Comment Of The Week: Whiteousness, Not Whining

COTW winner Amasius slaps down a shitlib’s lame attempt at a reframe.

Question: If you and Donald Trump are alpha males, why do I feel that both of you are better cunts than Hillary? Always,complaining how the world is unfair. Who told you that the world was fair to begin with? Must have been your alpha male father. My bad.

That’s the new motif I’m seeing everywhere in shitlib circles. White people fighting back is “whining.” Of course everything that jews, women, blacks, immigrants have is because of “whining” and guilting White people, but never mind that. Also never mind that what you’re doing is exactly what you claim to oppose: you’re bullying, victimizing, abusing, and then blaming the victim some more by saying they’re “whining.” You people don’t care about justice or fairness or decency or anything and you never did. You just want to tear down and destroy your betters.

That’s it right there. It’s lessers, in their feeble passive-aggressive womanly way, trying to take down their betters.

It can work for a while, but failure is always inevitable once the betters wise up and decide it’s time to crush the rebellion of the degenerate freak mafia. That isn’t whining. That’s winning.





Comments


  1. That response is somewhere between a tactical nuke and an orbital bombardment. Wow!

    Like


  2. I live in a GOP niche in blue California.

    Local turnout is crazy huge today. I’d guess 96% will vote for no Hillary.

    Like


  3. MAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like


  4. Today’s the day when you are either Making America Great Again, Mentally Hill, voting for losers, or sitting around like a damn idiot. How do you want to remember yourself this election day?

    Like


  5. […] COTW winner Amasius slaps down a shitlib’s lame attempt at a reframe. Question: If you and Donald Trump are alpha males, why do I feel that both of you are better continue […]

    Like


  6. Working from home today to keep tabs on all the action.

    When Trump wins, gonna show up to work tomorrow in a suit and tie! (We have no dress code, so let your imagination run wild!)

    MAGA!

    Liked by 1 person


  7. on November 8, 2016 at 12:13 pm (((Divine Son of Kek)))

    It’s still amazing how whites suddenly lose agency when the topic of Jews pops up.

    Like


    • on November 8, 2016 at 12:24 pm Enfant Terrible

      In the context of the modern world, the Jew, by infiltrating the institutions of western civilization, has outsmarted (some of) the white man, and turned the white man’s psyche against himself. Whether this situation is going to last, or not, only the future will tell.

      Like


    • Why are (((you))) always changing your names?

      One must first have agency to even lose it – Wrong Side…

      Like


    • It’s even more amazing how jews NEVER take agency for themselves and always project it on white christians.

      Liked by 1 person


    • JEW JWE WJE WEJ WEY WYO YOU UEW UJW JEW
      JEW JEW JEW WEJ WJE WJA ARJ ARE ERJ JEW
      JEW WJE JWT TEW THE WJE JET TJH THE EJH
      JEW JEW EJW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW

      Like


  8. on November 8, 2016 at 12:16 pm Enfant Terrible

    Their fear is that the white man stops caring about being fair, and starts taking whatever it wants.

    Liked by 3 people


  9. This is bullshit on stilts (as a cuck might say), but even worse, it’s counterproductive for (((them))). Whining? No – using the elegant system of public debate *we* designed understanding the potential abuse stemming from might makes right. But if you dismiss it as whining without addressing the core substance, well we can learn the rules of might makes right pretty easily. And there’s only one race that has been might enough to conquer the world.

    Like


  10. Drain the swamp.

    It will help that bulldozer operators will vote for Trump 5-1.

    Liked by 2 people


  11. That cuts to the heart of it all. The appropriate response to anyone complaining about whining is “FUCK YOU”.

    Like


  12. Nobody complained that the world was unfair.

    Like


  13. I honestly believe the media supports Trump.

    They have been testing, probing, prodding — but as the man says, Trump’s gotten about $3 billion of free advertising from the mass media. The proof is in the national exposure.

    Think who the TV line producer is. A white male, in his forties or fifties. A man who is not going to be particularly pleased to spend 8 years watching an ugly grandma with caked-on makeup as POTUS. He sees Trump, by contrast: an interesting, video-friendly man who has done reality TV for a living.

    Who would you support as the TV decider/producer, even if you were nominally liberal?

    The choice is obvious.

    Like


    • Are you nuts?

      Liked by 2 people


    • I would buy that as a plausible argument, except that it does not take into account the lock-step expression of a-moral absolutism in liberal thought. Liberals are liberals first, foremost and always. The exposure given to Trump “for free” was a result of the media being so tone-deaf to the wants and needs of the forgotten electorate that they looked at Trump’s effort to hear them and act on their behalf as him destroying himself – which they are always happy to do for any non-liberal. Trump, in essence – played the media for fools….because he knew that when push came to shove – the avalanche of people desperate for any smidgen of genuine leadership would flock to him in droves.

      Watching Trump rub Jeb! Bush’s face into a pile of Bush’s own bullshit on national TV was enough to get my attention.

      Like


    • I too believe the media supports Trump, and that I am a stupid faggot, and that Hitler was a negro, and that baby Jesus had a big beard, and that milo is not a fag, and that being queer is normal and being normal is gay, and that moonman is from mars, and that blacks are from Europe, and that jews can go to heaven, and that…

      Liked by 2 people


  14. http://torontolife.com/city/life/tinder-tales-donald-trump-supporter/

    Canadian SJW sleeps with Trump supporter, realizes it’s some of the best sex of her life, goes into meltdown mode

    Like


  15. We live in an age where mediocracy is king. The days of seeing someone better than you and being inspired to be like that person are over. They stand at the base of the mountain, “triggered” by the man who climbed to the summit, and proclaim where they stand as the new top.

    Liked by 3 people


  16. Furthermore, I believe the liberal apparatus believes it can control Trump. They believe the constitutional safeguards can keep this lion caged.

    *slow smile*

    They may regret their overconfidence in a constitution not designed to endure severe stress.

    It would be entertaining to see Trump Go Dictator Mode full-on. And if he had, shall we say, unique ideas, he could do A LOT of damage to the liberal consensus that has dominated America since before most of us were born. A war against the liberal mindfuck machine, waged from above, would be a WONDERFUL DIVERSIONARY SOURCE OF ENTERTAINMENT, one that many of us would actively pick up sides and support. It all depends on what’s really going in in Trump’s mind: Is he an alt-righter at heart, or is he simply someone who wants the thrill of power wielded?

    Liked by 1 person


  17. on November 8, 2016 at 12:50 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Whiteitude.

    Like


  18. “Congress shall make no law respecting…..the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.’

    1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution.

    To justly complain about significant unjust treatment in a civilized manner is manliness and not whining. Conflating the two is a leftist lie—like when they conflate disgust/dislike of homosexuality with “homophobia.”

    Fuck the Left with the Constitution rape!

    Liked by 2 people


  19. Yeah, what is it about liberals and criminals that they try to trick people into believing them when they characterize their crimes as mere natural occurrences, and that getting mad and blaming them for their crimes is the equivalent of getting mad and accusing a tornado or a hurricane or an earthquake of malicious intent? Of course life is not fair, but liberals and criminals are not fair either, and there’s something that can be done about unfair liberals and unfair criminals.

    Like


  20. Like


  21. I picked a hell of a time to get my first COTW. Thanks everybody!

    Liked by 3 people


  22. Leftism is the intellectual equivalent of a toddler. Whine about something being ‘unfaaaair’ and break things.

    Liked by 1 person


    • Comment of the Century.

      Like


    • Have posted this before, but worth spreading. Kaczynski on liberals:

      The Psychology of Modern Leftism

      Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.

      But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)

      Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th century.

      The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

      Feelings of Inferiority
      By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

      When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftist anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

      Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.

      Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).

      Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

      Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

      Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative”, “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

      Art forms that appeal to modern leftist intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

      Modern leftist philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftist philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e. failed, inferior). The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

      The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant behavior. 1 But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.

      Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist trait.

      Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

      If our society had no social problems at all, the leftists would have to INVENT problems in order to provide themselves with an excuse for making a fuss.

      We emphasize that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of everyone who might be considered a leftist. It is only a rough indication of a general tendency of leftism.

      Like


      • True but full of DR3 cuckery. Leftists are weak and powerless parasites. That is the default human condition for low-IQ’s in the absence of strict social mores.

        Like


  23. Moocher-Takers vs the Producers-Prime Movers.

    And in this corner:

    Middle-Aged Harridans on SSRIs
    Post-Wall Cat Lovers
    Neocons
    K-Street Whores
    Shitlibs
    Effeminate Manboobs
    Bespekled feeble SJWs
    Bluehairs
    FUGS (tatted)
    MSMFatty Cockblockers
    Wall Street Whores
    The FED
    Gay Mullatos
    Mud Sharks
    EBT crowd
    Illegals
    MIC w/freebee taxpayer NATO $$
    Big Pharma, Big Ed, Big Unions
    Nancyboyz Limp wrister’s
    ((( )))
    Envrio-wankers
    Greenie’s
    Collectivists
    The anti-reality dufus
    Left-side of academia and the POMOs
    Feminists

    Distill all of that in a funnel and you have the future and its enemies.

    And in this corner:

    Reason
    Reality
    Producers
    % of Tax Payers who fund the entire country
    Tea-party
    Constitutionalists
    Populism
    Confused cucks in rehab
    Business men who meet payroll
    Innovators
    Aesthetes who worship greatness and have a disdain and contempt for a philosophy of feces
    Those who want secure borders to ensure continuity
    Good deal-makers
    Return of the Jedi
    Civilization Advancers
    Prime Movers
    GBFM
    Alpha
    Leadership
    Life accession

    You would think it would be game over in Round 1

    #draintheculturalswamp

    Like


  24. http://thehill.com/media/304982-carl-bernstein-trump-wins-if-alternate-universe-of-drudge-is-right

    Alt-Right Ready for its Closeup Moment

    April 2017 – Trump Blind Trust buys CNN, MSNBC and NBC out of bankruptcy, Fox News – after a month of live on air contrition, keeps broadcast license. Free press restored under the 28th amendment.

    Liked by 2 people


    • BanksMedia
      Education
      Trump has to secure or at least build up those. Imagine 49 percent of Americans plus scores of Europeans, Australians taking their money out of ((banks)) and putting it all into the Trumpenbank. Then boycotting the cuckmedia, building strong community with emphasis on education of next gen shitlords and so on. It’s possible to build up an empire. Let’s go win again

      Like


  25. Fear is one big difference between criticism and bitching. Stating the truth is easy when what you say is popular or when you have no skin in the game but it is an act of courage when you stand to lose something or the person you are being critical of has power. The other thing is that if you are criticizing something just to complain, you are just bitching.

    Like


  26. The Left is weak. The system is in tatters. What you need to really know is that what opposes you is really just a lunatic fringe. They are maybe 18-19% of the population tops. The (((enemy))) of course, and then the sycophants, functionaries, drug addicts, mongrels, aliens of different stripes and a lot of crazy people. All the rest are just freeloaders. They just came for the cheese. They’re not interested in their Glorious Revolution or global village Dizzy Channel Small World crapola. Even if gangs and terrorists fight, they don’t really fight for (((them))). They might fight us, but they won’t fight to save (((them))). That’s an important distinction. We are a cohesive unit. Like the American Revolution, we hang together or we hang separately. They have no unity. Their followers are weak. Any combat readies are not their soldiers. They fight for Mexico, or Allah or their gangs, but not for (((them))). Remember that. Divide and conquer is their strategy, or at least what they want, but we can use it better. They have nothing to hold their soldiers to them.

    Liked by 1 person


  27. Innocuous test comment without trigger words.

    Like


  28. Ruh-roh raggy, are there verboten trigger words that set off the alarms?

    Like