Comment Of The Week: Be The Owner, Not The Dog

Comment of the Week winner is “anon”, who supplies a very apt metaphor to describe how successful, happy relationships are ultimately a pairing off of a psychologically beta, highly empathic woman with a less empathic, pack (socially) dominant alpha man.

This is like how a pet dog will check his owner’s face and look the owner in the eye every 10 seconds to see whether the owner is happy with the dog because the dog is behaving correctly, or if the owner is going to punish the dog for doing something wrong. A dog that is owned and trained properly by a male owner knows the owner is the alpha; the dog is beta. Both are happy.

In a relationship, the woman should be the beta. When the man is the beta, the woman is repulsed and confused. With a dog-owner relationship, when the owner is beta–like a single woman owner–the dog is confused and unhappy. You will notice, if you are a dog owner who walks his dog every day, that the dogs owned by single women spinsters are the ones who are nasty to other dogs; they are confused because the female owner treats them like a living furry teddy bear and never disciplines the dog properly.

I have just summarized all of CH’s teachings for you. I’m not even kidding. Read carefully and think about it.

In a dog-owner and in a woman-man relationship, the beta (submissive) will look at the alpha’s (dominant’s) face every 10 seconds and is very good at detecting whether the alpha is pleased with the beta.

I actually read a book about dogs one time and then I started noticing this. My dog looks at me every 10 seconds, looks at me in the eyes, and determines if I’m happy or upset with it. My dog never tires of working to please me.

As colorful summaries of the CH worldview go, this is as close to striking distance of core teachings as any.

******

COTW close runner-up is Mike, who has some insight into low SES versus high SES moral senses and ethical codes.

I’ll give my experience. I’m low SES but went to a high SES private school. Low SES people are more empathetic, and thus their interactions are different. My high SES friends cannot keep up with even normal (non confrontational) low SES interaction. They also run into issues with me because, as a lower SES person, manners and social behavior means a lot to me. The reciprocation just isn’t there with them when it should be, and when they don’t recognize protocol it comes off as disordered from my perspective.

They can be assholes, but many aren’t – as most are constrained by their SWPL ethics rather than any innate empathy. However, in some cases, their lack of empathy leads to a specific type of anti-social behavior that is a definite precursor to dysfunctional social behavior if not criminality.

Absent sociopathy, which is what Heartiste conflated with ‘normal prole criminal behavior’, the typical normal IQ (100) prole personality is less criminal prone than higher SES personalities. This is due to empathy. What makes up for that, in the statistics, are higher levels of low IQ individuals (<100), abuse or attachment disorders that screws personalities, and more culturally accepted violence as a means of resolving disputes amongst males. In black communities, that violence is amplified to much higher levels because it’s instinctual rather than cultural (empathy is shockingly low amongst blacks in general); hence the disparity in violence between prole white and prole black neighborhoods.

In other words, proles are nicer and more reliable friends but more unpredictable for dysfunctional behavior in groups. Higher SES individuals are more uniform in behavior but also in their lack of reliability and trustworthiness as friends and in business.

Here’s something funny that I’ve noticed: when higher SES individuals begin to engage in business in competitive environments, they find that those environments simulate lower SES threatening environments and thus they all of a sudden put more emphasis on loyalty and other prole social norms that depend on empathy for execution. There’s nothing more valuable to a high SES executive than the loyalty of his few truly prole underlings.

That last paragraph is astute. It gibes with my experience as well; when the heat comes around the corner, successful alpha businessmen who normally luxuriate in their social rank will quickly assume the attitude and slogans of “lower” ranking prole men, and emphasize as mike said, loyalty and teamwork (aka ingroup cohesion). It’s a microcosm for what could soon be happening at the national level, once lifestyle indicators really start to go south.





Comments


  1. […] Comment Of The Week: Be The Owner, Not The Dog […]

    Like


    • A submissive and docile wife who adores and worships her emotionally strong and dominant husband leads to a happy marriage. I can attest to this.
      Unfortunately, many people in today’s western societies look on in disdain, revulsion and pity on a woman like me who loves submitting, respecting and worshiping her husband even though I swear that it makes me really happy. Sometimes when I look around, I truly feel like I am an endangered species.

      My feeling is that the only way things will change is if men vote with their feet and hearts and insist on pairing with women who don’t castrate their masculinity.

      The challenge is that today after years of cultural brainwashing, most men in western societies have no clue on how to find and keep a submissive and docile woman. I am convinced of this based on the interactions I have had with the male readers of my blog.

      In some eastern societies, parents still play an important role and pair their boys with “appropriate agreeable women”. The parents’ wisdom helps weed out “overly ambitious, authoritative and dominant women” from the matching pool. But with arranged marriages pretty much dead in western societies and kids being raised in single family homes often dominated by selfish single moms, today’s boys often make terrible decisions on which girl they should invite into their lives and hearts. The consequences can be deadly.

      I am so saddened by the current state of “modern manhood” that I have started writing a series of blog articles on “How to find and Keep a submissive woman”. it is my hope that in some small measure, these articles will help men steer away from “wenches” and find their own “submissive angel”

      Here is the first series in the post

      http://blog.desidaasi.com/2014/09/how-to-find-and-keep-submissive-woman.html

      Please support, cherish and stand up for submissive women by choosing them over women who want to castrate your masculinity, otherwise given current trends I fear we may go extinct within a generation 😦

      Like


      • A true alpha wlll turn any woman permanently submissive and docile if he just catches a good girl earl enough and gets those buns in the oven.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2014 at 10:10 pm NotZombieShameThisTime

        In all seriousness, good post. Submissive women are happier and easier to get along with, not just because they are compliant.

        Like


    • Apropos the themes of this post, and hell, this entire blog: Heartiste is going to have an absolute field day with this article on Salon. The title is literally “My doomed mission to make her happy.” I am not even making that up. Have fun! http://www.salon.com/2014/10/05/my_doomed_mission_to_make_her_happy/

      Like


    • I notice this in NYC – Central Park etc. Women attempting to train men, and not training their dogs. The dogs need it and are confused and wild. The men don’t need it and are confused and betafied. An upside down world…
      Also the dogs use “staring” as a way to establish dominance. So glare back!

      Like


    • How about some variety? These days, every other post is about IQs and of course how low blacks are on the scale…how many times can you make the same point? What are you trying to tell us? I don’t understand how this relates to improving ones game. Enough with the IQ obsession and fetishism…

      Like


      • what color are you?

        Like


      • This post says that wealthier people have less empathy and they rely more on their own networks and codes and rules to keep that status up, but then when they find themselves in unfamiliar settings, they have to be more personable (empathetic), and they end up mimicking their lower class pals.

        At the same time, on the larger scale, race dynamics affect a man’s status. Obvious example: a high status white man in the ‘hood, alone. Not so high status anymore. And as America becomes more and more ghetto, the effects of this on the status of individual whites increases.

        So a man’s game depends on his social context (his status) which is at issue in racial dynamics.

        **************

        I am suspicious that lower SES people are more empathetic; but i would agree they are more personable, amongst themselves. Empathy and personability are close, but.

        Like


      • Another butthurt betaboy, who is scared that there are people that don’t believe his dearly held shibboleths.

        To quote Greg Eliott: You fairy.

        Like


      • Nice try, buffoon. It’s “Avaunt, you fairy!”

        Like


      • The true Greg Eliot yet again corrects the sound-alikes:

        Avaunt, THOU fairy.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like


    • Dog walkers know about this stuff, but whether or not they compare the master-dog thing to the man-woman relation is another question.

      If one is a dog walker, one knows about girls (excuse me, women) and their dominant dogs, their substitute loves, and then they freely admit to sharing their beds with big handsome German shepherds.

      Bestiality would be a step too far (as least for swapples chicks), but the misplaced eroticism is hard to miss.

      Like


    • And i would advise men who have struggled with women, but still have not completely given up on life and density and (and let’s just say it) themselves, to, by all means, get a dog.

      And then become the dog whisperer. On the way there though, be very careful of these “women” and their big dogs. (Always be careful of them, obviously.)

      And on a more sober note, it’s irresponsible of them, and disgusting, really, those clueless little girls, and their poor confused un-understood and mislead dogs. The idea that all the dog abuse in the world is in the ghetto, when a good half of it is in the trendy neighborhoods, by the trendy girls, with the various popular breeds.

      Like


  2. > “successful alpha businessmen… will quickly assume the attitude and slogans of “lower” ranking prole men… once lifestyle indicators really start to go south.” As if these kleptocratic mercantilist nihilist sociopaths – who gutted our economy – deserve even an ounce of our sympathy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mask_of_the_Red_Death

    Like


    • BTW, inverting the point of view here: As long as you are a wage slave [who doesn’t at least work for his own S-Corp/LLC], you must never forget that Boss Man looks at you as being nothing more than a DOG.

      Like


      • this is pretty much true…how can you not look at someone as a dog who acts like a dog tho? Everyone is always kissing the boss’s ass

        Like


      • > “always kissing the boss’s ass” Betas and Gammas are BROKEN-SOULED. Purpose of Chateau == LIGHT A FIRE UNDER THEIR ASSES!

        Like


    • Leftist workers gutted the economy by voting for socialist parties, greedy as they are. Then they blame the huge government debts on “the rich”.

      Like


      • But do you see these elitist nihilist sociopaths sending their own boys to K-12 indoctrination in John Dewey’s Vast Reserve Army of Wage Slave Gubmint Training Centers, teaching Gramscian YKW’s ubiquitous relentless pathological anti-male anti-white anti-Christian anti-Civilizational brainwashing, replete with enough Ritalin & Adderall & SSRIs to destroy the mind of even the most courageous little boy? Hell No! Private Academy Lacrosse Team Gang Rape Game FTW.

        Like


    • Report: Which states give the most to charity? The ones with church-goers. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3211831/posts

      Like


      • “…the giving gap between the rich and poor is significant, especially in view of the widening income gap. The report shows those who earned $200,000 or more donated 4.6 percent less of their income between 2006 and 2012; those who earned less than $100,000 gave 4.5 percent more…”

        Like


      • In other words, this kleptocratic mercantilist-nihilist sociopathic detachment from humanity is very measurably INCREASING [possibly even accelerating].

        Like


      • To his credit, Ross Perot was the ONLY “politician” who tried to warn us about this sociopathy.

        Like


      • Like


      • Perot lays out Sociopaths’ entire game plan for gutting our economy. GHWB-41 and Blythe-Clinton thinking: “SHUT THE FUCK UP, DUDE!!!”

        Like


  3. It is true that things work best when the man leads. But you must also be a man capable of leading. This is often lacking in this kind of analysis. Don’t just stroke your ego by saying “I a man!”, be a man who is actually worth something. You can start by turning off your teevee, stop playing computer games every day and get rid of some of the dough under your skin. And maybe pick up a book and learn something. I say this to no one in particular, because it applies to the majority of man-boys in the West today. Don’t just get high on reading about how you are one of the chosen because you are a man – the manosphere is full of this kind of mental-masturbation people.

    As for COTW 2: “resolving disputes amongst males”.

    It’s “men”, not “males”. To say “males” is a typical feminist thing since it makes men sound like animals. Think of the words you use, understand how the language is being distorted.

    Like


    • And maybe pick up a book

      You listed some classic fiction not too long ago. Can you list those books again? I meant to write them down but lost track of which thread they were in.

      Like


      • 0. THE BIBLE
        1. Homer’s Iliad
        2. Homer’s Odyssey
        3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
        4. Virgil’s Aeneid
        5. Socrates’ Apology
        6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
        7. Plato’s Repulic
        8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
        9. Aristotle’s Poetics
        10. Dante’s Inferno
        11. The Declaration of Independence
        12. The Constitution
        13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
        14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        15. Newton’s Principia
        16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
        17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
        18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
        19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
        21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
        22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
        23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
        24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
        25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
        26. THE BIBLE

        Like


      • Mr. Plissken’s been reading the GBFM.

        Like


      • The Ego and Its Own by Max Stirner

        Like


      • The short stories and plays of Chekhov

        Like


      • Blood Meridian – Cormic McCarthy

        Like


      • The Great Shark Hunt – Hunter S. Thompson

        Like


      • Sea Wolf, by Jack London. But you can stop reading when the woman shows up, about 2/3 through.

        Like


    • Male is more appropriate in most manospherian contexts because we’re analyzing instinctual animal-like behaviours and thought processes in men.

      Same goes for females, even if using it too often is an omega dead giveaway.

      Like


    • @Arbiter Good post.

      “You must also be a man capable of leading”…yes. Leadership comes with experience–in business and with women. This is a constant work in progress. I read many comments here and often wonder if the poster actually goes out with a variety of women. Theoretically it’s easy to say “lead”…but in reality it takes experience, trial and error and a building of your confidence.

      The “Dog Whisperer” guy Cesar Millan offers an interesting parallel.

      In order to get good with dogs…you have to get over your fear of dogs. “They’re afraid of what dogs can do…fear comes from the lack of knowledge….my goal is to make a knowledgeable dog-lover world…a lot of people give affection at the wrong time…they don’t understand that rules, boundaries and limitations…”

      Like


      • His wife filed for divorce. She now gets $120,000 a month, including child support. Plus the house, I bet, and custody, evidently. He tried to kill himself. He’s not much of a woman whisperer, by the sound of it.

        Like


      • I’m sure he gets bitten by dogs occasionally, but dogs don’t have courts/cops/government on their side.

        Like


    • Arbiter
      It is true that things work best when the man leads. But you must also be a man capable of leading. This is often lacking in this kind of analysis. Don’t just stroke your ego by saying “I a man!”, be a man who is actually worth something.
      ———————————————————————————————-

      Yeah, and this goes double for all you mofos runnin around claiming to be “white.”

      I ain’t impressed. You wanna impress me? You gotta DO SOMETHING. Im from Missouri, you gotta SHOW ME. I don’t get to lay around in bed all day pale and stiff like The English Patient, why should you?

      Don’t try to play me.

      And don’t touch my dog either.

      Like


      • on October 5, 2014 at 12:17 pm Customer service

        Your writing is vulgar and crass.

        The pinnacle of white achievement is landing on the moon with the same amount of computational ability as a handheld 1980’s pocket calculator.

        The pinnacle of black achievement is 1000 uses for peanuts (not including peanut butter).

        Of course as a black male you suffer from African big man syndrome and as such are willfully ignorant of your shortcomings.

        The fact that you are even in this site belies your white ancestry as pure Afros rarely use the Internet for little else than jacking off to white chicks.

        So you’re probably genetically 25% white yet by appearance 100% black. I can’t imagine a worse fate, a disabled white man trapped in a black mans body- or as you claim, the future.

        Like


      • Does lynching shitskins count as doing something?

        Like


      • Pisstomer service
        Your writing is vulgar and crass.

        The pinnacle of white achievement is landing on the moon with the same amount of computational ability as a handheld 1980’s pocket calculator.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        Do white girls know this?

        How much ass do you get when you tell them this? Who cares what the Saturn 5 can throw; do you even lift?

        You never landed on the moon, that was just jooish theater for you proles to jack off to while your pension was looted.

        At least I try to make white babies; why don’t you take credit for something you actually DID?

        Like


      • You attack the appearance of his writing without touching the content — why’s that?

        You believe you are great because other men in “your group” (really just men who convinced you that you are in their group) — who likely profit every day from your continued compliance — achieved great things — why’s that?

        You see any connection between these two tendencies? Mainly, how easily impressed (or repulsed) by the superficial you are? Makes it easy to get between a fellow such as yourself and “the truth,” as it were.

        Next step — why are so many white fellows like you “beta?” I’m counting on that big brain of yours to kick into high gear. Don’t let me down.

        Like


      • I actually agree with Scray’s criticism. As for why it is that white people have lost their belief in the themselves, and let browns and blacks take over so much territory and the pussy that comes with it?

        White people lost their Mission and Purpose. Without that, there is no belief in themselves. The mission and purpose of the browns and blacks is to get some.

        Like


      • scray – you sound like an idiot ..I know BETA’s that beat most alpha’s.. in any task.. thinking..creativity.. money making …problem solving.. not to mention a greater regard for responsibility morals and ethics.. and I know many alpha’s that are miserable after they experience that worshiping “high school values” doesnt mean much in the real world

        “you keep using that word..I dont think that word means what you think it does..”

        Like


      • Piatti, reminding us all of the pleasure irony can bring to our hearts and minds.

        Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 2:03 pm GhostBustANut

      Agree a 100%. I follow the edict i found on Mayhaan.blogspot.com I call them “females’ or “girls” they don’t deserve the title of “MAN” in wo-Man. and i call us “MEN”,

      Like


  4. on October 4, 2014 at 2:31 pm theshadowedknight

    I have been saying that pushing the middle and upper middle class whites into the lower class would be a huge mistake for the upper class to make, as the introduction would begin to allow lower class whites to organize in their own interests. They will end up coalescing around the middle class men that have adopted lower class loyalty and status markers. By becoming one with the lower classes, culturally speaking, middle class men will be able to command their loyalty, while still being able to use their superior intelligence to plan out their actions.

    In short, the worst thing for the ruling upper class to do would be to introduce the leaders the lower classes so desperately need into their midst.

    The Shadowed Knight

    Like


    • TSK, our biggest problem right now is the amount of money that the elites have been inventing – $1T per year – and just handing to themselves. That kinda loot can purchase one helluva Praetorian Guard of Whores.

      Liked by 1 person


      • Think of all the Southern Irish Drunken Papists in the NYPD who are ready and willing [???] to lay down their lives for their YKW masters, just as long as YKW keep the FOP pensions solvent.

        Like


    • “In short, the worst thing for the ruling upper class to do would be to introduce the leaders the lower classes so desperately need into their midst.”

      Yet this is exactly what is happening. There are already loads of highly intelligent whites that, just a generation or so ago, would have had high status positions in society. In the coming years, this trend of dispossessed talent will rapidly accelerate, as whites have been largely displaced at many of the Ivy League schools. Liberals will falsely portray this as evening things out – but it isn’t. Non-Jewish whites are vastly, vastly underrepresented at the very institutions that their forefathers created.

      I’ve even heard credible claims that whites (non-Jewish, non-Arab) constitute only about twenty percent of Harvard students. Twenty percent! If that’s even close to the truth, and I suspect that it is, it is truly remarkable. Extrapolate that out over the next ten or twenty years, and you’re going to see a radically different system elite. It is already anti-white, pretty soon it’s going to be anti-white on steroids.

      Especially among the millennials, an awful lot of white talent isn’t going to get to the top, or anywhere near it. The anti-white system isn’t even trying to buy them off, it’s just counting on weed and video games to keep them sedated.

      The anti-white system has made a decision that will come back to haunt it: it has bought off pretty much any black and brown who has even a modicum of talent, promoting them over whites that have far greater ability. With each passing year, there are more and more high ability whites out there that do not enjoy status remotely commensurate with their talent. Sure, some whites will be delusional and assume that they possess greater talent than they in fact do, but the reality is that many will be perfectly correct in their assessment. And what happens when they put the video game down?

      When genuinely talented men no longer have a stake in the existing system, watch out. Instability is sure to follow. Really, it’s just a question of how and when, not if.

      Separation is the only solution.

      Like


      • Separation is the only solution

        The Civil Rights coup was essentially a re-frame on human rights, wherein Whites’ right to community, living space, and family-formation was sacrificed for the sake of Black’s (and now for the sake of all non-whites) access to our social capital. This perverse reinterpretation posits human rights as the colored’s license and access to raid us.

        A historic re-frame back to White human rights is due.

        Like


      • “When genuinely talented men no longer have a stake in the existing system, watch out.”

        White apatheia‘s going to bite the ykws, hard.

        Like


  5. My girl always inquires me about my thoughts and is very sensitive to the slightest infraction my countenance conveys. Perhaps her inquires are the verbalization of what a dog might think when surveying his owner’s face.

    Like


    • it’s time to ask leopards to change their spots, too. Demoncrat women find conservative men sexier and more attractive. High income women as well.

      Like


  6. there are many better candidates for the no. 1 award, South Africa for instance

    Excellent point. Lower class White men are painfully rudderless. As one snapshot of that reality, I went into an auto parts store in which a middle aged White and a younger Black male worked. An R&B station was playing on the store sound system. It struck me as odd that a White employee would have put up with that. Make of that what you will, but it seemed wrong.

    Now, there are plenty of confident, alpha rednecks where I live, but that seems to me as echo of their having grown up in a still-normal Eighties America. Scaling things up though, at some level those men — and younger White proles too, many of whom superficially adopt Black mannerisms — know they are a decapitated body. Who speaks for them? Romney?

    Intelligent, intelligent Whites (like most of us here, even if income-wise we’re short of middle class) at least have the benefit of not being quietly bewildered by being men without a country. We understand, we wait, and we act privately for now — like getting rid of out TVs and seeing through the feminist NFL commercials propaganda, for example The Redneck, still a White man and someone like us, who needs to belong and serve a larger community, does not understand the historic context of our times and does not see beyond teh face-value of our alien elite’s messages. Quite possibly, the redneck silently resigns into numbness.

    Like


    • (Comment in mod; I accidentally pasted the wring citation at the top of my comment; I actually meant that in response to Shadowknight’s point about middle class leaders to the lower SES.)

      Like


    • I see new comments come up, and I see every single comment I make — 100% of them — go into mod and appear buried in a dead thread maybe two days later.

      [CH: PA, regrettably, the spam filter has been set to a very strict protocol because in the past year or so spam, both the troll and garden varieties, has been raging like a wildfire in a hot Texas wind. This filter catches some legit comments.]

      Like


    • An R&B station was playing on the store sound system. It struck me as odd that a White employee would have put up with that. Make of that what you will, but it seemed wrong.
      ———————————————————————————————

      First of all, what do you mean by “R&B” ?

      If you just mean old school black people music; thats some of the best music ever produced and its quite possible the white man chose to listen to it; no cussing, they all wear suits, the ladies wear dresses, God fearing, respectful…

      Compare that to todays contemporary trash Niki Minaj, Miley Cyrus…

      Black people used to make songs like this:

      WTF happened?

      Like


  7. I once dated a girl who owned a badly trained dog – she kept the dog after her ex went to jail. According to her, the dog had separation anxiety and would freak out if she left the dog alone, so she brought the dog to our first date (almost got cockblocked by a dog that night!). By the third date, the dog was listening to me and would heel, sit and be quiet etc. She couldn’t understand why.

    Like


  8. Nothing new in comment n°1.
    The astute readers of this site already know about dogs, cesar milan and all the parallels between heatistian dogma and dog ownership.

    Like


    • In terms of the human female to canine bitch metaphor, there is a huge difference between a dog who will attack a threat [sacrificing its own life if necessary] out of sheer love for the family, versus a poor dog who is scared of its own shadow because it’s been beaten so cruelly by its master; or, maybe worst of all, a dog who lunges at a burglar only because it senses that its Master might be marginally more capable of keeping its belly full of doggy treats than would be the burglar.

      Like


      • In terms of the human female to canine bitch metaphor, there is a huge difference between a dog who will attack a threat [until it gets whipped] out of sheer love for you and whoever you hold dear (the pack), versus a poor girl who is scared of her own shadow and can never be that loyal.

        Like


      • Loyal because she wants to be loyal. Loyal because she has CHOSEN to be loyal. Not faux-loyalty derived from weakness or outright whoredom.

        Like


      • Be the Master to whom she wants to give her loyalty, the Master to whom she is COMPELLED to give her loyalty.

        Like


  9. on October 4, 2014 at 3:05 pm Reservoir Tip

    Story time:

    Got a snapchat last night from one of the girls I’m involved with back in my home state. She and I date off and on, but I don’t commit. She just got out of a LTR and got back in touch with me.

    Well the other night, I get a snapchat from her, and she’s with the girl that I really liked (in my last post) but cut things off when I was messing around.

    The snap was a picture of the two of them together (colluding?) and it said, “which one of us was better?”

    This was obviously bait, so I gave my reply some thought, and replied, “the one without the daddy issues.”

    They both have serious daddy issues, and the girl that got away, who hasn’t been in contact with me in weeks/months, even texted me to tell me “her relationship with her dad is great, thank you very much.”

    Obviously this got her hamster spinning, but where should I take it if I’d like to get her back?

    Like


  10. This reminds me of a meeting when the company president made he obligatory visit while we were earning record profits at the local office. He mouthed all the usual encouragement and motivational BS, then asked for questions. [ALWAYS a mistake, BTW.] After some softballs, I raised my hand and asked, “So, I hear that you’re glad we’re doing such a great job, and you’d like us to keep working hard, but what’s in it for us?” To which he replied, “Well, if I paid you more for working harder would that motivate you?” [Again, ALWAYS a mistake to answer a question with a question; it’s been 2000 years since Christ, we’re all a bit smarter, now.] I replied (paraphrased), “I know about what my labor’s worth, and I’m already well paid for what I do, so working more hours for the same rate of pay isn’t really going to get me anything worth the extra time at this office. Do you have anything else to offer?” His reply was to stammer through a string of relatively unintelligible corporate-speak for the next ten minutes. Afterwards, the marketing director, who years later now works as the spokesman for the state highway department, congratulated me for stumping the president of a national corporation employing thousands. My immediate supervisor and the office manager didn’t thing it was funny, but that didn’t stop my promotions the next five years.

    All this to say: the high SES folks really don’t comprehend poor-folks’ motivations, nor are they willing to open their tight-knit groups to others – especially en masse. In this particular case, the partners eventually sold the firm to a multinational operation rather than entertain any notion that the junior partners might be ready and willing to purchase shares in the firm. Five years later, that office is one-third the size, as is the rest of the absorbed business. Most folks left for various alternatives, usually self-employment of one kind or another, and we’re all expanding the business lines we had previously, despite the poor economy (back then, I’d hoped for Alltel as a client; now I’ve got AT&T). What these low-empathy types overlook is that high-empathy types can read the motivations of others and adjust loyalty as necessary. Further, if we adopt in-group and out-group coping mechanisms to ignore the feelings of out-group opponents, we use empathy to predict our opponents future decisions and act to secure our interests while feigning loyalty.

    Like


    • “””Afterwards, the marketing director, who years later now works as the spokesman for the state highway department, congratulated me for stumping the president of a national corporation employing thousands. My immediate supervisor and the office manager didn’t thing it was funny, but that didn’t stop my promotions the next five years.”””

      You must be black, gay, or both……

      Like


      • LOL! Axe me ‘nuther, sugar!

        Seriously: I could stand-in for Anson Mount. I think the hair intimidates people.

        Like


      • Cool story but I ain’t buying it. You wanna fight the system?

        You are the system; how can you kill John Wayne when you wanna be John Wayne?

        Like


      • how can you kill John Wayne when you wanna be John Wayne?

        Smile when you say that, pilgrim.

        Like


  11. Off-topic but I knew Salon would be the first to ask “Is It Racist to Worry About Ebola”, complete with black child-victim being rudely escorted by a white boogeyman :

    http://www.salon.com/2014/10/04/ebola_the_heart_of_darkness_and_the_epidemic_of_fear/

    Salon’s proprieters have a good setup going. Lots of ad revenue and a cadre of non-paid Speculative Journalists cranking out opinion essays about opinion essays about opinion essays about studies. Some occasional first source commentary on topical events. How they survive amidst growing numbers of copy-cats and more original competitors is a mystery though.

    Like


    • So when is the authoress leaving for Africa?

      Like


    • Its simple elmer, they do it by avoiding the truth and giving the readers the LANGUAGE to do it too.

      Once you give people the truth, there is nothing left to do but ACT; this is precisely what most people are trying to avoid doing.

      Lets have another study, lets look at the metrics, maybe we need a focus group…

      The truth is black and ugly, nobody wants it.

      Like


      • That’s insightful. It’s changed my point of view about writing.

        Like


      • And “HBD-genetics-is-destiny” discourages action BECAUSE heredity; I wonder who has made these connections. X group cannot be helped, so don’t help them. X station and life can’t be changed, so stop trying to change it.

        Now sure, sometime we get weasels who say “I didn’t say can’t be changed at all, I just said can’t be changed to a great extent.”

        It’s all clever uber alles.

        Like


  12. Hey Kant,

    What kinds of tinder pictures and profile description do you have that imply you get laid a lot? My tinder sucks, looking for tips.

    Like


    • on October 4, 2014 at 5:34 pm braveagnosticg

      Hello Hunter 🙂 I do have a Tinder, though I didn’t take it seriously, live in the border Mexico-United States and most people that appeared were Mexicans, however there were some few Americans, and interestingly so far 2 American women have been matches, my weird pic had something that interested them. here

      http://postimg.org/image/rfm5bbk41/

      Like


    • @hunter

      I have two pictures, a face pic and one with my band. My profile just says “Musician, in town for a few days”

      Like


      • @Kant @walawala Thanks, I’ll hit you guys back on any improvements. Also took a look at your Tinder guide on Sedfast, Kant. Might be just my bad quality photos, but I’m not getting a lot of good matches. 4 pics, main one is me, other 3 are pics with girls in them… average girls, one is chubby lol.

        That might be why most of my matches are fatties with the occasional skinny chick. Getting a smartphone soon and gonna start taking more pics with hotter girls.

        Like


      • @hunter

        “4 pics, main one is me, other 3 are pics with girls in them… average girls, one is chubby lol.”

        So you are communicating that you hang out with average girls, and you expect them to think you deserve a hot girl? wtf lol, take that shit off

        Neither of my pictures have girls in them at all. That looks try hard more often than not, girls can smell that a mile away.

        Glad you found my Tinder guide on Sedfast though, I hope its helpful

        Like


    • @hunter I have one of me in shades in profile like a Roman coin.

      Like


  13. I’ve noticed that as my alphatude grows, nearby girls who seem interested will now look at my face usually once every minute or two or so. I catch them doing it with my peripheral vision; I’ve trained myself to never look back unless I have something to say to them or they happen to be walking across my line of sight.

    Like


  14. What is SES?

    Like


    • saturated estrogenic status

      Like


    • Some exoteric sociology. As someone else said, it’s your economic class, but it’s also your social class.

      These social and economic status markers don’t carry as much weight nor are they as rigid as they once were. In times past, one was part of a Class, one’s social and economic class, and that was pretty closely correlated with his status in society at large. Now those classes are rigidly defined, the boundaries are smoother, and even more than: Individual Status transcends class barriers.

      I suppose that has always been the way of it, and perhaps one could say that class barriers existed for the very reason to keep individual status from getting out of control.

      Whatever, progress. But more flux in the play of individual status versus social class allows individual high status blacks and browns to impress white girls. (I am not advocating this; it is to my disadvantage.)

      On an individual level, high T is more determining of status, whereas on a class level intelligence would be more helpful. That is one example, and but a crucial one.

      Like


    • *Now those social and economic classes are less rigidly defined, the boundaries between them are smoother, and even more significant: Individual Status is more likely to transcend class barriers.

      Like


  15. My daughter who is very feminine and is pretty much “take care of me big strong man” is dating an alpha. I don’t see it working into the future. But maybe it’s just me… He’s also in a high divorce rate profession. I see a train wreck ahead. My question: what is the best type of female to keep an alpha happy?

    Like


    • guessing a cop?

      lol, he like most of the gym rats you meet, aren’t alpha.

      poseurs and facsimiles, as are most soldiers.

      Liked by 1 person


      • You, of course, ARE alpha. (well as much as any little-dicked white guy can be…)

        Like


      • Looks like Greg Eliot has entered the building AGAIN.

        Dude I sent you a jersey, whats your problem?

        Like


      • thwack, trying to think of a positive, and all you can come up with is dick size?

        Well, feel good that at least you have the koreans statistically beat. Congrats

        Like


      • But thats exactly what their behavior is all about; pretending to be somebody BIGGER and BETTER than they are.

        Indeed, having your screen named hijacked is proof of your alphatude. Its the virtual equivalent of a guy wearing a football jersey with your name on the back.

        I ain’t mad at em, he’s just another fan.

        Like


      • eg Eliot in a unanimous decision. I could have knocked him out but his wife and children were in the audience.

        Like


      • thwack, the only fan base you’ll ever see is the one holding your Wal-mart $16.95 Cyclone.

        Like


  16. ok so today i basically said “fuck it” and asked for who i believe is the hottest girl at my job for her number. this was the convo (we work at a grocery store)

    im waiting in her line to get my lunch, as i walk up i notice her hair is curly (was straight last time i saw her). her hair is also naturally curly, cus she is always complaining about doing that straightening shit.
    anyway
    i get to her line, and look her in the eye, she looks back and begins to giggle, which caused me to giggle as well (laughter is contagiuous, no?). she then licks her licks (i precieved this as an obv ioi).

    her: hey [me]!
    me: whats up, im liking the curls *half grin*
    her: so ur saying i look bad with my hair str8? *smiles* (i swear girls cant even take a compliment without including a shit test)
    me: yeah, the curls look better. (complementing her natural look, alpha or beta?)
    her: *smiles while changing topic* this new movie looks cool.
    me: which movie?
    her:annabel, i wanna see it.
    me: ok lets go tonight (is it beta to offer a date before acquiring digits?)
    her: umm, i cant, i get off at 9.
    me: *laughing while talking* what, you got a curfew?
    her: no! (the way she said it it sounded as if she was trying to qualify herself)
    me: ok y not then?
    her: my mom wont let me. what about next friday?
    me: ok (didnt know what to say to that lol, so i skipped a neg, as she is pretty self concious about her fam)
    me: (takes out phone w/o talking, handing it to her on the dail page)
    her: i cant do that here! (shes always been shy, but so have i)
    me: wow
    her: ill come over to ur dept at lunch.
    me: sure *walked away with stuff i bought*

    she did come and give me her number, i havent texted her yet, even tho i want too, i am such beta @ heart.

    two questions: what could i have done to stay more alpha? (i think i had pretty good frame control)
    and
    should i text her tomorrow asking her if her mom said she could go (shes 19, its pretty sad, but i suppose it sollidifys the fact that shes prob either a virgin or only fucked 1-2 dudes). ot wait until i see her at work again, so i dont get drawn into some texting shit? saying, ive been busy, if she asks why i hadnt texted her yet

    Like


    • It looks like she was in charge of the conversation.

      Also, you talked for too long.

      You need to add push/pull;

      “Hey want to know a secret? (she responds) Too BAD! (now she is intrigued and gushing pussy juice) Hey Im going to see this movie, what time do you get off (wink here…”get off”)…”

      Don’t ask for her number. Confirm the movie thing then let her ask for the number…if the woman asks it confirms your value to her. If you ask for a movie date AND her phone number, you are leaking value all over the place.

      Like


    • undefined: “should i text her tomorrow asking her if her mom said she could go (shes 19, its pretty sad, but i suppose it sollidifys the fact that shes prob either a virgin or only fucked 1-2 dudes). ot wait until i see her at work again, so i dont get drawn into some texting shit?”

      At this point, assume the sale. She came to your department and gave you her number…how much more reassurance do you need? Don’t ask if her mom is allowing her to go, just assume the date is on and that it’s going to be fun. Treat it as a given, and that she must be looking forward to it. It’s on her to cancel.

      If her mother ends up interfering and is the reason the date is canceled, be cool about it – you really seem to inhabit a different world than most of the guys here, by the way. If it’s that type of situation, you may even offer to meet the mother first. Point is, this girl seems to be closely tied into her family, in a way that is unusual in this day and age. If you’re not comfortable with that, and not prepared to cheerfully deal with it, you’re probably fishing in the wrong pond.

      Since you work with her, I wouldn’t do too much texting at this point. No need to overload the circuits. I’m guessing this girl doesn’t require a whole lot of alpha, though I could be wrong. Best bet is to mix in compliments with light, playful teasing. There is no need to overdo it with inexperienced and insecure girls, so just keep it light and airy.

      I’ll also say that I’m a believer in the “ethical scumbag” approach. If your goal is to just get a lay, you shouldn’t be gunning for the good girls to do it with. Stick to the floozies, which is to say most girls these days, so it’s not as if you would be facing a shortage. Don’t mess up the good girls, and it appears as if she might be one. If it turns out she’s already ridden the carousel, then fine, have at it and move on. But if not, handle with care. What little is left of culture and civilization depends upon it.

      And I just can’t resist: sounds like both of you have terrible taste in movies, so you may well be perfect together. Good luck, dude.

      Like


      • i know she is inexperienced with guys (as far as ik shes only had one bf and they dated for months and he eventually dumped her cause she wouldnt fuck)

        but i am also inexperienced with girls, never had a gf but ive had fwb and one night stands

        im just not really good with relationships and i want to ensure i dont beta backslide, causing her interest to decline

        is there a thread or some guidelines to relationships with little to no experience in the dating market

        Like


      • “im just not really good with relationships and i want to ensure i dont beta backslide, causing her interest to decline”

        Relax. You’re doing well, the prettiest girl in your workplace came to YOUR department to give you her number. Don’t over think this, just have fun on Friday with a pretty girl. At this point, you shouldn’t even be assuming that the two of you will have a relationship – you haven’t gone out once yet (that’s definitely beta thinking). Assume the date, nothing more. Take this like an alcoholic in recovery: one day at a time.

        “is there a thread or some guidelines to relationships with little to no experience in the dating market”

        Maybe someone else has other suggestions, but I’d say you’ll learn more just hanging around the Chateau over time, reading and asking questions as confusing things come up (they will). It’s more about attitude and process than some sort of paint by numbers – it’s not something you learn in a day.

        At least you have the internet as a resource. I came of age shortly before the net went big time, and all I had to rely upon for my questions was a group of friends just as dumb as I was – and a popular culture even dumber. Man, if I had a site like this back then, well, I would have probably made the same initial screw-ups. But I’m convinced I would have learned from them much faster, which would have been nice. Very nice.

        But the most important thing, to repeat, is to relax. You’ve got a date with a pretty girl. You’re relatively inexperienced, she’s probably inexperienced. You’re both idiots with barely a brain cell between you (no offense, we all were/are). It’s entirely possible absolutely nothing will come of it. It’s also entirely possible that much will. You’ve got to be cool with either outcome. She could be a dud, or she could be one of The Ephemeral Few. That’s part of the fun and tragedy of all this.

        Like


      • @Transpotter two recent examples of assuming the sale with a girl who lives with her overly protective parents.

        She texted me saying a major storm was about to hit and her mother didn’t want her to go out. “Help!” she wrote. This was how I knew she wanted validation.

        Me: “You won’t melt…” then gave her the logistics.

        Another example:

        “My friend is in a play next week. Thursday or Friday, what works for you?”

        I didn’t ask, I assumed she was going and gave her two options that worked for me.

        Like


    • Work is obviously more risky so this talk is well calibrated

      Start was a bit rocky – you buy into her frame a bit. Better option? Smirk and change the topic to – like she did – a movie.
      The fact that she opted to rearrange is good. Means she wants it to happen.

      Btw the fact that she’s 19 by no means guarantees that she’s only fucked 2 dudes. Sick truth, but some of these innocent bitches are cray

      To quote a Heartiste maxim: ‘the more innocent she seems, the higher likelihood she’s been in a gang bang’

      Like


    • Curly hair? Does that means she hails from the land of Ebola and AIDS?

      Wait to see her at work, don’t get drawn into texting BS.

      Read your company’s HR policy that allows her to decide at any point that you are making her feel uncomfewtabow and have your ass fired on the spot.

      Asking her “why not?” was a bit beta. I would have just looked at her quizzically with a one-sided smirk at an 11.2-degree angle — she would have qualified herself and probably told you, without being asked, that her mom won’t let her.

      Boy, you gonna get SO LAID!!! Congrats.

      Like


    • Dude good work on the number. Trainspotter’s advice is spot on but I’ll just add a couple of things:

      1. Don’t worry too much about the details at this stage. You’re obviously young and getting started with this stuff. You did the important stuff – you took action with a hot girl, she liked you and gave you her number and you are going to have a fun date. So kudos for that. Sure you need to learn and practice and stuff but don’t let it paralyze you with overanalysis – you’ve done well and made a good start.

      2. I don’t believe in this artificial distinction between good girls and floozies. They are the same thing (see YaReally’s old posts for loads on this). I’d say it is more of a broader rule – treat ALL the girls you’re with well and leave them with good memories of you and no burnt bridges – it has nothing to do with whether they are floozies or not. This has nothing to do with being beta or alpha – it has to do with taking responsibility for how you affect someone else.

      Like


    • even ASKING THESE QUESTIONS is beta! Stop OVERANALYZING everything.

      You got her damn number, stop obsessing over every detail..just ACT. An alpha saying the same words as you did is STILL alpha!

      Like


  17. I now have 4 25-26 year olds in my soft harem. I’ve banged 3 and made out with the 4th. What I’ve found in the context of this post is that “leading” them means three things: 1) being decisive 2) not being needy 3) being capable of some skill or skills.

    Anyone have any experience with this? I see these girls semi-regularly: once every two weeks on some type of rotation. I bang 3 of them. That’s the deal. We go out and at some point we bang.

    But they work, I work and travel so we can’t always get together and they aren’t overly needy.

    Here’s how I ask them out: “My friend is in a play next month, what days are you available to go?”

    “Drinks. Friday?”

    This structure of “activity” then “timing question” is something I’ve begun introducing with greater success.

    There’s one other girl who just turned 35 who I was banging at the start of the year. She is annoying: clingy, needy, demanding. I just ignore her. In fact I ignored her for 9 months sending one word text responses 3 days late. I banged her again last week. Now she’s all about demanding my time….

    Any comments on this dynamic?

    Like


    • Haha a girl in your “soft harem” that you haven’t banged…

      You do know what harems are, right?

      Hint: it doesn’t mean “I got her number”

      Like


    • I am curious about this harem business. For simplicity sake, let’s assume that there is more or less one man for every woman. You have thus taken 3 men out of the game. Is that something you care about? Of course you will say no or that in terms of status, you being with 4 women is more optimal since they are attracted to you but I do wonder what you think those 3 men will do now? Or phrased differently, what will involuntarily celibate men do with themselves? I doubt they won’t harbor any resentment.

      Like


    • @walawala

      “I now have 4 25-26 year olds in my soft harem. I’ve banged 3 and made out with the 4th. What I’ve found in the context of this post is that “leading” them means three things: 1) being decisive 2) not being needy 3) being capable of some skill or skills.

      Anyone have any experience with this? I see these girls semi-regularly: once every two weeks on some type of rotation. I bang 3 of them. That’s the deal. We go out and at some point we bang.”

      Yes, I have experience in this. But I don’t think the 4th counts as being in your harem if she hasn’t fucked you

      My advice on meetups once they are in your rotation

      1. If you always see them on the same day of the week, say one of your girls usually gets Thursdays, she will come to expect to see you on that day every week. Up to you whether this is a good thing or a bad thing.

      2. I send out a reach out text that is vague. Like “What are you doing Thursday?” Make her curious and invest a little before you pitch what you want to do

      3. Any more than once a week, and they will start pushing for monogamy. Any less, and they feel like a fuck buddy. It’s a fine line so keep this in mind when you decide how often you want to see her

      Like


      • @kant thanks. I haven’t converted the 4th….yet and she is on then flakey.

        All these girls work odd hours and I am always traveling so regular meet ups aren’t always possible.

        What astounds me is that the girls all want some acknowledgement of me liking them….but aren’t especially clingy or needy. That is new for me. I’m trying to figure what it is that I’ve done right in this situation. After I banged them I limited my contacts. I did get one a birthday gift—actually it was chocolates the hotel I stay at leaves on my desk. Cost= $0. She loved it so much she posted photos of it.

        Like


      • @walawala

        It’s not surprising, you’re simply becoming more alpha. Girls are used to being used by alphas once or a few times for sex before those guys move on, so they don’t get their hopes up when they hook up with one. You have to actively show them you’re interested in them for mLTRs before they start to invest emotionally.

        This happened to me as well when I made the transition. “No really, I do want to see you again, I’m not just saying that” lol

        Like


      • “I’m trying to figure what it is that I’ve done right in this situation.”

        not to discount what you may be doing differently with these girls because you likely are but you do have to consider that you’re dealing with a different demographic than you were previously.

        you mentioned the previous girls being more needy and clingy. they were a little older than your recent girls and were likely tiring of the cock carousel. they were wanting relationships and had developed attachments to you.

        good or bad, these girls you’re dealing with now aren’t probably wanting what those girls did. if you’re being clear about what you want and telling them that you see other girls, they aren’t going to invest themselves in you as much as they would if they thought there was relationship potential. and some of them wouldn’t invest even if there was. a lot of girls in their 20s are of the mindset that relationships are for later in life so they aren’t going to get attached and needy. they are having too much fun riding the carousel to develop an attachment to one man.

        that’s not a bad thing if you’re only looking for FB or FWB arrangements. just enjoy it for what it is.

        Like


  18. It’s a microcosm for what could soon be happening at the national level, once lifestyle indicators really start to go south.

    Unfortunately for the leftoids in politics, media, and academia, we have an exhaustive & searchable online record of what they said and did before the SHTF. They’ll get no pity or help from us, once the baying mob turns on them.

    Schadenfreudelicious!

    Like


  19. Thanks to my father who stated to me on the topic of this
    website, this weblog is genuinely amazing.

    Like


  20. […] Comment of the Week winner is “anon”, who supplies a very apt metaphor to describe how successful, happy relationships are ultimately a pairing off of a psychologically beta, highly empathic woman with a less empathic, pack (socially) dominant…  […]

    Like


  21. A little off topic but I would like to thank all of you guys for opening my eyes to reality all around me… 2 years ago I would be watching a video like this and feel sorry for a “rape” victim… not anymore

    Like


  22. High School teachers accused of group sex with student http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/10/destrehan_high_school_teachers.html

    Like


    • Like


      • Like


      • NAWALT aside, the female mind is completely incapable of dealing with the nihilism which is modernistic freedom from virtue [combined with incessant propaganda urging sin]. These “human” females are behaving no differently than canine bitches in heat [except that the poor canine bitches aren’t capable of knowing any better].

        Like


      • I saw this in the tabloids who seem to be having a bit of fun writing about it. The consensus is that no crime was committed. I don’t like that women can take things from men, including sex, and it is never wrong. I also don’t like that there are attractive women who have incredibly low standards in terms of socioeconomic status. I say men of high status should punish this behaviour harshly.

        Like


      • NAWALT aside, the female mind is completely incapable of dealing with the nihilism which is modernistic freedom from virtue [combined with incessant propaganda urging sin].

        Nihilism? Faaack…

        Say what you want about National Socialism, dude, at least it’s an ethos.

        Like


  23. When genuinely talented men no longer have a stake in the existing system, watch out. Instability is sure to follow. Really, it’s just a question of how and when, not if.

    Separation is the only solution.
    ————————————–
    Not only do they have no stake in the existing structures they are formally prohibited from creating their own.

    Like


    • Actually that may matter even less than you suppose. I was watching this Bitcoin conference video and the first thing the young man mentioned as an application was being able to help people in Africa. I dont have any problem with helping others but why would that be the first thing to think of? I doubt he even had a family of his own so why become philanthropic as first option?

      Like


      • I was watching this Bitcoin conference video and the fit white rst thing the young man mentioned as an application was being able to help people in Africa.
        ———————————————————————————————

        Thats a smart white man. He use WORDS to up armor bitcoin with some “helpingAfricashit”; that way the system can’t oppose it or him.

        “helping Africa” is “its for the children” on steroids.

        Smart white man.

        Like


      • “I dont have any problem with helping others but why would that be the first thing to think of?”

        No question about it, the white race definitely produces some goofballs and kooks. The sort that is highly susceptible to system propaganda, even of the most ludicrous and absurd kind. People can believe some crazy things.

        At least with religion, one can’t definitively prove that the hereafter doesn’t exist. But the modern liberal believes all sorts of things that are demonstrably, provably false. The fact that reality is not in accord with his beliefs doesn’t affect him a bit. What an utter wack job!

        If someone claims that reality is whatever he says it is, despite his claim being provably and demonstrably untrue, is that not a reasonable definition of insanity? Well, that’s the anti-white liberal for you.

        So who is more primitive and irrational, the liberal or the religious type that the liberal loves to look down upon? The answer is obvious. Neither is committed to reason, of course, but only one rejects empirical, observable, provable reality. The religious believer openly admits that he operates on faith, while the liberal anti-white claims to operate on reason – while explicitly making ludicrous claims that are provably untrue and utterly ludicrous. Yet he believes the absurdities all the same. Again, utter wack job.

        In any event, as the talented pile up without status and without a stake, just as the anti-white system inherently requires, I doubt most of them are going to find their thoughts drifting to philanthropic endeavors in Africa, or whatever other wild goose chases that various system lackeys (read: YKW for the most part) cook up for them.

        Of course, some will fall for the ruse. Probably not most, but some. The anti-white system will encourage kooky “thinking” as a distraction from reality, and one must admit that it has achieved some degree of success with the millennials. After all, as they were systematically stripped of everything from their personal liberty to their collective heritage, not to mention their economic future, more than a few young white clowns were getting all hot and bothered over Kony 2012. LOL!

        When the system elites see that sort of thing, how can they but not hold us in contempt? Have we not earned it? What fools we have been, and still are.

        And yet, it’s going to wear thin. It’s just not a substitute for living an authentic and meaningful life, and the anti-white system can’t provide either of those things, in fact quite the opposite. Instead it offers faux meaning and high fructose corn syrup, while engaging in genocide and stripping people of their very humanity, all in the name of silly phrases. It offers you extinction, and demands that you applaud the process. It’s cool and progressive to applaud. It’s also sick and demeaning.

        The real moral crusade – and more – can begin once this is more widely understood. The dispossessed talent will exist to lead the crusade, or probably more accurately, crusades. It’s already there, or at least has already been born.

        Separation is the only solution.

        Like


      • thwackowitz, you are one schizophrenic blackface YKW motherf*cker.

        Like


      • thwack: “Thats a smart white man. He use WORDS to up armor bitcoin with some “helpingAfricashit”; that way the system can’t oppose it or him.”

        Ha! That’s a hopeful way of putting it, thwack. I’m not sure I’d give the guy that much credit, but even if we do, it’s telling what master he has to appeal to.

        Like


      • ya gotta play the entire chess board if you wanna win

        Like


      • thwack: “ya gotta play the entire chess board if you wanna win”

        You’re right about that, thwack. If some of these apparent clowns are actually mind weapons, paying lip service to the system while actively promoting a project that inherently undermines that same system, then more power to them.

        It makes sense that there would be such men involved in the promotion of things like alternative currencies or various open source efforts. Those kinds of projects definitely tend to undermine the system (by providing alternatives to system mediated structures, which in practice largely means YKW mediated structures, and in any event anti-white), regardless of what the proponent may claim to believe.

        “I’s wit you, boss!” might not be a bad approach for such types. As you say, the entire chessboard.

        But for most people, spouting the party line is just that – spouting the party line and supporting the system. They aren’t doing anything to undermine the status quo, so they don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. Certainly the benefit of the doubt can’t be given to the sort of dopes who glom all over things like Kony.

        Like


      • ya gotta play the entire chess board if you wanna win

        Tell it to Reti… http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1250654

        An effective attack only has to succeed in one small area.

        Like


  24. And yet, it’s going to wear thin. It’s just not a substitute for living an authentic and meaningful life, and the anti-white system can’t provide either of those things, in fact quite the opposite. Instead it offers faux meaning and high fructose corn syrup, while engaging in genocide and stripping people of their very humanity, all in the name of silly phrases. It offers you extinction, and demands that you applaud the process. It’s cool and progressive to applaud. It’s also sick and demeaning.
    ——————————————-
    White men deserve this though you had your day. What problem do you have against equality?

    Like


    • In any event, as the talented pile up without status and without a stake, just as the anti-white system inherently requires, I doubt most of them are going to find their thoughts drifting to philanthropic endeavors in Africa, or whatever other wild goose chases that various system lackeys (read: YKW for the most part) cook up for them.
      ———————————————–
      Its actually worse than you make it out to be. Not only do men not have a stake, they have an unbelievable amount of obligations to pay for. The entirety of the welfare state is a yoke around every mans neck and yet what do they see for it? Betty Friedan wanted to liberate women but didnt want to liberate men from their responsibilities.

      Like


      • “The entirety of the welfare state is a yoke around every mans neck”

        The entirety of the welfare state is a yoke around every white man’s neck and a wondrous gift to men with feces-colored skin.

        Like


      • White men deserve this though you had your day. What problem do you have against equality?

        What problem do you have with punctuation?

        On the topic:
        Deserve ain’t got nuthin’ to do with it, boy.

        You fairy.

        Like


    • Ever wonder whether a white girl was, is, or will be a miscegenating coal burner? Joke around with her, kid her about dating a feces-skin. If she jokes back with you and seems sort of okay with feces-skins, then you know she either has, is, or will be miscegenating with a chimp at some point in her life. The only acceptable response should be utter disgust, combined with genuine anger that you would even imply such a thing about her. It should be as revolting to her as implying she would screw an animal.

      Like


      • clowndar
        The only acceptable response should be utter disgust, combined with genuine anger
        ———————————————————————————-

        How bitch made and ni66erish can you get? Why don’t you just chimpout on her too?

        stomp your feet, shit your pants…

        You are giving her way too much power. Now she’s gonna walk around with that thought in a holster threatening to pull it out on you the same way white people walk around with the word ni66er in their back pocket like its a black remote control.

        You’re acting like a white knight in white face.

        Go lift.

        Like


      • exactly.

        one of the few advantages to open sluttery these days is how many women have forgotten human disgust at bestiality and sluttery and now will openly discuss it with guys who seem “cool” and “nonjudgmental.”

        It’s tres easy, once you’ve gotten an alpha vibe and comfort vibe with a girl going, to get her to admit to all sorts of past indiscretions such as sleeping with apes. Even those who haven’t done the latter often will say that they want to, which is just as bad.

        I’ve found it to be a great advantage here in making me more determined to avoid LTRs. Once I find myself getting sweet on some chick—yes, even, the magnificent whorefinder can get sweet on a girl—I just schedule a f uc kfest day (such as a Saturday/Sunday when neither of us are working) where, after drinking the night before, we spend the day/night before being wild in bed, recovering from hangovers, and “opening up.” My vibe: as nonjudgmental, light hearted as possible.

        Invariably in such circumstances, today’s sluts reveal something horrid—black guy sex/attraction, gangbangs, multiple one night stands, etc.—-that cause an instinctual revulsion towards them and lingering feelings of disgust that arise whenever I start feeling like I want to get serious. They will never know why you eventually “pulled away,” and you will never tell them, protecting yourself from the p.c.-police. All they will know is that, for some reason that feminism denies that they should know, they are unworthy of a fulfilling, happy LTR.

        And I move on.

        Long-term mindf uc k rape!

        Like


      • You know a lot of chicks will joke back because they want to please you, right?

        Like


      • Nice girls. Good families. Buns in ovens. Old School Values FTW.

        Like


  25. By implication every aspiring Alpha should get a young dog and learn how to train it.

    As silly as this sounds I believe that having a pet dog really helps understanding relationship dynamics. It’s so easy to get into a situation where you coddle the dog and you become the instant gratification engine. Then when YOU the owner discover your dog doesn’t even come when called… it’s a big wake up call to who should be in charge. Just have your dog run out into a busy street chasing a jogger to find out how dangerous it is not to have a disciplined dog.

    Some ideas from dog training I remember is to realize that you are dealing with something that thinks about things differently.

    For example in training a stubborn dog to come you toss it’s toy ball behind you and say the dogs name. That way the dog associates it’s name with coming to you.

    How to Teach Stay
    1- Put a leash on your dog and have him sit comfortably next to you.
    2-Wave a flat palm toward his muzzle and say “Stay.”
    3-Step in front of your dog, wait a few seconds, and then step back beside him.
    4-Reward him for not breaking his stay.
    5-If he moves, calmly say “Oops” or “Uh uh” and put him back where he was initially. Again, give the stay command along with the hand signal.
    6-Practice this multiple times every day in different locations.
    7-After rewarding him with praise and a treat for success, teach him a release word, or the word you will say when it’s time for him to be released from the stay. A good release word is “okay.”

    Come to think of it… a lot of women a my dog training class compared dog training to husband training. Go figure.

    Like


    • someone in this thread made the observation that women tend not to discipline their dogs, and instead treat them like moving trinkets. it’s so true. spend any time at an informally designated dog park and you can’t help but notice the men giving orders to their dogs and the women letting their dogs run all over the place unsupervised.

      Like


      • Dogs can help women screen men. How a man is able to handle (or not handle) your dog will tell you almost everything you need to know about him as a man and potential father.

        Like


      • Women are also likely to bring their dog to places dogs shouldn’t be brought and get mad when someone bars them because of it. This is strange, since women more than men place a premium on social savvy, and breaking social taboos seem to hurt women more than men. Then again, women these days think that whipping out their titties in public to breastfeed their bastard brats should never be stopped or questioned, so perhaps they are related.

        The female behavior is like the kneegro behavior when told they can’t dress like 12-year-old brats in a certain place, or they can’t behave like a12-year-olds on a sugar rush in a certain place: disbelief and a profound,inability to even comprehend that their will is not law.

        This what happens, gentlemen, when savages are given free reign in a society. This is why Rome tried to keep the Goths out of the empire….only to see he entire west collapse within a century of Gothic immigration and “Equality.”

        Rape!

        Like


      • Women are the same way with children – in fact, women from Eastern and Middle Eastern countries seem to actively encourage bad behavior by their sons.

        Like


      • I agree with Kate (first time agreeing with a probable female on this board!).

        I remember a date one time… when I knocked on the door the gal opened the door suddenly to let her dog yap at me. I guess it was some kind of twisted test. Anyway I love dogs and just made this mini-collie my best friend. The chick just could not stop talking about how her dog “always hated men in the past”. Yep I did her later… while her dog was exiled to the laundry room. 🙂

        Like


    • on October 5, 2014 at 5:42 pm midnight toker

      “Come to think of it… a lot of women a my dog training class compared dog training to husband training. Go figure.”

      funny that you say that. they might say that’s the way it is but most of them don’t actually try to train their dogs at all. they will treat their pets like royalty while they treat their men like shit and try to “train them”. messed up.

      Like


  26. Alternatiive title:

    Be the Rapist, not the Rapee.

    Rape!

    Like


  27. One of my sons just bailed out of private school because he wasn’t getting along with the rich foreigners. They behaved rough, he didn’t even consider them for friends even though I think if he had ignored the roughness or not taken it seriously, he would have been fine.

    We’re lower SES than those families. He was on sports scholarship. But he said the “social” stuff was bad. Actually it was good, and I was hoping it would cause him to escape the public-school habits I see him getting.

    He’s made it so I can’t put him back in. He decided what his preference was and made sure he got it.

    I am sad. He was stupid.

    Like


    • Maybe I’m missing something, but your post doesn’t make a lot of sense. Why should your son accept being treated “roughly” (whatever that means)? Why should he attempt to befriend his tormentors? How is doing so “good?”

      Sounds like you are training him to be a beta suck-up, just so he can rub shoulders with rich foreigners that hold him in contempt. What kind of life is that? Why would your son want that for some of the most important years of his life?

      Perhaps you should have told him to beat the hell out of one of them. But I suppose that’s unrealistic in our progressive and just society. Fair fights are a thing of the past, and the rich and sophisticated foreigners would likely have ganged up on him at least five to one. Just another benefit of our vibrant diversity.

      FamilyMan: “He decided what his preference was and made sure he got it.”

      Good for him. Sounds like he’s got a shot in this world, such as it is.

      FamilyMan: “I am sad. He was stupid.”

      I think the inverse of this is likely closer to the truth.

      Like


    • Heartiste, if you think there isn’t overwhelming pressure for elitist young boys to experiment with bisexuality [even if it’s just HJs and BJs], then you’re being delusional.

      Like


      • The indoctrination in public schools is quite heavy. The white male team at the private school seemed like good folks. He should learn to be rough back, that’s the normal private school way.

        I don’t think the old boarding schools produced a lot of gay men. Could be wrong, but my guess is the risk is much higher in the PC environment in public school.

        Like


      • FM: Sayreville football parent reveals sexual nature of alleged locker room hazing ritual (Exclusive) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3212950/posts

        Like


      • “In the darkness, a freshman football player would be pinned to the locker-room floor, his arms and feet held down by multiple upperclassmen. Then, the victim would be lifted to his feet while a finger was forced into his rectum…”

        Like


      • FamilyMan: “He should learn to be rough back, that’s the normal private school way.”

        It is, but that’s not the point here. Why? Because your son’s situation was not representative of the “normal private school way,” at least historically speaking. You describe your son as having problems with “rich foreigners.” (I’m assuming Asians or Arabs, maybe even mestizos, but you don’t specify)

        Historically, the “normal private school way” developed within the context of a certain people and a certain culture. The young men, while they might have been rough on one another at times, were also taught traditional virtues and that they must be prepared to do their duty. There was a code, and it permeated the entire institution, the entire way of life.

        The boys may have been of different classes, but they were of a common race and belonged to the same culture. It was an intricate, nuanced, and in some ways quite convoluted subculture, and it was quintessentially white.

        All of this is now gone, or at least seems to apply very little to the school you sent your son too. Diversity destroys trust. You’ve added rich Asians and Arabs, and the school itself almost certainly does not teach virtue and duty, instead preferring to demonize the very people and civilization that created it.

        The world has been turned upside down, yet you continue to expect the beneficent results of a culture that no longer exists, and institutions that have been turned inside out.

        Like


  28. Hotep

    Shout out to all my blacks on lock down in the mans racist system; keep ya head up, brothers gonna work it out.

    Keep liftin and remember: lā ʾilāha ʾillā-llāh,

    Like


  29. […] Comment Of The Week: Be The Owner, Not The Dog | Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like