“France Hits Back!”

This is all so drearily familiar.

– White Western nation opens borders to millions of muslim migrants.
– A muslim terror ring pulls off an attack in the heart of said White Western nation.
– Western nation responds with moments of silence, effete symbols of solidarity, reaffirmations of commitment to multicultural dispossession of native Whites, and a few bombs flung from the stratosphere onto abandoned campsites in the desert.
– Bubba cheers.
– Western leaders ignore nation’s open borders, preferring instead to acculturate its citizens to expect more genital patdowns of elderly nuns at the airport.
– muslims continue streaming into Western nation, more embittered and full of rage against the West.
– Another attack in heart of Western nation. Trend is toward higher kill ratios.
– Another bombing sortie against the desert.
– Bubba cheers.
– Western leaders ignore nation’s open borders, engage in all-out semantic war against “nativists”, and issue a flurry of executive orders bringing more muslim refugees into Paris and Mobile, Alabama.

Repeat ad infinitum until demographic and spiritual displacement of Whites from their homelands is complete.

Something’s got to break the cycle. Will Bubba eventual stop getting deliriously distracted by desert bombing sorties long enough to WAKE UP to what is really happening to him and his kind?

Meanwhile, the bodies of Frenchmen still warm on the ground, president Butt Naked commits high treason (again) when he announces at a meeting of globalist Davosians that “not all Syrian refugees are terrorists” and he will act to resettle more freedom-loving Syrians into small town, post-Christian America.

Start the countdown to the next attack….

***

In related high treason news, British officials have made an arrest in the War on Terror.

Police arrest woman for ‘racially abusive’ Facebook post banning Muslims from beauty salon because it is ‘time to put my country first’.

I feel safer already.

***

This is the change we can believe in.

***

More hope and change:





Comments


  1. Yup. The question is: “is there a breaking point where the population gets tough and vote in some of those “nativists” and stop the music?”

    Like


    • gonna be a while if it ever happens, we just got our shiny new smart guy speaker ryan who just can’t conceive how we’d deport our illegals so he thinks it shouldn’t be done. he wants a ‘vibrant’ system of immigration

      it’ll take more than elections

      Liked by 1 person


      • “Look, Speakrr Ryan, about this amnesty. I won’t beat about the bush: It’s impossible. There are just too many of them. There are AT LEAST ELEVEN MILLION of undocumented hard workers — how could the government handle issuing papers and social security and licenses and all that when they can’t even do it to us? Then there are MILLIONS MORE that we don’t even know about, how can we even handle those? And finally, there are MORE streaming in every day, coming across the Rio Bravo to work in this great country or landing in LA to give birth and so give their children a brighter future. I mean, not to be defeatist but you have to be practical. Amnesty is impossible. There are too many of them and you just can’t stop more from entering. Just give up.”

        [CH: quality reframe.]

        Like


      • Good luck when all they young recruits play with barbies.

        Like


    • Actually, this might be the time for nativism. It was a thing in the late 1700’s and early 1800’s if I remember correctly, but the U.S. was too young at the time, and nativism was an Anglo-Saxon thing. It is from before White was an over-inclusive multikult that I refer to as “white”, and was mostly used against other Europeans. Ben Franklin was a nativist, and even after it sort of died out as a trend in the U.S. due to more non Anglo immigration, some Anglo-Saxons held onto the sentiment.

      Nowadays though, American means something different than it did back then. For better or worse, we are a multi ethnic nation, but not really so “multicultural”, and European Americans lead the way in political trends, at least at the moment. This position can be used to hate on everyone else, or to make a kind of ideological umbrella that those who aren’t under it, are the enemy.

      It’s been done before, and can be done again, but this time around it needs to be done carefully so that you don’t break people’s identity. I believe that this breakage has a lot to do with people’s forgetfulness and lack of awareness when a damaging trend (like over-integration, which led to lack of freedom of association) is underway.

      Like


      • It wad a thing for all of US history except 1890-1920 and 1965-. And we had excuse for the first period since it was when mass migration of garbage folk began.

        Like


      • Brown Shirts…

        Like


      • Nicole – the ideological umbrella of which you speak is already there, it is one of the core tenets of the western cultural tradition, and as an especially celebrated and elevated tenet of americanism, and this ideological umbrella of which I speak, is obviously the idea of the egalitarian (egalitarian defined as the equal fundamental existential worth of individuals).

        It is not just an idea, it is an emotive disposition. If emotively felt, it automatically predisposes those under it’s thrall to the golden rule behavior. It instills community trust. It probably has it’s ancient source with respect to innate predispositions for it, among those that were shaped by darwinian selection dynamics via very harsh environmental conditions that would favor for survival those that could feel this way, thus allowing them to be more open to group outsiders (though all humans also have a deep rooted innate fear of outsiders), to see their social survival group as a meritocracy, instilling more trust that was necessary to be more collaborative in order to survive etc. All human ancestry has probably been subject to this dynamic, as evidenced by several bottlenecks in our collective genetic heritage, that would give credence to very harsh environmental conditions having reoccurred numerous times within human prehistory (with associated population reductions). The most recent of which may have been the ice age conditions suffered by the ancestors of northern europeans (thus northern europeans probably are flavored by traits that support the egalitarian emotion a bit differently than others, but the main point being that all human ancestry has been subject to similar environmental shaping within various episodes of prehistory, so the appreciation for the egalitarian is probably innate within all ethnicities, but not as emphasized, normatively, in some ethnicities vs.others).

        Nicole – you make a very important point though – the ancient innate emotive attributes of the egalitarian include the feeling that those that do not share the egalitarian ideology are the enemy. This is necessarily part of the ancient egalitarian dynamic. People would have to choose (and have the ability) to master themselves socially, inhibit themselves when necessary, to have forbearance around impulse control etc. They would need to choose (and have enough self control) to be part of the egalitarian group. The egalitarian therefore, became the feeling/idea that there is no “Them vs. Us”, because we are all “Us”, except for those that choose not to (or simply can’t) belong as belied by their actions.

        This egalitarian emotive disposition therefore (especially for those of northern european stock) has at it’s heart a sharp dagger of violence saved for those that choose to show themselves as one who cannot be trusted to uphold the greater good. Back in ice aged times I think what would naturally happen among these northern europeans, is that when the community trust was betrayed, the betrayer would be banished (which probably meant slow death) or killed (more likely killed). There is a big difference in the emotive disposition of northern european men and women in this aspect of the egalitarian – it was the men that would do this culling (killing), probably in the dead of night, not to be spoken of again. I’m 56, and through experience I have come to the conclusion that at least western women of european ancestry do not understand this about their men and are very conflicted by it when shown evidence for it (they are both repulsed and attracted by it). For european men, it is better to leave this male aspect for brutal righteous violence as an unknown nebulous undercurrent for which their women can spin their own designs around. For these northern people, that is as it always has been I think.

        When we see the current circumstances of warring ideologies through the lense of what I described above – everything becomes much clearer, In the west, due to the unprecedented success, the Feminine Imperative is now in ever rising ascendancy. The western women see the egalitarian bereft of it’s enforcing power, without it’s backbone of violence, because they are probably innately partially blind to this (as described above). So we get the childish political correctness of the femcentric now prevalent in western culture. Western women (and so many western men have now been conditioned so, due to the prevalent Feminine Imperative) think that everyone should automatically enjoy the fruits of the egalitarian, because they believe in this principle in a very shallow way, and in their childish way think that since they believe, it must be so (at least within their own communities). They can’t seem to grasp that the egalitarian is just as dependent on the backbone of potential violence to dissenters that act on their dissent, within their community, as it does on the international scene. They don’t see the police as a modern proxy for the violent backbone of the egalitarian, but instead seem to think of the police as a paternal or perhaps fraternal influence that would harm no one but only guide those it interfaces with towards good behavior (I’ve been on the receiving end of police interference in my life, and if you are a man, you cannot help but see that the police wield power by the threat of violence to you, if not physically, then by way of their predisposition to try to fuck your life up if they judge that appropriate). Northern european women don’t get this about the police.

        So we get some of the Islamic guys (a minority but a pretty big minority of middle eastern and north african muslims) in europe telling everybody now going on 30 years, how they despise the egalitarian, how they think we are weak, how they spit in our faces with their disrespect at every turn, how our women are decadent (but sexy) so deserve to be used by them, the real men, etc. etc. And our women just think, – oh we just need to show them the error of their ways with our christian love. This is naive in the extreme.

        Europe and the west in general has always had alot of people that do not prescribe to the egalitarian. People that have impulse control issues, or just aren’t emotionally disposed to appreciate the egalitarian. We have stopped killing these (mostly men) a long time ago. Now we jail them, or punish them in other ways, or allow life paths for which their tendencies can act more as a boon than an hardship on everyone else. Our carrying capacity for this is full though (and has been for a long time).

        The Islamics who have shown to be non-egalitarians come from parts of the world where the egalitarian has never been upheld to near the same degree as in the west. Distrust and either cheating or coercively dominating of others is more the order of business in these cultures. So there is going to be more of the non-egalitarian ilk within their own communities, and furthermore, in the face of western scrutiny, can easily hide within such communities imported into europe from these middle eastern and north african nations (because they won’t get called out for their attitudes as much as non-egalitarians within northern european communities would get called out, because the dissimilarity from others within their community is not as large).

        I’m from Canada and we have alot of immigration in Canada (this has never really stopped or really slowed down much since the earliest days – just the demographic mix has changed alot). Immigrants are quite heavily vetted. Immigrants come from pretty much everywhere. In Canada it sort of works (maybe partly because the country is still lowly populated). In the fairly large western city I live in there is no where I can’t go on foot. If that started happening in Canada (no-go zones) I think we would all start to freak out (Trudeau better continue to have this immigration done right, but by the way he talks he seems to be under the spell of the Feminine Imperative himself, he seems to be naive about this stuff, time will tell – he does have a reputation for taking advice from those around him, so I hope he surrounds himself with smart people). I’m not in europe, so I am only guessing but I think:

        – Europe needs some small population growth, and so probably should continue to allow immigration, but Europe is getting too much immigration from their closest still developing neighbors, so there probably isn’t enough worldwide diversity of immigration

        – they obviously are doing a poor job of vetting immigrants. Apparently there are no-go muslim ghettos. People should only be allowed to come if they already possess the right skills and/or assets (language, professional or career skills in short supply in the economy, or bring lots of financial assets with them etc. with obligated promises to invest in the economy, etc.). It is wrong to let people come when there is not a proper fit for them to find success. This is not helpful to anyone then.

        – since they have done such a poor vetting job, they have no choice put to slow it way down (not speed immigration from these areas up!), so as to monitor whether their new vetting policies do lead to better assimilation

        – since the muslim world is already subject to the less than stellar prescription to the egalitarian on which european culture depends, as I have described above, people from this background should be vetted especially comprehensively. I would suggest more stringent hoops to jump through, and a longer timeline, to citizenship, for muslims vs. non-muslims. This is only being realistic and also sending the correct signals to the muslim world (there has to be consequences for Islam being so far behind in secularization, in cleaning up their act so to speak. Incentivication is a useful political tool if used wisely).

        – they obviously have a home grown Islamic terrorism problem. They need to figure out who is associated with the terrorist ideology, who of these they can deport, especially among virulent imams they must have there, and update their hate laws so as to jail (and try to rehabilitate) the rest (I’m not much for hate laws, freedom of speech and all that, but since they have already caved on that, they might as well ensure these laws actually work to Europe’s advantage)

        – their politicians need to cut the Politically Correct crap, and start discoursing in an realistic but even handed way, like I have outline above. This should be easy, just pay homage to the egalitarian, in the realistic way vs. the shallow politically correct way that they have been prescribing to up to now, and the people will have to see the light – it is just so obvious. As a side benefit, this change in discourse would force a reexamination of the remarkable immaturity of the Feminine Imperative the west is being choked on right now. This juncture of confusion in their native populations, is actually a golden opportunity for intelligent and savvy politicians in Europe to turn this around now.

        Like


      • What’s this “we” shit, n1gger?

        Like


      • Wild man, I used to be a we’re all equal type person before. You’re wrong, the emotive disposition is something I do possess, but towards whom it’s geared is open to manipulation. The emotive disposition is natural within your peer group, but on a mass scale it’s just manipulated out of people.

        Like


      • Hello Anonymous:

        Yes, the egalitarian emotive disposition is very easily manipulated, by a person’s past experiences, and current circumstances (especially by the cultural environment of how the “Them vs. Us” meme is interpreted). The reason for this, that the emotive disposition towards the egalitarian (collaboration with others based on a deep feeling of trust, which is based on deep appreciation for the mutual respect), can so easily be manipulated is because it is in conflict with other human innate traits that we all have (such as our deeply rooted innate suspicion of outsiders, as I mentioned above).

        My viewpoint, as outlined above, is that western civilization has been based on a tendency for northern europeans to expand the definition of the “Us”, and to test the “Usness” of others, via trying to find out whether the other’s emotive disposition also supports the expanded definition. This dynamic results in the egalitarian usurping the “tribal”, as the ascendant ideology. It starts to become, – “can I trust you because we have a mutual respect that is strong and won’t be broken”, instead of – “I should just unquestioningly trust you simply because you are in my clan”. You can see how life and death ice-aged tribulations could shape people in this direction, and then how this tendency, under subsequent more favorable environmental conditions, could favor larger and larger organizations of people, resulting finally in a civilization

        But since the egalitarian disposition is in tension with our tribal dispositions, it’s ascendant hold within the culture at large is extremely tenuous, and must be fostered and protected, if we expect that we should continue to enjoy the fruits of more nuanced, subtle, and increasing collaboration, of which the juggernaut that is now humanity, now depends upon to quite a high degree, I would argue.

        If you agree with the above, then note that the current cultural environment of how the “Them vs. Us” meme is interpreted, is getting quite dangerous, because it has been fragmented into the Politically Correct camp, which is a duplicitous stand-in for the egalitarian (a fake version), vs. a revision to a more tribal viewpoint (which, because of humanity’s natural in-species proclivity for perceiving in-species diversity, can be sliced and diced 1,000 different ways).

        I think a more equanimical view of the egalitarian (getting back to the root of how it arose and therefore what it in fact is), is desperately called for now.

        I am getting more and more freaked out, because I have been discussing these ideas re the egalitarian all over the place, for the past few months now, and I am blown away by the utter confusion around this concept (within both the left and the right). I am 56, and was of the assumption my whole life that a deep understanding of the egalitarian, was appreciated by at least a large minority of the western populace, but now that I am drilling down on this hard, I am reconsidering if it is as large a minority as I once thought. This freaks me out, because if we don’t change course about appreciating the more equanimical definition of the egalitarian underpinnings of our western culture, very very bad things will start to happen eventually (it doesn’t take much of an imagination to see this). I don’t want that.

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:30 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      The West is in dire need of regime change.

      More terrorist attacks will create more chaos, destabilize Western governments, and lead to their downfall, so at least there’s that.

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 12:26 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        Here’s another video of an anti-invader demonstration yesterday at Austria / Slovenia border:

        Like


      • I don’t think you guys are willing to see the problem. No regime change can fix mass sheeple preference. Only population change can do that. Most white ppl are the problem. That does not change b/c most of the solution is white. Tyrants are a dime a dozen in a nation of sheeple. The fix has always been cull and free resources for reproduction of the winners. If the winners are not civilized rationalists, there is no fix unless a new dark age eventually nurtures an enlightenment of conquerors. Scenario B assumes the gene pool is not set back some thousands of years by loss of rationalist genes.

        Like


  2. Shouldn’t the chronology lead with one or both of the following?

    – Jews invade Palestine and ethnic cleanse the native Gentiles the territory.

    – The United Stated and European allies invade and bomb Muslim homelands, killing hundreds of thousands.

    Like


  3. People will stay asleep as long as remains easier to sleep than wake up. It will take the kind of event that you see rather than read about on the news, like a massive economic calamity and severe resource restriction.

    Like


    • As soon as I saw that they identified the terrorists by conveniently finding their passports, just like in 9/11, my Hoax alert was going off. And after looking into Sandy Hook, I now realize that the sheer magnitude of the power that the elite have over us psychologically is immeasurable. Nothing in the media can be trusted. It is all lies. The real reason they suppress anger toward refugees and muslims, besides the fact that the muslims are a tool in their agenda, is because the muslims didn’t do this. Zionists did. It is all fake, just like Sandy Hook, just like the Boston bombing. I am angry at myself for buying into the fervor. The migrant invasion must be stopped. That is unquestionable. We need to use the fake Paris bombings against the elite and rally the people to close the borders and get rid of the traitorous politicians.

      Like


      • They wore explosive belts, so they left plenty of themselves behind. Real life explosions are not like the movies, I saw Syrian and other passports on dead suicide bombers in Iraq.

        Keep in mind, some of these guys had been pulled over earlier that day.

        Like


      • Is it normal to carry your passport everywhere in Europe?

        Like


      • RJ “Is it normal to carry your passport everywhere in Europe?”

        Well yes and no.
        Inside the (now history, I hope) zone of the Schengen Agrement, most EU serfs have always carried ID cards of some sort, to show to the Nazis, the Emperor, or the Bolsheviks and such.
        Those outside the Zone, but still within the EU (following me?) need passports to get in, and better yet, out again.

        Brits, being generally unused to the ways of the world off their rocks and shoals, didn’t until very recently even carry driver’s licenses, since we all knew each other by sight, and could very rapidly establish the precise degree of cousinhood with a few pertinent queries (think of Appalachia, but maroon it on the Outer Banks).

        So, when condemned to traverse the wastelands of Abroad we carry the Monarch’s passport, which used to be a fine dark-blue hardcover book with a large gilt Royal Crest, wherewith to intimidate lesser breeds without the law (now it’s a poxy little soft maroon thing, like a credit card holder).
        About one’s person at all times, because foreigners are inveterate thieves.

        And because Continental police like nothing better than pulling over right-hand-drive cars, in the hope of a few fines for various imaginary infractions of their visibly non-existent traffic regulations.
        You can’t even get a hotel room without it (well except in chill, ZFG places like Belgium. God love ’em).

        I expect sketchy-looking brown or black dudes, who are (with a deal of justification, I might say) regularly hassled to fuck by the gendarmerie will carry some sort of ID in an attempt to stave off being shoved in the back of the van for a special massage down the station. Not necessarily real ID, just the best bet at seeming credible, a bit like buying underage liquor. And if you don’t have an EU state card/NI number, or wish to conceal one’s actual citizenship, fake passport it is, as it’s a PITA for the cops to check with the relevant foreign govt. on the side of the road, or up a dark alley, and they need to move on quickly to a better prospect, who might actually have some cash.

        Like


      • “So, when condemned to traverse the wastelands of Abroad we carry the Monarch’s passport…”

        I expected as much. What struck me as odd is that a guy on a one way trip *within* the borders of his own(ha) country would go to the trouble of packing his passport.

        Americans don’t tend to carry or really even think about passports unless we’re going overseas. When they ask to see your papers in The Peoples of Color Republic, we show a state driver’s liscense.

        Like


      • You don’t need passport if you’re an EU citizen to go anywhere in Europe. You do need to have id though anywhere you go. I prefer traveling with my passport because it’s easier to scan at those automatic customs terminals. The Schengen area has nothing to do with the identification you need.

        Like


      • Mmm. Just so. But, as a brit, apart from my Nectar card, my driver’s licence and my RAC membership, it’s all I’ve got, being a free man and all that. The crucial item is the reciprocal EU health insurance card, which I have along with the passport, as that’s how it seems to work.
        Otherwise the Frogs etc, will quite happily shrug and drive off in the ambulance as one’s family charcoals slowly in the wreck. Giving my half-century-plus old medical number is no good, as it seems to have been quietly dropped even here by the NHS. I doubt they’d be very much impressed by me reciting my lineage back to the time of Stephen and Matilda (or Robert le Diable, allegedly, on my mother’s side). Plus francais que les francais, we be. Means bugger-all, to a bureaucrat.

        Like


  4. Like


  5. Yup. I’m at the point where 100% of the blame goes to the Shitlib faggots who are in favor of this bullshit.

    I can’t remember where I read it, but someone recently wrote that if you only had 1 bullet and had a traitor and an enemy in front of you, you’d be better off shooting the traitor.

    Like


    • Our own governments now side with the invaders and punish us for complaining or opposing this race replacement program.

      Yet only a handful of us talk of rebellion.

      It is hard to remain optimistic, it seems nothing will ever wake up enough people to stop this anti-white slow genocide.

      [CH: yes it is hard to be optimistic, however i will leave you with this: when everything seems at its most hopeless, the logjam of insanity can break suddenly, and the light come streaming into the darkness like an exploding sun.]

      Like


      • We are currently experiencing what would be known as “The Dark Night Of The Soul” in a movie or novel. It’s basically the time when things feel most hopeless. Lord of The Rings is a perfect example of this and has incredible parallels to today’s and historic events.

        We could be one viral video away from the destruction of the Shitlib Cathedral and the Mosque Jihad.

        Like


      • The sun rises in the East. Eastern europe, more precisely.

        Like


      • There’s a financial concept that asks ‘how do you go bankrupt’

        “It occurs first very slowly, then all at once.”

        I think that might apply here.

        Like


      • Ar10 what the fuck it should’ve already happened I’m watching Fox news with commercials from Jews telling Christians to send $30 food boxes to Israel no fucking joke.

        Like


      • Lol. We’ll send the Heebs some German oven-smoked sausage and tell them the smokey flavor will remind them of their ancestors.

        Like


      • Take heart, my friends…

        Things always look darkest before they go totally black.

        Like


      • It can’t last forever. Shitlibbery is weak. It can never ultimately compete with the natural human compulsion to protect family and people and nation.

        Like


      • I just read on Yahoo news that now 7 governors from 7 different states are saying they will refuse to take in Syrian refugees because it is too dangerous since Syria does not really keep much record on its citizen and it is even hard to say if one is truly who they say they are.

        If Obama the dictator in chief does not force them to take those “refugees”, then this gives me some hope.

        Like


      • Now we know which governors aren’t being blackmailed.

        Like


      • PA: …yet.

        For more on refugees, read https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

        Pay attention to which states have no say in refugee resettlement, like Louisiana. Jindal can’t stop a single Syrian arriving in his state.

        Like


      • The going bankrupt analogy is apt, but what the poster refers to is called a preference cascade in economics. It’s how all revolutions happen. I’m pretty sure in France a day or two before the revolution started, all would have said they’re loyal to the king.

        Like


  6. If the Paris massacre was not enough

    If the tens of thousands of young white girls raped in many different towns ( not only Rotherham, it is endemic, not local) by immigrants is not enough

    If September 11 2001 was not enough, and instead of Americans closing the doors to Islam, they elected a Muslim President who will not even say the word terrorist.

    What will it take?

    What the hell will it take?

    Like


  7. This attack worked against jihad marcro interests. It is better for them fly under the radar until their holy war is won in the demographic battlefield. All they gotta do is behave well for 20 years, keeping their hight fertility rate and the european Caliphate is guaranteed. This kind of show off works only as an alert to their victims.

    Like


  8. rather than bombing ISIS fighters let’s send all of our lonely, childless, 40+ spinsters over there to depress them and make them so miserable they no longer want to fight

    that’s basically what they’ve done to us over here

    Like


    • that would also stop all those sexless losers from killing themselves to get 72 virgins. an actual orgasm now, even from a post-wall spinster, is still better than imaginary orgasms.

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 10:35 am gunslingergregi

        sexless losers from killing themselves to get 72 virgins””””””’

        thats pretty nice really
        our sexless losers kill themselves and go to hell or suffer in perpetual silence

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 10:37 am gunslingergregi

        there religion is kind enough to give their losers a way to be winners
        our christian one does not and just puts them down while using them to achieve things and telling em to man up and shit or whatever

        Like


      • Was shown recently what all this 72 virgin shit is about.

        The fucking ayrabs are on twitter bragging about their hourie they’ll be getting in paradise. That’s right, as in pronounced as whore. One fucked up religion.

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:59 am The Other Anonymous

      Now that’s wisdom. They shall beat their swords into cat litter scoops – become stupefied with on-line porn – and we will have solved two of our most pressing social issues by pitting our enemies against one another.

      Like


    • He he he shit alpha fuck beta bucks alpha bucks bet a no save the slut

      Like


  9. Hollande now wants to amend the French constitution to allow stripping dual-citizens of their French citizenship. Not good enough, you’d probably say, but by Euro-leftist standards that is actually pretty extreme.

    Like


    • I love it. The US should follow suit, with no exceptions. A certain foreign country tends to enjoy exceptions that others don’t. This should be ended.

      Like


      • To be clear, you’d have to commit some sort of crime to have your citizenship revoked. It’s not a categorical outlawing of all dual-citizenship.

        Like


      • its a good start. I’d be cool with all dual-citizenship being outlawed.

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 10:21 am gunslingergregi

        shartiste

        its a good start. I’d be cool with all dual-citizenship being outlawed.
        ””””””

        but then there would be no escape

        Like


      • And here in Canada our new Prime minister, Justin Trudeau says he is against revoking Canadian citizenship for Canadians who have joined ISIS in the Middle East and then want to come back to Canada.

        To him they are still good people who simply were in bad circumstances.

        yes he is a liberal.

        [CH: high treason. in a sane world, trudeau would be swinging from a moose rack.]

        Liked by 1 person


      • its a good start. I’d be cool with all dual-citizenship being outlawed.

        Me, too, but that’s another common-sense measure we can’t take because of the subversive traitors who dominate the Supreme Court. Google _Afroyim v. Rusk_. (Incidentally, I think you can guess the second nationality of Afroyim without even having to look it up.)

        Like


      • Seriously: Mexico? [Not that any dual citizens should be trusted, but I’m wager the largest number come from that one nation.]

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:45 am Experienced Father

      Hollande is afraid of Pres. Le Penn in 2017

      Like


    • “Hollande now wants to amend the French constitution to allow stripping dual-citizens of their French citizenship …”

      The better choice would be to allow these people to retain their citizenship while languishing in prison after conviction for serious crimes.

      Perhaps a new serious crime of “acquiring citizenship by deception” would allow the state to show its teeth when dealing with some of these people — I’d be in favour of making the mandatory sentence at least as severe as the sentence for serious fraud, such as “banksterism”, because serious fraud is what this involves.

      Just as one example that tests the rule, Ayaan Hirsi Ali should be spending significant time in a Dutch prison for lying to the Dutch immigrations authorities, even before the additional time she should be spending in prison for whatever other lies and deceptions she put into motion in order to become part of the Dutch political class.

      And yet she’s free to roam around in the United States …

      She should be rotting away in a Dutch version of France’s Perpignan.

      It’s possible to fix these problems, one Volksverräter at a time.

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 3:46 pm Facepalm to the Max

      Australia started stripping dual nationals of their Aussie citizenship months ago and then deporting them if they had done a year or more in jail.

      About a hundred of them appealed their deportation and were sent to immigration detention off shore where they rioted last week.

      We have also gotten rid of two bikie bosses, one of them a muslim, so its a start.

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 7:22 pm The Other Anonymous

        Whats a bikie boss?

        Like


      • Bikies? I wouldn’t worry. That’s only a Thing for countries that have roads, and gas stations and stuff. I’ve told the kids that I don’t mind if they flunk their degrees, it’s not as though they’re ever going to have to pay them back. Just carry on with the horseriding lessons, and for God’s sake learn how to shoot straight (more difficult than one might imagine, here on Airstrip One).

        Like


  10. Something’s got to break the cycle. Will Bubba eventual stop getting deliriously distracted by desert bombing sorties long enough to WAKE UP to what is really happening to him and his kind?

    I suspect many Bubbas (like me) are wide awake, but have no idea what the hell to do about it. After all, it’s not as if voting is going to change anything. All the important economic issues are decided by Janet Yellen, an unelected autocrat, and all the important social issues are decided by Anthony Kennedy, another unelected autocrat.

    If you have some viable plan of action (other than stockpiling ammunition and and canned food in preparation for the Big One) I’d like to hear it.

    Like


  11. Hollande wants state of emergency extended, which included provision to prevent gatherings in public.

    Since jihadi jimmys don’t do public gatherings, wonder who they want to prevent getting together to protest?

    This is a rhetorical question.

    On the plus side, as Coulter said of the Paris attacks, “Tonight Donald Trump just won the election.”

    Like


  12. on November 16, 2015 at 10:01 am gunslingergregi

    most people don’t think about shit like this they are trying to live there lives and too busy just trying to do that

    Like


  13. on November 16, 2015 at 10:03 am gunslingergregi

    instead of all this bullshit can we just make about an added billion white chicks and have a big fucking party
    lets move towards that goal i think we can get behind it he he he

    [CH: open borders interferes with white woman baby-making. negative psychosocial feedback loops ftw. or rather, ftl.]

    Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:13 am gunslingergregi

      im talking baby factories men need to make it happen

      [CH: close the borders and reduce diversity and the white baby-making will follow.]

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 10:39 am gunslingergregi

        could create a new paradigm try something new have ten woman for every man see what happens he he he

        Like


      • No it won’t work.

        r vs K selection, we are not bunny rabbits.

        We are warriors, the best that ever lived.

        Like


      • The only winning move .. is to eradicate all forms of dole.
        Muslamic/Africoid brat farms neutralized, K-selected northerners back to intended, proven strategy.
        It’s going to happen anyway, when the tax-farmers can’t squeeze the stolid Euro-stones for any more blood. And it’ll be quite horrid. Such a pity, someone should do something for those poor ickle babies .. or .. maybe not.
        It’s not as though they’re going to give the (conditionally) industrious tax-paying natives any of their jobs back, eh? Race to the bottom. See you in April, grasshoppers.

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:15 am gunslingergregi

      make us more money in exports than all combined exports to date in the world he he he

      Like


    • [CH: open borders interferes with white woman baby-making. negative psychosocial feedback loops ftw. or rather, ftl.]

      Please describe the specifics of mechanism.

      Like


    • The West should simply insist that any Muslims that we import be 15-25 year old women. No family reunions; no nothing. Western men can then start breeding the retarded inbred out of the Muslim communities. Also many Muslim women would make good wives so it would provide more competition for native women. Isn’t it about time to turn that Muslim cockiness about breeding around against them. As for the Muslim men, they’ve still got their camels and their young boys and their porn don’t they?

      Like


  14. The revolution isn’t coming until somebody interrupts the NFL’s schedule.

    Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:07 am gunslingergregi

      The game peaked at 120.8 million viewers during its final ””””

      even that one third of people once a year

      Like


    • @Greg Eliot
      NASCAR and NFL fans skew right and white. The fact that they don’t even seem to care enough, even in the face of encouraged immigration and violent muslim attacks at White rock concerts and soccer games overseas, is telling. Even if this happens in America at a heavy rock show or the Superbowl, I seriously doubt Americans would stand up. I like my NFL team (don’t give a shit about NASCAR) but I’m not distracted to the point of blindness like so many of these fans (largely skewed white and right) seem to be. You KNOW NFL fans aren’t lefties, so how is it that ALL these fans can’t elect like-minded politicians? Rhetorical.

      Like


      • the demographics of players in the sports americans love has suppressed their pro-White instincts, at least subconsciously. How can dindus be bad… I won fantasy football this week. There is real cognitive dissonance there. They may be race realist at heart, but they hang a lot of their emotional balance on magic negroes.

        Meanwhile.. Aaron Rodgers spoke out against a fan who shouted a slur against muslims (said nothing in support of White french people). Packers lost. Peyton Manning donated to Jeb Bush. Got benched this week. Tom Brady, unapologetic Trump supporter, led his team to another cold blooded win in an undefeated season.

        Like


      • I stopped following football ten years ago, was a big Redskins fan through the 80s and 90s.

        But that does it. While I still won’t follow football, I am now a Patriots fan.

        Like


      • As Tom Brady continues his middle-finger tour of the NFL 🙂

        Like


      • Well said, shartiste. I figured the shit Rodgers was talking about was along those lines. He did go to Cal, after all.

        Peyton doesn’t have a leg to stand on…literally. (And they lost to the Chiefs, whose name is not offensive? HAHA!)

        Brady is on mega-Effe You mode this year. Every waking second inflated his sense of purpose. That was most definitely a cold blooded win.

        Like


      • I’ve never followed football(too gay and black) but I’ll tell anybody who asks me about it how great Tom Brady and the Patriots are. It triggers non-whites and SWPLs alike.

        Like


  15. on November 16, 2015 at 10:06 am gunslingergregi

    they had the most ever watch the debates it was 20 mil people
    still 300 million that didn’t watch

    Like


  16. I don’t think anything short of a small nuclear explosion in a large American city will make us collectively snap out of it. And I don’t rule out that possibility, especially with our President rolling out the red carpet to thousands of Syrian refugees.

    Did I mention that a cache of weapons was stolen from an Army base in my hometwon this weekend?

    Like


    • First of all, in these dark times, after our great collective loss, make no mistake: Islam is a religion of peace … (a while later) … It’s not America that has been bombed. It is the world. Those who were lost in this tragic event are first and foremost not Americans, but citizens of the world. The world stands by them in solidarity, and humanity says (firm voice) “Never again. No mas.” Thank you.

      Like


    • Since the events of September 11 2001 were not enough, I am afraid it will take a nuclear bomb.

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:37 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Maybe that cache was taken by White paramilitaries.

      One can hope.

      Like


  17. Shit cuckservatives say…
    “Islam is a religion of peace.”

    Just ask the french…

    Like


  18. on November 16, 2015 at 10:10 am gunslingergregi

    nicole might be actually right if ya can get the 300 million involved in local politics instead of trying to get the 300 million to have a civil war some shit would definetly change

    Like


    • It certainly would. The federal government can only do so much to enforce their policies. If the locals do not want something to happen, and are willing to do without the federal funding, it just won’t happen. They can try to do things sideways, but if the people are prepared for the fight, then they really can’t do anything.

      Talk to anyone in the local government of Beaumont, Texas. They are among the most visible opponents of forced integration in the U.S. right now…both the European and African Americans there.

      It’ll be good for them to see that someone is paying attention, and they can tell you some of what they’re going through.

      Some others at the city and state level are doing what they do on the downlow, and arranging things so that there would be an inability to enforce the federal policies. If you smell some sanity, speak up as much as you can while staying under the radar, and eventually they’ll be able to come out of the closet.

      Just be careful out there.

      Like


      • SE Texas is not the norm for the US though. The Klan is also active out there, so its impressive that blacks and whites are standing together against forced saracen “immigration.”

        Like


  19. If 20 years ago somebody had spelled all this out for me, exactly these things that are happening, I would not even have laughed because I would have thought it so stupid. And not just the moose limbs, open borders and terrorism, but the whole thing, including the krazy kids on kampus.

    If a movie were made 20 years ago, it would have received terrible reviews because it was just too unrealistic, Waterworld and Mad Max would have been considered much more probable.

    Yet, here we are. Wow.

    Like


  20. on November 16, 2015 at 10:22 am The Night Porter

    The answer is NO. Bubba will never “wake up;” Leftists will apologize to Muslim rapists if their girlfriend was on the rag when she was gang raped; immigration will not be stopped; the NWO has already won. Visit “Ground Zero” in my neighborhood in the Financial District and tell me there is hope. There is no hope but a fool’s hope. Only an extreme surge IN EUROPE could, maybe, begin to possibly, perhaps, make a minor dent in their armor. The technique of mass mind control has been practically perfected. This is why the Bruce Jenner, women-no-longer-exist Double Think is so critical to their plans. People are no longer human. That’s what the autism is about. Unless Europe decouples from the US and the US suffers a major, Vietnam-like military disaster, AND Putin proves to be the real thing, then perhaps there is a slight chance to turn this around – in Europe and only in Europe. The US is a cancer on the world that has militarily and culturally occupied Europe since WWII. But as of now, no.

    Like


    • we don’t need even a majority of people to wake up, just for the small percentage of awake people (10%?) to reach the point that they feel their way of life is so threatened that it’s worth it to risk their freedom to fight back

      there is presently a large, numerous, heavily-armed, media-censored demographic of this country whose just salivating for the opportunity to use their AR-15s and street sweeper Mossberg’s to set things right

      all it will take is what Greg said, interrupting the NFL season

      only half joking

      Like


      • It make take just a bit more… maybe DirectV only having 3 channels and 80% of the McD’s and WaWa’s running out of coffee.

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 11:46 am gunslingergregi

        those guys did go use their m16’s to go kill muslims give em some credit
        it wasen’t the libs that went

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 11:52 am gunslingergregi

        even though you good whites put them down they went out and whooped some ass
        even though the good whites didn’t care enough to protect their homes while they were gone

        Like


  21. I must say the clarity is nice. In political discussions usually so fraught with wonky details and mental gymnastics, we finally have a clear issue in which people must classify themselves as either a patriot or a traitor.

    Anybody who wants more muslims in your country wants you and your family dead.

    Liked by 1 person


  22. Here’s the the type of things Shitlibs think we should do in response to the terror attacks:

    Public coloring books.

    http://www.westsiderag.com/2015/11/15/a-colorful-tribute-to-paris-at-book-culture

    Like


  23. on November 16, 2015 at 10:30 am Wrong Side of History

    Conservatives need to get over their near religious devotion to the idea of free markets and realize that the state-corporate nexus is a natural feature of capitalism and threatens our survival as a people. “Muh market, muh freedom” keeps us fat, stupid, atomized, apathetic, and too frightened of losing everything to think beyond the acceptable parameters of political discourse. The GOP worships the twin gods of GDP and Diversity just as much as the Dems so the electoral process will not save us. We need nothing less than a full-scale exit from the system.

    [CH: libertardians and cuckservatives like to say “well capitalism gave us all these nice things”. no, White people gave us all these nice things. capitalism is an emergent property of Whiteness, not the other way around.]

    Like


    • Christ was chased out of the public schools and public squares to make room for Mammon.

      Hilarity ensued… and continues to do so.

      Like


    • [CH: libertardians and cuckservatives like to say “well capitalism gave us all these nice things”. no, White people gave us all these nice things. capitalism is an emergent property of Whiteness, not the other way around.]

      Hmm, this could make for its own substantial post.

      Like


    • CH: “Capitalism is an emergent property of Whiteness”.

      It’s funny how long it’s taking people to grasp that.

      “Capitalism is colour-blind – it’s what people do naturally when they’re left alone”, say the cucks and libertarians. When you leave most non-whites alone, what you get is a perpetual cycle of plundering, corruption, inter-tribal squabbling and social upheaval. Very few non-European societies are capable of creating that layer of civic substructure that capitalism needs to survive and prosper. Capitalism and classical liberal democracy are part of whites’ extended phenotype.

      Like


      • Yeah I speak as a reformed cuck. I used to believe all that stuff, “capitalism is color-blind, lots of immigration is good blah blah.”

        Living in Asia for 10 years and keeping my eyes open has given me a different perspective.

        Capitalism, rule of law etc really are an emergent property of whites.

        No other race in the WORLD has ever come up with this stuff. Instead, every nation that has modernized has done so by copying the white model more or less.

        Asians are pretty orderly, smart and hard working. But rule of law? Fucking forget it. It’s a mafia and hierarchy mentality here. Little creativity too.

        [I recall a story from Charles Jenkins, a US soldier who defected to North Korea in the 1960s. He had to live in an isolated cabin with a couple other defectors. One day they came across some Korean famers building a brick wall with mortar. The farmers were just stacking bricks one top of each other. Jenkins showed the famers how to stagger the bricks to interlock them an make the wall stronger. They were amazed at it. Yeah, I see stuff like that all the time here in Asia — very little creative thinking.]

        Africans? They never invented the wheel, cities, metal working, sailing vessels or structures beyond mud huts in thousands of years. That’s all you need to know.

        The middle easterners and arabs are smart enough. But too tribal and nepotistic to create a thriving, advanced civil society.

        There’s a reason the Mission Control room in Houston was staffed by all white men. And no, it wasn’t about discrimination against Ahmed the Clock Boy.

        Ask a shitlib the color of his kid’s doctor. I guarantee no blacks. Even shitlibs know the score but pretend not to because Goodwhite(TM).

        Like


      • Moses, what made me snap out of the free market worship besides realizing that having them as a goal, not as a means, undermines everything human about us and reduces us to consuming automatons with jobs is that capitalism is self defeating because it not only needs a specific type of people, it actively selects against it. Leaving aside the human capital issue and how capitalism erodes it, it’s in the interests of businesses to destroy cultural differences to market the same things to everyone. I’m an advocate of markets as a tool, but one has to be careful about what the goals are.

        Like


  24. no, there were plenty of self-hating white idiots, going “what about beirut” & posting about africa from april. 1 idiot de-friended me, but i’ve decided to stop holding back

    Like


  25. National Front members are being booed at “solidarity marches” in France. I’m afraid most people will never wake up.

    Like


    • Some will never wake up of course, but not being there myself I have to ascribe some of that to media exaggeration. Same way Trump “protestors” were a big thing, all while barely any showed up and SNL got its best ratings in a half a decade.

      Like


      • I wish it were all a media exaggeration, but there are videos of nationalist protesters being surrounded by mobs of white French citizens yelling and calling them “fascists.”

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:43 am gunslingergregi

      the people have been awake you liberals living with blacks or blacks in universities or high school or grade school teaching
      they just dont carry their heart on sleeve and are devious
      just like people talking about au pairs liberals been inporting their own personal ho;s while telling the proles ho’s are wrong rofl

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 10:46 am gunslingergregi

        they look down on everyone else for doing exactly what they do but they get away with it and get to feel like a good white while others don’t if that ain’t woken up i don’t what would be woken up he he he

        Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 10:48 am gunslingergregi

      there is a group of people placing feel good labels on shady shit doing whatever the fuck they want to do

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:00 am gunslingergregi

      you see blacks on welfare but they create some of the only jobs in my town the welfare office completely staffed by white woman and a few men
      the office for bill help or what not white woman
      counselors white woman
      drug rehab mostly white woman
      the people working the front of all the feel good programs white woman

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:01 am gunslingergregi

      those white chicks as hell not marching to put blacks in those jobs rofl

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:43 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Is another civil war in France in the making…?

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:44 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:45 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Like


    • And a man’s enemies shall be those of his own house.
      Matthew 10:36

      Like


      • Greatest line in “Breaker Morant.”

        “There is an epitaph I’d like: Matthew 10:36. Well, Peter… this is what comes of ’empire building’.”

        Like


      • Poignant movie. One of my favorite lines is what Bryan Brown says when he comes back from boffing some settler’s wife:

        “A slice off a cut loaf is never missed.”

        Like


    • Wow. They booed?

      With the Greeks at the Battle of Marathon lined up in their phalanxes, then the Persians boo really loudly and the Greek line crumbles.

      Like


      • I don’t think you are getting my point. I’m not saying that the National Front is too weak to put up with some booing. I’m just pointing out that the majority of Frenchmen are too brainwashed to ever speak out against the takeover of their country.

        Like


  26. Six states claim to be shutting the simian refugee door:

    http://news.yahoo.com/four-u-states-shut-doors-syrian-refugees-paris-165757926.html

    while Dear Leader wants to bring in more.

    Speaking of unrealistic movies, this is straight out of the Second Civil War:

    Like


  27. The most hilarious response so far is the president of France asking people to unite. But unite by what? Ethnicity? Language? Culture? Values? Peace? Well not killing each other is something, but is it enough in case one party despises what the other values. Unity cannot be ordered and begging for it is a sign of weakness, but also a lack of understanding people. Asking for it is like a beta male asking a girl to love him after he has done all the possible mistakes. An alpha leader inspires unity, and if it´s lost, doesn´t at least beg for it. Begging people to unite when there is nothing uniting them is as crazy as asking one not to be hungry in the absence of food.

    Like


  28. Islam says, “Submit.”
    Multiculturalism says, “Submit.”

    When enough people don’t want to submit to either, then you’ll get your change.

    Like


  29. on November 16, 2015 at 11:16 am gunslingergregi

    ahh fuck ya know what i made a comment about how it was so easy in our wars it should go back to like swords and shit to make it more proud or something
    sorry guys he he he
    so they importing em close we can do that daily on the streets
    i guess the elites do listen
    really though actual war against muslim nations coming from the us is like an adult male beating an 8 year old so maybe now they will have a chance to fight man to man with out the technology
    whites will just have to start running in groups

    Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 11:28 am gunslingergregi

      it is kind of funny people talk about the whites rising up yea ya know a lot of us went to war
      most didn’t
      what a million went to war where were the other 300 mil he he he
      i guess it doesn’t take that big of a group
      but really like i said we did go to war still are in a war
      kicked the shit out of the arab world easily lost like 5k people

      Like


  30. about 15 states saying no refugess. the blueprint for secession.

    some southern governors such as Florida’s shamefully silent so far.

    Like


    • Saw the pictures of the pop star and her erstwhile beau several days ago…

      … what’s your point?

      Like


      • You weren’t actually trying to induce angst by pointing out that a pop star floozy once dated some sort of Subcontinental, were you?

        I mean… I can’t even… wow, just wow… and here, it’s 2015 and all…

        :world’s largest duckface

        Like


      • No. Triggering you is just fun. Sort of like making an aluminum casing of a fire ant nest.

        Like


      • If you thought this would trigger me, you haven’t been paying attention.

        I never mourn the loss of a pop star… even if she be one of the less heinous ones, she still be heinous.

        And let’s face it… how sad is it that you take pride in trying to aggravate people with such flaccid tactics? Geez, man, get a life.

        You fairy.

        Like


  31. France should hit back the whorefinder way.

    It involves a lot of chloroform, duct tape, and a million reels of film to upload to porntube.

    Fear is a great demotivator.

    Crazy rape!

    Like


  32. Yet still you have liberals defending these “refugees”. And at the G20 summit press conference Barry called the Paris attacks a terrible “setback”.

    http://www.steynonline.com/7299/the-leader-of-the-free-world-and-his-universal

    [CH: the fresh noose is meant for the necks of traitors, first and foremost.]

    Like


  33. on November 16, 2015 at 12:09 pm gunslingergregi

    Bubba cheers.””””

    bubba didn’t cheer though he is the only one with the balls to go physically kill
    in close combat
    i got to say though i suppose the libs have tried to take care of us somewhat we have the money to get out of the shit areas they created and don’t need ombamacare thanks libs
    people who didn’t go bubbas yea they fucked
    its just guys with too much empathy having a problem

    Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 12:17 pm gunslingergregi

      maybe the muslims invasion is the immunization against empathy

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 12:32 pm Mr Bigglesworth

      “The question is: is there a breaking point where the population gets tough and vote in some of those “nativists” and stop the music?”

      ^^^

      25 years ago, this was indeed the question.

      Here in 2015, the question is thus: is there a demographic point of no return…. a point when the music cannot be stopped?

      The answer is yes.

      This was never about bullets and bombs. It’s about maternity wards. Even the dullest of minds will come to understand that glaring truth, in the near future.

      Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 12:38 pm gunslingergregi

        of course it is about bullets and bombs when one million can kill billions

        The answer is yes.”””””

        the answer is no demographic people are wrong
        how many people in america in 1840 around 20 million people
        that is all ya need to repop america the dont take a demographic specialist take away their degree and make em panhandle in the street

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 12:47 pm gunslingergregi

        how many people came over on the mayflower lol come on man

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 1:09 pm gunslingergregi

        i’d enjoy seeing you admit you are wrong
        thanks

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 1:16 pm gunslingergregi

        Today there are tens-of-millions of individuals descended from these brave souls. It is the goal of The Mayflower Society to join together people who share this heritage and to carry on the memory of our Pilgrim ancestors.

        The Pilgrims

        The group of 102 passengers who crowded aboard Mayflower for the crossing was not homogenous. Many of the passengers were members of the Leiden congregation, but they were joined by a number of English families or individuals who were hoping to better their life situations, or were seeking financial gain. These two general groups have sometimes been referred to as the “saints” and “strangers”.

        Although the Leiden congregation had sent its strongest members with various skills for establishing the new colony, nearly half of the passengers died the first winter of the “great sickness.”””””””””””

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 1:18 pm gunslingergregi

        plymouth rock is a pretty popular site you should go check it out it is pretty cool they have the sawmills they made using the stream power not steam power that i think still work
        badass shit

        Like


      • “This was never about bullets and bombs. It’s about maternity wards.”

        maternity wards indeed… who here is a fraction as tough as this woman?

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 2:30 pm gunslingergregi

        went up to a gang with the blue and red bandanas on by myself
        doesn’t take much toughness and it didn’t hurt at all he he he
        could of taken out the gang by myself as well
        when our mothers quit holding us back with pussyfied nonsense
        yea we be good

        Like


      • on November 16, 2015 at 2:48 pm gunslingergregi

        wonder if that why i don’t get fucked with lol everyone prob heard that story in the black underground in my town he he he
        see shit ya do prob follows ya he he he
        met some blacks i played football with i got up after the loudest hit ever recorded and was wanting to keep playing coach said no go rest he he he
        i can leave for a month and noone robs my copper pipes
        really it might of made a diference back then that continues to today
        everyone know of one white dude who when pushed is not afraid at all
        shit my moms house sat for 7 years and noone took the copper pipes i guess thats respect

        Like


  34. “My land, my land
    Here you are in my land
    My waves and my shore
    My land”

    The VEVO version of this song was removed less than two months ago when the “refugee crisis” reached heightened levels in the mainstream media. It has been on there for three years. I don’t believe it’s coincidence it was taken down. Who owns and operates YouTube?

    Like


    • someone said that Rammstein was pretty red pill, like du hast was an anti-marriage song

      Like


      • Yes, they are red pill. But they use a lot of double entendres and metaphors because nationalism is frowned upon in Germany because of its past. They’d be silenced at least, possibly jailed or punished at most (I don’t know the laws) for being too straightforward with their message. They even wrote a song called Links 1, 2, 3, 4 that claimed they were leftists, but it was satirical.

        They have a song called Mother, which is about longing for the German homeland of old, and another called Amerika, which mocks American imperialism and multiculturalism.

        Like


      • fuck, dude. I saw the links video. The ants get slaughtered by the beetles at a concert. Very…um predictive I think.

        Like


      • Yeah man, it’s subtle, but if you’e red pill or even clear-minded, you know what’s going on.

        Like


  35. Michigan, Alabama, Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Indiana, Mississippi, Illinois, Massachusetts and Ohio are now saying “You are not sending Syrian or ME ‘migrants’ here, we will refuse them”.

    Like


  36. ROFL TOUGH GUY POSTURE TALK

    FAT SLOB ACTIONS THO

    WHOS FOOLED BY YALLS NONSENSE?

    Like


  37. “Over the long term, I’m pretty optimistic, and the reason is because this country just becomes more and more of a hodgepodge of folks,” -Barack Hussein Obama

    [CH: did he really say this? and what was the context?]

    Like


      • In his Vox interview, Obama predicted that immigration would overwhelm conservative causes.

        If “you go to Tennessee and it turns out that you’ve got this huge Kurdish community. And you go to some little town in Iowa and you see some Hasidic Jewish community, and then you see a bunch of interracial black and white couples running around with their kids… in these little farm communities, and you’ve got Latinos in the classroom when you visit the schools there,” he said.

        “So people are getting more and more comfortable with the diversity of this country, much more sophisticated about both the cultural differences but more importantly, the basic commonality that we have,” he said.

        That diversity hinders conservative priorities, he said.

        Those goals include support for families so they can independently govern themselves and their kids.

        “The Republican party, even the most conservative, they have much less ability, I think, to express [opposition to single-sex marriage] than they did even 10 years ago,” Obama said.

        Fascinating. I guess that means they now have elected a new people and are feeling pretty comfortable with it. Also note Obama makes a point of having inserted outsiders into every community. (“Every”? Well …) Divide et impera, losers.

        Like


    • Honestly, this baby shit brown mulatto can’t actually believe this shit.

      Like


    • Full context in interview with Ezra Klein.

      http://www.vox.com/a/barack-obama-interview-vox-conversation/obama-domestic-policy-transcript?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=voxdotcom&utm_content=Monday

      I think there may be use for the pressurized lines of unrefined natural gas at the family farm in Texas by the end of this decade.

      Like


  38. Personally, I love the game-shitlord nexus, MPC be damned.

    Like


  39. “The way to battle this leftoid semantic tactic is to pathologize their ethnomasochistic/anti-White instincts, using similarly laden words.”

    Can you please offer us some more examples besides the -philia words?

    Like


    • philia means love of and is meant to be the opposite of phobia i.e. fear of. Not sure from your question if you got that or not.

      Like


      • I got that. I am hoping CH (and others) can provide us with additional words to use to pathologize, in addition to words that end in -philia.

        Like


    • “Anti-White” (pronounced AN-tie) seems to have become the term of choice. The many Greek-origin words that have been suggested, like hesperophobia or the awful oikophobia didn’t work.

      Like


    • You need to straw men them. When they call you a racist, tell them that at least you don’t support black men raping white women or whatever and make up some specious rationale of why they want that. Lol. At least it’s amusing. When theycall you a racist again, say that at least you’re not a rape apologist and assume your previous argument was rock solid. This is how they debate to begin with so they don’t need you to be logical and intellectually honest. Heck, tell them to shut up and go jerk off to interracial porn in an oblique manner.

      [CH: i once told a white girl i was with, after watching her coo like a phony idiot over a black baby, that “little brown bunnies don’t turn me on like they do you”. her fuming was, in a word, delicious.]

      Like


  40. on November 16, 2015 at 1:30 pm gunslingergregi

    A group of Black Lives Matter protestors at Dartmouth College led a violent protest Thursday, hurling racial insults at students and pushing them up against a wall as they tried to study in the library, The Dartmouth Review reports.

    “Fuck you, you filthy white fucks!” “Fuck you and your comfort!” “Fuck you, you racist shit!” they reportedly yelled.

    About a 150 Dartmouth protesters shouted as they marched through Baker-Berry Library at Dartmouth College. Students who didn’t join in on their protests were harassed, one woman was pinned to a wall by protesters who shouted, “filthy white bitch!” in her face. Students who were seated were told to, “Stand the fuck up!” “You filthy racist white piece of shit!”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/15/dartmouth-protesters-assault-students-while-screaming-racial-threats/#ixzz3rgjwZYnE””””””””””’

    dayyyymmmmmmmmm

    Like


  41. Francis Hits Back (with a slap you silly goose!):

    Like


  42. I enjoy reading stories like this because they are all friendly fire incidents, what in Afghanistan they call blue on green attacks. How many of those students being attacked are White Identitarians? Zero. How many are even cuckrepublicans? Almost zero. Notice in the original story that some of them were sceamed at for applauding the rioters.

    Like


  43. Know what I’m sick of hearing? “We condemn these attacks in the strongest possible terms.” That is right up there with going into a Cat 5 hurricane and farting.

    I was driving and listening to various news outlets. There was an interview with a fellow–he’d had done just about all of the alphabet agencies (FBI, CIA, etc) and seemed to be knowledgeable sort. However, I didn’t like his answer when asked “what do we need to do to keep ourselves safe?” The short version was spend more on resources, more manpower, bigger budgets to track suspected terrorist movements, etc. etc. Why the hell should we work ourselves to death when it’s so much simpler to tighten up who we allow in our country in the first place. Keeping the trash out seems to make more sense than allowing trash in to begin with. The Imam In Chief is now trying to bring potential jackasses in wholesale…thanks.

    Btw—I know Paris is and was a nightmare, I do not discount what those folks went thru. However, did anyone really get the comedic timing of Obama’s interview saying “Isis is contained” and the attack? This is what came to mind..

    Like


  44. Negros are dumb enough to believe that Muslims will make them the senior partner of some anti-white syndicate.

    In reality, Muslim treatment of Negro slaves was always much worse than white treatment. Plus, negro slavery in the Americas was an idea originated from Muslim slavery of the same, which was going on for much longer..

    Like


    • Negros are dumb enough to believe that Muslims will make them the senior partner of some anti-white syndicate.

      Here in the U.S., they think the same thing about Hispanics, even while the Mexican invaders are ruthlessly cleansing them from large areas of Southern California.

      Yes, they are dumb. Very dumb.

      Like


    • What’s funny is that culture clash aside, Muslims don’t really mind white people in a racial way, but they HATE blacks and the morons keep converting to Islam. To be expected for a race living in mud huts and whose technical sophistication during the 18th century to be at iron age levels to be this stupid though.

      Like


  45. – White Western nation opens borders to millions of Muslim migrants.
    – A Muslim terror ring pulls off an attack in the heart of said White Western nation.

    No, it starts with France bombing ISIS in Syria for months, killing not only ISIS soldiers but also hundreds of civilians. Unless someone thinks that bomb runs are “surgical”, which means said someone has never heard anything from reporters who have actually seen the effects.

    ISIS naturally thinks, you attack us and our civilians, we do the same to you. This is blowback for France’s policies. But that is taboo to say right now, because then “You are with the terrorists!”

    In this one case, fighting ISIS, I actually think they should be bombed, since ISIS is simply anti-Shia, not pro-Palestinian like the early al-Qaeda, and therefore is supported by Israel, funded by Israel’s allies in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar. (With the U.S. lackeys turning a blind eye to this – and training Syrian fighters that defected en masse to ISIS, effectively functioning as ISIS’ largest training camp.)

    I do not, however, think the U.S. and its ilk should have illegally invaded Iraq, or illegally bombed Iraq’s infrastructure for twelve years before that, or starved Iraq for twelve years with sanctions that killed half a million children, which Zio Madeleine Albright confirmed, saying it was “worth it”. France cooperated with the U.S. in the Iraq occupation even though they didn’t drop any bombs at that time. You don’t think the Sunni Iraqis who make up the ISIS core think they have a right to retaliate on behalf of their killed relatives?

    Most Americans are completely ignorant of what the politicians they elect do in the Middle East. And then they gasp in surprise when someone retaliates. “They hate us for our freedom! Muslims are irrationally evil, just attacking for no reason!” Frenchmen are the same way, most people being stupid and too lazy to learn.

    Arabs, Africans, Afghans and Pakis are in general bad seeds, and almost half of Arab men in Europe have a criminal record. But unless you can only think in black and white you should be able to keep this separate from the reasons why al-Qaeda and ISIS might think they are justified in killing the civilians who elected the leaders who kill their civilians.

    Unless you understand that you won’t understand everything. Meaning you’ll be a neocon stooge.

    Like


    • Most Americans are completely ignorant of what the politicians they elect do in the Middle East.

      Better.

      Like


      • I kind of lost all wish to be diplomatic about this last year when, after four months of nearly daily Ukraine news, most Americans still couldn’t find Ukraine on a map. And it was shown that the more they favored “American military intervention” in Ukraine, the farther away were their guesses. They placed it in Britain, in France, in Africa, in the Middle East, in India, in China, even in South America, Alaska, and some smack in the middle of the U.S. It was incredible. Something to keep in mind when the rah-rah crowd starts braying online.

        [CH: to be fair, this sort of thing is likely true for any war, in any era. if americans were asked to locate germany on a map in 1939, how many would be right? ok ok, idiocracy in full fx and there are more ignorant americans today then in 1939, but still, the point stands.]

        Like


      • Sounds about right. These are the folk that spell Columbia University as Colombia.

        Like


    • That last part should be “understand everything you need to know about the situation.” Ah, whatever.

      Like


    • Arbiter, the reason these wars do not work is that these are wars to “liberate” a people from “oppression.” The problem isn’t the war, but its goals. The purported legality of any war is sophistry. War is genocidal. Anything less is suicidal.

      Like


    • on November 16, 2015 at 6:51 pm Greasy WIlliam

      Arbiter: White people don’t need a Jew controlled media to not care about Palestinians, or Iraqis or Iranians. Americans know that the US invaded Iraq and bombed it for years and they simply do not care about all the dead Iraqis. China and Russia do not have Jew controlled media and yet public opinion polls in those countries routinely show that the Russian and Chinese people don’t give a rats ass about what happens to any of the people in the middle east.

      This “if the Tsar only knew thing” is tiresome. Let it go.

      Like


      • I damn sure don’t give a rat’s ass about muzzies , yahooties,chinks,norks, taco benders, or you fill in the blanks. I give a damn about me and mine you, my kind and that only.

        Like


    • Damned good post.

      Like


    • If elections weren’t rigged I’d give your comment credence, but they are and even if they weren’t what politicians do behind their peoples’ backs can’t be blamed on the people who just want to live peaceful lives. Get out of my face with that muslim-apologist horsecrap.

      Like


    • Arbiter – this is the confusing part to me about the whole mess. Is there real worthwhile incentives for the U.S. to be so deeply involved in the middle east (because there sure is a whole host of disincentives)?

      It seems like the military cost is so high that the economic benefit doesn’t outweigh it. But perhaps I’m wrong about that. They have oil and so have an incentive to exploit, develop and sell it at some price. If less was spent military-wise, and such funds redirected elsewhere in the economy, could that alleviate potential for oil price shocks that may occur without military interventions (given that under such scenario the U.S. would still possess a mighty threat of military intervention, so there still would be an incentive for the arabs and friends not to get carried away with being dickheads about using the oil price as cudgel, especially when there then wouldn’t be an ideological reason for them to do so, because U.S. presence would be much more limited under such scenario).

      I do understand alot of U.S. policy in the middle east occurred within the context of the cold war. But why didn’t the U.S. just apologize to everyone after the Soviets were defeated (hey we didn’t blow everybody up, we didn’t let the Soviet’s either, middle east was at play for that dynamic, you guys didn’t fair too badly, we will leave you alone now, let’s now just be regular business partners oil-wise)? The Chinese seem able to do this sort of thing.

      Bush 1 probably should have just let Saddam Hussein continue to wreak his havoc instead of doing the first gulf war. Clearly the middle east has to sort out what is to be done about their rabid tendencies all by themselves. There would probably be even more blood spilled over the last 25 years in the middle east than there has been with the U.S. interventions, but at least it wouldnt’ be blood on the hands of the U.S. And this perspective isn’t cynical – it really is the way it is eventually going to turn out anyway – it is a middle east problem and they will have to solve it themselves even if it means much more killing. It is clear the west really can’t do too much about this. Ultimately they will have to discharge their rabid element themselves. The world will be better for it when they finally achieve this. Their Islamic ideology will have to be overhauled for the secular, for them to obtain the possibility of becoming real partners of the other nations at any rate. Holy wars in the middle east may be the only road for this to occur unfortunately. The west definitely should have no part of that.

      So if I am not too far off in my ponderings above, then does that mean it really just comes down to the Israel issue then? That was a big mistake picking sides like that. How is the U.S going to dis-entangle itself from that one? If they don’t this doesn’t look good at all.

      Arbiter – what do you think?

      Like


    • It starts with America sponsoring the Arab spring and trying to topple Assad. An ISIS like organization arising out of the attempt to topple Assad was predictable. You can find unclassified Pentagon reports discussing it. This being said, this isn’t really blow back for France bombing isis, it’s simply the result of westerners having a passive aggressive view of war. I agree with you that we should stop bombing them for idiotic short term goals with no strategic objectives, but the reality is that America needs to either mind terrorism or not, instead of minding some terrorism insofar as it serves its short term ends. AL Quaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan during the 80s or various factions in Libya and Syria now. EU countries shouldn’t have acted like vassals and backed all the north African dictators because the current migrant insanity was predictable. This being said, we need to learn that terrorism is on the rise because we don’t return the favor just like piracy is on the rise because we no longer flatten the coasts of pirate countries. What France should have done is broadcast that Raqqa won’t exist in a week and that it should be evacuated after which they should have carpet bombed it and say that the next time a terrorist attack against France happens, the warning won’t exist anymore. If you hide in civilian areas behind women and children, we will kill all of them too. This way their civilians would resist isis too because in this way, they acquiesce to isis because isis forces them to while we don’t force them to fight terrorists by bombing them along with the terrorists. War should be done only by those with the stomachs for it because doing war in this pussy way is worse for everyone involved. Outright nuking Saddam’s bunker would have cost less Iraqi lives than the idiocy America decided to do in Iraq.

      Like


    • nah. I don’t buy it. They hate us whether we ignore them or whether we intervene. We are the big shiny easy target for every loser on the planet. They see how easy we are to fuck up, with all our trust, altruism etc and they go for it. They’ve as much logic as a pedophile. And you’re a wanker

      Like


  46. Why are the biggest refugee-loving islam apologist liberals concentrated in cities where terror attacks are most likely to occur? Do they not even sense that threat? And the rednecks who would martel the muslims for them live in areas least likely to be targeted by muslims?

    This divide alone demands the amygdala theory be more heavily examined.

    Like


    • They’re sick. They’ve got nothing else going for them so they want the fame/infamy of being “one of those” sites. Gives them something to bitch about, FB/Twitter. They have zero purpose.

      Like


    • on November 17, 2015 at 4:09 am Mandingo Dindu

      Maybe subconscious nature?

      The rednecks are free to spout knowing well that there are no consequences to it.

      Similarly, the shitlibs are ass-kissing in order to be spared behadings.

      Like


  47. The only thing that will stop this cycle is for the Mideast’s oil supply to be exhausted.

    No oil, no money, No money, no terror can be sponsored. The region goes back to being the vast, inconsequential wasteland it was before 1900.

    Anyone read the works of James Kunstler? His non-fiction book “The Long Emergency” spells this out, as do the books in his “World Made By Hand” fiction trilogy.

    Like


  48. More and more, I realize that women should have never been given the vote. So many of these girls trying to side with Islam after recent events on fb. It’s hard for any culture to be able to out-alpha one that will just go and slaughter civilians randomly and brag about it. It makes me sick to my stomach watching them bend over backwards to fawn over how Islam is really a religion of peace after watching their own people get slaughtered like dogs. Coincidentally, the same girls are dating men covered with tattoos who look like they might be drug dealers.

    Like


    • Yeah I came to the same conclusion. Women will always vote with the feelz. Socialism is inevitable with women voting.

      If only men voted we wouldn’t have had a Dem president in 40 years.

      I also concluded that not every man should have the right to vote either. It should be earned by being a net tax payer and/or a veteran. If you are a net consumer from the system you cannot vote.

      The Romans and early Americans had the right idea.

      Like


      • ‘I also concluded that not every man should have the right to vote either. It should be earned by being a net tax payer and/or a veteran. If you are a net consumer from the system you cannot vote.”

        This.

        Just looking at the historical voting of white men is very telling. Starting with women’s suffrage and the system began its unraveling slowly, with a tipping point in the 60s.

        Like


      • The Romans and early Americans had a good idea about what citizenship is too. If you don’t want someone to marry your daughter, you shouldn’t want them to be a citizen of the same body politic. While I dislike slavery, this race mania started with the proto-cucks, the abolitionists and the first cucks, the idiots who gave blacks citizenship. At that point, multiracial societies would have became the norm as long as America was to be considered part of the same civilization and as long as America’s influence would have increased as it did. Rambling about the Frankfurt school misses the point. Exposing hypocrisies in the narrative isn’t the problem, the narrative is the problem. I imagine Americans prefer to ramble about the Frankfurt school because their ego is invested in the mythology about America. The moment you’re so moronic that you give your former slaves citizenship in a country founded on equality between its citizens, you end up where we are. Multiculturalism isn’t even an issue. The Austro-Hungarian empire had people of various cultures in it too, but it didn’t mandate equality between the cultures because equality is a leftist value spread by the two left wing revolutions in the west. Amusingly, there’s no real difference between blacks and Muslims when it comes to how different they are to whites, but apparently America isn’t multicultural.

        Like


  49. Europe is lost. It’s response to this has confirmed my fears. We are in the grasps of liberalism which is a suicide cult.

    Like


  50. on November 16, 2015 at 6:50 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

    The Consequences of Weaponized Empathy.

    http://thedeclination.com/the-consequences-of-weaponized-empathy/

    Like


  51. The UK hates free speech… unless it’s Muslims chanting “UK go to hell!”, in which case they get a full police escort.

    Like


  52. on November 16, 2015 at 11:00 pm Siegfried Kesselfieber

    From the horse´s mouth:

    Like


  53. http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    France is right and justified in doing. The big question will be what it is doing in it’s own homeland too. There is no question that the country is at war.

    Like


  54. Response:

    France Hits Back: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/france-hits-back/

    I am sorry whenever an innocent person is killed. I can’t imagine what the families of those who lost loved ones in France must be feeling. I also think that the way the situation has been framed is different than when people frame discussions about violence committed by white people against other white people. During WWII, France was nearly destroyed by the German Nazis (white people), but the US didn’t treat German people or German-Americans the way they treated Japanese Americans even. I wonder if this is a prediction for what’s to come for Syrian immigrants and Syrian-Americans…?

    During Oradour-sur-Glane, 642 French people were murdered by Nazis (other white people) by the way.

    Like


  55. on November 17, 2015 at 12:26 pm Experienced Father

    Compare and contrast French and Russian responses to Paris and the Airbus 321 bombing respectively.

    France send 10 tactical jets with 20 smart bombs.

    According to the wire services, Russia sent the following —

    As initially reported by Reuters, a US official has confirmed that Moscow has conducted a significant number of strikes in Syria using both sea-launched cruise missiles and long-range bombers.

    The Russian MoD said 25 long-range bombers took part in the raid: 5 x Tu-160s, 6 x Tu-95MS and 14 x Tu-22M3.

    According to one our sources who wishes to remain anonymous, the long-range bombers the Russian Air Force has used against ground targets in Syria early in the morning on Nov. 17 were Tu-22M Backfire strategic bombers.

    The aircraft were allegedly launched from Mozdok airbase, in Ossetia, where as many as 6 Tu-22s were spotted on a recent deployment.

    Remains of a KH-555 missile wreck were found in Syria: considered that this type of air-launched missile is mainly carried by Tu-95 Bear and Tu-160 Blackjack bombers (Tu-22s have been tested with the KH-555 but full integration is not completed or at least unknown), the long-range bombers that launched the attack on ground targets using those missiles may have been the Tu-95s or Tu-160s flying alongside the Backfires.

    The Tu-160 Blackjack is 30% larger than the American B-1 bomber.

    The Tu-95 is a turboprop equivalent of a B-52.

    The Tu-22MU Backfire is a supersonic medium bomber built to carry a pair of massive anti-ship missiles to kill Nimitz class carriers.

    Any one of these planes could carry as much payload as the 10 French tactical jets.

    For the Russians, collateral damage from these attacks is a feature, not a drawback.

    Like


    • Given that nobody gives a shit about international law anymore(Israel has been violating the fourth Geneva convention for decades, America violates the sovereign airspace of other countries etc; a side note, the French are violating international law with their bombing in Syria too), if I was Putin I’d flatten the entire city of Raqqa and the message will be that those who aid those who do terrorism against Russia either actively or indirectly by providing them with cover among civilians won’t have schools, won’t have mosques, won’t have houses. The hilarity is that given the rationale of the dune coon apologists that they do it because of colonialism and whatnot, I’d say I’m doing it because of terrorism and that it’s their fault.

      Like


  56. What I find comical about the whiny German politician is that that’s how the leftist jackboots either civilian or uniformed(any police man that imprisoned someone for hate speech) behaved to silence everyone else too. I wouldn’t hang them though, I’d just sell them to isis and ban them from ever setting foot in Europe again. Go live among those you suck up to.

    Like


  57. I am A Muslim and any one who have any thing agains Muslims is a less person for me and very much ignorant one too.
    why?
    Muslims are absolutely forbidden to kill innocent people regardless of what religion the other person follows. They’re instructed to show kindness to people who are harsh to them and Islam does not advocate barbaric attitude towards Non-Muslims. Rather, it teaches its followers to deal with Non-Muslims in a fair and kind manner.
    http://www.slguardian.org/2015/04/wester

    Western Wars Have Killed Four Million Muslims Since 1990

    by Nafeez Ahmed

    ( April 9, 2015, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) Last month, the Washington DC-based Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) released a landmark study concluding that the death toll from 10 years of the “War on Terror” since the 9/11 attacks is at least 1.3 million, and could be as high as 2 million.

    Like


  58. on November 18, 2015 at 9:56 am gunslingergregi

    yea it is just gonna be the french losing all rights so attack will fullfill intended purpose probably
    kill couple hundred people make everyone else bend over and take the anal probe

    Like


  59. on November 18, 2015 at 4:54 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

    Worth watching…

    Like


  60. “”He’s not my boyfriend!” she screamed in reply.

    Seconds later, she detonated a suicide vest, killing herself and causing the floor of the apartment to collapse.”

    Seems relevant…

    Like