Gay Marriage Is A Farce

Having had the great honor and privilege to detox my buttox be a member in charmed standing of social circles past that included a fair number of gay men, I’ve heard enough lurid stories about their sex lives to fill an abattoir of ripped anuses. Some of them got gay married, many of them knew someone who got gay married. As an insider, I’ll let you in on a leetle secret…

Every gay marriage that was talked about was an open relationship.

Not a one of these gays who were married, or planned to get married, held any pretense of practicing monogamy. When the topic of promiscuous married gays came up, the only surprise was the blasé avowal of the fact. The gay men announced their intention to defile the tacit monogamous stricture of marriage with such nonchalance that it would astound them to learn anyone thought they might behave otherwise.

The Chateau has gay readers. I know you’re reading this. Tell me I’m wrong.

Gay marriage will be a continuation of the unmarried gay lifestyle and all that entails, except legitimized by the state. The bathhouse won’t stop at the boy wedding. The national embrace of gay marriage will have, as per usual when infantile tantrum-throwing leftoids get their way, unintended consequences down the line, and I predict bad ones at that. Marriage is already assaulted by numerous cultural forces; undermining it further by essentially permitting into its scope avowed nonmonogamists will drive deeper the wedge between straight beta men and the institution. And once the beta males leave the marriage game, it’s game over.





Comments


  1. Homosexuality is abnormal. What’s the point of sex if it can’t lead to procreation?

    Gay sex is simply masturbation inside an anus or male mouth. That’s it. It might be pleasurable to individuals, but it serves no biological function. It would be like eating a meal that doesn’t make you full or provide nutrients. What’s the point? Other than self pleasure.

    If you want to have gay sex, have at it. I could care less…. but you can’t legitimize something that is abnormal by any reasonable standard
    .

    Like


    • Kind of an odd attitude. Sex is actually quite healthy besides of procreation (which can actually be dangerous). And since ever is “self-pleasure” not a motivation to do something?

      Like


      • Anal sex is inherently unhealthy. The rectum is not designed to take the abuse of penetration, so it tears, exposing the “pitcher” to the “catcher’s” blood. The rectum is designed to absorb fluids, so viruses like HIV pass from the “pitcher” to the “catcher” quite efficiently.

        Gee, if only humanity had noticed this pattern we might have avoided all this destruction. But alas …

        Like


      • Look at the AIDS epidemic. Gay sex isn’t healthy

        Like


      • Yeah gay sex is pretty dangerous, especially since they are reckless about it and very promiscuous. That’s well established.

        Jack here referred to all sex that doesn’t lead to procreation as being pointless.

        Like


      • If you get tears when you’re catching, you’re not using enough lube, bro.

        Like


      • on October 7, 2014 at 9:18 pm braveagnosticg

        I am a Bisexual reader and I do prefer men over women, however I plan to marry until my 30’s and I choose to do it with a woman to have my own biological children. Right now I could ride the cock carrousel 🙂

        Like


      • “Sex is actually quite healthy besides of procreation (which can actually be dangerous)”

        The contortions you motherfuckers go through are astonishing.

        Like


    • If the sole point of human sex was procreation, then women would literally only be able to have sex while ovulating.

      Like


      • Exactly. It’s like when people tell me not to stick carrots in my ear, I say if they weren’t meant to be in there, well how come they fit so well?

        Like


      • That’s like saying, “If the sole point of the digestive track was digesting food, people wouldn’t be able to swallow pennies or poison.” Human beings, as rational beings gone wrong, have the power to abuse the natural function of most anything.

        Like


      • “If the sole point of human sex was procreation, then women would literally only be able to have sex while ovulating.”

        We have sex for fun also, yes. But it fun because it is an activity shaped by one of our strongest instincts, the instinct to procreate. Cultures all over the world are heavily influenced by this instinct and the need to help it act as smoothly and efficiently as possible – marriage is part of that. But the Left doesn’t want the West to function smoothly and efficiently, far from it. They want us to be atomized. They hate nothing more than a loving Western family with a mother and a father who raise children together, as those children are most likely to grow up as conservatives. That is a threat to the Left. They attack family as an institution in a number of ways. Ridiculing it by allowing mentally ill perverts treat it as a joke and a toy is one of those ways.

        The other reason they push for homosexual “marriage” is because the homosexuals are loyal allies to the media owners. Homosexuals hate normal, loving, healthy families because they can never be part of one. And most of them never were a part of one as children – homosexuals usually coming from twisted backgrounds, for example being raped by homosexuals as children. They want to tear down the normal society and make victims out of the hated normals. Homosexual marriage is a bone tossed to them by the media owners, even if those media owners might not be interested in the subject themselves.

        Homosexual marriage is also something the perverts pursue because their homosexuality is their baby. They have nothing else in their empty lives. They will never bring up children to carry on their names. (Adopting? That’s just mental masturbation, simulating a family. Children through donors? When the kids grow up in a homosexual home they will be atomized individuals like the perverts that brainwash them – they will carry on nothing. And despite law changes, most homosexuals will not bring up children any which way.) Homosexuals obsess over their perversion because it’s their baby and it can only be “real” if everyone talks about it, always. Pushing for homosexual marriage is simply a way to accomplish that.

        The media push for homosexual “marriage” can only be understood when seen in its wider context.

        By the way, for those who say perverts “should also have a right to marry” – they have always had that. Like everyone else they have always been allowed to marry someone of the opposite sex. But neither they nor normal people have been allowed to marry someone of the same sex, or marry children or animals for that matter. This law doesn’t discriminate, it’s the same for everyone. The cry about “discrimination!” regarding this law is just another leftist misuse of words.

        Like


      • “By the way, for those who say perverts “should also have a right to marry” – they have always had that. Like everyone else they have always been allowed to marry someone of the opposite sex. But neither they nor normal people have been allowed to marry someone of the same sex, or marry children or animals for that matter. This law doesn’t discriminate, it’s the same for everyone. The cry about “discrimination!” regarding this law is just another leftist misuse of words.”

        Knocking it out of the park here, man.

        Like


      • So for the other days of the month, retractable wolverine-like claws would encase the vagina? I’m not sure how an orifice like that could biologically switch access on and off like that.

        Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 12:25 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Well, the same can be said about blowjobs or anal with women.

      Like


  2. on October 7, 2014 at 12:47 pm Steve Johnson

    Marriage is for fags.

    Like


  3. did not know that. not surprised but did not know that.

    Like


  4. What about lezbos? They’re probably monogamous.

    The point of marriage is to create environments in which to bring up the next generation. “Gay marriage” contributes to the idea that the point of romantic relationships is individual happiness, rather than the biological and cultural continuity of the species.

    Like


    • Lezbos are basically fat roommates.

      Like


    • Lesbians can be monogamous, but they’re famous for terrible relationship crashes. The ladies are quick to fall into deep relationships. And I’ve been told by several friends that their lesbian relationships ended with them “crying on the floor of [their] kitchen after she suddenly moved out.”

      The joke, “What do Lesbians do for their second date? Rent a U-Haul.” comes from real life experience.

      Like


      • Squid’s got it right. This area has about 10 times the national average of carpet munchers, and while their relationships do seem among the most stable in today’s society, when they end, they end with TONS of drahmah.

        Like


      • What is also peculiar about lesbian couples is that they usually seem that both of them settled, in fact just about everywhere they congregate it seems to me like a statistically highly unlikely concentration of unattractive women.

        I think they also have the highest rates of “domestic violence” among any coupling.

        Like


      • This!

        Like


    • Fun fact: 75 percent of homosexual women are obese.

      In other words, they turn to each other because no one else wants them.

      Almost half of homosexual women have also been molested or raped as children. This makes them turn to homosexuality out of fear of men.

      In both these cases the women were failed by a leftist society that caters to its voters by removing all standards on behavior. Psychologists are therefore forbidden to set the girls straight when they start disfiguring their bodies through swelling, or when they get sick ideas in their heads after being molested.

      If the girls turn to drugs, suicide attempts, if they descend into depression, start hearing voices, become extremely paranoid or infantile or show any other deranged behavior, the psychologists are allowed to help. They are allowed to tell the girls that this is because of their being raped, and they need to stop it. But if the derangement is homosexuality, then the psychologists’ hands are tied. By the media owners and their political allies.

      Like


      • It’s only been a few short decades since the APA voted to eliminate homosexuality from the list of psychological disorders; and it wasn’t without dissent that they did so. I think it was something like 40% of APA members who were against the move. I think we tend to forget how quickly brainwashing can take place.

        I often wonder what it would be like if popular media in this country suddenly stopped wielding the immense amount of power that it does.

        Like


  5. If most decent people knew the depths of depravity your average faggot partakes in, I suspect there would be a lot less tolerance for faggotry. Then again, most decent people these days are weak whytes having their strings pulled by Jew puppetmasters.

    Side note, I can’t seem to smash a college age girl these days without having to cross paths with her coffee colored gossiping faggot friends. You know, the kind of queer who looks like his mother fucked a death row jig and then shat out a broken from birth mystery meat baybay that grew up to be a 135 pound millennial anus gaper, NPR lisp and all. Well enjoy the rest of your day fellas.

    Like


    • “Enjoy the rest of your day…” not with that image in my head.

      Like


    • Looks like someone else besides me has noticed how halfbreeds are disproportionately fags (at least the male ones).

      Like


      • Thats because most Halfricans identify with their white side.

        Like


      • Until the rebolution git here… den dey black!

        Amirite?

        llzozlzozlzozlo9zlozlozlozl

        Like


      • on October 8, 2014 at 12:30 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        thwack, they’re just more honest like white people and refuse to be on the down low. 😉

        Like


      • Halfbreeds have more mental derangements. They are more prone to depression, etc. Homosexuality is just another mental derangement. Is this because of screwed-up genes or because of the insane situation of being born without belonging to a people?

        Here is something where Black nationalists and White nationalists can agree: nothing good comes from mixing the blood. It is no wonder that the media owners promoted Black leftists instead of Black nationalists.

        Like


    • regarding the depravity

      dont read if squeamish

      Like


      • Wow… I’m really hoping that some of that is troll, but damn…

        Like


      • My God… I’d heard about bugchasing, but never…. my God… never had I imagined…

        Like


      • Are you a pollack?

        Like


      • the wife looking the other way while her husband brings aids to her family and wants to pimp out his son to be raped by 30 men… if that type of talk, much less deed, doesn’t earn the death penalty anymore, then whites are too soft to be in charge of anything. that is sick fucking shit.

        at least you can get help if that happens to you, though. in some parts of the world, suggesting that you’ve been raped is a death sentence socially, literally.

        i wonder if all this talk of bug chasing is just darwin’s work. the mentally deranged seeking out self-destruction. i just wish normal people didn’t get caught up in it as victims, too.

        Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 8:42 am Edward (Teddy) Bear

      I’d like to airlift these NPR hipster lispers out of the safety of New York and drop them into Alabama or Wyoming and see how they fare.

      Like


  6. Of course gay marriage is a farce, when it is not an outright malevolent parody. But one can argue that it is a farce whose time has come. Gay marriage would not even be thinkable unless heterosexuals had already pretty much gutted marriage of its meaning and moral dignity. I wrote a couple of pieces about this issue:

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/06/the-gay-marriage-controversy/

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/07/marriage-first-and-second-class/

    When blame is apportioned for the death of the West, the homosexual identity, lifestyle, and community have a lot to answer for. But it verges on scapegoating to claim that they are the cause of the decline of marriage, when they are merely a symptom, campily cashing in on the farcical fuck-all decadence of late heterosexual marriage.

    Like


    • Hey Greg, can you ask Mr. Stark not to raise his microphone volume over his guests volume when he does interviews?

      In addition to it being and old joo trick, Its really annoying and ruins what are otherwise great discussions.

      Thanks.

      Like


      • Robert is now completely independent of Counter-Currents/North American New Right. So you can ask him yourself.

        Like


      • Thank you.

        BTW, Thank you for your lectures on Socrates, Plato… they where were very well done and interesting; I thought they would be boring but they were so interesting I ended up listening to all of them.

        Your voice and presentation style work very well for radio. Some of the guys on this site are smart enough they should consider doing some presentations of their own. But I doubt they will.

        Like


    • Seeing as how you’re a homosexual yourself (although a closeted one), I don’t think it’s appropriate to take your opinion on the matter. You have a cock… a dog in the fight, as they say.

      Like


  7. Fag-ure skater Johnny Weir(d) had some lurid stories along these lines with his gay “husband”. F#cking disgrace. Barely a peep from the mainstream media on this.

    Like


  8. Legally-recognized same sex “marriage” is not an attempt to equalize rights, or build parallel structures, or celebrate diversity, or formalize love, or any of the other putative goals asserted by its proponents. It is a nihilistic effort to destroy the institution of marriage, which is the foundation of the nuclear family and of society. Period. Full stop.

    Homosexuals tend to be miserable, broken people deep down in their cores. They hate seeing normal people happy, when they themselves can’t find happiness in their favorite perversions. Rather than drawing the logical conclusion and resisting their dangerous and counterproductive desires, they lash out childishly to drag everyone else into the pit with them.

    These activists are not rational. We cannot persuade them out of a worldview that they weren’t persuaded into. They’re the brats in the sandbox who hate our nicer sand castles, so they dedicate themselves heart & soul to kicking them over.

    Like


    • Yeah, some people just want to watch the world burn. And some people want to marry their homosexual partners so they are not kept away from them on their deathbeds by malevolent parents who have medical power of attorney.

      Like


      • malevolent parents who have medical power of attorney

        I’m going to use small words so that you’ll understand. “Malevolent” parents only end up with power-of-attorney when their adult sick gay child chooses not to give power-of-attorney to his/her gay partner.

        POA paperwork is ridiculously simple, is easily available online for very little cost, and is customized to each of the 57 states and the District of Columbia. If the adult sick gay partner doesn’t designate the other adult gay partner as his/her POA for medical decisions, then it’s either due to negligence or due to a lack of trust in the “healthy” partner.

        Nobody gives a shit if you designate your gay lover, your “malevolent” parent, or your neighbor’s uncle’s roommate’s pansexual polygamous college professor as your POA. The legal system doesn’t care; as long as you’re of sound mind and you execute the paperwork with the correct attestation procedure, the POA is valid and legally binding.

        If your sick gay lover didn’t designate you as POA, or didn’t specify that you were to be allowed to visit his/her bedside, then it’s your sick gay lover’s fault and not society’s. Don’t even try to turn their laziness, stupidity, or distrustfulness into a reason to destroy society, you fool. Heterosexual monogamous marriage is the foundation upon which civilization stands. If you ruin it, you and your fellow gay activists will be among the first to be devoured by the savages who will rush in to take over.

        Got any other bullshit objections? I’ve heard ’em all, cupcake.

        Like


      • You dream of rimming other men’s feces-covered anuses and of getting sodomized by girthy penii. Please do not comment on faggotry, ever. You are a deviant.

        Like


      • Lot’s of people die without filling out wills. Doesn’t mean they didn’t care about who gets their stuff.

        Like


    • Besides the other heavy themes in the Dark Knight, I always thought the Joker represented the worst of femininity/homosexuality. Nihilistic, manipulative, calculating, darkly opportunistic, anti-traditional, and corrupting.

      Molon labe.

      Like


  9. Somehow me thinks gay marriage was almost always the dyke brigades prerogative. ‘If” queer men maintain any of their manliness, I must believe that they are just as sick of modern women and their BS than the rest of us guys that have no interest in earning our Rump Ranger tabs. Women have reduced male gay bars to becoming petting zoos for overweight, drunken skanks to visit for their bachelorette parties to fawn all over the creatures inside. Just as the poor gorillas can’t take a [email protected] in peace because there’s always a school bus load of children on a field trip watching its every move through a plexiglass screen seven days a week, the fags must get tired of being used as show ponies for straight bitches amusement? I don’t blame gay men for the whole “marriage” issue, its gotta be the lesbos that fronted this push, but I could be wrong?

    Like


    • Gay men have more power. They may seem nicer on the surface, but they’re sneaky bastards who will stab you as soon as look at you (heh). Lesbians are a lot louder about the LGBTWTFBBQ cause, but they’re not really all that subversive in the way fags are.

      Like


      • Fags are the sneaky fuckers lurking in the wings, waiting on you to say or think something inappropriate, and then they pounce.

        I was working alone one time, installing a tricky low profile tire onto an expensive rim. I got frustrated and pissed off, and blurted “Oh you fucking faggot!” at the tire or the trim.

        I got summoned before the Grand Inquisition over that one, and forced to go through sensitivity training. Before it was all over, I ended up going out drinking with that fag too, because the slimy little fudge packer had power over me, and I needed to get back in his good graces, politically.

        I’m glad I quit that job. I’m not cut out for the corporate world at all.

        Like


      • “Lesbians are a lot louder about the LGBTWTFBBQ cause, but they’re not really all that subversive in the way fags are.”

        Highly doubt that. Homos are too apolitical to be more dangerous than lesbians.

        Like


  10. No government should promote a policy that doesn’t produce future tax payers, period, full stop. Homosexuals are incapable of producing offspring – i.e., future tax payers, so any promotion of their lifestyle will only help to decrease future tax revenues. But the government is stupid and too corrupt to care about it’s own eventual economic demise, so this is just another item to add to the list.

    Like


    • the SC case that struck down DOMA was a lesbian not wanting to pay estate taxes.

      I can’t see why her non-normal coupling is more special for tax reasons than my being single.

      Like


    • While this is true, gay marriages are the perfect place to off load the gluttony of illegitimate children being brought in the world. Cause you know, two men can raid a child just as well as a married man and woman.

      Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 12:54 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Well, this is a tiny problem compared to giving old people decade long vacations instead of guns with which to blow their brains out.

      Like


    • So a people or a nation should only be thought of in context of their economic value? What about tradition, ethny, or family? These have no economic value. Can these not be included in the argument against the destruction of Western civilization, or are the economic arguments the only ones that carry any weight?

      Like


  11. One of my best friends is a homosexual. I don’t want to talk about some of the things that have happened to him for his sake but let’s just say std’s and abuse run deep in the community. I don’t think he ever cared about gay marriage. Everywhere it was put to a vote I think it was never by more than a 10 point margin, I could be wrong. So roughly half of voters wanted it, but homosexuals are only maybe 1-2% of the population. It was a straight person’s lobby not a gay one. It may have been influenced by some gays but its support came from straight people who wanted to be fashionable. I personally don’t care, I think visitation rights, taxes, and wills should be open to them but these are not strictly about the marriage. Think of how much money was raised in the campaigns for it. I can not help but believe a lot of it had to do with perceptions and money but that the straight people who voted for it honestly couldn’t give a care about the homosexuals.

    Like


    • I think visitation rights, taxes, and wills should be open to them

      They already are. They always have been. You only need a Power Of Attorney form and a couple of witnesses. Easy peasy.

      Like


  12. US v Windsor, the legal case that overturned DOMA was, in essence, a *TAX* law case. Two lesbians domiciled in NY were “legally married” in Canada and one passed away. The other sought to overturn DOMA so that the estate could pass to her without incurring estate tax.

    The dickhead mainstream media kept painting this as a “civil rights issue.” What a load of bullshit. It was a case of somebody trying to dodge taxes. Not that there’s anything wrong with dodging taxes, but God forbid if a hetero white guy tries to do it.

    Like


  13. on October 7, 2014 at 2:17 pm You_know_nothing

    You think that’s the worst about gay marriage? You know nothing, Jon Snow.

    Have you ever investigated pedophiles’ sites and forums? The ones where they trade illegal pics and videos by hiding them inside other apparently harmless files (with the right program, you can later extract them)?

    Do you know how many times I’ve come across some pedo looking for another pedo to pretend to be faggots so they could marry, adopt a child and rape him/her at their will?

    Like


  14. (With the proper links this time)

    On unintended consequences, I’ll reproduce a comment I left on Half Sigma about this topic in 2012.

    http://halfsigma.typepad.com/half_sigma/2012/08/chik-fil-a-vs-amazon.html?cid=6a00d8341bf6ae53ef017743e50bfc970d#comment-6a00d8341bf6ae53ef017743e50bfc970d

    The thing which worries me about gay marriage is that the norms surrounding gay long-term relationships will be imported into the concept of marriage.

    http://www.sfgate.com/lgbt/article/Many-gay-couples-negotiate-open-relationships-3241624.php
    (The above is a media write-up of a study that found that in a study of 566 gay couples, only 45 percent had made the promise to be sexually monogamous. This is an example of a different moral norm surrounding gay long-term relationships.)

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/29sfmetro.html?_r=1
    (In the above link is a NYTimes piece arguing that homosexual marriage could modernise (that is import different norms into) marriage as an institution.), specifically; “The traditional American marriage is in crisis, and we need insight,” he said, citing the fresh perspective gay couples bring to matrimony. “If innovation in marriage is going to occur, it will be spearheaded by homosexual marriages.”

    The importation of a moral norm like the one above surrounding gay long-term relationships would destroy the institution of marriage for heterosexuals who wish to pursue a long-term mating strategy. I don’t know many men who would sign up to an institution where the partners are expected/morally obliged to be emotionally faithful but not sexually faithful. It is much easier for women to get casual sex than men, so any man signing himself up to that deal would be signing himself up for cuckoldry and cuckoldry is the absolute worst thing that can happen to a man pursuing a long-term mating strategy, (and it is the evolved moral norms surrounding the long-term mating strategy which marriage as a cultural institution is/was developed around/for.)

    Of course, if people became more knowledgeable about evo-bio/evo-psych and instead started calling marriage essentially what it is, the social-codification of the long-term mating strategy in humans, then this concern wouldn’t really matter. (No worrying about importing norms anti-thetical to the reproductive interests of one party in the relationship and subsequently which disincentivises the pursuit of the strategy from that party as its definition is strictly evo-bio/evo-psych.)

    (On a side note, the reason I’ve given above is also why I think a lot of religious people are against gay marriage, they fear that it will change the institution and expose them to cuckoldry. This wouldn’t be the first time that religious norms have been developed to prevent cuckoldry/ensure paternal certainty; see http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-06/uom-hrp060412.php

    Of course, I doubt these fears will be allayed as doing so would go against the feminist establishments desire to create a matriarchial/matrilineal cad society where all men are cuckolds (if they aren’t cads that is), but that’s a whole different issue.)

    Addendum:
    More evidence of different moral norms surrounding homosexual relationships:

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/gays-anatomy/200809/are-gay-male-couples-monogamous-ever-after
    see “In his book, The Soul Beneath the Skin, David Nimmons cites numerous studies which show that 75% of gay male couples are in successful open relationships.”

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00918360903445962

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19243229

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20635246
    This is the link to the actual study from the newspaper reports.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20069497
    This one provides a good review of the literature. But it is pay-gated.

    Another worthwhile comment made by commenter map and reproduced from that same page is this one;

    http://halfsigma.typepad.com/half_sigma/2012/08/chik-fil-a-vs-amazon.html?cid=6a00d8341bf6ae53ef017743e3c1c8970d#comment-6a00d8341bf6ae53ef017743e3c1c8970d

    jaakeli –

    “There is no double standard. If someone campaigned to end Christian marriage, there would be plenty of outrage. Gay marriage isn’t going to ruin anyone’s heterosexual marriage and anyone claiming that it does comes across as either delusional (fearing that acceptance of homosexuality is going to spread it wide) or hateful (being so disgusted with homosexuality that the mere association feels harmful to marriage).”

    Really? Did you forget how the law actually works?

    Equality implies an equivalence. Not only must homosexuals be treated the same as heterosexuals, but heterosexuals must be treated the same as homosexuals. Once gays have the legal standing to marry, they will then have the legal standing to alter the laws as they see fit, especially through the courts. Any such legal changes must directly map to the marriage laws that underpin heterosexual marriages.

    In other words, heterosexuals will be treated like homosexuals under the law. What would that entail?

    Well, what is a feature of gaydom? Gays are very promiscuous and their relationships are essentially open. Gays will import their “open” relationships into their legal marriages. After all, why not? If openness was not a problem before they were married, then why would it be a problem after they were married? And if cheating is not an issue in the marriage because the gay couple did that before they were married, then why would it be an issue in, say, a divorce? What prevents a gay partner from arguing that his cheating on his spouse is inconsequential and should have no bearing on a divorce proceeding?

    Poof…gay marriage has now introduced de facto polygamy into straight marriages by reducing the consequences of cheating. Remember, divorce is only no-fault when a party is initiating a separation. It is not no-fault when it comes to money. Fault matters when discussing child custody, alimony, child support, and assets. Cheating still determines whether a woman gets anything out of a divorce, especially if a man initiates divorce first. With gay marriage, women can cheat to their hearts content and never have to worry about getting called on it.

    Like


    • “Once gays have the legal standing to marry, they will then have the legal standing to alter the laws as they see fit, especially through the courts.”

      It is already happening. Birth certificates are replacing mother and father with parent 1 and parent 2. Even the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ are now discriminatory.

      Like


  15. who gives a shit. marriage is for beta men anyway. you’d have to be a fool to get married these days. let them marry each other. why some of you care is what is worrisome.

    Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 12:59 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Well, some women are worth marrying, at least here. They usually bring more money into the marriage than you though. Thinking of it, I don’t know a single quality man that married a woman that didn’t own a house courtesy to her parents.

      Like


  16. that’s odd because modern culture has told me that it’s the same love, you know? Every sitcom seems to have the perfect gay couple. Of course, popular culture’s goal is to make the suburbs look bad.

    Like


  17. hey if gays want to perform the act of marriage and have the same rights that it would entail, then let them. call it whatever you want, just don’t expect me to call it marriage and refer to it as such, marriage is between a man and a women, any other combination cannot be marriage by definition so fuck you for meddling with my language

    ub

    Like


  18. Great point CH. I think the betas are wising up

    Like


  19. The thing that gets me is that the same people who are banging the goddamn drum so loud for gay marriage are the same people who have been telling us for the last 50 years that straight marriage is so superfluous and unnecessary.
    Tell a liberal gays shouldn’t get married and they look at you like you’re Hitler. Ask them why they haven’t married the bf/gf they’ve been shacking with for two years and they just look at you like you’re daft. “Huh? It’s just a piece of paper?!”
    Why is gay marriage a moral imperative and straight marriage just an anachronism?

    Like


  20. Gay marriage is health insurance fraud, pure and simple.

    Like


    • on October 7, 2014 at 5:36 pm Foolish Pride

      My understanding is the push behind gay marriage is so that HIV+ men could be supported by their GRIDs-free partner.

      Like


  21. Are we surprised that people who risk the consequences of anal intercourse would have some other “different” habits? The CDC estimates that one in five urban homosexuals is infected with HIV, and nearly all have an STD. It’s like playing roulette with a fully loaded revolver.

    Knew a guy who was doing so. Everybody was sad for him, but nobody was surprised, when his test came back positive. And like many know all too well, AIDS is a terrible way to die.

    Like


    • on October 7, 2014 at 5:12 pm Goddess Kalifornia Surfer

      “Are we surprised that people who risk the consequences of anal intercourse would have some other “different” habits? ”

      I’ve heard that online porn has mainstreamed anal sex these days even for heterosexuals. I’ve also read adult diaper sales are on the rise for increasingly younger men AND women. I’ve also read that more men AND women are being admitted into hospitals to undergo surgical sewing up of the anus.

      Oral sex was thought of as “disgusting” by my grandparents generation but by the time my parents were having sex is probably considered “kinky but fun”, thanks to VCR video porn.

      Now MY generation thinks nothing of blow jobs and cunnilingus and anal sex is becoming mainstream as well, if not already considered “normal” and “healthy”!!!

      Oral sex, what we currently think of as “normal” and “vanilla”, was introduced FIRST through gay porn and then only it entered into straight porn and then the general population, just like anal sex.

      Like


      • people have been having hetero oral and anal sex for as long as there has been people

        Like


      • I’m sorry, but anal sex IS inherently unhealthy and disgusting. The rectum isn’t designed to take that kind of abuse and results in tears and microfissions, allowing faecal matter and diseases into the bloodstream. Vaginal and oral sex do not carry the same risks.

        Like


  22. on October 7, 2014 at 5:00 pm Goddess Kalifornia Surfer

    Many gay men are promiscuous but there are many that are not also.

    There are AIDS documentaries that cover the extreme promiscuity that was taking place in the gay communities of NYC and San Fran in the post-sexual revolution late 70s and 80s (the Disco Era). There are also several “based on true story” dramas – plays and films, based on this particular era.

    It was an era of sexual liberation and anyone (homo or hetero) with a promiscuous bent thought lifelong monogamy was for square, conservative vanilla types – grandmas and grandpas. Certain gay men took a socio-political stance against monogamy because “we shouldn’t copy heterosexual mating patterns but create our own.”

    The AIDS epidemic changed all that.

    Still, I have noticed that there is a core contingent of gay men who again feel comfortable with open relationships and even promiscuity now that HIV is no longer an immediate death sentence but a “manageable chronic illness” due to advances in medical science.

    Lesbians are generally not promiscuous, at least nowhere near the level as the gay (or hetero) men who are.

    A hetero men who is highly promiscuous is really better off in the “gay community” because he can certainly find more gay men than hetero women to get his freak on with.

    Like


  23. on October 7, 2014 at 5:20 pm Ebolaing for Columbine

    Hey! Be sure to vote this November because- “Will of the People”!
    When your vote is over-ridden by a non-elected Federal Judge, don’t fret!
    There will be another chance to vote again next time. It’s your Right!
    And why should hetero males be the only ones to suffer in marriage?
    Wedding cakes & divorce courts for all!

    Like


  24. The battle against gay marriage has long been lost, and it’s inevitable that in time, it will spread out to all 50 states. If West Point is hosting gay marriages, than the Vatican will eventually. Marriage went from being a social institution to civil right with benefits and prizes. But during that battle, I’ve been told over and over that it doesn’t affect me and it doesn’t affect my marriage.

    Yet no sooner did the Supreme Court rule, the story changed, and I was told gay marriage meant there is a new (gay) sheriff in town, and his name is Intolerance.

    In New Mexico, a photographer who declined a job offer of photographing a same sex commitment ceremony was sued by New Mexico’s Human Rights Commission even though New Mexico at the time didn’t even have gay marriage or civil unions. The photographer’s defense was on First Amendment grounds, but the First is gradually joining the Second in Amendments the left no longer recognizes.

    There is of course the more famous Washington State florist case, and the Oregon bakery case.

    These aren’t religious institutions, these are individuals, and it looks like individuals are having their rights peeled away. I can’t be indifferent to gay marriage, or even merely tolerant of it, the law is gradually going to force me to love, love, love gay marriage.

    Religious institutions will eventually get theirs. The people on the left who say they support religious freedom sure were supportive of the Obama administration’s initiative to force Catholic institutions to provide contraception. If they can do that, they will eventually force churches to perform gay marriages. That already happens in Europe and our time is coming.

    I knew the promise that their marriage wouldn’t affect me would turn out to be a lie, but I admit I’m surprised with how rapidly we’ve gone to, “I just want my partner and I to have what you have,” to “ You’re not allowed to ignore me, you must provide services for my over the top marriage extravaganza! And if you don’t, I’ll see you in court!”

    Like


  25. on October 7, 2014 at 5:47 pm Chris from Dublin

    Gay marriage is a farce.

    “The Chateau has gay readers. I know you’re reading this. Tell me I’m wrong.”
    You’re right, you knew I’d post in this one, didn’t you?
    Fuck you all the same!!!

    🙂

    Greetings from Dublin by the way, where the flames of destruction of western civilisation have begun at long last. When docile countries like the Republic of Ireland (but not, interestingly, Northern Ireland) rise up, they really know how to raise hell. Imagine Canada in flames …
    Over the past week the most ordinary and decent folk in the Republic of Ireland have revolted over being pushed one step too far by a nanny-state régime which is only interested in feathering its own nests and looking after its own cronies. This arises from … wait for it … a water-metering system in which the citizenry are being demanded to surrender their most intimate personal details. These craven ruling classes never know when to stop. (Google Facebook, Ireland, Irish Water, Edenmore, Garda, injunction).

    I was raised by a mother and a father and I had the benefit of a normal parenthood. The gay environment is intrinsically sexualised and promiscuous – it is not suitable for child-raising. I know that there are many gay men who have become fathers via fucking women but that does not make the environment ideal for child-raising.

    The fallacies of gay parenting and gay marriage are part of a larger malaise in western society – that you can have it all. That an older women who has fucked around can still marry an alpha and bear children that resemble him. That you can sponge and scab off society and that it won’t cause societal breakdown.

    Gay men are openly and proudly promiscuous, especially those who are out on the scene. I recall a casual conversation with a young office worker who described a holiday to Florida he had just returned from and how he had hooked up with a group of other similar men in Miami with whom he had “had fun” on a few occasions. He had had group sex, threesomes, one on one and they had all met in the bar the next day to say hi and compare notes. This is the truth of how the gay scene works, get over it.

    Accordingly, gay marriage is nearly always a sham until they get older and lose their mojos (sound familiar … ?) Then they “settle”.
    When I lose my mojo I’ll marry a woman.

    It’s not natural – it doesn’t make babies, but I was born gay, it’s the only way I know. (Also, anal is lovely … !)

    The fallacy of gay marriage is similar to the fallacies that are floating around pre-revolutionary Dublin at the moment, particularly the idea that citizens can exempt themselves from water tax merely by posting their water demand packs back to Irish Water with “no consent, no contract, return to sender” scrawled on them.

    What the fuck is wrong with people?

    The truth hurts. Being gay requires sacrifice – I am not going to be a family guy (on the other hand I get instant blow-jobs with a crescendo in lovely, lovely anal. No pussy can match a sphincter for tautness. Beautiful. A happy sacrifice, for me …) Being politically active requires many years of courage and hard work. You cannot be a part-time, overnight revolutionary. A proper political activist always tells the truth, even (especially) when to lie is expedient in the short term. Proper political activists never worry about the short term (we leave that to the Government).

    Just for the laughs, see this:-

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pseudolaw

    Like


    • Greetings from Dublin by the way, where the flames of destruction of western civilisation have begun at long last.

      The fallacy of gay marriage is similar to the fallacies that are floating around pre-revolutionary Dublin at the moment,

      Being politically active requires many years of courage and hard work. You cannot be a part-time, overnight revolutionary.

      So you’re a termite in the House of Civilization.

      Like


    • on October 8, 2014 at 1:01 am Goddess Kalifornia Surfer

      “Accordingly, gay marriage is nearly always a sham until they get older and lose their mojos (sound familiar … ?) Then they “settle”.
      When I lose my mojo I’ll marry a woman.”

      Disgusting. If there is any justice in this world you will not find a single woman who will have you.

      Like


      • This website is dedicated to observing how illogical women are when it comes to sexual selection. And anything else, come to think of it.

        Like


  26. on October 7, 2014 at 9:38 pm PaulusTurnerius

    Let the gays have it.. it’s an outdated, obselete institution being held on to by upper middle class snobs anyway. The working classes have abandoned marriage almost completely.

    Like


  27. It’s a farce for the arse.

    Like


  28. http://xkcd.com/1431/ Looks like gays only marries to because it’s popular

    Like


  29. I predict that in the near future many straight marriages will be implicitly or explicitly open to the detriment of beta males and the short lived benefit of aged women and studly cads, thus further speeding up the decline of that great civilization building institution.
    Because if gay men can do it, why not women too will go the battle cry.

    Like


  30. The reason why gay marriage is so popular with feminists is because gay men act the way they want women to act: Ride the cock-carousel while young, exhibit zero shame, and rabidly spew hatred at those who question your choices. When the party’s over and the wall approaches find someone who doesn’t mind the cavernous gape.

    Like


  31. Justin Raimondo is homosexual and runs the Antiwar website, which I recommend. Unlike at least half of those found in the homosexual subculture he did not become homosexual because of twisted childhood experiences messing with his head, or a desire to enter a subculture full of drugs, alcoholism and easy sex. He was simply born with the defective genes. In fact, he isn’t part of the subculture at all.

    He has spent a lot of time together with libertarian and paleoconservative leaders, and says he never had any problem getting along with conservatives like Pat Buchanan. It is only the leftists who call him “fag” etc, “which is what they do once you stray from the pen”. Leftists hate him for not being a leftist homosexual. Just like they hate women who aren’t feminists.

    Here is his The Libertarian Case Against Gay Marriage:
    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-libertarian-case-against-gay-marriage/

    He notes the importance of cultural institutions to maintain a healthy society, and that the Left attacks those as part of their political strategy. He also reveals how homosexual circles have changed over the years. In the beginning they would only laugh at the thought of homosexual marriage. They knew they were not part of that kind of tradition, and they were proudly outsiders. But in time certain homosexuals in politics began pushing this as part of their strategy and everyone had to fall in line.

    “The homosexual agenda of today has little relevance to the way gay people actually live their lives.

    “But the legislative agenda of the modern gay-rights movement is not meant to be useful to the gay person in the street: it is meant to garner support from heterosexual liberals [read: the media owners] and others with access to power. It is meant to assure the careers of aspiring gay politicos and boost the fortunes of the left wing of the Democratic Party. The gay-marriage campaign is the culmination of this distancing trend, the reductio ad absurdum of the civil rights paradigm.”

    Like


    • Pat gets along with everyone because it’s all a game to him, a way to earn a living.

      Like


    • Justin’s a good guy. I’ve seen him in the speaker line-up with catholic conservatives and he somehow manages to fit in despite his vice.

      Like


      • Of course he fits in, christians don’t have the backbone to say no face to face. Their whole thing revolves around passive-aggressivity.

        Like


    • Raimondo is awesome. One of my favorite political commentators

      Like


  32. Gay marriage is also a way of institutionalizing cuckoldry within heterosexual marriage. Right now, if a man catches his wife cheating on him, he can still initiate a divorce, seize the assets and get custody of the kids. If gays are allowed to marry, it’s only a matter of time before one tries to divorce the other for infidelity, attempts to seize assets, and gets stymied because others act as witnesses to confirm that the marriage was always understood to be open. This will set a precedent in the case law where any woman can claim that her marriage was always understood to be open and her infidelity was tacitly accepted.

    That’s the thing about equality. It’s an equivalence. You’re not just treating homos the same as heteros. You are also treating heteros the same as homos.

    Like


  33. on October 8, 2014 at 3:54 pm Hilary Clinton

    Sylunt AF

    Like


  34. “The reason why gay marriage is so popular with feminists is because gay men act the way they want women to act: Ride the cock-carousel while young, exhibit zero shame, and rabidly spew hatred at those who question your choices. When the party’s over and the wall approaches find someone who doesn’t mind the cavernous gape.”

    LOL!

    I always wondered how that worked between gay couples. Does the anus eventually become so stretched out that you can feel anything? What is the average age y’all start wearing adult diapers?

    Any gay guys on here to answer?

    Like


  35. […] Gay Marriage Is A Farce […]

    Like


  36. […] Gay marriage will be a continuation of the unmarried gay lifestyle and all that entails, except legitimized by the state. The bathhouse won’t stop at the boy wedding… […]

    Like