Go-Topless Day

There was a “Go-Topless Day” in NY this past Sunday. Two hundred (mostly) women and four hundred boobs marched in protest of those wrong kinds of white people in those horribly backward flyover states who force women to wear burqas over their nipples when out in public.

Hey I am all for women — but only cute women — having the freedom to display their naked bodies in public, as long as those women accept that men have the freedom to leer at their naked bodies and Instagram photos of their titties for Dad back home. But I’m thinking these weirdo cult feminists wouldn’t be down with that part of the individual freedom deal. Equal rights, yo.

Always with these slut parades there are mixed in with the occasional cuties an insane asylum of grotesqueries and/or subversives who provide fodder for normal people to point and jeer. This time it was a couple of men with huge, pendulous manboobs demanding the right to swing their milktits in little Johnny’s face. At least, I think they’re men, but who can tell for sure. Freaks have a knack for looking like they’re stuck in the pupal stage morphing from one species to another.

There’s one manboob, all the way to the right.

Here he is with his buddy, in a clearer shot.

Let your manboobs out, freedom fighter! Why weren’t their nips pixelated? Two dirigibles sporting flapjack mammaries is less offensive to the taste than female boobs? If the goal here is to uphold norms of journalistic conduct, these two gelatinous blobs should’ve been blurred head to toe.

“Slut pride” is synonymous with “civilization perishing”. By the time your culture gets to the point where women are proud for doing something that their grandmothers were proud of NOT doing, you should have your post-collapse plans squared away.





Comments


  1. First?
    Boobs

    Like


    • this country is doomed- stick a fork in it.

      “equal topless rights”!??!? Is this mfin insanity or am I in bizarre world? These SAME women…they gonna advocate for coed restrooms? How about equal sentencing for criminal offenders? Or maybe the “sexism” and “female privilege” inherent in that 90% of prisoners are male?

      I like tits as much as the next guy but women have inherently NO self-control

      Like


  2. that redhead is pretty hot

    Like


    • on August 26, 2014 at 10:16 am furiousferrett

      Agreed. Probably just there because she’s even hotter when she stands next to an army of warpigs. It’s attention whore tactic #52.

      See hot gamer/nerd girls for more examples of this.

      Like


    • Yep. The topless movement attracts 2 types: beautiful women who seem to want to show off their pert, supple breasts… and whales who happen to walk on their hind legs, far away from the sea.

      Like


    • on August 27, 2014 at 8:52 am the soft brute

      also noticed.

      Like


  3. When did the Panzer-bra become the default young womens undergarment? A few decades ago pretty women more freely shared their erogenous beauty: braless seethru, bouncy, pokies, peekaboo, and other ways.

    Like


  4. At least New York did not – does not – have to endure The Notting Hill Carnival where vibrant people annually stab each other despite the presence of seven thousand police officers.

    Like


    • that’s because of lack of “opportunity” and “access” and because of “white privilege.” And because they are “plagued” or “besieged” by The Violence.

      Like


  5. I promise the excitement would be much less if the publicity shots contained the women that you will see publicly topless in America on any other day.

    It would be similar to People of Walmart, with more dry heaving.

    Like


    • WB the redhead and the brunette with paper hearts over her nips. In public. Because it’s more equal that way.

      Like


      • I had the same thought. Is it any coincidence that the feminists handed off the banner (literally, during a portion of the march at least) to the most attractive woman dumb enough to take up their cause? Of course not. It’s just good marketing. The redhead is gorgeous, but no man with any sense or self-worth (the two seem to go hand-in-hand) would ever be publicly associated with her in any official capacity. As the fatties get more unfuckable, the beautiful women get more unmarriageable.

        Like


    • what a bunch of attention whore losers

      Like


  6. The sad part is that they don’t realize that no one is impressed.

    Like


    • Agreed. I’m mostly disgusted but in a way it’s kind of sad that they think something like this is meaningful or adds purpose to their lives.

      Like


  7. While this is perfectly legal in NYS (tested up to the Supreme Court), what do you suppose the reactions of these very same women would be if men in NY started approaching women and saying, “Come on, baby, show us some tits”?

    Like


    • on August 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm The Other Jim

      You notice how they’re not going be strolling in front of the local mosque while topless? Yeah, I didn’t think so either…

      Here’s the other thing that I noticed with these women at the Chicago Slutwalk & from the photo’s above. That at one point in their lives they had the choice to look feminine and pretty or ugly themselves up and they chose the latter. Look at the way they’ve chosen to make themselves unattractive (and I’m not talking about the fat chicks in the crowd); Tattoos, dyed hair, bad hairs styles eg bangs covering their foreheads(really unattractive IMO), big dark rimmed eyeglasses, sloppy, slovenly clothes, no makeup, no jewelry, no perfume, no high heels or stockings, etc. None of the tools that women used to use to attract a mate are present in any cohesive form. All of it is a outright rejection of conventional standards of beauty and femininity and the real power that goes along with that. They’re not only not trying, they’re rejecting the concept altogether.

      It’s quite telling and damning. There’s quite a bit of self-loathing and hatred going on inside of each of these women.

      Like


    • I bet a lot of these women would protest against being paid to show, aka stripclubs

      Like


  8. on August 26, 2014 at 10:54 am The Burninator

    It is not illegal for women to go topless in central Ohio (in fact, I believe across the state, generally). The only women I have seen topless in public have either been at the beach (where you’d expect to see it I suppose), at the local “Community Fest” where you do find the uglies in droves flaunting their sweaty, oily mounds (pretty women not welcomed, btw) in support of socialism, or out in front of the latest hard opening of a strip club, passing out fliers. The women who do the non-community festival flaunting are generally highly desirable looking otherwise, and the reaction here is typical; the fat, ugly monstrosities bitch and moan about it and declare how degrading it is, blah blah blah (unless you are ugly and do it for Marxism). The very same kind of grotesque females featured in this march, as a matter of fact.

    Point being, I doubt that three weeks ago few to any of these women gave two shits about going topless in public. But the command came down from on high and the hivemind engaged and now suddenly they all want to take off their shirts. Let the law change in NY and I guarantee you that will be probably the last time you see women topless in public, and within a year these same beasts will be shouting at the few pretty women who take off the shirt in public as somehow supporting the “patriarchy” and feeding the lewd desires of men. They don’t care about this “right”, they simply are bored, pampered, shameless cunts in search of some kind of meaning in life who latch onto the first cause that they are convinced “empowers” them.

    As P.J. O’Rourke mindfully noted in the 1990’s, we’ve become a Tyranny of Boredom.

    Like


  9. I live in NYC, and I remember a year or 2 ago there was all this news about how it’s now legal for women to walk around topless…..Yet I’ve never seen a topless woman on the streets on the city.

    So a few thoughts:

    1) This “topless freedom” shit reminds me of women who demand the right to be able to serve on the front lines in times of war. But since they’ve been allowed this freedom none of them have embraced it or exercised it.

    2) Slutwalks, the Mermaid Parade, and now this topless protest thing are the domain of ugly attention whores. No one wants to see these fuggos as sexual beings, so these chicks have to go out of their way to slut themselves up and then be loud and obnoxious to even get male attention (Also, notice how it’s only ugly chicks who complain about “street harassment”? Something tells me they make it all up to make it sound like they’re hotter than they really are. I wouldn’t even notice most of them on the street, much less feel the urge to holla at them).

    3) The redhead in the red skirt close to the far right in the first photo is fucking cute. And she knows it. Slender toned body, perfect tits. And look at that hand on her hip and that smirk on her face. She’s a 20/10 in that crowd of uglies and she can’t get enough of it. She’s the only fuckable girl in either of those photos, and that’s saying a lot in a city filled with models and actresses and trophy girlfriends/wives.

    Like


    • “Slender toned body . . .”

      Nor particularly. She is, however, rather Classical.

      Like


      • downright tubby with silicone parts

        Like


      • Also very pointy elbows.

        Like


      • Well you guys bring up a point I was wondering about when I made that post. Is that redhead legitimately hot, or is her SMV increased by the simple fact that she’s surrounded by lard-asses? After all, an average girl will comparatively seem like a 10 in a crowd of Andrea Dworkin look-a-likes.

        Like


      • “Is that redhead legitimately hot, or is her SMV increased by the simple fact that she’s surrounded by lard-asses?”

        Yes.

        While I avered that she was not particularly slender and toned, neither did I cast any aspersions on the Classical figure. Aphrodite is a bit squishy about the limbs, but she shows abs.

        Like


    • her knees are also too sharp

      Like


    • on August 26, 2014 at 2:01 pm The Other Jim

      The redhead is attractive, but as mentioned elsewhere in this thread she’s a actress which means she’s certifiably nuts, and yes, I’ve found this out the hard way. As Rex Harrison once said, ‘Never marry an actress, they never stop acting…”

      It’s true of all women, but with women in the entertainment industry it’s of an order of magnitude worse.

      Like


    • on August 27, 2014 at 5:11 am haunted trilobite

      It’s hardly filled with through creme de la creme like you say. ‘filled with a lot of unsightly women’ that make way for the occasional rate beauty might be more accurate. maybe I was just hanging out in the wrong parts.

      Like


  10. on August 26, 2014 at 11:17 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    This kind of stuff is neither erotic nor impressive.

    :::yawn:::

    At this point it’s about as exciting as seeing a pair of African boobs in an old National Geographic.

    Funny, though, how femcunts and other progs are always reduced to acting out in the most infantile, petty, primitive ways possible.

    Like


    • Funny thing about National Geographic and those topless Zulus – I could never get a hard on.

      Like


      • that’s because you beez rayciss

        Like


      • Funny, though, how femcunts and other progs are always reduced to acting out in the most infantile, petty, primitive ways possible.

        i.e., typical unrestrained female behavior. This is why patriarchy is needed to ensure civilization.

        Like


  11. It only makes women look even more stupid than we already know they are.

    Like


  12. the whole country is a gathering of the juggalos now.

    Like


  13. are those 2 fat guys doing it to point out how absurd it is? or are they such fat losers, that’s it’s the only way they can be near topless girls?

    Like


  14. The red head is Rachel Jessee, a lunatic illusionist magician attention whore (stage name “Scarlet”) who plead guilty to the battery of her mentor, and older male, in 2010. With pics!

    http://www.insidemagic.com/magicnews/2010/04/scarlett-pleads-no-contest-to-attack-on-mentor/

    As Mr. Weatherford notes, Ms. Jessee’s story serves as a “cautionary tale of a show business dream.” The dream was shared between Ms. Jessee and her mentor and manager John Lewis.

    In the end, Mr. Lewis claims he spent nearly a million dollars, lost his prized antique car collection, left his wife of 41 years, and subject to Ms. Jessee’s physical abuse.

    It is also a story of domestic violence and — if Lewis had his choice in the legal system — elder abuse.Mr. Lewis has reconciled with his wife, Carolyn and together they filed a breach of contract suit against Ms. Jessee alleging “repeated physical abuse and financial improprieties in converting Carolyn Lewis’ assets without her consent.”

    Mr. Lewis told the columnist, “It’s hard to believe that when you see her onstage, but she would just, like, turn into ‘The Exorcist,’ ” he says. “She’s got a terrible violent temper that just explodes. It’s hard to explain, because she looks small. But she’s extremely strong when she gets mad.”

    Like


  15. and older dude’s – Lewis was 67 when he was beaten by the 21 YO Jessee, so they met when she was 19 or 20 and he was 65 or 66…. hehehe

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/ex-manager-sues-entertainer-claiming-coercion

    Like


    • a 65yo man will still be able to overpower a 21 yo woman. a lot of times when you hear about these stories of F->M domestic assault, the man just stood there and took the beating from the woman, rightly assuming that retaliating in any way would either hurt her too much or bring down the law on him.

      Like


      • Yes obviously he was a pussy, who else would spend $1M promoting his baby doll, who was one step above a stripper…

        Like


      • But he was a 65+ dude bangin a hot 19 YO… Fame Game for the win… to bad he betafied in such an epic way…

        Like


      • Ain’t it weird that a society where it is generally accepted or tolerated that a woman physically assaults a man is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where men are not allowed to defend themselves from physical assault by women is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where men are thrown in jail for simply defending themselves from a physical assault by a woman is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where even if it is the man who calls the cops to ask them to come stop his wife from assaulting him, even if he is bleeding and the wife is not, it is the man who the cops take to the police station to spend the night is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where a woman cuts off the penis of a man other women are allowed to congratulate her publicly on tv and in articles published everywhere is called a patriarchy?

        Like


      • the real truth about DV inequality is that women initiate physical attacks on men as frequently as the reverse, in some studies, slightly more often. Men just hit harder. He was right. I know a jacked black guy like 220, 230 and he just went into the bathroom and called po-po when his crazy white gf busted a vase over his head. You’ve got no choice these days, the system is so women-first that it makes anyone’s accusation of “patriarchy” so absurdly laughable as to be a farce.

        Like


    • She does have the crazy eye thing…

      funny – http://celebrity.wikia.com/wiki/Scarlett,_Princess_of_Magic

      a father weeps in the distance…

      Like


  16. Militantly Nude

    Some of you may also register a whiff of disingenuousness in exhibitionists accusing their critics of being repressive and stuffy. Exhibitionists may be eager to dispense with clothing in incongruous locations – say, a traffic island in the middle of a busy intersection – but they desperately need an audience, preferably a clothed one, and preferably one that’s embarrassed, inconvenienced and unwilling. San Francisco is remarkably well-equipped in terms of nude-friendly laws, clubs and amenities, including a nude beach and nearby nudist colonies. As Zombie notes, what’s revealing is that such venues weren’t deemed sufficient for our wrinkly radicals:

    These protesters and urban nudists don’t simply want to be naked in private or be naked around other naked people; they want to be naked around clothed people. Because that’s where the sexual thrill originates; violating a taboo. Being naked where nakedness is normal doesn’t count; eliciting shock or interest from unwitting strangers is the whole point.

    Like


  17. […] Source: Heartiste […]

    Like


  18. on August 26, 2014 at 3:03 pm Joachim Peiper

    Going topless used to be common in much of Europe during the 80s and still is on beaches, but it has dropped off preciptously since then. The majority of women won’t go topless anymore whereas back in the day, most did, including those you didn’t want to.

    Like


    • Ah yes…I remember the days when hyper-repressed U.S. college guys would ask me where the nude beach was. And their disappointment upon discovering that for every 1 topless 19-year old Swedish bikini model, there were 7 Italian families- mom, dad, 5 kids, 7 nephews & nieces, grandma, grandpa, uncles – also topless and/or Speedo-clad…….
      Not to mention the graying, balding German Hippies with beer/Granola bellies.
      No Speedos there…..

      Like


    • yeah…the only good part of that was the teen girls doing it

      Like


  19. “She’s extremely strong when she gets mad,” he said. Meaning it was a common thing and not a one time surprise. So he was clearly getting off on being dominated by her, both physically and financially. He didn’t make the angry comment of a true beating victim. His comment is just a show of more awe/submission to a young female. My guess is that he was in a money slave, whipping boy fantasy land and it spun out of control. Much like females who call rape after being dumped, he called ‘abuse’ after being dumped, even though she was his long term dominatrix and he must have loved it. That’s my call.

    Like


  20. Here’s another thing I noticed while reading about this march: Most of the girls who aren’t utter pigs are wearing pasties over their nipples. Someone mentioned before that it seems to be the least sexy girls who are the biggest sluts, and I have a theory on that.

    For women, their power lies in their sexuality. If they have smoking hot bodies then, in theory, it takes more work to be able to see them naked. But an ugly or fat girl needs all the attention she can get, so there’s a higher chance it’ll be easier to get her naked. This is why a pig like Lena Dunham is constantly naked in the show “Girls”, but more attractive actresses like Jennifer Lawrence or Megan Fox have (To my knowledge) never done a nude scene.

    Long story short: It’s easy to give something away for free if it’s valueless.

    Like


  21. Reminds me of Jerry Pournelle’s description of women at SF cons: half-pretty girls half-dressed to prove it.

    Like


  22. “talks with topless women at a protest”

    Like


  23. The ykw redhead would get it hard. She’s also been prominently featured in other top less day articles as well. I believe there’s pics of her top less in front of the Whitehouse from last year. Serial attention whore.

    Like


  24. Boyfriend Gets Pissed as I stare at his Girlfriends Boobs

    Like


  25. Reminds me of Jerry Pournelle’s description of women at SF cons: half-pretty girls half-dressed to prove it.

    I believe that was in his SF novel, “Inferno,” a satire on Dante’s work wherein a writer journeys through hell. It’s an interesting commentary that such females are the gateway to the infernal regions!

    Like