Feminist Catchphrase Translator

The following open source, feminist bromide translation service is offered free of charge. Share with your local warpig!

exploitation, noun
1. anything that gives straight men pleasure.

threatening, adj
1. an instance of consensual lovemaking.
2. an erect penis.

“Men are threatened by [X]”, clause
1. rationale offered when men don’t like what feminists like.

rape, noun
1. regret.
2. unsatisfactory sex with a beta male.

rape culture, noun
1. invisible, unidentifiable, cosmic force that helps provide justification for massive redistribution of wealth from men to women.
2. normal, healthy society.

slutwalk, noun
1. a gathering of half-naked ugly women imagining that men want them.
2. a gathering of half-naked cute women orchestrated by a rich man living in the Upper East Side as a ruse to get laid.

social conditioning, noun
1. biology.
2. all-purpose explanation for any innate human behavior or sexual preference that vexes feminists.
3. hope.

BBW, proper noun
1. a fat woman looking at herself in an hourglass-shaped funhouse mirror.

“smart and sassy”, adj.
1. annoying.
2. ugly.
3. fat.
4. what women with the above three traits put in online dating profiles in lieu of a full body photo.

[X] privilege, noun
1. anything that isn’t immediately recognizable as feminist privilege.
2. the sin of someone being better at something than someone else.
3. the quality of not being a loser.
syn.: envy

creep, noun
1. a boring niceguy who makes an innocent pass at a woman.
2. a male target of a feminist’s psychological projection.

asshole, noun
1. noncommittal lover.
2. sexy cad who doesn’t know feminist exists.
3. irresistible man.

mansplaining, noun
1. logic.
2. reason.

whine, noun
1. legitimate complaint.

double standard, noun
1. a reality of human sexual nature which bothers feminists.
2. holding women accountable for the consequences of anything they do.

“WOW, JUST WOW”, exclamation
1. emotional response to hurtful facts.
2. a resounding admission of defeat in the marketplace of ideas.

War on Women, proper noun
1. a make-believe land dreamed up by feminists and their male enablers to explain away the natural consequences of sex dimorphism.
2. a shibboleth offered by community college professors to starry-eyed, naive coeds, for the purpose of easily seducing them.
3. propaganda to divert attention from the fact that women in the whole receive every societal and cultural advantage in life.

cisgender, noun
1. normal human being.

LGBQT, proper noun
1. abnormal human being.

heteronormativity, noun
1. the imagined cause of a misfit’s deep feelings of shame and inferiority.

“I am a feminist because [X]”, clause
1. rationalization for having no dating life or marital prospects.

Women’s Studies, proper noun
1. lifetime poverty.

“No self-respecting woman would date [X]”, clause
1. An obvious face-saving excuse ugly women say when rejected by men.
2. No True Feminist fallacy.





Comments


  1. I’m surprised you haven’t caught wind of my latest post…

    Keeping it Real… | JayMan’s Blog

    Every once and awhile we’re hit with a piece in the campaign against the very concept of beauty and the human desire and appreciation of attractive people (especially attractive women). Most silly among these are those that talk about what “real” women look like…
    Sure, the media likely does compound the beauty arms race (as with many things), but if you believe that that is solely responsible for the human desire for beauty, and hence, women’s obsession over their own appearance – let me show you a few things.

    Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 9:20 am RappaccinisDaughter

      Nice piece.

      Like you, I have mixed feelings about the “real beauty” information campaigns. On the one hand, there is a justification for some of it. We have a couple of generations of men and boys who don’t realize that nearly 100% of the images of women that they receive through popular culture are manipulated to the point of caricature. They finally get to the point where they see a real human female naked, and they’re grossed out. (Ewww…pores!) They feel cheated; they’re angry. And not without reason—they should be angry, because they have been cheated.

      But then, like so many other well-intentioned movements, it’s almost immediately co-opted. Instead of helping to illustrate reasonable and factual points (e.g., it’s quite rare to find a post-pubertal woman, even a very slim one, who has *no* cellulite. 90% of women have at least a little, due to the differences in male and female subcutaneous body fat distribution), we’re being propagandized.

      Like


    • > ““smart and sassy”, adj.
      1. annoying.
      2. ugly.
      3. fat.
      4. what women with the above three traits put in online dating profiles in lieu of a full body photo.”

      Whew, I dunno, I think you might be letting them off a little easy there.

      “Smart and Sassy” could very well be a code phrase for “The Darkness”.

      > “the very concept of beauty and the human desire and appreciation of attractive people (especially attractive women)”

      No woman is beautiful without a kind and gentle and warm HEART.

      You start throwing in a little smart-n-sassy Darkness, and, before you know it, a Monica Belluci or a Megan Fox can quickly become more hideous than the tatted chain-smoking gin-guzzling broken-down old whore sitting at the end of the bar.

      Bitches with The Darkness in their hearts: DNFW.

      Like


      • BTW, if the bitch were really “smart” – like a genius level manipulator of a man’s emotions – then she would realize how much it would behoove her to learn to FAKE a little airheadedness.

        A chick with a big brain who fakes being an airhead [if for no other reason than simply to please her master] – now that is some serious wood right there.

        Like


      • Not for me. It makes me wonder what else she is hiding and why.

        Like


      • Well, you can have a smart-n-sassy Sarah Silverman or a Rosanne Barr nagging and criticizing and demeaning and humiliating you 24-hours-a-day.

        Or you can have an Elizabeth Montgomery or a Barbara Eden faking a little airheadedness for her master:

        https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=elizabeth+montgomery+bewitched

        https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=barbara+eden+dream+jeannie

        Your choice.

        Like


      • Nah I like the challenge. Faking ditziness used to be very common among the brightest women of a couple generations ago.

        Like


      • Not sure that’s right (well, it’s fine if it’s “right” for you – diff’rent strokes ‘n all).

        I was once told by a Catholic Priest that the essence of faith is to see the facts and still believe the myth (I think he used the word “mystery”, as part of his self-serving papering-over of the challenge). I think that’s exactly right, and akin to Kirkegaard’s “Leap of Faith”. You will bend like the willow in the wind, and be left standing when the storm has subsided.

        I find that there is nothing sexier than an intelligent woman who sees the facts, recognizes her drives and self-contradictions, and chooses to be a woman who supports her man and is “into it” vis-à-vis hearty sex and gender roles. The woman who does that has a far greater chance of happiness than the complain-o-bots that populate the Femin-o-sphere. Unfortunately, that woman is very few and far between.

        Keep it fun. Keep it playful. Life doesn’t have to be so fvcking serious. Serious is tiring.

        “Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes.” – Walt Whitman

        Like


      • ‘No woman is beautiful without a kind and gentle and warm HEART.’

        Totally in agreement.

        Like


      • No woman is beautiful without a kind and gentle and warm HEART.

        I agree. But I’ve been thinking about this lately, and I think there’s a permutation of this feminism bullshit we haven’t really looked at.

        This kind of qualification – niceness, or emotional attractiveness – can only be used in an environment where the emphasis rests on relationships rather than sexual gratification. IE, where marriage comes before the sex, or where sex is de-emphasized. The current sexual dynamic allows the prettiest girls to bang whatever man they’d like; raw, biologically-determined appearance is more important than personality. Women don’t have to cultivate a pleasing personality, they just have to present an outward physical facade of fuckability. Men have no ability to demand that women be pleasant, because the alphas will fuck the hot girls regardless. And women have no access to decent men unless they meet some physical threshold. (I’m not talking about, say, fat girls. That’s a different subject, those women do it to themselves)

        Beta males lose out to feminism, sure, but so do the less attractive females, because they can no longer leverage innate, controllable qualities like niceness into a strong relationship that fulfills their physical and emotional needs. Just as alpha males don’t have to restrain their base impulses due to societal pressure, neither do alpha (hot) females. Ugly women lose out to feminism as surely as beta men do.

        I know that probably runs counter to conventional wisdom around here and it’s not exactly a complete thought, but I don’t know. Something I’ve been chewing on.

        Like


    • i felt (99.9% inaccurately i’m sure) like this was taken (and expanded, and improved) from my comment on that shitty ‘dawn of the startup douchebag’ article the other day. someone claiming ‘douchebag’ was a sexist term. (douchebag or doucher would go with asshole up there).

      anyway, by all this i only mean that this sort of constant renaming and redefining is truly and continually going on right now, i am glad to see pushback and ridicule about it.

      Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 12:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozozo

      zlzlozoozozoz

      Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 12:37 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozozo

        zlzozoozozoz

        Like


      • http://jannaldredgeclanton.com/blog/?p=1873

        “Changing Church: Dr. Mary E. Hunt, Catholic feminist theologian, Co-founder and Co-director of the Women’s Alliance for Theology, Ethics and Ritual (WATER),”

        Like


      • JIDF pls go

        Like


      • http://catholicfeminist.tumblr.com/

        Confessions of a Catholic Feminist

        “I am a woman and a feminist. Until women received adequate healthcare and the same career opportunities as males without sexual or physical prejudice, if we can trust women to make their own decision thats suits them, then I will go back to being pro-life. I am still waiting for the change.”

        Like


      • If you can meet the same physical requirements as a man in the job, I am sure you too could get hired as an NFL linebacker.

        Like


      • http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt53.html

        “This well written book gives a studied presentation and analysis of the phenomenon of feminism, especially among Catholic religious women, during the latter half of the 1980s.”

        Like


      • > “Revolutionary Jews Promote Porn, Feminism & Homo Agenda…”

        Gaping at the Kiddy Porn Americans Won’t Gape At
        http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3072739/posts

        A widely celebrated “undocumented immigration reform activist” allegedly confessed to Federal agents to downloading child porn off of the internet for years.

        Roy Naim is being described as a “non-citizen” from Israel by CNN. According to previous feature articles in TIME magazine and The Jewish Daily Forward, he admits to being an illegal alien. Apparently he has also distributed a picture of himself online where he outs himself as an illegal alien from Israel. He is also appears to have no source of income. He volunteers to work with children for a Jewish community group in New York City.

        His pro-amnesty activism got him featured in a TIME magazine cover story in 2012. He has also been featured for his pro-amnesty work in the New York Daily News and the Jewish Daily Forward in 2013. The Jewish Daily Forward called him “the Jewish face of the immigration reform struggle.”

        Now he has been arrested for child porn. Federal agents say Naim admitted to viewing child pornography for years.

        The following is a video from the Jewish Daily Forward, a far-left publication that decorates their NYC lobby with a bust of Karl Marx. It was published only two months ago…

        Like


      • Oh….you’re such a genius! As if only Jews were ever caught with child porn, never ever never a Gentile, right? Stupid!

        In fact, there are more Gentiles caught with child porn then Jews. There are more gentile serial killers than Jews. There are more gentiles than Jews who commit violent crimes, etc….

        This doesn’t prove anything, just that everyone has a bad apple and that your mind is warped.

        Like


      • Did you ever think that there is a larger Gentile population than Jews?

        By that rationale…of course there will be more bad apples in a bigger population.

        Like


      • Bob Guiccione and Larry Flynt and Hugh Hefner are were Jews? Who knew? Silly me I figured they were just sleazebags making bucks off horny guys and female exhibitionism.

        I guess that … horny guys and female look at me is a Jewish plot. Those devious Jews, contolling the weather and all.

        Like


      • Like clockwork.

        Flies on shit.

        LOL’ed.

        Like


      • Jews And The Pornography Industry

        “A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.

        and this: “According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.”

        and this: “Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”

        and this: “It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channeled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s.”

        from an article entitled Triple-exthnics by (Jew) Nathan Abrams, appearing in Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004 Read the entire article here: http://www.jewishquarterly.org/article.asp?articleid=38

        Like


      • Squid ink… Penthouse and Playboy aren’t porn, in the sense we all understand and speak about it here.

        And even if for the sake of argument we deem them as such, they’d have died on the vine without the media hype and distribution networks controlled disproportionately by, well…

        And I notice there’s no mention of “pioneers” such as Al Goldstein, or naming the innumerable producers and distributors of the raunch that has infested nearly every corner of known media over the past three decades.

        Again, as always, you can’t spell whiskeysplace without a Y, K, W.

        Like


      • I’d like Mr. Jones to describe the Leftist, Roman Catholic Kennedy family.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 8:25 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlzzzlzlzoz

        lzozozlzozzo

        Like


      • Ok thanks for that. It’s rife in the Church.

        Like


      • http://www.waterwomensalliance.org/2013/02/march-4-teleconference-with-mary-e-hunt/

        “A Feminist Conversation on Catholic Patriarchy: What the Papal Transition Means and What Feminists Can Do About It”

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 7:29 am Joachim Peiper

        These last several Hammer of Love postings are really from Lily, who has sock puppetted his identity.

        Like


      • http://feminismandreligion.com/contributors/

        Catholic feminists fighting hard for feminism.

        Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 9:09 pm Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

        why do we always send the ugliest lesbo Jewesses to do the work of subduing White Men?

        1. Because that’s all it takes

        2. We need the hotties for the important jobs:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheryl_Bentov

        Like


      • Not you too, Gay Blowjobs For Men……

        Like


    • “2. a gathering of half-naked cute women orchestrated by a rich man living in the Upper East Side as a ruse to get laid.”

      That’s GOLD JERRY, GOLD!!!!

      Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 3:12 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozlozlozo

      zlzolzozoozozo

      Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 3:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzlozozozoz

      lzozozozozo

      Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 3:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlozozozozo

        zllzozozlzlzoz

        Like


      • Hahahaha……the usual suspects – Macdonald, Russo, Jones, Clown Nathanial, a couple of cleverly produced WN conspiracy and slander videos dubbed in a sinister voice, who else did I forget?

        Like


      • creepin…sloowly…watch it now…here it comes…its DAVID DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKK ALL THE JOOZE RUN!! RUN JOOZE!! HE GONNA DICKSLAP Y’ALL!

        Like


      • I don’t know what David Duke said but I know he’s bad because they told me.

        Well they didn’t know what he said either but they heard that someone else said…

        Just trust me he’s bad news.

        Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 10:29 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzzozlzzzzoz

        zlzlozzzzozol

        Like


      • I thought there was already a thread designated for this flamefest, couldn’t you folks leave a few threads for discussion of … other stuff?

        Like


      • Bro Nathaniel a self-hating Jew with lots of issues. Self-hate is a plague afflicting Westerners.

        The blame-America-first crowd, did you hear about them? They are self-haters too. They see America as evil no-good country, while terrorists and Mesoamericans are angels in their eyes.

        Anyway, just because someone claims to be Jewish, so what? Some of the worst antisemites were self-hating Jews. One of them is Carl Marx. He badmouthed the Jews and their religion, then came down on them for being capitalists, so he invented socialism – in his warped mind, a better system. Many other self-hating Jews of Western persuasion, like Kafka and Mendelsohn. You hardly see this in Sephardic Jews, although there are some.

        This clown can be someone with a similar affliction. He trashes them as if it’s going out of business. He obviously has mental issues if he spews conspiracy theory like The Protocols.

        Aren’t you Jewish too, from your mother’s side? Just proves my point, yet again. As I often say, I am hardly ever wrong when it comes to my observations.

        Like


      • Don’t feed the trolls.

        Like


      • What jooz have to say about jooish domination of the porn industry:

        Triple-exthnics
        Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry
        http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

        Jews in porn
        by Luke Ford
        http://www.whale.to/c/jewsporn.html

        Jewish porn star: The Jews are better than everyone else

        Sensual Semites
        By MENACHEM WECKER
        http://www.jbooks.com/nonfiction/index/NF_Wecker_Abrams.htm

        Pornography, drugs, Hollywood, and Jewish influence upon the values of mass culture
        http://web.archive.org/web/20101124042239/http://jewishtribalreview.org/porn.htm

        Jews DO control the media
        http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/

        Like


    • This list should be copypasted in comment sections over and over until it becomes a meme.

      Like


    • You forgot that listen translates to obey, and dialogue translates to lecture.

      Like


  2. I always found it amusing that they (feminists, liberals, and the like) say that gender and sexual orientation are social constructs, but also believe that individuals that are LGBQT are born that way (aka genetics/biology).

    Hint: neither is supported by science.

    Like


    • I love how libs tend to be into science and hate religion. Yet their explanation for how LGBQT people come to be that way is to never be analyzed, so they pretty much just act like it’s magic……No different than explaining women were created by God from a man’s rib.

      Like


      • Come on now, haven’t you heard of the magic gay fairy that lives in the land of rainbows !

        Like


      • Oh, how ignorant of me!

        But to add on to what I mentioned before, the safe road to take is saying people’s orientations are just something they’re born with, that’s it. Some people are born with blue eyes, though, and some with brown, and we have scientific explanations for that. But I have the feeling that when we find out what truly causes LGBTQ orientation it’ll be something really horrible, like a brain fuck-up, hormone fuck ups in the womb, viruses/diseases, etc. So now people who are gay or queer or transgender won’t be happy people who just happen to be that way, it’ll be because of a genetic defect. And this scares the libs because they know it’ll hurt lots of people’s feeeeeeewwwwings. So it’s just safer to say that it just happens, and that’s it.

        And this explanation is given by some of the most INTELLIGENT and SKEPTICAL people I know. But they’re only intelligent and skeptical when they feel like it.

        Like


      • Yes, they hate religion a whole lot more than some real scientists like, oh say, Newton and Einstein did.

        Like


    • same thing with their position on evolution

      they firmly believe in it as long as they can use it to bash the right ( or the religious right) but then when we use evolution to explain why certain demographic groups never invented the wheel or a written language or why they commit more crimes or do not succeed as well in school, suddenly the left/feminists/gays do not believe in evolution anymore.

      same thing with their position on women being equal in every way,

      until a ship is sinking and suddenly it is women first and all men must treat them like little fragile helpless weak creatures

      liberalism is so full of contradictions it is mind boggling.

      Like


      • Liberalism, like any evil, can’t be defined by what it is. It’s more defined by what it’s opposed to.

        Like


      • It seems to be opposed to everything that is good and logical.

        but it is mostly opposed to everything that is normal and natural.

        I have been saying for years liberals are dysfunctional.

        ( I made it rhyme for fun but I’m serious about what I am saying here )

        Like


      • The older I get the more I realize Michael Savage is right when he says liberalism is a mental disorder. It thrives in ivory towers where they don’t have to deal with the unwashed masses, yet they claim they want to uplift people they really want nothing to do with. It’s all a narcissistic ego boost.

        And I’ve believed in Human Biodiversity for a while (There are multiple red pills and this one was the first I took). It’s absolutely crazy to me that people will classify different breeds and species and genuses of animal, but claim that humans are just one giant species with no difference at all. Last I checked, a black guy appears very different than myself, a white guy of European descent. We can can have children together and speak common languages, but to say that we possibly couldn’t have evolved differently due to environmental factors is absolutely bullshit. Elephants in colder climates developed fur and smaller ears and became wooly mammoths – They adapted to their climate. So why is it that we have different races and colors of skin indigenous to different parts of the globe if we’re all just one giant group with no differences?

        Like


      • Liberalism contains so many contradictions, only dysfunctional people can agree with such a mess of ideas that collide all one with the other.

        There are hundreds of examples but off the top of my head,

        liberals tell us “race is a social construct” and then they tell us we must do more to help non-whites…if there is no such thing as race – if it is only a social construct, something that does not exist – then why must we help other races??? …yet liberals can not see this does not make any sense…

        or they will say ” race is a social construct, it was something white people invented to oppress other races”…if there are no races then how did one race “construct it” and how did one race oppress other races???…yet liberals can not see this does not make any sense…

        They tell us Blacks and Hispanics are in no way inferior to whites, but then they insist that if we do not help them then there is no way they can succeed as well as whites……yet liberals can not see this does not make any sense

        They tell us evolution applies to all living things ( older, such as apes = more primitive … more recent, such as humans = more evolved ) that is why we are more evolved than apes…but then when you use evolution to explain difference between races ( black race is around 150 to 200 thousand years old, white race about 50 thousand) , they swap positions; evolution does not apply anymore…yet they can not see this does not make any sense…

        and here something from a great Canadian Blogger and brilliant woman, Kate McMillan of smalldeadanimals.com

        You Might Be A Liberal

        If you believe that women who stay at home to raise their children are repressed by a male-dominated society, but that women who wear hijabs are expressing freedom of religion – you might be a liberal.

        If you quote the John Howard Society on the ineffectiveness of incarceration, and MADD on the effectiveness of drunk driving zero tolerance – you might be a liberal.

        If you believe it should be illegal to smoke in your vehicle, but support legalized marijuana – you might be a liberal.

        If you believe that a “woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”, but claim to love your sons as much as your daughters – you might be a liberal.

        If you believe it is American hubris to believe they can bring democracy to the Middle East – but America’s shame for not reversing climate change – you might be a liberal.

        If you reject absolute moral concepts like “right” and “wrong”, but believe George W. Bush is “evil” – you might be a liberal.

        If you’re still waiting for the epidemic in AIDS cases among heterosexual women in America – you might be a Liberal.

        If you’re an “advocate” for the poor who uses “trailer trash” as an insult – you might be a Liberal.

        If you believe in evolution, but hold that all cultures are equal – you might be a liberal.

        – Kate McMillan

        Like


      • > “It seems to be opposed to everything that is good and logical.”

        Speak truthfully.

        And straightforwardly.

        Don’t say “seems to be”.

        Say “is”.

        If you allow them to scare you into a retreat back to [what feels like] the comfort and safety of “seems to be”, then you’ve lost the war before the first shot has even been fired.

        Like


      • An excellent point.

        A ex wrote to me (she’s been married for few years) and began a sentence with “honestly…….”.

        I ignored (and didn’t respond) to anything else she said, except that.

        My reply to her paragraphs and questions:

        “Never begin a sentence with Honestly,….’ because that’s like openly announcing you are LYING the rest of the time.”

        I know she got my reply and wanted to smash her computer. Clicked send, and couldn’t stop laughing.

        Like


      • Titanic was 100 years ago. I don’t think it would go that way now.

        Like


      • It is still women and children first, just it was 100 years ago.

        Twin towers, Sept 11 2001 is a good recent example.

        Women claim they are equal when it suits them, and they want to be treated as fragile weak little things when it suits them

        the Titanic today would be better built/less sinkable, but the rest has not changed, in fact it has gotten worse as white males are even less respected and more “expendable” now than ever and are considered third rate citizens, after women, children, gays, non-whites.

        Like


    • They also conveniently ignore the prevalence of certain homo-erotic activities in prison. Either most criminals are gay, or being homosexual is a choice after all.

      Like


      • What the left does today is identical to what the church was doing when Galileo was alive.

        No one is allowed to have differing opinion.

        Information is under their control so as keep the masses for knowing the truth.

        They are wrong on most things just as the church was wrong about the earth being at the center of the universe.

        Those who dare expose them, expose where they are wrong are punished harshly.

        This is done not only to punish but to scare those of us who are thinking of exposing where the left is wrong, scare us enough that we will not dare talk publicly about such things.

        Leftism has become a witch hunt, an “inquisition” just as sick, demented and as irrational as any before it.

        I have been saying for almost 10 years now that the left has taken us into a new dark age.

        I was hoping then that I was wrong, unfortunately it is worse than in my wildest nightmares, and getting worse everyday.

        Like


      • You are depressing me good Canadian. but I agree.

        Like


      • ahaha, I never thought about it that way, but you’re right. lol

        Like


      • totally right

        if you can achieve an erection in a man’s hand or mouth or anus, you are gay. and if you think it’s a choice, well, you yourself can imagine your erection in some hairy butthole probably.

        when these markers are known earlier it’s going to be a lefty-abortion-legislation-circus as they try to stop the bloodbath of abortions of females, gays, etc etc etc

        Like


      • According to the CDC for the last year they have stats, which I believe was ’09, 3 out of 4 women in that year who had sex with a woman also had sex with a man.

        Its must be that on Tuesdays, being with women was not a choice; on Fridays, being with men was not a choice. Oh, and of course, they were only with some of the men because of rape.

        Like


  3. Not-so-stunningly accurate.

    Like


  4. ‘feminist exists’

    feminists exist 🙂 is it?

    Like


  5. You forgot shitlord, they seem to love that word otherwise excellent job sir. I wonder if GBFM will donate to this fledgling lexicon (flexicon? lol).

    Like


  6. Perhaps more insidious is the penetration of feminist/equalitarian imagery in all aspects of public life by the white females and gay men who dominate advertising agencies. While the editorial staffs of these enterprises are devoid of heterosexual males and people of color, they feel compelled to use every print, web, and televised graphic as an opportunity to inflict diversity shaming and compliance instruction on the populace. It is so ubiquitous that to call attention to it identifies one as an unhinged paranoid crank.

    Like


    • The customers of said agencies are fully complicit in this bizarre self-emergent charade as well. Hence you have “creepy ass crackers” showing up in urbane, sophisticated black people’s bedrooms at 3AM followed by the same scenario of a handsome black gentleman showing up in limp-wristed white people’s bedroom at the same hour to reassure them of their insurance product choices. That same guy always seem to be lurking at the end of the driveway when your daughter drives off, or hiding behind the refigerator to advise you about bug spray. And don’t get me started about how white women have adopted those infernal “afro-puffs” en-masse and are mincing around like they got a damn crown on their head.

      Like


    • Ad agencies w/o straight men is reason SJP is portrayed as ‘sexy’.

      Like


      • SJP has a good body. Very few straight men would turn her down.

        Like


      • very few men would turn down any non-overweight woman if it’s handed to them. sjp did have a good body and was cute enough in the movie with bruce willis on the boat, but that’s about it.

        she is ugly now. no doubt at all– like naturally-wicked-witch, startlingly ugly. not too many men would pursue her based on her looks now.

        Like


      • She was cute in LA Story with Steve Martin but that was in 1991.

        Like


      • SJP has flat abs– FOR A FACE.

        Monstrous creature. Can’t believe I ever skipped Cub Scouts to watch “Square Pegs”

        Like


      • –I guess I should say “ripped abs”. She’s freakish from top to toe

        Like


      • Lara,

        My buttox are producing whopping quantums of gas, and have ballooned in size.

        When the gas is discharged, it will be dense and creamy.

        At that time, it will be your privilege to….

        ….. Detox my Buttox.

        Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 1:07 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozo

      zlzlzoozlzlzo

      Like


      • “One of the ugliest and most hateful conspiracy theories centres around the claim that the Jewish people control the world. One of the more notorious examples of anti-Semitism is in the form of a book entitled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

        The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is fiction. To put it bluntly, it is a pile of rubbish. Among anti-Semites however, the Protocols book remains a big hit, especially in Europe, the Middle East, North America and even in the Far East. What is odd is that the publication did not originate as anti-Semitic in nature. Its roots can be traced to a book written by a French clergyman named Abbe Baruel, who condemned shadowy, secretive Freemasonry as the force behind the violent French Revolution of the late 1700s; but Jews were not mentioned in his book.

        In 1806 Baruel received a letter from a Florence man, J.B. Simonini, who claimed to have pretended to be Jewish and infiltrated a Jewish sect in Italy. This sect, Simonini claimed, started Freemasonry, had infiltrated Christendom and planned to arrange the election of a Jewish Pope.

        “The Jewish Conspiracy” resurfaced in 1871 in a novel written by Hermann Goedsche, a Prussian postal worker. The novel described how that once every 100 years, Jewish men who traced their ancestry to the original twelve tribes of Israel met in a graveyard to plot Jewish control of the world. The book, though a work of fiction, was accepted as fact by some in Russia and France and copies of it circulated among anti-Semites in those countries.
        The actual Protocols of the Elders of Zion then surfaced in Russia in the late 1800s. It plagiarized Goedsche’s novel and mixed it with a French anti-Napoleon III pamphlet, written in 1865. Completely fictional, the Protocols book was 24 chapters and 1200 pages long. In it, an “Elder of Zion” clearly spells out international Jewry’s plot to take over the world. It called for the stirring up of agitation and worldwide revolution in which Gentiles (non-Jews) would rise up against their political leaders.

        The Jews would then move in and restore order (and subjugate the Gentile peoples) with promises of a welfare state, controlled by big government, which promised full employment, higher taxation of the rich, education for all—none of which the Jews were actually prepared to deliver, the Elder wrote, but rather intended as a perpetual carrot on a stick to control the Gentiles.

        The Protocols were published in Russia in 1903 under the last Tsar, Nicholas II, who reigned from 1894 to 1917. Its publication fuelled hysteria among anti-Semites in Russia, leading to pogroms against Jews in the early 20th century. In one pogrom, 300 Jews were killed in Odessa.

        American car manufacturer Henry Ford launched, in 1920, the Dearborn Independent newspaper, to specifically publish The Protocols and other anti-Jewish literature. The Nazis, not surprisingly, embraced The Protocols as truth. In 1944 the German Propaganda Ministry declared “If it were possible to checkmate the 300 secret Jewish kings who rule the world, the peoples of this earth would at last find their peace.”

        Wherever The Protocols surfaced, the book was used to justify a specific country’s anti-Semitic element’s hatred of Jews. In Tsarist Russia, the revolutionaries were Jews. In Germany, the Jews were responsible for her defeat in World War I, and led to Hitler’s “revenge” against the Jews during World War II. In Henry Ford’s mind, America’s rise of labour unions, a massive influx of immigrants and bigger government were all Jewish “schemes.”
        http://www.spirituallysmart.com/protocols.html

        Like


      • which part of it has not come true?

        Like


      • i do not understand the whole jewish conspiracy stuff, and i file it pretty much with anything else that lays external blame on problems. if we were free individuals, and free to pursue our own aims individually, and we were not responsible for our lazy-ass or bad-luck neighbor, we wouldn’t have to worry about those kinds of things. if their conspiracy worked for them, great. like the shakers, for example. they lived freely as communists without being able to force it on the rest of us. the only way any of this kind of stuff is a threat is if it’s backed by the coercion only the state can bring to bear.

        Like


      • i have to say although i am not acquainted with it, i am extremely intrigued by the jewish conspiracy stuff. it’s such an ongoing thread and so universal i just wonder what the hell is going on that those feelings are so omnipresent.

        Like


      • Whatever the cause; I’m assured that they didn’t do nuffinz

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:23 am The Spirit Within

        What’s going on is that every in-group needs an enemy to create unity and social cohesion.

        To white Christians, that’s been the function of the Jews for literally two thousand years.

        Like


      • That’s why Christ picked on the Sanhedrin, scribes, and Pharisees, eh?

        Like


      • Don’t you have some loans to approve or something? Sheesh

        Like


      • I just noticed that Brother Nathanial has a “Jeff Rense” on his board of Advisors.

        i hope its not the Jeff Rense at this site: http://www.jeffrense.com, because he’s a wackjob.

        Like


      • Yes, it is. The same Rense that believes in conspiracy theory galore, including UFOs. These are the heroes of the antisemtic movement. They’re quacks.

        Some of them are shills that need to foment fear and hate and anger so that peeps can’t think clearly and just fall into their web of lies. I hope no one sent Clown Nathanial any money.

        Like


      • Does it really matter what religion is doing what?

        The people doing it all are nothing more than Satan’s pawns. I could care less what religion they subscribe to…I know who their true leader is and that is the enemy that must be attacked.

        Like


      • The HELL you say !

        Meh – all religion is rank superstition.

        Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 4:38 pm Cad and Bounder

      Uncle Elmer, I’m interested in further reading on the subject matter. Has anyone written about this in more detail?

      Like


  7. LGBBQT*

    Like


  8. Anyone who spouts these platitudes above seem to all have the same characteristic in common: They have given up in life. They have no accountability to the betterment of themselves. It’s a “let’s take what we can and drag everyone else down” whether they want to admit that to themselves or not.

    Like


  9. Thank you for this.

    Like


  10. Reblogged this on A Life Un-Lived and commented:
    CH is at it again.

    Like


  11. I would change “heteronormativity, noun
    1. the imagined cause of a misfit’s deep feelings of shame and inferiority.”
    To:
    2. The imagined cause of the biologically abnormal’s deep feelings of shame and inferiority.

    Like


  12. on September 30, 2013 at 10:02 am gunslingergregi

    equality?
    everything must be equal except for the things ya don’t want to count like hours worked or type of work or how hard it is or if you can die on job

    Like


  13. Hey Yareally, got two long FRs in mod in the last two posts. Just another quick heads up. Appreciate the help!

    Finally getting shittested. Yay. If they continue to not show up, I might just break up them into smaller posts so that they get published immediately.

    Like


    • All good lol Keepin an eye out for em.

      Like


      • Note: Too impatient, so I’m breaking this up.

        Friday FR:

        After watching the 1-hour infleld footage vid from RSD, headed out and went out with my wing. His commitment to the game has been questionable in the past, but whatever, he’s here now so we do a quick warmup (high fiving and saying hi to random girls) and then walk right into a bar and talk to the first girls we see. It was still pretty early in the night so not a lot of people.

        Basically nothing to record on this set. We talked for maybe 20-25 mins and there was no real sexual tension happening in the 2-set. I was kind of waiting for my buddy to do something cuz several times I implied we should leave the set, but he kept talking so I was like, fine lets keep talking. Did some awkward kino (yeah it really is weird if the touching isn’t natural lol) so we finally bounce out and hit the streets.

        We try to talk to blonde 2-set and they ignore us, that’s fine (our pull was weak to be honest, we didn’t really try). Nonetheless we keep going.

        I starting singing about getting laid “BAAAAALLLLSS DEEEEEEP” and we’re just having a good time (in state basically). And then I try and dance with this girl outside of a store (she’s with her friend). I put her hand on my shoulder and we start dancing. She laughs and doesn’t make eye contact. I laugh and say, you’re ruining our first date.

        Her friend doesn’t seem to care, thinks its funny. Meanwhile the girl i’m with is acting really awkward. I try to lace our fingers together but she moves her hand away completely. So i’m like “oh, you’re just awkward”. She bursts out laughing and I spin her around (really just to look at her ass lol) and she’s like “I don’t even know your name!” We exchange names and then she looks into the store and starts walking away and these two dudes come out lol

        Apparently she had a bf…

        Anyway, I go down the street and a group of girls are walking past. My friend tries to open one of the girls half assed. He does this all the time and I’m like dude, that’s not how you do it. Tyler says you have to walk with her and she has to her you talk/convey your personality:

        Never tried it before lol so i do just that and bam it works:

        Me: Hey I think you’re cute.
        Her: (no response)
        Me: (Now walking with her) Do you know why we should be together? Cuz see you’re hair is really wavy and mine’s really curly. See it works, like seriously (lol)
        Her: lol
        Me: Alright stop for a sec.

        She stops and tries to talk but her friend pulls her away saying “like seriously, we have to go”

        Whatever on a single girl it would’ve worked 😀

        We walk down the street some more (saw quite a few chode crystals…lol sorry, we saw a lot) and I see this HB9 (seriously done up to the nines or whatever they call it) at the ATM. I’m like looking incredibly shitty (haven’t shaved in weeks, holes in my hoodie, messy hair) so I’m like yeah definitely time to approach.

        Me: Hey I don’t want your money, but we should totally dance.
        Her: Lol
        Me: You can keep your gross money, the only green i like is weed.
        Her: But I have a bf!
        Me: Don’t worry I’m not the jealous type.
        She finishes getting her cash and I try and escalate on her but she says she has a bf and she has friends she has friends who are single.

        Honestly, I could’ve gotten her number and asked her to introduce me to her friends… but when I saw her facing me completely… i was just like… wow… HOW THE FUCK AM I TALKING TO YOU lol

        I was just like, okay… lol (drool)

        So I let her leave… (facepalm)

        Like


      • When you were in A3 but haven’t seen the girl for a week, should you go back to A1, then A2 real quick then go to A3 and into comfort? Or should you just go right through A3 then comfort. Also in comfort how much A1, 2, and 3 do you have to keep in comfort, or do you stop it all and try to get through comfort as fast as possible.

        I’m trying full-on MM with a girl for the first time in probably 3 years, because I want to make her my girlfriend for a long time, not just a fuck buddy. She’s a 9 I would say. How long should I stay in comfort with her. Should I go for the full 6 hours, or can I get her into seduction in say 2 or 3 hours if I move her around longer? What say you or anyone else for that matter.

        Like


      • What I meant was, can I get out of comfort faster if I move her around to venue changes more. Also the crux of the last part of the question is, is it better or worse to get sexual with her faster, or should I keep in comfort as long as 7 hours or whatever the max is in order to get her more emotionally bonded to me.

        Also, how far would you go with the core identity sharing with something like this in the connection stage of comfort (I think, if I remember it correctly).

        Would really apprecitate the help. Not trying to be an ass haha.

        Like


      • @Crazy Heart

        Not sure if trolling, but for the sake of other guys wondering the same questions. Also as a warning: this is going to get tech-heavy lol Mystery Method is rock-fucking-solid, but it’s intricate. For someone like Scray who’s gaming more off his general vibe/charisma/dominance than a technical step by step process, this isn’t worth reading. But for someone who’s studying Mystery Method and is approaching game on a more technical level, this might help clear some shit up. MM is very logical and consisten when applied correctly and it’s what I started out by learning, back in the day:

        1) “When you were in A3 but haven’t seen the girl for a week, should you go back to A1, then A2 real quick then go to A3 and into comfort?”

        Yep. You’re basically starting over cold when you meet up with her again.

        A lot of guys think “we made out in the bar, so I can just assume she’s in that same state when we meet up again!” and are surprised when she’s way more reserved than she was in that moment. The good news is you don’t have to spend as much time, just blast through them with some quick fun shit. I like to plan my Day 2 out to involve a totally non-sexual environment (like a brightly lit sports bar or pub etc. which usually have shitty awkward seating where you’re stuck across the table from her or in shitty separate chairs) and a nearby more sexual environment (dark swank lounge with booths to cuddle up in etc.). Ideally the first venue is a bit loud and hard to talk in. I’ll run through Attraction in there, keeping things light and joking around and spiking her buying temperature for a couple drinks, then say “This place is too fucking loud, let’s hit this lounge up the street so we can talk and I can actually get to know you.” and take her to the second venue (teasing/flirting all the way there, some kino around her lower back as we leave the first venue, arm in arm as we walk toward the second venue, etc.) so that in the second venue we can get a quiet booth and go into Comfort.

        I’m assuming this isn’t a date and you’re just going to be bumping into her, but the concept is the same. Ideally you want to save Comfort for when you have a bit of isolation and the mood is chiller. Like say you meet up with her and a group of her friends at a bar at 9pm. Trying to do Comfort at 9pm is kind of silly, she just got there and she has all sorts of socializing and shit she wants to do first, and that her friends want her to do. So for the first part of the night, blast through to A3 quickly and stick to that.

        Later in the night, like around 11-midnight, when her friends are off being drunk and retarded, and she’s pooped from dancing or whatever, you can move into Comfort. Ideally you can isolate her to a booth or corner or different floor/room of the venue for Comfort where her friends won’t barge in and fuck the vibe/mood up.

        2) Or should you just go right through A3 then comfort?

        Don’t think too much about the difference between A1 – A3 with her, she likes you if you were in A3 once already, so you’re not starting totally cold like the initial approach where the difference between them is more important. The more important thing now is to stick to Attraction in general (cocky/funny, teasing, push/pull, roleplaying, innuendo, future-projection, etc.) and have the mindset of “assuming attraction”. And just look for a good opportunity to transition into Comfort. Stuff like isolate her from her friends to a quiet part of the bar or a booth, or a different floor/room, or if you all walk somewhere like to get food or to a vehicle to get to the bar, lag behind with her and walk together, etc. You basically need some uninterrupted time with her. You can build Comfort in little bits throughout the night, but it’s not as efficient/powerful as being able to go through Comfort all at once.

        3) Also in comfort how much A1, 2, and 3 do you have to keep in comfort, or do you stop it all?

        “Never go backwards in a pickup” (starting over when you re-meet up is different, but once you’re interacting, don’t go backwards). You might find that in comfort she tries to go back to teasing and playing hard-to-get etc. (aka Attraction). If she does, you do a takeaway, instead of following her backwards back to Attraction. This is where calibration and the “art” side of things comes in though, because depending on your vibe it might be congruent to you to throw in some cocky/funny and teasing etc. in Comfort. The idea is basically that you’re taking the vibe down in energy from Attraction into a slower-paced bonding vibe where you guys share personal stuff. So if she’s like “ya I haven’t really been dating since my dad died, it was pretty devastating :(“, you don’t want to be like “oh, then you can call me Daddy when we bang later lolololz” lol

        So even if you do throw in a little teasing and push/pull, in Comfort it’s done with the purpose of still moving things forward or bringing them back to Comfort. So the difference might look something like this:

        Her: (shares intimate detail about how her last boyfriend dumped her)
        You: (tease her about how it was clearly because she’s a starfish in bed)
        Her: (“OMG you asshole!!”)

        If you just leave it hanging there, you’ll end up in a fight. Or if you stay joking around there, you’ll be stuck back in Attraction. So you lead it back into Comfort like:

        You: “lol no but seriously, I think people need a certain chemistry together for the sex to be good. And a lot of people are great together outside of the bedroom, but aren’t always compatible inside. I always look for chemistry with a girl (staring her down with deep eye-contact) because both parts of a relationship are important to me. I was dating this girl a while back and–” bla bla bla

        Like you dip back into Attraction for a sec, but pull it back into Comfort so you don’t end up going backwards in the pickup.

        4) try to get through comfort as fast as possible?

        lol. Take your time with Comfort. You should be ENJOYING building Comfort with her. This is where the bulk of your 7 hours is spent. A1-A2 can happen in under a minute, you can be in A3 in under 5 minutes. C1 (comfort in the venue) tends to be more like 30min – 2hrs depending on where you’re hanging out and how much time you can get together. C2 (comfort elsewhere from the venue) tends to be like another 2-4 hours, C3 (comfort in the sex location) can be another hour or two. So the majority of your time is going to be spent in Comfort.

        The problem with how AFC/beta guys approach seduction is that they skip Attraction and try to go right to Comfort off the opener. “What do you do? Where do you live? Do you want to go out sometime?” They skip the Attraction stage where you’re giving her a rollercoaster of fun emotions. This is why girls don’t care that my shoes are dirty or that I have a bit of a beer belly, because I keep their emotions going too crazy during Attraction for them to even slow down and notice and take me all in…all they know is that a source of masculine energy is shaking up their world all of a sudden. So when I head into Comfort, she’s already attracted to me in general and if she notices that stuff at that point, she’ll forgive it or rationalize it away. Whereas a beta guy will skip Attraction and try to build Comfort right away, so the girl is forced to judge him based on his appearance to decide whether she wants to share her personal shit and be in Comfort with him, so she looks at his shoes, watch, 6-pack, etc. because he didn’t give her anything more powerful to judge him on.

        Anyway, so enjoy Comfort. If you’re meeting up in a bar, shoot for 30min to an hour of comfort at the bar, mid-way to late in the night. If there’s an afterparty, go to that and build C2 and C3 there…or try to get her to come for food after the bar with you (“let’s just grab a slice of pizza, you have to try the pizza at this place, it’s awesome”) and build C2 there and then push for heading back to your place to build C3 and head into Seduction.

        If you can’t get her alone at the end of the night or away from the group etc. (like she HAS to go home with her friends), pitch a Day 2 and get her number for the purposes of time-bridging to the Day 2 (ie – the number is to arrange details of meeting up for drinks that week, VS getting a number just to txt about how her weekend was and talk about gay shit that doesn’t progress things forward lol), then build C2 and C3 on the Day 2.

        5) I’m trying full-on MM with a girl for the first time in probably 3 years, because I want to make her my girlfriend for a long time, not just a fuck buddy.

        MM is the way to do that. Pickup can be streamlined into something where you bang the girl in an hour, and that CAN be turned into a GF or long-term FB situation, but there’s a lot more dice-rolling involved and you have to do a LOT of catch-up work after the bang. MM was designed to build a rock-solid connection with a girl, where she looks at you like you’re the most amazing thing she’s ever experienced in her life and she feels like you know her SOUL lol Ya, 7 hours is slow compared to a lot of what’s taught these days, but if you use MM proper, that 7 hours makes things incredibly solid/deep connection-wise, to where girls feel like they’re falling in love with you before you even bang eachother.

        6) She’s a 9 I would say.

        If you got to A3 with her already, you don’t need Negs, so don’t use them. Teasing/busting is okay, but not flat-out Negs. Those are for when the girl won’t give you anything but a bitch-shield (aka A1). If you legit had A3 already, even if she’s an 11/10 in hotness, you don’t need any Negs. Stick to Attraction and transitioning to Comfort.

        6) How long should I stay in comfort with her?

        Answered above. Expect this to be the majority. Try to have fun with it and enjoy learning about her and getting her to open up and trust you. Most chicks are pretty cool and normal people with normal insecurities and hopes and dreams and it’s fun to learn about them. This is why we have games like The Cube and Strawberry Fields and stuff, where they take a solid half hour and involve cold-reading a ton of insightful stuff about her personality. We don’t cram that into A1 because it’s meant to be brought out in more of a slower-paced part of the pickup.

        7) Should I go for the full 6 hours, or can I get her into seduction in say 2 or 3 hours if I move her around longer?

        Moving her around helps a lot, and you can get her into Seduction in a couple hours, BUT the connection won’t be as solid as if you build up more Comfort. Think of it like building a bridge…you can build one quickly by just throwing down some poles and laying a board over them, and it’s possible to cross it, but it’s not going to be as solid as if you take some extra time and re-enforce the poles and add extra ropes and cement and shit to solidify everything.

        You sound a little one-itisy, so I’m gonna recommend taking the slow route because it’ll help chill you out if you go into the meet-up thinking “I’m NOT going to bang her in an hour, I have 7 hours to kill, so fuck it, let’s just relax and enjoy it” VS “I gotta nail this out as soon as possible like some of those other pickup guys do!!!” Personally all I care about is that the guy gets the lay…whether he does it in an hour, or 7 hours, or he fucks it up for 2 months but turns it around like a boss in the 3rd month and bangs it out, that all deserves props to me. It all comes down to solid game and adapting to the situation.

        8) the crux of the last part of the question is, is it better or worse to get sexual with her faster?

        The key rule is this: Don’t go past a light rom-com PG-rated 5 second kiss on the lips (no tongue) until you have (or believe you can create) a clear path through the logistics to isolation with her and being able to escalate to actual sex.

        So if you meet at a bar, and she LOVES you but she has an early flight in the morning or has to drive her half-consciously-drunk friend home, or you don’t have enough time to build enough Comfort to make her comfortable going home with you (you learn to guage this from field experience), or her cockblock friend doesn’t approve of you, then stick to a light romantic little kiss at the most, and save the heavier escalating for the Day 2.

        If you meet at a bar, and her friend is hooking up with some dude, and she lives near you and her friends like you and don’t want to cockblock, or you can ditch her friends and isolate her and tell her to just txt them that she went home, etc. then it’s safe to escalate to hardcore making out and foreplay on the dance-floor etc. and escalate fast. This is a lot more chaotic/random and you may find that like, she’ll leave the bar with you but you’ll have to pull back and build some Comfort going for pizza before she’ll actually come home with you. Or you might find the opposite, that if you slow down at all (or take her into a brightly lit pizza place), the horny attracted vibe she had wears off and she clams up and it gets awkward and you never hear from her again lol. This again comes down to field experience and calibrating to the vibe you guys have.

        Two things to keep in mind with escalating quickly: 1) In general you’re probably going to get more LMR, and it’s going to be harder to disarm and you’re going to end up having to do shit like Riker’s 3 Rules and, if absolutely necessary, a Mystery style “lights on, no touching” freezeout…but if you play things a little slower and build a lot of Comfort, you won’t get much, if any, LMR. Things happen a lot more fluid/natural because she’s totally comfortable being with you and trusts you, whereas on a quick seduction she doesn’t really get to know you so a lot of last-minute “oh shit he doesn’t even know my name” stuff can flood in and produce LMR.

        And 2) If you DO get the lay quickly and bust through that LMR and all that shit, spend some time after sex cuddling with her, let her stay the night and grab breakfast with her in the morning, etc. Basically do your Comfort building AFTER the bang…VS kicking her out at 4am or playing “aloof” and calling her a cab as soon as you wake up etc. If you skip Comfort, she can feel slutty because she slept with you without you even knowing eachother well, and she can end up with Buyer’s Remorse which can translate into either not seeing her again because she feels too bad about putting out, or her being extra prudish and trying to make you take her on a REAL date that she won’t put out on so you know she’s not a slut, or, in the worst-case scenario, a false rape accusation.

        I escalate pretty fast, so I end up doing a lot of cuddling after, even if I don’t really like the girl, just to make sure she feels good about what we did and doesn’t get Buyer’s Remorse. Also I’m a big homo who actually likes cuddling so it’s fun to me lol

        9) should I keep in comfort as long as 7 hours or whatever the max is in order to get her more emotionally bonded to me.

        The longer you’re in Comfort, the more she’ll be emotionally bonded to you. But if you spend too long in Comfort without escalating to Seduction, she’ll start to think you’re not interested, or too chicken to make a move, or get frustrated with you in general, or start to see you as friend-zone material, etc.

        That’s another mistake AFC/beta guys make. The open with Comfort, skipping Attraction, then try to stay in Comfort forever because they’re too chicken-shit to risk transitioning into Seduction because they don’t want to fuck it up (scarcity mentality, one-itis, outcome-dependence, etc.) and they end up friend zoned and seem asexual to the girl, who probably would’ve banged them if they had built Attraction before they tried for Comfort, and made sure to escalate to actual Seduction from Comfort instead of being happy drifting around aimlessly in Comfort till some asshole like me comes along and fucks her.

        Again this is all part of the “art” of pickup…guaging how fast you can/should move. It comes from Field Experience. So even if you fuck it up with this girl, you’ll at least learn some calibration for future girls.

        10) Also, how far would you go with the core identity sharing with something like this in the connection stage of comfort?

        The more you open up, the more she’ll open up. Ideally you should work on yourself to a point where you’re comfortable sharing yourself fully with the people around you. The main reason we don’t share ourselves is that we’re afraid of judgement. The more you share of yourself and show her that you won’t judge her, the more she’ll share of herself, the deeper your connection will be.

        “Would really apprecitate the help. Not trying to be an ass haha.”

        No prob, good luck! Don’t stress yourself out over it. Go in assuming she’s into you, and expecting to do a solid 4+ hours of Comfort building and maybe a Day 2. Play solid/smart, not to break speed records. Enjoy the experience, so that even if you don’t get her you at least had fun and gathered reference experiences for future girls you meet that are just as awesome as her.

        Like


      • That is like good good medicine my friend. Thank you for that. I have changed my mind about her, but I probably will try to still go through the motions to get the practice. Much respect.

        Like


      • I got till Sunday to read this, so take your time if you want.

        Like


      • Dude you’re going to lose her with or without YaReally’s help. I can smell it all over your post. No offense Crazy Heart, but why would a 9 want to date you when she has the option of guys who don’t give a fuck? You care way too much.

        Not trying to be a dick, just being honest.

        Like


      • Ok we’ll see about that. Just because I have a plan, doesn’t mean I give a fuck. So long suckers.

        Like


    • Maybe he just can’t hang Hunter. Don’t worry about it.

      Like


  14. Hey you forgot one:
    “NAWALT!” (not all women are like that)
    -A phrase to denounce the behavior of a ‘rogue’ female when it fact all women ARE like that.

    Like


  15. Am I missing some inside joke on the below? I’m usually 99% on board with your musings but…

    “rape, noun
    1. regret.
    2. unsatisfactory sex with a beta male.”

    Unless specifically targeted at the “all penetration is rape” species of feminists, then I failed to find the humor or wisdom in that one. I get the generally (and in many cases well deserved) low opinion of the feminine, but how someone could have a mom and throw that one on the list, it leaps from humor or satire into inhuman malice.

    I appreciate the useful insight and humor you write here, but that was just tasteless, thoughtless, and really, beneath the intelligence you usually exhibit. I initially wondered if it was written by one of the more dimwitted dittohead commenters and not the editor himself…
    If that was said in seriousness, then it looks like you may have achieved some degree of the sociopathic narcissism that you’ve often preached of emulating for game-sake. As I thought that the next level objective, beyond merely obtaining mass-poon, was becoming stronger, self reliant, wiser and simply better men, then I don’t see how trivializing actual rape is befitting of that. A casual reader would see it as condoning and endorsing the act. I can’t think that was your actual intent.
    Maybe I just took a failed joke too seriously. Hopefully so.
    (Cue ignorant ass responses from the cheap seats.)

    Like


    • You have clearly missed the context. The article title is “Feminist Catchphrase Translator”. It is NOT “general dictionary of commonly used terms with no political connections”. Hence, in Feminist Catchphrase, this is how they use “rape”. In real life, we use “rape” entirely differently, for what it actually is.

      Context, as always, is key.

      Like


      • Concern trolls need not be fed, but I commend your public service of explaining (or is that mansplaning) things to would be retarded readers.

        Like


    • yeah CH. why do want to rape your human mom?

      Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 11:12 am RappaccinisDaughter

      He’s being hyperbolic, and he was targeting the “all penetration is rape” feminists, as well as those who are happy to turn a blind eye to false accusations of same.

      I also doubt he was saying that when I hissed “asshole” at the guy who cut me off in traffic this morning, that I said it because the guy was a sexy cad who wasn’t paying me enough attention. (I’m actually not even 100% sure it was a guy. I was too busy trying not to hit his car to notice much more than the “Coexist” sticker. BTW, can somebody explain why that sticker is such an excellent predictor for utter incompetence on the part of the driver? Thanks.)

      Like


      • BTW, can somebody explain why that sticker is such an excellent predictor for utter incompetence on the part of the driver? Thanks.

        It may have to do with the fact that constantly-stoned hippies have less than optimal reflexes.

        Like


      • The bumper sticker actually implies that they deign to let YOU exist on THEIR piece of road. Just don’t think you get to make use of any part they need at any given moment. I prefer the sticker that has “Exist” spelled using firearms.

        Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 12:27 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Yeah, that’s a fun one. I just prefer not to leave any outward indicators that I’m a gun owner on my car.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 5:37 am The Burninator

        Neither do I, as a matter of safety for the paint job of my automobile. I open carry most of the time so people know I have a sidearm by default, but advertising it on the automobile is a sure way to get keyed by all of the “tolerant, diverse, respectful of others opinions” left.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 7:35 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Personally, I rarely open carry. It’s legal here, but in SWPL-land, they’ve been known to freak out and call the cops because your Average Quinoa Sucker and Farmer’s Market Attendee doesn’t know that. You won’t wind up getting in any trouble, but it’s a pain in the ass.

        Plus, it’s so easy, if you’re a woman, to just do purse carry in a holster handbag.

        But what I’ve heard from some of the guys I know who OC is that frequently people don’t seem to notice the gun at all. Their theory is that so many people walk around with so much shit hanging off their belts all the time that casual observers just parse the black butt of the gun as being a PDA or a cellphone or something.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 8:16 am The Burninator

        Yeah, it depends on where you live as to the reaction. I live in central Ohio. I’ve yet to meet a person who has panicked or freaked out over my open carry, and the cops I’ve spoken to have to the last man been polite and friendly. Never been asked for ID or harassed in the least by any of them. We’ve made huge strides regarding carry in Ohio since 2004, outside of vehicle carry laws our open carry laws are essentially the same as Wyoming’s, more or less. Plus we’re adding like 60,000 new CHL’s every half year now, so the gun culture is really, really growing beyond the large size it was prior to CHL’s (concealed handgun license).

        There are still a few rogue cops up in northern Ohio, but video recorders and lawsuits are weeding their influence out, fast. Here, cops can lose qualified immunity if they deprive you of a civil liberty under color of law (iow, harass you simply for open/concealed carry, lacking any actual crime being carried out). We’ve sued the living hell out of Cleveland and even they have backed down and been whipped into submission lately.

        Like


      • My favorite: “Don’t like my driving? Call 1-800-EAT-SHIT”

        Like


      • By the way, here’s a “model policy” from NCHERM, an organization that advises US universities.

        “Example: Amanda and Bill meet at a party. They spend the evening dancing and getting to know each other. Bill convinces Amanda to come up to his room. From11:00pm until 3:00am, Bill uses every line he can think of to convince Amanda to have sex with him, but she adamantly refuses. He keeps at her, and begins to question her religious convictions, and accuses her of being “a prude.”(*) Finally, it seems to Bill that her resolve is weakening, and he convinces her to give him a “hand job” (hand to genital contact). Amanda would never had done it but for Bill’s incessant advances. He feels that he successfully seduced her, and that she wanted to do it all along, but was playing shy and hard to get. Why else would she have come up to his room alone after the party? If she really didn’t want it, she could have left.

        Bill is responsible for violating the university Non‐Consensual Sexual Contact policy. It is likely that a university hearing board would find that the degree and duration of the pressure Bill applied to Amanda are unreasonable. Bill coerced Amanda into performing unwanted sexual touching upon him. Where sexual activity is coerced, it is forced. Consent is not effective when forced. Sex without effective consent is sexual misconduct.

        (NCHERM recommends that Bill for this be sanctioned by the university in some way, ranging from a warning to an expulsion.)

        http://www.ncherm.org/documents/MODELSEXUALMISCONDUCTPOLICY1-10.pdf

        (*) This part seems a bit unrealistic to Glengarry.

        About NCHERM: The NCHERM Group is the umbrella for eight linked organizations which serve to advance holistic, proactive prevention and risk management within K-12 schools and on college and university campuses. The NCHERM Group is both a law and consulting practice that has served the education field for more than 15 years. As a law firm, The NCHERM Group represents 35 colleges and universities as outside counsel, making it one of the largest higher education-specific law practices in the country. As a consulting group, The NCHERM Group’s twenty-four consultants have provided services to more than 3,000 clients, giving it unparalleled reach and impact on the field. The NCHERM Way has become the risk management touchstone for schools, colleges and universities across the country.

        Like


    • What do you mean by (your words) “actual rape”? You sound positively republican.

      Like


      • oh, brother. first off, you’re an idiot. “Whatever Polanski was guilty of, it wasn’t rape-rape,” was hyper-lib black woman whoopie goldberg, in referring to an actual, underage, drugged, sodomized “actual rape”.

        and if you don’t notice the overuse of the word ‘rape’ in culture such that it requires phrases like “actual rape” or “literal rape” to mean what it originally meant outside of the currently-watered-down version, then you need to get out more.

        i suspect you know full well, and you just wanted to type republican and smile at your reflection’s cleverness in your screen for a moment. and maybe you think everyone in this reddit discussion ‘sounds republican’ too, but for those that actually read, though, it is not an uncommon thing to notice the trend:

        http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1l1jks/rape_is_overused_and_watered_down_cmv/

        Like


      • When a woman decides of her own free will to get drunk, then decides of her own free will to have sex with a guy, then the next day has remorse, and then cries ” rape”

        that is NOT actual rape.

        as a matter of fact it is NOT rape at all.

        When a woman is trying to get revenge on an ex boyfriend with false accusations of rape

        that is NOT actual rape

        and there are many other examples

        That is what the Republican who’s name I forgot was trying to say

        the liberal media twisted it into something else that people repeat as if it was true and will repeat for years and years.

        I am not saying that Republican was a great thinker nor a great orator, but people who repeat this fabricated story are gullible useful idiots.

        You are being lied to and you are being used.

        Like


      • I admit it, I always smile at my own cleverness. At least inwardly.

        But let me walk you through it. A liberal is now a caveman hypocrite for parsing any nuances of “actual rape” versus “rape” (how dares SoulInvictus disregard the experiences of thousands of raped women?), while at the same time the word “rape” itself now arguably has attained a far less charged meaning, apparently including giving your ONS a handjob after him whining about it for a couple of hours, or having regrets the morning after consenting sex.

        Like


  16. I’m all too familiar with the smart and sassy one being that black chicks feel as though being smart and sassy is a prerequisite to dating. This also ties into sarcasm. Women need to quit the sarcastic bullshit ’cause it isn’t cute.

    Like


    • With those types it’s actually some level of entertainment to give them a non-emotional blank stare when they try to “sass and sarcasm” to impress. Then find somebody else to talk to, or something else to talk about as if they hadn’t tried to be “smart and sassy” with you.

      Gotta train them to respond as you wish, or they’ll just mess all over your proverbial house.

      Like


    • There are some sweet black girls out there, but that’s just what I know.

      Like


    • “Oh wow, a sarcastic woman, yeah, that’s unique. Uh-huh, suuure.” Take it from there and see if her head explodes.

      Like


  17. Or, the last ditch fallback:

    “It’s always a woman’s prerogative to change her mind”

    Translation: “I was wrong but cannot admit error”

    Like


    • I always attributed it to their extreme sense of entitlement. They see it as their prerogative to go back on their word at any time.

      The promise of a woman being meaningless and all that.

      Like


  18. Speaking of imagined non-existent oppression,

    The LGBQT community is waging a war against Barilla Pasta – trying to make it go bankrupt – simply because Guido Barilla said he did not want gay people in his ads because his line of products is aimed at the traditional family.

    Of course spine-less ball-less liberal men are joining in along with most females and feminists to try and hurt Barilla as much as they can.

    They are trying to destroy Guido Barilla’s business, carreer and reputation

    how tolerant of them.

    In this case the bullies are the gays and their liberal/female friends, but they are too dumb to realize it. their vile hostility is clouding their judgement…

    If they manage to make Barilla go bankrupt more people will hate gays and they will be right to hate them.

    http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/26/barilla-pasta-company-facing-boycott-following-chairmans-anti-gay-remarks/

    Like


  19. You forgot lozzllzzll.

    Like


  20. Women are more [x] than men.

    1. Feminism has lied to me about where my value lies, and I am seriously-delusional enough to believe that s**t, because: gunt.

    Like


  21. “No True Feminist fallacy.”

    Indeed.

    Like


  22. You forgot “independent”—> “I’ll do whatever I want to do until I need you for something”

    And “It’s fine”—> “I will punish you forever with this”

    Like


    • I was texting a bitch I met last week at a bar and she told me she had a boyfriend so I told her that he must work very very hard to keep her and she texted back that she was an independent woman who made her own decisions. She almost raped me the other night when she was at the same bar sober and horny this time. I’ll add a HAHA for those of you who don’t get the humor in that.

      Like


  23. This reminds me of a great dictionary – “The Devil’s Dictionary” by Ambrose Bierce old book by Dover Publications/1958 I found it somewhere and it just has a bite to it: Here is one similar to this post but about men. ie Male,n. A member of the unconsidered, or negligible sex. The male of the human race is commonly known (to the female) as Mere Man. The genus has two varieties; good providers and bad providers. The woman’s definition is 4 times al long and just as nice.

    Like


  24. marriage, noun

    1. An investment vehicle which generates for women returns measured as a percentage of the ex-husband’s income.

    2. A legal arrangement in which two women (or two men) gain various advantages such as tax benefits, rights of inheritance, and social status.

    3. mythology–A living arrangement in which a man and a woman live together for their entire lives, often resulting in children.

    slender, adj.

    1. Describes a body type which lacks healthy stores of fat; indicative of severe anorexia.

    2. psychology–Male desire for this body type is abnormal and generally indicative of pedophilia.

    Like


  25. Looking for a good response (verbal):

    girl: Do you have a girlfriend?
    dan fletcher: It’s complicated
    girl: Like, how many months complicated?
    dan fletcher:

    What’s a good response for this?

    Like


    • You missed the opportunity to deflect the question, and the more probing question by going with the stock CH response.

      girl: Do you have a girlfriend”
      dan fletcher: Look at you, so keen on my relationship status, its cute. (alpha smirk). Come over here and look at [X] with me.

      Short 2 word responses are great for texts. In real conversation more words can flow smoothly and quickly.

      The problem with “it’s complicated” is its an evasive answer, but still an answer. As such it is immediately vulnerable to more probing questions.

      Where as the response I suggest is an accusation of her attraction for me, an IOI on my part towards her, and a redirection. All in 2 short sentences.

      The question is sure to come up again. But you now have a time window to further build attraction, and comfort.

      Like


    • girl: doyou have a gf
      me: its complicated
      girl: how many months complicated
      me. lotsa cockas for you lolzolzzolozzz
      girl: be right over
      me: bring da movies
      girl: ok

      credit to gbfm

      Like


    • Which one?

      Like


    • It is what it is

      Like


    • “They all tend to take about nine months….”

      “Interviews cost extra.”

      “Not enough to prevent you from auditioning for the role….however, most of the points will be allotted in the bedroom.”

      “…..uh…..however long it takes for a girl to stop fucking you after you keep disappointing her over and over again. It’s like when the empty light in the car comes on — -sure you SHOULD stop at that moment — but y’know….I prefer to just ride it out, man. Who knows how complicated it’ll get.”

      “No, no…I mean the sex is complicated. It’s very intricate. I could draw you a diagram if you want.”

      I dunno, whatever else.

      Like


      • I loled at your last one. classic.

        Like


      • I usually go with either “What is this, 20 Questions” or redirect the same question back on them. The latter is effective because chicks love to talk about themselves and once they get going they typically forget all about the original question. The smarter ones sometimes realize what I’m doing and quickly apologize for being so nosy, which is ideal because it means that they have totally stepped into my frame.

        Like


  26. You forgot
    “Creepy”
    1. Anything that doesn’t agree with their view
    2. A beta male’s attempts at hitting on them

    Like


    • actually CH did not forget this one. it’s right there in the OP.

      CH, lol at you for banning me for some reason while letting a whole hoard of morons continue to post unlimited garbage

      bye

      Like


  27. I have to say that while I find a lot of things posted here to be fascinating (and explanatory of a lot I have seen and heard with respect to interactions between men and women), I’m more than a little turned off by what I perceive as an ugly streak of Jew-bashing that seems endemic here.

    Like


    • You must be new here.

      Like


    • If so inclined, check the history you were never taught in school.

      For starters, you might research the international central banking cabal, the BOE and the US Fed in particular, and the European families who started, own, and run it. What role did they play in the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the War of 1812, the Bolshevik Revolution, and WWs 1 and 2.

      Determine who founded, funded, and controlled the CPUSA, the NAACP, the SCLC, and the SPLC. Why do all Dem and Repub presidential candidates, immediately upon their nominations, prostrate themselves before AIPAC? Who dominates the inteligentsia of both the neocon and the lib/progressive movements?

      Who spearheaded the Immigration Reform Act of the 1960’s? Who controls or dominates the pornography industry, the pop music industry, corporate Hollywood, all major MSM outlets, the major publishing houses, the largest and most corrupt WS investment banks and brokerage houses? Who dominates the top staff positions in their corresponding regulatory agencies in the executive branch? Who in the Senate now leads the charge in the victim disarmament movement?

      Investigate the real motives, having to do with the assimilation of state-controlled central banks into the Red Shield cartel, for the viscious corvert and overt meddling in the affairs of Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, and Iran? Which ME country has, arguably, the second or third largest nuclear-armed submarine fleet in the world (courtesy of US taxpayers of course) and refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty while incessantly maneuvering the US to bomb Iran which poses no threat the U.S..

      What does the Talmud say about the role of the goyim in a Zionist NWO? Who founded and comprised the upper echelons of NOW? Review GBFM’s ruminations about the relationship between the feminism movement and coercively imposed debt money, and the consequent cultural necessity of game for men.

      When you’ve grappled witih a few of these questions even minimally, then we maybe can start a serious conversation about “ugly streaks that seem endemic.”

      This is not about jeolousy or complaining. At the day’s end, Aryan men are responsible for this colossal mess. Nonetheless, if an interloper who has morphed into an outright adversary, he must be identified and studied:
      In this case, an internally focused upber-tribe, nepotistic, bred for high intelligence and in-group loyalty, with no regard for universal ethical applicability – that has foisted upon us a fraudulent money scheme which transfers wealth and power first to its own and then, secondarily, to its Anglo second-tier collaborators, to the detriment of both White (and Black) men and women.

      Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 9:26 pm Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

        You forgot to mention: we will pimp your women to Pakistani guys in Western Karachi (previous, error’ ed spelling: London).

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 2:46 am Days of Broken Arrows

        “Who spearheaded the Immigration Reform Act of the 1960′s?”

        Two CATHOLICS, Philip Hart and Ted Kennedy. And Teddy pushed it through because it was a pet project of his brother John, also a Catholic.

        America was a majority Protestant country. If you’re going to blame the Jewish influence on screwing up its values and morals, you need to blame the Catholics too, because the bring an entirely different mindset to law when they serve in office. This is one example, but I bet people who know more about history and current events could cite scads more.

        Like


      • what a bunch of angry hogwash from someone who is obviously steeped in anti-Jewish bullshit.

        “This is not about jeolousy or complaining. At the day’s end, Aryan men are responsible for this colossal mess.”

        Oh, it’s about jealousy, and nothing more.

        But who’s jealous? The usual suspects – self-identified Aryans. It’s either self-identified Aryans, or militant Muslims.

        Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 10:12 am Hugh G. Rection

      It’s on every fucking article here, and it’s always the same shit.

      Like


  28. And when you thought we had returned to more pleasant discussions, some shit-stirrer starts shit-stirring. I beseech ye, whichever side of that discussion ye might fing yerself, do not humour his inept attempt.

    Like


  29. Gro, I can’t tell if your ‘shit stirring’ reply is aimed at me or not. If it is, why do you consider my post to be in that category? Is it really that incredible that someone might find Jew-bashing posts to be offensive? I don’t recall seeing you dumping on people posting about zionists, Joos, etc… People who know me in real life find me the farthest thing from being Politically Correct, so don’t bother going there (if you weren’t, my apologies in advance…)

    Like


    • People who know me in real life find me the farthest thing from being Politically Correct, so don’t bother going there

      Your being the first to bring up joo-bashing in this thread belies your self-declared non-PC pedigree.

      Like


      • For the record, I agree with a LOT of what has been posted about how the Left is doing its best to destroy Western culture. I just don’t see what this has to do with Jews. Then again, if you believe (as you seem to) that anyone objecting in a forum like this to such posts is PC, their protestations to the contrary, I’m likely wasting my time discussing it with you.

        Like


      • And I don’t see what this thread has to do with jooz. Again, my previous point stands. If you want to argue with hit-ler fans, go to the threads where they argue with Lily and do so there.

        Like


      • They turn every thread to Jew hate fest, and that’s because they are jealous and envious of Jews which they perceive to be more successful and wealthier than them.

        When people are weak and they think they have no hope, they often turn to bullshirt slander and conspiracy theory, the kind used to incite the masses to take to the street in times past. Most of what they post in the comment section is low class street mob nonsense.

        The problem is that many antismeites have converged here thinking that the antifeminist and antiliberal messages give them carte blanche to turn every thread into a Jew hate fest.
        .

        “For the record, I agree with a LOT of what has been posted about how the Left is doing its best to destroy Western culture. I just don’t see what this has to do with Jews.”

        Exactly! This is my position too. However, these antismeites try to substitute Jew for lefty and liberal, so that they can channel and funnel their Jew hate. They have no interest in solving social problems, just finding ways to trump up hate and incite violence against Jews. Anyone who can’t see this is blind, and anyone who denies this is lying through his teeth. Do not let them deceive you. You know exactly who they are now, which is why they are protesting and attacking you.

        Like


      • You stay out of this. Or go pick on GBFM, which I’ve never seen you do yet.

        Like


      • I’m not picking on you, although I disagree with you.

        GBFM? To be honest he’s so stupid why even waste time? FYI, I get picked on more than I do the picking, but that’s irrelevant to the issue at hand.

        However, I think this indeed concerns me, since I was the first to speak about the Jew bashing nonsense that takes place here on every thread, in place of the serious discussion this blog is about. “A Random Guy” noticed this level of Jew fixation isn’t normal. Otherwise, I doubt he would have said anything.

        A few antisemtic posts are one thing, but soiling every thread from top to bottom in this excrement is definitely a manipulative agenda of Jew hate.

        And you saying, “Your being the first to bring up joo-bashing in this thread belies your self-declared non-PC pedigree” is a joke, right? Haven’t you noticed GBFM up top? The thread is still young, yet he already started with his Jewish feminists’ nonsense. You know…..I sometimes wonder if any of you can deal with reality properly, or do you all live in some bubble filled with figments of your imagination?

        Like


      • A few antisemtic posts are one thing, but soiling every thread from top to bottom in this excrement is definitely a manipulative agenda of Jew hate.

        Kind of like CBS, NBC, ABC, NY Times, et al speak about White men. Your hate’s ok but pointing it out and responding in kind is wrong. Gotta love the way they fight and get sanctimonious on you when you call them on it.

        Like


      • Dear Carlositto,

        CBS, NBC, ABC, NY Times, et al don’t speak ill of White men in every report on every page and every program, like it’s done here in every thread against the Jews. Here every thread is tied to them in some form or fashion, which proves extreme jealousy and resentment of them, frustration, powerlessness, and lack of potency. Stop exaggerating your nonsense before you appear like a true loser.

        BTW, do you like using my name? Seem like many here enjoy switching places with me. Gladly, I’ll post as Carlos in Danger if that is something you wanna try.

        Like


      • What rankles me about this joo debate is not so much the facts you bring up, but the over-the-top vehemence with which you do so. It’s kind of weird, especially given that you’re not jooish yourself. Don’t you think so? I mean, think of the criminalization of “holocaust denial” in Germany especially, but most Western nations to an extent. Why criminalize the musings of crackpots at all?? Don’t you think that there’s at least a slight chance that the massive and completely ridiculous over-reaction by entities such as the German goverment, and individuals like you, doesn’t harden anti-jooish sentiment and make people who might otherwise be sympathetic think that maybe, just maybe, there’s something to these jooish “conspiracy theories” after all??

        I mean, just look at the mess on this board. How many hours do you spend playing Hasbara Brigades? Whatever happened to game tips and poking fun at fat broads??

        Like


      • Frankfurt school. Cultural marxism. troll on dude.

        Like


      • “Troll” is probably one of the most over-used (and abused) words on any forum. If I had a nickel for every time I see the accusation hurled at someone just because X disagrees with Y, I’d be happily retired and living on my own island somewhere. But, carry on…

        Like


      • Frankfurt school = bad insidious shit

        Frankfurt school is not equal to Judaism.

        Like


      • Jews are behind pretty much all ridiculous leftard causes.

        White privilege, “gay rights”, feminism, “diversity” – all dominated by Jews. Also, the media that hushes up black on white hate crimes and fabricates “white” on black hate crimes: owned by Jews.

        Like


      • Please stop filling up every thread with your conspiracy theories.

        Like


      • You flaming faggot how is this a conspiracy theory? Jews owning the overwhelming majority of US media outlets is a fact, as is their completely disüroprtional involvement in these abominations of ideologies.

        “Conspiracy theorist” must be the rallying cry of the ostrich. Yeah, let’s ignore the scores of “conspiracy theories” being proven right.

        Jews are the West’s no 1 bullshit merchants. Maybe only a minority of them are, but they are by far the most prolific in that department.

        Like


      • No conspiracy theory has ever been proven to be right, that’s just the thing. So you claiming so doesn’t make it true.

        Apropos, China’s richest man just donated 130 million dollars to an Israeli university (after he checked out 72 different institutions throughout the world) because he says it’s on the cutting edge of technological research and invention. He also invested in 15 different Israeli tech companies and vowed to contribute all his proceeds from his earrings to the Israeli university, calling Israel a “spring of infinite knowledge.”

        So while you idiots follow Adolf Hit-ler’s methods of doing business by demonizing the banks, and the corporations, and Jews (seems like a good strategy for doing good business), the Chines are following the World’s leaders. You peoples are too stupid to be anything but subjugated salves – WN antisemites or Muslims. Both of you have the same mentality – you’re so hateful, you’ll shoot yourselves in the leg. Meanwhile, others are benefitting, and later you’ll ask how come the Jews always control everything, blah, blah, blah…….

        Blah, blah…..indeed.

        Like


      • Gulf of Tonkin.

        CIA putting LSD in the bread of a small French village to test it.

        Did you just say no conspiracy ever happened?

        Lol.

        Like


      • Lily ,ho is right. Some conspiracy theories have been proved. But the ones about Jews, not so much, some of them even define things like “crypto-Jews” who are bad guys that aren’t Jewish but we’ll call them Jewish to make the theory fit.

        Like


      • David, what I meant was any conspiracy theory in connection to the Jews; none of those was proven. This is telling.

        Like


      • Shut up commie

        Like


  30. This thread in particular has nothing to do with Jews. I made my original post as a reply because I can’t (as far as I can tell) create new threads. I didn’t reply to an older thread which did have such comments, since I didn’t think folks were likely to read&reply to older threads. I haven’t been posting here long, so I wasn’t aware I’d be stepping on any toes…

    Like


    • OK, you want the answer?

      I am of half-Jewish descent, so I can claim ‘J word privileges’ here. Of course, it’s more like unprivilege in this forum 😉

      Fundamentally, Jews have been big in many aspects of the Left–communism (Marx), feminism (Steinem, Friedan), arguments for the nature side of the nature-nurture controversy (Boas), and so on. Even the Jews on the Right as it’s commonly defined have tended to be libertarian (Friedman, Rand) or neocon (Wolfowitz, Kristol, Podhoretz), which paleoconservatives don’t like.

      The argument of Kevin MacDonald in his trilogy was that this represents a group evolutionary strategy meant to destroy and/or weaken European Christians. You can argue this if you like (and I wasted many an hour doing so in my younger years), but that’s the opinion here.

      What does any of this have to do with picking up girls? Well, the bloody, bold, and resolute attitude favored by Game practitioners fits well with the tribalist attitudes of paleoconservatism. Furthermore, of course, PUAs and feminists (see above) get along like union bosses and managers, and for the same reason–irreconcilable opposing interests. And, of course, there are network effects–people who read the same blogs and link to each other tend to converge on certain viewpoints.

      Like


      • Jew fixation is stupid. Pill, condom, anon urban living, rising female income, false sense of security, status mongering to move upward in income are the problems. Mcdonald proposes century long conspiracy among massive outmarriers? Definition of moron … magical thinking. Like beta male fallacy … even moar!! Suplicating.

        Like


      • +lots, really a very good short explanation. Of course I like it because it corresponds largely to my own thinking :^) The only thing I’d add is that people are in the grip of unconscious motivations that they rarely understand. So, you get concerted action from like-minded people who have not consciously “conspired” in any way — and this applies to damn near everybody.

        Like


  31. lol. look at this shit. i’m positive you are all abusers. i wave my evil phallus at all of you!!!

    “Ridicules/makes bad remarks about your gender ”
    or my #1 favorite

    “Breaks dates and cancels plans without reason”

    http://www.cdh.org/medical-services/services-a-z/emergency/domestic-abuse/abusive-behavior-checklist.aspx

    Like


    • that list is too close to home for comfort … but I’m working on it, for crying out loud!

      Like


    • “Threatens to leave or told you to leave.”

      Breaking up with your GF is now considered abuse.

      “Does not include you in important decisions”

      Making my own decisions as a man is now considered abuse.

      “Takes away car keys, money or credit cards ”

      Protecting my finacial security is now considered abuse.

      “Threatens to commit suicide”

      A desperate cry for help is now considered abuse.

      “Minimizes or denies being abusive ”

      Calling out false accusations of abuse, is now considered abuse.

      “Comes home at late hours refusing an explanation”

      Going out drinking and playing poker with friends, then not wanting to deal with nagging wife in said state……..you guessed it, is now considered abuse.

      Thanks for the link.

      Like


      • ” … “Threatens to commit suicide”

        A desperate cry for help is now considered abuse…. ”

        If he is considering suicide, odds are fairly high he is the one who is the victim of psychological abuse.

        Like


      • plus, someone who accuses you of being abusive at the drop of hat, throws the accusation at you a dozen times a day, and makes you walk on egg shells all the time is the one who is abusive.

        A woman who starts fights, then tells you to leave her house (because she can not win the argument), and because you try to resolve the problem, try to talk things over and refuse to leave threatens to call the cops is definitely abusive.

        well…actually… she is batshit crazy and should be put in a padded room.

        I’ve dated at least 4 women who were that insane, they were beyond abusive, they were evil.

        Like


    • Most amusing, but aren’t many of these indicators merely of “being in a relationship with a woman”? I ticked some that seemed relevant.

      “Emotional Abuse

      ✓ Frequently blames or criticizes you
      ✓ Calls you names
      ✓ Ridicules your beliefs, religion, race class or sexual preference
      ✓ Blames you for “causing” the abuse
      ✓ Ridicules/makes bad remarks about your gender
      Criticizes or threatens to hurt your family or friends
      ✓ Isolates you from your family and friends
      Abuses animals
      ✓✓ Tries to keep you from doing something you wanted to do
      ✓ Is angry if you pay too much attention to someone or something else (children, friends, school, etc.)
      ✓ Withholds approval, appreciation or affection
      ✓ Humiliates you
      ✓ Becomes angry if meals or housework are not done to his/her liking
      ✓ Makes contradictory demands
      ✓ Does not include you in important decisions
      ✓ Does not allow you to sleep
      ✓ Repeatedly harasses you about things you did in the past
      Takes away car keys, money or credit cards
      ✓ Threatens to leave or told you to leave.
      ✓ Checks up on you (listens to your phone calls, looks at phone bills, checks the mileage on the car, etc.)
      Tells people you suffer from a mental illness
      ✓ Threatens to commit suicide
      ✓ Interferes with your work or school (provokes a fight in the morning, calls to harass you at work, etc.)
      ✓ Minimizes or denies being abusive
      ✓ Abuses your children
      ✓ Breaks dates and cancels plans without reason
      Uses drugs or alcohol to excuse their behavior
      Uses phrases like “I’ll show you who is boss,” or “I’ll put you in line”
      ✓ Uses loud or intimidating tone of voice
      Comes home at late hours refusing an explanation”

      Like


  32. “Independent woman” = Female aged 30 to 42 who has never been married and is very proud of her $35k/year (to 50k max) job in HR and one bedroom apartment (or 2 bedrooms w/ roommate) she managed to scrounge up along with paying for a full 20% of her food and alcohol from age 19-(present).

    “He’s just afraid of a strong woman” = Hamster rationalization output for female aged 36-42 who is either never married or divorced (her initiation) and is on match.com looking for man aged 28 to 38–her explanation for why man her age or younger is not interested.

    “Ambitious” = (1) Self description of female aged 27 to 32 who attends community college and is still working on her AA degree. (2) Self description of female aged 27 to 33 who is only 3 semesters away from B.A. in “communications.” She seeks a similarly “ambitious” man on match.com lzozlzozlzozlzozl

    Like


  33. The “Chateau Heartiste” blog is very secular but encompasses a wide band of “red-pill” thinking.

    A.J.P.

    Like


  34. The blog is very secular but encompasses a wide band of “red-pill” thinking.

    Like


  35. Hey Heartiste, what is the comment character limit for this blog?

    Like


  36. great weekend….new girl….

    Anyway, at a neighborhood BBQ with crew (we brought the alcohol, we were having the most fun, etc. etc.) and this was the game-making play. This chick (hawt 7.5 srs…the power of a value-giving group in action) had been talking shit on me for a few minutes. But I’d been just throwing it back…finally she took my plate of food and was threatening to throw it

    Me: Ya I’m gonna need that back.
    Her: No, you need to be nice.
    Me: Listen nerd, give me my food back or I’m putting you in the kennel.
    Her: Oh you’re just intimidated by the fact that I’m obviously smarter than you are.
    Me: Ya that’s cool, maybe one day I’ll let you do my dick’s homework (hard eye contact and crew instantly lets out an OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH….laughing)
    Her: (stunned…..but I see it, in her eyes….she’s into it)
    Me: (relaxes a little) But for now I need the food…so that one day my dick can grow up to be big and strong.

    Ya….this was a same day kinda deal. Just walked her home. Then went inside. Then we just kinda did our thing.

    It’s weird. This has never happened before, but at the same time, it’s not really that big of a deal to me. Mainly because she’s hot but I don’t really like her that much lol Typical neurotic, left-brain, femmy lawyer nerdo. At least she’s young tho…24.

    Seems like success just starts begetting more success…

    I thought that shit test response was pretty good though, for a chick who thinks, or maybe even -is-, smarter than you are and is trying to lord it over you.

    Like


    • That response was really nice dude!

      Like


    • Maybe you can do my dick’s homework … hilarious! Well done, man.

      And no she isn’t smarter than you. But she’s had a lot of help from the school system, that’s tried from Grade 1 onward to select her over you, and affirmative action. Her brain is already as good as it’s gonna get, and yours will continue to improve.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 4:45 am The Burninator

        That’s actually true. They say women mature faster than men, and that’s true. But what is maturity, from a biological perspective? It means that the organ/facility is now fully developed and thus no longer growing. If women mature intellectually and emotionally long before men, and assuming a similar growth pattern (which is true as well, its not like boys are retards who get F’s until they hit 11th grade), isn’t that proof positive that men are hard wired by nature to be more intelligent? Why yes, yes it is. Our brains keep growing and developing long, long after girls have stopped the process. I thus find it really funny when chicks sneer with pride that they mature faster than men. That’s right honey, you do, but you really don’t know what that implies, do you? Heh

        Like


      • Oh lol I dunno, I don’t even think about shit like that any more. I just take people at their word. If she thinks she’s smarter, then fine — I don’t give a shit. Why does it even matter…

        Nothing anyone will build is going to last anyway.
        Dr. Manhatten, speaking for the Universe at large, “And the world’s smartest man poses no greater threat to me than does its smartest termite.”

        Like


      • Or Manhattan…lulz, see. She’s prob def right

        Like


    • Funny FR for you. Yeah, that’s pretty much the idea.

      Trickier, tho, are girls who think that you want them because they’re hot. For example, my ex-oneitis’ younger near-clone of a sister, who’s one of the few 9s I know of. Two weekends ago, for whatever reason, I had drunk-texted a mutual female friend telling her to inform the younger sister that I was “not interested”, after encountering her twice that day. The mutual friend sent back a couple of panicked texts asking if I was all right, and what happened??

      Well, this past weekend, I ran into the younger sister again. She blatantly cut in front of me as I was walking back to my house, turned around, and muttered some apology or other. I merely said “Excuse me,” and walked by. I wasn’t looking directly at her and wasn’t quite aware it was her until just afterwards, when a male companion called her name, and she answered to it.

      However, another girl that is friends with the same mutual female friend of mine was in town, and she ducked and hid from me. I had previously texted my friend noting that she was “kinda cute”. (She’s about a 7, so more of a throwaway in my view.)

      But the difference is pure game confirmation. “Kinda cute” results in the girl ducking and hiding. “I’m not interested” results in the girl getting in my face (assuming that my mutual friend was worried enough to tell her about it).

      Go figure.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:46 am gunslingergregi

        this blond chick likes it that i show her ass off and she my little trophy bitch
        get to dress up get bitches starin jealous she gets to brag what not to like

        Like


      • Girls like being an alpha’s trophy. Yet again, feminasties weep.

        Like


  37. The End of White People: Kevin MacDonald on Group Evolution. (Part 1 – 6)

    Like


  38. An honest Israeli Jew tells the Real Truth about Israel

    Like


    • You really are working hard, trying to dig out any morsel you can use to prove your bullshit, which at this point I don’t know what it is besides just good ol’ fashioned Jew hate. And the fact you use my name is just proof you are angry I am disproving all of your nonsense. Nothing screams butthurt more than using Lily. LOL. I am faltered I have such an impact on men.

      .

      “An honest Israeli Jew tells the Real Truth about Israel”

      No, he’s not honest. Far from it. He’s a self-hating Jew who hates his own religion. In his warped mind, if Israel falls in the hands of Islam then it means there is no God and he doesn’t have to keep the commandments or practice Judaism or any religion. He can happily be an atheist. He was interviewed on Israeli TV. That was his rationale.

      None of what he claims has any merit. He keeps refuting even the OT, without which Christians can’t prove Jesus existed. You see, you can’t say there was a Jesus and then agree with idiots like him that there was never a King David or the Davidic dynasty, or that Jews even lived in Israel. It’s the same paradox some of you antismeites fall into. On one hand, you say Jews rule the world, and on the other hand, you say you’re just as smart as Jews. You can’t have it both ways. If Jews rule the world than it means you’re stupid. If Kind David never exited and the Jews didn’t live in Israel, then Christianity is a hoax, cuz without Judaism Christianity can’t exist. It’s intertwined with Judaism.

      Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 5:34 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

        So Heartiste, I was wondering: why do you keep this dreg around? Honest question.

        Like


      • Maybe reading a real history book would help you guys? British historian Paul Johnson’s book “A History of the Jews” is a 4000 year survey covering not only Jewish history but the impact of Jewish genius and imagination on the world. He says in the introduction that as a believing Christian, he feels he must report “the magnitude of the debt Christianity owes to Judaism,”

        http://www.amazon.com/A-History-Jews-Paul-Johnson/dp/0060915331/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1380563419&sr=8-2&keywords=ISBN+0-06-091533-1%2C

        Like


      • Britain treated its Jews well under Queen Victoria in the 1800s. Under her rule, Britain grew continually in power. What went wrong?

        During World War I, British naval guns were running short of gun powder. Winston Churchill, then First Lord of The Admiralty, sought the help of a brilliant Jewish scientist—Chaim Weizmann.

        Weizmann produced 30,000 tons of synthetic acetone to enable the British to manufacture cordite gun powder. That helped them win the war and conquer the Holy Land from the Ottoman Empire (Turkey). All Weizmann asked for in return for his services was a homeland for his people on their historic homeland, which Jews never left completely and there were many Jewish communities that remained in the Holy Land after the Romans exiled the Jews.

        Despite assurances of a homeland for the Jews in Palestine in the 1917 Balfour Declaration, the British, upon taking control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, partitioned the land in favor of the Arabs that started to immigrate there in full force when they realized the Jews were returning in full force. The Arabs received a huge portion of the Holy Land, what is today Jordan. However, The Arabs refused to take it and continued fighting and trying to take the entire area on which the historic land of Israel sits. This is the conflict in a nutshell – namely the Arabs trying to steal the Jews’ land from them.

        Why all of these rich Arab states refuse to absorb their Arab brethren? Because they use them as pawns to continue the conflict hoping it will result in the Arabs winning Israel from the Jews. This is the only reason they are not charitable to their own brothers. If it were the Jews instead, they would have moved heaven and earth for their brothers. The Arabs constantly kill their own flesh and blood. 100,000 people Assad killed in Syria in the last 18 months. Are these the kind of people America shares values with? NO!

        Regarding Arabs claiming ownership of Israel, during the Ottoman Empire there were almost no Arabs living there. It was quite desolate. You can consult Mark Twain’s writings on that. He visited Israel in the mid-19th century. His writings confirm it was desolate, and few people lived there – mostly Jews in Jerusalem and the Galilee, and a few Arabs guarding the mosques in Jerusalem. The Arabs started immigrating there from neighboring areas when the Jews began coming back in the late 19th century, as the Jews offered them farming work on the various Kibbutz they built. They didn’t call themselves Palestinians either. Palestinians are an invented people. The term began to apply to Arabs in the 1960s. Your video is a grotesque distortion of the truth.

        Like


      • “The Arabs started immigrating there from neighboring areas when the Jews began coming back in the late 19th century”

        Holy shit are you retarded.

        The “Jews” going there were europeans. They have as much of a right to that country as Chinese had. Maybe there weren’t as many Arabs as there were later, but Palestine has always been mostly Arab for a millennium by then.

        Besides, Jews aren’t really an ethnic group either. Ethnicity doesn’t care if your mother or father is a Jew.

        Like


      • “Maybe there weren’t as many Arabs as there were later, but Palestine has always been mostly Arab for a millennium by then. “

        WRONG.

        As I said, consult Mark Twain’s writings on that. He visited Israel in the mid-19th century. His writings confirm it was desolate, and few people lived there – mostly Jews in Jerusalem and the Galilee, and a few Arabs guarding the mosques in Jerusalem. The Arabs started immigrating there from neighboring areas when the Jews began coming back in the late 19th century, as the Jews offered them farming work on the various Kibbutz they built. Before the Jews came back to their land, Israel was desolate. There wasn’t much there but some Jewish villages, lots of ruins from biblical times, and a two mosques on Jewish holy sites, which the Arabs stole form the Jews. This is a practice prevalent in Islam – taking holy sites of other religions and converting them to mosques, with the most coveted place on earth being the Holy Temple in Jerusalem.

        Palestinian is a term that came into use in the 1960s. You won’t find any book before that period refering to the Arabs who claimed ownership of Israel as Palestinians. Arabs called themselves Arabs, not Palestinians because Palestinian is an invented people that never existed in history. In addition, they never owned Israel anyway. It was owned by the Turks before the British. So either way, they have no rights to it, period. They hope that most people like you don’t know the truth about them never owning it.

        How did the Holy Land came to be called Palestine, is a better question for you to ask than to spew ignorant nonsense that proves you don’t know history.

        When the Romans conquered Judaea (where the word Jew came from) the Jews refused to accept Roman rule and there were many battles between them. To anger the Jews, the Romans renamed Judea, Palestina, after a people called the philistines (from David and Goliath fame) whom the Jews ousted from there 1,000 years before the Roman’s era.

        However, after Roman rule, Judea was renamed the Holy Land and it remained that for 2,000 years, until the British Empire conquered it from the Turks in 1917. The British recycled the Roman name because antisemitic factions within the Empire were opposed to the Jews returning to their ancient homeland, especially because of concerns they might be angering the Arabs who just discovered vast reservoirs of oil in their lands and who didn’t want the Jews to reclaim Israel because that would mean they have to return the holy Temple Mount back to the Jews. The Arabs know the Jews in their religious prayers said that one day God would bring them back to Israel and Will rebuild Solomon’s Temple. So they feared this eventuality.

        The funny thing is that all inhabitants of the Holy Land were called Palestinians when the British ruled, even Jews, while the Arabs never referred to themselves as Palestinians ever, just Arabs. However, in order to destroy Israel, in the 1960s Arafat devised a plan to invent a new nationhood for the Arabs, called Palestinian.
        .

        “The “Jews” going there were europeans. They have as much of a right to that country as Chinese had.”

        You’re a Muslim, so you would like nothing more than to undermine Christianity. The fact of the matter is that if you deny the land of the Jews is Israel, you are denying Christianity, because Christianity cannot exit independently of its birthplace.

        Jesus walked the streets of Jerusalem in Judea, which is an area inside the Land of Israel, from where the word Jewish is derived. He spoke Hebrew, and he knew the Jewish religion inside out. Reading Arab publications, they’re filled with misnomers. They are trying to rewrite history and say the Jews never existed, they never had a temple in Jerusalem, there was never a King David, and there wasn’t even a land called Israel, blah, blah, blah…… It’s really sad they have many collaborators from both the Christian and the Jewish worlds who have an agenda or simply bought into their lies. The Arabs are trying to steal the land of the Jews, not the other way around.

        Sorry, you are very ignorant.

        Like


      • “As I said, consult Mark Twain’s writings on that. He visited Israel in the mid-19th century. His writings confirm it was desolate, and few people lived there”

        Same could be said about Mongolia. Doesn’t matter. It’s still the land of mongols. And Palestine was still the land of the Arabs living there (now known as Palestines)

        “In addition, they never owned Israel anyway. It was owned by the Turks before the British. So either way, they have no rights to it, period.”

        Get a load of this kike.

        I guess Indians under Ghandi didn’t have a right to India either.

        Just because they were occupied by Turks/Brits, doesn’t mean they didn’t have a right to it. They were the local population. Most of today’s “Israelis” were European Ashkenazi Jews.

        I knew women had a ridiculous hamsterbating habit but yours is by far the worst I’ve seen.

        “You’re a Muslim, so you would like nothing more than to undermine Christianity. The fact of the matter is that if you deny the land of the Jews is Israel, you are denying Christianity, because Christianity cannot exit independently of its birthplace.”

        I couldn’t give less of a damn about undermining Christianity. Bottomline is, you do no take away a people’s land based on religious texts. Out of the question. Two, even if it is true, you have no right to it. It was thousands of years ago. If that were true, my people, the Turks, would still have a claim to central asia. They don’t.

        I also like how you pretend that the Jews today are the exact same people as the people mentioned in the Bible. In all likelihood, modern Palestines look more like the Jews described in the Bible than your average Ashkenazi. Do you honestly think that modern Arabs don’t have Ancient Hebrew heritage in their blood?

        “The Arabs are trying to steal the land of the Jews, not the other way around.”

        Yes, the Arabs, who have been there since the 7th/13th century are trying to steal that land from Jews, who are mostly Ashkenazi, who immigrated from Europe starting at the end of the 19th century. All of that is based on Scripture, which is fact. Also, the Hebrews mentioned in the Bible are exactly the same people we think of when we hear “Jew” today. Also, Arab’s have zeor Hebrew blood in the, despite the fact that they have been living in those lands for centuries, while those immigrating Jews have been living as diaspora in Europe, mixing with goyim here and there (which didn’t dilute their Jew status, because Jewish mothers, hue hue).

        Above all, I am supposed to believe a this coming from a Jewess, who has a vested interest in convincing people that Israel isn’t a piece of shit that wags the dog called USA to attack various Islamic countries, which, despite their barbarianism, are unlikely to start wars with the US.

        Lol.

        Like


      • “Just because they were occupied by Turks/Brits, doesn’t mean they didn’t have a right to it. They were the local population. Most of today’s “Israelis” were European Ashkenazi Jews.”

        They weren’t the local population. They were population from neighboring counters that came to the Holy Land for work, to be employed by Jews, which they later used against the Jews. They’ll do the same in America if allowed to immigrate here and establish roots.

        As far as most Israelis being Ashkenazi, that’s more ignorant shit. Most Israelis are Sephardic who were thrown out of Arab counties after Arabs took all their property away. They are not Ashkenazi. So you forgot about Sephardic Jews, or you just don’t know shit?
        .

        “Doesn’t matter. It’s still the land of mongols. And Palestine was still the land of the Arabs living there (now known as Palestines)”

        Which Palestinians? Show me where Palestinian is mentioned in connection to Arabs before the 1960s? It doesn’t exit. They are a fabricated people.
        .

        “Just because they were occupied by Turks/Brits, doesn’t mean they didn’t have a right to it. They were the local population. Most of today’s “Israelis” were European Ashkenazi Jews.”

        They weren’t the local population. They were population from neighboring counters that came to the Holy Land for work, to be employed by Jews, which they later used against the Jews. They’ll do the same in America if allowed to immigrate here and establish roots.

        As far as most Israelis being Ashkenazi, that’s more ignorant shit. Most Israelis are Sephardic who were thrown out of Arab counties after Arabs took all their property away. They are not Ashkenazi. So you forgot about Sephardic Jews, or you just don’t know shit?
        .

        “Doesn’t matter. It’s still the land of mongols. And Palestine was still the land of the Arabs living there (now known as Palestines)”

        Which Palestinians? Show me where Palestinian is mentioned in connection to Arabs before the 1960s? It doesn’t exit. They are a fabricated people.
        .

        “If that were true, my people, the Turks, would still have a claim to central asia. They don’t.”

        Of course, they don’t. You know why, because they can’t prove it, but if they could, you bet ya they would. Unlike the Turks, the Jews can. End of subject.

        And it’s not just based on religious texts. The Jews are the oldest surviving people on earth from antiquity that can actually prove linage. There are no Romans, Greeks, Assyrians, Babylonians, philistines, Canaanites, etc around anymore. Yet, the Jews still exist today as they did during the existence of these ancient people. No one today that can prove he is a direct descendent of a people from antiquity, except the Jews. That’s the beauty of the Jews, they can, which is why the Arabs and their collaborators do everything in their power to try to undermine this by spreading conspiracy theory such as the Khazars, or destroying archeological artifacts in Israel and the Middle East at large that prove Jewish ownership of Israel. But one thing they don’t have access to is Jewish genes, which have been used to prove Jewish linage.

        Bottom line, you guys are dreaming. The Arabs will never be successful in stealing the Jews’ land from them. And, the Jews survived thousands of years while everyone else just disappeared. They don’t seem to be slowing down either. You’ll be spinning your wheels like Hit-ler did while they will still be ahead – alive and kicking.
        .

        “I also like how you pretend that the Jews today are the exact same people as the people mentioned in the Bible.”

        Absolutely. How do they know? Through the DNA tests of the Cohens – the Jewish priests. Ashkenazi and Sephardic Cohen are almost identical. Those Jewish communities were separated for 2,000 years and yet they are almost identical. Ask God why he keeps helping the Jews, being a Muslim and all.
        .

        In all likelihood, modern Palestines look more like the Jews described in the Bible than your average Ashkenazi. Do you honestly think that modern Arabs don’t have Ancient Hebrew heritage in their blood?”

        Some do. In fact, many people thought the world have Jewish blood, this has also been proven. You probably also do. So what? They don’t call themselves Jewish, and they have waged war against the Jews. Some say Hit-ler had Jewish blood too.
        .

        “the Arabs, who have been there since the 7th/13th century are trying to steal that land from Jews, who are mostly Ashkenazi, who immigrated from Europe starting at the end of the 19th century. All of that is based on Scripture, which is fact.”

        Look, you’re holding onto fallacy after fallacy.

        First, Arab presence in the holy land isn’t ownership of the land. There were NO Arabs living there for centuries, except guarding the Mosques which they have built on the famed Jewish temple, the holiest place in Judaism, which they stole from the Jews because they thought it was important, and they do this everywhere. They also tried to do this at Ground Zero in NYC. This is the Muslim way.

        Additionally, why would anyone who isn’t Jewish and loved this land, live in Israel anyway? It was a barren land for 19 centuries, until the Jews turned it around. It wasn’t a center of banking or farming or industry like Istanbul or Cairo. There was literally nothing there except rubble. The land grew nothing. The miniscule Arabs’ presence there was for the sake of the mosque they built on top of the Jewish ruins. On the other hand, Jews lived there because they were really connected to their land.

        Second, most of the Jews living in Israel aren’t Ashkenazi, which shouldn’t make any difference anyway because through the Cohen’s DNA it has been proven Ashkenazi Jews are almost identical genetically to Sephardic Jews, despite being separated from each other for 2,000 years.

        Third, Jews didn’t immigrate just in the 19th century. Jews always came to the holy land. In the 16th century there was a major immigration to the holy city of Zfat, in the northern Galilee. And, Jews always remained in the holy land. How else the crusades in the 11th century kill 10,000 Jews in Jerusalem?

        Fact is, Jews never completely left. They just weren’t in control any more. Israel was controlled by foreign powers, despite its barrenness. Foreign powers wanted to hold on to it for its historic and religious importance, nothing more. Not because their citizens were living there.

        Forth scriptures is fact, because the OT is not just a religious text, it’s also a history book of the Jews. No one is disputing that the birth place of the Jews is isreal, save antsemites of the n-NZ variety and the Islamic variety. Why? Because they have an axe to grind.
        .

        “Above all, I am supposed to believe a this coming from a Jewess, who has a vested interest in convincing people that Israel isn’t a piece of shit that wags the dog called USA to attack various Islamic countries, which, despite their barbarianism, are unlikely to start wars with the US.”

        Yes, because you have a warped perception, which no respectable historian backs. And nothing you said in the above paragraph is true, BTW. You’re ignorance of history and the truth, and you have a skewed perception which is why you think Israel pushes America to invade Islamic countries. You just forgotten that Islam is responsible for almost 100% of the terror in the world, including 9/11/2001, which is the reason America invaded Iraq. And, you also omit the fact America fought on behalf of Muslims too, like in Yugoslavia and elsewhere against Christians. Maybe you also think Israel is responsible for 9/11? LOL, don’t answer, I know what you think.

        Like


      • Please tell me the name of the person who wrote the Balfour Declaration, and what relationship he had with the Rothschilds. Thanks!

        Like


      • “They weren’t the local population.”

        Proof by assertion.

        “Of course, they don’t. You know why, because they can’t prove it, but if they could, you bet ya they would.”

        Holy shit, did you just deny that Turks can prove that they are from Central Asia?

        Yes, Turks CAN prove it, in fact it is the origin of them. It was a thousand years ago however, so they can no longer claim it.

        “There are no Romans, Greeks, Assyrians, Babylonians, philistines, Canaanites, etc around anymore.”

        Where do you get this shit from?

        “The Arabs will never be successful in stealing the Jews’ land from them.”

        This is what merchants actually believe.

        “Through the DNA tests of the Cohens – the Jewish priests. Ashkenazi and Sephardic Cohen are almost identical.”

        How does proving that 2 different Jewish groups are similar prove that Jews today are exactly the same people in the OT? Hint: it doesn’t.

        “Third, Jews didn’t immigrate just in the 19th century.”

        It’s when the huge majority of them came. Whoever was there 50 years before the founding of that state, has a claim to being there. The others don’t.

        “Some do. In fact, many people thought the world have Jewish blood.”

        So they all have a claim to the “Holy lands”. Neat.

        “First, Arab presence in the holy land isn’t ownership of the land.”

        Is it a suprise that her people came up with Feminist hamsterbation?

        “and you have a skewed perception which is why you think Israel pushes America to invade Islamic countries. You just forgotten that Islam is responsible for almost 100% of the terror in the world, including 9/11/2001, which is the reason America invaded Iraq.”

        Yes, Israel DOES push Americans to attack middle eastern countries. Who are the most prominent neocons? Exactly.

        Islam isn’t responsible, muslims are. Besides, that is well known and undisputed. But a huge part of that is the scumbaggery of Israel and USA. They hate them because they know the West don’t give a fuck about Arabs.

        Why do you think they would rather attack the USA and not Japan?

        Also, lol at the US attacking Iraq, a country completely unrelated to 9/11, because of 9/11. They attacked because the opportunity was golden to score some cheap oil/military base, plus the arms dealers prefer a war because they can make more money.

        Like


      • You want proof Arabs weren’t the local population? Here is one.

        Pilgrims to the Holy Land from as recent as the 19th century describes it in details. It was desolate and no one lived there, as I mentioned above.

        For example, Mark Twain visited Israel in 1867, and published his impressions in Innocents Abroad. He described a desolate country – devoid of both vegetation and human population:

        “….. A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds… a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route…. hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.”

        He was amazed by the smallness of the city of Jerusalem:

        “A fast walker could go outside the walls of Jerusalem and walk entirely around the city in an hour. I do not know how else to make one understand how small it is.”

        And he described the Temple Mount thus:

        “The mighty Mosque of Omar, and the paved court around it, occupy a fourth part of Jerusalem. They are upon Mount Moriah, where King Solomon’s Temple stood. This Mosque is the holiest place the Mohammedan knows, outside of Mecca. Up to within a year or two past, no christian could gain admission to it or its court for love or money. But the prohibition has been removed, and we entered freely for bucksheesh.”

        Like


      • The problem with all these kind of arguments is that the people using them on others would never allow them to be used back on themselves. As if the Zionist would have accepted, “Well, some Arabs have lived here before and some Brit said they own it. That settles it. Let’s go back to Ukraine and stay.” Seriously.
        Besides, every piece of disputed territory was promised by somebody to someone during the course of WW1. That is why the aftermath of the Treaty of V. was never going to be anything but bloody.

        Like


      • Lily: this is like telling the waves to go back. If you really think it’s worth your while to argue with these people, go ahead, but I’d ignore it and pick up what you can about Game (being female, of course your interest is in countermeasures).

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:12 am Carlos Danger

        He was talking about forcibly removing people from their homes, which happened and I didn’t hear it from him first. Then legitimizing the crime by creating facts on the ground and punishing anyone who points it out. He didn’t deny anything you claim he denies about King David. The metaphor is that David was also an aggressive King and expanded Judea at sword point and that the modern Israel takes that example as its inspiration. Maybe he simply has a sense of justice greater than his ethnic affinity. Sometimes even CBS will say it.

        Like


      • There is no sense of justice when you overlook historical facts and act as if history was created in a vacuum last night because it is convenient and helps prove your bogus understanding of history, which is what he’s doing.

        It only fits the narrative of Muslims who try to obliterate any fact of any Jewish presence in Israel, and antisemites who hate the Jews so much they will join forces with detestable races who even look to destroy them just for the hell of killing Jews.

        Now, I ask you, if Muslims had real claim to isreal would they try to destroy historical and archeological artifacts on the temple mount? No. However, they need to separate Jews, Judaism, and the peopel of Israel from the land of Israel.

        Like


      • http://www.wnd.com/2007/09/43330/
        MUSLIMS CAUGHT RED-HANDED DESTROYING TEMPLE ARTIFACTS

        Like


      • http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/163528
        Report: Waqf Continues to Destroy Jewish Antiquities

        Like


    • on September 30, 2013 at 9:35 pm Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

      the guy runs a “karate studio” for little kids in Coronado, California. A SERIOUSLY stuck up place.

      Hasn’t been in Israel for 3 decades.

      Like


      • He is a self-hating Jew with lots of issues. Self-hate is a plague afflicting westerners. I hear Israel has lots of those walking around.

        Same in America. The blame-America-first crowd.

        Like


  39. Hey thanks for this CH. I’m getting these types of signals now a lot more now that I’m back gaming in Church. I tell you the White Knight/cockblocking is way stronger in conservative circles more than ever before. I think liberal SWPL are even easier on this now. God bless ya. Trying to turn these Christian betas into real live men.

    Like


  40. Both definitions for “threatening” are nouns. I propose the following definition instead:

    threatening, adj
    1. unapologetically masculine

    On an unrelated note, check out the hamster on this one:

    http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct3=MAA4CEgBUABgAWoCdXN6Amly2AEB&usg=AFQjCNH9eFoAcdNpAALhLSm8kLEBVdlN3g&rt=HOMEPAGE&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/26/dumped-by-text_n_3996576.html&ei=POhJUpiJJMPh1QaPZg

    She’s single, gentlemen!

    Like


  41. How the holy fuck did this comment section turn into a talk about Jewish people and their influence on world affairs?

    The CH post had nothing to do with any of this shit.

    The worst thing about posting about jewish conspiracy theories is that it brings out the hideous thing known as Lily and she then proceeds to spam the whole comment section writing endless amounts of paragraphs without saying anything what so ever.

    Like


    • Antisemtic nonsense isn’t hideous, right?

      Like


      • Just ignore space cadets with grandiose crazy theories instead of writing a whole book on why it’s not true.

        Do you walk up to the crack addict on the street and then vehemently debunk his fascinating insights on how the government is really made up of purple aliens that are using mind control on the population?

        Like


      • Yes you shitstain, because stating that Jews seem to love perpetuating bullshit through their influence in media, academia and finance is equivalent to purple aliens that use mind control.

        It is because of mentally ill faggots like you that most of the west will go down the shitter. There is noone as blind as those who refuse to see.

        Like


      • THAT’S RIDICULOUS, CRACKHEAD….WAT R U, SOME KIND OF CRACKHEAD?!

        Like


      • Faggot, do you even know what that word means?

        What’s next? OJ SImpson being a murderer is “wacist”?

        How much of a SHEEP do you have to be to deny this you despicable sack of shit? Jews are almost singlehandedly responsible for many of the “shibboleths” that we have to deal with right now.

        And yes Lily, Jews are smarter than most people. Are you happy now?

        Like


      • “And yes Lily, Jews are smarter than most people. Are you happy now?”

        NO. This means you can’t compete fair and square, so you have to resort to lies and conspiracy to foment fear and hate of them. It will never help Whites or to the West, so I am not happy.

        It’s a case of, ”mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest of them all?” Can’t you see it’s just butthurt jealousy?

        Because you can’t compete, you want to eliminate them. Like the above verse from the fairytale, jealousy is the oldest emotion in the world. What did the wicked queen want to do to Snow White because she was more beautiful than her? Eliminate her.

        However, if you were true men, you’d want to compete with them, which in the process strengthens you and makes you better.

        Hit-ler was really an omega, despite you idiots thinking he was an alpha, since he turned to mass murder instead of learning to compete.

        On the other hand, Glen Beck learned to compete. That’s why he has a media empire worth almost $100 million in what you guys say is a Jewish-dominated field. Oh, he didn’t sit and spew Jew hate and become a crybaby. He worked hard, competed with giants in mainstream media, and made it happen, despite “Jew brilliance.“

        Men like Beck help develop humanity. Men like Hit-ler keep humanity backwards. Both are German, BTW.

        Like


      • Hitler seized control of one of the most powerful countries in the world and conquered nine nations. I don’t think he helped white people–he killed more white people (Poles, Russians, and Germans) than anyone short of his nemesis Stalin, made racial identity a really dirty word, and reduced Europe to rubble–but you can’t call him weak.

        Like


      • “Hitler seized control of one of the most powerful countries in the world and conquered nine nations.”

        True. But I still call him omega because of all of the destruction he wreaked on Europe. Did it get him anywhere? What good is an effort if it’s useless in the end?

        Did he achieve any of the goals he outlined in Mein Kampf? None, except killing of the Jews.

        Did he better Europe? As you said, no, and he is the main reason for liberalism taking root.

        So, while I don’t call him weak, I call him omega. He’s crazy, like Adam Lanza.

        In addition, he wasn’t responsible for all of that power Germany oozed through him. People close to him complained he was lazy – didn’t start his day until much later in the afternoon, lounged a lot and daydreamed while he had other prosecute the war for him, and he hiding in one of 11 palaces with 1,000 armed guards protecting him at all times. He was more lucky than smart, and for a while he succeeded.

        Like


      • AH was a leader of men. An omega is a loser, an anime nerd. He might have done terrible evil, but he was a great leader.

        Like


      • Despite your denials, Jews are responsible for the cultural bullshit in the US. They can be brilliant all they want, but I don’t want to live in a world, were kikes like Tim Wise get to spew poison without anyone pointing out the obvious. (Hell, Biden LITERALLY came out and admitted that Jews are responsible for gay marriage being accepted through their media bullshit)

        I am a muslim capable of admitting that my fellows are pretty barbaric. You should grow some ovaries and do they same.

        Like


    • Honestly: no black people read alt-right blogs, but lots of Jewish people do. So CH can make cracks about black people all he likes, but go after Jews and plenty show up to argue.

      I’ve actually found the younger generation to be less anti-white, and I take advantage of my position to spread a little immigration heresy where I can 😉

      Like


      • I’m confused.

        So when did “Feminist Catchphrase Translator” turn into “Jewish Conspiracy Theories that I want to put out there”?

        The post I read was a humorous take on feminist doublespeak and had nothing about jewish people. Yet when I look at the comments, I see all this jewish posts going on and I’m scratching my fucking head.

        I have an excellent idea. Lily can start her own blog called ‘Jewish People Rock’. She can post on how Jewish people are awesome and then the anti-jew nutbags can go there. I predict a 1000 comments on her first post with 9970 being from Lily herself.

        Like


      • Excuse me! If you haven’t noticed. Many times, I post one or two comments, which spawn many replies that I have to answer.

        In addition, I don’t post pro-Jewish comments out of the blue, just in connection to refuting conspiracy theory, so I don’t understand why you are so bothered by me disproving the nonsense, but not by the dozens upon dozens of antismetis communists that fill every thread. I don’t see you criticizing GBFM and his long stupid incoherent posts about Jewish conspiracy, or Zombie Shane use of capital letters that scream Jew this or Jew that and the frankfurters and in every one of his comments, or Hammer of Love on his race baiting and anstiemtic-charged posts, or OralC on his holocaust denying… ..etc. All you see is my comments, which you exaggerate to thousands. Hardly.

        If it bothers you, just skip what you don’t want to read. I have a suggestion: if game is all you’re interested in you can limit yourself to YaReally, Scary, immoral Gables, and a couple others. They don’t mess in the excrement. So, what is your problem?

        Like


      • oh god shut up already

        Like


      • Seconded.

        Like


      • But I can’t filter the blog to read only their comments. Can I?

        Like


      • just skip what you don’t want to read.

        Like


      • “So when did “Feminist Catchphrase Translator” turn into “Jewish Conspiracy Theories that I want to put out there”?”

        When Jews started being responsible for the spread of leftist liberal thought such as “feminism”.

        Furious ferret probably believes that black people being overrepresented in the NBA is a “conspiracy theory” too.

        Like


      • on September 30, 2013 at 9:40 pm Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

        Mossad still allows white guys to shine in the free-throw category.

        There’s a memo on it. didn’t you get the memo?

        Like


    • Seems like half the commenters here are are highly intelligent/observant people who come to have rational discussions about topics the mainstream shies away from, while the other half are deranged racists (REAL racists, not the way modern libs use the term) who need a place to espouse their crackpot conspiracy theories now that the KKK is irrelevant.

      Really is a shame that the former group will never be taken seriously due to the latter.

      Like


      • Jews own the huge majority of the media. The media perpetuates bullshit that is mentioned in this post. Jews are also prominent in feminism.

        This is a “crackpot conspiracy theory” in your mind.

        Your mothers should have aborted you you despicable little turds.

        Like


      • That’s ignorant, nonsense. Who owns ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN etc? shareholders. Not Jews. You could invest in those corporations same as everyone. Same thing with most newspapers.

        If you see lots of Jews in journalism it’s because it’s one of the careers they are drawn to. Why didn’t you get a degree in journalism?

        And if you think Jews control the media you probably didn’t hear about this lovely man:

        http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/23/ted-turner-says-men-should-be-banned-from-politics-for-100-years-video/
        Such a nice Gentile-supporting feminists, eh? Even if just in spirit. Those bitches don’t deserve any support, yet lefty idiots like him do provide sustenance. Imagine if a Jew said that? The uproar this would cause here.

        Like


      • Lily, I’m sorry, but Jews do control the media, or at least punch way above our weight class. Even Jon Stewart (nee Leibovitz) has admitted as much in his ‘America’ book. It’s pretty easy to check who most of the managers, journalists, etc. are. Most of it has to do with nepotism (which every group practices) and the present-day composition of the Ivy League (with the WASPs preferring business to journalism), and I do think higher verbal IQ might have had something to do with it (even on the alt-right some of the best writers–Unamusement/Radish, Sailer if you believe him have partial Jewish ancestry), but it is there, and it is not something I am proud of, at all.

        Like


      • This a common fantasy the notion that publicly traded companies are somehow owned by shareholders as a tangible coherent actor. Most the companies you’ve listed are subsidies of a larger holding company who have a plurality of shares and ostensibly control the company. Joe Schmoe with a couple dollars squirreled away in a 401(k) and a couple shares of stock has about as much say in the operations of any of these companies as a janitor.

        Like


      • “This a common fantasy the notion that publicly traded companies are somehow owned by shareholders as a tangible coherent actor…………Joe Schmoe with a couple dollars squirreled away in a 401(k) and a couple shares of stock has about as much say in the operations of any of these companies as a janitor.”

        Well, what do you want? Do you want them to turn over to you the lock and walk away? Indeed, you can’t influence these companies, unless you sat on the board or owned a substaintail amount of the company. What I meant is that you might feel less Jew-resentment if you owned some shares and they kept going up in the market. It’s like owning a home as opposed to renting it. If you owned it, you’d take care of it better.

        That said, you have other options – which I repeat in almost every thread when you bash the supposedly Jew-owned media:

        1) if you hate the media get a degree in journalism if you’re still in school so you could present your worldview
        2) start your own media company if you got some bucks,
        3) or start your own website. The beauty of the internet – everyone could be a journalist today, and it’s inexpensive. It all depends on how much drive you have instead of complaining over the success of other people.

        The problem is a lot of you have no drive and no vision. You’re great in the Jew-hate and Jew-jealousy departments, but nothing else.

        Like


      • [URL=http://s1.directupload.net/file/d/3397/85mrfssk_jpg.htm][IMG]http://s1.directupload.net/images/131001/temp/85mrfssk.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

        Hmmmmmm

        Like


      • Better.

        Like


      • Notice the crickets?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:05 am Carlos Danger

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership

        Concentration of media ownership (also known as media consolidation or media convergence) is a process whereby progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media.[1] Contemporary research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.[2][3]

        Globally, large media conglomerates include Viacom, CBS Corporation, Time Warner, News Corporation, Bertelsmann AG, Sony, Comcast, Vivendi, Televisa, The Walt Disney Company, Hearst Corporation, Organizações Globo and Lagardère Group.[4][5][6]

        As of 2012, The Walt Disney Company is the largest media conglomerate in the US, with News Corporation, Time Warner and Viacom ranking second, third and fourth respectively.[7]

        In nations described as authoritarian by most international think-tanks and NGOs like Human Rights Watch (China, Cuba, Russia), media ownership is generally something very close to the complete state control over information in direct or indirect ways (see Gazprom Media).

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 11:02 am Hugh G. Rection

        Buying stock on a secondary market is certainly not investing.

        Like


  42. Glenn Greenwald Schools CNN Host on NSA, Wikileaks, Controlled

    Like


  43. Women’s Studies, proper noun

    2. A diploma annotation used to warn prospective employers of impending harrassment lawsuits.

    Like


  44. A man can be a man without a woman, but a woman can’t be a woman without a man.

    (drops the mic)

    Like


  45. Does anyone know if the tribe of YKW are the ones behind the brutal torture and humiliation of our beautiful young women on redtube and similar sites?

    Like


    • I like to call out the “YKW” as much as the next guy, but WHAT?

      Your beautiful young women are deranged sluts. Who cares about them being “humiliated and tortured” (something they chose out of their free will)?

      Like


      • They are our people our tribe very often being brutalised by people of other races. If you hated white people you would love redtube

        Like


      • I care about them because they are human beings. Seriously horrible things (ATM) for instance is nothing short of torture

        Like


      • Do you think they are prisoners or otherwise not freely participating?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:34 am Max from aust

        Would any human being freely do ATM. I has to be the most unnatural and repulsive act ever

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:36 am gunslingergregi

        im sure its happened just in the heat of moment without really thinking about it

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 1:41 am gunslingergregi

        when ya get with someone you can do anything and say anything too and they still gonna love you it can get a little crazy

        Like


      • A lot of porn actresses are addicted to drugs, etc.

        That said, plenty of people of both sexes are willing to be the ‘bottoms’ in some pretty crazy BDSM scenes, so I can’t say it’s definitely nonconsensual.

        Like


  46. Millionaire men prefer to marry poor girls, millionaire women won’t marry poor men.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/24/millionaire-men_n_3983741.html

    Like


  47. Y’all have to admit: annoying as Lily’s posts are, she actually attempts to construct logical arguments in good English instead of snarking in ‘leet speak. Who’s the man here?

    Like


    • Perhaps, but it is all rather on the tl;dr side. It would appear the jew-bashing and loving comes from a place of emotion, which tends towards verbosity and ranting.

      Anyway, to attempt to climb the ravine this topic careened into, I must ask how these sophist memes get propagated. Some people being fooled by the the perfidious redefinitions can be chalked up to people being to charitable or lazy, but some of the other contrived whoppers (hetero-normative cis-gendered) really require a complete lack of skepticism or Lenny level retardation.

      Like


    • On top of presenting logical arguments in good English, Lily is neither a liberal nor a feminist.

      You have to give her credit for that.

      In my book she earns a LOT of points just for that.

      and she is not whinny, she is not emotional, she is feisty but always in control, a rare quality in women

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 7:23 am Joachim Peiper

        I thought you were smarter than that.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 8:03 am The Burninator

        Absolutely agree regarding Lily. I’d prefer a bit long winded and logical over emotional “lolzzlzzl” crap as a form of debate rhetoric. Agree or disagree with her, she at least lays out a detailed argument with lots of homework done and good points. The last thing the manosphere needs is to take up arguing from emotions instead of facts. Manipulate silly broads at a bar with their own emotions, sure, but debating historical or political points with emotions is a step down for men, IMO.

        Like


      • Good God, really?

        “Arabs cannot steal the Jews’ land” “Just because they lived there doesn’t mean they own it”

        It’s better than calling someone a sexist or “muh soggy knee” but the “homework” you refer to is misinformation. Jews not being prominent in feminism/multiculturalism. Hahahahahahaha.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:51 am The Burninator

        The same arguments Europeans used against Indians. Do you wish to cede your land back to the descendents of Sitting Bull, ho? Or are you content to rationalize that away, while holding others to standards that you yourself do not follow?

        Always a victim, eh?

        Lily does a fine job of putting together rhetorical retorts to the three sentence haters here. She may or may not get points wrong, but at least she’s putting in intellectual rigor and striving to present what she sees as facts. If she’s wrong about some fact(s), that’s fine, it has nothing to do with the actual point being made by Canadian Man that I was agreeing with.

        Feminism was actually born in Rome and grew up in medieval France, btw. You can thank all those Roman centurions and (Jew hating) medieval French/English nobility for setting up and protecting the framework of feminism we now live under. In fact, most of feminism and its push has strong roots in European heritage and traditions. Christianity itself was quite liberating for women, compared to what preceded it, and is today one of the driving forces of feminism (been to Church lately? It reeks of feminine imperative). Scandinavia practically had to revert to feminism due to the Vikings being in absentia most of the time (out raiding others, you see). But, yeah, history is hard, right?

        You need to feel like a victim. Go be scared of the boogeymen under your bed if you wish. Not my problem.

        Like


      • @CF

        “Lily is neither a liberal nor a feminist.”
        Thanks for making that clear.
        .

        @ Burninatorsometimes

        I have to be long at times because these crazies impose so many accusations it’s hard to refute them in one sentence, especially when they scream they want proof. Not that bringing proof ever changes their mind. It’s just their excuse to slow down an argument and try to put a monkey wrench in it, but never the less, I bring proof anyway. Notice, how they never bring any serious proof, except some stupid conspiracy website or a silly youtube video. Never a mainstream source or study. And if they do bring an article from a mainstream mag, they usually put such an anti-Jew slant on it, you lose the meaning. Then it’s up to us who analyze fairly to correct their slant.

        Like


      • Given the ethnic composition of the mainstream media, they’d be likely to suppress antisemitic data. They also suppress news of anti-white attacks and anything that makes men (as opposed to women) as a class look good, though I think that’s more for the usual political ideological reasons.

        I won’t deny your opponents tend to bring up stupid examples, but the role of Jews in the media (every major movie studio) and feminism (Friedan, Steinem, Allred) is well documented. Even Jon Stewart jokes about it.

        I was pretty happy to be a right-wing hemi-Jew, and used to read Commentary religiously (they had quite a few nice bits about race and IQ and the decline of NYC back in the eighties and nineties), but then the neocons dragged America into the Iraq War, and I couldn’t really support that wing of the Right anymore. Still, I have no desire to wind up in an oven if the paleocons win, so I just checked out of political identity altogether–I read both sides and make my own decisions.

        Like


      • “Given the ethnic composition of the mainstream media, they’d be likely to suppress antisemitic data. They also suppress news of anti-white attacks and anything that makes men (as opposed to women) as a class look good, though I think that’s more for the usual political ideological reasons.”

        But the stance of the media is liberal, not Jewish. The Jews in the media are even anti-Israel or anti Judaism, because they are atheists and/or reform. Therefore, they support lefty causes. But, how many lefty gentiles around in the media and they support lefty causes? Lots, and influential ones, at that. Look at MSNBC – Chis Mathews, Laurence O’Donnell. Same thing at CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc….lots of gentile journalists.

        As I asked in the other comment to you which hasn’t posted yet, what are Jewish interests? Maybe you mean liberal/lefty interests? As you said, the browning of America is not a Jewish interest, even though many Jews support that stupidity. As far as I am concerned, the only legitimate Jewish interest is Israel, which most Jews don’t support unless they are religious and/or conservative. Liberal Jews don’t care about Israel, and their Jewishness is incidental, just as it was for German Jews. So, you can’t say the media support Jewish interests, as it’s very hostile to Israel (which antisemites overlook), but you can definitely say it supports liberal/lefty interests. There is no doubt about it.

        What I think is happening here is antisemites looking for an excuse to foment Jew hate, latch on to the liberal media and use it to channel and funnel their Jew hate.

        As far as feminism, it wasn’t started by Jews and many non-Jewish feminists around, past and present.

        How many Catholics support feminism? Lots, as I showed up thread in the links I posted.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:57 am Carlos Danger

        You reeeaaallly need to brush up on your world history then.

        She tells some amazing whoppers, like Turks aren’t originally from Central Asia in this very thread. Lots and lots of squid ink. It’s standard public manipulation tactics in action. The less well read don’t know who to believe. It’s meant to muddy the water and nothing more. Common practice in Communist regimes. That’s why I think she’s been trained.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:58 am Carlos Danger

        Would you say that if she looked like Bella Abzug?

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:05 am The Burninator

        I have no idea what she looks like, actually. What does that have to do with anything? Serious question. If she’s cute it’s not like I can bang her, this being the internet and all. And if she’s ugly, it’s not like I am forced to associate with her, this being the internet and all. Your question thus makes no sense to me.

        Like


      • Bella Abzug? What the hell? I had to Google her, lol.

        I get it, Carlositto; anyone who opposes your bogus narrative of Jew-conspiracy has to be some old feminist witch. Dear God…….you call yourself a logical thinker?

        This explains why you haven’t yet met a Jew-conspiracy you didn’t like.

        You never miss an opportunity to toot your skewed opinion that Jewish women are responsible for feminism.

        Read it and weep:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_feminism

        Like


      • Newton was an omega male who was proud of his celibacy and spent his time doing math instead of chasing women. I still believe in physics.

        The person’s looks, or game, are irrelevant to the truth value of their statements. Let’s not confuse the manipulations of Game with seeking after truth; getting laid and finding the answer are two different male pastimes with different mindsets required.

        Like


      • I have no idea what she looks like, but even if she was butt ugly I would still say the same about what she writes here.

        Like


      • on October 2, 2013 at 5:38 am Carlos Danger

        I thought you were smarter than that. I’m disappointed.

        Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 10:00 am Carlos Danger

      You need to read much, much more.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:11 am The Burninator

        I’m probably not being clear in my underlying point. I’m saying, if you’re going to be a hater, then at least put intellectual rigor and thought into your (not you personally) posts. Three sentence posts, of which two are ad hominem or screeching “Jeeewww!” basically cedes the argument to your opponent(s) by default. Right now, she gets full credit for doing what most here don’t seem to have time nor desire to do.

        Frankly it comes across as uncontrolled emotional screeching and effeminate. Men can and should rise above the Pathos rhetorical tool in a debate, it is of limited use and really makes no good foil to a well thought out post (even if the well thought out post has factual errors).

        Like


      • What should he read, conspiracy shit? Watch tasteless youtube videos? The kind you shamelessly post here even when it’s not related to the subject of the thread because you need a place to advertise your lies and spread your skewed worldviews? Stupid is stupid is stupid. Stop telling guys to become as stupid and as worthless as you.

        Like


  48. Have people forgot about a crafty little devil by the name of Satan?

    Or is it easier to blame a group of people who subscribed to a certain religion?

    For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Ephesians 6:12

    Stop with the conspiracy theories and get real. The devil is real and Hell is real. To blame all of the world’s ills on a group of people tells me that a lot of people don’t think Satan exists or is even a concept.

    And what if the Jews are doing all this…how many of you are subscribing to the filth that is being preached to be celebrated? How does that make you any different from them?

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 7:59 am The Burninator

      Lots of folks revel and writhe in enjoyment at the thought of being a victim. I have no idea why. It’s just another form of escapism, similar to the female hamster in action. Why no, the reason I’m not a billionaire is because of XYZ, and has nothing to do with my lack of motivation to actually go out and get the hard work done to become a billionaire.

      Your point is well taken. Christians especially would be wise to take heed of your words.

      Like


      • Can someone be this deluded?

        Nobody blames Yids for not being able to become billionaire you imbecile, they blame em for cultural trends that they dislike.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:40 am The Burninator

        Your effeminate flailing places you into the realm of the emotional. You’re much more easily defeated when you move into that frame. This is why Game works on most females, you know.

        Nothing is stopping you from buying a news site/newspaper or television station/radio license or website and setting up shop. The public buys what it wants to hear, so whose fault is it that you cannot craft a message that they want to buy? If you can craft a better message and get it out into the public market, you win. If not, that’s not anybody’s fault but your own.

        Even claiming “trends!” is a form of victimization. Don’t like it, go do something about it besides blaming other groups. Stand up and act like a man of action instead of like a sniveling, wounded little internet bitch.

        Take this site, or Rollo’s site (far more intellectual there, btw). The message is being crafted and sent out, and Red Pill thought is finally on the verge of going mainstream. These men, CH, Rollo, etc. stood up and not only took action, but learned how to sell their vision. No “jews” stopped them and no other forces can stop them, because they learned how to sell their worldview. They acted like men, and now their vision is about to bear fruit which will improve society. They didn’t sit back and whine about how they don’t have a chance or are victims of the actions of others. They are to be commended for being manly and rational.

        Perpetual victim status is the domain of the feminine imperative. I have no use for it.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:51 am Carlos Danger

        He hasn’t said a word about anyone being a failure and sites like these become a vehicle for this message and this discussion. So the relationship is symbiotic in nature. This site would not be as interesting without the people who post here. He hasn’t sniveled once. He’s merely pointed out who was swindled and by whom.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 9:58 am The Burninator

        Yeah, who has swindled you precisely? Any of us? Are you forced to buy something you do not wish from Jews? Please, enlighten me as to how precisely you’re a victim of them. Me, personally, if I dislike a trend or product, I simply refuse to buy/participate in it. For example, I find most urban black culture reprehensible, so I do not buy rap music and emulate their fashions. What I do not do is run around screaming about blacks in general, as a collective. The world has had enough collectivism without adding more to it, imo.

        So if you don’t like “Jew” trends/movies/television, don’t give them money. It’s really not that hard, and it stops you from impugning actual innocent Jews who have nothing to do with the trends you see and disagree with, and which they likely disagree with at an individual level as well. Kind of like feminism screaming about “the patriarchy!” all the while ignoring that the majority of men lived as serfs and slaves to those same 0.01% of men who lorded over women, back in the day. It’s a rather selective vision, n’est-ce pas?

        As Earl noted, if one is Christian and screaming about any one group, then one is clearly forgetting the overarching architect Satan and instead focusing on the worldly. That’s a huge mistake. If you’re not Christian I guess that wouldn’t apply though, to be fair.

        Like


      • I agree with most of what you are saying but… when those who are in control ( be they liberals or jews or whomever it does not matter ) are inserting propaganda, indoctrination and brainwashing in their media and entertainment, the average human is too dumb, ignorant or lazy to know what is going on.

        He may have a choice to not buy a product that contains too much refined sugar but most people are not capable of knowing they are being indoctrinated.

        Just like a kid does not know if adults are lying to him or not, it is the adult who is to blame

        and the left/liberals who are now the establishment and control information, education, governments, entertainment etc are to blame, very few people have what it takes to be able to know they are being brainwashed.

        They don’t know nor understand enough to know they have a choice.

        I am neither anti-jew not pro-jew, I see about as much evidence they are innocent as they are part of the problem ( although I would think white liberals – any type of white liberal – are more of a problem ), but Hollywood… really who can argue this is pure indoctrination disguised as entertainment?

        As I said we have a choice in what food we eat, what cars we buy etc..but as far media news, entertainment, education etc etc we do not have much of a choice; 95 % of it has some liberal indoctrination messages imbeded in it.

        About the jews I never really explored that question all that much but here is an idea; maybe just as there is no conspiracy by food producers to poison us with refined sugar and hydrogenated fat, they are simply people who think about profits so much that they don’t care about the long term consequences,
        well maybe there is no big conspiracy by the jews who make those Hollywood movies full of propaganda/indoctrination/brainwashing, maybe they only do it because it sells and they get better support form the leftist establishment and they get subsidies or whatever and all they care about are profits.

        Maybe I am wrong, I don’t really know enough about jews to do more than bounce ideas around about why they are so involved in the demise of our civilization.

        But no one can deny Hollywood is one of the worse offenders…

        what’s that new movie? ” the butler” ? they changed EVERYTHING to make whites ( and even reagan) look like evil cruel diabolical racists yet they still call it ” based on a true story”

        Maybe all they care about is the huge profits at the end and they don’t care what is in their movies…I don’t know

        maybe they are not the cause of it, but they are guilty of being part of the problem.

        Like


      • So beautifully said, Burninator. This is exactly how society improves – men taking action, as opposed to whining. I can’t stand the childish complaining permeating the comment section. These remarks are not of alpha men. They are weak people that resent others’ achievements so they have to try to slander them and destroy them. Every demagogue in history employed these exact tactics.

        I have told them many times that they can start their own media company if they think their opinions are not heard in the mainstream media. I take the extreme example of Glen Beck, but because of the internet, anyone can be a journalist. You don’t have to have huge amounts of cash to start a website. If you can write well and have opinions and things to write about, you can have a site that puts forth your views. Perfect case in point are CH and Rollo.

        But, you know what? These guys that complain about the Jews day and night couldn’t sell lemonade for free. Their best talent is to complain about the Jew, and demonizing him for imaginary ills under the guise of culture wars. They bring no solutions to the table because they don’t care about cultural issues, just vilifying the Jew by substituting Jew for liberal/lefty. Their shills fill their heads with conspiracy theory and imaginary ills supposedly all carried out by Jews (blood libels, the Protocols, the Rothchilds, 9/11, stealing countries, and thousands others) , hoping they’ll carry hatred in their hearts and maybe start some kind of violent reaction. They use these guys as useful idiots to do the bidding for them, while these guys are too stupid to see they’re being manipulated.

        Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 12:58 pm The Burninator

        Thanks Lily. If you read Beck’s comment sections under his stories on the Blaze, you probably already know me, albeit under a different handle. My writing style is the same there as here of course, minus the occasional foul word or sexual reference.

        Like


      • I love the media empire he built with his own 2 hands from scratch. He was a divorced drunk dad a few years ago and he turned his life around by being positive, not touching alcohol, taking care of his family (the former one and the new one), surrounded himself with trustworthy friends and buddies and built his dream with them. The guy is a classic American success story, if there ever was one. And, he’s gracious and generous to boot.

        I’ll look for you there 🙂

        Like


      • You do know Beck was canned by Murdoch (gentile) because he thought Beck was getting too close to antisemitism after his list of the 10 worst people in America had 9 Jews on it, right?

        I actually have no objection to what Beck did–nothing wrong with going after your political enemies in a show about politics, and I certainly don’t think he should have avoided criticizing them because of their ancestry. But it does lend some support to the idea that the media supports Jewish interests, at least as they conceive them. (I think a browner America is Bad For the Jews, because it’s going to screw up the country, we live here, and Israel’s got maybe another 50 years before they’re overwhelmed.)

        Murdoch’s philosemitism I don’t get–maybe he figures it’ll keep the rest of his competitors from ganging up on him.

        Like


      • SFG,

        “But it does lend some support to the idea that the media supports Jewish interests, at least as they conceive them. (I think a browner America is Bad For the Jews, because it’s going to screw up the country….)”

        What are Jewish interests? Maybe you mean liberal/lefty interests? As you said, the browning of America is not a Jewish interest, even though many Jews support that stupidity. As far as I am concerned, the only legitimate Jewish interest is Israel, which most Jews don’t support unless they are religious and/or conservative. Liberal Jews don’t care about Israel, and their Jewishness is incidental, just as it was for German Jews. So, you can’t say the media support Jewish interests, as it’s very hostile to Israel (which antisemites overlook), but you can definitely say it supports liberal/lefty interests. There is no doubt about it.

        .

        “Murdoch’s philosemitism I don’t get–maybe he figures it’ll keep the rest of his competitors from ganging up on him.”

        I think he’s a bit more conservative than the usual media lefty, like Ted Turner, CNN founder. So, his News Corp has been more conservative than the usual lefty media. That’s why FOX at least tries to be balanced. Also, he owns stations, networks, and publications all over the world, including Israel.
        .

        Regarding the 10 worst people in America, yeah I think they were his political enemies and even if you don’t think they are indeed the 10 worst, they were close enough. I think he was right to name them.

        As inconsistent as that might sound, I don’t consider Beck an antisemite.
        I think he’s a clear thinker and very honest. He tells you exactly what he thinks without being too diplomatic, which is why FOX wanted to control him. When FOX saw it can’t, they asked him to leave without too much fanfare. Yet, he said he left of his own volition. Maybe, who knows?

        Anyway, I don’t have a problem with criticizing lefty or liberal Jews. I have a problem with spreading lies and conspiracy theory dressed as facts in order to trump up Jew hate and foment violence against them.

        These antisemites have no intention of solving cultural issues. They just need a way to channel and funnel their beliefs. If they did, the word Jew wouldn’t even factor into it. They would focus on the faulty worldview, not the ethnicity.

        Does Glen ever mention the ethnicity of any of the liberals he talks about on his show? That’s a tell tell sign he isn’t an antisemite. In contrast, the antisemites commenting here make sure to emphasis the Jewishness of someone in case you missed it. That should tell you their whole beef is the Jews, not cultural issues.

        Like


  49. I am slowly figuring this out.
    It is fine to make a comment on word-press saying “meat-hook first-grade pensioners, propane-torch interrogation, or burying an infant in boiling donkey shit…
    But some other words will get stopped.
    My daughter went to the same high school as the actual founder of word-press. She would not let him even know her phone number. Make this up I cannot.

    Like


  50. Good grief. I come here to read about hypergamy and the like, not about some idiots flogging their anti-jewish hobby horse 24/7.

    Like


    • So do it.

      Scan the post, if it looks tribal-matters-related skip ahead.

      Like


    • Seriously, what is it with you faggots and you brainless lickspittleism of Jews? Can’t you see that everything we say is true? Just because somebody indoctrinated you to believe that ANYONE who criticizes Jews in ANY fashion is automatically wrong doesn’t mean it’s true you sack of shit.

      Like


      • on October 1, 2013 at 10:23 am Hugh G. Rection

        Whether it’s true or not, why should I give a shit?

        Like


      • Sorry, ho but you’re a buthurt fucking loser on flames. You can’t sell lemonade, let alone start a business, or influence and lead men. Idiots like you have to resort to projecting all their frustration on a boogeyman scapegoat. You’re simply jealous, frustrated, resentful and you lack potency.

        Like


      • Yeah, if it weren’t for the Jews you’d be living on 5th Avenue instead of a trailer park, and your wife would be Morgan Fairchild instead of that obese gender ambiguous “woman” who recently went missing, last seen in company with your favorite mule.

        Damn Jews.

        Like


  51. Millionaire men prefer women with less money. Millionaire women won’t mix with men with less money.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/24/millionaire-men_n_3983741.html

    Like


  52. […] The following open source, feminist bromide translation service is offered free of charge. Share with your local warpig! exploitation, noun 1. anything that gives straight men pleasure. threatening, adj 1.  […]

    Like


  53. Got a few more for you:

    strong, confident woman
    1. bitch

    independent
    1. dependent on the government

    loser
    1. a gentleman who doesn’t feel the need to try and impress women

    patriarchy
    1. an all purpose excuse for anything any woman ever fails at
    examples:
    “I’m bad at maths and science because patriarchy”
    “I didn’t get that job because patriarchy”
    “I’m not considered attractive because patriarchy”
    “And I would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for that meddling patriarchy!”

    Like


  54. on October 1, 2013 at 7:06 am gunslingergregi

    i guess party over for a bit bitch taking me out to the country my cellphone don’t even work there lol

    Like


  55. I met a Chinese girl who’d been living in Sweden for study. I gamed and banged her within 5 hours. She made an interesting point to me. In Sweden the “equality” between men and women has become a real turn off for Swedish women. She claimed that many Swedish women now long for the time when men were men and this leads them to pursue “black guys” (her exact words).

    She has no knowledge of game but the way she explained this was exactly the way much of this blog explains things.

    Like


    • on October 1, 2013 at 9:39 am Living in Sweden

      Either you or her is full of shit, the only Swedish girls you see with black guys are fat and/or trashy.

      Like


    • She claimed that many Swedish women now long for the time when men were men and this leads them to pursue “black guys” (her exact words).

      Or if they aren’t Wal-Mart types, to pursue men who are in Sverigedemokraterna, since they are probably more masculine than the guys they find in the Social Democrats, or even Reinfeldt’s party.

      Like


      • Can’t speak to Sweden, but while white nationalists are certainly masculine in the USA, they’re so disproportionately blue-collar and underclass they don’t seem to be major chick magnets. Ladies love the green, for obvious evolutionary reasons.

        Like


  56. whiskeysplace Bob Guiccione and Larry Flynt and Hugh Hefner are were Jews? Who knew? Silly me I figured they were just sleazebags making bucks off horny guys and female exhibitionism.

    If a leftest claimed that is was unreasonable to fear blacks because most blacks do not commit violent crime you would point out that black overrepresentation‎ in crime is the reason for the fear, not the belief that all black are murderers and rapist.

    Overrepesentation. But I’m guessing you already knew that.

    I guess that … horny guys and female look at me is a Jewish plot. Those devious Jews, contolling the weather and all.

    Sarcasm strawman.

    Like


  57. rape statistics, noun

    Sophisticated random numbe generation algorithm.

    Like


  58. “Well, what do you want? Do you want them to turn over to you the lock and walk away? Indeed, you can’t influence these companies, unless you sat on the board or owned a substaintail amount of the company.

    You could have just as easily said “yeah, you are right, accumulating shares probably isn’t the most practical approach to influencing culture, or a business.” Journalism school is also a pretty horrific suggestion; one would be wasting 3-4 years of their like, as there is not much ROI there and any schmuck who can scribble their name can be declared a journalist. Just read Yahoo News if you want to disabuse notions to the contrary.

    “What I meant is that you might feel less Jew-resentment if you owned some shares and they kept going up in the market. It’s like owning a home as opposed to renting it. If you owned it, you’d take care of it better.”

    Silly similes aside, I think you have me confused with someone else. I don’t resent any person who would voluntarily forgo pork products. Although, I endorse in part the prohibitions on shellfish (mostly overpriced and not so tasty those). Perhaps you are using a general you here though.

    Like


    • Yes, I was using a general you. I was speaking mostly to the resentful antisemtes who say the Jews own all the media. First, I don’t think the Jews own all the media, and second, If they don’t like the media, they should do something about it. However, I think they are too lazy and they are lacking vision to do anything substantial.

      Like


  59. […] All non-consensual touch is sexual assault. Related: The biggest challenge facing young women. Related: Feminist catchphrase translator. […]

    Like


  60. I did not design the wordpress protocols or the internet, or any of the obtreperous filtering systems that apparently some of you wish to use to enclose and enslave humanity
    .So not to blame me.You guys made the word-rules.
    My day job is (excellent) but is nowadays all about bashing thru past stoopid.Medical IT issues.and saving the world.
    Selah..

    Early – Pentangle Music = The Sound of the Neanderthal-God
    The Berlin Marathon 9/30/1990 = Rock & Roll, Serious Majic, and how it became the final head-shot to the Cathedral.
    And I was there.and finished, more or less…

    Like


  61. […] UPDATE: More feminist Newspeak has been translated at Chateau Heartiste. […]

    Like


  62. […] Heartiste offers up a Feminist Catchphrase Translator. […]

    Like


  63. […] has up a great blog post on twat terminology: Feminist Catchphrase Translator The following open source, feminist bromide translation service […]

    Like


  64. […] Feminist Catchphrase Translator. […]

    Like


  65. […] [Feminist Catchphrase Translator] […]

    Like


  66. […] Hint: neither is supported by science. [källa] […]

    Like


  67. […] den här sidan postad i kommentarsfältet, där står en del feministiska fraser som de slänger sig med. […]

    Like


  68. […] slutwalk, noun 1. a gathering of half-naked ugly women imagining that men want them. 2. a gathering of half-naked cute women orchestrated by a rich man living in the Upper East Side as a ruse to get laid. […]

    Like


  69. […] – From feminist-speak to english. […]

    Like