Feminism For Bros (DEFCON: Vomit Bag)

I dare you to watch this all the way through without feeling at least a small gurgle of nausea.

Feminism For Bros (level 105) is a PSA by a group called “Centre for Gender Advocacy”, based in Montreal, associated with something called The Consensual Collective. I imagine corporate headquarters is a coffeehouse office where two manlets and a chubby cunt get together to project their confused sexuality and self-loathing onto normal people. The video shows a couple, (mostly the vaguely male hipster), asking for verbal consent at each step of foreplay. Unedited footage taken five years into the future shows him asking her if he may briefly appear naked in front of his now-wife while he dresses in the morning. She asks if she may shove her prized buttplug up his rectum. He assents.

“Can I kiss you?” “Can I put my hand here?” “Can I take your shirt off?”

Bzzt! Rebuffed! Her shirt stays on. They go back to loud kissing that sounds like an octopus pulling its tentacles off wet glass.

“Can I kiss your neck?” “Can I take off your shirt?”

This time he gets the green light. Not really sure what difference waiting ten seconds to approve his shirt-removal request made for the girl.

“Can I kiss you… there?”

He points to her sternum, that well-known erogenous zone on women.

“Can I go down on you?”

Of course, this faggot opts to mash his face in her pussy before banging her. OF COURSE. Pre-sex cunnilingus is 99% of times a huge beta male tell.

“CONSENT IS FUN”

No it’s not when it has to be verbalized every five seconds in a cloud of gnawing fear that a presumptuous ear nibble could lead to a rape accusation.

“CONSENT IS SEXY”

No it’s not, and telling yourself that won’t make it so.

“CONSENT IS SAFE”

Pretty sure gonorrhea is transmissible with or without consent. And there’s no way this manlet is overpowering the girl.

“CUTV”

So close.

I hope this video was a parody, because if not, then the people involved with this shit, or people who would seriously entertain its message, are down with the sickness that has no cure.

Coitus interruptus, meet passion interruptus. I can’t think of much that would kill the mood faster than asking for permission to escalate foreplay and slip the tip in. A barrage of mewling inquiries, however smokily whispered, makes whiskey dick seem like the pinnacle of bedroom prowess. Fatrelle whipping out his micropeen and flicking it to life with his porky pinky would be less likely to spoil the moment than a guy following BRO FEMINISM verbal consent guidelines.

Anyone who’s been with non-psychotic non-feminist girls (or, if you’re a woman, with men who aren’t afraid of their penes) knows how this works: The heat of the moment carries both of you forward through sexual escalation, wordlessly (unless you’re into actual dirty talk), clothes flying everywhere, hands exploring, mouths traveling great expanses of flesh, until panties are tugged off and sex ushers a symphony of moans. Consent is implied, usually, by the girl not saying “no” or pushing herself off the man.

This is what normal human beings whose brains weren’t hijacked by parasites do. As a female commenter at Total Frat Move put it:

As a girl, if a guy can’t take at least some control, it’s a turn off. If a girl doesn’t want sex then she will say so. If I want you, you’ll be able to tell. This was ridiculous.

Most feminist agitprop amounts to unattractive or psychologically defective women running from that scary and confusing female desire to submit to a dominating man, and grappling with those feelings that remind them of their vulnerable femaleness by neutering any man foolish enough to pursue them. A man who obeys feminist pique is a man who is never getting laid, and that’s the point. This stuff helps filter out weak betas who are too insecure to give women what they really want: A sexually entitled man who doesn’t second-guess his allure.

Males who are into this game are poseurs angling for broken snatch, genuine androgynous misfits play-acting revenge fantasies against the jocks who flipped their lunch trays, or sexually parched spergs who can’t read nonverbal arousal cues.

ps The reader who sent this clip wrote, “I love America, but I’m moving.” This sentiment must be shared by more men every day who watch this freak parade of putrescence shamble over the remnants of a once vital culture.





Comments


  1. CH, no Fuck This Gay Earth? This belongs to “Great Moments in FTGE” if anything does.

    Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 9:52 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzlozozozozoo

      GBFM: can u blow mez?
      HER: lotsas cockaz? 4 me?
      GBFM: if u hurryz

      Like


      • “Hi Mr. Hipster, can I put my fist here?”

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:43 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Firends, Countrymen, Romans, and MArk Singer!!

        Lend me your earss!! DA GBFM has come up wih the solution to the moral morass!!

        THE BILL OF MENZ RIGHTS!!!!

        lzozllzllzl every man shall have the right to

        1) a womenz who hasth been butthexed less than 4 times
        2) said 4 times not being done in the same night nor two consecutive nights niether lzozlzl
        3) said butthexing events not being secretly taped without her conthent
        4) no woman shall have a right to her husbands assetts if he comes home and finds her banging the poolboy ontop of his ps3 controller, thusly damaging said controller lzozl that would suck
        5) wehnu ask a women how many poeple she has been with it wil be law that she will have to verbally multiply her anser by 10, and then add at least half the ass cocking sesssions which still count as sexth in certain religions lzozlzlzl
        6) no man shall be made to fund a pussy that it out banging biker drummer cock, nor shall any man be made to pay for past use of a pussy lzozlzlzlz

        i think that if we can pass this men’;s bill of rights into law, 90% of marriages will last lzozl.zlzlzlzlzl lzozllz which is why the butthex congreth and fiat masters will rail against my sublime logic reason phsilophy and religion lzozlzlzzl

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:45 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozlz

        epic gbfm threadz:

        http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/debasing-marriage/

        lozoozoaooozoz

        Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 10:11 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      da gbfm revealedz!!

      lzozzlzlzozooz

      Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 9:39 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      today’s women are desouled in secretive tapigs of butthext sessions and converted into vehicles of wealth transfer so as to convert fiat debt and a law degree into physical property and wealth, tranferring from menz to da statez zlozlzozo.

      women are taught to serve the corporate state bottom line (lzolzoz bottomz lzozolz) instead of the higher ideals of the judeo christian heritage zlzolzzol

      Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:39 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        inflation:

        once upon a time money a decent salalry bought you a loyal wife and home and kidz.

        today all a billion fiat bernanke dollars will buy you is a billion fiat berannkified chcicks who have been desouled and tuaght and programmed to bitch moan compaliian and persuecutue their husnabds and spy on them and tranfer their assets to da statez and to the divorce anti-god regimez lzlzooz

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:40 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        thankz dalrock, but i must admit aritiophanes aristophanes beat us too it in the frogz lzozozooz as id copernicus: aristophanes wrote long ago:

        You know what I often think:
        We treat our best men
        The way we treat our mint
        The silver and the golden
        We were proud to invent
        These unalloyed
        Genuine coins, no less,
        Ringing true and tested
        Both abroad and [in] Greece
        And now they’re not employed
        As if we were disgusted
        And want to use instead
        These shoddy coppers minted
        Only yesterday
        Or the day before
        (as if that matters).
        (Aristophanes: The Complete Plays, trans. Paul Roche, New American Library, 2005, p. 573)

        http://mises.org/daily/3885

        “It used to be that every economist worth his salt knew Gresham’s Law (or, if he was Polish, Copernicus’s Law): “bad money drives out good.” Narrowly understood, this rule says that when the government requires people to accept different forms of money at an exchange rate fixed by law, the form of money that is overvalued (the “bad money”) will circulate, while the form of money that is undervalued (the “good money”) won’t.

        Now comes a new translation of the plays of Aristophanes by Paul Roche, among them “The Frogs,” which has the oldest known expression of this rule.”

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:40 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        By debasing the dollar, the FED transfers wealth from you to them. By debasing your “wife,” they accomplish the same task.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 9:42 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Dear Michael,

        What is more important–one’s grammar or one’s soul?

        Tucker Max (whose name rhymes with Goldman Sax) sodomizes women and tapes it secretly. Then, the “conservative” Weekly Standard repeats his lies about his succeth and his height, labeling him as a six-foot-tall butthexual hero, while ignoring the true heroes jumping on grenades in foreign wars on foreign shores.

        How come good Christians do not speak out against this? Did not Moses et al. teach against adultery and fornication and butthext?

        Why do I mention butthext in the context of fiat currencies and counterfeiters? It is because Dante and Milton associated all these things, as did many others. In Dante’s Inferno the butthexters are placed on the same level of hell as the counterfeiters, as both engage in unnatural acts that produce no true wealth, but only debauch and degrade.

        The counterfeiters funded the women’s movement and encourage butthexters to desoul and debauch your future wife, robbing her of value and you of an intact family. While such atrocities are occurring in mass, the funny thing is that the myopic Christians here are saying, “GBFM said butthext! I’m offended!” at the very same moment that their future wife is being butthexted and desouled while it is secretly taped. Never will the “good christian” speak out against the butthexting of their wives, but they will instead persecute the prophet trying to save the future wives from sore buttholes, no kids, and cats; whence she is robbed of her greater destiny as a beloved wife, mother, and grandmother.

        Then Dalrock states that men need Game–they need to learn how to satiate their pre-buttcocked wive’s anal cravings. Whereas da GBFM states that what we need is a renaissance, whence the literature of the land teaches women the far greater wealth of serving the higher ideals as opposed to the fiat bottom line. Dalrock is focusing on getting laid, while GBFM is focusing on the future of civilization. And so da GBFM is persecuted, for Jesus also focused not on getting laid, but on the higher ideals of His Father and the future of civilization.

        And so I lozozzlzlzlzozo that I may not weep.

        Best,

        GBFM

        Like


      • Who dafuq is that fake “Brother Nathanael” you keep posting? That guy must be a member of the tribe pulling a brilliant troll on gullible goyim.

        Like


      • https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/feminism-for-bros-defcon-vomit-bag/#comment-630082

        GBFM, this is pure poetry. I am in tears.

        This needs to be the primer on your site. For the uninitiated have not yet learned to decipher the lolllzz.

        The lord speaks through you, so that we may be blessed.

        Like


    • Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?
      Can I put it in now? Cab I pull out now?

      Like


  2. After he is done he has to ask her; can I have my balls and my spine back?

    Like


  3. Check out the other videos of this channel: basically all of the top viewed ones are of some form of “confrontation” with the police – those are obviously some left wing “revolutionary” hipsters seeking crumbs of meaning in their empty lives by “fighting the system”…

    Like


  4. Truly horrible. Hard to accept the fact that this was popular music just 2 decades ago:

    Like


    • Greatest. Band. Ever. Saw them in a small club, not too many people showed up. They put their asses into that for 40 people. Hung out with them later, Eric Adams and Joey DeMaio…lol. I was there with my ex wife who was gf at the time, fkin stunner she was…we went to many shows and all the rock stars hit on her. Joey told us to go have babies.

      Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 10:26 am Ted Cunterblast

      What your typical SJW girl sounds like:

      Like


  5. The guy in the video has tattooed arms and his head is shaved on the sides but not on the top. He has an ugly beard that fills the cheeks, but if you’d tell him to shave it into shape he would probably make it something “hip”. That is not a “bro” of ordinary men, it’s a leftist. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a homosexual, as The woman has a large tattoo on her leg. Leftists pretending that they are ordinary people, in order to propagandize to the normals they hate.

    This “center” is no doubt one of the many leftist organizations that feed on taxpayers’ money. They are also involved in “anti-racism” and pro-homosexual activities. These leftist organizations pop up like mushrooms and are immediately promoted by the media and given tax money. The left-wing extremists move from one to the other – the names and official stated activities of the organizations are irrelevant. This is the usual pattern among left-wing extremists, who will easily hide behind an endless list of new names and false statements. They have always done so. It is dishonest, but they can do it because their tactic and nature is based on dishonesty. From the beginning it was about pretending not to be associated with communist crimes committed against Russians and others, and today it is also about looking like the “new thing”, which is what the leftist audience likes to see.

    Also – they like it when things are fragmented, cut up into pieces that always change, like the ways they disfigure their bodies. That mirrors their twisted personalities.

    Those involved in making the video are Jimmi Beaubien, Emily Campbell, Julia Jones, Skylar Nagao, Catherine Karas, Adrian Luis Sousa, Stacy Lee and Thomas Carlo Promise. Just looking them up quickly you see that at least one is obviously a homosexual, several are non-Whites. This video is about attacking normal Whites, nothing more. They know it’s ridiculous to ask for every millimeter you move forward, but the point is to make all Whites suspects, make all Whites criminals. “You didn’t ask for permission! Rapist!”

    This is reminiscent of Stalin’s “rubber laws” that made sure all captive citizens in the Soviet Union were guilty of breaking the law, which could be used against them at any time. It also made them feel fear so they would work hard to appease the rulers. The Left loves wide-sweeping rubber laws and tries to introduce them whenever possible.

    Like


    • I understand the Jews have been trying to destroy society for 40 years with “feminism,” equalism, liberalism (leftism is denial of biological reality–that’s what it boils down to on any issue, along with lack of women having to take any responsibility for their choices), but how does this tattoo thing fit in?

      Why do the Jews who control all media want everyone to be tatted up?

      Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 2:50 pm Hammer of Love

        For one, it restricts many possible career choices and limits your economic opportunities and freedom.

        Like


      • > “Why do the Jews who control all media want everyone to be tatted up?”

        In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. [b]And the light shineth in darkness; and THE DARKNESS COMPREHENDED IT NOT.[/b]

        Like


      • There are multiple factors/explanations as to why young people these days and especially females are into tattoos

        One of them is that it is a sign of rebellion, but those young ladies are rebels without a cause, they want to be seen as rebellious, the tattoos are like a badge and a statement but they do not have any real thing to rebel against… especially North-American women who are the most pampered women on the planet.

        Tattoos used to be worn only by people who had gone trough rough things, men that had seen action in a war, men who had been in jail, prostitutes, etc
        and of course criminals who wanted to make sure you knew they were tough dangerous people ( or belonged to a certain gang ) today’s spoiled brats/ pampered cry babies/young ladies with their big bad tattoos look like a joke compared to that.

        Tattoos are also something that very primitive people used to do, and some say that white liberals semi-consciously wear tattoos to lower themselves to the level of the third world immigrant.

        Of course there is the fact that when we are young we do things we will regret one day, because we are too young, too imature to realize the consequences over long term of what we are doing. which is why society/adults used to give us less liberty, it was in good part to protect ourselves from the foolishness of youth.
        in today’s ultra permissive society where anyone can do anything, you get young people who get their whole arm, their nack and face covered in tattoos, they will regret it one day, but unfortunately there are no adults to stop them from doing something permanent like a tattoo

        anyone who is at least 25 must have bad memories of a hair cut they once had but that today looks awful or stupid, yet at the time you surely thought it was the coolest haircut ever. well imagine if that haircut had been a permanent thing, imagine if your hair was stuck that way for the next 50 or 70 years – until the day you die.

        well that is what a tattoo is

        there are other explanations, I have read at least half a dozen and they all make a lot of sense

        and about tattooed up girl being sluts? here is a study that confirms they are more slutty,

        http://www.annalsofepidemiology.org/article/S1047-2797%2811%2900287-0/fulltext

        If you don’t want to take the time to read the study, here s someone’s comment on this ( taken from the archives at Lawrence Auster’s Voice from the right )

        …There’s an old prejudice that women with tattoos are more promiscuous. And that remains true—a study of Australians found that the frequency of tattoos was highest among the most whorish women, in fact nine times higher, when compared to the least promiscuous. Table 2 states that while 3.3 percent of women with 0-1 sexual partners have tattoos, the 30 percent of women with 11 or more partners have tattoos. Some other interesting points from the study:

        The link between promiscuity and tattoos is weaker in men, with the most promiscuous men six times more likely to have tattoos than the least promiscuous. That figure for women is nine times higher…

        […] A greater portion of those reporting a history of venereal disease have tattoos, at 19.1 percent vs. 12.5 percent for women and 21.6 percent vs. 14.2 percent for men…

        Also when a person who complains they are poor, on welfare or that they work at minimum wage but they have many hundreds of dollars of tattoos on their bodies ( and tell you they plan on getting more tattoos ), this is a sign you are dealing with someone who is messed up in the head.

        Tattoos on the face indicates psychological problems.

        I could go on but this is already long enough.

        Like


      • Willy Muenzenberg, 1930s Jewish Communist theoretician said that control will be achieved only when ‘we make Western Christian civilisation stink’.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 4:19 pm Meaner Mr. Mustard

        Tattoos are the new clitoris.
        Every cunt has got one.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 4:38 pm Hymen Mingesky

        Lulz. Had a convo with a buddy regarding this topic 2 days ago. It went something like.

        Him: I like small girls that are tattes up
        Me: *grunt dissaprovingly*
        Him: Why com no lyk tattoo
        Me: I have no time for crazy. Tattoos signal either low class, neurosis, or both.
        Him: I do seem to bang a lot of crazy chicks.
        Me: *Nod knowingly* yep.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 4:56 pm Hymen Mingesky

        Lulz, it was Mr. Mustard on the helipad with the roflcopter. “….Every cunt has got one”

        😂😂😂😂😂😂

        Like


      • The normal instinct is to value smooth skin as it is a sign of youth and health, traits that help us survive. Therefore it is part of what ordinary decent, conservative people all over the world prefer.

        Disfiguring your skin with ink and metal is something inmates used to do, as Canadian Friend says. But why? Because it is a sign of toughness – you want to show you are so tough you don’t mind the pain. And it is reminiscent of scars. You show that you don’t care about preserving your skin, which means you are ready for fights, with the scars that follow.

        Only prole culture appreciates that. And the Tribe-controlled media want all Whites to adopt prole culture of the lowest kind. If we become pigs rolling in the mud, then we won’t think the other pigs in the mud look dirty.

        Permanent disfigurement messes with your head. Once done in a foolish moment, you have to rationalize it every day. And so you will rationalize prole culture.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 5:19 pm haunted trilobite

        Society is being fattened up for the kill: encouraging tattoos is a ploy to make people less resistant when they implement their plan of corralling and barcoding citizens. FEMA do seem to be stockpiling ammo and people carriers

        Like


      • They have nothing to do with tattoos man! Some of you guys have the wrong idea about tatts. Tattoos are an ANCIENT EUROPEAN THING and they are awesome. All of the ancient europeans had tattoos, the Vikings were all tatted up, has nothing to do with that polynesian crap.

        Truthfully alot of you guys that want to get chicks, one thing you can do is get all tatted up. Chicks LOVE it. PERIOD. Even a dorky hipster looks a little more masculine and [email protected]$$ with them. Chicks always love the badboy everyone knows that.

        I’ve always got tons of chicks but I’l; tell you what, after I got all tatted up I got WAY more chicks.

        And it doesnt mean tattoo = trashy for girls either necessarily. Ancient European royalty&women etc were always all tatted up. It’s awesome.
        Its actually the j3ws who say its bad and what not so you actually have it backwards.

        Like


    • Couldnt reply to your other post, but yeah man, I was just asking the crew here what they thought of a situation where it apparently went really good minus the small hitch at the end of her asking for my number before we parted, then the comments turned into some weird thing almost implying I was a pickup failure despite slamming her two nights in a row.

      Like


      • No, you were an overwhelming success as a PUA. The question is whether there is potential here for a serious LTR, and maybe even some BUNS -> OVEN [cause it sounds like the two of you have off-the-charts chemistry, and you don’t ever want to walk away from that unless she crosses over some forbidden line, such cuckolding you, or boring you to death, or going full-blown BPD with a chef’s knife]. Right now, it sounds like she has your cell number, and your street address [whereas you have neither her cell number nor her street address?], so she’s in control, and you can’t be the aggressor in the usual sense. Whatever you do, NEVER beg for the pussy [you always want to try to maintain a frame where she is begging for the cock], never apologize about anything, and if you have to cyberstalk her to figure out her contact info, then be Alpha about it. Although that’s going to be tough – even just an opener such as “Listen, I ain’t never cyberstalked a chick before, but a friend of mine just called, and he said that he has two extra tickets to blah blah blah…” has an air of Beta supplication and apology to it. Always go with “Betas ask questions, Alphas issue commands” and say something more like “I got a spare ticket to blah blah blah; meet me down at yada yada yada at 9PM,” and then let her hamster burn through 10,000 calories trying to figure out how you successfully cyberstalked her.

        Like


      • It was at a hotel, so we hooked up in her room, she has no idea what I do at all or where I live. Our jobs will sooner or later bring us back into contact.

        No buns in oven on this one, she is a MILF, so long term there is nothing other than some surprisingly fun sex.

        Like


      • Reply in mod, but one final thought – if you decide to cyberstalk her in order reinitiate contact, then you’re going to need a clever devil-may-care shit-eating-grin response just in case she says, “Who are you?” So work on the wording of it.

        Like


  6. on November 10, 2014 at 8:16 am The Spirit Within

    Our civilization has grown too powerful.

    Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 4:23 pm Meaner Mr. Mustard

      No, the influencing (YKW’s) / controlling elite and their cohorts/enablers (media, marketing, banks and coprorations) have grown too powerful.

      The people on the other hand have grown too comfortable, too sedated and too fucking stupid to ask why a big cryptofascist cock keeps getting jammed up their ass. In fact, most of them are beginning to like it.

      Like


      • So you are saying the Tribe is “cryptofascist”? Not Marxist then, but anti-Marxist.

        Think about how the media manipulate what the words for Evil should be, and why. Why isn’t communist the go-to slur?

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 11:45 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

        I will put my hand up and say that I am no expert on political theory.
        The Tribe/YKW’s as a group and their cohorts/enablers/corporations/banks are the cryptofascists with respect to the rest who they want to impose cultural Marxism onto.

        For one dares not criticize or critique the Tribe/YKW.
        To do so is to be an “Anti-Semite” or at best is highly suspect of their motivations.

        No other group is able to simulataneously be so concentracted in positions of influence, power, control and weath; yet no other group is so likely to portray themselves as the “victim”.

        On the other hand, it is Culural Marxism for the rest, seeking the elimination of class/race and so on in general society.
        One big generally blended mass, no united strength, unable to differentiate itself, unable to unite. Bereft of any real values squabbling among themselves.
        The patriarchal family model destroyed.
        Accepting the status quo, non-questioning, obedient workers.
        Ripe for exploitation. Economic consumer units.

        In America you have a front row seat to this.
        Enjoy.

        Like


      • > “Why isn’t communist the go-to slur?”

        Because the YKW will always flip on a dime and adopt a completely different strategy [or even multiple different strategies, all with ostensibly incompatible objectives] in Its never-ending quest to destroy and annihilate and eradicate the Shkotzim. Anarchism, Communism, Fiat-Money Mercantilist-Fascism, Feminism, Multiculturalism, The War to Destroy Shegetz Masculinity, Heavy Industry Labor Unionism, Mercantilist-Fascist Off-Shoring of Heavy Industry – the YKW will employ all of those techniques [and any other technique which It needs to invent] – and wield all of them simultaneously – in order to achieve Its goal of eradicating the Shkotzim.

        Like


    • Blech look at those hogs. They should have welcomed them with open arms tied them up and held a public pig roast. Fuckin cunts recording because they knew what the answer would be. Probably called adozen people before finding one to admit to not wanting anything to do with 2 fat dykes even if they are fat enough to feed them for half a year.

      Like


    • Yeah, and part of the fine was to pay for their emotional distress! Eesh….friggin’ horrible. They probably used that to pay for their bullshit wedding.

      Like


      • The Giffords … were ordered to pay a total of $13,000 — a $10,000 fine to the state and another $1,500 to each member of a lesbian couple to compensate them for “mental anguish.’’

        Notice who comes out the big winner when the money changes hands.

        Like


      • If those two lesbians were to open a vegetarian restaurant, and I was to sue them because they refused to serve me a steak, I am sure they would be happy to pay a $10,000 fine and an additional $1500 for my mental anguish

        It is sad that we do not tar and feather outcasts anymore…

        Like


    • Freedom of association was killed with the civil rights act. A sensible country would let businesses reject business to whoever they please for whatever reason they please but since black people can’t not be criminals, we all get to suffer. Thanks Thwack!

      Like


      • I have no problem with such behavior as long as participating businesses are forced to display a highly visible symbol of this chosen behavior.

        That way people who do not support the behavior would not be tricked into supporting it.

        I think it should be conducted as an experiment to see which businesses the hot girls choose?

        Like


    • Seriously, people like that ought to be harrassed. Like have the same shit happen to them that happened to that Jessica Slaughter chick. Sending Craigslist homos to their place, unwanted pizzas etc.

      It’s not like Sturmabteilung but it’s something.

      Like


    • Perhaps Canadian Friend’s comment should be taken as a guideline. A one sided war has a guaranteed winner. Now, we can’t guarantee every couple(or their legal allies) has an opening to exploit. But should motivated locals/activists find that the gay couple (or their workplace) has made a legal mistake in their business practice, maybe a suit should be filed.

      Like


  7. I’m confused. The chick was the one with the beard, right?

    Like


  8. Why does that lesbian have a beard?

    Like


  9. Suppose Lucy van Pelt presents you with a notarized document promising to hold the football in place.

    It’s a shit test, Charlie Brown.

    Like


  10. > “I love America, but I’m moving.”

    Get out of Bluetropolis and into Deep Red flyover country. Quit chasing morally and spiritually and physically diseased snatch in the gin joints on Saturday night and start experiencing the bliss of the sweet sweet pussies of the Nice Girls from the Good Families in the evangelical churches on Sunday morning. BUNS -> OVEN Game FTW.

    Like


    • I keep thinking about this everyday and am making a plan. Living in the Gomorrah that is the LA metropolis is draining. Think I might join my folks over in Alabama. Nevada’s looking tempting, what with its zero state tax.

      Like


      • Man, when I was in LA, every friggin day was like sitting in the dentist’s chair and having pieces of sharp metal poked into my mouth. I couldn’t wait to get back home. PS: There are pro-life Christians in greater LA, just not very many of them [relative to the muds and the coons and the jews and the jew-wannabee whites and of course the Kardashians].

        Like


      • If you’re looking for a transition, try Texas. Zero income tax, solid morals, defiant politics, fiery economy. If, later on, you can’t stand the feel of a truly conservative state, you can move to Austin. ‘Bama’s only one day away by car if you’re homesick

        Also, since I’m promoting places, Arkansas just went all Republican for Congress and all statewide constitutional offices, so things are finally changing here, too. Expect to see taxes cut in Arkansas after the legislature meets.

        Like


      • How would you guys rank the major blue metropoleis in terms of The Darkness?

        Like


      • I only know of the LA metro and it is too dark for me. LIke Zombie stated, you can feel it everywhere. There’s just so much of it, it’s draining and if you’re not careful, you can get sucked into its vortex of villainy. There are some spots in CA that are conservative, aka Reagan Country, and I’m looking to those spots first before the final exodus–long story, but all to help out my family.

        I cannot speak for NY or Chi-town or others. But, I’m not big on places with people packed like sardines. As I’m discovering out here, weather ain’t everything.

        Like


      • > “rank the major blue metropoleis”

        What fascinates me are these emerging “Do as I say, not as I do” Hipster Whiteopia zones where the X-sters and the Millenials are voting with their feet to get as far away as possible from the muds and the chimps and all of that Oscar Mayer Wiener Academy multicultural insanity. On paper, they are uber-liberal [fascistically so], but I wonder if there is any undercurrent of DoublePlusUnGoodSpeak within those zones? Or do the Jewish and Gay Lettuce Bacon Tomato overlords enforce a rigid uniformity of thought at all times?

        Like


  11. This stuff helps filter out weak betas who are too insecure to give women what they really want: A sexually entitled man who doesn’t second-guess his allure.

    Feminism is one giant shit test.

    Like


    • Feminism isn’t the triumph of women … its the cumulative degeneration of generations of men who failed in their capacities to be men, which created an environment that fostered manliness in women and womanliness in men.

      Like


      • It has nothing to do with men failing to be men. People are controlled by the media. That does not make them weak or “unmanly” or whatever, it makes them people. People have always been susceptible to propaganda, in all times, that’s why it still exists. And we were never made to deal with an artificial reality created on television, our brains react to the characters we like or detest in the same way they react to people in real life.

        As for feminism, it has nothing to do with promoting women’s interests. Feminists didn’t say anything when Clinton was revealed to be a serial rapist or when he cheated on his wife with his Tribe intern. Feminists say nothing about 1,400 girls raped by Pakis in Rotherham. They say nothing about mass immigration bringing gang rape.

        Feminism exploits women just like its parent socialism exploits workers. When you hear college sociology professors and their most loyal students talk in private, you hear how they hate and fear workers. In their minds Western workers are always just one step from a fascist dictatorship, and so they must be controlled by opening the gates to immigration from Eastern Europe and the Middle East and Africa. The hatred and fear is very real. The leftists convince themselves that they are the ones who are the underdog.

        Like


      • Yes, TV is a powerful weapon, but is was weak, sex starved men who aided and still aid the feminist onslaught. Is Pajama boy, or any run-of-the-mill hipster faggot “manly” by virtue of his personhood, propagandized or not?

        No.

        These quasi quarter-men have assumed in their dispositions, psychologies and modes of thought, qualities of the feminine in equal measure and proportion to their sisters’ absorption of masculine qualities.

        The rise of feminism therefore is the decline, or, degeneracy of men

        Yes, the role of TV cannot be ignored in this perversion, however, as Ludovici observed:

        “Environment, does not create anything in us, nor does it put anything into us that was not there already. What it does do is either to stimulate or leave dormant what is already in us.”

        Like


      • I like your wording Pluv, “manly by virtue” this sums up these faggots perfectly. Lumberjack beards and flannel button downs, drinking dark beers outta the mug….doing their best to look the part, yet wouldn’t know the first thing about say, turning wrenches on their own car, cutting and splitting firewood, or building something with their own soft girly hands. The world needs a good war and cull, start with these homos first.

        Like


  12. I love America, but I’m moving.

    Uruguay is looking better every day.

    Like


  13. on November 10, 2014 at 8:46 am dagenhamblonde

    The SJWs are really into turning “dude” and “bro” into slurs. The title of this video is basically the same as “Ethical business practices for kikes.”

    Like


  14. Of course, the ambiguous race girl (half Asian?) is covered in tattoos. And she’s pretty without being too pretty which would threaten feminists.

    Like


  15. I remember reading once about how porn has changed over the years and, for instance, in the 70’s the porn actors who became famous were comparable to disgusting, swamp-thing, societal rejects. This was something the clientele then could relate to. I also remember that the porn began to feature dominatrices and women who are sexually aggressive. For men who could not find real sex, the fantasy of the sex coming to them reflected in the porn they watched. This seems similar. A male who is incapable of any sort of romantic leadership is trying to make his condition socially acceptable, even sexy. This was really just a fantasy of the male, it had no content.

    Like


    • > “the fantasy of the sex coming to them… A male who is incapable of any sort of romantic leadership” Contrast the ancient Greco-Roman point of view: That the feminine is purposeless insanity [CHAOS] and that the masculine is the purposeful act of fertilization [EROS]; that the feminine is the Attention Whore Histrionic Personality which inspires the hunt [ARTEMIS/DIANA] whereas the masculine is that which captures, corrals, tames, plows, seeds, and harvests the object of the hunt [CRONUS/SATURN].

      Like


      • Contrast the ancient Greco-Roman point of view: That the feminine is purposeless insanity [CHAOS] and that the masculine is the purposeful act of fertilization [EROS]; that the feminine is the Attention Whore Histrionic Personality which inspires the hunt [ARTEMIS/DIANA] whereas the masculine is that which captures, corrals, tames, plows, seeds, and harvests the object of the hunt [CRONUS/SATURN]

        I think Christians should leave talk about European religions to the rest of us. That desert religion will skewer the competition at all times.

        “the feminine is purposeless insanity” Hmm, odd how this is non-existent pretty much everywhere in Greek and Roman writings. You certainly don’t see Julius Caesar write like that, and he wrote a lot. Of course they didn’t consider men and women to be the same, but this statement is ridiculous. Sure, you can find some philosopher who makes a statement like that – the philosophers usually being old men without wives or children – but such a guy doesn’t speak for ordinary people.

        To see women as The Enemy is a Semitic thing, practiced among Jews and Arabs and a certain Jew-derived religion, universal Judaism if you will. In European culture men and women were always partners, working together in marriage as the natural foundation for the tribe. This is true in Nordic, Celtic and Greek mythology, the mirrors of the nature of European peoples.

        Like


    • These ridiculous consent scenarios are coming from liberals and feminists!

      Yes there probably are a few omega males who might be into this scenario (‘can I see your… your… ankle?’) but this is clearly part of a larger Regressive political movement:

      http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/06/04/College-Students-May-Need-Verbal-or-Written-Consent-to-Have-Sex-on-Campus

      Like


    • I miss the days of going to the “art” theater and sharing the movie-house with a bunch of winos jerking off into their hats.

      Like


  16. I want to comment on the poll I asked people to complete last week. Although you are welcome to press “back” on it and answer the poll, I am probably not going to use this data for any analysis because the sample size is too small. Assuming this data isn’t all lies, I thought it was interesting that no one mentioned meeting anyone through tinder(although this could be because I put online dating just before it) or charity work. The option with most votes was work, followed by friend network, followed by other which does reflect other studies. Dating sites, pubs, and class all had a strong showing too. Take what you will from this.
    http://poll.pollcode.com/93215964_result?v

    Like


  17. Being aggressive works, though most here would know that.

    I got with a nurse this weekend, first night lay, it was insane how easy it was, left her a mess, I’ll be surprised if I dont hear from her again.

    In fact the only thing that was ‘asked’ at night was her ‘would you like to do me from behind now?’

    Like


    • EK, congratulations on the pump, but I wouldn’t be so quick to dump that chick. I’d give some strong consideration to getting her off of birth control and becoming a father. Just a hunch, my man, but the best things in life start as just a hunch.

      Like


      • I’m saying this because it sounds like the two of you might have had some raw natural chemistry, and that’s so very rare in life; certainly she gave herself to you, Body and Soul. BONUS TIP: If you decide to stick around for the long haul, then HOLD FRAME AT ALL COSTS. Don’t let your guard down and starting becoming a Beta supplicant. She opened her heart and her legs to you because you are a REAL MAN, damn it. Not a Scalzi.

        Like


      • if western civilization ends up with anyone left, we’ll owe you one zb. probably won’t be followed til it’s too late, but i do appreciate the sentiment and persistence.

        Like


      • Like


      • It was great man, I maintained superb frame, I thought I was dumping the arrogance on too heavy, but evidently not.

        Anyway, I did feel like we had great chemistry, and I actually liked her a lot, which is unlike a lot of younger girls I’ve slamed out.

        But…and this is a big but, the final night (we fucked 2 in a row) she had to get up to go to work and she was kissing me saying how much she missed me, and how ‘stupid happy’ she was, and she wanted me number – meaning I do NOT have hers. So at this point its a bit of a waiting game, but i do not mean it lightly to say I blew her mind with sex, and based on what others say, usually thats enough to bring them back.

        Like


      • How did the interaction proceed wherein she got your contact info but you didn’t get hers? Especially: Did she pwn the Frame of that particular interaction?

        Like


      • I had the frame pretty solid, when she was getting up to leave, she even said something like ‘I want to do it again, but I’m too sore’ and at the start of the night, she was the one that came to me.

        The only ‘bad’ thing was that she asked for my number, I’ve never been in that situation before, so simply asking how ‘bad’ that is?

        Like


      • In addition to the one-sided phone number situation, did you fuck her at your place or at hers? Because if she knows everything about you [phone number and street address], and if you know nothing about her, then she’s firmly in command of the relationship already. Do you even know her first and last names with any certainty?

        Like


      • “the two of you might have had some raw natural chemistry, and that’s so very rare in life:

        it is very rare. we meet lots of people who we are compatible with or we can make a relationship work with but very few that we have the raw, intense kind of chemistry that keeps you awake at night. that’s definitely something to hold onto.

        Like


    • Be wary of nurses. Especially SNL nurses. Their profession predisposes them to a high level of emotional detachment. They are excellent at feigning empathy, but don’t doubt for a second that it’s fake.

      Like


      • I know man, I am being wary. I’ve had experiance with a BPD so I know what fake empathy can do, that being said man, what about the simple calculus of
        ‘great sex = coming back for more’
        will that hold true?

        Like


      • http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SNL
        Okay, but SNL would imply that she’s in charge, not you. Which means that she pwns Frame, not you. Which means that the war was already lost before the first shot was even fired.

        Like


      • > ‘great sex = coming back for more’

        Not to get all Jesus Phreak on you, but God gave the two of you that red-hot chemistry so that a little baby would be born nine months later.

        Like


      • BETAS ASK QUESTIONS, ALPHAS ISSUE COMMANDS: When that little voice in the back of your head says, “Okay, the time is now, let’s up the ante,” then you say to her: “Stop taking your birth control.” She’ll understand. And no Beta supplication such as “I want you to…” or “Would you consider…” Just simply and straightforwardly inform her what her new reality is going to be.

        Like


      • Wow, all the assumptions here. Everyone knows everything about someone from just a few short sentences. Amazing.

        “Their profession predisposes them to a high level of emotional detachment. They are excellent at feigning empathy, but don’t doubt for a second that it’s fake.”

        Yeah, evil creatures, taking care of people like that. Florence Nightingale was no doubt a serial killer stalking the streets when she wasn’t inventing new ways to stop infections and save lives. What kind of woman enters a profession where she helps and nurtures anyway? Highly suspect.

        “and that’s so very rare in life; certainly she gave herself to you, Body and Soul.”

        Strongly starting to wonder about your sexual experience. Erudite Knight writes about getting an easy lay where he “left a mess”, and you make this assumption, and start it up with marriage and babies. It might feel warm inside to be so holier-than-thou visavi those of us who have casual sex with women, but do you really think that proselytizing is productive? It’s rather about looking morally superior. But here’s the thing, having sex partners without planning to join your church and “put buns in oven” does not make people worse than you. And when you constantly talk like that when people try to discuss pickup, you simply show yourself to be removed from ordinary people’s lives – and that means that whatever you have to say about politics is moot.

        Contrast that with CH who shows he knows that ordinary people have casual sex, and who doesn’t shriek in horror at that thought. He shows he lives in the real world with the rest of us. How much more powerful his opinions about politics become then. If you are truly honest about trying to affect people, instead of just advertising your own moral superiority for a feel-good kick, that’s something you should think about.

        Oh, and I slept with a gal this weekend. And I never considered marrying her, not even once. And that is a good thing. Sex for pleasure is good, despite what your Jew-derived religion says.

        Like


      • “Their profession predisposes them to a high level of emotional detachment. They are excellent at feigning empathy, but don’t doubt for a second that it’s fake.”

        yup

        Like


      • on November 11, 2014 at 6:37 am haunted trilobite

        Definitive statements are occasionally reconsidered and reviewed

        Like


      • > “Strongly starting to wonder about your sexual experience.”

        LOL’ed. Dude, it’s precisely because of so much experience in banging chicks that I know how very precious and rare that flaming hot chemistry really is. A player is very lucky to cross paths with it once a decade. I never got it in high school or college, I got it once in grad school, and I have had it all of twice since grad school. You cross paths with that flaming hot chemistry – and as long as she is slightly less nuts than a homicidal maniac, and maybe minimally deceitful and disloyal by chick standards [which is not saying much] – then it’s time to man up and put BUNS -> OVEN.

        Like


  18. I lasted 40 seconds into the video then felt the acid buildup in my stomach. Can anyone beat my score?

    Like


  19. on November 10, 2014 at 9:16 am Proper Villain

    CAN I GIVE YOU THE PANTS?

    Like


  20. I went out with a chick who had one of those “My sober yes is my consent” magnets on her refrigerator. I was extremely tempted to ask “May I penetrate you now” to prove a point but I opted for getting laid instead. I gave her shit for it later and she laughed. Even liberals don’t actually believe the bs they spew.

    Like


  21. Somebody needs to tell the ladies, I have a much younger buddy that went with “Can I kiss you” and got “You could have until you asked”

    It would be funny to see video of a bunch of interactions flame out as this type of interaction turned them off in real life. Just a desert wind of weakass consent questions

    Like


    • Girl I’m dating told me a similar story. She was once asked for a kiss, never talked to that loser again.

      Like


      • But with just the slightest change in phraseology [Betas ask questions, Alphas issue commands], you could drive her nuts. “This is the part where I kiss you; this is the part where I slide my wet fingers into your underwear, this is the part where I massage your little clitoris into a seething volcano of passion; this is the part where I remove your underwear; this is the part where I enter you and we become lovers…”

        Like


      • Yes, phraseology! Love it.

        Like


    • I have asked can I kiss you a bunch of times. You just don’t wait for an answer. Or you go ahead and do it no matter what the answer is.

      The thing is that an alpha will ask “can I fuck you” and the girl will say “hell yeah.”

      Like


    • Ooooh she said that, oooh no not that! Lol lame.

      I ROUTINELY pull the old MM “would you like to kiss me?” “do you want to kiss me?” for the first kiss. Has NOT FAILED ME YET.

      EVEN WHEN I FUCKED IT UP and said it like an uber retard and she said no and said I was lame, I still got laid later.

      the KEY IS TO KEEP MOVING FORWARD.

      Like


  22. That obsequious, faggy little smile on his face when she denied him permission to remove her shirt at that particular juncture filled me with an almost violent disgust.

    This society simply does not deserve to survive. And it won’t, thank God.

    Like


  23. oh btw i think he’s left himself open to university expulsion at 15 seconds, he clearly asks if he can touch her defaced leg AFTER he is already touching it. if that’s permitted, can you do the same with penetration? because getting a ‘yes’ post-insertion is relatively trivial

    Like


  24. The “consent movement” will only lead to a consent slippery slope, and it won’t do anything to reduce cases of regret rape. Think of it this way:

    “Can I touch your leg?”

    “Yes”

    *Goon touches and rubs leg*

    Enter the court room, where our rapist asked to touch our victims leg, but not to rub it, and we have the beginning of our rape case.

    “He asked to put the tip in, not the whole thing!”

    Like


  25. Can’t wait for the emerging legal specialists that will arise from these bedroom negotiations. We will have court rooms trying to define consent with actions and damages resulting from boob grabs not implying consent for ass.

    Like


  26. That video must really be from The Onion.

    Like


  27. And of course at youtube comments are disabled for that video because feminists are so open minded and tolerant.

    Did they ask if we were consenting to not have the right to post our opinion?

    Like


  28. That was fucking nauseating.

    Like


  29. Can I use the wine bottle?

    Like


  30. Burton never had to ask for consent….would love an alpha of the month post CH

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1386878/Richard-Burton-slept-women-week-30-years.html

    Like


    • What an amazing article… Never even had to make obvious passes and even the women who he dumped felt “momentarily blessed” just to have gotten the 5 minutes of Alpha. Wow…

      “The writer Ruth Waterbury, who witnessed his dalliances with the women of Los Angeles in the mid-Fifties, was struck by the fact that he never seemed to make obvious passes.

      ‘He has a kind of availability about him, and the girls come running,’ she said. ‘He does not implore. He just quietly demands full surrender.’

      Frank Ross, who produced two of Burton’s earliest films in Hollywood, was astounded by the respect women had for him, even when he signaled that a relationship was over: ‘I’ve watched some of his girls and you can see they’re bewildered, first by their good luck — and then by their loss of him. Yet when he rejects them, they all go away. They act as though they’ve been momentarily blessed — and that’s enough for them.’”

      Like


      • I read some of the comments at the guardian and many females are calling Burton names such as filth or some word like that, but what about the women who cheated on their husbands to have their 15 minutes of sex with Burton? are they not filth as well?

        Like


    • If you feel like getting hit in the gut by a speeding 747, then take some time to watch “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” BPD meets NPD in terrible tragedy.

      Like


  31. On the flip side, this manboobery offers an opportunity for men with functional testes to positively differentiate ourselves.
    I’m 42 & the #1 compliment I get from the early 20-somethings I bang is “I love that you actually fuck like a real man.”
    Thanks, hipsters!

    Like


  32. lol its part of a 5 part series of manboobery

    this is the 1st

    watch them all if you can without punching your computer screen

    Like


  33. It’s impossible exaggerate the abject ridiculousness of this YMY mentality.

    Consent only matters if it can be proven. That’s why surgeons make you sign a lengthy form before they begin operating, and why schools make parents sign consent forms before taking the kids on a field trip.

    All the supplicating questions in the world won’t matter a whit if she decides the next morning, or the next week, or in 5 or 10 years, that she regrets the encounter. At that point, you will still be stuck with your word against hers.

    Since pausing to get a signature on the appropriate form for every bedroom manoeuvre is impractical, the only real solution to videotape every sexual encounter.

    Is this what the YMY geniuses intended? I somehow doubt it.

    Like


    • Hah, funny. The sign pointing at the talk-show host: “OVULATES ->”

      Unfortunately Married With Children always presented Al Bundy as a slob with no good arguments against feminism. Every time he and his friends went up against feminism they would just say something chauvinistic that viewers could laugh at, but not agree with. In the end the audience would say that heh, funny how they socked it to the worst of the feminists, but the feminists still had a real grievance.

      Same with Stuart in Spin City: an anti-feminist character whose anti-feminism is never given any good arguments, only some chauvinist joke. He would then always be bested by the leftist, homosexual Black character Carter, who was superior to him morally and intellectually.

      In The Simpsons, Homer, the dumbest character, is the main conservative character. He is constantly fooled by the evil Fox News, and his arguments for conservatism are always blatantly wrong. The Simpsons is one of those shows that pretend to be equal-opportunity satirists, but only criticize the left-wing characters for personality flaws, while criticizing the right-wing characters for having personality flaws and also the wrong arguments. Lisa, the leftist, is shown to be boring and pushy when she talks about leftism, but her arguments are always real-world arguments that the producers want people to believe.

      Same in The Office. The homosexual Mestizo Oscar is the most intelligent and knowledgeable character, like Carter and Lisa. And like Marcy in Married With Children, who while annoying is the best educated character. Oscar is a leftist. His only flaw, shown only in one episode, is that he often corrects people, starting with “actually”. The sexist boss Michael is shown to be intellectually inferior. And while we’re at it, the conservative Dwight is shown to be dumb and annoying. His adversary Jim is chummy with homosexuals and Blacks and often tries to stop Michael’s behavior – and Jim is naturally far more intelligent than Dwight.

      There are plenty of examples. In MASH, Frank Burns is conservative, and therefore stupid and extreme. Hawk-Eye Pierce is leftist, played by the socialist Alan Alda. Pierce is presented as an intelligent protagonist. It goes so far that Pierce is showed to openly support the North Korean invasion, refusing to hope that the U.S. side will win – and this is never opposed.

      Always the same. Leftist character intelligent, conservative character dumb. To fake an equal-opportunity satire, leftists will only be presented as sometimes being too pushy with their beliefs, but the beliefs themselves will not be attacked. The conservative ideas on the other hand are presented in extreme and false ways.

      Like


  34. I believe the song playing at the end (yes, somehow i got that far) is “Pony” by Ginuwine. You all remember the lyrics:

    You’re horny (at least I think so; I’m not good with non-verbal cues)
    Let’s do it (but only if you’re okay with that)
    Ride it (by which I don’t mean to imply that I’m commanding you)
    My pony (certainly not a full grown stallion)
    My saddle’s (please, please, please)
    Waiting (and has been for a very long time)
    Come and (again, only if you really want to)
    Jump on it (you have to be on top; it’s the only way I can climax)

    Like


  35. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11221164/ITVs-Dapper-Laughs-says-woman-is-gagging-for-rape.html

    “ITV’s response has been heavily criticised after Dapper recently tweeted: “Remember, it’s only sexual harassment if she’s more attractive than you.”

    Like


  36. on November 10, 2014 at 11:18 am Slow on the uptake

    Worst porno ever. Don’t bother.

    Like


  37. Why is pre-sex cunninlingus beta? I get off on giving oral.

    Like


    • Because you’re risking throat cancer to do something that pleases her.

      Like


      • Yes, I guess I am. Not sure you are, if you know what I mean 😉

        Like


      • When I was younger, I thought that it was my duty, as part of foreplay. But then I came to discover that a woman has far more intense orgasms while you’re fingering her clitoris and the head of your erection is just behind her pubic bone and stimulating her G-spot. Plus there’s the fact that the mere physical supplication of having your head between her legs is probably [correctly or incorrectly] signalling to her the intellectual and spiritual supplication of the Beta.

        Like


    • First of all, it’s an inherently submissive gesture.

      Secondly, when it comes to microbes, the mouth is almost as filthy as the anus.

      Like


      • cunnilingus is a leading indicator that the man offering it is a supplicating, over-earnest beta male. this goes double if the woman isn’t attractive enough to warrant a desire to go down on her.

        Like


      • This is silly. I think you people just think vaginas are icky. Do you banish women to the corner when they’re on their period as well?

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 12:50 pm haunted trilobite

        You mean the axe wound?

        Like


      • tomboys and athletic girls definitely have more labial terrain. deep grooves, folds upon folds, blossoming petals of vaginal tumescence. i’m convinced the higher T they were likely exposed to in utero produces, for lack of a scientific term, manlier vaginal sheaths. uber femmes have those dainty labia that tuck away neatly into a smooth uncomplicated vertical slit, and require much prying to expose to the outside world. cf.: asian chicks.

        Like


      • Don’t ask me how but somehow wanting to eat a girl out before you fuck her is sort of beta but wanting to rim a girl is not. Because rimming is perverse and therefore more invasive. Just how it rolls.

        Like


      • i know a guy who dates dark-skinned girls because he gets off on the contrast between the dusky labial shell and the pink within. he calls it neon pink. strange fellow.

        Like


      • God damn, FX, you’re on a roll.

        Like


      • “First of all, it’s an inherently submissive gesture.”

        I don’t disagree with that statement, with one caveat; it’s all in the way you initiate.

        She’s on her back, her hands outstretched above her head( you placed them there) ,

        Her legs splayed open, and held there(by you).

        Free hand gripping her neck(or firmly gripping her hair by the back).

        There is no doubt in that scenario about just who is charge.

        I don’t bother with one night stands. I f I am investing the time tracking down a quality lay, my intent is to get the most use out of her until boredom, or her feeling become an issue. If she isn’t worth going down on, I won’t fuck her.

        Like


      • CH, a friend of mine enjoys the brown girls and calls it “Neapolitan” like the ice cream flavor. White-pink-black. I laughed.

        Like


      • Really? Every guy that has ever seen my pussy has enthusiastically remarked on how they like the contrast. I suspect it is partially because my inside sort of is neon pink, as opposed to a lightly pigmented bubble gum pink. But I would still find it quite odd to select girls simply for the sake of that contrast look.

        Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 3:10 pm Master Blaster

        Most porn in my view is inherently about creating beta males.

        When did you last see the male in porn ‘take’ his woman or women as the case may be.

        Feast on them with desire like the man that he apparently is.

        Never.

        It’s all about the man asking permission the whole way or waiting for her to initiate.

        Have a look next time and see for yourself if the man is really seducing and ‘taking’ the woman as he pleases and sees fit and she is melting into his masculine power and essence giving herself fully to him and her experience.

        Now I get that’s its a ‘movie’ and there are legally as well as other requirements from the performers and producers, my point still stands I believe, porn shows a beta male or lower asking or waiting for the woman to initiate sex as she mostly requires it, Every Step Of The Way, permisiion seeking has been standard for a long time.

        Like


      • “First of all, it’s an inherently submissive gesture.”

        It doesn’t have to be. Rough her up first and make her earn it.

        Like


      • @Travis Bickle @Amy

        Problem is, under that scenario, there’s a different part of my body that would be demanding to get inside her far more than my mouth. If it keeps the man sexually frustrated, it’s beta.

        Like


    • I never eat pussy, for any reason. Not cuz I’m alpha (I’m a complete twink), but because I only do poles, not holes, yo.

      Like


    • If you want to eat her out eat her out. Beta is just waiting on her cue to do something. I can see the point here…it’s not that eating a girl out is per se beta…it’s that there are a ton of guys who think they ‘owe it to’ a girl to eat her out.

      If you don’t want to do it don’t do it. If you want to do it, do it.

      Like


      • In the heat of the moment, what you “owe” her is the most intense orgasm possible, which seems to come from PIV + clittoral stimulation, not from cunnilingus. Long term, of course, what you owe her is BUNS -> OVEN.

        Like


      • on November 11, 2014 at 2:18 am Mean Mr. Mustard

        Enough with the buns in the oven stupidity.
        She has to prove herself worthy of a bun in her oven and capable of being a good mother.
        Put a bun in the wrong oven and you stand a good chance of getting royally fucked over.

        Like


      • “LONG TERM” [you do understand the difference between “short” and “long”, right?] it’s your duty to see to it that she doesn’t waste the very best years of her fertility on some God-damned Peter-Pan-Syndrome 35-y.o.-pre-pubescent fuckup loser who refuses to give her any children at all.

        Like


      • In the heat of the moment I also owe her nothing 🙂

        I’m not saying don’t do stuff that will pleasure her or whatever, but do it because you’re into it. I strongly believe that just sticking to shit you like and enjoy will lead to the best result.

        And if you’re talking LONG-TERM, Shane….then what….let’s be cereal. 23-26 is probably best age for a girl long-term on average. 18-23 year olds are smokin’ but they’re also retarded. Short-term = awesome, long-term = eh.

        But that’s just what I notice. Maybe I’m wrong.

        Like


  38. I bet the session ended with her asking him if she could peg him *again* with the Lexington Steele strap-on, and he replied “THANK YOU, SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER!??”

    That guy must be going for the ghey-boi hipster look. He’d fit perfectly in parts of Austin.

    Like


  39. Anybody else here like to get the girl all hot and completely undress the her first while remaining fully clothed, then take a couple sips of my drink before returning to fuck?

    Like


  40. I don´t understand why going down on her is beta.
    Sometimes when I´m role playing “fighting” with a girl to physically dominate her in my bed or car, I manage to reach her pussy with my tongue and she calms down really quick. And, besides this, I really like the taste of pussy.
    I like to deep dive my tongue in all her holes. I belive it passes her a good message that I´m dirty and venal.

    Like


    • I think it’s more of a relationship thing. I wouldn’t eat out a girl I wasn’t dating long term either, that’s not very smart. I don’t do one night stands or short hookups so this isn’t a problem for me. People who say eating a woman out generally have problems with what are called “cooties,” I’m convinced.

      Like


  41. Well the girl is kind of hot (except for the tattoos), which is something. I guess.

    [CH: in real life, she’s played by lindy west.]

    Like


  42. No, I believe THIS is feminism for the bros … perhaps why the brothas like the white girls – they don’t want to be fuckin’ someone who acts like a confident male thug:

    Like


    • How many of you would’ve returned the slap like this man did? Very tough predicament in today’s society.

      I applaud the man for standing up for himself with that bitch, but also for taking care of his business when that white knight attacked him after.

      Like


    • YouTube comment:

      “This was my favorite scene in Planet of the Apes.”

      lolzlzlzlzolo

      Like


      • on November 10, 2014 at 5:14 pm Master Blaster

        Could zombies movies really represent what happens to civilization when the vibrant and their ‘ill formed’ ilk are allowed to set the narrative and the behaviour patterns…..it eventually spreads like a disease to most of the rest of the civilized population.

        Think about it.

        Like


      • Except you can’t shoot ’em in the head with impunity… yet.

        Like


    • In regards to the video about “Feminism for bros,” I think it’s nice that they’re trying to respect a person’s right to consent and all, but that video is unrealistic and extreme. Date rape is a problem, i understand that, but it is unrealistic to expect that most couples or sex partners are really going to stop every few seconds and ask if they can do something…”can I move my lips an inch down your neck and kiss and then just to let you know after that i’d like to move my hand down to your lower back, with you consent.” That’s just not realistic and probably not very enjoyable.

      Sex is built on trust, if you have a level of trust, then you’re not going to want to do anything will hurt your partner. If your partner clearly signals they don’t want you to do something, then you’re going to stop.

      This isn’t to suggest that I agree with a lot of the reasoning behind those commenters on this blog who’ve said that they dislike the feminism for bros video, but I do think this video isn’t realistic.

      In regards to newlyaloof’s comments:

      “No, I believe THIS is feminism for the bros … perhaps why the brothas like the white girls – they don’t want to be fuckin’ someone who acts like a confident male thug:”

      First what those “women” were doing was not feminism. That was just disrespectful, male or female.

      However, I think you are making a generalizations. I was appalled by the video, i don’t know the full story, but it appears that the young woman instigated that conflict. She got in his face and hit him with her shoe or something and he slapped her back.

      I don’t condone physical violence unless it’s a serious situation and you’re defending yourself. However, you can’t get into someone’s face, male or female, put your hands on them and then act shocked if you get hit back. There are people who will hit you back male or female.

      And I hate to say this, but especially if you are a female, i definitely wouldn’t put my hands on a male who is bigger and probably has more physical strength than I do. For my own safety.

      Next, I think the behavior exhibited on that subway speaks more about values and upbringing than race. I am an African-American female and I can honestly tell you I have not seen a Black woman behave that way in person. I don’t really see that behavior in general any way but again that’s because of the upbringing that I have and those whom i associate with having a similar upbringing.

      The closest I can relate is one time when I didn’t have my car and I was traveling to a school in the inner city, I had to take the bus. Most of the people who were riding the bus in that area come from a lower income background, it’s a very marginalized area. Any way, most of the people on the bus were very nice, I met some nice people who went out of their way to help me as an outsider to that part of the city. But, it was unfortunate because a fight almost broke out, but it was only two people and you know what of the 20 or so people on the bus the MAJORITY were just as appalled by the fight as I was. so it is stereotyping and generalizing when you look at one or two people and then extrapolate based off of that. It’s also confirmation bias because if you go looking for the angry, bitter, violent Black woman, then that is what your eyes will find. They will see the 1 or 2 fighting black women and miss the 50 who were trying to stop the fight or simply minding their business. That is confirmation bias.

      But any way, the fight on that subway was appalling. I think the young woman needs therapy. Perhaps she grew up in an environment where she had to fight to survive and that’s how she learned to deal with conflict. It’s a shame.

      Like


      • Its simple:

        1. None of those girls have fathers in the home

        2. They are all desperate for male attention

        3. They all now want to sleep with eight ball jacket pimp slap guy

        4. White knight dude gets no love.

        Like


      • “Confirmation bias, stereotyping, blah, blah, blah. Call it whatever makes you feel better. Having grown up with the brothaz all my life, this is standard operating procedure among black girls, even in the suburbs. Go to any suburban mall and you see this. Check out the rap videos, especially female rappers and you will see this. White liberals say, “You go girl.” Black thug liberals(and I say liberal to represent everything that isn’t feminine) say, “Fuck that bitch up, yo!” Everything that doesn’t go their way, the sistaz be flying off the hook. And even though you stick up for them, they’ll be the first one calling you a house N with your light skin and reasoned thinking. The brothaz will tell you, they don’t think a girl who can “throw down” is as sexy as a girl like you. About 90 percent of the sistaz I’ve ever known growing up acted like these girls. You’re the minority minority.

        Like


      • also, i don’t want to let the man who slapped the woman off the hook. he participated when he should have just disengaged and walked away from the situation and he wasn’t in any real danger in the first place. the woman was just being obnoxious. maybe she was trying to get his attention and she was really attracted to him, maybe she was just ignorant, maybe she was drunk…who knows.

        Like


    • god help me but these bitches turned me on!

      Like


    • @ Thwack,

      “None of those girls have fathers in the home”

      I think that having a loving, supportive father in the home makes a big difference. I think that women who have involved, supportive fathers tend to be more trusting, appreciate of men in general. I also think having a good father sets a model for the type of treatment that a woman knows she should receive when she gets older. I for one, had a wonderful father. I didn’t constantly have to fight because I had that support. It’s a shame some women grow up without that support and are almost somewhat hostile to all men because of a bad relationship with a father. Fathers are important.

      Like


      • “I think that having a loving, supportive father in the home makes a big difference.”

        More like a father that lays down the law.

        Like


  43. Britain yet again proves how it’s worse than the USA. Sodogamous couple has three babies with three different fat broads:
    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6076473/Gay-couple-to-have-3-babies-by-three-different-mothers-in-world-first.html

    Like


  44. This is depressing really. My average date with a call girl is way more passionate than this, even if she fakes it. God. Once this evolves to having to sign a consent form, then how different is this really from those Islamic temporal marriages?
    I mean, Islamic guy wants sex with Islamic girl, they go to see imam, Islamic guy and girl sign islamic paperwork and fuck.
    Western dude wants sex with western girl, they go to see a lawyer, sign paperwork and fuck.
    What’s the difference really?
    Western dude wan

    Like


  45. I see a market opportunity for a mobile consent app.

    Like


  46. Has anyone seen Gone Girl? It’s basically a horror movie for beta males

    Like


    • nope no one has seen it 🙂

      her treatment of her long-suffering provider male was spot-on, although doogie was completely unconvincing as a straight man.

      pretty good, i like all the girls in it and when emily ratawhatever unveils hers they’re worth the admission. even having seen them everywhere.

      Like


    • on November 10, 2014 at 4:32 pm Meaner Mr. Mustard

      Worth watching.
      Bitches be Insane.

      Like


  47. anyone read any good game posts lately?

    Like


    • Well, if you really want, I can post up an FR about how I used game to pull a white businessman from Topeka? On the other hand, he was paying me $200 so maybe that wasn’t really game?

      Like


  48. Oh my gawd. I stopped when he asked to take her shirt off like a goddamn pussy and she predictably says “No, not yet.” Are you fucking serious?

    At least COMMAND her, for pete’s sake.

    Overall, asking is lame. Made my insides turn just watching it.

    Like


  49. How about if you put on your thinking cap and take this ENTIRE FRIGGIN WORLD VIEW and see how you can go about incorporating it into all aspects of your own personal Game?

    Like


  50. unrelated and i’m probably not the first making this connection, but here’s a nice pair from nature.com

    “2% of the genomes of people who descend from Europeans, Asians and other NON-AFRICANS is Neanderthal”
    http://www.nature.com/news/modern-human-genomes-reveal-our-inner-neanderthal-1.14615

    “Human mathematical intelligence came from Neanderthals”
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7194/full/453562a.html

    huh

    Like


    • That’s bullshit, man! Brothers back in Africa invented nuclear power, space travel, computers, all kinds of good shit. Then fucking white guys stole it all! And no, don’t bother asking how a bunch of primitive white crackers conquered a continent full of advanced black civilizations, because… uh… I dunno, but RACISM!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Like


    • burke
      unrelated and i’m probably not the first making this connection, but here’s a nice pair from nature.com
      ————————————————————————————

      Why did the Neanderthal go extinct?

      Quest for fire

      Like


  51. 30 seconds before his annoying voice made me turn the volume off.

    ATTENTION “MEN”: WOMEN HATE HIGH PITCHED MOANING FAGGOTRY FROM MEN DURING SEX.

    fucking growl and grab her throat when you blow your wad then toss her aside. Dont stare into her eyes while pouting, asking for permission to hold her hand.

    Faggots

    Like


  52. Haha. If you need affirmative consent, tell her to beg for your cock. Don’t ask for much. That’s silly.

    Like


  53. Does anyone spot the fallacy of all of this? Do you think it will stop something like regret rape or vengeful accusations when the man fails to call her after?

    From the court transcripts:

    ALLEGED RAPIST: She said “yes” the 73 times I asked for permission during the sexual encounter.
    PROSECUTOR: Is this correct?
    ALLEGED RAPE-VICTIM: No. I mean, maybe. I mean, I think I maybe said “yes” about 70 times, but there may have been one or two times I don’t think I said it. I’m pretty sure I wasn’t *that* clear, but he continued.

    No matter how many times “yes” is screamed during the sexual encounter, it is still her word against his were she to decide that what happened to her was rape. He still has no protection against false accusations.

    Like


    • Apparently dudes are now surreptitiously taping their sexual encounters now (hide that camera in the closet!). Being busted for taping something is a lot better then being wrongly convicted of being raped!!

      It is CRAZY out there. Glad I gave up on women…

      Like


  54. “presex cunninligus is a beta tell”

    You mean an alpha waits til afterwards so he can eat his own cum out of her pussy? I never knew.

    Like


    • i was waiting for someone to pounce on that. you didn’t disappoint.

      fyi, all it means is that betas are more likely to muff dive before selfishly getting themselves off.

      ps if you’re an alpha, your bj to twat licking ratio should be in the ballpark of 10:1.

      Like


      • I almost nibbled at that myself, but it smelled fishy to me.

        Like


      • “i was waiting for someone to pounce on that.”

        Blimey! Set up like a bowling pin. Well, some guys actually like it for its own sake. Nothing sweeter than fresh-n-clean. The video, however, is another story. It had the look and feel of two lesbians.

        Like


      • @Libertardian – ar ar ar!

        Like


      • @Robert What: Anyway, I agree that while most betas are no doubt muff divers, that doesn’t guarantee muff divers are betas.

        This makes me wonder if women tend to be more responsive to being eaten after sex than before. Maybe someone here has conducted a scientific study.

        Like


      • I have no link handy but everything I have read about it since the 1970s says pretty much the same thing about how most women reach orgasm.

        Most women reach it trough clitoridal stimulation and only a small percentage ( 10 to 15 % at best ) reach orgasm trough penetration alone.

        Pretty much every woman enjoys penetration, they want it, they like it, but most of them do not reach orgasm trough penetration alone.

        If you are lucky enough to have a woman who reaches orgasm trough penetration alone, great ( they do exist, and they usually have multiple orgasm if you can last long enough, I would know, I was lucky enough to have dated four such women).
        But if she requires clitoridal stimulation like about 85% of women do, you will have to either use your fingers, a vibrator…or give her cunnilingus…

        Like


      • @Libertardian – I won’t assume that all women are the same as my mistress, but she can easier have a vaginal orgasm after a clitoral orgasm. Bless her sweet heart, though, she only thinks of me and never wants me to “wait” for her.

        Like


      • https://ubcpsych350.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/the-clitoris-in-3d/

        Apparently the clitoris is like a wishbone with only the head exposed and the prongs wrapped around the vaginal canal. Which would tend to explain (1) how women can reach orgasm from penetration at all and (2) why it’s harder because you have the vaginal muscles and other tissues in the way.

        Supposedly this was only discovered using an MRI in 2009. The usual suspects, of course, claim this is because patriarchy. Whatever the cause, I will admit to being dumbfounded that it took this long for this to be discovered.

        Like


  55. I think it is offensive the way you refer to people who have Aspergers. We are not necessarily weaklings, you know, and may even agree with you most of the time. It is a real condition, after all, and has no bearing per se in one’s opinions.
    Regards,
    Jose

    Like


  56. “Of course, this faggot opts to mash his face in her pussy before banging her. OF COURSE. Pre-sex cunnilingus is 99% of times a huge beta male tell.”

    Like


    • I wondered about that. So cunnilingus should be AFTER sex? Hmmm….

      Like


      • I think of it as part of the deal. You don’t do it every time, but still. Can you expect oral sex from a girl without being ready to give it to her? And a girl should give oral sex. When I have dated girls who wouldn’t do it, it just felt plain wrong. And I started thinking, imagine the guy who marries this girl, and never gets oral sex for the rest of his life. One shudders at the thought.

        Then again, maybe he will get oral sex. Just not at home. But can we blame him?

        Like


    • this crazy sjw chinese chick is really going after julien hard…looks like shes trying to get the site that hosts RSD’s website to shut them down.

      Like


      • What’s a Julien?

        Like


      • “looks like shes trying to get the site that hosts RSD’s website to shut them down.”

        lol doesn’t matter. PirateBay, 4chan, etc. are still running. Has no one ever used the internet before? They can make new Twitter/Facebook accounts and re-upload videos down the road when less people are in full rage mode.

        Everything about Tyler’s strategy is in this video that no one will ever actually watch for the EXACT reasons Tyler explains IN this video lol:

        Anyone who thinks that once shit hit the fan there was ANY way to handle it that would result in zero damage taken is naive and has never engaged the media before. The media tried to blame Tyler/RSD for Elliot Rogers just a few months ago when the guy was a member of pua-HATE, an anti-PUA site. He talks about his experiences with that in this video. The media wants to spin a narrative, so they will. If they want to push 20 articles on the same day all spinning the exact same narrative to drown him out, they can do that. Whatever gets more clicks.

        It doesn’t matter what Tyler says, a black dude isn’t talking his way out of a lynch mob. Firing Julien would just make the SJWs target the rest of them because they know they can cause firings, and there’s plenty of content on RSD for SJWs to endlessly be outraged over.

        Sure, he could waste time and resources trying to discredit the asian chick and posting videos defending himself etc., but to what end? The people who hate RSD are still going to hate RSD. No one who thinks OJ is guilty/innocent is going to change their mind if he releases a statement. No one who thinks Michael Jackson molested children is going to change their mind no matter what he says. And the people who are interested in RSD will still be interested in RSD.

        Like Tyler says in the video above, this isn’t the first time he’s had the media come after RSD. If you didn’t realize that, it’s because he’s handled those situations before and you haven’t noticed because he didn’t engage the media and let it drag out.

        Eminem is banned from all sorts of places, everyone is flipping their shit about him rapping that he’ll punch Lana Del Ray in the face right now like they think he’s serious, but he’s doing just fine. The fucking KKK is in the USA lol Like, no one cares.

        RSD does small bootcamps where they only allow like 3 guys on the program, they’re not hurting for customers. They’re not over in Australia and Japan because they’re struggling to find customers here. Even if Julien was locked down to the USA, he could run bootcamps in Vegas or around the USA and fill them every single weekend EASILY.

        There’s no financial hit in this at all. Their content is free online for anyone to view and spread via word of mouth and the guys who’ve watched a few videos will give them the benefit of the doubt and look into things further and might just avoid Julien’s content but resonate with one of the other instructors and take their bootcamp instead.

        Bootcamps are only like 3 people. The big crowds you see in those speeches are generally Free Tour events that don’t cost money (there’s a $50 retainer fee that you just E-Mail to get back after, so they know how big a crowd it’ll be). If no one goes to a single Free Tour ever again, they haven’t lost a dime. Or those people in the videos are Hot Seat crowds, which are like $200 to attend I think, and if you’re taking a Hot Seat you are FULLY interested in RSD and understand Julien’s trolling wasn’t to be taken seriously.

        Maybe Julien can’t go to Japan or Canada. Oh no. A handful of guys in Japan won’t get to learn how to approach and talk to girls. Sucks for them, but there’s another handful of guys in the USA who would happily take those empty bootcamp spots and go mack some hotties and those Japanese dudes can always travel to the USA if they want him as a coach bad enough.

        But hey, I’m just a shill, right? Don’t read any of this or use critical thinking, and definitely don’t watch that video…it’s LONG, and Kim Kardashian is probably giving her opinion on what Eminem said and who KNOWS what’s happening with the ebola nurse, I heard she has to re-plan her ENTIRE wedding!! click click click…

        Like


      • nobody really listens to the lamestream media anymore….not anyone who wants to win elections that is…

        Like


      • Weren’t you the guy who defended Tucker Max in that video where he talked to these two yentas by saying that “It’s impossible to convince those broads but he convinced the moderates/neutrals in the comment sections”?

        There’s your hint.

        Like


      • @ho
        Different situation. That was a one vs one debate. This is one vs possibly hundreds of thousands. Try writing a defense of RSD and see how far it gets. People haven’t adapted to online war in 2014. Shit has changed, old tactics that worked before Twitter and archives and streaming video etc. don’t apply anymore and the SJWs use tactics that people didn’t have to deal with before the Twitter era. Plus Tucker is appealing to the masses to get money from them so he has to appeal to the moderates. RSD’s income comes directly from students who are aware of RSD and spread it by word of mouth and tell their friends how railroaded the Julien situ was.

        This is all simple logic.

        Like


  57. http://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

    Any normal human who has lived in this world over 20 years knows these things to be true.

    The best definition of liberalism (not classical founding fathers liberalism) or leftism is the denial of real world natural law reality that all normal and honest people know from simple life experience.

    Like


    • I have spent many hours at that site, I have learned so much, some of it simply fascinating, but whitelocust has been inactive for a few years, does anyone know what happened to the author/blog owner?

      Like


  58. Is cunnilingus “Beta” if you’re getting “referral sex” based on your prowess in that department- think I’m in the 1% exception… Seriously, my reputation has women coming back for more…

    Like


    • No, and it really doesn’t have to be beta at all. Context is everything. I’m sure the way the guy in that video did it was nauseating, though.

      Like


    • Dick game beats lick game, son.

      Like


      • @YaReally do you go down on girls you’ve just picked them up or is it only after repeat business? I’ve been scared to do it cuz I don’t want to get any STDs from some random.

        Like


      • @Hunter
        “do you go down on girls you’ve just picked them up or is it only after repeat business?”

        I go down on pretty much all of them. I love it. I’m like a puppet-master down there with fingers and tongue giving them all sorts of crazy orgasms. I prefer when I can have a few hours with the girl so there’s no rush and I can tease the fuck out of her (kissing up and down her body, nibbling her neck, light kisses down her body and circling her pussy without quite touching it then down to biting the inside of her thigh and back up to circling again and tracing her pussy lips slowly one at a time still without touching her clit, dangling the tip of my tongue across her clit as slow and light as possible, etc.).

        Once I’m on her clit doing my thing I’m working her G-spot, A-spot, Deep-spot, playing with her ass, all sorts of combinations. With a new fuckbuddy who’s going to be a regular I like to mix up what I’m doing as I push her over the edge so she gets a variety of orgasms, like the first time she comes over I’ll give her a few G-spot (aka squirting) orgasms. Next time I’ll work her A-spot as she cums. Next time it’ll be the Deep-spot, sometimes I’ll press on it rhythmically sometimes I’ll just hold the pressure down on it, etc. Then maybe next time it’ll be just a normal clit orgasm but with a finger in her bum (her finger or my finger, whatever). Then a super slow teasing orgasm where I keep her on the edge as long as possible till she can’t form words. Then I’ll tie her up and give her multiple orgasms where she can’t get away from them. Then out come the toys like nipple clamps and floggers and shit, etc.

        I have fun doing all of this. It’s an awesome power trip to leave her a blubbering quivering pool of jelly and to watch her body squirming at every tiny movement I do, hear her frustrated breath as I take her to the edge but stop and don’t let her quite reach the tipping point into orgasm over and over and just be completely in control of her body/pleasure. I lol every time they’re in that zombie post-multiple/quirting/prolonged-orgasm state where they can’t even form words as I pull them against me and pull the blanket up to cuddle while they recover and come back down to Earth.

        Some guys aren’t into any of that stuff, but hey that’s cool. I don’t expect a construction worker with a hammer to paint the Mona Lisa lol I still get to get off how I want, it’s not an either/or thing like only one orgasm can happen during sex lol And I mix up different types of sex. Sometimes I’ll be rough and slap her around throat-fucking her and calling her names, sometimes I’ll do the candlelight and massages slow sensual shit, sometimes I’ll do a full out rape roleplay, sometimes I’ll take her out to bar and we’ll drink and I’ll fuck her in public somewhere. Depends on the girl and the mood. I talk to them about sex and their personal fetishes and shit too, so I can come up with fun shit for us to do. Even with P in the V I like to mix things up, like I’ll tease her for a bit and then just fuck her as slow as possible teasing her instead of always just pounding away like a jackhammer.

        And ya, I know, I know, “yareally you giant beta homo, a girl will be happy if YOU get off, don’t u kno NETH1NG???”. Don’t worry, I also throw in that “just fuck her brains out and use her as a fuck-hole and not care if she gets off” type shit for variety but I personally prefer all the orgasmic shit. I look at it like I’m not offering them anything but sex (no commitment, no dates, no spending money on them, etc.) so I might as well be giving them good sex lol

        Like I’ve said before, fuckbuddies don’t come back to me for my 6-pack abs and mansion with 10 BMWs in the garage. They come back for the sex, often even after they boyfriend up. And I get the occasional referral which is always a pleasant surprise lol

        “I’ve been scared to do it cuz I don’t want to get any STDs from some random.”

        A lot of STD hype is just fear-mongering to keep teenagers from fucking irresponsibly. I’ve done my research over the years and basically everything can be cleared up with a handful of pills as soon as you notice any symptoms, no fucks given. Those images you see on Google are all INSANE cases where the disease has gone untreated into like stage 9 out of 10 levels of terror…you are never going to catch anything that looks like those images lol

        The two major STDs to care about (because they’re the two that can’t be cleared up with a simple round of pills) are herpes and THE AIDS. You’re so unlikely to catch AIDS from P in V and even less likely to catch it from oral that it’s not worth even thinking about.

        Herpes sucks because you can’t get rid of it. Statistically like a quarter of the population has herpes and something like 3 quarters of them don’t even know they have it because they don’t show any symptoms. So basically sex in general is a crap-shoot. If you want a 0% chance of catching the herp, don’t have sex at all. A condom is only going to protect your shaft, the herp can go all the fuck over the place.

        But the herp comes in two versions, one of them is generally “the oral one” which results in cold sores, and the other is on a person’s jimmies. So much of the population gets cold sores and can catch it so easily from like, a relative kissed them when they were a baby, or sharing drinks, or any number of other things that it’s like if I end up with that, and I get it from giving chicks mind-blowing multiple/squirting/prolonged orgasms while Bob from Accounting got it from sipping out of the same glass as a buddy a few years ago, I’m alright with that lol

        If you DO catch the herp, you can be totally asymptomatic and never even know it or see any kind of outbreak, or you can have a minor version of it where it’s like a minor pimple that crops up like once a year and is gone in a couple weeks, and if you get the full out TV-commercial version of it you can take drugs to manage it. Or if you eat super clean and stay as healthy as possible, you shouldn’t get breakouts or should be able to minimize them (they appear when your immune system is out of whack, like when you have a cold, thus the nickname “cold sores”).

        If you’ve been making out with girls and share drinks at the bar with your friends and shit, there’s a decent chance you HAVE it and just aren’t showing any symptoms. Even if you’re in a relationship with one girl, if she goes and cheats on you or she’s been asymptomatic her whole life or she’s sharing drinks with her friends, you’re not really any more immune. I know a dude who got chlamydia (round of pills clears it up, no big deal) from a huge fat chick he was in a long-term relationship with…I figure if I’m going to catch something it’ll at least be from some hottie where guys go “wow, ya, that’s worth it, fuck she’s hot” lol

        And if you get one version of the herp, then you’re pretty much immune to catching the other version of the herp because your body is used to that shit. So if you get cold sores, you’re probably not going to catch jimmy sores down below lol

        So it’s like, ya, there’s a chance you might catch the herp…but if the choice is “no sex ever, or kind of half-assed sex with regular old orgasms for the girl and a bunch of paranoia and stress for you”, or “fuck a bunch of girls my entire life and blow all their minds into orgasmic bliss like a boss”, I figure I’ll take my chances. I might get hit by a car or struck by lightning but I’ll still go outside and cross my fingers.

        If you want to fucking TERRIFY yourself, ask people around you if they’ve ever had a cold sore lol You probably won’t leave the house ever again.

        If you want to be sneaky and do some recon, when you’re in deep rapport/comfort, tell a funny story about being at the STD clinic recently and probe her to see when the last time she went is. And/or when things are heating up, tell her you shouldn’t kiss her because you just got over a cold sore and wouldn’t want to give it to her if she’s never had one before and if she’s had them before there’s a good chance she’ll say “oh it’s fine, I get them too” and then you can dive out the window and go swig a bottle of mouthwash and delete her number lol

        This has been your sexual health lesson for the day lol Don’t be a fool, wrap your tool. Try to check her pussy out in the light and if you see red bumps (sometimes it’s frame shaving, but I don’t risk it lol) stay away. And if you’re sexually active, go get tested every few months. It takes a couple weeks for whatever disease you might catch to kick in, so if you just kicked out some dirty STD-ridden bar slut last night and your peener is itching, you were probably just too rough with it and it’s raw ’cause symptoms aren’t going to kick in that fast…don’t spank it for a few days and keep an eye on it, and hit up the STD clinic in a couple weeks and tell them you want to test for everything.

        Also I do like Ron Jeremy recommends and take a super hot shower right after sex…I’m not much of a science guy but I gotta’ figure soaping off a bunch of bacteria is probably better than stewing in it overnight, but who knows this could be superstition lol

        But I can’t say you won’t get ebola. THAT SHIT IS EVERYWHERE.

        Like


      • @Hunter – I looked into the STD thing *really* carefully a few years ago after I had my first SNL (as in, it got to the point where I was reading detailed academic papers about clinical research studies on transmission risks and stuff).

        Short version: Wear a condom for penetration. Other than that, enjoy yourself without a condom. Yes, there are some risks if you don’t wear a condom when getting a blowjob etc, but in practical terms, it is so low as to not be worth worrying about – if you want real safety you probably want to be celibate or only sleep with a serious girlfriend and nothing else.

        As for your specific question – cunnilingus is safer than a blowjob. Nothing is absolutely safe, but really don’t worry about it too much (use your judgment obv – don’t do it if you see open sores and shit like that).

        Like


      • @Culum – Thanks man. The girl I banged on Halloween wanted the lights off so I was like, I’m definitely not going on down her now when there’s no way I can really see anything.

        Like


      • @Yareally – Hmm alright. I’ve learned a lot once again 🙂

        And I suppose I’d rather have sex (good sex, need to get on that) than go back to the emptiness of no sex life.

        “But I can’t say you won’t get ebola. THAT SHIT IS EVERYWHERE.”

        I’ve been taking girls’ drinks and telling them I have ebola for weeks now lol

        Like


      • you really gonna let the internet tell you how to enjoy your sex lol

        Like


      • @Hunter
        “The girl I banged on Halloween wanted the lights off so I was like, I’m definitely not going on down her now when there’s no way I can really see anything.”

        Ya that’s a common warning sign, I don’t go near it on those situs or put the light on so I can see what’s up down there. Sometimes it’s just that it’s red from razor bumps and they’re embarrassed but like, I ain’t flippin that coin lol

        Like


  59. But it is obvious that the concept of consent is an attept by the patriarchy to legitimize rape!

    Like


    • In case some of the younger readers think you are exaggerating:

      “In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent” – Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies

      Like


  60. kinda funny, what I am seeing. Aging spinster sjw who went long on obama for the gays and their marriages now trying to wrap head around regime’s push at net neutrality.

    Like


  61. “Pre-sex cunnilingus is 99% of times a huge beta male tell.”

    You lost me here, man… what, are you afraid of eating pussy?

    Like


    • false premise. fear’s got nothin’ to do with it.

      Like


      • I like to use my 225 lb 10%-body-fat-self to forcibly pin a girl down and eat her pussy long after she begs me to stop. Beta? Ya right.

        Like


      • I actually enjoy cunnilingus, but try and hold back. Why? It’s more a control thing than an alpha thing (same diff?). She should never, ever come to expect it regularly. It’s an occasional treat that I sometimes also use as a reward to shape behaviour I want.

        Like


      • … She should never, ever come to expect it regularly. It’s an occasional treat that I sometimes also use as a reward to shape behaviour I want….

        Best answer so far.

        Like


    • I’m a bit confused myself about this “cunnilingus is beta” thing

      I can understand not going down on a girl the first time or at least not before she gave you a blow job, but in a relationship where you are exclusive, why not?

      Like


      • @Canadian… “beta” in the sense you are servicing the woman instead of the other way around…beta is a mindset. If the idea is to get her off first, then it’s supplication. If you eat pussy because YOU get off on it…the smell, taste, moaning whatever then it’s “alpha”—we’re talking mindset and beliefs not the act itself.

        Like


      • on November 12, 2014 at 2:23 pm Joachim Peiper

        It’s a lot of keyboard jockey trash talk.

        Like


      • on November 12, 2014 at 2:25 pm Joachim Peiper

        Real alphas never worry about whether what they’re doing is alpha or not.

        Like


  62. This is an interesting video as it purports all the “Blue Pill” thinking. What I do find interesting from my own experiences is if you ASK a girl what she likes, she’ll tell you she wants this in the video: a “caring” “gentleman”. But the realities of desire are such that when a woman is in the state of desire generally in my experience they see fucking as the ultimate “escape” not the “logical” progression of moving from kissing to first base to the bang.

    So, to expose guys to this is women giving relationship advice= Blue Pill= epic fail= decline in masculinity= more sexually frustrated women.

    Here is my personal experience: game, escalate, bang girl senseless for 2 months…then suddenly girl starts shit-testing like crazy and sabotages relationship. I walk away or she breaks up on some bizarre pretense that “You’re not serious about a relationship”…then when I’m gone they invariably miss the wild sex.

    But the wild sex is also scary because it takes their emotions on a crazy ride that they’ve never been on.

    I’ve been with girls who after the relationship ends in some cases we’ve become “Friends” and they are back to being their annoying selves instead of the crazed bundle of emotions they were with me.

    So what videos and Blue Pill advice like this video series do is rob women of the wild emotional ride they crave and deny guys the skills and confidence they need to deliver what women really want.

    Like


  63. First comment 7:55AM which means the post maybe went up 15 min prior to that.

    Arbiter starts his formulaic schtick @ 8:16, ZS starts the apoplectic “buns in oven, YKW, Joos!” rant by 8:39.

    I seriously want to party with you psychos! Could you imagine how fun that would be?!?! It’d be like watching 2 slow kids at a petting zoo.

    Party on you weirdos!

    Like


  64. what player eats pussy?

    fuuuuck that.

    Like


    • Pole smoking is the way to go, m’kay? Shoot me your email, bro and let’s see what happens…

      Like


      • lol. I thought you were vibrant no?

        I’ve seen you all put in your work and the quality you all are willing to lick…I’m good thanks :/

        Munch away you proud, vibrant man you! HPV for thee, not me!

        Like


  65. Before i post, I need to know if I can post.

    Like


  66. consent is prostitution

    Like


  67. on November 11, 2014 at 2:29 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    So, taken to its logical conclusion, when the point finally arrives for the bearded lesbian hipster to thrust her enlarged and engorged clitoris into the other female’s genitalia; will permission will have to be asked prior to every thrust?

    Like


    • In the interim, how long before Obamacare requires coverage for clitoral enlargement surgery? Look for it to begin as a requirement in the military and in the federal [and KKKalifornia] prisons. Also look for NIH grants to study “female viagra” drugs which induce clitoral erection.

      Like


  68. Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
    It’s like watching a little boy beg his mother in a shop.

    Like


  69. on November 11, 2014 at 4:43 am haunted trilobite

    Despite all the PUA posterior pain expressed in these comments, consent for sex is the greatest aspiration a civilisation could have. Despite how any poon-hound idealises things, it has been a feature of our successful society for 100s of years. Here is how it is sought:
    “I’ll be marrying young Janey, Mr Wenchworth. What are you offering as a dowry?”
    “Two pigs and 40 bales of hay”
    “I’ll be returning her if she’s been breached, and I’ll be keeping the dowry”

    Like


  70. Causing a storm and teaching losers with laughs. What’s not to like. Oh, and read the women that comment for more.
    Dapper Laughs On The Pull | Season 1 Episode 1 | …: http://youtu.be/PO1n70znXGA

    Like


  71. From the town that brought you a ‘modern parents’ statue of two fat pregnant mixed race women and their future thuglets, it is now apparently mandatory that kids get homolove lessons or else.
    http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/nov/11/primary-school-headteacher-attacked-fighting-homophobia

    Like


  72. Tried to watch without feeling sick, and failed.

    What kind of wretched relationship requires that kind of repetitious reassurance? I think most women would freeze up and clamp their legs shut to any guy who had to ask this shit.

    “Can I pump?”
    “Yes.”
    “Can I pump again?”
    “Yes.”
    “Can I pull my cock out, diddle your clit with the head, then force every inch down your throat until you vomit?”
    “Yes.”

    This shit is delusional.

    The only CH assertion I take truck with is that only betas eat before giving the meat. In a relationship, I totally get the concept; the guy is afraid of blowing his load early, so hopes to please his woman w/ his tongue. But for a first fuck, I usually go down first, to inspect where I’m about to shove my most precious of preciouses. To taste the tang, and sniff the snatch, if for nothing else. After the first lay, I’m all for going right to the pounding, but the first time, I like to do the taste test

    Like


  73. please comment on the bs melanie curtin article on linked in

    Like


  74. I think this thing is parody

    Like


  75. Submitted for Goodbye America:

    Today’s Google doodle. Veteran’s Day theme.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/veterans-day-2014-google-doodle-honours-americas-armed-forces-9852864.html

    (L to R) Black male sailor, white male Marine (although if you look closely you might seen an Asian), mixed (unknown, but with brown) male coast guard, white female Air Force (she’s the featured character), black female Army soldier.

    Like


    • Funny you mention it… my first reaction was a laugh when the Air Force broad was the featured character.

      Like


    • Casualty figures from the USA’s wars dispute this bullshit multicultural representation, as one only one race accounts for a majority of them. Additionally, just because they’re wearing uniforms doesn’t make them true soldiers. The only thing the Air Force chick probably flies in is a secretary’s desk. They never stop with the propaganda do they ?

      Like


      • They’ve become especially egregious this year… they’ve shown multiple “doodles” for obscure negroes, celebrating the “hundred and x-something” birthday thereof… but when President’s Day arrived, nada but the standard GOOGLE.

        Like


  76. ‘May I kiss you?’ is surely the correct question – rather than ‘can I’. Massive Fail.

    Like


  77. Some of you guys have the wrong idea about tatts. Tattoos are an ANCIENT EUROPEAN THING and they are awesome. All of the ancient europeans had tattoos, the Vikings were all tatted up, it has nothing to do with that polynesian crap or anything else. It’s an ANCIENT EUROPEAN THING and IT’S ABOUT BEING PROUD OF YOUR EUROPEAN ROOTS. (Mud people can’t even get tattoos that will show up at least).

    And also,

    Truthfully alot of you guys that want to get chicks, one thing you can do is get all tatted up. Chicks LOVE it. PERIOD. Even a dorky hipster looks a little more masculine and [email protected]$$ with them. Chicks always love the bad boy and everyone knows that.

    Personally I’ve always got tons of chicks but I’ll tell you what,.. after I got all tatted up I got WAY more chicks and that’s a fact. Hotter ones too.

    It doesnt mean tattoo = trashy for girls either necessarily. Ancient European royalty&women etc were always all tatted up. It’s awesome. Its actually the j3ws who say its bad and what not so you actually have it backwards.

    Like


    • I was reading this and was all WTF…then I remembered that school is out for V day. :/

      Like


    • All of the ancient europeans had tattoos, the Vikings were all tatted up,

      Bullshit.

      The sagas were usually explicit about physical appearances and yet mention nothing about tattoos.

      If memory serves, the only ever-so-slight evidence is some Arab writer mentioning that some Swedes (Rus) were “decorated” all over their arms.

      The so-called “Viking” tattoos one sees nowadays are merely modern renditions of ancient carvings and jewelry.

      Like


      • I’ve studied sagas from most european groups extensively everything from Norse sources to Flemish etc etc(each European race has many sagas btw which is something most american “educators” try to leave out or obscure) and there are numerous references to tattoos.

        The ibn fadlan reference you mentioned DOES explicitly reference the fact that the Rus Vikings were Tattooed from hand to feet. He doesn’t describe them as “decorated” he explicity is talking about tattoos. Specifically the Norse designs that he could describe as “Tree like/branch like” which is a common thing in Norse art(actually it is winding dragon serpent art).

        Not a decoration, permanent ink embedded in the body. And it is an Ar yan tradition going back into prehistory and everywhere Ar yans roamed.

        The other point I mentioned is that all Ar yan mummies/preserved remains found prove they were tattooed. (Even Otzi the cave man was tattooed!) but a better example is the Ar yan mummies found through pre asian asia. They had the exact same type designs as ib fadlan describes. i’m not even going into the extensive histories of Picts etc being tattooed from head to toe etc but look into it and there’s no other conclusion you will come to.

        Like


    • Comment stuck in mod, but in short… bullshit.

      Like


      • Results don’t lie my friend.. maybe it has to do with it’s an opportunity for girls to open “oh I like your tattoos or what does that one mean blah blah” but either way, for me I notice an increase in positive female attention and I’m sure most men would agree.

        Regardless of that.., as i said, tattooing is an ancient european tradition for europeans only, all ancient european warrior class & royalty had them(as even all european mummies found & all european sagas prove).
        Vikings, Celts & all Ar yan cultures worldwide had them

        Tattooing is FOR whites only i.e tattoos do not show up or look good on muds.
        As far as anyone would know BHO or sidney poiter could have full sleeves & back pieces and no one would ever be able to tell.

        Like


      • Those results have been in for a while and are nothing new: modern women are feral, lipstick-clad, monkeys, and they gravitate towards clowns and jesters who can provide them with the most ephemeral enter’taint’ment tingles, and can wave shiny colours and itoys before their doe eyes. Perma-peacock disfigurement is just the latest pitching woo du jour, employed by shit-eating sycophants, who bend over backwards to ingratiate themselves to these trollops, in their pursuit of a slit that smells like piss.

        Like


  78. on November 11, 2014 at 5:00 pm Pijama Wearing Ninja

    For me the annoyance started with the first question and with his wimpy, completely devoid of lust, voice. His second question was revolting. I’ve put my hand there on girls in clubs without asking for permission, merely going by non-verbal cues. lol

    What actively pissed me off though was the repeated ‘you like thats’. The only acceptable way of asking that is by whispering it in her ear while adding ‘you delightful little slut’ at the end. Preferably while you’re actually doing something to her that she might like instead of pestering her with dumbass questions.

    Like


  79. I was just reminding myself of my first street pick-up. I was fourteen and she was older. ‘Can I fuck you’ I enquired – Tootsie style. Now, I am sure I could have done, but that just freaked her out even though she was taken with my boyish good looks. Never asked a woman since.

    Like


  80. The comedian Dapper Laughs show has been cancelled yesterday and he was publicly shamed for his comedy. Feminists 1 society 0
    Well done feminists, you’ve just successfully killed an inch of equal free speech and expression. That being what feminism is supposedly all about.

    Like