The Great Men On Women’s Eager Submission To Tyranny

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.

George Orwell, 1984

Ol’ George was spot on with this observation. It’s [the current year] and you can’t toss a cat on a college campus without hitting an SJW hugbox humidified with the triggered tears of a bulbosity of bitterbitches.

Related, PA adds historical context to an anecdote recalled by social scientist Jonathan Haidt:

the auditorium full of high school girls doing the finger snapping routine at him. […] Haidt says it is (was) very disconcerting, worse than disconcerting actually – upsetting and a little scary even. Threatening.

The teenage girl’s simple minded absolutism and devotion to the master.

Accounts of Mao’s and Pol Pot’s atrocities consistently paint teenage female cadres as the most terrifying among the henchmen.

Women in their prime beautility (beauty + fertility), which coincides with the ages from 15 to 25 or thereabouts, are the most eager to submit to the reigning tyranny. CH writes a lot about the romantic desire of women, especially young women with a full load of eggs in their moist wicker baskets, to submit to a powerful alpha male. A lot of Game concepts proceed from this first principle governing the instinctive mating behavior of women.

But Le Chateau is more than a dating guide, and hopefully readers are beginning to see how Game and Seduction tie in with Culture and Society. The internal combustion forces that drive women to happily submit to intoxicating powerful men are the same forces that equally drive women to submit to the tyrannical Leftoid Orthodoxy, and to profess their undying love for the orthodoxy. (Even to make excuses for the orthodoxy, just as they do for their jerk boyfriends, when someone points out that maybe they’d be better off in the long-run with a different master.)

The only way to win White women back from their loyalty to antiracism tyranny is to present them with the allure of an even stronger, sexier tyranny. Mock antiracism without apology or backpedaling and you provide women a glimpse of your ZFG alpha rebel bona fides. Offer in the place of antiracism orthodoxy another, better, orthodoxy that speaks more clearly to the White woman’s future and, importantly, exhibits more conspicuously the greater good of your sexually irresistible self-entitlement.

Shitlibs and cucks will tremble and rage, while you, Master of Your Amused Domain, Knight of the Order of State Control, Wielder of the Shiv of Unified Purpose and Divided Vaj Flaps, reap the dual rewards of a rich sex life and a reborn nation once again administered for the benefit of your posterity.

Game can, indeed, save the White homelands.





Comments


  1. […] The Great Men On Women’s Eager Submission To Tyranny […]

    Like


  2. I think women value conformity a lot more because they depend much more on the group for survival.

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 2:09 pm Captain Obvious

      But, on average [NAWALT?!?], women lack the capacity to distinguish between Good and Evil – on average, the Hamster only seems to sense Dominance versus Submission.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:13 pm Captain Obvious

        Arguably, you could say the same of our Traitor class – the Quakers and the Unitardians and the Lutherans and the various Churchians and the Jesuits and the S0d0mites and the Academics: They seem to be extraordinarily malleable personalities, who dutifully obey whichever propaganda-du-jour is being spewed from the loudest and most persistent megaphone.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:14 pm Captain Obvious

        And of course we know who has controlled the Megaphone for the last century, and imposed a rigidly doctrinaire conformity upon the malleable and obedient:

        Like


    • Women care more about how they appear to others versus looking at the actual issue.

      When determining their beliefs

      Man: “What evidence is there for belief X vs belief Y?”

      Woman: “What will people think of me if I hold belief X vs belief Y?”

      Liked by 1 person


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:18 pm Captain Obvious

        If you ever cross paths with a chick who seems to be able to behave otherwise, then do not hesitate to put BUNS -> OVEN. Chicks who have even the slightest inner moral compass need to have their DNA replicated far and wide. Let the Quaker & Unitardian & Lutheran etc etc etc chicks go barren and disappear into extinction.

        Liked by 1 person


      • Part of why women only care about what people think of them regarding taking a position is that most of them aren’t willing and/or capable of engaging in learning about whatever is the issue at hand, then applying logic, reason; and buttressing it with deeper philosophic judgment. The easiest thing to do is say: “I care about humans in need, that’s why I support bringing in Syrian refugees.” You know, the whole virtue signaling meme.

        Liked by 1 person


      • CO…

        You give women too much credit when you weigh in their thoughts. Think of them as your property, and not just in the bed, and they’ll thank you for it. So will your own fortune.

        Liked by 1 person


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:40 pm Captain Obvious

        > “applying logic, reason” ——— Not DEductive logic, but below here I’m talking about some luck which I’ve had with INductive logic – the Empiricals – and their patterns. Pattern identification [and prophetic future prediction via understanding of the patterns] seems to be something which chicks can grok.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:42 pm Captain Obvious

        RP, I probably have no business in the Manosphere, because I’m fundamentally a Romanticist at heart, but I can’t shake that nagging feeling that NAWALT. Some chicks are just better than others – maybe not a whole lot better – but enough that you can work with it.

        Like


      • CO: No question about it.

        And by better, I hope you mean they are virgins.

        Their thoughts still don’t count. They are all just as malleable – some more than others – virgins more than sluts… but throw them an ounce of that exquisite masculine leadership, and witness more than the sight of panties dropping. Witness the sweet sound of a girl changing her life for you.

        The more you objectify her, the better she’ll behave.

        Like


      • the system is “antiracist” now. Only REAL collapse will change it. Game ain’t gonna do jack shit.

        Oh, so let’s have everyone gaming…then nobody’s gaming.

        Sluts, virgins…all the same. Anyone can bind a virgin. You have to peel them off of you with a spatula because their oneitis is incredibly strong. If you can make a slut your bitch well you know you did somethin others failed at. I had a prouder moment when the girl who stopped counting at 37 txtd me “I wanted to say all this in front of you because I was afraid I’d start crying like I am now…” than when one of the virgins I recently banged really wanted to be my gf.

        Like


      • CO, not all women are like that. My wife isn’t and my daughter won’t be. But all desire a leader and we have failed our boys by not teaching them that and expecting it of them as we used to. It’s kind of like spanking children so they know you care.

        Like


      • @Trav777 then shame on you for shitting on their notions of what good and decent is. That makes you part of the problem. Stick to cut loaves.

        Like


  3. on November 30, 2015 at 2:08 pm Diveersity Heretic

    In 1984, George Orwell also said (through the protagonist Winston Smith), that if there is hope it lies in the proles [proletariat]. Does the white working class still have within it the moral force to overthrow the Party? (Perhaps Orwell would today equate the Party with the Cathedral.) Or was James Burnham right in The Managerial Revolution that the industrial proletariat just doesn’t have the capability to run things. I wish I kew!! Where will our leader come from?

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 2:23 pm Captain Obvious

      DH, sometimes the good guys lose. They sure did get slaughtered at Pickett’s Charge. Heck, it took a 1000 years [circa 450AD to 1450AD] to rebuild what was lost when Rome went bad. In addition to plenty of Alpha Sh!tlord Dark Triad ZFG, we sure could use a little good luck – maybe even the occasional Divine Intervention here and there.

      Like


    • The proles are too dim witted to think but as Trump has shown, they can be whipped into a frenzy.

      The Feds undermining of the white mobs and criminal underclass led to losing the streets and neighborhoods. I doubt this was an accident.

      Whites have no “boots on the ground”. Instead of looking for ways to retake lost territory, they flee further into the sticks like cowards. This will not work.

      Refugee centers in Sweden and Germany are burning while planned sites are covered in pigs heads. The government and their female enablers can do nothing but whine about it as winter approaches…

      Like


    • The Negro.

      Like


  4. I think women are (on average) just inherently uncritical and (therefore) conformist, laregely because the alternative, as feminism has shown, is unviable. Uncriticality in women has been evolutionarily adaptive, in facilitating patriarchy, which is itself evolutionarily adaptive. (Now there’s some true vile heresy.) This applies especially to fashion trends of all sorts, including language and culture. I have not exactly conducted a scientific study, but it seems that the shout down drama queens on campus these days are indeed disproportionately queens, not kings. The more female-dominated colleges become, the more intolerant of fashion-dissent, and the more seeking of glorified pretexts for outrage, they become.

    Like


    • when there is chaos and disorder women are little more than cattle. they know this in their hindbrains, and so always have an ear tuned to wherever the wind appears to blow.

      whatever the next regime is, they want to ensure they’re within its good graces

      Like


      • Women can’t afford courage or loyalty if their tribe loses. The men are killed, the women are taken. Brave, loyal women die with their men. Fickle, conniving hussies thrive.

        Like


  5. I couldn’t agree more with the solution.

    I have railing in this fashion for years. I have little whimpers of negative feed back occasionally but nothing to worry about. I always point out that almost every single mudshark/brownie lover/multicultural whore tries to come back to lily white land because they end up with an STD or get tired of getting played.

    When I mention those elements almost every single girl I know can’t deny those facts because it has either happened to them or a friend. Then I cast away the shank. This man has no time for skanks and I let them know…

    Like


  6. A lot of the reason women submit to the tyranny is, as long as they are pushing its agendas, they are not getting judged for their less than womanly behaviors.

    Like


    • vicky,

      My buttox are smooth…
      My buttox are round..
      My buttox will soon make..
      An incredible sound!!

      When the billowing cumulonimbus of gas is released, it will be dense and steamy..

      It will then be your privilege and honor to….

      …(wait for it, wait for it)….

      Detox my Buttox.

      -GB

      Like


      • I’m so glad this golden nugget of an offer dropped in my lap lol

        GB, I wasn’t defending women running to the arms of Leftist Tyranny only explaining why many do. Liberalism, home of feminism (non traditional values, anti-religion, slutdom, etc.) is a place where girls can do as they please and not feel judged, and in fact…praised.

        That aside, you got some good rhyme game going there 😉

        Like


    • possible but i doubt they are thinking that far ahead, most are driven by feelings. and then they are begged just like a limp-noodle ex-boyfriend “come back we’ll be good to you” and their reaction is exactly as in romance– unpitying revulsion

      i think this post is one of the most important posts on ch in ages, and it is more or less policy-irrelevent. it is just the prescription for guiding women back to a better nation

      Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 6:47 pm Diversity Is Good

      Women are totally afraid of being judged as being different than their herd, whether the herd is a yoga studio or a book club or something else. Plus, vicky, the tyranny gives women access to a lot of cock for “free” until they get close to the Wall, and then they wind up paying after all.

      Like


    • jeezus, was it rationalmale or someone ALREADY did a massive evopscyh article on women and knuckling to the power.

      That’s what they DO, ok? They’re MADE for it. Watch it in real time in the animal kingdom. Might IS right for them.

      A chick could see you and think…no, FEEL, that you’re ugly and then find out you’re famous and FEEL you were the hottest guy on the fuckin planet, in the same minute! And she would NOT notice ANY internal dissonance or contradiction. They aren’t operating on logic.

      Women HAVE to stay conformist because they are totally dependent upon the ingroup for their own and offspring survival. They chase the best DNA. The men decide who will mate then the women give them their pussies.

      Like


    • A lot of the reason women submit to side with the tyranny superlative authority = alpha is, as long as they are pushing pushed ahead of everyone else by its agendas, they are not getting judged rewarded for their less than womanly behaviors according to their womanly inferiority and social value necessarily less than a man’s.

      Female dependency is the norm. Faux female dependency as a weapon is a luxury of immediate female security provided by a large pool of emasculated men.

      Ditto the comment by trav777.

      This comment is not for the women, who can’t be rational, but for the few men who can. Stop appealing to women’s logic, guys. It is a ruse when she ‘listens’.

      Like


  7. Up until now, they have not had much choice in brands of tyranny. I expect that as the red-pill light dawns, many disparate groups will rush to market hoping to fill a niche, so to speak.

    Like


  8. Speaking of the Maoists, the Red Guard is an illuminating case. Mao’s “Great Leap Forward” had been a gigantic failure, where people were forced to hand over everything made of metal in their homes, including pots and pans, to smelt steel. This failed, as anyone with any knowledge of smelting could have foretold. What you don’t hear about this is that they were specifically focused on making weapons to invade Taiwan, and they would have maybe two uneven cannon from a village and declare it a success.

    People starved. The tools were gone and the harvests were rotting in the fields. Communists aiming for a measure of realism came to make more of the decisions in the party. But no one dared criticize Mao directly.

    Mao then decided to make a comeback. He couldn’t throw out his opponents in government, not by himself, so he decided to build up a movement to threaten them with. That is why he started the Red Guard – to take power through terror when his experiments had failed.

    Just like SJWs are promoted everywhere today to silence critics of the failed multicultural experiment.

    It was always the worst students who joined the Red Guard. The students who didn’t want to study. They now got the power to terrorize the teachers and the students who worked hard, the students from better homes. This is something you will never hear about the Cultural Revolution. Just like the cadres of communists in the West consist of the students who hate studying, and who hate the fact that they have to work for a living instead of being coddled like when they were children.

    The stories from the Cultural Revolution are so insane that most people would have a hard time imagining that such a thing could happen. Red Guardists even forced their own parents to “confess their crimes” in public, standing on public podiums with their heads hanging in shame.

    Sounds extreme. But then you see a leftist who says on Twitter that “I would spit in my mother’s face if she was a racist”.

    SJWs are Red Guard wannabes, pushing their own Cultural Revolution. If they could they would make it just as extreme, invading hospitals, teacher’s lounges, people’s homes, to steal, to vandalize, to beat and mutilate those they hate.

    Coincidentally the Red Guardists hated beauty. The Red Guard women tied up their breasts to make their chests as flat as possible. There would be no makeup. Having flowers in your garden was capitalist materialism. Stocky women with broad, plain peasant faces were the ideal. Today’s feminists would have felt right at home.

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 2:31 pm Captain Obvious

      > “SJWs are Red Guard wannabes…” But why do they want to be? And why do we not want to be? Obviously Our Enemies spotted this weakness in a certain portion of Our population, and have been exploiting this weakness for more than a century now. And as CH hints in his essay, their methods are 100% psychological in nature – very early on, their psychiatrists pinpointed this weakness, and they have been psychologically conditioning the weakness to work for their benefit since forever.

      Like


    • Red Guard in the Cultural Revolution. Seeing this picture you’ll feel inspired to sing the old Guard song, Mother, I Want To Go To The Mountain And Harden Myself With Physical Labor.

      An ex-Guardist said that they were so full of hatred toward the West, that if she had seen a White person at that time she would have shot him instantly. We aren’t quite there yet, but give it time.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:34 pm Captain Obvious

        Arbiter, there has to be a genetic component to this sh!znat. The terrifying thing is that the genetic antidote appears to be shockingly rare in the species – having only flourished very briefly in Athens and Rome and Runnymede and Philadelphia.

        Like


      • “Athens and Rome and Runnymede and Philadelphia.”

        And now here.

        Like


      • I should add how the Cultural Revolution ended: in disgust. The Red Guard became more and more insane, even fighting each other in factions that all claimed to be the only true Maoists. They tried to take on the army and failed. By that time Mao had reclaimed power over the government and didn’t need the Guardists; and also, his wife’s involvement had made her think she had some power independently of Mao. He ended the movement by sending many of them to work at farms in order to separate them.

        The economy had not improved, there was no Land of Plenty, and fanatic studies of Mao quotes and party history instead of mathematics had not opened a bright new door. People were poor. They were hungry and exhausted. Despite the massive oppression they started muttering among themselves.

        They were not allowed to criticize communism, so they criticized the Red Guard for being insufficiently communist. They simply took the communist ideals and turned them in such a way that the Red Guard seemed not to fit. (One of the many lessons in how any ideology can be said to stand for any given thing, if the speaker so wishes.)

        This is similar to how people criticize the Left for not caring about the workers, for not being democratic enough (even though their populism seems to be democracy’s end station), for being “the real racists”. They use the enemy’s paradigm to criticize the enemy.

        In the end, anyone who had been a Maoist would be sneered at. Families slowly picked up the pieces of ordinary family life and tried to get by. The end of the Cultural Revolution was the end of belief in communism, and absent any other belief the country became cynical. Cold. Each looking out for himself became the new thinking, which prevails to this day.

        The same happened in other communist countries, like Cambodia. A Western journalist told the story of how a girl fell from a tree and cracked her skull against the pavement. It was a busy street, but people just kept walking. Only the Westerner rushed to help.

        Like


    • Very insightful, especially the bit about the worst students becoming Red Guards.

      Like


    • Mao’s evil is never mentioned in this nazi obsessed Eskimo run culture. Even Warhol ‘s portrait of Mao is deemed cool. Available to buy in the eskimo run Corcoran Gallery in DC.

      Like


      • Mao was truly a psychopath, and he killed twenty million people, making him second only to Stalin in mass killings. But all you’ll hear about is “Six million!”.

        Mao betrayed other communist generals. When he had his forces on one side of a mountain, and another general was on the other side fighting the Japanese, he held back his forces to make sure that general would be killed.

        For a long time Mao refrained from fighting the Japanese that invaded in 1938. The communists let the nationalist Kuomintang, led by Chiang Kai-Shek, fight, even though holding back meant more suffering for the people. This is typical for communists – they cared nothing about the people, and preferred to see the country burn instead of help out. Just like communists in Indochina betrayed the leaders of nationalist and Buddhist resistance group to the French, or killed them themselves. This weakened the rebellion by destroying well-established groups, but it meant that the communists were the only place young Vietnamese men could go if they wanted to fight the French, and that’s all they cared about.

        When other communist generals started fighting the Japanese Mao still held back. But afterward he would claim that he was the one who came up with the idea to cooperate with the KMT against the Japanese.

        Mao’s “Long March” through warlord territory was a disaster, where more than 90 percent of the people he led died. It only served to put Mao in safety in a safe zone established by other communists, and that’s what he cared about. On the road he ditched his wife and got a new one, imprisoning the old one in a mental hospital.

        Mao pretended to be proletarian but immediately took up residence in the emperor’s palace when Beijing was taken. He ordered his men to kidnap peasant girls from the nearby villages, which he raped. He raped thousands. He had syphilis and he gave them syphilis, but he didn’t care. He was a psychopath.

        His personal physician wrote about an episode when they were watching a circus. A female acrobat fell from high in the air and broke several bones, screaming in agony. The whole tent was silent – except Mao. He sat there in the front row, ignoring the girl who was close to death, and just talked and laughed with an aide.

        A true communist, imprisoning the country’s population and using them as slaves.

        Like


  9. on November 30, 2015 at 2:21 pm The Spirit Within

    In a free society, that tyranny is expressed in other ways.

    Like


    • Shut up, faggot.

      Faggot within rape!

      Like


    • How the SJW TSW must hate seeing a picture with only White women. So of course he must find a negative angle. Anything for the Agenda. “They’re using cellphones for the purpose of making this picture, oh no!” It’s leftists like TSW who promote a society where laziness and self-admiration is the order of the day, so it’s funny to see him try to use that angle.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:58 pm The Spirit Within

        Yeah man, you should’ve seen how furious I was on Thanksgiving Day, sitting around the dinner table with the eleven other white members of my white working-class family, all with full-time jobs or retired on pensions. Actually, we would’ve been thirteen, but two of them couldn’t make it because they were too busy working holiday shifts at their cultural marxist retail jobs. In fact, between the Packers and the Cowboys games, I barely found five minutes to brainstorm new ways of undermining the Western family construct.

        /sarcasm

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:29 pm Captain Obvious

        /!(sarcasm)

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:35 pm The Spirit Within

        Cappy, how many times have you jacked off to that picture?

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:46 pm Captain Obvious

        Mordecai, she ain’t my Mameshi .

        Like


      • What does TSW stand for? I’ve looked all over.

        Like


      • TSW= The Spirit Within.

        TheSpiritWithin is most likely eskimo, but pretends he isn’t.

        Just like the poster Whiskey who claimed to be Scots-Irish. Remember him?

        Like


      • CO

        Andrea Porkin–the face that sunk a million dicks.

        Like


  10. Don’t forget that women, as the weaker sex, are constantly reminded, even in their denial, that they have no power beyond what a man grants them. Then when they gain power over men, they abuse it to the max, like a pauper who wins the lottery—-sure enough to make sure they become bankrupt.

    History is destiny rape!

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 2:34 pm Captain Obvious

      God I wanna NAWALT on some of this pessimism – there has to be a bell curve with at least a very small non-zero standard deviation to it – it can’t just be a frigging “Delta” function.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:37 pm gunslingergregi

        well my whitegirlfriend went batshit and got me out of jail an hour after putting me in he he he
        if that makes ya feel better
        took responsibility for her own actions
        she could of not done that and let me rot
        she was mad as fuck at me for punishing her on thanksgiving by not letting her come so she was able to calm down and think a little logically and do the right thing within an hour

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:48 pm Captain Obvious

        “Come” as in “Oh my God, I’m cumming I’m cumming I’m CUMMING!!!”???

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 4:12 pm gunslingergregi

        naa i let her get dressed up to the 9’s to go eat dinner
        then dropped her off and drove away for a punishment
        for being a fuckup previous

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 4:16 pm gunslingergregi

        that is how you test a woman to see if she passes and can be relied on to submit to your direction and authority
        i cancelled the marriage ceremony with my wife she just accepted it as i knew best
        i think all men should plan the wedding and then cancel
        then watch the womans reaction
        dont break up just say it is not the time
        it seemed to be a good indicator of just how serious my wife took me
        she had no problem with it
        we got married the next time

        Like


  11. Your Greek alphabet soup “alpha cure” won’t work, just make things worse.

    Eric Hoffer on women: “And what excellent material are women for the building of a totalitarian society! Their capacity for blind faith, self-sacrifice, leader worship, and snooping makes them ideal true believers. What a picture: an elite of intellectuals served and guarded by an army of amazons.”

    You might want to look up what St. Paul wrote about women: they should have no authority over men.

    Like


  12. Women perceive Alpha as Passionate + Dynamic + Authentic and will be led by anyone who can demonstrate these traits, regardless of ideology.

    What we see today is the manifestation of these traits so zealously employed over the last 40 years by the left (radical leftist goes together right?) to the point where women are now even following other women (Hillary, etc.) despite that doing so leads to oblivion for them as a species (abortion, go grrl, leanin careerism, spoiled eggz, lesbianism etc.). A multi decade failed shit test…

    The men of the right, if they want a chance to lead women again, need to remember that these traits are solely communicated to women via emotionemotion is the only truth to a woman – and abandon all LOGIC while doing so.

    And so we have Game to the rescue… and yet the deniers and haters will still cuck themselves in spite, LOL!

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 2:39 pm Captain Obvious

      > “and abandon all LOGIC while doing so” ——— I dunno. I’ve had a lot of luck pointing out the PATTERN to chicks – when the PATTERN keeps replicating itself, chicks sense at least the power of the PATTERN, and of the PATTERN-Whisperer who teaches them about the PATTERN. So the power of Empiricals [if not Deductives] seems to impress the chicks.

      Like


      • Cap, you’ve got a pretty good read on women from what I can tell.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:42 pm Captain Obvious

        On a similar note, I’ve had a lot of luck with analyzing the group psychology of a chick’s social circle or work environment for her, and helping her to navigate around the all deviant personalities with whom she is forced to interact. And I’ve also had a ton of luck with “Game” Game – walking chicks through the psychology of how I’m gonna Game them, and then actually Gaming them [as I had predicted] through to the soaking wet undies and what follows.

        Like


      • Think about whether you were passionately and dynamical and authentically conveying your points Cap’n… I suspect from your many, many zealous posts that you were.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:45 pm Captain Obvious

        Vicky, from what I’ve seen, chicks [at least the NAWALT ones] simply LOVE to learn about all of this sh!znat – you can even start teaching them about how YKW are manipulating everything in the TV shows and the commercials and the product placements and the newscasts and whatnot.

        Like


      • Cap, I am interested in the topics CH posts both political and even gaming, which I believe do tie in to the political/cultural aspect. I’m all for men being men. I may not agree with everything in the comments but most commenters here are highly intelligent. It’s impressive. Some of you know women extremely well. Your average guy could learn a lot from this blog.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 2:48 pm Captain Obvious

        > “passionately and dynamical and authentically” ——— You know, I hadn’t thought about that angle. But I guess if you can’t get passionate and dynamic and authentic about the looming Death of the White Race and Western Civilization and Chr!stianity, then what can you get excited about? There are only so many martinis and white russians and pina coladas which you can drink while sitting poolside, before you get cirrhosis of the liver…

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:04 pm Captain Obvious

        Have you ever PASSIONATELY tried to get a chick interested in Bach or Beethoven or Brahms? You ain’t even gonna get 1-in-a-hundred to show some perk up and show some interest – you’ll be lucky if you get one hit in a thousand. And you can completely forget about Bruckner – ain’t no chick in the entire history of the human species ever gonna show any interest in Bruckner. Fuhgeddaboudit.

        Like


      • If you show a passionate interest in Bach or Brahms or Wagner, dismiss all her poo-pooing about said composers, then she too will be as passionate, if not more.

        If she doesn’t, she doesn’t.

        I’ve seen firsthand women who follow their men’s passions. Not many examples, but I have seen them. And yes, the girls were God-fearing women.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:15 pm Captain Obvious

        Chicks probably cannot understand most Deductives, but I’m coming to believe that chicks can understand the Inductives – the Empiricals – and the persistent PATTERNS which the Empiricals certify [and then predict as you head off into the future]. Try it in a PUA Sh!tlord fashion: “I’ll bet you right now that that murderer is a Ch!mpanzee, and if I’m right, then you’re gonna wear your psychedelic mini-skirt with no panties on Friday night when I take you to Spago.”

        Like


      • What’s attractive to a woman IS a man’s passions.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:20 pm Captain Obvious

        MT, I’ve dated plenty of chicks who were frigging music majors in college, and they simply do not grok music the way that guys do. I think you’d have a heckuva lot better luck getting them passionate about Degas paintings of ballerinas or Singer Sargent paintings of mothers with children. Maybe also poetry – MAYBE – but even there, chicks don’t read anymore [especially not with the rise of instagram and snapchat].

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:24 pm Captain Obvious

        Vicky, you seem to be agreeing with Sentient and MT, in that a chick will follow a passionate man whether his passions are for Good or for Evil. Which, sadly, is largely CH’s point in this essay. But the White Knight in me is trying to envision actually SAVING these chicks – helping to teach them how to spot the manipulations and the manipulators. I dunno – maybe I’m being delusional…

        Like


      • Cap, what I was implying is that women are moved by men with passions. That could mean art, music, literature, etc. A broken women, one not raised by a positive alpha male father or with a moral upbringing will not think logically about whether said man’s passions are good or evil. This is why you see girls being taken down the path of destruction by bad men. I don’t disagree with your method at all about trying to save these girls about how to spot these manipulators. And if anyone could do this masterfully it would be you.

        Like


      • CO, I hear you loud and clear, but what if the girl does not want to be saved? (Rhetorical, but think about it.)

        From the sound of those girls you mentioned, they chose music as their major cause it was “easy”…i.e. no math, science, etc. Which is odd, since music, especially classical, is all math.

        There’s a leggy blonde that works here. She majored in the cello, which means she like big wood betwixt her legs. She’s a wannabe actress that just got engaged so it’s time for me to see how devoted she is.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:47 pm gunslingergregi

        But the White Knight in me is trying to envision actually SAVING these chicks – helping to teach them how to spot the manipulations and the manipulators. I dunno – maybe I’m being delusional…”””””””

        they might just be what saves you

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 3:54 pm Captain Obvious

        MT – that’s precisely it – Daddy got her a $25,000 cello, and the $75/hr once-a-week lessons, and she did the prim and proper and acceptable thing and got a BA in schmaltz. But does she get a chill down her spine when Bruckner comes on the classical channel? LOL’ed.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 4:01 pm Captain Obvious

        BTW, I love Dvorak to death, but that Witches of Eastwick clip shows precisely what people are talking about as regards a woman following the MAN’S passions…

        Like


      • gunny, I love your Yoda-like wisdom. That’s some prime truth right there.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 4:26 pm gunslingergregi

        yea captain way to go going after some chicks with degrees
        not a bunz oven woman who didn’t swallow the coolaid and can live off the land
        both my loves in this world can survive a shtf situation on their own
        wtf is going on did noone plan for anything

        Like


      • lolzlzlozlz Oh jeez, Cap’n, memories.

        We sat in bed while I made my Ex listen to Bruckner’s Fourth one time. I don’t even know why. I mean, I would’ve been the FIRST person to tell you that you can’t start a Classical newbie on BRUCKNER. Why on earth I went with Bruckner I just don’t know– some sort of deep end of the pool hubris I guess, or maybe I just wanted to hear it at that moment.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 6:10 pm gunslingergregi

        Captain Obvious

        Chicks probably cannot understand most Deductives, but I’m coming to believe that chicks can understand the Inductives – the Empiricals – and the persistent PATTERNS which the Empiricals certify [and then predict as you head off into the future]. Try it in a PUA Sh!tlord fashion: “I’ll bet you right now that that murderer is a Ch!mpanzee, and if I’m right, then you’re gonna wear your psychedelic mini-skirt with no panties on Friday night when I take you to Spago.”
        ”””””””””””””””’

        so if the patterns are so good why aren’t the drugs able to be stopped
        or does it only work on white men

        Like


      • “This is why you see girls being taken down the path of destruction by bad men.”

        LOL, Vicki I see an awful lot of women do that themselves. They don’t need a man to do it for them.

        Like


      • Putin – of course not. My poor wording perhaps. As adults we are all responsible for our own choices. My point was that the women were allowing their emotions to lead their poor choices.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 6:58 pm numbers racket

        mendozatorres, yuri bezmanov’s ‘subversion’ lecture mentions that the willingness of the subverted is essential.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 7:20 pm gunslingergregi

        Putin

        “This is why you see girls being taken down the path of destruction by bad men.”

        LOL, Vicki I see an awful lot of women do that themselves. They don’t need a man to do it for them.
        ””””””””

        yea how many chicks tried to get me to deal drugs be a pimp or carry a package for 3 grand
        said no
        or trying to use me to take revenge on someone
        they are definetly eve
        and holding frame and showing them the light is the only way to deal with em or you get fucked up
        when they see robbing people for 20 bucks is not the way to live they come over to your side eventually through 8 million regresses
        then you might win some of their soul back
        but yea shit not something ya want to try to do to have a life
        the men are the ones who usually foot the bill for the crap
        the woman are the ones with more time to refine there machavelian craft and more experience

        Like


      • Mendoza:

        “If you show a passionate interest in Bach or Brahms or Wagner, dismiss all her poo-pooing about said composers, then she too will be as passionate, if not more. ”

        It’s that emotional connection thingy that women like.

        Like


  13. on November 30, 2015 at 2:58 pm TastaOrelletes

    And what excellent material are women for building a totalitarian society! Their capacity for blind faith, self-sacrifice, leader worship and snooping makes them ideal true believers. What a picture: an elite of intellectuals served and guarded by an army of amazons. ~ Eric Hoffer, Working and Thinking on the Waterfront.

    Like


  14. Women in their prime beautility (beauty + fertility), which coincides with the ages from 15 to 25 or thereabouts, are the most eager to submit to the reigning tyranny. CH writes a lot about the romantic desire of women, especially young women with a full load of eggs in their moist wicker baskets, to submit to a powerful alpha male. A lot of Game concepts proceed from this first principle governing the instinctive mating behavior of women.

    I’ll also point out that women, especially the hotter ones, are more pliable about their political viewpoints, especially when the reigning orthodox tyranny is presided over by a bunch of ugly feminists and disgusting faggoty manboobs and they run up against one of Trump’s sons (h/t prez butt naked). I’ve seen it happen before. Unsurprising, really.

    It’s actually the male SJWs who are more dangerous than the females. The women’s bark is far worse than their bite. I guess male feminists, being androgynous, act like bitchy backstabbing women holding grudges.

    Like


  15. Beautility = Beauty + Utility (Fertility). What use are women, compared to men, if fertility is not accounted?

    Like


  16. “Is it any wonder that so many high-achieving young women, despite all the happy talk about their academic success, find themselves in the early stages of their careers in chronic uncertainty or anxiety about their prospects for an emotionally fulfilled private life? When an educated culture routinely denigrates masculinity and manhood, then women will be perpetually stuck with boys, who have no incentive to mature or to honor their commitments. And without strong men as models to either embrace or (for dissident lesbians) to resist, women will never attain a centered and profound sense of themselves as women.

    From my long observation, which predates the sexual revolution, this remains a serious problem afflicting Anglo-American society, with its Puritan residue. In France, Italy, Spain, Latin America and Brazil, in contrast, many ambitious professional women seem to have found a formula for asserting power and authority in the workplace while still projecting sexual allure and even glamour. This is the true feminine mystique, which cannot be taught but flows from an instinctive recognition of sexual differences. In today’s punitive atmosphere of sentimental propaganda about gender, the sexual imagination has understandably fled into the alternate world of online pornography, where the rude but exhilarating forces of primitive nature rollick unconstrained by religious or feminist moralism.

    “. . . After the next inevitable apocalypse, men will be desperately needed again! Oh, sure, there will be the odd gun-toting Amazonian survivalist gal, who can rustle game out of the bush and feed her flock, but most women and children will be expecting men to scrounge for food and water and to defend the home turf. Indeed, men are absolutely indispensable right now, invisible as it is to most feminists, who seem blind to the infrastructure that makes their own work lives possible. It is overwhelmingly men who do the dirty, dangerous work of building roads, pouring concrete, laying bricks, tarring roofs, hanging electric wires, excavating natural gas and sewage lines, cutting and clearing trees, and bulldozing the landscape for housing developments. It is men who heft and weld the giant steel beams that frame our office buildings, and it is men who do the hair-raising work of insetting and sealing the finely tempered plate-glass windows of skyscrapers 50 stories tall.

    Pretty interesting since the author of this screed is Camille Paglia, lesbian thorn in the feminist’s arse.

    Like


  17. How would one respond to a heartfelt text apology from a girl who had been the recipient of a freeze out as punishment for bad behavior?

    Like


    • I should think as casually as possible. “No sweat” followed by a question completely off topic “Hey… what was the name of that [insert thing]?”

      Like


      • Saying “No sweat” seems like you’re saying the transgression is acceptable. I’d ask for a bj to make up.

        Like


      • Yes – just move on as if it didn’t happen, Don’t “reward” the apology, that is just to make herself feel better. Just pick things back up and move forward, if you are of the mind to that is.

        Like


    • always act like you’ve been there before.

      If you love her, tell her thanks and she means a lot to you and don’t do it again.

      If you don’t, then just say np and lol it off.

      Like


    • bring da movies?

      Like


  18. Its an interesting theory. If its pure submission, the Donald will no doubt philosophically father a generation of beautiful young nationalists. There’s probably more at play though. As someone said above, conformity, they’ll fall in line when their peers do.

    But also status…as long as poz controls the levers of media, academia, Hollywood it will continue to be fashionable for young girls to be liberal and thumb their button noses at Trump supporters.

    If the ((media)) fights every step of the way, I have doubts about a trumpening’s ability to convert any large numbers of women. But control the status signals a girl sees in her iphone, and you can have the entire lot of them preaching nationalist patriarchy in a week.

    Like


    • Trump already has strong support among women. Back in September 33 percent of Republican women supported him, more than the men at the time. 52 percent of GOP women said that illegal aliens was an “extremely important” issue, with only 45 percent of GOP men saying the same.

      On the other hand, on November 16 his support among GOP women had slipped to 25 percent, so it goes up and down apparently. The two groups he had lost support among then were women and regular churchgoers, the latter supporting Ben Carson like the dumb sheep they are: actively bringing in Latino, African and Arab immigrants, worshiping Jews in Israel, and voting for a Negro. Universalist beliefs gotta go.

      Like


  19. “The only way to win White women back from their loyalty to antiracism tyranny is to present them with the allure of an even stronger, sexier tyranny.”

    I visited a meeting in Stockholm about Feminism in Islam. Mostly white women in their early twenties listening to middle eastern and african muslims speaking about how there’s really no big difference between the early Islam of Mohammed as found in the Hadiths and modern feminism. Eager girls took notes and didn’t seem to find anything peculiar about the whole situation even though the news at that time were mostly about the latest beheadings and mass rapes performed of that other adherent to early Islam, the Islamic State. That’s a strong tyranny for you to tame the shrew.

    Like


  20. This seems appropriate:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

    Although I swear as recently as 5 years ago, it was shown that women were more obedient and if they were anonymous more sadistic than men, I can’t find that anymore.

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 6:53 pm Diversity Is Good

      Wikipedia entries are routinely edited especially for anything that doesn’t fit the Narrative. So you are probably right, and a deeper search into the Milgram experiments might be a good idea.

      Like


  21. Young women are especially obedient to feminist programming. My attempts to link my young ladie’s advice essay on women’s career and bridal blogs have been rebuffed.

    This feminist has a “Bullish” advice blog for women, complete with a unicorn-bull icon. They know that a bull is male, right? Her sister publication “A Practical Wedding” is chock full of feminist advice for women planning their wedding day.

    http://www.getbullish.com/the-best-of-bullish

    Sadly could not get any traction from them towards download traffic to my book, offered free today only on Amazon. See employmentgame.wordpress.com for your free copy.

    Marketing through blogs fragments the mental state. I may have to set up a “twitter” account.

    Like


  22. on November 30, 2015 at 3:58 pm Wrong Side of History

    Antiracism can only take hold amongst a low T male population. Rescuing masculinity should be the first priority of the reactosphere.

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 5:57 pm gunslingergregi

      the racists as called seem to be the ones that can get along with everyone else
      while the other moved into walled cities to get away from them for most part

      Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 5:59 pm gunslingergregi

      note every pic of college people seperated in groups by race

      Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 8:29 pm gunslingergregi

      the problem with consistantly teaching equal oppotunity or diversity is you teach people to think about race more than they might if they never had those classes
      i didn’t realize minorities and woman had more benefits than i did or think about it till the army equal opportunity and those type classes i had to go to
      so there is institutionalized racism in regards to whites after you take those classes and look around you realize wtf
      but there is not necesarily instiutionalized racism vs blacks
      being white male has a negative value that can be quantified
      so pointing out the diferences in treatment may be a logical flow from those programs that in fact insititutionalize those diferences
      so yea people are gonna talk abuot how the shit is diferent because it is

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 8:58 pm gunslingergregi

        then my asian friend was pissed at a black dude who got into a good school
        and he had higher test score but then i had higher test scores than my asian friend or anyone in my graduating class
        talk about uncomfortable i didn’t say anything
        but years later that same asian friend was mad i pointed out that blacks were getting some kind of advantage and doesn’t talk anymore
        rofl
        i was third in line with the highest score and didn’t even go to college he he he
        his brother and sister became doctors who scored lower than him
        its a sick joke that there aren’t white supremacists but whites tend to live their lives under the unfairness and keep pointing it out and what happens i don’t know it just gets worse
        we keep being ghandi
        and it doesn’t get better
        maybe one day

        Like


  23. “Every woman adores a Fascist”

    — Sylvia Plath

    Like


  24. Speaking of women:



    Like


  25. The media created dreams of a 14 year old German girl. When we laugh at North Koreans wailing about the death of their Living God, we really shouldn’t be laughing at all, we should see that as a mirror back on our society.

    Like


    • This so-called German girl looks nothing so much as some yenta in training, and dollars to donuts, there are some trolling fucks behind the making of this video.

      The little kikette could barely keep a straight face.

      Like


    • que porra essa???!?

      Like


  26. I read the link to the Jonathan Haidt article with interest, and now I realise where much of the hackneyed left wing orthodoxy I’ve heard parroted by former teachers, work colleagues, and the media, originates….. Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School.

    It’s endemic, scarier stil the people spouting that nonsense don’t even realise where it comes from, like we’ve been brain washed en-masse.

    Like


  27. We’re all wrong. Men’s and women’s brains are the same:

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28582-scans-prove-theres-no-such-thing-as-a-male-or-female-brain/

    This study will be read as proof in every college sociology, anthropology and gender studies class in the country.

    Wasn’t there a study that said the exact opposite out a few months ago?

    Like


    • Some years ago, I remember seeing it being reported in the news that researchers had found that the brains of gay men resembled those of straight females and that the brains of lesbians resembled those of straight men.

      But if everyone’s brains actually do look alike, that means that there’s no biological basis for homosexuality, which means that homosexuality actually is a mental disorder. It’s going to be interesting to see what kind of mental gymnastics the shitlibs engage in in an attempt to have their cake and eat it too on this issue.

      Incidentally, there is strong evidence that male and female brains really are different and that gender is not a social construct:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

      Like


      • “Although the team only looked at brain structure, and not function, their findings suggest that we all lie along a continuum of what are traditionally viewed as male and female characteristics.”

        The parts are the same size, so men’s and women’s brains are the same too. Leftoid scientific logic at work.

        Like


      • Some years ago I read an essay by a house cleaner that said the filthiest fag house was cleaner than the cleanest dyke house.

        Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 7:10 pm numbers racket

        Well elmer, you’ve overseen the extinguishing of a pretty lipstick lesbo lie. Cleaners and landlords routinely note that women are far messier than men. I had a French lesbian couple stay for a few days, and after one of their dual showers, there was runny shit and minge clippings left in the unflushed toilet bowl.

        [CH: 100% true fact. women have, by and large, filthy hovels, especially the bathrooms. i’ll assume that this applies less to married women, but who knows anymore these days?]

        Like


      • “CH: 100% true fact. women have, by and large, filthy hovels, especially the bathrooms.”

        If the women fear being criticized by other broads, they will clean up their shit. If men grow some stones and criticize broads, then that will likewise spur broads to clean up their shit.

        Like


      • I did some maintenance at a grocery store in high school. Every time I was paged for complaints of errant shit in a bathroom, it was the women’s bathroom. Every. Single. Time.

        Like


      • I’m glad someone else sees this. It generally gets better after marriage but only better. If it wasn’t there to begin with, get used to TV dinners.

        Like


    • You gotta read the article, Damn Crackers, not just the title. Then you see that there ARE differences between men’s and women’s brains, but “there are individual differences”, which is the basis for the lying title.

      “This means that, averaged across many people, sex differences in brain structure do exist, but an individual brain is likely to be just that: individual, with a mix of features.”

      This is like saying there are no male and female faces because “there are individual differences”. You can always find a woman who has a nose that look like that of some man out there, and so forth. But there are averages, which is why everyone can tell a male from a female face.

      It’s like saying there are no male and female voices, no male and female hips, no male and female muscle differences, no difference between men and women in height, because “there are individual differences”.

      Like


      • on December 1, 2015 at 3:42 pm Damn Crackers

        You should have read my follow up quote, Arbiter, where I quote from the article that shows, like you, how the headline and equalist comments are contrary to the research itself.

        Like


  28. My grandmother participated in Nazi resistance in the Europe during WWII. My grandmother was a feminist before it was cool and was very pro woman. But when describing the SS and Nazi guards, she said, “They were all inhumanly cruel, but the women guards were the worst.”

    Like


    • The word is nazist, not “Nazi”. Nazi was a slur invented by the Jew-led German communist party, then picked up by the newspapers in Britain as propaganda. It’s like saying “commie” and acting as if that’s the real word. Very telling that the propaganda word becomes the enforced word, and telling the truth about such a simple matter, the name, makes the speaker a target.

      “inhumanly cruel” Sorry to hear that your grandmother was a shitty liar, Cel. Honest people have told of how the Germans behaved much better than the trash they fought, socialist scum like your granny. It was the French and Russian Jew loyalists who treated prisoners cruelly. And the American invaders, who raped thousands of French women, then proceeded to rape German women and murder Germans for fun. The American guards kept German soldiers in open-air prisons, after the war was already over, with no shelter and no water. They fired at the prisoners, killing them for fun. When a woman visited to give bread and wine to her husband who was imprisoned, the guard drank the wine, then shot her. They murdered the wives of SS men for “target practice”. They forced German soldiers to lie down in the snow without clothes, until they died.

      The French, like the Russians, kept Germans as slaves after the war. The ones who were sent into slavery in Russia were never allowed to return. You support the Jew loyalists, so you support slavery. Good to know.

      Like


      • You’re fighting a losing battle on getting people to change over to some other version of National Socialist, my friend.

        Nazi (or in my best Churchillian, NAH-ZEE) is forever embedded in the psyche of the West.

        Like


      • And speaking of embedded stereotypes, after Helga, She Wolf of the SS on the low-brow end, and nurse Ratched (actress purposely chosen for her “that kind of aura” looks and of course, awarded handsomely with an Oscar) on the high-end, there’s no hope of dislodging that troll meme.

        Like


      • on December 1, 2015 at 11:50 pm Subway Disasterater

        “The word is nazist, not “Nazi”. Nazi was a slur invented by the Jew-led German communist party,”

        I get it, the Nazis were sweethearts, really–the negative image is just another Jew plot.

        You’re a real nut, Arbiter. Lucky jewsaresmarterthanyou.com

        Like


    • Cool story, sis… eh, Zis.

      Like


    • Cool story, sis… or should I say Zis?

      Like


    • When suspecting a troll, look at the handle. If it’s just a single-syllable or a common first name, odds of it being one are close to certain.

      Like


    • Is your oma the one who shit diamonds for years so she could hand them down to you?

      Or is she the one who had her eyes injected with aquamarine Sherman Williams paint by Mengele himself, after he amputated both her arms and reattached them on the opposite side?

      Like


    • The Jew-Soviet killed 40 million in Russia and China. The Russian soldiers who saved the Jew only after Jew-America’s funding systematically went house to house raping innocent German women in their own homes.

      In short, fuck off, cunt.

      Like


    • Your grandmother was an indoctrinated moron that happily fought to destroy the white race. You want to know what the merry band of kike led mongoloids did to Eastern European and German civilians? Check out Mike King’s ‘Hellstorm’. But, you’re probably a dumb broad and ‘my daddy..my ____….’ will do.

      Did your dumb cunt grandmother also know feminism was invented by the Jews?

      Like


  29. on November 30, 2015 at 6:23 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

    New York Field Report:

    *disclaimer: no pick-up/lay reports*

    This was my second trip to NYC from the frozen People’s Republic of Canada, but this time I looked at the city a lot differently than the last, probably because of my growing suspicion and view that the city is the heart and capital of a Satanic project. (The montage of the city in “Make the truth go viral/The man who fought the bank” probably didn’t help.

    First, for one of our core constituencies here: Uncle Roosh wrote earlier that women aren’t half bad-looking in New York and are receptive/approachable. I didn’t do any approaches given that I was with the wife. However, in terms of worthwhile targets, I saw enough but not an overwhelming number. Eliminating all the unattractive negresses and jewesses (there are some not bad-looking jewesses), you’re left with a relatively small number of decent-looking girls. A feminine-looking blonde will certainly cause one’s head to turn on the street or subway for they are so few in number. In absolute terms though, any aspiring PUA will have more than enough to keep him busy there. A lot of frumpy and unattractive hipster girls though. I sense day gaming is more effective in NY than, say, night game, as the girls seem, again, relatively approachable, and night game brings up challenges around social circle, expensive clubs, and weird hipster joints. That’s all I can say. As I sat in a sunken, wood-panelled diner on Lexington Ave. and 63rd street in New York listening to two late 20s/early 30s girls go on about lame topics such as walking their dog and one’s boyfriend named “Corbett” (for real), I couldn’t help but think, “man, this is the future and it’s bleak.”

    Now about that future. Looking around New York, one can see the elite’s future vision for America and perhaps the world.

    Take a taxi from La Guardia to uptown Manhattan, you’ll see blocks and blocks of projects – government housing for blacks dominating Queens, the Bronx, and Harlem. These are housing zones for the feral population, sustaining them with welfare and EBT, while giving them free time to form gangs, fight among themselves, and terrorize whites unfortunate enough to be in proximity to them.

    New York is not white. I think the last I read it was 25% white, excluding Jews, the number goes down to 12 or 15% – and it shows. I think I saw a grand total of one white policeman the whole time, a blond haired guy built like a brick shithouse; I checked his badge – an Irish name. Go into Manhattan proper, and generally it’s a mud flood as far as the eye can see, particularly on the subway. In the Upper East Side, it’s a bunch of wrinkly old Jews who look as though they should be bundled off to Florida speaking with those ghastly New Yahk accents, and au pairs pushing the strollers for the elite’s children.

    New York is something resembling a police state – cops everywhere, cameras, tactical units, helicopters surveilling from above. Citizens, of course, are all but disarmed.

    Socially, it’s no secret that it’s a thoroughly atomized society, with living alone apparently the norm. Remembering Henry Miller’s novels, women have been holding office jobs with their own apartments (and presumably with some crypto carousel-riding) as far back as the 20s, at least. White men seem queer, effeminate, and prissy.

    In New York, you have a Jewish-ruled city and economy, whites are a tiny minority, blacks roam the streets looking for victims, elite men are feminine, elite women are masculine and often childless, faggotry is ascendant (and was long before it went national, no wonder AIDS took off here), citizens are defenceless, and abortion, atheism, and socialism rule the day.

    In fact, all degeneracies seem to have been incubated and piloted in New York before they were taken national, as is the case today.

    I contend that this has been planned all along. And not just when the Jews arrived in the city in the 1880s onward. Many of these phenomena have been accurately predicted and warned against in the Bible; indeed the Bible is pretty accurate overall. Jesus probably called them out their plan and that’s why they killed him. First, they set up their capital, then use it as a template for the world.

    There is something distinctly Satanic about that city. On a lighter note, I enjoyed the restaurants.

    Like


    • Nice post. Keep commenting.

      Like


      • “One time was to bang a chick I met next to her bf at JFK, and another was to bang a dude’s wife who I made out with on a flight back from LHR.”

        Please do tell the reports on these two episodes.

        Like


    • blacks do not roam the streets in NYC looking for victims…most of what you wrote is nonsensical hyperbole LOL.

      Your 2nd fuckin time going there…leave it to people like us who actually live or lived there to describe it. I have been there more times in the past half-year than you have in your life and I spent 4 years there before.

      One time was to bang a chick I met next to her bf at JFK, and another was to bang a dude’s wife who I made out with on a flight back from LHR. Another was for a bjj tournament…just off the top of my head. I am there comparatively frequently.

      Manhattan has tons of pretty white chicks, but the City itself is predominantly Hispanic and mystery meat types. You won’t see that many blacks in various parts of Manhattan.

      As far as violence, it is literally about as safe as Boise.

      Like


      • on November 30, 2015 at 9:35 pm gunslingergregi

        As far as violence, it is literally about as safe as Boise”””””””

        those types of references used to be true to invoke a certain feeling rather than using a stat

        Like


      • You ignorant wannabe gangsta child. New York is the most dangerous place in the world to be right now. Sure it might be free of muggings for 323 straight days, but on the 324th day the next 9/11 or Paris *is* going to happen.

        You are a fucking retarded hipster faggot who deserves a Paris if you live in New York.

        Like


    • Les, I love your handle. it cracks me up. I imagine a virtuous action hero working in secret for truth and justice like the Shadow or similar.

      Like


    • I have never understood why there is no connection made between the Money changers ion the temple and the modern day banksters. This is the second Iteration of that same event transcended to the world stage instead of the ME one. People also overlook the Leviticus prohibition on sacrificing children to Moloch. God is especially concerned with this crime. There is a reason. Our evil leaders do exactly these things today and do so to maintain their power. I have concluded that viewed only as a piece of literature, the Bible is a tight story, as tight as Moby Dick or the Illiad. That means that its metaphors and symbology all have an intertwined purpose and build on one another. it is, of course, far more.

      Like


    • “and abortion, atheism, and socialism rule the day” Gasp! Let’s ignore the priests who have been pushing mass immigration for decades. The evil atheists are to blame!

      “my growing suspicion and view that the city is the heart and capital of a Satanic project”

      Okay. You don’t actually believe that it’s a “Satanic project”, do you? You don’t actually believe that demons possess people, do you? (FYI, daemon was a name for spirits in the times of European religions. As usual the Jew-derived religios turned it into something evil. Like they modeled “demon” images on Europe’s nature gods and spirits, like Pan.)

      I hope you don’t seriously think demons enter people’s bodies on “Satan’s” behalf – you’re not that crazy, are you?

      “Uncle Roosh wrote earlier that women aren’t half bad-looking in New York and are receptive/approachable. I didn’t do any approaches given that I was with the wife.”

      Ah yes, there’s that Xtian hypocrisy. Fun example. But it’s the atheists who are to blame. Hey, look over there, a chick you can chase if the wife’s not looking!

      Like


      • Read up on the Process and Larry Gundersun. Read up on Bohemian Grove. You have no idea how naive you truly are.

        Like


  30. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-29/obama-signs-defense-bill-authorizing-500-million-more-aid-moderate-syrian-rebels

    Figure out where the real evil is instead of shooting at scarecrows. The Republicans voted in a united majority for this.

    Like


    • It’s Israel. We know. Our government is occupied and our military is Israel’s muscle and the bankers’ security detail.

      What are we going to do about it?

      Like


  31. Les Saunders, I’m in Ottawa, its the same here essentially. I don’t understand the dislike of blacks though, I’ve never had any issue with a black, if anything they are a breath of fresh air. At least they aren’t totally effeminate and prissy.

    Like


    • Come on down to the US and stay awhile in a black neighborhood.

      Like


    • lzlzozlozlozlozlozl… “negroes” and “breath of fresh air”, said in the same breath…

      Beyond The Valley Of The Trolls.

      Like


    • Blacks are “a breath of fresh air”, hmm…. Google “New DOJ statistics on race and crime”. Or simply “black crime statistics”. Ignore the propaganda link from Huffington Post at the top of the page and read the actual statistics, for example in the AmRen link.

      And these statistics don’t cover everything. Feral Blacks run rampant in Black neighborhoods and many of their crimes go unreported. The stats also don’t show how Blacks harass Whites in schools and in the streets, not enough that people would call the police, and certainly not enough for the teachers to actually do anything to help their targets.

      “aren’t totally effeminate and prissy” – This is something I see on RoK the few times I visit there, Black posters trying to claim that they are “alpha”. Acting like an aggressive animal is not “alpha”. And this shows a limitation of the alpha/beta dichotomy, which becomes defined simply by beta=shy, so that every other behavior is labeled alpha.

      Like


  32. This song is my bedtime lullaby:

    Like


  33. ‘The only way to win White women back from their loyalty to antiracism tyranny is to present them with the allure of an even stronger, sexier tyranny…’

    And success can be measured by the decibel meter reading for this kind of female shrieking:

    Put women in thrall to you and you win. What’s true for game is true for politics…

    Like


  34. It needs to be noted that most of the agitators during the recent fury of college madness at Mizzou, Yale and other places have been those silly little undergraduate girls. When put in a group they are the most mindless conformists.

    Of course this all begs the question: is perhaps Islam correct in all its prohibitions against allowing women any say in public life?

    This is why Europe is doomed, and Islam will win in the end. The bitches today pushing feminism in Europe will tomorrow be happily wearing the burka.

    Like


    • on November 30, 2015 at 9:04 pm gunslingergregi

      well they declared war on the west and then were allowed to invade so kind of a diferent situation than normal

      Like


      • “they declare war on the west”

        That’s neocon propaganda, and since the biggest thing you’ve done in your life was to join the military I’m not surprised to hear it from you. No facts, needed, eh? No need to think of the U.S. propping up Israel-loyal tyrants across the Middle East, and invading and sanctioning the few M.E. nations that dare oppose the Palestinian genocide, causing the death of millions.

        And the neocons who fill your head with phrases to spout are the same people who orchestrate mass immigration – which you then claim is the Muslims’ fault. Good goy.

        Like


      • @Arbiter. No need for facts? Necons? Isreal? Ha ha! You pretentious LARPing fairy!

        Learn a little history, you ignorant wannabe. Islam “declared war on the west” in the 8th century, and it has yet to cease hostilities. Je’ Suis Charles Martel, indeed. Do you actually think that your kind will be spared on the Day of the Rope?

        Like


      • on December 2, 2015 at 12:48 am gunslingergregi

        and since the biggest thing you’ve done in your life was to join the military ”””””””””’

        ”””””’
        John 15:13
        There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.
        ”””””””’

        well of course it was
        and going civilian in iraq too

        even though i did not want to marry a white woman have her fuck me over in marriage and have to kill her for it
        and i even gave that up
        i gave up the white woman so i would not have to kill her future self or my kids with her
        for the same type of principle

        and yea even though the society cause mass pain in my life
        i still understand that people are enjoying their lives
        and need protection
        so it was noble to be able to be willing to lay down my life that i didnt want to live in order to protect those who love their lives and trying to live as best they can
        i don’t know what better thing i could of done or any nobler way i could of died
        than the pre approved ones

        Like


    • Need I post the fate of empires PDF here again?

      of course what you say is correct.

      Rome ruled the world. Then they let women rule Rome. Then Rome fell.

      Like


  35. There is at least one honest Jew:

    Like


    • Let us display it
      We invite other filthy Eskimo to write indictments
      And we know it ends exactly like it did 200+ times before

      Like


    • while the person who wrote that may or may not be eskimo, the use of the term goyim in that way is incorrect, as it is plural. i have never heard a fellow eskimo use it in that way. I have only seen people who know nothing about eskimos or eskimoism use it like that. But I am probably just a zionist agent sent to confuse you, by pointing out that it is probably fake. Of course, this guy taking his time out on the internet to antagonize people probably has access to all the plans and should be wholly believed. The super successful /powerful people that would be involved in or have knowledge of such plans, have plenty of time for internet trolling.

      Like


      • While this shortest of all Protocols abrigments may or may not be written by an eskimo let me paraphrase Ford on the same question
        I do not care it fits perfectly well
        As for plural of goy perhaps you should give us a 101 course how goy is used in modern eskimo parlance
        You will understand that the cattle has only plural in English and therfore those of us who feel first and formost individuals may have some trouble locating themselves on eskimo humanity appraisal scale

        Like


      • They also wouldn’t talk about interest-free banking, that sounds more like a talking point from someone on the U.S. Right who is concerned about the Fed. For most of the world central banks are not a political issue. It is a talking point only on the U.S. Right as radio hosts and websites that don’t dare mention race need to hold up someone else as the enemy leader, and they put the Fed in that role.

        The Jew probably wouldn’t call itself “Proud Israeli” either, that is too general. And with the Izzy flag there – also very general. Would be more believable if it used some Jewish name, like a name from history or the name of some Izzy politician.

        The Jew also wouldn’t tell its enemies that they have “a gazillion people” but would say the opposite, that no one is on their side. To tell a group they have billions on their side is an encouragement, which is probably the writer’s intent.

        “a few crappy edited videos” – crude language, but crude language in the way of an American native. Despite spelling errors the text shows a native’s grasp of the language in various ways. Americans are generally bad at writing faux foreigners speaking bad English. You’ll get foreigners who say “ja” and “da” when learning the word “yes” is the absolute first thing in English class, and you’ll get foreigners talking about themselves in third person, “Poirot” and “Miyagi”, to indicate their bad grasp of the language, while using more difficult words than “I” expertly.

        And finally, a Jew wouldn’t say that “we own” YouTube, Google, Facebook, etc. They instead claim that “everyone” is on their side. I don’t see any common leftist references in that text, such as “it’s 2015”. I do however see many points a right-winger would (correctly) criticize.

        Like


      • The super successful /powerful people that would be involved in or have knowledge of such plans, have plenty of time for internet trolling.

        And as if the less successful don’t take delight in their connection and association with the more powerful?

        And if “goyim” should have been used in the singular, i guess it just couldn’t possibly have been a mistake – because it was written by a jew?

        Thanks for playing. Your hubris is cool though, seeing as how it is tempered with anxiety. Have a nice day.

        Like


      • Good Point. I knew that and I’m not Jwish.

        Like


      • Elk, I specifically say that he may or may not be eskimo. So I agree. Theoretically, Could be a guy, as you suggest, taking delight in their “connection” and association with the more powerful. I am merely suggesting that anyone who could possibly know anything of such plans are probably not wasting time trolling on the internet. Further, the manner in which the term goyim is used is not just slightly off. It doesnt work. It is so wrong as to be off putting. it is an automatic signal to me that the person using it has no natural feel for the language. It is used here as I have seen many eskimo haters use it, who have only learned of the term on the internet.

        Like


  36. >>> The only way to win White women back from

    Am I the only one who thinks that “winning back” intrinsically damaged goods, is…. below-market return on invested effort?

    You are pedestalizing your Oneitis. Which ===will not== succeed to turn them away from previous bad choices/strategies. I mean, why should Chadlinna change her habits – you’re announcing here that you have no other options!

    >>> Game can, indeed, save the White homelands

    Am I the only one who thinks that the ==evidence== supports the opposite conclusion? Faggots in Hollywood are getting better pussy than you.

    Make no mistake – I am no progressive, nor liberal. But I do know how to count. And trying to build re-build a civilization when the building blocks are the currently-available inventory of contemporary white western women… THIS Venture Capitalist doesn’t believe that those numbers add up very well.

    Ghengis Khan (isn’t that the one) left more genetic descendants than anyone else in history. And he didn’t do it by only dating in his own neighborhood.

    The Spanish Conquistadores also did pretty well in the War Bride nookey business. Again – they went outside their own ethnic campfires.

    Islamists ===will not== respect you, or fear you – until they SEE EVIDENCE that you can impregnate their women, and get away with it. In fact, they’re so scared of it, that they will kill their own women to prevent that. Am I the only one who sees a nerve waiting to be touched? Why should a Pakistani fear getting a 14-year old white girl pregnant – you’re not even willing to bury her 6 feet down, with the rest of the trash!

    Same with the groids. They have reptile brains, they recognize successful mating strategies.

    White women are women. Show them pre-selection – they’ll jump on your dick.

    Like


    • There are actually quite a lot of Hispanic girls who are very hot in their teens and 20’s, but something terrible happens to most of them around 30/32. Also, at least in my area, they do NOT like White guys. Middle Eastern/Arab girls tend to be rather hairy, and, like their half-cousins the Hispanics, they lose whatever looks they may have early and hard. The maybe 2-3% of Black girls who are actually attractive are just not enough to worry about. East Asian girls can be cute if you’re ok with a female who looks more like a 12-year old boy and who has a cash register instead of a soul.
      I have been telling anyone who would listen something similar to what this post says for years.
      Women will go whichever way the stronger wind blows, if all they see on TV, in movies and even in real life (provided they manage to look away from their iphones long enough to perceive reality) are tall, ripped Black dudes, who are portrayed as smart, fun, gentle, masculine, tolerant, good, brave and so forth on one side, and pasty, blubbery, video-gaming gay-ish GoodGuy Googlenerds who major in Bespectacled Lispology on the other, guess which one they will find more appealing, sexually and otherwise.
      1 example out of millions: I just watched ‘Kingdom of Heaven’, which may be better titled ‘Your Politically Correct Guide to the Crusades’. The movie brings into very sharp focus the greedy evilness of the Knights Templar and the chivalrous tolerance of Saladin – very obviously based on his characterization by Scottish writer Sir Walter Scott, and in the History Channel and A&E ‘making of’ specials also contained in this 2 DVD set, the PBS oldgals and quasi-fags are practically having on-screen orgasms when they talk about Islam or the Arabs.

      Like


    • “And trying to build re-build a civilization when the building blocks are the currently-available inventory of contemporary white western women… THIS Venture Capitalist doesn’t believe that those numbers add up very well.”

      –If you’re implying White men need to build their posterity off of foreign DNA, I would remind you that the Central Asian progeny of Genghis Khan and the Latin American heirs of the Conquistadores pretty much suck.

      Some mutt combos may be less offensive than others, but it looks as if pretty much all of them are subpar, at least as opposed to what an intraracial couple from one of the Ice People populations can make.

      A Finn doesn’t even need the Italians. A Han doesn’t need the Vietnamese.

      Like


      • Well-said… these mischling mongers are truly a clueless sort, assuming they’re actually White and sincere in their thoughts.

        Of course, most of them are race-mutts themselves, so misery loves company, there’s that.

        Or they’re the usual suspect Cathedral shills who think a new form of agenda-mongering might actually fool the dumb goyim.

        Like


      • >>> would remind you that the Central Asian progeny of Genghis Khan and the Latin American heirs of the Conquistadores pretty much suck

        The proof of the pudding is in the eating. And it wasn’t your crowd that implanted any genetic material into Pakistani girls in Rotherham. It was the other way around.

        Coupla generations ago, Scandinavian populations were – what? 98% Aryan? How did that protect them from getting swamped by an invasion of browns? Answer: it didn’t. It only takes one black-swan to disprove that all swans are white.

        Your arguments have the flavor of fat chicks who click their heels and endlessly repeat that they are more beautiful than “Dress-Size 1” girls. Denial is NOT just a river in Africa.

        Look at the fate of the Incas, to see what is the end-game of insisting on holding onto incorrect market information about human populations…….

        Like


      • >>> A Finn doesn’t even need the Italians

        I’ll give you a hundred dollar bill for every male Finn who truthfully testifies that he would throw a 6-7 Italian girl out of bed on racial principles.

        Lets look at Brevik’s writings. Brevik is as real as it gets. And he didn’t think that Scandinavian guys should stay away from Mediterranean girls.

        Speaking of Finns – they never were pure racial Aryans. Lots of War Widow action been going on in Finland over the past 3000 years.

        Like


      • Finns are awesome, Italians are hot, whatcha gonna do?

        Like


      • Like


      • I blew it on that picture post, but there are plenty of Central Asians who are like cowboys except they don’t sing quite as well.

        The best Aryan blood got mixed in with them, and the kicker is that the selection pressure on them lately has not been so civilized. They are tough. They have a different mentality, one that does not have some white qualities.

        This is where goes the picture of Chuck Norris in the Imperial forearm clasp with Bruce Lee.

        Like


    • –In fairness, Karl, I see you may only be suggesting this as a sort of first strike to achieve pre-selection in White women’s eyes, but still–

      Mutts are a jealous breed. It really is an immoral thing, to shackle your legitimate progeny with unappeasable half-siblings who will always simmer simmer simmer with resentment and alienation, all the while playing upon the pity and fear of your own chosen successors.

      And why should White women internalize the idea that a man who receives the caresses of foreigners is thereby special? Many plainly don’t, or do so equivocally at most. We wouldn’t expect a high-value woman to be impressed by a man who dumpster-dives with fatties. Dark meat is a dumpster too.

      Like


      • >> And why should White women internalize the idea that

        You don’t get to fight this slow-motion race war with the White Women you ==wish== you had.

        You have to fight it with the women you’ve actually got. And we know how they are ===actually=== traversing the DNA market place.

        Maybe you judge females by what they say. I judge them by what they ===do===

        Women don’t “internalize ideas”. Women work off their reptile brains.

        I thought this website was dedicated to finishing off “pretty lies”.

        Like


      • You don’t get to fight this slow-motion race war with the White Women you ==wish== you had.

        You don’t get to fight… more importantly win… a race war by sleeping with the enemy either.

        It’s White women or oblivion… you should know this, assuming you’re not some shill who already knows it, but is trying to convince White men that up is down and (ahem) black is white.

        Like


      • My 2nd reply above (“In fairness, Karl . . .) was submitted before his ramblings in reply to my first one were up.

        Really, Karl doesn’t make any sense, except under the auspices Greg has assigned him. What is this babbling about “fat chicks” and “incorrect market information”? If Europeans wanted to wipe out the heirs of the Incas and the old African slaves today, they could make uglier and quicker work of them than they did five centuries ago. If the “market” is a force of Nature, then Nature is entirely on the Whites’ side. Only Gramscian false nurturing holds us back.

        Nogs and wogs sure as hell didn’t land on Scandinavian shores by virtue of their Norseman-like boating skills. On account of this crap about mud swans, I guess this is an “Uncle Karl” type we’re talking to. Avaunt, schlomo

        Now if Suburban_elk gets an uncontrollable urge to sate himself in a hot Uzbekistani, he of course enjoys some latitude. I confess to once walking such a creature– a louche specimen in a leather jacket, no less– back to her dorm one night.

        Not that I sated myself– but I DID leave her reeling with the heady discovery that I knew her homeland was somewhere in the southward vicinity of Kazakhstan.

        Like


  37. Tell the ladies that they deserve better and that those precious White ovaries can’t be defiled by lower forms of life. The legs will spread far and wide.

    Like


  38. German masculinity was humiliated after WW1. Leave it to the wives to lead the Nazi charge. They didn’t like the Jewish women looking down their noses at them.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2432620/Hitlers-Furies-The-Nazi-women-bit-evil-men.html

    Like


    • I remember being perplexed, years ago, when I read in Mein Kampf that as Hitler was sent ot the slammer, the men dispersed, while the females endured in their support for Hitler. He thanked the ladies of Germany. It didn’t make sense to me then as it does now. Hitler was a powerful alpha of the highest status and drew in the bitches.

      Like


  39. Cult leaders always seem to handfuls of damaged but young, semi-good-looking poontang. When guys see the influence they have on ladies, they ought to get on board of this crazy religion too!

    Like


  40. http://freedompowerandwealth.com

    They repeat only what others have told them to say – and endless repetition of phrases – it can be pretty funny dealing with them – you thing you are talking to a parrot.

    Like


  41. Makes me think of the French sluts who were ‘co’erced’ by the reigning Nazi ubermensch during the Nazi occupation in Paris. Many a bastard was born.

    Like


  42. Karl Marx considered women as conservative in nature and liable to support the status quo whatever that may be.

    If Marxism is the untenable peak point away from the caves – the highest point of a nature-defying civilisation before it falls – it makes sense to me that it would be the product of cerebralism and men and that women would always be trying to emotionally drag us back to a darker and more barbaric past(often without even realising it).

    Objectively speaking across the ages I believe women are the natural/biological supporters of clan/nationalism and conservatism. Their emotion and reliance on the group makes them more likely to support stagnancy and the status-quo – new things happen only because of men – and the nation is the greater family which suits women and fences men in. Men are the rationalists, the individualists, the Lockians, the Marxians – all the cerebral and dense ideologies of the intellect which taken to extreme result in social meltdown as they do not respect mother nature. Mother nature’s daughters in essence respect mother nature and all its confines and limits far more than men do.

    Like


    • Nationalist leaders are often the same as women. Hitler wasn’t a manly man at all, there was something seriously feminine Hitler. and CH is the same.

      Like


      • The irony is that if women were denied the vote and a role in politics and the orcs were kept away from the nation then egalitarianism and liberalism would be much more effective and valid.

        You’re relying on the rationalism, cerebralism and autism of maleness to build and maintain a civilisation that is so far away from natural human behaviour.

        Like


      • Objectivism, too. Could there be any other life-view more estranged from natural/neurotypical behaviour? Marxism and Objectivsm are in certain respects different – they follow different paths to a stateless society and the fully actualised/autistic individual – but neither of them are human.

        And this to me is the reason why feminist women sound like Marx(or a doctored version of Marx)but actually behave like an unfeminine autistic bitch. Ayn Rand – a living and breathing offense to womanhood and beauty – was the prototype for the ugly selfish careerist we see today.

        Like


      • I believe Rand said something like a woman’s natural position is in chains and banged on endlessly about female submission – if this isn’t a masculinised brain insecurely grasping at a femininity it yearns to possess I don’t know what is.

        All this D&S and S&M is more like how a gay man talks who on one level really wants to be a woman, but never can be.

        Like


      • And who are the John Galts if not the nerdy high school boys who were never first pick for the football team, able to win any fights, or likely to get laid?

        John Galt is the wet dream of men who can’t be men. This ridiculous caricature of masculinity forms the spergy black/white complement to the female caricature in this autistic narrative. Basically Objectivism is primarily a life-view for people who are insecure in their gender and uncomfortable in their own skin(probably why you find so many Objectivists online).

        Like


      • Hypermasculinity and hyperfemininity are not the products of confident men and women. Instead they are a reaction to something lacking inside.

        An inward lacking of true human and gender-based personality gives rise to both the genderlessness of pee-cee as well as the hypermasculine/hyperfeminine ways of reaction, game and the unnatural seducer.

        Like


      • This is why game and pee-cee barely exist amongst proles and naturals and instead cling so closely to the middle class. The streetwise prole doesn’t do pee-cee and to him game is innate and certainly not something you learn from a book. Game as we know it and pee-cee are simply the consequences of not being streetwise – reactionaries and gender-benders come from the same middle class place.

        Like


      • “If there is hope, wrote Winston, it lies in the proles”

        Like


      • “Nationalist leaders are often the same as women. Hitler wasn’t a manly man at all, there was something seriously feminine Hitler. and CH is the same.”

        LOL Good one. You’re just making shit up. You have never met a nationalist leader, that’s obvious, and how could you tell that “CH is the same” when you have never met him? And Hitler, feminine? Laughable. Contrary to whatever propaganda sites you read will tell you, he was a ladies’ man for a long time. But of course you’ll refuse to believe that.

        “Objectively speaking across the ages I believe women are the natural/biological supporters of clan/nationalism and conservatism. … Men are the rationalists, the individualists, the Lockians, the Marxians – all the cerebral and dense ideologies of the intellect which taken to extreme result in social meltdown as they do not respect mother nature.”

        It’s funny when feminists join the Right, and try to present women as superior followers of right-wing beliefs.

        Meanwhile, anyone who actually studies the subject can see that women more than men vote for whatever is the safest alternative at all times. Women therefore vote far more socialist than men do, disregarding the effects the socialists will have on the country in the future.

        If it hadn’t been for female voters Mitt Romney would have won in a landslide in 2012. If it hadn’t been for female voters every U.S. state except for Washington and a few small N.E. states would be run by conservatives. Women FAR more than men have supported mass immigration.

        You make shit up – anyone can see from personal experience that you are wrong. So when there’s word against word, we turn to statistics to see how wrong you are.

        Like


      • “The streetwise prole doesn’t do pee-cee and to him game is innate”

        Bullshit. So now we know what you are: a feminist uneducated worker. Your targets are men and the middle class, those people who actually studied in school and earn more money than you. How dare they!

        Take your crap to some feminist website. Try to convince them that women are more nationalist while men are inherently anti-nationalist. Then post a link to that, it will be fun to read.

        Like


      • Hitler was a war hero who won about 32 medals for bravery in World War I, because he volunteered for the most dangerous duties constantly, including going back to the battlefield when he didn’t have to after being shot. You coward. How’s about you shut your fucking face hole, you whiny little bitch.

        Like


    • I bet you’re a lot of fun at parties.

      Like


      • Good one. I am not even going to bother.

        I replied to UKIP on a previous thread wherein he described PUA’s acting the bad boy as nerds from the middle class, and corrected him on his misconception of “nerd”. (Also i would add that mostly everyone in America is middle class.) But that tone-deaf post of his there, and now reading the one up above? he will have to do better than that to influence the conversation.

        The post above is try-hard intellectualism, similar to what the university feminists might try. It is not impressive. If i were to try and tease out a point or two – then i would be doing the damn work.

        Liked by 1 person


    • We don’t give two short and curlies what any Jewish communist thinks or thought. Dig?

      Like


  43. on December 1, 2015 at 4:51 am Oberstleutnant Shitlord

    CH, had Haidt been prepared for that sneering, finger-snapping reaction, what’s your suggestion for a retort?

    [CH: good question. when the crowd is that large and belligerent, it’s almost impossible to steer the audience without aid from allies.]

    You’re dealing with a squad of hivemind teens drunk on their ability to control the group mood. It’s all well and good to talk about controlling frame, but often the discussion here understates their frame is strong too, misguided or not.

    [no argument here. but if haidt had a stronger frame he at least would’ve given himself a fighting chance… maybe not to win but at least to spare his dignity as he exits the stage and flips the crowd off. my advice for future teen sjw eruptions is to have a few quips ready for mic’ed deployment, like “ladies, if you want to be more like men you’ll need a thicker skin”. stick that shiv in all the way.]

    Like


  44. @Having a Bad Day – dropped a note for your thoughts on the Charismatic Jerkboy Joe Jackson thread… Thx.

    Like


  45. from the CH twatter: “best things about trump presidency that aren’t a wall:
    1. a hot first lady swpls don’t have to pretend to chub for
    2. mass eskimo triggering”

    On #1, more like they’ll have a first lady that they’ll pretend NOT to chub for. The libs have already started mocking her plastic surgeries. They truly are backwards psychos…. pretend Michelle is hot, pretend Melania is not.

    BTW, that Michelle is hot thing didn’t have much traction. You’ll notice it lasted less than a year before even the shitlibbiest manboob couldn’t even pretend she’s attractive.

    I’m on record predicting a post-presidency divorce for the Obamas.

    Like


    • Speaking of Trump – his meeting with the 100 black pastors yesterday which several in the African-American community tried to stop (and led the Trump campaign to cancel the press conference plans afterward, the media had a field day with that) – not only still happened but went very well AND he got his press conference after all lol

      Trump is in control. I wish we could just elect him in now.

      Like