Robin Williams Forced To Commit Suicide By Divorce Court System

What would a clickbait Chateau Heartiste be like? “Anonymous” comments,

If CH writes a post now with a title like “Robin Williams Forced to Commit Suicide by Divorce Court System” he can get a lot of traffic and extra fame. One thing I suspect happened is that the family courts of California ruled that Robin owed each ex-wife 5 figure alimony sums every month regardless of any drop in his earning power or desire to retire. But he was a liberal who supported that kind of system overall.

There is evidence that suicide risk has a genetic basis, however, like most genetically-influenced behaviors, strong environmental shocks can suppress or trigger the expression of the genes. In the case of Robin Williams, his two ex-wives were the environmental shocks that pushed him to a final solution.

Robin Williams will return to TV after nearly three decades – because two divorces have left him short of cash.

The comic’s breakups cost him £20million and he claims to need a ‘steady job’. He is also selling his £20million California ranch due to his sizeable alimony payments.[…]

The 62-year-old, said: ‘Divorce is expensive. I used to joke they were going to call it “all the money”, but they changed it to “alimony”.

It’s ripping your heart out through your wallet.’

There is no “rape culture” as deranged feminist cunts starved for male attention would want you to believe. Rape rates are at historical lows. There is a divorce rape culture, and it has amassed a pile of real victims far larger than criminally prosecuted rape has claimed. Men are literally killing themselves out of desperation once the divorce rape industrial complex has taken everything from them.

And I do mean “them”. Williams’ ex-wives had absolutely NOTHING to do with his talent, his drive, and his career success. Nothing. And yet with the sanction of the state they walk away with pieces of the man’s soul, leaving him pondering the escape of the rafter rope.

Marriage has never been a bigger sucker’s bet for men. Prenups are routinely shredded by lawyers and ignored by judges. The fix is in. The fundamental premise has been codified in law to the cheers of rabid feminists and solipsistic soccer moms and taken to its logical conclusion: Men are resource chattel, milked by a constabulary of strongmen to redistribute their earnings to an army of cackling divorcees.

If America is fated to be a post-Malthusian, r-selection reproductive free-for-all, then let it be in every way. That means, women are cut loose from the male alimony and child support teat to fend for themselves and accept the consequences of their decisions. Relying on men for support, pre- and post-marriage, is a luxury afforded K-selection societies, and that luxury comes with certain duties that modern women have largely chosen to abandon. If justice is fair and not wholly rigged against the interests of men, the divorce rape culture will be dismantled and an ex-husband’s life may be saved.





Comments


  1. […] Robin Williams Forced To Commit Suicide By Divorce Court System […]

    Like


  2. If you’re going to get married…which is utterly reckless, the key is to never marry a woman who makes less money than you. Never.

    Like


    • Shortly after 2:00PM today [Aug 13 2014], the Chateau received a huge national media shout-out: “This is Rush Limbaugh, joining you here in THE DARKNESS”, followed by an on-air chuckle.

      Like


      • I felt like he was sitting right behind me in the car.

        Hi Rush!

        Like


      • BTW, El Rushbo has been divorce-raped three times so far.

        I hope that Rogers chick doesn’t make it four.

        Like


      • Rush is still a God. A tie-wearing, cigar smoking, football watching, sometimes leather jacket wearing man, more than willing to travel to male paradise in Central America for some ‘manning up’ activities on occasion. I’ve never met him and would trust him with anything. Good guy.

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:18 pm The Spirit Within

        Rush Limbaugh has the self-esteem of a weevil. He shits where he sleeps, can’t look people in the eye, and can’t stop getting divorced. He’s nothing but an angry omega with a very large bullhorn.

        And he’s already walked back his comments about Robin Williams.

        Like


      • Shortly after 1:35 p.m. today [Aug 14 2014], Zombie Shane received a huge national media shout-out: Dr. Michael Savage used the word “darkness” while discussing Mork’s suicide on his radio show. Bulletproof evidence that Dr. Savage is a regular reader of the Chateau. Drinks on me.

        Like


      • Oscar Mayer Wiener Academy fifth-columnist philo-semitic toad tries to stick a knife in Rush’s back:

        http://minx.cc:1080/?post=351150

        Like


    • Robin Williams had a history of depression. Unless he wrote in his suicide note that he offed himself in specifically in part because of his two divorces, it is mere wild speculation that his ex-wives were the primary cause.

      Like


    • So………… don’t get married then. Because last time I checked, most men make more than their female counterparts due to, you know… the system not viewing women as equals.

      [CH: please tell me you’re joking.]

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 10:51 pm Modern Primitive

      I’m dating a doctor. Winning.

      Like


    • As I wrote before, it was his addiction to marriage that killed him. Plus I have little doubt that he could see the current wife lining him up for another ass raping and that was too much. Sleeping in separate bedrooms? After only three years? Not checking up on him even though she knew he was fucking down in the dumps? I hope he at least gave her herpes before he died….

      Like


    • Marrying someone who makes more than you is not a wise long term, divorce-avoidance plan. Most women quit their careers (or significantly down-size) at some point — either to have kids or because … they are women.

      Like


    • Don’t marry period. Even if you marry a woman who makes as much as or even more than you do, she can always reduce her work hours or even quit her job after the wedding. Why? Just so she can claim that she “sacrificed her career” for you and then take you for what you got.

      Like


  3. This country depends too much on the value of the Beta Male to the economy to allow opinions like this to be voiced without subsequent marginalization by the Cathedral.

    The single mothers living-off alimony don’t just drag down the Beta. They drag down the economy. You talk like this in ‘polite’ conversation and are a misogynist.

    Like


  4. on August 13, 2014 at 1:31 pm The Burninator

    They are trying desperately hard to not put too much attention on this in the news. Expect articles mentioning his huge divorces to go back page and the ones focused solely on “the tragedy of suicide” to get permanent play.

    I figured out the divorce angle the moment I read his quote about ripping out your heart through your wallet, combined with stated hatred of doing movies as it made him feel dark, but he had to do them to basically eat.

    imagine that, Robin Williams basically forced to work to afford to eat. And the Cathedral desperately wants you to not put 2 and 2 together.

    Like


  5. What will be interesting to watch and see is whether most, if any, news sources will be interested in searching for “root causes” in his death, and if so, will they be honest about it. Will ANYONE of them dare to ask whether his ex-wives deserved to financially eviscerate him?

    Yeah, I know that is a rhetorical. Just fascinating to watch it in real time.

    They are so fond of finding root causes to explain tragedy, particularly when they can use it against the enemies of leftist thinking.

    Got to hand it to guys like George Clooney, whatever else you might think of the guy. He absolutely friggin’ refuses to get caught up in this kind of drama, whether it is marriage or getting a woman pregnant. Wonder if he’s careful, or he simply had himself snipped?

    Seems to me ANY guy who has some means, and thus much to lose, should simply freeze some genetic essence for possible procreation and get a vasectomy, rather than risk getting rolled. I bet Gibson wishes he’d gone that direction.

    Like


    • Clooney is engaged.

      Like


      • there are credible rumors clooney is gay.

        Like


      • Egads! I am behind on my celebrity gossip! The same was said about Cary Grant, but he married five times.

        Like


      • there’s a celebrity rag called ‘blind gossip’ or something that claimed clooney was seen entering a hotel late at night to visit a room that was being used by a platoon of young men for a gay party. tbh, he doesn’t give me much of a gay vibe, but he is an actor after all.

        Like


      • Thanks for the scoop, CH. And here’s some for you 🙂

        Like


      • Clooney has refused to answer the question whether he is homosexual. (“Gay” is a propaganda word promoted by the media.) His excuse is that it “wouldn’t be fair to my gay friends to say that I’m not”. Which is a ridiculous crap, like almost everything said by lying leftists.

        Like


      • But it could just be the breeze blowing her dress, or too many carbs.

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 3:17 pm The Spirit Within

        Arbiter, try to understand this: the less an icon reveals, the more people adore him. Ambiguity creates attraction.

        Haven’t you learned anything from this site?

        Like


      • Arbiter, try to understand this: the less an icon reveals, the more people adore him. Ambiguity creates attraction.

        Haven’t you learned anything from this site?

        Dumb comment as usual from Socialist Within. “the less an icon reveals” LOL The celebrities reveal everything about themselves, moron. Nice little try to excuse the pervert’s lie.

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 5:41 pm The Spirit Within

        @Arbiter

        Maybe you want to click on the Sixteen Commandments of Poon.

        VI. Keep her guessing

        Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel.

        Like


      • VI. Keep her guessing

        Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel.

        For pete sake. We’re talking about making her fantasize that your masculinity is higher than it is, not lower.

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:14 pm The Spirit Within

        Corvinus, please explain the mass sexual appeal — to women — of sexually ambivalent male entertainers such as Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Prince, Russell Brand, etc. They’ve all worn eyeliner, tights, and heels. Not to mention all the disposable teenybopper idols who flatout look like women.

        The most effective womanizers in entertainment keep themselves sexually ambivalent, probably to reflect women’s desires back upon themselves. A narcissistic loop that creates attraction.

        tl;dr — Stone Cold Steve Austin isn’t winning any Shagger of the Year awards.

        Like


      • So that’s what Bruce Jenner’s up to!

        Like


      • Being asked if you’re gay (by a woman) is not such a bad thing. Be ambiguous. Let her figure it out.

        Like


      • Corvinus, please explain the mass sexual appeal — to women — of sexually ambivalent male entertainers such as Mick Jagger, David Bowie, Prince, Russell Brand, etc. They’ve all worn eyeliner, tights, and heels. Not to mention all the disposable teenybopper idols who flatout look like women.

        I’d put it on their being famous and in a rock band playing guitar and singing, not their acting like fa99ots. If anything, they act like fa99ots because they can. A run-of-the-mill average guy would simply and justifiably get hazed like an emo.

        Like


      • Always thought that of him…

        Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 2:07 pm midnight toker

      “Seems to me ANY guy who has some means, and thus much to lose, should simply freeze some genetic essence for possible procreation and get a vasectomy, rather than risk getting rolled.”

      exactly. you can’t trust women to handle the birth control and some of them will intentionally get knocked up. i don’t know how much it costs to store your seed for long term but it makes sense. especially if you’re planning on having kids later in life. that would sure give you more freedom and a lot less stress. you’d also have the benefit of having young manjuice for babies later so you’d be using the best stuff you’ve got. younger genetic material is always going to better than the old stuff.

      Like


      • > “some of them will intentionally get knocked up”

        Which ought to be a GOOD thing – a blessing – not a curse.

        Like


      • I disagree, Zombie Shane. Again, it is not more Whites we need, but to convince the Whites who already live. Which will be done once the dollar ceases to be the world’s dominant trade currency – which will happen when technology makes it easier and easier to “jump” from one currency to another in order for country A to buy from country B.

        You can’t solve mass immigration by having more children. Not when the globalists can turn on a tap containing billions of Third Worlders. So either the Whites already alive – and still a majority in the West – organize to stop this, in which case they can beat opponents three times more numerous, or they don’t organize, in which case more Whites born to be brainwashed won’t make a difference.

        Besides, you can’t make Whites have more children by telling them they should. People have many children only when they need them to provide for them when they get old. Whites are predisposed to having few children and raise them with quality, so when kids are not needed to provide for their parents in their old age, you can shout at people to have more children ’til kingdom come and it won’t happen.

        As for women getting accidentally pregnant – how would that be good? Children growing up without a parent are far more likely to turn leftist and to live a gutter life. And making people have children from unwanted pregnancies WILL NOT lead to more children. It will lead to a teenage girl becoming a single mother, which greatly reduces her chances of marrying. These girls will live alone with their one child for many years. If they can avoid the unwanted pregnancy instead, they are much more likely to marry, in which case they can have children within marriage.

        And if anyone suggests the solution to unwanted pregnancies is to tell people not to have sex before marriage – get real. That is not going to happen. People are having sex outside of marriage and that’s that. I for one would not want to change that, sex is a big part of people’s lives, married or unmarried, and it is good that we can enjoy it.

        For anyone who wants to actually do something, there is only one way: organize. Join an organization, one that explicitly addresses the problem, or that is implicitly against it.

        Like


      • When the manosphere informs its white customers to refrain from marrying and having children, the inevitable result is fewer white children being born. Welcome to the decline.

        Like


  6. I HATE divorce. Hate it with a passion. It ruins lives. It hurts children profoundly.
    But on the other hand, how poor could Robin Williams have been? He was not likely to be starving, tightening his wallet strings a little yes, but poor? If he had 20 million mansion to sell, financial problems solved, yes? Even if he lost everything, does that mean he would kill himself? No, men have endured poverty before. It was everything else that went with it.

    The mental problems that would have caused him, not so easily solved. The feelings of failure, rejection, heartbreak, bitterness, hopelessness.

    My thoughts about marriage. If one is not Christian, there is no logical reason to marry. Marriage is a sacrament. The secular version of marriage is a cruel joke. If one marries in the Orthodox Church it is not easy to get a divorce, and in fact when you get that divorce you will be excommunicated for some time.
    In traditional culture, divorce comes at a big price, even if the women is not at fault. It means excommunication from Church, social stigma that you are not a righteous woman because you left your man, struggling to feed your babies, or even custody of your babies.

    In many countries now assets are divided 50/50. I am not sure about my opinion of the ethics of that, it is a difficult opinion to form when you believe divorce is wrong full stop.

    But overall, yes this is what happens, all too often. Robin Williams was famous, (God have mercy on his soul), so this gets attention. But there are millions of other men in his place. There are heartbroken men, poor men, men having to raise their children alone or worse, losing custody of their children. Eventually this kind of stress on the psyche causes mental health problems, depression, illness, alcoholism and even suicide.

    Society is not going to wake up any time soon, so precautions must be taken with marriage. That does not mean I am against marriage, because it is a beautiful sacrament, but when abused hell hath no fury like it.
    So, better to marry in Church where divorce is difficult to obtain, if not, get pre nup.
    This is a topic close to my heart.

    Like


    • About the 50/50 asset split. If the divorce is fault of the woman, she should get nothing. If the father has custody, she should get nothing.

      If the divorce was fault of the man, it is justifiable.
      But to prove that fault in a court of Law, is something difficult. So it is a delicate topic I know little about.

      Like


      • If the divorce was fault of the man, it is justifiable.

        Why?

        Like


      • Because if a woman’s children were in danger because he was abusive If the family have been abused at the hands of the man. etc.

        It is not common, but theoretically in such case I think it would justify the woman to have half, for ethical reasons. If she has been a good house wife, and now can not feed her babies? The father does not want them?

        Do not take this at my complete word on it, I am theorizing. It is not black and white. There are too many what if’s in such situation.

        What is your opinion?

        Like


      • It is not common, but theoretically in such case I think it would justify the woman to have half, for ethical reasons. If she has been a good house wife, and now can not feed her babies? The father does not want them?

        Women can get jobs, same as men. If they don’t get jobs they get unemployment checks or welfare. When two adults are not married, person A is not responsible for person B.

        Like


      • But not everybody can get much money to feed their children and house them. Usually the money you would get barely cover rent. Child benefit is 500 euro per year. Unemployment benefit requires you to have previously paid taxes in work. House benefit is also difficult to obtain. If you are an uneducated woman and you go to work full time 600 euro per month, your rent is 400 per month, it is impossible to pay for child care for children and clothe and feed them. Unless a woman comes from wealthy family, she will struggle a lot. In that case the man needs to pay for his children.

        Like


      • I think whether the mother or father has custody of the children, the other one needs to pay for their children.

        Like


      • I should clarify. There is a national minimum wage, but if one is not educated there are people working for 500 euros a month. Some less, the net average for a domestic worker is 314 euros a month. If somebody is educated and works a good job it can be 2500, which is a great salary for a family. A single parent supporting a family on a 3 figure salary is very difficult, whether man or woman. I do not know about no fault divorce or the conditions of divorce and alimony, but I do believe that if a woman forgoes education to marry her husband young, he needs to make sure the children are provided for even if he leaves. And women should not be able to not pay also if they are leaving their children with the father.

        Like


      • Now that we have no-fault divorce, it is exceedingly difficult to obtain a divorce decree assigning fault to either party. Lawyers and judges don’t want the hassle.

        Like


    • how much money did williams have… look at it this way, say he made 30m last year, after taxes, 65%, thats basically 20m off the top leaving 10m. not bad… but theres agent, accountant and lawyers…. agent is prob 10%or 3m, accountant and lawyers around a million together now hes down to 6m. 100k alimony times 2 times 12 is 2.4m. down to 3.6. child support, insurance, schooling is around 20k/kid per month. 60k times 12 is about 1m. down to about 2.5m to pay all his business expenses and living expenses, houses cars… he might have money but hes not really rich by hollywood standards. professional athletes and actors may make a lot of money but he was not rich.

      Like


    • No such thing as stress raising a child on your own. If I found myself a single dad raising my own children I would feel like the luckiest man that ever lived. It would in fact be true.

      Like


      • My father was a single father. It was difficult for him and lonely.He did not have social life and he dated only once or twice. It is hard on men, greyghost.

        Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 11:48 am midnight toker

        “It is hard on men, greyghost.”

        yes it is. AND hard on the children.

        jesus greyghost, you sound just as selfish and delusional as those women who choose to be single mothers because they think children don’t need fathers.

        kids with single fathers do better than kids with single mothers, we all know that. that doesn’t mean single parenthood is better than having two parents. kids need both.

        Like


      • midnight toker.

        Yes it is difficult for children too. Maybe greyghost just does not understand that, because he is not single father, it is okay, bless him.

        There is a feeling of rejection, and emotional problems you have to get over. The parent who divorced your other parent, you can sometimes be angry and have issues with that gender, especially if your parent is emotionally vulnerable after the divorce, which most people would be.

        In many ways you take the childhood from the child, especially if a young boy of a single mother home is having to be the man of the home from young, or the daughters of a single father home have to be the woman of the home from young.

        When you are a child, you just do not understand why. You feel not wanted, but you learn from early age not to express your own pain because your parent is also in pain. There are often psychological issues such as fear of abandonment early on and obsessive thoughts about something happening to the parent who is caring for you. It is a recipe for neurosis.

        Tragically, today I heard of another suicide, just a few hours ago. A woman with a 2 year old son killed herself due to severe depression after the death of several close relatives recently. The husband is 50 years old and is now a single father. God have mercy, on her soul, and comfort and give strength to the son and the father. They are in for a tough time. It is so tragic, words can not explain correctly.

        Like


      • You all sound like childless single people I have 3 kids and I know a man that had his wife leave him and his 3 kids. It is not as hard as having a wife and kids . Children raised by men do very well and why would a man with kids want to date any way. I call bullshit on the both of you. One is just a female offended by the idea of a father happily raising HIS children.

        Like


      • NO Greyghost. I was raised by a single father since I was 4 years old. With 5 sisters.

        It might be easier if your wife is horrible and causing more stress yes. But is is not “easy:” or stress free. I am not a female offended that by a single father happily raising his children. I am offended on behalf of men like my father who happily raised their children alone, with out a woman, but not with ease. Men who think it is easy are deluded. Dating? How to date when you have many children at home? Leasure time? It is now with your children.
        A man with out the money to pay a woman to help has to do it all, cook, clean, dress their children. etc.

        The men who are single parents have difficult time, it is not natural for a man to raise his children alone and be both mother and father.

        You might think it is easy, but please consider the men who’s hearts are absolutely broken from their wives divorcing them and then having to take care of the children, and not having much money.

        Childless single people? Se parakalo.

        Other than that, I wish you all the best in your single parenthood. And if you think being single father is easy? You are superman.

        Like


      • “Why would a man with kids want to date anyway?”

        Why would he not? He is still a man. Just because he has children does not mean his needs as a man are no more. I think that a single father’s loneliness must be difficult for him. As a single father, how can you not understand that? Do you think mother leaves him, so he magically hyper estrogenic, and has no manly needs any more?

        Like


  7. Jack wrote: “never marry a woman who makes less money than you.”

    You realize that you can’t stop her from quitting her job, right? Statistically women are very likely to quit demanding careers, just a few years after graduating college, and especially after having kids.

    Like


    • You can tell her all the cutbacks she will have to make when she quits her job: no more Carribean vacations, no more German cars, we will have to now somewhere where I an make more money — maybe the Midwest. That kept her working the last 15 years.

      Like


      • “no more Carribean vacations, no more German cars,…”

        And no more illegal daycare providers for little Madison and Phoenix, which means that YOU, Mom, will have to stay home, and raise them — which is terrible, indeed, because they may grow up actually getting to know you and you them, adopting your values instead of someone else’s and [trigger warning!] perhaps even learning to speak English without a foreign accent. Yes, terrible, indeed.

        Let’s try a re-write: “Never marry a woman who does not put her role as wife and mother first.” (Nah, that’ll never fly.)

        Like


    • They have a huge problem on this with female surgeons. Just about the time a hospital has invested a couple of $m into a surgeon and they are at the point where they are beginning their most productive stretch of their career is the point where women calculate that they have to check out for a few years if they’re going to have any kids. Then a lot of them do. They don’t ever really make it back.

      The hospitals know this. They know that female surgeons are a bad investment. They know that they’ll abandon ship and leave the hospital short-handed. They know that the ones coming back from mommydom aren’t nearly the surgeons that the ones that continued their practice (mostly guys) are… but they still have to hire them anyway. You wonder why your surgery was so expensive? You’re paying for this.

      Like


  8. If marriage is shit deal for men, and it is, then modernity is a shit deal for men who want children.

    Marriage and children are inextricably linked. Yeah, there is the view that kids are a funsuck. I would never try to persuade a man who is against kids otherwise. But the desire for legacy, and genetic continuity and rearing your own flesh and blood towards flourishing adulthood has an appeal to many men. The best way to do this is has always been marriage, as marriage goes so does K-selected child rearing and all the good stuff that comes along with that.

    Yeah, there is the Swedish style co-habitation child rearing. Works great for the swedes but thinking it can apply universally would be wide-eyed blank slate bullshit. Many people need the structure and discipline of god-fearing marriage for lifelong monogamy to work.

    So if you want kids I guess it comes down to (a) cohabitate with a Swede (b) put your nuts in the vice that is modern marriage.

    (To the daisy fresh PUA rookies who just read Sperm Wars and would argue that you should cuckold-a-beta for children, I’d point out that net genetic legacy isn’t the point, part of the appeal of fatherhood is rearing the children yourself. Of course, if you don’t get it, you won’t get it.)

    Like


    • Gay marriage is the best friend of single men. career women waiting to have kids and queers are our best friend. They will bring the market pressure for surrogacy. Gay men are a God send (imagine saying that in this context ) Now it wil be “normal” for men to be around surrogacy clinics and with volume comes investment in more clinics and them you will have competition and a need to keep the place open. Single men will fill the void.

      Like


  9. A man that could still joke about being raped by the legal system. A true liberal to the end.

    rape!

    Like


  10. OK, his divorces cost $20 million, he owned a $20 million ranch.

    Do the math. I believe he also had a $35 million house and tens of millions of dollars in other assets for a net worth north of $100 million.

    Now, was his problem divorce, or he wasn’t willing to sell assets to deal with his foolish decisions?

    Yes, divorce is Hell, but he’d weathered that storm already. What we have here is a guy who tragically failed to realize that his significance did not lie in assets he could sell to pay his debts.

    Like


    • >>he owned a $20 million ranch
      >>he also had a $35 million house

      He might’ve financed them with mortgages with onerous terms and the monthly payments (and property taxes) were too big to bear. I doubt he paid cash for properties.

      He probably fell prey to the idea that the millions per year were going to continue – just like what happens to pro athletes who go broke paying for their entourages and overleveraging themselves with expensive property.

      Like


    • What some of you are forgetting or lost is that Robin Williams and his latest wife were not sleeping together. She last saw him at 10 pm and she was not the one to discover him. His assistant was. I think the last wife had just informed him he was going to be divorced once again.

      Like


  11. Men are resource chattel, milked by a constabulary of strongmen to redistribute their earnings to an army of cackling divorcees.

    Just had to be said again.

    Like


  12. fuck america. i blame all you red pill guys for not starting an armed revolution as your founding fathers would have expected you to do so every 100 years or so. enjoy your primordial cesspool while you and all your loved ones slowly drown in it.

    Like


    • > “i blame all you red pill guys for not starting an armed revolution as your founding fathers would have expected you to do so every 100 years or so.”

      Jew – be patient – it’s coming. LOL’ed.

      Like


      • Jew – be patient – it’s coming. LOL’ed.

        If you don’t do something quick, I’m going to have to go back to Israel!

        Like


      • you talk the talk zombie shane, i fucking dare you to put your jewgold where your mouth is. truth being, of course, your nation of obesity / feminism / negro-latin culture would rather wait for season 5 of game of thrones rather than fight, even protest, for what they believe in. makes you admire the westboro baptists for having a spine in a country of slugs.

        Like


  13. Some especially dark humor from Forbes:

    “While the real estate, the children’s trust funds, and any life insurance will not technically be part of Robin Williams’ estate, his ongoing royalties, earnings from new deals over his image and likeness, and future releases of his comedy material would be managed through his estate, unless he had previously assigned those rights to another trust or a corporate entity. These should add up to significant value.”

    Thank goodness! How does one possibly LIVE without millions in the bank!

    “While nothing can make the horrific loss of Robin Williams better for his family, at least he appears to have taken the proper steps with his legal planning to avoid the pain from becoming worse.

    It’s a lesson that others can learn from. While few people will need the sophisticated type of estate planning that Williams used, a revocable living trust can help anyone who wants to help their loved ones avoid the pain, cost, stress, and publicity of probate court. Because of his foresight, Robin Williams’ family can focus on grieving and not have to worry about unnecessary complications with his estate.”

    Har, har, fn har. Wasn’t it nice of him to allow them to focus on grieving instead of thieving? I wonder if they will use the time to contemplate the blood on their hands.

    Like


    • alpha fux, dead beta bux

      Like


    • Almost as if they knew his suicide was a realistic possibility.

      Like


      • Sounds to me like he thought third marriage was a realistic possibility.

        Like


      • The people who knew him day to day in the real world would have known better than anybody that suicide was a realistic possibility.

        I find his death sort of liberating, actually. I don’t have a fraction of his talent, fame, success, or wealth, but even if I did, it probably wouldn’t do a damn thing to fix any of my underlying problems.

        Neither would pussy, if I could get it.

        Like


      • Some ex-wives encourage it. You know, for the life insurance.

        Like


      • @xxxxxxxxxx: “Past statistics have shown that in the U.S. 50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second, and 73% of third marriages end in divorce.” I will be interested to learn more about his third wife.

        Like


      • all the funnels of hell lead to the same source

        Like


    • on August 14, 2014 at 8:56 am Holden Caulfield

      and don’t forget that 70% (or more) of divorces are initiated by the woman, knowing she’s going to get free cash out of the deal

      Like


  14. here’s one for the ladies. dating advice from a eunuch: http://tinyurl.com/lkduj7s

    sometimes I feel like I woke up in the Old Testament.

    Like


  15. “Clooney is engaged.”

    Yeah, okay.

    One, call me when he actually takes the plunge and signs on the dotted line. Until he does, it is irrelevant…

    “When George and Stacy (his last girlfriend) got together, he told her she would be the one he’d marry — and that they could have kids.”

    http://thestir.cafemom.com/entertainment/172164/stacy_keiblers_reaction_to_george

    Engaged is not married. Engagement does not lose you half of your wealth.

    Engagement gets you:

    A) Positive Press for a career that relies on keeping your name current

    B) Hot “I am going to marry a famous movie star” sex from your fiance’

    C) Other beautiful women working overtime to get a piece of that or steal you away

    D) Even more press if you walk away from it

    Two,

    If Clooney is DOES actually take the dive, he is doing it when he is 52, and to a woman nearly twenty years younger, but who is at the age where child bearing really becomes difficult and less likely. I suspect that even if he marries, I don’t think kids are on the menu. If they are not, then why the hell marry, which leaves me to believe this will “fall through”.

    If he does do it, he has still set himself up for a good SMV balance (she’s attractive, but not the best he could or has gotten looks wise) and I will bet the pre-up they have with be as close to bullet-proof as possible.

    Bottom line, Clooney kept himself out of the honey trap for most of his adult life, and certainly his prime years.

    Like


  16. I have only seen one of his movies (Dead Poets Society) and probably an episode of Mork and Mindy (for I had no idea what it was about), and thus in light of events it was odd that only a day or so before his death I caught a clip of him from a talk show where it was clear he was utterly manic – and probably therefore at other times depressive. I would suggest that that rather than Divorce per se was the catalyst of his suicide.

    A further exacerbating factor is that the higher the gods raise you the further you fall and paying men truck loads of dollars to pretend to be someone else is asking for hubris. Even actors like Williams no longer had box-office appeal.

    Was he still funny or as with Cleese does one now sit there Stony-faced?

    Like


    • Dead Poets Society – where conservative teaching is boring and bad, leftist hippie-style nonsense teaching is cool and good. Conservative parents are bad, oppressive, don’t show up for birthdays, and must be spurned. They drive a student to suicide, and then the poor innocent leftist teacher is made the scapegoat. Evil, evil conservatives. Typical propaganda movie. Typical for the socialist, drug-using alcoholic Robin Williams’ career: he knew what tribe runs Hollywood, and he knew how to cater to them. They don’t care if you are a drug-using piece of trash, that’s only a plus.

      Funny though how his second wife was the kids’ nanny, and the third wife was his nurse. Pathetic lower-beta behavior to fall for the woman who is closest and who gives you a smile, knowing how much money you have.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if he wanted to divorce his third wife too, after six years of marriage, and realized he couldn’t since he was already in dire financial straits. A third divorce would have cleaned him out. The rope was the only way out. A leftist broken by feminist divorce laws, how ironic. I hope he realized this right before the end.

      Like


      • I always found his shickt annoying… and the only few funny lines I can remember are when he voiced the genii in Alladin.

        He was the darling of the Cathedral memes… from Dead Poets to Good Will Hunting to Mrs. Doubtfire.

        Meh… next.

        Like


      • Even so, the suicide boy’s parents were appalling. In fact they were just like mine though as you see I failed to kill myself, but you do not want to hear of my bitterness towards my parents.

        Like


    • I watched every episode of Mork and Mindy and he was clearly manic, i.e. bipolar. Which accounts for the drug use and alcoholism.

      I know a woman who is bipolar and undergoes electroshock for it. As does Carrie Fisher.

      Like


      • The only Robin Williams movie I remember seeing was ‘Jumanji’, and that was crap. Other than that, I think I saw him a couple of times on comedy specials and he sounded rather bitter, not funny at all.
        With the kind of money he was likely making in royalties, appearances, etc. , I doubt his divorces were the catalyst for his suicide, there must have been a deeper psychological reason.

        Like


  17. Get stabbed in the neck by your wife, then jack-booted thugs come and take all your guns and break all your thousand dollar safes. Who wouldn’t want to get married in this legal climate?

    “Mr. Litner owned almost 200 guns in five vaults, had tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition in the home, and around 300 pounds of black powder. Because he did not consent to the search, cops used a jaws-of-life from the local fire department to open the safes, which are worth thousands of dollars in their own right.
    Multiple law enforcement agencies were called to the scene to help confiscate the collection, and Mr. Lintner was charged with causing or risking widespread injury or damage for possessing more than 30 pounds of black powder. He pleaded not guilty.”

    http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/new-jersey-police-arrest-seize-domestic-assault-victims-firearms/#ixzz3AIxGvNqc

    Like


  18. on August 13, 2014 at 2:21 pm gunslingergregi

    wow

    Like


  19. on August 13, 2014 at 2:33 pm gunslingergregi

    people on this thread don’t seem to get how much money money is
    its all spndable
    so he had 20 mill house was It paid off
    and 20 mil divorce
    but also sizable alimony monthly payments every month
    why don’t these guys just hire someone to kill the wives is what I don’t get
    should be in the prenump and paid for before marriage in vent of breakup wife take them court boom dude come and handles businss

    Like


  20. on August 13, 2014 at 2:33 pm gunslingergregi

    I guess goes to show money isn’t necessarily power
    power Is power

    Like


  21. on August 13, 2014 at 2:35 pm gunslingergregi

    im jealous I can admit it

    Like


  22. on August 13, 2014 at 2:36 pm gunslingergregi

    i’m thinking he was killed though cause he didn’t take wives with him
    someone figured worth more dead than alive

    Like


  23. He probably found himself at 63 with everything he had to show for it stripped away from him. All the struggle and hard work for nothing except feeding the ex-wives. Without that monkey on his back he might possibly have been able to deal with starting all over again at 63. But with those burdens he probably looked at what the remainder of his life would be like and said “I can’t take this s**t. I’m checking out.”

    Like


  24. I wonder what the female parasites will do now that their multi-million dollar meal ticket has offed himself???

    Like


  25. In library, sitting right across for a cute girl. She smiled, and stifled laughter as I opened up a large ziplock of blueberries. We both had good eye contact for like 10 seconds. Was a fool and missed the opportunity to open there, now we’re both quietly studying need a good opener, quick!

    Thought about offering her some blueberries – about 2 minutes after we had the prolonged eye contact.

    Silently cursing my lack of initiative in this moment

    Like


  26. too bad american justice is not fair and is indeed wholly rigged against the interest of men.

    Like


  27. “If America is fated to be a post-Malthusian, r-selection reproductive free-for-all, then let it be in every way. That means, women are cut loose from the male alimony and child support teat to fend for themselves and accept the consequences of their decisions.”

    The State being what it is, I suspect every demand for social change is foredoomed to begin with redressing legitimate grievances, to then be hijacked by opportunists, and to end as a grab for power and the resources of those outside of power.

    Like


  28. on August 13, 2014 at 3:00 pm St Pete Railer

    We certainly don’t know all the factors, or all the numbers, but my own experience has painful similarities. Ex wife became the town ‘ho, in more ugly glory than you can imagine – a pathological narcissist. Had two young sons that I mostly raised because she was “busy.” In the divorce I proved these facts beyond question, lots of forensic accounting, and iced with the testimony of her then disgusted former best friend. Judge said “I don’t care if she’s doing the entire Tampa Bay Buccaneers, she’s the mother.” I was crushed, crushed, crushed financially. Lost everything, and worst, lost most of my middle class income for at least the next dozen or more years. I couldn’t afford to live on what little was left.

    Like far too many divorced fathers, I momentarily considered ending it. Plan B was to abandon my kids and leave the country. Instead, I went to the law library, got smart, and fought back. Whittled enough away to at least survive. Still ugly, but it restored hope that I could eventually surmount this.

    And, although the alimony was onerous, it was at least time limited. If it had been “permanent,” then I doubt my story would have had this reasonably happy ending. So whether you’re a movie star, pro athlete, or middle class schmuck, the Courts enslave you based on your financial life remaining perfect. And when your income inevitably falls, or takes a temporary dip, you’re totally, totally screwed. Alimony and child support only go up, never down.

    Child support hurts, but at least there’s an eventual end to it. Handing over your pension, 401Ks, your small business, and income (you may not now, or ever again have) for life can leave a man hopeless.

    Don’t marry – ever.

    Like


    • I told my ex wife that I would eat a bullet before I gave her a cent. I told her this right after she left me. I did not make this statement out of sadness or anything like that but pure pragmatism. I have seen where men make it abundantly clear and are known for having the guts to do something like this or even leaving the country right off the rip seem to experience less thievery from their ex’s.

      My question is why didnt you just refuse to pay her shit, take the money you had and changed your identity?

      Women know they can use the children against men. Take that threat off of the table and MAKE SURE they absolutely know that you will walk away from the childrens lives without a backwards glance. This takes, maybe not all, but a lot to most of the power away from them. Another thing is men need to consider that when facing a divorce make plans to shut down and liquidate any business and cash in all retirement accounts. Stash the cash and if anything its better to give it to the lawyers than an ex wife.

      Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 5:03 pm St Pete Railer

        Agree with you whole heartedly. My story was the old me, the boy scout who played by the rules, who naively believed in truth, justice and the American Way. F’ all that – it doesn’t work in our current, feminist, misandric, dystopia. So my words are meant to dissuade the new suckers from the 50/50 odds of being crushed and having their hearts, children, and wallets ripped out.

        Prevention is the key and NOT MARRYING greatly limits the potential for damage (and ironically, eliminates the evil allure of divorce theft).

        If I had a do-over, I’d follow your instructions and add a few tricks of my own. It is hard to dump accounts and hide cash at the last minute so every man should have a secret and substantial war chest. If you’re one of the few who doesn’t need it then it becomes found money later in life. The first thing her attorney will do is starve you of funds and income – count on it. Keep the nut and income she knows about as small as possible. Increasingly hard to do these days with Big Brother so intrusive.

        Like


      • I did much the same when my divorce happened. I made it abundantly clear to the ex and the lawyer that I would happily go the slash’n’burn route through everything if she wanted to push her luck, and would leave nothing at all for either of us.

        They was very meek. They knew that I’d do it, and that I would bounce back from it better than she could.

        Nuke the site from orbit is always an option.

        Like


      • Women often show little empathy for men, especially men they have discarded. It doesn’t seem like sound strategy to tell somebody you’ll off yourself when that somebody might not care or might be happy if you did. Worse, a suicide threat is an open invitation for her to attempt committing you. If she succeeds she would have no obstacle to her designs on your finances, and gets revenge (in the form of your loss of liberty) in the bargain.

        Like


      • Its her word against mine. I have enough people around me to vouch for my general stability. Being a vet and sometimes being a firearms instructor, I must always make sure I am stable. As for empathy, your right they often no longer care about you as a husband, but they will usually take a second look at things if they know you would do it for sure hence abruptly leaving them in a position with nothing. Shit I would cancel the insurance and burn the house down if I really needed to play dirty. The thing is that most men don’t have the balls to exercise a full nuclear retaliation, even when the ex is lobing tac nukes at them. I am a firm supporter of MAD.

        Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 10:15 am Hugh G. Rection

        Worse, a suicide threat is an open invitation for her to attempt committing you. If she succeeds she would have no obstacle to her designs on your finances, and gets revenge (in the form of your loss of liberty) in the bargain.

        Not really, the problem is if you’re in the loony bin you aren’t earning money any more, you might even lose your job. Whatever she gets initially is nothing compared to what she’ll get in alimony. Just imagine how much money you would have if you’d save half your income every month for the next 12 years.

        Like


  29. on August 13, 2014 at 3:01 pm EvilDictatorGuy

    Women should exit a marriage with exactly that which they entered it with, not a penny more. If they generated their own wealth and assets during that time, they can keep only those, at best. If they cheated they should receive nothing, their paramour should be legally required to compensate the husband or take 5-10 lashes if he has no money, and the wife should receive 5 lashings and some minor jail time. Bwahahahaha!

    Like


    • ^This.
      Divorce must become something no more complicated or costly to the man than breaking up with a girlfriend.

      Like


    • This is how it is in most Western nations. If you brought in 40 or 60 percent of the household’s total income, you get 40 or 60 percent of the household’s assets in a divorce. Though if you brought in nothing there is still a minimum that you get, maybe 15 percent (it varies, it can be much less than 15 percent).

      And that’s it. Then it’s over. You go to work, whether you’re a woman or a man. Or you get unemployment checks or go on welfare. Same as everybody else. Once the divorce is over you have nothing to do with the person you were married to, that person is not responsible for your life.

      The U.S. – well, large parts of it – is more conservative than most of the West, so it is surprising that the alimony law still exists. Maybe it has to do with how much the wife’s lawyer makes. And there is a certain Tribe that makes big bucks in the lawyer profession, and has the ear of their brethren in the media.

      But let’s not forget that conservatism can be very white-knighting. Heck, even in conservative Iran men have to pay women a predetermined “mehrieh” when she asks for it (which she does when she wants a divorce), often a sum bigger than what the man makes in his whole lifetime, and if he can’t pay he goes to debtor’s prison, which tens of thousands of men do. The judges are eager to protect the poor, defenseless women against the men – why, women are the heart of the family, the hearth of the home, the mothers of the nation’s brave little children, etc etc etc.

      So in the U.S. we have this white-knighting: women didn’t work in the past, and got alimony because of that, and now it would be “cruel” to take it away. And this is coupled with leftist exploitation. Foolish. As so often, conservatism hands over territory to the Left because the Right always wants to be “fair”, while the Left couldn’t care less about being fair, only about taking as much as possible.

      I suppose any senator who suggested a change to this would be attacked by the media and abandoned by female voters. Once again democracy holds the productive imprisoned. Wait a hundred years until democracy has had its run and we’ll see a change in this law.

      Like


  30. on August 13, 2014 at 3:04 pm Amanjaw Marcuntte

    The more I think about the fundamental premise, the more it explains all of human history. Seriously, civilisation, war, religion, revolution, innovation, the whole freaking thing.

    Like


  31. Not a rape culture, but a CUCKOLD CULTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like


  32. Speaking of divorce laws, I found this gem at A Voice for Men through the Manosphere news wire:

    http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/indentured-servitude-for-men-in-iran-the-myth-of-patriarchal-oppressive-divorce-alimony/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=indentured-servitude-for-men-in-iran-the-myth-of-patriarchal-oppressive-divorce-alimony

    The New York Times lies by omission by saying that men in Iran, evil male oppressors that they are, can get instant divorce while for women it is a longer process “which can take many years”. (Note the “can”, also a lie by omission. In reality it usually takes a couple of weeks.) They also say that a man inherits 25 percent of his wife’s assets if she dies, but a woman inherits only 12.5 of her husband’s asset. Sexism!

    They “forget” the little matter of “mehrieh”, which means the sum of money a man agrees to pay to a woman when they marry. The sum is enormous, on average 450 gold coins, about $140,000, which in Iran takes about 200 years for the average man to earn. (The writer however has never seen a case where the mehrieh is less than 1,000 gold coins. Probably the average is lowered by people in the countryside.) A woman can ask for this sum at any point. Typically they do so at the same time as they ask for a divorce. If the husband can’t pay, he goes to debtor’s prison. His car, his home, all his possessions are sold to pay for the mehrieh. His relatives will have to sell what they own to try to get him out of prison.

    In 2011 the law was changed a bit in men’s favor: if a man pays 110 gold coins he can keep one of his homes (if he has two apartments one will be sold) and will be allowed to keep working in order to pay off the mehrieh. Typically two gold coins a month, about $615, which a woman can live off quite well in Iran. This goes on for several decades.

    After this more “lenient” 2011 law, in 2012 no less than 20,000 men still went to debtor’s prison because of mehrieh. Imagine how many there was before that.

    Mehrieh fraud is common. In one case the mehrieh was a woman’s weight in gold. As soon as the man had signed the papers, before the wedding had been planned, the bride-to-be sued for the mehrieh and got it. (The man’s family was rich and had to pay for him.)

    So that’s why divorce takes a bit longer for women than for men – there is a lot of money involved, and the man’s assets have to be frozen and confiscated. (Instantly frozen, and before 2011 he was instantly thrown out of his home.) However, if the wife agrees to walk away with only half the mehrieh, she gets instant divorce. If she wants all of it, she gets it if she can show one of many reasons for the divorce, such as that the man’s job (or lack of a job) shames her, or if they haven’t had sex in six months, etc.

    And if a virgin woman has sex with a man, she can sue him for mehrieh, on the grounds that she assumed they would get married. (Try to prove she wasn’t a virgin, why don’t you.)

    Also, a husband has to pay his wife a monthly “nafaqa”, living expences. By ancient Iranian and Islamic law, he can’t tell his wife what to do with the money. He can’t tell her to use it to help pay the rent, for example. Also, the nafaqa has to be at least as big as what she was used to before the marriage. If she had maids before the marriage, he has to pay for maids. Women can and will sue if they don’t get their nafaqa, and it is grounds for instant divorce with full mehrieh paid.

    If the husband dies, all that he owns is sold off to pay for the mehrieh and nafaqa – and if anything is left, the wife gets 12.5 percent of that too. (The rest goes to her closest kin.) If the wife dies, the husband gets 25 percent of her assets – but still has to pay the mehrieh to her closest kin.

    But the New York Times only wrote that “a widow only gets 12.5 percent of her husband’s assets, while a widower gets 25 percent.”

    A wife’s parents pay a dowry, but that is only furniture for the couple. The mehrieh is a huge threat hanging over a husband and his parents – they can be ruined, and often are.

    If media like the NYT mention the mehrieh at all, it is briefly at the end. And framed in such a way that it sounds like a recent addition to offset the wife’s hardships (that she can’t get instant divorce like a man can) – and there is no mention of how enormous the mehrieh is, or how 20,000 men go to debtor’s prison in a single year because of it. The truth is, mehrieh is ancient Islamic law, 1,400 years old. It was implemented as protection for women: “Send him to prison by mehrieh”. Strange how we never hear about it. But of course, that would chip away greatly at the feminist view of the world, where women are always defenseless victims, and especially when religion is involved.

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 5:13 pm gunslingergregi

      holy fucking shit man

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 5:14 pm gunslingergregi

      holy shit man

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 5:14 pm gunslingergregi

      omfg no wonder they want us muslim lol

      Like


      • I forgot to mention, that paying an ex-wife the equivalent of two gold coins per month year after year, decade after decade, is more than what the average Persian man earns. If he can’t pay, then off to prison he goes. So his parents, uncles, siblings etc will help him pay so he can stay out of prison.

        But – this isn’t technically alimony, since he is just paying off the pre-decided mehrieh debt. So in a huge NYT-style lie by omission we can say, “There is no alimony for women in Iran! How oppressive!”

        Once again the world turns out to be nothing like what the feminist teachers in school tell the children.

        Like


      • The feminist school marms aren’t the only ones who’re clueless about the rest of the world……

        Like


  33. To anyone claiming Robin Williams had “enough” money left over after his two ex-wives pillaged his portfolio, you are missing the point. To be a man means control of your destiny, engaging in productive work and reaping the rewards of what you sew. No matter how much money you have made, if someone takes half – and far worse, that someone is a cackling shrew who violated her wedding vows and initiated the divorce – that is a serious blow to one’s manhood. (I have no idea of the circumstances of Robin Williams’ two divorces, so I’m speculating here.)

    Couple that with it happening twice, and then being forced to pay exorbitant monthly alimony figures to two cackling shrews who you hate and who hate you, well, you are no longer in control of your destiny. When you know engaging in productive work only serves to enrich your enemy, why bother? And when you take away a man’s natural desire to be productive, to be a man, what’s the point?

    The injustice is compounded when the ex-wife has done nothing, absolutely nothing, to earn the money the man made (or the inverse, e.g., Kevin Federline). Did Robin Williams’ ex-wives support him through med school? Double especially so when the amount of money the ex-wife gets is wholly out of proportion to the marriage, ahem, “services” she has provided. Why does banging a movie star entitle one to millions when banging a regular Joe gets you basic sustenance? If anything it should be the other way around – having enjoyed a luxurious lifestyle for years, the ex-wife should get nothing more, having already been fully compensated.

    Imagine the financial rewards of your life’s work being ripped from you slowly, reminding you each month’s worth of five-figure alimony payments that you have been a slave to the matriarchy, and being at an age near retirement, knowing you have no time or energy to create an empire again, and even if you do, it will likely be stolen from you just like the other two times. Robin Williams should not have committed suicide, but should have been a man and stood up for himself, either refusing to pay (molon labe) or exposing his personal injustice – every detail and penny – and advocated for change.

    Men don’t just let injustice happen to them. Men fight injustice.

    Like


  34. CH: When I read Anonymous’ comment, something told me you would would bite – it was just too tasty a morsel to ignore. Glad you did.

    Going through my second D now, but I’ve been lucky – both were sufficiently done with my pursuit of other poon and had their own resources.

    Lucky me…I married well.

    Like


  35. commenter “Grim” would have a field day.

    speaking of which..

    Like


  36. A couple of unrelated thoughts:

    First, divorce laws are theoretically made for the Great Unwashed who make $32K a year (or whatever), and it pretty much never changes. What happens to actors and athletes is they are expected to continue to pay vaginamony and child support at their top-level earning years (assuming that’s when the divorce rape occurred) and so when the athlete retires, the musicians records aren’t selling and the actor doesn’t have the same box office appeal, tough noogies, you pay until you’re broke. Sure, you can go to court and try to get it changed, but then you’re a bad guy who wants to starve his kids, etc.

    Second, show me a really funny guy who is “on” all the time and I will show you a guy who had a really shitty childhood. Comedy is forged from Pain. When the kid who was excluded or rejected because he’s the Fat Kid (Chris Farley, Jackie Gleason, John Candy, John Pinnette), the Abandoned Kid (Williams, Rodney Dangerfield), the Funny-Looking Kid (Jerry Lewis, Dangerfield again–really every Jewish comic ever) discovers that he can make people laugh, he finds Acceptance for the first time. The “comic” or “clown” in him becomes his Representative out beyond the barricades, where he cannot tread The problem becomes that the Rejected Kid thinks that people only love the Clown, and if he ever turns it off, he will be relegated to being the lonely, rejected, un-loved kid, again. If someone in Williams’ family had gently taken his face in their hands and told him that they would love him even if he wasn’t funny any more, they wouldn’t be picking up the pieces, today.

    À bientôt,

    Mistral

    Like


    • The tears of a clown. . .a tale as old as time.

      Like


    • Right. Everyone should realize that most comedians are chronically depressed, especially the over-the-top ones who come off as dancing monkeys. The late Robin certainly qualifies. Mark Twain was also known for being unhappy all the time.

      Like


  37. on August 13, 2014 at 3:59 pm Reservoir Tip

    Question:

    Girl broke up with me because I cheated. Now she’s dating someone else. She was a good girl, I’ve mentioned her before, and I want her back. However, if she split with him after a while and wanted to get back together with me, would it be a bad move on my part to take her back?

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 4:05 pm gunslingergregi

      you can’t cheat on a bitch and ever have it be good again
      or a future
      can still fuck but yea she’ll make you pay
      anyway
      I keep getting back with mine cause not much downside
      a reg bitch well look at mr williams

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 4:08 pm gunslingergregi

      although my first wife didn’t try to get me for any my shit
      robin was prob just a pussy

      Like


    • Getting back together is rarely a good idea. And when it goes stale, both will wonder who will break up first to “win” this time. If you were the one who broke up the first time, the girl will want to get even. If the girl was the one who broke up the first time, she knows you might want to get even. And vice versa.

      It is much better to look for a relationship with a girl where you don’t have such a bad history together.

      Of course, individual circumstances can differ.

      Like


    • Getting back with *any* ex is not a good thing. In many cases it’s just going to end up with her sticking the knife in you once more and twisting it again – probably harder.

      Question: Why are you even thinking about going back into a wasteland.

      Like


  38. I prefer the Walter White pre-nup. Give a couple guys 500k retainer and if you ever get divorced “pop” while on vacation.

    Like


  39. It is delicious irony that an ultra feminist liberal like Williams ends up getting butt fucked in divorce court by the same liberal policies that he was oh so fond of promoting. HA HA HA HA HA HA

    Like


  40. on August 13, 2014 at 4:24 pm JenkPac Shakur

    After three marriages, it was clear to Robin Williams that ‘love’ was a lie. That had to be part of the cause of his depression.

    Robin Williams wasn’t some ‘tragic depressive’ but someone who got his soul destroyed by the American divorce industry (and it is an industry). To you young men out there, do NOT marry.

    Like


  41. But but but we need to marry those sluts and save civilization.

    Like


  42. What we need to do is to mock the system into submission. How about a book: Condoms are not romantic – get out of paying child support on July 15th!

    Like


  43. Frankly, he did have the resources to abscond to France (where Roman Polanski lives freely, without fear of extradition) or whichever other country will not extradite him for non-payment of alimony.

    He could still do a fair amount of local standup work, given his fame. He could still live on the last $5M he could abscond with.

    This guy absconded to Indonesia and lived freely, and he has a lot less money than Robin Williams.

    Roman Polanski is an actual criminal. But he showed alimony-avoiders what can work. Robin Williams could have gone to France and lived happily.

    Like


    • Probably was too attached to his kids, who would have stood by mom and froze him out. They had already threatened him if he didn’t go to rehab, the guy was on a leash

      Like


      • Then his kids (some of whom are in their 30s) have betrayed him.

        The ex-wives are one thing (in fact, they have to compete with each other. Having two ex-wives causes competition between them too, for the money).

        Like


      • Thats why a man must make a decision early on to walk from the kids if there is ANY chance the ex can use them to control him. The kids are going to be fucked up in some way anyways. It suckes, men love thier children, but everyday I see men with their balls in a vice because of their fucking kids. The state and the women know that that they can use them to their full advantage against the men. This just highlights the point.

        Like


    • Guy owned real estate here. Guy gets his royalty checks from American corporations. Guy works here. Sure he could grab a few million and live a gentle decline somewhere. But the exwives would still be getting their court mandated checks right on schedule and he would never work again. In other words it would suck.

      Like


  44. Yup. This is the fault of Valerie, Marsha and our antiquated divorce laws. Hope they enjoy their bloody 30 pieces of silver.

    If something this bad would only start a movement to abolish Alimony, Palimony, Community-Property & a few other things in that locus…

    Especially since women have many more rights now as when those original laws were penned.

    With it taking-out not just Joe Sixpacks, but [albeit liberal] geniuses now,… How long shall they kill our prophets, while we stand aside and look?


    At least the #WomenAgainstFeminism thing is a glimmer of something good. http://womenagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 5:17 pm gunslingergregi

      its been like that for a long time
      we acted and said we were free but it has been a shithole forever

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 6:20 pm gunslingergregi

      really I think the worse thing you can do is think life wasn’t always shitty for adults
      just make sure you look around and not get the worse of the ass fuckings
      woman against feminism don’t mean shit its prob a really bad thing
      keep the bitches working maybe really we are heading towards no alimony and shit if the faggot beta conservative bitches with woman have their way though guys will always have a boot of slave money stomping their face

      Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:23 pm gunslingergregi

        just like dudes thinking 1950 perfect fuck no
        alimony child support bullshit
        always alimony child support bullshit
        so yea blowing bitches heads up maybe they will finally be like yea I don’t deserve that or some shit

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:29 pm gunslingergregi

        With it taking-out not just Joe Sixpacks, but [albeit liberal] geniuses now,… How long shall they kill our prophets, while we stand aside and look?””””””””””

        life is shit it has never not been shit
        it will always be shit

        Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:32 pm gunslingergregi

        remember price dude who got ass fucked in divorce yea he still thought that dudes should be forced to pay that and not be free to pay or do what they felt was right
        ask the supposed mens rights dudes about child support alimony they will tell you it is ok to rape mens wallets

        Like


  45. In his shoes, I would have looked for some country to flee to that wouldn’t enforce a California divorce order. But if that fails, what other choice did he have? Go postal?

    Like


    • He certainly could have absconded to a number of countries without fear of extradition. France, among them, would have kept him happily.

      Like


      • on August 13, 2014 at 6:16 pm gunslingergregi

        then he would of married some bitch in france and paid

        Like


      • If he rape-raped a 13 year old, sure, but not paying alimony and child support?

        Honest question. I have no idea how French law deals with divorce, or American entertainers who are not Jerry Lewis or Roman Polanski.

        Like


    • $10k gets you a new life. Some cosmetic surgery and a man could be home free. If a man had about 2 million he could chill in some fishing village in western europe banging young hotties and living a simple life.

      Like


  46. There is nothing wrong with marriage. The problem is men choose crappy women to marry for superficial reasons and when she shows her cards later the it’s too late.

    I would say marriage isn’t necessary if a couple doesn’t want children. However, what are men who want children to do? It’s the best thing for kids. Most communities who don’t have high marriage rates are suffering and the kids suffer the most.

    How about choose marriage partners wisely? Getting married. more than Two times signals that someone is making bad choices.

    With that said, RIP robin I really liked his personality and his acting.

    Suicide is scarey and one must be going through A LOT to make that decision for themselves.

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 9:17 pm gunslingergregi

      75 percent of woman are crappy?
      people break up it happens
      shouldn’t act like a bitch can’t support herself after divorce she still still has a pussy for gods sake which is all she needs

      Like


    • … The problem is men choose crappy women to marry for superficial reasons…

      No, the problem is more than half of all women are crappy.

      The present culture encourages women to be crappy, and then it rewards crappy women with money stolen from the ex husband even if the husband was the perfect father/husband and even if the wife was a horrible mother/cheated/lied/ etc .

      Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 10:17 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      If all the “crappy” modern women got disqualified from getting married; I doubt much would be left over.

      Like


    • Its to the point that marriage and even having children are a bad idea for most men. Even when men find a supposed good woman to marry, and I use that term very loosely, all it takes is a short period of “I’m just not haaapy” and the mans world is turned inside out.

      Like


    • Better to not to have a system that encourages blowing up a marriage for cash and prizes.

      Get rid of alimony, get rid of ridiculous amounts of child support, audit usage of child support money, don’t give custody to the incompetent partner, joint custody by default, audit family court, remove monetary incentives for government to worsen the process, respect prenups, etc etc.

      Like


    • What you guys fail to see is, it’s not gender in divorce court it’s whoever makes the most money in the marraige.

      That is why women these days also have to be careful if they are the breadwinners because it’s the breadwinner who loses in divorce court. Not just men.

      But your host truly advocates against “lawyer nuts” and women with good income and careers and days men should marry younger women who make less. Well of course if this is the route the man will be paying because he’s the breadwinner.

      Also the younger you marry you run the risk of later divorcing.

      It’s not a system set up against men, it’s a system set up agAinst the breadwinner in the marraige.

      As more financially sound women martyr men who are not the moneymakers they too will get “raped” in divorce court.

      Like


      • … It’s not a system set up against men…

        Wow I can not believe you said such a dumb thing.

        Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 11:17 am Hugh G. Rection

        What you guys fail to see is, it’s not gender in divorce court it’s whoever makes the most money in the marraige.

        Well that’s the law on paper, the reality in court is quite different. And most women won’t marry a man who makes less than her (go figure).

        As more financially sound women martyr men who are not the moneymakers they too will get “raped” in divorce court.

        Not as much as when the sexes are reversed. I have even seen cases where the man makes more money and still has to pay his cunt of an ex-wife for some convoluted reason. Throw in child support that she can spend whichever way she wants. The stats also don’t support what you’re saying either, with 91% of alimony being paid by men to women.

        There is nothing wrong with marriage. The problem is men choose crappy women to marry for superficial reasons and when she shows her cards later the it’s too late.

        So given the 50% divorce rate that means at least 50% of women who do get married are crappy. Do you like the odds? And usually the relationship starts to deteriorate as soon as the woman knows she has the husband dead to rights.

        In summary, you’re talking shit.

        Like


      • Women rarely have to pay alimony even if they make more money than the man. So no.

        Like


  47. Its not your fault, robin.
    Its not your fault, robin.

    Like


  48. And yet you, Heartiste, disparage MGTOW. It boggles the mind.

    Like


    • MGTOW: “I can’t get a date, so I present that as a victory somehow.”

      Aesop’s Fables: The grapes are probably sour anyway, said the fox.

      Like


  49. Quote:

    “His marriage to Valerie Velardi ended in 1988 after the pair had been together for 10 years. The actor then wed his son’s nanny Marsha Garces with whom he stayed for 19 years and had two children with.

    The couple divorced in 2008. Williams is now married to graphic designer, Susan Schneider”

    JFC. Once wasn’t enough. Twice wasn’t even enough. Man’s a slow f*&(ing learner.

    Like


  50. Robin Williams cheated on the first wife with the live-in nanny.
    He married said nanny after a costly divorce from the first wife with a toddler age son.
    He and the second wife divorced due to his relapse into alcoholism citing “irreconcilable differences.”

    As someone who has seen the toll alcohol can take on families (men or women depending on who has the addiction) it is easy to say “she should’ve stayed” but sometimes the best action is to cut your losses and not enable.

    Now his third marriage is more telling given they slept in separate bedrooms and she left that morning without having seen or checked on him. Sounds like a very distant marriage. Given his recent relapse into depression, a good wife should have been more vigilant.

    To turn this into an example of divorce rape is in bad taste and it does not address the other issues: infidelity, substance abuse and depression. These women may have compounded his issues or he may have had his demons regardless of who he was married to and I would bet the truth is somewhere in the middle.

    Divorce is too costly, typically for the man although not always as a colleague of mine recently discovered the reverse in CA is also true: she makes six figures and supported her unemployed husband for the magic number of 10 years. Although she has custody of their child, due to his meager finances, he sends her hardly anything, sees his son regularly, and collected half her pension, half their estate and received a good chunk of palimony to boot. She’s not alone although she is in the minority but recently I overheard two women discussing this phenomenon at a cafe and the one woman said she wouldn’t marry her boyfriend because she’s afraid he’ll take her for everything if they divorce. The shoe in these liberal states is starting to be worn on the other foot and with more women in high-powered salaries, the balance of power will shift as this continues to happen with more regularity. This may be the only way for divorce to equalize into something that is reasonable for both parties and children. We could just abolish marriage and give it to the gays.

    You do have to factor in Mr. Williams’ infidelity, addictions, depression, etc. No one held a gun to his head and forced him to marry and have children with these women. Given his celebrity status and income, he would’ve been wiser to go the way of DiCaprio’s two-year relationships with models although with these problems the end result might have been the same.

    A married man that cheats, has addictions and psychological issues,is probably headed for divorce court. Amplify it with fame and wealth attracting the kind of woman who probably is in the union for the perks and it’s a recipe for disaster. He married, had a child, cheated, divorced, married, had children, relapsed, divorced, married, slept in a separate bedroom and committed suicide. This is the timeline.

    There are no free lunches. Marriage is a risk. Having children is a risk. Cheating is a risk. Substance abuse is a risk. Not marrying is a risk. Not having children is a risk. Find out which risk is too great a burden to bear fairly young in life and accept the consequences of that choice.

    It’s the I want it all on my terms attitude without accepting the consequences of those actions or choices that is creating this gluttonous downfall in society. Had things gone differently, I might’ve enjoyed having a wife and children but I clearly did not want them enough to take the risk. Those who do can whine or try to marry a woman who makes more money so the financial risk is on her, or hope for the best, or take great care in selecting their wife with the very real probability of a divorce given the statistics. That’s the deal as it stands. I predict in the next 10 years women will be experiencing a turnabout. Eventually, marriage may become such an antiquated notion that it is not marriage the way we view it now but something entirely different. And there will be consequences for both sexes and society.

    A man who makes a significant income, has substance abuse problems, cheats and marries not once, but three times and has children with said wives isn’t going to walk away unscathed. And shouldn’t. It’s a tragic outcome but a rather predictable one given his instability. He shoulders his share of the responsibilities in his choices. All of us do. To simplify this story as an example of divorce rape is irresponsible and doesn’t portray the entire chronology. It just reads like a desperate attempt to exploit a beloved actor to boost traffic.

    Like


    • 10s of millions is not a reasonable consequence. Maybe if Williams had 1000 kids with 500 wives

      Like


      • @R. Swanson: And you can rest assured that if any one of Robin Williams’ wives cheated on him and even had babies that belonged to other men, Mr. Williams would still have had to pay a king’s ransom when those wives divorced him.

        There is no reason why anyone should have to pay exorbitant sums to an ex-spouse for the rest of that ex-spouse’s life. If there was adultery, then there should be just compensation but an exorbitant stream of income for the rest of that ex-spouse’s life?

        And those ex-wives and wife knew that Robin Williams was unstable. None of them would have looked twice at him if he just made the average man’s salary. But they knew that in the event of a divorce they would grab his fortune so they “overlooked” his mental health issues.

        That’s the problem with this divorce rape legal system. It allows opportunists to take advantage of people like Robin Williams, who are very vulnerable.

        It is the legal system that exploited this beloved actor, not this blog.

        And it shouldn’t happen to anyone again.

        Like


    • Oh look, it’s a woman.

      Like


  51. I’m not sure that the spousal maintenance laws here in Australia are as harshly enforced as they are in the US. We hear a lot here about men paying loads of child support and divorce settlements, but we very rarely hear about ongoing alimony.

    Not exactly sure what the set-up is here.

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 10:25 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

      Meaner. In Australia we don’t have alimony.
      What we do have is highly overpriced housing, which is having a flow on effect to everything.
      So if the ex wife manages to her hands on your house, you are going to take a big hit and then good luck being able to afford another one to live in.

      Like


  52. Men are resource chattel, milked by a constabulary of strongmen to redistribute their earnings to an army of cackling divorcees.
    ——————————————————
    At what point would you expect there to be a war among men against these strongmen and constabularies?

    Like


    • on August 13, 2014 at 9:14 pm gunslingergregi

      never

      Like


    • It depends how strong the propaganda is. Right now these men have been made to believe that they are guilty and deserve it and need to man up.

      The war always starts when enough men say with conviction “I do not deserve this”.

      Like


    • There will be no such war. However, the issues we talk about here might be picked up by men fighting for bigger issues in the future.

      Like


      • Arbiter

        There will be no such war. However, the issues we talk about here might be picked up by men fighting for bigger issues in the future.
        —————————————————-
        In what context do you see men fighting for bigger issues?

        Like


  53. Yep.
    Worth 130 million, forced to spend 30 million on two ex wives and three kids. Which left him only 100 million. Poor dude.

    [CH: “it’s only a flesh wound!”]

    Like


  54. So it seems like the readers of Heartiste do not believe in fixing the system by forcing women to behave better. You guys want things to be fair by letting men behave as badly as women. It would be fair, but it would also be a surefire way for the United States to become a majority White version of ZImbabwe.

    Some men here advocate abandoning their children, just so their ex-wives never get any money from them. This is not the solution to the problem. The real solution to the problem is to make it easier for divorced men to get 50-50 custody or primary custody of their children. If you all walk away from your children, you are no better than Dantrell from the ghetto.

    Some men here think that if women can divorce their husbands easily, then men should be able to divorce their wives just as easily. One of you has said that men should be able to divorce their wives as easily as if she were just a girlfriend. This is not the solution to the problem. The solution is to make it more difficult for women to divorce their husbands. That way it is fair and discourages bad behaviour.

    In short, the solution is not to let men behave badly; the solution is to force women to behave well. Take away no-fault divorce and go back to the fault based system. It should favour well behaved people of either gender, and punish badly behaved people of either gender. If your wife cheats on you, she should give you money and you should get primary custody of the kids.

    [CH: the issue of women’s behavior is orthogonal to the issue of a family court system that is grossly punitive against fathers and husbands. the latter is more easily fixed than the former, and in fact fixing the latter will go a long ways toward incentivizing better behavior from women.]

    Like


    • I don’t disagree very much.

      But too many incentives have been put toward the Eat, Pray, Queef path.

      Every single one must be removed, including the faults you mention.

      Also, 50-50 custody should be Mandatory and assumed. In addition to all allegations of spousal abuse by the father being held to the standard of reasonable doubt fit to dispense a punishment of execution for murder. (ie: all allegations chucked-out b/c women & unscrupulous attorneys use it as a lever to further dispossess and distress men + their finances. (see psychobitch Penelope Trunk for this))

      Women’s nature cannot be Changed, but through holding their feet to the fire, using the equal rights they’ve achieved against them, perhaps they can be Contained, as the Victorians were so very smart to do.

      Your objection is noble, but in terms of punishment and “Violence perceived is violence achieved”-methodology, I still agree with prev. commenters that showing the bitch your “War-Face” and how scorched-earth you are willing to go, may be the required fear-instillment in the current climate.

      I don’t think No-Fault is going anywhere. But using the route of “Now you have your equal rights, and your equal pay, so you can now pay-up equally and outlaw Alimony” a more promising pathway to subverting future marital cuntery. -Similar idea; different paths; cat still skinned.

      Like


  55. on August 13, 2014 at 10:26 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    O.T.: Oldie but goodie.

    The only comment: “At least 100% of all cults are just scams to have sex with teenagers.”

    Like


  56. Don’t forget…williams was married to 3rd wife for only 3 years and the two slept in separate rooms. His wife went to bed at 10pm (last time she saw him), she woke up, didn’t see Williams, and went out to walk the dog or run errands at 10:30 am. She didn’t even walk into Williams room to say good morning or give him a kiss or just to acknowledge him. People who are family and live in one house always check in and say good morning or good night. She didn’t even care. She’s such a b*tch. Williams always talked about how lonely he was. This is so sad. The world loved and admired him dearly and now he’s gone. I’m still upset by his loss. 😦

    Like


  57. Just a tidbit more info the media is leaving out surrounding his death. Robin Williams because of his depression and anxiety (ex wives) was on 3 antidepressants SSRI meds that he started just 6 months ago. I believe it was these drugs that ultimately made him do it. I know people who were close to him who gave me this info.

    Like


    • on August 14, 2014 at 1:30 am cad and bounder

      More likely the drugs stopped him doing it sooner. The cause of the anxiety and depression is what you should really look at.

      Like


      • There must have been many factors such as his career “slowing down” and him having to accept humble tv roles to be able to pay the bills, but a bitchy wife must have been one of the main reasons he was so depressed.

        Maybe she had just informed him she wanted a divorce and that she had younger lover or something like that, and that was too much for him, it pushed him over the edge.

        What man wants to pay millions to a bitch while she is being fucked by the guy she left you for?

        Of course we do not know if that is the case but I would bet money the wife was a big part of why he was that depressed.

        Bitchy women are like vampire, they can suck the life out of a man, even of a good man.

        Like


    • on August 14, 2014 at 11:40 am Hugh G. Rection

      I once read somewhere that these pills even list suicide among the side effects.

      Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 12:03 pm gunslingergregi

        yea why they give so many to vets
        didn’t enable me to pop myself though so def not 100 percent

        Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 12:05 pm gunslingergregi

        counselor wanted to give me more though told him I don’t want to become a fucking addict

        Like


      • welcome of the obamacare nightmare america

        Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 12:09 pm gunslingergregi

        woke up in pile of glass and cold liquid all over me in kitchen just remember opening fridge to get something to drink night before after taking some sleeping shit
        getting up i’m crunching shit and it fucking glass shards everywhere was freaky as fuck
        ho’s is def better medicine

        Like


  58. […] Robin Williams Forced To Commit Suicide By Divorce Court System | Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  59. Interesting points. This puts a new spin on the old John Lennon song, “Woman is the Nigger of the World.” In other words, today’s American women are niggers in the sense that they are parasitical, amoral, and bestial as a group. They contribute nothing, take everything, and complain constantly.

    Like


    • Western women are the most coddled, most pampered, most protected, most entitled, most parasitic demographic group on the planet.

      On top of that they now have something resembling ” Diplomatic Immunity”; no matter what bad thing they do, they are unaccountable for it…kind of like a retard person is.

      Like


      • Correction: the Tribe is the most coddled, pampered and protected group on the planet. An American politician can criticize feminism but he can’t criticize the Tribe.

        Like


  60. on August 14, 2014 at 5:20 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    Bill Burr on the Epidemic of gold digging whores.

    Like


  61. on August 14, 2014 at 5:43 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    Haha !

    Like


    • Funny how those yenta harpies (oy, the voices!) pooh-pooh the study’s findings that they DON’T agree with, but get right behind the findings they DO agree with… go figure.

      Like


    • on August 14, 2014 at 12:20 pm gunslingergregi

      so owned
      he said your bragging about not needing a mans money to the chick yet you are taking alimony
      the chick like I have three kids
      then it cut off
      hahaaahahaha

      Like


      • on August 14, 2014 at 12:23 pm gunslingergregi

        chick was dumbfounded host stuttering that’s it cuts off

        Like


      • She couldn’t even come back with a good explanation. Alimony is not for the support of children, child support is. She should just take the child support, not the alimony if she doesn’t need a man’s money.

        Like


    • haha she said women at their sexual prime at 35 lol…

      Like


  62. At least the pussy-past-used that guys have traditionally paid for in divorce was young? Now bitches be expecting guys to pay for pussy they didn’t even start using until it was post-menopausal: http://nypost.com/2014/08/13/nyc-career-women-gather-at-egg-freezing-party/

    Like


  63. So whoever wrote this blog post, I want you to be wholeheartedly honest with me. Do you ever see yourself getting married?

    Like


  64. I actually know a little bit about this topic. Lived nearby Robin Williams.

    He lived a middle/upper class neighborhood. Much, much smaller place than you would expect given his earnings. Yes, he was wiped out by the divorces, and bear in mind wife #3 did not find him–they were already in separate bedrooms.

    Second, yes, sometimes prenups get effectively challenged in court. However, most are upheld. The real problem is that . It’s that guys don’t get one in the first place. Too many cave to the women who say “If you loved me, you wouldn’t ask for that.” Which leads to the real problem.

    Men (this one included) marry for romantic and sexual reasons. We fall in love and lust. Women, on the other hand, look coolly at it–in large part–as a business decision driven by “Is this the best provider I can find?” It’s an unfair game. Women are deciding with their heads, men with something else.

    The only solution–which itself may not work–is to absolutely avoid marriage with women who by word or deed do not follow traditional feminine values of chastity and modesty. Date/use the others all you want, but reward only the good ones with marriage, and let the others enjoy Sex And The City reruns and their cats.

    Like


  65. on August 14, 2014 at 12:14 pm The Chosen One

    I’m totally on board with the marriage laws being pretty horrible for men in America. But Heartiste, you seem like you keep up on evolutionary psychology. His impulsive and reckless behavior was probably the catalyst for his success and suicide. He was conflicted and not a prototypical high status male. His talk show appearances betrayed some insecurities.

    But ultimately nature doesn’t care if a man is happy. It wants him to reproduce. And his hot daughter is evidence that he met his Darwinian objective.

    In “Dead Poet’s Society,” he reminds the boys that we’re food for worms. Make your lives extraordinary. Well, RW did that. But extraordinary doesn’t mean happy. Hell of a career, though.

    Like


  66. Williams was a liberal though so he was supporting the same system that destroyed him.

    Like


  67. Williams was persecuted, but not forced to do this. He could have joined the rest of us broken souls and die in the flesh without taking matters into his own hands. He could have even used his experience to further his passion of trying to be relevant.

    Like


  68. Pre-nups provide absolutely no defense against divorce rape by spouses. I read on the NY Daily News an article stating Williams money problems, that he had to pay the second wife he divorced in 1987 a five-figure monthly alimony despite there being a prenup. It’s a joke.

    Like


  69. Williams apparently also had parkinson, which invalidates this whole thread.

    At least when it comes to the reason he bailed… Otherwise yes, system be fucked up and bitches be greedy hoes.

    Like


    • How does the Parkinson’s invalidate this whole thread? On the contrary, it only validates it.

      Robin Williams was already paying alimony to two ex-wives and given the fact that he and his ex-wife slept in separate bedrooms, he was probably facing another divorce where he would have to pay more alimony to a third ex-wife.

      Now, he finds out he has Parkinson’s in his 60s. This means that he will not be able to work as he did before. He won’t be able to do stand-up or movies with the frequency and energy he did when he was younger, which means he won’t be pulling in a lot of income any more. So his expenses will be going up but his income will be going down. He knew that he wouldn’t be able to recover and rebuild his life like he did before so he decided it was over.

      Like


  70. If you live in Europe I would encourage every man to actually murder their ex wife. Without prior convictions, fake remorse and a good psychiatrist declaring you temporarily insane you will be out in 12-15 years. And prisons in Europe are a vacation.
    It’s a lot better than slaving away for the rest of your life.

    I’m kidding of course.

    Like


  71. A man of wealth, especially in the state of California knows the financial risks of being married and the buzzards circling very quickly
    with gold digging women and Shyster lawyers.

    A wise man of wealth can pay professional whores for his fun and it’s a lot cheaper in the long run. He can adopt a child our pay someone to have a couple kids for him.

    This way he stays in complete control of his money and does not get ass raped in a divorce settlement.

    Like


  72. No man should kill himself without first setting fire to a courthouse.

    Like


  73. […] I suspect that Misandromasochism is a related phenomenon. It is absolutely true that many men have unreasonable burdens thrust upon them by the state. However, there are also a significant number of men who still […]

    Like