Should Game Be Taught In School?

Reader “Harkat” asks:

Should game, or at least socio-sexual dynamics, be taught in middle/high school? It’s a significant part of life, and knowledge of these topics would help the vast majority of confused teenagers (at least the boys).

The little that was said about sexual dynamics in my high school was extremely idealist egalitarian and far from reality, and did nothing to help us (at least not the boys). We got delivered phrases like “Do not feel pressure to have sex!”, which hardly resonates with the average teenage boy.

In a perfect world, sex and love education is left to family (parents, friends, older siblings, cool uncles) and experience. But we are far from that world, and condoms are rolled over bananas while men are rapped for phantom sexual repression in the halls and classrooms of almost all our venerated institutions. That being the case, it’s more effective to undermine suffocating elite orthodoxy by working within its confines, instead of feebly fist-pumping from outside it. So, yes, in a world designed according to Chateau tenets, game would be taught to high school boys — preferably in classes separate from the girls.

I can see it now.

Week 1: Introductions to male-female sex differences and Syllabus (Included readings from various respected sources in evo psych, game and social dynamics, e.g., Ridley, Markovic, Carnegie).

Week 2: Why chicks dig jerks. (Students expected to fully understand sexy son hypothesis).

Week 3: Alphas and betas, the hidden hierarchy.

Week 4: Sycophancy and involuntary celibacy, the connection.

Week 5: Men and women have an agenda, and how to recognize it.

Week 6: Game as revolution in sociosexual thought.

Week 7: Core game principles.

Week 8: Dating to maximize one’s happiness.

Week 9: Sex, guilt and expectations: why society has an interest in corralling male desire.

Week 10: Relationships and marriage: making them work.

Week 11: Finals: In-field exam.

Music to my ears. Of course, this will never happen. Teaching young men the unvarnished truth about women, sex, dating and marriage would throw grit into the gears of the beta cog molding machine that supplies a never-ending procession of obedient housetrained quasi-eunuchs. What good does it do the dealers of consumerist opiates if they can’t domesticate a suitably pliable army to staff their globocorporate offices?

The channeling of male vitality with the help of useful lies has been a central element of the civilizing process in the West and elsewhere for eons. It has its place, even for the poolsiders who need a prosperous nation in which to pursue their lifestyles. But the last fifty or sixty years (monarchists would argue the effort goes back at least 150 years) has witnessed the twisting of this process into a monstrous form, under whose shadow the lies have multiplied and tyrannized free-thinking men, restricting respectable thought to a narrow range of groupthink.

A public policy to make the teaching of game and its underlying concepts mandatory for high schoolers would have to overcome so many obstacles and entrenched thought and interests as to limit the notion strictly to the realm of fantasy. But that doesn’t mean current sex ed classes can’t be deviously rippled with pebbles of thoughtcrime by sympathetic operatives.

Instead of starve the beast, you could call this the “stuff the beast” philosophy of saving civilization by feeding it too much of its own late-stage bile. A hastening and amplifying of consequences, come to reckoning in technicolor exuberance. And you might even help a few tormented betas get laid on their own timetables.





Comments


  1. Those who can’t do, teach. Public school teachers would do such a poor job that the kids would likely conclude game isn’t worth their time.

    Like


  2. It’s already taught in school — just look for the few AMOG that are the 5% of guys who are sleeping with 40% of the 6s or better.

    Of course, the other 95% of the guys in school HATE the AMOGs, but just don’t know why.

    Thankfully, those guys can find the Chateau and other places — but be careful violating COPPA regulations.

    Like


    • What’s funny is that when you are young it does not look like 5% of the guys get all the girls. It looks like every single guy is getting some, except for you (and that one friend that everybody has who is even more omega than you are), and you can’t understand why and it is maddening.

      Like


    • OT: A.B., you said you follow the paleo diet. How do you reconcile that with hanging out in clubs? Do you stick to sparkling water or fruit juices? Thanks.

      Like


      • Tequila (straight) has blood glucose reducing properties according to some (small) research studies. I typically will buy a double tequila on the rocks.

        I love good Scotch whisky, but most bars don’t seem to stock a good variety.

        One thing about switching to a higher saturated fat diet is that my desire to drink alcohol is greatly reduced. Whereas I used to be able to drink pretty heavy, I find myself at a comfortable buzz after just 2 drinks in a night.

        Like


      • on December 19, 2011 at 3:09 pm on behalf of everyone

        SHUT UP

        Like


      • He was answering a question, dumbfuck.
        Get back to jerking off on your sister.

        Like


      • Tell that to the guys who email me practically every day inquiring with questions. Of course, I’m sure they’d email you, too, if you weren’t an anonymous coward.

        Fag.

        Like


  3. With public schools so feminized, there is no point to even trying.

    However, all is not lost. There is a vibrant and active tutoring community out there to pick up the slack when the schools inevitably fail young men. And young men area all over the Internet. It’s just a matter of channeling their interests and efforts to the right websites.

    Like


  4. The name of the game class for the girls? Home Economics.

    Like


  5. As someone who is just now learning game long after high school, I’m A-OK with it being something guys have to seek out on their own. I worry that the age in which only a few (naturals or learned) can get hot chicks will end before I become tight enough to benefit from it, if the next rising generation of men were all game-aware.

    Like


    • This is something I worry about also. I wonder how many men are learning game now from sites like this now…

      Like


      • It doesn’t matter how many are learning game, as few will ever have the discipline and courage to properly internalize and use it. For most it will remain a mostly intellectual pursuit.

        Like


      • Most men will not become PUAs, you are right about that. I think a lot of men will be more aware of their interactions with women, they are already married to, in a relationship with, work with, etc.

        Like


      • This is exactly why I read this site, I must admit. I don’t have the drive or urge to be a PUA, and I accept that. All I really aim for is being alpha enough that I don’t drive my wife onto the dick of another man.

        Like


      • Your attitude needs to be to learn enough game to keep her on your dick and think its the best dick in the world.

        Like


    • What age is that?

      Like


    • The more men who know game, the better, in my opinion. It is a way of handling empowered, confident Western women.

      Like


      • We don’t wanna “handle” an “empowered”, “confident” cunt, we want to pump and dump them if they’re hot enough.

        Submissive, shy girls are the real deal.

        Like


  6. on December 18, 2011 at 5:45 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    lzozozlzzoloz

    love it1!!!

    I can see it now.

    Week 0: Introduction to da federal resevree monetamoney butthexual sodomite men who desoul women in college in secrtely taped asscocking sessionss and transofrm them into soulless vitu vituperative vehicles of welath transfer via neoocn sodomy zlzoolozozozlzozlzozo

    Week 1: Introductions to male-female sex differences and Syllabus (Included readings from various respected sources in evo psych, game and social dynamics, e.g., Ridley, Markovic, Carnegie).

    Week 2: Why chicks dig jerks. (Students expected to fully understand sexy son hypothesis).

    Week 3: Alphas and betas, the hidden hierarchy.

    Week 4: Sycophancy and involuntary celibacy, the connection.

    Week 5: Men and women have an agenda, and how to recognize it.

    (menz want lotsa pusssiess without paying for it and womenz wants lotsa dollars without giving der pussieis sout to all zlozlzlzo)

    Week 6: Game as revolution in sociosexual thought.

    Week 7: Core game principles.

    (lostats cockass 4 da ladies zllzlzlzlzl!!!)

    Week 8: Dating to maximize one’s happiness.

    (lzooaoaoaooozozozoz u said “dating” lzozlzzozozozoz ask a girl on a date in a mjor city ay major western country dat gets da enococn TV and she will put u in da betabag zozozozoz beta bucket 4ever and once u are in da beta friend’s bucket there is practailly no way out untless u have a cockas as big as da gbfm nd seh happens to trip on it one night zlzoozlzo)

    Week 9: Sex, guilt and expectations: why society has an interest in corralling male desire.

    Week 10: Relationships and marriage: making them work.

    Week 11: Finals: In-field exam.

    Ya! Da GBFM will be amdinistering da ifnal final oral exam to all da ladies lzozozlzozo if you STUDY HARD you will be able to make the GBFM HARD lzozzlzlzzzozlo

    Like


  7. Can someone explain how the Sexy Sons Hypothesis accounts for the fact ‘chicks dig jerks’? As a commenter wrote in an earlier thread…

    “Isn’t this a tautological argument, though?

    You’re saying that women love assholes because they are sexy, and want to breed with sexy assholes to have sexy asshole sons?

    [Heartiste: From a gene’s-eye view, a woman stands a better chance of having sons who can charm the panties off women if she mates with a charming man.]

    So it’s a circular proposition?

    [Great truths often distill as tautologies.]

    That still doesn’t answer the question of what is it about assholes that makes them so sexy to women in the first place.

    [Asking this question is like asking what is it about perky tits and firm asses that makes them so sexy to men in the first place. Or: It’s self-evident.]

    Sociobiology would say that there has to be some kind of evolutionary competitive advantage to being an asshole.

    What is it?”

    [There is an advantage to being an asshole in a beta milieu, where the majority of men have sacrificed sexiness for dependability. It gets interesting when we look at societies where most of the men are assholes.]

    My view: in assholes, women see a potential leader, and we can easily understand why leaders are attractive from an EP perspective. Also, being an asshole implies that you are not afraid of losing a woman, meaning you therefore must have options and are preselected by other women.

    [All true. The congenial leader is a cherished myth. Most ambitious men who become leaders are what niceguys would label assholes.]

    Like


    • The “potential leader” mentioned above is key. A young
      female baboon (or a young woman, not a big difference)
      can try to impress the leader. But the competition is intense.

      Another good plan is to spot a _future_ leader, and get
      on his good side BEFORE he makes it to the top. And in
      the wild, that means a rebel – how could it be otherwise?
      Of course in modern society the number of rebels who
      make it to the top is negligible, there are very few
      Fidel Castros (fortunately).

      So the plan is in fact not likely to work as far as getting
      a guy that becomes a leader (unless the female is a literal
      baboon) but the evopsych wiring is still firing that way.

      Thor

      Like


      • “Another good plan is to spot a _future_ leader, and get
        on his good side BEFORE he makes it to the top.”

        Only where marriage or other lifetime commitment is socially enforced, so women can be sure their early discernment and attachment is honored.

        If guys can dump at will, her attempt to get on his “side” is unavailing.

        Like


    • on December 19, 2011 at 12:09 am Obstinance Works

      Just be a leader to/in the sack. Everyone will then think you are asshole enough.

      Like


    • There’s no reason to be “nice”. It’s horseshit. There’s no reason to be “nice” unless it will benefit you. Doing things that benefit many people just happens to be what benefits you most of the time.

      Man is not civilized. He is simply lazy, unable, or unwilling to take command. Those who are seen as civilized are really just biding their time or have accepted their place as Nobodies. They sit in their chairs at night with a flaccid penis thinking about how much they hate their leaders, preparing for another day of asskissing.

      This happens in large societies and small groups of 4. We’re extremely complex and dynamic pack animals.

      Like


      • on December 19, 2011 at 4:05 pm John Norman Howard

        Well, some of us are motivated by karma and staying in good odor with God… so there IS a reason to be nice… leastwise, to other men of good will… and the few quality women left on this spinning ball of mud.

        Like


  8. on December 18, 2011 at 5:56 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    Just a little reminder that ONCE UPON A TIME the universities ALL TAUGHT GAME!!!! VIA DA GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ!!!!! lzozlzlzl

    lzozozzozzo

    21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

    22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

    23 And Adam said, This [is] now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

    24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

    (NOTICE NO MENTION OF NEOCOCNSHTS BUTTHEX NOR NO-FAULT DIVORCE IN DA BIBLE!! LZOZOZLZZO)

    15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

    16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

    17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed [is] the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat [of] it all the days of thy life;

    18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

    19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.

    20 And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

    21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

    22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

    23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

    24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

    AGAIN NO MENTION OF SECRTIVE TAPINGS OF NEOCONCTHS BUTTHEX LZOZZLZLZZLZLZLZZOL

    Even Helen in Homer’s Iliad realizies what a CUNT she has been zlozzlozoozo leaving her HUSBAND for pretty boy MTROSEEXUAL PARIS WIMPY PUSSIFIED PARIS who today is a hipster plaing in da band lzozlzzo

    http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/helen/a/Helensportrayal_4.htm
    Helen and Hector
    The fifth appearance of Helen is in Book IV. Helen and Hector talk in Paris’ house, where Helen manages the household just like the other Trojan women. In her encounter with Hector, Helen is self-deprecating, calling herself “a dog, evil-contriving and abhorred.” She says she wishes she had a better husband, implying she wishes she had a husband more like Hector. It sounds as though Helen may be flirting, but in the previous two encounters Helen has shown that lust no longer motivates her, and the praise makes sense without such an insinuation of coquettishness.

    “Hector, you are my brother,
    and I’m a horrible, conniving bitch.
    I wish that on that day my mother bore me
    some evil wind had come, carried me away,
    and swept me off, up into the mountains,
    or into waves of the tumbling, crashing sea, 430
    then I would have died before this happened.
    But since gods have ordained these evil things,
    I wish I’d been wife to a better man, [350]
    someone sensitive to others’ insults,
    with feeling for his many shameful acts.
    This husband of mine has no sense now,
    and he won’t acquire any in the future.
    I expect he’ll get from that what he deserves.
    But come in, sit on this chair, my brother,
    since this trouble really weighs upon your mind— 440
    all because I was a bitch—because of that
    and Paris’ folly, Zeus gives us an evil fate,
    so we may be subjects for men’s songs
    in generations yet to come.” (Book VI)

    SEE DA GREAT BOOSK FRO FOR MEN TEACH DA GAME and DEY WERE THUSLY BANNED LZOZOZZOZL

    Like


  9. This blog is getting more and more hilarious by the moment.

    Oh well, at least we still have these 3 years of wisdom archived

    Like


    • on December 19, 2011 at 12:15 am Obstinance Works

      Just loaded up on Christmas cheer.

      Like


    • Your illiterate tweets are nevertheless insightful and eye-opening. They always make me swoon.

      I might even propose to you. Hell, I’ll do it: “Deutsch, Do you want to suck my cock?”

      Like


  10. Sorry, but Nazi SS officers, Spartan hoplites, and Turkish janissaries all prove that the state is best for turning wimpy betas into badass “alpha betas”. Civilizations aren’t made by jive shufflin’ alphafag douchebags. They’re made by unthinking terminators who want nothing more than to kill anyone their shogun commands them to. Then, viciously sodomize the enemy’s women to save their virginity for their future wives.

    That’s the kind of beta who demands absolutely nothing from women, yet receives everything, for they feel in awe of his capacity to serve with no hesitation. The ORIGINAL chivalry.

    What we have now is Star Trek betas. We need Starship Troopers betas, unquestioning men of honor, like our great/grandfathers. Communist bug slayers and defenders of the fatherland. Alphas are purely genetic products, not what the state should try to mold men into.

    Listen to that and try to tell me being beta is always pathetic. Just hand the schools over to the military and watch all the problems suddenly get solved.

    Like


    • Not all sacrifice is honorable.

      Try this scenario: Your wife fucks some scumbag behind your back. She gets knocked up by him and implores you to forgive her and take care of her and the baby. If you were to do so, you would be making a sacrifice, yet, is submitting to your own cuckoldry honorable?

      The same analogy can be drawn with a state/nation/system which seeks to exploit you.

      Like


    • on December 19, 2011 at 4:08 pm John Norman Howard

      The movie, though entertaining enough, is a travesty compared to the original book… which should be required reading in every middle school.

      Like


    • This movie sucked balls so hard it made my teeth hurt. The book conveyed the message you ascribe to the movie. It was brilliant. The movie had chicks in the military and serving in the most elite units and everyone showering together. It was a lame assed leftist parody of the military and a demonstration of what the left wants to do to undermine the military. Hollywood makes me puke.

      Like


  11. If everybody did it, wouldn’t it become ineffective?

    Like


    • True, then all the “alpha” dudes would be killing each other over stupid stuff (like they do in the ghetto with crack, women and/or Glock .40s involved). But, then again, the Alpha should have some productive function (not sperm donation) or they’re just a parasite and not evolutionarily constructive… and these douchebags don’t. (Tear down society, sure; but build it up, not this crowd. Alphas do have some leadership responsibilities/burdens in real life, it ain’t all pump and dump.)

      Like


    • “If everyone is special then no one is special.”

      Like


    • No, it’s like if all women became stunning models with big tits and 0.7 whr, and started to approach men. It would increase sexual activity.

      Most men would become desirable and with enough balls to approach women. Even if women tried to be careful, they cannot shut down their attraction triggers which evolved for millenia. Hypergamy is only effective when most males are chumps. Being surrounded by casanovas is a huge incentive for women to slut it up.

      I see mass slutification, minimal commitment from men… It would be like Sierra leone without the war, or like the US blacks with even more playas and bitches. Or like the gay community.

      There will still be love, but it will last for a couple of weeks. Men would become even more angry at women because they can’t hold their legs closed. And women will become jaded sperm collectors complaining about where the real men at.

      It sounds fun. However, a civilizational collapse would take a while, but it will unavoidably happen at some point.
      I don’t know about the long term evolutionary repercussions, but I suspect that even if I strongly believe God doesn’t exist, he will come to existence and wash all this mess with a giant tidal wave.

      We are already heading towards a wall, teaching game sounds like stepping on the gas.

      Men in the know should be selfish and favor the young males close to them. Once your nephews, brothers, sons hit 15-16 years old, hand them a collection of game literature. What they choose to do with it is their responsibility.

      Like


      • Disagree that it would increase sexual activity if every man learned game. Men are wired to sleep with every hot woman. Women are wired to be attracted to only the top dog.

        [heartiste: not quite accurate. women are attracted to the alpha attitude that top dogs typically possess. if all men copped that attitude, there would be more happy ladies in the world. at least for the short term. on a sufficiently long term time horizon, evolution would ensure that desires adapt to the mating landscape until an alpha/beta 80/20 equilibrium is once again reached.]

        If 10 men with game approach her she will simply choose the one with the best game. Us men have to accept that someone is always gonna be on the bottom only getting scraps even if every man learns game. There will never be a utopia where every man gets as much pussy as he wants. There will always be a pecking order and I dont always like it, but evolution made it that way and all we can do is adapt.

        Like


    • Absolutely not.

      If there were more alphas in the world, even a majority, you’d likely see the “supply and demand” curve adjusting over time.

      Fat women, seeing the availability of great guys, would likely start to lose weight. Feminists, completely priced out of the dating market, would consider their faults and adjust.

      Sure, there’d be more ‘great’ guys for a fixed number of women for a period of time, but at the moment, women know they can get fat, have feminist viewpoints, and still get a beta provider when they want one. When the beta provider pool dries up, things will have to change.

      Like


  12. Perhaps a book (or series of blog posts?) directed at introducing young men to these concepts is something the writers of this blog would be interested in producing?

    Like


  13. To a great extent, “stuff the beast” dream has already come true, at least in some public schools. Sex Ed became “Health” class — and Health class has now become the dumping bin for every disease of the week, hysteria of the month, and crusade of the season.

    My own kid was told to avoid anorexia, watch out for obesity, practice safe sex, practice abstinence, respect the choices of the girls who get pregnant, say no to drugs, get vaccinated, get exercise outdoors, avoid ultraviolet light, don’t bully, don’t commit suicide, and (inevitably) reduce your carbon footprint or a hurricane will blow up your house. All this in twelve weeks.

    The class consisted of rote memorizing, open-book quizzes, and some macaroni and glitter glued to posterboard style “projects.” Everyone including the teacher realizes the class is a joke.

    Like


  14. I don’t mind game not being taught. Like the Dark Lord stated there are a multitiude of resources. If you think about it; even listening to Rihanna’s songs can lead a man to. “I want you to take me… like a thief in the night!”
    “Boy you look so ugly when you cry”
    “Come here rude boy come come can you get it up”
    “Just gonna stand here and watch me burn but its alright because I love the way it hurts’

    Just reiterate theat there’s a difference between girls and guys. Girls enjoy pain, hate weakness in others, like to be challenged, and want to be taken. Boys like civility, order, sh!t that makes sense, and to be respected. Praising/respecting/encouraging a guy usually leads to positive results and belittling/degrading/negging a girl usually leads to postiive results.

    What I do mind is the bullsh!t shoved down people’s thraot and the blatant misandry. Deliberate misleading. Feeling ashamed for having natural desires. Not consuming enough calories. Feeling ashamed of being nerdy and pursuing knowledge. Feeling proud of smoking weed every fukking day.etc.

    I want boys who befriend girls and try to comfort and assuage them undersatnd that they should do it out of pure generosity.

    I want discipline, honor, and respect to be evident in the highest most popular athletes and the stoner, douchebags, and jocks to be alevel below them..

    That’s all.

    Like


  15. There is an underlying ‘consciousness’ to every culture, that determines ways and methods and the symptoms of it’s actions.

    See where U.S. culture comes from. Understand the baseline of the religious doctrine that is an indelible part of its foundation. There is no escaping the suppression of the average male in a system designed to do so, and while the pope is out of the picture, the rest still applies.

    Meanwhile, I just got out of Malaysia, back to Thailand. None of those bits apply here! http://two.cedonulli.com/2011/12/visa-run-malaysia/

    Like


    • This Jake guy cracks me up. Everytime, it’s the same pattern.
      He comes in here, writes some random shit linked to H’s post followed by a link to an off-topic article on his blog. And he gets trolled almost everytime, this time by me.

      The funny thing is that he never responds, and repeats the same circus over and over again.

      Cracks me up, I’m telling you.

      Like


  16. who’s markovic

    Like


  17. Many of the behaviors exhibited by “alphas” are already showing up naturally when most boys hit about 12/13. I know with me and my peers it did. the upwards head nodding, etc. Of course, reality sets in soon after and the social roles get cemented throughout high school and then usually for the rest of their lives..

    So many of the things mentioned on this site and others are things I used to do instinctively but just lost as he years and my youth flew by.

    The school system tends to crush all potential in most boys.

    Anyway, your children shouldn’t be in school. They should be home-schooled and when they’re old enough, out with their fathers learning to be men, not being ordered to sit quietly and read fucking Charlotte’s Web. Faggot book.

    Like


    • Public school sucks.

      It’s just a place to babysit the unwashed masses before the boys get factory jobs and before the girls get married. Oh wait, there are no more factory jobs for men & women don’t give 2 shits about marriage in their prime years.

      Like


  18. Dear pi… Heartiste. I wonder what you would make of this article about western women?

    http://llco.org/female-chauvinist-pigs-women-and-the-rise-of-raunch-culture/

    Like


    • A woman signaling sexual availability is threatening to women who aren’t.

      Like


    • on December 19, 2011 at 12:38 pm John Norman Howard

      What to make of what? Another Jewess talking head (writing head?) telling us how fucked up our culture is, without mentioning how her tribe took and continue to take the lead role in said decline?

      Meh.

      Like


  19. Game is better underground.

    The guys who will actually benefit from learning game and who are mentally ready to put effort and dedication into studying it are the guys who’ve hit total rock-bottom and are typing “how do I talk to girls?” into Google out of a desperation to turn their lives around.

    Anyone who’s tried to introduce their “never get laid” friends to game has probably found out the hard way that people will reject the teachings or half-ass the learning process until they’re at rock-bottom.

    Like


    • Interesting. So you think those who are at rock bottom are in better position to learn game than your average AFC?

      Like


  20. Although it’s obvious that game would never make its way into the curriculum, given the systems track record for socio-sexual education (I would include “citizenship”/”PHSCE” under this banner), I reckon it would be possible to get the psychological elements of game taught. This could be done under the guise of Social Dynamics.

    A lot of game skills are generally useful outside the realm of sex and relationships, and a case could be made to mainstream thinkers about how Social dynamics ought to be taught.

    It’s already happening in the corporate world, what with Cisco hiring RSD to teach their sales people.

    Like


  21. Speaking of PC and feminist indoctrination, it’s worse than ever.

    I graduated from a professional grad school 10 years ago. Recently I visited the website of my school to look up some professors. It was all “diversity this” and “women that” and “unconscious bias” and gender roles etc etc.

    What the hell has higher education come to?

    All this focus on differences and gender studies? What about what makes us all the same?

    Then it hit me — this is all about power.

    The fembots and minorities with grievance and their ilk get power from claiming endless discrimination and making up new ways they are oppressed. It will never stop.

    I fear for America.

    Like


  22. Week 10 needs to be 2 weeks to adequately discuss the mass suicide – financial, emotional and sometimes real – which is modern marriage for men in America and most of the West.

    No-fault (== his-fault) divorce, with its crippling alimony and “child support” fees, false domestic violence accusations where the male is guilty until proven innocent, and isolation of men from their children, all make modern marriage an incredibly risky proposition for the male. Much of that applies to cohabitation as well.

    Like


  23. Teaching Game in school
    will be as pointlessly stupid
    as teaching American History has been

    Like


  24. This might be kinda off-topic, but I recently came across this article http://www.isteve.com/lesvsgay.htm

    It’s impossible not to think of hardcore feminists when you read the “lesbian tendencies” column.

    Like


  25. What would be the consequences if everyone knew and practiced game? Would it lead to a more equitable distribution of pussy? or would the top 15% of men just further distinguish themselves?

    Like


  26. Theprivateman, schools do not fail young men in the sense that you seem to be implying. Schools should not be tasked with raising children and any parent that entrusts schools to do that has irremediably failed their children. Schools fail for other reasons, but I felt compelled to make this distinction

    Like


  27. 150 years? are you talking about the emancipation proclamation or the liberation of the russian serfs? and what do either of those have to do with feminism?

    Like


  28. I guess it couldn’t be any worse than sex education as it is currently taught. Scare tactics about STD’s and pregnancy are of little use to a skinny, awkward 15-year-old who can’t see any light at the end of his tunnel of celibacy.

    Like


  29. on December 18, 2011 at 11:53 pm Obstinance Works

    It would no longer be cool.

    Like


  30. 1. This should be mandatory curriculum to Asian-American males.
    2. As this knowledge becomes more commonplace, what is the societal outcome? The level of the playing field goes up. Women have more choices than ever? The pax romana of game for the few and enlightened ends? Fuck that. I’d rather keep the truth close and amongst my friends and offspring.

    Like


  31. Off-topic, but this just in… Kim Jong Il is dead. No more 5’3″ megalomanic tyrant to make fun of any more.

    Like


  32. “[All true. The congenial leader is a cherished myth. Most ambitious men who become leaders are what niceguys would label assholes.]”

    Evidence? Most great leaders seem “paper alphas” – dominant over other men, but beta as fuck over women. Read Napoleon’s letters to Josephine.

    Like


  33. Silly boy! Schools exist to create cogwheels for the corporate system not to empower individuals.

    It is up to the individuals and sometimes to his benevolent mentors (like a smart father or uncle if he has one) to empower them.

    If school would exist to empower individuals then everybody would be taught how to attract opposite sex, how to start personal business, how to navigate legal system, martial arts, handling a gun and fixing ones car. Something only perhaps a few private schools for extremely wealthy children teach.

    Instead we get math drills to drill in patient slavery and false history to drill in patriotism to create corporate drones and army cannon fodder.

    Like


    • And they don’t even teach math right, in a way that you can actually understand them and apply them to everyday life, they have you memorize shit so you can only use it for work and then not understand a thing.

      Like


  34. The biggest obstacle to teaching Game would be found among many young men. That sector which refuses to recognize the male-female differences/dynamics. Those guys who put women on a pedestal. The white knights, the male feminists, the manginas. They’d fight this thing tooth and nail, even as their female classmates are using them as doormats and mocking them behind their backs and in their faces.

    Another thing that this would be going up against is the massive propaganda from media and older generation. The traditional line that it’s all about meeting Miss Rite, romance, and happy ever after. Or the Playboy delusion that all men can date centerfolds if only they buy the right consumer junk. Too many guys are chasing these fantasies.

    Yes, there are many young men out there who would take the Red Pill if offered. But, as Tyler Durden pointed out, they have to first hit rock bottom before they can free themselves.

    Like


  35. Funny article.

    So if they teach game in public schools, how will do the PUA artists who sell seminars books and dvds? LOL

    No, game is not different from math or geography. Teach it in public schools, and it will be ruined.

    Public schools should not exist period. If you are serious, you pay your class in a private school where there is not affirmative action or drugs or bullies. And if you are good, the state can maybe reimbourse you the fees. Maybe. Just maybe.

    Like


  36. Interesting idea.

    Even if it was possible to cut through all of the socio-political bullshit and a public high school was allowed to teach “Evo Psych” or “Modern Social Dynamics” or whatever, the subjects described above, 99% of the women would get angry at it and the majority of men wouldn’t believe it, or apply it. Just like now.

    It amazes me that this knowledge, much of which is captured in this very blog, and also is and has been commercialized and published at book stores and all over the fucking internet for 7 years, and………very, very few men apply it. That’s the key, the continuous application. Most men don’t do it.

    Most men are beta, and will stay beta. Some will choose to swallow the red pill, but of the ones who do, only very few have the intelligence, tenacity, discipline and courage to allow the red pill to digest into their blood; and flush the culturally programmed beta-tardness out of them. Bottom line, it takes work.

    Even at the “community” meetings I attend, I see it. Every meeting there is a very small few who: take notes, ask intelligent questions, share stories and examples. After every meeting we go out. And again, those very few APPLY the material. Ya know, actually approach women they are attracted to and talk to them.

    The rest are just there. Just there taking up space with the look of retarded beta awe.

    It’s ok with me. I’m the guy your girlfriend is thinking about. Ya know, her “new friend” she met when she was out with the girls. I just sent her a txt. Funny, she didn’t mention she had a boyfriend.

    Hmmm…if Game was taught, it’d cause a time paradox. The universe would impload.

    Like


    • on December 19, 2011 at 4:17 pm John Norman Howard

      It’s ok with me. I’m the guy your girlfriend is thinking about. Ya know, her “new friend” she met when she was out with the girls. I just sent her a txt.

      Actually, you’re the guy who needs the name of a good orthopedic surgeon… for the rotator cuff repair you’ll require eventually, the way you pat yourself on the back around here.

      Like


      • Dear John Beta Norman Howard,

        I hope your sex life is more stimulating than your humor.
        *pats self on back, again*

        ~Ripp

        Like


      • on December 20, 2011 at 1:14 pm John Norman Howard

        A lame riposte indeed, but expected… from one whose lance is but a straw.

        Pack it in, Beevis… you’re outmanned.

        Like


  37. Hell no! If you have an advantage then you don’t want others to have it too thus negating the poiint of having it in the first place.

    Like


  38. @moses:

    Bingo! Misogyny and rape culture are not about actual misogyny and rape culture. They are about how easily you can manipulate an average men when you even hint that he might be a misogynist or a rapist.

    Like


  39. What do you think of this Heartiste?

    http://web.archive.org/web/20030417003242/http://www.space-ninja.com/hitler/

    I know I know, women love power and the sexy son hypothesis, but Hitler?!

    Like


    • Obviously Hitler was an alpha. He led millions of Germans into an unwinnable war through force of charisma and political skill.

      He used them for evil, but he had undeniable strong leadership qualities.

      Like


  40. […] Way better then the idiotic sex ed we have now. Published: December 19, 2011 Leave a Comment Name: Required […]

    Like


  41. “Week 1: Introductions to male-female sex differences and Syllabus (Included readings from various respected sources in evo psych, game and social dynamics, e.g., Ridley, Markovic, Carnegie).”

    Could someone help? Is the reference to ‘Carnegie’ a person or a reference to the study of evolutionary psychology at Carnegie Mellon University?

    Cheers

    Like


  42. This is school — were on the internet. This class is a google search away. 🙂

    Like


  43. Can someone tell me who ‘Carnegie’ is??

    Cheers, AD

    Like


    • Dale Carnegie was an American minister and wrote a very famous work about human nature and psychology before those terms were made clinical (1920s). His book is called “How to Win Friends and Influence People.” Pretty much every salesman in the US gets told to read it at some point in their careers, but it is also popular with successful businessmen too. He’s the Sun Tzu of self help books and one of the very first of that genre.

      Like


  44. Great to read Books for men posts! Love that stuff!

    Like


  45. Furthermore, trying to overload society with game is doomed to failure. Only a small percentage of men are capable of independent thought. That means only a small minority of men can even accept that Game works, let alone have the persistence and nerve to actually get good at it.

    Like


  46. Another excellent post… To a certain extent it is an “untaught” course in schools – with people perfecting their “game” through observation and trial and error. Of course, as with all things – it is much more effective if one can build upon the work of others rather than re-inventing the wheel over and over again…

    Like


  47. The government schools may eventually teach Game as an example of “sexism” and “harassment.”

    The teachers will likely look like Janet Napolitano, Hilary Clinton and Esther Rolle. There may also be a few male teachers who will sport ponytails, glasses and sandals.

    Like


  48. This post is Heartiste’s strongest indication yet that he is on a crusade, despite all the protesting too much about the website being a hobby or making society safe for “poolsiders who need a prosperous nation in which to pursue their lifestyles.”

    Unlocking the secrets of alpha mimicry helps a “poolsider” not at all. Rather, he should hang onto these hard-won secrets like a stockpile of food and ammo for the apocalypse.

    “[Y]ou could call this the ‘stuff the beast’ philosophy of saving civilization by feeding it too much of its own late-stage bile.”

    Remind us why are we “saving civilization” again? Sexual chaos is the alpha’s best friend. Civilization would only mean organized resistance to men who reap the unprecedented slut harvest.

    Here’s the real dynamic. Heartiste writes (and most of us comment or blog) for a simple reason. It is an expression of power. It’s the same reason why men climb cliff-faces, strive to be the first to the South Pole, plant your country’s flag on the moon. Because we can. And the corollary: You can’t.

    The popularity and response of the blog are the confirmation of power. Heartiste wouldn’t be writing without this confirmation. That explains the genesis of the site, but what explains its indeterminate continuance? The confirmation is forever certified by 20,000,000 hits over five years, the proof of a sui generis force, without promotion or branding, through simple word-of-mouth and an invitation to contradict the virtue on display at a certain URL address. But what is the ongoing compensation? A will to truth? When will it no longer be necessary to post? When the last beta turns?

    This is why the detached pose is not a sufficient explanation. It becomes more than a hobby when one feels compelled to post long after all that needed to be said has been said a single time. Now we are in the realm of applying those comprehensively elucidated principles (Commandments, Maxims) to new phenomena. Either Heartiste needs still more confirmation that his philosophy works universally and therefore is applicable to topical events, or he is trying to reach new audiences for some reason.

    If those new audiences weren’t at odds with the poolside strategy, continuance would be understandable. But there will always be people who haven’t heard the Good News, always a new generation coming up. Occam’s Razor says he wants to do more than display power. He wants to display his power to a certain end: men taking back their manhood, even if it makes his personal pick-up mission more difficult or not. These are the thoughts of a maturing mind, slowly turning toward contemplation of one’s legacy.

    Why do most alphas neglect to keep a blog without pause for half-a-decade? Why are they satisfied with mere vagina, whereas others keep (and, in particular, one keeps) publishing their diaries daily? It is because — all protests to the contrary notwithstanding — they are invested in something bigger than their own selfish pursuits. But to admit this would undermine a philosophy that claims to be only selfish pursuit, despite all evidence, and tacit admission, to the contrary.

    This is your Come to Jesus Moment, Heartiste. (Not literally Jesus, not yet, you can come off the fainting couch.) You have yourself put the lie to the idea you aren’t concerned with anything beyond the application of game to pick-up. The tent-sulk has gotten old. The Achaeans will need their Achilles.

    You’ve done a decent job protecting your anonymity. That has preserved the option to come out under a different persona — whenever the ennui gets to you at last, whenever you are ready to take proper command of your legacy.

    Like


    • heartiste may not ever get over the disgust that fuels his nihilism (reading between the lines) to say get up on top of his desk at work and do something as positive as lead the ‘revolution’. (i’m imagining him a male marianne rallying newly empowered citizens into battle in that delacroix painting)

      nope, someone more optimistic and virtuous is needed. like you said before, he’s closer to a john the baptist-‘i am a voice crying in the wilderness. make straight the way of the lord’- than the necessarily more charismatic and credible revolutionary.

      Like


      • Who cares about revolution? For who, for what?

        It’s too late, sweetheart. A revolutionary spirit needs an idealistic meta-narrative. The era of idealism is over.
        We don’t need a charismatic leader because there is nothing left to be believed in.

        The reason Heartiste is so compelling to men is precisely because he is a cynical nihilist who doesn’t believe in anything and advocates nothing, except to enjoy the final act of a civilization which was handed by our elders to the destructive whims of a bunch of delusional women.

        Human nature is exposed. Optimism and virtue are for the weak who still believe in some kind of fairy tale. King A is a rather good example.
        It’s too bad because he has the profile of a traditional charismatic leader (at least virtually) but words can only lead you so far. He doesn’t have anything valuable to offer, no one does.

        Like


      • ‘He doesn’t have anything valuable to offer, no one does.’

        i’m not necessarily disagreeing with you. nobody will offer another vision that will reinvigorate a decadent society,… until someone does. that may be a long time coming, maybe too late as we’ll destroy ourselves in the meantime.

        what i do know is that what is unsustainable will not be sustained, and that the future belongs to those who show up for it. that future may not be as comfortable and prosperous as the present one. maybe it won’t exist at all. but if there are survivors, they will _necessarily_ be optimists. the despairing will die out. which group is better off i don’t have a fucking clue.

        Like


      • These little boys need more seasoning, is all. Despair is magnetic, especially when you don’t know shit. Brooding goth trends and weepy pussy-rock are popular with newly minted adults for a reason. These boys are at an age when they’re expected to perform like men, but nobody taught them how. So you get an all too typical inchoate nihilism and rage, expressed in manic bursts, signifying nothing. They know they’re missing something and they don’t have the least idea how to express it. Worst of all, they know no men worthy to be models for their lives; so they attach themselves in desperation to the first charmer who unapologetically challenges them to be men. Heartiste is the father figure for many broken-home orphans.

        Like


      • Actually, the fairy tale is that once upon a time there was an era of idealism and virtue and that in just a few weeks the world will end. Time is cyclical, not linear. It’s the same as it’s ever been – the heroic few, like King A, stemming the tide of chaos and insanity. The meta-narrative is always the same meta-narrative. Human nature has not all of a sudden been exposed. It’s always been known by those who desire to know it. What it really sounds like is you are projecting your own personal realizations about human nature on history. The history of the West is a history of war, death, bloodshed, and men killing men for the ultimate prize. Only NOW, do we live in a cuddly, touchy-feely, namby-pamby world. The West has not become hardened and cynical, it’s actually become soft and optimistic. I think you have it ass backwards. Save the drama for ya mama!

        Like


      • carolyn wrote:

        i’m imagining him a male marianne rallying newly empowered citizens into battle in that delacroix painting

        There’s a thrilling illustration for us! Thanks for the reference.

        And how apt that the symbol depicted is a topless woman in an environment of chaos “leading the people” to war. Many appropriate metaphors here.

        Before feminism, we used to render great principles and nations (and ships) in the female gender, as objects to be admired like a man would naturally, immediately, and comprehensively venerate a world-class beauty. That Delacroix had this personified principle’s blouse coming off makes the concept even more literal and explicit.

        Poets and painters cannot convey the ineffable awe a man experiences when he sees a beautiful woman (“HB10”). That awe can be exploited (“pedestalization”), of course, and it was used to great effect on the generation of betas who first acquiesced to the deluded feminist demands which subsequently became the default status for the generations that followed, including ours. But an encounter with beauty is the same awe a man encounters when gazing upon the truth. It’s no coincidence therefore that “liberty leading the people” would look like a resolute hottie so unencumbered that the very essence of her beauty — all of her beauty, symbolized by the secret knowledge of her breasts — cannot be constrained.

        We came to regard this grammatical elevation of the feminine as condescension, and we stopped naming the great forces of nature (e.g. hurricanes) after women. In the name of equality, women attempted to duplicate the feats of men, they attempted to become facsimiles of men, and in doing so lost whatever status of equality they once enjoyed from la différence. Not only did they fail in their mission in every way but the nominal, they trashed one of the few powerful perks of being a woman because it wasn’t outwardly masculine enough.

        The idea of Heartiste being “a male Marianne”? Too perfect. Heartiste’s concept of liberty is so inextricable from the feminist disaster that it’s not inconceivable to imagine him perverting his own masculinity in that way to revel in the chaos. Feminism is the best thing that ever happened to him. It may disgust him on a visceral level, he may give lip service to its destruction, but his “game” would be at an end the day order was restored. When you’re “poolside,” you’re not thinking much about what comes after the chaos.

        You may be right: he’s not in the best position to “lead the ‘revolution,'” given his investment in a milieu that is already passing, with or without his leadership. But that doesn’t mean he will stay permanently indifferent. One can only soak up so many rays and splash around in the kiddie pool for so long before the ennui engulfs him. Great champions and wealthy men, after gaining that goal which drove them their entire lives, have a common reaction: Is this all there is? They miss the struggle, the journey, the conquest. The epic denouement is so precipitous that it can be near-suicidal. At a certain point the cloying stickiness of the last mai tai begins to “spoil [his] stomach[].” “A little poison now and then: that maketh pleasant dreams. And much poison at last for a pleasant death.”

        The expense of spirit in a waste of shame
        Is lust in action; and till action, lust
        Is perjured, murderous, bloody, full of blame,
        Savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust;
        Enjoy’d no sooner but despised straight;
        Past reason hunted; and no sooner had,
        Past reason hated, as a swallowed bait,
        On purpose laid to make the taker mad:
        Mad in pursuit, and in possession so;
        Had, having, and in quest to have, extreme;
        A bliss in proof, and proved, a very woe;
        Before, a joy proposed; behind, a dream.

        All this the world well knows; yet none knows well
        To shun the heaven that leads men to this hell.

        — Shakespeare, Sonnet 129

        Like


    • “This post is Heartiste’s strongest indication yet that he is on a crusade”

      “Either Heartiste needs still more confirmation that his philosophy works universally and therefore is applicable to topical events, or he is trying to reach new audiences for some reason.”

      OR maybe CH just thought it’d be amusing to reply to Harkat’s question and expand on it a little.

      Queen B, you spend way too much time alone and inside. You beat off in your brain so much that if someone shit on your doorstep, not only would you talk to the bacteria in the shit (they might listen), you’d come up with a disertation about the philosophical overtones of feces manifestation on cement.

      And in reality it was just Heartiste’s dog passing by.

      Man, get out of the house more often- go talk to some women.

      Like


      • Zzzzzz. How do you not bore yourself to death?

        Man, get out of the house more often- go talk to some women.

        Why leave the house when the hot pipin’ fresh delivery of your sister’s cunt is one text away?

        Like


      • And this is a supposed Christian writing. In reality, it’s someone whose prostate isn’t working and envies other men over 30 who fuck teenagers, so he makes up all this bullshit about there being better things to do like build cathedrals.

        Like


      • he’s probably not in the demographic that reliably ‘fucks teenagers’ (jeez….). he must be well over 30, judging from the perspective shown in his writing.

        but whatever. king a’s inclination is to light a single candle vs heartiste’s cursing the darkness……or whatever the hell he’s doing.

        Like


      • Yeah yeah yeah. I get this all the time. “And this is a supposed Christian writing.” Invariably from people whose familiarity with Christianity is on par with what betas “know” about women: they think they got it all figured out and then construct their armies of straw to conquer and tautologically confirm that … they got it all figured out.

        My faith, by the way, inaugurated the very assumptions that unconsciously cause you to rebel, and this was all determined for you long before your great great grandparents’ great great grandparents were born. But that’s grad-school level you needn’t be concerned with beyond the basic acknowledgment.

        Your stunted understanding of Christianity is what you learned as a child: that Christ said turn the other cheek therefore never fight; said the meek will inherit the earth therefore be meek before everything and everyone; said love your enemies therefore let them trample and defame you and all that you honor. Well, glad tidings, chump. The faith of billions stretching back millennia is not as simple as your nutshell understanding of it. It is well past time for you and your ilk to “put away childish things.”

        Catechize yourself, simpleton, before exposing the world to your aggressive retardation again. Inquire into the Ecclesia Militans and try out a different set of conclusions from context-free quotes like

        Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

        and

        I am come to send fire on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled? … Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: for from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.

        The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.

        and

        Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. …

        And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: praying always … that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in bonds; that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.

        Here endeth today’s catechesis. God is not mocked, and neither am I, His Obedient Slave.

        For the difference between my Servitude and yours is: 1) I am conscious of my Master, of Whom I serve, and you are not. 2) “I can do all things in [that Master] Who strengthens me,” whereas you pay tawdry obeisance to “men over 30 who fuck teenagers,” as though that were the highest possible human aspiration. 3) I have done all you’ve done and more, and that fact makes nonsense of your simplistic formula.

        Are we clear now, son? Are we starting to get a glimmer of the world past your button-fly?

        Like


      • Waiting for your cognitive dissonance, King. It will be a goddamn work of art.
        Call me when it’s time, I shall bring my pop-corn.

        Like


      • another thing- king a here is conjuring up an idea so repellent that it’ll give pause even to those here who hanker for the most salacious images. maybe to challenge their libertine leanings with an reductio ad absurdum example?

        Like


    • Good analysis, however, I and many others long ago had him pegged as a partial closet moralist, mostly for the reasons you cite. Men not being in charge is why our society is decadent in the first place. This is also why I must ultimately say our host is a force for good and of God. Where else can hedonists and social conservative Christians find common ground?

      Like


  49. OT: Ignorant airhead party-cumdumpsters lap up the fembot propaganda like thirsty dogs:

    http://www.examiner.com/sex-relationships-in-national/lindsay-lohan-playboy-nudes-being-touch-with-your-body-gives-you-confidence

    “Sex and sexuality are a part of nature, and I go along with nature. I think Marilyn Monroe said that, and I agree with her. Knowing your body and being in touch with your body is important because it gives you confidence, and in life women need confidence. It’s a very male-dominated world, so knowing yourself and being comfortable with your body is an important thing for me as a woman. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that’s mine.”

    Like


  50. i like how you squeezed Mystery in between Dale Carnegie and Matt Ridley.

    Like


  51. Forget about the public schools. Make it into a course similar to the ones offered by the Teaching Company, with twelve one hour sessions, and sell the thing. It could be this blog’s first tie-in product. It would make a fortune for the proprietors, more than a book ever will.

    Like


  52. I would think that by teaching it in school, the whole dynamics will change…suddenly nice guys will start to get laid left and right (scarcity principle) on top of that kids always do the complete opposite of what adults say

    hmmm thinkaboutit!

    Like


  53. Why Not?

    As I recall, the educational establishment had no problem teaching the pretty lies in school.

    Like


  54. There’s a reason why men have to read about things like this on a blog. It is a pure logical argument. There are no straw men. No ad-hominem attacks. No shaming. No delusions.

    Bring this into the light, and it’s like arguing feminism. The first harpie will ad-hominem attack you. The next will use logic as a strawman to make you jump through hoops. The next will belittle your small dick. Etc.

    Point being, logic solves situations amongst men, when women are not involved. Bring a woman into the fold, and now you have to turn every trick to convince them you are better than the next guy. Logic is only useful if it makes your opponent look stupid and inept, not because of the valuable info the message might contain.

    The only way forward is down. Let any instution die that believes it’s own delusions of letting fem thought infect itself.

    Like


  55. goddamnit King A, I already got my fill of literary analysis in grade 12 english

    Like


  56. The schools would teach it about as well as they do the 3 Rs, if they ever did it, which they wouldn’t because they’d hate it. They may try to teach girls game-resistance at some point, but they’ll fail miserably because Uncle Sugar teaches an entirely different lesson about the consequences of deadbeat alpha fucking.

    Like


  57. on December 19, 2011 at 5:24 pm mavala (wife & mother)

    I have not read all the comments and it is possible that I disgress here… but… most things are learnt at home, not at school. And not necessarly as explicit lessons but but taught by example. I am not an expert on game by any means, but I am sure game is one of the things is taught this way.

    Also: we humans pass truths to our children as stories, legends, fairy tales… not Disney altered stories but the more Grimm brothers stories and the like. Two Grimm stories come two my mind now:

    King Thrushbeek provides an example of a man who puts his arrogant, shallow woman in her place. I don’t know if King Thrushbeek is an alpha or not, but he certainly gets the respect he deserves.

    The fisherman and his wife, is maybe not as relevant, but describing a greedy, ambitious, ill-mannered wife that nags the good man she is married to, certainly dissuades any girl of becoming this kind of wife.

    Like


  58. I think that game-learning should be a secret club for males – if too many women cotton onto the fact that men are being taught game, they may turn up their bitch shields and shit tests to weed out the ‘learned alphas’ from the natural ones. I just get the feeling knowledge of game is something that’s meant to be at least something of a secret, lest you suddenly have to compete with even more people. I remember the first time I was taught about what I know these days to be ‘game’ – a 40+ married woman, a ‘cool mum’ sort, telling me about leaving a time delay with texts. She definitely spoke to me and my friend as if she was sharing a secret.

    Game, if ‘taught’ on a curricular level at all, should be taught discreetly to the civilisation-making upper crust people who are too soft from generations of sheltered existence, to balance out the proles who are low-IQ enough to know little other than follow their instincts – that of simian one-upmanship. They might be in the form of remedial classes, but selecting people discreetly and unobtrusively observing playground dynamics would not be easy.

    Like


  59. To put it simple,like the guys over at the art of charm/pickup podcast said a few years ago:”We’re not even using the social studies or geography we learnt in school ages ago.But we’re still using our game to get our swerve on”.

    Like