Emma Watson’s Banal Feminist Hypocrisy

Feminists… they just can’t keep their stories straight. Here’s Emma Watson, quoted at two different times, contradicting herself with an assurance that makes one wonder if she has an evil twin.

The first quote, from this past Tuesday’s gender equality speech (guffaw), reads “If men don’t have to be aggressive in order to be accepted, women won’t feel compelled to be submissive.”

(Never mind that this assertion makes absolutely no sense if you think about it for longer than a second.)

The second attribution, from two years ago, reads “But now Emma Watson has said she doubts she will date a British man ever again – because they are too shy. […] Instead an American will come up to her straight away and suggest a date – a boldness she finds attractive.”

#HeForShe? More like #HeForHeadCases.

Feminism long ago abandoned any pretense to logic or internal consistency. It’s nothing but feels all day, every day, with an extra helping of feels. Watson’s rationalization hamster, like most rodents residing in the brains of her callow ilk, is 700% thigh and 800% glutes. A swole spinner on the wheel of ego-masturbation.

Not that more evidence was needed, but once more, from the top and with throat cleared:

DON’T LISTEN TO WHAT WOMEN SAY, WATCH WHAT THEY DO.





Comments


  1. Being Politically Correct means you never have to bother with proof, logic or consistency.

    Emma Watson just wants easy money, so she parrots whatever those in power want her to parrot. An empty flask, like the one she pushes in between her thighs at night.

    Like


    • I fucking hate that term, ‘politically correct.’ The assumption that all leftist, neo-marxist opinion is somehow correct by all objective standards. Why isn’t the term challenged by anyone for what it is?

      Like


      • The term “politcally correct” had its origins, AFAICT, among college students in the 80’s who would answer questions posed by leftist professors in a way that was factually correct but ran afoul of leftist doctrine and therefore be treated as wrong answers, hence, the need to be “politically” correct to get good grades. The term is, at its core, sarcastic.

        Like


      • The word “correct” is like the word “white”; if you hafta qualify it with another word before or after it, you ain’t it.

        Like


      • Using the term is mockery. It means to imply, and rightly so, that the Left only accepts their own opinions as legal. That they want to ban all dissent. That a discussion is not about facts and reason, but about which opinion is allowed, and whether it is true or false is irrelevant. “Politically Correct” has a tyrannic ring to it.

        Like


      • Politically correct, otherwise known as Incorrect.

        Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 8:58 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozolzlzloz

      emma like my very harry pottter sllzoozoz zozlz

      Like


  2. […] Emma Watson’s Banal Feminist Hypocrisy […]

    Like


  3. Let’s please ignore Miss Emma hereafter.

    Like


  4. I used to worship the ground that Cate Blanchett walked on, but first she sided with the Mohammedians in the Australian Beaches Crisis, and then she committed the unforgivable sin of making a movie with Konigsberg. Frigging whores the lot of ’em – just dutifully reading whichever script that their puppeteers hand ’em. Compare Li’l Barry Soebarkah Dunham Reggie Love and his teleprompter, the so-called “TOTUS”. PS: And as you would expect, it’s *** who are always whispering into the earpiece. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick/2014/09/05/host-whisperer-new-republic-editor-suggests-mtp-success-depends-ep

    Like


  5. At least half of what Emma says is professionally prepared.

    She’s used to parroting from a script.

    Hence, one should expect to hear punishingly banal utterances, rather like a presidential speech.

    Women, like politicians, have to be judged based upon their acts, for their yap is almost always headed in the other direction.

    &&&

    A fare amount of this dissembling is a tick picked up during the endless girl-wars of youth. Unlike boys, girls are ‘socially violent’ — with on-going deceit campaigns against rivals that would trigger fatalities in boy-world.

    Most guys can reflect back on virtually life-time friendships that lasted through thick and thin. That’s strictly a male experience.

    Girls socially stab each other with glee and abandon — from the first day to their last. It’s what gossip is all about. This female tick is socially tolerated because, with adulthood, this social scheme is thrown over: it’s a man’s world.

    &&&

    This telling dynamic is also common among gays — and boys raised in female dominated homes.

    The most famous man who organizes his friendships along female principles is our President.

    He not only has powerful women making the biggest decisions in government — he trades allies around like a teen girl would in her social circle.

    This latter tick has absolutely floored Putin, Netanyahu, Cameron, et. al.

    If you want to witness how a teen girl swaps phone buddies, then keep an eye on America’s swirling foreign policies.

    .

    Lest we forget: a woman’s emotional meter can spin on a dime.

    So, always be escalating.

    Like


    • Girls socially stab each other with glee and abandon — from the first day to their last.

      A certain percentage do, but this is far from all of them. When I went to high school it was only a minority of girls in my class who acted like that. Of course, our studies were focused on higher education, so we didn’t have many working-class trash there. They’re the ones who gossip and backstab the most. The girls who study hard are more mature.

      Obama swaps allies around? Only if you believe the pieces published in neocon rags. They make sure to direct right-wing criticism of their fellow socialist in a “safe” direction, where you are supposed to claim he doesn’t obey Israel enough. They lie through their teeth and say he backed the Muslim Brotherhood during the demonstrations that toppled Mubarak – when he actually sent large quantities of riot gear and tear gas to the dictator’s police. And he supported the military’s coup, because they promised to close the border tunnels to the Gaza Strip in order to starve the Palestinians and ruin their economy. Obama has always been loyal to Israel, but the slightest hesitance is published by neocons as “proof that he is a Muslim”. Meanwhile the money and weapons continue to flow to Israel, in violation of U.S. laws which say that no financial aid must go to a country with illegal nuclear weapons and other WMDs.

      Like


      • Obama is a Muslim at heart and not loyal to Israel.

        Look at him, and consider his background.

        The Israel gorilla got him by the balls (and now he’s got grey hair). He don’t love them there.

        Like


      • Last year this time Obama wanted to bomb Syria to remove Assad and install ISIS. This time he is bombing Syria to protect Assad and hurt ISIS. Last year he was shipping arms to ISIS to kill Iranians in Iraq and Syria, this year he is Irans air force. He was for the Muslim brothers in Egypt then the military, back and foth a few times. He sold out the Saudis to Iran and the got back with them.

        Obama detest Jews and Israel like his wife as his LA Khalidi speech shows. But he’s torn between substitute Mom Valerie Jarret re Iran and his Paki Sunni pals and sponsors from college.

        Like


      • Whiskey he is not bombing ISIS to protect assad…this is all part of a master plan to co conquer the region. ISIS where created by the US to cause chaos so they would have to go in and save the day. Boots will be put on the ground soon, Assad will be removed from power. Next on the list is Iran and then Russia

        Like


      • *** want the absolute destruction of Christianity in the Middle East. *** used Dubya-Moron-43 to destroy Christianity in Iraq, *** tried to install the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to destroy the Copts, and *** want Assad gone so that the Aramaic Christians will be slaughtered. Ted Cruz jumped the shark on this one – I will NEVER vote for him. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3207892/posts

        Like


    • AAA+

      *****************

      Forgive the meta, but it is always fun to see the new talent.

      Like


      • Disloyal to Israel…Netanyahu dressed Obama down in front of Congress to standing ovations and sat there like a child being scolding by an adult.

        Like


    • Barry might be genetically inclined to being homosexual but is one that hasn’t acted on it. Then again, maybe he has.

      Like


      • Don’t waste your time trying to analyze the MARIONETTE. Concentrate on understanding the PUPPETEERS for who they are. My guess is that Barry is so narked up on coke and meth and God-only-knows-what that he doesn’t even know who he is anymore. And he was never particularly bright in the first place. He just happened to be the dark-skinned actor whom the PUPPETEERS chose to play the role of Chauncey the Gardener Driving Miss Daisy to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

        Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 7:12 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      You’re talking like backstabbing your allies isn’t an American tradition. 😀

      Like


  6. From the feed:

    http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/09/22/wesleyan-fraternities-ordered-to-go-coed/

    LOL! If they require the female frat pledges to be feminists, there will be 119 rape accusations a day while the boys cower in the basement and their testicles shrivel and drop off. Otherwise, if they allow non-wildebeests, the resulting fuckfest will drive the price of birth control through the roof.

    Like


  7. Gullible boyim will beleib anything.

    Like


  8. —————————————————————————————————-

    But there’s another key reason that Watson wants men to speak out. “Gender equality is your issue too.” One of the reasons she became a feminist, she says, was because male friends were unable to express their feelings. Sexism – and homophobia – mean that men are expected to conform to a certain repressive stereotype. Those who don’t conform – maybe by not talking about or treating women in a sufficiently degrading way, or by expressing emotions, or by not getting into enough fights – risk being victimized as “unmanly”.
    ——————————————————————————————————

    Little whore in uber left Guardian on her “male friends” being unable to express “their fillings”
    Now contrast that with complaining about these very male being shy

    Apparently there may be some hacked photos of her face drenched in cum of her shy male friends unable to express their fillings.

    These are final few lines of the article written by Owen Jones and entitled
    “Men need to stand together with Emma Watson against misogyny”
    ———————————————————————————————————-
    That’s why men should heed Watson’s call and sign up for the HeForShe campaign. Standing in solidarity with women fighting to be heard, and struggling against sexist oppression; but also to help men, too. Watson’s bravery may prove another inspirational landmark in the generational struggle for equality – for all of us.
    ———————————————————————————————————

    It is not difficult to imagine what this insult to manhood looks like

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/24/men-stand-together-emma-watson-misogyny

    Like


    • “One of the reasons she became a feminist, she says, was because male friends were unable to express their feelings. Sexism – and homophobia – mean that men are expected to conform to a certain repressive stereotype.”

      Meanwhile, betas who express their feelings are “creepy”, and PUAs are guilty of “street harassment”. #YesAllWomen

      Like


    • One of the reasons she became a feminist, she says, was because male friends were unable to express their feelings.

      She might even believe that. But she probably would rather like the men express her feelings. Most women would be mortified if men were to be fully honest about their feelings. Exhibit A: Their fight against the manosphere.

      Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 7:15 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Is there a #sheforhe campaign in which women will campaign for something of value to me? If not, why should we care? These people are insufferable so no wonder they’re angry and moaning all the time..

      Like


  9. it should come as no surprise that as a female gets older and her younger hotter tighter and lighter self becomes a distant speck in her rearview mirrors, greater quantities of feminist nonsense are more likely to spew forth.

    she’s not aging too well and subconsciously she knows it. she’s 24, but looks older. in a couple of more years, we’ll be using her past and present pics as an example of how merciless the wall can be.

    nothing more to see here, move along…

    Like


  10. Annoying bitch! She was laughed at while in college at some Ivy Leaguer,studying bullshit.A pretentious career striving cunt.But I ‘d love to jizz in that sweet English face

    Like


  11. Women don’t consciously know what they want, until it’s right there in front of them. Watson’s superficial blah-blah will be instantly discarded when a sufficiently manly guy strikes up a conversation & gives her tingles.

    Like


  12. But man does she look good. I don’t know if I’m looking at airbrushed photos or whatever but she’s a solid 9.

    Like


    • You are joking. When I was younger certain female actresses were genuinely beautiful – at their height, Elke Summer’s ice-cool beauty, former Miss Italy Claudia Cardinale, or the mystique of Catherine Deneauve, by way of example. Miss Watson is not fat, and some may like freckles but rating her homely English looks higher than a 6 would surely be too generous.

      Like


    • But man does she look good. I don’t know if I’m looking at airbrushed photos or whatever but she’s a solid 9.

      You cannot possibly be serious.

      Any normal college campus will have scads more highly attractive women on it that put Watson to shame, than those that do not. You need to get out more cryo.

      Like


      • thats what I thought but I didn’t say anything because I assumed Emma had some secret “white essence” that only white people could detect?

        She’s only sorta hot in a my DNA drippin off her chin kinda way.

        would bang.

        Like


      • I’m 30, and didn’t even go to college, so never been surrounded by lots of hot college girls. My standards of beauty will naturally be lower than others.

        Like


    • I don’t know about 9, but definitely a 7, though.

      Like


  13. This is Emma Watson’s boyfriend:

    Like


  14. Got a screen grab of the bf, Corey?

    Like


    • This is the image. It’s an FB meme that for some reason wouldn’t load. Anyway the caption read:

      “Men should be free from stereotypical gender roles…

      …Men like my 6’6 manly muscled rugby playing rugged boyfriend.”

      Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 7:17 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        His body language is atrocious. This kind of body language looks even worse on tall men.

        Like


      • He would look better if he stopped slouching his shoulders forward. Tall men have a tendency to do this, while shorter men more often walk with great posture, shoulders thrown back and square. Leave the weak, self-protective slouching to the slits (note that all the slits in that photo are slouching).

        Like


  15. on September 25, 2014 at 7:17 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

    According to the mainstream media, celebrities ARE the fountain of all knowledge and wisdom.

    Like


  16. on September 25, 2014 at 7:44 pm Never Mind the Bulzac

    In his outstanding red-pill aware book that aims to help men improve their sex lives “The Manual” W. Anton has this to say on the damage this relentless tide of feminist dogma is reeking on western societies.

    “The idea that females are more valuable than males in a society may come as a surprise to you if you live in a country where feminist ideas have become popular, particularly the notion that females are unequal to males, but have been and still are less valued, not more. The opposite is really the case, and males have always been and still are the disposable sex as far as a society is concerned. However, the idea that females require more protection, even to the extent of calling them victims, will always be politically correct. But an idea that is popular is not necessarily accurate.

    It appears that more males tend to be more feminine these days than in the past, and entire generations of boys are being intentionally raised to be more like girls in many of the industrialized nations due to the rise and political success of feminism. Many females complain that males were somehow manlier a decade ago, without understanding that this is the obvious result of inviting feminist ideas into our schools and institutions. The latest generations of males who are currently being raised with these new ideas are even more emasculated and effeminate than ever and are really finding it more difficult to get girls (as if their fathers didn’t have a hard enough time already). Without seeing the connection between diminished masculinity and reduced attractiveness to females.

    Few people are aware of this, however, but even if the radical feminist leaders who set the political agenda were aware, they would not care, considering such a large portion of them are lesbian and hence not interested in males, regardless of whether the males are attractive”

    Like


    • on September 25, 2014 at 8:35 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Men might be more feminine. And Emma Watson might say that they should be so. But when it comes down to who Emma Watson actually dates, what kind of guy do you think that is? Wimpy? Effeminate? Here is a clue”

      Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 5:35 am Never Mind the Bulzac

        The fact that we are now judging a mans masculinity by how much time he has spent obsessing about his looks down the gym is just another sign of how deep the female mind set has taken hold.

        There are plenty of gay guys who look just like this dude. Gyms are full of them.

        Here’s a clip to remind you of what “real” masculinity acts and sounds like:

        Like


      • Bitch looks shabby in comparison. This is how they turn gay isn’t it?

        Like


      • ha, i was waiting for these 2 pictures to show up. more evidence to ignore what girls tell you. she only wants tall muscled men to be more sensitive. this hypocrite needs to shut her yap. some super-rich famous actress “needs” feminism? sure, so she can make more money. & the idiots believe her.

        Like


      • An unsettling resemblance to Ringo Starr

        Like


      • Looks like movie-star game works for girls, too. Why else would this dude bang a dumpy cheesecake like Emma?

        Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 7:19 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Why is that bad? More future teenage girls for us.

      Like


  17. Hypocrite is an understatement. She is a useful idiot, who ostensibly has become some kind of ‘diplomat’. WB however.
    I wrote more about it at my blog: http://wp.me/p4n7vv-9r

    Like


  18. “When at 14, I started to be sexualized by certain elements of the media. At 15, my girlfriends started dropping out of sports teams because they didn’t want to appear masculine.”

    Hahaha, oh shut the fuck up.

    Like


    • “At 15, my girlfriends started dropping out of sports teams because they didn’t want to appear masculine.”

      Well, I guess if you take roids. But I have the benefit of being with many physically attractive and physically fit women. Both on and off the field. A fine example here, at least to my eyes…

      Like


      • Every heterosexual male, living or dead, gets it about Michele Jennecke…Everything about her screams not just fitness but female fitness. As in the sense that EVERY bun you might put in her owen will grow up fit and strong… every single one of them.
        You can learn a lot by study-ing the grimaced, hating faces on every other female within a 100 meters of her little warm up dance..

        Like


      • This says exactly what I was thinking watching that video.

        http://mattforney.com/2012/08/09/why-men-love-michelle-jenneke/

        If you compare the picture to the video, you can see her appeal gets a large boost just from being young, healthy, happy, and feminine. These things are freely available to countless women who will instead be dressing up in pantsuits tomorrow, complaining about the patriarchy as men give them their bus seats, getting blind drunk and twerking tomorrow night, and running out to get some Plan B on Saturday morning.

        “Before feminism, just about every woman was Michelle Jenneke, or at least aspired to be.”

        Like


      • @Libertardian

        good article. thanks.

        Like


  19. Any mature and experienced man knows that females can argue in favor of two (at least) starkly incompatible ideas at the same time and the with the same energy for each one – even if one is known to her as one of her favorite fantasies.
    So, put on the whole armor of God.

    I got my copy of “The Revoluntionary Psychology Behind Politics” by anonymous today.

    My first, very strong, impression is that it the strongest book that any of us will ever read in our lifetime. (Except the Jerusalem Bible, of course.)

    Like


    • Yeah, they tend to doublethink a lot. Fits in nicely with their socialist and totalitarian leanings.

      Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 7:25 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        And yet somehow right wing Americans get their pink panties in a knot when you point out to them that they can’t both think that Hamas is evil for hiding rockets behind women and children and that WW1 was somehow about freedom for Americans: no, it was about some dudes smuggling weapons while using women and children as shields. Everyone who has an identity based on an ideology doublethinks because all ideologies make these unprincipled exceptions.

        You can even come up with examples from today: Russia annexing Crimea after a referendum in which most Crimeans consented to the annexation, moving troops to Crimea based on a signed treaty between Russia and Ukraine etc is violating international law, invasion etc. Bombing Syria isn’t even considered war – after all, we should all remember the American reaction to Pearl Harbor. All Americans just said this isn’t a war act and that the Japanese are America’s friends.

        Like


    • “females can argue in favor of two (at least) starkly incompatible ideas at the same time and the with the same energy for each one”

      lawyers too.

      women and lawyers… the most dangerous people on the planet.

      Like


    • “Any mature and experienced man knows that females can argue in favor of two (at least) starkly incompatible ideas at the same time ”

      Which is why they look to be led and can be led…

      Like


      • Most Americans don’t even know there was a World War I, and I know of no one who believes that it had anything to do with ‘freedom’.

        Like


  20. emma was sofa king hot in, um, Bling Ring. Can u believe that can got peeled by basic caveman?

    Like


  21. Just absorb this, you Incel Beta Males Who Self-Flagellate. She hates her countrymen, her blood because they’re what I think the host call k-selected, all shucks and by-your-leave, ma’am. That is the death of your seed. Enjoy Londonistan, bitches as you twist yourselves into pieces trying to logically please girls.

    Like


  22. Experiment proves that fatassery harms women more than men in the dating market:
    http://abc7chicago.com/society/attractive-woman-and-man-wear-fat-suits-on-first-dates/323647/

    Like


  23. I think “watch what people do not what they say” is good to do with EVERYONE in life. Difference is you’ll have significantly better chances a man will be consistent with his words than a woman her’s

    Like


  24. We may need more Emma West, less Emma Watson.

    Like


  25. And so, at the hard inner core of the Women’s Liberation Movement lies a bitter, extremely neurotic if not psychotic, man-hating lesbianism. The quintessence of the New Feminism is revealed.

    I remember reading this article from Rothbard years ago. At that time I thought it was improbable and outrageous that the sole purpose of feminism was lesbianism. But now I believe he got it right. Lesbianism also ties in nicely with feminist efforts to curtail male sexuality and put female sexuality into hyperdrive.

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/murray-n-rothbard/against-womens-lib/

    Like


    • The Women’s Aid movement in the UK, heavily funded by the taxpayer for the hostels they run, has it’s fair share. I guess they have a lot of vulnerable women to ‘look after’.

      Like


  26. It surely must take some cognitive disjunction for a twenty-four year old woman – the daughter of two lawyers, schooled at private schools, an alumni of both Oxford and Brown Universities who in her most recent Harry Potter Movie – a couple of months work – earned $15,000,000, a figure greater than most people will earn in an entire life-time to give a speech in favour of ‘gender equality’ even as the speech demands that men be placed at the disposal of women – dressed as she was in a blouse cut lower than any man would reveal chest and with a pink breast cancer awareness medal on her left lapel.

    Stupidity or Hypocricy?

    Like


    • Recently in the UK Labour leader David Miliband gave a speech about the “ordinary people” he met on his walks on Hampstead Heath (rich London area) – including a young woman who told him – “my generation is falling into a black hole”.

      Turns out this ordinary person isn’t THAT ordinary.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2769176/Woman-inspired-Ed-Milibands-speech-disillusioned-young-grew-900-000-Oxfordshire-mansion.html

      “Miss Bazell is currently studying Victorian women’s bodies in art, photography and literature.” There obviously aren’t enough tenured posts in Victorian women’s body studies.

      Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 7:27 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        ““Miss Bazell is currently studying Victorian women’s bodies in art, photography and literature.””
        Pffts, she asked to be gamed into a threeway.

        Like


      • I am amused to learn that Milipaede is cruising the Heath – plenty of trade there if you are that way inclined – or is ‘ordinary people’ now code for Gay. Of course one could always interpret that ‘black hole’ into which Miss Bazell is falling as a thinly veiled criticism of Government immigration policy. Either way Milispeed is not English.

        Personally, (as an very ordinary person) I love the Heath.

        Like


      • Had to chuckle there Hugh. The UK Labour dear leader is actually ED Miliband.

        He is routinely misidentified as DAVID Miliband – his brother – who took the usual YKW approach of fucking off to magic America the second the more far-flung goy teats grew withered.

        All the same, carry on.

        Like


    • Pecuniam leviosa!

      Like


  27. So let’s go for the jugular. How hot is Emma? Certainly she is a favourite for the photo-shoppers at Image-fap. For my benchmark I will use women who in their prime were as close to female perfection as one could reasonably get on this earth; women like Elke Summer, Claudia Cardinale and Catherine Deneuve, or if you feel I should choose someone who is English, then how about Shirley Eaton. If you don’t care for them or don’t even recognise the names choose someone else.

    When I look at the three above photos of Miss Watson, even the airbrushed window photo, I observe that she is not a war pig, and some recognise that some people like freckles. She, frankly, is plain – a 6 at best. If she is wise she may given her position marry well.

    Like


    • You guys must see stunningly beautiful women all the time if you think Emma Watson is a 6. In my day to day life, it would be a very rare occurrence to run into one who looked much better than Watson.

      Like


  28. Oh, Emma. Just look pretty and shut up. I am the daughter of feminism. And it means work. Hard work. Not make believe on movie sets. Emma Watson meet John Kerry: I was for playing Anastasia Steele before I was against it.
    #letmebackinthekitchen

    Like


  29. Liberals are a trip. Just know that this speech was meant for white men only. That’s always the target. Just sit back and enjoy the base on the following song and sit back and read the lyrics. Do you ever see these types of bitches protestin’ the botthas and songs like this? Hell no, cause blank folks would never let some white bitches try to control their nut sacks. White folks need to get their studios in order:

    Like


    • Well white male liberals who are ashamed of their gender and think that Emma Watson might sleep with them if they degrade themselves some more.

      Like


    • “Just know that this speech was meant for white men only. That’s always the target.”

      They hate white men because they envy them. White men built the modern world. Often it was a single white man with balls of steel leading a ragtag group of criminals across the ocean to brave the wilderness, harness resources and open new trade routes. See the late 15th century through the early 19th.

      They don’t teach the facts in school, just degrade the white man with revisionist morality while simultaneously enjoying the fruits of his incredible accomplishments.

      Stupid cunts all of them.

      Like


      • Sorry…nobody envies us,except maybe Asians.Bitches,queers,minorities,liberal shots,they don’t have our values,they don’t respect our ways,they just want us to feed them and shut up!

        Like


  30. What can one say? She has lived a fantasy for most of her life. Now she has been handed another fantasy that provides her with a soap box. She doesn’t realize how badly she will be used. By the time she is 35 she’ll have a house full of cats.

    Like


  31. The male contraception revolution is on the way:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance

    http://www.mtv.com/news/1926484/male-birth-control/

    Recent news articles tell of the current trial that was 100% (!) effective on baboons.

    This appears to be a 100% effective male (and male controlled) contraceptive. Reversible, too! Won’t stop diseases (only a condom has the power to do that). Completely block sperm through the vas deferens by was of a special gel injected in there.

    The manosphere talks about the revolution that will come with male contraceptives. Well, we are at the doorstep of the revolution, gentlemen.

    Like


    • “100 percent effective on baboons” ,Dude,you gotta be racist?

      Like


    • The blockage, even if non-surgical, can still cause deterioration. It’s kink of like blocking the output of your kidneys. See how long THEY last with a blockage.

      “One of the main factors influencing pregnancy rates is the obstructive interval, which is the duration of time between your original vasectomy and the reversal. As the table below shows, rates of both the return of sperm to semen and subsequent pregnancy are highest when the reversal is performed relatively shortly after the vasectomy.”

      Like


  32. If I were an Englishman, I’d be very shy too. Friends of mine that live there have spoke of the evil, lay waste to the countryside mentality of the courts against men in their divorce proceedings, and this is even with documented proof of abuse against the men…

    I watched about 10 minutes of the diatribe hamster wheel spinning and had.to.walk.away….

    Like


  33. Her mouth is saying one thing, the open kimono or whatever the hell it is she has on is saying another.

    Also, that ?marimba? music that plays as she’s coming up to the stage makes me want to get all on board with the nearest goosestepping regime that doesn’t come to those meetings.

    Like


  34. I just saw a picture of the 350 pound land whale over in GB who says she can’t lose weight because it costs too much to eat healthy and exercise (as she points to her pantry full of crap). She has orange hair and tats+piercings. I wonder if Thwack has hit that yet?

    Like


    • yep. women spin plates just as much as we do.

      Like


    • That’s an interesting, unintentionally funny article, thank you for sharing. The humor resides in the underlying notion seems to suggest that men should think twice about their actions because the woman in their lives has options. The kind of man that would inspire a woman to even keep options available deserves to live in fear.

      Like


  35. […] this post over at Chateau Heartiste about Emma Watson’s silly speech at the UN and noting her own […]

    Like


  36. Its not just feminists who are hypocrites. Everyone is, including CH. If you don’t like it, criticize life as a whole, but to blame groups of people is silly. Everything is part of a deterministic universe that is a fucked up accidental machine

    Like


  37. CNN is officially a joke. The feminist agenda is just so clear they must think people are stupid not to notice.

    Literally 80% of all headlines on the front page are about feminism. They should literally just rename it and admit the radical leftist bias. Be another “slate” or whatever, not “cable news network.”

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/world/meast/uae-female-fighter-pilot/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

    Like


    • And not only is this fighter pilot a woman, she’s an Arab. So “see what women will do when freed from male discrimination chains!” screams CNN.

      Like


  38. I actually think this just demonstrates a difference with regard to assumptions men make versus assumptions women make.

    For example, if a man hears someone bitching about a problem, then he assumes that the individual is working to solve that problem as well. And if that person is not working to solve the problem, then the man all but dismisses that individual and their complaints. Men are big on credibility, ethos, whatever you want to call it, and “consistency.” It’s not really logical consistency, it’s more like personal consistency, because the individual could be making plausible “complaints.”

    Women never carry that assumption. That’s why a dude with rock-solid confidence in himself and mellifluous verbals can be successful with women — women do not need, or expect, hard tangible evidence to support “the attitude.”

    So it is here, that Emma Watson complains about a social “problem,” but probably sees nothing wrong with her personally failing to correct that problem or personally furthering that problem.

    Like


  39. It’s no big surprise to see the big Feminist Push going on in the MSM right now. The constant droning on about Emma Watson making headlines when in fact it’s not even back paper news, the gearing up of “domestic abuse” from detractors of the NFL, television shows getting even more hard ass feminazi (isn’t there a show on now basically about Hillary without explicitly naming her)? Yep, gearing up for the Hillary! campaign and the 4-8 years after that of her doing to Feminism what Obama has done for race relations. Can’t wait, will be great fun (do I really need a sarc tag?).

    Like


    • The Burninator, I agree but to add to what you said, if Hillary gets elected you’ll see websites like this closed down because they’re “sexist and incite violence”. You’ll see.

      Like


  40. OK Gamesters…. it’s time for the FRIDAY CHALLENGE…. What could be more fitting than the girl of the moment…

    Here is what you know about her going in – feminist, “highly educated”, professional, affluent, and has a BF… Let’s just stipulate for the sake of the hypothetical that she is a 7… The scene, daygame, your local Starbucks, she is sitting alone, reading poetry…

    Lay it out there… What are your best openers and how do you optimize for a SDL…?

    Your likely facing an “thanks I have a boyfriend” objection from the start…

    @Zombie Shane – you are limited to ONE entry, make it count.

    Like


    • She feels the breeze I leave as I walk right past her.

      Like


      • Yeah, same. Girl is a 7, as he mentions. Rather plain when not dolled up to the nines, decently fit but still a bit frumpy and slouchy, and her idiotic attitude is off putting to the extreme.

        Life is too short to be with a girl like her, unless she’s paying your way on everything. Wonder if he beau is getting a cash kickback?

        Like


      • Come now, i would think some of you guys would be into it just for the hate fuck…

        It’s quite sweet when you destroy the carefully crafted persona someone has established for themselves and they dissolve to your will… In an hour…

        Like


    • ‘Don’t worry luv, it might never happen’ – she looks miserable even as she has her puppies on display.

      Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 12:52 pm ALPHAbetacal Order

      Where you at my grandmother’s estate sale this weekend?

      Like


    • Nice manjaw…

      Like


    • on September 26, 2014 at 2:16 pm having a bad day

      @sentient

      do the meta analysis…first step = what do you see?…outside of restaurant/cafe, small table, sitting alone, two drinks finished, papers spread out (poetry per ‘facts’), nicely dressed but not slutty (but plunging neckline…lol), small accessory/neckless accents some cleavage, hair casual, day makeup…no ring…lol…a 7 per facts…sad face…

      second step = what does that tell you about her/the situ? (in addition to the ‘known’ facts)…{out alone + sitting out in public for some time (‘enjoying the day’…lol) + her dress style accentuates her sexuality (in a ‘demure’ way) + small table/spread out papers = beta filter (it will take some balls to approach)} = hindbrain/hamster is looking to ‘trade up’ (she’s likely ovulating…)…BUT hair/make up choices = ASD…lol…(she also likely has ‘sensible’ shoes on…lol) … 7 = likely ‘entitled’ bc she gets hit on all day = rolodex of shit tests ( the biggest/most effective is ‘i have a bf’…the second is pointing out violations of social conventions to keep betas in line…i.e. shaming…)…so her hamster/hindbrain is open to a SDL(see her hair/makeup/shoes (and probably ratty underwear…lol) = plausible deniability…lol) but you have to get past the filters (so it can JUST HAPPEN…lol)…and the BIGGEST one is going to be her ASD…poetry = she sees herself as an intellectual…lol…sad face = her hamster realizing she’s not going to get to trade up this ‘cycle’ and has to go back with her bf…lol…

      third step = basic approach…your mission is to help her hindbrain to fulfill her biological mission… i.e. to get her laid…lol…her hamster will make it ok, but you need to help out by not screwing things up…lol…

      given her ‘background’ you need to challenge her in a non-PC way (mildly violate some social conventions…and own it…with a smirk to show her you know what’s going on…), while dismissing her intellect…while at the same time not triggering her ASD…just be sure to make her hamster your friend…and push the ‘no judgment’ angle…lol…so you need to avoid ALL overt sexual content (keep sex on the subcomm level…) until you are back at the ‘isolated location’…then naturally ramp it up…when she ‘wins’ your approval…lol

      approach #1 (overall approach structure)…walk up…see her reading poetry…”poetry, huh? tell me your favorite poet” [compliance test] (also, like aways, your body language is going to make or break this approach…so strong eye contact and confident posture…)

      ‘xyz poet’

      ‘oh, my mom’s friends love xyz poet…but I really don’t see the attraction…” (disqualification) [sitting down facing ‘away’…pull up a chair from another table…engage with head turn…]

      (expect a shit test about joining her uninvited…) = ‘how else are you going to meet me?…” [with a puzzled look…like she was just waiting for you…lol] [then change subject to her drink…]

      ‘hey, did you pee in here? that’s some good stream management…” [picking up bottle and looking at liquid…smell it and react like it’s pee…]…lol…’they have bathrooms here you know…this isn’t london…”

      ‘official’ shit test = “thanks, i have a boyfriend…”
      “i would have been disappointed if you didn’t…” [like it’s just a formality…then change subject…and don’t forget to assume the sale…lol]

      if she stays after you sit down, it’s on… IF you don’t trigger her ASD…or beta LJBF protocol…lol…

      approach #2…walk up…

      ‘thinkin’ about me again, huh?…i can tell…my ex used to get that dreamy look, too…right before we would hook up at some coffee shop…hey, tell me what you’re drinking…” [like you’re going to buy her one…lol] [compliance test] (note – she doesn’t actually have to have a dreamy look on her face…lol)

      ‘xyz’ [engage with pee example above] or if she objects to you buying her one…lol… ‘you wish!…’ [take either response as a request to sit down…]

      and any snarky comment gets ‘that’s socially retarded…’ [then change subject and continue…]

      [continue…]

      approach #3…walk up…

      ‘my old aunt has that same exact dress. she LOVES it…but she tells everybody that she’s got a great figure and can pull it off…”

      [continue…]

      to pull to her place…after all your DHV stories/leading the interaction, challenge her to come up with a poem/read it to you that you will ’emotionally connect with’ (since she knows you so well now…)…and don’t screw things up by sexualizing the interaction before ‘she amazes you’ with her selection…lol…

      Like


    • Let’s assume she looks exactly like this during my approach, or in other words, has a bitch countenance.

      I drape myself in sheep’s clothing; first I sit at a table near her and glance in her direction — long or obvious enough for her to notice — then smile before ending the eye contact. I wait a beat. And then I open with…”I’m sorry, but…well, do you mind if we chat for a few minutes to get to know one another? I saw you, and you seem like a normal, cute girl…but I’ve made a lot of mistakes in the past and gotten myself into some pretty crazy situations. Ha, so I’m new at this, but yeah…do you want to just talk for a second?”

      We have pre-selection, we have ‘bad boy trying to reform himself’ narrative, and we have social intelligence — all in one ostensibly insipid question.

      If she bites, I have license to take this ‘bad boy’ narrative as far as I want to go — shit, I can pretend that I don’t even really understand talking ‘on this level,’ which strongly implies I just meet chicks and get to fucking. Oh wow, guess who implicitly becomes ‘special’ during the interaction, because I ‘took the time’ to talk to them? Ms. Feminist-Narcissist.

      And it plays straight into what she likes — men as uncivilized and needing ‘guidance’ from women.

      Hard for me to imagine this kind of self-aware styled opener going badly. Similar approaches work pretty great on the smart girls in social gatherings.

      Feminists confuse snark with wit and irony with insight. Use their worldview to your advantage.

      Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 2:34 pm having a bad day

        @scray

        how do you spin it when she says ‘no, i have a bf…”? and she doesn’t bite…

        Like


      • @scray… subtle… I think I would go with the sheep’s clothing approach as well, but maybe that would be a mistake. I would do something a bit more direct though…

        Two thoughts right now are, as initial openers,

        1) go in harder and cocky… Pass by table, double back… “oh I see you are studying here, high school is really hard, I can probably help you with some of that (and take a seat). This will leave a more shocked impression to play off of, she will probably deny it’s high school (qualifying) and I would lighten things with a “hey I am just busting your chops, seriously what are you looking at there” and play off of that.

        2) same approach, but lighter, more complimentary, pass her, double back but this time ask a question “I see you are reading some poetry, let me ask you something (taking a seat), I am trying to get my GED (when it is obvious from my appearance this is impossible) and I need a tutor, maybe you can help me” and play off of that.

        Either way I think the moves are the same, get seated with her then draw her into a conversation about some of her beliefs and then use logic traps to tweak her, one that usually works is “so you look like an intellectual, (she will concur) does that mean you don’t believe in God?” If she says yes, go down the path of people say that because they have never seen God etc. almost agreeing with her, then go to “What do you think about life on other planets?” and she will most likely agree it exists.. and you come back with “But no one has ever seen an alien have they?, curious you don’t believe in one thing you haven’t seen while you do believe in another, how can you explain that?” It works going the other way too. IF she believes in God and aliens you take the position that no one has seen either and play it that way. Usually you will find a contradiction though. I think the key part of the interaction is knocking her down a peg.

        And that dress is really begging for a well timed neg. “I love thrift shopping too, tell me where you found that dress?” etc.

        Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 3:05 pm having a bad day

        @sentient

        what’s your plan for the snark? (if any) and the ‘i have a bf’ gambit?…

        Like


      • @HABD

        “what’s your plan for the snark? (if any) and the ‘i have a bf’ gambit?…”

        Depends on the level of snark… If it is acid, something like ” you know, there was a time in this country when strangers could meet in a public place and have a civil conversation” and then hold eye contact and say nothing until she caves. with a serious but not butt hurt look. This has even worked on guys BTW who are being assholes.

        If it is more generic rudeness a quizzical look “where did you go to charm school again?” and a slight smile…

        The “I have a BF” thing is a work in progress. still looking for an optimal response. My basic assumption is that all women will say this. I try and play it a few ways depending on the vibe.

        First – no big deal – shrug “how nice for you” and plow.

        Second – “how long you kids been seeing each other (I’m 47 so this acts to dismiss there kiddie romance)?” when she says X if it is short, dismiss it “8 weeks – I have ketchup bottles older than that” and plow. If it is longer, which is what I hope for, I play on the lack of commitment “3 years… pause… No ring yet huh?, hmmmm”

        Third – I am married and wear a ring, so “That’s cool, I’m married myself, so XYZ” and plow. The married thing is interesting, if things start to hook, I start to get projection from them, “your wife must be very beautiful” etc. stuff like that. Basically they want to beat the competition. A good sign. I always say “yeah she is something else” and never play her down. Then when they go to “why are you talking to me then” I can go into something like “I’m a man, I see something I like I go for it.” or “well I’m not like most guys you have met”.

        a work in progress…

        Like


      • ‘no, I have a bf….’

        ‘…oh perfect, no pressure, I can just get some nice practice.’

        I actually try to avoid too much logic or ‘belief’ discussion during the sarge. She’s a chick. Chances are that she believes in a lot of incoherent nonsense. Instead, I just plow over those beliefs with the Trojan horse approach and use the narrative to serve myself:

        “yeah it’s crazy how gender power dynamics work. I mean, like……society gives me as a man a huge leg up; it took me awhile to realize how much girls have given me because of what society says about men and women. And it’s not fair, how I was allowed to treat them and how I was allowed to take and not give…’ blah blah fucking blah => pre-selection, you’re a special snowflake who will change me.

        Once I have co-opted her worldview to my advantage, THEN I will start dropping C&F bombs. And when I do, she”ll be ready to make excuses for me “oh he’s just a good guy trying to change,” blah blah fucking blah.

        Like


      • on September 26, 2014 at 6:30 pm having a bad day

        @scray

        ‘…oh perfect, no pressure, I can just get some nice practice.’

        that’s good…lol…

        gotta plan for the snark…?

        Like


      • ‘gotta plan for the snark’

        The whole approach is designed to avoid the snark. The snark is just a defense mechanism. When you come to her with this ‘broken man, man feminism is making me think things’ stuff, her snark is less necessary…you have (by all appearance to her) already conceded the point.

        Girls who are like this and who fall for feminism bullshit are often low self-esteem. That’s why I avoid immediate direct C&F, etc. I ease into it, and I wait until I’ve gained her trust first.

        I mean, if she still insists on being a bitch, well….sometimes a girl is just a bitch, brah.

        I’d probably last-ditch it with some kind of “wow you’re really opinionated,” but say it like a child learning something new. I would then keep on with the pre-selection, hyper-dominant frame “yeah, all my other girlfriends just wanted me to do everything and listened to me. It was real easy. But I see it’ll take more than coasting with you, I see.” Believe it or not, this kind of shit is setting up some slapping/spanking/choking later on.

        And if she still insisted on being a bitch after that…just cut her loose, mang…what more can you do?

        90% of my game these days begins with putting a lot of myself out there, or at least -coming off- that way. You set this frame of ‘honesty,’ which makes them feel like they’ve known you for awhile, which intrigues them because they know they’ve only known you for a few minutes….and then when you roll in with all of that C&F shit, well…lol, game over man.

        Like


    • @Kant – anything to offer? this seems like it’s up your alley…

      Like


    • on September 28, 2014 at 6:29 am anonymous does not forgive

      time has hit her hard. she was easily a 9 when she was like 15. now she is rapidly approaching the wall

      Like


    • on September 28, 2014 at 6:36 am anonymous does not forgive

      Will you sign my copy of…. The God Delusion???

      Wait, you’re not Richard Dawkins? My mistake.

      Like


      • on September 28, 2014 at 4:07 pm Never Mind the Bulzac

        NMTB: Hey what do you think about men marrying each other?

        Her: I think its great. (they always do)

        NMTB: So in principle you’re ok with anal… that’s nice to know.. What you doing Friday?

        Like


  41. Paging Emma Watson. A Muslim convert just beheaded a woman in Oklahoma. I await your protest speech against Islam!

    Like


  42. Thrash talk

    Like


  43. Confident vs aggressive.

    Like


  44. DON’T LISTEN TO WHAT WOMEN SAY, WATCH WHAT THEY DO.

    This is the ONE thing that all men need to get beat into their heads. Rather than listening to what a woman says, look at what she does and rewards through her actions. It wasn’t till I was in grad-school that I actually did tests to verify what I had empirical evidence for from my days in college. Mostly because it wasn’t till then that I had the time. But in college I would regularly take women from guys. From what they said the guy they were with would be ideal – yet they would be back in my dorm room getting plowed by the end of the evening – while telling me how the “never” did this… (Yeah… Right…) Of course, I was doing it mostly because I could, so they would go back to the guy – so they could stay in my social group, and I would enjoy them again – usually after sending one girl home. But the guy would always take them back… Really sad…

    In high-school, I was that schmuck. Sure I was banging lots of older women, but the ones my age were all cock-teases when it came to me. I learned from the older women that all women are the same – regardless of age. Sure they get a bit more desperate as they age, but I learned to never listen to what they said, but watch what they did. Once I learned that suddenly, the girls were spreading their legs like magic. That is why I have nothing but good things to say about the older women I enjoyed…

    If I could get men to grasp one thing – that would be it… I learned young, but I still wasted several years… Of course, today with all of the college rules – men should enjoy women from other colleges and women who are out of college – mostly to avoid female college admins that hate men… Anyway… Good post…

    Like


  45. The simple fact that she’s calling for “gender equality” with an organisization called “HeforShe” should be all you really need to know about the so-called logic of feminists.

    Like


  46. She is NOT being inconsistent. If you are ugly, beta, or otherwise have a low SMV you are “aggressive”. If you are alpha, you are “bold”.

    When she says Englishmen are not “bold”. what she really means is that there are no alpha males in England who are particularly attracted to her.

    I am not surprised, frankly, since she is scrawny, flat-chested and mannish.

    Like


  47. Somebody needs to tell these celebrity idiots that just because they’re famous doesn’t mean they’re smart or that their opinion matters.

    Like


  48. One way I look at this is modern politics, being “Show-business for ugly people”* needs the likes of Ms Watson to present a palatable and pretty face for the masses of unthinking, unquestioning Sheeple (the majority being women) to listen to and be influenced by.

    First you get the women and the children, and so follow the men.

    *credit for this goes to Gerald Celente.

    Like


  49. on September 27, 2014 at 2:28 am Paladin Justice

    Reblogged this on saboteur365.

    Like


  50. Emma – I made my fortune playing a bossy precocious schoolgirl in a movie which celebrated and normalised the elitist English public school system circa the 18th / 19th centuries – arguably the most patriarchal institution there has every been – Watson.

    I’m sure she was chosen to head this campaign because she is the perfect female for triggering a chivalrous reaction in men. Men are most likely to sacrifice themselves for young (fertile), attractive, puny (vulnerable), doe eyed females who exude fragility.

    He for She (males self sacrificing for females) is just a rebranding of chivalry / patriarchy but disguised with feel-good PC mantras (‘equality’ etc) and probably lots of NLP too, which is why so many people claim the speech left them ‘on a high’.

    Like


  51. Ah, get with the reality FFS:

    You rail against the MSM, yet now it speaks the truth?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2218451/Emma-Watson-doubts-date-British-man-again.html

    Like


  52. Woooow loool, you tried so hard to make the two passages conflict; when in fact, they don’t. Since when was shy the antithesis of aggressive? It’s not one or the other, not being too shy doesn’t mean being aggressive, it means being confident in yourself OBVIOUSLY. This is so forced :s

    Like


  53. […] attempting to co-opt men into the ranks of feminism. Before I do any real analysis, here’s a link to the Chateau that demonstrates hypocrisy. At a deeper level, it really shows the conflict of interest between female sexual desire and […]

    Like


  54. More weak minded men shitting all over themselves because of feminism. lol

    Like


  55. She could have changed her mind between the two quotes.

    But what I was not impressed with was how she wore lipstick (among other gobs of makeup) during the speech itself, while at the same time complaining about being “sexualized” by the media. Red lips are not sexual???

    Like


  56. I happen to be friends with her sister on Facebook. Her sister is staunchly against islam I can assure you. She fucking hates muslims. Lol

    Like