Comment Of The Week: 60 Years Of Shivving

Libertardian piths,

Literature is full of this stuff [women tooling men], going back to the Bible. Civilization reins it in, but of course in the West we had to abolish civilization because it was hurting people’s feelings.

First things first… excellent handle Libertardian. Bryan Caplan would laugh if he had a functioning empathy module.

Yes, it does appear that the Cathedral’s entire 60-year project of dismantling the West to its pre-civilizational state is the rotten fruit of the leftoids’ REM-ish “everybody hurts” infantile morality hitched to the engine of their endless war against their heretic racial cousins.

Every monster and manboob, every fat feminist and single mom, every quadgender and third world wretched refuse had to be appeased and their crocodile tears dried, and the cause of all their histrionically dramatized hurty — white civilization itself — razed to make room for the glorious vomit of vibrancy that is currently prolapsing the rectum of the historical West.

God looked over all that He had made, and saw that it was good. The leftoid looked over all that his ancestors had made, and saw that it was good enough to squander. And on the eighth day, the leftoid rested his gated community security detail.

Well, if there is still fight left in some, then it is your pleasure to throw back into the Cathedral’s shitty mouth, truly the shit-pool of all shit, all the muck and shit which its damnable rottenness has vomited up.

*Historical figure quoted in this post for any keen-eyed sleuths.





Comments


  1. Reblogged this on Mindweapons in Ragnarok and commented:
    Every monster and manboob, every fat feminist and single mom, every quadgender and third world wretched refuse had to be appeased and their crocodile tears dried, and the cause of all their histrionically dramatized hurty — white civilization itself — razed to make room for the glorious vomit of vibrancy that is currently prolapsing the rectum of the historical West.

    Like


    • on August 8, 2013 at 3:50 pm HerrGoebbels

      This is incorrect. Civilization does not does rein in feminism; it produces feminism. Advanced civilization is the only place where feminism is even possible. Out in the wild, feminists would simply get kicked in the c*nt. We are living in the most civilized times ever, which is why everything is so messed up, because civilization is essentially a revolt against nature.

      It’s time to return to more primitive ways. It’s time for men to become men again.

      Like


      • @HeerGoebbels You relate an insight keen of itself, but it is misapplied. CH said ‘feminist’ not feminism. Patriarchy is civilization and is what reins in the Female Imperative. Feral conditions free the Female imperative, thought not like decline does with the worst of both worlds (feminine sociality and transferred masculine vitality). Is the United States still a civilization because tards have Obama smartphones directly, or indirectly for ‘making a difference’ that sums negatively? There is no patriotic in-group, only suckers sucking suckers. Only functional in-groups exist in reality, and when the music stops, many will discover they are hopelessly alone, unable to act for themselves.

        Like


      • on August 8, 2013 at 7:10 pm Dan Fletcher

        Bullshit. First, he never said that civilization reins in feminism. Secondly, civilization is a necessary precondition for, but does not necessarily lead to feminism.

        Like


      • on August 9, 2013 at 1:39 am evilwhitemalempire

        you need to go bowling with this guy some time
        http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/2010/10/matriarchy-of-past-canard.html

        Like


  2. on August 8, 2013 at 11:24 am Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

    Isn’t it hard not to see something cyclical in all this, ala Spengler? We build it up and then, dissatisfied and unable to help ourselves, succumb to ethnomasochism and tear the whole thing down again, which opens the way for new civilizational startups.

    Like


    • on August 8, 2013 at 2:55 pm depressed_danny

      I don’t like the ‘we’ part of that. I’m in my early 20s. I had no say in the decision to, nor the political power, to stop the tearing down of the system that works. All the mechanisms behind these idiologies were started 20-30 years before I was even born.

      The circumstances of today are entirely and wholly the fault of the boomers – their parents and grandparents built up a system to be proud of and the boomers then turned around and tore it down like the spoiled children they are, leaving we younger generations to live in their mess.

      I just hope there is something left to build on when the younger generations finally start gaining the ability to influence the system in 15-20 years.

      Like


      • Dear Depressed: Don’t fool yourself into thinking that you get off scott free because you are too young to have contributed to this mess. It doesn’t work like that. I never once in all my years have owned a slave. But I still have to live with reverse discrimination and white guilt (not my own guilt mind you) over minority disenfranchisement.

        You have to understand that it will get worse, much worse than this. You will look back 30 years from now and think this was the time when things weren’t so crazy. And then some 20 year old will ask you how you could have let things get so fucked up.

        Like


      • Slavery is the liberal version of original sin.

        Like


      • I dare say that the Elite and their Zionist accomplices had something to do with it as well.

        Like


  3. I really hope I’m still alive to see it when we brings the guillotines back. I’d say 2/3+ of our representatives are deserving of it and it’s probably closer to 4/5’s. Granted, the gallows are more american.

    Like


  4. ,strong>God looked over all that He had made, and saw that it was good. The leftoid looked over all that his ancestors had made, and saw that it was good enough to squander. And on the eighth day, the leftoid rested his gated community security detail.

    Great parallelism.

    Like


  5. Just read Wilheim Reich and other communists from the early 20th century, they specifically called for the end of traditional marriage and the nuclear family. The agenda is not new, and it’s not secret – you can read the publications where they lay it all out in detail.

    Like


  6. Time for the Chateau to review “A Failure Of Civility,” methinks.

    Like


  7. I stopped reading after “‘”‘”‘White'”‘”‘” “‘”‘”‘Civilization'”‘”‘”. How dare you notice things?

    Like


  8. Never be afraid to say you dislike a certain type of art.

    Why?

    Because sometimes it just ain’t art:

    Like


    • The headaches I’d get whenever I listened to modern music were enough to convince me that modern “artists” are mentally ill.

      Like


    • Everybody should listen to this.

      Like


    • Piss Christ was created by Andres Serrano, a Roman Catholic.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andres_Serrano

      The video is patently wrong in that respect, and presumably many others.

      Like


      • Dude!

        I don’t care under what religion he was raised, he obviously didn’t take that faith seriously… indeed, unless by gaydar needs recalibration, I’m sure he was queer as a three dollar bill.

        And who championed the promotion of his alleged “art”… indeed, who invariably champions each and every defilement of Christ, whether overtly or standing behind the proverbial curtain?

        Like


      • I don’t know… who? According to wikipedia, he rose to prominence due to winning an award at a private gallery in North Carolina originally funded by a member of the Hanes family, and the Ford Foundation was one of contributors to the award.

        Like


      • Google is your friend, chum… I’m sure you thought you were making a gentile point by mentioning the Ford Foundation, but they dance to the tune of the masters as lively as any hora.

        Like


      • Hora is not a jewish dance. It was simply stolen. Hora is an European dance, present in Europe at least since the neolithic, simply stolen and adapted to their tastes and needs. Even the israel’s national anthem is a stolen song. Originally it was an old European (common in Romania, Poland, Bohemia, Italy) folk song also stolen and adapted to their needs and tastes.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hora_%28dance%29 – even wikipedia recognizes the theft
        http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:Cucuteni_hora_Frumusica.jpg – this is the original hora and it it is from Europe since neolithic.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Cohen_%28Jewish_settler%29 – another theft euphemistically named “arrangement” or “adaptation”.

        So much regarding the jewish culture. Thefts and “arrangements” to suit some ideological needs and queer tastes.

        Like


      • Not really, my eye… look at some of the bullshit they’ve been funding… and look how they folded faster than Superman on laundry day when they displeased YKW a few years back in re some Palestinian issue.

        Like


      • “in re some Palestinian issue”

        For which you have the supported the Ford Foundation at the time, right?

        But when they fund anti-Christian art, you quickly try to deflect it somehow…yet again on the jooz.

        When you embrace the truth, it will set you free, you sham of a man.

        Like


      • I don’t bother with the Ford or any other current foundation because they’re all solidly in the Cathedral camp.

        And truth be told, I’m about as interested in the Palestinians as I am in the Etruscans.

        In your frenetic efforts to embarrass me, you’re only bringing greater ridicule on yourself… or hadn’t you noticed the recent additional voices?

        Like


      • They’ve always been here; the usual suspects.

        In addition, I hardly call disgruntled lunatics of the lack-of-pussy variety bizarros and desperados, additional voices.

        They all feed on each other’s resentment and stupidity, as do you.

        When I read someone like “checked out” beginning to blame the “Joo takeover” for why he can’t get laid, I now have an even clearer picture of what is transpiring here. It’s a shame, because he’s really a good man who should be able to achieve the kind of happiness he wants for himself. Yet, no man here brothers to set him on the right path, or help him find ways to help himself, save YaReally.

        Your ilk seize on his searing resentment and anger (over the mistakes he made), and tell him it’s not his fault; it’s the jooz. You and your ilk are nothing but evil opportunist thieves. You steal men’s souls at their most feeble. You’re not looking to help them. You’re looking to create more anti-Joo drone.

        There is no question about it – you hate the joo so much, you’re even willing to manufacture a variety of lies about him, and you don’t like it when you get called out, as DirkJohanason just did above. I assume that while he has no love for the joo, he at least has some integrity. He still wants to call out the real culprit, as opposed to you who just wants to make it all about the Joojoos.

        You’re so transparent Greg. You’re not fooling anyone. Even Silver is on to you.

        Like


      • You disingenuous shill, tell the whole story or none at all…

        Google Piss Christ and (that forbidden word) and see what comes up…

        My point (as you and the other cogdis snarkers full-well understand) wasn’t about who might have contributed to a young artist’s early career… or the erstwhile “gentile” foundations that nowadays exhibit a distinct lack of Henry and Edsel-esque characteristics in their officers – go read the names and look at the faces…

        My point, which you conveniently ignore in your bloviating smokescreens, is about the promotion and propagation of such “art”.

        Now, run off and find some gentile gallery owner and neener-neener another smokescreen about how NAGOALT.

        Like


      • What’s really on your mind, though, baby? You can tell daddy. All of this stress is not good for your milky gentile skin.

        Like


      • “My point, which you conveniently ignore in your bloviating smokescreens, is about the promotion and propagation of such “art”.

        I know what your point was. Did you see how DirkJohanason refuted it? Now you are trying to backtrack your original point.
        .
        The only thing we agree here is that it was garbage, not art. The rest is you trying to blame the jooz collectively for promoting that artist because they own art galleries. This position is no different than saying Marxism is Juish because Marx was a Joo.

        Seriously, Eliot, can you be any more pathetic?

        Like


      • It’s ironic to accuse others of backtracking, just because you yourself never even go down the path at hand to begin with…

        Rather, merely throw up a smokescreen and head down totally unrelated roads.

        Chomsky and Sunstein may be proud of their little bubeleh, but you haven’t been fooling anyone else.

        Like


      • I know what your point was. Did you see how DirkJohanason refuted it?

        No, you don’t, and no, he didn’t. The Ford Foundation did not provide funds for the creation or promotion of Piss Christ.

        Chew on this awhile… geez, it’s like a damn Streicher charicature:

        Like


      • And this youtube propaganda video is supposed to be proof? Youtube is replete with anti-Joo propaganda videos which are posted here daily.

        WNs making youtube videos are hardly an authority, or a disinterested party reporting the truth. They have an axe to grind, just like do, WN.

        You can’t prove your point, period.

        Like


      • Riiiiight… evil NAH-ZEES put Geraldo and that culture vulture up to it… and somehow made the mainstream media broadcast it… so they’d have some decent antisemitic propaganda.

        Is that your best defense, weak sister?

        Sheesh, wake up to yourself.

        Like


      • You just outted yourself, Gregi; you just did. It’s always like that, eh? Give you enough rope and you’ll hang yourself, lol.

        This entire video is taken out of context. 4 minutes out of Geraldo doesn’t prove anything.

        And one liberal atheist Joo who probably hates his own religion too doesn’t mean all Jooz as a whole supported that crap. You try to make this Joo be more important than the Ford Foundation which supported the artist with funds and publicity.

        If you called out the Ford Foundation like you called out the Jooz, you’d have more credence, WN. But, no. You tried to hide the fact gentiles and non-Juish organizations were just as complicit in pushing that garbage as that man.

        Like


      • More disingenuous bullshit from shilly lily… as if that “one man” were the only ooJ (thanks thwack) behind this particular outrage of art and media hype.

        And of course, it’s all “taken out of context”. llozozozlzlzozozlzlzozozlzlzl

        Like


      • Disingenuous? Look who’s calling the kettle black, lol.

        You were trying to place all fault on one single J promoter, while overlooking all the other non-J entities that were complicit in promoting that garbage, as well as the non-J artist himself (which you haven’t said a word against), in order to indict the entire J people. That is what makes you a disingenuous liar, whose J hate is so blinding he can’t assign blame accurately. That’s why you got caught, and not by me even, by another WN with a little bit more integrity than you.

        In addition, just for the record, any J who disrespects Christianity, is the same type of J who also disrespects Juism. There is a strong correlation between the two, and could be proven scientifically. So, this man who was promoting that crap is really pissing on all religions through promoting that artist, not just on Christianity. Unfortunately, that video is taken out of context (4 min out of an hour show) so you didn’t hear all he had to say, as well as hear his attitude about religion in general. You can’t indict an entire people based on the beliefs of one man. And, the fact you were trying to hide the Ford Foundation (a known antisemite organization) backing this crap, as well as not come down on the non-J artist himself is very troubling. It simply proves my point about you that your whole anger is the Jooz themselves, no matter what they do or don’t do. You hate them in the same sprit Hit-ler hated them – devoid of rationality. You need to seek help, NZ.

        BTW, why are you revisiting a dead thread once again? Obsessed much? Felt compelled to try to have the last word? Not when you’re lying, I won’t let you. Now, fuck off, you got caught, accept it. The more you belabor the point, the guiltier you look. Better try next time, though.

        Like


  9. You’re a really good writer CH 🙂

    Like


  10. “In a society that has destroyed all adventure, the only adventure left is to destroy society.”

    Allied victory, American hegemony, unprecedented prosperity and safety. Every corner of earth explored and conquered. No more true struggle. No more true challenge or frontiers. No doubt these conditions attributed to the spread of Marxist ideas post-WWII. Millions of years of brutal survival in hostile environment had equipped man with a certain expectation, a certain need, to struggle against something. Without any real challenges, people turned to the artificial. Feminism, multicult, white-guilt, etc… all Marxist derivatives. A deep hate for all things Western Civ. It was the only adventure left.

    It is for these reasons that the halt on human space exploration has been such a tragedy. Space is the next frontier. Mankind’s survival and salvation. A new frontier and a new struggle for people to throw themselves into. Something real and dangerous. A stark contrast to the petty vapidness of the social justice whack-jobs and other assorted fairies. A true adventure.

    With nothing to fight against, people fight against themselves in a desperate bid to fulfill their primal need for struggle. Time to get off this rock.

    Like


    • It is for these reasons that the halt on human space exploration has been such a tragedy. Space is the next frontier. Mankind’s survival and salvation. A new frontier and a new struggle for people to throw themselves into.
      —————————————————————————————–

      Sorry Dan, but the MANNED space program is pretty much a fraud. And Its the worst kind of magical thinking for a white man such as yourself. There is no place to run this time. The space shuttle was a worthless “midnight basketball” program for white people and the ISS is a 100 billion dollar floating mens locker room.

      They gave you the apple they knew you would bite.

      Like


      • C’mon, thwack, don’t be a philistine shill for the Cathedral. An endeavor as titanic as space exploration often entails baby steps.

        Like


      • on August 9, 2013 at 1:56 am evilwhitemalempire

        like faster than light travel

        Like


      • Thats true Greg, and I give the white man credit for all the great and vast accomplishments in space exploration he has made; but don’t abuse it.

        All I am challenging is the official Apollo historical record as presented to the world by NASA. In other words, if it did happen, it didn’t happen like that; you were sold a sexier version of what really happened.

        NASA is just a public relations firm. You wanna see what a real space program looks like? Check out the Soviet/Russian version with all of its secrecy and deception; thats what its supposed to look like.

        The reason the Soviets lost the moon race is because they actually really tried to go.

        Like


      • Aw, geez… if you’re going to pull that “moon landing was fake” bullshit at this late date, then that goes beyond mocking… straight to the “consign to oblivion” ignore list.

        Like


      • Sorry, but you’re a fucking moron if you think the moon landing was faked.

        Like


      • I too used to dismiss the moon landing conspiracy as nonsense but that was before I became “joosmart”. If you can separate yourself from the white male pep rally it was sold to you as; you can see the inconsistencies and contradictions in the official Apollo record.

        Just face it white people, you got sold a moon landing the same way you got sold a black president.

        And they were both sold to you by the same “group of people.”

        Think about that.

        Look at these 3 white men as they describe a THEIR moon landing.

        Why are they so uncomfortable?

        PS– You cannot visit the grave site of the first man to set foot on the moon.

        Armstrong had himself buried at sea?

        Think about it.

        Like


      • One of the astronauts said it best in a documentary I saw… something along the lines of “If we faked the first one, why in the hell did we go back?”

        Like


      • Amortizing the expense of the sets and costumes.

        Like


      • Droll.

        Like


      • Honestly, though, it’s like the franchise of a blockbuster. Granting the premise of a faked landing, it makes sense to keep producing sequels. The problem then is figuring out a way to close out the franchise on a bang. Exploding the South Massif is pretty bang.

        Like


      • Greg, why do you reveal the dimensions of the “rabbit hole” and then get upset when people reveal how deep it goes?

        If the conspiracy is as great and vast as you say it is, why can it not include the Apollo moon landing records? It would hardly qualify as the first time the ooJ has fooled the Gentile with a “production”.

        What are you trying to say Greg?

        Like


      • In the words of the immortal Doug Shaftoe: “Haven’t you guys spent any time at all around people like Comstock? Can’t you recognize bullshit? Don’t you think it would be a useful item to add to your intellectual toolkits to be capable of saying, when a ton of wet steaming bullshit lands on your head, ‘My goodness, this appears to be bullshit’?”

        Like


      • DTH,

        Some of the moon landing conspiracy theorists are shills for NASA. Their job is to discredit the Apollo skeptics by providing easily shot down questions, sounding like bumkins, advertising their ignorance if physics, technology…

        Sorta like the liberal white person who goes to the Tea Party rally and acts like a racist in order to discredit the movement…

        Here is my question about the space suits: How many people does it take to put one on?

        Can two guys in space do this by themselves? How about in the Lunar module on the moon?

        Also, where is the film/video of Armstrong and Aldrin inside the lunar module AFTER their moon walk?

        You don’t see that do you? You don’t see them standing around inside the lunar module high fivin each other… after being the first guys to walk on the moon.

        Why not?

        I suspect its because 1/6th gravity is much more difficult to fake than “zero gravity”.

        Think about it.

        NASA = “Never A Straight Answer”

        Who does that sound like?

        Like


    • Without any real challenges, people turned to the artificial. Feminism, multicult, white-guilt, etc… all Marxist derivatives. A deep hate for all things Western Civ. It was the only adventure left.

      That’s mostly my reading of post-war events too. The great problems of living hard largely been solved; all that was left was to… destroy it all.

      Okay, I’m being facetious, but dammit there’s an uncomfortable ring of truth to that characterization.

      Like


  11. CH, I mean this as a compliment to you. If you get laid, at all, you are nothing short of incredible. As we know, your blog is divided into two interests: (1) game (gaming women); and (2) important sociological issues such as this.

    I agree with everything you write, and again, this is a compliment.

    How can you possible separate the anger and frustration that comes with the knowledge of what’s really going on in the world (the sociology stuff), enough to hide it from the bimbo girls (all of them) you are seducing, where in gaming women, not a scintilla of a hint of negativity, about anything really, is allowed by the woman. In other words, to get laid, whether ONS or LTR, the man must basically adopt a feminized frat boy happy go lucky I just wanna party attitude.

    I for one can’t do it, and I admit it. I have so much frustration over the state of the world, the jewry take-over as posted by GBFM, etc, that I can’t help but internally laugh at and hate the stupid women I meet, even when I’m able to basically hide the bitterness.

    How can you know the things you know and still get women?

    Like


    • The trick is to be… in appropriate turn and measure… philosophical and steadfast… and, as with children, only feed meat in due season.

      A Methodist’s Measure of humor (gallows or otherwise) doesn’t hurt, neither. 😉

      The bitterness over stupid women (and men) does often leave one in despair these days, though… fully understandable. A dollop of Christian forgiveness helps attenuate the sting.

      Like


    • Try to be a little forgiving and remember you also bought into this bullshit for a long time if you are like most of us.

      I get extremely frustrated myself, but then I remember that a few years ago I was also sucking on the Jews dick and believed in a lot of the bullshit that the Cathedral preaches…

      Like


    • Cheer up mate. After many months of anger you will get to where there is more despair than anger. As time goes on you will find that you will have no anger at all, only despair.

      You’re welcome

      Like


      • Heh, heh… things always look darkest before… they go totally black.

        Like


      • LOLZ!

        See, I feel better now than I ever have in my life. At least now I know the score and things make sense. Maybe it’s the way I think, but if I can at least make sense of a situation I am happier, even if that sense is “DOOM!!!” 🙂 Happy beliefs that conflict with logic and plain old ignorance are not bliss for me, more like nails on a chalkboard, makes me edgy. I’m less of a Russian Roulette guy, more like a smile at the firing squad guy.

        Like


  12. I was in the metro part of Hartford, Connecticut the other day. Might as well have been in the Third World. After working hours, all decent working folk flee to the surrounding suburbs. What’s left over is hideous to behold: packs of feral pavement apes roaming the blighted and burnt-out neighborhoods. What once were charming and historic Victorian houses are now blasted crack dens of eldritch horror. Niglets as young as 8 running around with loaded guns and terrorizing public parks. Whores peddling their fetid vaginas in front of Jamaican bodegas and Check$ Ca$hed places.

    This is pretty much the future of any eastern seaboard city that isn’t attractive to SWPLs. It will get worse and worse until finally the madness starts to invade the suburbs. By then, whites and other human species will have to live in a constant state of uncertainty and fear. Section 8 housing and minority pandering are the greatest weapon the ruling class has: blacks especially are a potent biological weapon that can wipe out entire civilized communities in less than a decade

    Like


    • Dresden, Nagasaki… thriving cities today.

      Camden, Detroit… well…

      The lesson is, if you want to destroy a city, fire bombing works well, at first.

      But if you truly want to annihilate a city… give it over to Negroes.

      Like


      • But if you truly want to annihilate a city… give it over to Negroes.
        ————————————————————————————
        Ah hah…

        So if YOU don’t give it to them, can negroes take it from you?

        Are negroes giving cities to each other?

        What country you from?

        Like


      • Of the dozen or so cities that filed for bankrupcy in the last few years – and that is a new phenomena – and I did my own research, it turns out ( as I had predicted ) most cities that filed for bankrupcy have a black and/or hispanic majority.

        only one – one damn – city had a white majority

        Now the question is ; how was I able to predict that?

        nope racism is not the answer.

        Like


      • The West, as you will have noticed, is going through an odd stage right now… white folks move rather than take on blacks and the gummint.

        We’ll continue this discussion when there’s nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide.

        Like


      • “We’ll continue this discussion when there’s nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide.”

        Hope I live to be a part of that discussion.

        I have a lot to say.

        Like


      • We’ll continue this discussion when there’s nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide.

        Well, here’s the advice I give somnambulant whites: Hey there, White Man, before you take flight, man, take on the anti-whites, man.

        Like


      • on August 8, 2013 at 7:20 pm OralCummings

        “…negroes giving cities to each other?” No I think once a large group of negroes is in a particular city they are required to stay there.

        Like


      • Anti-whites in power -many of whom are white race traitors- gave it to them.

        Like


      • This controversy about Bill O’Reilly’s recent comments seems unbecoming when the situation is viewed objectively. I don’t like O’Reilly because he thinks hip hop is naturally degenerate (although I’m sure he has some evidence upon which he can state that claim) but O’Reilly is in the right as of recently.

        The reasons why blacks cannot sustain their own metropolitan areas is because we lack the same “tendencies” which allows such areas to arise and flourish.

        Yes, I am saying that black culture is intrinsically inferior.

        Self-racist on my part? Maybe, until you read onward.

        I do maintain a very unique disposition about race relations in this country. Blacks could forgo their monopoly of our culture’s Dionysian impulses, their strict grasp on the gladiator spirit. Because those pursuits reward instant gratification, I don’t believe they (we?) can maintain those gifts while acquiring the ability to perform within areas of the economy that require deference of enjoyment, and an emphasis on perseverance.

        I have never been able to decide whether mostly black cities would fail if not for a lack of complete integration (LOL that’s a joke for ya!). However, if we lived side by side with whites, their aforementioned “tendencies” would slowly infiltrate our sub-cultural consciousness.

        (Aside: I sternly believe that the Left demands that blacks act under certain roles, i.e. entertainer or athlete, whereas most people you’ll find on a site like this treat each and every individual according to the merit of their actions)

        However, there is one problem with having whites and blacks live side-by-side. They would learn the same lessons, live the same lifestyles and see no reason to marginalize each other. The maturing progeny would act as they always do, and when the time comes, you end up with…

        …children that don’t look like you.

        Like


    • What happened in Detroit is not an exception, it is a virus that is spreading, it is what will happen in dozens of cities in the next few decades.

      I am not just talking about the bankrupcy, they have packs of wild dogs ( actual canine, not a play on words ) that are attacking people, the police tells people that certain areas are ” enter at your own risk” because of the very high rate of violent crime, and the list of horrors goes on and on

      Look at Detroit, that is the future of all western nations who welcome millions of third world immigrants who are never asked to integrate, quite the opposite, we must bend over backwards to accommodate their uncivilized ways.

      Something huge, something immense would have to happen to not only stop but reverse this, this…suicide orchestrated by the left

      Leftism, feminism and multiculturalism like termites are slowly eating the house foundation, from the outside it may look fine but it is about to crumble to dust.

      We are in deep trouble and this is mostly because of the left and their mentally deranged “elite”.

      If I believed in such things as God and the Devil I would say the left is the Devil.

      In a few decades they will have destroyed the greatest civilization in the history of the planet.

      Like


  13. on August 8, 2013 at 12:24 pm some feminist

    “the leftoids’ REM-ish “everybody hurts” infantile morality hitched to the engine of their endless war against their heretic racial cousins”
    I consider myself quite liberal and I don’t even know what this means.

    Like


  14. I guffaw’d at Libertardian’s statement (and CH’s comments). Agreed 100%.

    Like


  15. [b]How can you know the things you know and still get women?[/b]

    Great fucking question.

    Like


  16. “…Every monster and manboob, every fat feminist and single mom, every quadgender and third world wretched refuse had to be appeased and their crocodile tears dried, and the cause of all their histrionically dramatized hurty – white civilization itself — razed to make room for the glorious vomit of vibrancy that is currently prolapsing the rectum of the historical West….”

    I wish I could write like CH.

    That is brilliant and dare I say poetic.

    and painfully accurate.

    Like


  17. That most Christian of poets, Blake, and Mary Wollstonecroft, mother of Mary Shelley, both argued for the end of marriage, monogamy, and the nuclear family. In 1770 and 1798 respectively.

    Like


    • That most Christian of poets, Blake, and Mary Wollstonecroft, mother of Mary Shelley, both argued for the end of marriage, monogamy, and the nuclear family. In 1770 and 1798 respectively.

      Note that Protestants aren’t “Christians”, but rather a liberal facsimile thereof.

      Like


      • If you’re Roman Catholic, what about Mr. Maddow?

        If you’re Eastern Orthodox, what about Mr. Joseph…. Stalin?

        Like


      • If you’re Roman Catholic, what about Mr. Maddow?

        If he’s a libtard, then yes, the Catholic Church was way, way too soft on libtards in the last couple hundred years. But in Protestantism, libtardism is intrinsic rather than a heresy like it is in Catholicism.

        Like


      • Note that papists aren’t Christians, but rather a grasping authoritarian facsimile thereof. OTOH, if I was forbidden to be in a home church by some temporal authority, I’d choose to obey Rome over Cambridge.

        Like


    • Blake is NOT “that most Christian of poets”.

      Try George Herbert.

      Like


    • on August 8, 2013 at 3:01 pm Jochen Peiper

      Blake was a Christian in a rather loose sense of the word. He would be more accurately described as Christian inspired mystic. The end of marriage, and the nuclear family is not new. It has been around in one form or another since ancient Sparta at least. It was a key plank in the Prussian school reform movement, a predecesor of Communism and closely linked with the counter enlightenment. What is new, is a systematic effort to gain control of society through its key institutions in order to destroy it in preparation for a dictatorship.

      Like


    • Blake is the most Christian of poets? More so than Milton, Hopkins, de Vere, Donne, Dryden, Johnson?

      You can’t spell whiskeysplace without a “Y”, a “K”, and a “W”.

      Like


  18. i didn’t recognize it as st thomas more, i only recognized it as awesome old-time language, so not as much a sleuth as a ctrl-c ctrl-v googler. well worth the read anytime muck and shit and damnable rottenness is mentioned.

    Like


  19. More like, “on the ninth day, the millenials sat in their parent’s basement, jobless, penniless, unlikely to ever advance in life, but happy in the knowledge that some gay guy they saw on TV can now marry his fake TV gay boyfriend.”

    Like


  20. Congenital Insensitivity to pain with anhydrosis (CIPA)

    Contemporary Imbecilic Palindromic Asses.

    insuring your perpetual comfort though your foot be buried in a mount of fire ants.

    Being able to sense pain is better than sex fuck, for brainses…

    Like


  21. Well, how dare you point that out? After all, everything wrong with the west today is the Joojoo conspiracy to take over. So, non-Joojoo feminists from the late 1700s spewing such anti-marriage anti-male rhetoric is not important. Don’t you know, the reason men like “checked out real man” can’t find a woman is because of the Joojoo takeover of the world, not because he keeps making bad choices and chasing after immigrants or trashy hos who can’t possibly be a good partner for him. Sigh….another frustrated male that can’t see his own contributions to his own unhappiness, who feels more comfortable blaming others than looking inward.

    Like


    • My comment is in response to whiskeysplace who always inserts a bit of reality into the mix.

      Like


    • on August 8, 2013 at 2:53 pm Jochen Peiper

      It still doesn’t exonorate your tribal friends from taking up this banner with far greater vigor than others have. Communism is essentially a Jewish Movement and always has been, despite its roots being from Germany. Without Jewish energy and determination to make it succeed, Communism would not be the existential threat to Western Civilization that it has become.

      Like


      • Marx was a Jew. Game, set, match.

        No special relativity theory, no Objectivist doctrine, no exploration of the id, no Rhapsody In Blue can change that first statement.

        Like


      • Talk about simple minded dummy. So just because a Joo invented a new political/economic system, it means the system is Juish?

        1) First, it’s not based in Juism, as he was a secular joo who hated Juism and married a Christian woman. He wrote against juism extensively.

        2) How does it exonerate all of Europe, all of South America, parts of Asia, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada, etc….from adopting his new political/economic system in its different variations? Just because someone “crazy” comes up with something crazy, doesn’t clear all his followers from guilt. The point is that although Marx was Juish, the root of his philosophy was European and Christian in nature, and that is why it was accepted by all of these white Christian countries.

        A lot of it is based on Germanic and French philosophies developed in the 1700s, when Europe was undergoing revolutions, enlightenment, and industrialization. Europe tried many types of governments – monarchies, Napoleonic style “republics”, Fascist entities, etc…until somehow Marx’s ideas took root and morphed into communism, and its lesser evil twin, socialism. Simply blaming the Jooz for everything you don’t like, or for every one of your failures is neither seeing the real picture nor looking for ways to solve problems. The jooz are an easy scapegoat for people who don’t want to face their own shortcomings. Now, why don’t you start researching how Europe’s history developed and gave rise to communism and fascism, as opposed to our style of government, which is based on John Lock and respect for private property and individualism, rather than crazy Germanic and French philosophies which call of a Big State and the common good.

        Like


      • “until somehow Marx’s ideas took root”

        ‘somehow’. lol.

        Like


      • Ah, yes, the distaff mind:

        It “just happened”…. LLOZOZOZLZLZOZOZLZLZL

        Like


      • on August 8, 2013 at 8:00 pm Carlos Danger

        What’s wrong with shining a light in the darkness, Lily? It helps to know the motivations of the people behind a given message before you choose to follow it. Perhaps their motives aren’t so altruistic as fist meets the eye.

        Like


      • I like shedding light, Carlos. But this is not shedding light. It’s retarded nonsense. You can’t base a whole philosophy on joo hate.

        Hit-ler tried it, and it didn’t work, and you can even argue Juish influence increased since he took his last breathe. If anything, his philosophy and actions pushed liberalism to front stage. So it backfired. NZ Germany is often cited for why we can’t discriminate, or stop immigration, or stop gay marriage, or why the rich must pay for the poor, or why affirmative action is fair, or why we must give women more rights than white men, or, or, or….to the point our civilization is crumbling.

        In addition, blaming the fall of the west on jozz, while overlooking the fact liberalism is deeply embedded in classical European thought, is not going to help solve anything, and might even backfire in the end. Europe was on the fast track to decline since the revolutions. Some Christians argue since the Reformation, but that’s another issue. One can even argue since the fall of Rome. The fact is, Europe has always been in trouble (way before Marxism took hold), and America’s birth was a direct response to Europe’s failures.

        Like


      • on August 8, 2013 at 7:31 pm OralCummings

        Not even Curb Your Enthusiasm can change that.

        Like


      • Nor the catalog of Bacharach/David… lulz.

        Like


      • Now THAT’S what I call inserting a bit of reality… take note, Silly Lily.

        Like


      • You’re an idiot Gregi, which is why you think like that other idiot named trillmatic who thinks that if Marx was juish then Marxism is a Jusish invention.

        You really need to be put out of your misery, ridiculous stupid old man. Both of you are not on my level if your mind is as simple as that. Or, maybe your joojoo resentment is getting the better of you.

        Like


      • My remark was in reply to Jochen’s statement, you little twit, explaining how it all goes far beyond the simple fact that Marx himself was of the tribe… nearly immaterial that he himself was a J, when you look at all that transpired thereafter… and what’s happening to this very day, courtesy of your ilk.

        You silly, silly shill.

        .

        Like


      • I know it was in response to Jochen’s statement, I can see that you responded to him. Nonetheless, he and trillmatic essentially mean the same thing. In fact, trillmatic was responding to Jochen. Jochen says “Communism is essentially a Juish Movement and always has been,” and Trillmatic summed it all up and said ‘Marx was a Joo and nothing can change that’. So basically, they said the same thing, and both are wrong, as you.

        “nearly immaterial that he himself was a J, when you look at all that transpired thereafter…”

        Ok, since you’re so smart, what has transpired thereafter? How does it exonerate, say Aryan states from following a supposed Juish idea after Hit-ler, when Joos no longer lived there? Why did they embrace “Juish ideas,” exactly? How did all of Europe become either Communist or socialist? And don’t tell me because of HW, as Europe embraced communism/socialism either before HW existed or became liberal.

        You idiot. I’ll tell you why. Because, Marxism has its roots in GERMAN, French, and Scottish philosophies, as well as Christianity. Which means Marxism is not a foreign idea to Europe. it’s intertwined in the European psyche. Gregi, when you embrace the truth, it will set you free.

        These philosophies (especially the various German ones) began developing around the Reformation, and took hold in the 18th century. In fact, Europe began “liberalizing” from the time of the Reformation. It was such a slow process that you do not notice it when you read about the 16th century. Not just the power of the pope challenged, but the power of the monarchy as well. All of Europe was on a cusp of a seismic shift – ready to shed religion and king, embracing science instead. Once the French Revolution, Darwin’s ideas, and the Industrial Revolution came about, the transformation was faster and more noticeable. It was just downhill from there. Blake and Mary Wollstonecroft only expressed what many people involved in the arts and philosophy at the time believed. They were the liberals of their day.

        1) From the Germans, Marx borrowed mostly Kant and Hagel, although he borrowed from earlier Germans too. Ludwig Feuerbach was one of his contemporaries who advocated for liberalism and atheism. He wrote an anti-Christian book, which Marx loved. He felt that just as he (Marx) criticized Juism, Feuerbach was criticizing Christianity. It was music to his ears, and to the ears of many atheists at the time who were challenging all religions.

        2) From the Scottish, Marx borrowed Adam Smith

        3) From the French, he borrowed Jean-Jacques Rousseau (author of The Social Contract), although he borrowed from many other French philosophers as well.

        This is Marx in a nutshell. Marxism took hold everywhere, and not because of the jooz. Because Marxism is based on much of European thought. It appealed to secular jooz as it speaks about supposed equality and the common man, and since jooz were persecuted throughout history they liked these ideas. It’s interesting that most devout jooz denounce Marx as evil, anti-Juish, and anti-Bible.

        Biblical thought speaks about free will, personal responsibility, and individualism. It’s also about equal taxation for all – rich and poor alike – as well as limited power of the king (government) – things John Locke embraced. Marxism is about “the social contract” and a big state that seemingly protects its citizens and ensures they do “the right thing.” Locke is about Unalienable Rights from the Creator, the right to life, property, and the pursuit of happiness, as reiterated in The Declaration, while the social contact is about turning over these rights to a big government “to keep us safe,” while restricting our freedoms if necessary. Personally, I rather be free than safe, but that’s another issue.

        Europe of the last 500 years is based on shedding the power of the church and the king via reformations and revolutions, and turning it over to a new entity to keep the peace, to distribute resources” equally,” and to FORCE people “to do the right thing.” Only the United States of America embraced John Locke and Biblical principles, while all other white countries embraced Marxism. To say it’s all a Joo conspiracy is really retarded, especially since Marxism is based on European philosophy (not Juish), and The Framers based America’s principles on many orthodox Juish ideas.

        You obviously need a lesson in history, you idiot.

        Like


      • That’s it. I’m cutting off your trust fund.

        Like


      • Only the United States of America embraced John Locke and Biblical principles, while all other white countries embraced Marxism.

        The problem here, Lily, is that Locke (as well as Hobbes and Hume) were simply another gentler facet of the same Reformation-spurred liberalism. They’re the Mensheviks to Marx’ Bolsheviks. Ever wonder why the Lockian Republicans seem so impotent versus the Marxist Democrats? That’s why. Locke is Marx lite.

        Like


      • Is the love affair over? Hahaha….. no more kissipoo for us? I’m bummed!

        {I thought you said “Fucking is better than fighting.” Changed your mind so quickly? Is it another women? (or man? Eliot?)}

        Like


      • First, Locke and Hobbs are not the same. Many think Locke and Hobbs are interchangeable; they’re not. Hobbs is the father of big government, supporting absolutism for the sovereign. In Leviathan, he originated the concept of the social contract (before Rousseau). And why? Because he wrote Leviathan during a crisis (the English Civil War), where he advocated for a strong central authority to keep the peace. Whenever we have a crisis, it becomes an excuse for the government (and foolish people to agree) to usurp more power from the citizens – take away more of our rights and freedoms. “Never let a crisis go to waste,” sounds familiar? Locke doesn’t think like this. He talks about the people’s rights before the collective – Natural Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property. His ideas inspired the American Revolution, not the predecessors of Marx.

        Second, you’re wrong. “Locke is [not] Marx lite.” He is the best hope we have for any type of proper government; he’s most closely related to Biblical principles from all Enlightenment philosophers; he’s the least of all evil governments, unless, to you a viable government is either a pre-renaissance European model??? Maybe your strict Roman Catholicism is blinding you against Lockian-style government where you rather have the Catholic Church run the show??? Is it possible? Or maybe, you simply want anarchy???

        “Lockian Republicans seem so impotent versus the Marxist Democrats?”

        It’s not because Locke is closely related to Marx. It’s because it’s Marx thuggary vs. Lockian elegance.

        People pushing Marxism use force and brainwashing to overcome the Lockians.

        Before the Civil War, they used this tactic to turn the tide against slavery. While I think slavery was wrong, we should have just sent them all back to Africa. But the abolitionists (the left back then) advocated for full rights. And we know how it all turned out since, don’t we? That was the point where America’s social decline began. It was just a short hump form there to female suffrage, free sex, and open borders. It didn’t start with 1920s progressives, or 1960s hippies.

        America’s military and financial decline, that happened much later. The point of America’s military decline occurred when we couldn’t execute a proper war during Vietnam, and America’s financial decline – well, we’re living through it right now, aren’t we? Anti-Lockian thuggary set all this in motion.

        Like


      • No, my love is eternal. However, I’m sending Herr Eliot over to your place in full Schutzstaffel garb to fulfill your Nazi rape fantasy, liebschen.

        Like


      • Hell, that’ll take the Stahl outta my helm.

        Like


      • Alas, yet another fine Pickelhaube you’ve gotten me into.

        Like


      • Eternal love, eh?
        No, the love affair is over.
        This is my last kiss to you…………fooooooo
        Did you catch that?

        Like


      • Heh, heh… catch those kisses and there’s no telling what else you might catch.

        Like


      • LOL! Happy to have your MASTER all to yourself, DickyLicky?

        Your wish has come true, finally.

        Like


      • Second, you’re wrong. “Locke is [not] Marx lite.” He is the best hope we have for any type of proper government; he’s most closely related to Biblical principles from all Enlightenment philosophers; he’s the least of all evil governments, unless, to you a viable government is either a pre-renaissance European model??? Maybe your strict Roman Catholicism is blinding you against Lockian-style government where you rather have the Catholic Church run the show??? Is it possible? Or maybe, you simply want anarchy???

        Well, at this moment, the Catholic Church, having been infested with libtards since before Vatican II, and apparently controlled by libtards since, is in absolutely no condition to lead anything or anybody, so I would be willing to consider a modified Lockian model for a government for expediency’s sake.

        It’s not because Locke is closely related to Marx. It’s because it’s Marx thuggary vs. Lockian elegance.

        People pushing Marxism use force and brainwashing to overcome the Lockians.

        There’s a critical weakness in the Lockian model, in that its very tolerance enables intolerant folks (Marxists, Muslims, even the Nahtzees with Weimer Germany, etc.) to rise up and exploit what they justly regard as weakness and take over. A traditional Catholic government in its very “intolerance” would keep the lid on this kind of horse hockey. But as I said, this is untenable at the moment.

        Like


      • Look, Lily, I would like nothing more than to diddle your bean about Marxism and its relation to the classical liberals, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Locke. We can talk about the general will and the right to revolution and unalienable rights until the sun comes up, finally putting your poli-sci degree to use.

        But you present yourself as gratuitously adversarial in an attempt to defend the Jéws, which does not defend them so much as it invites further attack. In other words, you are needling people just to pick a fight, which would be fine if you could also produce a spirit of bonhomie. But the idea seems foreign to you, not to mention that esprit de corps/loyal opposition generally eludes a woman’s capacity (insofar as she is feminine). So you end up not just setting your cause back but also alienating yourself from the men here who would otherwise agree with you.

        I don’t expect an energized harpy on a crusade to process my straightforward logic above in a way that will help advance the conversation. So I predict you will keep spinning on your wheel. I have found that physically dominating smart, peppy girls like you is the most efficient way to liberate them from this vicious spiral. But as fucking sense into you is an option restricted by this medium, you will have to be a dear and use your imagination.

        Now pick up your dog-eared copy of Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin of Inequality and let the noble savage ravage you in my stead.

        Matt

        Like


      • “Look, Lily, I would like nothing more than to diddle your bean about Marxism and its relation to the classical liberals,….”

        Look, Matt…….let’s cut to the chase here. With you I only discuss sex; nothing else, and most definitely not politique, économie, et religion?

        Comprenez-vous 😉

        Like


      • @corvinus

        “There’s a critical weakness in the Lockian model, in that its very tolerance enables intolerant folks (Marxists, Muslims, even the Nahtzees with Weimer Germany, etc.) to rise up and exploit what they justly regard as weakness and take over.”

        True! However, do we have any other options? No, because Lockian tolerance was originally created for our privilege; so that we might live to our fullest potential. So that we might have the right to life, property, and the pursuit of happiness. Strangers took advantage of our openness, fairness, good opportunities, good economy, scientific and technological advances, and civilized values, and used them against us. Now, we’re faced with either going totalitarian (which will mean against ourselves as well), or finding a way(s) to instill most of our old values by going back to how things were when this country was first established, but at the same time not turning dictatorial against ourselves. I don’t know if it’s possible to do, but the first step is overthrow the left. It’s not going to happen overnight – it might take decades. This quagmire took a few generations to develop, and it might take 2-3 generation to undo. However, if we can oust the left from the education system it will be a very big + for us. It must be done in the media too. Look at Glen Beck, he went his own way and he’s doing pretty well. It’s going to take people who start businesses, schools, and institutions that adhere to American values.

        “A traditional Catholic government in its very “intolerance” would keep the lid on this kind of horse hockey. But as I said, this is untenable at the moment.”

        This is delusional. There is no place on earth with a traditional Catholic government. The only time it existed was before the English broke away from the pope and the Reformation from Rome. If you want pre-Renaissance-style European government, and you think this kind of church-lead endeavor has the answer, I guarantee, you will be very disappointed. You won’t like it one bit. Most of you people have it so good in this country, you’re spoiled rotten, and you keep looking for imaginary reasons why this country doesn’t work. It works just fine, and it’s better than any place on earth. The only thing is, it’s starting to veer off the Constitution and Judeo-Christian values. If things continue on this path, in 20-30 years it will end up in the hands of other lesser cultures and races that didn’t give blood, sweat, and tears for this country, and didn’t build it form nothing when it was Prairies and dry desert, and nomadic Indians were roaming alongside the buffalo.

        Yes, things need to change, but NOT in the totalitarian or dictatorial direction. That’s just switching one evil for another. It’s very much like the people on this blog so desperate to marry or find a new lover, they run after useless rakes or skanky dancers. The idea is not just to marry, but to marry someone good so your life isn’t ruined AGAIN. The idea is not to replace the Constitution with a totalitarian entity because you’re irritated over some of its freedoms. We need to find ways to close loopholes by adhering closely to the Constitution’s original form. The problems we’re faced with are the direct result of trying to circumvent the Constitution.

        Like


      • Strangers took advantage of our openness, fairness, good opportunities, good economy, scientific and technological advances, and civilized values, and used them against us.

        Here’s a little bit of Dark Enlightenment for you: Overthrowing the left would require “intolerance”. The right to “freedom of religion” as defined means the right to believe whatever crap makes you feeeel good. Society isn’t perfect, and due to man’s fallen nature, never will be. But once one dumps traditional Catholicism, people look to maximize their own wealth at the expense of everyone else, leading to the situation we have with venal elites who care about nothing but profit — which leads to resentful people “left out” of the bonanza who want the government to redistribute the wealth — Marxism and hope-‘n-changism and big gov’t providing bread and circuses. This is what will eventually happen to any atheist society.

        This is delusional. There is no place on earth with a traditional Catholic government.

        Certainly. And I think mankind as a whole will sink further and further into the depths of absurdity until they start coming back.

        The only time it existed was before the English broke away from the pope and the Reformation from Rome. If you want pre-Renaissance-style European government, and you think this kind of church-lead endeavor has the answer, I guarantee, you will be very disappointed. You won’t like it one bit.

        Only if you were also going Amish, back to 15th-century technology. But nobody here is recommending that. But the point is this: people trying to operate on the assumption that all religions are equally good is an absurdity. It’s like having freedom of opinion about engineering. People would want to believe that the entropy of the universe doesn’t constantly go up, because it would suggest the universe isn’t eternal, and would therefore deny it’s so. People would want to believe that the speed of light isn’t what it is, and deny that, substituting something else. People would want to believe that it’s possible to make a perpetual motion machine, but although the laws of physics say it’s impossible. Nevertheless, they’d try. (Like this social engineering bullshit that’s making so many of us extremely unhappy!)

        Most of you people have it so good in this country, you’re spoiled rotten, and you keep looking for imaginary reasons why this country doesn’t work. It works just fine, and it’s better than any place on earth.

        One thing you seem to forget is that a lot of the seeming good life is due to better technology that has never been seen in the history of mankind. Plus, I am still unable to live independently (yet) due to lack of employment, so things ain’t all they’re cracked up to be for me personally.

        The only thing is, it’s starting to veer off the Constitution and Judeo-Christian values. If things continue on this path, in 20-30 years it will end up in the hands of other lesser cultures and races that didn’t give blood, sweat, and tears for this country, and didn’t build it form nothing when it was Prairies and dry desert, and nomadic Indians were roaming alongside the buffalo.

        Yes, things need to change, but NOT in the totalitarian or dictatorial direction. That’s just switching one evil for another. It’s very much like the people on this blog so desperate to marry or find a new lover, they run after useless rakes or skanky dancers. The idea is not just to marry, but to marry someone good so your life isn’t ruined AGAIN. The idea is not to replace the Constitution with a totalitarian entity because you’re irritated over some of its freedoms. We need to find ways to close loopholes by adhering closely to the Constitution’s original form. The problems we’re faced with are the direct result of trying to circumvent the Constitution.

        The only problem with this assertion is that the loopholes were built into the Constitution’s original form, and there’s no way of getting around it. It’s a flawed document. Granted, it was a lot better than most of the other governments that have been made these past few hundred years, but it’s flawed enough that given time — which, in our case, would mean “starting most obviously in the 1960s” — the flaws will start to bring the house down.

        Like


      • Look, Matt…….let’s cut to the chase here. With you I only discuss sex…

        Perfect! We are on the same wavelength then.

        But we were talking about sex, weren’t we? “… let the noble savage ravage you in my stead.” How jejune of you to think I would waste your precious, precious attention in an exchange of arid political polemic!

        Everything I say to you is sex. You are an object. The wind whistling through your skull-chimes about politics and culture kills my arousal. I want to pound the liberal discourse out of your lungs and turn it into breathless moans. The hot air that gasses from your larynx goads me to gag you, choke you, throat you.

        Next time you get a political thought in your pretty little head, I want to physically liberate you from its mischief before you translate it to the computer, bang you until your face is crashed into the keyboard, slobbering. I want to interrupt your ten-paragraph posts with gibberish and ellipse …

        kln,lhko,kjk;l.mjkl

        Before I’m done with you, your contributions will look like GBFM’s.

        Like


      • Hahaha……..what am I supposed to do with a reply like this? I’m speechless lol.

        Ok, one thing though.

        “The wind whistling through your skull-chimes about politics and culture kills my arousal.”

        I did give you credit (twice) in one comment below that is yet to post. And….. I know you love being appreciated for you mind, even if I think you’re only good for one thing (hint, hint 😉 😉 ). And I did insult GBFM, so it might be music to your ears 🙂

        Anyway, worry not about it. Haha…before you know it, CH will post another thread about women (instead of this boring politics stuff) and you can get back to your favorite topic.

        Like


      • I’m speechless.

        The goal, achieved. And without a gag!

        You are my favorite topic. What CH posts is irrelevant.

        Well, certain parts of you are my favorite topic, I mean.

        I would stoop to even become a beta provider for you, but with a big dick. I’ll treat you like a whore, but only when nobody’s looking.

        Like


      • Everywhere else, as the princess, as you deserve.

        Like


      • “. . .despite its roots being from Germany . . .”

        Not despite, because of. Marx’s single greatest failing as a thinker was being a 19th century Prussian. He was never in his life able get outside that box and think in any other context.

        Like


      • on August 8, 2013 at 8:01 pm Carlos Danger

        Good point and one not commonly understood.

        Like


      • Odd that… I never figured a Prussian as a “workers of the world” champion.

        Either my impression of Prussians is off… or calling a YKW a “Prussian” is somewhat, eh… shall we say misleading?

        Like


      • It’s like how we’re taught that the people inhabiting Judea during the time of Herod the Idumean were members of the tribe of Judah.

        Like


      • Your impressions are not likely too far off about Prussia itself, which is why it was the suitable environment for an individual Prussian to become one. You must first perceive a problem before you can set about finding a solution to it; and Prussia had problems. If you can think in the context of a 19th century Prussian, Marx, even if you don’t agree with him, actually at least makes a certain sense. Well, at least his analysis of the problems.

        For Prussia.

        For 19th century America he was essentially trying to divide by zero.

        Although Tsarist Russia wasn’t a particularly conducive environment to develop a Marxist like philosophy, it nonetheless fit well with the problems there and took root, especially among the Russian Jews who were . . . Prussian Jews. Well, Rhinelanders actually (as Prussia as a sociopolitical entity didn’t exist at the time they moved eastward), albeit having been displaced for some centuries. That’s what Ashkenazi means; Rhinelander Jew. Many of them even still bore Germanic family names and spoke Yiddish, a German dialect.

        With the late 19th century wave of Russian Jews migrating to America they achieved political freedoms that they didn’t have in Russia and used those freedoms to lobby for those Marxist political reforms they wished to have been able to lobby for under the Tsar.

        Which, unfortunately, in America, was to divide by zero.

        It wasn’t a Jewish plot, it was a simple cultural mismatch. What they had wanted in Russia they didn’t need in America, only they hadn’t figured that out yet.

        Note that this is a recipe for Useful Idiots.

        To bring it all together into one ball of tangled yarn and to help get into the mindset of a Prussian social reformer it might help to read Marx’s On the Jewish Question. Note in particular that the Prussian view of the Jewish question makes absolutely no frickin’ sense in an American context.

        Yes, Marx went on and on about “history,” most of which wasn’t Prussian, but every time he looked at history he did it through his Prussian colored glasses. He was never able to take them off.

        Of course what I have written here is a Golden Book story, leaving out the role of the German-American banking and industrial cartels (non-Jewish Germanics migrated to the US in the late 18th and early 19th centuries in such numbers that Germanic languages were actually dominant on the street), as well as that of the City of London, but it’s close enough for horseshoes, handgrenades and the provocation of thought.

        Like


      • I see Sunstein has finally sent over a better class of shill.

        Like


      • In other words, your obsession must respond and refute every comment that doesn’t fit in with your world view. You constantly attack the arguer instead of the argument, as you have nothing to say but deploy Ad hominem tactics.

        You can’t digest the truth, you decrepit ill-minded WN. When you embrace the truth, it shall set you free.

        Where is Matt – to save you from my trampling on your sourpuss sullen self?

        Like


      • I’ve long-admitted I no longer argue with your ilk, because

        1) That plays into your cogdis frame and muddies the water by introducing several errant topics, obscuring the main point of a given prior statement… which can’t be denied, so the tactic is to demand superfluous explanations and/or mention two or three other points, so that the initial one gets buried.

        2) Even when a sound argument and/or counter-argument is made, it’s ignored… and you and your ilk just bring up the same ol’ already-been-refuted bullshit weeks later in other threads.

        As I’ve said on numerous occasions, the majority of my reactions to your ilk’s shillery is merely mocking at this point, since that works best among the peanut gallery and provides far more satisfaction than debating politics with folks who have no intention of listening anyway.

        Like


      • Haha…in other words, you lost. You just can’t make a sound argument against someone who knows how to unwind your web of lies.

        Now, let’s see how l’obsessionnel will stick to their promise not to argue with our “ilk.”

        Like


      • of course what Judge Joo Schleindlin forgets here in her concern about “racially discriminatory” profiling is that blacks commit 95% of violent crimes while being 12% of the population. lefties literally won’t let us look at simple “reality” same thing with news reports that no longer report race of the perp…even when he’s on the loose and people are supposed to help the police find him!! lzozlzl http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/judge-rules-nycs-stop-frisk-unconstitutional/storynew?id=19936326

        Like


      • “of course what Judge Joo Schleindlin forgets here”

        Mayor Joo Bloomberg is appealing her decision, so what’s your point?

        Like


    • Yes, Lily, actually. Hahaha so cute and funny. GBFM has explained it. We’re not crazy. You’re brainwashed.

      Did you know that the #1 promoted thing on Disney Channel this summer has been the new Disney movie “Teen Beach Movie”? The entire point of the movie is to instruct girls that (1) they don’t need a boyfriend and (2) not only that, they affirmatively should *never* want a boyfriend and that beta-behaving boys who behave chivalrously are worthy of scorn and ridicule.

      I don’t have time to type the entire plot and examples but any red piller who watches it knows what I’m talking about.’

      The producers of the movie are named Goldstein, Silverberger, Goldberg, Silverstein, and Jewberger. I kid you not.

      Again….THE THINGS CH WRITES HERE ARE TRUE. As others have illustrated for you, feminism and communism are Jewish.

      The Cathedral actively TEACHES women to disrespect and hate normal white men who built this society. It actively teaches htem, in fact, that “girls can do anything boys can do” and you are bad if you even *want* a man in your life. Never mind the fact that in a state of nature women most certainly do need men and only jewish/communist affirmative action and related crap as covered here ad nauseum lead to make-work fake jobs for women fucking up the economy.

      God I could write you a book but I don’t have the time.

      Watch the move “Happy People” and see the role of women and how important men relaly are. Only our success at building a great society has allowed women to act like they do now with impunity.

      I’m bitter because the state forces me to pay $4,000 a month to a woman who is my ex wife. That’s not child support; the children don’t consume nearly that much per month. Basically what I do is pay her rent and then pay the normal child support. Actually it’s not even court ordered. I do it for my kids. It’s “nature ordered” because of my ex’s patheticness.

      Yes all the pretty white girls who saw me as too beta in my 20s are missing out. If they only knew; my ex wife, the one who married me, has not worked since 2003.

      Like


    • I have an entire folder full of pictures that showcase how quite literally almost all defenders of anything that’s degenerate (think feminism, “gay rights”, anti white attitude, “white privilege”) is a kike.

      As for the “blaming others for my unhappiness”: so it’s my fault that people actually think that the royal family is wrong for calling their newest son a son instead of waiting till it grows up and decides what gender it will be? It’s my fault that dykes are allowed to defile the institution of marriage?

      Good to know.

      PS: Joe Biden himself has admitted that Jewish media leaders are responsible for people’s acceptance of homosexuality.

      Like


  22. on August 8, 2013 at 3:09 pm Jochen Peiper

    http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/valerie-jarrett-the-real-power-corruption-behind-the-oval-office-part-2

    This is an excellent expose of Valerie Jarrett and her control over Opie via George Soros and the CPUSA network. What about the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion hasn’t come true yet, Lily? You are willfully blind because your purpose here is to diffuse criticism of the tribe and maintain the benefit of the doubt by muddying the waters.

    Like


    • I’ve been saying that for months now… it’s about time the peanut gallery starts hearing it from others, lest it be too easy to dismiss one or two voices as “cranks”… another of the usual suspect techniques.

      Like


    • Their efforts to blind us are astonishingly effective. Even after I became wise to the Question (thanks to Belloc), I blithely assumed the Protocols were garbage. Because I had been told the document was a scurrilous fabrication. Yet truth will out.

      A critical part of being a critical thinker is to read all vilified texts.

      Like


      • Whether spun of whole cloth or not, in the words of Henry Ford:

        “They fit!”

        Like


      • Same thing with the Willie Lynch “letter”. Sure its a fabrication, but that does NOT make its logic any less accurate.

        Like


    • “What about the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion hasn’t come true yet,”

      Let me set you straight, since you can’t see straight if your life were depended on it. I usually don’t respond to idiots that bring up the Protocols or the Blood Libels (Matthew’s favorite), for the umpteenth time. That might only appeal to Greg Eliot-style idiots, buts serious people laugh at people like you.

      “This is an excellent expose of Valerie Jarrett and her control over Opie via George Soros and the CPUSA network. “

      Here goes the straightening up:

      – Valerie Jarrett hates Jooz and Israel. She keeps influencing Obama against Israel.

      – George Soros hates jooz, Juism, and Israel (although he is of Jusish origin). He trashed Juism, worked against Israel, criticized Jooz for not assimilating and intermarrying, you name it, he did or said it.

      – CPUSA, although has some Juish members, not all jooz are communists, and not everyone in the CPUSA is Jusish. You keep making the same fallacy of composition.

      All of these people or entities working in unison doesn’t mean there is a Juish conspiracy. It means they are like-minded individuals where some of them might be Jusish and some not. What they have in common is their lefty values, not Juish sympathies. They’re not working for the sake of Jooz; they’re working for the Left.

      “You are willfully blind because your purpose here is to diffuse criticism of the tribe and maintain the benefit of the doubt by muddying the waters.”

      Why does your ilk angrily accuse me of defusing when I bring forth the truth and shed light on their various truth-twisting? Because they don’t want anyone shedding light on their distorted argument, is why.

      The WN’s purpose here is to spread vicious lies and slander the Jooz with constantly substituting Jooz for liberals, as their war isn’t with the left at all. it’s with the Jooz. The way they attack me and others that tell the truth as opposed to attacking our argument, shows they are grasping at straws; they know they’re being deceitful, and they are trying to cover their tracks.

      Like


  23. Men (resources) are being controlled through women. It doesn’t have to be some kind of grand conspiracy either, I think it’s pretty much human nature. Modern technology is the only reason this is even possible.

    You didn’t think the vacuum created by agriculture/industrialism was going to remain unfilled did you?

    So what if society eventually collapses, the wealth created will be enjoyed by the few able to amass it, through whatever means provide the opportunity. Capitalism has a dark side as well.

    We’re a long ways away from conquering Mother Nature, it may not even be possible. The environment has changed, and with it, new opportunities to exploit. It isn’t wrong or right, it simply is.

    Like


  24. “quadgender”

    Im not even sure what that means… wtf is this wolrd coming to.

    Like


  25. the West to its pre-civilizational state is the rotten fruit of the leftoids’ REM-ish “everybody hurts” infantile morality hitched to the engine of their endless war against their heretic racial cousins.
    >>
    Um… no. It is raw nihilism. There is no real rationalization. The concern for “feelings” is just a jedi mind trick to confuse the weak minded. There is nothing but the will to destroy. It has been with civilization since the start. It is Alinsky’s crude Satanism. Don’t be so stupid as to take the bait that their is some rationalization for cultural marxism other than the crude pyschotic instinct that lingers from our days swinging from trees.

    Like


  26. […] Comment Of The Week: 60 Years Of Shivving […]

    Like


  27. on August 8, 2013 at 6:58 pm akhilleussocrates

    Bryan Caplan would laugh if he had a functioning empathy module.

    Made me laugh out loud.

    Like


  28. The left are a coalition of the ugly, the deviant and the other.

    Ugly=losers of the majority group who want to see their betters brought down (equalised) to their level. They are the last-men or under-men..

    Deviant=Gays, lesbians, trans-gender, any-type of weird fetish or sexuality, masculinised women, feminised men. (There is overlap here with the ugly)

    Other= The outgroups to the majority.

    Like


    • Pretty much how it is. Feminism has always been about getting society and, more specifically, men, to pay attention to ugly and fat women.

      Like


    • I used to read as much as 15 hours a day on politics, I have alos spent too many hours arguing with leftists,

      it did not take me long to figure out that dysfunctional people tend to be leftists.

      leftists have far too much anger and are far too emotional, many of them are neurotic, irrational and despite their claims of being the ones for tolerance, most leftists are extremely intolerant people

      no matter how many facts you present them, they hang on to their leftist beliefs, they do not care that for every Zimmerman shooting a black man about 500 blacks commit murders, they “feel” blacks are victims and facts do not matter to them, they feel that way and that’s that.

      the most ironic thing about leftists is that they claim to be the ones who care about others, but the truth is exactly the opposite, they are extremely self centered people

      they support “feel good” causes or do a few nice things here and there but they do it only to give themselves a good conscience, when you know them closely you see they are – most of them – very much self centered people

      a lot of them hate capitalism, hate rich people but live in their parent’s basement and use dad’s or mom’s car, computer, and eat their food for free…or they get a government check – yet hate the rich people who pay for it in taxes – a lot of them are parasites and hypocrites

      Liberals claim to hate dictators – they accused Bush of being one – but I know a lot of liberals who in their personal lives are little dictators, they rule with an iron fist over their lover or friends, and when you try to discuss a serious topic with them not only do they lose control, become agitated and angry, but they constantly interrupt you, they talk louder and louder as they are trying to crush your dissent, they refuse to hear any different point of view and act like little dictators … once all that fails they resort to calling you names

      yes on top of all that most of them are very immature

      They hate the conservative idea of personal responsibility, they want everyone else to take care of them, mom, dad, the government, they are like babies who do not want to let go of mom’s breast

      women wanting tax payers providing them with “the pill”? that is parasitic behavior and a refusal to be responsible

      A lot of them are simply angry people who like to vent and break things during protests no matter what the protest is about

      some of them are drug addicts who want free needles

      no matter how you slice it , most of them are dysfunctional people who want others to pay a price for what they do not like about themselves be they ugly lesbians, ex wives who let themselves go…most of them are angry people who want others to be punished

      the left is the party of the dysfunctional, lazy angry parasites

      Most leftist know what they know because they saw it in a Hollywood movie, or they saw it on the 6 o’clock news and thus believe this is the whole truth ( the main stream media doctored the 911 call to make Zimmerman appear racist, this is common practice with the MSM )

      while most conservatives know Hollywood is simply a propaganda machine that changes every ” based on a true story” into some pro-feminism, pro-gay, pro-multicultiralism, pro-left radically anti-white male brainwashing message ( true of the MSM and most TV shows as well )

      and I could go on and on

      most leftists are angry, intolerant, neurotic, immature, parasitic, irrational, brainwashed and dysfunctional

      they are the perfect useful idiots

      Like


      • @Canadian: I like how you think. Are there any others like you up there, or are you dining alone most of the time?

        In urban USA you won’t find too many like you anymore.

        Like


      • Thanks Stark,

        No there are not many of us, but more of us than the media would have you believe.

        In 2006 we did put in power a conservative, the prime minister of Canada Stephen Harper.

        Of course our media is bashing him and his party almost all the time just as they do in the USA with Republicans

        and our Canadian media is very liberal and speaks as if everyone in the room agreed with them, as if the liberal way was the only way.

        But Harper got elected and re-elected again and is still in power.

        Millions of Canadians are not liberals but they have no voice in the main stream media.

        It is a myth that all Canadians hate the USA, the millions who vote conservative – about half of voting age Canadians – do not hate the USA at all. But they can not stand liberals

        Our main stream media is anti-USA, this is no surprise because just as in the USA our main stream media is a propaganda machine of the left. This is as obvious as the nose on my face.

        They embellish stories about liberals to make them look good – or simply sweep under the carpet stories that would them look bad – , and they distort stories about conservatives to make them look like evil bigoted macho racists.

        They used to join in with your media to bash Bush.

        I’m in the province of Quebec where most people speak French unlike the rest of Canada, and this province is the most leftist/liberal one.

        Just as in the USA there is a larger concentration of liberals in large cities ( Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal etc) where you will also find the vast majority of drugs addicts, criminals, gay/lesbians, people on welfare, non-caucasians and a lot of third world immigrants

        the further away you are from a large city, the more whites you will find and the less decay you will find

        A McDonald in a town far from a large city will be very clean, while a McDonald in very a “diverse” neighborhood ( read; majority of non-whites) will be filthy as those people throw empty containers and food on the floor as if they were animals in a cage.

        I wish I had photos I could post, it is shocking.

        The less white people there is in a McDonald, the filthier it is; this is not an opinion , it is an observation of a fact.

        Yes we do exist – Canadian conservatives, millions of us – but the media pretends we don’t.

        Like


      • “Liberals claim to hate dictators . . .”

        However, libralism is an effect of dictators. It can only exist under an autocratic form of governance where power and resources are dispensed. A liberal society is one not of rights, but of privileges. In a modern context it is an outgrowth of European fuedalism.

        The American form of government was specifically constructed to prevent dictatorships by denying the government resources and retaining them in the hands of The People. A pauper cannot give alms. A pauper must, neccesarily, be the begger.

        Anyone wishing to live in a liberal society (which is to say one of privilege) must, therefore, oppose the American, libertarian form of government and seek to replace it with an autocratic one.

        Only be sure to call the privileges one seeks to gain by it “rights.” See the Second Bill of.

        Like


  29. And on the eighth day, the leftoid rested his gated community security detail.

    Fuck that.

    On the eighth day the Lord looked over the trail of destruction blazed by the leftoids’ romp through the institutions and resolved to begin anew. And the Lord said, “Let there be White.”

    Like


  30. The left are a coalition of the ugly, the deviant and the other.

    Ugly=losers of the majority group who want to see their betters brought down (equalised) to their level. They are the last-men or under-men..

    Deviant=Gays, lesbians, trans-gender, any-type of weird fetish or sexuality, masculinised women, feminised men. (There is overlap here with the ugly)

    Other= The outgroups to the majority.

    + The Elite. Cannot forget the elite. Again there is overlap between the elite and the other three groups.

    Like


  31. “” + The Elite. Cannot forget the elite. Again there is overlap between the elite and the other three groups. “”

    Does the term “Elite” include the Zionists or are the Zionists allies and conspirators with the Elite?

    Like


    • Does the term “Elite” include the Zionists or are the Zionists allies and conspirators with the Elite?

      If the Zionists are powerful, and/or wealthy and/or influential then they’d be Elite.

      If they are not then the Zionists would fall into either the ugly, deviant or other categories, (with possible membership in more than one category), most likely the ‘other’ category.

      Any leftist can also belong to more than one of these categories, perhaps even all.

      Like


    • on August 9, 2013 at 8:29 am Carlos Danger

      In my opinion,they are co-conspirators. There can be no denial that Rockefellers, et al are also complicit in this hostile elite. The question is who dominates. Me thinks at this point its the men from Zion.

      Like


  32. Here we go AGAIN! You dumb, desperate, and ignorant lemmings. Falling for the same “Cathedral” lingo slight of hand by CH.

    Do some reading people, for chrissakes. Or, if you don’t have the patience to read a book, simply watch the film series called ‘The Century Of Self’ to get your inquiry started. You can probably find it on YouTube.

    Its a “Synagogue”. CH knows this. CH never mentions this. And, the reason(s) should be obvious to observant readers of this site.

    Its always Brown people, Women, Mexicans, Leftoids, etc. However, NONE of these groups have/had the power to

    Like


    • …..really impact lives on a serious level.

      Like


      • If the USA was a human being:

        1. Who controls the BODY (Congress and lawmaking)?

        2. Who controls the HEART and BLOOD FLOW (FED, Banks)?

        3. Who controls the BRAIN (Media)?

        ….It ain’t not a “Cathedral”. And Blacks, Mexicans, and gays have NEVER had the power to do anything (wars, pollution, criminal justice, financial abuse, destroyed industries, etc, etc, etc) to hurt you.

        Do some reading. You guys always need to be spoonfed?

        CH is playing around with you scared little wimps.

        Like


      • Dude… a growing number here have and continue to name the YKW.

        But note we have to use ciphers such as YKW, The Js, Sanhedrin, Ju, Joo, etc., etc., etc. if we want the posts to go through the auto-censor.

        No man is an island, and even CH has to step lightly in certain areas.

        All we can do for now is keep swatting down the numerous and insufferable cogdis shills the Sunstein Brigade keeps sending to muddy the waters.

        From a thread a few weeks ago, the Cathedral vs. Synagogue debate was covered… it’s okay to call it the Cathedral because (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) we all understand the irony and the need for such, well, Cyberian Samizdatery.

        Like


      • Greg, you “namers” – WNs, SNs, neos and other learned elders of Albion – step lightly not only because of possible repercussions (all too real, I might add) but, I’m afraid, also because of your age-old effort to sugarcoat what you’re really all about. While your mouths are saying “homelands for all!” your heads are thinking something else, and your hearts are feeling something else again.

        Now look, I’m all for speaking racial truth to anti-white power. All for it. And part of doing so does indeed require some “naming.” Less commonly appreciated, however, is that tactful, responsible naming, contrary to the – ahem – “Cathedral’s” worst fears, has the effect of allowing the kooks to reveal themselves. I’m convinced the hardcore WN message is a natural born loser (the alternative to which is hardly white demise, as some of you seem to think). But let’s put that contention to the test and may the best man win.

        Like


      • While your mouths are saying “homelands for all!” your heads are thinking something else, and your hearts are feeling something else again.

        Heebie-jeebie paranoia… not having pure motives themselves, they attribute perfidy to all others.

        Like


      • Total projection. Whites do not, as a simple matter of our nature, wish to exterminate your kind. Or any kind.

        We propound negotiations, we accept the compromise. Very rarely do we push logic to its ultimate conclusion in irrevocable act. This is because we suffer the infliction of having pity for our foes. Mercy comes naturally to us, because we are granted mercy.

        Open your eyes, Esau, and notice that Jacob is not the one striving to slay his brother.

        Like


      • Greg, anyone can log onto a WN forum and see for himself what sorts of things WNs believe. Most people would very quickly agree that WNs tend to be “full of hate.” It’s just silly to pretend that this isn’t true.

        Racialism is a very sensible societal organizing principle but it’s going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming, it seems, out of the intellectual and cultural ghetto in which it’s happy as a pig in shit.

        Like


      • Greg, anyone can log onto a WN forum and see for himself what sorts of things WNs believe. Most people would very quickly agree that WNs tend to be “full of hate.” It’s just silly to pretend that this isn’t true.

        The vast majority of those so-called WN forums are merely disaffected individuals and cogdis shills looking to either muddy the waters or masquerade as WNs, going over the top to give the movement a bad name…

        And when the snarky coloureds start chiming in with their muh-dik nonsense, all hell breaks loose.

        We see that on nearly every Cyberia forum… here included.

        “Full of hate” you say? I look at those posters who upend such forums and see where the real hate lies… far surpassing the so-called “hate” of the WNs.

        Again, just look at this forum.

        As time goes on, and more white folks get dispossessed, a better class of WN forum will arise… until then, there are only one or two, and those caught up in philosophical rather than real-world solutions… the only viable one thus far being something along the lines of the Northwest Imperative.

        The mistake they’re all making now is disregarding or merely tolerating the idea of Christ.

        Like


      • On a side note, you berated ZombieShane for his newspeak on Native American Terrorism and then squawked about Robert Howard being a RAY-CISS!

        What game are you playing, Gracie ol’ boy?

        Like


      • Haha….This is the kind of thread in which Greg Eliot thrives. This is why he’s here. Nothing gives him more pleasure than to participate in a thread like this.

        Notice how he gleefully responds to very stupid remark about the Elders of Zion, the supposed commission of anti-Christian art, and various conspiracy shit, and he thinks that because of a few disgruntled antisemites angry at women for not getting any pussy believe his shit, it make his lies the truth. He he he…..stupid foolish angry little Man –a failure.

        What happened Gregi? Didn’t you get that promotion, or that research grant, or admission to that university you wanted? Did you get fired? Is your Jusih neighbor richer than you? Your enviousness stinks to high heaven. I suspect, you have deep-seated issues for which you blame the Jooz for, as the other WN and antisemites posting here. Their anger and hate for the jooz is a substitute for their own failures and loserishness.

        Like


      • You promised me you’d behave.

        I write a woman’s oaths on water.

        Like


      • Did I hit too close to home? Or, are you just ensuring he continues licking your dick???

        Is this why you come to DickyLicky’s rescue?

        Like


      • Potty mouth now? I thought you were a lady.

        I’m not sure what you’re talking about, “close to home.” I was referring to this little pledge of yours:

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/when-its-alright-to-white-knight/#comment-465204

        Like


      • Their anger and hate for the jooz is a substitute for their own failures and loserishness.

        This kind of kneejerk anti-anti-semitism is every bit as dumb as the Protocols-must-be-true reaction to every instance of Jewish involvement in public affairs. Whatever mainstream mileage it still gets the crowd here’s a tad more sophisticated doncha think?

        Like


      • good grief – what a hysterical piece of work you are.

        Like


      • Sure, if you disagree with my position, then I’m hysterical. lol

        Like


      • I wouldn’t speak like this in person, but here I give myself liberties.
        .
        I know what you’re referring to, don’t you think I know?

        But what YOU don’t know is that I kept my promise, since I didn’t initiate any contact with your SERVANT.
        In his usual annoyed manner, he initiated a comment to me, https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/08/08/comment-of-the-week-60-years-of-shivving/#comment-466034

        and that started the ball rolling, again. However, since you are a blind man (in the chauvinistic sense), you immediately assume I didn’t keep my word.

        Once again, you’re wrong about me.

        Like


      • When the lies begin to stink
        The liars begin to shriek

        Like


      • @Silver

        My remarks are based on my observations, which are usually very sharp. It’s why so many here get so angry with my comments – as they are harshly accurate. It’s why Matt always comes to Gregi’s rescue, to neutralize the damage I do to his buddy.

        They built a whole philosophy based solely on Joo-hate, and most of the examples they bring forth are either slanted, twisted in some way, exaggerated, misunderstood, or blatant lies.

        There is a BIG difference between criticizing joos, and flat out making up lies and conspiracy theories to trump-up hate against them.

        For example, it’s one thing to criticize Marxism and say many joos are liberals. It’s true.

        It’s another thing to say Marx was juish so Marxism is juish, and all jooz are Marxists, and they all want to destroy western civilization. Then bring the actions of a few liberal Jooz to prove it’s how all jooz think, while overlooking so many gentiles that hold the same exact liberal stance.

        The issue is not jooz. The issue is liberalism and the left. Liberals and lefties come from all backgrounds and religions. For example, how many Catholic priests and Nuns are pushing for gay marriage now? No one mentions it here, but they keep saying jooz push for gay rights. No, it’s not jooz, or Catholics, or any group, per se. It’s liberals from all walks of life as they have lefty values. Their values are not juish or Catholic or anything else, just lefty values.

        Therefore, most joo haters throughout history were either jealous of the jooz for their smarts, or they were religious zealots and hated the jooz for not converting. These are the only two reasons there is joo hate. And BTW, Greg Eliot embodies both of these two reasons – he’s jealous of them for their success, and he’s resentful they will not embrace Christ – which makes everything he says against them seriously suspect.

        Like


      • Same song, twentieth verse… Cathedral YOU’RE JUST JEALOUS bullshit coupled with water-muddying bloviation… the chateau needs a better class of shill… this one is merely making a dog’s breakfast of the whole strategy.

        Like


      • Lily, obviously the big concern is that what starts as “reasonable criticism” ends up in kooked out Jew-on-the-brain. We’ve all seen examples, I’m sure.

        Never-the-freakin-less what you are doing is treating even reasonable criticism as “unhinged hatred.” It’s bullshit and you know it’s bullshit. Organized Jewry is a potent anti-white force in American culture and politics. I wish it weren’t so but it is, and it’s totally unrealistic to expect people not to eventually notice.

        Like


      • good grief – what a hysterical piece of work you are.

        It’s not hysterics. It’s enthusiasm for the gangbang.

        My little exhibitionist here is always eager to be the object of mass male gazing, the hole in the center of the peen party. Three, four, eight guys at a time, she takes on all cummers. I’ve tried to ween her from her addiction to attention. Now I am resigned to a paternal appreciation for her dedication to the craft.

        Daddy will always be proud of you, Liliana. No matter what.

        Matt

        Like


      • Now, we’re getting somewhere. You pretty much know me – “My little exhibitionist here is always eager to be the object of mass male gazing.” lol

        “I’ve tried to ween her from her addiction to attention”

        Obviously, you’re not doing a good job, “weening” me. When you fight with YaReally and Yeahokcool, it takes away time from me and I start touring in search of attention. I need you constantly.

        Like


      • See, Gregi….unlike yourself, I don’t have a strategy. Just the truth. And, the way I’ve described you is 100% true.

        Like


      • Never-the-freakin-less what you are doing is treating even reasonable criticism as “unhinged hatred.” It’s bullshit and you know it’s bullshit. Organized Jewry is a potent anti-white force in American culture and politics. I wish it weren’t so but it is, and it’s totally unrealistic to expect people not to eventually notice.

        This.

        Again, take note, Silly Shilly Lily.

        Like


      • You keep patting yourself on the back for victories merely imagined, none achieved. Your lances are but straws.

        Careful you don’t hurt your shoulder.

        Like


      • “Organized Juery is a potent anti-white force in American culture and politics. I wish it weren’t so but it is, and it’s totally unrealistic to expect people not to eventually notice. “

        But you see, Silver, it’s not organized Jeury. The Jooz aren’t organized. They haven’t organized against whites. This is bullshit conspiracy that stems not form reality, but from hate of them. Lo and behold, when you say “organized Jeury” you use the exact term used by Hit-ler. Every one of his speeches was about “organized Juery.” Surely, the situation then couldn’t have been the same as today since the Left wasn’t as strong as it’s today (and it’s debatable the left is what he cared about anyway). This tells me “organized jeury” grievances are bullshit. It stems from Joo hate and the need to come up with something that would scare people. Thus, a worldwide organized-Jeury conspiracy isn’t new.

        I’m not surprised though, the Jooz were always accused of all kinds of things. In the Middle Ages they were accused of drinking the blood of Christian kids. Amazingly enough, there are still people posting here (Mathew) who believe this nonsense. “ Organized Juery” nonsense is the same type of claim as the Elders of Zion, or the “blood drinking” of yesteryear – same shit, different day. What was then is today.

        Matt King on “the-shit-test-was-known-to-men-in-1910” thread posted the genius words of King Solomon:

        “What has been is what will be,
        and what has been done is what will be done;
        and there is nothing new under the sun.

        Is there a thing of which it is said,
        “See, this is new”?
        It has been already,
        in the ages before us.

        There is no remembrance of former things,
        nor will there be any remembrance
        of later things yet to happen
        among those who come after. …

        For in much wisdom is much vexation,
        and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow.

        — thus spake Qoheleth

        There is nothing new in what is taking place here. It’s not original to the times we live in, or to the current political and sexual climate in the world, or to this blog’s anti-Joo commentators, or to Hit-ler, or to any other joo hater in history. They all feed on each other, and they all add fuel to the previous hater’s level of Joo hate. They just change the grievance form “blood drinking” to the “Elders of Zion” to “organized jeury” to “Khazars are the real Jooz,” to Jooz responsible for holodomor” to “jooz stealing Palestinian lands” etc….There is no end to how many complaints they level against them. It’ll take this whole thread if I list them all.

        I don’t expect you to be reasonable about this. When you hate jooz this much there isn’t enough reason or logic in the world that will ever take over and help you see reality the way it really is. That’s why it’s the same usual suspects here, repeatedly spreading the same type of nonsense. They will never admit it’s not a conspiracy of jooz.

        If there is a conspiracy, it’s not juish, it’s lefty. And the left, as I said repeatedly (and you know this) is comprised of mostly white gentiles as the jooz are only an infinitesimal fraction of the world’s population. It doesn’t compute how all of Europe, all of South America, all of Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and most of Asia are either socialist or outright communist. Almost the entire earth is. This reminds me of another Biblical verse that says: “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words.” Maybe humankind doesn’t speak the same language as we did back in Genesis, but we are at the point where we all think in unison, which is exactly the point made in the Book of Genesis during the Tower of Bable. Again, Solomon is right: There is nothing new under the sun, and what has been is what will be.

        This is why I can’t take these guys seriously, as they can’t explain what’s happening here other than say the jooz control the world, like little jealous hate-blinded imbeciles. Joo haters are either jealous of their success, or they’re religious zealots resentful the jooz will not convert. Some are haters for both of these reasons, as Greg is.

        Unfortunately, when you have such blatant irrational hate, you can’t really help Western Civilization, because you’re focusing on your joo hate, not liberals and lefties. In other words, you substitute jooz in the place of liberals and lefties. So go ahead, believe all of these ridiculous videos of GBFM. They are all made by Joo haters, neeo-NZs, and WNs whose only mission is to spread lies and hate on the internet against jooz, while they remain as insignificant and as lonely and pussy-empty as ever. For goodness’ sake, haven’t you noticed how ridiculous GBFM is? He’s angry at the world. Not once, has he praised anyone. I guarantee, if he had a good life (a woman he loves, a good job, property, money) you wouldn’t have heard a peep from him. It’s always the disgruntled and the unhappy fomenting trouble. Hit-ler had the same disgruntled and frustrated mindset.

        Anyway, back to your comment. I don’t have a problem with criticizing Jooz for their liberal participation. Many liberals are jooz, that’s just a fact. But they are only a part of the liberal/lefty movement. To overlook all the whites in this crusade is foolish, dangerous, and will not help this country rid itself of who is ruining it.

        Silver, my point is that I am very concerned Joo is being substituted for liberal/lefty so that all the anger is being directed solely at the jooz. Before you know it, it starts taking a life of its own and the feeding frenzy begins. I guarantee, if all the jooz disappeared today off the face of the planet, all of our problems will remain the same, if not worse. At least the jooz brought us the Bible, which influenced much of the West, in particular our government’s values and principles. Please don’t be foolish and run after the angry, disgruntled, frustrated and jealous nutcases who need a scapegoat for their own failures and shortcomings, or resent the Jooz for not converting to their religion. In addition, I don’t know how old you are, but the best way to deal with these issues is to live life to its fullest. Start a business or focus on your career, attract pussy, enjoy hobbies, travel and have fun. Don’t sit and build an obsessive resentment against the jooz. I think Matt King said this once about enjoying the best life has to offer. He also said he’s not worried about the liberals and he doesn’t brood over politics that much anymore either. They will lose in the end, and his decedents will run this country. I think he has the right idea. It frees his mind to do other things instead of being tormented over what others have and you don’t.

        Like


      • On this medium a woman’s ego flits about unchecked. Integrity is dependent on self-discipline, constancy, and fidelity to promises here, which, in a female, can only be enforced by the men in her life and physically.

        So you disappoint me but do not surprise me. Just another rambunctious bitch-chihuahua yip-yipping over the net without a leash. I thought you were different, Lily baby, I thought you were proof of NAWALT. I thought you were special.

        Matt

        Like


      • “Just another rambunctious bitch-chihuahua yip-yipping over the net without a leash. I thought you were different, Lily baby, I thought you were proof of NAWALT. I thought you were special.”

        Just because I put your friend in his place doesn’t mean I’m a “rambunctious bitch-chihuahua yip-yipping,” lol, but I like the imagery, it’s funny.

        You don’t know me Matt, so you can’t possibly think me special. Stop patronizing me. Save that for your WN buddies. They need someone else to egg ‘em on in their useless pursuit. You sure provide resources.

        Like


      • “You don’t know me”!

        The war cry of the precious snowflake.

        I know you better than you know yourself, Miss Harrumph. Inside and out.

        Like


      • Just because I put your friend in his place doesn’t mean I’m a “rambunctious bitch-chihuahua yip-yipping,” lol, but I like the imagery, it’s funny.

        You’re putting no one in their place, merely because you don’t know yours.

        And I would agree that the imagery is droll and apt… were it not so unfair to bitch chihuahuas.

        Like


      • “You’re putting no one in their place, merely because you don’t know yours.”

        Right, I should be quiet so that you can make your absurd assessments, eh?

        Not on your life, WN. I think YOU don’t know your place. Your obsession is taking over your mental faculties too. You can’t leave a dead thread alone. It’s time to seek help nutcase.

        Like


  33. It’s the fault of the republicanist form of government. The Third Estate’s elites are the bankers and global capitalists, and the Third Estate is running wild without the First Estate keeping it in place.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estates_of_the_realm

    Like


  34. 400 years ago big business elites brought in the wretched slaves with consequences. 400 years later you haven’t learned the lessons of the past.

    Like


  35. Today the web is abuzz with the announcement that “Oprah” has been a victim of racism in Switzerland.

    In the future, everyone will be a victim for 7 1/2 minutes.

    Like


    • Oprah is using a “ooJ” strategy. By BRAGGING about being a victim of racism, she identifies with and gets support from the rabble; while at the same time she gets sympathy and support from her superiors.

      As Oprah becomes more and more irrelevant, she will claim to be a victim of racism more and more.

      Think about it, she didn’t even name the store?

      Who does that?

      Like


  36. I see the cogdis usual suspects are attempting a new tactic now.

    And then they wonder why people hate ’em.

    Like


  37. Just a word for Omega’s considering killing themselves over unrequited love. Bad news-they don’t care. If she viewed you with contempt in life, it gets worse in death. If you think that your drama queen splattering your head will get female sympathy and the expression of their soul, let me save your life and tell you that it won’t happen. Your final act will just turn her off more. Think about that when the shotgun is in your mouth because she wont answer your texts.

    Like


  38. […] – Heartiste: […]

    Like