Another Realtalker Burned At The Stake

A University president was fired by the school board for talking sense about personal responsibility and advising women on the effective means available to reduce their chances of sexual assault or romantic disappointment.

Jennings, who to no avail apologized for his comments before his firing,

Never apologize. It only incites the barbarians to pick through your bones.

still insists that his critics are taking the YouTube video out of context. But even the truncated version casts doubt on why he has been ridden out of town on a rail. The video excerpt begins with Jennings saying he’s going to let the women in on “a little secret”: “Men treat you, treat women the way women allow us to treat them. . . . We will use you up, if you allow us to use you up,” he said. “Well, guess what? When it comes time for us to make that final decision, we’re going to go down the hall and marry that girl with the long dress on. That’s one we’re going to take home to Mama. There is something about the way you carry yourself and respect yourself that commands and demands respect from us.” At this point, the video shows the female crowd clapping in agreement.

Slutty women get used like sluts. This was conventional, even trite, wisdom not that long ago, but today is apparently crimethink that can get you fired.

Then came the statement that clearly sank Jennings’s presidency (he may still have tenure as a professor): “I’m saying this because, first and foremost, don’t put yourself in a situation that would cause you to be trying to explain something that really needs no explanation, had you not put yourself in that situation.”

When the speech excerpt appeared on YouTube, it created an uproar. Marybeth Gasman, a University of Pennsylvania education professor, said it showed that “the president blames young women for being raped by saying that when they have sex with someone and regret the act, they then create a story [of rape] to explain it.”

Some women do this. Regret Rape is a real social phenomenon. But feminists and their enablers would rather light the torches and brandish the pitchforks against anyone who dares practice the sorcery of noticing the bad behavior of women.





Comments


  1. As usual, the Social Justice Warriors are overextending themselves. Even blue pill schlubs are starting to notice that it doesn’t pay to appease the howling mob. The SJWs will win some more victories before the pushback hits, but the pushback is coming.

    Now we just need to encourage our brave little leftoid interlocutors to venture out past the beach, out where the ocean just suddenly drew back, out where all those pretty seashells lie shining in the sun. We must urge them not to pay any mind to the animals fleeing uphill, nor to that faint rumble on the horizon. Shiny things beckon!

    Like


    • “the pushback is coming.”

      I sure hope you are right.

      Like


      • i don’t know that it is coming fast enough. they have enough time to get 30,000 signatures to ‘bring back beth’ on walking dead after a head shot.

        “Beth was a symbol of hope that a lot of women could relate to and see themselves in (especially self-harmers who saw her as someone who overcame their suicidal/depressive feelings). By sloppily killing her it just shows that she was used to further a man’s (Daryl’s) storyline.”

        Like


      • Shirtgate definitely helped.

        Like


      • Yeah, thanks alot Burke, I’m working through the Season 4 DVDs and just watched the first episode with Daryl and Beth. I guess now I know what to expect (although, reading interviews with the comic creator, the only character who is truly “safe” from being killed off is……..
        ….
        ….
        Carl. Not Rick, Maggie, Glen, or Daryl.

        Carl.

        Like


      • touche jcclimber you’re right, although the headlines of “The Walking Dead Fan Petition To Bring Back Beth Gains Steam” might have given it away eventually.

        if you want some surprise back, rest assured that in the world we currently live there are so many people dumb enough to support the idea that she might be resurrected by the time you catch up. the ideas of how are preposterous, but hey “HER story wasn’t finished”

        http://comicbook.com/2014/12/08/the-walking-dead-fan-petition-to-bring-back-beth-gains-steam/

        Like


      • Just for the record, I liked Beth about 5,000 times more than Lori. End of the world arrives, she is totally dependent on the males around her for protection, her husband returns from the dead, takes effective action to protect her and the baby and even is willing to turn a (mostly) blind eye to the pregnancy……and treat your husband like a feminist girrrrrllll power bitch.

        I’d feel bad for the actress, but she accepted the part and got paid for it, so….

        One criticism I have for Walking Dead is the whole grrrlll power where women are nearly as effective as men in the sheer physical effort of taking out zombies. The feminist mindset totally infects everything.

        But I do think that the show is so successful because people are really sick of the current culture and at some level would love to see it go into apocalypse mode. And the fact that they aren’t afraid to kill off beloved main characters.

        Like


      • on December 8, 2014 at 3:15 pm themanofmystery2

        I sure do too. *tilts back beer*

        Like


      • no pushback – let all the knuckleheads continue to discredit themselves all on their own. more riots, more frivolous accusations!

        Like


      • That’s hilarious. Not sure how they plan to “bring her back” after a headshot blew out most of her brain pan. And I’m not sure if the showrunners give a crap if the cannon fodder du jour was a grassroots feminist hero. Everyone on that show dies eventually.

        Like


    • on December 8, 2014 at 6:30 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      We must urge them not to pay any mind to the animals fleeing uphill, nor to that faint rumble on the horizon.

      Or to the men in the hills.

      Like


    • There is no pushback because most of these people that should be doing the pushing are conservatives. Conservative history consists of retreating in the face of judeo-marxist assault during the past 100 years at every turn. There have been zero stands on any issue. The jews keep pushing and the cowards keep truckling.

      Like


      • on December 8, 2014 at 7:39 am Whomever Wherever

        > “The jews keep pushing and the cowards keep truckling.”

        The tide is slowly turning. And guess who’s leading the charge? Here is Our Leader, the noted children’s book author, wherein he challenges The Narrative, as Narrator Chris “Wallace” Wallik would have like it to have had it narrated:

        Like


      • It takes courage to push back, in any way, because we whites don’t stick together like we should, like blacks and YKW does. I believe CH has written about Europeans’ “pathological altruism.”

        It takes a heroic mini-effort, in real life, day to day, in the face of the potential loss of one’s livelihood, to try to impact people’s opinions. Just yesterday there were Ferguson “protesters” in my town blocking the main highway, again, with ridiculous liberal news coverage, and I ranted at a YKW (very white skinned) in a public place for 10 minutes about the white genocide that is going on, which YKW pushes for through their control of the media propaganda machine.

        I pretended to be “ignorant” or naive, as if I considered him a sympathetic white, but it was like “wink wink” Mr. YKW, I know you don’t consider yourself white, you Jew, and you people are the problem. I told him “diversity is white genocide” and “diversity plus proximity equals war.”

        And I told him that tens of thousands of white people are catching on, thanks to the alt internet and twitter. I let him know the “wink wink” part by saying “I might be putting my foot in my mouth” because I don’t know his political views (LOL yeah right) and he could be a Democrat, but I basically was bashing the whole #blacklivesmatter BS and blaming the media, in public, sort of making a scene in a public place. I told him white nationalists are catching on and there is going to be a backlash to the liberal madness, kind of like wink wink there was in 1939, as if I was complaining “we’re on the same team” about the black “protesters,” but sort of hinting that I know his YKW communist societal destruction game.

        The other day I was telling a (very pretty and attractive) 30 year old (smart but miseducated, of course) woman how she was brainwashed to have considered herself too young for marriage and kids at age 24 or 27. Told her how feminism is a war on femininity and families. Told her how it’s not “empowering” to tell women to have sex with 50 CADs in their 20s for free without requiring commitment–feminism was an attack on women, used women to destroy white families. Used Ferguson as a way to get into complaining about leftism. And she “gets it.” She’s sad. She knows her time is running out, so to speak…. now she’s single, no prospects, before she knows it, she’ll be 33.

        It takes acts like this, standing up to libtards, women (such as at work, in the office and in your personal life), and YKW puppeteers, in real life, using your real name, and it’s hard, because decent normal people have careers and loved ones to support.

        And you will find that most well-meaning, brainwashed sheeple libtards are just so far brainwashed that any realtalk like this just blows their mind at an extreme level. Like, they are mouth-agape shocked to hear assertions about simple things that were taken as common wisdom just 2 generations ago.

        Like


      • @Anon

        You reminded me that, personally, I’ve found that it’s actually easier to deal with them in real life than online. A lot of places on the internet are highly censored and biased in their favor. Not to mention some of them are autists with zero social skills who completely disintegrate in a debate where they are not shielded by their PC screen. That’s not to detract from the importance of blogs like these, they play a major role.

        Like


      • I have used my declining years to study that very subject. History shows that Jews keep pushing and pushing. Problem for them though is that they never know when to stop. They never DO stop. And then the blowback strikes. Hence their expulsion from over 100 different countries/regions to date.

        Their relentlessness and indefatigability – possibly their strongest weapons – is also their Achilles heel.

        Like


    • maybe, maybe not. They control what truth is.

      You cannot speak a truth that people do not want to hear anymore. It doesn’t matter if MSNBC has NO viewers; it’s still on.

      They control who wins and who loses.

      Like


    • on December 8, 2014 at 1:01 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      hey herataistestteetsz! herarseteteustes!!!! heatsrrsitessze!!!! now dat i have passedz on and gone to heavenz, i am hanging out with great knwoeldge and wisodm the GODS !!!

      and dey have enlighetetneded me: MARRY DA COMPLICTAED GIRLZ!!!!

      http://elitedaily.com/dating/marry-complicated-girl/858579/

      “A simple girl has a simple mind. Things won’t be so hard when you are with this girl; it will be calm seas and smooth sailing. This is the type of girl you probably imagine yourself marrying, not the one who is opinionated and smart, who doesn’t always agree.

      But, if you want to be the best you can be and expand your mind and capabilities, marry the complicated girl.

      Marry the girl who tells you exactly what she expects and follows through.

      Marry the girl who demands your respect.

      Marry the girl who can talk politics, even if her opinions are different from yours.

      Marry the girl whose eyes flicker with passion about a number of different subjects.

      Marry the girl who won’t let you get away with slacking on your talents.

      Marry the girl who pushes you to be better every day.

      Marry the girl with whom you sometimes fight.

      Marry the girl who is your equal or greater.

      My dad always says the thing that attracted him most to my mom was the fact that she was smarter than him. Only a real man can say that and know it’s good for him.”

      http://elitedaily.com/dating/marry-complicated-girl/858579/

      lzozozoozolz

      Like


    • When you get raped in the ass it’s only gay if you push back!

      Like


      • Some useful information on this subject. The British Army warned their men that rape inevitably followed capture by the Turks. Adding reassuringly that the victim’s inevitable erection during the process was a purely biological reaction and did not signify homosexual leanings.

        Like


      • Capt, you’re a funny m-f-er…

        Like


    • We were making some gains. But we were noticed and action to contain us has already occurred. High profile punishments for domestic disputes in the NFL. TV ads encouraging / mandating white-knight behavior by men.

      It’s pretty effective, the pendulum that was swinging our way six months ago is swinging back. But that doesn’t REALLY help women heading inexorably for the wall as men start to shun them.

      Like


  2. Conservatives have a much more down-to-earth view of threats. Be realistic about them. Leftists on the other hand have repression of facts as one of their primary tools for any situation. Also, their view of rape is that it’s something to be used for their own profit, and for creating campaigns and laws that serve their ideological aims of breaking up the West. They cannot have someone say that it will always exist and you need to learn obvious safety measures.

    At the same time, they cannot let anyone show how certain immigrant groups commit far more rape, since that is actually preventable – by keeping those groups out. So they are completely silent about 1,400 girls being raped in Rotherham. If feminists actually cared about women being raped they would hold demonstrations against the Rotherham rapes in every city in the West, and it would be front-page news everywhere instead of silenced. Outside Britain I expect that less than one percent of Westerners know about Rotherham.

    ……………………

    Common sense and its detractors:

    Tell people not to step inside a burning building, because then they might get burned.

    “How dare you blame the victim! How dare you say they deserve to get burned!”

    Why do feminists get away with this? Simply because their allies control the media. When you control the media nothing you say has to make sense.

    If leftists had to operate under the same scrutiny that conservatives do they wouldn’t stand a chance.

    Like


    • “If leftists had to operate under the same scrutiny that conservatives do they wouldn’t stand a chance.”

      The question is… Why don’t they?

      I am not sure I know, maybe someone with greater insight can comment, but I think there is a reason for feminists and other left-wingers focusing so much of their time, resources and attention on controlling media. I think it’s because their arguments don’t hold water in and of themselves. And so they need to rally behind their “cause” and make a loud road about it.

      On the other hand, conservatives really just mind their own business. They reap the rewards of following time tested principles. They prefer their privacy and the comfort of being a part of a community of other like-minded conservatives without feeling the need to go out and rally for their causes, because they already have the results they want.

      If I take personal accountability for my health, and for my wealth, as well as relationships, and take steps that make sense to me, and they bring me the results I anticipated, why would I feel the need to harp on about it?

      On the other hand, most left-wingers are simply ignorant. They aren’t malicious from my observation. They simply drank the kool-aid. And when their theories fail to deliver results, they rally for a “change”. They don’t understand that the world works the way it always has worked. Men will always be repulsed by the notion of marrying sluts. Hard work, prudent investment, lean living and creativity will always produce wealth, not taxes and spending. Attractiveness comes from eating right, working out and sleeping well, not plastic surgeries, or worse fat-acceptance. Since their theories don’t work, they feel like they have no choice but to rally even louder.

      Yet, conservatives are thriving. All the ones that I know are. They’re doing really well. They marry early, have kids, maintain families, and close community ties. Fathers protect their children from making foolish choices. I don’t see why they’d want to go out and rally for a “cause”. They have good lives already.

      Jealous liberals on the other hand, deem this to be an offensive display of “patriarchy”, “oppression of women”, “white privilege” etc.

      Like


      • >Why don’t they?

        Because most of the media is controlled by a certain group with a certain common agenda and they have A LOT of financial power.

        Like


      • It goes back to the Frankfurt School’s teachings. So the Authorised Narrative derives not just from control of the media but academia, finance and politics also. This is a Jewish project, aided and abetted by White traitors and useful idiots. Have no doubt about this.

        Like


      • They want money and power, but through facilitation of a model that’s unsustainable, and they’re supposed to be smart?

        Like


    • “When you control the media nothing you say has to make sense.”

      Yes. And when you know who controls the media you start making some interesting connections.

      Like


    • Now don’t get all hoity-toity, but “1,400 girls being raped in Rotherham” is a fembot professor’s deliberate damned lie er statistic.

      If you read the report, it’s an extrapolation of a *sample* of the far smaller number of actual cases known to police and the social-work white-slavers, over many years, of underclass kids being abused (these wallahs ain’t fussy ; omegas the lot of ’em ; bum is bum, it’s all good to them). The possibility of “repeat customers” among this small sample being deliberately obfuscated.

      This was then extrapolated to the whole of the Rottenham urban district [and coyly insinuated for the rest of the near-conurbation, Sheffield, Barnsley, Leeds etc. at the same rate per hectare or something, on the IMO reasonable grounds that it’s all a sea of bhurkas and baggy pants].

      Result? OMG 1400 “girls” !1!!!
      (because only girls have feelz and can appreciate that they were abused, boys are as sentient as molluscs, to these zealots).

      And the nutty professor went balls-out in the tabloids (almost certainly has a pair, or three; she’s evil, ginger and northern, like Anne Robinson). Quoted as saying this is “going on in every town and village in the country”, because menz.

      Several correspondents on manosites have noted that this calculation requires something in the order of quarter of a million unique victims per year, which requires the entire (fairly trivial, I suspect there are many more MacLeods, or Campbells, far more pernicious) male rug-nutting community to put in many hours a day each plus overtime at the buggermills.
      But it *must* be true, because racism, if not.
      They really do tie themselves in knots for my amusement.

      The other sorts have just taken to eating their young. Tragic, but not unforeseeable, the authorities are entirely at fault here, consigning these delicate flowers to a damper, less-fun version of Siberia.

      Moved too far north therefore S.A.D., or fear of the dark, who knows?
      https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=alva+heart+boy&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=Palemoon:en-US&client=palemoon&gws_rd=cr&ei=N5yFVNnlKISAU6KBg6AH

      [all editions now assiduously recast to excise all reports of “heart cut out” and “ritual” and consign it to the memory hole, of course].

      Like


      • Let’s not get all confused about the issue at hand. The media might say that this is about men, particularly white men, but you ought to read the report. The 1400 figure was from known records and probable cases all from within Rotherham. There might be a great deal of hand-wringing over it but make no mistake, ethnicity played a part. I dare not speak my mind on the internet but I hope you can figure out exactly what I think about those perpetrators and their lot. Feminism is bad but it isn’t the only problem right now.

        Like


      • Au contraire, Martin old son. It’s a madey-uppy number.
        Yes all the whoremasters were indeed Mirpuri or nearest equivalent wogs. It’s a byproduct of the national heroin trade from thereabouts, SYP involvement ensuring (temporary) untouchability.

        But the actual number of cases “investigated” was fairly paltry compared to the Shock! Horror! headline.
        viz:-
        “4.3 The Inquiry was given a list of 988 children known to children’s social care, or the Police. 51 were current cases and 937 historic. We read 66 case files in total.
        4.4 We took a randomised sample of 19 current and 19 historic cases. In 95% of the files sampled, there was clear evidence that the child had been a victim of sexual exploitation. Only two children (5%) were at risk of being exploited rather than victims. From the random samples, we concluded that it was very probable that a high proportion of the 988 children were victims.
        4.5 A further 28 case files were read. 22 were historic cases sampled from lists of suspected victims in police operations, including Central, Czar and Chard. Three were current cases brought to our attention during the course of the Inquiry, and three were historic cases of children who had been highlighted by national media. All 28 children were victims of sexual exploitation.”
        [p30 of Jay Report]

        and from this they conclude
        “No one knows the true scale of sexual exploitation in Rotherham over the years. Our conservative estimate is that there were more than 1400 victims in the period covered by the Inquiry, and an unknown number who were at risk of being exploited.”
        “Estimate”.
        “No one knows”

        OFC it’s all about tarring unsuspecting and unsuspected Indiginaborigilocal Pinkygrey Men with the the same foul toiletbrush, distract from the real problem, hence the projections.

        Like


    • Yes! And the best offense for dealing with individuals is the amygdala hijack described at anonymousconservative.com.

      Like


    • Feminists aren’t anti-rape. They’re just anti-white.

      Like


    • I left a response many hours ago, but I suppose it got caught into the blackbox of comments.

      So I’ll try one more time…

      “If leftists had to operate under the same scrutiny that conservatives do they wouldn’t stand a chance.”

      The question is… Why don’t they?

      I am not sure I know, maybe someone with greater insight can comment, but I think there is a reason for feminists and other left-wingers focusing so much of their time, resources and attention on controlling media. I think it’s because their arguments don’t hold water in and of themselves. And so they need to rally behind their “cause” and make a loud road about it.

      On the other hand, conservatives really just mind their own business. They reap the rewards of following time tested principles. They prefer their privacy and the comfort of being a part of a community of other like-minded conservatives without feeling the need to go out and rally for their causes, because they already have the results they want.

      If I take personal accountability for my health, and for my wealth, as well as relationships, and take steps that make sense to me, and they bring me the results I anticipated, why would I feel the need to harp on about it?

      On the other hand, most left-wingers are simply ignorant. They aren’t malicious from my observation. They simply drank the kool-aid. And when their theories fail to deliver results, they rally for a “change”. They don’t understand that the world works the way it always has worked. Men will always be repulsed by the notion of marrying sluts. Hard work, prudent investment, lean living and creativity will always produce wealth, not taxes and spending. Attractiveness comes from eating right, working out and sleeping well, not plastic surgeries, or worse fat-acceptance. Since their theories don’t work, they feel like they have no choice but to rally even louder.

      Yet, conservatives are thriving. All the ones that I know are. They’re doing really well. They marry early, have kids, maintain families, and close community ties. Fathers protect their children from making foolish choices. I don’t see why they’d want to go out and rally for a “cause”. They have good lives already.

      Jealous liberals on the other hand, deem this to be an offensive display of “patriarchy”, “oppression of women”, “white privilege” etc.

      -QDA

      Like


    • The marxists will happily spend their fortunes to advance their agenda. The Australian politicians even passed restrictive gun laws knowing they would lose their jobs just to push the agenda. Suicide bomber tactics. There is hope. At least tactically. Kamikaze tactics didn’t help the Japs. That’s what gramps told me. But what did he know, he was only there at the time. We just need to organise. The famous ‘silent majority’ better start acting.

      Like


  3. What an idiot Why would he apologize?

    Like


  4. Anywhere I can get the 60 years of challenge ebook at a discounted rate? $70 seems a little much…

    Like


    • Torrents man.

      Like


      • Ah of course haha. Thanks Lumpy.

        Like


      • Yah! 60’s stuff is awesome. I have an audio version of the books and for my first year or two in pickup I listened to chapters 7-9 on sexual mindsets before every first date.

        Principles you’ve heard before, but written out in excellent form: All interest is sexual, women are obsessed with cock, risk perverted, persistence is attractive, etc.

        Like


      • Dude his stuff is freakin’ sweet. Couldn’t find the audio versions of the material but the written stuff is just as good.

        Like


      • From the website, looks similar to Good Looking Loser’s screening method…

        http://www.goodlookingloser.com/entry/in-field-videos/a-night-of-screening-women-in-the-bar-scene

        Over all his game is pretty weak, but seems effective enough. Look for IOI’s, be direct, immediate kino, extract or move on.

        Like


      • @Sentient wow, I didn’t believe you could actually lead a girl outside that fast… trying it this weekend.

        Thanks for sharing.

        Like


      • @Hunter – well keep in mind he is pinging off of IOI’s to start with, these aren’t cold opens, but that is part of his method i.e. not “waste time” when there are no IOI’s. That and it’s warm where he is, not NYC and sub freezing. Also if you look at the link, he breaks it down a bit more, goes into he was just taking them outside because he was filming and would get a better shot that way, he would usually pull them away inside otherwise, until the extraction of course.

        Like


      • I’d definitely recommend 60YOC over GLL.

        GLL has awful game, but he gets laid because he puts in massive numbers.

        Sixty emphasizes sexual state, unreactiveness and fast escalation as well as screening. It’s a much more powerful method

        Like


      • @kant

        “I’d definitely recommend 60YOC over GLL.

        GLL has awful game, but he gets laid because he puts in massive numbers.”

        Lol yeah, I’ve seen his vids before, it’s just the bouncing outside part that impressed me. His game not great, agreed.

        I’m really enjoying Sixty’s stuff. I’m excited to try it this weekend (pretty sick right now, stayin’ inside for the most part).

        Like


  5. Sorry to disappoint you ppl, but the pushback is NOT coming even as so many people – men – wish it would be that way.

    The PTB have all mechanisms of society tightly under control, and with unending waves of propaganda things won’t be easier either. It helps to think of feminism as weaponized ideology in the service of a parasitic “elite”.

    Like


    • This, unfortunately. I have said this many times.

      Like


    • The parasite may well kill the host. But it’s worth noting that the parasite only dies *after* the host does.

      Until then it’s going gangbusters, living in idle plenty, what me worry? They usually compensate by leaving milliards of highly durable, theater-hardened spores, eggs and spawn, or simply jumping onto the next unwary free lunch to blunder into the body farm.

      The host has long since been ground down beyond the point of even replacement reproduction, and is a crawling husk for the final stages of its “life”.
      Which strategy should a rational agent seek to emulate? “Noble”, ethical, living-death carcase, or sprightly healthy virus, leech and caterpillar?

      Like


    • I tend to agree. I’ve noticed a confirmation bias people develop from reading political websites, where they assume 1) most people outside their online echo chamber agree with them, and 2) are willing to take their online “real talk” offline and face the kind of overwhelming scorn this man is getting. In reality, most people are far more interested in defending their own little slice of the pie than in fighting for any kind of long-term social change. Massive anti-establishment political upheavals only tend to occur when people are facing actual starvation and have no other options, and that’s a long ways off in the West.

      Like


      • I’ve been doing my part in the real world. I’ve been shocking people lately, telling them about white genocide and how feminism is a lie, in real life, using my real name. Twice in the last 15 hours, in fact.. And it’s scary. Most people are 100% sheeple. A man cannot even begin to have a conversation with these SJW-brainwashed SWPL white-guilt liberals; they are too far gone. Even though they are often high IQ, they are simply ignorant–that means uneducated or misinformed, not stupid. They simply have not read the materials and they do not know the information that we who read CH know.

        Like


      • Your last sentence is far more optimistic than warranted.

        Like


      • Oh trust and believe, it’s coming. Just not nearly fast enough to vindicate this generation of “realtalkers”, at least not from where I’m sitting. Your grandkids are gonna have fun though.

        Like


      • I understand the SJW shitlib resistance to realtalk. I was one of them up until 2 years ago. It was a slow process that took gradual realization and self-learning. Not everyone takes that initiative.

        If one of you started talking that white genocide smack to me 2 years ago I would have laughed at you. You need to start small and encourage self learning/reading. Stop blowing libs minds with the conclusion and start with the premise (demographics, traditional gender roles, open minded discussion of conservative principals, etc).

        Like


    • Maybe, but by the early thirties in Germany Jews controlled the media and banking, were hugely powerful in academia (e.g. the Frankfurt School) and 40$ of judges were Jewish. Things can change quickly. Not saying they will, just that they can.

      Like


      • And what was the ultimate outcome of that particular change? Think about it.

        Like


      • Spiralina. That’s exactly my point. Jews should know when enough is enough, but they never do. The reaction in Germany was terrible but they drew it on themselves. They’ve already destroyed the West by imposing feminism, bogus ‘eguality’, mass immigration, miscegenation etc. yet rather than drawing back they keep rubbing our noses in it.

        Like


      • It might be different the next time, when the entirety of the Western world won’t (or can’t) dance to the “correct” tune, nor offer up their sons to save their own secret enemy’s collective ass.

        Habt Acht.

        Like


      • But nobody got involved to save anyone else’s ass. Western Europe had no choice and got involved to save its own ass from being reduced to rubble, the U.S. got involved because of Pearl Harbor, and Russia got involved because ain’t nobody got time for a foreign invasion. Nobody gave a crap about Auschwitz, or even knew it was happening until after the fact. Again, self-preservation is the law of the land, always. Which is why “massive revolutionary change” has a very short shelf life and tends to calcify into more tyranny rather than less.

        Like


      • @ irishsavant – they won’t say it out loud, but I’m pretty sure most Jews would secretly consider the sacrifice of 6 million poor folks well worth it given the entrenchment and untouchability it has granted them worldwide ever since. Nothing empowers like martyrdom, and nobody knows it better than they do.

        Like


      • The US was under no dire threat, and indeed, pushed the Japanese into making a move, which our War Dept knew was coming at least three days in advance.

        Britain and France could have backed out early on and let the Krauts duke it out with Russia… the Germans had no designed on either country, and indeed, allowed the Brits a mulligan (Dunkirk).

        The Cathedral version of history has long-been debunked here… in that regard, pipe down when men are talking, toots.

        Like


      • Spiralina, I don’t even know where to begin so I won’t. Just to say that when it comes to WW II you’ve drunk the Cathedral’s wine so fully that it’d take an age to show you the error of your ways.

        Like


      • Charming as always, Greg 😉

        Like


      • “Nothing empowers like martyrdom”
        Tell me, how did that work out for the (heavily yDNA R1b *) Armenians?

        * [“R1b1a2a represents the largest haplogroup for Armenians in general and project members in particular.” FTDNA]

        Like


  6. The Cathedral never misses an opportunity to push communism.

    http://time.com/money/3620588/gas-prices-gas-tax/

    Like


  7. We already have “Communism.” It’s just Communism without the unworkable Soviet-style economics. You could call it bankster crony capitalist Communism. And Soviet Communism only lasted so long due to being propped up by the West. See The Soviet Economy and the Red Army, 1930-1945, by Walter S. Dunn Jr.

    Like


  8. on December 8, 2014 at 6:28 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    Never apologize. Fuck ’em.

    Like


  9. Re: your tweets. I don’t think DNA exoneration rates indicate the rate people lie about rape because many of those cases involve rape murders where there is no false accusation from the victim because the victim is dead. People get exonerated post-conviction through DNA testing when they were convicted before DNA testing was available. Hence, they are serving very long sentences which they would not serve if they had only raped someone. DNA exoneration is in part about how much the state gets it wrong.

    Like


  10. I have never understood apologizing. It tells the world that you don’t believe what you say.

    Like


    • Hmmmm. What if you make a mistake? I’m not saying Jennings did make a mistake, but a “never apologize” policy seems unworkable.

      “I’m sorry I answered your question truthfully and said you’ve gained weight”

      is not the same as

      “I’m sorry I ran over your cat in the driveway.”

      Like


      • on December 8, 2014 at 2:34 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck

        Agreed. Most people in our zero accountability culture are loathe to admit their mistakes. If you fucked up and offer a true apology, I will think much more highly of your moral compass. That being said, this guy was a total pussy for apologizing. When the truth requires an apology, it is confirmation of a sick society.

        Like


      • “When the truth requires an apology, it is confirmation of a sick society.”

        Spot on.

        Like


  11. Most people will apologize because they are default-liberals who have never been exposed to, nor have independently arrived at a red pill world view.

    But there is also another angle when it comes to apologies. Thus was recently discussed at Mangan’s where a commenter made a good point: an accusation of racism or sexism can be extrely traumatic and isolating, and most people would cave and apologize unless they’ve rehearsed the scenario in their minds. Being accused of thoughtcrime makes everyone avoid you. Even people who mostly agree with you will distance themselves from you. They will call your intelligence or character into question and second-guess your every word because you weren’t perfect eloquent.

    The sensation of panic in this case is visceral and I’d bet that many people who apologized gave been kicking themselves for it later, when the shit storm subsided.

    It is important to have a simple mantra in your mind for such a situation. I like the sentence “I stand by every word I wrote.”

    A nother thing that is extremely crucial: ANY gesture of support toward an accused is priceless. One word of support in such a case can mean the difference between apologizing and giving the accusers a middle finger.

    I wonder what Emma West is doing right now. Net searches don’t turn anything up. A couple of years ago she was on a train with her baby, with menacing coloreds circling them. She verbally lashed out at them, was arrested, and was subjected to worldwide hate. Even friendly bloggers like 1STDV criticized her for not her imperfect oratory. I like to think that she’s OK now, and she knew about the massive support she had from clear-eyed Whites worldwide through the ordeal.

    Like


  12. I have no doubt rape does happen in isolated incidents on campus, but I find these lurid over-the-top fraternity “gang rape” stories hard to believe. Young men today are raised in an environment where they know a rape accusation would get them not only booted from their national chapter, but have their names publicized, their employment prospects evaporate and their lives ruined forever. So I find it far-fetched any accredited fraternity would incorporate premeditated gang rape into their pledge activities. They are risking losing literally everything and they know it.

    Like


  13. speaking of realtalkers being burned at the stake, is thwack still banned?

    [CH: no, thwack. but have you noticed how much clearer the comment air has gotten lately?]

    Like


    • I often wondered what would happen if thwack met Greg Elliot or ZS in a bar and they discovered one another’s identity. Blows, immediately go their separate ways, or would some bizarre common ground be found?

      Like


      • Blows?! Why?

        They’d probably chat.

        Like


      • Blows? Well inter alia thwack has been referred to as ‘boy’, ‘nigger’, it’s been inferred that he has a bone through his nose, his residence is a mud hut. Maybe I’m overly sensitive but I imagine such would not form a good basis for a friendly discussion….

        Like


      • I’ve often said we’d probably find each other hail fellows, well-met, and drink a health to the other, in turn.

        Alas, my duties as RAY-CISS bouncer, here at the chateau, often make me appear less affable than I’d like. 😉

        Like


    • speaking of realtalkers being burned at the stake, is thwack still banned?

      You flatter him (or, as CH suspects, does he flatter himself?) as a “realtalker”.

      For every pinch of RealTalk on his plate, there was a dollop of Afrocentrist and Muh-Dik troll fare.

      Still, every chateau’s landscape accoutrements should include a lawn jockey.

      Like


  14. as for the ‘false rape is rare’ shit– this graph is going around for SCIENCE!

    and doesn’t even relate to the biggest current stories. neither dunham nor ‘jackie’ went to the police. numberless hordes of women claim rape casually, and it ruins men’s lives, but it’s not on this image because they obviously don’t go to the police a lot when it’s totally made up

    false rape claims are not rare. maybe false rape police reports are, but who needs police to ruin a guy who was as drunk as you were when you had sex?

    Like


  15. This is an instructive lesson; to SJW being an White Female* > Black Male.

    Oh, and of course he shouldn’t have apologies. NEVER APOLOGIZE, NEVER EXPLAIN. Refuse to do the retarded little “shame dance” that they want to extract from you. If you go down, go down guns blazing.**

    À bientôt,

    Mistral

    *By which I mean an “aggrieved” one, complete with hurt feelings, etc.
    **For the benefit of my future inquisitors, I am speaking metaphorically.

    Like


    • This is an instructive lesson; to SJW being an White Female* > Black Male.

      Actually, I think it depends upon who is more Marxically correct. If a ghetto thug loser rapes a white woman and she complains, she’s in the wrong. If a black dude RealTalks about women, he’s in the wrong.

      Like


  16. “I’m saying this because, first and foremost, don’t put yourself in a situation that would cause you to be trying to explain something that really needs no explanation, had you not put yourself in that situation.”

    I’m not even sure what he’s trying to say here. He SHOULD be saying “don’t put yourself in a situation where your judgment or ability to communicate is impaired, or where your consent can be misconstrued.” I think people got ticked off because he’s implying every woman who regrets a sexual encounter is inclined to cry rape. Because… no, they aren’t.

    [CH: i didn’t get that implication from him. it was obvious he was referring to the fra hysteria that’s recently commanded media attention.]

    Like


  17. Spotted on British train the other evening. Dramatis personae: fat-as-hell pregnant 5 chav female with fit, good-lucking 8.5 20-something beta male.
    Her: So you’re gonna transfer half your wages to my account by direct debit?
    Him: Sure, babe. Makes sense. That way, if I don’t see it, I won’t spend it.
    Her: Exactly. And when are you selling the car?
    Him: I dunno…
    Her: Do it before Christmas. I want the money to cover family presents and doing up the room for the baby.
    Him: I’ll look into it, babes.
    Her (angrily): Just list it in Autotrader! [UK car sales magazine] I’m fed up with you being so difficult all the time! It’s not attractive. I don’t find it attractive, you know.
    Him: Sorry, babe.

    When grotesque munters are holding peak specimens of UK manhood to this sort of beta bux ransom, you know the country is holed well below the water line. I was biting my tongue not to intervene and tell her to stfu, and him to run for the hills (with his motor and a red pill), but as the story goes, they shoot realtalkers, don’t they?

    Like


    • A phenomenon that appears to be widespread in Britain for some reason.

      Like


    • If he’s lucky, she’ll dump his ass and he’ll find this place. I found this place after I was dumped by an unattractive girl I should not have been dating. Being dumped was probably the best thing that ever happened to me.

      Like


      • Exactly, it takes a big loss to wake a lot of us up.

        Like


      • No way she’s dumping his ass. She’s taking half of everything even before the divorcerape, plus he was a clear 3-4 SMV points higher, despite the abject betattitude. Her capacious belly housed an anchor baby if ever I saw one, anchored in his bank account. Chances are she’ll stick by him until she starts taking some chavvy alpha on during school and work hours, and even then she’ll stay sucking off his moneyteat.
        I was desperate to get the lad offside at the dining car or by the toilet and give him a quick rundown on his actual options, but he literally wasn’t allowed to leave his supplication position for the whole journey. Normally, I’m quite opposed to the generation of single mums sponging off the state and prefer men to man up to their progeny, but this case was so spectacular an example of female agency run riot that I was prepared to make an exception.
        Of course, saying anything in front of her would have caused a riot and triggered his whiteknighting. Those who shoot the realtalkers are sadly usually other men, and those most in need of hearing the realtalk.

        Like


      • “I was desperate to get the lad offside at the dining car or by the toilet and give him a quick rundown on his actual options”

        This would be an interesting subject: how would you open such s conversation?

        You wouldn’t have a captive audience in him; he’d likely be defensive and would tell you to f. off.

        A memorable one-liner would be a good way to open.

        Like


      • A doormat beta male will not dare stand up to his skank girlfriend, but he will nut up impressively against another man, even a well-meaning one.

        There is bottled-up frustration and wounded pride in those kinds of betas. Face-saving imperative alone may be a reason for him to go full-white knight on your ass.

        Maybe write this blog’s url on a piece of paper and hand it to him. The note can also say something like “you can do better” except without implicitly insulting his bitch.

        Like


      • I’d just say to him: “Come with me if you want to live.”

        Like


      • Skinner, FTW… most droll.

        Like


      • A doormat beta male will not dare stand up to his skank girlfriend, but he will nut up impressively against another man, even a well-meaning one.

        This, this, and THIS… I’ve had to walk away from several otherwise solid friendships because I could not tolerate the cunt SO’s attitude as part of the bargain.

        Like


      • on December 8, 2014 at 9:08 pm Master Blaster

        ‘This would be an interesting subject: how would you open such a conversation?’

        Pick up your phone, pretend to call a mate, start talking in a loud voice how some bird tried to pull the same stunt with you and how you dealt with it and what her game was.

        If they say anything you have plausible deniability.

        Like


    • >Him: Sure, babe. Makes sense. That way, if I don’t see it, I won’t spend it.

      Alas poor Beta Male, I knew him; a fellow of infinite supplication.

      No seriously, that guy is fucked. If he is paired with an adipocyte storage tank it may very well be too late to save him. I agree with the idea of a one liner and somehow slipping a link to the manosphere though. Any attempt to engage in a red pill discussion will probably backfire.

      Like


      • Some people are only ready to take the pill when their entire lives have been burned to the ground. Others won’t take it even then.

        Like


  18. What excellent timing. I was just thinking about how academia has been completely and thoroughly taken over by feminism. Feminism was invented there but I assure you, that hard science and math departments had resisted changes for hundreds of years. They were meritocratic, taught in a traditional sense, and for the most part, politics was seldom heard about. In fact, it is a well known phenomena that the worst scientists are the ones who talk about politics and so it was anathema in many of these departments. Over the last 10 years, there have been changes made. Now, the same departments are so accommodating to women as to no longer be meritocratic. The attitude of men has changed too. Now they rush up to defend women at every chance they get. The tech industry has done the same thing after similarly coming under fire from a relentless media campaign. Look through articles in techcrunch and NYT for anything about the company Uber, or just do a google news search for it. It is a great company, and the owners haven’t bowed down at the alter of feminism after a feminist journalist targeted their company for being anti-women not so long ago. I have counted 8 different anti Uber articles from major news sources in the past 24 hours. It is a targeted hit. I have never seen so much vitriol disguised as concern by reporters before. I think they have won.

    Like


  19. Women have always hated when men get sex for free. To make sure men can’t get away with sex for free women slut-shame other women who give it away to men without commitment or investment. Except for the sluts of course, they rape-shame the men who pump and dump them instead. Because all women hate when men get sex for free, sluts and non-sluts alike.

    Like


  20. Emily Yoffe, of Slate’s Dear Prudence, wrote a surprisingly even-handed REALTALK article about the negative effect the “war against rape culture” is having on men (namely those innocent who are wrongfully accused and given no real opportunity to defend themselves). It is quite long, but worth reading: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/12/college_rape_campus_sexual_assault_is_a_serious_problem_but_the_efforts.html.

    I’m not sure why Slate approved this article.

    Like


    • on December 8, 2014 at 2:00 pm mendozatorres

      It probably got approved since it’s so long and they figure their “tl;dr” readers will just ignore.

      Like


    • i had forgotten that ms. yoffe has a history of being reasonable. last year, she wrote an article suggesting that women may be able to reduce the likelihood of being sexually assaulted by not drinking themselves into oblivion and, more broadly, being responsible for your own actions. (http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/10/sexual_assault_and_drinking_teach_women_the_connection.2.html). as you might imagine, many, many feminists decried yoffe as a rape apologist who loves to blame victims. there are reasonable people out there, even in crazy liberal land. however, the shrieks of the silver-spoon benighted are loud and many… more and louder voices are needed to counter that awful, intellectually dishonest din

      Like


  21. on December 8, 2014 at 12:17 pm Lurking_Gorilla

    I heard earlier on a podcast that in some states it’s a felony to misconstrue yourself to get laid, such as lying about your salary. This unveils the basic structure of female sexual psychology: sex for women is intrinsically linked to banging status or alpha males and avoiding betas.

    Male quality takes longer to fully discern and is open to more deceptive advertising, hence shit tests and the value of preselection.

    Can you conceive of a man getting upset if a woman lied to him about her salary or job to have sex with him? The idea is laughable. Do femborgs get cognitive dissonance about this stuff or are their brains too addled by groupthink stupidity and indifference to truth for any dissonance to even get a foothold?

    Like


  22. Won’t most people eventually realize that the rape obsession in academia has nothing whatsoever to do with women? It’s obvious to me that the main agenda here is to drive men out of college, one way or another. Why? My guess is it’s part of the outsourcing of men in general, which is meant to make them such poor and ineffectual sad-sacks that the PTB can have their way with the structure of society. I know many here assume this is being done in order to build a socialist/communist paradise, but I think it more likely the structure is “Galt’s Gulch in plain sight”, where potential unionists are left powerless, and unionism can be ended.

    Like


  23. From the National Review article itself: “While his attempt at fatherly advice on sex may have been inartful,…”

    What the hell was “inartful” about it? Sounded like straight forward, good advice to me.

    Even though author John Fund purports to be on the side of Mr. Jennings, he, too, toes the party line by admitting tacitly that there was something wrong with what Jennings said, hence the reference to “inartful.” This, of course, provides Fund with an escape hatch should his article inadvertently upset the wrong people (“Hey, I agree he used the wrong words — I would never say something like that myself,” etc.)

    As long as these perhaps subconscious, but very real fears continue to exist, and as long as most continue to think a prefatory apology or other escape route is needed before stating the simple and obvious truth, we are merely treating the symptoms, rather than the disease. But then again, free speech is much too powerful a force to leave in the hands of the great unwashed masses.

    [CH: most of the NR staff are pussies. it’s their inception trait.]

    Like


    • “What the hell was “inartful” about it?”

      That’s exactly what I meant about even people who mostly agree with you distancing themselves from you.

      Like


    • Another one: “I don’t agree with everything X says, but…”

      No shit. I don’t agree with everything anyone says. I don’t even agree with everything I’ve ever said because my views have changed on some subjects.

      The reflex is to cede moral high ground to the leftoids, and then try to work from a deficit in qualifying yourself to them. Don’t do that.

      Like


    • What the hell was “inartful” about it?

      “Inartful” = not enough sophistry and BS.

      Like


  24. #fartrape

    We’ll know we’ve hit peak feminism when whorefinder has to be explained.

    Like


  25. unbelievable

    http://www3.law.harvard.edu/orgs/blsa/files/2014/12/HLS-Open-Letter-to-President-Barack-Obama-and-Attorney-General-Eric-Holder.pdf

    [CH: reason alone won’t win tribal wars like the one unfolding in the US now.]

    Like


    • Agreed. So what’s next?

      Like


      • bide time. things aren’t bad enough yet. if something drastic is to happen, it will happen quickly and violently. there will be no real planning for it beyond general preparedness.

        Like


    • [CH: reason alone won’t win tribal wars like the one unfolding in the US now.]

      I wouldn’t exactly call their PC platitudes “reason”.

      Like


      • Um. We’re not saying otherwise. What we’re Expressing shock over is that this type of offensive treason is coming from Harvard Law school. Every person who signed this letter should be either disbarred or not admitted to the bar if they are a student.

        Like


  26. Grovelling and apologising only whet the ghouls’ appetite for blood. This has been demonstrated time and again.

    Like


  27. Wonder who was the first abject apologizer. Trent Lott is the earliest case I recall. Don Imus shortly after was the second.

    The earliest case of modern-day PC witch hunt I recall was NFL’s Jimmy the Greek and DC radio personality Greaseman, both in the mid-1980s. I don’t know if they apologized.

    Like


    • Anita Bryant was the first casualty that I can remember. I don’t think she apologized, but she did take the defensive position afterwards and qualified her opinions within the frame of “Christian love” or some such think.

      Around that era, there was an Iron Lady, the Ann Coulter of her time, named Phyllis Schlafly… who wouldn’t bend to any firestorm over her remarks. One of the more droll lines I remember (from an appearance on the Phil Donahue show, if memory serves) was “All of the legislation in the world isn’t going to make men like fat women.”

      Like


  28. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/12/michael_tomasky_thinks_dems_should_write_off_the_south.html

    “With Landrieu’s departure, the Democrats will have no more senators from the Deep South, and I say good. Forget about it. Forget about the whole fetid place. Write it off. Let the GOP have it and run it and turn it into Free-Market Jesus Paradise. The Democrats don’t need it anyway.”

    U mad?

    “And at some point in the near future, you’ll be able to talk about Georgia as a state a Democrat can capture. And eventually, Texas, too.”

    Battleground Texas 2014! shit, uh, 2016! okay, 2018! god fucking damnit

    Like


  29. Slutty women get used like sluts.

    Amen to that… And they wouldn’t have it any other way…No matter what they may say – they are slutty for a reason, and it’s because it gets them what they want… To be used like the sluts they are… Of course, they won’t admit that – although it’s exactly what they want…

    Like


  30. til sjws come from shadowmoor

    Like


  31. tl;dr version: its the Hypergamy stupid. On steroids from Anonymous Urban Living, the pill, condom, improved status and earnings of women (now WHO came up with that) plus the supercharge steroids of female-oriented mass consumerism. How do you fight that? Not with mirror-image witch-hunts but naked (heh) appeals to women’s self-interest.

    Don’t get drunk, don’t be slutty, if you want a good husband is a powerful message. So is the fact that good men are scarce, most women only get one shot at one. Oprah got rich by telling women you go girl eat that Haagen Dasz you’re beautiful at 400 lbs and counting. But while that common sense message women’s grandmothers knew won’t make people rich it helps save civilization one happy marriage at a time.

    Like


  32. OT but…I found another article on Slate I thought I’d share. This is in regards to the mass hysteria and hyperinflated statistics of “sexual assaults” on campuses. Seriously, why are men going to college? Men are now suing the colleges because they are guilty before proven innocent and ARE NOT ALLOWED legal council. Higher ED is treated like its own country/fiefdom with its own laws.

    Check out this quote: “Assertions of injustice by young men are infuriating to some. Caroline Heldman, an associate professor of politics at Occidental College and co-founder of End Rape on Campus, said of the men who are turning to the courts, “These lawsuits are an incredible display of entitlement, the same entitlement that drove them to rape.” Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Missouri, a co-sponsor of the CASA bill, said to the Washington Post of these suits, “I don’t think we are anywhere near a tipping point where the people accused of this are somehow being treated unfairly.”

    http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/12/college_rape_campus_sexual_assault_is_a_serious_problem_but_the_efforts.html

    Like


    • “Caroline Heldman”

      Do Jews really want to get gassed a second time?

      Like


      • Seems like they just can’t help themselves… a satanic combination of hubris, chutzpah, Selbsthass, and death wish.

        As Scripture says: “You are of your father, the Devil. And the lusts of your father you will do.”

        Like


      • Bitter is frontrunners’ wage. Not for nothing were the more capable of them driven to the darkest despair (e.g. Stefan Zweig). The current anti-betaman hysteria is especially harmful to them, given schlomos’ libidinous tendencies (see Lewin-MIT). That yentas are the shriekest propaganda peddlers of this latest campaign to expose the enemies of the people makes it the more ironic.

        oink

        Like


  33. In lighter news, some jigaboo antics resulted in two jigs made good http://m.tmz.com/#Article/2014/12/09/floyd-mayweather-earl-hayes-murder-suicide-wife-cheating-witness-facetime

    Actually, the wife is (was, lol) some sort of coffee colored halfbreed, but close enough for my tastes.

    Like