and more people who feign agreement with us in part, but then lace the post with anti-white bromides and harmful associations. They are not our friends.

      But one lousy post doesn’t negate years of effort, and it appears that you’ve done good work over time, and you should be commended for that. Further, I shouldn’t have been so harsh straight out of the gate, and since you knew I was a “friendly,” you should have clarified matters immediately instead of resorting to snarky comments about reading comprehension. Which is to say, we could have handled it better.

      In any event, I don’t particularly enjoy expending time and energy ripping into a fellow traveler. I’ll do it when necessary, but prefer not to. It just doesn’t bring me the same joy as going after an anti-white.

      I’ll check back on this thread, but unless something particularly warrants a response, I’ll leave it at that. Good luck in your endeavors.

      Like


    • I’m representing ResistingDefamation

      We founded Resisting Defamation in 1989, and we’re all over the Internet.

      Oh, the bragging. “representing”. “we” are “all over the internet”. Yes, such a vast force.

      Yeah, I’ve seen that website. Trying to beat the Left by using leftist talk about “rights”. “all people should be allowed to define the words for themselves! Please allow whites to define themselves”. That is embarrassingly transparent. And just plain embarrassing, appealing to the enemy.

      The real attitude is this: the Left wants to kill us, all talk about “rights” is bullshit used to displace Whites. That’s the reality.

      By the way, your use of the word “white supremacism” shows what you are really like. Wasn’t the website supposed to be about “defining our own name”, and then you use the Left’s names? I guess it takes a leftist-leaning guy to set up a website like that.

      Like


      • Do you even date or chase trim anymore or are your days filled with writing 9 paragraph nuttery and replying to yourself in your weird, fake intelligentsia manic way?

        i think you should put down the Schopenhauer and Mencken and go get an ice cream cone before all that omega over-think permanently fixes it self and the brainsmoke stains your ears.

        You can talk shit all you want about me but shit brother….life ain’t that hard.

        I’m saying chill homie, everything is (probably) gonna be ok.

        Like


      • Aww, poor little Tilikum comes online to vent his hatred. Poor old loner is FURIOUS that I beat him over and over again for his sickness: he thinks women are “not humans”. Because they refuse to go near him.

        Poor little retard Tilikum. “do you even date”? You haven’t fucking talked to a woman in ages, old loner. Btw, I have been gone from the forum for nearly two weeks now, and in that time I have probably banged more than you did in the last two decades. But when I write again just now, you talk as if I would be writing constantly. You’re pathetic. A pathetic fat little liar.

        “omega over-think” Funny, I’ve been calling out the retard for being an omega repeatedly, and then he feels he has to use that word for me. Like a little kid repeating the words used against him.

        You can talk shit all you want about me

        Aww, are you crying now, little loner? You’re crying, aren’t you? I know you are. LOL All you do these days is attack me. Then you go back to hiding. Now go back to your loneliness, fatty. You have nothing to do with the manosphere, this is for people with actual social lives.

        Like


      • 11 paragraphs in 7 separate posts that you directed at me today with smoke rolling out of your ears. That’s the second time in a month. The screenshots are freaky similar.

        You (my crazy little psycho twinkster) are head over heels in love w/ me it seems or at least think you are.

        You don’t have the right equipment for my tastes 😦 I’m sorry little buddy.

        Like


    • Bo, you sound like a new tactic of Sunstein shillery… I welcome the greater sophistication as a break from the neener-neener Buttheadism of most of your peers, but…

      Try not to be too obvious on congratulating the perspicacity of your own sock puppet, Waldgren… it’s “bad form”, old chap. :duckface:

      Like


  44. OTOH, her lipstick is bright red. Her base make-up is thick and skillfully applied. The nose pin… can go either way. There is definitely something here to work with.

    Like


  45. SJW’s have an uncanny resemblance to persian cats.

    or

    They have unusually broad faces and pug noses.

    Like


  46. Wow, she kinda looks like that creepy old dude from Raiders of the arc

    Like


  47. Probably the Puritans burning witches looked something like that, as did abolitionists and temperance crusaders centuries later.

    Like


  48. Hahaha – that “Lips That Touch Liquor” poster should be in every faux Irish pub in the U.S. The feminist specimens in DC would be reminded of their unique lineage.

    Like


  49. right lower corner

    The original duckface.

    oink

    Like


    • on December 22, 2014 at 9:38 am Pyjama Wearing Ninja

      It’s the typical James Bond progression though. Brosnan was stylish and suave, Craig looks like a bodyguard and he never seemed able to make the typical Bond charisma congruent. Considering the decline, the next Bond should look like a bouncer. I guess the bodyguard look is already passe.

      Like


    • Once Hollywood put him in Valhalla (llzozlzozlzozlozl), guarding the Bifrost Bridge (lzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzolzol), no white role was too good for him.

      Like


  50. “Cult religions and their followers are immune to the emotions and sympathies that sway normal people.”

    The key point. These people are mental defectives.

    Like


  51. on December 22, 2014 at 9:19 am themanofmystery2

    Bitch looks like Kevin Spacey in Glengarry Glen Ross.

    Like


  52. […] It’s hard to choose one face that stands — or scrunches — above the rest as the iconic social justice warrior (SJW) face. But I believe I have found it. This Harry Potter tranny was snapped at a Ferguson protest in Portland. Like most SJWs, she is a raving beauty. That knitted brow which will never unknot. Those beady, judgmental eyes. The boycut. The thin, sexless lips pressed into a perpetual Puritan’s scold. All she(?)’s missing is the pitchfork and torchlit mob, and a witch to burn for heresy against the Church of Anti-Racism. If only degenerate SJWs could see themselves the way others see them…. I doubt anything would change. Cult religions and their followers are immune to the emotions and sympathies that sway normal people. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/the-iconic-sjw-face/ […]

    Like


  53. Just had another highly depressing reminder of just how stupid and brainwashed most people are. Tried to talk realtalk about things that are simply obviously true to a brainwashed idiot at work, who, citing a Jew York Times article, tried to tell me that she’s amazed we still have a racism problem after the “civil rights movement” was in the 1960s. She means the problem is white cops going around killing innocent blacks. lol how can one be so god damned fucking stupid. It’s just pure fiction.

    the problem in this country, of course, is black thugs like this:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/nypd-monitors-social-media-death-threats-cops-article-1.2052600

    who executed two innocent family men trying to have their lunch while doing their jobs.

    folks most of our fellow white people and nearly all white women are simply retarded, without an original thought in their head, having never read anything other than CNN and jew york times.

    god help us

    Like


  54. No one has mentioned Tessa Kum,the Australian nut who has been in the news lately,sticking up for the dear muslems after the hostage murder in Sydney. Pure subhuman shit.

    Like


  55. In other news, is Taylor Swift the poster child for hypergamy? All evidence says “yes”.

    In fact, there’s some clickbait for you, CH, Taylor Swift is Everything That’s Wrong With Today’s Women

    lozlozlozlozl

    Like


  56. Observe, gents, The sickening complections of theses hags, reflecting decades-long losing battles to cover up their pinched faces, shriveled by hours upon hours stirring hell broth in their cauldrons….

    Like


  57. It’s interesting how the “barbaric” practices like discrimination, slut shaming, fat shaming, chauvinism etc are vindicated in hindsight.

    We can now see that the age old pastime of beating up nerds was an effective survival strategy.

    Like


  58. And now, on a lighter note ………

    Like


  59. She’s our version of the Taliban

    Like


  60. FSG
    “Dominant women are quite rare”

    I trust you meant to say
    Feminine-looking dominant women are quite rare

    cortesar
    No man would touch this even if armed with 6 ft pole

    Looks like this animated film character

    Shame, because apart from that PC stuff, Big Hero 6 is a good movie.

    Like


  61. I’ve seen her on the Venture Bros.

    Like


  62. Come on CH… Harry Potter deserves more credit.

    Like


  63. Ironically enough, I myself usually now have my face set in more or less the same way as our “iconic SJW”, and women seem to respond very well to it.

    But then again, I’m a dude.

    I can understand why SJWs are all about defending trannies now. Given the choice, I wouldn’t be surprised if a large fraction of SJWs (of both putative sexes) aren’t itching to go tranny themselves.

    Like


  64. Yesterday’s overbearing, uber-pious, and rigid church lady is today’s female SJW.

    Like


  65. For an horrific example of an empowered SJW, go to Google of Bing and search these two cross terms: 1. Rozalia Salkind; 2. CheKa. I doubt that either of the Nazi bitches, Ilse Koch or Dorothea Binz, had anything on her in terms of sheer wanton cruelty.

    The crimes of the Soviet revolution and the Red Terror in Eastern Eirope in the 1920s, should be publicised and remembered as widely as are the crimes of National Socialist Germany.

    Like


    • It does seem that the Stalin’s Willing Executioners enjoy a pass from America’s media, entertainment, and academic enterprises.

      Like


      • And yet all we’ve heard from your crusading ilk thus far is “white supremacy”, with nary a whiff of complaint in re foetur judaicus.

        Like


  66. Gaaaahhwd those jewess manjaws! My eyes!

    /yell MEDIC!!!

    Like


  67. From the same collection as the image in CH’s original post:

    Like most SJWs, she is a raving beauty.

    The subject of the post, to the left, is not quite so bilious in this other brief moment.

    Overall, in regards to attractiveness, there is clearly variety.

    [CH: if you were to average the looks ranking of all the women in that crowd, it would be a 4.]

    Like


  68. My name is Charlotte. I’m a Social Justice Warrior. And a pig. I’m here to say no to E.B White privilege #justsaynotoebwhiteprivilege.

    Like


  69. Ahhh another mentally ill tranny like John Flynt who now calls itself “Brianna Wu”. The only thing missing from the creature’s ugly mug that Heartiste put up for all to see is the black rimmed Buddy Holly sunglasses almost all of these hipster SJW’s wear. Its basically become their calling card these days. If you see black rimmed Buddy Holly sunglasses on a person’s face generally they’re going to turn out to be some smarmy and smug beta male hipster or loser female that has attached herself to the hipster SJW cause in order to find meaning in our nihilistic Jewish controlled dystopia Idiocracy trash culture.

    Like


  70. If you’ve seen the movie The Killing Fields, you might remember a young woman who suffocated dissidents by putting plastic bags over their heads while their hands were tied behind their backs. This SJW reminds of her. These genocidal maniacs are kindred spirits of the Khmer Rouge.

    Like


  71. May i submit an entry for iconic SJW face?

    How about “Hollaback!” girl?

    NY Daily News – Public Advocate Letitia James is often out of office for personal appointments, political events: schedules

    She is the real deal: Knitted Brow, Outraged, Sexless, Down for the Struggle.

    Like


  72. on December 24, 2014 at 2:21 pm Hilary Clinton

    Does SJW stand for single joo-itch women or social justice warriors. Then I realize they are the samez.

    Like


  73. on December 24, 2014 at 6:59 pm Cuddle Party Boner Rampage

    To point out the obvious:

    Like


  74. Tilikum is the given name of 6 and a quarter ton Orca that has been systematically killing every stupid swimming attention-whore that has so far fallen into his pond. Amen.
    I call myself “Rum” because Whiskey has been fairly taken first.

    Like