Comment Of The Week: The Psychotic Left

COTW winner is DavidTheGnome, who perceptively writes of the gleeful masochism with which leftoid whites immerse themselves,

I grew up in Bethesda Maryland, DC’s jewish/white liberal suburb, so I’ve been around them all my life. I’m also involved in the arts, which is probably more liberal than academia. I don’t want to throw my left leaning friends under the bus (that includes my “conservative” ones) but the more I see of this pathology, the more disturbed I am by it.

I mean, I don’t get into frothy political shouting matches with people in my social circle (although they know I’m not like them in many respects, and every now and then we go at it to a certain degree) but there’s just something profoundly dark and ignoble at the heart of what I used to consider a somewhat silly, effete and thoroughly conformist ideology.

All the hysterical posturing, the crazy eyes they get when a topic gets too close to the edge. I’ve seen genuine terror in some cases, child like saucer eyes (and these aren’t bad people, and I don’t personally know any who could sink to Coopers level) but as every year goes by they seem to get worse whenever animated by these ideas. Kerry Bolton wrote a good book “The Psychotic Left” and details some of its most prominent personalities. It’s really horrifying, but great, all his books are great.

I’m on an evo-psyche and fantasy series stint at the moment, but I wouldn’t mind reading a book that went about mining the depths of the liberal bobo heart. I suspect at the center lies some kind of ravenous, stygian chimera, vacillating between states of paralyzing fear and impotent rage. It eats culture and shits hypocrisy.

My edumacated guess: The leftoid mind, honed over millennia in NW Europe under manorial and outbreeding conditions, is today a fish out of water. Diversity — real diversity — is finally at their doorstep, and that precious altruistic mental module just doesn’t know how to comport itself in the teeth of a daily reality that defies its prescriptions, its hopes, and its preening self-righteousness. The result is a lashing out — although in this case it’s accompanied by a “lashing in” — against intruding crimethink and the tiniest deviations from their increasingly manicured ideological boundaries.

******

COTW runner-up winner is mts1, writing about the utter lack of desire that men feel for challenging women.

“An unevolved man or a boy will always want the simple girl. He doesn’t want to have to work hard for anything, especially not a relationship. He doesn’t want to be challenged or confronted.”

I am challenged and confronted every day out in the world, at work, and the commute to and from it. The only challenge and confrontation I want at home is the job of raising children, and I want a wife as a co-pilot in that, not an enemy combatant. But I come and go from MGTOW, each time trying to find someone who’d be that safe harbor where I can rest my warship’s crew, get the maintenance and repair my ship’s needs, then come morning I go to battle again for that safe harbor. This warship can take a lot, but even the USS Enterprise needed basic maintenance to make it the length of WW II. But each emergence from MGTOW ends up in “yup, touching fire still burns the hand” and so I stayed single. The incredible drive to have kids is the sole reason for leaving MGTOW from time to time. But the demanding harpies who have a number of kids by whomever, but laugh when I ask if they’d think of having more by me this time, drive me back into sweet solitude. They don’t realize I have but one sole freaking job for them, make that “down there” make me little ones, and in return you got me for life. They have 101 hoops for me to try to jump through that’ll allow them to keep me if I get 100% right; I have but one for them and they can’t do even that for me. On the other side of town, every gangbanger has a slew of baby-mommas and a line around the corner of girls dying for him to put a bun in their oven…

These entitled women think they know from “intelligent, strong woman.” My grandmothers came over from the Old Country when told to do so once their respective husbands established a nest egg in this country after working a bit where they hot-cotted it with a dozen other day laborers in a cold water flat, then graduating to a mill job. One raised 8 children (birthed 12, but 2 died stillborn and 2 by flu), the other 7. Then came the Depression. One nearly lost the house he built from a kit, the other lost his, and went to another mill city on a relative’s tip, then hailed the wife to bring the kids once that worked out. Yet blowing up the marriage was not even thought of. These were hard bonded families and the kids still had mom AND dad even if a bite of bread and a cup of watery coffee was every day’s breakfast. Then came WW II and though immigrants, every son on each side served, even to the last sole surviving sons, which was an out back then. And momma at home worrying over each son, luckily, none got the gold star. That is strength, and always finding a way to raise the kids and care for the husband and keep her own wits, that’s intelligence. Yet those “shackled, enslaved” women, I never heard a word of them being bitter, instead, their families were their lives, and they died happy and fulfilled. Today’s modern, independent, strong womyn, I wouldn’t give her a week in either grandma’s shoes without a nervous breakdown herself and a legion of Ritalin addicted trainwrecks for progeny. Strong, my ass.

Strength will take a vacation when it’s not tested. I wonder if the modren woman, should she be tested like her grandmother, would find a hidden well of strength to draw upon. Maybe that’s what pampered, tartphone-strapped women need: To be tested. Pushed forcefully out of their maudlin malaise so that they can recapture that happiness which eludes them at an accelerating pace. I leave it to the reader to draw the obvious game parallels. (And biochemical hormesis parallels.)





Comments


  1. on December 14, 2014 at 10:27 am Angry Midwesterner MD

    I never knew how good I had it until my mom told me this in front of her friends. “Well, when your father was alive, I never had any hobbies or cared much for fashions. I chose an earlier shift so I could get home early enough to nap for 30 minutes and then have dinner ready by 6 PM every single day. I honestly just did not have time for anything else.”

    Like


    • on December 14, 2014 at 9:28 pm themanofmystery2

      You raise a point which I’m realizing in myself – keeping busy is a much better way to stay happy than too much alone time “relaxing.” These broads probably felt the same way.

      Like


      • keeping busy is a much better way to stay happy than too much alone time “relaxing.”

        Interesting. Care to elaborate?

        I have often suspected the same. Early retirement isn’t as fun as it sounds….

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 12:26 pm themanofmystery2

        Anon2, think about relationships. The kind where people spend too much time together and start picking apart little details about each other because there’s nothing else to do. Alone time is the same way – it’s not good to be alone for too long with one’s thoughts. At least for me.

        Like


  2. My vote goes for the second comment of the week, because it could impact the first. The men that are the delusional, diversity leftist under severe and prolonged testing would find there numbers decreasing. I conjecture that 1/3 would completely abandon that view and another 1/3 would modify it so severely that it would bare very little of its current cultural toxicity. That would leave the remaining 1/3, likely genetically constrained to this malady, as an culturally unimportant group on the outskirts of a better culture.

    Like


  3. “And, General, how hold out our sweethearts,
    Sworn loyal as doves?”
    –“Many mourn; many think
    It is not unattractive to prink
    Them in sables for heroes. Some fickle and fleet hearts
    Have found them new loves.”

    Excerpt from “Souls of the Slain” by Thomas Hardy.

    No matter what you do for modern women, it can never be enough. Their greed is insatiable.

    My firm’s Christmas party occurred recently. The office manager is a woman. After a few drinks she began to complain that her daughter, (single mom no dad in the picture) who works at the firm–#nepotism– had to pay more for her medical care as a result of Obamacare. The daughter was on Medicaid. The office manager complained that the government has to take care of single moms and that they shouldn’t have to pay as much. The office manager identifies herself as a republican.

    It just shows that for women it is all about the goodies.

    Like


    • on December 14, 2014 at 11:00 am Whomever Wherever

      > “It just shows that for women it is all about the goodies.”

      They certainly seem to be programmed that way. As this blog matures, it needs to start pontificating on how married men must be constantly re-inforcing and restating and retracking the moral lessons and moral training of their wives and their daughters.

      Like


    • People with jobs can get Medicaid?

      Like


      • She probably gets EITC money every year, too. We work only to take care of blacks and women. We are all beta provider suckers.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 2:16 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck

        Yo, Mark Power, it’s funny that on an article pointing out the idiocy of the left, you point out the idiocy of the right. A hell of a lot more of your money goes into propping up the corporate protectionist FedRes system than goes into supporting “blacks and women.” The left and right are fraught with those who cling to identity politics. Division is intentional and maintains the status quo. Paging da GBFM…

        Like


      • Bobby Cuddlefuck,

        If that is true, that more goes to corporations than blacks and females ( and you forgot those millions of South-American illegals, half of them being on welfare, how convenient… ) it does not make it right that the government is giving away your hard earned tax dollar to people who produce pretty much nothing or give nothing in return.

        If your tax dollar helps a corporation create jobs it is better than your tax dollar helping a few whores get free abortions or get the pill for free so they can have as many drunken one night stands as they want, better than a few blacks buying expensive Basketball shoes and drugs and illegally obtained firearms, better than providing free needles to drug addicts, and better than providing whatever stuff they provide to illegals instead of kicking them out.

        One evil is a lesser evil.

        I chose corporations over “redistribution” to parasites.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 3:49 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck

        Reply fail repost for Canadian: You mean create jobs in China and India? Corporations don’t care about creating jobs, only about maximizing profit. Mammon is never sated. And while I agree that it doesn’t make it right, it helps to have some context of the scale of how your money is redistributed. For instance, we pay 6.2 billion a year in public assistance to wal mart workers. These are people that are the working poor. You are subsidizing their shitty wages so the Waltons can amass even more money that they’ll never be able to spend. If you want to be angry, be angry at the right people at least.

        Like


      • Yes, if you make less than $25,000 in many states. You can work full time, minimum wage, and qualify.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2014 at 8:04 am The Spirit Within

        Bobby, Canadian Friend would be destroyed by a sophomore on a high school debate team. Don’t bother explaining economics to him.

        Like


    • It just shows that for women it is all about the goodies.

      No, for women it is all about the personal. That is what influenced her opinions in this matter, what happens to her and the people close to her. They also respond to threats, for example, but only if those threats affect them and people close to them now or in the immediate future. This is logical since women have always been weaker and had to care for vulnerable children. Because of this their instinct is to focus on their immediate vicinity. Or as a wise man put it, “their horizons are shorter”.

      Which is not to say that most men don’t think like this too. The majority of men in the world, like women, also have a two-digit IQ and don’t think much. But a larger number of men, while still a minority, are capable of thinking of higher goals.

      When you write propaganda you always have to think of this. Even when you turn to women in a political party or organization you have to talk to them only about how mass immigration increases crime and costs. Not how race-mixing will destroy the minority of IQ outliers that innovate and drag the rest of society forward. That is too abstract.

      Like


      • talk to them only about how mass immigration increases crime and costs.

        The most effective way of reaching a childless young woman is to appeal to her sense of sexual competition (with regards to the rare physically attractive immigrants) or her physical fear of alien females (with regards to black/brown women).

        Like


      • The most effective way of reaching a childless young woman is to appeal to her sense of sexual competition (with regards to the rare physically attractive immigrants) or her physical fear of alien females (with regards to black/brown women).

        Man: “Better watch out, girl… the black and brown women are gonna steal your men.”

        White Woman: “:LZZOZLZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZOZLOZOL… whatever.”

        Some things even THEY won’t swallow.

        Like


      • East Asian female: “hey White girl, I’m gonna steal your beta-insurance chump”

        Dark female: “white girl bleed a lot…”

        Like


      • Arbiter, you have a point. Women tend to look inward (to the direct family). That’s not even necessarily a bad thing, IMO. It also explains why when they get married, have a family and finally start making it, they get pissed at the minorities and welfare queens (now perceived as stealing from *their* family!)

        Like


      • Yeah, its nearly impossible to get around the iq problem, the issue is complicated, and most people are unable to understand it. So much easy to have simple, wrong, emotional arguments.

        ‘the leftoid mind, honed over millennia in NW Europe under manorial and outbreeding conditions, is today a fish out of water. Diversity — real diversity — is finally at their doorstep, and that precious altruistic mental module just doesn’t know how to comport itself in the teeth of a daily reality’

        This is interesting, I wonder how true it may be, that white group thought is essentially being used against whites.

        Like


      • Why is it necessary to persuade weak, stupid people?

        You can force them to do what you want.

        The complaints that will surely follow are everything that is wrong with whites in a nutshell.

        We wanna be the good guy, the nice guy. To be able to explain our actions should anybody ask. awww..

        Like


      • “the crazy eyes they get when a topic gets too close to the edge.”

        A woman whom I gently acquainted with a few Hate Facts quite literally began to perspire and tremble. It really is a disease.

        Like


    • I have to say, I have greatly enjoyed the wails of the leftoids, crying Hot, Salty Tears about how unaffordable their Obamacare premiums are. It is just so delish.

      À bientôt,

      Mistral

      Like


    • her daughter is a coal burner??

      Like


    • on December 15, 2014 at 3:24 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck

      You mean create jobs in China and India? Corporations don’t care about creating jobs, only about maximizing profit. Mammon is never sated. And while I agree that it doesn’t make it right, it helps to have some context of the scale of how your money is redistributed. For instance, we pay 6.2 billion a year in public assistance to wal mart workers. These are people that are the working poor. You are subsidizing their shitty wages so the Waltons can amass even more money that they’ll never be able to spend. If you want to be angry, be angry at the right people at least.

      Like


    • on December 15, 2014 at 3:27 pm Bobby Cuddlefuck

      Reply fail, see below

      Like


  4. My vote goes for the second comment of the week, because it could impact the first. The men that are the delusional, diversity leftist under severe and prolonged testing would find there numbers decreasing. I conjecture that 1/3 would completely abandon that view and another 1/3 would modify it so severely that it would bear very little of its current cultural toxicity. That would leave the remaining 1/3, likely genetically constrained to this malady, as an culturally unimportant group on the outskirts of a better culture.

    Like


  5. on December 14, 2014 at 10:55 am Whomever Wherever

    > “something profoundly dark and ignoble at the heart”

    The Darkness. In their hearts.

    > “I’m on an evo-psyche and fantasy series stint at the moment, but I wouldn’t mind reading a book that went about mining the depths of the liberal bobo heart.”

    I’m becoming convinced that the propensity to fall for this stuff [and then to propagate it] is strongly genetic in nature, and that we are now re-discovering an ancient evil which several millenia of Christian cultural dominance had kept at bay [allowing Western Civilization to thrive and flourish in the interim]. But since our elites threw off the sheep’s clothing of faux Christian piety in the 20th Century, we are now starting to understand them as they really are.

    Darwin wasn’t the first person to see human nature for what it is – that honor belongs to Calvin. Darwin [and Mendel and Watson & Crick et al] was just adding a little [hypothesized] biochemistry to the mix.

    But in the face of all this overt Nihilism which now confronts us, it remains to be seen whether the Dark Ones are going to continue making progeny, or whether they are in the process of unbreeding themselves right out of existence.

    Like


  6. on December 14, 2014 at 11:26 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

    My family were dissidents during communism and consequently got persecuted. This includes being denied university admissions, going to jail for their political beliefs, being denied qualified employment, being denied promotions* etc. Before the fall of communism, you could barely find things one nowadays considers basic things and yet my family managed to stay together. The reason why I’m not interested in marriage or family is because I know what both meant to people close to me and I simply never met someone that deserves me to put a ring on her finger.

    I envy my father because he got a pretty girl above his station in life that is both intelligent and devoted. My mother worked full time all her life excluding a year after or so after each of her pregnancies and yet I never lacked cooked food, albeit my grandmothers chimed in to help when I was a child and needed constant care. My father’s only housework has been vacuum cleaning the house and sometimes doing the dishes. He only started doing more when he started to work from home which makes him be in the house more than my mother. I never heard a single woman here say that men should do more around the house despite the majority of women worked since the 1950s and what my mother did isn’t completely out of the ordinary in my social class. My best middle school friend’s father was fired and not hired again because he wanted to leave the country during communism and his mother maintained the whole family despite just having my friend. I have to mention that you could find only bad consumer goods before 1989 so you would be better off washing clothing by hand than using the commie washing machines. My mother did it. The clothing you could buy were often pathetic, so my mother also tailored her own clothing at times. Women nowadays aren’t even a fraction of what women used to be**. Vapid girls who are incompetent at taking care of themselves, let alone of others and who can’t even make themselves look really good despite having far more opportunity than women in the past to do so. I talked to a few girls about this and they said it’s a bitter way to look at things. I guess it’s easier to rationalize that I’m bitter than to realize I’m just disappointed in how low they are. It’s not like I mind not having any responsibilities to a wife and all that altogether.

    *This made me laugh out of hand at the persecution blacks whine about in the West. I’m pretty sure none of them have any idea how it is to work full time and after work wait in queues to buy food while being denied education simply because the regime doesn’t like their parents. You can whine as much as you want about Jim Crow, but the KKK didn’t come burn your house down and lynch you because you watched a movie they didn’t approve of. My history teacher’s father was arrested and imprisoned because he owned a VCR and watched American movies. He died in prison a while later.
    **Neither are men. How many Millennial men would crack under pressure if in the shoes of his grandfathers? I’m sure less than the number of pathetic women, but there’s a considerable share of worthless men nowadays.

    Like


  7. on December 14, 2014 at 11:33 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

    My big comment disappeared, yay. CH, I don’t really believe your educated guess because evolution doesn’t work that fast. Swedes mocked Louis Armstrong when he was there on tour and that was an attitude towards blacks openly endorsed by people at the time. My grandparents have/had the same attitude, despite people my age not having it. My grandmother would routinely comment about how ugly some black football player is despite me finding it offensive to say that despite agreeing with her at times.

    I used to be the ‘racism is bad’ kind of person and I did have to twist what I believe was just and moral in my head due to it. Maybe the outbreeding of NW Europeans makes them predisposed to feel more charitable to outgroups, but I don’t think it explains this, unless diversity close to them is an epigenetic trigger of sorts.

    Like


    • Whether or not Northwest Euros are evolved for outgroup altruism is a serious question.

      In any case they are a disadvantage in this multi-racial environment called the USA or wherever else, if they do not consider themselves to even exist, as a group with their own interests.

      Questions about the effects of this multi-racial environment on the development of white infants and children and kids, into adults, ought to be of interest to the keen scientific minds. Are they looking into those questions? i don’t fucking know.

      Everyone on the street knows from their own experience, that the multi-racial environment and its hierarchy affects the behavior and the actions and the life results of any individual.

      This comment was composed in a text editor on the side. That way its wisdom will not be lost for the ages. Your mileage may vary.

      Like


    • My haplogroup is i1 (although I have an admixture of various European ethnicities). This puts me at great risk as it relates to the expression of leftist hysteria. However, I was raised around vibrant diversity. I grew up on the periphery of a ghetto and attended all black schools elementary through high school; with one exception, I was the only cracker on my Pop Warner football teams; in fact, I work in downtown Miami which puts me in the middle of more diversity … and, yet, after all these years, I still don’t feel enriched.

      In truth I feel alienated, a stranger in my own home, defensive and always prepared for confrontation. This is no way to live, but it’s exactly what leftists need to experience to rid them of their psychological cancer. It’s easy to preach diversity from a gated Whitopia, not so much when centered in a seething brown and black mass.

      And I feel a little bad writing that because I do know some good black and brown people, some of whom I consider friends, but even so, my affection for these good folks is of no consequence.

      The fact remains that diversity, at its core, is an unhealthy way to organize society.

      Like


      • black and brown people, some of whom I consider friends

        A WN commenter here once wrote about a close friend who is Japanese. The commenter said that if his Japanese friend was opposed to his sister or daughter dating White men, he would not be offended. He added that he would respect his Japanese friend’s humanity, and in doing so, he would respect his boundaries around his identity.

        Friendship is a relationship of equals. Would your bring and black friends respect your White boundaries, or would they throw you under the bus?

        Like


      • or would they throw you under the bus

        I understand your point. Perhaps I was using the word ‘friend’ too loosely.

        Like


      • In truth I feel alienated, a stranger in my own home, defensive and always prepared for confrontation. This is no way to live, but

        This is the theme that wants addressing.

        Who even acknowledges it, the price that white people pay in the day to day in terms of their lives (let’s not even call it pain), for having to live in this multi-race environment, which they did not ask for and do not want.

        Part of the reason that it doesn’t get addressed is because men are in a catch-22 about their problems. They are not supposed to be acknowledged because they are not supposed to have them in the first place because they were supposed to transcend them at some time in their formative past.

        Men who do not secure their environment have failed, and they are not men. And so with white Americans.

        Somehow the paradox of it has to do with separation between youth and maturity. With the vigor of youth the struggle and the conflict of the multi-cult can sort of be put up with because youthful energy and life is just in itself good, but then you are old and it’s like, well what is the advantage of that energy sink that is the multi-race scene? And then by the time you are old, you are a somewhat disinvested in things, at least now in America you just retreat.

        Like


      • “The fact remains that diversity, at its core, is an unhealthy way to organize society.”

        Yup.

        Underscoring the CH truthism: diversity +(in) proximity = war(confrontation).

        The deluded altrusitic affection for diversity-advocating by the left is anchored by:

        1) confirmation bias by describing a sprinkle of isolated incidents they personally experienced where Shaneekwuh and José who they observed we’re nice or once did something positive. This hasty generalization is then applied in the aggregate as pseudo-truth.

        2) No practical experience living and/or making a living in black-brown dominated environments over a significant time span.

        3.1) J3w hollywood / media content control of blasting feel good diversity fantasies 24×7.

        3.2) suppression of empirical fact based conclusions, and the demonization of those who publish the information in easily readable formats.

        Anyone can pull crime data or demographic information these days; however the eye’s of the leftard (and many rightard) masses will gloss over and they’ll begin yawning (read: unable to comprehend) at raw data tables to make intelligent decisions on their own.

        The cancer is deep.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 11:21 am Charlesz Martel

        And you just lost Tobacco Road, to boot!

        Like


    • outgroup altruism

      This quality may be overstated. Most libs do not altruize to Coloreds for its own sake. They self-segregate and push diversity on less fortunate Whites in the manner of a hiker who wants to outrun his slower companion as they are chased by a grizzly bear.

      Most putative acts of outgroup altruism are minimal-cost posturings. Actual alturistic acts, like adopting a black child, seem to me to be more a function of ruderlessness and suggestability than anything else.

      Like


    • Regarding the mentality of the outgroup altruist ethnic masochists otherwise known as white liberals.

      Whether or not there is an evolved genetic disposition toward outgroup altruism among the NW Euros such as the white Americans who are so afflicted, their mentality abides. What is this mentality which we suffer then?

      Isn’t it the case that many reactionary rights have switched over from the left? and so can we not just ask amongst ourselves what was our mentality then.

      I had leftist leanings, 20 years ago. I thought that people could be helped and it would be a better world. That in itself seemed the basis of an ethical code. And there was no religion leaning against it. And even now it seems a good thing to believe, that people can be helped and the world be made better. I do not argue against that now.

      This shit gets confusing fast, but my point is that, that still has to be the basis of an ethical code (what else could there be?), but that code has to work with the biological reality on the ground.

      If race exists and there are different races and ethnic groups and these things have value, then an ethical code will recognize them and advocate for them. So that white advocates, in my ever humble opinion, will want to make their case from the angle that they are doing the best they can to do right by others and to help people.

      Like


      • Isn’t it the case that many reactionary rights have switched over from the left?

        You are talking about neocons. And they are not reactionary. And they are Jews. They are the ones who hijacked the GOP with the help of the media owners and Jewish financiers like Zionist Adelsohn. They then proceeded to attack and throw out anyone from the conservative movement who was racialist and dared criticize the subservience to Israel. They took over National Review this way, as William Buckley confirmed once he was retired. He regretted letting them take over his life’s work, but it was too late to say so when he had retired. Real conservative editors like Joseph Sobran were then thrown out.

        CH’s talk about “NW euros” completely ignores Jewish media control. I guess the “NW euros” in the Ku Klux Klan were reaching out to Blacks because outgroup. For those incapable of understanding this, if you see Germanics in politics catering to mass immigration, that’s because Germanics are the ones successful enough to build wealth, which is how you get to Congress in the U.S. And because Germanics are far more numerous than other Whites. So they are the ones who are visible to you.

        This is like those saying “Capitalists are behind mass immigration! Because I saw a capitalist hire Blacks.” As if workers wouldn’t support the Left and be the reason socialist parties could even be built in the first place. As if they wouldn’t work for race-mixed companies with not a thought of boycotts. But you don’t see them because their names are not on your teevee. You only see those higher up whose individual actions are the most powerful, and then you blame them, even though those on the lower rungs behave the same, and would behave the same if they were put on the higher rungs.

        Like


      • Arbiter, it’snot just the media control. Jews, mainly through the machinations of the Frankfurt School, have master-minded a FULL-SPECTRUM destruction of Western ‘Christian’ society. I liken their impact to that of Monomorium santschii on an ant colony.

        http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2014/02/perhaps-i-can-be-of-assistance-here.html

        Like


    • More about friendship. In a college lit seminar we discussed “A Passage to India,” a novel about the waning days of British colonial rule in India. The book’s protagonist was a liberal Englishman who was friends with an Indian doctor. The Englishman’s gestures of friendship were sincere and generous, but the Indian eventually told him “we cannot be friends until the English leave India.”

      The discussion we had in that seminar centered around power relations and colonialism blah blah blah.

      Well, I did find a solid nugget of truth in that scene. As I just said in my earlier comment, friendship is a partnership of equals. It may be difficult, if not in a practical sense impossible, for a White man and a Black man to be friends in an anti-White America.

      Like


      • PA that is very interesting, because I came from a predominantly black environment growing up and went to majority black schools, and I have come to the same conclusion as you.

        While I have been able to get along with the majority of blacks on some superficial level, I have just found friendship impossible and in fact, I go out of my way to avoid black people.

        When you actually grow up surrounded by a lot of black people (instead of the few curated blacks on your college campus) you get tired of their antics real quick.

        I am not alone in this sentiment. A good friend of mine grew up in a large, very poor family in the ghetto and she is the most race realist white person you will ever meet. She by no means “hates” black people, having grown up with them, but she strongly prefers her own kind, as do I.

        I have always thought it was so ironic how liberals have always abided by the mantra that if we just have exposure to each other, well then we will all get along and sing Kumbaya. Inevitably, these white libs are always from lily white communities and have the most naive view of the world.

        #whitelivesmatter

        Like


      • My comment above is in mod- but basically I say the same.

        Those that advocate the diversification of blacks and browns haven’t lived/worked with them for any significant duration.

        Like


      • As a kid I can honestly say I had genuine friendships with a handful of blacks. We were too young to understand politics, history, or, in our cases, have any interest in the subjects at all. The only things important to us were doing the things young boys do: fishing, camping, sports, sleepovers ect.

        As a youth, I was largely blind to race as such. Sure, I noticed obvious differences like skin color, that blacks have a peculiar smell and that their ears and heads were smaller than my own, that most of them were as quick as cats and that nearly all possessed an utter lack of respect toward authority. But we were friends.

        It wasn’t until we all aged a bit that things began to change. I remember telling one of my black friends that he has White in him and the whites of his eyes were the evidence. He began to cry after those words left my mouth, which, in retrospect, was probably because he was being teased by other blacks as an Uncle Tom for “hangin’ wit dem crackas”.

        Over the course of the next year or so those friendships faded and we all self segregated as the reality of the differences between us (racial, historical) replaced our younger, naïve, sense of life.

        Like


  8. I respectfully disagree. The hidden strength etc makes these women bitter angry bitches. My grandmother raised her younger brothers when her mum died and also got abused by her dad. Biggest pain in the ass you’ll ever meet tho. My mother has taken that influence of bitter angry bitch. Doesn’t stop me loving and respecting them both tho.

    Experience + destruction of innocence = bad effects for women
    Experience + destruction of innocence = good effects for men

    Better to preserve young beautiful orchids in the dark, than expose to too much sun and wilt them

    Like


    • on December 15, 2014 at 11:48 am Charlesz Martel

      Which is exactly why women’s influence in the political sphere should ALWAYS BE SEVERELY LIMITED- I.E., THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE. George Gilder, in “Sexual Suicide”, around 1971, pointed out that if women were to be given political and economic power in addition to the sexual power they have over men, the men would simply leave. How tragically prophetic he was.

      Like


  9. The mental acrobatics that left have to do is actually very interesting. For example people change and behave always like they want them to behave; nobody will lie to get subsidiaries or benefits from the government, but immediately if people get guns they will start shooting everybody in their sight.

    It will result in these wonderful situations where the verdict is completely mental. You cannot get kicked out of England because you have a right to family life, but at the same time you went to jail because you threatened to kill your family. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2854784/Algerian-migrant-father-t-kicked-Britain-despite-threatening-kill-ex-partner-children-right-family-life.html)

    wonderful times we are living in.

    Like


  10. For all generations of humanity, except perhaps the last two, average people experienced actual hunger from time to time. When is the last time any of us experienced hunger for more than a day?

    Modern American women know their children will never starve and the loss of that threat allows bad behavior to flourish. There are no consequences.

    Like


  11. There is a mental health crisis on the left these days. Probably because during the current President there has been a distinct leftward jump in public policy.

    Things like Amnesty, Obama Phones, Welfare reforms ended, Racial tensions escalated … it all adds up.

    A wise man said to me that Democrats are actually Republicans who haven’t been mugged yet.

    I think the cognitive disconnect is due to the fact that White center left folks KNOW that the entitlement cornucopia has been gleefully opened the last 6 years. AND STILL the mildly liberal has to see Furgeson et al.

    I mean to them it’s like WTF? “We elected one of you… why are you doing this?” Of course the answer is easy. Rewards without effort only yields more reward thinking… NOT effort to build a better society.

    Like


    • A wise man said to me that Democrats are actually Republicans who haven’t been mugged yet.

      That’s a twist on “RINOs are Democrats who have been mugged.”

      As you say, the Left’s problem is that they know they have Affirmative Discrimination and all the other wealth-stealing programs, and still non-Whites behave according to race. Asians still act like Asians, Blacks still act like Blacks, browns still act like browns. In all nations.

      In the beginning it was said that Affirmative Discrimination would create a new self-perpetuating order. Because Whites only educated themselves and got good jobs because they had only done so. But with all being equal according to Marxism, if you place Blacks in higher positions they will remain in higher positions by their own accord, by studying more and working more. This was supposed to happen in just a few decades. And it still hasn’t happened. Just like Haiti sank right back to the bottom once it stopped being run by the U.S. Marines way back when, the Affirmative Discrimination can never be removed, even though it was said to be temporary.

      So the leftists have to claim that there are armies of “racists” working day and night to stop Blacks from studying and improving their neighborhoods. It is just like in the Soviet Union, when all lack of progress was blamed on “saboteurs” paid by the CIA and MI6.

      They are taught to believe that people are molded entirely by environment, which includes statements about facts – so the mere mention of crime facts is something that holds Blacks down, and therefore it mustn’t be allowed. That is why they must shout down conservatives who point out the truth. That is why they can’t allow school children to read about facts. The mere mention of facts perpetuates them, they claim. And aside from that, they know there was supposed to be paradise by now and it still hasn’t come – and that truth must be shouted down, because they can’t stand accepting that they have devoted themselves to a lie. Besides the leftist controllers only reward the liars and punish the truth-tellers.

      This is what is in the brain of the average leftist. But the elite at the top don’t believe it, of course. The elite only use their propaganda tools and censorship to keep enough people confused for long enough so that Whites can be turned into a minority in their own nations, and no longer pose a threat to their control.

      Like


  12. hey im a queer woman who loves your blog but i wanted to ask, by your logic shouldnt me and my girlfriend be murdering each other? or do you think because she grew up in russia she has traditional womanly values, despite being gay– and if it was two of (spoiled, american) me, then we would be at each other’s throats? actually i think maybe that’s the secret to our relationship. anyway, keep up the (deeply problematic but) good work!

    Like


    • “by your logic shouldnt me and my girlfriend be murdering each other” When has CH ever said that’s what would happen when homosexuals get together? What a peculiar interpretation. Though, of course, statistics show that homosexual households suffer from far higher rates of domestic violence, as well as more alcoholism and drug use.

      Like


    • “My oddball sample of one doesn’t confirm your hypothesis. Therefore you are wrong.”

      Like


    • Man: “Honey, looks like we need to buy more light bulbs.”

      Woman: “By your logic, do you mean to infer I don’t turn you on. When I have sex with you its my charity. I’m the world’s most special snowflake.”

      —–

      Man: “The sum of the square of the legs is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.”

      Woman: “By your logic, you think all women are a set of legs to be objectified and ranked. I won’t be subjected to your math rape. I’m the world’s most special snowflake.”

      Like


    • You’re not a queer woman, you’re (yet) another level of Sunstein shill, probably male, attempting to disrupt the discussion with a new sophomoric tack of jew-jitsu antics.

      Like


    • on December 14, 2014 at 3:52 pm When Negroids ATTACK!

      Your cunts, your problem.

      Like


    • Shill who can’t speak English (“me and my girlfriend”, “and if it was two of us”, as well as generally poor grammar vocabulary and the use of “actually” to express an opinion, rather than a fact.

      No wonder America’s cooked.

      Like


    • Any good pussy eating tips?

      Like


  13. I had leftist leanings, 20 years ago

    I wouldn’t say I ever had leftist leanings except for brief phases of silly rebellion in my early twenties. On a deeper level, I followed a Christian code as I best understood it, and in line with my well-brought-up manners.

    An illustration — in my early teens, my family arrived from Eastern Europe to the US early during Reagan’s first term and we lived in a solidly-White working class neighborhood. One time one of my younger sisters and another girl from the neighborhood yelled the n- word (I’d write it out but for the mod) at an older black woman who lived down the street. I took both girls to the woman’s house and made them apologize, and I also said ‘sorry’ as the older brother. The old woman was gracious.

    Back then, I had a very different perception of racial power relations. Even though individually we were poor recent immigrants, I had a boundless internalized confidence in ourselves, in my future, and an instinctive pity for blacks.

    Without giving it a whole lot of analysis or articulation at the age of thirteen, I understood blacks to be unintelligent as well as “fun and funky.” In other words, I took HBD for granted. I understood that the nearby metropolis had a ghetto, but I knew that only an idiot would expose himself to harm there. What little I thought of WF-BM miscegenation, the thought would strike me as unthinkably disgusting and degenerate.

    I thought of blacks in a paternalistic manner because in the early Eighties in a solid confident redneck and striver neighborhood full of two-parent families and smart kids, the notion of blacks as an existential antagonist was unthinkable. But I felt sorry for blacks and assumed that it was society’s responsibility to take care of them.

    My innate paternalism may have been interpreted as having sprung from the seeds of “outgroup altruism” but it really was, in my case, a matter of confident identity. On that last point, a tangent — there are arguments in favor of multicultural child-raising, hinging on the fact that a person learns to navigate multicultural realities by formative exposure to all-diversity all-the-time.

    Bullshit to that. Sasmung sales execs don’t need non-Koreans around to successfully market their brand globally. You can’t talk to another man as an equal unless you know who you are. An education policy that blurs White children’s developing identity by a barrage of confusing and demoralizing messages has a crippling and emasculating effect. I believe that in large part, the SJW and cross-race adoption phenomena are acts of cripples and psychological casualties of an anti-white system, not so much misfiring manifestations of some evolved virtue.

    Like


  14. Take an East Coast SJW and drop her on east side of Detroit at sundown with a bucket of KFC and see how long she lasts.

    #whitelivesmatter

    Like


  15. My edumacated guess: The leftoid mind, honed over millennia in NW Europe under manorial and outbreeding conditions, is today a fish out of water.

    That’s what happens when you ignore Jewish control of the media in any analysis of politics today.

    “in NW Europe” You mean people who were racialist at all times before Jews took control of U.S. media and Hollywood? The human mind is not made to handle television, its false reality is responded to emotionally as if it was real. Not just in “NW Europeans” but in everyone. Besides, the south Europeans and East Europeans moving to the U.S. supported leftist bribers when they came over more than Germanics, as a way to get a bigger share of the cake from the majority.

    It was northern Europe, particularly Sweden and later Germany, that had racialist institutes, before the globalist invasion of Europe. Even the foolish Enlightenment philosophers in Britain were privately racialist, as their statements show, even though their books sounded as if their principles would be universalist. And before Marxism made the Germans wake up, the French, descendants of the Germanic Franks, were the most Jew-aware in the West. So where’s that supposedly Germanic-only egalitarianism you’re talking about? And a note, “NW Europeans” sounds ridiculous – it’s North Europeans to everyone except Americans. Or even, dare you say it, Germanics, which is the correct word.

    Like


    • It is a combination of multiple factors.

      Whites are genetically more predisposed to altruism and even pathological altruism.

      Whites are the only ones who live in such abundance and comfort that they can afford silly things such as feminism

      Feminism – a white/Western phenomena – and the fact women tend to vote liberal no matter what has changed a lot of things

      Feminism and having women in high positions where they make or influence important decisions has also made the west more liberal and more focused on short term goals.

      Feminism and women have feminized liberalism, have feminized western society and have emasculated white males,

      Women being more driven by emotions than logic, and being more self centered than men ( and having a much lower scientific curiosity which makes them uninformed on most things from how things work to history ) tend to be bad at long term planning, they tend focus on immediate ” good feeling” things

      Women tend to believe – very naively – that if you are nice to bad people. bad people will stop being bad to you, for example most women believe that if we got rid of our weapons it would make other nations stop wanting to start wars

      It is possible ( actually almost a certainty ) things that are fairly new such as hormones and antibiotics given to cows or chemicals leeching from plastic or hormones from the pill that end up in drinking water ( and thousands of other relatively new things ) – all things whites living in the most advanced civilization – have been and are exposed to are affecting our behavior ( for lack of a better word, don’t forget my first language is French, and my English is self taught )

      we now know that certain toxins can affect behavior…

      Although many blame the jews (and I am not saying they are innocent), I think there are actually multiple “groups” who are all trying to steer the west in the direction that benefits them.

      I do not think there is one single group that causes all those bad things to happen that are slowly destroying the west

      each groups pushes in -more or less- the same direction for its own reasons

      feminists want weaker white males for their own reason ( but can not see what this will cause in the long run; a weaker west that will taken over by non-white males who crush feminism like an insect )

      Muslims want a weaker west/weaker white males so they can gain more control

      Blacks want a weaker west/weaker white males so they can gain more control

      Hispanics want a weaker west/weaker white males so they can gain more control

      and who knows? maybe some leftists group do not even know it and there are agents paid by North Korea or some other nation, maybe Saudi Arabia who have infiltrated and are influencing those groups

      many people on this planet would benefit from a weaker west, those groups may not agree with each other but they agree on push the west towards destruction.

      All those nations at the United nations that are so anti-USA and anti-White man, they are no more than temporary allies, they only agree on making the USA – which is the bullwark of Western Civilization/white man – weaker

      Our advanced technology also has contributed in making men less manly and gave some power to women

      this is only a partial list

      dozens of factors exist,

      I doubt all this is planned from one place, by one single group.

      Even Europe having always been jealous of the USA and having tried forever to compete ( creating the Euro was mostly an attempt at equaling the mighty US dollar ) may be – to an extent – be happy with the USA being reduced to a smaller player ( but like feminists they can not see the long term effect )

      I am sure other people can come up with other factors

      Leftism – especially in the USA – is the village idiot of the world;

      we had one when I was young in my small town, people gave him beer so he would be more likely to execute what evil and dangerous things they wanted him to do, that if not drunk he might have been not dumb enough to do

      Leftism is the village idiot of the world.

      Like


  16. I posted a very long and comment about “outgroup altruism” twice, which got eaten both times. … to CH editors, may I ask that you publish the second rather than the first version? the second draft is better and fixes a couple of typos.

    Like


  17. Arbiter, even if we are homosexuals we are still women– demanding, entitled, unstable women- without even a man to bring stability and reason into the picture

    Like


    • And with this Exhibit B, your honour, I rest my case. :duckface:

      Like


    • No, you are ghastly simulacrum of a woman. Shrieking quivering and fat, stinking and hairy armpits, you could sweep the floor with your pubic hair. Get thee to a nunnery, you mutant.

      Like


  18. I proudly label my mother as a “Last Generation” woman. She overcame a brutal childhood to raise an awesome family, and she never tried to emasculate my brother and I. Ever. Because of her, NAWALT rings with some truth.

    Nowadays, she praises me for the fact that I don’t want kids and that I’m pretty much asexual at this point in life. That’s rather telling. I’ve been alive for almost 36 years now, which isn’t that long in the thick of things. It’s only taken a few generations to go from people like my mother to people like Snooki.

    It never takes long.

    Like


  19. Altruism starts in my pocket. When someone starts rabbiting on about someone else having a hard time, I tell ’em they can shut the fuck up or take care of them by themselves. Half my wages already go to taxes for these pieces of shit.

    Similarly, my home is my home. When a temporary girlfriend starts rabbiting on about “you need to do this” I tell ’em: “I own it. My home. My way.” They get the message – or the door – real quick.

    Regarding “fire still burns” – yes indeed! So they stay temporary only.

    Like


  20. Leftoids are pathetics. Real ”responsible ones” for its misfortune you know very well who are. I have a leftoid ”anti-racist” whitish-mestizo brother (who look southern european). He’s stupid about basics on biology, anthropology, genetics but he’s really believe can ”debate”’ with me about this subjects.

    I’m near-to-psychotic but i’m extremely realistic guy. Psychosis have two sides. People with higher intelect (called factor g for me, my opinion, different than ”iq”), cognitive control (i have) and higher psychoticism can develop higher self awareness and ”sense of reality”. But, many psychotics do not have this combination and perish in ”fairy tales way of life” (usefull idiots).

    Like


  21. Fuck, mts1’s bit is great stuff.

    Like


  22. Besides the women, many men out there (particularly the low-T manboobz, white knights, and feminist cheerleaders) need to be tested in their own way. They need their own challenge, a right of passage…and they don’t get it from this feminist society that places escape pods and parachutes and safety nets at every obstacle to save people from their mistakes…except socially dominant, predominately white, heterosexual men, of course. Some men get their masculine drive from military service…but look where that is headed now in the US. As far as I’m concerned, the military is nothing more than a factory for the manufacture of psychopathic killers in service, ultimately, to a feminist agenda, though most never fully discover that reality.

    In order for men to embark on their own unique challenges that truly test them, they must do so by their own accord. They are fortunate if they have an older, wiser, much-experienced male mentor to consult with…and they are even more fortunate if that man is their father. Unfortunately, most fathers these days were themselves never fully challenged, so they are worth less as teachers and mentors. In the case of the fathers who spawn leftoid children, they are often misguided fools who likely provided a lackluster role model for male behavior. The daughters grow up to see men as weak-minded and supplicating to women, so that is what they expect in the men they interact with as adults. The sons see weak-mindedness and supplication as the way of success, and thus mimic the behavior.

    In this day and age….a man simply has to “just get it” on their own.

    Like


  23. Seems to me like in the US, places where Scottish settlers went are more conservative, and places where English settlers went are more leftist, yet in the UK the English are generally conservative and Scottish are generally more leftist. It varies and depends on a few things but in a relative way I think that holds. It changes a lot though, honestly. If anything, I think the French revolutions look a lot like the leftists these days. The modern movement’s influence probably comes from that way of thinking.

    Like


    • The Scots (or Scots-Irish, rather) in the U.S. are disproportionately Southern Baptists or other such staunchly-Protestant groups. Scots in the UK are mostly irreligious. The English in the UK are also mainly irreligious, but they’re the majority group, and so swing right, unlike the Scots, who are a minority and so vote left.

      Like


  24. From what I’ve seen, beneath all the layers of pablum. White liberals are actually incredibly racist (if you want to use that term) in a weird and far more intense, almost implacable sense. Their whole awkward relationship with non whites reminds me of women and the apex fallacy. The only difference being, every now and then shitlibs deign to scoop up the great mass of untouchables to be bandied about in morality plays, after which they promptly disappear, because they are really ephemeral props. Abstractions for feels and status.

    Like


  25. on December 14, 2014 at 3:47 pm Artist of the slightly shady deal

    Apparently, rather than focusing on their own jobs, men are supposed to spend their time playing therapist to how women think and feel.

    In short, men could use a career guide—about women.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/women-at-work-a-guide-for-men-1418418595

    Like


    • By Joanne Lipman

      You really can’t make this shit up. Where is that crotchety faggot tillikum to tell me to check my privilege or some shit

      Like


      • “they are often clueless about the myriad ways in which they misread women in the workplace every day”

        That’s why it sucks working with women. You need a degree in reading facial expressions to communicate with them. It’s exhausting. Eventually you start mincing around like the butt-plug is starting to irritate and inflame.

        Like


    • Best statement ever:

      “As a man, you’re the privileged one. You just don’t realize you’re privileged.”

      Loooooolllzzloollz, ridiculous

      Like


  26. CH- Please check the picture on this link (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2873131/U-S-Navy-updates-strict-hairstyle-guidelines-boot-camp-officer-controversially-kicked-refusing-remove-dreadlocks-tie-hair-smaller-bun.html). It needs to be in the Goodbye America blog. Any white male that still believes in ‘serving’ his country for these dykes is truly nuts.

    Like


    • As I currently work on a military base (also spent 3 years in the Army decades ago) I see camo-fatigued women, many of them pregnant, strutting around in their tight hair-buns. As yet no military man has dared protest that he too be allowed to sport a hair-bun.

      Like


  27. My edumacated guess: The leftoid mind, honed over millennia in NW Europe under manorial and outbreeding conditions, is today a fish out of water.

    I would say that it comes from the Puritans, who developed the egalitarianism we see today and forced it onto the rest of the country by force and propaganda.

    A very good book in this regard is “Yankee Babylon: American Dream. American Nightmare.” by MacDonald King Aston, wherein he traces the development of the U.S. as a Puritan empire as Puritanism evolves, or metamorphoses by several steps into modern day “progressivism”.

    Like


    • The only reason the destructive ideology has taken hold is because it appears to “work”. But as the multicult, feminazism, and homophilia advance, neo-Puritanism will finally die.

      Liked by 1 person


  28. You can destroy an engine by revving it without a load. Strange, but true, an engine can rev to 5,000 rpm under load and survive… 5,000 rpm without a load — it falls apart.

    Which largely describes the female mind. Millennia of evolution have crafted a brain that can’t not be tasked.

    Quite literally, idleness has been bred out. Slothful mothers don’t have off spring — or — if they do — that generation will be childless. (This category also includes mothers so neurotic that they ‘medicate’ themselves into passivity — booze, drugs, or both.)

    (I’ve seen PLENTY of the latter.)

    &&&&

    The male is totally different critter. ‘Idleness’ for a man is often his most productive time.

    The extreme examples:

    Einstein famously slept (12-15 hours/day) and strolled (interminable bucolic walks) his way through life. He related that all of his best work was done while in solitude — if not in the transitory state between sleep and waking.

    Newton was just as bad.

    General MacArthur famously slept through the Inchon bombardment. His battleship was firing its big guns at the time!

    One could go on endlessly

    Spectacular intellectual achievements require a state of relaxed composure — Zen, if you will.

    This male-only tick comes from the ancient hunt. Like MacArthur, our universal ancestors had to totally shut up, stay relaxed — yet alert, to bag the really big, dangerous prey from a hide/ camouflage.

    Persistence hunting does not work with mammoths, bears, aurochs. They only run towards you. { This ancient contest is echoed in Spanish bull-fighting. }

    At the time of the attack, one must break loose and use maximum exertion — while at peak risk. Upon success, one can kick back and talk shop/ the hunt.

    This male-only tick is replicated during the sex act. For it is the male who reaches peak intensity — never the female.

    Unwittingly, every man, with every thrust, is communicating to his mate his hunting virility. This hits her limbic brain.

    If you’ve witnessed enough pr0n you know that at the final stages, the female is always reduced to a quivering, dripping, bump target. (Yes, it’s not just your lovers.)

    And, of course, there are endless battle accounts of men spontaneously creaming in their pants upon victory/ battle survival. Surviving a bullet festival is a highly arousing event. This aspect of battle is excised from most historical accounts — which are directed at teen males, anyway.

    &&&&

    This is the yin yang of humanity.

    She slaves on as the heart and stomach of humanity — holding body and soul together — creating the next generation.

    He risks all as the mind and vision of humanity — protecting and expanding the human space against all threats — while bringing home the bacon.

    Equal, they are not.

    Female culture is always drivel. For they are wired to talk to and understand babbling infants. Female social experimentation quickly devolves to having no children. Hence the complete absence of successful matriarchies.

    (Though these are commonly seen in Africa: elephants, lions, …)

    Like


    • Great comment well done.

      Like


    • Hell. This blog attracts the best and brightest. Excellent writing and content. And I shake my head at the incredible inefficacy of ‘persistence hunting’. Truly the definition of working hard, not smart. But then again, Homo Sapiens has always been a mob of retarded, r-selected, and status whoring apes… when compared to Homo Neanderthalensis.

      Like


    • “if not in the transitory state between sleep and waking.”

      edison would take naps in a chair holding a ball bearing in his hand above a metal plate on the floor.

      as he drifted into that magic zone between awake and asleep the bearing would fall out of his hand and strike the metal plate waking him up.

      he did this so he could remember and record his most creative thoughts when his brain wasn’t task engaged.

      “For it is the male who reaches peak intensity — never the female. ”

      some women climax like men in one big explosion. they always seem more satisfied than the multiple tiny O gals. plus getting off simultaneously can be fun and they will bond quickly if that’s what you want.

      “If you’ve witnessed enough pr0n”

      do not watch it, ever. fictional work with ACTORS, lighting, editing, post production etc.

      it will ruin your brain exactly as its disseminators intend

      “Great comment well done.”

      agreed.

      Like


  29. “I’m on an evo-psyche and fantasy series stint at the moment, but I wouldn’t mind reading a book that went about mining the depths of the liberal bobo heart. ”

    There is such a book:
    http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/sample-page/

    Like


    • Nice, you know you’re the second person to show me this book. I might just have to check it out, cheers.

      Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 4:15 am JenkPac Shakur

        “I wouldn’t mind reading a book that went about mining the depths of the liberal bobo heart. I suspect at the center lies some kind of ravenous, stygian chimera, vacillating between states of paralyzing fear and impotent rage. It eats culture and shits hypocrisy.”

        Then you might find these two books extremely enlightening…

        1. The Fourth Political Theory by Alexander Dugin

        And…

        2. Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin by Dietrich Eckhart

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 6:26 am JenkPac Shakur

        David one last book I want to recommend to you is “Which Way Western Man” by William G. Simpson

        I recommend this book to you as I simply don’t believe that a person can fully understand the libtarded mindset (or at least modern liberalism which is basically Communism-lite) unless they have a deep understanding of Communism’s origins which are of course found in Christ insanity and how a true blue hardcore “takes the words on the page literally” type of Christian thinks and operates and William Simpson was basically this type of Christian and surprisingly being such a devoted Christian willing to give up pretty much all human comforts and pleasures in true Communist (idealist) fashion as Jesus basically commanded of those that would be his “perfect” disciples via Matthew 19:21 ironically enough these true Christian experiences were what helped William Simpson to see Christ insanity for the lie that it was and break free of it.

        David you have to understand that liberal self hatred and white guilt are akin to those Christians of old who believed self flagellation would bring them closer to their Jewish god or somehow remove their sins, etc.

        Most of the questions about why libtards think the way that they do about blacks and their race can be answered simply be researching oldschool Christians and their behaviors and it has to be Christianity as a religion specifically that one studies since modern liberalism is simply Christianity mutated into a new form.

        White liberals have merely replaced the suffering downtrodden Jesus archetype for that of the suffering downtrodden black man archetype as their object of worship or if you prefer the new “black” (actually mixed race) Messiah Obama.

        They even have saints like Christians do but in place of Saint Peter, Saint Paul and Saint Matthew they’ve got Saint MLK, Saint Trayvon and Saint Michael Brown.

        The Christian like it’s liberal counterpart is a hater of nature’s will/intent but likely wouldn’t consciously see themselves as a hater of nature but they are in that the world the Christian seeks is an unnatural world where “the lion lies down with the lamb” and the world the liberal seeks is similar in its abnormal utopian anti nature ideal ie a world where DIE-versity actually works as they suppose it would ie coombaya singing, harmony and oneness with the “colored brother” when all it ends with in reality is extreme violence, bloodshed and sorrow for all involved.

        Like


      • Religious doctrine does not drive collective behavior. Racial temperament does. Religion conforms to a people’s preexisting nature.

        If Europeans mass-converted to Isalm they wouldn’t suddenly start ululating in the streets like Arabs. Instead they’d find a way to work winter solstice and fir trees into isalm like we did with Christianity.

        Like


  30. on December 14, 2014 at 7:24 pm Lurking_Gorilla

    I have a game question. Where is the balance between her being nervous around you versus her being comfortable around you (to open up sexually)?

    CH Maxim #44: “Women can’t feel impassioned without also feeling a little unease.”

    No doubt. It’s better she feels a little nervous around you, and afraid to say the wrong thing, than to have the kind of lazy comfort you see in long-term couples.

    But what’s the right mindset for keeping her in that state of butterflies and excited nervousness (different from the infamous “dread”) long term, while also getting her comfortable and feeling a connection to you? Comfort is especially important when going for the bang. But beyond that, too much comfort is a passion killer.

    Like


  31. Semi-OT: wtf is with this polyamory crap that is growing in popularity http://www.livescience.com/27129-polyamory-good-relationships.html Now they are trying to justify it as “scientific” and “ok”

    Like


    • More liberal shit. The media is trying to push and promote cuckolding (also note that black guy holding hands with a white girl).

      Like


      • “The media is trying to push and promote cuckolding”

        something to recognize here

        a woman who cuckolds her man typically has a renewed and heightened sex drive, a sense of overall entitlement, heightened assertiveness and demands more support from her spouse while giving less and less

        these are all male traits that women find attractive in men

        promotion of cuckolding in the media is a reaction to the betafication of men and the inherent female desire to find an alpha that has sex with many women, is entitled and selfish, is assertive and dominant and takes much more than he gives.

        be that man

        Like


      • @ho down

        >promotion of cuckolding in the media is a reaction to the betafication of men

        A reaction to their betafication or a push to betafy them more?

        Like


      • “A reaction to their betafication or a push to betafy them more?”

        women don’t want to betafy men at all. they want strong alphas just like we want feminine beauties.

        sitting on the train this past weekend all i saw were skinny jean faggots playing with their computer phones like sissies. i watched them file in, sit down and immediately take out their digital pacifier. every single one of them did this. i saw fail after fail as young women gave them openings and they bombed every time and returned to their faggot screens.

        it’s our fault. we run the show. women have no power. women don’t make the decisions. things are the way they are because men made them this way, just like men have shaped the world since the stone age. we might just be to the point where progress is actually decline.

        i’m starting to think that feminism is not some evil bankster cia plot but simply a natural reaction to the postwar consumer economy and men agreeing to move to the city and suburbs and work in emasculating paper pushing office jobs instead of making their living on their own property like the vast majority of the population did prior to WW1. my grandma didn’t even know there was a depression because her life on the farm didn’t change one bit. she had nine kids.

        commuting, mowing lawns, watching t.v., going shopping, going to the gym. all bs.

        look at the amish dudes. isolated. making their own shit. skinny submissive wives, tons of kids, no t.v. no advertising, no propoganda. i know for a fact that it feels amazing to work your ass off all day in the field and then go into the house, fuck the shit out of your skinny woman and then eat the food you grew and she lovingly prepared.

        we sold out. we gave up our manhood for faggot convenience and crappy entertainment. restaurants suck. hollywood sucks. digital technology sucks. we don’t need forced air gas heat. wood stoves and layered clothing work just fine. we don’t need a/c people are just pussies. it’s cold in the winter and hot in the summer. welcome to earth people. we don’t need indoor plumbing. my aunt used an outhouse until she was 17 and she’s still going strong. modern medicine is great for trauma care but our modern lifestlyes are killing us in ways we can’t possibly treat. the past wasn’t perfect but neither is the present and future looks fucking horrible with guys fucking sex robots and women dying without children. something is broken in a fundamental way.

        we need our own land, clean water, good dirt, a fire pit, tools and women who know their place and do what they’re told. hemp for clothing. herb to smoke. barley for beer. this is what we had for thousands of years. women got used to having badass men around. now look at us.

        i saw a relative i hadn’t seen in a while a few weeks back. a lot of the family talks shit about him because he lives alone in the woods and likes to drink but this guy is solar powered, geo thermal, drilled into the water table himself, kills his own meat and also just happens to have banged a lot of women that weren’t his hot wife while he was married. when the shtf you can bet your ass the family will be begging him to take them in, feed them and protect them.

        i like to piss outside. i like to fuck outside. i like to sleep outside on the ground. sleeping on a mattress the past month is killing me. eating only really feels good when i’m really hungry. relaxing only feels good when i’ve worked my ass off. we’re fucking drones. tax slaves. useless eaters. mindless consumers. our great grandfathers would hesitate to call us men.

        women don’t want to cuckold us. they want to dedicate themselves to us and the children we give them. we just stopped giving them a reason to and they went batshit crazy as a result. i don’t know why we chose this path but it’s funny as hell.

        Like


      • on December 17, 2014 at 10:05 am Eliezer Ben Yehuda

        check out the high-testosterone, man-jaw’ed lady companion of the “doctor of psychology” at Champlain College who penned that garbage…..

        Like


    • Polyamory? Just another step in the long march through the institutions. Western ones, that it.

      Like


  32. “tartphones” haha good stuff

    Liked by 1 person


  33. on December 14, 2014 at 11:29 pm Eliezer Ben Yehuda

    OT question: will Ryan Duffin soon be benefiting from pre-selection?

    Liked by 1 person


    • And pictues of J law, the star of hunger games, whose vagina and boobs are easily accessible by anyone with innawebz…

      Like


      • Meant for the hunger comment above…

        …although jamming my thumb up j law’s asshole does make me kinda hungry…

        Like


  34. “I wouldn’t mind reading a book that went about mining the depths of the liberal bobo heart. I suspect at the center lies some kind of ravenous, stygian chimera, vacillating between states of paralyzing fear and impotent rage. It eats culture and shits hypocrisy.”

    This book is called The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion from Jonathan Haidt, a basic book to start thinking red pill about politics if you ask me. He is a neuroscientist and psychologist who just started out on his journey trying to explain some puzzling aspects of human morality but inevitably discovered why certain ideologies contrast and clash against each other if on the surface they basically care for the very same positions. The harm-based morality.

    Like


  35. on December 15, 2014 at 7:56 am L. Jon Hubbard

    Why do you pick his as a comment of the week, instead of merely upbraiding him for using the illogical Communist (sophisicticated Kindergartner) tactic to psychoanalyse people he disagrees with politically, referring to them with meaningless, non-falsifiable and Jewish-derived labels such as “mentally ill” and the like? It’s easy enough to take down their non-rational, internally inconsistent, anti-human, anti-life ersatz religious belief systems without venturing into the Semitic territory of ad hominem illogic.

    Like


    • This. You can’t win insult wars with the tards, who will always be able to generate a new ism to describe their mental jism.

      Like


    • The original point was not to insult or play psychiatrist but to analyze the manifestly weird and maladaptive behavior of libs.

      Like


    • on December 15, 2014 at 9:33 am L. Jon Hubbard

      We are far more likely than they to have false medical competency of psychiatry used against us (as had our Soviet citizen elders and forebears), by voting to add “racism” to the ever-expanding list of “illnesses” in the DSM and force-administering drugs that turn us into William’s Syndrome patient-like zombies.

      Like


  36. I can relate to both of the comments. Re: comment #1, in the mid-1980s I dropped out of college and lived with a modern feminist prototype in Bethesda MD. She wrapped the pussy around me from the first night and after several months of marathon sex realized that she was a real nutter liberal feminist (hairy arm pits, worshiping POC, anti-patriarchy, anti-republican, anti-gun etc). She lied about her past, said she’d only had 3 boyfriends, but when she got “comfortable” in the relationship started admitting to what seemed a never ending series of one night stands and “get togethers” since she was 15. I have to admit it dampened the joy of having sex with her. I recall looking down at her one night as she happily gnawed away at my boner and wondering just how many guys she had blown and swallowed before me. I felt like just another dick for her insanely voracious sex appetite. And then there was the time she visited my parent’s house and knowing that she was very anti-gun, I wanted to simply show her my fathers 38 revolver and she had a panic attack and locked herself in the bathroom until I promised that I would not show her the gun. During the 3 years I dated her, I had to be away from the DC area several times and each time she immediately acquired a surrogate dick, which she tossed aside anytime I came back to live or visit. She got pregnant by one of her part-time cocks during one of my absences and tried to convince me that I was the father which she finally admitted wasn’t possible. She of course had an abortion. She eventually decided to have a child (a non-white father of course) and is now living with what appears to be an older bald professor looking white guy and popped out some more kids. She’s still violently liberal.

    Re:Comment #2, I was definitely programmed to think like that, that I needed a “modern” challenging woman. I fucked up, passed on at least 3 very intelligent, quiet, attractive, healthy and normal women who would have made MUCH better wives and mothers than what I chose. I actually recall thinking that they were “too quiet” and “too submissive” for me. LOL The much more wonderful life I could have had, had someone, anyone been able to share what all of you now have at your fingertips here at CH and other great sources. You need to make her plug into your life, not vice versa, or else everyone involved will face a world of shit. Nothing beats raising your own kids with a supportive and loving wife. Nothing, not all the pussy in the world can beat it.

    Like


    • “Nothing beats raising your own kids with a supportive and loving wife. Nothing, not all the pussy in the world can beat it.”

      At the end of the day, this is God’s honest truth.

      Like


    • Interesting story, thanks for sharing. After 7 years since I first read “The Mystery Method,” I am done with hooking up with gross girls. I know want to meet a very religious girl. I heard a talk by a woman giving dating advice. She said that women shouldn’t try to be like men, and no kidding, she said we all need to take “The Red Pill”.

      If more men could channel their thirst and boycott sex with sluts, and demand faithful women for marriage, we can do a lot of good for society. I think we can start by being assertive and standing up against feminism in the churches. There is a Catholic church near me that for years was slowly dwindling in attendance…now there are young families, women getting married in their early 20s, not working and raising the kids, and some of the women have started wearing a head cloth inside the church like in the days of old. I heard this is happening elsewhere in the country. Hope springs eternal.

      Like


    • “anti-republican”

      My, well even the stopped liberal clock is correct twice a day!

      oink

      Like


  37. on December 15, 2014 at 9:23 am Hymen Mingesky

    I blame the Disney channel.

    Like


    • They’re changing their tune: here’s the theme song from the “How to Build a Better Boy” movie. Listen carefully to the lyrics. This movie came on the heels of another Disney original called “Zapped,” which was a girl movie with a pro-boy message.

      Like


  38. Off-topic but the first instinct on hearing of a racial or sexual outrage it to think “hoax”. The Berkeley tempess-fressers are getting more histrionic in their attempts to get attention from adults :

    http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2014/12/13/effigies-of-lynched-people-hung-on-uc-berkeley-campus

    Like


    • In-situ diversity prof: ““It falls somewhere along the line between prank and consciously racist messaging,” he said.”
      You say that like .. it’s a bad thing..??

      Like


      • A(n obvoius) false flag with graphic necklacing victim and anti-White slogans/slurs would be an effective propaganda counterpoint to the Berkley effegies.

        Like


      • Yes, but that would require the artists to be truly daring and radical… not “accepted” er satz iconoclasts.

        Like


      • on December 15, 2014 at 2:41 pm L. Jon Hubbard

        Obvoiusly the establishment-buttlickers wouldn’t ever depict the PC trump race members in a bad light. But a genuine anti-establishment artists’ such work (maybe with “Kill the Boer” as a caption) would be impossible to deride without implicitly deriding lynching depictions.

        Like


  39. #i’llridewithyou

    in response to the Australian hostage situation

    it never stops, makes me fucking sick, when will these mentally illness stop?

    Like


  40. But the demanding harpies who have a number of kids by whomever, but laugh when I ask if they’d think of having more by me this time, drive me back into sweet solitude.

    I don’t mean to criticize the COTW runner-up who is only doing his best to make it in this world, but look how far expectations have fallen for a hard-working, vigorous, stand-up man who deserves a whole lot better.

    There are still a few older people who can remember a time when any man could expect that his wife would be a virgin when they married.

    Even a few decades ago the average man expected that when he got married, his wife was also marrying for the first time.

    Then the leftists/feminists started expecting men to accept women who had already once promised themselves to some other man until death did them part, but had broken that promise.

    Now it seems that a man is required to accept a woman who has already had children with some other man, just as long as she’s willing to have at least one more with you.

    Presumably the next push will be for men to marry women who already have children and have no intention of having more, and to experience a faux-fatherhood with someone else’s offspring. (“Genes don’t matter”)

    I shudder to think two steps ahead. Perhaps average men will be expected to pay a national child support tax and receive pictures of random children whose mothers are benefiting from the men’s hard labor, in a “for just 76¢ a day you too can sponsor a starving child in Ethiopia” happiness-once-removed kind of way.

    Anything beyond that I can’t contemplate, but I’m sure Organized Feminism has it in their plans.

    Like


  41. Here’s an example from Australia. Media ‘personalities’ express their support for the Muslim ‘community’. This is in case people might say unpleasant about them after one of their ‘refugees; did the Muslim thing in Sydney. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2874431/I-llridewithyou-Celebrities-tens-thousands-everyday-Twitter-users-social-media-support-Muslim-community.html

    Like


  42. Breaking news! Fatter women make less money! Sexism rampant!
    http://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/overweight-women-tend-earn-smaller-paychecks-study-claims-n231906

    Obviously even other women are generally disgusted at having to deal with obese and larger women.

    Like


  43. Thank you for your nomination. I cannot pump out top content daily like Heartiste and others, but I hope my flashes of inspiration can benefit someone.

    Like


  44. I want a wife as a co-pilot in that, not an enemy combatant.

    Hahahahaha…. What a card… A wife that isn’t an enemy? Wow… You are really stretching the imagination on that one… Unless you are looking overseas and that pool is decreasing all the time as the “we hate all men” mantra spreads…

    Best to just have sex with a woman (girl really as the younger the better) and move on to the next one. A LOT easier… At least till you are too old to really care…

    Like


  45. Update for YaReally/Kant/Having a Bad Day

    The 27 year old HB8 I banged last week…we exchanged a series of racy texts—basically her telling me all the nasty kinky things she wanted to do with me.

    Then we were set to meet up Sunday. 30 minutes prior she texts that she’s “unwell”. I wait 30 minutes and reply: “Arrived. Just got this”. I actually hadn’t left my house. She was panicking apologizing and asking me to forgive her.

    Then she proceeded to send me a series of texts about how she wanted to bang my brains out etc.

    Then Monday morning she sent a text: “I want to see you so bad”. Me: “Come over after work”.

    Radio silence. I send a ping: “Done work, on way home.”

    Her: ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.

    Me: bring dessert

    Her: you didn’t reply

    Me: keep me satisfied and I won’t have to. want someone serious

    Her: that’s not the answer I was looking for. lets not waste time.

    OHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the drama

    Me: “say what you wanna say, ask what you wanna ask, but look me in the eyes or I’m gone.”

    That’s it. Radio silence for a day now. What is it with these crazy girls? They are the best fucks but wow: morning: wants to see me end of day: hates me.

    Cluster B. They go off like bad lettuce.

    THen there’s the opposite end of the spectrum: the 23 year old I was banging who broke it off suddenly feeling we were getting “too close”.

    Now she’s giving me IOI’s at my Saturday dance party. I ignore.

    After the year I’ve had: banging 12 hot younger girls, there’s no need to engage unless these girls literally come back begging for the cocka…

    Like


    • on December 16, 2014 at 9:14 am having a bad day

      @wala

      “The 27 year old HB8 I banged last week…we exchanged a series of racy texts—basically her telling me all the nasty kinky things she wanted to do with me.

      Then we were set to meet up Sunday. 30 minutes prior she texts that she’s “unwell”. I wait 30 minutes and reply: “Arrived. Just got this”. I actually hadn’t left my house. She was panicking apologizing and asking me to forgive her.

      Then she proceeded to send me a series of texts about how she wanted to bang my brains out etc.

      Then Monday morning she sent a text: “I want to see you so bad”. Me: “Come over after work”.

      Radio silence. I send a ping: “Done work, on way home.”

      Her: ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.

      Me: bring dessert

      Her: you didn’t reply

      Me: keep me satisfied and I won’t have to. want someone serious

      Her: that’s not the answer I was looking for. lets not waste time.”

      talk/text is cheap… she doesn’t hate you (doesn’t sound crazy either…lol), she just feels the wall approaching…just her trying to work you into a bf/beta provider role = battle for frame…watch what she does, not what she says…how else is she going to get commitment from you?…lol…she’s just trying a standard rolodex ‘chase me’ gambit…

      good luck!

      Like


      • HABD ok, what’s my play?

        Like


      • on December 16, 2014 at 4:34 pm having a bad day

        @wala

        “HABD ok, what’s my play?”

        this is a GREAT opportunity for you…lol…you can practice some alpha comfort game…

        own your feelings/sexuality…don’t apologize… and maintain a rock solid frame…attitude = you’ll stop ‘screening’ girls when you find the right (absolutely amazing) one…until then, you’ll keep looking…AND you want to keep seeing her…

        buuut…calibration is important…so, don’t be (just) a dick…lol…i think this is your next sticking point…props on getting this far…and putting in ALL the hard work…giving comfort/rapport to a girl that needs it (and they all do…) is the ONLY way to keep them around long-term…and it’s just as important as fielding shit tests…bc they are…lol…just a different kind…YaReally’s game is so solid bc that’s what he does…comfort without supplication…

        “Me: “say what you wanna say, ask what you wanna ask, but look me in the eyes or I’m gone.””

        this seems kind of hard-ass…lol…did you understand that she’s looking for some comfort? and doesn’t want to feel like a slut? (especially if she did all sorts of nasty with you…) just bc she is trying to get you into a beta/bf frame doesn’t mean it’s all bad…i know you have a blind spot there…this is a great chance to practice…lol

        she might be feeling the wall and running her rolodex, but understand that’s all she has to go on (AND it’s all unconscious…). girls don’t generally ‘introspect’ like men do. they just react to the feelings they have…(thank G*D!…lol…otherwise, no game…lol). so, you need to be soft enough to let her ‘feel’ (the roller coaster of emotions – good AND bad)…but have a strong enough frame to not cave/apologize for your needs/desires…when she blows up and tests your frame…OR when she needs comfort/rapport…

        it’s hard to be a ‘soft’ alpha, but it really is the next step for you…so, give her a bunch of comfort, but don’t cave into being a beta provider/bf/monogamy…OR get butt hurt when she freaks out/shit tests your frame…OR when she needs you to give her comfort/rapport…OR etc…just laugh bc she’s just being silly girl…and respond to her on the subcomms…

        “Her: ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.”
        subcomm translation = i need comfort…you need to tell me that i’m not a slut…and am not just another notch…

        “Her: you didn’t reply”
        subcomm translation = you didn’t give me what i need…

        “Her: that’s not the answer I was looking for. lets not waste time.”
        subcomm translation = maybe you are not really alpha…bc you don’t get it…

        “”Her: ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.””
        proper response = own it (avoid it = beta) = ‘ya, i see other people when i want to, but that doesn’t change how i feel about you. i love [whatever makes her special…] about you…bring dessert”

        also, understand that she’s spinning herself into ASD by all the sexting…soooo, spin her into chasing you…lol…

        her: i want to…your brains out…
        you: behave…i just want to hangout and be friends…come over for dinner and bring dessert

        your play = two choices – 1) same old game = wait a week or so and ping for drinks…then treat the exchange like a flake…no escalation until in person…give her comfort/rapport…but not supplication…they’re different, treat them as such…

        or…2) new softer alpha = text her ‘i just reread my last text. seems harsh. i apologize. i do see other girls when i want to but i want to see you. i love [whatever makes her special…] about you. come for dinner bring dessert we’ll talk…’ then own your sexing other girls AND wanting to keep sexing her…

        and see what happens…

        on the 23 yo…ping for drinks…lol

        good luck!

        Like


      • @HABD/Having A Bad Day

        While you’re here – you gave me some good advice a few weeks ago about redpilling (is that a verb?) my marriage. As you may remember – I’m substantially higher SMV than my wife and have developed my game pretty decently with other women in the last couple of years but now trying to apply it to my wife and change our marriage.

        It’s progressing. Slowly. But a lot of it is like going to the gym – even when I know what I should do, it’s hard to change old habits and do it consistently, even though it’s easier with new women who are like a blank slate.

        Anyway, question: suggestions on dealing with outbreaks of insecurity? Not based on anything real (she doesn’t know about other women) – just generalised insecurity based on her lower SMV and fewer options (not to mention financial dependence). Stuff like “You’ll never leave me will you?” Or “Yeah..you’re footloose on your business trip..living the life of a single guy”. Or (today on the phone as I am away), “Is everything okay?” (repeated 5 times) because she *thought* I sounded strange on the phone.

        Simply reassuring her repeatedly seems (a) a bit beta; and (b) a bit ineffective. But I think any kind of cocky/funny response will just send her insecurity screaming into overdrive..so how do I handle it?

        Like


      • @habd

        Ok, with the 23 year old she ended things, ignored me. When I moved on, suddenly she’s trying to get my attention by dancing. But she hasn’t texted or reached out to support my recent project.

        So is she just feeling bad or does she just want plausible deniability: she smiles/blows me a kiss= I’m chasing.

        She hasn’t bought a ticket to my New Year’s party—should I invite her?

        Or is this just a case of a girl ignored seeking attention?

        Like


      • on December 17, 2014 at 8:23 am having a bad day

        @wala

        “Ok, with the 23 year old she ended things, ignored me. When I moved on, suddenly she’s trying to get my attention by dancing.”

        she ended things…you did not get butthurt or chase her…that’s probably new for her if she’s hot…lol…how else is she supposed to reengage? maybe she hasn’t ever done that before… also, how else is she supposed to come back from a rolodex ‘failure’?…cut her some slack, she’s just a silly girl…soft alpha, right?…

        “But she hasn’t texted or reached out to support my recent project.”

        ya, so…lol…girls don’t always follow the script…would you still bang, even if she hated your recent project?…lol…

        “So is she just feeling bad or does she just want plausible deniability: she smiles/blows me a kiss= I’m chasing.”

        no…rethink this concept…girls don’t feel ‘bad’…lol…especially hot ones…(that’s a male concept rooted in transactional equity…) they feel ‘lost alpha seed opportunities’ …or ‘lost beta provisioning opportunities’…but never ‘bad’ (guilty for putting herself first…)

        her smile/blow kiss = IOI…just like any other girl…doesn’t matter if you banged already or not…also, she might be thinking ‘ha, i’ll get him to chase me…” buuut that’s just her hindbrain poking her hamster into action. there is never any irony in IOIs…lol…if she’s giving IOIs, she wants to bang…you just have to negotiate the mine field of ASD and social conditioning to get to the prize…

        “She hasn’t bought a ticket to my New Year’s party—should I invite her?”

        is it more important to you that you bang or that she goes to the event? focus your energy in that direction…ping for drinks…bang…she’ll probably go to the event…lol…

        “Or is this just a case of a girl ignored seeking attention?”

        maybe…so what…lol…IOIs = attraction/hindbrain is interested in qualifying your ‘seed’…or moving you into a beta orbiter position…but that’s only if you fail the alpha seed shit tests and you didn’t go there the first time, so it’s probably about your seed…lol

        also, just a follow up note on the subcomms…girls communicate on many levels at the same time…

        “Her: you didn’t reply”

        this is her telling you she didn’t get what she needed from you. but it’s ALSO setting up her frame, so if you just fall into her frame = beta. what you have to do is see the subcomm ‘i didn’t get what i need’ AND the frame..and then avoid the frame AND give her what she needs…which will lead her to where you want her to go…

        and remember girls do this all on an unconscious level, it’s just instinct for them. you don’t get mad at a puppy that poops on the rug bc it doesn’t know better, right? you are at fault bc you didn’t LEAD the puppy outside to go…if you don’t LEAD girls to where you want them to be, you can’t really be mad at them for pooping on the rug…lol…

        props on the hard work…

        good luck!

        Like


      • @HABD took your advice and re-engaged the 27 year old. She wants to meet but we she was busy the date I mentioned so I left it. It’ll pan out.

        For the 23 year old, I’ll see her over the holidays so will see if she gives IOI’s.

        I wasn’t “Butthurt” when she left. I was firm but didn’t chase so maybe the IOI’s are an invite to re-engage.

        An out of the blue text would be too weird and seem like chasing, accepting her invite to dance would be a way to start gaming again.

        Will keep you posted on developments.

        Like


      • @habd

        there is never any irony in IOIs…lol…if she’s giving IOIs, she wants to bang…

        Awesome point. I’ve missed opportunities because I thought the iois were a joke.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2014 at 8:39 am having a bad day

        @themarquis

        “While you’re here – you gave me some good advice a few weeks ago about redpilling (is that a verb?) my marriage. As you may remember – I’m substantially higher SMV than my wife and have developed my game pretty decently with other women in the last couple of years but now trying to apply it to my wife and change our marriage.”

        props for putting in the hard work…this shit ain’t easy…especially when you’re married…and can’t just ‘next’ your mistakes…lol…

        “It’s progressing. Slowly. But a lot of it is like going to the gym – even when I know what I should do, it’s hard to change old habits and do it consistently, even though it’s easier with new women who are like a blank slate.”

        the thing to remember is that girls have a VERY short time frame reference. if you were to suddenly just ‘become’ super alpha dude, and field all and every shit test (with appropriate calibration…) a week later, you would just ‘be’ that to her…the only thing stopping that is YOU…lol…guys have a much longer time frame reference and impose that idea/experience onto girls…BUT, they really are different…lol…

        “Anyway, question: suggestions on dealing with outbreaks of insecurity? Not based on anything real (she doesn’t know about other women)”

        don’t count on it…she probably does know, at least on some level…but it shouldn’t be a problem even if she does know…just don’t flaunt it or rub her nose in it…or apologize for it…and you should be good to go…just be ready for a shit test…lol…

        “– just generalised insecurity based on her lower SMV and fewer options (not to mention financial dependence). Stuff like “You’ll never leave me will you?” Or “Yeah..you’re footloose on your business trip..living the life of a single guy”. Or (today on the phone as I am away), “Is everything okay?” (repeated 5 times) because she *thought* I sounded strange on the phone.”

        there’s a couple of concepts in play here. 1) dread = the fear of losing you = good…that will (usually) motivate her to action… 2) her lower SMV means that she doesn’t see how she can compete to keep you = bad…especially if she has never had to ‘compete’ for a man before (like hotter girls have…) bc she doesn’t know how and will just shut down…or doesn’t see how she could win even if she does know how…so you need to reassure her…

        “Simply reassuring her repeatedly seems (a) a bit beta; and (b) a bit ineffective. But I think any kind of cocky/funny response will just send her insecurity screaming into overdrive..so how do I handle it?”

        calibration…lol…(see wala’s ongoing drama/advice in this very comment…lol) and yes, cocky/funny is the wrong move here…’beta’ isn’t always bad…(unless you’re dealing with a high end stripper…lol)

        like anything else involving girls, you will have to lead her to where you want her to go…you have to tell her what she needs to do to keep you – lose weight, cook/clean the house, bj’s, whatever…don’t be a dick about it…lol…you have to support her as she makes these changes = she has to have hope…just mention that you really like it when [xxx] and see what happens…if she does [xxx] reward her with attention – call her from the road and talk to her (bc you miss the sound of her voice, etc), rinse and repeat to model her behavior…if she doesn’t do [xxx], just ignore it (don’t give her ‘failure’ attention) and comment that you really liked it when she [something she actually did that you want her to keep doing] and give her attention for that…then rinse and repeat with something ‘easier’ for her to accomplish (than the last thing she didn’t do)…rinse and repeat, escalating in difficulty…just like any operant conditioning…lol…reward = attention…punishment = no attention…

        good luck!

        Like


      • on December 18, 2014 at 8:49 am having a bad day

        @themarquis

        got one stuck in the stack…

        Like


      • @HABD/Having a Bad Day

        Thank you that is great stuff – especially the breakdown on how to do the conditioning – yes, losing some weight on her part would really help – and actually losing it, not “diet of the month” and then knocking back half a bottle of wine to pick up the calories).

        And I take your point that even if she doesn’t have any evidence or hard suspicions about the other women (I am pretty paranoid with my precautions, only do it out of town etc), she could have picked up the vibes..the extra-long business trips etc (come to think of it, she has made comments like “everyone in [our hometown], thinks you’re having an affair..you keep travelling to [other city] so often..”.)

        Like


    • @walawala
      busy with work but a quickie:

      That chick isn’t cluster B, you fucked up. Got too excited by your super-power and slacked off on the calibration. It can happen when you have a lot of abundance going on and just stop caring about running tight game because if she doesn’t just jump on your magic stick then she’s out of the rotation and who cares you have 10 others on the go why put any effort in. That leads to this mentality: “After the year I’ve had: banging 12 hot younger girls, there’s no need to engage unless these girls literally come back begging for the cocka…”

      But it also leads to building bad/sloppy game habits that can fuck you up down the road. It won’t fuck you up immediately, it’s a slow gradual thing where down the road you can’t seem to keep a girl or you lose a girl you actually liked but it’s because you’re running the bad habits you built up.

      You got this from her:

      “Her: ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.”

      …specifically because when she sent this:

      “I want to see you so bad”

      …you sent this:

      “Come over after work”

      …instead of noticing her ASD was spiking and she was trying to get you to return her feelings of wanting to see HER, specifically HER, because she’s a special snowflake. So her ASD was hoping you would send something like “mmm me too babe I’ve been thinking about you all night. can’t even focus on work. come over tonight after work.”

      Same end result but she feels special.

      Because you didn’t give her that, you got this:

      “ru going to tell me you have other gf’s/lovers, whatever.”

      IMPORTANT SHIT TO NOTE: it’s important to remember that IF you had diffused this early the way I just described, you would NOT BE FACING THIS TEXT. Like, having to deal with this text happened BECAUSE you weren’t paying attention and missed the chance to avoid this by diffusing things sooner.

      Picture it like Ceaser the dog whisperer, how he talks about when a car is going by your dog as you’re walking it, you have to give the dog a little kick to distract it when the dog is still at like a 3 on the 1-10 scale of crazy. If you don’t kick it that soon and you let the dog get to a 7 then you’ve got a situation on your hands, and if you let it get to a 10, you are fucked.

      She got to a 7 because you didn’t snuff it out at 3, and you didn’t snuff it out at 3 because you were plowing without calibrating.

      That doesn’t mean it won’t work on girls, since you’ve done it before and it HAS worked, but don’t let yourself get sloppy and stop calibrating or you’re gonna’ build bad habits where you write the girl off as “crazy” instead of stopping and looking objectively at your game and going “oh you know what? that was actually my bad, shit”

      Then again when she sent that, you still plowed instead of calibrating and dismissed her level 7 ASD with:

      “bring dessert”

      Sending her into level 10, full barking at a car rage mode.

      She might come back, it’s totally possible. But this wasn’t a cluster B crazy bitch, this was you running sloppy game. That doesn’t mean your game sucks or that all your game is sloppy or that this won’t work on girls or anything, it’s just that in THIS particular case, with THIS particular girl, running THAT particular style of game, you missed some cues that you should’ve been watching for and stuck to your gameplan rigidly instead of calibrating and adapting on the fly.

      Be like water, my friend. 😉

      Like


      • @YaReally pure gold. After I followed up with replies of this type, she was suddenly keen to meet….and CHASING me!

        Like


      • @YaReally would love to hear the difference between “calibration” and going beta. In the above two examples: 27 year old, I gamed and banged her same night I met. She’s a cool chick not slut…artsy funky, needy. I can’t tell the difference anymore between Cluster B and just “girl”.

        The 23 year old—in that case total calibration: banged, solid game, alpha, non-needy—one day she just decides “we’re too close”.

        Something here I’m not getting and not sure what the blind spot is.

        Yes, I had HUGE success—12 girls most of them 8’s and below 30…so where is the next step/learning?

        I’m afraid after crazy ex gf where she just went cold and then did all sorts of shit and cheated and all the crap….that I’m just getting my bearings sorted and on the defensive.

        With 23 year old I wasn’t butthurt, but when she said that I said basically tell me to my face…she said no and left. Now she wants attention and I’m not sure what to do. My soft-next seems to be working but then again…

        Like


      • @walawala
        “would love to hear the difference between “calibration” and going beta.”

        Calibration is going just beta enough at just the right time.

        A lot of guys will pick a level of alpha/beta and then just plow ahead with that to the end goal and beyond. So you’ve picked hardcore alpha no fucks given and regardless of what signals she’s throwing at you, you’re plowing ahead with your gameplan in the same way a super beta guy would miss the signals she’s giving that she needs him to be decisive or aloof and just plow ahead with his gameplan of being too needy and supplicative. Neither guy is calibrating to her.

        Calibration is basically being very aware of what she’s throwing at you and why, and it’s different for every girl (though they tend to fall into groups and patterns in general).

        It’s not that you lie or change your entire personality for her, it’s that you dole out just enough beta when she needs it so that she feels special.

        A lot of naturals get enough abundance that they stop calibrating because they get into the mindset of “whatever, if she isn’t going to just jump on my dick like these other bitches then fuck her, NEXT!!” Which is fine, you can DO that…but it leads to problems and down the road you end up in situations where you keep losing your fuckbuddies or have trouble retaining new ones beyond a bang or two or they throw lots of drama at you and it gets frustrating and you blame them instead of your game.

        “Something here I’m not getting and not sure what the blind spot is.”

        If I had to guess I’d say you’re looking at the lay as the “end”. Like it seems like your mentality right now is venturing toward: “if I got the lay then what I did must have been “right” and she should just always want to bang me after that and I should just stick to whatever worked to get that first bang and if she doesn’t want to bang me again she’s crazy and fuck figuring that shit out”.

        But even if you get the lay, you have to be calibrating afterward, to stay balanced between her feeling used/slutty like you’re too aloof, and her feeling too close and like it’s getting too serious and running or giving the “I can’t do this if we aren’t going to be BF/GF” ultimatum.

        “so where is the next step/learning?”

        Retaining them consistently for weeks/months/years with casual sex-based relationships that have low drama and a lot less of this “now she wants me, now she doesn’t want me, who knows wtf is wrong with her, I shot her something and it seems to be working but I dunno who knows?” uncertainty.

        I can’t retain them all, obviously, but I have pretty solid consistency with keeping fuckbuddies on the line for months/years without them feeling slutty or falling too in love with me. And I can tell you accurately about where each of them is in terms of that scale at any given time…like I know exactly which girls I need to shoot a “saw this thing that reminded me of this cute thing you did the first time we met that told me you were going to be a fun girl” beta text and which girls’ texts I need to ignore for the weekend, etc.

        So I don’t get a lot of the drama and puzzles and back and forth that you’re getting, not because my girls are built any different, but just because I’m constantly calibrating and looking at why they’re saying what they say and where in that balancing act they are, and when they’re at a 3 toward feeling slutty or in love, I pull them back with a little beta/alpha so they always stay (using that dog whisperer scale again lol say 0 is ideal and -10 they feel slutty like you’re just using them for sex and they aren’t special, and 10 they feel too close (and deliver an Ultimatum to date them monogamously) or feel like you’re getting too needy and they need space) around -3 to 3 and rarely dip into -7 to 7 and really rarely end up at a -10 or 10 where shit gets way out of hand unrecoverable.

        You’re kind of doing what Tyler’s joked about that newbies do where he tells them “ok when she asks what your job is, don’t give her a straight answer right away” and the guy takes that concept and runs it into the ground so their interaction looks like:

        “what do you do?”
        “I work at taco bell”
        “lol no seriously what do you do?”
        “I work at pizza hut”
        “…no, c’mon, really what do you do?”
        “I work at mcdonalds, I’m the head fry chef.”
        “sigh…(leaves)”

        …and it bombs because the first goofing around was great, the second was like oookay that’s funny but seriously I need to know, and then the last one is like, just uncalibrated and went too far. She was trying to communicate to him “I need to know something about you to feel like I know you and like we have comfort/rapport so we can fuck” But he was sticking to his gameplan and missed that signal.

        You did a similar thing…to ME, her signals were bright flashing neon signs, but in the moment you were sticking to your guns and not registering her trying to get you to make her feel special.

        Calibration is something you just learn from fucking up a bunch and losing a bunch of girls lol I went through the same growing pains to get where I am. Had girls falling in love with me too much, then couldn’t get girls to come back, then it was all over the map, etc. etc. until I learned to guage where they are on that slut/too close chart and nudge them when they need it.

        Like right now you sent some beta shit to that chick and now she loves you, so instinctively your brain may go “okay so be beta with this girl” but that was only in that moment because she was heading way off balance toward feeling slutty. Now that she’s back to loving you, it starts over…you can go back to being aloof because you’ve given her enough beta to make her happy for now. But down the road you may go too aloof and have to drop some more beta, or you may drop too much beta and she needs to miss you a bit or fear losing you. It’s a constant calibration.

        You don’t have to think about it when you get used to it…like I don’t really consciously think about this with my girls. I’m just going by the “vibe” now, but a “vibe” is really just my brain quickly calculating a bunch of variables/signals and comparing them to my reference experiences and spitting out what to do…I wouldn’t have that ability if I didn’t have those reference experiences of dealing with this and of spotting those variables/signals. But for me I basically just feel when to show more beta/alpha.

        And showing beta isn’t even showing gay beta, you can tell her you miss her or are thinking of her in an alpha way. Hell I’ve gone as far as using like “disappointed yet again…why don’t other girls know how to fuck the way you do?” lol I don’t recommend using that one (it was a special case) but my point is that you can make the girl feel special without coming off like a virgin in scarcity crying yourself to sleep over her.

        “I said basically tell me to my face…she said no and left.”

        Just a note on this move: you’re asking girls to go against their programming when you use this “tell me what you want” stuff. I’m sure that it’s worked and struck a solid alpha chord in a handful of girls so I won’t say don’t use it, but it’s kind of forcing a girl to either trigger her ASD (if she feels used) or trigger an Ultimatum (if she has feelings for you) and then present that via direct communication when girls want to have as little accountability as possible.

        So if she’s leaning just a little bit toward “no” and you’re like “tell me to my face, what do you want?”, she’s going to have to give you a full “no” when you could’ve instead calibrated that she was leaning a bit toward “no” and given her a bit of beta/alpha (depending on what she needs) and pulled her back toward “yes”.

        Like


      • @YaReally pure gold. For 27 year old…I tried this stuff…just wove a whole bunch of alpha direct but comfort-based stuff….she would tell me all her fantasies or ask me something about my day and I would just lay it on: “want my baby to stay warm…”

        Next thing…she’s all up for meeting again. So I’m getting this.

        For the 23 year old….I think i’m pissed off. That was the one I thought I had calibrated properly. Now she’s sniffing around at a distance—wants to re-engage safely after blowing me off…..

        While in this case I followed the “soft-next” pretty much as outlined, I’m not really interested in what I would feel is “dumpster diving”—going back to where I was. I’ll see how THAT plays out and let you guys who follow my path know what if anything transpires.

        In the third case—the girl who was seeing a friend of mine and who I didn’t game—it’s like I don’t have to do anything….we just end up banging our brains out and then it’s all cool. She even jokes: “all your ex gfs are going to be out…don’t worry I won’t mess it up for you”…we drink…we have a blast.

        But I do know when to tone down the dick moves with her. Also I’ve known her for a long time and she’s seen the girls I’ve banged and knows them all so somehow she feels this is cool. Pre-selection in action. She is smoking hot too.

        Like


      • @walawala
        “I tried this stuff…just wove a whole bunch of alpha direct but comfort-based stuff”

        But now remember that that doesn’t mean “okay just dump all this comfort-based alpha direct stuff on her all the time”, because then you’ll have pulled her from -3 to 0 but start pushing her toward 3 which’ll lead to 7 on the other end of the scale and she’ll feel like you’re too needy or (more often) she’ll fall too hard for you and develop too many feelings and then drops the Ultimatum (“date me monogamously as BF/GF or I can’t see you anymore because it hurts too much”) and then you lose her that way lol

        The balancing act is key, and it’s really not a big deal when you get used to it. Like it sounds like over-thinking it the way I’m writing it out here, like “wow how supplicative to spend all this effort trying to appease her”, but with practice it just becomes instinctive. You just know how she’s feeling the same way a guy who trains a lot of MMA can feel when people around him are angry because he’s learned to read those subcommunications.

        Some examples of balancing:

        – if you haven’t seen her in a while and being aloof she’ll feel unspecial and you’ll lose her…so you make her feel special and you can keep things burning while you’re away from her…but then if you start seeing her two or three times a week, that same making her feel special shit will make her fall too in love and fuck it up so when you’re seeing her a few times a week you’d be more aloof via text etc. So you’re always keeping her around that 0 mark.

        – if I get drunk and have a shitty night I might fuck up and text a girl I was Soft Next’ing with something that when I wake up I’m like “fuck that was gay” because it wasn’t calibrated and too needy…and I’ll know “ok BECAUSE I sent that stupid text, now I have to ignore her for a couple weeks to balance it out” lol if I didn’t pull back I would end up sabotaging myself, but because I know whereabouts she is on that scale and what my text likely caused her to feel in terms of that scale, I know how to bring it back to 0.

        – if a girl starts to take me for granted, like she shows up not dressed sexy and in a good mood, or she’s not initiating texts etc., then I know I need to ignore her for a weekend so she experiences a bit of dread game to appreciate me again

        – if a girl is getting super clingy with me, I know to be “busy with work” so that we can only see eachother once every week or two instead of whatever frequency we were seeing eachother, so her oxytocin and shit can settle.

        – if she’s feeling used and slutty like I’m just using her for sex, I’ll do something very slightly romantic/beta that reminds her that she’s special and not like the other girls.

        And this could all be the same girl over the course of a year lol I’m calibrating as things develop and just always keeping that 0 balance. It’s not mandatory, but the % chance of things being “over” with her go up when you let her slide around on that scale too far…sometimes that’s okay because you don’t care that much about her or just have other priorities in life, but it’s important to be consciously aware that that’s a decision on your part to not calibrate to her signals anymore.

        Also I want to just stress that none of what I’ve written is to imply that your game sucks or anything…you’ve been doing this a while and you know your shit and you’ve had success, it’s just that our game always fluctuates depending on what’s going on in our lives. So right now you’ve had a series of things happen to you that have built a certain mentality and certain blindspots and certain good and bad habits in your head for this particular period of your life…a few months from now it’ll be something else, and a few years from now you won’t even be able to relate to your current mindset but you’ll have other blindspots related to that period in your life.

        It happens to us all, and it’s why you have to always consider yourself a student of the game and not lock yourself into rigid beliefs and comfort zones and routines. Got to always be able to step back and objectively view your game and look for patterns and sticking points so you can grow.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2014 at 9:36 am having a bad day

        @wala

        “For the 23 year old….I think i’m pissed off.”

        why? serious question…i have a good idea, but what do you think?…

        ” That was the one I thought I had calibrated properly.”

        maybe you did…so what?…you can do everything absolutely perfect and still get a bad result…shit happens…they’re just girls…lol…

        “Now she’s sniffing around at a distance—wants to re-engage safely after blowing me off…..”

        does this offend your ego? (her wanting some ‘safety’)…do you see this as a failure on your part?…or do you see it as an opportunity? she’s hot, right?…what else matters?…lol…calibration = softer alpha…i’m not busting on ya (well maybe a little…lol) but i think this relates back to your exgf blind spot…

        “While in this case I followed the “soft-next” pretty much as outlined, I’m not really interested in what I would feel is “dumpster diving”—going back to where I was. I’ll see how THAT plays out and let you guys who follow my path know what if anything transpires.”

        why would this be dumpster diving? serious question…unless she was your gf/ltr/wife, how is her ‘dumping’ you any different than a flake?…it’s all just part of negotiating the type of relationship that you want with her…there’s a reason ‘soft nexting’ exists…lol…it’s bc it’s such a common issue (for PUA anyway…lol)…and how else are you supposed to get a ‘soft nexted’ girl back into your rotation when she comes back around and treats you the way you want/expect to be treated? soft next implies some type of reengagement…otherwise it’s a hard next…

        “In the third case—the girl who was seeing a friend of mine and who I didn’t game—it’s like I don’t have to do anything….we just end up banging our brains out and then it’s all cool. She even jokes: “all your ex gfs are going to be out…don’t worry I won’t mess it up for you”…we drink…we have a blast.”

        game is ALWAYS in play…lol…whether you realize it or not…or understand what is happening on a conscious level or not…start buying her dinners and flowers and talking about how amazing she is…and see what happens…lol…maybe she just happens to click naturally with your current style/calibration…(see YaReally’s comments)

        “But I do know when to tone down the dick moves with her.”

        that’s calibration… FTW! …you can have this much of a natural easiness with ALL your girls…just calibrate…lol…

        ” Also I’ve known her for a long time and she’s seen the girls I’ve banged and knows them all so somehow she feels this is cool. Pre-selection in action. She is smoking hot too.”

        so, you calibrate with her on an unconscious level…how is she different than the other girls?…bc there is some difference in play here…and it might be the key for you…

        good luck!

        Like


      • @YaReally great insights. HABD: I’m pissed because the dumping/flaking just came out of no where. One day we’re hanging out, suddenly it’s like done. No shitty game, no beta nothing…just gone.

        As for re-engagement…I see the point between “soft” and HARD next.

        I’ll see how this pans out, whether she comes out and if there are any natural or forced IOI’s…. take it from there.

        I hadn’t thought of any of what you had said as either an explanation or a motivation. Much of my motivation after the crazy ex gf was to dump anyone who even remotely displayed anything that could be a Cluster B type manipulation. It’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater with some of these girls.

        Yes, it’s an affront to my ego. But yah she’s making the moves and yes she’s hot. There could be nothing wrong with accepting her IOI’s and having a drink or a dance with her as long as she’s initiating somehow.

        And if she did it a few times, I’m sure she’ll do it again next time I see her out and about.

        Will let you guys know if anything develops.

        My goal this year was get over crazy ex gf…the strategy: bang as many hot under 30 year olds as I could….12 in total, 9 were under 30. All but one were 8’s…the one who wasn’t was a Tinder hook up and 33 but banged me senseless. I’m pushing 50 so banging 9 girls all in their 20’s and hot is like having a superpower. So now it’s time to learn a bit more about how to manage this harem. I appreciate all the insights.

        Like


      • on December 18, 2014 at 10:21 am having a bad day

        @wala

        “HABD: I’m pissed because the dumping/flaking just came out of no where.”

        maybe…or you missed something like with the 27 yo…and didn’t calibrate effectively to keep her in that -3 to 3 range…maybe she got too hooked and didn’t know how to handle those feelings…and knew that you wouldn’t go for monogamy…and just bailed…shit happens…lol…

        also, not all girls have well-polished games themselves…maybe she just sucks at/has a small rolodex…lol…if she’s young and hot, and inexperienced, she might not have ever dealt with your situ before…

        focus on the positive… you have a GREAT learning opportunity here…

        good luck!

        Like


  46. My comment yesterday seems to have gotten eaten, so here it is again:

    But the demanding harpies who have a number of kids by whomever, but laugh when I ask if they’d think of having more by me this time, drive me back into sweet solitude.

    I don’t mean to criticize the COTW runner-up who is only doing his best to make it in this world, but look how far expectations have fallen for a hard-working, vigorous, stand-up man who deserves a whole lot better.

    There are still a few older people who can remember a time when any man could expect that his wife would be a virgin when they married.

    Even a few decades ago the average man expected that when he got married, his wife was also marrying for the first time.

    Then the leftists/feminists started expecting men to accept women who had already once promised themselves to some other man until death did them part, but had broken that promise.

    Now it seems that a man is required to accept a woman who has already had children with some other man, just as long as she’s willing to have at least one more with you.

    Presumably the next push will be for men to marry women who already have children and have no intention of having more, and to experience a faux-fatherhood with someone else’s offspring. (“Genes don’t matter”)

    I shudder to think two steps ahead. Perhaps average men will be expected to pay a national child support tax and receive pictures of random children whose mothers are benefiting from the men’s hard labor, in a “for just 76¢ a day you too can sponsor a starving child in Ethiopia” happiness-once-removed kind of way.

    Anything beyond that I can’t contemplate, but I’m sure Organized Feminism has it in their plans.

    Like


  47. Homo sapiens can not be happy, if they do not live in misery and once in a while get moment of relief from misery.

    Like


  48. “On the other side of town, every gangbanger has a slew of baby-mommas and a line around the corner of girls dying for him to put a bun in their oven…”

    In their heart of hearts, women of that particular group know their worth. Your brothers of color, generally, have this advantage over you: they too know their women’s worth, and they’re not afraid to treat them accordingly.

    Go and do likewise, gents.

    Like


    • “”a line around the corner of girls dying for him to put a bun in their oven…
      Well I suppose somebody has to.
      Ye gods and little fishes have you seen them, though?
      Not with yours mate, I’d sooner boff the dog.
      At least he’s loyal.

      Like


      • I wasn’t suggesting that you focus your attentions on a particular group of women. I was suggesting that you take a lesson from your brothers of color, who are MUCH better at treating women as afterthoughts as opposed to canonizing them.

        Like


  49. “But the demanding harpies who have a number of kids by whomever, but laugh when I ask if they’d think of having more by me this time, drive me back into sweet solitude.”

    I hope you’re not really asking them that. I know when women brought up “having kids” too soon, I ran. I doubt the “whomever” that you refer to asked first.

    Like


    • For brevity’s sake I compacted a number of conversational scenarios into a sentence. But whenever I meet a woman, even and especially some I wouldn’t want to date but just want an answer, I’ll do temperature taking questions while shooting the breeze. Is this the job you like, or would you rather be working doing something else? You like this area, or is there somewhere else you’d go if you could pull up stakes? You ever plan to marry some day, or are you set with being single? Done with kids, or would you have more if you met the right man? I keep it all not me-focused at all. Most are matter-of-fact and forthright in their answers, and don’t get defensive or self-conscious. The standard answer is she was young and dumb when she had a baby by this asshole and that jerk, but she’s past that stage now, and since she crossed 30, sure she loves her kids and “they come first before anyone,” she sure as sunshine will not go through childbirth again no way no how – her brood is set, and that is that. I’ve had a number of older people who insist that when you marry a woman with kids, you’ll always be held at arm’s length, you’ll never have authority over her kids, and she’ll back them against you in any dispute, and the best you can hope for is for the two of you to grow closer once her kids have grown and left the house. I see zero that I gain from such an arrangement, and have come to only want to consider someone who hasn’t had children yet as marriage material with me as husband, father, and head of household. Unless I send for some 16 year old from the Old Country who is tired of standing in line for 3 hours for a beet-root to make borscht with and who would love to be with indoor plumbing and a gas furnace, then my pickings are slim.

      Like


  50. “Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.” — Wililam F. Buckley.

    Liberals really haven’t changed much. They’ve always been hostile to opposing views, but what has changed is the frequency in which they’re exposed to those opposing views thanks to the internet. The internet is a real threat to them, which is why they’re always looking for backdoor attempts at controlling it e.g. Net-neutrality and cyberbullying.

    Like


  51. Like magnetic poles, the psychotic extremes of the far right and left seem to have a deep affinity for each other. While on a surface level, one side purports to be on the side of the common man and the other a supporter of the traditional middle class. One only has to scratch the surface to find a rotten core of old geezers who get their kicks abusing young boys.

    The Psychotic left is a perfect example of this. Its forward was written by Dr. Chris Brand who lost his tenure at the University of Edinburgh for expressing support for Nobel laureate Daniel Carleton Gajdusek’s pederasty.

    Dr. Gajdusek, while studying Kuru an infection caused by cannibals in New Guinea eating human brains took the opportunity to bring 57 boys back to live with him over a series of years to molest. Some also speculate that he may have deliberately infected humans with Kuru to study its effects.

    Kerry Bolton the author of the Psychotic Left has a similar sketchy history. A brief review of his biography shows a strong association with fascism and the occult which mirrors many of the darker elements of the Nazi regime. For example, he helped start the Temple of Set branch in New Zealand which is an offshoot of the Church of Satan.

    Michael Aquino, a high ranking psychological warfare officer in the US military, founded the Temple of Set after squabbling with the Church of Satan. Aquino was discharged from the US military following investigations of his possible involvement with a pedophile ring at the Presidio Day Care Center in San Francisco.

    Aquino – Satan and the US Military

    It all reminds me of the strong association of the Nazi hierarchy with the butch homosexual pederasts:

    Like


    • One can hardly expect an even handed Wikepedia article for someone like Kerry Bolton. I’ve actually heard him complain about it in passing. These are the books of his I’ve read.

      -Revolution from Above
      -Babel Inc.
      -The Banking Swindle
      -The Psychotic Left
      -Stalin the Enduring Legacy
      -Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific
      -Peron and Peronism
      -Artists of the Right

      None of these books advocate pederasty, homosexuality, satanism or Neo-Nazi-ism. They are, in my opinion, even handed and well researched books. If you’d like to read a bit of his work in smaller doses, I suggest you head over to http://www.counter-currents.com/author/kbolton/ and see for yourself.

      Like


    • David, thank you for your thoughtful reply. You seem sincere so my quarrel is not you but with the author in question. If you are only familiar with Bolton’s more recent, sanitized works, yes, he does seem somewhat innocuous on a surface level. You are also correct to question any mass media source like Wikipedia regarding their treatment of individuals critical of the Left.

      My main problem is that Bolton passes the Nazi/Satanist Duck Test: He walks like a duck (Satanist) and quacks like a duck (Nazi) and, as you will see below, this opinion is based on a more substantial study than simply googling Wikipedia.

      Some may ask: Who cares if he is a nazi or a satanist as long as one agrees with his basic premise that leftists are nuts? The problem is that it is fairly easy to demonstrate that Leftists are nuts without using a Nazi/Satanist to bolster your point. so knowingly using one to prove your point is going to greatly enhance your chances of coming across to the general population as a Pendejo (pen DAY ho).

      For those who did not grow up in the great Southwest, Pendejo is Latin slang for dumb ass but it a has a deeper connotation as someone who is actually smart but who has no scruples. Just to clarify, I am not saying David nor Heartiste readers are pendejos because I trust that they do not know Bolton’s background.

      Why do I believe that Kerry Bolton is a Nazi/Satanist? I believe it because academics who study these matters confirm it. Here is what Mattias Gardell (who is the Chair of Comparative Religion at Uppsalla University and received The Royal Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities Award for Distinguished Research in the Humanities plus Royal Gold Medal) has to say on the matter in his book, Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism:

      It should be noted that Bolton’s publisher also confirms it because they classify his books under its Third Position/Way section:

      Black House Publishing
      third Postion

      While David has listed Bolton’s more recent fairly sanitized titles, he leaves out the older, more obscure, darker ones such as:

      Aleister Crowley As Political Theorist

      Esoteric Hitlerist

      If you do not believe Mattias Gardell or Bolton’s own publisher, how about Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, who was the professor of Western Esotericism at University of Exeter specializing in German politics, philosophy and the modern occult revival. He also published the most renowned book on the subject, The Occult Roots of Nazism. Here is a bit of what he has to say on the matter:

      Don’t believe Gardell, Bolton’s publisher, or Goodrick-Clark, how about Bolton himself from an interview:

      Interview Question: For a while and up until 1992 you were involved with the Temple of Set, from what I understand an offshoot of LaVey’s organisation. What attracted you to that milieu?

      Bolton Answer: I was irritated by the failure of the Christian-based conservative movement to act beyond low-key methods, and the Right was decreasing with age. For reasons which are now obscure, I thought that something could be made out of the so-called Left Hand Path as an iconoclastic movement. I had already rejected Christianity due to the critiques of Ben Klassen’s “Creativity” books, which on hindsight was very superficial. Critiques of Christianity and the Bible tend to be of a superficial character.
      One area where I would quibble with David is his statement that Bolton’s recent work does not advocate things like satanism or nazism. How about the last book on David’s list, Artists on the Right, a study of the glorious nazi sympathizer artists. Here is a quote from the Amazon review:

      Kerry Bolton’s Artists of the Right: Resisting Decadence is a study of ten leading twentieth-century literary artists-including pioneering modernists-who were sympathetic with Fascism and/or National Socialism.

      Lastly, and perhaps most damning, Bolton is in my opinion unbearable to read. He reads like a dry Soviet Politburo communique. A good way to test this is to read his work out loud. Here is a sample sound bite that will allow people to judge for themselves:

      Like


      • I’ve actually read his bio regarding the temple of set stuff, left hand path, dark esoteric, non (or perhaps anti) Christian mysticism, as well as his initial interest with and subsequent abandonment of Klassen’s Creativity movement. His Fascist sympathies don’t bother me either as I share some myself. And his are mostly based on his own conservative proclivities and view of economics, all within a Spenglarian rubric, with which I find mostly agreeable.

        I think we all trod different paths in our pursuit of truth. And rarely do our way points throughout this process please everyone. And deep down I am very interested in people with radical ideas, or perhaps the penchant to pursue them despite the judgement of the boring, incessantly chattering “respectable class”.

        I think most readers here at the Chateau would find Kerry’s work to be both enlightening and agreeable, as well as sans any proclamations from a satanic, nazi cartoon character. If you don’t like the writing style, I can’t fault you for having an opinion I don’t personally share, but I think the knowledge he disseminates speaks for itself.

        Like