The Wickedest Links

1. “So there’s really nothing that can be done about the decline of the Republican Party. As virtue and ability decline in the electorate so does the republic.” Randall, and Reihan, are right. Demography and character are a nation’s destiny. And right now, the US of Gay is going down the crapper on both counts.

2. Do you have a palette of tissues handy? Because feminists are about to weep their last bitter tears. Satoshi Kanazawa is back in the news with a study that concludes the maternal instinct decreases by a quarter for every fifteen extra IQ points. Smart and over-educated lawyercunts are a dying breed. Literally. I believe it was the Audacity of Huge who once tabulated and correlated GSS data to find that smart men have more children than dumb men, while smart women have fewer children than dumb women. I call this the “Alpha Male-Cute Secretary Assortative Mating” theory. You may know it better by its street handle: Female hypergamy. And… wait for it… it will be the salvation of the white race in multicultural miasmas.

3. Study shows girls commit dating violence as often as boys. If you’ve ever dated a drama whore, you know that they can get physically aggressive. It comes with the hot sex territory. You’re banging the bejeezus out of her one night, and the next day she’s pushing you into the knife rack. Now of course, owing to inherent size and strength differences, this sort of physical violence from women carries less risk than the same violence would from men. Men are also more unwilling to admit they get pushed around by their girlfriends and/or wives. Which may be why girls resort to physical violence more often, because they know they can get away with it. The study authors also looked at “verbal violence” — which in CH terms is known as psychological warfare — and this too, is one area where women excel. Now I don’t believe verbal violence is nearly as bad as real violence, but if you take feminists’ and leftoids’ words for it — that bad words are trés hurtful and on a par with stabbings and shootings, and therefore their expression ought to be regulated by the state — then a lot of women should be thrown in jail for nagging and needling their men. #feministlogic

4. “[T]he West began to diverge from the rest long before the Growth Revolution.” Why did the West rise? If you look at GDP per capita, instead of total wealth, it becomes clear that the West diverged from China long before the 19th century. Conclusion: The North Sea diverged from the rest in 1,000 AD. Why? Outbreeding is one answer. Whatever the precise answer, it appears that genes are more and more becoming the obvious candidate for explaining Western greatness. #equalistpain

5. Chicks dig violent jerks. #hohum

6. Suicidal libertarianism. In multiracial, open borders societies, libertarianism is nothing short of a death cult. Any time sperglord Bryan Caplan is owned, is a time to

th_SnoopyDance

The inevitable logic of their Rainman ideology that libertarians don’t get (or pretend not to get for tribe-scoring subterfuge) is that, although open borders to the world’s riff-raff may bring short-term proximate benefits like cheap strawberries, it also brings longer-term costs in the form of sacrificing ultimate interests, like one’s ethnic genetic continuity. But perhaps that cost is what the open border libertarian traitors really want. In which case, all that needs saying to them is

7. Sex video exonerates men who were falsely accused of rape by a world class cunt. It’s ironic that the feminist push to enlarge the domain of legal rape and to make it easier for women to accuse men of various sexual improprieties is also creating an incentive for men to videotape every sexual liaison they have with women that feminists would hold up as cultural heroines fighting the patriarchy. But, that’s what you get when you follow #feministlogic.





Comments


  1. on August 6, 2013 at 12:23 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    I don’t understand why CH believes the Kanazawa study would make feminists cry. Telling me my IQ runs in inverse proportion to my maternal desire is hardly an insult. If anything, the study’s results represent a rather cruel insult to those women who have chosen to have children…one that I as a childfree-by-choice woman would never have made, because I know better. Several of the most brilliant women I know have chosen motherhood.

    And of course we shouldn’t be shocked, because this is the Daily Fail, but that hed is nothing but shit-stirring. “Are you too clever to have children,” indeed.

    Like


  2. In this day and age, any aspiring or accomplished PUA needs to bring a discrete video/audio recorder to all sexual engagements, particularly those with women whom you do not have a prior sexual history (ie ONS)

    One, if it can be used to exonerate then cool. Second, it’s a good way to critique both one’s technique and more importantly the actual quality of the women you are pulling. Anyone can remember a sexual encounter as having been with a high quality woman (the haze of nostalgia) but the video will never lie.

    Like


    • Ummm, without her consent? Not only is this a really crappy thing to do, it’s illegal in most states.

      Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 1:07 pm supersystem3

        The alternative for the men in the linked article was prison. It is definitely a solution to be considered, and I am absolutely not saying you should ever share such a video with someone. However, there are valid reasons to want to do such a thing.

        What I said about having ‘personnel records’ was more of a joke though…

        Like


      • I am in no way suggesting that false rape charges don’t happen or that they aren’t devastating. But there are better ways to protect yourself. I would completely flip out if I found out someone did this to me, and I’d be happy to press charges. Instead why not text her later that night or next morning “Hey great time last night, did you have fun” or some variant. Obviously you want her to text back something that confirms consent. If you don’t want to give her your real cell number then get a prepaid throwaway.

        Like


      • But there are better ways to protect yourself. I would completely flip out if I found out someone did this to me, and I’d be happy to press charges.

        On what grounds? This broad was pressing false charges beforehand, claiming she was raped. She even got her white knight male bitches to beat up one of the guys.

        Like


      • On the grounds that he violated whatever section of the penal code in that jurisdiction that prohibits nonconsensual videotaping in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It varies but that’s the basic concept.

        I’m not talking about the woman in the story… I think she knew she was being taped anyway. I was saying I would press charges if I found out someone did this to me. Granted, I’m not going to be filing any false rape charges so I’m not sure how I’d find out about it. But just because you might get away with it doesn’t make it any less crappy of a thing to do.

        Like


      • What if she is so devious that her text reply is also a lie to make it look as if she is being harassed?

        Some women are capable of evil, I would know, I have dated a dozen such women.

        videotaping everything is still the best defense.

        Like


      • Evil is banal, but still evil nonetheless

        Like


      • This depends on the state you are in. Guess what? My house has a sticker:
        ‘This property is protected by Audio and Video surveillance.’

        That sticker, by every entry door, is all that is required for me to have cameras wherever I feel like. That does depend by state, but that warning would probably work in most. In my state, I am legally in the clear. I am not a lawyer, but I did pay one for his skills to make sure it was legal.

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 3:09 pm Dan Fletcher

        Virtually no disadvantages to videotaping your encounters:

        Cons:
        -Few hundred $ on camera system, few hours to get it set up
        -Minuscule chance of being caught if you put even a bit of thought into it. Those cameras are so small you can hide them in fucking anything. Just don’t tell anybody and you’ll be golden.

        Pros:
        -Rock solid defense against life-ruining rape charge because you didn’t call a girl back/take her out for breakfast.
        -Get to record your encounters for future viewing. When you are old and out of the game, you can get a 1080p reminder of a life well lived.
        -Can view them later to improve technique and form, like watching a replay of an athletic performance.
        -Did I mention not being convicted of rape?

        Such an idea would never have occurred to me were it not for our biased court system and ridiculously light punishment of false rape accusations. Sucks but it seems to be the best way to deal with the world we live in.

        Like


      • Nice double-u on the minuscule. (((Fist bump)))

        Like


      • Con – you get reminded that the those hot girls of yesteryear weren’t actually that good looking.

        #beergoggles #kodachrome

        Like


      • it is not legal for women to lie about rape but many still do it

        we have to fight them any way we can

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 4:45 pm depressed_danny

        Don’t ask, don’t tell.

        If one of my ONS ever dines to have a problem with it, I guess I’ll just have to write on a little Post-It note and stick it on the wall somewhere “I am filming you.” Boom, onus off me.

        Besides, I’d say less then 5% of my ONS have ever even asked if I had a condom. These skanks aren’t really too concerned with consent – or much of anything else for that matter. In a way that’s the beauty of the modern Western woman; for them, ignorance really is bliss.

        Like


      • I guess you just do not understand the law, Amy. A participant is not barred from taping himself in most states of the union. It is the surreptitious taping of others without their consent that crosses the line, but one can surely tape whatever happens in his own bedroom, especially if he is in the tape himself. Sorry to disappoint you.

        Like


    • on August 6, 2013 at 1:23 pm Dan Fletcher

      Really is a good idea for any man. Spy cameras have gotten very cheap, covert and easy to use. Only guaranteed way to exonerate oneself after rape accusations.

      Wiretapping charge > rape charge.

      Like


      • No, it isn’t a good idea. How about you restrict your sexual activity to girls who enjoy being taped? It’s probably a pretty big pool. My guess is that willingness to be taped correlates strongly with tattoos and a very deep tan, so you can filter quickly. In fact, I’m guessing that willingness to be taped, willingness to have ONS and willingness to file false rape charge are all pretty strongly correlated.

        Some of you are almost as bad as feminists, accusing women of being lying whores and using this contempt to justify nasty behavior against all women. It’s like feminists suggesting we should force men through criminal background checks and a police frisks before having sex, because the guy could turn out to be a rapist.

        Like


      • with the judicial system almost always taking the side of women, we are simply reacting to what feminists have created

        we are not as bad, this is self preservation

        Like


      • I don’t think you get it. It’s not “nasty behavior”. It would only be “nasty” if the guy filmed the girl then spread it all over the internet and showed all his buddies. If he kept it to himself and only showed it in court if he got hit with a false rape accusation, then I don’t see how it’s objectionable.

        Like


      • No, I get it. The filming itself is nasty behavior. You may not think it’s so terrible, but I do, and the women out there who value their privacy and actually have some class and modesty (they exist) would agree. It doesn’t matter whether it gets spread around, although it’s much worse if it does. I don’t want to be filmed in that situation. I never want to be filmed in private without my consent.

        It’s like the police forcing DNA testing to catch a rapist at large. How would you feel about being forced to give DNA just because you’re male living in the area and there’s a rapist out there they need to catch? You’d be in Big Brother’s DNA database forever, even though you didn’t do anything wrong. Most men are going object to this, and they should. Why should your rights be infringed to protect women from rape?

        [CH: On the scales of moral justice, falsely accusing a man of rape is a LOT worse than secretly videotaping sex.]

        Like


      • I don’t understand how having your video on some guy’s computer is as dangerous as having your DNA in a government database.

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 4:46 pm FuriousFerret

        “You may not think it’s so terrible, but I do, and the women out there who value their privacy and actually have some class and modesty (they exist) would agree.”

        If you are having casual sex with men, I think class and modesty went out the window a long time ago.

        Amy, you are dangerously getting close to being in the ‘TITS OR GTFO’ category. Babbling about how you think people should behave that always seems to benefit women’s interest in the SMP and society.

        You really think that this is the place for moral finger wagging?

        Like


      • [CH: On the scales of moral justice, falsely accusing a man of rape is a LOT worse than secretly videotaping sex.]

        I agree… and rape is a lot worse than a DNA sweep. But if you’re saying the ends justify the means for either or both, I can’t agree with that.

        Like


      • No, I get it. You’re a better sort of whore who is mortified by the thought of being lumped in with the tanned and tramp-stamped variety.

        I doubt that this precautionary videotaping is a criminal offence. I’ve never heard of any arrests for nannycamming. There may be possible actionability in the civil sphere in some jurisdictions.

        Like


      • Thanks Kai, there’s a compliment in there somewhere. Lol. I’m in the US and usually it’s about whether the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Nannycam in living room is probably ok. Nannycam in bathroom, probably not.

        Ferret, assume what you like but I’m not into casual sex. My initial post on the videotaping was mainly to let people know it’s illegal in some places. As for “moral finger wagging”, I would have been off this thread five posts ago if not to answer other people who were addressing me. I have nothing more to add, you’re right about that.

        Like


      • My initial post on the videotaping was mainly to let people know it’s illegal in some places.

        It’s only illegal if the cops catch you.

        Like


      • No, I get it. The filming itself is nasty behavior. You may not think it’s so terrible, but I do, and the women out there who value their privacy and actually have some class and modesty (they exist) would agree.

        If false rape accusations weren’t as common as dirt, there’d be no reason to do it. But they are, so there is.

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 7:35 pm Modern Primitive

        How do I screen for those girls? You can’t just ask “do you have a problem with being filmed while fucking?

        Like


      • @ Amy

        “My guess is that willingness to be taped correlates strongly with tattoos and a very deep tan, so you can filter quickly. In fact, I’m guessing that willingness to be taped, willingness to have ONS and willingness to file false rape charge are all pretty strongly correlated.”

        That’s all true; they all correlate very strongly with a willingness to be taped. However, a girl wouldn’t have anything to worry about if she weren’t into casual sex. Casual sex is at the heart of this issue.

        Many of these guys here pick up girls for one-night stands. I don’t care if such girls were videotaped without consent getting fucked. As far as I am concerned, getting video tapped during sex is a risk you take for having casual sex, much like contracting an STD or getting killed or beaten are. There are risks to casual sex.

        Girls that don’t want to contract an STD, or get killed, or get videotaped having sex, shouldn’t sleep with strangers.

        Your point is irreverent.

        Now, if your BF/hubbie videotaped you without your consent, that would be a whole different thing, but then again, why would he? If he wanted to do a sex video with you, he’ll tell you, so you can perform lol.

        @ corvinus

        “I don’t think you get it. It’s not “nasty behavior”. It would only be “nasty” if the guy filmed the girl then spread it all over the internet and showed all his buddies. If he kept it to himself and only showed it in court if he got hit with a false rape accusation, then I don’t see how it’s objectionable.”

        And, how many men (a woman slept with on a one-night-stand basis) could be trusted not to show such hot property to their buddies? C’mon! That’s a dumb argument. It’s on par with sexting. I don’t understand girls sending nudes of themselves to guys they hardly know, expecting those pics to be for his eye only. Of course, he’s going to show them to all his buddies. It’s too tempting not to.

        A man is only going to feel loyalty to you if you’re his woman. Otherwise, all bets are off.

        You don’t want your reputation compromised? Don’t put yourself in a compromising position to begin with.

        Like


      • And, how many men (a woman slept with on a one-night-stand basis) could be trusted not to show such hot property to their buddies? C’mon! That’s a dumb argument. It’s on par with sexting. I don’t understand girls sending nudes of themselves to guys they hardly know, expecting those pics to be for his eye only. Of course, he’s going to show them to all his buddies. It’s too tempting not to.

        A man is only going to feel loyalty to you if you’re his woman. Otherwise, all bets are off.

        If a guy is going to be dumb enough to tape a girl without her consent and pass it around to his buddies and open himself up to prosecution, that’s his problem. (Although, as GBFM points out, Tucker Max apparently gets away with it all the time.)

        Like


  3. “Libertarians” who support open borders are self-deluded pompous asses. You can’t have private property (which they have orgasms over) and open borders (more orgasms) at the same time. If everything was private property you wouldn’t any immigration at all, because no one is going to let millions of immigrants tramp across their property. And they certainly not going to stand outside all night with a shotgun and a flashlight to charge people $5 to cross their property. Personally, I want $20,000 for each immigrant crossing my property.

    Like


  4. Sex video exonerates men who were falsely accused of rape by a world class cunt. It’s ironic that the feminist push to enlarge the domain of legal rape and to make it easier for women to accuse men of various sexual improprieties is also creating an incentive for men to videotape every sexual liaison they have with women that feminists would hold up as cultural heroines fighting the patriarchy. But, that’s what you get when you follow #feministlogic.

    Bitch is looking at four years in the clink for felony assault and battery, due to her getting her white knight boyfriend and beta orbiter to beat up one of the alleged “rapists”. The cops couldn’t find the two white knights so they threw the book at her instead. lozlzolzozlz

    Like


    • The cops couldn’t find the two white knights so they threw the book at her instead. lozlzolzozlz

      Technically, it was the judge (the “justice system”) who threw the book at her. The bitch got a taste of her own feminazi medicine.

      Like


  5. From the sex video link:

    “Jurors acquitted Kurre of the misdemeanor filing of a false police report”

    In other words, she got away with the false rape charge. She was found guilty of assault because she told her boyfriend that she was raped and proceeded to be present when he beat the living daylights out of one of the men.

    Like


    • precisely

      Like


    • Which is bullshit. This is why I have my surveillance system. I never go back to the woman’s place for at least 15 bangs, tons of texts from her, et al.: I will not end up in jail because some snowflake suddenly felt bad, guilty, vengeful, et al.

      Heck, it’s why I do all the break ups at my place.

      Like


  6. Diversity+proximity=war
    Just ask the Balkans, post British ruled Africa, or the British Northern US States vs the Scottish Southern States. The modern Marixt diversity programs will bring this conflict to our country soon enough. Diversity is not a strength. It chaos. E plurius unum (out of many, one) expounds to brilliance of the framers original intent to have a strong country. The current regime controlling America is doing everything they can to destroy our character and culture and they are winning.

    Like


    • You are right

      we have a saying in French that when you are in bed with different people, everyone is pulling on the blanket, they think of themselves, not of the others

      and that is what different ethnic groups are doing right now

      there is La Raza, there all those Muslims demanding more and more, there are those who wanted to use the Zimmerman/Trayvon thing to obtain more from whites

      diversity only works temporarily until one group wants the whole blanket and takes it all by anyway it can

      diversity brings tensions between people who are not very compatible

      this may seem absurd but diversity in the end is divisive

      Like


  7. Lesson: grow up, find a decent woman, marry her, reproduce. Do not have sex with strangers.

    Like


    • All decent women start out as strangers. Unless you live in West Virginia.

      Like


      • No they don’t. You might meet them at church when you’re ten years old and grow up to marry them. Unless you live in California.

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 4:53 pm depressed_danny

        Church girls are sluts AND hypocrites. I’ve yet to meet a 4+ girl on the attractiveness scale who goes to church and isn’t a (or well on her way) to admirable sluthood. They just use church as a moral shower; they’re ‘better’ then those skanks who give it up on weekends because they have a close personal relationship with Jesus and he like, totally forgives everything, every weekend.

        And the ones who save their ‘virginity’ until marriage? Guaranteed they gave out plenty of hand jobs, blow jobs and anal in the interim.

        There’s a reason the Church is a joke in the modern age – it’s full of devious women and weak men. Why do you think real men have left their flock en masse?

        Like


      • I don’t know what the faggots up north do, and I don’t really care. And I don’t care what their nasty women do, either, between bedding negroes and getting tramp stamps. But where I come from, the nice girls still go to church, as do the real men. And we meet at youth services and date without sex and get married. Rarer breed, maybe, but we’re still around.

        Like


      • One of the hottest girls I banged in high school was the stereotypical: the preacher’s slutty daughter. She was the biggest skank in school, bar none. She was a bigger skank than the second class, white trash slut, by at least 15 cocks I found out later. Worse, in comparison to white trash girl, preacher’s daughter was a raw dog skank.

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 8:20 pm depressed_danny

        @futurodellanazione

        Hate to break it to you guy, but you’re displaying a hard case of NAWALT, and that leads me to suspect that you’re still a hard blue piller – at most a purple pill.

        All those ‘nice’ girls you’re going to youth group and church with are out at the club with the ‘nasty’ women and playing the same game hard. While you ‘real’ men are praying away Friday and Saturday nights, working your butts off to provide cash for your future stay at home wife, she’s out grinding up against the other guys. We’ll be getting the real her, all of her, and you boys will be getting her doppelgänger.

        It’s the modern West. You’ll save yourself a lot of heartache and wasted love if you accept that. Also, those ‘faggots’ up North are doing a lot more for keeping America a functioning first world country then Dixieland is.

        http://www.fuckthesouth.com/

        P.S. I clearly hit a chord with you. Sorry fella, but tough love includes tough truths. Hope you find your way.

        Like


      • I’ve been married for years. What your last six exes did to you and your four inches of insecurity matters to me not at all.

        Deo Vindice.

        http://dixienet.org/

        Like


      • on August 7, 2013 at 11:33 am depressed_danny

        @Alex

        My first term in Uni, we had a hard core Baptist’s daughter on our floor (Co-ed dorms). Pretty cute, but a real self righteous, holier then thou type that most of these Christians seem to be. She openly criticized all the women in the dorm who slept around.

        Lo and behold, the first Alpha to call her out on her sermonizing and stick to his criticisms had her v card by the middle of October. Over the next year and a half she slept with at least a dozen guys I knew, including a MFM threesome.

        Church is blue pill Beta male central – ironic in a way, since the Bible is chock full of anecdotes about the real nature of women. You would think they’d know better, but they don’t, and cute church girls are starving for real men to show them how to be women; cads or otherwise.

        If my ADD didn’t make church unbearable, I’d totally play some Sunday Game.

        Like


      • No self-righteous Baptist’s daughter would live in a co-ed dorm. Fail.

        Like


    • Yeah, good luck with that, you’re going to need it.

      Like


  8. Smart men are no great deal either. They never want to do anything around the house.

    Like


    • That’s a feature, not a bug.

      Like


    • they probably do not want to do anything because they pay for everything.

      Like


    • Again another inane comment, oh look, it’s a female commenter. I understand that banning women from the comments section would be bad PR and almost unenforceable, but please wtf is going on.

      Like


      • Maybe it’s a bit like when a woman being abused by her partner husband still can’t bring herself to leave for whatever fucked up reasons her little empty little head rationalizes.

        Like


      • You can block their comments with the Comment Snob plugin for Firefox (and I think Chrome as well). I wrote a rule for this specific site to block based on username of the comment writer. I can post it if you’re interested.

        Like


    • Close to the opposite of the truth. Plenty of smart men would be willing to do more things around the house if they weren’t viciously punished for it. (See http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/07/lets-call-the-whole-thing-off/307488/ for a punishment example.)

      Like


    • Believe me, once your husband starts helping around the house (other than a few manly things that most women don’t do), your attraction to him will wane. Men helping around the house isn’t all that.

      It’s a feminist misconception that women like men who help. It’s also a feminist misconception that women like sensitive guys. I don’t buy neither one of these claims. Women like manly men, period.

      Like


  9. #6. I just don’t see the connection between wanting to bang hot broads and the weird racialist/nativist strain. Hard as it is to believe, many of your readers are now stupider for reading that link.

    Like


    • Where in that link did you read the premise that there is necessarily a connection between wanting to bang hot broads and wanting to preserve one’s ethnic group? Answer: Nowhere. So you’re just a garden variety lying sack of shit.

      Like


      • Yeah, I think your syllogism is not airtight there.

        [CH: Where is your counter evidence that you didn’t engage in a false premise fallacy?]

        No need to get all pissy.

        [That’s not piss. That’s passion.]

        I think you, and a handful of commenters, bring a lot of unconventional insight into discussions of The World We live In, punctuated by some crazy-ass shit.

        [So the truth is that you weren’t *stupider* for reading that link, you were *angrier*. Keepin it real.]

        Like


    • on August 6, 2013 at 1:24 pm supersystem3

      I’ve only been reading this for the past few months, but from my understanding CH is not a PUA blog. Sort of like Dalrock, there is much to be learned here but the articles here are about more than random sex.

      There are plenty of blogs linked to on the right side of your screen about entirely PUA matters, with Krauser being one of my favorites.

      Like


      • This blog is about truth and beauty. Game is a central focus because the reward from the seduction of beautiful women is one of life’s great truths.

        Like


      • Here’s my big takeaway: Be a fucking man.

        Too often, though, the logic runs like this: “Be a fucking man, so you can score lots of pussy.”

        To me, it should be: “Be a fucking man, cuz God knows this world needs more men. P.S. You can score lots of pussy.”

        I’m an old married guy. At this point, it ain’t about the pussy for me. But I still find stuff here relevant and useful to my life. Not the nutty politics, but the man-woman dynamics. For that, I thank you.

        Like


      • You know, I could argue here that “being a fucking man” is just evolution’s final design for maximizing, through proxy filters, male access to high quality pussy, but…. it’d be pointless, so I’ll just muse aloud about the size differences in vaginal “throw” between tall and short women.

        Like


    • on August 6, 2013 at 1:28 pm Dan Fletcher

      Doubt you would be saying that if it were a black or mexican posting the same content. For some reason those criticisms are only leveled at whites. Hmmmm.

      And as usual, no attempt at refutation is made. Just a more verbose form of “Wow. Really? Just wow.”

      Like


    • Lets look at it this way. One of the current sluts polishing my knob was a girl who screwed interracially. Of course that was when she was overweight. Now that she’s ‘in shape’ (a solid 7) guess what? White girl be bangin’ white guys only.

      I will admit its possible for a couple to date, and even marry, interracially with zero problems in m eyes. There are two types of every race in my eyes: the builders and the fucking trash. Black, White, Asian, Native American, et al. They may have different distributions of each, but they exist in ALL races.

      So yes, I’m friends with people of different races. People I consider my moral peers: they are builders. They may, or may not, own a business. They work hard, and they play hard. Some of them have wives of different races. The one thing they aren’t is trailer, ghetto, et al., trash.

      Funny thing. Most of them, better than 80%, have wives of the same race.

      Like


      • true.

        every race has its “trash”

        but some trash of certain colors commit 10 times more violent crimes than trash of another skin color …

        Like


      • Somewhere in the hypersphere of time, an exhausted, sleeping Crusader coated in a crust of multiple heretics’ blood dreamed of you saying that and lurches awake in a cold sweat.

        He tells himself, “This will never happen…” and falls back asleep.

        Like


  10. Open borders does not equal race mixing. At all.

    Ethnicities naturally cohere without outside government interference, and exchange with other ones if various forces dictate.

    Get it the fuck out of your head that things will go to shit if the state goes poof in an area.

    Like


    • Open borders does not equal race mixing. At all.

      If men from one group are living in the same area with women from another group, there will be copulation going on.

      Ethnicities naturally cohere without outside government interference, and exchange with other ones if various forces dictate.

      Or go to war, or separate.

      Get it the fuck out of your head that things will go to shit if the state goes poof in an area.

      I would never bemoan the demise of the U.S. Fedgov, but typically, anarchy is not a pleasant situation in which to live.

      Like


      • Unless you have very good aim. Then it can be very rewarding.

        Like


      • Things WILL go to hell with the demise of the fed gov. Only two things keep the lid on ethnic violence. A strong central government not afraid to kill (Soviets, China) or a social contract that all sides believe equals the playing field (our Constitution). As our government is rapidly destroying our constitution, DHS is arming itself to the teeth. Wanna make a bet that smart money already knows the end state is nigh?

        Like


      • Yeah, Fedgov/DHS is preparing to go the Soviet/Chinese route. In this case, I’d prefer anarchy, and that’s consistent with my statement that I would never bemoan the demise of Fedgov.

        Like


  11. on August 6, 2013 at 1:39 pm The Man From K Street

    Female hypergamy. And… wait for it… it will be the salvation of the white race in multicultural miasmas.

    I don’t see the causal progression, much as I’d really like to. Elaborate?

    Like


    • Repopulation through better living.

      Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 1:51 pm The Man From K Street

        But greater procreation by educated males/less-intelligent females just leads to reversion to the mean–what an ethny needs is positive eugenics via increased fertility by high IQ M *and* F partners together.

        Like


      • High IQ females have lower maternal instincts. There is no policy in the world that will change that biological fact. But high IQ men have higher reproductive fitness than high IQ women. So you work with what you got, and the system of pairing up higher status smart men with better-looking but not as smart women will get you closer to the goal of a competent, accomplished citizenry than having high IQ members of both sexes sit it out on the sidelines, waiting for the market to turn up or the womb of older women to suddenly become fertile again. Bonus: Men who pair off with pretty secretaries are more likely to want to provide for them and commit to them.

        The reason why you have to abandon the idea of getting smart women to reproduce is because female hypergamy is about as rock solid and immutable a hindbrain human characteristic as exists in the state of nature.

        Like


      • This is moronic.

        [CH: Takes one to know one.]

        What % of the population share your demographic goals?

        [Who cares what people profess in surveys. What matters is how they act in the real world.]

        Would you prefer to have offspring with a stupid white woman or moderately intelligent mixed-race women?

        [False dichotomy. Average intelligence white women are everywhere, and make good partners. Real trouble only begins to appear once you get up into the well-above average range of female IQ.]

        Like


      • Isn’t arsene a poisonous gas?

        Like


      • Yes, but look at the bigger picture. We are entering an economic era where only a very small % of high intelligence people are needed to design and tend the machines.

        [CH: Skynet, meet District 9.]

        High testosterone- and intelliegence-levels will be seen as very negative qualities among the vast mass of worker drones (those lucky enough to have jobs, changing some old billionaire’s nappy or whatever).

        [Who will have the purchasing power to buy all those gadgets the machines make that fatten the wallets of the 1%?]

        Like


      • [Who will have the purchasing power to buy all those gadgets the machines make that fatten the wallets of the 1%?]

        Where were the consumers during feudal times?

        [CH: Subsistence farming. And this is the world we’re heading back towards.]

        Answer; there weren’t any. Only a system based on expanding-credit/growth requires mass consumption. That game is dead.

        The next monetary system already been designed and is ready to roll out once the dollar system fails.

        [This shell game played among the elites can only last so long before blood starts running in the streets.]

        Like


      • on August 6, 2013 at 5:03 pm depressed_danny

        “Yes, but look at the bigger picture. We are entering an economic era where only a very small % of high intelligence people are needed to design and tend the machines.”

        Yeah, and what happens to the 6.5 billion people who aren’t of high intelligence? Think they’re all going to march into their nearest suicide booth and off themselves? Social theories are all bulls*** by default, because they never take into account that people ARE people; we’re chaotic, selfish beings with no real predictability.

        Or say America buys this theory, let’s their population fall to about 40-50 million highly intelligent people. China, Brazil, Iran, Russia, or anybody really decides to push (or retain) their population to 400-500 million, rife with jackasses and all the social problems that go with it. 700 million idiots will outbreed 50 million genius’s. 500 million idiots will outproduce 50 million genius’s. 500 mill owns 50 mill in a war, even if those 50 mill are using robotic weapon systems to do all the fighting. Numbers win, every time.

        Technology replacing people is a far, far, farrrr ways down the road. The inevitable chaos between our time and that one will probably destroy us as a species any ways.

        Like


      • [CH: Subsistence farming. And this is the world we’re heading back towards.]

        When the hi-tech economy sees most people as superfluous, and can’t sustain them, it’s back to the land for them. Welfare layabouts generally don’t know how to farm, but that’s what natural selection is for.

        “Yes, but look at the bigger picture. We are entering an economic era where only a very small % of high intelligence people are needed to design and tend the machines.”

        Yeah, and what happens to the 6.5 billion people who aren’t of high intelligence? Think they’re all going to march into their nearest suicide booth and off themselves? Social theories are all bulls*** by default, because they never take into account that people ARE people; we’re chaotic, selfish beings with no real predictability.

        In the ex-Western world, they go on welfare and live off the government, and turn to crime and drugs out of boredom.

        Or say America buys this theory, let’s their population fall to about 40-50 million highly intelligent people. China, Brazil, Iran, Russia, or anybody really decides to push (or retain) their population to 400-500 million, rife with jackasses and all the social problems that go with it. 700 million idiots will outbreed 50 million genius’s. 500 million idiots will outproduce 50 million genius’s. 500 mill owns 50 mill in a war, even if those 50 mill are using robotic weapon systems to do all the fighting. Numbers win, every time.

        And Britain never ruled India.

        Technology replacing people is a far, far, farrrr ways down the road. The inevitable chaos between our time and that one will probably destroy us as a species any ways.

        Au contraire… I think it’s coming upon us right now.

        Like


      • Maternal instincts or not, girls are still girls. They will overwhelmingly obey the rules they are raised to believe are correct. If you simply raise smart girls to believe that intelligence is valuable and genetic, they will reproduce. Smart girls don’t like calculus AB, but they get it done. Doesn’t really matter if smart girls don’t like having babies, if they believe having them is morally right, they will probably do it. Right now, high IQ girls are trained to believe overpopulation is causing egological strain and that white people are the devil, so they don’t believe it is more right than wrong for them to have children.

        Like


      • on August 7, 2013 at 12:10 pm depressed_danny

        @corvinus

        “When the hi-tech economy sees most people as superfluous, and can’t sustain them, it’s back to the land for them. Welfare layabouts generally don’t know how to farm, but that’s what natural selection is for.”

        Because people always accept being made useless and irrelevant with good humour and grace. There will be absolutely no violence at all /s

        “In the ex-Western world, they go on welfare and live off the government, and turn to crime and drugs out of boredom.”

        And how will the government pay for 70% + of it’s population leeching off it?

        “And Britain never ruled India.”

        India was (and still is IMO) a backwards culture with a backwards government lacking the day’s modern technology. The technological gap in weapons systems have closed between most nations, and those that cannot produce modern weapons can buy them from any number of countries that can – long gone are the days when all a great power had to do was park some cannons on the coast to conquer a country. Human numbers have come back as the decisive factor for a country’s military, economic and prosperity standing. Even if the people are forced to live miserably, superior numbers (for the foreseeable future) will decide the matter.

        “Au contraire… I think it’s coming upon us right now.”

        Instead of a sly twirl of the moustache, riddle me this; what technology is that? Honestly, what are these pieces of technology are we going to (realistically) discover and implement in the next 10-30 years that will completely alleviate all our difficulties and deliver humanity into some futurist utopia?

        Like


      • “When the hi-tech economy sees most people as superfluous, and can’t sustain them, it’s back to the land for them. Welfare layabouts generally don’t know how to farm, but that’s what natural selection is for.”

        Because people always accept being made useless and irrelevant with good humour and grace. There will be absolutely no violence at all /s

        The populace seems to be taking a similar docile attitude toward having their homelands flooded with immigrants, including blacks and muzzies with orc-like dispositions, so if anything, a softer (if more insidious) screwing by the elite will have even less of an effect on them.

        “In the ex-Western world, they go on welfare and live off the government, and turn to crime and drugs out of boredom.”

        And how will the government pay for 70% + of it’s population leeching off it?

        I don’t know either, but they certainly seem to be giving it their best shot.

        “And Britain never ruled India.”

        India was (and still is IMO) a backwards culture with a backwards government lacking the day’s modern technology. The technological gap in weapons systems have closed between most nations, and those that cannot produce modern weapons can buy them from any number of countries that can – long gone are the days when all a great power had to do was park some cannons on the coast to conquer a country. Human numbers have come back as the decisive factor for a country’s military, economic and prosperity standing. Even if the people are forced to live miserably, superior numbers (for the foreseeable future) will decide the matter.

        Only insofar as the largest number of stupid bodies vote for something, they’ll get it, which is why the USA is in an initial stage of turning into ANC-dominated South Africa. But, in many other ways, numbers don’t matter. The threat of being smashed by the U.S. Army (population 1 million), or even nukes, keeps a lot of places quiet… including tens of millions of pissed-off Americans.

        Instead of a sly twirl of the moustache, riddle me this; what technology is that? Honestly, what are these pieces of technology are we going to (realistically) discover and implement in the next 10-30 years that will completely alleviate all our difficulties and deliver humanity into some futurist utopia?

        The elite, which has lots of money and absolutely no morals or noblesse oblige, has every ability to outsource all menial tasks to robots right now, and are doing so. But it won’t be a utopia by any means.

        Like


  12. speaking of nooses: read this shit.

    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/What-Makes-Houston-the-Next-Great-American-City-213879781.html?c=y&story=fullstory

    Houston, what I assume was a staid southern oil city that absorb a couple thousand hmongs and vietnamese before 1980 numbers bandied about in the story, goes to about 78% non-white of people under 30 years old.

    and now elects openly gay female commies for mayors.

    Why, because the left managed to flood the city. They did this in Houston, they did it to Cali and most other “blue” states.

    And the glee with which this traitorous writer tells it tells you that that’s the reason for diversity, not for cheap chalupas or great restaurants.

    Like


  13. CH,

    I concur with your opinion regarding open borders. Immigration restrictions may be described within freedom of association terms, in which case USA citizens get to choose who visits, who stays, and who joins. Please continue to discredit open borders idiots whenever it suits you, but please also name the idiots when a particular one advocates something stupid. I’m fast exhausting groups with which I can associate, and libertarian is about all that’s left for politics.

    So, for sake of clarity, the idiots are Bryan Caplan and Don Boudreaux, who advocate the sacrifice of real freedom for the sake of theoretical freedom.

    PS: Since sex videos prove so useful, should we just go ahead and record all sexual encounters for evidentiary purposes? Given your example, it seems prudent.

    Like


  14. Smart:

    Bottom line that guys like @DouthatNYT won’t accept: Voter preference is partly driven by racial predisposition & oppositional identity.

    And the left is making damned sure that every person FOB coming here is told that the democrat party is their party, just because. Again, Amnesty is going to be greeeattttt.

    Like


  15. This site is written by economic losers. For economic losers.

    [CH: You sound upset.]

    Wish there were more intelligent folk in these communities to engage with.

    [Commenter, heal thyself.]

    Like


    • Dear Diary, “and then I told them the site was written by economic losers, for economic losers. lolz score zing.”

      Like


      • It’s not mere name calling.

        [CH: Spot the irony.]

        The site is fuelled by a bitterness that is not pushing us all to greatness.

        [Realtalk is not a synonym for bitterness, no matter how much you wish it were.]

        Any man in the west can ‘rule’ if he has his wits about him.

        [Poolside is a lot more relaxing when the world isn’t burning down around you.]

        The world will always filled with scum.

        [So we should keep them out at the border.]

        Fuck it.

        [This doesn’t sound like you’re pushing yourself to greatness.]

        Win anyway.

        [What if the rules are stacked against you?]

        Every American whines now.

        [Was Martin Luther King Jr a whiner?]

        The society is 90% victimology and loserism.

        [So then you believe that the opposite of victimology and loserism is to lay prostrate and let the world have its way with you. At least they can’t accuse you of whining then.]

        In this way even CH is more like Obama supporters than he might think.

        [If they only knew…]

        Like


      • [Realtalk is not a synonym for bitterness, no matter how much you wish it were.]
        Depressed people are often very realistic.

        [CH: So are mischievous fun-loving smartasses.]

        Does this help them?

        [It does if they practice the precepts of realtalk.]

        No they can explain their shitty lives to themslves with total accuracy.

        [False premise #3. Realtalking and bountiful lives are not mutually exclusive.]

        [Poolside is a lot more relaxing when the world isn’t burning down around you.]
        The world isn’t burning.

        [Where there’s smoke…]

        The hysteria of the new generation of US male is very bitch-like.

        [Were the American revolutionaries of 1776 in the grips of hysteria?]

        What would you have done during the great plague? The Irish famine?

        [Well, if I were to listen to you, I’d have accepted my slow starvation with stoic repose.]

        [This doesn’t sound like you’re pushing yourself to greatness.]
        Yes it does.. Fuck whining.

        [Spot the irony, part 2.]

        Fuck the fact that 99% of your countrypersons are scum.

        [It’s probably closer to 50%. And rising.]

        Your mindset is based on whining.

        [And yours is based on… willful ignorance?]

        You read like a guy who is setting himself up for failures, and can then blame it on the blacks or the feminsists or whoever.

        [The bulk of the blame goes to the ruling class and its propaganda arms, aka whites. Non-whites have a lot of issues (on average), but the disastrous policies deep-sixing the US aren’t crafted and pushed by them. They are pawns in this game to the death.]

        Win anyway.
        [What if the rules are stacked against you?]
        Fuck the rules. They are almost always shit. Greatness requires new, better rules. Your own rules. How many people you admire stuck to the bullshit demanded by their peers ?

        [The people I admire took a flamethrower to PC glibtalk.]

        Every American whines now.

        [Is this the only argument you have in your quiver? The word whine?]

        [Was Martin Luther King Jr a whiner?]
        No he was not.

        [By your loosey goosey definition, he sure was.]

        He took action and sacrificed, unlike those who praise him now.

        [Many realtalkers are taking action and paying for it with their jobs. See: Richwine, Watson, Derbyshire.]

        [So then you believe that the opposite of victimology and loserism is to lay prostrate and let the world have its way with you. At least they can’t accuse you of whining then.]
        Really weird how you imagined that arguement from my basic observation.

        [The logic path was clear as day.]

        The world is a cunt.
        Make it squirt.

        [The world is a cock waiting for you to bend over and stop “whining” so it can proceed with ramming you up the ass.]

        Like


      • Okay. I’m stopping here. You seem intelligent enough to create your own opportunites, despite your social context and faulty world-view

        I hope you are young enough to have time to widen your mind and win.

        I wish you all the best.

        Like


      • CH is more than intelligent enough.

        He is highly intelligent.

        highly intelligent people rarely fall for pretty lies as they see things more clearly than most.

        Like


      • And the tremendous wailing and gnashing of teeth commenced from all CH readers at the loss of the erudite and powerful intellect of Arsene. Or not…

        Like


  16. The noose … such a glorious item of illustration, it just warms my heart every time you employ its beauty.

    Thank you.

    #pleaseletmebealivewhenthedayoftheropearrives

    Like


    • on August 7, 2013 at 1:54 pm HerrGoebbels

      I wish to be there as well. This blog needs to introduce its readers to the works of William Luther Pierce.

      #dayoftherope

      Like


  17. Hmmm. Regarding link #7 about the false rape, I can’t find a single picture of Jasmine Levanna Kurre, the woman who lied. I’m very disappointed in the MSM’s failure to reveal her face to the public. Women like her should be paraded online to keep others from pulling this shit.

    I stopped working in the print Journalism because the people working in it have obvious feminist inclinations. It’s not surprising considering it’s staffed mostly by betas and 5’s.

    Like


  18. on August 6, 2013 at 3:58 pm Harry Morgan

    Does anyone know if a serious study has been done looking at women’s IQ and their relative testosterone levels?

    I’m curious because it is a known thing that a mate’s pregnancy and birth of offspring lowers men’s testosterone levels temporarily (and apparently encourages paternal investment). I wonder if it’s a simple fact that testosterone encourages high IQ and discourages parental inclination, and therefore women with higher testosterone levels are smarter, less inclined to have children (or care for children), and more promiscuous?

    Like


    • I wonder if it’s a simple fact that testosterone encourages high IQ and discourages parental inclination, and therefore women with higher testosterone levels are smarter, less inclined to have children (or care for children), and more promiscuous?

      Change “parental” to “maternal”, and what you suggest seems accurate to me.

      Like


    • “I wonder if it’s a simple fact that testosterone encourages high IQ and discourages parental inclination, and therefore women with higher testosterone levels are smarter, less inclined to have children (or care for children), and more promiscuous?”
      I think its that high IQ coupled with high testosterone levels results in higher education and income levels, rather than testosterone having a direct effect on IQ.

      Like


  19. Just so you know, CH, it’s très (grave accent), not trés (acute accent).

    (Please do not take this as an act of condescension, but merely an act of knowledge-giving, as that is what I intend this comment to be.)

    Like


  20. Heartiste (I am sad to say) writes: “Demography and character are a nation’s destiny. ”

    No. Fundamental philosophical ideas are a nations destiny. It was your nations white elite that started embracing the ideas of the German Counter-Enlightnment in the middle of the 19th century. Now these ideas dominate the culture. You could get rid of every “genetically substandard” illegal/legal immigrant you wish. I wouldn’t do you any good. Only rational ideas would.

    Like


  21. on August 6, 2013 at 6:36 pm suppressedtruthsociety

    I like this blog enough to read it religiously, but portion dedicated to drumming up “America is collapsing” hysteria is just ridiculous. Worst case scenario- The country becomes inundated with illegal immigrants, they vote overwhelmingly for liberals, and people with high-paying jobs end up paying a shit ton in taxes to support a depressingly large class of moochers. That sucks, but it’s not a collapse. By that time, technological advancement will have improved your life far more than leftist policy can ruin it. This has been the story throughout history–social policy is always evolving, sometimes for the worst, but people’s lives still generally improve in spite of it. Our time is not unique. At all.

    Like


    • on August 6, 2013 at 8:39 pm depressed_danny

      Why all this faith in technology? I’m no Luddite, but all those illegal immigrants aren’t going to be nullified by google glasses and pre-built wireless in our cars – there is not going to be some magic miracle tech that drops out of the sky and somehow solves all our problems, and especially not before another very dark time descends on the West. Technology might have moved at an incredible pace these last few years, but humans have not.

      And yes actually; there are unique social situations in America and the larger West right now, ones that have never before been seen in history.

      Like


    • Detroit city is the future of the USA if things don’t change.

      Like


    • Or Rome,

      it fell did it not?

      Empires do fall, the USA might be next unless some radical change happens

      Like


  22. “Whatever the precise answer, it appears that genes are more and more becoming the obvious candidate for explaining Western greatness.”

    1. The West is not the only great civilization in world history.

    2. The genes of the ancient Greeks didn’t suddenly start to decline in the middle of their Golden Age.

    3. The genes of the West didn’t suddenly start to decline in the 19th century, in the middle of our great age (at the same time as the German Counter-Enlighnment started to spread).

    So:

    4. Even if genes did play the major role – which I don’t accept – they are obviously helpless against fundamental philosophical ideas, since even the best nations succomb to them.

    Like


  23. PS: People with every kind of gene support the welfare state because ideas in the West make them believe that it is moral to do so. Without the pseudo-morality of altruism the notion that the state has a right and a duty to steal from the producers and give to the parasites would be seen for what it is.

    Like


  24. 2. Do you have a palette of tissues handy? Because feminists are about to weep their last bitter tears. Satoshi Kanazawa is back in the news with a study that concludes the maternal instinct decreases by a quarter for every fifteen extra IQ points. Smart and over-educated lawyercunts are a dying breed. Literally. I believe it was the Audacity of Huge who once tabulated and correlated GSS data to find that smart men have more children than dumb men, while smart women have fewer children than dumb women. I call this the “Alpha Male-Cute Secretary Assortative Mating” theory. You may know it better by its street handle: Female hypergamy. And… wait for it… it will be the salvation of the white race in multicultural miasmas.

    In other words, in the future intelligence will be sex-linked. Evolution is essentially, working, and breeding out those most likely to adopt feminist ideology.

    Like


  25. Why did the West rise? If you look at GDP per capita, instead of total wealth, it becomes clear that the West diverged from China long before the 19th century.

    The source you link to relied solely on the GDP estimates of Angus Maddison. While Maddison is certainly one of the biggest names in quantitative economic history there are actually two competing schools of thought.

    Maddison (who has passed away) could fairly be said to have headed the “steady rise” school, that sees a slow and erratic rise in per capita GDP in western Europe throughout the middle ages (roughly from 1000AD on).

    The opposing school contends that per capita GDP remained within a steady band (rising during good times, falling during bad times) through European history until the mid-19th century.

    From my cynical reading a simple dimension along which the schools disagree appears – I stress appears – to be the Maddisonians being European exceptionalists (and stealth HBD realists), while the opposing school – the “no growth” school – tends to explain the greater part of Europe’s rise eventual rise in terms of stock leftoidism, “updated” (aka prettied up) with jargon for a new generation of unsuspecting dupes. That’s complicated by the inclusion of the apparently very HBD-aware Gregory Clark (of “A Farewell to Alms” fame) in the “no growth” camp. That’s a bit simplistic, however, since both sides do make good arguments. The truly confounding factor is the paucity of hard data from the period.

    Personally, I believe the “steady rise” school to possess the better arguments, but this isn’t not merely a consequence of my HDB disposition. I think the arguments stand for themselves completely aside from HBD.

    Like


  26. on August 7, 2013 at 2:50 am evilwhitemalempire

    for a long time, my suspicion has been that those bimbo secretary types are actually some of the smartest women there are

    while most of those ‘smart’ women just sound smart

    and if IQ does correlate with physical attractiveness, which I suspect highly likely, [given that what is beautiful is really just ‘average’ phenotype (i.e. minimum of genetic defects)] it probably can’t be any other way

    Like


  27. About the whole ethnic phenotype survival issue:

    I’m a first-gen Nigerian American, and when I read that, I didn’t feel insulted. But it did seem nonsensical for me. Shouldn’t someone be fighting for their immediate genetic survival as opposed to the survival of their entire phenotype? Why do some African-American women have wealthy spouses? Why do wealthy black men stand a greater chance of dating/marrying non-black women?

    (Aside: Always wanted to learn more about Friedman’s stances. I went to the University of Chicago for a year and my greatest regret is not engaging myself in research within the Economics department. I’m currently reading his book, Free To Choose, and it’s growing on me.)

    Yes, I do agree with what you’re trying to say…which is that integration works less often than most would like to believe. This is coming from a far-right of the bell curve segment of “us” (scored top 1% of blacks on SAT, top 9% overall).

    Not a fan of Richwine or Derbyshire, something about their research makes me believe they were seeking a certain answer and went out of their way to find it at all costs. Watson, however, is someone I highly respect (I read his book on the discovery of the double helix) and when he explained some of his controversial comments, what he had to say really resonated with me. He really wanted to claim something Krauser mentioned on his page, the very un-PC notion that the Western world owes its advancements to an exclusive group of driven white men (sans royalty and slaveowners). Only when our schools started running away from this obvious truth did our cities and nations go down the drain.

    I’m a somewhat firm believer in tabula rasa, although the neuroscience behind Locke’s theory is still a work in progress. And can everyone refrain from using dog breed analogies here?

    Anyways, discovered your blog a few weeks ago, the negative side effects to the red pill have been minimal at best. Always looking forward to your next post!

    Like


    • on August 7, 2013 at 12:22 pm depressed_danny

      And I’m looking forward to you finally getting that 45 million dollars from your Nigerian bank so you can pay back that 6 grand you owe me.

      As much as I lean toward Tabula Rasa myself, there’s far too many examples for me of persons born and raised in a specific environment and going completely against it with no external stimuli for doing so. I think tabula rasa only applies to the portions of human that are more Beta in genetics – the followers, essentially.

      Anyways, welcome to the manosphere! Don’t let the Human Bio-Diversity crowd get you down too much.

      Like


      • I’m a first-gen Nigerian American Which firmly seperates you from your absurdly dysfunctional African-American brothers. In point of fact… in spite of my ahh “controversial” racial views, I do in fact interact with LOTS of black folks. AA’s generally despise African immigrants because they got here under their own steam and often with significant hardship along the way. True hardship, the likes of which the ‘bama sailphone wielding AA has no real inclining of anymore. And like yourself, they often come quite educated and ready to face the challenges of trying to be at least semi-functional in what still passes for modern Western Society. I’m sure you are going to get a quick education here one way or another…

        Like


      • Correction: second-generation

        I know what you are worried about, as indicated by the ellipsis. And when I say I know, I mean I really know!

        What you fear, will not happen. I will say no more than that.

        Like


      • And I’m looking forward to you finally getting that 45 million dollars from your Nigerian bank so you can pay back that 6 grand you owe me.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayman_Islands

        Anyways, welcome to the manosphere! Don’t let the Human Bio-Diversity crowd get you down too much.

        I’ll do my best.

        Like


    • John Derbyshire is a journalist and mathematician. As far as I know, he’s never done any research or conducted any studies about race.

      Like


      • CH, I’ve got a suggested topic for you, on the political side of things.

        We all can see plain as day that the Cathedral is *heavily* pushing the faggot agenda, even more so in the past year than in the prior 5 years. CNN should be renamed “Fag Propoganda Network.”

        We also know that the Catheral/Illuminati/Old Money Banking interests want to turn us all into brown serfs like circa 13th century. Globalization.

        Part of this plot, of course, is to destroy the nuclear family (done; they can check that off the list). Is that my answer?

        My question is, why the huge push to make everyone not only accept gayness but think of it as admirable?

        How does that in particular help them? They still need strong manly men to do all the dirty work!

        Like


    • ” But it did seem nonsensical for me. Shouldn’t someone be fighting for their immediate genetic survival as opposed to the survival of their entire phenotype?”
      If all ethnic groups would be as outbred as whites then you might have a point, but they arent.

      “Not a fan of Richwine or Derbyshire, something about their research makes me believe they were seeking a certain answer and went out of their way to find it at all costs.”
      I dont see it at all, and Richwine wasnt the only author that paper and Derbyshire hasnt published any research articles related to HBD.

      “I’m a somewhat firm believer in tabula rasa”
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabula_rasa
      “Tabula rasa, meaning blank slate in Latin, is the epistemological theory that individuals are born without built-in mental content and that their knowledge comes from experience and perception. Generally, proponents of the tabula rasa thesis favour the “nurture” side of the nature versus nurture debate, when it comes to aspects of one’s personality, social and emotional behaviour, and intelligence.”
      This is wrong, twin studies show that personality is about 50% genetic and intelligence is somewhere around 60%.

      Like


      • Sure the studies are legitimate.

        I read the National Review regularly, both print and online format. I know what Derbyshire said. Richwine didn’t have to be an author at all.

        If all ethnic groups would be as outbred as whites then you might have a point, but they arent.

        My life improved exponentially when I started viewing all situations from a cost-benefit analysis POV. A gift and a curse, I’m too analytic, and fields like economics, genetics and human sexuality were NEVER designed to cooperate with each other.

        But I know what you fear. I can say with certainty that on my part, none of what you fear will happen. I will say no more.

        Like


  28. on August 7, 2013 at 8:40 am RappaccinisDaughter

    Speaking of wickedest links, here’s a fun one:
    http://getoffmyinternets.net/katie-vyktoriah-story-being-questioned-by-internets/

    1. Mommyblogger submits a story to Huffington Post about an evil, nasty-bad redneck who assaults her 2-year-old son for wearing a girly headband.
    2. Story is instantly believed by everyone and goes viral. The Cathedral goes into full battle array.
    3. Details start to emerge: Mommyblogger never reported the assault to the police; story seems too “perfect” to be true; mommyblogger has a long history of telling bizarre, self-aggrandizing lies.
    4. Huffington Post diligently deletes all comments from people questioning her story, although this must require at least one person’s full-time attention.
    5. Mommyblogger announces that people are stalking and threatening her, and that she has called the police.
    6. Because this is very public, and the police have not been notified, they stop by to check on her.
    7. She makes suicidal statements to the police and is kept overnight.
    8. Huffington Post has yet to admit that they published a bullshit story because it suited their narrative, although they have deleted her original blog post, supposedly “at her request.”

    Like


    • Unfortunately similar things are happening a hundred times a day in every Western Nation

      there is a witch hunt on white males especially if they are heterosexual, vote conservative or are religious ( for the record, I am not religious at all )…

      it is open season on white males, and it is getting worse everyday

      Carreers are destroyed, lives are destroyed based on lies that fit what the left and their media want to hear and want to use against us white males

      it makes the Spanish inquisition look like a picnic by comparison

      Like


  29. Since when did open borders have anything to do with libertarianism?
    Sure, some libertarians probably want open borders, but really it has nothing to do with the core premise of libertarianism which is: “Government, stop telling me what to do”

    I consider myself Libertarian, but open borders is a stupid idea, and to people who disagree I always say this:
    “So, how many homeless/impoverished people do you have living in your house? None you say? You mean you don’t just let random people come into your house and live with you? You disgusting bigot!!”

    Like


    • on August 7, 2013 at 10:21 am RappaccinisDaughter

      I call myself a libertarian too, but I dropped the open-borders part of that worldview on September 11, 2001.

      Like


      • on August 7, 2013 at 12:30 pm depressed_danny

        I find most libertarians are centred around the ideology only in the national sense – i.e. every citizen should have the right to do whatever they want, so long as it doesn’t harm others who haven’t consented to it – while being conservative for international relations. That’s my belief anyway; well, I lean more toward ultra conservatism for international relations.

        I wouldn’t care who we’re bombing into oblivion so long as I can get high on mushrooms and participate in BDSM with some teenagers. 🙂

        Like


    • Well, the only reason for open borders/immigration is that the policy would enable positive relations between countries.

      I’m from Nigeria, and we’re in the top 5 for oil exports to the United States. That relationship probably led to a reasonable visa grant program between the two nations. Same probably goes for Arab countries, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea (I’m exluding Europe because most of those countries have been on somewhat cordial terms with the United States for centuries).

      Libertarians also stand for economic efficiency, and many immigrants from the aforementioned countries do well for themselves when they arrive here and adapt to the culture.

      As for your analogy: can’t speak for anyone else, but I honestly don’t want to live in your house. Though I’m sure your pad is the business and the hot spot, waterbed and 5.1 surround sound system nonwithstanding.

      @RappaccinisDaughter

      I’m still very sure the 9/11 attacks were a ploy allowing Cheney to pump up his ol’ buddies at Halliburton. Too bad they never found any crude out there. Meanwhile, all that lovely opium from the farms hundreds of miles outside of Kabul, all of that opium keeps headed out East for Chinamen to indulge in after a long day of weaving Hanes t-shirts.

      Like


      • “Well, the only reason for open borders/immigration is that the policy would enable positive relations between countries.”
        Positive in what way and for whom?

        “Libertarians also stand for economic efficiency, and many immigrants from the aforementioned countries do well for themselves when they arrive here”
        Their type of ecocomic effiency has other costs, such as increased crimerates in certain areas and other problems that multiculturalism creates.

        As for the immigrants you mentioned, yes, it is true that they generally do well but many times bringing them in lowers wages and removes job opportunities from the natives.

        Like


      • As for the immigrants you mentioned, yes, it is true that they generally do well but many times bringing them in lowers wages and removes job opportunities from the natives.

        Dissecting the efforts of Ron Paul and (to a lesser degree) Gary Johnson, I don’t believe they were going to just open up the southern borders and lets the hombres and mujeres just come in like that. I’m from Los Angeles, and the effects of a lax policy on immigration have been drastic and not very rewarding. These repercussions I’ve witnessed have been discussed to death on this site, so I won’t mention them. Do a small amount of them keep produce prices low? Yes? Ok. But I think Paul and Johnson weren’t going to align themselves with those who wanted to completely open the flood gates.

        As for immigrants from other countries…they wouldn’t be necessary if America simply maintained a self-reliant 100% domestic based economy (I must add that I really like it here, don’t cause any trouble, and don’t want to leave anytime soon). However, what most people don’t realize is that even as this culture changes for the worse, the dollar is doing just fine…for now. We could go back to a self-reliant economy, but I’ve read novels like The Grapes Of Wrath, where corporations take advantage of those with little “human capital”, and a service economy is better for all of us rather than maintaining manufacturing jobs which also establish a higher cost of living. If taxes were lowered, the rich don’t need to spend more because anyone can spend freely, and low-end service jobs would see the benefits of such policies. Not that I ever imagined working at the mall my whole life.

        We are fine, but I have to add a somewhat dismal corollary to my prognosis:

        If Saudi Arabia were to call for oil to be traded in euros, “that announcement would be the end of the U.S. dollar,” said Ashraf Laidi, chief currency analyst at CMC Markets. But he said that would never happen as long as the United States and Saudi Arabia are allies, and the U.S. continues to negotiate arms and other deals with the world’s largest oil producer.

        (Never saw that coming from ABC News of all places!)

        Again, Paul and Johnson stand vehemently against environmentalists who show disdain for drilling on U.S. soil. The Sierra Club and their ilk need to shut up, period. If a period were to ever come where Saudis would start asking for another country’s currency as the standard method of purchase for oil…America would be screwed royally. We have the means and resources to eventually produce, consume and export a surplus. However, the extraction needs to start immediately. Now or never.

        Like


  30. Now as we know people with higher education are the “serious” ones, which means this poll from the Australian election is quite revealing…
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-09/vote-compass-data-results-important-issues/4872896

    At a glance: findings of note

    Coalition supporters rate the economy as being twice as important as Labor supporters tend to.
    Greens supporters rate climate change about twice as important as any other party grouping.
    The older a respondent is, the more important they think the economy is.
    Respondents without a university education rate the economy as a slightly more important issue than those who have a university education.
    Men consider the economy to be a bigger issue than women do. On the other hand, women rate asylum seekers as a bigger issue than men do.
    Women also rate health and education higher than men do, while men rate broadband higher than women do.
    The richer a respondent is, the more important they think the economy is, whereas when it comes to health the exact opposite is the case.
    The more interested a respondent is in politics, the higher they rate the economy.

    So again women are shown as “Muh feels”
    Coalition (Our conservative/Repub-lites) seem to know without money there is no health/education.
    Greens confirmed for being shit for brains
    Men confirmed for liking porn on the net.
    People who value health confirmed for thinking money grows on trees?

    Like


  31. Gentlemen,

    Learn how to have a female LUST for your seed (yes, even little pussies like Ya and immoral). A female lusting for your seed… pretty cool, I must say. (I don’t actually wish success for Ya or immoral or their weak-ass followers… cost of doing business), but what the fuck. Then you can discard— throw out—all the butt-sniffing game advice, and just get down to business. Gentlemen, this is NOT a video game. I’m not sure why the MS sites don’t discuss this. No idea. When a female lusts for your seed, and shares that lust with her females-in-arms, you cannot lose. YOU CANNOT LOSE.

    Let me ask you a few questions: Do you look her in the eye, into her pupil? Do you pierce her? Or, are you a pussy? Do you lead the conversation, based on your OWN life objectives? Do you OWN your own fucking life? Why the fuck should she go with you? Who the fuck are you? Do you run your own life? Or are you a little bitch of the politically correct? Check this out: be non-politically correct and watch the pussy gel around you. But, look, this is NOT for the pussies… you scrubs can fuck off. For the ACTUALLY, aspiring males, ROLL UP, BITCHEZ, be a MAN. Put it out there. Own her. She is your bitch, if only you will allow her. Get out of your head.

    Females do not operate on the same logic that you do. Own it. Own HER. Are you a man, or a pussy? I’m totally seriously speaking to all of you pussies: tough love. From an extremely self-interested view, I want men who own their women, to mesh into my life, because that contributes to what I’m building—not for you, pussies. I have no use for pussies. Please, seriously, take ownership of your bitch, and then be useful to the rest of us. We genuinely want that. STOP playing video games—be a man. Like, get into the fucking game, or fuck off. Love all you guys, but grow the fuck up.

    Like


  32. I enjoy, lead to I discovered exactly what I was having
    a look for. You’ve ended my four day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye

    Like