Comment Of The Week

Jodark makes a very good suggestion for men thinking about marrying older careerist broads.

If I were considering wifing a middle-aged career woman, I would insist upon a dowry sizable enough to put a 50% down payment on a bitchin’ sports car (probably a new Nissan GTR).
I would consider it compensation for her wasting her young sex and beauty on fucking shitbag artists and musicians.

As the cryptically great GBFM might say: lzolzozlzol why would i pay for curdled milk when other men got her younger, hotter, tighter for free lzzol?

Good question. And one that women in general, and feminists especially, don’t want you asking yourself.

I predict Peak Wall Victim Marriage coming this decade. At some point, enough well-off men will tire of neglecting their primal urges to fuck and love young, nubile babes and will begin to abandon the SWPL-acceptable life path of marrying older, overeducated libarts careerist broads “for the children” or to avoid divorce theft alimony payments. This abandonment will take the form of either a lower total marriage rate (which is already in evidence), or of an increased younger mistress rate. As Jodark presciently revealed, dowries may very well make an appearance on the American marriage market scene. Do you think feminists will be happy about dowries?

But feminists and their puppet masters have meddled with the forces of nature, and now the hellhounds of chaos are let loose.





Comments


  1. Most fun i had was watching the universal condemnation by the women in the office of a manager who brought in a nice 20-ish Filipina girl rather then select a fat pasty entitled b*tch of his own country and age (50-ish). But for all the guys you could see the gears clicking, although only a few dared to say it out loud.

    Like


  2. on July 4, 2012 at 11:31 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    zlzlzooozzlzolzolz

    younger hotter tighter twenty poundz zlzoighter zlzozlzollzozzo

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 11:31 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      i can show you the way, neo, but you will have to walk it zlozlzlzozzlozlzlzo

      ozlzlz the more you read me the mroe your life will improve as you come to see the fiat butthex matrix for what it is — you will see the green streams of fiat data (dripping with buttdouche fresh off the butthex presses) like the matrix but with a subltle difference as some of you wieinsteinas have already seen for urself lzozzll

      at the ned of the matrix neo saw it as

      1010101011110100101
      1101001010100101010
      1101010101011101001
      0101010000010101111
      0100101111111101010
      1101010101001001001
      1101001010101001010
      1101001010100001010
      0100101010010101010

      and when you have walked the path you too will see the butthexing matrix for what it is and how the fed funded the desouling of womenz with massive amounts of douchcock frrom an early age in all tehir orfices and are acting through the soulles temptresses to seize your assetts now when a girl says, “what i really really want is a nice guy, i’m tired of the asswholes (lozlzl who got her younger hotter tighter)” instead of hearing what she says and then trying to be a nice guy you will hear the truth behind the butthexing matrix’s facade lzozlzl:

      10101010010110101010101010
      10101010101010101010010110
      101010z01010z0101l01zzlzozll1
      1o1o1o1o1ozozozo1o1o101011
      1o1o1o1oozozzozozozozo01011
      lozlzlzozlzozlozzlzozlzozlzozzoz1
      1010i1o1o1want1010a01010001
      douchebag10to butthex me0101
      010and i want you 2 buy me100
      01meals and a ring while i01011
      0101give by butt & vagina01010
      010away for free to butthexers1
      100who tape it scretely lzozl100
      zlzozllzlzlzozlzozzloozzllz and101
      1010make my anus sore for010
      1010days010101 101010101011
      1010lolsolsoslslollzzlozlzzozlz010
      0101pay 4 my meals0101001010
      101010and1010maybe1010u1010
      1001can1010touch1010my10dry
      101001dried1010up110pussy100
      101stds stds stds0101010101010
      10101buy me 1010a ring1010101
      1010for100the1010pussy1010i100
      0101gave1010away1010for0101
      1010free1010when1010it0was10
      100younger1010hotter0110lozlz
      lolzlztighter1010and010propose01
      1010so1001i1010can0110rape10
      1010your101010anus1010in0101
      1010divorce01010court1010and01
      10transfer010your0101assets1001
      1010to1010bernanke1001and1010
      1010the1010fiat1010buttheex1010
      1001matrix01010lozlzlzlzlzlzzozllzzl
      omglzozlzlzllzlzlzzzlzllzlzlzlzlzlzllzlzllz

      10lzozllzlz0zzllllzllzllzlzz1ozozlzlzl0
      010111010101010101101010101

      the sublime act of butthex is a beuatiful metaphor for what the fed does to a currency and a country, which is why the neocon weekly standard celebrates butthexers–es[pecially those who taope it without the girkl’s conthent and profit off the act. lzozlzlzlzl!

      [on the war that devastated the Real World]
      Morpheus: We don’t know who butthexed first, us or them. But we do know it was them that videotaped it without our consent while scorching the sky wioth a long trail of butthex lies. At the time, they were dependent on butthex power. It was believed they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the common man’s collective anushole. lozzllzlzlzzl

      Trinity: I know why you’re here, Neo. I know what you’ve been doing… why you hardly sleep, why you live alone, and why night after night, you sit by your computer reading GBFM. You’re looking for him. I know because I was once looking for the same thing. And when he found me, he told me I wasn’t really looking for him. I was looking for an answer. It’s the question that drives us, Neo. It’s the question that brought you here. You know the question, just as I did.
      Neo: What is the butthex fiat Mathrix?
      Trinity: The answer is out there, Neo, and it’s looking for you, and it will find you if you want it to.

      [Neocon sees a black cat walk by them, and then a similar black cat walk by them just like the first one]
      Neocon: Whoa. Déjà vu.
      [Everyone freezes right in their tracks]
      Trinity: What did you just say?
      Neocon: Nothing. Just had a little déjà vu.
      Trinity: What did you see?
      Cypher: What happened?
      Neocon: A black cat went past us, and then another that looked just like it.
      Trinity: How much like it? Was it the same cat?
      Neocon: It might have been. I’m not sure.
      Morpheus: Switch! Apoc!
      Neocon: What is it?
      Trinity: A déjà vu is usually a glitch in the butthexMatrix. It happens when they change something. Now that I am an aging women in the butthex matrix with her eggs and gina drying up having given the best years of her anus to drunk alphas during her college desouling years via massively multiplayer asscockig in the butt sessions and getting her fiat mba (masters of butthexing in da Anus) and blowing upper level mangement lzozllz, the butthexmatrix is now delivering my cats. Two this morning and now two more. yaya! lozlzl

      lozlzlzlzlzl

      Morpheus: The Fiat lozllolozllzzl butthex Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. lzozozozozl! But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, bloggers, teachers, betas, lawyers, herbs, carpenters, and neocon womenz writing for the weekly standard, repeating the fiat lies of secretive tapers of butthex without teh girls conthent lzozlzlzlzl. The very minds and anusholes of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that butthex system and that makes them our anus’s lozlzlzozzozozl enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unbuttplugged. And many of them are so inured to butthex, so hopelessly dependent on the system of secretive tapings of butthex without tehir conthent, that they will fight to protect it and reapet the lies of secretive tapers of butthex in teh pages of the weekly standard even though they seem to be nice neocon ladies.
      [Neo’s eyes suddenly wander towards a woman in a red dress]
      Morpheus: Were you listening to me, Neo? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress (woman as temptress in the heor’s journey myth) who was desouled via copious fiat-funded butthex from butthexers celerbated in teh pages of the weekly standard?
      Neo: I was…
      Morpheus: [gestures with one hand] Look again.
      [the desouled, massively-butthexed woman in the red dress is now a bestselling new york times author, pointing a cock at Neo’s ass; Neo ducks]
      Morpheus: Freeze it.
      [Everybody and everything besides Neo and Morpheus freezes in time]
      Neo: This… this isn’t the butthex Matrix?
      Morpheus: No. It is another training program designed to teach you one thing: if you are not one of us lozlzlzlzlers, you are one of them butthexers.

      lozlzlzl

      i wanna start lzozlzlzl media where we have a character based on who sees green streams of streaming data every time a bernankified chick opens her moutrh and throughout every episode all the herbs and betas pay for the meals of the chix butthexes in the end due to his supreme knowelge of being THE ONE lzozlzlzllzzl

      i would be more like one of those minor characters along for the ride in the mother ship stanidng off to the side going lzozlzz zlzozlzozlzozlz zlzozllzozlzlzlz and don’t gte me worng i would score with all the hotties but like woudl get first pick for his lead dick and i’d get the next two as that’s only fair lzozlzlzlzllzlzllzl

      Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 12:52 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozlzlzol !!! herarstsitezz!!!!

      i came up with a scienetigfcici forurlmalalsa forumlaa!!

      the gap in the age between the man and the gilr he wants to marrie = the size of the gap of the buttholez of all da benernankified women in his genertaion

      zlozozozozlzo

      Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 3:12 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozo

      when u do endz up getting mariried to a berankified mba, lzozozo dis is what you should drink out of every morning as u make da breakfast for your bernakified, asscocked wife and ritalin addicted kidz :

      http://www.cafepress.com/greatbooksformen.584117744

      Like


  3. on July 4, 2012 at 11:42 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    What it comes down to is that women are terrible long-term planners and thus terrible investors.

    A woman’s greatest asset–capable of gaining her lifelong love and security–is her ass.

    Now a woman’s ass is a depreciating asset, which loses value over time as it grows and gets striped with cum. And so the wise women invest it before 25 in 2-3 carefully-chosen long-term good guys. The foolish women–the vast majority–invest their assets in douchecockas, giving their butthole to druggies, douches, and pump’n’dumpers like da GBFM lzozolzlzzolzol.

    For women do not operate in the realm of abstract, exalted ideals, but rather they operate in the realm of gina tingles and butt tingles. The ancients realized this in their Great Books and Classics which exalt Zeus, Moses, Jesus, and Thor over a woman’s butt tingles.

    A woman’s greatest asset is her youth. With it, she can gain her way into an exalted mythology of wife and grandmother. But too, too many women waste it on pursuing the imediate gratifiction for their butt tingles and gina tingleszlzozlzolzozlzozo.

    Then, they hit 30, and their tinglez tingl gina tinglalzizyzzizlz and butt tinglelzlzlelele aren’t so great anymore. But by the time she hits 30, her greatets asset is gone.

    Today’s Bernanke elders smile upon this, as the depopulation of the responsible class is achieved. Ben Berannke rubs his hands and smiles, creates a few more debt-based dollars which men must some day pay off, and funds more feminist studies with it.

    I wrote a poem for all the poor, deosuled, asscoked women with cats. I will share it soon.

    Like


    • Then, they hit 30, and their tinglez tingl gina tinglalzizyzzizlz and butt tinglelzlzlelele aren’t so great anymore. But by the time she hits 30, her greatets asset is gone.

      I’m so glad I’m a man.

      The huge overhang of childless baby boomer career wimminz are, genetically speaking, dead weight on Western civilization’s carcass. lozlozlzolozlzolz

      Like


    • It all boils down to modern dating devolving back to the prehistoric age.

      The whole “uncertain paternity” hasn’t been in fashon since we were picking berries and running away from lions, yet now its the only thing we see on the runway.

      Beta fathers tell them to marry a prince, sorority sisters tell them to have two men. And sisters are always correct and know what’s best, right? RIGHT?

      new men to the dating game should know that women now want two men, and it’s up to their actions to determine which role they fill. Cause there’s no reason why cute girls can’t find a cuckold to cuddle with when they’re too sore for fun.

      Like


    • Who are you, and what have you done with the real GBFM?

      Like


      • I guess he’s having an off day

        Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 11:23 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlozlzolzzlzozozlozzlozzzolzzoz

        yah i am feelizizngzz much much betetztzt todayz lzozozozo!!! zlzozozo

        i am coming down form my eoeverodoes on da irtalalaiznz adderleoeoldss dey drudgdgde my grirlfieiendz up on zlzozlzo

        how da university works: feminism = debt & debauchery & divorce & Desecration machine/army lzozlzlzlzlzlgh weo

        lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzozllzlz

        univeristies are at the tip (tit lzozlzlzoz) of our debt empire

        over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls

        the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz

        and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl

        today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1

        the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz

        short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

        so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

        http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

        Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

        Saw this floating around. good question!

        MCCOY MOUNTAIN
        ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

        Ms. Priscilla Painton

        Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

        RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

        Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

        “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

        Dear Ms. Painton,

        I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

        “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

        Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

        http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

        Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

        “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

        –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

        Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

        –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

        “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

        Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

        Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

        “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

        Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

        Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

        What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

        Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

        It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

        “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

        So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

        “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

        Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

        ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

        For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

        “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

        Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

        http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

        “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

        It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

        Best,

        McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

        –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

        the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

        What’s up with women these days?

        It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

        Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

        http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

        Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

        Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

        http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        Does she get off on this?

        “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

        Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

        Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

        Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

        http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

        http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

        http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

        “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

        [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

        [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

        [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

        [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

        [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

        11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

        Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

        ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

        http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

        “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

        See? That is the clever banker ruse.

        Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

        http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

        “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
        and Government’s War on Fathers”

        “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

        The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

        –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

        Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
        –Vince Vaughn

        When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

        “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

        Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
        “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

        What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

        Amazon.com: End the Fed (9780446549196): Ron Paul: Books

        Review for End The Fed
        “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
        –Arlo Guthrie

        “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
        –Vince Vaughn

        Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

        The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

        Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

        And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

        “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

        http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

        lzozozozzzozlzbuttehetxtxt alzlzlzoz

        Like


      • The more of these I read the more I realize that tucker max is now more than just a symbol for the demise of western civilization, its a sign.

        much like rome’s burning.

        Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 4:35 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        tucker max is my FAVORIETE FEMINSIST WRITERR!!!ZZZ

        like da fmineists like it, he goes straight for teh bugngholez and tapes it secrteely zlzozl

        this allowez the fmienists to get both asscoked enjjoy it assccoing and also to legislate against good men citing da exapmple of da secrtieve taping of buttcocking which must necssessitate millions of dolalrz from da fed for new fmeeineists curricuclumz displaciaing da GRETA BOOKS FOR MEN even do d a greatest books advocaate against against buttccookingz zlzozloz seically sectrley taped onenzz lzozlzlz

        Like


      • People please, do not click on any of these links relating to tucker max.

        Stay with me here. Everytime you read an article about this guy, it incentivizes the writers to write more

        If we collectively ignore these people, and disparage/ostracize them when necessary, they’ll fall out of relevance,

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 11:38 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozzlzo

        dat is already happened

        beyond charlotte allen and da pages of da neoethocncths weekly sstdnaddth, they are irrleleelvant film failures zlzozlzo

        look at all of his “fans”

        http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/threads/

        hilariousszzsss that not one of those threads is started by any fanz zlzozzozozo

        probabaly because charlotte allen at da weekley standardth and priscilla painton at siomn and hcieters doesn’t have an imbdb accountt lzozlzo

        Like


      • on July 4, 2012 at 11:00 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzozozzolz

        by misstaekekek i tooook my own ritalain prssisicptionz and my two grirlfirendzz rritalinzzz

        so i could make me fofucs

        on speeleing and gramamrzz!!!

        next wwekek i am gointt to take 11008 ritalinz pillz and apply to da weeklystatstsnadardth blog! lzozlzlzozlzzol

        Like


    • Well said.

      Add Shakespeare to “Zeus, Moses, Jesus, and Thor.” In anticipation of your poem, here is one girl that got it:

      ‘Her house is sack’d, her quiet interrupted,
      Her mansion batter’d by the enemy;
      Her sacred temple spotted, spoil’d, corrupted,
      Grossly engirt with daring infamy:
      Then let it not be call’d impiety,
      If in this blemish’d fort I make some hole
      Through which I may convey this troubled soul.

      The Rape of Lucrece

      The account of her noble suicide is the best in all of literature. “Even here she sheathed in her harmless breast / A harmful knife, that thence her soul unsheathed: / That blow did that it from the deep unrest / Of that polluted prison where it breathed …”

      Matt

      Like


  4. on July 4, 2012 at 11:42 am adore teh goddessss

    “Do you think feminists will be happy about dowries?”

    Feminists wouldn’t be happy if they had anything to be happy about. They love unhappiness and victimhood, and they’re great at both…leave them to it

    Like


  5. on July 4, 2012 at 11:45 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozoz

    lzozlzzozozo

    Like


  6. Right now there is a smoking hot, 17 year old latina that is begging me to marry her in 2-3 years. She stays fit, rarely tries to start shit with me, and when we are together we fuck like bunnies(it’s legal here). Her “career” plans are to marry and raise children. When I see these 20-some year old NY sluts around me going from cock to cock it sickens me. Granted this hot little piece of ass I got may be up and gone at any second, the comparison of marrying her vs marrying these fem cunts is a no-brainer.

    Like


    • Be sure to get a prenup that pretty much mimics living together in the event of a divorce. Or that should be the starting point. No alimony period. As for property division, I might give her half the equity in the primary house, but no share in your retirement funds etc.

      Otherwise she’s an alimony risk (depending on the state) if the marriage lasts a while.

      Like


    • It’s doable but you’re all alone, hoss. Managing the hypergamy of a piece of trim like that will be like driving a herd of steer across the country and back again — by yourself. Are you cowboy enough? Or are you like most of the braggarts in these here parts, all hat and no cattle?

      Matt

      Like


  7. Nothing establishes ones higher value than demanding that she pay you a dowry for the privilege of marrying you.

    Personally, I think it would be hilarious watching the face of these vain entitled western women when a man demands a dowry from her and thus pulls the pedestal out from under her that she has lived on her whole life.

    Like


  8. You do realize that when the woman is the higher earner, there either is no alimony or the man is paid alimony, right? And that when you divorce, you could end up with considerably more than you started out with?

    Like


    • Depending on the jurisdiction…

      The bigger problem is that most people are wilfully ignorant of the real incentives involved in relationships. They’d rather sit around feeling lonely than confront the reasons why, and even when they do, they can’t necessarily do anything about it.

      Single, middle aged career women who can’t keep a boyfriend are the relationship equivalent of fat people with a Doritos addiction.

      Like


    • 3% of alimonies is awarded to ex-husbands. Nice try, Feminazi.

      Like


    • What Jack said CommenterX.

      Men got just 3% of the alimony that was paid it 2007. Family courts are enormously biased against men and in favor of women.

      Like


    • Alimony should be abolished in all states, as it largely has in many.

      California is horrific however. After just 10 years of marriage men owe alimony for life.

      Like


  9. on July 4, 2012 at 12:27 pm Rick Derris

    Just make sure that the dowry is in gold or physical assets like classic cars – don’t accept it in Bernank-ified “helicopter dollars!”

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 12:50 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      zlozozozzo

      yah womenz are wiredz entietleedment bernanke dolalrz zllzlzlzlzo hadn delivered from beernekeae helicocopterz zzozollzoz

      when a womena’s foremost goal is serving da bottom fiat butthext line

      den she won’t make a gooz winfe no no no nolzozozlzlzzozo

      when you’re on a date know taht the girl is working for the federal reserve & during destert that is ben bernanke or tucker max she is texting… or maybe me lzozllzllzlz

      last chcik i hooked up with shared this rap with me:

      i gots my fiat cash from ben bernake,
      gettin’ my dinner from the herb beta,
      texting GBFM for a midnight spank me,
      i don’t butthex, but i’m no playa hata

      lzozllzllzlzlzl

      when you’re on a date know taht the girl is working for the federal reserve as she is trying 2 get you to pay for gaining access to the pussy she gave away for free lots in college when she was younger hotter tighter during all the mandatory pre-cats-spinsterhood prima noctae deosuling sessions, in teh same way the fed gets you to bail out the banks who just gambled your pensions savings away when they were younger hooter tighter… or somethihnng… you get my drift .. unless you are a betadipshit lzozlzlzl

      lozlzllzlzllz

      from an early age womenz are deosuled by over sexulization of briteny spears mileyly cyrus bratz dolls lozlzlzlzlzlzlz as ocmmanded by the fed which must desoul women to make them less loyal t2 god husband family lzozlzl and more loyal 2 the fed lzozllzl and the almighty fiat dollar (which is basless debt zlzozlzlzlz). a fiat system inverts all of entirety exalting secretive tapoers of butthex to the pinnacles of publsihing, while deconstructing teh great books anbd classics lzozllzlzlzl

      so when you are out with a womenz buying her dinner chances are

      0) she is working for the fed lzozlzl what do you think law shcool business school trains womenz 2 do? to serve teh almighty fiat dollar above all else lzozllzzl and use buzzwords and short skirts to convert fiat debt into physical welath and property as teh fiat debt trickles on down and the phsyical wleath ghushes on up lzozlzlllzlzl ever wonder why goldman sax rhymes with tucker max & gets richer and richer as poeple get poorer and poorer and teh national debt grows and grows? someone must be spenidng the money that is augmenting the debt for everyone else lzozllzz and that would be goldman sachs and the warfare and welfare states it funds, alongside fmeinism, which denies a women her greater chance for glorya nd story and uses her temptress wiles to help the fiat masters convert fiat debt into property lzozlzlzl. poor ladies they end up butter and alone and soulless with cats as teh fed goes lzozlzlzlzlllzllzlzlzlzl women’s right to choose!!
      1) someone had her hotter younger tighter for free and you are now buying her dinner
      2) she was deosuled in secrteive tpaings of assoccking sessions taped without her conthent which the neocns are fond of lzozlzll
      3) when she texts during dinner she is setting up plans for a midnight assocking sessiomn with an alpha who creates welath from thin air someone like the head of the fed who wires it to goldman sax which rhymes witgh tucker max lozlzllzlzl who gets book deals from women-riun publishing houses like simon ans shcuster lzolzlzl because tehy dleight in his debt-creating debuachery-creating art succeth of losing ten million on a twelve million film as well as his asscocking sessions and secretiev tapings of butthex iwthout their girlsths contehnt which he publishes for both neocon pleaseure and profit lzozlzllz
      4) if you do get married 2 her there is a fifty percent chance it will end in divroce. lolzlzl would you get on airplane if it crashed 50% of the time? lzozlzllzlzlo hell no!! and what if, after it crashed bevcause your wife was fucking some biker drummer mba in teh cockpit (as he put his cock in her cock pit lzozlzl), what if after she cuased it to crash, you had to give her half your assets and begin paying for past use of her pussy? lzozllzllzlzl plus by going down once the plane will have gone down more times than your wife once she is married–dats a joke! lzozlzllzllz
      5) 2/3 to 3/4 of womenz initiate divorce as it transfers a mans assett s to teh fed/divorce regime as womenz are trianed to do in school with promises of her ex husband having to pay alimonies for past use of a pussy and fund and reward her further asscocking sessions tthat hshe hand’t had since college but whcih she missed dearly lzozlzlzloz (once back never back! lzozlzl or once in the back door, nver back! or you make your own joke here lzozllzlzzl i hate puns) she will get full rights 2 the kids and take them with her for her array of step boyfirends/fathers 2 abuse as abuse skyrockets in fmailies where the real dad is absent lzozlzlzlzlzllz, which is why the fiat neooncs detest fatherhood and the heoric spriit zlozllzlzl and love womenz who “tame men” lzozlzlzl and keep them from accessing tehir Natural Rights lzozlzl
      6) rising womenz generlaly make more than men these days as they are paid in fiat dollars which really only create debt and so it is that womenz excel at creating debt and they call this wokr lzolzllzlzlzl so let them buy some fiat dinners and drinks with their fiat dollarz lzozlzll

      seriously do u guys still date?

      i mean i love the laides but they look down on guys who ask them out. lzozllzlzlzlzl

      last chcik i hooked up with shared this rap with me:

      i gots my fiat cash from ben bernake,
      gettin’ my dinner from the herb beta,
      texting GBFM for a midnight spank me,
      i don’t butthex, but i’m no playa hata

      lzozllzllzlzlzl

      Like


  10. “If I were considering wifing a middle-aged career woman, I would insist upon a dowry sizable enough to put a 50% down payment on a bitchin’ sports car (probably a new Nissan GTR).”

    A mere $50,000?

    Surely you have no idea how much alimony and 18-21 years of child support, per child, costs. Not to mention not being able to fuck hotties.

    Like


  11. [When I first posted this comment, it simply vanished.
    So excuse me if my 2nd attempt results in a repeat posting.]

    Jordak’s comment (“I would consider it compensation for her wasting her young sex and beauty on fucking shitbag artists and musicians.”) appears to reveal that he seethes with hostility toward all creative men who have not yet achieved huge career success (leaving one to wonder if he would prefer a world without any of the output of musicians, writers, actors, etc.).
    Or maybe he just hates the “shitbag” individuals among that category of men.
    But it’s interesting how his comment creates a first impression of a man who is bitter because he chose to conform to the majority and live a very conventional, safe, comfortable life, a life which slowly kills his spirit (so he’s hating any man who did not make the same choice).

    My point is, if this impression is accurate, it’s an example of a person being angry at the wrong target, which is a self-defeating choice.
    Self-defeating choices are among the most insidious enemies to one’s happiness.
    It can be hard to spot them, but if you can see them and avoid them (or stop doing them), it can make such a huge difference in the happiness of your whole life.
    That’s why the subject has intrigued me for years.

    Like


    • I am an STEM focused man. I have nothing against artists and musicians, specfically. I could have added thugs and douchebags to the list as well. I just didn’t.
      Creative men like the kind I referenced are among the least useful to society, especially in their early 20s. Most male artists and musicians I’ve met of those ages are as moody and bitchy as women. Not to mention that it is that type of man who has created much of the propaganda responsible for bringing Feminism down upon America.

      As for bitterness, sure. Plenty of it. For everyone. I am bitter at many of my friends, family and people I’ve held as role models for selling me the lies that they did. I am bitter at the Alpha friends I have had for not throwing some insight my way. I posted above that I’ve only taken the Red Pill as of recently, so the bitterness and anger is still working its way through my system.

      Like


  12. on July 4, 2012 at 12:42 pm The Shocker

    what do you guys think should I fuck a black girl? http://i.imgur.com/n8Kc7.png

    Like


  13. This abandonment will take the form of either a lower total marriage rate (which is already in evidence), or of an increased younger mistress rate.

    Plus a third factor: a widening in the gap between the ages of men as older man/younger woman marriages become “cooler”.

    In the last few years, the only woman who ever looked askance at my dating her for being significantly older than her was also the only one I know who ended up becoming a single mom. None of the others ever brought it up.

    Like


  14. on July 4, 2012 at 12:53 pm LifeUniverse42

    @The Shocker
    Why not? she look thin enough. I did it with a few black girl and I must say they are usually pretty fun to be with and have a few less hangup than white girl.

    Like


  15. I wonder what the collapse of the older bitch dating, marrying market would look like? An article a day on how men aren’t carrying their load, playing too much video games, etc? Remember, the article on hypergamy, how men never shared the pain of alimony and divorce because it’s too personal and because of pride, maybe older unwed women will have the same unspoken reaction, and the message will only drabble out. Too bad girls these days monetize their looks decade of 18-28 (or getting pregnant by football players) instead of getting their m.r.s. degree.
    In the host’s scenario, a dowry isn’t enough, you need a permanent hall pass. Hey, it’s what the french do!

    Like


  16. What it comes down to is that women are terrible long-term planners and thus terrible investors.

    They just have different values.

    5 minutes of alpha at age 20 >>> 10 years of beta from age 30 to 40.

    Like


  17. Return of the Dowry? sounds good.
    Especially if a man is established with a house. He marries a young women with no real estate. She moves in and enjoys the pleasure of his purchase-investment.without any of the purchase costs.

    and what happens if that property goes under water? (as I’ve seen here in California) then the property becomes a liability and if she has no investment in it, and she tires of the marriage and bolts, then the poor fool is left with an underwater property he had attracted her with, that is now not worth the mortgage.

    The man should require money up front as a “buy in” to his living quarters. He can put that money into a retirement account for him alone. If the two get divorced, which is likely, he has some money squirreled away.

    I think we’re onto something here. As an older single man I am looking at what women can offer me besides the obvious.

    Like


    • If you’re attracting women with your property you’re doing it wrong.

      Just saying.

      Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 10:07 am King Tundè

      That’s what pimps did back in the day. They would require new girls to pay an upfront fee in order to offset the costs of them possibly going to another pimp which would occasionally happen. You beta white guys oughta read the urban literary classics by such greats as Donald Goines and Iceberg Slim (who were pimps in real life before becoming authors).

      I remember Heartiste having a posts about the wisdoms you could learn from old-school black pimps. Ha, here it is: http://bit.ly/N0Fmc5

      Like


  18. on July 4, 2012 at 1:12 pm Obstinance Works

    Yes but they don’t want “those type of women.” Young hot hoes. They want a “loving wife.” Where’s my Yayo? Let me take a bump as I tell you above this dive bar I was at till 5 am.

    Like


  19. Reblogged this on M3 and commented:
    Reading dating profiles of women in their 20’s talking about their careers and having fun, then reading profiles of women in their late 30’s talking about looking for their partner in crime and wanting to settle down… this comment is SOO applicable. That and i think the NIssan GTR is a fucking sweet car.

    Like


  20. They say the 8s pair with 8s and 5s with 5s, but if you want proof that a lot of 2s and 1s don’t pair with other 2s and 1s and would rather be alone, look at the debris you find on dating sites. Set up two accounts, one female and one male, and look over the long-time denizens therein of both genders. Human bags of garbage left on the curb for nobody. They could have paired off long ago, and some do, but most don’t and would rather fap, game, read romance novels and magazines, and watch TV. Omegas exist, and a fair portion of them will be omegas all their lives no matter what they do.

    What you see little of on such sites, outside of maybe cuckoo cocoons like back in NYC or DC, are high-powered, hign-income career women. If they want mates, they find them.

    Like


  21. “If I were considering wifing a middle-aged career woman, I would insist upon a dowry sizable enough to put a 50% down payment on a bitchin’ sports car (probably a new Nissan GTR).”

    In a sense, dowries are already in effect. The marriage market right now is highly assortative within the various socioeconomic bands. Upper class men are already requiring dowries: they are largely confining themselves to marrying women with degrees and jobs and in doing so decreasing (but not eliminating) their risk of losing it all should she divorce him. Part of the reason these guys aren’t marrying low SES women is because they’d taken to the cleaners completely if she ever quit the marriage.

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 8:08 pm Lord Valtrex

      But isn’t the current stratagem, for women, to: (A) get her degree; (B) start her “career”; (C) take time off to have his kids; and then (D) divorce him claiming that:

      doing (C) caused her to sacrifice (B) so she is entitled to generous “compensation”?

      Like


  22. on July 4, 2012 at 2:54 pm Simon Corso

    Cry Freedom ! And let slip the cocks of war !

    Like


    • I wish this rallying cry were less than metaphorical. You guerrillas, philosophers, and freelancers blindly striking at targets of opportunity need to be organized.

      And, no, not by “The Spearhead.” First of all, it sounds like a fucking gay bar. Second of all, it sounds like a fucking gay bar. The end.

      The next step is not online. We need speakeasy men’s clubs where we can get drunk and compare notes face-to-face, like Tun Tavern. The virtual revolution has achieved all it can. Whenever I speak candidly with any man of any age about any of this, the gratitude is visible on their faces for having been relieved of the lies for even a brief moment. We are ready to roll. Let’s.

      Matt

      Like


      • I second the motion. All in favor?

        Like


      • It’s not a committee vote. That’s for parent-teacher networks, student council, and kaffeeklatch gaggles of women. Men take initiative. Open a men’s club like we got here, only … actual.

        The men-only requirement will create attention, but that attention dies away (just as homotrimony will die away, given that roiling all-male bathhouse clusterfucks never wanted to get “married” in the first place). Quite a few men’s clubs have survived.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_gentlemen%27s_clubs

        Women don’t want to be there, unless they and their butch haircut feel they need to “make a point.” It is not their scene. Take this site: even the most strident of feminist haters come and leak their stinky menses in a comment and then disappear. Augusta survived the New York Times treatment at full-force with some 30 or so front-page harangues about The Masters a few years back. Result? Women still can’t be a member at the country club. The storm has passed.

        Matt

        Like


      • It’d be like the Fight Club, but without fighting… well, maybe an occasional bloodied schnozz.

        Like


  23. “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?” This is old school wisdom that although forcefully “ignored” by feminism and its pawns, is just as relevant, if not more so than ever.

    Like


    • “… cow …”

      Like


    • Why buy the cow when the courts have decided that a man can’t really own a cow and if the cow leaves he must pay for all the milk he got plus he has to pay for future milk that he won’t even be given.

      Like


    • On the contrary. Feminism indirectly targets men through that exact phrase.

      Hence the transfer of assets during divorce, the screeching about paternity tests, the birth control subsidies, the “get me a drink” pedestal.

      Its pretty clear that in a heavily commitment-based culture (aka christian america) there are less cows but less free milk. theres lots of free milk and lots of cows now.

      Like


  24. leftist celebrities spend 4th of July slamming America

    http://twitchy.com/2012/07/04/shameful-left-celebrates-independence-day-by-slamming-america/

    I remember your 4th of July piece 2 years ago.

    It’s time for an update. More political “goodbye america” ranting please.

    Like


  25. 18-25 yr olds 4evah

    Like


  26. on July 4, 2012 at 4:24 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    It might also be worth blogging about the new Bravo TV reality show “Miss Advised,” about three thirtysomething women in media and their dating lives. It not only addresses a lot of issues discussed here, but confirms the worst suspicions of some of us.

    By the way, the real name of one of the stars, Julia Allison, is Julia Baugher and she caused some controversy in DC back in the day by lying about being from the Washington Post. Google her.

    Like


  27. Did the proprietor ever gave an opine on the HBO series Girls?

    Like


  28. I’m kinda surprized by this. It was until recently that I just started commenting, because I didn’t have much to contribute. Frankly, I didn’t find this place and take the Red Pill until February this year. I lost a week of my life to reading the archives and it was worth every second. Prior to that, I have a tragic love history of “LJBFs”, “I need to focus on my career”s and even several Beta-Oneitis-Letters to my shameful credit. I have a lot of recovery from all those years as a well-conditioned NiceGuy with Beta-reflexes still to be done, but I’m glad to start somewhere.

    Like


  29. I tried posting about 3 hours ago. My comment just vanished, as if I’d never attempted it. So I tried again. Same result. Three hours later I come back, hit refresh, my comment still isn’t posted, not ‘awaiting moderation’, nothing.

    So I try posting it again right now. This time I get a message that said ‘You already posted this — duplicate message’.
    “Posted”? Noooo, merely *attempted* to post. Blocked. Censored.

    So there’s some tech glitch here which stops me from posting my original comment.

    Like


    • Your message is held in limbo whether you get a notification or not. Then the host comes back from the weekend (or vacation, as is the case with the holiday) and clears/deletes them all en masse. The method destroys threads, so I make it a point to revisit old comments up to a week back.

      Like


  30. “I wrote a poem for all the poor, deosuled, asscoked women with cats. I will share it soon.”

    lololololzolzozlo

    Please do.

    Like


  31. Im a bit of a musician-loser and it never got me laid. Going to the gym, getting a passable job, and being too busy to care about women or doubt my every other word got me laid. Now nothing gets me laid. I’d tap a sagging lawyer-bitch just for company these days, which attitude is no doubt stopping me getting laid.

    Like


  32. Anyone else prefer GBFM’s older writing style? man’s still a genius though.

    Like


    • on July 4, 2012 at 6:45 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      zlzozolzozozzo

      i was under rpperusuurse form da edidtroths of da weekekly standadtdh standardth and form da edurtoz fanboyz of da spearhead to take all my ritalauznszz and write COCOFRTETCLY!!! lzozlzozozoo

      hehehrs siiss iiis what the speparhehd said:

      “Comment of the Decade.

      Mr Eric packs more wisdom into one sentence than GB4M manages in all of his inpenetrable rants combined. Steam of consciousness writing is tedious even in the hands of masters like Marquez. When lesser mortals attempt it, the result is always a pretentious bore. It nay impress your creative writing tutor, but the rest of us are lzozlzlzlzzlzo.

      Take a leaf out of Mr Eric’s book and just say what you mean and mean what you say. Stop torturing the English language and bone up on what some of our greatest western writers had to say about erudition and rhetorical discipline. They may be old, dead, white guys, but they certainly knew a thing or two about writing. Show some respect.”

      da master betas masteebeaters masterbaters at da spearhead are saying my STEAM (SIC) OF CONCOICOUSNNENSNSNS SUxx zlzolzozlzozlzolozz

      laozozlozzozlozzzlo

      the spearhehad would be far more useful if the tip of the spear wasn’t aimened at their very own butthoelozlzolzolozlozzlzozlozlozlozz

      Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 8:54 am Wrecked 'Em

      I think the Bath Salts stories in the news have scared him off the stuff for a while. 🙂

      Like


  33. I was chatting with my wife’s friend last night. She’s tall, blonde, very nice, a solid 7. Went to an elite university and works in the arts. Parents are Polish immigrants. She’s definitely a catch.

    She was telling me about a recent idiot who’d attempted the world’s most awkward boob grab–then followed it up with a massive email to her trying to explain his complicated feelings about romance.

    “Where are the men with game?” she finally blurted out. “Say what you want about players, but at least they know how to do it. And you always know where you stand with them.”

    This, my friends, is a serious case of beta-fatigue. The lesson: Tall, smart blonde girls WANT to be gamed. She was nearly begging for it.

    Like


    • I took inspiration from that okcupid thread and am now a hot girl on the internet. I don’t think I’ve gotten a single PM that even remotely resembles game. Most of them just look like regular guys, but there’s pretty much nobody straying from 3 basic “game plans:

      1) A half sentence along the lines of “hi, how are you”.

      2) Guys reading my profile then building several paragraphs commenting on key points from it. Not sure if it’s better or worse than 1. Brevity is good, but a medium size message with something interesting in it might stand out more since half the messages come from guys doing 1.

      3) Guys trying to stand out in obnoxious ways (like telling me that I probably get lots of emails from old men trying to be my sugar daddy). I haven’t gotten a single one. I dunno how a woman might respond but I’m guessing that making a wild prediction like that and being completely wrong looks try hard, pathetic and an instant DHV. Might fire a PM back on this one and see if he breaks below the relentless assault of a master troll with solid theoretical understanding of game.

      Another common pattern is men claiming they have a sense of humor without actually saying anything funny in the endless fucking paragraphs.

      Anyway, this experiment only started 2 days ago, gonna keep it going for 5 more. To me at least it looks like online competition is virtually non-existent, which would allow a man with some skill to wipe out the bank at the pussy roulette.

      I’m not planning to respond, but we’ll see if my full blown trolling instinct doesn’t end up kicking in.

      Once this is over I’m thinking of testing several male profiles and see how they do. Depends how unethical I’m feeling at the time since I’d have to actually contact women and get their hopes up over nothing. This type of experimenting might be useful to the aspie ultraintroverted crowd (though they’ll still have to actually talk to real girls sooner or later) so they are not tossed out in the gladiator pit without preparation.

      Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 4:26 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Great idea. You should start a blog detailing the results, but I assume someone, somewhere would start screaming about your alleged lack of “ethics.” This is, in fact, helpful to those of us who are introverted, and confirms things I long suspected (i.e. most people are boring but think they’re positively hilarious).

        Like


    • The “men with game” are in utero (metaphorically, of course, but literally in the case of pioneering PUAs). Small numbers of the genpop are converting, but only in the shadows, and old presumptions about men are just beginning to wither.

      What your blonde Polack desires cannot be a widespread phenomenon until certain cultural presumptions are upended by the coming sexual apocalypse. Meantime, we of the secret Pythagorean knowledge have a generation to play (and die) in the anomie before the culture wises the fuck up. The wheel turns slowly, and entire lives will pass through unfortunate circumstances before redemption becomes visible.

      Don’t be fooled by the appearance of preponderance in a forum like this. We are a sub-ghetto within a ghetto. Staying beneath the radar is the only reason we have been allowed to communicate with each other. The numbers are such that your wife’s friend is lucky to have met you. You have almost an obligation to play. If your wife does not understand this duty of yours, you have some things to teach her as well.

      While “girls WANT to be gamed,” the official culture does not want them to be. So we operate where they and the Southern Poverty Law Center have not (yet) reached.

      Matt

      Like


  34. The problem with the 18 year olds is their taste in music can be annoying, especially when they want to play it loud so all your neighbors hear it with your window open in summer and you’re distracted while making out with them.

    But is it annoying enough to switch to 22 year olds? Nope.

    Like


  35. Don’t know if this has been posted here before but it left a smile on my face. Hilarious story.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/fashion/missing-the-love-boat-the-case-for-marriage-modern-love.html?_r=1&ref=modernlove

    Like


  36. Just listened to that video that GBFM linked. So what do you have to do if you eventually want to have kids and raise them well?

    It sounded like he was saying the social climate makes doing this nearly impossible.

    Like


    • Either stop believing the progtard indoctrination program wrt religion, or move abroad. Preferably both.

      Here’s the deal, though. Raining kids well, to a large extent requires raising them with lots of siblings; as well as even more cousins and other available friends of all age groups. SWPL careerist women with 1 or 2 kids living in barren neighborhoods obsessing over child psychology books, couldn’t do that if they wanted to. Since no high status alpha child psych hack has written about that in a book for fear of alienating the hamster market.

      Like


  37. I wrote a poem for all the poor, deosuled, asscoked women with cats. I will share it soon.

    I know that poem. It’s the best American poem in the past 50 years.

    Like


  38. I predict Peak Wall Victim Marriage coming this decade.

    Have you read The Misandry Bubble?

    It talks about this decade as a timeline too, and is the essay that introduced me to Heartiste’s blog…

    Like


  39. Dating them is not a bad strategy.

    Marrying them? I’ve yet to consider the full implications of such.

    In either scenario, be sure you are in the lead. Covertly, though.

    Last [type]: Handling Disrespect: Man Up! Edition

    Like


  40. ahh yes Jordak, but these younger “artists and shitbag musicians” must have had a respectable element of Game, yes?

    Like


  41. They want us to marry them? They better bring a lot of things to the table all right:

    * dowry
    * femininity
    * soft
    * sweet
    * kind
    * loving
    * gentle
    * maternal
    * dependable

    She brings that to the table and I might – MIGHT – take her seriously. Otherwise she can go back to her cats.

    Like


  42. Recently I easy-banged a chick at the very edge of bangable age on my way through a town.

    It was the easiest lay possible, we were fucking two hours after we met, broad daylight, no alcohol, no mitigating factors.

    Two months later, I find this photo of her on Facebook: http://two.cedonulli.com/2012/06/i-bang-he-marries/

    Like


  43. Replace the ugly-ass GTR douchemobile with a ZR1 Corvette, and you have a strong thesis for The Return of the Dowry.

    Like


    • On that note, every self-respecting American man has a couple of cars they hate or find douchey. These cars are different for everyone.

      You can’t impress everyone I guess.

      Signed,
      -searching for that first car

      Like


  44. ‎”By today’s standards King George III was a very mild tyrant indeed. He taxed his American colonists at a rate of only pennies per annum. His actual impact on their personal lives was trivial. He had arbitrary power over them but…it was seldom exercised. If you compare his rule with that of today’s US Government you have to wonder why we even celebrate our independence.”

    The 4th of July should be a day of mourning as everything our Founder’s warned against has come to pass.

    Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 8:21 am Lord Valtrex

      Remember, the American colonies of the 1700s were a start-up corporation. They needed a very loose leash so they could be allow to grow. A contemporary example would be the mostly hands-off approach the U.S. Government has taken towards the World Wide Web. Growth first, tax later.

      Once the colonies would have sufficiently matured (i.e., reached a state of profitability) the Crown would have greatly increased taxes on them. The Crown had invested a lot into the colonies (corporation) by the late 1700s. They wanted a little compensation back.

      The “rebellion” was a conspiracy orchestrated by a few men wanting to execute a hostile takeover of the America corporation. These men agitated the “rebellion”.

      Like


      • I seem to remember a little bit about the Americans wanting the same rights as Englishmen in England had… representation, etc. The reason the WWW got left alone for awhile? The politicos didn’t understand it nor understand the possibilities it opened. As soon as they saw Amazon and others putting pressure on their contributors and smelled some money to be made, they went after it. Hence one of the reasons that Amazon and others are fleeing California as it becomes impossible to do business. Where could the colonists have fled to if they already started without the rights of free Englishmen?

        Like


      • You’re right but that’s not really the above posters point.

        Like


      • That’s not true at all. Franklin remarked that the true revolution occurred in the minds of the average colonists from 1760-1775, over fifteen years. Americans needed Britain, against the ever present menace of the French arming the Indians and aiding them in fairly large raids. The manifest incompetence of the British army in the Seven Years War showed the more ambitious local men of means that Independence COULD be won. The proximate cause for conflict was raising taxes to cover the cost of the Seven Years War.

        Like


  45. A good film to watch regarding what the alternatives to older career women are would be Metropolitan from 1989 or 1990. It’s the original Gossip Girls except none of the rich Manhattan late teen males are more than lower alphas. Most, including the hero Tom, are solid beta males. Through much of the film their female contemporaries, who only needed to be born to be hot at that age, are socially interacting with them as equals, but what’s telling is that the hottest of them sneak off on dates with much older men who own houses in the Hamptons. The boys cluelessly watch this happen and then fixate on the least attractive girl, deciding to save her chivalrously from the predations of a lower alpha cad their age, who himself mostly doesn’t have a clue on how to deal with women.

    Teenage males tend to bottom-feed. And they rationalize this with romanticism.

    Any of you guys over 25 can swoop in and crush the chances of guys like that with the hottest gals their own age. Don’t look at shows like Gossip Girls and decide that you wouldn’t have a chance in that environment because the guys their age are supposedly so attractive and full of personality and alphatude.

    That’s propaganda to get you to feel you have no choice but the career gal your age.

    Like


      • Carolyn Farina plays Audrey Rouget. She was 26 at the time, probably at peak beauty. Very pretty, nice hair, lovely skin. Legs acceptable. Tits small.

        Overall an appealing package I think.

        The cad, Von Slonecker, had classic Dark Triad traits, as the Nick Smith character explains. I think Stillman, as writer//director, deserves an honorary mention as an early theorist of Game.

        Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 9:38 am Rick Derris

        David:

        How was Stillman’s latest movie? It didn’t come to Austin, which was a surprise since the “film” community here takes itself so seriously.

        I might have to add a comment to your discussion because Rick Von Sloneker was a total douchebag.

        Like


      • Rick, I haven’t seen it. I think one of my commenters had. Living in Australia, I shall be waiting a long time before I see Damsels in Distress, if I ever do. I only got to see Metropolitan because my daughter downloaded it for me from some site. I mainly was interested because I fancy Carolyn Farina.

        Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 11:56 am Rick Derris

        Got it – the DVD/BluRay is supposed to be out in September so I will have to wait until then to see it.

        I really liked his other three movies. Too bad he didn’t produce more or try to write more. 😦

        Like


      • Good review of the Stillman trilogy. Note the Intercollegiate Review critic of the film makes the point that Metropolitan is really just a modern remake of Mansfield Park like Clueless later became a modern remake of Emma. Mansfield Park, written exactly 200 years ago, was about a group of really young adults wondering how to amuse themselves without parental supervision for the first time in their lives.

        But that critic is hopelessly beta when he says “fully mature adults are conspicuously absent from all but a handful of scenes; when they do appear, they are largely ineffectual.”

        This reviewer was blind.

        For instance the scene where Sally uncomfortably introduces her nerdy contemporaries to a balding forty something alpha before basically telling the nerds that her days of hanging out with them are basically over, isn’t anywhere near worthy of an interpretation that “adults” are inconsequential to the story line. This adult single-handedly breaks up the entire teen angst group and that’s inconsequential?

        Likewise, the really hot Jane tells the same two nerds, including the hero Tom, that they can’t come down on the elevator to meet the new guy she’s going on a date with. It’s pretty clear the new guy isn’t anything like them (they have upper class status and are the same age but that doesn’t matter to Jane). Meeting her date would upset them and that’s why she, their supposed good friend, won’t let them meet him.

        The nerds fail to see how, why, by whom or even that they’ve been defeated for the affections of the alpha females of the group. But the film reviewer, a religious beta conservative, assumes that this group of teen guys and gals somehow still belong to each other as some sort of “lost generation”.

        The Intercollegiate reviewer ends with this beta point of view “They are still abandoned by their parents’ generation, not only having to solve their own problems without adult guidance, but having to make up their own rules for living.”

        As if.

        As if Jane and Sally haven’t already abandoned their weak and confused male peers for real adult males who will likely make the rules for them. The girls in Metropolitan dropped the boys for adults. Audrey doesn’t even get with Tom at the end. He’s too wishy washy to take her. Then the same Audrey character is seen with an older alpha in the film’s sequel, The Last Days of Disco.

        Like


    • Are you serious?

      Predating on teenage guys? No shit it’s easy, but even to a guy like me that’s low.

      I was sitting in a theater with my college buddies, and a group of 10 high schoolers sat in front of us. 2 of the girls left them 15 minutes into the film and sat next to us instead, trying to distract us from the movie and “meet” us.

      Normally I close in situations like this but there’s no reason why I can’t find hotter girls at college.

      Yes, game young girls but when you start hitting the high school years as a 25-something you must have problems.

      They don’t know what they’re doing.

      I even had a cute 7.5 literally shaking in nervousness while we kissed.

      I agree there’s propaganda to some extent, but you’re on a slippery slope when the girl is in high school. Smart older guys I’ve known usually wait for their senior year / right after graduation. If you can’t find a Hot 18-19 freshman/post-highschooler and have to resort to taking low hanging 15-17 fruit from young guys who don’t know a clit from a g-spot, you should probably hit the showers an work out some personal issues before going out with girls.

      It just reeks of “I didn’t have this opportunity when I myself was a beta teenager” and it just perpetuates the cycle of cuckolding unknowing young guys, reinforcing their disillusionment about girls, and putting yourself into a terrible sexual relationship.

      There’s nothing fun about taking a girls virginity. And being a *really young* girls first alpha lover while you really don’t give a shit about them in the first place further perpetuates their future bad behavior.

      Many manosphere complaints are legitimate, but we need to recognize when we’re contributing to the problem too.

      Young girls’ biggest dating problem is getting strung along in pseudo-relationships with alpha guys.

      I only ask you to aim a little older when your stringing along.

      Like


      • No chance. Everything about that sermon is propaganda. Anyone over 16 knows exactly what they’re doing.

        Like


      • It’s also amazing how 18 year old college guys have let the feminists dupe them into thinking it’s uncool to date a girl who is younger than they are by even one year. It’s all about the hotness, in the end (or the local laws). Sure, any woman can hurt her desirability by being immature and stupid, but a 25 year old with a low IQ is more likely to come across as clueless than a 17 year old with a high IQ.

        For instance, I had an 18 year old and two 17 year olds hanging out at my place today. The older girl (by six months) was hotter than the others. Not by much, but by enough. All are above average in IQ and mature enough. She’s the one I’m fooling around with.

        But it’s because she’s marginally hotter, not because she’s crossed the Hollywood standard magic number called 18.

        Like


      • Thank you for your reply but I disagree.

        We can agree that anecdotal evidence is pretty shoddy, but I took an 18-yo model’s virginity my sophomore year in college. She was a hs senior. It’s not like she missed any love trains either, she just never went past 3rd on previous guys.

        A second girl I met at a party, she was a virgin still, but didn’t tell me. She had just graduated hs and wanted to get it over with, from what her friend told me later. Our sex parts were too inappropriately sized to do it though.

        Girls now have higher counts than ever before, but there are still many inexperienced young lasses around.

        An extended stay at the manosphere hotel get us a jaded sometimes. They’re not all getting on their knees at 12,14,etc.

        I really think there’s a middle ground we should aim for. Going young is ideal, but the younger you go the greater the risk you run into an inexperienced little cutie who falls for you when your game-awared ass is trying to paint the town white……with cum.

        Like


      • “the younger you go the greater the risk you run into an inexperienced little cutie who falls for you when your game-awared ass is trying to paint the town white”

        No one said virgins are a good prey for someone whose sole purpose is to fuck around.
        Virgins should be chased only for ltrs/marriage. They’re not really pump & dump material… Well except if you’re a don’t-give-a-shit alpha sociopath and are not interested at all in ltr/marriage.

        If you want to have children, their mother should damn right be “an inexperienced little cutie who falls for you”. A virgin is more likely to bond deeply with her first lover, especially if he’s a worthy male with game.

        I’m like you right now, I’m targeting college chicks. But I’m approaching 30. And at that point I will start actively looking for a virgin. And they’re more likely to be 18 or under.
        Marrying even a 25 year old sounds like a waste anyway. That’s already almost 10 years of exquisite premium fuckability flushed down the toilet.

        Like


      • I gotta agree with Cyrus. I have extensive professional experience (not sexual) with all sorts of girls between fifteen and twenty. There is really a world of developmental difference between people aged 16 and 18, and our laws do recognize this a posteriori to our biology. Fathers on this blog may also understand.

        As usual, the snake oil merchants in advertising nailed it by identifying the 18 to 24 demographic decades ago. Billions of potential dollars demandes truth, and age eighteen isn’t arbitrary; it really is a dividing line.

        Like


      • No. Western media tries hard to confuse them into thinking they are still children in an “increasingly complicated world” made complicated by feminism and modern women-led religious evangelism, AKA jealous older women who feel the heat of competition from those in their late teens.

        The developmental difference is that they want to lose their virginity to someone between 16 and 18 and it’s beta to let other males do that. The new progressive laws that never existed before are all about feminists eliminating the competition and white knighting betas sucking up to the women their own age and allying with the fembots to achieve what was never achievable before women got the vote.

        Before women got the right to vote and started to control the media, men had no problem marrying virginal 16 year olds. It’s still normal in much of the world. And I do agree with Anon above that one should only deal with the more innocent virgins with more or less honorable intentions and not a mean pump and dump attitude. It’s still almost always more alpha to do a virgin than a slut older than the virgin.

        In fact, that is part of the definition of alpha.

        Alpha divorced fathers of women in their late teens will compartmentalize and not make excuses for themselves to date only women considerably older than their daughters. I’ve met many fathers who think exactly like any other alpha on the subject.

        You’ve declared yourself a Democrat Jason and your opinion on this is consistent with your toleration of that political party. Of course, women control the Republican Party as well so American men in states where the age of consent is still 16 can depend on do-gooders changing those laws for the first time in history.

        The laws still haven’t changed in most of the US and most of the world. That reflects thousands of years of history where men said “Fuck that” to any jealous older women who tried to make their competition off bounds.

        America may be a lost cause on this subject. If American men are willing to let the hottest women be made illegal, that’s another example of what wusses they are.

        Like


      • I agree with some of your screed, Anonymous, but there are a few problems too.

        1) I was speaking from my anecdotal experience, which is extensive. I’m the boots-on-the-ground here — I’ve worked with literally thousands of young people. And this experience tells me that sixteen ain’t eighteen, not emotionally, not intellectually, not socially, not even physically.

        2) No one’s keeping you from marrying an eighteen-year-old. No one’s keeping you from taking a sixteen-year-old virgin in many states either, if that’s what you want — but my point is that a thinking adult male probably wouldn’t want that second one. Girls are just too bizarre at that age. Unless all you want is an open vagina, most men — despite the bluster here — are looking for a tad more. Like cooking, at minimum.

        3) Modern life really is that complex. Puritans didn’t know what adolescence was because they had to make exactly zero choices. Everything was (pardon the pun) predestined. Today, with thousands of life paths, adolescence is real, and it’s extending as the choices get wider. On many occasions I’ve worked with 23-year-olds who act emotionally like 16-year-olds. I suspect this is modern. Three hundred years ago, a 16-year-old girl would probably have been forced to mature through hardship. Today that 16-year-old girl hasn’t suffered much of anything, and is a much more immature creature. Get my point?

        3) Dems/Repubs have nothing to do with my opinion about this.

        4) Women do not control the media and the Republican party. That’s patent horseshit.

        But thanks for the reply.

        Like


      • Sounds like your extensive experience is in women that age not being interested in you.

        There’s no need to rationalize this and deny the female control of the media.

        Like


      • Anonymous,

        This was excellent. But 16 seems to be a magic number of your own. Not a criticism — an adjustment.

        Like


      • Jason wrote:

        I have extensive professional experience (not sexual) with all sorts of girls between fifteen and twenty.

        So you are a public educator. That explains your ineradicable leftism as well.

        Of course there is “world of developmental difference between people aged 16 and 18” just as there is a difference between a 21-year-old and a 30-year-old. We are constantly maturing and growing in wisdom, at a more gradual rate as we get older, but nonetheless still changing. This fiction of the “age of majority” is not only un-biological, it is also absurd in the cultural context. It is illegal to argue against the magic number of 18 because there are two constant pressures sacrosanct to the left: pushing higher the age of dependency on the state (e.g., health coverage until 26), and pushing lower the age of emancipation from the family (e.g., the elimination of parental consent or even notification about state initiatives).

        The Bar Mitzvah and Catholic Confirmation, together with spirit quests and just about any other culture’s coming-of-age rites, roughly coincides with the biological imperative — the beginning of puberty, not its end. The recognition that “you are a man now” helped develop that person into a full adult through the pull of expectation rather than the gentle nudge of his enlightened mom trying to get her X-Box weedhead to roll his pasty ass out of her basement.

        The left seeks to infantalize us in all the important ways (wealth creation, sovereignty of the body) while giving us a false sense of “liberation” in all the trivial ones (whips and toys in the bedroom).

        A father’s protection of his daughter does not end at 18. It only ends when he finds her a suitable paternalistic replacement to manage her hypergamy. And in early bloomers there is no reason why that cannot be 16 or before. We merely concoct rough lines of demarcation and put the force of law on either side. Perhaps that’s a practicality that cannot be avoided. But it hardly suffices as a basis for our thinking through the gray areas of maturation.

        Matt

        Like


      • Matt, I’m not a public educator. This wrongheaded assumption led you to a wrongheaded conclusion about my “ineradicable leftism”. I agree with much of what else you wrote about puberty rites and biology, though.

        Here’s my short point: A 16-year-old in 1712 was much more mature than a 16-year-old in 2012. The culture demanded it. Suffering was greater. Lives were shorter.

        Today, modern men who fantasize about 16-year-old girls obviously don’t know very many of them. And they’re using a historical tradition that makes little sense in a radically different modern world, one that is more divorced from biology. This is why non-Western cultures, the ones closer to their biology and without much education, do still marry 16-year-olds.

        Anonymous: the media isn’t dominated by women. Go find a list of ownership of media companies. Since Katharine Graham died, my guess is you’ll find close to zero.

        And for the record, asshole, many sixteen-year-olds DO develop crushes on me — it’s really not hard to do. But they are gently managed and turned away, for about a hundred different legal, physical, emotional, intellectual, financial, spiritual, and marital reasons.

        Like


      • Jason wrote:

        Here’s my short point: A 16-year-old in 1712 was much more mature than a 16-year-old in 2012. The culture demanded it. Suffering was greater. Lives were shorter.

        And here’s my short point: Your assumption that 16-year-olds are immature because of improvement in life expectancy is what contributes to the culture that keeps them immature.

        True enough. Girls had to grow up more quickly in the past — at least mentally and socially, whereas they are growing up physically more quickly today. And yet biology and aesthetics have always required the same rude cut-off of fertility beginning at 30. In that way, their lives of fertility are not longer at all. If anything they are much shorter as adulthood is delayed by legal fiat.

        It is not the 16-year-old woman per se that men are naturally attracted to. It is a girl’s capacity for first reproduction. If she exhibits no sign of sexual maturity, or if she bears the telltale vibe of diverse experience with cock, her attractiveness is diminished.

        Physically, 2012 girls are, if anything, more mature than their 1712 ancestors. Socially, they are far less mature, but that is by policy choice of the culture, and one that can be remedied. But not if we are assuming that maturity cannot be inculcated because lives are longer/suffering is lower. Your formulation amounts to an apology for socially stunting 16-year-olds, and that I suspect is the reason for your defense of randomly determined age norms. Those norms are the very cause of their delayed social maturity, even as that delay consigns them to a frantic attempt at motherhood a short decade-and-a-half later.

        The bottom line is, you imagine our attraction to their physical readiness should be overcome by the turn-off of their social retardation, and it simply does not happen that way. If anything they become more attractive to men without a paternal impulse in their soul: easier to manipulate, easier to score. Perhaps men should have that protective-daughterly instinct towards the socially immature, but then you must advocate strongly for a reinstitution of paternalism in the culture, rather than thinking the declaration of random demarcations in law will instantly make men look away. That shaming works, but only to a point, especially when it goes contrary to nature.

        We don’t have a primal instinct to talk to/partner with women of any age, but we do have an urge to fuck and impregnate the healthiest fertile wombs. Any cultural or legal attempt to limit that urge must be realistic to the limits of normal men. Or else normality becomes illegal and the solution becomes unsustainable.

        Matt

        Like


      • From a social perspective I’d agree guys older than say, College, ought to lay off the HS girls. Ideally these girls would not be having sex, but experimenting with boyfriends to see the pluses and minuses of A-holes vs. non-A-holes as boyfriends, that what gets them hot and bothered can also carry considerable risk and they are not made of transforming magic (the usual delusions of girls and women). That process makes them more fit for being a wife and mother. Rather than a single-mom disaster of any socio-economic status.

        HOWEVER, it is not unusual these days for a 17 year old to have three sexual partners, a society with no moral standards … has no moral standards. The obesity epidemic seems to be chasing guys in their twenties into the teen pool, despite obvious risks, as girls balloon up after college. Audacious Epigone and others would counter “your generation was sluttier” but I remain unconvinced, the GSS data they cite is thin in respondents and subject to the usual female rationalizations, AE’s conclusions (valid I’ll grant from the data) don’t gibe with what guys here and elsewhere report on the ground. Being a virgin is seen as a social handicap, it is no problem for most girls to lose that around age 16 or so, if they are inclined.

        My take is however the morality boat has long sailed. Gay marriage, polygamy, slutwalks, slut-norming, Jizzabel, what have you, no social restraints equals no social restraints. So guys will if they can score the most attractive women/girls: ages 16-19, and not care about much of anything else. That’s pretty much standard in the Black and Hispanic communities, proceeding well apace even among middle and upper class Whites.

        Like


      • Before the “morality boat” sailed, there was a brief period after women’s suffrage when prostitution and alcohol were banned. Even that started a civil war, which is what the gangster decade was really all about. Men initially resisted the attempts to regulate them.

        Before suffrage, it was mostly anything goes for men as long as one was discreet and maintained appearances. And even while maintaining appearances, men were dipping into the teen pool for marriage no matter how old they were, if they had the money.

        So it’s entirely a sham to suggest that it’s part of a supposed wave of immorality that men are looking at teens. They always have and always will.

        But, it is a good point to say that the obesity epidemic would now be driving men into the teen pool even more, regardless of the morality boat issue.

        Like


      • It’s also brilliant that Whiskey noted that gay marriage is at least as “immoral” as men dating women in their late teens.

        Social cons need to prioritize what they dislike most and what they should want to criminalize most.

        Like


      • Cyrus wrote:

        It just reeks of “I didn’t have this opportunity when I myself was a beta teenager” and it just perpetuates the cycle of cuckolding unknowing young guys, reinforcing their disillusionment about girls, and putting yourself into a terrible sexual relationship.

        No. And this is cryptofeminist attitude (complete with your fully unconscious adoption of their terms of art, like “predation”) is more dangerous than a simple sexual free-for-all. There is and always will be a shame culture. Only, instead of shaming women for their consequence-free sexual advertisement, we have transferred the guilt of all attraction to mature men responding instinctively to innocence and youthful beauty.

        Maurice Chevalier’s “Thank Heaven for Little Girls” is not some proto-paean to the delights of molestation, although today it is considered such. At one point we were able to appreciate the unmistakable glory of youth without thinking it was a evidence of our hidden desire to fuck it.

        There obviously is an enormous power gap in age and between the sexes. A young woman has no chance alone against an adult man. We can rectify this by attempting to shame the instinct out of men with appeals to equalism and dreams of asexuality, or we can acknowledge as a culture the power gap and enlist everyone into its rectification — i.e., shaming the fathers and mothers who indirectly pimp their maturing daughters by leaving their child’s sexual power to herself. The feminists and you have gone full-force with the former, pretending the fault for the sexual imbalance lies exclusively with a normal man’s normal thoughts.

        This imbalance is so skewed, and people like you are so impotent against it, that I side with the “predators,” until the phenomenon is redressed rationally. Because they aren’t true predators, like the men so warped as to be sexually excited by asexual children. The very association of normal male attraction (to bodies capable of reproduction, which also retain the possibility of exclusivity, i.e., virginity) with the perverse impulses of paedophilia is the origin of the problem you are attempting to white knight against.

        So please. Save your old wives’ tale of “I didn’t have this opportunity when I myself was a beta teenager” for menopausal hens in sewing circles. The “opportunity” is based on something far more fundamental than feminist just-so-stories.

        Matt

        Like


  46. I can’t see any reason whatsoever for marrying a woman who is too old to give you children so if you are talking about marrying “older careerist broads” you need to be aware of the expiration date.

    Like


  47. […] This is not what of those times. Not even close: Jodark makes a very good suggestion for men thinking about marrying older careerist broads. If I were considering wifing a middle-aged career woman, I would insist upon a dowry sizable enough to put a 50% down payment on a bitchin’ sports car (probably a new Nissan GTR). I would consider it compensation for her wasting her young sex and beauty on fucking shitbag artists and musicians. […]

    Like


  48. on July 5, 2012 at 9:14 am Shiva The Destroyer

    I think this will win comment of next week:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9375952/Women-could-delay-the-menopause-indefinitely-with-ovary-transplant-doctors.html

    This just blew open the “wall” theory.

    [heartiste: no it won’t. i will now school your flabby femcunt ass in the logical errors of your fantasties.]

    sure, women may not be at the prime of their beauty in the future but they’ll still be in prime fertility at , say, 45.

    [the wall is a function of women’s looks, which are, evolutionarily-speaking, a proxy for women’s fertility. ovary transplant tech may extend fertility but it won’t do a damn thing for aging women’s declining looks. men’s eyes don’t see women’s ovaries, they see women’s bodies and faces. and men are wired to respond sexually to youthful female looks. a 70 year old woman could be rejiggered to bear children thanks to the intervention of science, but she’ll still look 70 years old, and so men won’t be turned on by her. she will still be a wall victim. because in the gene-governed sexual market where visual cues are men’s primary information medium, it’s the proxies that matter, not the actual wiring underneath.]

    Wow.

    [just wow.]

    Like


    • ummmmmm……no.

      even if a woman could be as fertile at 45 as she was at 18, this does not mean that her chances of carrying a healthy child to term are as good at 45 as they were at 18.

      getting knocked up ≠ having a child

      Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 2:40 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Beyond what Heartiste just wrote, in no way will having women “in prime fertility at 45” alter the wall theory. What idiot wants to have a baby with a 45-year-old woman? It’s hard enough chasing after toddlers at 25 much less 35 or 45.

        In fact, my theory is that this will make older women less attractive to men. The one benefit of a 45 year olds is it’s hard to get them pregnant. If it turns out you can knock them up easily and be forced into mandatory parenting or child support, well, guys would rather have a hot 25-year-old for that.

        A 45-year-old in prime fertility. Talk about the worst of both worlds.

        Like


      • I agree, and furthermore this invention will further ruin any country that adopts it.

        Get ready to support a new generation of downies and autistics

        Like


    • I partially disagree on this, insofar as there are plenty of elderly betas around who can take them, not to mention huge numbers of older childless women who are otherwise absolutely worthless to society. (Worse than worthless, actually, since they help destroy it by voting for the Democrats.)

      And I don’t know if it would still produce lots of downies and autistics, if the ovarian tissue was frozen when she was in her early 20s.

      I agree with Heartiste that a man with a functioning penis won’t go for it and the “wall” theory still applies, but OTOH old people getting married to each other happens.

      Like


      • Granted, she has fresher ovaries but her womb is still crusty and old as shit.

        All they have currently is 28 cases of it working. Put that on a large scale with 100’s of thousands of irresponsible women and the problems start becoming more transparent.

        The last paragraph, along with the poll results (I loled) is the most telling part.

        They really think freezing ovaries will keep hormones fresh? Her brain, her pituitary gland, and other relevant structures are all still 45 years old.

        I’m still waiting to hear from an endocrinologist about this. I still have to take a fertility doctor’s say with a nice plate of salt.

        And this technique creates a major negative externality. No doubt women Who undergo this will undoubtedly live longer, and we already are starting to recognize the costs of preserving 100-somethings who have had so much cognitive decline they can’t even do a fucking crossword puzzle.

        Like


    • That is incorrect, Shiva the Destroyer. No man will look at an older woman and feel in his subconscious — or any other part — “fertile”, regardless of any unholy technological advance like ovarian transplant.

      This has been true throughout history. Are you a religious person? In Genesis chapters 15 and 16 we read of Abraham and Sarah. Sarah was older and bore Abraham no children.

      Abraham could not believe the aging Sarah could have his child, this despite his love for her and being told by GOD HIMSELF that she would bear a son. Abraham took the young maid Hagar and had a son with her.

      Even a man of Faith like Abraham disbelieved God that an older woman could have a child. What chance do these modern fresh ovary recipients have to convince maledom that they are young and fresh “on the inside”? This is not as revolutionary as you would have us believe. In a man’s mind, young and cute = fertile. The Wall is quite safe.

      (Note: Sarah did conceive and had Isaac, Genesis 21:1-2)

      Like


  49. The only legitimate reason for a guy to ever consider marriage is children. I really don’t understand why any man would get married to someone who is too old to have children or who doesn’t want to have children. In my opinion, middle-aged and older people getting married is just as pointless and irrelevant as gay marriage.

    Like


    • You mean middle aged women getting married is pointless. If a 60 year old man marries a 25 year old female for babies and a late family after finally settling down from the PUA activity, that isn’t pointless. To argue otherwise, is to agree with the feminists that men should suddenly have a menopause at around the same time that they do, which is in the mid forties.

      Like


      • I meant middle aged people marrying each other, which is the most common pairing in that age range. Contrary to what many guys in the PUA community seem to think, men have an expiration date as well – ours is just much later. Sure a 60 year old man can still produce children, but by that age finding a young woman willing to bear his children is not as easy as some seem to think. Only a certain minority of young women are interested in men that much older and due to the fact that young women aren’ t likely to be regular members of a 60 years old man’s social circle, finding that woman could be difficult.

        Like


      • You should stick around and read this blog more. There are plenty of alphas that age that can impregnate fertile women. If you don’t want to believe one then that is your own tough luck. Go through your menopause at 45 like the women do. Be my guest. In the meanwhile, remember that you’ve just negated much of what this blog is about, which is that men have a much longer window than men and have more time.

        I just had an 18 year old reject me today by saying I was too old for her, but then her 17 year old friend made out with me after telling me she was air-headed. It’s a numbers game. Only 40% of young women would refuse to date a much older man. If you’re male, that is supposed to be good news. No need to be perturbed with good news.

        Like


      • Oh, I already love you.

        Like


      • The only 6à year olds who can attract nubile beauties are apex alphas with premium looks/social status/game.
        But a slightly above average 60 yo man with a decent shape, social status and game can swim in a fuckpool of late 30-early 40 yo women, with an occasional younger gal if he gets lucky.

        Like


  50. on July 5, 2012 at 12:06 pm colombian guy

    i know its a little bit off topic. but i need advice. my current fling , a young career chick. wants to see me today, so she can tell me that our thing has to stop . ( a close friend of her, warned me). may be my omega self, fucked things up last week, but still i think i played my cards well.
    since she does not know, i know… i decided i will never get to our apointment… whats the use? what would you guys do?

    Like


    • Text her that you’re busy then go off the radar for a couple weeks.

      Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 2:43 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Google “pre-emptive breakup” which was an idea from an early episode of “Seinfeld.” In other words, break up with her first, so you come out a winner and give her doubt as to how good a g/f she was.

      It’s rude to do this by email or text, but if you want to beat her to the punch, send her something that at least alludes to the fact that you want out. If you even want to go this route. Good luck.

      Like


    • text her ‘ljbf’.

      Like


      • on July 5, 2012 at 9:32 pm colombian guy

        guys, i have nothing but gratitude. my beta ways made it difficult for me to play asshole, but i never showed up.. off course, she called one hour after our intentionally missed date. with a bad tone , i said.. sorry , something came up. for you experienced players, this is nothing… for me its a milestone. im so glad that at this moment im not coming back home after a long chat of lets just be friends and you can count on me for whatever you want except sex.. even better,… if i dont get to see her again, im not terrified about being alone, i feel i have the power to meet someone else…. i compare to what i would have done wihthout knowledge of game and i would have been an omega disaster. seriously!! THANKS!

        Like


      • Well done, player.

        Like


      • Yeah, well done. Good early stages. More to learn and work on.

        Like


  51. on July 5, 2012 at 12:26 pm Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

    W-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w-w

    Wow.

    Just wow.

    Like


  52. on July 5, 2012 at 1:37 pm Jolly Rauncher

    BREAKING!:

    The wimminz are gettin’ crazier. Found this on Drudge:

    Ovary transplants could undo/delay menopause:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9375952/Women-could-delay-the-menopause-indefinitely-with-ovary-transplant-doctors.html

    xDDDDDD Trying to reverse wimminz wrong choices by extending the wall HAHAHAHAHA xDDDDD

    Like


    • Yeah, you ought to read the comments before posting,That’s the 3rd time that link has been posted.

      Like


  53. You twittered that New York Feminist Times article about the movie Ted, which apparently is one of a the many comedies that presents the male character (Marky Mark) as a slacker/buffoon/loser. He cares more for a Teddy Bear than his hot gf Mila Kunis. The writer says this about male buffoon comedies:

    If I were a sociologist, I’d probably point the finger for the popularity of arrested male adolescence at the usual villains: helicopter parenting, the rise of feminism, video games and a cruddy economy that has a larger percentage of 25-34 males living with their parents than ever before.

    Note how the tip-toeing male writer uses the vague and gender neutral “helicopter parenting” instead of something more provocative like “single moms”. He’s trained well and knows any criticism of women will jeopardize his job, and he’s also simply obedient to the feminine imperative (as Rollo calls it) like most guys.

    He disingenuously lists a “usual villain” for male slackerhood as the rise of feminism, when feminism is rarely if ever criticized or blamed for anything in the mainstream. It’s far from a usual villain, and If you want honest discussions about feminism you have to read the manosphere. And I highly doubt sociologists in academia would be discussing it in anything other than glowing terms.

    I believe one reason for the male buffoon comedies, and as the writer points out are made by men, is because the self-degradation serves as a male-guilt apology to women. The filmmakers and everyone involved are showing women that they identify with their supposed plight, that they have to deal with men who gave up trying to keep up with relentless fem-centrism, when their valiant efforts gain them little to nothing except maybe a good-doggy pat on the head. You’ve discussed this often here. Men are dropping out, they can no longer keep up with female hypergamy. These movies, like sit-coms and tv commercials and everything else on planet Earth, is standard male pandering to women directly and indirectly in the subconscious effort to ingratiate yourself to them.

    The NYT writer comes to the boring conclusion that comedies are made this way because quite simply it’s funny to watch immature people doing stupid things, and always has been. True, but he has nothing original or provocative to say. He is incapable of looking behind the iron feminist curtain and stays on the plantation. He litters his article with “shaming language”, ironically doing the exact same thing those male filmmakers do, pandering to women.

    It’s the reason non-conformists and independent thinkers don’t read the mainstream media with any expectation other than to get feminist/leftist/thought-police approved tedium.

    Like


  54. Donald Trump shows the way with his system of trading in his aging wives for younger, hotter, tighter every several years…

    Like


  55. Agree on that last point, Anonymous, on the movie Metropolitan. That was what I was saying at my blog. Tom remains ineffectual to the end. Look, I am pretty square. As I said at my blog, I would have ended the film with Audrey married to Tom, waddling around knocked up, and seeing him off to his big job with a wifely kiss. The reality is, as you say, in the next film, Disco, Audrey has left the kid stuff behind, including Tom, and seems to be dancing with a big, alpha looking man. One could read this to mean that she is riding the cock carousel with cats at the end of it, to go with her complete collection of Jane Austen and her ladylike career in publishing. Or one could see it as Audrey about to land a really impressive man finally.

    I pointed it out at my blog, but not here I think, that I just realised that Audrey is likely named by Stillman in honour of Audrey Hepburn. The two actresses have some similarities.

    Sorry to put this here, but I am constrained by the nature of my screen view on this computer.

    Like


  56. […] Heatiste – Men Aren’t Attracted To High-Earning Women, Entitled Careerist Woman Logo, Comment of The Week, Chicks Dig Cruelty, Chubby Chaser […]

    Like