Leftoids Fear Themselves More Than They Fear Redneck Bogeymen

An anonymous commenter at Sailer’s left this interesting remark about the psychology motivating the lords of lies:

Some of the virulence… stems from an underlying chain of logic in elite thinking that I find scary: If young black males really do tend to be more crime-prone, then…oh, no, the Nazis were right! So if Americans ever become embarrassed by the insipid political correctness we instruct them to spout, they will immediately thaw out Hitler’s cryogenically preserved brain and elect it president. Or something.

I’ve noticed this for a long time. I can’t claim to have a perfect explanation, but keep in mind that most American lefties tend to embrace (at least implicitly) two key ideas: Utilitarianism and Utopianism.

Look at all the hip SWPL charities that swear their mission is to “End ______ forever!” (Insert “poverty”, “child abuse”, “racism”, “gun violence”, etc.) In contrast, dour conservatives (whether religious or secular) tend to agree with the Gospel warning “the poor you have always with you“.

Similarly, lefties in the USA tend to be basically Utilitarian on most issues- the idea that something should be avoided simply because it is intrinsically immoral strikes most of them as rather quaint, except for issues that don’t really affect them personally, on which they can afford to be high-minded (In fairness, too many conservative Republicans have the same problem, just for different issues). A woman got knocked up by mistake? Sure, abort the pregnancy for her convenience. Dad’s taking too long to die and running up big medical bills? Euthanize him. A jury failed to make an example of an innocent man as instructed? Screw double jeopardy and bring him up on “hate crime” charges.

When you believe (at least implicitly) that 1) Society can be perfected by human means, or at least come reasonably close to perfection, and 2) any practical means to achieve that objective should be seriously considered, the progressive dread of politically-incorrect Hatefacts starts to make more sense. If “genetically inferior” blacks are all that is standing in the way of turning every city in America into a hipster SWPL paradise, what can’t be justified? My theory, then, is that, despite what they say, progressives are not really worried about what crotchety conservatives and religious zealots out in flyover country will do if frank discussions of race become commonplace- they’re worried about what they themselves will have to consider doing. Already, most urban progressives aren’t bothered much by the NYPD’s institutionalized racial profiling, the disproportionate abortion rate of blacks, or sex-ed programs clearly targeted at black teens. How big of a leap is it to, say, forced sterilization? I don’t presume to speak for progressives, but it doesn’t seem like much of a leap to me.

Projection… it’s what’s for dinner!

This commenter is onto something. The progressive aka leftoid (a term of art CH coined to fully capture the anti-human, hivemind quality of progressive psychology) harbors deeply troubling thoughts. Dark intimations swirl in his heart when solitude and a time-out from status whoring allow the full range of his true feelings to command silent attention. These discomfiting brain betrayals of RealThink which flit in and out of the leftoid’s conscious awareness truly upset him. He’s supposed to be The Good Man. Why does he feel so much unease when reality and his rectitude collide?

For some leftoids, self-flagellation cleanses the impure thoughts and offers redemption among peers. But for most, gargantuan egos unable to tolerate pointed self-abasement direct their discomfort outward to animus-bearing stand-ins, i.e. racial cousins, who have been caricatured and, in a way, enshrined as moral infants in need of the leftoid’s divine guidance. It’s in his act as the bringer of phony salvation and the dispenser of righteous judgment that the leftoid maneuvers around his own dangerous crimethink, and continually postpones the day when his superego must reconcile with his id.

When the moment of reckoning arrives — as such moments will when reality weighs down so heavily upon internalized propaganda that its sustenance is no longer possible — don’t be shocked at the depravities the leftoid is capable of summoning. He is a perfectionist, a utopian, and a moral supremacist: A psychological trifecta hitched to a constitutionally unhappy person that can unleash immense evil and even immenser rationalizations for that evil.

So, down in the carbonized core of his arhythmic heart, the leftoid knows he is a Grendel, a monster of the misty night who can’t stand the sounds of normal humanity. His twisted compulsions drive him to meddle in everything that seem not up to the standards of his fantasies, and he suspects he would do monstrous things if the moral winds ever shifted and opened up new utopian opportunity. He suspects monstrous deeds are his tomorrow because he thinks monstrous thoughts today.

A prediction: The first large-scale, mandatory “sterilization for welfare” program will be proposed, framed skillfully in the garb of slippery sophistry and blame redirection, by a SWPL leftoid, and advocated by a SWPL leftoid message machine. You read it here.


  1. One of my friends is sort of leftist, but what I like is that he’s at least realistic about the reasons why he supports things like abortion. Example:

    Me: “You know abortion was created as a eugenics program to kill blacks, and that Hitler thought it was a good idea.”

    Him: “Yeah, that’s exactly why I support it.”

    I wouldn’t find leftoids half so deserving of ridicule and contempt if they were intellectually honest about what exactly their policies promote and what the underlying reasons are.


  2. Progressives today would have been racists in the 50’s and Nazi’s in the 30’s. Someone is always pulling their puppet strings but I doubt they’re self aware enough to realize it. They have this delusion they’re oppressed when all of their opinions are supported (it’s more likely going the other way) by the people with the biggest voice.


    • The Nazi’s were Nietzschean and traditionalist, read Evola. They saw this shit coming, and lived through it, (1920 Weimar Republic) a hundred years ago. There were 25,000 blacks living in Nazi Germany and another 250,000 mixed jews in the Wehrmacht. None of them went to the KZ lager cuz they weren’t the problem. Dimes to dollars being a progressive card carrying Bolshevik asshole got you a first class seat up the smokestack at Auschwitz, whether you were a german, jew or otherwise it didn’t matter. The rest is propaganda fed to you by the Citadelist-Globalist-Universalist crowd who won the war. Ever since then its been non-stop incremental frog in slowly brought to boil water type improvementation.

      When you get it, its like getting hit by lightening.


      • “When you get it, its like getting hit by lightening.”

        Although many on this blog talk of taking the red pill, they are not truly unplugged from the matrix. They only see and understand the tip of the iceberg, which is feminism; when it is what lies hidden under the water that is truly frightening.

        The truth surrounding Hitler and the catastrophe that was WW2 is what one finds at the deepest level of the rabbit hole. Waking up to the reality of what happened is a shocking and utterly depressing experience.

        I would guess CH is making greater progress debunking Cultural Marxism than the White Nationalist blogs (which tend to preach to the choir), as he commands a much wider audience. I encourage him to keep up with the political posts.


  3. “The first large-scale, mandatory “sterilization for welfare” program will be proposed, framed skillfully in the garb of slippery sophistry and blame redirection, by a SWPL leftoid, and advocated by a SWPL leftoid message machine. You read it here.”

    PUA would rejoice in order to get paid to have vasectomies.


    • Nobody’s cutting my junk. Besides, when your granddaughter is 18 she might want a bun in her oven. Blammo.


      • Then no EBT for you.
        This would also be in conjunction with bringing back the Shotgun wedding. You blast her, you ring her, or you get blasted too. Blammo.


      • Ooh struck a cord. Haters gon hate.

        Shotgun weddings have been nullified by feminist sponsored no fault divorce. Not to mention that she’ll want a beta for a provider husband and you would rob her of that in your quest for self-righteousness. Boom.


      • You made this personal.

        I could just take a page from one of the Great Books For Men on how to defend the honor of the women in my family:

        Genesis 34: “1 Now Dinah, the daughter Leah had borne to Jacob, went out to visit the women of the land. 2 When Shechem son of Hamor the Hivite, the ruler of that area, saw her, he took her and violated her”

        ” 24 All the men who went out of the city gate agreed with Hamor and his son Shechem, and every male in the city was circumcised. 25 Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male. 26 They put Hamor and his son Shechem to the sword and took Dinah from Shechem’s house and left.”

        The Bible fucking rocks, doesn’t it?


      • on July 24, 2013 at 3:02 pm Zombie Lyndon Johnson

        > “The Bible fucking rocks, doesn’t it?”

        Yeah, unless you’re the 10,000,000 kulaks starved to death in the Holodomor.

        Or the little Romanov girls bayoneted to death after the bullets had bounced off their jewel-encrusted ballgowns and failed to kill them.

        Or the 6,832-odd nuns and priests who were brutally raped and murdered in the War of Revenge for 1492.

        Or any of the myriad other people [and peoples] over the last 150 years who have been on the receiving end of this nihilism.

        In which case – right before you were slaughtered – you might have said, “Who the fuck are these monsters?!?”


      • Your point is a bit incoherent. Please clarify.


  4. If you are a square peg in a world of leftoid round holes, you will eventually be carved into shape, forcibly pounded into your designated hole, or “reluctantly” destroyed.

    Because, progress.


  5. The Puritan/Quaker utopian mindset has a lot of coming to grips with the facts in times ahead. For a story of this process, back when the Appalachians were the favorite Yankee victim group, see here:

    Sound Familiar? | JayMan’s Blog

    Be sure to see the previous and following posts to see how it fits into the larger scheme of things.


  6. I hope you are right. Depo-Provera shots for welfare recipients have been suggested in the past.


  7. Now that sounds like it would actually push society closer to true utopia and eventually colonization of other planets once all the dead-weight is removed.


  8. You read it here

    I have said the same thing for a couple of “enlightened” friends for years. More than welfare, what really hits deeply with SWPLs is the point about beautiful women and their ethnic distribution.

    To that, they have no answer


  9. If they push sterilization, it will be similar to how they push gun control: they’re really scared of the NAMs that live next to them, but they pretend that the problem is because of those hillbillies in the Red states. Like, Honey Boo Boo. Can’t have those fat ugly rednecks popping out little bastard rednecks.


    • Yeah, that’s the problem I had with Idiocracy’s first ten minutes, but I suppose it was necessary to not have leftoids on Mike Judge’s ass.


      • Judge knows this. It’s a wink and a nod.


      • Exactly. The movie takes it as axiomatic that intelligence is inherited. That’s badfeel crimethink.


      • Idiocracy is a great analysis. Who is the audience for that movie?

        People’s wouldn’t watch it because it is too insulting. Libs wouldn’t watch it either because it is too true. So who is watching it?

        My guess is that libs secretly loooove this movie because it is actually all the dirty secrets they believe but hide from their sociable organic neighbors. I bet they yearn for the day they can use the law of the jungle belligerently.


      • Meant to say proles.


      • on July 25, 2013 at 2:07 pm The Spirit Within

        I dated (briefly) the woman who produced Idiocracy.

        She’s Jewish.


        (sound of Greg Eliot’s brain exploding with cognitive dissonance)


      • A Jewish producer? I’m shocked… shocked to learn!

        Got a postscript for ya, kid… I’ve been saying, quite awhile here now, that you can tell who’s in charge by who’s allowed to act as the so-called opposition.


  10. We’ve already been down this road – about a hundred years ago. The Progressives/Socialists of the 20s and 30s were big into Eugenics, etc.

    Hell, there was even a Supreme Court case, Buck v Bell, in which OWHolmes decreed the state could force sterilization. Francis Galton, Darwin’s cousin, is considered the godfather of high-minded eugenics and his “teachings” were loved by the “intellectuals” such as Victoria Woodhull (suffragist), Margaret Sanger, Charles Davenport, etc.


  11. Melinda Gates is funding research into implantable birth control, and experimenting on Africans. She rather cleverly frames it as a way for women to defraud their husbands, which evokes such joy in the feminazi leftists that they don’t have to worry about race.


    • The Gates Foundation also paid for antiretrovirals to crush the AIDS epidemic in Africa, helping their population to keep soaring.


      • There is no aids epidemic in Africa. Malaria, dysentery, cholera, Ebola, malnutrition, poor hygiene, dirty water… has always killed people in Africa.

        The only difference today is; by calling the symptoms “AIDS”, the white people hand out tons of money,drugs and treatment to you. Treatments like: clean water, healthy food, sterilized medical equipment.


        not so much.

        Only in Africa is a non-AIDS diagnosis a death sentence.

        The relationship between AIDS in Africa and the United States is that white faggots and IV drug users in the U.S create “3rd world” conditions in their blood streams by sharing too many needles and dicks among each other.


      • True. Have you read Duesberg?


      • Yes.

        He’s a perfect example of how you can fool some of the white people some of the time; but you can’t fool all of the white people all of the time.

        “House of Numbers” is an excellent documentary on the AIDS industrial complex.


      • You’ve reversed the figure and the ground. The thing to notice about fooling white people is that it takes effort.


    • I want a link for that priceless quote.


  12. on July 24, 2013 at 1:35 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    Ah, projection. Yes, indeed, it’s what’s for dinner (with a side of organic quinoa and asparagus from the farmer’s market). You’ll see it a lot during debates about gun control.

    Leftoid: “I don’t want my neighbor to have a gun! What if we get in an argument about his tree falling on my fence and he shoots me?!?”
    “Concealed-carry laws are going to cause blood in the streets! People will be shooting each other every time somebody cuts them off!”

    Unfortunately for them, the evidence doesn’t support any of these conclusions. The type of people who bother to go get mandatory training, get fingerprinted, and register as concealed-carry permit holders tend to be law-abiding, stable, and moral. Gun-crime rates among CCW holders are below the general population by several orders of magnitude. (Personally, I won’t even honk or flip the Bird when I’m carrying…no matter how extreme the provocation…it’s just not worth risking getting into a confrontation.)

    The only possible reason why they’re ascribing these evil potentialities to their mental image of the Right-Wing Bogeyman is because *these are thoughts they themselves have.* The reason they envision someone shooting them for a minor traffic infraction is because they’re afraid that’s what *they’d* do if they had a gun.


    • on July 24, 2013 at 5:33 pm Modern Primitive

      “Leftoid: “I don’t want my neighbor to have a gun! What if we get in an argument about his tree falling on my fence and he shoots me?!?”
      “Concealed-carry laws are going to cause blood in the streets! People will be shooting each other every time somebody cuts them off!”

      I believe these moral arguments are diversions away from their true goal, the eventual total disarmament of society, an end goal of socialism where only the state is authorised to use weapons.


      • on July 25, 2013 at 12:38 am Hugh G. Rection

        Yes, some European countries have a legal framework where the government has a monopoly on the use of force. Self-defense is legal, but still can get you in trouble if you overdo it.


      • on July 25, 2013 at 7:56 am RappaccinisDaughter

        I believe that you are correct about the elites of the movement, but that the average ninny on the street who is supporting said elites is being driven by projection and self-loathing.


  13. John Maynard Keynes was a big proponent of eugenics. They love that fucker. Also, check out the various policies that Woodrow Wilson implemented (or attempted to implement). “Progressives” are an evil bunch.


  14. Not sure where the anonymous commenter gets the idea that modern liberals embrace a real sort of Utilitarianism. They have embraced a philosophy of moral consequences and perpetual futurity, cleverly swamping Utilitarianism in its own very juices.

    The majority of the present is no longer the majority. Its a tyranny well beyond even them . Global warming, for example, legitimate or not, now makes the unborn, infinity into the future, the utilitarian object of goodness. Everyone alive today, and into the future, is expendable to this ever expanding greater good. Stock the pantry , but never open a single can.

    It genius really. How does one rule with arbitrary power while conforming to a Utilitarian philosophy? Simply make the unborn your constituency and super majority. No individual or group will content with it.


  15. I suspect one of the reason leftists want to flood the U.S. with “Hispanics” is because their crime rates, overall, is on par with whites. If blacks (whose crimes rates are astronomical) are removed from well-to-do areas, that will suit them just fine. Now to where blacks go, why should they care? They’re not around them anymore.


    • I suspect one of the reason leftists want to flood the U.S. with “Hispanics” is because their crime rates, overall, is on par with whites.

      They’re lower than blacks’, maybe, but they’re still very high compared to whitey’s. Murder rates in Mexico’s Mexico (countries like Honduras) are astronomical.


      • Honduras, Guatemala, Panama etc have pretty sizable Afro-Carribean populations as well. A bit like Brazil


    • Circa 1620

      I suspect one of the reasons PLANTATION OWNERS want to flood the COLONIES with “SLAVES” is because their crime rates, overall, is on par with whites. If NATIVE AMERICANS (whose crimes rates are astronomical) are removed from well-to-do areas, that will suit them just fine. Now to where NATIVE AMERICANS go, why should they care? They’re not around them anymore.

      (There, fixed it for you)


      • Burn BEFORE Reading.

        A new level of inane analogy… even for you, thwack ol’ boy.
        (((shakin’ mah haid)))


      • Oh, give him credit for the first part: blacks were imported for cheap labor, just so the mestizos today.


      • From the constitution of the United States of America July 4th 1776

        “He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.”

        Don’t sound too inane to me.


      • 1) Nobody wanted to “flood” the colonies with slaves.

        2) Negro crime rates, free or slave, were never even close, let alone “on par”, with whites.

        3) Indian warfare against the white man is not “crime”.

        4) Much care was taken as to where the Indian was to go, indeed, to the point of having a Bureau of Indian Affairs, with commensurate civil servant “agents”.



      • Greg Eliot

        1) Nobody wanted to “flood” the colonies with slaves.
        (then how did it happen? Who am I and how did I get here?)

        2) Negro crime rates, free or slave, were never even close, let alone “on par”, with whites.
        ( thats right; negro slaves had a very low crime rate; most couldn’t even steal themselves LOL)

        3) Indian warfare against the white man is not “crime”.
        (so neither is black warfare against white people?)

        4) Much care was taken as to where the Indian was to go, indeed, to the point of having a Bureau of Indian Affairs, with commensurate civil servant “agents”. (so its white people who chose Home Depot and 7-11 parking lots for the Indians to hang out in?)


  16. “A prediction: The first large-scale, mandatory “sterilization for welfare” program will be proposed, framed skillfully in the garb of slippery sophistry and blame redirection, by a SWPL leftoid, and advocated by a SWPL leftoid message machine. You read it here.”

    It already was. Paging early Progressive movement and Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr….


  17. This article is so way off the mark in what was trying to be conveyed that it’s not even funny.

    I don’t know since when Leftists seen themselves (ourselves) as morally righteous and other such off-the-wall adjectives which more so defines Conservatives.


  18. I dunno heartiste, The Projection Theory of X, whatever you want to plug in for X, often seem just so and entirely speculative. Progs seem to take pride in their progressivism. They wear it proudly on their bumpers (COEXIST) and won’t hesitate to brag about it.


  19. on July 24, 2013 at 3:28 pm Uncle Elmer

    My theory is that they are terrified of blacks, a phobia which can be cured by moving into a vibrant neighborhood, as described in my Spearhead essay “Salon’s Toxic Race Shame” :



  20. “A prediction: The first large-scale, mandatory “sterilization for welfare” program will be proposed, framed skillfully in the garb of slippery sophistry and blame redirection, by a SWPL leftoid, and advocated by a SWPL leftoid message machine. You read it here.”

    I have no doubt that you’re dead right on that CH for two reasons. First of all the religious wing of conservatism has mad an idol of babies to the point where many of them oppose any form of birth control period. But second there is the idea of counter push. I think it was Vox Day who said “It took Nixon to go to China and Clinton to pass DOMA” because this is coming from the side you wouldn’t expect it to, there really is no opposition.

    So yeah if and when such a program happens in America it will probably be a leftoid.


    • Plus, since the Left controls all the institutions, the only things that are going to get done will be pushed by the Left. But I don’t see the Left pushing for sterilization for welfare for the foreseeable future because it would impact the races differently.


  21. on July 24, 2013 at 4:16 pm Carlos Danger

    It was Freud who said “In the subconscious, opposites converge.”


  22. on July 24, 2013 at 4:18 pm Carlos Danger

    I laughed pretty hard when I read that Tim Wise’s 12 year old daughter thought he was an idiot over his stance on white privilege and the Zimmerman trial.


  23. Bruce Charlton, in his book Thought Prison, says that fascism is the non-religious alternative to leftism.


  24. The best thing about “left-oids”, is it remains almost completely undefined in the ravings here, making for interesting diatribes about nothing in particular, just sort of showing the vicious character of the authors.


    • on July 24, 2013 at 5:37 pm Modern Primitive

      Shame it was defined pretty early in this very piece.

      “progressive aka leftoid (a term of art CH coined to fully capture the anti-human, hivemind quality of progressive psychology) “


      • Circular weaseling recognized. “Progressive” is another abstract term. Now if you mention objective reality, like a bill banning handgun ownership in a certain city, that’s something that can be debated. The rest is just raving.
        The Subway Masturbator has spoken.


      • on July 25, 2013 at 4:55 pm Modern Primitive

        You sound like a wanker.


    • on July 24, 2013 at 6:21 pm Alec Leamas

      It’s quite easy, really. Imagine a healthy, patriotic, white heterosexual male. He’s attracted to the equally healthy girl next door, doesn’t have any irrational fears, is confident, honest, forthright, and looks a man in the eye when he shakes his hand – firmly. Imagine the sort of right-thinking opinions he has about the matters of the day, based upon his own observations, received wisdom from elders and some canonical books (in the Western sense) that he’s read.

      Now, imagine the complete polar opposite of those opinions. An asshole who holds them is likely a leftoid.


    • Vicious? Really?


  25. I knew a guy like this.

    Classic Beastie Boys wannabe. Lived in a good SWPL suburb. All he wanted to do was hate other white people and roll with tha homies.

    Got into an LTR with an unattractive Black girl, lived with her, married her, moved to Brooklyn.

    And one day you hear the jet-engine-powered hamster fire up as he gets jacked on the way to the subway, by who?

    Three Black teenagers!

    And finds out all his ghetto Malibu’s Most Wanted street-cred buys him precisely nothing.

    Rationalize that! Spin hamster, spin.


  26. This could explain why Leftoids conscientiously erace news in the mainstream media and on their own blogs, including deleting any race-realist comments, but are relatively tolerant of the existence of race-realist Rightie blogs.

    By this logic, Libs are vigilant about not exposing themselves or others like them to heresy, but they don’t really care if we talk hate-facts among ourselves. Maybe they trust racists with the truth, but they don’t trust themselves with it.


  27. on July 24, 2013 at 5:15 pm AlphaHelixBetaSheet

    You’re wrong if you think leftists have no sense that something can be immoral in and of itself – the vision of people suffering needlessly when there are abundant resources nearby to help them is something that leftists find morally repugnant, in a visceral way not subject to rational analysis.

    I used to think this way myself. (Actually I still do, though as I’ve drifted rightwards it’s no longer so central to my concept of right and wrong.)


    • on July 24, 2013 at 6:40 pm Alec Leamas

      I beg to differ. They’re more upset that someone has abundant resources than that others are suffering from the lack of resources. They viscerally enjoy the taking of the resources from some than the delivery of them to those purportedly in need of them. That’s sort of why they’re not too interested in policing whether a recipient of government largesse is truly needy – ameliorating the unfortunate condition is entirely collateral to the morality play of robbing from the (wrong sort of) rich.

      When the snopes thing about the steak and live lobsters bought with EBT cards was making its rounds, I recall that the reaction from many lefty sites was “so, even the poor deserve some luxuries.” No one really believes that people who can’t feed themselves should be buying steak and live lobsters rather than nutritious staples that can be stretched unless the purpose of the system in your mind is to punish the people who had to part with the money in the first place – especially since many of those working suckers probably never get to have a surf and turf meal like that unless they’re on a once in a lifetime vacation.

      Think about the welfare to work push in the 1990s – the left opposed the very idea and has since set about to carve all of the teeth out of welfare reform. Who would object to the idea except for someone who gets off on the idea of people laying about their whole lives supported by the mind-numbing, back-breaking labor of others?


  28. This is really stupid. No, swpl’s will not be doing forced sterilization. Ur stupid. They are just cultural Marxists. U don’t get them. Of course swpl’s are racist, but they profoundly respect black anger and its uses. They don’t give a shit about practical policy because they hate western civ more and blacks make useful allies in their internecine Götterdämmerung.


  29. I’ll see your sterilization prediction and raise to an outright, Hitler-like attack on the leftoid’s favorite (for the moment) pets: namely, the blacks. The worm will turn with the ascension of the hispanics to “most favored” status, primarily because they are a bigger voting block than the blacks. The blacks will then be blamed for everything by their former benefactors and cast into outer darkness (no pun).


    • on July 25, 2013 at 12:32 pm OralCummings

      No because no one except the Jews themselves has such a burning hatred for whites as blacketty-blacks. No one is more irrational and Coo Coo for Coco Puffs than the ghetto dwellers. Jews recognize in the black a certain kinship–they are so similar. Jews would never want the latent hatred that coons have for them—think Steppin Fetchit.The “coon” desexualizes the black male and makes hima joke,his muscles and aggresive sexuality worthless to attain white women– to blossom,they want it aimed at YT and YT only. The Jews made a fortune on slavery,which cost the white man dearly. Yet the Jews flog YT for not being nice to Negroes. Jews practice negro-removal in NYC, & stop & frisk,to protect themselves, and the big HNIC’s dont care as hey are doing what theyre told,going after George & yelling “Crucify him”!!


  30. I think there are 2 things that one has to separate. The drivers of the liberal agenda are thrilled at the prospect of seriously fucking society up with their evil legislation. Its the equivalent of 2 teenagers losing their virginity prom night. The lemmings that mindlessly drool out the drivers propaganda can be gotten to occasionally when talking about the end results of their drivel. So when they go around saying why are republicans trying to get between women and a doctor, the best response is to laugh then call them racists.


  31. Since the Left controls everything, it’s no great prediction that something will come from them, if it happens.


  32. on July 24, 2013 at 6:42 pm Dan Fletcher

    What’s the difference between an openly racist person and a bonafide anti-racist leftoid?

    About 4 beers.

    Grew up around SWPLs and most of the company I keep are SWPLs. Rare to meet one who doesn’t profess racist beliefs when given a safe environment to do so in.

    The tension of their internal conflict between anti-racism and obvious racial reality ends up projected onto the wrong sort of whites.


  33. on July 24, 2013 at 6:56 pm frozenpie77

    Picked up a decent book recently that I think applies to some of this. “The Camp of the Saints” is about a huge convoy of ships that arrive at the south of France from the 3rd world, teeming with millions of 3rd-worlders on board who are seeking “refuge” in France, and ultimately the West.

    Most of the French flee northward, other bleeding heart liberals stay behind to welcome the horde. And still some stay behind to fight.

    Of course, even those on the left realize in their last moments that they were wrong, and they’ve doomed their land, but the story raises one very good question.

    Does the West, and the white race actually even have the will to survive? If it came down to an us vs. them situation, would any of us be able to pull the trigger on the leftist or the 3rd-worlder at the other end of the barrel of the gun?

    Pick up the book. I haven’t read anything else more telling of the times we live in.


    • Read it when it was first published… if that book tickled your fancy, see if you can dig up a copy of Wilmot Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority.


  34. on July 24, 2013 at 7:02 pm frozenpie77

    Another great example of irony:

    I’m new to college in Atlanta. One of my classes is literally almost all black, except for three of us white kids. Day one, there’s this pretty blonde girl in my class who ended up sitting at the other end of the room. She catches me after class, and open with, “Hey look, I’m another white person.”

    She laughs and then gets serious, saying, “Oh my gosh… I’m so glad I wasn’t the only white person in there. I was getting really scared for a minute.”

    Come the end of this summer semester, she and I are talking some more, and I tell her I’m proud of my heritage and stuff, then she goes on this, “Hey that’s wrong. I’m German, and so are you. We should feel sick that our people tried to wipe a whole race off the planet. We have nothing to be proud of. In fact, I’m dating a Jewish boy now. I love Jewish people.”

    I responded with the fact that the tribe led the Russian Revolution that killed some 20-40 million Russians, and she shut up pretty promptly.


    • Don’t read her Budz until after the lay.


    • Yeah you shouldnt have said all that. The opening line was good but keeping it light-hearted until after the lay would have been better. And only slowly revealing what you believe at the right moments (calibrate for this) would have ensured a better relationship b/w you two.


      • on July 25, 2013 at 3:33 pm frozenpie77

        Nah, I wasn’t too concerned with the lay on this one. This whole story occurred over the 7-week semester. Just using this as a solid example of the irony of the left.


  35. Yo yo, wheres da GBFM at?! lzzozozozolozozozlozololz!

    The only way in which we can reasonably say that “All Men Are Created Equal” is that we are all responsible moral agents created in the image and likeness of God. God is no respecter of persons: whether you’re a king or a little street sweeper, sooner or later you dance with the Reaper. Not all Godless heathens are leftoids but leftoids are by and large a bunch of Godless heathens. Therefore they cannot abide the notion that the poor will always be with us or that the only equality we will enjoy is being held to God’s exacting standards. That’s why the wise man builds his house ON A ROCK and fills it with the Great Books For Men and learns the wisdom and teachings of HOMER, MOSES and JESUS.

    I hopez u don’t mind me stealing your catchphrases and sales pitches GBFM lzozozolozozlol


  36. […] Leftoids Fear Themselves More Than They Fear Redneck Bogeymen […]


  37. Hey Heartiste readers, want to know how to spot a wimpy, self-loathing white man (and on the flip side find out if you harbor similar qualities)?

    Take the quiz and find out!



  38. Want to learn how to spot a wimpy white, or see if you yourself harbor similar qualities?

    Take the quiz and find out!



  39. “A prediction: The first large-scale, mandatory “sterilization for welfare” program will be proposed, framed skillfully in the garb of slippery sophistry and blame redirection, by a SWPL leftoid, and advocated by a SWPL leftoid message machine. You read it here.”

    And on that day, I will vote for that leftoid.


  40. CH, hate to confuse you with facts, but you’re about 100 years late on your (incorrect) prediction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization


  41. on July 25, 2013 at 3:40 am Master Beta

    aaahhh Utilitarianism…….

    Gang Rape!!!


  42. Mostly what drives a Progressive is their simple addiction to letting everyone know what a good person they are. They cant come out and say it directly because that would defeat the purpose, so instead they adopt a hyper politically-correct persona. Its more about projecting the desired image of themselves than any particular issue. They see themselves as heroes and need us to see them that way as well.


    • That’s true of some of the Left, but not necessarily Progressives. What drives Progressives is a certain intellectual dissatisfaction with the way the world is and a vision of a better one (Utopianism).


  43. I have seen people who desperately want something good to happen fuck it up even before getting out of the gate. It’s illogical, but I now understand why it happens.

    These people will ultimately make any sacrifice to protect their ego, including fucking themselves over financially or socially- so long as they are not at fault or given the blame.

    Social standing uber alles.


  44. I’ve seen comments from liberals at HuffPost saying poor people shouldn’t be having children.


  45. I had a professor at the University of Alabama, she was a black woman. She had lived in Chicago for several years and came back to Alabama. She said that northern liberals loved the Negro race—this was at a time when the word Negro was OK to use—but they did not like any Negros, or even know any. Southerners on the other hand, she said, claimed not to like Negroes, but loved all the ones they knew. Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima were stand-ins for real people that southern whites knew and loved. This is still true today. The most racist people I have ever met are liberal whites and blacks who have had to associate with them.


  46. I have been wondering about why Whites are racists,
    and no other race is…

    Proud to be White
    Michael Richards makes his point…

    Michael Richards better known as Kramer
    from TVs’ Seinfeld does make a good point.
    This was his defense speech in court
    after making racial comments in his comedy act.
    In it he raised a few interesting points…

    Someone finally said it.
    But how many are actually paying attention to this?

    There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans,
    Arab Americans, etc.
    And then there are just Americans…
    You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.

    You call me ‘White boy’, ‘Cracker’, ‘Honkey’, ‘Whitey’, ‘Caveman’…
    And that’s OK…
    But when I call you Nigger, Kike,
    Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink…
    You call me a racist.

    You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you…
    So why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live in?

    You have the United Negro College Fund.
    You have Martin Luther King Day.
    You have Black History Month.
    You have Cesar Chavez Day.
    You have Yom Hashoah.
    You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi.
    You have the NAACP.
    You have BET…

    Imagine if we had WET
    (White Entertainment Television)…
    we’d be racists.

    If we had a White Pride Day,
    you would call us racists.

    If we had White History Month,
    we’d be racists.

    If we had any organization for whites only to ‘advance’ OUR lives,
    we’d be racists.

    We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce,
    and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
    Wonder who pays for that???

    A white woman could not be in the
    Miss Black American pageant,
    but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

    If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships…
    You know we’d be racists.

    There are over 60 openly proclaimed
    Black Colleges in the US …
    Yet if there were ‘White colleges’,
    that would be a racist college.

    In the Million Men March,
    you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.
    If we marched for our race and rights,
    you would call us racists.

    You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange,
    and you’re not afraid to announce it.
    But when we announce our white pride,
    you call us racists.

    You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us.
    when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

    I am proud…
    But you call me a racist.

    Why is it that only whites can be racists???

    There is nothing improper
    about this e-mail…
    But let’s see which of you are proud enough to send it on.
    I sadly don’t think many will.

    That’s why
    we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS
    in this country.
    We won’t stand up for ourselves!


    It’s not a crime YET…
    But getting very close!


  47. Left or Right is beside the point; the cryptofascist pseudocapitalist cleptocracy under the influence of the ZIonists and is reigning supreme.


  48. The strawmen in this article and the comments is staggering.

    Independent thinkers. Right…


  49. […] got me to seriously consider a recent post by Heartiste (emphasis in […]


  50. Also partly based on this post, I made a new post:

    The Atheist Narrative | JayMan’s Blog


  51. […] then, tonight, over at heartiste, Woodrow Wilson came up, and somebody (wait, is that GBFM(TM)s sparring parter,  the DJ A King Matt King?) linked to a […]


  52. Why shouldn’t we unthaw Hitler and elect him president?

    I think the leftists could be an asset to us.


  53. “A prediction….”

    Yeah, you could be on to something there.

    REPORT: CA prison doctors sterilized 150 women to cut welfare costs…
    Posted by Matt Drudge on: Monday, July 08, 2013 – 18:45


  54. Many commenters hit on it above. Human nature hasn’t changed in the last 100,000 years. Religions and ideologies have come and gone, but there are always enablers and enforcers of whatever is the popular thinking.

    Back in the day I spent time on the interwebz arguing with liberals (I might as well have poured expensive perfume to sweeten the city sewer system.) Their thinking is incredibly shallow and impervious to reason. They claim moral authority over not only their own lives, but everyone else’s as well. Yet not a single one of them could coherently explain the source of their authority over others.

    We can see what humans are like from history in spite of their inability to articulate their justifications. They are Germans who sent people to the gas chambers. They are the people who sent American Japanese to the concentration camps. They are the people who burned witches at the stake. They are the people who informed on their Soviet neighbors.

    It goes on and on. Of course they’d day today they don’t agree with those old crimes. And there is no reason to doubt them. But had they lived in that day, they would be right there manning the pitchforks.

    You can’t expect consistent moral behavior out of someone who can’t coherently define the basis of their own moral authority. They will instead be swept up in their own emotions and the appeal of the day.

    They will tear down the Constitutional protections like an angry storm uprooting trees. Their goal is the emotion of the moment. They will eventually justify anything if they think it furthers whatever their priority of the day is.

    Limits of behavior come from our sense of moral authority. If it isn’t rational, behavior won’t be either.


  55. on July 30, 2013 at 12:23 pm Laughing Shadow

    Progressivism already has a long history of advocating eugenics. Google those words and see. It was overt in the first half of the 20th century until Nazism gave it a bad name. FDR and Earl Warren were the two responsible for the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII, not any conservative. Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger all advocated limiting the reproduction of minorities. Conservatives like GK Chesterton felt compelled to write against eugenics in response (called: “Against Eugenics”)


  56. […] fear themselves more than they fear conservatives. Related: Why to leftoids hate hatefacts? Related: Victor Hanson […]


  57. […] seems like another case of leftists fearing themselves more than […]


  58. “The poor are the poor, and one’s sorry for them – but there it is.”
    -Henry Wilcox in “Howards End” by E.M. Forster.