Chicks Dig Cruelty

Blogfly Whiskey has taken his fair share of lumps from the alt-sphere commentariat for his view that white women universally swoon for black cock and for his… ahem… Scots-Irish sensibilities. But this comment he left over at Sailer’s contains more than a grain of truth.

Here’s the mechanism. Guys being funny get chicks. Girls being funny get … well maybe just maybe fame. But say an ugly girl who is a stand-up comedian won’t pull as many hot guys as an ugly guy who has the same level of success. Because men value looks while women value fame and social dominance more.

Russell Brand is (to my male eyes) one ugly dude who looks like an ape and is not in particularly good shape; nevertheless women go nuts for him, because he’s famous and considered funny and socially dominant (by abusing social taboos and being cruel to old guys — women generally find cruelty arousing in a socially dominant way).

The “funny-to-fuck” theory is likely true, and we don’t really need to read a study to determine that. Just go outside and socialize in mixed groups for a few times each month. Funny chicks get as much male attention as their looks command (which is to say, their humor generation capability is irrelevant to their mating success). But funny dudes will, if their humor isn’t overly-deprecating, often clean up with the ladies, regardless of their own looks. The reason for this illustrates another core game concept: chicks dig male status, dominance and personality as much as, or more than, they dig male looks. Men, on the other hand, dig beauty first and foremost, and a woman’s comedic timing, however it might make a man laugh, won’t stir his schnitzel if she’s a dog.

Since women don’t see a benefit from humor in the competition to attract men, their sex, on average when compared to men, has not evolved a strong cortical humor module. Women are better equipped to appreciate humor than they are to produce humor.

(As usual for the feminist-impaired, I will note here that the fact of male humor superiority does not mean no funny women exist. I have known a few funny chicks in my life. There are just a lot fewer funny girls than there are funny boys, and within that select group, the funniest funny men are a LOT funnier than the funniest funny women.)

The more insightful and scandalizing assertion made by Whiskey is the connection he draws between male humor and male cruelty, the two of which often travel hand in hand. Anyone who goes to stand-up shows a lot knows that the best male comics are sometimes relentlessly cruel, either to the invisible characters populating their anecdotes, or to hecklers in the crowd. And when they are cruel, merciless sadists, the women in the audience are laughing their pedestaled asses off.

The darkest truths of female nature are so dark that they are rarely broached in free-thinking underground subcultures, let alone polite, straitjacketed society. And one of those darkest of truths is the dispiriting observation that women become sexually aroused by men who expertly wield the soulkilling shiv of sadism.

Of course, style matters. You can’t just go around pointing and laughing at bums and expect dates to jump your bones. (Although, if I were pressed to judge competing strategies, I would say that your chances of banging a hottie after a date are better if she’s watched you mock a bum than if you gave her a bouquet of flowers when you picked her up.)

Cruelty that is delivered with supreme confidence, bemused detachment, and eviscerating precision is catnip to women’s kitties. Glib male cruelty says “I have so much power and self-assurance that I can freely shit in the faces of losers and foes without appearing insecure”. It is the mischievous cruelty of the Joker that makes women swoon. Despite themselves, women will get turned on by the masterful application of cruelty toward lesser men (and women!), because cruelty, almost in a league of its own, flaunts dominance. Male dominance is to women as female beauty is to men: it’s irresistible.

I say “despite themselves”, because women will hardly ever admit to such crass cravings. In the face of your cruelty to others, she’ll pout and feign a morally indignant pose and wag a finger and beg you to show mercy and pretend to be put off but in the final calculation the seismic ripples of her pussy will speak louder than any words coming from her mouth.

You think I jest?

Me: Sweetcheeks, look. That bum just winked at you. He wants to take you back to his cardboard box. [waving at bum] Hi, bum!
Her: [struggling to conceal a grin] Shh, stop that. Stop waving. You’re horrible.

Me: You want to take a bus? Forget it. [nodding in direction of obese woman] She ate it.
Her: [looking heavenward] Oh my god, I can’t believe you just said that.
Me: I hope it wasn’t a school bus. Think of the children.
Her: [smiling] Why are you being so mean?

Me: You ever date a really fat man and compare boob sizes?
Her: Jesus. [laughing] You’re not winning any points.
Me: Would you be with a man who could fill out your bra if he had a million dollars?
Her: I sometimes wonder why I’m with you.
Me: The huge prehensile cock.
Her: Oh yeah. [kiss]

Me: [looking over at girl in wheelchair] Would it be rape if she can’t feel anyting down there?
Her: [facepalm] Are you SERIOUSLY going to be like this tonight?
Me: You mean, like the bastard you love?
Her: No, like the immature boy I definitely do not love.
Me: Don’t make me pull your ponytail.
Her: I can’t stay mad at you, can I?

Me: The perfect lover: black cock, white looks, asian flexibility. Waddaya think?
Her: I think you’re being racist.
Me: You know what black girls call me? Colonist.
Her: More like COLON-ist.
Me: Wow. That was. So. Funny.
Her: Shut up.
TRIUMPHAL SEX

***

Sugar and spice and everything nice?

NO.

Tingles and wetness and everything alpha.

The above snippets are far from the cruelest a man can be, but you get the idea. And, generally, the crueler you are, as long as you are confidently cruel and don’t back away from it when she huffs and puffs, the sexier you will be to her. Sure, women are generally the overtly nicer sex and won’t make a habit of ridiculing the weak and degenerate, but WOW JUST WOW can they appreciate the sadistic streak in men.

The way it will usually go down is like this: You revel in your cruelty. She reacts with manufactured disapproval, often stifling laughter. Her vagina moistens. A wave of hidden shame releases a continuous flow of blood to her vaginal walls, maintaining her in a semi-aroused state all day long. Later that night, the floodgates open and you slip in like a lubed eel.

And a thousand ancient dictums are proved right once again.





Comments


  1. Yup. Good advice.this works.

    Like


    • This guy is full of crap about white women. White guys are dating outside race almost ten times than they are based on couple statistics. I’m sure there are some it applies to, but not even close to being many of them.

      Like


  2. Anytime she says “O MY GAWD I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT!” you’re good to go

    Like


  3. “Nice Guys Don’t Get Laid”

    I saw that on a bumper sticker somewhere, (on my car)

    Like


  4. on July 5, 2012 at 5:23 pm Senior Beta

    Well, if you don’t want to write that book your fans are urging you to, you can always do stand up.

    Like


  5. Blogfly Whiskey has taken his fair share of lumps from the alt-sphere commentariat … But this comment he left over at Sailer’s contains more than a grain of truth

    DAMN GLAD to see whisky FINALLY giving Sailer some new ideas to swipe.

    Like


  6. My biggest fear is to marry a chick, essentially pay full price for something that some fucker got for free one lonely drunken night or one slutty vacation long ago.

    Like


    • I never met a leftist who was the true leader of his household.
      The few traditional alphas (like strong posture and body language…) that I met who were leftist also happened to be notorious cuckolds.

      Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 2:15 am Mr. Pointyface

        haha: Him: The most powerful man in the entire world.
        You: Typing with bated ( maybe beta-ed) breath with one hand, while declaring you assessment of His level of alphaness.

        The little people are so funny.

        Like


      • Collectivism is for pussies.

        Like


      • Anon, it’s not just leftists. This cuts across party lines. Ronald Reagan, spiritual father of the Republican party, called his wife “Mommy”.

        Case closed.

        Like


      • Different Era, champ.
        Not even applicable to today’s vileness.
        Not even CLOSE

        Like


      • Calling your wife “Mummy”, as my grandfather did, is a habit you get into when you have children and are used to talking to and in front of them.

        Like


      • Exactly. Then it becomes a term of endearment inadvertantly. Another case of censorship by ommission.

        Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 6:36 am Art Vandelay

      POTUS – Pussy of the United States

      His wife repeatedly disrespected him on TV for science sake… I think the femcunts get some tingles out of it, the supposedly most powerful man in the world bowing to some bitch.

      Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 12:18 pm Simon Corso

      @ migs,

      Romney will not save us. ( if he wins which I doubt will happen. )

      Rome is burning .
      It’s time to find your best girl, get a bag of marshmallows and find a comfortable vantage point to watch it from.

      Western culture is circling the drain, doesn’t matter who’s in charge at this point.

      Like


    • According to “The Amateur”, the pre-FLOTUS openly mulled over divorcing the pre-POTUS in 2000 when the latter lost that election. Denied by the white house naturally but it fits a higher kind of truth, or however NYT would put it.

      Like


  7. Case in point… Sharia Game in action:

    “Egypt’s First ‘Sex-Slave’ Marriage,” by Raymond Ibrahim, 5 Jul 2012
    http://www.raymondibrahim.com/11952/egypt-sex-slave-marriage

    Watch, Our America-hating, man-bashing feminists with be silent but all wet and tingly about this.

    Like


    • “Owner-Husband.” Now that’s more like iIt!

      Like


    • no doubt.

      recall the words of feminazi congresswoman Patty Murray a decade ago that Osama bin Laden is popular in poor countries because he helped pay for schools, roads and even day care centers. (BS, but BS she actually believed)

      Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 6:38 am Art Vandelay

        While the United States actually does these things, hospitals too, and is universally despised.

        Like


      • Go fix your own commie country
        You damned foreigner
        the land of coloreds running rampant in your streets
        impregnating your white sows
        because to them – you, as males, are mere repugnant betas.

        WE, have guns.

        Like


      • He’s merely stating a fact and pointing out the irony therein in how the left perceives things.

        Like


      • mmmkay,
        I forgot ironic Liberal Hypocrisy has never been explained.
        Good thing Vadge, has you watching his back.

        Like


      • “BS we can believe in.”

        Like


    • I guess that’s why feminists never vehemently criticize Muslims

      Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 8:18 pm Just A Girl

      BDSM marriage? At least both parties have agreed on what they’re getting into.

      Like


    • Haha. Like it or not, I got more respect for these fuckers than for whitey.
      They still got balls when it comes to women, and I’m sure it won’t change, the West showed them that freeing women is a dumbfuck idea.

      Like


    • I’ve wondered in the past when we would start seeing manosphere denizens talk about moving to the muslim world. I always figured it would be after Roosh exhausted all the pro-male countries outside the Middle East. Maybe that day has come.

      Like


      • lol, white people moving into Muslim countries, ever read the Koran? They follow it pretty literally over there.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 7:49 am Höllenhund

        Meh. Islam is just another female supremacist cult of gynocentrism and male expendability. They obsess over ‘protecting female virtue’ all the time. Middle Eastern countries are terrible places for young men.

        Like


      • That is true. You can’t game a woman in Saudi Arabia because contact among men and women who aren’t married to each other is strictly forbidden. This is why homosexuality [yes, homosexuality!] is actually rampant in the Arab world.

        Like


      • True. They obsess so much over keeping their women chaste and covered in tents that 1) typically they end up marrying their cousins, and 2) before they get married, young Muslim men are driven to screw each other (and non-Muslim women, if they can get them).

        Like


      • You have it backward. They were marrying their cousins before Islam, as that is or was the default mating strategy of most of mankind. Islam did not cause cousin marriages, and from what I’ve read of the K, nowhere mandates, though obviously does not prohibit it — as the Church did nearly a thousand years ago in the West.

        Homosexuality is not “rampant” anywhere in the Muslim world. It is a real underground phenomenon, but that is the extent of it. This is exaggerated by Western activist journalism, almost always humanities-degree cunts eager to undermine the Muslim man’s “constructed masculinity” by interviewing locker room fairies and pretending that that slice of life is the entire society.

        Well, what does one say to guys who spend x minutes of their day bitching about white women on the internet, then bitch about non-white men who haven’t completely succumbed to the egalitarian mind-rot and keep their women under control.

        White men moving to Muslim nations is not under discussion because most Muslim populations are highly inbred, i.e. xenophobic, so their cultures are for the most part impermeable. It is easy to go to Casablanca and Algiers for a good time but don’t expect to meet a Kabyle man who will sell you his daughter. Just go to Paris for that, LOL.

        Like


      • The Atlantic reported a few years ago that homosexuality really was “rampant” in Saudi Arabia for one simple reason: Men and women are forbidden to mix before marriage. So the guys do each other, out of sheer sexual frustration.

        It’s not the only example. British boys’ boarding schools have been famous for buggering, for the same reason. And of course American prisons too.

        I imagine that anywhere you lump young men together with zero female access, you’re going to get a huge homosexual underground.

        But I guess we’d need some hard (ba-DUM) numbers from Saudi Arabian men to find out what constitutes “rampant”. And good luck giving that survey.

        Like


      • You have it backward. They were marrying their cousins before Islam, as that is or was the default mating strategy of most of mankind. Islam did not cause cousin marriages, and from what I’ve read of the K, nowhere mandates, though obviously does not prohibit it — as the Church did nearly a thousand years ago in the West.

        Which goes to show that the Church was head and shoulders over all those other civilizations that we’re supposed to worship.

        Well, what does one say to guys who spend x minutes of their day bitching about white women on the internet, then bitch about non-white men who haven’t completely succumbed to the egalitarian mind-rot and keep their women under control.

        Not “white women” per se. Feminists and fatties, most certainly. And those nonwhite men who make it a mission to destroy my civilization are my enemies. I may have a grudging respect for keeping their women under control (although that’s less and less the case anywhere nowadays), but they’re still my enemies.

        Like


      • You guys are focusing too much on saudi arabia.
        The arab/muslim world is a big place. There are countries in North Africa and the middle east where alphas can fuck around (I’m thinking Tunisia, Morocco, Lebanon…) and still easily find a beautiful young virgin to settle down with, without risking the ass-raping in the divorce courts, and with enough slut shaming to keep women in check. Cuckoldresses are not stoned, but their are cast aside and shamed.

        Many europeans are going there for sexual tourism (Morocco) and even get married there. These countries are in an ideal spot as far as women are concerned. There is relative freedom, you don’t get hassled that much by the authorities if you’re a playboy. But there’s still a taboo on sex out of wedlock to avoid the bastardization of society. And women are given just enough rights to do what they want, without letting their hypergamy fuck up the social structure.

        Moderate arab countries are a sweet spot, and I’d go there if I had the opportunity.

        Like


      • I agree with this in theory, but in practice, any hopeful expat in moderate Muslim nations will sooner or later come up against the tribal mentality, probably in the shape of the local police. The danger is that hearsay triggers a much swifter and less forgiving response than in western nations. The corruption that makes those nations easy-living for playboys can also very quickly work against one as it the root is inbred, tribal mentality.

        Would like to believe Lebanon is a place to nab a wife, as Lebanese women are easily some of the most beautiful on the planet. But with great beauty comes greater cuntery, regardless of country.

        Like


      • I like your anthropologic erudition, uh. You’re spot on with the inbreeding correlation with xenophoby, although I don’t necessarily consider it a bad thing. Whites could use a little bit more of both.
        I’m curious about your views on arabs. Where do they stand in the race ranking? And what distinction do you make between them, the sub-sahel negro populace and berbers? My little experience in Europe showed me that there is a big distinction to be made between the three groups, and berbers seem to be the most K-selected in the bunch.

        I’m not really fond of miscegenation myself, but I consider mating with a north african to be less of a sacrilege than kissing baboon lips. Despite my deep dislike for islam, and the high arab criminality in europe, I don’t hold any grudge against the population in the muslim world, like I do for negroes. Is there an anthropologic/genetic basis for this? Or is it likely that one of my ancestors in from these parts (I’m canadian for more than 6 generations and american for 2, so it’s unlikely).

        Like


      • Polygamy makes male expendability even worse.

        Like


  8. Perfect placement of “wow, just wow,” Heartiste.

    The other day I was at an amusement park with two other guys and three girls (a triple date of sorts), and I found out firsthand how effective cruelty game can be:

    Girl 1: So what should a guy say if his girlfriend asks him if she looks fat in a pair of jeans?
    Beta 1: Obviously tell her she doesn’t!
    Beta 2: You just have to remind her how beautiful she is!
    Girl 2: Oh, you guys are so sweet. [holding back vomit reflex]
    Me: I’d tell her, you’re fine, you’re with me. I wouldn’t date a fat chick.
    Girl 1: What?! [mock indignation]
    Me: Yeah, we’ll have an understanding that if I’m still dating her, nothing makes her look fat.
    Girl 3 (my date): [swoon]

    She couldn’t keep her hands off me the rest of the night.

    Like


  9. Truer words seldom spoken.

    Vox Day
    Award-Winning Cruelty Artist

    Like


  10. I’ll just call this the Tucker Max rule and leave it at that.

    Like


    • Yeah, a lot of those imaginary exchanges were SO “I Hope they Serve Beer in Hell”.

      Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 12:12 pm Rick Derris

        Yes – F*cker Max and “imaginary” go hand in hand.

        Like


      • Now you see the bigger picture. Tucker Max is an imaginary construct of the Fed–just like the worthless paper dollarz bernanke prints. Ending the Fed means Ending Feminism–without a life support of fiat dollarz for worthless government jobs, women will be forced back into the family and the home.

        Now you know the source of that lefty sneer towards gold–it is a sneer towards reality itself: the reality of gold and the reality of male superiority.

        Like


      • “Yeah,” I said, “I’ll f–k anyone.” Big mistake.

        Tucked yelled for his friends to go get some kid, apparently the aforementioned virgin, because he’d “got one” for him.

        “Wait, wait, wait,” I interrupted. “Is he cute?”

        “No,” said Tucker. “He’s fat.”

        I replied that I had standards; Tucker replied that I was a whore.

        http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/09/23/i-slept-with-tucker-max-the-internets-biggest/

        He inspires me. Sometimes you have to lie to get head ahead lzzlzozozl. That’s my best try at GBFM.

        Like


  11. How can you maintain self-respect after merciless mockery of people who don’t hit you first?

    Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 2:17 am Mr. Pointyface

      It’s all right I guess if it’s in the service of getting chicks. Sounds a little pathetic and dishonorable, but game is amoral for most “red pill playas”

      Like


    • Many don’t care to. They are perfectly happy to trade self respect for pussy access. And, in Dystopia, they get to run and hide under the coattails of massa gommiment, should those they mock do what they would naturally do in more civilized societies.

      The reason ‘bum mocking strategies’ work, is that historically, when people still lived predominantly in civilized societies, the only ones who could get away with mocking people where those so powerful that they could put down any challenge from those mocked. Hence, mating with a ‘mocker’ ensured good genes. In dystpoian hellholes, the gommiment stands behind the mocker, so anyone can do it, regardless of how powerless.

      As well, in civilized societies, intra powerful male competition selects for those who behave well enough towards those less powerful to win their allegiance; after all that’s how you build a volunteer army. So, most powerful men still have this tendency to be nice in them. And mocking bums is largely the domain of those only marginally more powerful than the bums themselves.

      But, again in Dystopia, should the bum, or a few bums, or the powerful male the bums have sworn allegiance to, do what civilized people do to someone who mocks them or their bums (casually chain them to the back of pickup trucks and drag them around town for popular amusement); massa gommiment steps in. As always, on the side of the lowlife assholes, instead of those doing the civilization preserving thing. After all, non assholes need no gommiment to protect them, since by not being assholes, they don’t ofend anyone sufficiently enough to have to worry about being blown away in the first place.

      Which is just another reason why, for those of us who care about America, and the West, again becoming a civilized place; are much less concerned about Al Quaeda getting a nuke, than about the asshole worshipers claiming to “protect us” from them getting one.

      Like


    • it’s temporary – unless you are a keyboard jockey. When you don’t get any, yeah, anything will work, you’d do shit like this just like you’d fuck a chubby 5. Once you progress, you develop standards, including hanging out with women who would fuck you without having to resort to this.

      Like


    • You’re saying it like being mocked is bad for them. My mockery is kind, it helps give them the motivation they need in order to be better people. I’m making the world a better place through the power of cruelty.

      Or if it doesn’t it’s their own fucking fault.

      Like


  12. The bitchier a woman is, the more she likes being fucked senseless. In fact, the bitchiness comes from her not being fucked properly – and she knows it.

    When she complains about men not being able to keep up with her – she is really asking for a man to ignore her bitchiness and teach her a lesson by fucking her good – so she can feel normal again.

    Like


    • This should be posted up on a wall man!

      Like


    • This is true. Whenever I start to get cranky with my husband, he doesn’t even respond. He just puts out his hand and leads me to the bedroom. Works every time.

      Like


    • Completely true. And completely taboo to say. The acknowledgment of this universal Taming of the Shrew attraction would remove a main support beam and implode feminism.

      Athol Kay put it memorably, “The majority of drama queens are just seeking the king to finally show up and tell her to knock it [the fuck] off.” (Brackets my addition.)

      Hence the instilled fear that fucking a girl senseless is an act of “violence” to be avoided as illegal and immoral. Without this natural balancing maneuver, the cuntliness has frothed up to the surface and choked off the majority of sexual life below. Men are gentle in bed and women are frustrated — and the language of their frustration has been denied them, except in disrespectable quarters like Oriental fuck houses and gonzo porn. So they become frigid, save the sudden and vertiginous loss of control in the presence of alpha, who has reduced the ineffable truth to a stare.

      Cheating is rampant. Millions diddle their undiscovered clits and untouched depths over Christian Grey. For some reason we put these ugly frumps in charge of our sexuality. Down is up.

      Matt

      Like


  13. on July 5, 2012 at 5:59 pm The Shocker

    Yeappp, though when it comes to making fun of strangers vs acting princely it’s probably a wash. The stakes are too low. Make fun of her: moist. Make fun of losers in the group: sopping. Make fun of her ex boyfriend to his face: time to build an ark.

    Leaving a club at 2am last night, saw a cutie playing with her hair by herself. Walked over, made fun of her for being alone, she told me she was waiting for the guy who took her out. Said she was going to reject him and not looking forward to it. Ignored, had fun, within a minute she was flashing her boobs to show off her American flag bikini underneath. Put my arm around her shoulder and dragged her off with the rest of my group. Played the questions game (‘you get to ask me any question you want, i HAVE to answer honestly’), then asked her if she thought I was a good kisser as I went in for the kill. She loved it- and if by now you don’t think it isn’t biologically hardwired for her to delight in a cruel man stealing her away from her weaker date, then you’re a moron.

    Like


  14. on July 5, 2012 at 6:01 pm ThatNorwegianGuy

    Contrary to popular and politically correct belief, sociopathy (in men) is fucking sexy.

    Like


    • You had to let the cat out of the bag, didn’t ya?

      Now Jason will figure out why his douche-bagpipe pleas to boycott me went unheeded.

      Like


      • No surprise there. Greg Eliot is proud to be a hateful sociopath.

        Irrational hatred towards all NAMs? Check. Obsessive references to blacks and Jews? Check. Homeschooled children in same? Check. Son trained in the most idealistically rigid discipline on earth, same as Al Qaeda bombers? Check.

        You see where I’m going with this. If black churches and synagogues start getting bombed, we’ll know to point the pitchforks towards Greg Eliot’s homegrown madrassah.

        Thanks for the comment. This alpha loves to fight.

        Like


      • Heh, you’re such an asshole, you can’t even support your own clarion call for a boycott.

        And that PC lockstep this-follows-that logic of yours is a scream… almost as funny as hearing you, and only you, keep referring to yourself as an alpha.

        You claimed you weren’t a Jew… but your internet style carries all the earmarks thereof.

        If you’re truly not, you’re certainly their gold medal shabbaz goy useful idiot.

        Like


      • Sure, I told other people to ignore you. That’s because I want your Jew-baiting, black-hating, broken brain all to myself — to clobber as I please.

        And I’m not either Jewish or black, but I wish I were, just to piss you off some more.

        Keep hating, Greg Eliot, keep hating. I’ll be right here to comment every time you do. But thanks for the comment anyways. This alpha loves to fight.

        Like


      • Where I come from, it’s customary to pound one’s chest in victory only after it’s actually been achieved… and certainly never while one is wearing one’s own ass as a hat.

        I’ll leave it to others to discern which of us is worse for the wear.

        Like


      • Keep hating, Greg Eliot, keep hating. It makes it easier for everyone here to understand exactly what kind of person you are.

        Keep hating, Greg Eliot, keep hating.

        Thanks for the comment, though. This alpha loves to fight.

        Like


  15. “The darkest truths of female nature are so dark that they are rarely broached in free-thinking underground subcultures, let alone polite, straitjacketed society. And one of those darkest of truths is the dispiriting observation that women become sexually aroused by men who expertly wield the soulkilling shiv of sadism.”

    TRUTH

    PS: Women like ‘alpha’ guys being ‘funny’ or ‘skillful’ cruel cos it saves women admitting to themselves how much they despise the unfortunate. Everything female is wired everything evolutionary. As long as your worldview is totempole based with yu at te top and her somewhere beneath you and others still beneath both of you, that shit’s her mindset reflected back at her. Chicks dig darwinistic narcisism.

    Like


  16. When I am my most evil they tend to be the most wet. This is true.

    Remember, it’s about GETTING AWAY WITH THE MURDER. Not the murder itself, not the rules, not how cool your method of slaying it is. It’s the getting away with it.

    Limitation is stimulation you crimepussies

    Like


    • Nope. But whatever works for you goths.

      What you and the feminists call “evil” and “sociopathic” are baseline behaviors of manliness. The redefinition of the masculine essence as wicked was the coup that turned the culture inside out, giving you a claim to fake evil that is all of the fun and none of the annihilation. If its purpose isn’t true damage and annihilation, it is not truly evil. The frisson that accompanies your transgressiveness is based on a transgression against the omnipresent feminist lie, not against the good. The more you stump for this sabotaged definition, the more you empower the official apparatus that would call you a rapist by virtue of your desire for sex.

      Murder your date’s child with your teeth in front of her. See how wet she really gets for you. Take a tour of Auschwitz. That’ll put her in the mood. Make a night out of viewing Schindler’s List. She will so want to get fucked by you in your Nazi uniform after.

      Evil is hidden weakness and banality. It excites metal-heads and death-row groupies only to the extent they are unfamiliar with consequence. If evil thrills its victim, you’re doing it wrong. It gives a rush to its perpetrator that quickly crashes and thereafter demands a stronger hit. Abject dependency like a drunk and his bottle excites nobody.

      You feminized children have such a cramped understanding of evil. You invite dazzling demons in and are surprised when they start shitting in the coffee maker and raping your children. No, bad boyz, you aren’t close to true evil. You are a sight short of thorn-dicked incubi.

      Matt

      Like


  17. All the more reason not to be a white knoght and step in to “protect” a bitch if she is being abused by her boyfreind. You may wind up in the hospital looking at bill$ out the ass,pain,rehab and job loss…while she is fucking that guys brains out later that night!!!!!

    Like


  18. Question: I know a very sweet,nice,kind beautiful mexican girl(you know how some latinas can be;not all are squat Indians!!) She is very invested in the idea that she is good. She has,in fact,a fantastic way about bher and is the golden girl the older women adore. Now…would this shit work on someone like HER….??

    Like


    • Women are women

      Like


    • Give it to her in small doses.

      I know you issue. Cute, sweet feminine girl who stays wet for you despite you not being an asshole or cruel.

      It’s about spontaneity at that point. And cruelty doesn’t have to be directed toward her, either. Just stay the dominant one

      Like


    • Yes. My wife is that way. She thinks I’m a badass because I live life by my own rules for the most part. I don’t think I’m a badass, but if she does, that’s cool. I never want for sex.

      Like


  19. That’s too much. You can’t be that mean!

    Like


  20. Like


    • on July 5, 2012 at 6:32 pm ThatNorwegianGuy

      Actually, watching that movie for the first time was probably what sent me in the direction of the man-/gameosphere in the first place.

      Like


      • Still the best documentation of alpha body language available to the masses.

        Like


      • UMM…That movie was directed by A CHICK…
        to purposely attack and condemn 80’s “Reaganite Male Chauvinism’
        (chauvinism – even in my spell checker, check)
        So, that movie is ACTUALLY Propaganda for everything we despise.

        You norweegees need to get out of Ulmfsfdfjjord more…

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 3:52 pm ThatNorwegianGuy

        You’re matter-of-factly right. Still, I was about 10 at the time (and it’s about that long ago, too), and I didn’t give a shit that it demonized “chauvinism”; it somehow made this “chauvinism” appeal to me. Not so much the serial killing shit, more the aloof, dominant way Bateman behaved. I didn’t exactly look up game the next day, but it planted a sort of seed to not accept the political correctness that is drilled into boys in my country (and in the Western world as a whole).

        But yeah, Ulmfsfdfjjord isn’t as good as the lefties make it out to be. Cold weather, chicks with high t-levels, 25% sales tax (and ridiculous prices to begin with), and one of the most PC cultures in the world. I’ll consider moving somewhere else when I’ve leached off the state to pay for my six-year medical studies (democratic socialism isn’t so bad when you know how to exploit it).

        Like


      • Damn. Used to be, norway was The Ideal for us yanks – a mystical land full of statuesque Nordic Blonds. Now, it seems just like Bayonne NJ – but with a fatal dose of The Muzz.

        Like


      • That’s the intended irony of such anti-heroes. Deep down, she knew she was telling the truth, but couldn’t come to terms with her own cognitive dissonance. So she has to make a moralistic tale out of it to justify her ideology. The movie holds appeal to most of its fans for the very reasons you say you like the film.

        Like


    • Not only do I dig
      your multiple avatars
      but it’s really weird:
      I just watched that movie for the first time last nite.
      Laughed my ass off
      coulda been funnier, though

      Like


  21. This is one aspect of “game” that i can safely say i will not take part in.

    If it means passing up the primest of the prime pussy, at least i can say i did it with a clear conscience.

    Talking shit to strangers to impress a woman is for feral negroes.

    Like


    • “Talking shit to strangers to impress a woman is for feral negroes.”

      Now, that is a line that will get any girl going. Use it.

      Like


    • It didn’t sound like CH said anything about talking directly to strangers. It is dumb to start trouble with people for no good reason.

      Like


    • Besides, there is karma…

      Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 8:59 am Steve Johnson

        Karma – ha!

        I love the idea of karma. It means that whenever I do something fucked up and cruel to someone the reason it happened was because of something fucked up they did.

        Acting like an asshole is performing a public service.

        Easy way to pile up the good karma.

        Like


    • This comment reeks of butthurt.

      Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 3:06 pm Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

      Feral negroes is winnin’ the game, nigga.

      Like


  22. on July 5, 2012 at 6:52 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozzolzozzozo

    yes look how tucker max’s cruelty towards asians and minoriteis and teh deaf and blind leands lands him vast vast vast hunderde multi hundred thouand dollar bernanke fdollar advances from feminist female editors in chiefz and lands him freee publicicty from aging neocon aging neoocncth womenz as t at da weekely stanaddrad zzllzolzooz

    cruelty even makes oodldo old, wrrirkkneley dusty ginas tinei8egelleehelehlehelhelehlehel:

    Saw this floating around. good question!

    MCCOY MOUNTAIN
    ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

    Ms. Priscilla Painton

    Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

    RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Dear Ms. Painton,

    I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

    “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

    Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

    –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

    http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

    Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

    –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

    “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

    Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

    Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

    “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

    Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

    Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

    What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

    It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

    “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

    So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

    “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

    Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

    ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

    “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

    Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

    “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

    It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

    Best,

    McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

    the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

    What’s up with women these days?

    It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

    Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

    http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

    Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

    Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

    http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    Does she get off on this?

    “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

    Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

    Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

    Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

    http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

    http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

    http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

    “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

    [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

    [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

    [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

    [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

    [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

    11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

    Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

    ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

    http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

    “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

    See? That is the clever banker ruse.

    Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

    http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
    and Government’s War on Fathers”

    “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

    The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

    –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

    Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

    “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

    Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
    “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

    What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

    End the Fed

    Review for End The Fed
    “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
    –Arlo Guthrie

    “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
    –Vince Vaughn

    Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

    The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

    Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

    And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

    “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

    http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

    lzozozlzozlzozozlz

    Like


  23. This time, I would have to say, at best, that your mileage might vary. Two incidents spring to mind, a girl who loved me (she said so much later,
    while cuddling after sex) for going to much trouble – while driving –
    dodging a hedgehog that was already obviously dead.

    Years later, married to a different woman, I get nasty with a clerk
    and liquor store for not figuring out the price of a magazine
    (it had prices in several currencies, and as we were in the US,
    it took very little brains to pick the USD price). And wife blasted
    me for being snarly to the clerk.

    Now, I don’t doubt that cruelty can work in certain situations, and
    with catty women, but I would suggest as a working hypethesis that

    a) Stay away from being cruel to those who are in a poor position
    to defend themselves – any victory is hollow. This applies double
    to animals.

    b) probably OK to be cruel to catty women who can be seen as
    competition, especially if they are hot, but MAKE SURE thay
    are not related to or friends with the woman you are with.

    c) Possibly OK to be cruel to men who challenge you first,
    or who are truly obnoxious. But it could backfire. Stern
    talking down (remember YOU are in charge, YOU are
    the schoolmaster) is much safer.

    Thor

    Like


    • If a women, especially a wife, has lost all respect for you, a display of alphaness on your behalf will enrage her, not impress her.

      Case in point, it was reported that the reason Katie Holmes divorced Tom Cruise was because of the magazine cover that he appeared on recently. You know the one? All tattooed up and being groped by 2 skinny hot blondes?

      That pic was alpha man, but the effect it had on Katie Holmes was to enrage her, not impress her. Relationships will turn women evil over time. Its super hard for a man to remain true Alpha 24-7, even for Tom Cruise, apparently.

      I dare say that’s what happened to you in this situation. Its happened to me too before: when a woman has pussy-whipped you so severely, and out of the blue you make a demonstration of power and dominance, she will be enraged for some reason.

      Like


      • “Even for Tom Cruise?” Come on, you can’t tell me you seriously find Tom Cruise alpha? Even after 25 years of fame he still comes across as creepy and insecure.

        Like


      • Well, I’ve never met Tom Cruise, but in the book ‘The Game’, Style portrays Tom Cruise as the ultimate alpha. Now, I don’t know what the real situation is, but I’m at loathe to buy into the feminist mainstream media’s mythology of him being gay/creepy

        Like


      • The mainstream media has never suggested Tom Cruise if gay. He is a great actor and very powerful in Hollywood. I don’t see why a gay man can’t be alpha.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 12:34 am Rick Derris

        Tom Cruise probably is an alpha gay man – if this article is true, he probably made Beckham his b*tch:

        http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/359281/20120703/tom-cruise-david-beckhan-divorce-katie-holmes.htm

        “Hey, isn’t that fudge packer Tom Cruise???”
        – Mr. Garrison, “South Park”

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 6:44 am Art Vandelay

        Wasn’t Tom Cruise actually packing fudge in that episode? But yeah, he’s probably a fag, just like Travolta the other famous Scientologist.

        Like


      • Style portrays Tom Cruise as the ultimate alpha because he’s the same thing: a deep-down insecure guy who hides behind a mask of alpha behaviour. He can’t see Tom Cruise for what he really is because he has the same problems. I mean, does this guy seem alpha: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0uy8oiRSI8&feature=related

        I have a general rule: anybody who wants to go into acting probably isn’t that alpha, and any actor who gets suckered into Scientology definitely isn’t that alpha.

        It’s like Will Smith. That guy was a God when I was a kid, but look at him through adult eyes, and it’s like, you’re a grinning, try-hard idiot (and also a Scientologist). See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFjwbKMlmF4

        Like


      • Feminists and the mainstream media hate him for a reason. I think maybe he is just too macho, too politically incorrect (but silently) and pulls it all off too well. They hate him for it. He seems transparent to me, and I feel sorry for him.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 2:21 am Mr. Pointyface

        I love it when the little people puff themselves up to their true munchkin level of significance and opine on the defects of the mighty.

        Like


      • Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Tom Cruise is likely gay and Katie is still a relatively young woman.

        Like


      • I tend to agree. No matter how alpha you are, relationships generally become pretty evil and poisoned over time. I wonder if there is such a thing as an alpha female; one who always has her way with alpha males…kind of like Cleopatra.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 12:45 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        proof dat tom cruiseee is da top gunz alphaass!!

        lzozozoolzlzoz

        Like


      • It has nothing to do with Cruise. Its about the men until women have offspring. Now its about her offspring and the prospect of being absorbed by the cult of Scientology. I have seen this happen before when women will snap out of something because of their babies where you will find them at their most extreme. This is to be considered first. That is why betas become more popular after they have offspring.

        Like


      • Well I should not say nothing. It has nothing to do with his lack of alpha.

        Like


    • Getting snippy with a clerk ain’t dominant.

      Like


    • You might be able to pull off a roadkill if you can make a good joke about it, or if animal cruelty is really part of your personality and why that girl is sitting with you in the car to begin with. Most of the time though, it’s just going to seem clumsy and situationally-unaware– incompetent and lazy, not uncaring asshole. And perhaps more importantly, if she’s already been impressed by your cruelty and asshole game, sparing a small woodland critter shows your compassionate side. This sort of thing is almost cliche for an anti-hero. Murder disloyal, former friend in cold blood– rescue kitten for innocent girl on the street. Contrast is king.

      Like


  24. Something tells me the less-confident of people are going to take this as a technique while failing to let it ooze out of an established mindset.

    The result? Crash. And. Burn.

    Like any pick-up scenario, the young lady will throw a jab (insult) or a curveball (get up and leave), and you’ll be left wondering why it doesn’t “work.”

    For your own sake, develop a confident mindset. Realize you can say almost anything to a woman, so long you have frame. But don’t make the mistake of not calibrating your statements to 1) the woman you’re with, and 2) your own personality.

    Last [type]: Handling Disrespect: Man Up! Edition

    Like


  25. you know who’s racist… WOMEN

    Like


  26. While I was walking to the bar last night, I just happened to pass by a table with two guys and a girl (good looking, young). One man was latino. Drunk. He said to the girl, “I can punch you in the face, I can choke you”. The way her face lit up with a look of amazement and curiosity and fear as she looked at him right after he said that is something I almost wish I could forget. I heard her date tell the guy he needed to leave as I walked out of earshot.

    Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 11:18 am Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

      Came across a tumblr yesterday with a story about a guy who took a girl home from a bar, and told her he was mildly into femme dom stuff. So, they went at it, with him as some sort of sub. (Not my bag.) But he got tired and annoyed with her, and, the moment he was released, went at her ferociously. The scene ends with her hanging undead off the side of the bed in a messy pool of piss, vomit, and semen. The guy throws some change on the desk and leaves.

      Next weekend she calls back to see if he wants to hang out.

      Like


    • I’ve learned to recognize the expression women put on when they’re talking about something they’re supposed to be against, but have strange feelings about. I took an ex-girlfriend from a guy she was dating, and I remember when she described him grabbing her by the wrists and pushing her onto a couch.

      Like


      • You can tell when someone’s eagerly waiting to hear your reaction to something. She may say it with a tone of “Can you believe that?”, but her subcommunication is asking, “How do we feel about this?” Whoever made the post about bipolar women and ulterior motives for drama creation recently was spot on.

        Like


    • He said to the girl, “I can punch you in the face, I can choke you”.

      Violence is not evil in itself, nor is correction cruel by definition. These lies were instituted to demonize the dominant traits of men. When a man is dominant despite the lies, he is doubly masculine. Which is why anyone with even fraudulent alpha qualities get women in this environment like shooting fish in a barrel.

      “There’s plenty of fish in the…” barrel.

      Matt

      Like


      • on July 7, 2012 at 8:28 pm Dan Fletcher

        King knocks another one out of the park.

        “Which is why anyone with even fraudulent alpha qualities get women in this environment like shooting fish in a barrel.”

        Exactly. This causes people to overstate the extent to which women would normally crave psychopathy and general asshole behavior.

        Sure, women get wet for the Dark Triad and psychopathy, but the effect is amplified 10X due to the mass supression of masculinity. The contrast between the assholes and feminized betas makes the asshole seem so much more appealing.

        The mass feminization of men has forced women to choose between the “thug, dysfunctional, matriarchal brand of “manhood” and the nancy-boy Reddit-SWPL beta-bitch-tits eunuch”.

        Like


  27. Sad from an altruistic viewpoint but true. My wifes only complaint is I can be an asshole sometimes. Son’s inhereted it, hotties orbit around them.

    Like


    • SouthTX, I have noticed that my wife likes it when I show a bit of mongrel (as we say in Australia). I think they like you to be able to stand up for yourself at least sometimes, presumably because it suggests you can protect them too.

      I don’t believe in being unkind to weak people, but I have had good, surprised reactions when I have told people who badly need to be told to fuck off, to fuck off. When my wife is around, I mean.

      Like


  28. FYI,

    Sailors site is interesting because he makes the observations and thinks up the kinds of questions real men do; like you guys do here.

    The problem with him is he blocks comments that run counter to what for all practical purposes is a white male theme park he has constructed. For example, if you highlight an inconsistency in the logic of a position either he or the “collective” have produced; he will block it.

    Its not like the Chateau or Zero hedge… were you rise or fall on your own ability to use logic and make accurate observations…

    As great as Heartiste’s PUA code work is; the comments section is where the refinement process takes place. You can challenge, question, speculate… without being blocked or banned.

    This is very rare for a blog and all ya’ll should send him some money, because this is how you learn.

    Indeed, Sailor is doing his readers a vast disservice by preventing his commenter’s from having the logic of their positions challenged.

    What are these guys gonna do in real life when their logic is challenged face to face and they can’t block or ban the person?

    Take a swing at you? (yeah right)

    Sailors site is interesting, but if he blocks your comments, what other information is he blocking?

    The Chateau rocks, as does RooshV because it ain’t just a big feel good pep rally like all these other blogs.

    Whatever the original intent of the authors, most blogs eventually degenerate to the goal of driving traffic at the expense of the pursuit of truth.

    As far as I know, I’ve never had a comment blocked on this site. I kept waiting for it to happen, but it never did.

    Whomever runs this blog, I salute your pursuit and defense of truth; especially,

    Especially,

    When its black and ugly.

    Now send the Chateau some money!

    Like


    • Wish I could say the same about roosh’s terrible forum.

      I never knew I had a single drop of Indian blood until I was banned for being an “Indian troll” after disagreeing with a popular member.

      Like


    • Steve has to censor comments because Google’s terms of service are pretty stringent. Google/Blogger allows ads, WordPress does not. WordPress has more lenient terms of service, and is less PC (Google yanked my Blogger site for a bit after lefties complained).

      Steve DOES let a lot of guys argue with him over methodology and data. As for White male theme park, that’s a function of his discussions over data, politics, and un-pcness. That’s as White and Male as a SABR-metrics conference starring Bill James.

      Like


    • on July 7, 2012 at 8:15 pm Dan Fletcher

      Examples? Not doubting you would just like to hear what specifically was blocked.

      Like


  29. I heard white guys have bigger dicks than blacks on average

    Like


    • I hope you heard right, but I think you may have a verb problem.

      Like


    • That’s actually not true, blacks do have a bigger cock on average, but about 0.5 an inch/centimetere, I can’t recall which one.

      Like


      • The difference is quite large – in the locker room. White guys like me deflate to almost nothing when there is no action in sight, especially if it is cold. This has, however, little predictive value for size when it counts.

        For obvious reason, I have no first hand observations on the inflated size distribution, but consensus is the margin is fairly small.

        Thor

        Like


      • Yes, it is quite possible that African penises are simply more nearly erect at rest, as it were. The African San or Bushmen actually have ithyphally, a permanent semi-erection.

        My penis is like Thor’s (that sound good) in that it grows hugely on erection. As I said before, my wife used to tease me, but I literally shut her up by getting her to fellate me as foreplay. There is nothing like accidentally gagging on it to teach her a little respect.

        Like


      • Thanks Dan. Interesting.

        Like


      • on July 7, 2012 at 8:13 pm Dan Fletcher

        Hence the terms “shower” and “grower”. The Germans even have specific words for this phenononom.

        The showers’ penis is at its full length normally and wont become much larger when erect. The grower’s penis will seem smaller normally but can increase 3-5x in length upon erection. Google shower vs. grower for more details.

        Like


      • on July 9, 2012 at 1:36 pm Charlesz Martel

        And the gene that causes this – the “shower” gene- also causes sickle cell anemia, btw.
        A Dr. friend of mine, who gave lots of physical exams, told me that the black guys with the biggest schlongs are the small, skinny black guys. The tall black guys are about normal for their size, and the big fat black guys ( you know the body type) – are actually quite small.

        Like


  30. Study finds that a healthy relationship with one’s father is more important than with one’s mother for healthy psychological development along 6 out of 7 measures of adult mental health. http://psr.sagepub.com/content/16/2/103.full.pdf+html

    Like


  31. women love cruel men because inherently, they’re cruel too.

    have a look at this: (it’s a pic)

    read it carefully. this just might kill the white knight beta inside you.

    Like


    • 1) teenage girls lol.

      This isn’t the only story I’ve read like this. In fact, it’s surprisingly common. They get a power trip comparable to Ghengis Kahn’s sacking of The eastern world when they have their stilleto over a teenage guy’s throat.

      2) at the end she says all the nice things he did for her. Doesn’t that just scream out “don’t do any of these nice things for me!”

      3). 7’s. This girl is a 6.5-7 in my books. And from my experience, these girls can be some of the worst people. Much worse than 8s or 9s, being at the upper middle of the pack makes these girls ferocious.

      A study on bullying found the bullies were generally middle of the pack people, not popular kids. 7/10 girls fit this category well.

      4). This is a cuckold relationship. There’s no other way o putting it. The grrl actually wants to stay talking to Jon while she fucks Dor. I’ve mentioned it in my other comments – the goal for 2012 women is to have 2 men.

      If Jon had gone cold, no contact a few weeks before Armageddon, her head would still be spinning.

      Like


      • “7′s. This girl is a 6.5-7 in my books. And from my experience, these girls can be some of the worst people. Much worse than 8s or 9s, being at the upper middle of the pack makes these girls ferocious.”

        This is absolute TRUTH and should be a Poon Commandment.

        Girls who cheat in LTRs almost always tend to be in the 6-7 range. 8s and aboves tend to have integrity within LTRs.

        My theory is that an 8-10 will usually be in a relationship with an Alpha, and are smart enough not to risk it. Hypergamy reaches a rational plateau of some sort, cuckolding an Alpha with another Alpha yields diminishing returns.

        Whereas a 6-7 is a feral, hypergamous beast. She’s just insecure enough to latch onto the first Beta who seems like relatively stable and reliable relationships material, but will jump at the chance to cuckold the poor chump when an irresistible opportunity presents itself.

        I think women in the 6-7 range are in the predicament that realistically, they can only expect a Beta for LTR, but they’re just attractive enough in their youth to pull Alphas for casual sex. They also tend to be the ones who bitch the *most* about female rivals.

        Like


      • You guys are way too nice with your ratings of this girl. At the UF, she wouldn’t even be given a second look by guys who aren’t a pathetic loser like this chump. I would rate her a 4. That is being generous

        Like


      • You clearly have no taste for young Jewish poon, and your remark is borderline anti-Semitic. On the phone with crimethink police right now !!!

        Like


      • Woh, I didn’t notice UF Palm Harbor. You’re totally right. EXPLODING with top-shelf pussy.

        … much of it Jewish. Mmmm.

        Like


      • Every “HB” judgment that comes with a picture generates a critic. Beauty isn’t in the eye of the beholder, but there are enough limitations inherent to 2D that allows for a wide range of dispute. You have to watch you don’t stray into “2/10 would not bang” attempts to claim a higher standard for the purposes of aggrandizing yourself.

        My first impression was in agreement with the “6.5-7” above, based on youth alone. But then come out the magnifying glasses and the beautiful whole is vivisected into a dozen potentially ugly parts. I’ll stick with the 6.5, half-a-point boost for slenderness and youthful glow. A “four”? No way.

        It’s the dude with the manic expression that makes me want to reconsider her attractiveness. If she were better looking, she could do better than that. The company you keep has an outsized effect on one’s attraction quotient.

        Matt

        Like


      • Experience from my own yute – 6’s give the most nasty pyrotechnic rejections.

        Like


    • Women aren’t impressed with a broken heart because they know it’s not fatal.
      – H. L. Mencken

      Like


    • All this typical tale of woe does is point up the urgency with which we must get the game samizdat to teenagers. That poor kid had zero chance. The simple disparity between SMVs that every young man must learn to handle means he requires a heavy initiation in technique just to avoid abject, world-wide humiliation as little cunts-in-training like Shera Schmeul almost accidentally perpetrate on her peers.

      To keep game from boys like Jon amounts to keeping make-up from girls like Shera, but times ten. Even with no training in the womanly arts, she has such a natural advantage that it is a preordained ritual slaughter. What physical advantage he’d have in a wrestling match with her, she has in SMV against him. It’s not sporting to even let it happen. A heavyweight against a flyweight.

      Matt

      Like


  32. The cruel things he said were laced with humour, though. I don’t know how cruel yet sober comments would go down with them (i.e. “I’m happy that infant is dying from cancer”).

    Furthermore, he said confidence is needed with the cruelty. If the cruelty were a turn-on it would constitute an improvement by itself. A good-looking shy man still has an edge over the ugly shy man, and a successful shy man has an edge on an unwealthy shy man. Does a cruel shy man have an edge over a humane shy man?

    Beautiful women are high maintenance. But it’s the beauty, not the high maintenance, that attracts men. The maintenance is simply a byproduct of the beauty. Likwise, a fearless man is more likely to be cruel. This isn’t a personal opinion, but a fact: sociopaths have lower fear levels. A woman who gets the fearless man is likely to get a relatively cruel, or at ruthless, one too. Gnomesayin’?

    It may be that woman laugh away the cruel jokes and what have you to prevent their moral antennae twitching around and ruining a relationship with a man they find sexy.

    I might be saying all this because I hope women aren’t as depraved as this guy’s argument would suggest. It might be that the last remnants of idealism within me needs teh removal. Evolution would seemingly favour the cruel man over the mellow one because a man who relishes harming people would approach battle with more enthusiasm than a man who fights but doesn’t want to. And a woman attracted to the former would benefit.

    Like


    • Depends. In a small, communal society, cruelty will annoy people and decrease your fitness. In a large, chaotic one, it will improve your fitness because the person you screwed isn’t likely to run into you again.

      This is probably a major influence on ethnic personality traits, I suspect.

      Like


      • Cruelty is also a costly signalling mechanism.

        As you say, cruelty annoys people and decreases your fitness. Peacock tails attract predators and decrease the male’s fitness. Both are attractive to females, because only the finest specimen of man can afford to maintain such a costly display.

        Like


    • Idealism is beta.

      Like


    • It’s also about the type of girl.

      It’s been mentioned here before, when the primitive-style “let’s you and him fight” type of girls versus the type that would rather you two never even hear about each other – or couldn’t even think about being with two men in the first place.

      I feel the former would get much tinglier for cruel men.

      Like


    • It has to be implied and it has to be used sparingly.

      Like


  33. You’ve always had a soft spot for Whiskey. Kind of like I have for Jerry.

    Like


  34. How the hell do game bloggers remember their convos so accurately?

    Like


  35. Thanks for the validation, I used to think that some of the stuff that worked for me was an aberration. Sadly, it just comes naturally but I would say that it always happens when I am having fun with no regard to the consequences of the contact or to the relationship.

    Maybe that is what makes this seem so hard for guys to get started. When we were sales training we would always tell the recruits to have fun and disregard the fact that they needed to make a deal for money.

    A lot of the bloggers in the PUA community talk about the discipline, numbers, mentality and techniques. What we found in sales training is that when your head is right, everything mentioned is just reinforcement and sharpening the skill set. Yet, this first step is the hardest. Not the first approach which everyone falsely considers the first step, but the enjoyment for its own sake. Every situation becomes a first time free of the regrets of the past, not a matter of moving on after a loss. This is true outcome independence.

    Like


  36. on July 5, 2012 at 11:06 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    I’ll take it a step further: nothing turns a mother on more than a father or step-father who abuses their kids.*

    It was this way in my family. My parents will be celebrating 50 years and my dad almost killed me at least twice and left me with permanent damage to my body by refusing to give me meds for my chronic illness. This says something.

    * Women will deny this to the end, but y’all know the rules around here: never listen to what women say, watch what they do. See above where it says “50 years.”

    Like


    • Would say that it was less the Alpha effect and more Stockholm syndrome. Probably works better for females as strength and dominance are triggers, but your mom probably shows more PTSD than the “glow” of an Alpha’s mate.

      BTW: Abusers are usually the most pathetic betas. They are narcissists with impulse control in love with their own self hate. Want to get even; make him look bad publicly, in front of family. I have seen some try to kill themselves when subjected to this. Tell everyone he knows what he did, never stop.

      Like


  37. on July 5, 2012 at 11:08 pm Miley Cyrax

    “Her: I sometimes wonder why I’m with you.
    Me: The huge prehensile cock.
    Her: Oh yeah. [kiss]”

    A biology or anthropology major, eh? I don’t know too many slampieces who would otherwise have “prehensile” in their lexicon.

    Like


    • Prehensile is not such a “big” word. When discussing monkeys or elephants, it comes up normally. Penile prehensileness, , now that’s an innovation.

      Thor

      Like


  38. Off topic but…. the Girls In Yoga Pants site you tweeted about has a downloader virus on it (Blackhole Toolkit specifically). Anybody who went there and didn’t have an active anti-virus program should scan their computers.

    Like


    • Visiting the internet without virus protection is like raw-dogging on a first date. Obviously, lots of others have been there before you, so your chances of catching something difficult to cure are significant.

      Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 10:37 am Wrecked 'Em

      Set of my virus scanner, too… damn Russian Mafia… all hot chicks and evil software.

      Like


    • Wow. I went to that site every day for the past 3 months.

      Thank you.

      Like


  39. The elephant in the room is not that cruelty turns women on (even though it does) but rather that cruelty per se never seems to turn them off. And that manifesting the opposite of cruel-ness is so unproductive of pussy. We are talking about your mother, BTW.
    To enter the reality of the female hind-brain, first turn off all of the lights and then kill the guard-dogs.

    Like


  40. Imaam Ahmed, rahima Allaah, to his son on his son’s wedding day.

    Dear son, you will not attain good fortune in your home except by 10 characteristics which you show to your wife, so remember them and be enthusiastic in acting upon them.

    1. As for the first two; women like attention and they like to be told clearly that they are loved. So don’t be stingy in expressing your love for your wife. If you become limited in expressing your love, you will create a barrier of harshness between you and her, and there will be a decrease in affection.

    2. Ladies hate a strict, overcautious man, yet they seek to use the soft vulnerable one. So use each quality appropriately. This will be more appealing for love and it will bring you peace of mind.

    3. Ladies like from their husbands what their husbands like from them, i.e. kind words, good looks, clean clothes and a pleasant odour. Therefore, always remain in that state.

    4. Indeed, the house is under the sovereignty of the woman. While she remains therein, she feels that she is sitting upon her throne, and that she is the chief of the house. Stay clear of destroying this kingdom of hers and do not ever attempt to dethrone her, otherwise you will be trying to snatch her sovereignty. A king gets most angry at he who tries to strip him of his authority, even if he portrays to show something else.

    5. A woman wants to love her husband, but at the same time she does not want to lose her family. So do not put yourself and her family in the same scale, because then her choice will be down to either you or her family. And even if she does choose you over her family, she will remain in anxiety, which will then turn into hatred towards you in your daily life.

    6. Surely woman has been created from a curved rib, and this is the secret of her beauty, and the secret of the attraction towards her. And this is no defect in her, because ‘the eyebrows look beautiful due to them being curved’. So if she errs, do not rebuke her in a manner in which there is no gentleness, attempting to straighten her; otherwise you will simply break her and her breaking, is her divorce. At the same time do not let her off upon that mistake, otherwise her crookedness will increase and she will become arrogant with her ego. Thereafter, she will never soften for you and she won’t listen to you, so stay in between the two.

    7. It is in the women’s nature to be ungrateful towards their husbands and to deny favors. If you were to be nice to her for her whole life but you grieved her once, she will say, “I have never seen any good from you”. So don’t let this attitude of her make you dislike her or to run away from her. If you dislike this feature of hers, you will be pleased with some other good habits within her, so create a balance.

    8. Surely there are times when a woman goes through some conditions of bodily weakness and fatigue of the mind. Such that Allah has relieved her of some of her compulsory worships during that period; Allah has totally pardoned her from praying, and has postponed the days of fasting for her within this break to a later date until she regains her health and becomes normal in her temperament once more. Thus, during these days, treat her in a goodly manner. Just as Allah has relieved her of the duties, you should also lessen your demands and instructions from her during those days.

    9. Last but not least, know that a woman is like a captive with you. Therefore, have mercy upon her

    Like


  41. 1. Women say they want a guy with a “sense of humor”

    2. A popular theory of humor is that people laugh when it makes them feel superior to others

    3. Only guys with confidence and high social status can be superior and make jokes at the expense of others (and get away with it)

    4. “I want a guy with a sense of humor” = I WANT AN ALPHA MALE.

    Like


  42. I just invited a girl out to a bar for a game of marry/fuck/kill…

    Like


  43. “Nice find…”
    Better find… http://spinnerasses.tumblr.com/
    More, ah, urbane than urban

    Like


  44. on July 6, 2012 at 12:42 am greenlander

    LMFAO

    Like


  45. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: men are naturally evil for the same reason peacocks have big tails.

    Like


  46. Cruelty is a sign of high testosterone. The more testosterone a boy receives in the womb the less empathy he has, and the more likely he is to grow up being cruel to others.

    Like


  47. be cruel to your loved one, watch her swoon. . .
    The more you love her., the more cruel you must be; this is a hurtful fact but a fact nonetheless and no amount of programming can change that fact

    Like


    • I don’t see being cruel, especially to weak people, as something to encourage in myself. I know perfectly well what you mean about being “cruel” to one’s girlfriend or wife. And, yes, it does work a lot of the time. It is only one tool in the toolbox though.

      Like


      • Look, I am not a boy scout. Nor is my wife a girl guide. When we were courting, she asked me to take her down to the shores of a lake near town after dark and smack her around.

        I wish women would stop claiming that they don’t get off on this kind of thing.

        Like


      • I do get you,.But it is more of just showing a tinge of cruelty even if you are not being cruel to the man himself, The point is this is a mere exhibition of fact. and like it or not women are attracted to cruelty. I would have fun teasing around with fatties with my girl, but not really as far as to harm someone physically (except if its a foe or self defense). The example CH gave above is a good example. He didn’t really harm anyone verbally or physically.

        Like


  48. Could someone please direct me to the posts of his where he articulates the view that “white women universally swoon for black cock”? Btw, is whiskey white or black himself?

    Thanks in advance

    Like


  49. I don’t agree that cruelty is attractive. I think women admire someone that is just, but when crossed can mete out punishment.

    Also, with strangers they would rather a guy joke with a store clerk and make him/her smile than upset him/her. (Remember how women like humor?)

    Like


    • This is much more accurate. Its cruelty in layaway and availability when needed. Not random cruelty. Justice is cruel to the unjust.

      Like


    • Cruelty works when you have no other way to express your independence or strength. Cruelty is a confrontation. Women and betas avoid confrontation. “Chicks dig cruelty” is not the same as “Chicks dig only cruelty,” or “Chicks dig cruelty above all other qualities.”

      Men who are at ease with confrontation do not resort to cruelty. It’s piling on for the purposes of validation. If validation is necessary, you are not at peak performance. Cruelty can be a decent artificial boost, however, if the situation warrants it.

      We don’t eschew cruelty because we have an instinct against confrontation. We take a pass because cruelty is irrelevant to the typical tasks that engage men with things to do. It is by definition superfluous. (Pain that occurs in the pursuit of other ends, on the other hand, is not cruel.)

      The greater trick is to be effective without using torture. Transforming a weak man into an ally is a more impressive feat than being just one more coolguy shitting all over an easy target. It makes you a leader rather than a snark. Women may be attracted to the latter for the same reason faghags seek out gay male friends: she gets to gossip with a fellow hen who possesses by virtue of his dick all the wit and facility her sex lacks as a rule. But this is only possible because she’s not in the company of a stronger man who doesn’t indulge such shrewish cuntery.

      This is not a popular approach because it requires skills not immediately available to the populace.

      Matt

      Like


  50. I think it is really important for a young man to move beyond the sentimental lovey-dovey phase with a woman he finds attractive. This is where a lot of men go wrong. We were talking about the film Metropolitan. Tom should have been more decisive with Audrey. Or Charlie, who also fancied her, should have shown more steel.

    It is good and noble for a man to love a woman and admire her charms and virtue; but there comes a time when he has to turn thoughts into action. And that is when a woman will appreciate a smidgen of cruelty. Of resolve.

    As I said at my blog, courtship should not be an exercise in minimalism. The problem is that normal, decent men have been discouraged from showing the resolve they need. This leaves their women at the mercy of sociopaths like Rick Von Sloneker in the film Metropolitan. Audrey did not give it up for Rick – partly I think because she found him too stupid and absurd – but she will eventually fall for a man who has more balls than Tom and Charlie show. Although Tom makes a good start, his follow-through is weak.

    I have a sneaking suspicion that the director, Stillman, was trying to show the impotence of the WASP class he portrayed in the metaphorical form of the impotence of these young men in courtship. They chat away elegantly while the women they like are being bedded by other men, like cuckolds in an old comedy.

    Like


  51. On the virginity thing, definitely pick a virgin if you want to marry. She is likely to bond to you best. I don’t believe in going around taking virginities. I had a girl offer me hers once, and I declined – a friend of my sister. But when I met a cute girl who was suitable, and she offered me her virginity, I was happy to marry her and take it.

    I could never have accepted that another man had been up my wife before me.

    Like


  52. Girls who are serious about finding a husband and a future father wouldn’t consider marrying a guy who made these jokes.

    [heartiste: keep telling yourself that.]

    Besides, real alphas target the powerful and the elite, not the weak and the crippled.

    [the bullies in grade school were real alphas who were very pleased with their station in life, and they reveled in taunting the weak. didn’t seem to hurt their popularity with the girls.]

    Children are weak. Alphas protect the weak of their pack. Insecure men don’t protect the weak. Women looking for good fathers are looking for the type of person who can protect the weak.

    ]these are lovely words, but words are all they are in the face of relentless reality.]

    Like


    • Jane, I have much sympathy for your view. However, you skirt around it but don’t say it. An alpha husband can and will protect his wife. Is that what you want?

      Like


    • Precisely. “Cruelty”, if used at all, and including verbal cruelty, should be used very sparingly. Specifically, a girl that likes unwarranted cruelty is somebody you would not want to know.

      Thor

      Like


    • Women commonly claim to like certain types of men, while choosing the exact opposite.

      Women also have a tendency to define “real” masculinity solely in terms of what is most beneficial to them.

      Pretty much anyone who is a regular reader of this site is aware of this, so it’s going to be hard for many here to see valid point nestled within this biased shell.

      Like


    • This is not true. Alphas rarely protect others. They’ll protect relatives and perhaps close friends. Anyone outside that small circle they couldn’t give a shit about. They may come to a stranger’s aid if it provides a justification for them to be violent, but there will be no genuine concern.

      And if they feel any way about the powerful it is more likely a mild admiration than dislike or resentment. They covet their power.

      I think you’re distorting the reality of the alpha to fit your ideology.

      Like


      • Low empathy types have a small circle of sympathy. Close relatives, friends, a few women whom he approves of. I don’t care very much about, say, women in Afghanistan, or some woman down the road. Not my problem. It is not cruelty. More indifference.

        Like


      • “they may come to a strangers aid if it provides a justification for them to be violent…”

        It’s like you’re reading my mind. When I go out I wish someone gets victimized, just so I can jump in and fight with lessened worry about legal issues.

        Like


    • A man concerning himself too much with all the “weak” of the world probably isn’t going to be as protective of his own wife and children. I’d think he was looking for approval from others rather than caring about his own family first and foremost.

      Like


    • on July 6, 2012 at 11:48 am Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

      You femcunt open-to-the-world save-the-weak underman faggots were strongly grouped around the Sandusky boyfucking matrix, from his central circle to his lemming charity to the state industrial higher ed complex of knowing pass-the-buck SWPLs. Die, bitch.

      Like


      • Hate much? You sound miserable.

        Like


      • on July 6, 2012 at 2:39 pm Dr. Murray F. Rottencrotch

        Aw, you’re right. My hatred for serial boy rapists is pretty miserable. What a dark chasm in my character.

        Like


      • I hate serial boy rapists too.

        But I was referring to the reflexive hatred of generosity in the first line of your comment. Sometimes the weak need to be saved. God forbid you ever need help from anybody.

        But given your handle, I’m probably wasting electrons here.

        Like


      • Feminists don’t want to save the weak, they want to use the weak, and frequently ARE the weak, and not in a morally good or neutral way. They are the people who have given up on being decent and have decided to instead change the world so that what is decent becomes what they are.

        Like


    • Heartiste you’re wrong about bullies. Bullies are normally middle of the pack kids who try to use violence/blackmail/coercion to one-up other kids and get to the top of the dominance hierarchy.

      [heartiste: bullies are either top of the pack, or close to it and angling to unseat the king. still beats being a nerd omega, wouldn’t you say?]

      Their behavior is lesser alpha – you find the bullies do get girls if they arent bullying out of insecurity, however they don’t get the hottest women like the popular kids, who are capable of cruelty but don’t require actually using it.

      [there are different kinds and degrees of cruelty. like i wrote, style matters. the top alphas can often be very cruel indeed, but they know how to deliver the killing blow with flash, and, if necessary, with plausible deniability.]

      Research has demonstrated this and my own personal experience as a bully in elementary school, before the other kids outgrew me.

      [some bullies are losers in the bigger picture, but within their social circles they are usually alphas.]

      Like


      • Cyrus, I agree. This is obviously anecdoctal, but the bullies at my high school generally were not the most popular kids- they were the ones who were trying to ingratiate themselves with the popular kids, or the ones who were bullying out of other insecurities.

        Behaving cruelly towards weaker people probably does attract women. Most people are vile. Obviously, there is a difference between making a joke about an obese lady to your girlfriend. and actually mocking the obese lady to her face. The latter makes me sick to my stomach, and I don’t think that the attraction to that is universal. It is needlessly cruel, as well as juvenile and tryhard. Not to say that assholish behavior isn’t attractive…my husband is sort of brooding, aloof, and above it all, and we (privately) make fun of people all of the time. Probably not any better, but at least it spares people the public humiliation.

        Like


      • “Still beats being a nerd omega, wouldn’t you say?” is the revealing point here.

        Yes, being a bully is better than, or more alpha than, being bullied. But being the ass-kicker of bullies for picking on the weak is better than being a bully.

        Heartiste has a different experience than Jane. He obviously has reaped dividends from bullying and its analogue, snarky Perez-Hiltonian gossip (as evident in the conversation’s transcript). But “relentless reality” demonstrates no such thing as he claims. It is possible that “Alphas protect the weak” without arriving at Jane’s conclusion that therefore women are attracted to their potential fatherhood. Women are not attracted to those who serve justice on bullies because it demonstrates their protectiveness but rather because it demonstrates their superior strength.

        Women who talk to me like I’m their fellow gossip are told to keep that shit stowed away where I can’t see it. I don’t cluck along with hens. It’s a celebration of pusillanimity. But who will argue it doesn’t help get into their pants? It does, just not under the terms I respect. Whatever you want to call that slight-of-hand, it’s not “alpha.” Leaders don’t engage their targets with private whispers to women. They engage directly with what stands in their way. Manboobs and homeless people don’t show up on the radar, unless you’re trying hard to impress a woman with your knowledge of their femininity.

        Matt

        Like


      • come on. It’s human nature to discuss other people, and yes, women are more prone to doing it. it’s not cowardly if it is not done out of malice; it’s just how we gain understanding of one other. you can learn social norms and expectations through the exchange of gossip

        Like


      • If gossip were simply “discuss[ing] other people,” then you’d be right. But gossip is used for the aggrandizement of yentas kibitzing with each other based on the false premise of zero-sum jealousy: I demonstrate my superiority by reducing another person.

        You are a woman, therefore, yes, “it’s just how [you] gain understanding of one other.” The practice is harmless in your estrogen-watered eyes until you become the object of scurrilous rumor yourself. There is a reason gossips are almost synonymous with “any gathering of women” and/or queeny men who strive to be women. Whereas men can be (and are expected to be) direct in their confrontations, the weaker sex must appear passive when twisting the knife.

        Matt

        Like


      • Men deal primarily with reality. Lions or limousines. Women deal primarily with manipulating other people of both sexes. YMMV,

        Thor

        Like


      • you’re intelligent (you use words like ‘pusillanimity’) and can answer this thoughtfully. this blog is extremely focused on evolutionary psychology and genetic differences between the sexes. if women are genetically, hormonally, evolutionary programmed to be gossipy bitches, it’s all genetically and environmentally determined. so why is there a moral judgment placed upon it? please throw out some references to Schopenhauer

        [heartiste: now this is a meaty comment. short answer: our genes bequeath us probabilities and predilections and preferences. they do not stamp out a facsimile of choice.]

        Like


      • if women are genetically, hormonally, evolutionary programmed to be gossipy bitches, it’s all genetically and environmentally determined. so why is there a moral judgment placed upon it?

        Instincts are not destiny. Tendency is not choice. Women are prey to vices of social power just as men are to physical power. That doesn’t mean we must rationalize vice as insuperable.

        Our dispositions are determined by our weaknesses. Our actions are not. I don’t subscribe to fatalism any more than I subscribe to the tyranny of genes, hormones, evolution, or environment.

        We have volition. Our latter-century explosion in knowledge makes us believe in positivism, that all actions are physically determined but we just don’t have the wit (yet) to trace the complex causality. That is a species of faith for which I have great contempt, since it has put our will into the hands of clever and geeky priests-cum-scientists who purport to divine causality through non-falsifiable conjecture. That’s a deeply concealed astrology masquerading as “science.”

        You are more than your sin, sally. You have the ability to resist compulsions. Some have it more than you, some less. But to adopt an attitude of powerlessness in the face of impersonal forces not only destroys our humanity (and our art and our politics — look around you), it also precludes the possibility of responsibility. I am a drunk — so was my dad, it’s in my genes, hand me the bottle. I am fat — so was my mom, it’s in my glands, pass the Death By Chocolate. I am a gossip — so are all women, it’s “genetically determined,” look at sally’s cellulite. The incentive to overcome our foibles and flaws is not just reduced, it is eradicated.

        Or, as a more “thoughtful[]” and “intelligent” man than I put it:

        Men at some time are masters of their fates:
        The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
        But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

        No Schopenhauer. But why get dour with sour ‘Hauer when you can kick it iambic with the Bard? Take away human volition, take away creativity, take away Shakespeare.

        Email me pix. Ciao.

        Matt

        Like


  53. Understanding that women are biologically predisposed to cherish depraved men is both liberating and depressing. It’s liberating in the sense that I now feel zero guilt as I implement The Dark Trades to score ass. It’s depressing for reasons that are beyond evident. Since “unplugging”, I find to more and more difficult to value love.

    Like


    • Apollyon, that is a false dichotomy.

      You can just as easily use your knowledge to get exactly what you want from a woman in an LTR. And you can love her, but without illusions.

      Like


      • DC –

        I appreciate where you’re coming from. Thinking about humanity with an unplugged mind does not lead me to completely discard the value of love – I just treat the topic with more flippancy. Love is important. Love feels good, but, ultimately, a male/female romantic relationship is a business transaction. Basically, I enjoy being with this women because her presence is genetically beneficial to me. We are not soul mates. Her love is not unconditional. It’s just a game.

        Like


  54. Yeah it sucks how dark this universe is… when you realise freaks,perverts and psychopaths are in the gene pool, because women are themselves freaks perverts and psychopaths and crave mating with same lol

    Like


  55. When you say, for instance, “You want to take a bus? Forget it. [nodding in direction of obese woman] She ate it.”

    You say it out loud, so everyone around you can hear? Or you say it to her?

    Like


  56. Why this works is because it has a forbidden or taboo aspect to it… the sheer outrageousness of it contrasts with what the expected social mores dictate is the correct response. You have to be careful with this….making a joke at a funeral…..not good. You have to build up the tension with this….it’s like a neg but more directed at some thing or something else….go too far and you’ve lost that tension.

    Like


  57. I agree with this post’s thesis, and I furthermore agree with at least one other commenter that the mechanism for her attraction is the fitness demonstrated by being able to go unpunished for cruelty, but I don’t think Heartiste’s examples illustrate his case all that well.

    In none of them is actual cruelty being demonstrated, because the bum, the fat lady, etc., haven’t heard what he said about them. More illustrative is how beloved by chicks the jerks you remember from high school were. They never wanted for pussy, instead were flooded with it, even after, and in fact because of, their consistent, public, and unsubtle cruelty towards the betas and omegas.

    I have a base opinion of women, but it’s plausible that women laughed at Heartiste’s jokes not from sadism but for the same reason a man — that is, a human not sexually aroused by sadism — would: they’re funny.

    Like


  58. that conversation in the essay is very extremely true. People really do talk like that in real life. All women everywhere love men who talk like that.

    But the thing about keeping a woman’s pussy moist all day and then slipping in like an eel. Why would I want to spend all day with a woman, aren’t they primarily good for sex?

    Like


  59. The Agenda with Steve Paikin: Why Do We Disagree Politically?
    http://ww3.tvo.org/video/178088/why-do-we-disagree-politically

    Like


  60. on July 6, 2012 at 10:53 am Pray for Plagues

    Off topic but I banged a girl using the “are you a girl?” opener on OKC. After I fucked her she told me that I was an “asshole” at first but I intrigued her. I made money jokes like the ones in the article throughout the night and even making fun of preppies. Heartiste = Truth

    Like


  61. Can someone please satire this?

    I always love those on this site.

    10 Signs He’s a Keeper – From MSN

    http://glo.msn.com/relationships/10-signs-hes-a-keeper-6162.gallery#!stackState=0__%2Frelationships%2F10-signs-hes-a-keeper-6162.gallery

    Like


    • Actually, good advice. But that does not mean that it is taken. However, when a woman is ready to settle down, and has tired of being pumped and dumped, and is nearing the wall, THEN, if she is smart, she is ready for the advice offered.But that’s a bit of a checklist to meet. And of course, it does not necessarily mean that she will be faithful. And she might still, after 10 years and a few kids, dump the guy and, if living in the UK/US/Canada
      he may still be stripped of house, kids and most of his income.

      Thor

      Like


    • Women are usually either the “Jesus is my best friend” or “I’m not religious, I’m spiritual” type of religious though. The hardcore patriarchal God is not what they usually have in mind.

      Like


      • Women mostly talk the religious angle as long as it suits them. Bring it up as a salient point in an argument and watch them go deaf at the drop of a hat if it doesn’t support what they want. Men will evaluate and possibly surrender a point if they truly have faith. Women will gush when they are told they are spiritual, then not bother to find a church for their children to grow in unless they have a man determining that some structure is useful and making the decision.

        Like


      • What about Muslim women?

        Like


      • “I am spiritual”. Hah. Madonna and many others. This is blatant cherry-picking. Belong to and practicing any mainstream religion, and most non-mainstream religions, requires

        commitment
        effort
        adherence to certain rules
        often things you have to do to remain in good standing
        and often other things depending on the religion

        People who do these things expect some kind of respect,
        at least among their own kind (although they might not get it).

        But declaring that your are “very spiritual”, like Madonna, commits you to absolutely nothing. On the contrary, it is a free pass that can be used to exempt yourself from most external demands, and also from the obnoxious requirement to show some kind of consistency and logic to your actions and blatherings.

        Thor

        Like


    • “My theory: women are more religious than men because God is the ultimate abusive, demanding, aloof alpha asshole BF.” – Heartiste

      So… if you’re a demanding aloof alpha asshole, that means you’re more godly. I figured as much.

      About a month ago, I read Matthew’s Gospel for kicks. I was struck by how Jesus Christ came across the same way. He would probably have had some choice words for the modern liberal limp-wristed “christians” who think he was some kind of hippy social worker.

      Like


  62. “would say that your chances of banging a hottie after a date are better if she’s watched you mock a bum than if you gave her a bouquet of flowers when you picked her up.)”

    I give women flowers all the time with great success. It all started when I would sabotage the flower beds of lonely old ladies around the neighborhood and needed a place to hide the evidence. That’s what I still tell them and they swoon.

    Like


  63. advice columns like to tell women to size up boyfriends by observing how they treat other people, like waiters. if they’re rude to them, you’d best leave them, so the saying goes…
    seems logical, but the hamsters don’t have no stinking logic…

    Like


  64. Oscar Wilde said “I am afraid that women appreciate cruelty, downright cruelty, more than anything else. They have wonderfully primitive instincts. We have emancipated them, but they remain slaves looking for their masters all the same”. And there historical precedents: many Roman women converted to Judaism while their men were exterminated like ants by Bar Kochba’s army, almost being wiped off of the map of Israel, or as Cassius Dio put it: “If his G-d had not slain him, who could have overcome him??”. Women worship power and only power.

    Like


  65. Hmmm regarding cruelty.
    I was wondering whatever happened to Michael Vick (you-know-the-guy-who-torturues-mans-best-friend-did-jail-time-for-it-and-still-plays-profootball guy?)
    Wondered how he was doing w/ the ladies and saw this clip.

    http://thegrio.com/2012/07/03/eagles-quarterback-michael-vick-marries-longtime-philly-girlfriend/

    She’s a nice looking black lady, mother of his 2 kids, and the way she swoons talking about M Vick, her head tilted and eyes lighting up, whoa!

    Pity the next dog I see trying to cross the street!

    Like


  66. on July 6, 2012 at 2:52 pm Cannon's Canon

    lol scots-irish

    Like


    • Its the irish-scots who hate them the most. They are almost extinct I think. I would have never heard of them if it were not for these drunk asians who ran out of Scotch.

      Like


  67. OT: Chick who raised $67K online to study male sexism in toys and games, claims she is unfairly harassed online as a result:

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/07/what-online-harassment-looks

    Claims Lego is sexist and wants to work for sexual parity in video games…

    Like


    • I think she does it on purpose. She works for bitch media her role in life is to antagonize. Not “asking for it” but deliberately trolling to provoke irrational responses she can hold up to play victim, attention whore, and garner support from sympathizers. In this case, thousands of dollars worth of support.

      I’ve watched some of her videos and she’s unbelievably annoying. Here’s a video of her whining about shallow female characters in “movies”: http://www.feministfrequency.com/2011/03/tropes-vs-women-1-the-manic-pixie-dream-girl/

      She whines about female portrayals in Elizabethtown, Garden State, and Autumn in New York. That’s right, shitty romantic comedies. Hundreds of movies are released each year and she bitches about trash movies that wouldn’t get made at all if women didn’t watch them.

      Like


  68. Another observation on bullying/cruelty:

    I once knew this skinny white chick, like 5′ 2″, flaxen blonde hair, blue eyes and 80 Lbs wet. She had grown up in some bad inner city area (Detroit?) and had been beaten up and taunted by Black kids from the projects on her way to and from school for years.

    So when it came time to choose a husband for her future kids, who did she select??…

    … a 6′ 4″ Black thug, who had a history of violence and arrests.

    She said: “I don’t want my kids to get beaten up by other kids… I want them to be able to BEAT UP other kids!!!

    Like


    • yeah -this is what a fucked-up traumatized woman does. It makes sense she’s looking for a protecter, but she went for a violent guy because she’s messed up. Obviously she’s NOT a good marriage candidate because she needs therapy.

      What does a girl do who comes from a good family? Protected by her father? She looks for a husband who can protect her children, but she’s not mentally messed up so she doesn’t choose this guy.

      Like


      • Well its the fruits of feminism that she doesn’t have a father or other strong men in her family to protect her. They’ve all been driven off and told they were irrelevant. This is close to the end state that Feminism sought to achieve in its efforts to destroy the family The elite women who dream this nonsense up, don’t care about the working class women traditional mores were meant to protect and who benefitted the most from them and are now most harmed by their loss.

        Like


    • Hey! I saw that chick’s obit on the evening news.

      Like


  69. I reckon this is a difference between the “cruelty” of the alpha and the “cruelty” of the embittered beta/omega.

    Omega foreveralones in their internet forums revel in mockery of “faggots”, “retards” and “niggers” just as much as any playground proto-alpha. Doesn’t help them get laid though, cause they are still omegas.

    Alphas get away with it because they are alpha.

    Like


    • I think the difference is that alphas do it in meatspace, while omegas do it only in cyberspace like any other coward.

      Like


  70. Thanks for the link Heartiste. For the record, I am Scots-Irish. Quite literally. Irish on both sides mother, Scots-descended father. I do think that a lot of White women do find Black guys more socially exciting, dominating and so forth, though with obvious downsides. But hypergamy is hypergamy and globalized sex markets produce losers and winners (just ask Asian guys how happy they are to see the Beta Male White herb + Asian women pairing).

    Women do love that assertive, cocky cruelty, I’ve seen real-life examples of the bum ridiculing stuff work magic. You’ve opened my eyes to this.

    And for that I owe you a big thanks — for allowing me to see what really is.

    Like


    • @whiskeysplace
      “(just ask Asian guys how happy they are to see the Beta Male White herb + Asian women pairing).

      Or ask any fortysomething single woman in the US etc.

      Thor

      Like


  71. Russell Brand in the UK is probably most well known for a radio stint where he called up some elderly Dr. Who actor and told him he’d screwed his grand-daughter royally the night before, while mocking the old guy’s virility. THAT stunt probably got him Katy Perry chasing him and the undying sexual allegiance of most of Britain’s women.

    Like


  72. Hi Whiskey

    That was not a Dr Who actor. It was the bloke who played Manuel in Fawlty Towers.

    I like your blog very much. Very insighful on Hollywood.

    Like


  73. lol that last paragraph is gold

    Like


  74. hmmm… the examples you quoted didn’t confront a loser with his loserness, as you claim an alpha can do with impunity. ( the ‘hi, bum’ would probably elicit a WTF from the target rather than humiliation.)

    i’m with thor in thinking YMMV- most women, not all, would find ridicule, even snippiness, directed at total strangers creepy and abhorrent. i know i would. OTOH, poking fun at absurd situations and the people in them w/o their knowledge is okay. him asking a floorperson at walmart where to find some product who can’t help him. ‘hey, he’s only been working in the next aisle for 3 years’. snickering surely ensues, but to confront the employee would be disgusting.

    Like


    • Thanks for the kind words.

      Another thing = who would WANT to deal with a woman who likes cruelty,?

      Except for possibly an ONS? In an LTR, or worse, a marriage, she would be extra likely to stab you, literally or figuratively (i.e. emotionally, financially etc). And just love it, not just for her personal gain but just to see you squirm.

      Thor

      Like


      • Thor,

        Can you honestly imagine a scenario in which a woman does not respond favorably to this style of pussy orchestration?

        I can’t. My Irish auntie perhaps.

        Point being, of course dealing with women who like cruelty is undesirable, but they all seem to like cruelty these days, so what the fuck is one to do? Being a moral stick-in-the-mud is, I think, how we’d all prefer to be, but that isn’t what compels them to grab the stick.

        Like


      • “(just ask Asian guys how happy they are to see the Beta Male White herb + Asian women pairing).

        Yes.

        Like


      • Just discuss with them how you would deal with problematic elements in our society and why. Expleore their thoughts on the matter to see what they’re capable of. Find out who they would work to death in a gulag if given the chance,for instance.

        Like


  75. In terms of above comments. Good future wives are looking for a man who is strong enough to protect the family and most importantly future children. The cruel example quips come across as boy-ish. Fine for a boyfriend but not a potential husband.

    But we all make our own choices and each have our own fate. Good luck to all.

    Like


    • “Good future wives [may in fact be] looking for a man who is strong enough to protect the family and most importantly future children” but not primarily and not in any immediacy. You are attributing too much to your conscious preferences and discounting too much of your primal attractions. That mixes you up in the moment of truth, leaving you no explanation for what seem like inappropriate desires.

      Don’t append “enough to protect the family” to “looking for a man who is strong,” and you should be fine. Women are looking for strength, and the reasoning is irrelevant. Your foray into reasoning will not serve you when logic drops out the window and you are in an alpha’s thrall. The considerations of family and morality and children should be made in more sober moments that prevent you from subjecting yourself to the test of hypergamy, rather than as a means to try to rationalize your way clear of proximate temptation. If you think you can depend on logic and moral preference, you have no chance.

      Matt

      Like


      • Y’all are so young. I appreciate the sincerity of it. But I’ve been married for decades. Life is good.

        I’ve seen lots of people get married and divorced. I don’t see 15 years as a “long” relationship. Show me a couple with 30 years under their belt and I’m impressed.

        For most couples it’s fun and games in the 20s and 30s. But at some point the shit hits the fan. Yeah you might have infants to care for, and babies are exhausting, but healthy children are not the real hurdles you’ll have to overcome. Deaths in your extended family, sickness, unemployment… Good couples succeed and get past moments of tragedy. Choose well and you will have a happy life. The question is how do you find the best choice? How do you identify a quality person? Not just a fuckbuddy, not just a causal date for a summer or semester romance, not just a girlfriend for 4 years in University, not just a 3-7 year relationship in your 20s or 30s…How do you identify a quality marriage partner who will bring happiness for 30-50 years?

        This blog is very concerned about attracting women. That’s fine but if you are looking for a wife and family you need to know how to identify quality long term marriage partners.

        Like


      • Good advice. To men and women. But many will not plan that way, more is the pity.

        Thor

        Like


      • I’d say a good barometer would be the lead male characters in popular womens’ romance novels.

        Like


  76. These days, being the bullied might be preferable to being the bullier (if the incident is uploaded to youtube), to wit, the bullied bus monitor lady in the news lately might collect over $1 million in donations from sympathizers.

    Like


  77. Want to see the dark ruthless side of even the sweetest woman? Play “Marry, Fuck, Kill” game with her.

    Like


  78. HA! A cousin once was asked for a tip by a beggar while in his car. I was a kid and his girlfriend was the only other person in the car.

    He answered the beggar: “you are not relevant for my being” and closed the window. The chick protested and I wondered then why she didn’t protest more.

    Like


  79. Not all women are like that. Take Iliza Shlesinger. She is a really, really funny girl. She won the vote on Last Comic Standing, so she can’t be not funny. She is so funny I’d watch her funniness all day.

    If she’s not that funny, how else did she win Last Comic Standing, haters?

    And here’s another comedienne as good as any man, Lisa Donovan:

    She’s got 185,000,000 hits more than you. You losers just can’t stand to see women succeeding.

    Like


  80. Captain Jack Sparrow is a cruel alpha.

    Like


  81. […] Men Aren’t Attracted To High-Earning Women, Entitled Careerist Woman Logo, Comment of The Week, Chicks Dig Cruelty, Chubby Chaser […]

    Like


  82. on July 7, 2012 at 6:38 pm | ReplyKing A (Matthew King)

    So if I pick up a shotgun and use it on you as a baseball bat to transform your face into a mass of blood to impress a woman you’re ok with it, bro? How about I shoot you in the face?

    You PUA’s go too far for a sniff of the stank hole. Thankfully, for the sake of society, most of you are keyboard jockeys.

    Like


  83. The one significant unifying factor with my current mate was observing who she dated prior to me. In all cases, they were moneyed, handsome, fine. Other people noticed this and this is all they noticed.

    What they didn’t see was the consistent assholery these guys projected. It wasn’t in spite of this that she dated them: it was the motivating factor.

    She’s consistently told me she loves me for the calm generosity I display: but what she means is this:

    You’re tough and stern sometimes, but occasionally you do nice things for people (when you’re in a position of power).

    This is easily *DOUBLE* the wetness factor pure assholery gets.

    Be a rock, and bend when it costs you nothing. This is pussy moistening x2 over standard jerkyness.

    Like


    • Why would I bother giving more than necessary to a bunch of assholes’ leftover?

      Like


      • Most girls will be a bunch of assholes’ leftovers, so why does it matter?

        Like


      • Because being a captain save-a-hoe is a disgrace. If she’s been defiled by assholes, I’m not gonna play the white knight in a shining armor. I’m gonna be an asshole.

        I’ll save the better part of myself for a chick who deserves it, if I ever find her.
        And a big part of “deserving it” is not having a skanky past.

        Like


    • Gorbachev wrote:

      She consistently told me she loves me for the calm generosity I display: but what she means is this: You’re tough and stern sometimes, but occasionally you do nice things for people (when you’re in a position of power).

      The display of power is separate from the ends to which that power is applied, and women are primarily (and primally) attracted to the capacity, not the moral content of its use. Asshole game is championed by chumpions because it’s easier to understand and simpler to successfully practice.

      She needs to feel in her viscera that your power is not voluntarily circumscribed by any limits at all, even the limits of a moral code. Unalloyed niceguy power is not sufficient because it carries with it the suspicion that the man will not be able to perform at the extremes. Unalloyed asshole power is sufficient but inferior to the policy you describe: a steady enough control of the power source, from trickle (when gentle circumstances warrant it), to fire-hose gusher (when life and death is in the balance). All contingencies covered.

      After all, the code itself is an indicator of strength — the strength of discipline, the source of that “steady control.” If you are a spaz that flies into a rage at every perceived slight, that is an uncontrolled power dictated by forces you are too weak to make your bitch. This is why there once was a difference between men and “gentled” men, who are thymotic enough to tame the savagery within and act with maximum willfulness. (cf. Plato’s discussion of thumos or spiritedness, to discipline epithumia or appetite, in conjunction with nous/logos, or mind/reason, in the rightly ordered soul. Republic, Book IV)

      The proper mix is to act in easy kindness toward inferiors, with respect toward peers, and in confident deference toward superiors/elders. You display a general equanimity with hints of (or episodes of) steady but violent, murderous strength, to keep her hamster on its toes. Anything more than a hint indicates the weakness of indiscipline. Anything less risks tempting her to follow her hypergamy into Patrick Bateman’s apartment.

      We’d like to believe being good is enough to slake her thirst for powerful men. But a woman’s limbic fever is too simple for that rationality. It’s better to give her hints of that great darkness inside that only a greater strength can control. Just in the bedroom can be sufficient, depending on the tide of her hypergamous cycle.

      Matt

      Like


      • Not just in the bedroom. Because then she will be tempted to that feminist trope about only wanting dominance in the bedroom.

        Matt, I like your argument. But if a man wants to be moral, as I do, the solution is to hand. If the woman knows that you are moral, not out of weakness, but out of strength, and you could and would do harsh things, if not for your moral code – that is enough.

        The other thing a decent man can do is to show a woman some steel sometimes. In relatively harmless ways.

        On the point above, don’t marry another man’s leavings.

        Like


      • Funny how the exact same attitude that you describe, and believe it nor not, the same inner strength, never helped me to get laid in college.

        Have you been out lately? The things that you describe may have helped a guy land a decent wife in the fucking fifties. Modern chicks respond to a-hole douchebaggery more than anything else. Most of them respond *exclusively* to it.

        Your last paragraph is awesome though.

        Like


    • This was a big hit in the German speaking part of Europe a couple of years back. Stephanie is Swiss and was 19 when she had this hit.

      Like


  84. on July 12, 2012 at 2:42 pm Cervix Power

    Russell Brand is NOT ugly. He has very well defined, symmetrical facial features; clear skin, heart shaped lips, long straight nose, bright dark eyes, and long, dark curlyish hair. He is a facially attractive man. Moreover he has a look that you can’t exactly place. His coloring is such that he looks like he could be Arab, Persian, Mediterrenean, any number of ethnic backgrounds.

    What makes him look stupid is the way he dresses.

    Like


  85. on July 12, 2012 at 2:54 pm Cervix Power

    Me: The perfect lover: black cock, white looks, asian flexibility. Waddaya think?

    I think you got 2 out of 3 right. 😉

    Me: You know what black girls call me? Colonist.
    Her: More like COLON-ist.
    Me: Wow. That was. So. Funny.

    That was actually the funniest line in this whole dialogue. She could write for sit-coms. In NY? My aunt’s in the business and I could hook this chick up.

    Like


  86. CORTICAL HUMOR MODULE
    you really are funnier than any chicks i know! (=proof!)
    cortical fucking humor “module”.
    wow.

    …aaaaaaand can’t stop laughing.

    Like