Hitler Was Beta

A recently published book by an old friend of Hitler’s called “The Young Hitler I Knew” offers amazing insight into Hitler’s personality and early life as a romantic teenager. Evidence surfaces that Hitler was (though the author never states it outright), by disposition or by experience, a beta male with a bad case of one-itis and zero game who pedestalized women.

Kubizek’s uncensored account throws a fascinating light on the fanatical mind of the future Fuhrer.

For it contains, for the first time, the full story of Hitler’s teenage obsession with a pretty girl called Stefanie Isak, whose surname has clear Jewish origins.

And although Hitler’s distinguished biographer Sir Ian Kershaw has rightly dismissed Hitler’s feelings for Stefanie as ‘a juvenile infatuation’, the passion with which Hitler stalked her and fantasised about kidnapping and committing suicide with her lets us glimpse the mentality of the person he was destined to become.

Furthermore, August Kubizek’s account reveals that Hitler was utterly unconcerned as to whether the girl after whom he lusted was Jewish or not.

Those “juvenile infatuations” are not to be underestimated in their power as origin sources of a man’s lifelong character; for from those experiences a man holds his deepest, most cherished or most regretted memories, and the shadow of their mark haunts him for life. Now let’s contemplate the evidence for Hitler’s betaness in the following account of his courtship rituals:

Kubizek dates Hitler’s infatuation with Stefanie, which lasted four years, from the beginning of his 16th year, to an evening in the spring of 1905 when they went out for a stroll in the Landstrasse in Linz: “Adolf gripped my arm and asked me excitedly what I thought of that slim, blonde girl walking along arm-in-arm with her mother. ‘You must know, I?m in love with her,’ he added resolutely.”

Kubizek recalled that Stefanie Isak, he didn’t reveal her surname during the Third Reich years when the book was published under strict censorship, for obvious reasons, was a distinguished-looking girl, tall and slim.

“Her eyes were very beautiful, bright and expressive. She was exceptionally well-dressed and her bearing indicated that she came from a good, well-to-do family.”

Yet that was all the two teenagers knew about Stefanie to begin with, so they took to standing in a nearby street every evening at five o’clock, waiting for her to walk over the bridge to the main square.

“It would have been improper to address Stefanie,” recalled Kubizek, “as neither of us had been introduced to the young lady. A glance had to take the place of a greeting. From then on, Adolf did not take his eyes off Stefanie. In that moment he was changed, no longer his own self.” For someone who despised and denounced the social conventions of the bourgeoisie, Hitler conformed to them rather meekly when it came to Stefanie, possibly out of stultifying shyness.

Hitler’s game so far: Shy glances.

The Landstrasse was a favourite place for friends to meet in Linz. “There was a lot of flirting and the young Army officers were particularly good at it,” remembered Kubizek.

It would infuriate Hitler whenever he spotted young officers talking to Stefanie. His friend sympathised: “Poor, pallid youngsters like Adolf naturally cannot compete with these lieutenants in their smart uniforms.” Instead of trying to engage her interest and attention through the exercise of charm or humour, however, Hitler simply fumed in the shadows. “Conceited blockheads,” he would say of his rivals.

Hitler the emo.

Kubizek wrote that Hitler’s hatred of them led to his “uncompromising enmity towards the officer class as a whole, and everything military in general. It annoyed him intensely that Stefanie mixed with such idlers who, he insisted, wore corsets and used scent”.

Hitler’s dislike and distrust of the officer class, especially generals, was to stay with him for the rest of his life.

Hitler the bitterboy beta. Instead of learning from his alpha male betters, he lashed out at them, much the same way our modern manboobs lash out at alpha male “douchebags” and “players”.

Fortunately, as she chatted happily with her Austrian officer beaux, the 17-year-old Stefanie, who Kubizek recalled had a “natural and open expression” as well as “a freshness and lack of affectation”, had no inkling that she was being stalked by Hitler.

Hitler the creeper.

Kubizek states: “Stefanie had no idea how deeply Adolf was in love with her; she regarded him as a somewhat shy, but nevertheless remarkably tenacious and faithful, admirer.

Hitler in the friendzone.

“When she responded with a smile to his inquiring glance, he was happy and his mood became unlike anything I had ever observed in him.

Hitler the overly hopeful beta.

“But when Stefanie, as happened just as often, coldly ignored his gaze, he was crushed and ready to destroy himself and the whole world.”

Hitler the easily discouraged beta.

Hitler soon set Kubizek to discover everything he could about Stefanie. Her mother, it turned out, was a widow and they lived in nearby Urfahr, while her brother was a law student in Vienna.

Hitler the obsessed beta.

For those four years between the ages of 16 and 20, “for Adolf, no other woman but Stefanie existed”, since for him, “Stefanie embodied the whole of femininity”.

Hitler with crippling one-itis. If CH had been around then for Hitler to read, he would know that women are interchangeable, and he would not have wasted so much time on a girl who barely knew he existed.

This enthusiasm took the form of writing “countless love poems” to Stefanie, with titles such as Hymn To The Beloved.

Ugh. As you can see, even maniacal dictators with dreams of world conquest can fall into the same horrible beta traps as your typical weepy 21st century brooding teen boy with xVideos tabbed for convenience. If only Hitler had the compiled wisdom of CH, he would remember the maxim that you do not reward a woman with your love until after she has rewarded you with her sex.

Perhaps it is fortunate they no longer exist, as Kubizek recalls Hitler reciting one to him in which “Stefanie, a high-born damsel, in a dark blue, flowing velvet gown, rode on a white steed over the flowering meadows, her loose hair falling in golden waves on her shoulders; a clear blue sky was above; everything was pure, radiant joy.”

Kubizek remembered “Adolf?s face glowing with fervent ecstasy” as he recited these verses. Yet in all the four years he worshipped Stefanie, Hitler never once plucked up the courage actually to exchange a single word with her. He insisted that once he met her, no words would be needed.

The elaborate fantasy world of the lovesick beta male. You know, a part of me feels not just pity, but even tender admiration, for young Hitler’s romantic idealism, so pure of thought and intention. This was a Hitler, however misguided, who denied a cynical world its tribute in parcels of his uncorrupted soul. How might things have turned out differently had a strong male presence — an alpha male mentor — shown him the way to fulfill his burning desire? Or at least told him to stop acting like a tool?

“For such extraordinary human beings as himself and Stefanie,” he told Kubizek, “there was no need for the usual communication by word of mouth: extraordinary human beings would understand each other by intuition.” Moreover, Hitler convinced himself not only that Stefanie knew what his views and ideas were, but also that she shared them enthusiastically. Such was the power of his crush on this unwitting girl that he even believed her capable of telepathy.

The young beta, before time and painful lessons have turned him bitter, is prone to these flights of ego-soothing fancy, whereby amorphous “connections” of the most tenuous nature with his love object become rationalizations for inaction and unrealistic expectations of a future together.

When Kubizek expressed doubt that Hitler could possibly know what Stefanie thought about anything, considering they hadn’t yet spoken, “he became furious and shouted at me: ‘You simply don’t understand, because you can’t understand the true meaning of extraordinary love’.”

Can’t you just imagine an American teenage boy, with little understanding of the nature of women, saying these exact words to his street smart buddy, or his patient father?

Hitler also somehow convinced himself that Stefanie was feigning interest in other men “as a sort of deliberate diversion to conceal her own tempestuous feelings for him”.

Nonetheless, “this attitude often gave way to fits of raging jealousy”.

We’re veering into almost omega male territory here. Can a school shooting be far behind?

What he never summoned up the courage to do was simply introduce himself to Stefanie’s mother on one of their walks and ask permission to escort them and address her daughter, which was the accepted way of effecting a meeting in those days.

To be fair to Hitler, it was a lot tougher to pick up a girl in his time. Could you picture some video gamer bro having to introduce himself to a girl’s mother to get in a word with the girl?

Hitler was disturbed when he discovered Stefanie enjoyed dancing, which was “as contrary to his nature as smoking or drinking beer in a bar”. Kubizek half-jokingly suggested he take up dancing lessons, and suddenly their walks were no longer dominated by his long diatribes about the theatre or Danubian bridges, but instead by the subject of dancing.

“Visualise a crowded ballroom,” Hitler said to Kubizek, “and imagine you are deaf. You can’t hear the music to which these people are moving, and then take a look at their senseless progress, which leads nowhere. Aren’t these people raving mad?” When Kubizek attempted to disagree, Hitler screamed at him: “No, no, never! I shall never dance! Do you understand? Once Stefanie is my wife, she won’t have the slightest desire to dance!”

Here we see another facet of the beta male mind: The strict adherence to logic and linearity, and the inability to go with the flow. A great seducer of women Hitler was not, at least not then, or he would have known that the art of courtship involves emotional tangents that can seem confusing to men, but are nourishing and necessary to women.

It was in the depression brought on by the news of Stefanie’s love of dancing that the Hitler of the future can suddenly be discerned: “He hit upon a crazy idea: he seriously considered kidnapping Stefanie. He expounded his plan to me in all its details and assigned to me my role. I had to keep the mother engaged in conversation while he seized the girl.”

This is what rejected beta males thought about doing before they had access to internet porn.

After this plot was abandoned for lack of funds to live on after their elopement, Hitler considered suicide. “He would jump into the river from the Danube bridge,” he told Kubizek, “and then it would be over and done with. But Stefanie would have to die with him”, he insisted on that.

“Once more, a plan was thought up, in all its details. Every single phase of the horrifying tragedy was minutely described.”

What’s worse than a beta male? A beta male with a psychopath’s eye for detail.

However, before any desperate plan could be carried out against Stefanie, Hitler’s mood brightened. In June 1906, at the Linz flower festival, he and Kubizek took up places in a street, the Schmiedtorstrasse, which was so narrow, the festival carriages full of girls and young ladies had to pass close to them.

“Stefanie had adorned her carriage not with roses as most of the others, but with simple wild blossoms: red poppies, white marguerites and blue cornflowers,” recalled Kubizek. “A bright glance falls on Adolf. Stefanie sends him a beaming smile and, picking a flower from her posy, throws it to him.”

The effect on Hitler was transforming. “Never again did I see Adolf as happy as at that moment.”

“She loves me!” he told his friend. “You have seen! She loves me!”

This is how beta orbiters are born and maintained in their orbital flight paths. Stefanie probably wasn’t even aware of what she was doing; she was following an unconscious evolutionary script that maximized her extraction of emotional resources from a beta swooner.

[Hitler] had an absurdly idealised view of this pretty but otherwise normal Austrian teenager, and, as Kubizek understood, “the slightest divergence from this picture would have filled him with unspeakable disappointment”.

Now you know why the archipelago of misfit manboobs, male feminists, slam poets, game denialists, and suck-up white knights are so vehemently enraged when a realtalker like yours truly comes along to put the screws to their carefully mani-pedi’ed worldview. They have too much invested in their powerlessness.

In fact, it later transpired that, despite her surname, Stefanie was not Jewish. But crucially, Hitler and Kubizek did not know this at the time, signifying that the future perpetrator of the Holocaust had no animus against Jews as a young man.

Did he therefore cynically invent his hatred of Jews as a useful vehicle for gaining power in post-Great War Germany? This explanation is even more sinister than any of the myriad others as to where and when he contracted the bacillus of anti-Semitism.

Or perhaps, even more sinisterly, Hitler became the man he did when, as a young man in the grip of hot unrequited love, his Jewish princess “rejected” him for the charming alpha males Hitler despised. What followed from that irreparable wound to his heart was an act of id vengeance that would set fire to the world. Was WWI then, the revenge of a beta male scorned?

Chateau Heartiste has written that game can save the West. Disbelievers scoff. But if this outpost of sanity had been around during Hitler’s flowering youth to enlighten him about the nature of the fairer sex, the West might very well have been saved. Saved not just from war and genocide, but from every evil — cultural Marxism, feminism, equalism, and now racial self-annihilationism — that has come after.





Comments


  1. Well he was raised by a single mother, that’ll give a man some serious problems for the rest of his life.

    Like


    • Before Hitler went into any military endeavors, he was an artist. It was said that in his critique class his painting was met with repugnance and this is what ultimately drove Hitler to become involved in military curiosities. Rule of the story= Don’t piss off artist

      Like


    • Comments closed.

      Like


      • Hitler was a serious artist. His stuff wasn’t bad. There is a reason why you never see it, or only see a careful sampling of it to make him look bad.

        Like


      • “bad” = subjective.. he had no place in “art” history so he made his place in history

        Like


  2. Stalin, on the other hand….

    Like


  3. I don’t think she was Jewish. Here’s her Wikipedia page.

    Like


  4. This was before WWI and at that point Hitler had no reason to hate Jews. Everyone has to realize that on the Eastern Front, the Germans won. It was a huge blow to see Germany lose the entire war just because of what happened on the much less consequential Western Front. Our entire vague idea of WWI is purely Western Front: barbed wire, trenches, gains measured in yards, etc. The Eastern Front wasn’t like that at all, it was mostly a straight fight with armies moving every which way. If you like history, look up the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Aristocratic Prussian Junkers mingling at dinner with Bolshevik revolutionaries. It’s quite a story. But hey, Hitler had a crush on a Jewish girl and who is going to stand up for the H man?

    “In fact, it later transpired that, despite her surname, Stefanie was not Jewish. But crucially, Hitler and Kubizek did not know this at the time, signifying that the future perpetrator of the Holocaust had no animus against Jews as a young man.”

    Well duh, Hitler didn’t become anti-Jewish until after WWI! Jeez you think British papers would have a better sense of history.

    Like


    • Top post.

      Have recently read this book and there is no suggestion from Kubizek that Hitler’s love interest was a jew. For years – ever since The Mind of Adolf Hitler (coincidentally, written by a jew who was the brother of a US intelligence agent and not a practicing psychologist) came out – the west has been trying to sell the world on the man’s attitudes to jews as being a result of some Freudian psychological derangement. This article is just another example. It’s purpose is to link anti-semitism with mental illness lest the goyim come to the conclusion that there’s no smoke without fire.

      As much as everyone in the community boasts about being “red-pill”, few are clued up regarding 20th century history. Read some WW2 source material and I can assure you that you will quickly realise that everything you thought you knew is wrong.

      Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 5:33 pm Hammer of Love

      Bravo, good sir. Despite what the true ” revisionist ” historians would like us to believe; Hitler’s so called ” hate ” for the Joos came from deductions, and logical conclusions, based on events that he learned of during and after WW1. No one is born having a dislike for the ways of the Joos, or any other race, that animosity can only come from personal experience.

      Like


      • Exactly. He saw that the people who were responsible for Germany losing WW1 were largely jewish, then when communism took over Russia and the movement was spreading in Germany, almost all of them were jewish. It had nothing to do with anything in his early youth.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:24 am Jochen Peiper

        That’s because the Communists who started the coup that led to Wilhelm II’s abdication were largely Jews (80-90%). Nazi and German anti-semitism was never irrational, despite what is said about it today.

        Like


      • Good to see that people are awake to this

        Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 9:20 pm David Pittelli

        And yet anti-Semitism was quite common in Germany (and perhaps more so in France) before WWI. Plenty has been written of the antecedents of Nazi hatred of the Jews.

        Like


      • excellent observation, which means this charge that antisemtism started after WW1 is a bullshit story. These n-NZs try to revise history, while hypocritically claim the Jooz revise history.

        Like


      • Ah, dim bulb Lily strikes again…

        I believe the task at hand in this thread was speculation of when AH’s antisemitism began. not antisemitism in general.

        As one poster already succinctly said, instead of speculation, you can find out from the words of the man himself in his memoir.

        At least, that’s the usual historical method of investigation.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 3:26 pm Carlos Danger

        Anti-Semitism goes back to Ancient Rome, if you want to get technical about it. Nationalism was an avante garde classical Liberal movement across Europe, from the mid 19th century onwards. It was during this period that the study of European ethnicity became a social science. The Germans were leaders in this field but so were the French. There was Serbian, Croatian, Slovak, Czech, Flemish Walloon, French, German, Nordic, etc. nationalism. The YKW version of this is Zionism.

        However, the events Greg alludes to are the coup instigated by Communists that forced the Kaiser to abdicate and Germany to sign the Armistice and afterwards, the violent unrest as the Soviet Union and German Communist revolutionaries sought to overthrow the Weimar Government and establish a Communist state in Germany. This strategy was then seen as the linchpin to conquering Europe. The Weimar state had to fight an ongoing civil war with the Communist forces in Germany and they had to employ ex-soldiers as mercenaries to put down the unrest known as the Freikorps. See, for example, Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht and the Spartacus Uprising. This revolt was put down by the Freikorps as was the Kapp Putsch and countless other smaller actions from 1919 to the early 30s. The Freikorps was amalgamated into the SA, which was covertly supported by the Reichswehr and the Weimar Government because they represented a shadow army of 400,000 men who could be mobilized in case Marshal Pilsudsky’s regime in Poland chose to invade a much weakened Germany. There were firefights between armed SA men and Communists throughout the 20s that sometimes involved tens of thousands of men armed with Mausers, Machineguns,and grenades in major German cities. I recommend Hitler Over Germany by Otis Mitchell regarding this period. It is an excellent book.

        Like


      • “However, the events Greg alludes to are the coup instigated by Communists that forced the Kaiser to abdicate and Germany to sign the Armistice and afterwards,”

        That was just the excuse that broke the camel’s back. Antisemtism in Germany goes all the way back to Martin Luther.
        .

        “Anti-Semitism goes back to Ancient Rome, if you want to get technical about it.”

        Roman antisemsatism is not the same type I am discussing here, the type found in ancient Egypt or Europe, which stems from Joo envy or religious zealotry.

        Roman antisemtism was not really antisemtism. The Roman empire conquered many lands, and in most of these lands the locals accepted Roman rule. But in Judea, the story was different. The Jooz never accepted a foreign rule, and they constantly fought the Romans. That was the main reason for the hostilities.

        The Romans also hated the members of a Juish spin-off religion, called Christians.

        When Jesus revealed himself, the Romans looked at him as yet another joo troublemaker inciting the jouish masses.

        His Christian followers were persecuted for centuries because the Roman Empire was worried about being replaced by this new fledgling religion, until it itself succumbed to Christianity.

        European antisemetism is a whole different animal.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 6:40 am Jochen Peiper

        Lily, the part you refuse to acknowledge is that anti-semitism may well be justified. Germans were no more anti-semitic than anyone else in Europe. There’s a reason so many Jews settled there. Germany treated them better than most other nations did. Nor did the Nazis have much trouble getting occupied nations to cooperate in the ethnic cleansing process. Those nations were only too happy to get rid of their Jewish problem, especially when they cold blame it all on the Germans.

        Romans were anti-semitic because Jews refused to pay homage to the state Gods, which made Pagans nervous as they believed all would suffer from the Jews refusal. The same was true of Christianity. Christianity was generally not persecuted and only sporadically when and where it was practiced. People had to really make an effort to be sentenced to the arena for being Christian. This was usually also due to the refusal to pay homage to state Gods, not for being Christian per se. Had Romans been serious about stamping out either religion, it would have happened. You don’t hear too much from Druids anymore for example.

        Like


      • Jochen Peiper,

        The Romans were not classical anti-Semites. Yes, as you say, they were angry both the jooz and the Christians refused to pay homage to their Gods, but there were other issues at play. Mainly, it was the jooz refusal to be under foreign rule and have The Temple become impure with Roman idolatry. The Jooz were constantly fighting the Romans and creating unrest. That’s the reason the Romans destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. It wasn’t the result of anti-Semitism per se. Besides, idol worshippers don’t have the same religious zealotry as the Abrahamic religions which all vie for control and try to prove they are the true form of monotheism and the only way to the Almighty.

        Antisemtism, as we know it today, is a European invention that first arose because the jooz refused to convert to Christianity, and later manifested itself in envy of Joo success. These are the only two reasons for antisemtism. Otherwise, dislike of different groups, races, religions, etc, should manifest itself in competition, not hate. This is why I say the best thing to do is compete with the Jooz. Learn from them and use their ideas to build your own wealth and success. I often bring Glen Beck as an example of this, because he built his own empire without saying one envious word against the jooz.
        .
        “Germans were no more anti-semitic than anyone else in Europe. There’s a reason so many Jews settled there. Germany treated them better than most other nations did.”

        I agree on that point. In addition, in Germany, the Jooz arouse to great heights in all scientific, artistic, and philosophical fields. But that’s the point; gentiles grew envious of them and accused them of running the world, exactly like some say here in America when they see Jooz so successful. The Protocols of Zion written a few decades before WW2, embody this mentality. This viewpoint finally cumulated in NZ murder.
        .
        “Those nations were only too happy to get rid of their Jewish problem, especially when they cold blame it all on the Germans.”

        That’s because Europeans have a deep-seated hate for the Jooz, not because the Jooz deserved it.
        As I said,
        “Antisemtism, as we know it today, is a European invention that first arose in the 3rd, 4th and 5th centures because the jooz refused to convert to Christianity, and later manifested itself in envy of Joo success. “

        Like


      • on August 29, 2013 at 11:05 am Smash The ZOG

        Quoting Cicero: “Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.” (Oration in Defense of Flaccus)

        Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to “speak softly” shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote: “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

        Sounds like god’s Holey Peeble were practicing Tikkun Olam even then.

        Like


      • Wrong!!!!! Your uncle Adolf hatred of the Jooz was not the result of “deductions, and logical conclusions, based on events that he learned of during and after WW1.”

        That’s your revisionist history.
        .
        “No one is born having a dislike for the ways of the Joos, or any other race, that animosity can only come from personal experience.”

        Right!!!! Personal experience.

        Hatred of the jooz, is usually based on envy of them. That’s an undeniable fact. If you listen to Hit-ler’s speeches, he constantly talks about world Joory, and how it’s imaginarily controlling the world. Then he lumps one accusation on top of another, most of them imagined infractions of the Jooz, the kind loser-ish envious idiots like you have in their head.

        In addition, he fomented envy, fear, and hatred of the Jooz so that he could control Germany. WNs do the same thing today. They foment envy, fear, and hatred of the Jooz so that they could convince angry frustrated disgruntled individuals to start a useless revolution that will not solve any cultural issue except turn the world to a bloodbath.

        If you look at Wagner, he suffered of the same sickness as Hit-ler – envy of the jooz. Before Felix Mendelssohn, all of Wagner’s friends were Jooz. After Mendelssohn stated composing music and becoming competition, all of a sudden, Wagner started writing nonstop antisemtic manifestos, and that was way before WW1.

        Henry Ford was the same way. He was so envious and jealous of the Jooz, he couldn’t see straight – constantly hurling accusations at them, and that was way before WW1. He was a worse anti-Semite than Wagner ever was. Actually, Wagner was smalltime compared to Hit-ler and Ford.

        Martin Luther of Germany at the outset of his Reformation was a big admirer of the Jooz, and he honestly believed the Jooz would finally convert after he broke with Rome. He saw himself the messenger of Christendom who managed to deliver the jooz to the table. When he found out the jooz had no intention of converting to his brand of Christianity (just as they will not convert to any other religion), his hatred for them fired up. In fact, anti-Semitism in Germany was jumpstarted by Martin Luther, so don’t give us your bullshit revisionist history that WW1 Is the catalysts of Joo hate. Joo hate didn’t start with WW1. It’s as old as time itself.

        Look in the Bible. The ancient Egyptians were fearful of the Jooz after Joseph the Joo Regent Ruler of Egypt died. Why? Because Jooz have become successful and powerful in the land of Egypt; they were running the place. Pharaoh was scared of them. History has a way of repeating itself.

        There are hundreds of these examples throughout history. Joo hate is as old as time itself.

        As I said repeatedly, Joo hate either stems from envy of the jooz, or burns in the hearts of religious zealots for the Jooz’ refusal to convert to whatever the leading religion of the time is. There is no other explanation, no matter how much NZs and WNs try to convince us otherwise.

        You might be able to sell your revisionist history to ignoramuses who don’t know history, or were brainwashed by neo-fucking-NZ clowns. But not to clear-minded folks that know history.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Now, now… you’ve said in the past you enjoy making people angry… have you now been hoisted by your own petard? Tsk, tsk.

        Like


      • I never said that; you’re misquoting me, or just taking my statements out of context. I might have said I enjoyed angering the neo-fucking NZs and the WN ignoramus clowns. They don’t count as people though.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 12:52 am Imperial Leather

        ohhhh…the irony

        Like


      • Ah, the leopard shows its spots… certain people don’t count for much… looks like you and your favorite bete noires have something in common.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 3:52 am gunslingergregi

        so lily is hitler like interesting a group of people not even human eh

        Like


      • “They don’t count as people though.”

        -_-

        Like


      • LMAO! No, they don’t count as people.
        Sorry, I judge people by their friends.

        Like


      • Part of the joo-hate is because the jooz practiced usury, while Catholics forbid it, yet for some reason, Catholic authorities wouldn’t extend their prohibitions of usury to jooz living in Catholic countries. Now, of course, with the Protestant Reformation and the capitalist revolution, usury (any interest, especially compound interest) is pretty much universal in the western world.

        Like


      • This is true. But, ask why Jooz practiced usury? Because they were forbidden to do any type of work until emancipation. That’s why Jooz loaned money at an interest. Christians considered any loaning of money at an interest usury, yet the pope or local authorities didn’t stop it because kings and nobles often needed to borrow money from Jooz for their campaigns.

        Then rather than return the money, they would authorize a pogroms or expel all the Jooz from an area. Jooz were expelled from many places because Rulers and powerful nobles didn’t want to return the money they borrowed from them.

        There are always two sides to every story.

        Like


      • This is true. But, ask why Jooz practiced usury? Because they were forbidden to do any type of work until emancipation. That’s why Jooz loaned money at an interest. Christians considered any loaning of money at an interest usury, yet the pope or local authorities didn’t stop it because kings and nobles often needed to borrow money from Jooz for their campaigns.

        Then rather than return the money, they would authorize a pogroms or expel all the Jooz from an area. Jooz were expelled from many places because Rulers and powerful nobles didn’t want to return the money they borrowed from them.

        There is always two sides to every story.

        Like


      • Lily, you’ve told some whoppers in the past… but when you say Wagner was just jealous of Mendelssohn, well…

        And you might want to watch out on the “just jealous” litany of Who’s Who you got going there…

        Ford… Luther… hmmmm… somebody might get the notion that some pretty big men were something more than “just jealous”.

        Like


      • Big men or little men, they were jealous. What, do you think big men are above jealousy? Just the opposite. (And Wagner wasn’t big. He was a mediocre musician. )

        Look, jealousy is a very strong emotion, felt by big and small figures, and it’s a catalyst to many world conflicts. Rememeber ancient Rome, all the intrigue stemed from a lust for power; from jealousy.

        We only hear the stories of the big figures because they are interesting. No one wants to hear about toothless John form the trailer park voicing his unhappiness of the joo.

        As far as Martin Luther, it is well-documented. Start reading some real history books as opposed to WN publication.

        Like


      • I’m well-aware of Martin Luther’s writings… your shithouse psychology readings of his motives are what I call to question.

        Wagner wasn’t big, eh? Your landsmann James Levine, for one, might call you to question on that score.

        Like


      • I see Lily’s historical expertise stretches all the way to the Eternal City.

        Gentlemen, I… for one… am duly impressed by her ability to encapsulate such meaty subjects into such pithy sound bytes… saves one the laborious reading of Gibbon.

        Like


      • Jesus, it is time to throw this hook-nose cunt in the oven…

        Like


      • > Lily, you’ve told some whoppers in the past… but when you say Wagner was just jealous of Mendelssohn, well…

        There is probably some truth to that. Wagner did have a bit of an inferiority complex due to the fact that he couldn’t play any instrument well, while composers like Mendelssohn, Brahms and Liszt were quite adept at it.

        Like


      • I’m sure his other Gesamtkunstwerk skills skills helped salve his wounded ego… especially since, last check, he never touted himself as a performer. :rolleyes

        Like


      • He never could get the hang of brass… so he decided to compose instead, and let the trombone slide.

        Like


      • > I’m sure his other Gesamtkunstwerk skills skills helped salve his wounded ego… especially since, last check, he never touted himself as a performer. :rolleyes

        Well, just to be clear, you’re not arguing with me, particularly since eye-rolling is not an argument, but also because I’m relying on his biographer, Robert Gutman, for my information. Admittedly, it’s been almost forty years since I read it, but my memory has not succumbed to Alzheimer’s quite yet.

        Someone secure in his own mind about his own gifts and accomplishments would not have needed to treat other great composers of the same era with the ungraciousness that Wagner often exhibited. E.g., his condescending dismissiveness toward Brahms’ formalism. Nor would he needed to have gone out of his way to instruct his own students not to bother acquiring piano chops on the grounds that it would stunt their creativity.

        I’m not saying Wagner was not a great composer — far from it. I consider him one of the two or three greatest composers of all time. The Lord blesses whom He will, and He saw fit to bless this little pig of a man with some of the greatest musical talent in history. Like Pablo Casals said of Richard Strauss, as a composer, I take my hat off; as a man, I put my hat on ten times.

        Like


      • Little pig of a man, eh? Let me guess… you’re ooJish, ain’t cha?

        One of my other ooJish friends used to take great delight in taking me aside and, in conspiratorial tones, mentioning: “Ja, Wagner was some composer… but otherwise, he was a stinker.”

        We both had a good laugh.

        On the subject of Wagner, now THERE’S an alpha example for the chateau… seduced everything that walked, for love or money, for his own pleasure and artistic vision… from friends’ wives to Bavarian kings.

        Like


      • There is probably some truth to that. Wagner did have a bit of an inferiority complex due to the fact that he couldn’t play any instrument well, while composers like Mendelssohn, Brahms and Liszt were quite adept at it.

        Seems a bit far-fetched that the composer of the Ring, et. al., spent a lot of time stewing over better musicians. And although I’m a big proponent of developing musical chops in students, I can see his point that, even today, we see many skilled musicians who somehow lack the ability to compose fine music… but that’s a topic for another day.

        The salient point is that our Lily’s premise was that his jealousy of Mendelssohn led to him dropping ALL his ooJish friends and devoted himself to nonstop writing of antisemitic tracts.

        Which I’m sure you’ll agree is utter hogwash.

        Like


      • > you’re ooJish, ain’t cha?

        Why, no. You’re not an anti-Semite, are you?

        > The salient point is that our Lily’s premise was that his jealousy of Mendelssohn led to him dropping ALL his ooJish friends and devoted himself to nonstop writing of antisemitic tracts.

        Wagner devoted way too much of his energy to anti-Semitic activities, in my opinion. And he was probably the inspiration for Houston Stewart Chamberlain (Wagner’s son-in-law), who inspired Hitler with his anti-Semitic writings.

        On the other hand, Wagner’s favorite conductor (for his own music) was Hermann Levi, a Jew. So whatever the degree of anti-Semitic sentiment Wagner felt, it took a back seat to his artistic needs.

        > On the subject of Wagner, now THERE’S an alpha example for the chateau… seduced everything that walked, for love or money, for his own pleasure and artistic vision… from friends’ wives to Bavarian kings.

        And I consider someone who abandons his own wife, or preys upon the marriages of other men, to be a pig. That was not Wagner’s only piggish inclination, but it’s a good start. If that’s true alpha-male behavior, who needs it?

        > Seems a bit far-fetched that the composer of the Ring, et. al., spent a lot of time stewing over better musicians.

        I’ll go you one further: Wagner was practically worshipped in music circles and had people fawning all over him all the time. So why nurse any resentment at all toward those who refused to drink the Wagnerian Kool-Aid? It was not enough. The Lord Thy Wagner was a jealous god. The difference is that God doesn’t think He’s Wagner.

        Like


      • @Reformed Trombonist

        I disagree with you on Wagner being talented. I think he was awful. To say he was one of the 3 greatest, you’ve got to be kidding me. There were much better composers than him, most of them German, no less. He is garbage compared to them.

        In any case, it’s a matter of taste, although for gregi it’s about loving another antisemite like himself, much like he loves Hit-ler. It has nothing to do with the merits of neither one of them.

        HaHa! I already had this discussion with Gregi before, where he got creamed over Wagner. I love it, how he’s still at it, beating a dead horse.
        Accept it gregi, Wagner was mediocre at best.

        @Gregi

        “Seems a bit far-fetched that the composer of the Ring, et. al., spent a lot of time stewing over better musicians.”

        Don’t act like professional jealousy is really something you never heard of before, gregi. This happens all around us – talented people being less than gracious to each other, except not all of them go into antisemtic tirades like your friends do.

        Other examples of famous rivalries:

        1) Antonio Salieri vs. Wolfgang Mozart
        2) Edison vs. Nikola Tesla
        3) Jenifer Lopez vs. Madonna
        4) Aaron Burr vs. Alexander Hamilton
        5) Ernest Hemingway vs. William Faulkner
        6) Michelangelo vs. Leonardo da Vinci

        The list goes on, but you get my gist, don’t you? As I explained, life is full of jealousies, and it’s the main contributor of conflict. It’s also very personal. For example, after Edison died, Tesla wrote in the NYT, “He had no hobby, cared for no sort of amusement of any kind and lived in utter disregard of the most elementary rules of hygiene.” That’s nasty stuff to write about someone who just passed away.
        .
        Back to Wagner and Mendelssohn. Wagner was extremely jealous of him, and since he wanted to make it personal, he attacked his Juism. The funny thing is, all of Mendelssohn’s family converted to Christianity, yet he still went after his Jusims, which only goes to show that Jooz converting to Christianity doesn’t stop anti-Semitism.
        .
        “The salient point is that our Lily’s premise was that his jealousy of Mendelssohn led to him dropping ALL his ooJish friends and devoted himself to nonstop writing of antisemitic tracts.
        Which I’m sure you’ll agree is utter hogwash.”

        No it’s not. It’s well-documented that he had a strong rivalry with Mendelssohn, and his hate of him spurred his anti-Semitism. You need a lesson in history, fool.

        Like


      • So whatever the degree of anti-Semitic sentiment Wagner felt, it took a back seat to his artistic needs.

        As do we all… listening to a Bacharach CD right now. lulz

        And I consider someone who abandons his own wife, or preys upon the marriages of other men, to be a pig. That was not Wagner’s only piggish inclination, but it’s a good start. If that’s true alpha-male behavior, who needs it?

        You apparently missed my barb at this site’s usual determination of “alpha”.

        Still, these are, shall we say, indiscretions of those who live larger-than-life existences, and far removed from us personally. The fact that you were peeved enough by it to call him a “pig” just reminded me of those with an axe to grind on his account.

        The Lord Thy Wagner was a jealous god. The difference is that God doesn’t think He’s Wagner.

        Nonetheless, even Jehovah is a jealous God, by His own words… guess that “just jealous” stuff is a two-edged sword, eh?

        Hmmmm… it is truly that unusual for a rock star in any day and age to be a megalomaniac? It could be an actual prerequisite for such achievement… but that’s a subject for another day… the issue at hand is it seems quite ridiculous to rail about his long-gone instances of not being a nice guy, in light of the legacy he’s left.

        Silly Lily seems to think my high opinion of his music has been “creamed”.

        From where I sit, it looks like her philistine appraisal is the one that can be used in the churning.

        Like


      • @lily

        > I disagree with you on Wagner being talented. I think he was awful. To say he was one of the 3 greatest, you’ve got to be kidding me. There were much better composers than him, most of them German, no less. He is garbage compared to them.

        The nature of music criticism, such as it is, is that we’re talking about aesthetics, and as we all know, there is no accounting for taste.

        And the nature of music, such as it is, is that there is no such thing as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ music, there is only music that moves us and music that leaves us cold. At least that’s what Dmitri Shostakovich thought. I just happen to agree.

        But there is simply no denying the monumental talent Wagner had. As evidence, I submit that for two generations after Wagner, every composer you’ve ever heard of scrambled, hard and self-consciously, for some way to write original music that escaped Wagner’s influence. That desire, to write original music in Wagner’s wake, led such talents as Schoenberg to defenestrate tonality itself and try to invent a new system, namely the twelve-tone system and atonal music. It led Debussy to invent a form of music that did not rely on functional tonality at all, but to use chords simply for effect — we call it “Impressionism.” Debussy was totally overwhelmed and intimidated by Wagner’s “Parsifal” and the envy it provoked stunted his career.

        I will amend my statement, however: Wagner was one of the *two* greatest. Bach and Wagner. All others, please stand in line outside. Your number will be called.

        This is not the same as saying he is one of my two favorite composers. I love Wagner’s music, but I accept the criticism Verdi gave, that Wagner’s music contains beautiful moments and awful quarter-hours.

        It’s just that the beautiful moments are that amazing.

        My top five personal favorite composers are, in order: Shostakovich, Bruckner, Rimsky-Korsakov, Tchaikovsky, Janacek. Not a one of them would be in any musicologist’s top five rating of most “important” composers. It’s just a question of what I like, not what anyone else says is important.

        Wagner is definitely in the top ten, though. And, as far as I’m concerned, Siefried’s Funeral Music from “Gotterdamerung” is the most beautiful twenty minutes ever committed to manuscript.

        Like


      • +1 on Bruckner.

        +111 on your cogent evaluation, especially on Debussy… although I’m not sure his admiration of/intimidation by Parsifal can account for his having reached his plateau and gone no further. There is, after all, only so much a Frenchman can achieve. 😉

        And don’t tell Lily I like to listen to Carmina Burana now and again.

        Like


      • @ Reformed Trombonist

        I respect your musical taste. I really don’t like much 19th-century classical, save a couple of composers.

        As far as Bach, I agree with you; he was one of the greats.

        It’s just the Wagner’s music doesn’t move me, and Vivaldi’s criticism of it is spot on.

        Sigh…….at least you made Gregi happy. Alas, he needed a ray of sunshine after the thrashing he sustained today.

        Like


      • When an anti-white says something that silly, it’s either psychological projection of white envy or gaslighting.

        http://eyeslevel.comli.com/definitions8_26_13.pdf

        Like


      • Wagner’s genius was adapting existing Nordic Sagas into Operas. He did not write the stories any more than Disney created Snow White. An even better analogy is how Tolkien rewrote various themes from Nordic Mythology to create the Lord of the Rings. Whatever you feel they are as works of art, millions of people still enjoy them because they were updated into a format that was relevant and enjoyable to the people of his time.

        Like


      • Ooh. So you’re anti-Christian, too?

        2: someone who knows their organic existence is more important than some stories in a book

        Like


      • “Ooh. So you’re anti-Christian, too?”

        Not necessarily.

        You and I are in a foxhole fighting anti-whites. I know you’re a Christian, you know I’m not. In a lull in the fighting, we look through our binoculars and see the anti-whites performing a traditional Catholic mass. Can I trust you?

        Like


      • Before Felix Mendelssohn, all of Wagner’s friends were Jooz.

        When did, say, Liszt convert? Although other names escape me at this time, I’m sure I can uncover a gentile or two in the woodpile on Wagner’s Xmas card list.

        After Mendelssohn stated composing music and becoming competition,

        And which of Felix’s operas were considered serious competition to Wagner’s… then or now?

        all of a sudden, Wagner started writing nonstop antisemtic manifestos…

        Nonstop! It’s a wonder he was able to squeeze out a few trifles, like Parsifal, and finish up that other thing he was working on… what was it now…. something about a ring… between those tracts.

        There’s just too much to laugh here.

        Like


      • Jealous of Felix… hmmmmm.

        It’s a wonder, then, that the Protestants didn’t receive the brunt end of Wagner’s ire…

        Or are you saying being ooJish goes beyond one’s chosen religion? llozozlzlzozozlzlzozllz.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 7:44 am יהודה בן יוסף

        Greg you blue eyed untermensch you only speak like that behind the computer say that to my face

        Like


      • If this is your face, I certainly wouldn’t talk behind your back… otherwise I’d think I was viewing a Trabant with the doors open.

        Like


      • This is the most fun I’ve had since Xaviera Hollander’s tupperware party!

        Like


      • Your fake laughter and your fake fun, are just indication of buthurt because I attack all of your heros and show them the lesser men they are. You’re only making a fool of yourself – either you don’t know history, or you just spit out what they teach you in joo-hate school. Either way, it doesn’t bode well for you. Are you really a grown man? Gee, I wonder. I could have sworn you’re younger than me, cuz you act like a retarded teenager.

        I think your Master needs to administer a good licking. You really shouldn’t be allowed to venture out of your cage.

        Does he make you wear a collar?

        Like


      • I assure you, dahling, my laughter and fun are 24 karat genuine.

        Like


      • Wagner a “lesser man”? –Good God, Mendelssohn was a genius, and that’s not even counting his extraordinary chamber output, but who puts him ahead of Wagner? Even Nietzsche’s compliment to Mendelssohn in “Beyond Good and Evil” as the great halcyon intermezzo in German music obviously is a ‘what if?’ and not an objective reordering of the pantheon. Wagner is huge. And most of the great later Romantics– Brahms, Wagner, Tchaikovsky– were contemptuously dismissive of one another. Scorn Wagner’s diatribes as you must, they certainly are not the product of artistic frustration. Wagner preferred to write Songs With Words.

        Lily, you are such a dull white 10th grade college prep tennybopper.

        Like


      • “This is the most fun I’ve had since Xaviera Hollander’s tupperware party!”

        You mean, since you’ve started taking Viagra. Wifey must not be delivering the goods. I told you to look for a second wife.

        Like


      • That jest fell flaccid.

        Like


      • Is this the war of the jests, as opposed to the war of the roses?

        Like


      • Heh, heh… war?

        Your lances are but straws… be it in matters political or comedy.

        Indeed, like most dames, you just… aren’t… funny. lulz

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 10:43 am יהודה בן יוסף

        where are you from you fat american subhuman?

        Like


      • Watch that “american” stuff, Schlomo. I almost felt insulted.

        Like


      • I am not trying to be funny, hun, just making fun of you. It seems there is extreme butthurt, I detect.

        I know how to push your buttons, babe. Count your blessings I haven’t called you DickyLicky in this thread. I don’t want it to be empty insults like you result to. I like to debate you on your empty points, which you can’t defend because you have no viable argument.

        You’re a big loser, gregi. Face!

        Like


      • “where are you from you fat american subhuman?”

        Most Americans aren’t fat subhuman, just the n-NZ and WN-trash variety. Please don’t lump all Americans with this trash.

        Like


      • Butthurt seems to be one of your favorite words… laughable in that you come off here sounding like you’re undergone hemorrhoid surgery.

        You’re funnier when you’re not trying to be.

        Like


      • I know how to push your buttons, babe.

        Another example of your inimitable wit?

        Your buttons are getting hit harder than Macy’s elevators on Black Friday.

        Like


      • I don’t need to try being funny, gergi. With you, it just flows like your denial river in Egypt.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 3:36 pm Carlos Danger

        Don’t show your age. She’s a YKW you know.

        Like


      • Don’t show your age. She’s a YKW you know.

        I was hoping (yet) another jest had not fallen flat… sigh.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 7:55 am Hammer of Love

        Listen you dumb screeching banshee, take you putrid hamster hole and go scream your non-sequiturs somewhere else. I told you before to present some verifiable, facts, citations, and quotes to back up your inane ramblings or shut the fuck up.

        To quote you ” everyone who dis-likes the Joos is jealous of them “. Yes Lilith, you nailed that one, whoaaa , some deep thinking you got going there troll. You sound like a goddamn preschooler. Let me provide you with a verifiable list of countries, cultures, ethnic groups, and races who’ve kicked the Joos out of their lands. I guess they were all jealous of the them, right ?? You are one dumb troll.

        http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/HistoryJewishPersecution/

        Like


      • Another review of the book The Israel Test / George Gilders is dedicated to all the joo haters. Read it and weep. Hopefully, you’ll understand that you’re not fooling anyone.

        “Gilder argues that Anti-Zionism is driven by the same phenomena that have always promoted antisemitism: ignorance of economics and envy. This emotion manifests in the hatred of traders, entrepreneurs, bankers and other wealth creators that exists wherever a minority economically distinguishes itself.

        Ordinary people do not normally harbor this resentment; the intelligentsia does and often manages to spread it to society at large through the notions that poverty results from ‘exploitation,’ that resources are limited and that therefore the wealth of some is the cause of others’ poverty.

        That’s why Israel divides the world. Its opponents in the West, concentrated at the UN, transnational bodies and the humanities departments of academia, are those who consider capitalism as a zero-sum game in which success is attained at the expense of the poor & the environment. On the other side are those who admire success and recognize that everyone benefits by the accomplishments of achievers. Antisemitism is similarly a zero-sum delusion. Collectivists and their apologists envy Jews since they’re unable to emulate them; they therefore attempt to destroy that which accentuates their own failure. The author shows how Jewish entrepreneurs and scientists like Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Heinrich Hertz, John von Neumann and Richard Feynman helped to bring about the IT-revolution that provides the matrix of our modern prosperity.

        Gilder profiles contemporary Israeli scientists and entrepreneurs, especially those in physics and information technology. They are the minds behind Israel’s gifts to the world, some of which are highlighted in the book Israel in the World: Changing Lives Through Innovation by Helen and Douglas Davis. Israel in fact leads the world in per-capita innovation as proved by a 2008 Deloitte & Touche survey indicating that the Jewish State outperformed all but the United States in software, telecoms, microchips, biopharmaceuticals, medical devices and clean energy. The country’s growth since the 1990s is primarily due to (a) immigration of freedom-loving people from the former Soviet Union (b) immigration from the USA of people with business acumen and entrepreneurial skills (c) economic reforms that reduced taxes, regulations and state ownership, for which Benjamin Netanyahu deserves much credit. The author holds the current prime minister in high esteem, viewing him as the right leader for our times.

        After the 6-day war of 1967 Israelis started settling in the Territories, establishing an infrastructure of education, electricity, water & medical care. During Israeli rule, the economy in these areas surged by about 25% annually; growth surpassed that of Israel itself which was still shackled by statist thought. Palestinian life expectancy increased significantly as did their numbers, while the median income tripled. All of this came to a halt when the West and the United Nations forced the return of Arafat and his terrorists. The Palestinian Authority became the globe’s prime per capita consumer of foreign aid as billions of dollars were squandered on maintaining a culture of corruption, blame, victimhood and dependency.

        The reader is reminded that peace necessitates the imposition of penalties on aggression. Those who justify terrorism against a democracy that respects the rule of law and then condemn the inevitable retaliatory defense are supporters of barbarism and tyranny. THERE’S A LINK BETWEEN EUROPEAN ANTISEMITISM AND PALESTINIANISM AS DOCUMENT BY CHUCK MORSE AND OTHERS. Haj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, was an ally of the Nazis and a participant in the Shoah/Holocaust. Unsurprisingly, Arafat was an ardent promoter of Mein Kampf. In addition, antisemitic stereotypes disgrace the Arab media whilst the Iranian proxies Hamas and Hezbollah openly proclaim their genocidal goals.

        Gilder has identified the core issue and its consequences, revealing why Israel separates the free-market USA from statist Western Europe, individualists from collectivists and those who oppose high taxes from those in favor of big government. This line of demarcation broadly corresponds with the ideological divide between statism and classical liberalism. In psychological terms the book illuminates two opposing world-views, two incompatible mentalities — the mind which considers resources as finite & limited, versus the mind that engages reality in an endless creative process. Meticulously researched and well-written, The Israel Test is a work of outstanding discernment and clarity.

        Like


      • Did the local Country Buffet run out of self-serve?

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 7:00 am Jochen Peiper

        But this fellow completely ignores YKW interference in their host societies to control them in their favor. This is just telling YKW what they want to hear and strokes their egos by reinforcing their standard narrative. He completely ignores the YKW -Communist conspiracy that all of them deny exists when its as plain as the nose on your face. This is the true source of anti-semitism. If every YKW were like Peter Schiff or Michael Levin, I’d convert tomorrow. However, they aren’t. A few very powerful ones are trying to subvert the nation and turn it away from our noble experiment by manipulating the economically ignorant.If this is to be a power struggle between YKW and Germanic peoples, then lets throw down. However, stealing the game before it’s played doesn’t sit well with most of us and rightly breeds resentment.

        Like


      • Jochen Peiper,

        “But this fellow completely ignores YKW interference in their host societies to control them in their favor.”

        Because that’s your emotional perception of the Jooz; it’s not necessarily true. Your perception is more delusion than reality.
        .

        “He completely ignores the YKW -Communist conspiracy that all of them deny exists when its as plain as the nose on your face. This is the true source of anti-semitism.”

        Because it is only a conspiracy theory, not reality. Some Jooz might be communists, but then many non-jooz are communists too. It’s not a Juish communist conspiracy against white gentiles. That’s just an excuse to hate Jooz when the real reason is envy.

        It’s not a Juish conspiracy. Rather, it’s a struggle between two world views:

        1) People who push collectivism, feminism, homosexuality, big government to regulate everything and equalize everyone
        2) Freedom-loving people who like small government, protecting the family, and following a strict reading of the Constitution.

        There are jooz and gentiles in both of these groups. It’s unfortunate that some of you think the Jooz are all in group one and they have devised a plan against whites.
        .

        “A few very powerful ones are trying to subvert the nation and turn it away from our noble experiment by manipulating the economically ignorant.”

        BINGO!!!!! You’re proving my point for me. Notice how you are only focusing on the “powerful Jooz” and not on all the powerful gentiles that have a similar agenda. And, look how you say “manipulating the economically ignorant.” This is exactly the author’s argument:

        “Antisemitism is “ignorance of economics and envy. This emotion manifests in the hatred of traders, entrepreneurs, bankers and other wealth creators that exists wherever a minority economically distinguishes itself.
        Ordinary people do not normally harbor this resentment; the intelligentsia does and often manages to spread it to society at large through the notions that poverty results from ‘exploitation,’ that resources are limited and that therefore the wealth of some is the cause of others’ poverty.”
        .

        “If this is to be a power struggle between YKW and Germanic peoples,”

        BINGO!!!!!!! You’re proving my point for me again.

        I warned not to substitute Joo for lefty or liberal, because it’s going to encourage a useless war against the jooz, as opposed to resolving our cultural issues. No, it’s not a war between the Germanic people and the Jooz, or the Aryans and the jooz, or whites and the Jooz. It’s a struggle between two opposing world views. We need to focus on the real enemy.

        Why do you think Hit-ler was unsuccessful? Because of his useless contention against the Jooz. If he really wanted to solve social and cultural issues, he would have not brought the word Joo into it. He would have fought the Communists, without making it personal against the Jooz. Every time you make it personal against the jooz, you’ll lose. Remember, those Jooz have survived 4,000 years so far, and no hater in history has been able to eradicate them.

        Besides, why are you still fighting Hit-ler’s war for him? It’s been 70 years and you Germans are still at it. I find it quite interesting that all the guys of German decent raised in the USA are the most anti-Semitic commentators here. Just some food for thought for you.

        Anyway, I recommend you read the book, or at least some of the reviews to gain some insight, as opposed to only reading WN propaganda on the Internet that fill your head with the stuff you just spewed here.

        Like


      • “Let me provide you with a verifiable list of countries, cultures, ethnic groups, and races who’ve kicked the Joos out of their lands. I guess they were all jealous of the them, right ?? You are one dumb troll.”

        Yes. Joo hate stems from either envy or religious zealotry.

        The jooz live apart, practicing their own religion. That doesn’t bode well for them with the locals that view them as outsiders. Religious zealots trying to convert the Jooz end up empty handed. That foments anger towards the Jooz.

        In addition, Jooz usually rise to the highest of levels in all field, often becoming advisors, doctors, economists to kings and leaders of state. This acquires them power, which in turns foments envy.

        Finally, since Jouish emancipation in Europe took place, jooz rose to the highest levels in all fields – medicine, physics, philosophy, the arts etc…..and that has fomented strong hatred by lesser achievers who claimed the Jooz are trying to control the world. The Protocols of Zion came out just a little bit after full joo-emancipation occurred in Europe, as it became clear jooz excel in all fields and on all fronts.

        BTW, it’s noteworthy that most of the places where jooz lived (in your link), they were first invited there by the locals. From ancient Egypt, to Poland in the 1500s, to England in the 1600s, to America in the 1700s…..and once the Jooz immigrate and live in their new home for a while, the cycle repeats itself. They become rich as well as they rise to power, the locals become jealous of them, the locals persecute them, usually sparked by some envious leader who uses his Joo hate to rally people to his side so he could seize power, and the Jooz leave.

        It’s also worth mentioning that every place Jooz move to, prosperity followed. When Jooz left Spain, it slumped. The only thing saving it was the New world, without which Spain would have become a complete disaster. The NZs drove the Jooz to America and that’s why the American movie business, advertising, computer business took off in America.

        The Jooz are cultural and creativity leaders, and they go where they are treated best, and where they can create the most money and success.

        The Jooz are tremendous economic and academic benefit to the countries they settle. They develop industries and business that white gentiles don’t. The Juish story is the success and failure of nations. It is well-documented.

        Some people like to emulate success and some envy it. The enviers tend to be antisemties. Unfortunately, they frequent manosphere blogs because they think they are enlightened.

        As I said, the jooz go where they are treated best. Well, there is a mass exit to Israel now. Jooz returning back and taking all their money, economic power, knowledge, and creativity back with them. It’s going to leave America naked. Israel is on its way to becoming the world’s next economic super power.

        Here is an interesting prospective from someone else, who essentially says everything I said here repeatedly.

        The Israel test/ George Gilder’s

        http://www.amazon.com/dp/0980076358/?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=27841674678&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=7804907262007874012&hvpone=34.97&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_e6q1nkgdn_b

        “Israel is the crucial battlefield for Capitalism and Freedom in our time.
        George Gilder’s global best-seller Wealth and Poverty made the moral case for capitalism. Now Gilder makes the case for Israel, portraying a conflict of barbarism and envy against civilization and creativity.

        Gilder reveals Israel as a leader of human civilization, technological progress, and scientific advance. Tiny Israel stands behind only the United States in its contributions to the hi-tech economy. Israel has become the world’s paramount example of the blessings of freedom.

        Hatred of Israel, like anti-Semitism through history, arises from resentment of Joo success. Rooted in a Marxist zero-sum-game theory of economics, this vision has fueled the anti-Semitic rantings of Hitler, Arafat, Osama, and history’s other notorious haters.

        Faced with a contest between murderous regimes sustained by envy and NZ ideology, and a free, prosperous, and capitalist, Israel—whose side are you on?

        Like


      • >implying Israel has any justification for it’s existence
        >implying Israel didn’t just take half of Palestine without asking Palestines for permission
        >implying Kikes don’t rape western culture through their influence

        I don’t care about regular kikes. Elite kikes are parasites. They have high IQs and are very tribal. A terrible combo. (their religion which openly states that goyim are their livestock doesn’t help either. At least muslims simply give permission for slaughter if infidels attack them)

        If goyim are just jealous, how come nobody hates Asians as much? They are just as hardworking and intelligent. They are the only ones who can outjew you. Why don’t we hate them?

        They leave our culture alone, that’s why.

        Like


      • Hasn’t lily claimed to be non-Jewish? It is obvious, after her comments in this thread that she is jewish. People don’t like jews because they are jealous? Ha ha. That is straight from jewish supremacist thinking. It is always other people who are to blame- Jews are blameless!! A perfect people, don’t you know!!

        It is difficult to believe people actually think like this. But it’s true. Jews actually think like this.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 5:54 pm Hammer of Love

        Like I said before, Lily the bitch, sounds like a damn preschooler with that comment. Its almost like a student saying that he got all F’s, on a report card, because all the teachers hate him.

        Like


      • @Hammer

        Angry much? 😀

        You are fast becoming my new Greg Eliot – someone to embarrass daily.

        Like


      • So they are a band of traveling parasites that follow gentiles around to “compete” with them in their own lands? And they should be unquestioningly welcomed into each of these foreign homes? I see…….

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 3:35 pm Carlos Danger

        Lily, you need to differentiate between hatred and criticism. I hate no one and wish no one ill. I for one am rather accomplished and successful myself. I’m also happy and well adjusted. But we are under a silent coup and that needs to be discussed lest it happen and we know nothing of it before its too late. Given how much YKW uses the bully pulpits of media, legal, and financial control to insult white Gentiles to undermine them and squelches bad press or even the right to question YKW folklore passed off as unadulterated historical truth, I’d say our response is mild and tenuous and even still finding its legs.

        Voltaire was correct: If you wish to know who truly rules over you, find out whom you may not criticize.

        Like


      • Wrong, Carlos.

        I have no problems with criticizing. However, what most do here is spreading bullshit conspiracy theories like the Elders of Zion meant to foment hatred.

        If you stuck to the issues, without crazy charges, I could agree with you. Otherwise, those WN youtube video and the WN publications slanting every bit of news in an anti-Juish direction isn’t criticizing.
        It’s attempting to purposely substitute Joo for lefty.
        .
        “Given how much YKW uses the bully pulpits of media, legal, and financial control to insult white Gentiles to undermine them”

        See, this is what I mean. You actually think there is a conspiracy of Jooz against white gentiles. You’re crazy.

        There is a struggle in the world between two opposing philosophies: leftism and conservatism.

        There are Jooz arguing for both sides, although in America more Jooz are on the side of the left. That doesn’t make the left a juish movement though. More lefties are non-Jooz than Jooz, as Jooz are only 2% of the US population.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:00 pm Hammer of Love

        ” See, this is what I mean. You actually think there is a conspiracy of Jooz against white gentiles. You’re crazy. ”

        Your making this to easy Lilith, From the Jooish horses mouth ……………………..

        http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/

        http://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat.html

        http://mondoweiss.net/2013/05/influence-cultural-politics.html

        Like


  5. “The Young Hitler that I Knew” was published in 1955. You can get a free ebook version here: http://archive.org/details/TheYoungHitlerIKnew

    Like


    • Thanks you! For a minute, I thought it as newly revealed material, and wondered how old THAT guy had to be by now 🙂

      Like


  6. Fascinating post.

    Only problem I have is that Germany was such a basketcase during the Weimar era that if it weren’t Hitler who took control, it could have been someone else (Communist, Monarchist, Fascist, etc) who might have been dangerously more competent when it came to using the German military. Had he been a Communist, and allied with Stalin against the West, that combo may have been unstoppable. Hitler may very well have been the best of all possible bad scenarios.

    Like


    • The German industrial interests backed him in the election of 1933 because they were more afraid of the Communists, who were stronger in Germany than anywhere else in Europe at the time, and they thought they could control him.

      Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 3:50 pm Carlos Danger

        Stalin was actively working to subvert Germany as the birthplace of Communism with the help of the YKW dominated Communist parties of both nations. The association with Communism was a big reason for German distrust of YKW. If only he had nailed the Frankfurt School when he had the chance.

        Like


    • Yesssss!!!

      Bad things are not caused by bad men, but rather by environments in which bad men rise to power.

      Like


    • “Had he been a Communist, and allied with Stalin against the West, that combo may have been unstoppable. Hitler may very well have been the best of all possible bad scenarios.”

      This is just wishful thinking. East Germany became communist, so what? It turned back 45 years later. Germany becoming communist is infinitely better than the hell Hit-ler made the world taste for almost 14 years.

      The truth is Hit-ler wasn’t good for Germany and didn’t save anything. Just gave Germans a bad name, forever synonymous with genocide, not to mention a guilty conscience. Furthermore, Hit-ler’s actions have ramifications till this day, because his actions are used to push liberal agendas such as immigration, egalitarianism, equality of races and the sexes and for gays, affirmative action, etc….Who needs it? Everything he supposedly stood for, backfired on the west.

      That’s why I constantly admonish people not to substitute jooz for liberals, because it will not resolve our cultural problems, and will only backfire in the end.

      Of course, joo haters who have that as an agenda don’t really care about our cultural problems.

      Like


      • How can you be against cultural marxism yet deny that it’s like 80% Jews perpetuating it.

        Like


      • Because Jooz are .00001 of world population, and .02 of the US population. Yet the whole world is Marxist in one way or another (communism or socialism). That means that most Marxists are not Juish.

        Also, there is one Juish country in the world, and hundreds of non- juish countries, and they are all Marxists save for America, and believe it or not, save for that one Juish country, Israel. Israel has evolved out of Marxism, but America is sadly falling into it.

        Anyway, the entire earth is following Marxism in one form or another, and it’s because there are many, many, many, more non-joo Marxists as there as jooz.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 2:44 pm Carlos Danger

        You completely leave out the Soviet Union’s efforts to subvert the rest of the world, especially the West and the US. Who controlled the Soviet Union’s Communist party? We don’t need to answer that, YKW. Opinion making and setting people and organizations were co-opted first in the West, which is according to the Gramsci and Frankfurt School plan. The USSR budgeted 80% of the KGBs budget for external subversion and worked closely with operatives in targeted countries, like the CPUSA and their hundreds of front groups in the US, once again dominated by YKW. So, although they are a small percentage, they are influential. And we aren’t even talking about but a small fraction of this 2%. Most YKWs are completely innocent of this and are merely following their lives as the rest of us do. But there is a committed core of activist revolutionaries and a number of well to do sympathizers who are behind the current, intensified efforts to subvert the US.

        Like


      • “Who controlled the Soviet Union’s Communist party? We don’t need to answer that, YKW.”

        Wrong!!!!! That’s your perception.
        .

        “And we aren’t even talking about but a small fraction of this 2%. Most YKWs are completely innocent of this and are merely following their lives as the rest of us do. But there is a committed core of activist revolutionaries and a number of well to do sympathizers who are behind the current, intensified efforts to subvert the US.”

        Correct, but it’s important to note that these Jooz you say are activists, are fringe left, except, they are not the only ones in the fringe left. Many, many, gentiles make up this group. I still can’t see how you accuse the entire Jouish people.

        There are tons of gentiles running countries, universes, institutions, and other entities who are more lefty than Che Guevara. The left is not just a Jousih movement.

        Like


      • Of course alot of goyim are cultural marxist. But their participation isn’t disproportionate. Whenever somebody makes ridiculous claims in the spear head of cultural marxism it’s a Jew. anti-white sentiments and “white privilege” is perpetuated by Jews. Feminism is perpetuated by Jews. Because you are one of them you cannot see this.

        I am a muslim who can admit that my people are like orcs. Maybe you should admit that your people are like parasites.

        Like


      • Clearly you are a member of the tribe.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 2:49 pm Carlos Danger

        The really sad thing is the YKW have 2-3 times the Nazis’ blood on their hands from the Russian revolution, post revolution, civil war and the resulting Holodomor. That’s what control of the media can do for you.

        Like


      • NZ sympathizers often claim Jooz were responsible for the Russain Revolution, and Holodomor in particular, to justify NZ crimes against Jooz.

        Yet, they never mourn the 60-million people killed in Europe as a result of German aggression.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 7:05 am Jochen Peiper

        So you admit that there is blood on YKWs hands?

        Like


      • No, not at all. What I am saying is that the Russian Revolution and Holodomor, weren’t Jusih plots to kill White Gentiles. Yes, some Jooz were part of the Russian Revolution to overthrow the Czar, and some Jooz worked in the Russian Government when Holodomor happened, but it doesn’t mean the Jooz deliberately created these historic events to kill white gentiles.

        In contrast, the H-cuast was a deliberate plot by Germans to kill Jooz. Almost all of Germany participated in this mass murder in some way or another, through support and through direct killing of Jooz.

        To add insult to injury, antisemeties and NZ sympathizers try to justify Germany’s Juish mass murder in WW2 through the marginal participation of Jooz in the Russian Revolution and Holodomor. It’s bullcrap.

        And even more absurd and evil is how antisemeties and NZ sympathizers mourn the supposed Jusih victims of the Russian Revolution and Holodomor, but not the 60-million victims of WW2 that were killed directly or indirectly through German hands.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 7:06 pm Carlos Danger

        Lily,

        read the entry in the Encyclopedia Judaica about Jewish participation in the Bolshevik Movement. It was central and dominant and they are proud of the fact. The Holodomor was indeed a planned and deliberate act at least one year in advance and it was done to destroy the Ukrainian national identity. OGPU and NKVD Cadres carrying out the Holodomor were 75% YKW at least. Their leadership was 100% YKW. No Lily, God’s Chosen People murdered some 20 million of my wife’s people by starving them to death at gunpoint. I’d say their role in that genocide was central, deliberate, and premeditated. Perhaps the Holocaust was God’s swift justice for this crime?

        The Communist Party membership never dropped below 65% YKW in the USSR. KGB, NKVD, OGPU and Chekist cadres were always dominated by YKW. That YKW revolutionary zeal caused millions more to be murdered in labor camps and they also exported it with a missionary fervor everywhere in the world. Read “In Stalin’s Secret Service.” for starters. That same network remains, three generations later and has been slowly subverting the nation and deliberately displacing the traditional people of the US. Most of them are YKW as well. This business about White privilege and the constant insults against White men and people in the media stems from exactly this crowd. It is meant to devalue us and to displace us. This is why I’m angry. I feel betrayed and awe struck at such naked contempt for us.

        Like


    • There is good historical documentation that Stalin supported the rise of the Nazi’s in Germany. Through the Comintern, Moscow was trying to subvert all Western governments, including Germany. The Nazi’s were people what Stalin thought he could do business with. The German Communists tried to warn Stalin.

      The point of reading history, and most importantly contemporary accounts by participants, is that events are much more interesting and complicated and driven by human foibles than you would ever realize by reading the dry accounts written by historians years after the events. As the wag said:

      “History? An account of what never happened by a man who wasn’t there.”

      Any reading of the Nazi era would make it obvious that the Nazi’s were betas with women. They were idealists in the beginning, putting German women on pedestals, for example. So, when the pick up alphas disparage betas, they are often disparaging men who might someday be controlling their fates. Lack of success with women can drive those passions into other directions, not always socially beneficial.

      All betas, including recovered betas, should thank the Chateau for the tremendous service he has provided.

      BTW, for some serious historical revisionism, why don’t you think about why the invasion of Finland by Russian was OK, but when Germany and Russia invaded Poland, England and France declared war on Germany. Not on Russia. It’s like, you know, they were really just anti-German all along. And, the truly despicable actions of Germany lay in the future, after 1939, while the despicable government of Russia had engaged in atrocities for the two decades prior to 1939, including genocide (Ukraine) and global efforts to destabilize all non-Communist governments. At that time, Communist meant subservient to Moscow.

      The brain washed haters of Nazis and admirers of the Communists, which include many of our leftists and feminists, will spew venom when being told this. Their irrational response is no different than their response when the truth about women and game is pointed out to them. Deluded people.

      When you see the truth, and, most importantly, accept the truth, whether about women or history or anything else, you can sleep so much better at night. And, enjoy the success which has eluded you in the past.

      Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 2:52 pm Carlos Danger

        Good post. All true. Ever since Germany became unified, both Britain and France have conspired to keep it down. That’s no longer viable.

        Like


  7. I think that’s pretty solid omega, not beta. That’s school shooter/mass murderer omega (proven fact, right?). And the mass murder part fits too (omega). I think you are too hard on or have a different definition of beta. Betas do talk to girls, have sex with them, get married, have kids, avoid becoming mass murderers or rapists. In today’s world, a greater beta might have a notch count close to 10 to 20 or so before getting married. Or at least 3 to 5. IMO. Violent stuff like that, never even talking to her *at all*….that’s omega IMO. Does Hitler qualify as whatever is lower than omega in some people’s systems? Whatever that is….

    Betas are the fathers of the elementary school kids who got to work their office jobs after dropping the kids off at school. Some of them got a good bit of pussy in their 20s before they got married and became victims of divorce theft or just their wife getting fat and boring. Even betas lose their virginity by sophomore year of college if they go to any normal 4 year university.

    Omegas go shoot up the school where the betas’ kids are trying to simply be kids.

    Like


    • Agree.

      Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 9:35 pm anonymous does not forgive

      >Betas are the supposed fathers of the elementary school kids (who are actually fathered by the alphas their wives secretly cheat on them with) who got to work their office jobs after dropping the kids off at school.

      ftfy

      Like


  8. Hitler did nothing wrong. Don’t believe jew lies.

    Like


    • ? So invading Poland was what? Just for fun?

      Like


    • Kubizek is a Czech name,now jewish.

      Like


    • Dying in a bunker hated by all, after leaving the country you claimed to cherish above all in shambles; is doing nothing wrong???

      And, obsessing over some rather average broad for 4 YEARS, without saying a word to her, is nothing wrong????

      Whether that dude ever succeeded in doing anything at all right, is a more reasonable question.

      Like


      • Dying in a bunker hated by all, after leaving the country you claimed to cherish above all in shambles; is doing nothing wrong???

        You’ve been watching too many allied propaganda flicks. The Germans idolized him for the good he had done, the Pope blessed his crusade in the East.

        Watch “The Greatest Story Never Told” by TruthWillOut1001 on youtube for a truer idea of Hitler.

        Like


      • “You’ve been watching too many allied propaganda flicks.”
        But your WN videos on youtube aren’t propaganda, eh?
        .
        “the Pope blessed his crusade in the East. “
        Don’t drag the pope into the evil you call good. I doubt he would praise a mass murderer.

        Like


      • Dude, do you honestly believe a bunch of Germans starving and freezing in the bombed out ruins of their country after WW2, about to be locked up behind a Berlin Wall, thought Hitler had done a lot of “good?”

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 4:03 pm Carlos Danger

        I’ve known a lot of Germans. They are obedient to a fault. He had majority popular support until the end of the war, but a lot of people thought he was a dick. I’ve known people who thought the Nazi regime was a good thing, but even they didn’t think so much of Hitler because he was too headstrong to listen to his most excellent general staff. Gauleiters could also be a major PIA and irritated people as well.

        The inner circles looked like a bunch of stooges and sycophants at the end. Read what Leon Degrelle says about Himmler, for instance. His general staff looked down on Hitler as a dilettante, and when he started shooting good men with his anti-desertion death squads, he lost a lot of points with the troops.

        Like


    • Except hand over the Western world to the multicult and the orc hordes by his idiocy. No, nothing at all.

      Like


      • What kind of retarded logic is that? So if I destroy your country and make up lies about you afterwards to justify my own plans, it’s your fault?

        Like


      • I’m saying that he threw the war. And even if he didn’t, he was a complete dumbass who shouldn’t ever have been the leader of a country.

        Like


      • Hitler was one of the most successful military leaders in world history. The fact that he was defeated by 3 superpowers ganging up on him does not prove he was a dumbass.

        Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 7:34 pm Carlos Danger

        Hitler led a first rate general staff and a first rate army. He hindered their success more than anything else.

        Like


      • “Hitler led a first rate general staff and a first rate army. He hindered their success more than anything else.”

        David Irving’s book “Hitlers War” debunked this myth a long time ago. It was required reading at West Point for several years until Irving became associated with Holocaust denial and it was removed for being politically incorrect.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 4:05 pm Carlos Danger

        Read Lost Victories by a real general.

        Like


      • corvinus, the recent meta-biography by Stolfi takes an interesting angle on Hitler’s war aims. He argues that Hitler’s primary concern in almost every direction was to establish defensible borders around the natural resources (iron, coal) necessary to preserve the German nation. Thus he slowed or thwarted blitzkried attacks in the west and diverted what could have been an occupation of Moscow into a petty thrust at the Ukraine.

        Like


      • “Except hand over the Western world to the multicult and the orc hordes by his idiocy. No, nothing at all.”

        Well said.

        And let’s not forget his actions resulted in the murder of over 60-million people, most of them not Jooz. This clown above doesn’t care about them? 20 million of them were German.

        Point is, that awful war was useless and never achieved anything positive for western civilization, if anything it hindered western civilization. Hit-ler only made Europe worse. The Hague war crimes tribunal, came about because of that war, is a hoax. Now this court is being turned against the USA; our generals and leaders being charged for war crimes.

        European countries also opened their borders paranoidly trying to be less racists after WW1. The lsit goes on. Hit-ler ended backfiring on the west.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 4:07 pm Carlos Danger

        This is true. The Nazis hastened what they sought to prevent. On a metaphysical level, this little drama is still playing itself out.

        Like


      • Which is why I admonish the Joo haters not to substitute Jooz for lefties.

        Yes, indeed, many lefties are jooz, but, also, many lefites are not Jooz.

        Therefore, leftism isn’t a Juish thing. It’s a mindset, which afflicts many types of people from all backgrounds.

        Another thing, both the Marxists and the NZs had much in common. They were really just 2 sides of the same coin. In addition, today’s liberalism has much in common with both the communist and fascist agendas, even down to environmentalism. The NZs were notorious environmentalists and animal rights fanatics. They cared more about animals than about human beings, just like today’s liberals.
        .
        I’m pleasantly surprised that you are not drinking the Hit-ler Kool-Aid.

        Like


      • Yes, for giving someone sufficient motivation to waste 5 years and untold lives and treasure just to destroy your country. Without first making sure you can defend your darned self against those thus motivated.

        Like


      • None-sense.
        Only fools who have never studied Hitler hate the man. Considering how well informed you are regarding Cultural Marxism, it surprises me that you demonstrate such ignorance of National Socialism and what Hitler accomplished in Germany in the 1930’s.

        Like


  9. I have to wonder how much of the memoir is really just heavily adulterated slander by ykw. Regardless, i doubt he had any trouble tapping ass as an all powerful dictator.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 3:15 pm Carlos Danger

      Hitler’s sexual tastes were, shall we say, complex. Hitler was not promoted to NCO because he had an ongoing homosexual affair with another member of the company he was assigned to. This was made public in a German historian’s book published about twelve years ago. His company commander was on record in justifying his refusal to send an Iron Cross winner to the NCO academy that Hitler was not fit for NCO duties due to his “homosexual proclivities”. His First Sergeant also made similar comments in writing, referring to Hitler’s lover as a “man-whore”. It is also believed he called for the Night of the Long Knives to do away with Ernst Rohm, who was the head of the SA, and a screaming faggot, albeit a violent one, because he knew too much about Hitler’s perversions. Hitler was popular with the ladies as a politician, but there are not many stories about his lovers prior to Eva Braun. He seems to have led a mostly celibate existence or had sex with prostitutes or participated in Ernst Rohm’s sex parties. It is known that he seldom, if ever, touched Eva sexually. Those who admired Hitler in his day, admired him for his vast intellectual curiosity, understanding of world history and politics and fascination with technological advances. Leon Degrelle wrote an interesting essay on the man as are von Manstein’s comments on him in Lost Victories.

      German YKWs were disliked in the general populace for the same reasons they are criticized in the US.

      Like


      • Hitler was not promoted to NCO because he had an ongoing homosexual affair with another member of the company he was assigned to.

        As I’ve said before, most fags are actually omegas who take the easy way out.

        Like


      • There is no evidence of Hitler being a faggot.

        Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 4:09 pm Carlos Danger

        Memos from his company commander and 1SG are pretty damning evidence. These were supposedly located in the unit’s military records in the Bundesarchiv. The reason its not better known is because YKW’s latest darlings, the Gay lobby doesn’t want that particular historical figure being a homo. I lived in Germany for many years after that book was published and no one ever called it into disrepute.

        Like


      • Bullshit. Produce the source of these “memos”… I took a few in-depth courses back in my college days… we’re talking 400 level… and never heard of such a thing.

        They’ve been trying to pin the one-testicle/latent homo stories on Hitler for decades. If they had any reasonable evidence it would have been trumpeted from the rooftops from 1933 onward… can you imagine the wartime propaganda coupe on this side of the pond if there was one scintilla of evidence that he could have been queer? They weren’t a protected lot back then as they are now.

        As far as these I Knew Hitler memoirs, well… note the red herring nudge-nudge mentions of “possibly Jewish” girl infatuation.

        Like


      • We’re going to have to have the source of those memos… I always suspect these relatively recent uncoverings of documentation from a period that has been placed under a microscope by every credited and uncredited historian for over half-a-century.

        Like


      • Given how much the PTB/YKW’s love fags these days, if there actually was evidence Hitler was a fag, you can bet they would do their darndest to hide it.

        Like


      • That sort of info would have been known as far back as the 1920’s… and in the 1930’s, there was no “protected class” of queers, so the anti-Hitler propaganda machine would have had a field day with this sort of information, if there was one scintilla of evidence as to its veracity.

        Like


      • In the 1930s, faggotry was also considered too disgusting to even mention in the mainstream media.

        Like


      • When it came to Hitler, nothing was too disgusting to mention. And with all the volumes of biographical and WWII-related books released in subsequent decades, word would have gotten out toute de suite.

        Like


      • There is evidence he was a fag. The 3rd Reich seem to have an unhealthy admiration of the male form. It shows in its art and music, especially in incorporating the Greek love affair of the male body. Greeks were known for being homosexuals, which is why they constructed the most gorgeous male statues ever seen. The 3rd Reich picked up where ancient Greece left off.

        Here is an interesting video about this issue.

        sorry, Greg, I know your Hit-ler worship is preventing you from accepting anything derogatory about your god. The way you defend him is embarrassing.

        Like


      • Greeks were known for being homosexuals…

        Again, she shows her uncanny ability to capture the essence of hundreds of years of history in a single phrase!

        Lily, speaking of embarrassing and naked statues, I think you’ve shown your ass here quite enough now.

        Like


      • Are we in pain, NZ?
        Have I maligned your hero too much to your liking?
        Are you sweating in angst? 😀

        Like


      • And of course, dumb ass Lily posts a video by this Lothar Machtan whose book Carlos Danger was touting… said ooJ/queer author’s agenda already having been called out.

        An author touting his own agenda does not constitute corroboration, silly girl.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


      • Called out by you, doesn’t count, NZ.

        Like


      • I had decided not to comment but sweet lord, our moronic stupid interpretation of the past at least in this post, is grounds enough for you to stfu and go cook in the kitchen. Greek sculpture….male form…. male sculpture…..faggots….gay….homo ad infinitum, you are qualified to talk about shit you don’t understand.

        Like


      • How else to explain the fabulous boots?

        Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 4:22 pm Carlos Danger

        Hugo Boss designed them.

        Like


      • The love of his life was Angela (“Geli”) Raubal. They were lovers long before he met Eva Braun. When Geli shot herself Adolf was totally devastated and a hair’s breadth from killing himself too.

        Like


      • Damn, so this poor sap was a faggot who couldn’t muster up the courage to speak to his teen obsession; but was still somehow infatuated with some suicidal broad…..

        What about applying Occam’s Razor to all this. It’s all crap, and there will always be people who like to make crazy claims about famous people.

        And Ole Adolf was never more than some introverted dude that cared vastly more about building great castles in the sky, than about pretty much anything else; including girls, or boys.

        Like


      • Exactly. Most of this is just slander by ykw against anyone who sees them for who and what they are.

        Like


      • I don’t particularly kw, but as far as I’m concerned, some guys like to drink bear, play baseball and chase girls; others eat steak, drive sportscars and listen to classic rock; and yet again others to recite rousing speeches, conquering the world and killing Jews. And as long as the Jews (and almost the world) couldn’t even care enough to arm themselves sufficiently to do anything about it; heck, why not? Everybody’s gotta do something to stave off the boredom.

        Like


      • Castles in the sky? He wanted to rebuild whole cities; as a youth he drew architectural plans for the glorification of German cities.

        Like


      • You really are an idiot. Why don’t you read some real history and get off the drivel.

        Like


      • I am speaking of Stuki, by the way.

        Like


      • My father dealt with Leon Degrelle in Spain after the war, where he had taken the name “Juan Sanchez”. My dad being fluent in Spanish, was tasked with negotiating a contract with Juan Sanchez for American military personnel being stationed near Seville. Pops decided that the Americans could be charged no more than their monthly living allowance and this enraged Juan Sanchez, who had planned to make a lot of money on the scheme. He learned from another Spaniard that he was actually Degrelle, who had been sentenced to death in absentia by the Belgian government. When he mentioned this to his superiors, he was told to treat Degrelle as though he were Juan Sanchez.

        Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 8:44 pm Carlos Danger

        They knew who he was. That’s pretty interesting. DeGrelle is a character. Not sure how honest, but his men respected him and he was a good combat leader- he won the Knight’s Cross twice and was awarded the Close Combat Clasp in Gold- 75 firefights or more.

        Like


      • Hitler told him that he was like a son to him.

        There you have it :

        You->Me->My Father->Degrelle->Hitler

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 7:18 am Jochen Peiper

        He told him that when he was awarded the second Knight’s Cross. I believe the quote was “If I had had a son, I would want him to be like you.”

        Like


      • It is also believed he called for the Night of the Long Knives to do away with Ernst Rohm, who was the head of the SA, and a screaming faggot, albeit a violent one, because he knew too much about Hitler’s perversions.

        More bullshit. Rohm deemed the now-ensconced National Socialists as having compromised too much with various sectors of German society and wanted a more radical policy… with hints at using his influence with the Brown Shirts to stir up his own power play.

        That, coupled with ever-growing murmurs of the Brown Shirt leadership’s overt faggotry… and the potential for international embarrassment thereby… sealed Rohm’s fate.

        Like


      • Do you want a smack in the head?

        You give me a half-assed speculative book by a queer ooJ as proof?

        (definitely ooJ, probably homo, based upon his PhD adviser, known to be homo… I believe a prof at Heidelberg)

        As one reviewer said:
        With the introduction of each man from Hitler’s past, we are presented with the same litany of circumstantial evidence and hearsay upon hearsay designed to make a case for that particular man’s homosexuality.

        Hmmm… sounds a lot like the usual suspect agenda.

        Next.

        Like


      • Rohm was plotting a coup, and he got Becketted.

        Like


      • But only after he was butthext. lllzoozozlzlzozozlzlzozozlzlzl

        Like


      • Greg, you strike me as a man who would like the works of R. A. Lafferty.

        Like


      • Not familiar with the man… but always willing to look into a recommendation. Any particular starting point?

        Like


      • Lafferty wrote bizarre, gory, cartoonish, ultimately serious Christian SF. Imagine if Monty Python had been devout bachelor Catholics from Oklahoma.

        Here’s an appreciation of the man and his works.

        It’s hard to find any actual physical Lafferty books. The story collection 900 Grandmothers is a good place to start, and shouldn’t be hard to find. Alternatively, I suspect you could find OCRed ebooks in the usual places.

        Like


      • haha! Ready to commit suicide? All your internet warriors are turning on you, you poor thing. Probably won’t sleep well tonight, environing Hit-ler being maligned by your buddies.

        The way you defend your crazed fined is embarrassing. Even Carlos has more sense than you, and will not let himself get all enamored of your garbage hero. Get a grip man. At least shut up instead of revealing yourself the real NZ you are.

        Like


      • The stalking bit is getting old, dearie… as is your idiotic evaluation of anyone “turning against me”, when there are just as many here shooting down the same lies and outhouse psychological claptrap.

        And explain to the group here how pooh-poohing half-baked queer agenda speculation is the same as “defending” Hitler. The topic at hand is his beta/omega status… find one post of mine where I deny that and I’ll give you a cookie.

        The only thing I’m putting up a defense against is Cathedral media bullshit.

        You’re just embarrassing yourself, over and over again. I’m starting to actually feel sorry for you, and that ruins my laughing.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:52 am Jochen Peiper

        Greg,

        read the 3 star review. You read the single one star review that is rather biased. There is nothing new in the book. The writer was a German Gentile and not a ooj. His book was not well received but no one questioned his basic premises. Mostly they were embarrassed at the fact AH was gay and that damaged the pro-gay narrative in the German press. Nor have I heard of anyone refuting its contents.

        Like


      • Here’s a clue for you, shilly… setting the record straight on the reason for Rohm’s eradication is not a defense of AH or anyone else… it’s purely historical accuracy.

        “AH’s doctor said he had green scales and a bifurcated tail!”

        “Geez, are you crazy or something?”

        “HITLER DEFENDER!!!”

        Like


      • The writer was a German Gentile and not a ooj. His book was not well received but no one questioned his basic premises. Mostly they were embarrassed at the fact AH was gay and that damaged the pro-gay narrative in the German press. Nor have I heard of anyone refuting its contents.

        First of all, Lothar Machtan is a ooJ… and in all probability a flamer as well.

        Second of all, an earlier biographer, Konrad Heiden (if memory serves), covered the same material and premises decades earlier and, along with most other credited historians, did not think AH homosexual.

        Let’s stop the insanity now… there’s enough more salient aspects to discuss in this world, and this lurid fascination with spun-of-whole-cloth proclivities of AH by his sworn enemies masquerading as scholarship is enough to dry up the soul of purveyors and audience alike.

        Sheesh.

        Like


      • “when there are just as many here shooting down the same lies and outhouse psychological claptrap.”
        Bullshit. I can count them on one hand.
        .
        “And explain to the group here how pooh-poohing half-baked queer agenda speculation is the same as “defending” Hitler.”

        Because you are trying too hard to refute it. You just can’t deal with anything negative about hit-ler, or any antisemite. By refuting, you’re actually defending. It’s a clever tactic practiced by most communists and fascists, but it doesn’t fly.
        .
        “The only thing I’m putting up a defense against is Cathedral media bullshit.”
        It’s not cathedral bullshit, and you know it. It’ a book written by his childhood friend who is not Jooish.
        Face!
        .
        “You’re just embarrassing yourself, over and over again. I’m starting to actually feel sorry for you, and that ruins my laughing.”
        Don’t turn it around, you know I have you pegged.

        Like


      • Clueless Lily… sigh… I wasn’t talking about the boyhood friend book, I was talking about the AH is gay book. For about the third time now I say, I’m not even involved in any dispute of the beta/omega topic at hand. Find where I am and you get a cookie.

        Sigh… do pay attention if you would screed.

        Unless your tactic is to just keep piling on mountain of bullshit and aggravation until you weary the opponent… much like George Kennedy finally tired of knocking Paul Newman to the ground.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 4:15 pm Carlos Danger

        Two reasons to off him then. You don’t think he would have used that against Hitler if he did stage a coup?

        Like


      • Used what against AH?

        Rohm was killed because he was becoming a vocal and radical opponent to the NS… one with teeth, in having command of the SA.

        All other reasons, real or imagined, is rank speculation. That is/was/remains the point.

        Like


    • Hasbara should have known better than to put a woman on this detail.

      Like


      • Hasbra wouldn’t waste time diffusing Gregi of all his air.

        Like


      • Be sure to let us know when that actually happens, fraulein.

        llzozozlzlozozlzozozlzlzl

        The truly funny part is that there ARE several posters here defending Hitler and his military activities… all I’ve been doing is poking fun at the shithouse psychological musings in re his sexual proclivities.

        But Shilly only has eyes for me. 😉

        Like


      • And, you only have eyes for Matt King 😉

        Like


      • Hasbra [Hasbro? Hasbara?] wouldn’t waste time diffusing Gregi of all his air.

        Then what does that make you?

        Like


      • Good question. As always, I post a few comments and I get many, many, responses. It’s very rare for my comments to be left alone, whether they are about Joo matters or male/female relationships. Then, I am stuck answering them.

        Look at the “the-pretty-girls-dilemma” thread. I initially posted 3 comments, which in turn launched dozens of other comments, which I had to answer. I guess, I am provocative. I don’t always follow the consensus. I truly think for myself, and that cause trouble with people who live their lives as drones.

        It’s why I avoid commenting in many threads. I just choose one or two a week I think are interesting or impotent.

        Think of yourself, you are very much like that too. I have never seen you act as a drone. You bring your own original ideas to the blog, where many times you agree with CH, while at other times you disagree with him. The only difference is that you are a male and there isn’t as much resentment against you as there is against women. In addition, I am philosemtic, and there are many anti-Semites posting here and they are infuriated if I say anything positive about jooz, or if I try to scatter their stupid propaganda. For example, one comment to Hammer of Love lunched 50 comments.

        Like


      • Sorry, I mean important, not impotent.

        Like


  10. He was definitely a fantasizing bohemian beta as a youth. He also hated his drunk, abusive father and was severely traumatized by his beloved mother’s death. It seems like he was largely asexual in later life and had a much better understanding of human nature. His speeches were kind of an orgiastic experience and he called the masses “feminine,” so I guess it was sexual release by proxy. Either way it’s another case of the repressed beta becoming later maniac.and cold killer.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 3:46 pm Carlos Danger

      Good post. You also only ever see the crescendos of Hitler’s speeches. He usually spoke in a congenial and charming tone, working up to the ranting phase as a technique to sweep his audience off their feet after he had made his point and he wanted their emotional buy in. He got more donations from women than from men as well. Hitler was elected with a huge sense of exuberance and renewal- Hope and Change, so to speak. Young people and women were his most ardent supporters. I think the cocktail of drugs he was taking during much of his reign killed his sex drive. He would supposedly stay up all night and day reading technical manuals and R&D bulletins, not sleeping days at a time, for instance.

      Like


      • ” Young people and women were his most ardent supporters.”

        I do believe it is Hitler that is quoted as saying; “First you get the women and children and so follow the men.”

        This has been the main modus operandi of every sphere of influence working on society since WW2.

        Like


      • And this is how Barak Obama was elected.

        Every demagogue in history was elected or came to power in this way, not just since WW2.

        Like


      • which is why female suffrage is national suicide

        Like


      • I can’t argue against this point. Women make the worst political decisions.

        Another thing I hate is women getting elected to national, state, or local office.

        There is a Bitches Trifecta on the horizon about to come much closer:

        1) NYC mayor
        2) Fed Chairman
        3) President

        All 3 could be filled by women this time around. That would be the end of the country, as we know it. Get ready.

        Like


  11. “Hitler became the man he did when, as a young man in the grip of hot unrequited love, his Jewish princess “rejected” him for the charming alpha males Hitler despised.”

    Seen it already.

    Like


  12. Sounds more omega than anything.

    Like


  13. Hitler label was actually the secret Jewish greek letter only a few know about.

    Like


  14. While many of these tendencies are beta, if these accounts are true, he’s much more in the omega camp than the beta camp. I think of betas as still being socially functional. Some of these behaviors are socially retarded.

    Like


  15. I have no problem at all with a teenage boy engaging in soaring flights of romantic fantasy about his first love. There’s a time and a place for it, and that kind of naïve yet intense idealism is normal for teenagers.

    The key is the kid must *MUST* sack up and ask out his crush in an open, committed way, whatever the social convention is for doing that, eg, talking first to Miss Isak’s mom. When they interact, the kid is exposed to the real girl and can replace his fantasy with reality. Whatever happens from then on is real and he can begin in earnest his man’s education about women with the red pill and whatnot.

    Example: At the end of the movie Superbad, the healthiest development was Evan finally interacting with his crush Becca as a real person instead of his fantasy girl. He discovers she’s just a normal person and not a goddess.

    The problem is when a teenage boy, like young Hitler, fails to graduate from boyish romantic fantasy to interacting with real girls. When he ages into his manhood while still stuck on romantic fantasy, that’s when it becomes pathological.

    Like


  16. So far, I’ve learned that douche bags, gay/effeminate men, sociopaths, and serial killers are alpha. Great and impressive leaders of immeasurable accomplishments on the other hand……..

    Like


    • You don’t understand…everything in the world is based off how you interact with women and their reactions. That is the only value or worth men have. You must know your greek letter!

      Leading a country and then unleashing a World War doesn’t mean anything if you pined for some tart when you were 16 and didn’t have the balls to ask her out.

      Like


      • For the record, I think this blog is decent.

        It’s just embarrassingly stupid when the author says things like, “Game will save Western Civilization! It would have stopped Hitler, and he’s responsible for cultural Marxism!”

        This is a rationalizing lie if I’ve ever heard one. As if all these far-left ideas weren’t ripe for the picking either way.

        Game also, for the record, would prevent the next Nietzsche, Hegel, Kant, Einstein, every monastic scholar ever, about half the world’s great inventors, and so on.

        Like


      • Karl Marx came up with a horrible system because the object of his affections rejected him when he was 19. If he had game…Communism wouldn’t exist.

        Like


      • He was probably just jealous of rich people.

        Like


      • Alphas are rich. Why should they have all the game? They didn’t earn it. The game belongs to the state.

        Like


      • Omegas of the world, unite!

        Like


      • All kidding aside, that too. He was jealous of rich people, the gilded-age rich.

        However, more than anything, the thing that drove Marx was his disdain for all religion, and he found ways to tie it into an economic philosophy.

        Like


      • “Omegas of the world, unite!”

        Lol. :icon_lol:

        Like


      • If we all had game from the start, we’d save the humans from ever getting out of Africa!

        None of this mess would have happened!

        Whoopee!

        Like


      • you’re wrong. CH might be on to something.

        “As you can see, even maniacal dictators with dreams of world conquest can fall into the same horrible beta traps as your typical weepy 21st century brooding teen boy with xVideos tabbed for convenience. If only Hitler had the compiled wisdom of CH, he would remember the maxim that you do not reward a woman with your love until after she has rewarded you with her sex.”

        LOL! If only he had CH, he wouldn’t have been the victim of unrequited love, maybe would have ended marrying the girl if he knew what to do, and he wouldn’t have become the evil killer he ended up being.

        People who behave like Hit-ler are usually angry frustrated envious disasters, who can’t get women if their peens were trading freely on the open market.

        Clearly, if he had gotten married to the object of his desire, or at least was very successful with the ladies, he would have been much too busy having fun and womanizing to be devising plans of burning people in ovens.
        .
        “Chateau Heartiste has written that game can save the West. Disbelievers scoff. But if this outpost of sanity had been around during Hitler’s flowering youth to enlighten him about the nature of the fairer sex, the West might very well have been saved. Saved not just from war and genocide, but from every evil — cultural Marxism, feminism, equalism, and now racial self-annihilationism — that has come after.”

        I don’t know if game can do all this, but it can help, and the West indeed needs to be saved from “war and genocide, and from every evil — cultural Marxism, feminism, equalism, and now racial self-annihilationism — that has come after.” Words, well-spoken.

        Like


      • Yeah, you’re totally right lol

        And why did some guy invent clothes anyway? Probably just got all jealous cos all the girls wouldn’t touch him, so he needed to cover them up lol

        lol

        “Lol”
        -Izak & Lily forever

        Like


      • Without a doubt. By providing a great leader as an example of a “beta,” the author of this blog has set a very curious precedent.

        Like


      • He was a clear beta/omega at that time, at least when it came to women.

        He was unadultered alpha during his time as the fuhrer.

        Like


    • Other way around: the avg. profile of a sociopath or killer is the obsessive, effeminate omega male, far different from the run of the mill beta. See Cho taking trying to secretly take pictures of girls in his class.

      Like


      • And the frequent letters from horny women that these killers receive, which this blog often discusses…?

        Like


      • Congrats to them for getting love notes from gals with tingles. Hope it’s worth being in jail and making sure to not pick up the soap.

        Like


    • There is a difference between who you are, and what you do or have done.

      Like


  17. on August 26, 2013 at 3:38 pm unfortunateson

    WWII, not WWI.

    Like


  18. Chateau Heartiste has written that game can save the West. Disbelievers scoff. But if this outpost of sanity had been around during Hitler’s flowering youth to enlighten him about the nature of the fairer sex, the West might very well have been saved. Saved not just from war and genocide, but from every evil — cultural Marxism, feminism, equalism, and now racial self-annihilationism — that has come after.

    Humble as always. Kudos.

    Like


  19. I recall that HItler wanted to become an artist as a young person, and spent the years after this period in bohemian penury drawing postcards and reading dreamy romantic tracts about German destiny. This is probably where the antisemitism came from, above and beyond what was common in that era: it was the height of the Wagner influence in the arts at that time, and Hitler read all of Wagner’s turgid, didactic, and ferociously anti-semitic pamphlets during this period. It wasn’t until WWI, the Versailles treaty, and the Weimar Republic that his career turned toward politics.

    I don’t think this kind of thing is too unusual for a teenaged crush- tweak the details a bit, upated the cultural bits, and you might have something out of a John Huighes movie. It’s a universal experience, something every man can related to at some level, having once been that 16-year old boy with the raging hormones. Not everyone has that alpha male dad or uncle to show him the ropes.

    I think Stefanie dodged a bullet (er, heh). She might have ended up dead in the bunker at the end, like Eva.

    Like


    • I agree. De-sensationalize it, and Hitler’s boyhood crush doesn’t seem out of the ordinary. Teenage boys shouldn’t be judged alpha/beta the same way as grown men.

      Even for boys with a conscientious “alpha male dad or uncle”, I’m a proponent of letting the boy do it the blue-pill romantic way first. When the boy fails, then begin his red-pill education in earnest. The biggest thing the dad or uncle should do at step one is to push the boy to act on his first crush ASAP in order to get the ball rolling sooner rather than later.

      Like


    • “This is probably where the antisemitism came from, above and beyond what was common in that era”

      Alternatively, you could consider what the man said about where his anti-semitism came from.

      Like


      • Heh… that would require true source reading, not Daily Mail blog views or Family Guy vignettes.

        Like


      • Mama mia, mine campfire is burning my buns!

        Like


      • I have it on good authority that he was just jealous.

        Like


      • The Wagner influence on Hitler goes beyond just the antisemitism: there’s a sense in which Hitler adopted aspects of Wagner’s worldview- the German nationalism, an aethetics of politics, etc. Even Hitler’s personal tics, like vegetarianism, dog-loving, interst in the occult, were all Wagner’s to some extent.

        In music, though he talked a good game about Parsifal (there’s even a Hitler quote about the Final Solution that echoes a comment of Wagner’s on Parsifal), he was more of a common man: “The Merry Widow” more than the Ring.

        Like


  20. It doesn’t mean that Hitler was beta! He was only 16! I believe most guys have a first love or a teen love that they were beta about.

    Hitler also ended up sleeping with 17 year old Eva Braun, who wasn’t an extreme beauty, but he was 40 years old when he started sleeping with her, and this was WELL BEFORE he came to power. That’s a 23 year age difference!!! She became extremely devoted to him, he ignored her, she was constantly desperate for his attention and attempted suicide when she believed he loved another woman more than him.

    In addition to the other young mistresses he was rumored to have, like Unity Mitford and Geli Raubal, the latter likely committed suicide over him.

    He never settled down and didn’t end up marrying until right before his death.

    Mussolini had many women also.

    Like


    • Usually Heartiste is pretty good about holding teenage boys to a different standard than grown men, but I think he wanted to make a point here.

      Like


  21. on August 26, 2013 at 3:50 pm Theodore Logan

    Hitler accomplished more in his life in two years time than any man living in the 20th century or even today. And yet we have maniacal jerkoffs here believing in the YKWish propaganda that he’s a flaming faggot? Yeah, just keep blaming all the evils of the world on Hitler you butt hurt fools. Strange how the metal band Slayer is even sympathetic to YKWs Angel of Death.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 4:21 pm Carlos Danger

      It’s a lot more complicated than that. YKW would like nothing more than to conceal Hitler’s homosexual affairs as he’s the wrong kind of homo. Hitler took a great Army and ran it into the ground. He lost the war with his racial policies and discarded natural allies to assuage his equally intense hatred of Slavs. The war wasn’t lost at Stalingrad either. It was lost in Late July 1941 when Hitler diverted his Armies south, then rested and refitted them for six weeks, and failed to take Moscow and Leningrad while the Soviets were still reeling from the initial invasion. Germany could never have fought and won a sustained war against the Soviet Union, let alone the USSR and the USA, plus the British Empire too. The entire German military doctrine was predicated on quick victory for this very reason- not enough land or resources to fight a war of attrition.

      Like


    • That’s b.s. Hitler completely screwed up the Eastern Front against the commies by overruling his generals and making a lot of extremely stupid decisions. Hitler was meant to lose.

      Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 3:32 am Peter the Shark

        Since the whole point of the war was to eradicate or enslave the Slavic populations of Poland, Ukraine and Belarus and let German families homestead there, it’s not surprising the Germans had trouble getting local allies. The reason Germany lost the war was that Hitler’s definition of victory was probably never achievable. A true great German leader – like Bismarck or Frederick – would have seen in the 1930s that Germany was in a brilliant strategic position – the natural leader of Central Europe, not hobbled by an expensive archaic empire like France, and perfectly positioned to foster ethnic and political dissent in the USSR. Hitler squandered it all in a crazy pipe dream to play cowboys and Indians on the Ukrainian prairie (with the Jews and Slavs as the Indians).

        Like


      • Peter the Shark Since the whole point of the war was to eradicate or enslave the Slavic populations of Poland

        More drivel. Read John Mosier’s Hitler vs. Stalin 1941-9145.

        In addition how do you account that more than 2,000,000 foreign troops fought in the Waffen SS. Another 2 million or so Russians and Eastern Europeans fought with the Wehrmacht and SS as “Hilfswillige,” or “Hiwis”.

        See here also: http://www.feldgrau.com/rvol.html

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 1:22 am Peter the Shark

        I don’t have to read Mosier. Read Mein Kampf. Read any of the memoirs written by German commanders who served on the Eastern Front.The aim of the war from the very beginning was always to conquer, colonize and Germanize Eastern Europe. Hitler wasn’t stupid – he needed allies, and the Germans were willing to “Aryanize” some portion of the Slavic population and compromise on racial principles to achieve victory, but they sure as hell weren’t fighting Staling to help set up an independent Ukraine.

        Like


      • Same goes for Stalin.Soviet Union won not because but in spite of the pathetic georgian maniac Dzhugashvili (aka Stalin).

        Like


      • At least Stalin had enough sense to get rid of the political commissars and let his generals do all the thinking.

        Like


      • This is not exactly true.Stalin was scared as shit when germans were 60 miles from the Kremlin walls, and had no other choice than to listen.
        I still do not understand how Germans failed to win that war. The hate among soviet people towards Stalin and communism was massive, there was literally no desire to fight for bolsheviks, army was not in the greatest condition neither. Luckily ,germans are not known to be smart, they have miraculously managed to fuck it up politically,strategically and tactically (yet again).

        Like


      • “Hitler was meant to lose.”

        Exactly because if God wanted him to win he would have won.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:08 pm Hammer of Love

        So according to your logic, god meant for the jooish holocaust to happen. Damn your daft.

        Like


      • Yes, Hammer. He did.
        Nothing happens without his direction.
        The Lord works in mysterious ways; we don’t know his complete plan.
        The only thing we know is that nothing happens without his approving it.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 8:19 am Hammer of Love

        Sorry you fundamentalist stupid ignoramus, Only a brain dead zombie cult follower, would try to justify the murder of millions of people to satisfy some imaginary plan of a vicious “god”. Its obvious your a worshiper of the vengeful, hateful, and sadistic ” god ” of the old testament, just like your jooish overlords. The true Messiah would never agree to such a plan. Your statement above proves your not a follower of the Saviour, therefore its obvious where your religious loyalties lie. Now take your filth back to your money changer overlords, before we decide to turn plowshares back into swords, you demonic banshee.

        Like


      • You’re a fucking idiot. You don’t realize that God created good and evil in the world, and free will for all people to choose their path. He let Hit-ler choose his path, he let him take it up to a point, and then he wacked him. Had he stopped Hit-ler from the very beginning, then, there wouldn’t be any free will, right?

        You’re the idiot because you believe in some fairytale god that sprinkles magic water and tells you you’re forgiven. A beta god.

        Idiot. God is judgmental; he has a very clear line of demarcation between good and bad, right and wrong. He gives you enough rope (enough freedom) to do good in the world, and if you don’t, you get punished. That’s an Alpha God.

        If you don’t believe God created the world and runs it, then you don’t believe in the Almighty. You believe in yet another idol. In our limited understanding, we can’t comprehend God’s actions, but he can see the whole picture from the beginning to the end. Hirt-ler was just one more piece of his entire universe puzzle. God runs the world, not you, or your stupid beloved mass murderer of a leader, or any of your demented NZ friends do, but you all have free will. Use your free will wisely. Now fuck off; I just had about enough of your idiocy.

        Like


      • Lily, I want to take you out on a date. For realz.

        Like


      • “Lily”‘s true Christ-hating colors come out and she promptly gets a pat on the back. Does everyone see the “other” for what it is now?

        Like


      • Christ-hating. Blah, blah, blah…..

        Fanatic!

        Like


  22. on August 26, 2013 at 4:01 pm Robert in Arabia

    All our hopes and dreams died at Stalingrad.

    Like


    • Hitler’s defeat was the defeat of Europe. And America. How could we have been so blind?

      Like


      • Hmmm…Eisenhower…Spaatz…Nimitz…Einstein…ya know, maybe America’s Krauts were just better than their Krauts?

        Like


      • And I told those those friggin’ Krauts that I don’t roll on shabbos/

        Like


      • The defeat of National Socialist Germany was the greatest disaster in the history of the west.

        Americans let themselves get duped into fastening YKW’s shackles on their own hands. We continue to let ourselves be cuckolded into fighting the Chosen People’s wars for them to this day. It fills me with shame.

        Like


      • Then continue to be ashamed. You should be for supporting such a hatemonger that killed his own people, in his own personal interest for world domination and power, as all hatemongers.

        He’s not special or different in the annals of tyranny.

        Like


      • “Hitler’s defeat was the defeat of Europe. And America. How could we have been so blind?”

        You’re not blind; you an idiot. Hit-ler destroyed Europe and he would have gone all the way to destroying America, Asia, and the Middle East if we didn’t stop him. America indeed saw clearly and stopped him.

        BTW,
        Do you hold a vigil for him often? On his birthday, his suicide day, his entrance into Poland, France, etc…
        Do you have an altar for him at home to worship him?
        Is your house littered with lots of NZ paraphernalia?

        Like


  23. on August 26, 2013 at 4:20 pm FuriousFerret

    Someone should check on Greg Eliot and make sure he’s ok after learning that his beloved hero was the ‘Mona Lisa’ of omega males.

    Like


    • Since when is Hitler my hero? Hell, just read some of my posts here thus far… you fairy.

      The only thing I dispute is half-assed speculation by queer agenda you-know-whos masquerading as scholarship.

      You boneheads really should expand your horizons and not fall into the tired Cathedral stereotypes about who and what WNs love.

      Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:39 am Jochen Peiper

        Its not like that in this case. There’s a lot of smoke and Hitler is not DaVinci or Michelangelo. There were rumors about Hitler being queer during his lifetime and among people who were sympathetic to the Nazi cause. I think he liked women but also dabbled in sex with men.

        Like


      • I’m beginning to think that you dabble in sex with men.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 10:02 am Jochen Peiper

        Think what you like. I’m a big admirer of the Wehrmacht and the Waffen SS, but not the Nazi party or its movement. German nationalism is not and was not synonymous with Naziism. The Nazis became vile, corrupt, and self serving once in power. Paul Hauser, the de facto CiC of the Waffen SS had a low opinion of Hitler and risked the death penalty at the 3rd Battle of Kharkov for deliberately disobeying Hitler’s orders but that disobedience won the battle. The men of the Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler revoked their loyalty oaths to him after he claimed they had not fought hard in the Battle for Budapest. Most senior and mid ranking officers of both the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS had a poor opinion of the Nazi party in general and Hitler and Himmler in particular. So romanticizing them today, is not consistent with how they were thought of in their day. My German relatives who had first hand experience of him called him a Fantast- some one who has high flying notions and dreams inspiring him that were poorly grounded in reality.

        You fairy!

        Like


  24. Chateau, seriously? Fucking seriously?
    Do you even remotely credit that SOB of Kershaw?

    Please, tell me this is an elaborate troll.

    Like


  25. Hitler being spurned in his teen years by a Jewish girl is an old urban myth that’s been around for decades. I don’t put much stock in any of this.

    “a beta male with a bad case of one-itis and zero game who pedestalized women.”

    See, it’s this beta mindset that can make a decent civilization. The beta does pedestalize women, but he goddamn wants them in the kitchen and the bedroom ONLY, where they belong and where he can love her (and vice-versa).

    In his heart of hearts, no beta wants women to be in the workplace, the schools, or with equal civic rights. He knows that way works against him and the family/society that suits him.

    On the other hand, the alpha wants all those things for women because that way lies harems.

    The beta pedestalizes the mother and the wife. The alpha pedestalizes the whore.

    Like


  26. Sounds like Jewish propaganda i.m.o.

    Like


  27. It would be interesting to see which greek letter would be placed upon Abraham Lincoln.

    Like


    • Or Nietzsche.

      Or Kant.

      Or Hegel.

      Or Leonardo Da Vinci.

      Or Isaac Newton.

      Or T.S. Eliot.

      Or Einstein.

      Or Kierkegaard.

      Or just about every medieval monk ever.

      But, hey, at least we all know how to classify that one really douchey guy from La Jolla who lives off government assistance and has a funny hat.

      Like


      • on August 26, 2013 at 5:15 pm FuriousFerret

        Let’s see, if we go by the classical definition that is repeatedly given on this site as Alpha Male – man that hot women want to and will fuck

        then:

        Nietzsche – Omega as fuck

        Kant – Beta I believe

        Hegel – Beta

        Leonardo Da Vinci – Gay genius so probably Alpha +

        Isaac Newton – Sperg gay omega

        T.S. Eliot – Beta

        Einstein – Beta

        Kierkegaard – Notorious womanizer = Alpha

        Monks – Omegas

        RattLife – Alpha

        Like


      • “Leonardo Da Vinci – Gay genius so probably Alpha +”

        Definitely. Da Vinci probably invented game.

        Like


      • He wrote his game tips down in reverse. We’d have to hold a mirror up to our PC’s today to read his blog.

        Like


      • Now that we’re into the history of game……

        How would PUAs or whoever analyze Ovid’s Ars Amatoria?

        Is it at odds with the fundamental tenets of human nature, whose efficacy is only supported by a healthy civilization that socializes people out of their primal energies?

        Or is it a complete satire?

        Like


      • Ha, good show.

        I’d put Kant in omega status.

        Kierkegaard is a trick question, because he had to turn himself into a beta in order to write so well. He “faked it till he made it” in reverse.

        Like


      • Abraham-omicron…couldn’t get his wife pregnant without some divine help

        Moses-tau…he spread the legs of the Red Sea

        David-nu…he had to kill a man to get his wife

        Solomon-rho…so wise and powerful

        Jonah-iota…seriously how does a whale eat you

        Jesus-every greek letter

        John the Baptist-zeta…a steady diet of honey and locusts will do that to you

        Paul-xi…don’t ever mess with Paul

        Like


    • Easy now. The whole game-colored glasses spectacle used to annoy me too. But it is clear that the Chateau is navigating a paradigm shift, and you should be patient rather than cynical.

      Game and pick-up is the tippy-tippy tip of the spear of the renaissance of manliness as feminism begins its cultural decline at last. PUAs are the glans, as it were. And feminism is a BIG CUNT, sealed up for a century. It’s going to take patience, drive, consistency, pressure, lubrication, and possibly a shoehorn to make a proper woman out of it.

      Just like man’s sex drive made home video and the internet viable media via porn, the pick-up artists are laying (hey-O) the foundation for a massive cultural revanchism in the mainstream. It all depends on how well and how quickly the next generation can pivot with the truths discovered groinally to a maturer application than adolescent hedonism.

      Matt

      Like


    • Lincoln was almost ruined by his shopaholic, crazy, succubus of a wife. The same can be said for 85% of all men who get married. Perhaps 15% get a wife who provides the type of support that created the meme “behind every successful man is a good woman.”

      Now picture yourself a good man today (beta). You have to do all the work your grandfather did, but without *any* support, at all, from women.

      Gen X women and younger are complete failures.

      Like


  28. on August 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm toosexyformywifebeater

    Lol.

    Blogger superstar/cubicle jockey by day with a faggy penchant for prissy prose judges one of history’s greatest men. Conclusion: shit eating grins and smelly snatch from last night’s bar hopping broscapade beat world dominating ambition and intensity of the soul. Your world historical figures got nuthin on this D.C. slut slogging alpha dawg. Chug another brewski Bro!

    Seriously, you’re fucking pathetic.

    Like


    • One could argue that invading snatch is like invading Poland.

      Although it’s a lot more difficult and takes much more game to invade an actual country…over a willing fornicator who’s needing her tingles fulfilled.

      Like


      • One could argue that invading snatch is like invading Poland.

        In each case, the desidiratum would be a cordon sanitaire.

        llozozozlzlzozozlzlzozlzlzl

        Like


      • France was just waiting to be butthexed by Germany. They wanted to be Bernakfied and desouled because they saw how much fun it was for Poland Holland, Belgium, Denmark, etc.

        Like


    • +1

      Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 6:40 pm FuriousFerret

      “one of history’s greatest men”

      If he’s so great why the fuck did he lose the war?

      I ask the same question to ardent fans of General Lee and Stonewall Jackson. I ask them why they celebrate a person that lost their region’s most important conflict. A guy that is responsible for them not achieving the South’s valued independence thus dooming them into a persistent subjugation by liberal fags.

      I don’t see statues of Bill Buckner in Boston.

      Like


      • You might want to revise your use of Stonewall Jackson… it’s been speculated by more than one historian that, had he not been gunned down by “friendly fire”, there might have been some interesting victories for the South down the road. If memory serves, general on both sides regarded him as the best.

        Not to say that the South wouldn’t have lost anyway… it’s one of those interesting “what ifs”.

        Of course, I’ll let the CT crowd handle that “friendly fire” speculation.

        Like


  29. Hitler also validated the concept of female hypergamy once he became Der Chef. He could have had hot and cold running blonde pussy once he became The One, but needed to focus all his energy on achieving his destiny, so he kept to boffing Eva B on the QT.

    But the chicks dug him and that alpha trench fighter mustache/haircut (truth; the Nazis buffed up the combat veteran image of the leadership’s WWI generation, and the ‘stache/high-tight haircut, while made to be goofy in Allied propaganda, were typical for a frontline soldier, to avoid lice. Even though most pics of the ol’squarehead in the trenches showed him with a thick, full mustache, indicating he was in clean, lice-free quarters when they were taken). We’ve all seen the film footage of him striding between hordes of fawning frauleins all splooshing their panties over being within a few feet of his schlong. Chicks just dig power.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 5:01 pm gunslingergregi

      hot and cold running blonde pussy ””””””’

      nice turn of phrase now that is something to aspire to

      Like


    • “We’ve all seen the film footage of him striding between hordes of fawning frauleins all splooshing their panties over being within a few feet of his schlong. Chicks just dig power.”

      Chicks definitely dig power and they help put Hit-ler on top. But don’t let those images fool you. He was only playing a game. He carefully constructed his image to appeal to women, as he knew they fancied him. That’s why he would never be seen with Eva Braun in public, so not to signal to German women he’s taken. He wanted women infatuated with him, for as long as they were fond of him or lusting for him, he knew he would have the support of the German people. Women and young uninformed and inexperienced voters helped him get to power. We’ve seen this happening all too often.

      For example, in Egypt who started the latest revolution? Young people.
      In Iran, who put the mullahs in power? Young people and women.
      Who supported Che Guevara? Women and youngin
      In 2008 and 2012 who voted for Obama? College students and women.

      Like


  30. Another bio worth reading is by John Densmore, the Doors drummer. It was painful to read portions of his book. He was a true herbal betamax. He was the drummer for the Doors for godsake, but hardly got any women. He was constantly cuckolded by other musicians and begged his wife to come back even though she had another guy’s kid in her belly (one of the Allman brothers). He acquired 2 ex wives who got a huge bonus of Doors royalties after dumping him. And yet he’s still a dedicated feminist, equalitarian, even after getting shafted up the ass mightily by his era’s zeitgeist. He had NO game at all and was jealous of Jimbo’s game. Its called Riders on the Storm.

    Like


  31. Being rejected by what you want most of all can produce real, long lasting consequences. Like needing revenge, for the rest of your life. That is, if you are too slow in realizing it was your obsessing that was the wrong-doing.

    Like


  32. on August 26, 2013 at 5:37 pm Hammer of Love

    Do bad Hitler didn’t turn out this way. lolz

    Like


  33. The only thing more amusing about Hitler shithouse psychology and “I Knew The Man” memoirs is the glee with which they’re received.

    Like


  34. Dat omega. http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lve31bSIMO1r6l24co1_500.jpg

    People in the comments and I suspect even Chateu forget that a man changes. Most alphas were born betas but evolved trough their right of passage. I beleive that Hitlers “rite” was his experience of the WW1, however, it was also the darkness of that war that defiled his mind and turned him into a psychopathic (sociopathic?) monster. Afterall, Hitler could bath in pussy from morning light to moon shadow if he wanted to in his later years, yet he rejected that path. Does that make him an extreme jesus-style alpha male or an asexual permanent omega eunuch? It all comes down to perspective. Hitlers mind breaks all records when it comes to having been analyzed and discussed, and the only real conclusion is that it was wicked in an extremly complex way. I’ve come to think that he was not one man but many. Afterall, he was also a vegetarian and an animal lover, a very social and beloved man, aswell as a mass mudering ruthless killer. In either case, I suspect a man who survived WW1 with an Iron cross wouldn’t have trouble walking up to that cute blonde jewish girl, would they have met again.

    I don’t think that this beautiful girl, even if she ruled his fantasy for several years, solely was the source of his anti-semitism but rather a combination of all the baneful experiences of his life which was then channeled onto the succesfull jewish population (he saw them move back and forth from banks and rich enterprises in every city he visited, for example). They became another subject of his raging jealousy, and payed the highest price. Hitler had other things on his mind than the jewish ancestry of the pubertal love while he was climbing to be become the ruler of the world. Hitlers own officer during the war was jewish, and men at arms in battle of and death tend to come real close. No, hitler was teached anti-semitism like all intelluctual hatred is transferred from one sickened mind to another.

    In an alternative reality, Hitler met his younger love once again following the war on that very same bridge during a beautiful Austrian summer day. This time however – he was the military officer. He went straight up and talked to that girl with the powerful attitude of a war scarred iron cross alpha male and made her hamster spin like the wheel of the uninvented Panzer II. She wouldn’t even recognize him. They would meet again many times without Hitler ever having a thought of her mother but rather on his own dreams finally being realized, and live happily ever after with many little hitlers being raised by a respectable and educational Alpha father (whom also happened to be a great story teller coming bed time) – ina Germany far more powerful, attractive and illuminating than ours. What could have been.

    Like


    • Oh noes!!! Hiter was justjealousoneballlittledickcouldnotgetlaidmentallydisordered!!!

      Like


      • He was a resentful envious loser disgruntled over the jooz’ success.

        Your refuel to accept it, just shows how buthurt you are lol.

        Like


      • llozozozllzozozllzzoozlzl

        I don’t think “he was just jealous” qualifies as sound historical scholarship, bubeleh.

        And for all I care, he could be beta or omega with the ladies… but this queer agenda nonsense is tiresome.

        Like


      • There is plenty of evidence he was a queer, as well as had other emotional issues. I know it’s hard for you to make peace with your hero being a loser.

        Like


      • He ain’t my hero… and you’re a bit queer yourself, little girl.

        Like


      • Gee, the way you have been defending him all over this thread, NZ, can’t be overlooked. No one is blind or stupid. But now that I pointed out, you’re backtracking; saying he’s not your hero. Nice try, fool.

        Like


      • Defending him?

        I’ve been pooh-poohing the queer agenda cogdis… and of course, the Cathedral “just jealous” inanity.

        Other than that, I’ve been poking a bit of fun at him as well.

        I know I’ve mentioned it in the past, but you really should work on your reading comprehension… lest you betray further the bit of intellectual fluff that you are.

        Like


  35. I just wrote a fking essay as a response but it won’t show. God damn you all.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 5:54 pm Hammer of Love

      Always save your work my brother, and avoid the proper spelling of ” Joos “.

      Like


      • It’s not that simple. I just had a comment go into moderation that had none of the usual words. I suspect it had to do with a two word phrase describing an investigation made by Sir Richard Francis Burton into a double homicide that took place in the Middle East. The first word is the name of a Syrian city.

        Like


    • America must meet its demise, if the dark man is to rise.
      Kaleed Sheik Mohammad -Harlem USA

      Like


  36. on August 26, 2013 at 5:49 pm Hammer of Love

    Here are some pieces by Hitler the ” failed ” artist.

    Like


  37. Recently when I relocated I was without internet for a week so read an actual book “In the Garden of Beasts” by Erik Larson, which recounts the experience of the American ambassador to Germany in 1933. His daughter was quite the social butterfly among various German and Soviet diplomats. At one point she was introduced to Hitler himself when one of his cohorts decided he needed a woman. From the description of that event sounds like Hitler was a bit shy with the ladies. Later I looked over “The RIse and Fall of the Third Reich”, which recounts Hitler’s early youth and formative years in Vienna before WWI.

    Larson’s book is a good read, the kind of thing you pack for an overseas flight. Also his “Devil in the White City” about the architects of the 1894 Chicago World’s Fair and a prolific serial killer that used it as a lure for young women i srecommended. I enjoy the style of fictionlized history backed up with copius primary source research.

    http://www.amazon.com/In-Garden-Beasts-American-Hitlers/dp/030740885X

    Like


    • Then you should read the Flashman books — all 12. they are great for that.

      Like


      • I have always meant to. I read a couple other books on Scottish history by George MacDonald Frazier, such as “The Steel Bonnets: The Story of the Anglo-Scottish Border Reivers”, where I got my “savage kneecapping” line :

        “From the 13th century to the middle of the 16th, outlaws and “border lords” reigned supreme on the contentious frontier between England and Scotland. Feud and terror, raid and reprisal, were the ordinary stuff of life, and power was held by the notorious border reivers: raiders and freebooters, plunderers and rustlers who robbed, murdered, and wreaked havoc.”

        Like


  38. Seth Putnam was right: Hitler was indeed a sensitive man.

    Like


  39. Many of Hitler’s anti-Semitic ideas came from Richard Wagner.

    Like


    • on August 26, 2013 at 6:26 pm Hammer of Love

      Where did Wagner get them from ??

      Like


    • He got his anti-Semitic ideas form all kinds of antisemites, not just Wagner.

      However, he was a great admirer of Wagner, specifically for his joo hate, and he used much of Wagner’s anti-Joo rhetoric in his speeches.

      Early on, Wagner wasn’t really a fervent antisemite. He had many Jouish friends, business associates, and collaborators. However, his joo hate developed after a Joo composer named Mendelssohn became his competition. He was infuriated that an uppity joo was getting recognition, while he Wagner was the only one able to capture the German spirit in his music.

      The funny thing is, Mendelssohn and his entire family became protestant, but Wagner still referred to him as the uppity Joo, while he Wagner was the true German.

      Most joo hate is in fact based on joo envy.

      Like


  40. Girls will look at you with a glint in their eye for something as simple as seducing an extra cookie from the subway cashier.

    The book of heartiste, benevolent god of the old testicle

    Like


  41. The fact is, Hitler and his followers shed more blood fighting the good fight than you would if you lived for eternity. So until your sacrifices outweigh theirs, shut the fuck up.

    Like


    • It is beta to glorify losers.

      Like


    • The Red Army mass-raping Kraut pussy from East Prussia to Berlin…now *that’s* alpha.

      Like


      • You know what’s omega? Applying the terms “alpha” and “beta” where they don’t belong.

        Like


      • That’s just your mutter’s sore German pussy talking…;)

        Like


      • Your comments are of low quality.

        Like


      • Comedy isn’t pretty. Just ask a Russian soldier, nuyk, nyuk, nyuk, nyuk…

        Like


      • Sounds more like your sore pussy talkin’, Schlomo.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • Dig dat Turd Reich nostalgia, baby, by losers, for losers. Like they said in the Third Shock Army, take it all, blondie!

        Like


      • Raping women is definitely not alpha, it’s omega.

        Like


      • Indeed.

        And gleefully regaling it as a neener-neener on a forum is… well… lower than whale turds… which reside on the ocean floor.

        Like


      • “Raping women is definitely not alpha, it’s omega.”

        Only when it’s done to German women.
        When it’s done to all other women, it’s as alpha as hell.

        Gregi’s women getting raped was mentally anguishing him, he felt it on his wife’s pussy.

        Like


      • I’ve been somewhat patient with you thus far…

        But your foul Yid mouth is going to do you in someday… and I’ll wear red to your funeral, weibstück

        Like


      • I take it, you didn’t like it? 😉

        Like


      • on August 28, 2013 at 6:29 am Jochen Peiper

        Mass rape as official policy is an evil thing. None of those women deserved to raped or in many cases gang raped to death. This is where you become a rather disgusting person.

        Like


      • “None of those women deserved to raped or in many cases gang raped to death.”

        100% correct.

        But, the people I was responding to feel it’s OK, as long as it’s not German women.

        We’ve had many discussion of NZ Germany here before. NZ sympathizers often lament the allied bombing of Dresden over the 60-million people killed because of German instigation of WW2. And, in the same vein, they also mourn the 2-million German women the Russian army raped over the atrocities Hir-ler and his cohorts committed during the 14 years he was in power.

        I was just pointing out their hypocrisy.

        FYI, I don’t believe only the jooz were victims. I believe the German people too were victims, as well as the 60-million innocent people who perished because of the NZs. That’s why I hate the NZs so much. Nothing good came of them, just death and destruction.

        Like


      • “Take it easy — but take it.”
        –Marshal Zhukov

        Like


  42. Also interesting to note is that his original surname was Shicklegruber, which was changed to Hitler when he was a teenager. A fortuitous event, as one cannot imagine the German nation yelling “Heil Shicklegruber!” had he retained that name.

    Like


    • Yeah, there’s absolutely nothing suspicious about someone named “shekel-grubber”…

      Like


    • Back in one of my seminar classes, a lifetime ago, a student gave a report and used those exact same words.

      I docked him for plagarism… ‘though memory no longer serves which book it was in which I first found that quote.

      Like


    • Borrowed from Shirer, and not even correctly.

      Alois Schicklgruber changed his name to Alois Hitler in 1877.

      Fail.

      Like


      • Shirer recounts how elated the teenaged Adolph was to have his name changed from Shicklgruber to Hitler. Take it up with Shirer.

        Like


  43. Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
    Is betaness caused by a lack of patrilinearity? Otherwise, the most important post you will ever read.

    Like


  44. Wonder when the History Channel will be airing The Special with The Shocking Truth: A Homosexual Hitler in Wuv with a Jewish Girl!!! With UFO’s, naturally.
    It seems virtually unavoidable that everyone who becomes well known for whatever reason will, at some point, be portrayed as either Jewish or part-Jewish or gay or having had an illicit affair with a gay Jewish person or something along those lines. I’m actually kind of amazed no one has tried to find Black heritage among Hitler’s forebears. There’s the challenge, History Channel, you can do it! Don’t forget the UFO’s.
    Having had a little bit of a front row seat to this particular spectacle – for a person my age, at least – the Hitler I heard about seems to have been a stifled artist and pretty Omega in his general tendencies. Linz, the somewhat industrial capital of Upper Austria, couldn’t have had a very large Jewish population, but it’s possible that Miss Stephanie may have been the daughter of a Viennese or originally eastern European industrialist or something, which would certainly explain why she preferred dashing, cultured army officers to the short, morose country rube from little Braunau.
    The only one of Hitler’s crushes I’ve ever heard about was something like a second cousin of his, whose name escapes me. No, you Google it.

    Like


    • on August 27, 2013 at 7:11 am Jochen Peiper

      It’s already been done. Roosevelt had literally 1000s of German exiles interviewed to determine Hitler’s sexual proclivities and that was reported on in the History Channel. Its a documentary from about 12 years ago.

      Like


  45. Hitler was something of an ascetic. He wasnt a swaggering caudillo who was enamored with the promise of riches or women.

    He had more in common with Cromwell or Mohammad than he did with some simple conquering war chief out to enrich himself.

    The entire notion of “alpha” is basically Jewish. It’s the way people who unduly privilege money and “fame” think about value.

    Like


  46. Conclusion: learn game, man up or you’re as bad as Hitler.

    Like


  47. What’s to say he didn’t know she wasn’t Jewish? Maybe he heard from someone else that she wasn’t. Maybe she didn’t look Jewish. Maybe he had no idea her last name was typically Jewish. How many sixteen year olds would know that?

    Like


    • Hitler had nothing against Jews in his youth. It was only after WWI that he began to dislike them because they weren’t as loyal to Germany as they were to Jewry. He thought they had sold out at the end of WWI and that they were complicit in the Versailles treaty.

      Like


  48. “if this outpost of sanity had been around during Hitler’s flowering youth to enlighten him about the nature of the fairer sex”

    Obsession and oneitis are not rationally volitional behaviors, they are evolutionarily selected traits of bonding commitment to bring up baby.

    We can all agree that there is no one right “one.” But that is largely irrelevant to the biological impulses that spring forth from our animalistic lower levels — overriding our upper layers of intellect.

    We all believe in the force of hypergamy. We all believe in the sexual desire of men. But for some reason some people think “love” or infatuation or whatever you want to call it, is some sort of social construct pulled over our eyes by a manipulative matriarchy. Well they my exploit it to their ends, but this stuff is evolution and it is powerful. It’s not something we can easily overcome with reason — even if we are completely convinced of the correctness of the logic. The longing and the pain are still there, to be dealt with.

    Like


  49. on August 26, 2013 at 9:35 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

    Oi vey.

    Do smell whiskey on your breath this fine evening, Heartiste?

    But enough, I’m tired of being “Hyper-troll”. I will be a good boy and recite the Catechism Heartiste:

    What was Hitler’s great flaw?
    Hitler’s great flaw was not his disregard for human life, a trait which, after all, he shared with great men like Trotsky. Hitler’s great flaw was his anti-Semitism, the worst and only sin.

    Why was Hitler an anti-Semite?
    Hitler was not an anti-Semite because of massive Jewish over-representation among Bolsheviks, gangsters, Ponzi schemers, oligarchs, pornographers, “modern artists”, open borders advocates, Boasian/Freudian/Frankfort pseudo-scientists etc. After all, the erudite herr Foxman has proven that said over-representation is a CANARD CANARD CANARD, and he has also proven that said over-representation, while true, is actually laudable. In reality, Hitler was an anti-Semite because an Aryan woman rejected his sexual advances.

    How could Hitler have avoided becoming an anti-Semite?
    Hitler should have manned up and admitted that “alphas” were “better men” than “betas” such as himself. History proves that “betas” such as Andrew Jackson accomplish nothing worthwhile, while “better men” such as “alpha” Casanova lead great nations. Furthermore, Great Books For Men such as The Illiad teach us that “betas” such as Hector are contemptible compared to “better men” such as that embodiment of the dark triad, the “alpha” Paris.

    Like


  50. Conventional wisdom is that Hitler was a psychopath, but actual psychopaths are not capable of having romantic feelings…

    Like


  51. I think it is highly probable that little AH grew up being told that one of his grand-fathers was named Rosenburg but he did not want it known. So the support money arrived on time to his fathers mom in exchange for silence. That was the deal. So, little Adolf was reminded subtly that he might be related to the rich family living on the Hilltop but he would never be acceptable to them under any circumstance and should never in any event presume to walk in the front door of their house.
    Yeah. That would do it, for a proud and sensitive soul. Without Wagner or anything else. Oh, the teenangst crush was a splash of gasoline at a hormonally vulnerable patch, but that happens to a lot of guys that age(cough).
    Silly teenaged oneitis is often cured by laterly harvesting an abundance of poon.
    I do not know what it would take to undo the first type of cut. The imagination runs wild.
    Obviously this would be hard to prove, at this point. But the payments for something went on for 16 years and AH showed many times that harming his own semi-folk was of higher importance than defeating the Allies.-

    Like


  52. It should be noted that notes made by Hitler’s doctors were made public, and they posit that he was a homosexual. So … there’s that.

    Like


    • ??? Sources please… and no half-assed blogs or speculative revisionist history.

      Like


      • Another idiot that can’t tell shit from shinola when it comes to reliable sources.

        Maybe the sensationalized B movie poster should have tipped you off, fool

        Behold the intro:
        Newly discovered notes from a U.S. Army interview of former Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler doctors reveal that the madman had homosexual tendencies, did not sleep in girlfriend Eva Braun’s bedroom, and was doped up with multiple drugs including female hormones.

        Written in erratic shorthand, Army interrogator Herman Merl, a Vienna-born medical technician enlisted to interview Hitler’s doctors, Karl Brandt and Theodor Morell, scribbled “Homosex” in his notebook where he sized up the mass murderer’s sexuality.

        He then wrote: “Eva Braun = separate rooms” before adding “female hormone – injection 50,000 units.” Elsewhere he wrote, “His sexual life and intercourse with Eva Braun was told to me.”

        And of course, here’s the “tell”:

        The notebooks are going up for auction later this month at one of the nation’s leading sellers of historical artifacts, Alexander Historical Auctions of Chesapeake City, Md. Alexander has offered other important Third Reich relics, including a tea set from Hitler’s mountain hideaway and Josef Mengele’s diaries. Often the items are sold to Jewish collectors and museums.

        You fairy.

        Like


      • obsessive much? Do you have to sprinkle every comment against hit-ler with your contradictory bullshit? You are so transparent, Gergi. How is that Hit-ler altar in your house? Is it drenched in tears?
        .
        “Often the items are sold to Jewish collectors and museums.”

        Idiot, it’s sold to Joo collectors because they are trying to keep the memory of the H-caust alive, you fairy. They gobble up everything related to Hit-ler and the 3rd Reich for the H-cuast museums across the world, because fairies like you keep trying to deny it ever happened. They recently bought Dr Mangle’s diary for $50,000.

        His war account and his admission of his crimes was the most disgusting thing I have read in a long while.
        .
        You really need to stop defending these NZs. Everyone can see who you really are gregi. A fucking NZ sympathizer. I can’t be more disgusted by you than I already am. You have been chasing every comment here to try to diffuse anything derogatory of Hit-ler. Get a grip you nutjob.

        Like


      • Your rage has unbalanced you, bubeleh.

        Like


      • You see, I am never angry when I write my gregi diatribes. I LMAO because with my every attack I put you in your place by reminding you that your anti-Joo interpretation is disingenuous to say the least, which is when you unleash butthut attacks in return, and to see you squirming is good.

        Like


      • The raging harpy thinks she doesn’t sound angry…

        But my tongue-in-cheek jests and good-natured barbs back at her inanities constitute “butthurtness”.

        Go figure.

        Like


      • I know it hurts getting slapped my me. It’s usually painful when I make a fool out of you.

        Here’s a suggestion, try quitting while you’re ahead. It might alleviate some of the pain for you.

        Like


      • Fantasy world victories again… sigh.

        You should quit while you’re behind. How many people have to tell you you’re an asshole before you take the hint that your cogdis shilling and your pride in making a nuisance of yourself does not equal any sort of triumph?

        Like


      • The only one showing his ass is you. And, yeah, I did triumph over you, as always.

        Like


      • Reply in moderation, but here’s a sneak preview:

        You fairy.

        Like


      • The B movie poster as the lead-in should have given you a clue, Sherschlock.

        As well as this “tell” for the publicity piece:

        The notebooks are going up for auction later this month at one of the nation’s leading sellers of historical artifacts, Alexander Historical Auctions of Chesapeake City, Md. Alexander has offered other important Third Reich relics, including a tea set from Hitler’s mountain hideaway and Josef Mengele’s diaries. Often the items are sold to Jewish collectors and museums.

        Schmuck.

        Like


      • Don’t know this upsets you so much. I don’t know where you disproved the veracity of said source, except to quote it and provide snark. Greg, If you knew me you’d like me but I’d probably give little attention to you because of your childish attitude. Let’s just say there was speculation from Hitler’s personal doctor so you can sleep better. Goodness.

        Like


      • Bullshit sensationalist Cathedral “news” masquerading as historical fact was always a pet peeve of mine… unfortunately, the internet forces one to scale a mountain of this type of dreck, gleefully quoted by twerps such as yourself.

        Geez, a middle school student could tell from the writing it was a hit piece.

        Wise up, or continue to get butthurt when called on your folderol.

        Like


      • “If you knew me you’d like me but I’d probably give little attention to you because of your childish attitude.”

        Jooooooooooo.

        Like


  53. I’m pretty sure that if it weren’t for Hitler, all of Europe — or at least up to Germany — would be Marxist and speaking Russian.

    Like


  54. on August 26, 2013 at 10:12 pm gunslingergregi

    how do I zoom in lol fucked it all up

    Like


  55. AlphaBeta

    Is that because Marxism is such an overwhelmingly successful way to organize an economy? I am a little drunk at the moment, so I am struggling to remember which part of Germany (ie East or West) built BMWs and which built Trabants.
    In the morning, I most likely will remember that it was the Marxist side that achieved great FAIL.
    I spent some time in East Berlin back in the mid-80s and so I can explain to you a lot about Trabants. Also, Using the commercial exchange rates I had access to, what I carried in my pocket of USDs could buy more than you could believe.

    Like


    • No, because Hitler was Europe’s buffer against Stalin (and after Hitler it was the West/USA, starting the Cold War). It has nothing to do with economics.

      Like


  56. on August 26, 2013 at 10:18 pm gunslingergregi

    chick dude has community service in morning so you want to chill
    me bring the movies

    I used it yay

    Like


  57. So… this Hitler fellow… what has this prestigious assembly decided?

    Gay or Nay?

    Like


  58. If Hitler was beta it proves that psychopaths are not automatically alpha. Mike Tyson is another psychopath that was shy with women, at least as a youth. I remember hearing on a documentary that, in general, serial killers rarely date as teenagers. This is all the more astonishing considering serial killers are the ultimate psychopaths.

    If I may, I’d also like to take this opportunity to plug a new work of mine, featured on my blog – ‘Intergalactic Sexual’, a tale of a man whose extraordinary encounter leads him to a doctor shunned by his peers. What ensues is a friendship forged by one man’s willingness to take the concept of selflessness to newfound heights.

    Like


    • Most psychopaths are shy in the youth. Psychopaths matures slower than normal people. They’re also often bed wetters.

      Like


  59. He was not gay by the structure of his personality, wartime contretemps notwithstanding.
    You gotta remember, young AH grew up in the outer reaches of Wyomming or Arkansas in American terms. I have visited the Bayerischer Wald- where he grew up. It is dark, damp, and makes a person think of Hansel and Gretal constantly.

    Like


  60. Most of these comments are so clearly posted in a “rear-view mirror” kind of view. It is all so obvious that this or that are pertinent after the fact, regarding the most successful sociopath of modern times.

    He must have been gay.

    He must have been alpha.

    He was a genius.

    No one mentioned Parkinson’s or Syphilis. Two conditions he was reported to suffer from. The Parkinson’s tremors are quite obvious in later films of the great leader.

    People like Hitler become empty vessels. We load them up with our world view.

    I prefer to think he was an over-achieving a–hole. Like a lot of a–hole’s I have met, but he had ambition and access to a point in history that he really made the ‘best of’. Sort of like Rush Limbaugh on Steroids (not viagra).

    Like


    • Putting Rush Limbaugh and Hit-ler in the same sentence isn’t proper.

      Like


      • They are not in the same sentence.

        But I do enjoy the comparison. A misfit, insecure guy who manipulates people for a living. And El Rushbo is a little gay if you ask me.

        Like


      • “And El Rushbo is a little gay if you ask me.”

        Eh? He’s far from gay. Who has a wife 30 years his JR? Who puts the fear of Hades in the crazed leftoids hearts?

        Like


      • Viagra. Costa Rica. Or maybe he’s just a pedophile.

        The women he marries are rent-a-wives for his career purposes. It is very Hollywood of him.

        Like


      • Please, men with younger wives are not pedophiles. That’s a typical feminist charge.

        Men with younger wives enjoy female beauty, and they want to experience it every day, over the bitchy age-appropriate old hag.

        Like


  61. This CH thread is sure to create a furor.

    Like


    • It’s only creating a furor in your head over your Fuhrer.

      Like


      • Geez, you are dense, you silly girl.

        Now, tell me more about how I am obsessed with you. LZOZOZZLZOZL

        Like


      • The dense always see everyone around them as dense, except themselves, poor things.

        Like


      • You’re the one who commented upon my pun as if it were more than a mere jest, tootsie.

        You probably didn’t get the homage references I’ve been making right and left either.

        So we’ll let more objective heads than ours judge the dimness, my little hammentasche.

        Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 6:39 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

        Greg, I think is time to start ignoring this person.

        Like


      • Yeah, you’re right… long overdue… sigh… hate to let some of the cogdis go by unanswered, if only for the sake of impressionable silent onlookers, though.

        But yeah, you’re right.

        Like


  62. While we’re on the topic, I tell a joke:

    Where do you send a Jew with ADD?

    A concentration camp.

    Like


  63. Stalin often called his own mother a whore. His father was a drunk who used to beat him savagely when he was a kid. It has been speculated that Stalin was not the biological son of his father. Stalin’s own attitude toward his son was always equally contemptful as his own father’s attitude toward him. Stalin as a young man was charming, witty and good with the guitar. Stalin abandoned his first wife and child to embark on a career of revolutionary and bank robber. He was much more likely a psychopath than Hitler.

    A study of Hitler’s character was ordered by OSS (predecessor of CIA) in 1943. It seems that if Hitler had a personality disorder, his was a severe case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. At Hitler’s emotional core, there was a crushing sense of weakness, inadequacy and helplessness. His lifelong battle was against that. During the war he was bolstered by a cocktail of drugs called Vitamultin prepared by Dr. Felix Karsten. Whenever things were going well for him, Hitler felt like a god. It was typical of Hitler to crumble and become suicidal in the face of serious setbacks.

    Like


  64. Next:
    Jesus was a Beta and Joseph was an Omega

    iow duhhhhh

    Like


  65. on August 27, 2013 at 3:21 am Peter the Shark

    Hitler was a typical Asperger’s. There is an excellent bio about Hitler’s early years called “Hitler’s Vienna” by Brigitte Hamann. It puts Hitler in context, which most other bios fail to do. Very little about Hitler’s National Socialism was original – it was all recycled from right wing German nationalist parties in pre-WWI Austria-Hungary. Even the Swastika. Ethnic German politicians, even political moderates, in turn of the century Vienna constantly used anti-Semitism and anti-Czech sentiment to keep their followers motivated. We will never know how much Hitler really believed in anti-Semitism and how much was a useful poltical trope he learned watching successful populists like Vienna’s beloved Mayor Karl Lueger. Probably he started in the 20s using anti-Semitism more as a political tool than out of deep conviction, but, like many people, began to increasingly believe his own stories. America’s enmity to him also provoked greater anti-Semitic rages in Hitler because he seems to have sincerely believed that the US was run by a Jewish cabal.

    Like


    • If it wasn’t then, nowadays it is mate.

      Like


    • Ditch the jewish and pc psychobabble bios and read about the real man. Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny by R. H. S. Stolfi.

      “R. H. S. Stolfi (Monterey, CA), professor emeritus at the US Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, and a retired colonel in the US Marine Corps Reserve, is the author of German Panzers on the Offensive: Russia-North Africa, 1941-1942; Hitler’s Panzers East: World War II Reinterpreted; and NATO under Attack.”

      Like


  66. on August 27, 2013 at 4:37 am gunslingergregi

    so a month goes by and no talk of the minter marriage no kate whats goin down

    Like


  67. on August 27, 2013 at 4:39 am gunslingergregi

    I like when I do my he he he
    and then the bitch starts doing the he he
    deferring to me
    interesting

    Like


  68. How many people do you have to kill before you aren’t beta anymore? To be honest after what I have seen of Poland I would have probably stopped after them – left the Soviets alone – and simply had a constant supply of fresh poon delivered to my palace for personal interrogation. Then I would have openly traded with the Japanese for some of their Chinese plunder and local Japanese cuties.

    The heck with fighting the English, Americans, and North Africans – why bother? Offer to end the war in 1939 by returning France, Denmark, Belgium, Luxemborg, the Netherlands, Finland and Norway and watch the Allies bite that apple. Once the Allies are off your back blitz the Ukraine and promise them independence from Stalin if they fight on your side. As one they all march East (they hated Stalin) then get a little female tribute from them as well.

    Ghenghis Kahn (whose genetic legacy is in something like half or more modern day Asians) had the right idea.

    Like


  69. Heheheheh goyim, maybe you’d like to buy my memoir: Hitler’s Secret Gay Black Jewish drycleaner’s aquintance. I swear I can validate my identity with DNA samples from a seventy year old napkin.

    National Socialism is a romantic ideology because real nationalism is romantic.

    http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2011/01/which-was-is-worst-nazism-or-communism.html?showComment=1299995329975&m=1#c7492791147159245665

    Maybe the reason you rubes believe communist propaganda about the holohoax is because you live in a world where communism won.

    Like


  70. on August 27, 2013 at 5:09 am A Reasonable Man

    Hitler caused WWII, not WWI. I believe this was originally a typo by CH, but a lot of commenters might want to read some very basic 20th century history. Hitler was a soldier in WWI who was gassed at the battle of Ypres.

    Like


  71. Ok, Chateau, very very funny. Well done, you sure got us NSs buttdevastated. Trolled hard.

    Now what about getting back to write something useful again and not this misinformed and misinforming, inane, stupid piece of steaming shit?

    Like


    • I see, you WNs didn’t like this piece of literary work calling out your dicky gay leader, eh?

      Let’s get back to normal, eh? In other words, lets get back to trashing the Jooz again.

      Like


  72. on August 27, 2013 at 5:26 am Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

    I did NOT “rape” her. I ==had== her consent, but it was “undocumented”. Because I don’t believe in documentation.

    And you have to respect my feelings!!

    Like


  73. The pamphlet by Wilhelm Marr is titled “The Victory of Judaism
    over Germanism”, printed in 1879.
    http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/engl.html

    Like


  74. > Hitler the bitterboy beta. Instead of learning from his alpha male betters, he lashed out at them, much the same way our modern manboobs lash out at alpha male “douchebags” and “players”.

    This entire post lashes out at beta males. They’re not allowed to lash back?

    You should be more grateful for us beta males. Don’t we set the bar nice and low for you? Don’t we make it not so hard for you guys to make the ladies swoon?

    Like


  75. I’m still confused… did AH lust after a maybe-ooJish girl or was he queer?

    Did his lovers, whatever gender they may have been, enjoy the whimsical AH… the carefree AH… the AH with a song in his heart?

    Like


    • on August 27, 2013 at 7:17 am Jochen Peiper

      I think Hitler liked women but was shy around them or even feared them somewhat. I think he was an Omega sexually, who took the easy way out. There’s also the family situation which fit the usual pattern of a smothering mother and aunt and a distant father who had a tenuous relationship with young Adolf. Most Germans in the Weimar days were hoping for a military dictatorship or a return to the Kaiser.The Nazis were a bit radical and at the top levels, corrupt and opportunistic. If given the chance, they would have transformed society as radically as the Communists want to. Most of what people admire about the Nazi era was due simply to the excellence and culture of the German military.

      Like


      • Alas, another meaty jest and apt homage fallen flat!

        Like


      • “Most of what people admire about the Nazi era was due simply to the excellence and culture of the German military.”

        No, most of what they admire about NZ Germany is their joo hate. That is the only reason people like Gregi are enamored of Uncle Adolf and his cohorts.

        Like


      • Keep mentioning my name in your posts and people will say we’re in love.

        Like


      • Hugs and kisses are for closers.

        They’re gold… and you don’t get them.

        Because they would be wasted on you.

        Like


      • You know gregi, with you, I always feel a sorts of role reversal. I feel like the male, and you come across as the female – helpless and at my mercy. With every one of your comments, it’s what comes through.

        You need to change your image, hun.

        Like


      • Missed another one of my homages, did ya?

        Like


    • on August 28, 2013 at 6:44 am Jochen Peiper

      Adolf could be very charming. If you listen to his Christmas talk show from 1942 (played in the movie Stalingrad) Adolf was on top of his game and ooozing the schmalz there.

      Like


    • The Cathedral? You must not be an astute observer of the online multiverse. The pan-internet is currently mounted all-out war on a dancing babe simply because she’s a dancing babe. This of course, is because the whole culture and society (at least, what posts online, tweets and chats about) is beta to the core. You culture warriors and your White Knight tendencies are pretty consistent. Even though you dominate every area of polite society, you quake and tremble at lithe young women having fun in a sexual way as if it is the death knell.

      The idea that a monolithic culture, through “shaming” will recapture cultural greatness is quaint… the idea that social prudery is bulwark against creeping Islamic and religious fundamentalism or faggotry or whatever- bent. Its beta to the bone, Hitler style. It is psychological fallacy. Immigration, economic inequality, environmental and social degeneration all have discrete causes, and Miley isn’t one. The idea that we should control young female minds and bodies springs from the insecurity we feel over being relatively powerless to do anything about the other problems.

      The real obscenity is the corporate overlords who have stolen our government, the social beta overlords stifling our youth’s expressive impulse, and the boomers, who should be rolled into carpets for letting things slide for far too long.

      Like


      • It’s very simple. Miley Cyrus is humiliating herself and her father. GBFM and the Bible explain why.

        Like


      • “you quake and tremble at lithe young women having fun in a sexual way”
        “The idea that we should control young female minds and bodies”

        John Scalzi, is that you?

        You degenerate little piece of shit,did you even watch that joke of a performance? Slut apologists around the world recoiled at the sight of that satanic ritual. But I guess there is always that one manboob that will lap up ANY turd that these ratchets dump in front of them?

        If you were ever brutally murdered I would honestly do the snoopy dance.

        “expressive impulse” lol, you flaming faggot

        Like


    • That’s a nice piece of libtard gobbledygook. I couldn’t even understand what the writer’s point even was.

      Like


  76. […] Ugh. As you can see, even maniacal dictators with dreams of world conquest can fall into the same ho… […]

    Like


  77. on August 27, 2013 at 8:17 am Hammer of Love

    By the way guys, I just found a picture of Lily (a.k.a. bitch troll ). Enjoy ..

    Like


    • Butthurt over Hit-fuck-ler?
      ROTFL!!!

      Like


      • on August 27, 2013 at 10:57 am Hammer of Love

        Your post-wall existence must be so mundane and pointless, I almost feel sorry for you and your cats. I was actually born in a country that was attacked by Hitler’s Germany, so I don’t have an undying love for him. However, I do have a love for facts and the truth, and have no issue with pointing them out, whether I like them or not; unlike you, the eternal bag lady. Now scamper off and go douche that empty cavernous hole of yours, its starting to smell in here.

        Like


      • I love your tirades. They are deeply steeped in stupidity and in evidence of lack of pussy.

        Do they survive your hammering? Do you do it in the basement, or out in the shed? You toothless hammer of love, you.

        Like


  78. “As I’ve said before, most fags are actually omegas who take the easy way out.”

    Does that mean you would go for hairy asses if you did not have access to women?

    Like


    • No, but many dudes in that situation would, especially if they’re leftoids or incarcerated niqqers.

      Like


    • Steve Sailer (I think) posted some time ago about how some US soldiers in Afghanistan were surprised that Muslim Afghan men were wearing lipstick and blowing them kisses. Turns out, many Muslim men aren’t wealthy enough to marry any woman, so some of them turn to men instead (Game, Pickup are virtually impossible because of the “chilling effects” that sexual segregation + social shaming + harsh punishments for mingling with the opposite sex have on Muslim women)

      I guess this might also explain the rather unusual leftist coalition between gays, Muslims, and feminists.

      Like


  79. Hitler, by the way, was not a psychopath. OSS (predecessor of CIA) had a psychoanalysis of him made in 1943, The report was based on publically known biographical facts of Hitler and interviews of people who had known him personally before the war. Hitler was highly unstable and egocentric person. In the early stages of his career, there were a few setbacks after which he became suicidal but was talked out of it by his close friends and allies. He probably had a severe case of narcissistic personality disorder. At Hitler’s emotional core, there was an extreme sense of inadequacy and weakness. In a manner similar to all narcisissts, Hitler’s lifelong struggle was to compensate for that.

    The report:

    http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/library/whatwehave/specialcollections/donovan/hitler/

    Like


  80. One post I’d like to see you write would cover the great leaders of world history, and rate them as Alpha or Beta, and why. My impression is that early civilization was dominated by Alphas (e.g. the great clash between Caesar and Marcus Antonious, Alaric, Clovis, Charlemagne, Attila, Genghis Khan) with Cincinnatus being a noteworthy exception (who would turn down absolute power but a Beta??), and that modern civilization saw the emergence of great Beta leaders as well. For example, taking a tour through U.S. history, I’d say our greatest two Presidents, Washington and Lincoln were Beta. G.W. was probably greater Beta; he was rather stoic and religious, was a leader more through presence (he was exceptionally tall for the timeframe) than charm and charisma and extraversion, and turned down the lifetime Presidency when offered. Jefferson – Alpha. Jackson – Alpha. Lincoln, clear Greater Beta. He was very personable, likeable and a great speaker, but suffered from depression and wasn’t known as a ladies’ man. Just a general all-around good guy. U.S. Grant – toss-up. Lee – toss-up. Teddy Roosevelt was probably Alpha, but hard to tell since he was kind of frail as a young man; maybe he learned game later and became more Alpha than Beta. In the 20th Century skipping ahead to WWII, I’d say Ike was probably more greater Beta than lesser Alpha. Patton – Alpha. Bradley – Beta (he was the more accomplished general; Patton was the more aggressive general). Truman – Alpha (?). JFK – Alpha. LBJ – Alpha. Nixon – Beta. Ford – toss-up. Carter – Beta. Reagan – Alpha. G.H.W. Bush – Alpha. Clinton – Alpha. G.W. Bush – Beta(?). Obama – Beta. What say you?

    Like


    • Patton – alpha (numerous mistresses); Bull Halsey – alpha (was called Bull because he had pussy in every port); Eisenhower – alpha (boffing his younger, prettier driver); Douglas Bader – alpha (got a young, pretty wife despite having no legs); Bomber Harris – alpha (younger, quite good looking wife).

      Like


  81. In conclusion, regardless of whether he was ghey, he was a glorious winged ezz ezz phaggot.

    Like


  82. Love all the commenters taking this post way more seriously than the intent with which it was written. #trollfacepalm

    Like


  83. The long-term processes – the growing internal contradictions of German and Russian societies, the German and Japanese drive towards colonization, the spread of leftism, the collapse of Christian cultural hegemony, the impending crisis of liberal democracies – that led to the two world wars and the current situation of the West in general were already inexorable and irreversible before Hitler was even born. The Four Horsemen of the Sexual Apocalypse were to ride victorious, with or without Hitler. Female suffrage was bound to happen with or without him as well. And once that happened, the primacy of feminism was bound to happen.

    The engine of Western Civilization was its rate of wealth creation, and the only way to compel average beta chumps to work themselves to death and sacrifice themselves on the battlefield was to artificially inflate the social value of women by putting them on pedestals, so that betas never see their true nature. It was precisely anti-Game that kept this civilization afloat. But that is never coming back. The average beta cannot be compelled to work hard to benefit a woman (and risk his life for her if necessary) if he sees her for what she truly is.

    Like


  84. Where did my comment go?

    Like


  85. “But if this outpost of sanity had been around during Hitler’s flowering youth to enlighten him about the nature of the fairer sex, the West might very well have been saved. Saved not just from war and genocide, but from every evil — cultural Marxism, feminism, equalism, and now racial self-annihilationism — that has come after.”

    Nonsense. Did Hitler send the Four Horsemen of the Sexual Apocalypse? Did he introduce female suffrage? The collapse of Christian cultural hegemony? Did he plunge Russia into anarchy and bolshevik takeover, or Germany into economic collapse and political crisis after a lost world war? Did he start the first world war – which plunged the West into an abyss? No. The rot was already spreading inexorably and inevitably before he was even born.

    “Chateau Heartiste has written that game can save the West. Disbelievers scoff.”

    Yes – for a reason. Because it’s the believers who should be able to recognize that the success of the West was based on its supreme rate of wealth creation, which was only possible if every beta chump is compelled to work himself to death and die on the battlefield if necessary. And there’s no way to achieve that other than putting women on a pedestal and artificially inflating their MMV. Game is the complete opposite of that. Do you think the average prole can be compelled to slave away for a hypergamous, hamster-minded twat who tingles for alpha thugs and despises betas with a passion?

    Like


    • Off base completely….the rot you speak of started the very moment women wer put in pedestals, the men of yore (pre-enlightenment) NEVER HELD WOMEN ON PEDESTALS. You can read the literature, specially from the Middle Ages, you will see the “betas” worked in order to ensure the survivability of their offspring. But most of them were fully aware of women nature.

      Like


  86. This 22-year-old is on her 4th baby so far. I think she’s murdered only one of them. http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/27/3588581/mom-jailed-in-child-neglect-case.html

    Like


  87. Hey Heartisaizizte Heartistie Heariszieisst!!!!!!

    I have noticed that some commenters here are never pithy, entertaining, or funny, yet you let them post upwards of 75 comments per thread.

    Like


  88. on August 27, 2013 at 1:18 pm Every internet thread is about Hitler

    Hitler was beta, cry the philanderers. He was a heretic, cry the Papists. He was Austrian, cry the Krauts. He was Christian cry the Jews. He was right, cry the stormfronters. He was a socialist, cry conservatives. He was a fascist, cry the Bolsheviks. We are sorry for your loss, cry the Irish.

    Like


  89. >> when a realtalker like yours truly comes along
    sometimes you sound like a beta who wants to sound like an alpha.
    real men don’t talk so much …

    Like


  90. The REAL question – How would Hitler fare against the
    feminists ?

    Nobody whups them!

    Like


  91. Zerrt die konkubine aus dem furstenbett, schmiert die guillotine mit dem judenfett.

    Blut muss fliessen knuppelhageldick, und wir scheissen auf die freiheit dieser judenrepublik.

    Die reaktion hat ihn verraten, end dennoch kommit das Dritte Reich!

    Like


  92. […] Could game have prevented the holocaust? […]

    Like


  93. So, you are listening to Alex the Celtic Rebel’s show, too?

    Like


  94. Love it.

    I think this shows why women are repulsed by betas: Beta behaviour is a symptom of deep routed emotional instability.

    Like


  95. on August 28, 2013 at 5:31 pm mylittlepretender

    Holy fuck. All of you guys are motherfucking freaks. Everything, including motherfucking Hitler, comes down to your horseshit alphas and betas dichotomy.

    Like


  96. Your head’s up your ass if you think alpha male mentors take on beta mentees, except the occasional father.

    Like


  97. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/10247550/Nazi-Bride-Schools-These-girls-were-the-nucleus-of-the-Reich.html

    Hitler was actually the identifier of cultural Marxism (in Mein Kampf) and perhaps its most ardent and successful fighter. History will look kindly on Hitler for this (despite him going nuts later in his regime) because he fought the most destructive religion in human history (not Judaism, but CM). Even JFK spoke admirably of Hitler in the 30’s and many sensible people were sympathizers. So, there is a paradox: one of the most evil men in human history was also decidedly on the right side of history.

    Antisemitism was a political device to fight CM and communism. Although it is true that “some jews were commies,” the overwhelming number were not. The antisemitism was not justified. It was a tool to whip up nationalism and stop CM. Ultimately, basing a nation on racism doomed it to consume itself. The real question is “please identify a more effective way of countering CM other than demonizing Jews?” the answer: conservative Christianity and Judaism. They can fight CM without the Gotterdammerung.

    Hitler’s user of antisemtism as a national ideology was probably driven by several bad experiences with Jews (including being dumped from a CM art school and a jewish girl). Good find for the hilarious story of his epic fail in picking up the Jewish girl. Perhaps the vexatious nature of the Semitic female deserves a post to prevent future genocides?

    Like


  98. on August 28, 2013 at 11:30 pm Third Beta from the Sun

    Thought I read this same sort of thing about Bin Laden once in the tabloids.

    Like


  99. Hitler was something of an ascetic. He wasn’t a swaggering caudillo who was enamored with the promise of riches or women.

    He had more in common with Cromwell or Mohammad than he did with some simple conquering war chief out to enrich himself.

    The entire notion of ”alpha” is basically Jewish. Its the way people who unduly privilege money and ”fame” think about value.

    Like


  100. To support your idea, read George Orwell’s fascinating 1940 review of HItler’s Mein Kampf

    Like


  101. So, if Hitler’s dictatoriality and anti-Semitism was the result of being a failure with girls, how come Stalin was an inveterate womaniser leading up to the October Revolution. Ditto Chairman Mao for that matter.

    Like


  102. Unofficial Mercedes ad

    Like


  103. hitler was of jewish blood on both his mother and fathers side, he bulldozed many cemeteries in austria to hide the jewish headstones of his ancestors . recent DNA evaluations of hitlers american relatives reveal jew DNA. Hitler was funded by jews and served the jewish cause, he was a false flag operation from the get go, and he along with the jew stalin, the jew churchill, and the jew roosevelt, murdered multi millions of whites, before, during and after WW2.

    Like


  104. Stephanie wasn’t Jewish and Adolf Hitler was not a Beta male, that’s fucking stupid.

    He fits the original definition of an Alpha male – Aggressive, quick to action, open to killing without remorse.

    That definition of Alpha male wasn’t very profitable.

    Like


  105. […] [Hitler Was Beta] […]

    Like