Social Media And Female Self-Esteem

It’s funny ’cause it’s true.

Feminists and their suckups have been very effective at shifting cultural opinion in the direction of believing that women suffer from low self-esteem at the hands of an antagonistic patriarchy. And they have managed this propaganda feat while simultaneously trumpeting the world-changing force of grrlpower. Remarkable squaring of the circle! Feminists are, if nothing else, skilled at resolving seemingly insurmountable contradictions in thought. Their hamsters are juiced to the cheeks on roid pellets and spinning that wheel faster than ever.

The truth, as is always the case when closely examining feminist doctrine, is the complete opposite.

If you are a man, imagine experiencing life through the fish-eye lens of the woman in the left-hand side of that Facebook graphic above. The lens distorts reality so that you are the impossibly enlarged center of your frame and everything around you recedes to warped insignificance. This is an even better analogy for the life of the typical attractive young woman than the metaphor of living in a fishbowl.

Try to picture this life, except with the sex roles reversed. Every one of your trivial observations or random thoughts gets “upvoted”, literally and metaphorically, by throngs of admirers, mostly female but some male too. Your lauded accomplishments amount to sharing cute puppy pics. Say something stupid? No one will call you out on it. Make a lame joke? Everyone laughs uproariously. Post a drunken photo of yourself? Hundreds of chicks “like this” and cheer in unison, “you go, guy!”. Tell no one in particular that you are sad, and you’re having a bad day? Hundreds more line up to offer uplifting messages of support.

You get the idea. Now, what do you think experiencing life like that will do to your self-esteem? If you answered, “my self-esteem would fly through the roof”, you win. Again.

The notion that American women endure the travails of low self-esteem is unmitigated bullshit; mythmaking of the highest caliber. American women, and really most women in post-industrial countries on the downslope into cultural decay, have the opposite psychological condition: TOO MUCH self-esteem.

Social network mediums like Facebook and Twitter have contributed to the bloating of the American female ego by giving her access to the admiration of ARMIES of would-be suitors (the equivalent of a handful of suitors in pre-internet fame times), and to an emotional support system that numbers in the hundreds, even thousands, over the relatively tiny social circle her grandmother was grateful to have in her day.

Today, it is insidiously easy for a woman in her peak attractiveness years to attention whore. If you want to know why so many women so readily whore for attention, the answer is simple: because they can. Cute puppy pic —> cascade of high fives. Who wouldn’t avail themselves of that quick ego fix?

In contrast, most men must still attention whore the old-fashioned way: by earning real achievement and marketing it to as wide a receptive audience as possible. A man doesn’t have the luxury of posting puppy pics to get his ego thrills. He needs to actively market himself and/or his accomplishments, and to sell himself in such a way that he is received in a positive light by his audience. Game is a revolution in thought because it allows men to circumvent the traditional avenues of male attention whoring; namely, occupational status and ostentatious materialism.

In some limited ways, social media serve men’s interests as well. The task of preselection becomes a lot easier. One pic of you doing shit with a cute chick is worth ten overactive hamsters. Plus, if you have a band, it’s now a lot simpler to expand the pool of potential groupies. Nevertheless, critical differences in how social media affect men’s and women’s psychology exist; few men will experience the instant ego rush from online exposure that so many girls in their prime fertility years do.

I occasionally get emails from older men taking issue with one or another core game concept. Usually, they are along the lines of “When I was dating, I didn’t need to neg women. It wasn’t that complicated.” Well, that may or may not be true (rose-colored glasses come to mind, as does the suspicion that a lot of old-time players have conveniently forgotten how much game they used to spit), but the fact is that the prevalence of social media and its effects on women’s egos has demanded the use of self-esteem lowering seduction tactics like negs and disqualifications.

Maxim #22: A woman with inflated self-esteem is a woman who will erroneously believe she is too good to date men normally in her league, unless steps are taken to bring her self-esteem back in line with reality.

Corollary to Maxim #22: A dating market lopsided with unrealistically high self-esteem women will shrink the pool of men available to date and marry, with the consequence that women remain single longer than they would otherwise.

Corollary to the corollary to Maxim #22: The most effective measure society can undertake to increase the incidence of marriage and the quality of married life is to stop artificially propping up women’s self-esteems.

It’s no coincidence that social media — and the Generation Masturbation it spawned — and the modern permutation of game co-evolved at roughly the same point in history. Future anthropologists will study this era as one in which the sexual market operated in near complete freedom, with all artificial constraints tempering female sexual prerogative removed, and many of the impositions on the full expression of male sexuality removed as well. The consequences of this society-wide experiment are beginning to manifest, and so far the social landscape coming into focus — despite being a boon to cultural renegades like myself — doesn’t bode well for maintaining a healthy, prosperous nation.

*downvote*





Comments


  1. Is the picture a Heartiste original or something flying around the net?

    Like


  2. i painfully found that pictures of me with hot chicks made women lose interest in me…probably because it made me look like a player. if i kept my pictures private, everything would be cool though. it seems having lots of girls write on your wall helps though.

    Like


    • on November 22, 2011 at 4:02 pm Too Smart To Fail

      You don’t want woman to think you’re a player, you want them to know you’re massively desired by woman, yet selective in the woman you choose.
      Remember qualifying your prospects? The woman will feel special that you chose her out of all your options! Only woman with high self-esteem (not the delusional kind) will feel comfortable with this arrangement however.

      Like


      • It depends on why women are selecting you. If you still seem beta enough to be a provider-type relationship guy, then girls will be less interested if you don’t seem willing to commit. Why sleep with a provider if he flirts too often with other women.

        However if a girl wants you for alpha-sprog more than resources then photos of other women will be a turn-on. Nothing reinforces alpha better than other women.

        Everybody gets picked up by women who see them fitting into the resource paradigm rather than the gene supply paradigm. The important thing is to recognize when this is happening and, in the short term, shift your game somewhat.

        Of course in the long run you just treat’em all the same. Relationship game is relationship game.

        Like


      • on November 24, 2011 at 4:54 am Too Smart To Fail

        The best genes, the most fit, capitalize on their environment.

        Good genes are not limited to high testosterone in males and high estrogen in females. F’n Non-sense!

        This provider/good-gene dichotomy has got to be eviscerated immediately.
        Females can and do carry deletrious mutations as well.

        You honestly can’t believe that a beautiful woman, say a candidate for Miss Universe or Playboy playmate could not carry a recessed or hidden trait that is undesirable just because she is physical beautiful. Well, I hope you find her and your kid’s don’t turn out to be retards because her grandparents happen to be incestial hill-billies.

        Alpha’s do commit, it is just they are highly discriminating, they do not waste their valuable sperm on inferior females just as quality woman don’t expose their valuable eggs to inferior males by becoming sluts!

        What don’t or can’t you understand about this paradigm?

        My good gene’s allow me to be one helluva a provider!

        Anyone else want to challange me?

        Like


      • Beauty is still a good proxy for overall genetic fitness. Sure, nobody has perfect genetic fitness, but neither is anyone perfectly beautiful.

        Monogamy is never the perfect strategy for a truly alpha male. If you’re happy with monogamy, you’re probably not truly alpha. Nothing wrong with that, but don’t delude yourself either.

        Like


    • Could be the women thought you were too good for them and did a preemptive dump. This is to save themselves the pain of you rejecting them.

      Like


  3. Amen. The only cure is to stay ahead of the Tsunami of American ‘culture’.

    Also, to avoid dark alleys and Thai pimp dudes (even if they’re relatively tiny and not-so threatening, at first glance).

    Me, tonight, Bangkok, inadvertently negotiating my doom: http://two.cedonulli.com/2011/11/keeping-off-the-needle/

    Like


    • A post about narcissism – then you post a link to your blog where you use the words “I” and “me” twice per sentence. Score extra for being the Westerner in Asia who doesn’t bother to learn the language – and who paradoxically hates being around other Westerners. Super bonus points for mentioning the weird food – there’s nothing like mentioning the weird food to point out how different you are. Minus for not including a photo of the tentacle food – what kind of walking cliche are you without a photo? It’s what everyone does when they get to Asia.

      PS, it is remarkably easy to avoid dark alleys and pimps, exactly like it is to do so in America.

      Like


    • Seriously man, you know nothing about Thailand, and you’ll never speak Thai; beyond maybe: sawsdee kupt, sabai de mai na?

      Pick up a girl who you don’t have to pay for sex, and write about that. A blog about an American in Bangkok who bangs hookers isn’t new or entertaining.

      try a pick up line in thai, i guarantee it will generate intrigue, if nothing else: khun sway mak

      Its almost painful to read: “tentacle food” – jebus man, you really are the stereotypical American – attempting (yet failing miserably) to poke at a culture you will never understand; looking uncultured and egocentric in the process.

      Sure… BKK has young, sexy, purchasable girls, but it also has a LOT more.

      maybe my guide can help

      http://getasiangirlfriend.com

      Like


  4. Another great post, with the unspoken maxim of why it’s great for men NOT to be on facecrack:

    A Few ideas on why it’s best for Alpha males to stay far away from FB:

    1. Air of mystery: access to information about you is concealed. FB is The most readily available source of info on a person, once ‘friended.’)
    2. not like other guys (supplicators)
    3. not like other guys (no need to self-advertise/attention whore)

    If you MUST be on FB, put up sparse info, a few preselection and DHV photos, and NEVER update or respond to any of it. Aloof game.

    Like


    • You can have a FB with no information at all. Even your friends list can be undisclosed. Just put your real name (or abbreviated) and a picture of you to keep it not so creepy.

      FB is useful to get information, to organize your harem, to verify if that girl you met yesterday is really hot, to ask for if she doesn’t want to give her number.

      One example: once I asked a girl’s FB (it means her name + family name) at a red traffic light. There was no time or mood for a number.

      Like


    • I deleted my facebook account a while ago, and shortly after got emails from some of the hotter girls asking me to write to them and even got sent a parcel of goodies from one of them, so that must be another good reason to delete your account.

      I find that if a girl now asks me if I’m on facebook now and I tell her ‘nope’ they take it as the equivalent of somebody pretending they don’t have a phone number…. so inconceivable as to be a certified IOD.

      FB is usually used to appeal for validation in one way or another, and as such it is well suited to girls and betaroids but has no place in the alpha toolkit.

      Like


  5. Does leaving a neg on a girls profile actually make you on those white knights? Sometimes I feel like I am no different than the WK when I tease a girl online in Facebook. She is eating up the attention (along with 5 cheeseburgers).

    Like


  6. on November 22, 2011 at 1:57 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    lzozozlzollz

    if you protest studnet loans and fiat beenenr bernake debt massive student laons massive butthexnbg corprate state tcuecker max rhyems with goldman sax butthexing sectrivee tapings of butthex fiat dollarz like dante put the usuuers and counterveefeirters and cerators of ifta dollarz in helele alongssgsie in hell alaongside alongsididie aliongside lzolzlzlzl da butthexers on the sma elevel of hell is tcuker max sodoomite and folggamanss sax fiat couneteeteerfeieters lzolzllzlzllzlzlz buttheeieihexier tcuker max butehehxs girlthss tapes it without tehier iconthent zand gets hunddrgedds of thosuands of dolalrz fiat dolzlzlrz form tehe ocorprate state as well as ten millioin fiat dollarz for a cuky fail epic fial movei that only chaplrrlteoeos chalrleletotete allene neoenco chalerlrotetet allen seemesdd to like lzozlzlzlz

    anywayzyyz if you protest the fiat butthex matrix, then they send the beenrnake police fiat funded police to pepper pray the peaceful studnets in tehir faces lzlzlzlzlzlzlzlo

    the fmeinist polic etsatte lzozlolzlo police state lzozlzlzolo zlozozlo

    da bernnakififiers and pepeprr paprpspareyeyrs of all and buttehxxxers of all humanaity zlozozlzlozoz



    all bow down and wroship da fiat butthexxxx maststerzzz lzozolzlzlozlozlzlzozoozozolzl

    Like


    • After all this time I have to ask, how is Tucker Max much of anything in the big scheme of fiat currency and all the other real stuff you post about. He’s at best a douche bag schmuck who I admire his self promotion style but otherwise think he is a tool. He’s no Charlie Sheen.

      Like


      • on November 23, 2011 at 3:37 am Too Smart To Fail

        Tucker Max is the poster boy illustrating how unbridled rotten american woman have become. Sleazy, slutty, whorishness, based upon bullshit feminism and so-called financial independence or rather big-brother government subsidies that transfers and re-distributes wealth and property from men to woman through unfair, inequality bullshit divorce laws.
        As history has repeatedly demonstrated, the rise of woman to power (not through their own discoveries or contributions to the rise of mankind)coincides with the downfall of society. This phenomenon is occuring simultaneously as our monetary system and fiat currency system based on ponzi-scheme debt proliferation and dollar debasement robs savers and rewards borrowers. It is a mirror image of punishing men and rewarding woman. If you read through the lines of GB4M, it is a disguised riddle accurately describing our current state of affairs in this country similar to what our government is doing in front of our eyes blinded in disguise.
        Of course, since you take it in a literal sense, you are obfuscated from it’s true underlying meaning.

        Like


      • I think that’s the very reason Tucker Max is such an important symbol. His accomplishment is that he has no accomplishments.

        Just like the fiat money system, with Tucker Max there’s no *there* there. It’s “butthexing” all the way down.

        Like


    • This happened in the USA in 2011.

      wake

      the fuck

      up

      people.

      Like


    • on November 24, 2011 at 5:40 am Too Smart To Fail

      The people aren’t just making a political statement. They are fighting for their freedom, their rights, and their very futures. With low employment, rising school costs, and an insurmountable debt heaped upon them by the previous two generations, the young have realized the direness of their situation. They have nothing to lose anymore. It has already been taken from them. The only option is disobedience.

      We can see that as the movement strengthens, the powers-that-be are growing more nervous and resorting to more overt suppression. Not only are media being targeted, the elite are using their police forces to arrest protesters who for the most part aren’t causing harm to anyone. Their worst offense is taking too few showers and not being among the millions of ‘responsible’ citizens putting on their best business dress and marching to work every day.

      But then, if there weren’t such high unemployment, perhaps these people wouldn’t be protesting.

      This is setting up as an historical showdown for several more reasons. Once replete with easily obtainable resources, the earth is not as giving as she once was. Oil is harder to find and more costly. Ponzi paper-based debt and monetary systems are beginning their final collapses around the globe.

      Socialist government policies distort market prices and expand the business cycle into recessions and depressions. Large governments misallocate capital into inefficient projects and technologies, wasting resources they claim to be saving.

      Our government is now setting road-blocks for exploration of new, plentiful resources such as thorium and natural gas in favor of net-negative energy sources such as solar power. Subsidies, which are more government reallocations of wealth from one group to another, are required to force solar power on society that would not accept the technology otherwise. Solar uses dangerous chemicals, a lot of energy produced by oil, and presents major challenges in disposal of dangerous materials when depleted.

      Collectivist government laws are siphoning wealth from the productive to the non and are crippling any chance at a stable economy supporting a new generation of those that want to work.

      All of these factors are coming to a fore at the same time. Politicians are reluctant to initiate new change, as it would result in their elimination from the wealth-building insider games that make them rich. The people, now over 51% dependent on some sort of government program, are reluctant for change because it would remove their ill-gotten safety net. Those sucking at the government teat are unwilling to play on a level field where winners are determined by hard work, innovation, and consistent production.

      It is not surprising to most who have been watching the economy over the last decade that the young are fighting back. But it has apparently caught the powerful off-guard, as if they thought their systems would go on forever without needing a reboot.

      “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

      -Arthur Schopenhauer

      We are now in the second stage of violent opposition and moving into the third. While the police and media are yielded to quash opposition, popular culture discovers the truth to be self-evident.

      As the founding father’s predicted, Democracy is not a stable form of government. That is why they decided to form a Constitutional Republic, to protect the rights of the individual against the tyranny of the many. But slowly over time, our freedom has been abdicated to institutions who through their centralized and sterile influence have instituted a modern feudalistic slavery based upon the un-payable, back-breaking debt ponzi system driven by the unstoppable growth of collectivist social insurance schemes.

      We live in a very dynamic time. The Internet is our modern free press since those former bastions of free speech were since bought by elite financial interests. Information moves faster, communication is more effective, and organization of opposition is more efficient. We have seen social media change the landscape of power very quickly across the world. Old ideas and ways are crumbling. The powers appear to have been caught off guard while sitting on top of their hoards of oil, gold, land, debt, and paper money.

      If they are purposefully steering a collapse, it appears they have lost control of the ship. There will be no soft landings, only violent collisions with icebergs. As happened with the Enlightenment, the people are gaining traction based upon knowledge of schemes of the few, but at a much faster pace. Despite a technological advantage, those in power should be afraid. The people outnumber them, and are fighting with nothing to lose.

      You can shun them and disparage them. You can arrest them. You can shoot them. But nothing will stop a cold, hungry, desperate people with nothing to lose, except the greater society’s unwillingness to stand against tyranny and oppression.

      Can we build a better society, free from control systems that promote delusion and deceit? I believe we can pull the plug on the matrix, once and for all. But, as history has shown, the futures of the many are on fragile footing. It will take coordinated effort, luck, and perhaps divine intervention. We must educate people about control systems while preventing another strong, centralized government from emerging.

      These used to be common concepts in school, but they have since been changed in our American education system into obedience to the socialist, centralized model which children are now being brainwashed with.

      Like


      • Dude,

        you are confused. Most of this started as Democrat astroturf bought and paid for by ACORN and SEIU. Now anyone who is dissatisfied with their life situation is joining in. We need economic growth and more jobs, less crony capitalism, less nanny state interference.The last thing we need is more Socialism which entrenches the leading elements of capitalist society and hands them oligarchic power. Most of these people are adjutating for more political control to be given to people who think like them and will promise to pay off their student loans and give them lots of middle class benefits for free. The very people who set them up for failure in the first place.

        You mean you expect a six figure salary or some other comparable worth notion for basically learning one flavor or other of Marxist studies? What you and they fail to see is their very political positions have created the circumstances of their misery . For that reason, I have no sympathy for them or their cause. Their handlers and key influences in life are the source of much of my own dissatisfaction with the state as well as theirs. The difference is, I see that point and they don’t. Until you accept that basic fact, your Chomskyesque screed is a lot of misguided hot air and is a cure worse than the cancer. When society collapses people like you will become my serfs because following the false communitarian God is all you know.

        “Most men do not desire freedom, but rather, seek a just master.” – King Mithradates of Pontus.

        Like


    • “I was still deeply puzzled as to why OWS, this hapless, hopeful band, would call out a violent federal response.

      That is, until I found out what it was that OWS actually wanted.

      The mainstream media was declaring continually “OWS has no message”. Frustrated, I simply asked them. I began soliciting online “What is it you want?” answers from Occupy. In the first 15 minutes, I received 100 answers. These were truly eye-opening.

      The No 1 agenda item: get the money out of politics. Most often cited was legislation to blunt the effect of the Citizens United ruling, which lets boundless sums enter the campaign process.

      No 2: reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks. This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.

      No 3 was the most clarifying: draft laws against the little-known loophole that currently allows members of Congress to pass legislation affecting Delaware-based corporations in which they themselves are investors.

      When I saw this list – and especially the last agenda item – the scales fell from my eyes. Of course, these unarmed people would be having the shit kicked out of them.”

      No 2: reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks. This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.

      No 3 was the most clarifying: draft laws against the little-known loophole that currently allows members of Congress to pass legislation affecting Delaware-based corporations in which they themselves are investors.

      When I saw this list – and especially the last agenda item – the scales fell from my eyes. Of course, these unarmed people would be having the shit kicked out of them.”

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/25/shocking-truth-about-crackdown-occupy

      Like


  7. On the other hand, what’s even more tragic is that real intellectual achievements are regarded with condescendence by attractive women at their prime. I have no incentive whatsoever to innovate, not that I undoubtedly could, but still…

    Maybe it’s evolutionary, a prehistoric nerd could invent a space ship back then and still get his ass kicked by the leader of the tribe.

    For the sake of pussy, it’s better to emulate the leader of the baboon pack rather than competing for the nobel prize.
    Bitches be damned.

    Like


    • On the other hand, what’s even more tragic is that real intellectual achievements are regarded with condescendence by attractive women at their prime. I have no incentive whatsoever to innovate, not that I undoubtedly could, but still…
      It’s not a tragedy. It’s a nature.

      Like


      • That is not particularly Darwinian. Selection for Alpha social dominance at the expense of IQ advantage can get punished quite quick in times of turmoil. How good is say, Kevin Federline at fighting, effectively, with like-minded people (group cohesion) to keep resources. Think Dark Ages (there were two in Western History, one around 1100 BC, the other the fall of the Western Roman Empire). Complex, female-friendly systems collapse into semi-feudalism, with a few peoples that promote higher IQ reproduction gaining advantage.

        Female attraction to social dominance over IQ is probably a left-over (particularly in White women) to early hominid days. IQ has such a marked advantage (dominating resources, using them better, finding/creating new ones) that it should by all rights be constantly selected for, particularly as society gets more complex (and higher IQ people gain more resources through complexity). Is “going Federline” a good bet as welfare societies collapse? To quote GB4M.

        Like


      • Yes.

        Our female-friendly nerfed society favours men who have no useful qualities but are attractive to women. These men wouldn’t last long or be attractive to women when SHTF.

        An image of Russel Brand prancing around in an apocalyptic waste land comes to mind.

        Like


      • well, remember, women don’t need a man for his money. They have their own. Women have enough money to survive on their own for the most part, at least food and shelter. A woman’s basic needs are met.

        If her basic needs are met, then she looks to social needs and lifestyle. What does a nerd beta engineer provide in terms of lifestyle if all he does is go to work, get off, enjoy a nice dinner, go to sleep, and repeat?

        Like


      • This is phrased as though it were countering my point but actually supports it.

        ?

        Like


      • Brilliant point right there. This encapsulates everything.

        Like


      • You guys suck at evolutionary logic, seriously. Read The Blank Slate and The 10,000 Year Explosion if you want to educate yourself on this stuff.

        There’s no such thing as “attraction to social dominance being left over from early hominid days”. Evolution moves slowly, but it doesn’t move that slowly. Generally, the evidence seems to suggest that we are adapted to our current social system with perhaps a 300-1000 year lag. So whatever our behaviour is today was most adaptive around Shakespeare’s time, less so for things under heavy selection pressure.

        Furthermore, don’t worry about species or group based selection. People are selected for individual benefit. There’s an awesome book called Before the Dawn which speculates that many racial groups don’t easily establish modern governments because group cooperation has never evolved. Basically, they’ve been warlike for so long that people have only evolved to cooperate with family members. Tribalistic Arabian countries are potentially stuck that way because of genetic factors.

        As for lack of attraction to high IQ, nerdy aspergers intelligence is never an alpha male strategy. It’s a resource seeking provider strategy, and as such it’s only attractive if you’re the pair-bonded women receiving the resources. Also, it’s a recent adaptation: autism is unknown in hunter-gatherer societies, and much more common where nerds aggregate. It’s also on the rise, showing that we are under heavy selection pressure for increased intelligence nowadays.

        For good measure, read Kurzban’s Why Everyone Else Is A Hypocrite. You can’t really get many useful observations out of the shit people say. We are evolved to lie to everyone, including ourselves.

        Like


      • @Ian

        you suck at evolutionary SCIENCE. The human brain is on top of the monkey brain, which is itself on top of the reptile brain. Evolutionary developments don’t erase previous structures, but modulate their activity – if and when active, which is not 100% of the time.

        Autism is probably a result of the combination of mercury poisoning AND vitamin D deficiency. This is why either hypothesis doesn’t quite succeed w/o the other. Also why autism rates are highest among children of college-educated people; there are most likely to be aware of propaganda about vaccines and sun exposure, and obey same.

        Stop pretending to understand science.

        Like


      • In the environment you describe, the best and most successful men are those who are both able to fight well and have a high IQ. We tend to call such men “The Great.” Alexander, Cyrus, Alfred, Frederick, Ghengis Khan, etc. were all very high IQ and capably violent men. These men are by no means exhaustive of the number of such men in history. We used to promote the development of such men. I think that is the greatest tragedy and sign of decadence in our times.

        Like


      • I had a high IQ and ruthless agressiveness growing up. I could have become one of those men but our feminized school system and betafying Christian “turn the other cheek” religion I was raised with did everything in their power to stamp it out of me.

        Like


      • on November 24, 2011 at 4:56 am Too Smart To Fail

        http://www.fpri.org/footnotes/1325.200810.husick.stonetosilicon.html

        High I.Q. men are responsible for the progress of men from the development of agriculture based civilizations to the high technology forefront of modern civilization.

        Slaves are required to build and construct the infrastructure that high intelligence has developed. Ants and bees spend their entire lives building and tending to their colonies and hives unaware of their enslavement, unaware what freedom encompasses. As long as those enslaved are incognizant that they are slaves, they will never attempt to journey outside their boundaries, nor discover what freedom is, like that of a soaring eagle or scientist that pursues enrichment through a discovery that advances modern civilization. The masses motivated by sex unknowingly and unaware, utilize sex to propagate the species as well as to encumber their offspring into future slavery. For it is the brilliant who recognize that their genius allows them to escape the confines of their pre-destined existence and capitalize where other cannot, and reward themselves with the enlightenment which empowers them above and beyond the brute hunting-gatherer’s who were once held captive, enslaved by their environment.

        This is all fine by me!

        It is sure lonely at the top, any smart females want to join me?

        Like


      • Minor quibble but ants are no more enslaved than are my neurons.

        Superorganisms and all that…

        By the way, you should read a book called The Lights In The Tunnel by Martin Ford. Much of the problem in the current economy is more because plebs are no longer required due to increasing automation (and for now, Chinese people).

        Like


  8. Thanks for writing this post. I have problems with too high self esteem and don’t know what to do. My sense of SMV is too high. And it’s getting worse with age. When I was younger I used to hate myself and thought I was disgusting. Now, when my SMV is objectively falling, I’m starting to feel pretty. Will I end up like those women who feel most attractive at 31?! (https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/women-are-most-deluded-at-31/)

    “”Maxim #22: A woman with inflated self-esteem is a woman who will erroneously believe she is too good to date men normally in her league …”

    OK. This is me. I know it. But I’m NOT attracted to men in my league. I’d vomit or probably die if I had to sleep with someone in my league.

    “… unless steps are taken to bring her self-esteem back in line with reality.””

    What kind of steps? What should I do? HELP PLZ I want to find a boyfriend ASAP but for this I need to have an objective sense of SMV.

    Like


    • Be open minded about height.

      Like


      • I am. I don’t care about height. I’m small so everyone is tall enough for me.

        Like


      • How about dating Asian guys? Hollywood has given them a reputation for being nerdy, wimpy etc. They may have problems finding dates, but some are very attractive and they are not all ” betas.”

        Like


      • There are no Asian guys where I live.

        Like


      • Maya, assuming you aren’t trolling, you can hope to hook up with guys out of your league. But you won’t date them or have a long term relationship with them.

        The only way to maybe change this is to get hotter.

        Like


      • I’m as hot as possible (I even toned my triceps lately … after reading advice about this here on this blog).

        Like


      • Idea:

        Go riding the “alpha cock carroussel” at will. Try to keep an average of two alpha cocks per week during some months. Orgies and gang-bangs would help you too.

        You’ll be “enjoying life” and simultaneously diminishing your SMV and self-esteem.

        Like


      • Maya, I highly doubt you are “hot as possible.” I mean, lets be honest, you are not as hot as you could possibly be. Tone your ass and legs, and also adapt a more feminine personality. I may be wrong but you don’t come off as very feminine to me.

        “OK. This is me. I know it. But I’m NOT attracted to men in my league. I’d vomit or probably die if I had to sleep with someone in my league.”

        That doesn’t sound feminine to me. I know it is the internet, but if you talk like this in real life it will turn guys off.

        Like


      • “Tone your ass and legs, and also adapt a more feminine personality.”

        I’m working on toning up my ass and legs a bit more … but I don’t have much potential here I think.

        ““OK. This is me. I know it. But I’m NOT attracted to men in my league. I’d vomit or probably die if I had to sleep with someone in my league.”
        That doesn’t sound feminine to me.”

        Yeah, I know. What should I do?

        (I’m really not attracted to guys in my league. I can’t force myself to like them.)

        Like


      • Maya, I will give you the exact advice you need so you never need to ask (or troll) for it again.

        If the guys who are “in your league” are disgusting then I am wondering if you are disgusting yourself. If so, then you have a lot of work to do. But I get the impression that you are just average looking and not overweight. If that is true spend as much time as possible getting a more attractive body. You can tell yourself that you are “as hot as possible” but that is just an excuse. Eat better and work out harder. If you are average looking, a nice ass alone will take you a LONG way. If it is true that you are hot as possible (we both know it is not) then there is nothing you can do.

        As for becoming more feminine, definitely don’t speak in real life like you do online. Be friendly to every guy who approaches you whether or not you like them. Try to look and act “classy” and “sweet.” You know what I am talking about.

        Finally and most importantly realize if you don’t already that nobody cares if you succeed or not. Nobody feels guilty about not giving you attention, just like you don’t feel guilty about not giving guys you don’t like attention. Realize this if you haven’t already and don’t complain about it, since we ALL do this. That will help stop negative thoughts and end up motivating you to work out harder.

        You are under 30 right? If you tone your body, eat right, and act feminine and sweet to everyone who talks to you, then you can do it. Or you can make excuses like so many people do, but realize nobody else really cares.

        Like


      • Sprawl, thanks for your reply.

        Just a short comment:

        “Finally and most importantly realize if you don’t already that nobody cares if you succeed or not. Nobody feels guilty about not giving you attention, just like you don’t feel guilty about not giving guys you don’t like attention. Realize this if you haven’t already and don’t complain about it, since we ALL do this.”

        I’m very aware of this … I hope. I don’t want anyone to feel guilty (?!) or to care about my problems – I’m just asking questions here in case somebody has answers to them.

        “… just like you don’t feel guilty about not giving guys you don’t like attention.”

        Sprawl, what kind of attention do you mean? I talk to every guy who wants to have my attention (in case I have time). But unfortunately I can’t give them what they want from me. I can’t sleep with guys I’m not attracted to. Should I?

        “Or you can make excuses like so many people do, but realize nobody else really cares.”

        This is very true. Although I feel a bit lonely because of that. I wish somebody cared, at least my family. But maybe I’m just spoiled. People have much bigger problems than obsessing about whether they will ever get married or not. Maybe I don’t have enough real problems to worry about.

        Like


      • For women, it’s simple:

        Don’t be a fatty. Achieve this by working out and eating paleo.

        Grow long hair. Wear tasteful makeup and feminine clothing.

        Smile and be pleasant to men.

        Check yourself- If you are engaging in masculine behavior, fix it.

        Like


    • The last sentence was too obvious, Maya. You can be a better troll than that.

      Like


    • Do you know anyone who has the courage to be brutally honest with you? Use them and actually listen to what that person has to say. Do not rationalize what they have to say, but seriously consider that it is most likely true. Then do you very best to change it.

      Like


      • I have someone. He’s giving me good advice by criticizing me but I don’t think he has the courage to be brutally honest with me. All the others are only telling me how pretty I am and how much time I still have and that I shouldn’t worry at all.

        Like


      • You know those great old school Rossy posts where he would muse about how the world is cruel because it makes female beauty necessarily brief? Those were wonderful, pure seduction. Given that, I think the Chateau is likely uninterested in the project of female improvement. Still Maya, wouldn’t it be something if he could just give us what we want in the form of some good firm instruction?

        This isn’t the right space to get what you’re looking for, I don’t think. It is meant to subvert our ability to demand attention, which is what you are doing. Read the archives, try to be like the women that bring delight to men.

        And if that’s too much, try to get your BMI 20.

        Like


      • Thanks for your comment, Luisa.

        “… try to be like the women that bring delight to men.”

        I like this.

        “And if that’s too much, try to get your BMI 20.”

        I’m below 20 already, but I agree that this would help many girls to look prettier.

        ps. i love your dress!

        Like


      • Do you have erect nipples for real or are you using those fake plastic ones?

        Like


    • How old are you?

      Like


    • you need to make yourself a facetube profile.

      no, wait….better yet, let us design your profile. we know what works. don’t worry, you can trust us.

      Like


    • Hey Maya,

      I’m an aspergoid – the only game I have is World of Warcraft.
      Bring the movies.

      Like


    • Now you really are trolling.

      Like


    • As much as I hate to reward narcissism by responding and thus feeding…I have to point out the entire post was “I…I…I…”

      Like


    • “What kind of steps? What should I do? HELP PLZ I want to find a boyfriend ASAP but for this I need to have an objective sense of SMV.”

      Maya, despite your ignorant trollish ways, I will give you an honest answer… by pointing out that you answered the question yourself. You already know your objective sense of SMV:

      “I’m NOT attracted to men in my league. I’d vomit or probably die if I had to sleep with someone in my league.”

      This. If this is how you feel about men in your league, then you can bet that the reverse is also true. Look at the men who disgust you so much, that you say are in “your league,” and then look in the mirror. That is your SMV.

      Like


    • For starters, this blog is a piss poor place for women to get advice.

      Your rational mind knows that you are unlikely to get a relationship with the men you are attracted to, and yet you don’t want a relationship with men who want a relationship with you.

      This is similar to me eating chocolate ice cream. Tell me how to fix my ice cream addiction.

      In the ancestral environment, gobbling high fat high sugar foods was adaptive, because the supply of such foods was limited, so better scarf them up when available. In the modern world, not adaptive.

      Similarly in the ancestral environment, if a woman was not married at an extremely early age, she might as well give up marriage, and focus on getting impregnated with the highest grade sperm available. If male was not supporting that female by fifteen, probably not going to get support regardless.

      Thus, women tend as they age to transition from a mating strategy, a strategy aimed at relationships, because such strategy is less and less likely to succeed, to a leking strategy, a strategy of collecting high grade sperm, rather that supportive and protective relationships, and find themselves with appetites that are less and less likely to result in a relationship.

      This change in strategy is perceived by them as constantly rising standards that they require of males.

      When have lost twenty pounds, rendered my food appetites more appropriate to the modern world, I might have authority to give you advice on how to render your sexual preferences more appropriate to the modern world.

      Like


    • Is this girl for real?
      I’m starting to lose faith in women.

      Doll, first steps would be to invest in yourself.
      1) Image.
      2) Interests: if you don’t have any, find some (Other than getting a boyfriend)
      3) Learn how to hold a good conversation
      4) Life is unfair: When you stop looking, It’ll come to you.
      5) Be tasteful. “Riding the cock carousel” is not exactly the kind of advice I would take. From what I’ve analyzed, you don’t seem to be the type for those casual flings (stop convincing yourself you are) – so don’t work to turn yourself into one. Being a woman requires establishing a perfect balance between elevating your worth (aesthetically and intellectually) and remaining humble/modest about it. Essentially be an open and optimistic person. You’d be surprised how more intriguing you become with a smile on your face.

      Enough is enough though… seriously…

      Like


      • Thanks for your comments and advice, Annette.

        (Out of curiosity, why do you think I’m not for real?)

        Like


      • I’ve been wanting to insert a new word into the dating lexicon, and here’s my chance. Maya, your SMV is “UNDERWATER”.

        You are demanding a price that outstrips what your value can command, and you will not budge by lowering your price or raising your value. In fact your default state is one of continuous depreciation, so each month you hold out for that high price just makes your situation even more intractable. You will remain single and unsold unless the market ever returns to its days of wild excess, which it won’t any time soon.

        The market has spoken Maya, and you will not command the price you ask, because your own worth comes up lacking.

        Most of the women over 30 in America have underwater SMVs, and their lives just get more and more lonely because they think denial is a legit route to self-esteem.

        Like


    • you can tell who’s new around here by how they respond to maya.

      see, maya, you’re not entirely useless.

      Like


    • Aren’t you black?

      Like


    • “Thanks for writing this post. I have problems with too high self esteem and don’t know what to do”
      “… unless steps are taken to bring her self-esteem back in line with reality.””
      What kind of steps?

      Sit at home and talk to your cats from many a weekend night of turning down all those “men not normally in your league …”

      Like


    • Maya,

      to really give you adequate advice, we need to see some current naked photos of you.

      Like


  9. heartste

    Try to picture this life, except with the sex roles reversed. Every one of your trivial observations or random thoughts gets “upvoted”, literally and metaphorically, by throngs of admirers

    I’m always contemptuously appalled at/by the jungle of absurd morons polluting/clogging sites that should be all about meeting new ass.

    Social “networking” has been a massive fail except for ego-preening an already dissolute populace – and enriching the chosen few internerd inventors.

    Like


    • internerd: that’d be a good term to describe a 50-something latent homosexual who sits all day on the internet… like… you, for example.

      get a life, firepower.

      Like


  10. Social media is a major part of why overweight hogs think they qualify to date rich, buff doctors. Every dumb beta comment pumps up the ego a little bit more.

    I absolutely love trolling girls’ attention-whoring facebook posts. Here’s one I see pretty frequently:

    Girl: “I’m getting fat, need to exercise omg lol but I hate the gym 😦 What can I do?”
    [100 beta comments saying how she looks great]
    Proper response: “Cocaine”

    Works every time.

    Like


  11. What the hell is this facebook that everyone is talking about?

    Like


    • It’s kind of …MySpace 2.0 – an Ego Enhancement Device for chicks flashing gang signs with a troutpout. Both were intended to be easy pua tools for instant ass but both deteriorated into an Online Sausage Factory.

      Like


      • Google+ seems to be the same deal, only moreso.

        There’s a new player in town (no pun intended, called Unthink. No idea if it’s any good or not, I’m too busy to engage in it to find out.

        It seems the only online venues of any utility for men are carefully constructed profiles on POF, OKC, maybe Match… any other suggestions?

        Like


      • The whole “Myth o’ MySpace” ™
        and by proxy, FaceBook’s Fallacy
        was the sudden growth industry of Get SNL MySpace Action! $2k seminars
        concocted by Stylelife, TAF n’ VAF forum “sexperts”
        with 6 chapters of Magic Bullets
        and Season One of VH1’s The Pickup Artist
        under their belt

        Like


      • Backpage.com and sugardaddyforme.com. Lotsa hotties DTF4$

        Like


    • on November 22, 2011 at 7:55 pm So, do the Zonk

      Right on.

      I deactivated mine early this year.

      I do not miss it.

      I talked to a guy who buys data from FB for marketing. That is how FB makes money. The users are a gigantic volunteer army of market research lab mice. Have at it, suckers.

      Like


      • Use my info. It’s all so fake, it’ll skew your data so bad it’ll make it worthless.
        Who says you have to tell the truth? Do you tell the truth when picking up pump & dumps?

        Like


    • Was a time when MySpace did lend itself to tail-harvesting. Even of the underage sort. Is that illegal to say? Wait, who the fuck cares. I’d meet teenagers all the time on that and LiveJournal. Remember Yahoo Personals?? Now there, in its early days, was a fine resource for finding lonely latchkeys eager to “rebel” …

      A formula could be worked out expressing the, again, inverse correlation of a site’s initial usefulness in harvesting tail and its uselessness at the saturation-point. Just more overgrazing of the commons.

      Like


  12. It is with great pleasure that I resoundly detest/deplore (Yes, I know this sentence isn’t perfect, too damn bad) the social media self-esteem idiocy that poses as real life as you describle. I played the facebuchinyour/myspace game long enough to be disgusted by the trivial smegma that poses (again) as real life and walked away completely. There is no self-esteem issues on facebuch for females. It’s just after they put down their bloodsupply media device, that reality creep rears its ugly doubt. I’ve heard no end to the bleating of friends and enemies, “Why aren’t you on facebuch anymore?” I hesitate to explain.
    Give a platform to a woman and her groupies and the 461 trait list will expand to 600, along with her ego and waistline…

    Like


  13. I’d counter with the theory that much of female-to-female attention and adulation is female exuberance and fakeness, which females subconsciously are likely aware of; therefore the attention is worth much less than the genuinely earned attention and adulation men receive. Similarly, male-to-female attention is largely based on looks and is by nature, fleeting.

    So females get much more attention, but it’s worth less, and they know it.

    Like


    • on November 22, 2011 at 2:25 pm Too Smart To Fail

      More attention=Less value

      In economics, this is the law of Diminishing Marginal Utility.

      That first piece of ass after a dryspell is the best, then after your nuts are drained, each additional piece of ass in the same night provides less and less satisfaction, unless you are a superhero on coke and viagra.

      But for many woman, that 5th Cheeseburger is a scrumptious as the 1st!

      Like


    • Yes. I think this is one of the reasons that negs work so well.

      Like


      • cause really, no one is THAT nice. Someone may put up that front, but they can’t really believe all the bullshit nice talk said.

        I love being crude and rude. Walk into my house with shoes on? “uhhhh hello, shoes?!”

        I call it, the, “I operate in the real world” attitude.

        Like


      • on November 23, 2011 at 3:42 am Too Smart To Fail

        Stingray, there is only one woman that comes to mind that defends beta males (married to one), has a fairly good understanding of EP theory, and understands economic principles.

        SUSAN, is that you? (Last name omitted to protect identity)

        Like


  14. on November 22, 2011 at 2:11 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    i think we should start assbook lzozlzlzolzlzl where everyoene would post ictures of tehir buttholes for eteh neonconing ssockiers 2 enjoy zlzolzlzlozzo

    i also want to start

    “freindster with benefits–fuck ur friends and ur firiend’s friends zlolzlzozozolozozooz”

    socialala social media is where massive corprorations get people to upload all tehir information share all eveyrt8ng friend infoprmation frineds friend infmorations so that mak zuckerberg can profit off of everyone’ss friendships while tracking every move on da inetetrzrznts zlzzlzzoozlz zlozozzoz

    Like


  15. on November 22, 2011 at 2:13 pm Too Smart To Fail

    Man, these posts just get better and better.. Each one reinforces the preceding posts. Excellent CH!

    @ (r)Evoluzione – Facebook Game for Men – Great minds think alike.
    @Anonymous – “She is eating up the attention (along with 5 cheeseburgers)” Two thumbs up and two toes!
    She wants her cake, I mean cheeseburgers.. and eat them too!

    Like


  16. I will observe that my workplace is like this as well.

    My inbox today has many emails from my male co-workers. They all want to know when a report will be ready or need to schedule a meeting or need for me to review and edit a document or to confirm what that confused client said yesterday. It’s all work. Work work work work work.

    My inbox today also has many emails from my female co-workers. They want me to know about the seasonal door-decorating contest (and it took her three tries to correctly attach the form associated with that contest) or to ask what I’m bringing to next week’s pot-luck or to (no kidding) show me pictures of their new puppy. I AM NOT KIDDING. I got that email just a few minutes ago and then when I saw this post I nearly exploded.

    It’s all play.

    As I tour my building during the day, the (female) “administrative assistants” (we don’t call them “secretaries” any more) are all playing – chatting on the phone, on FB, whatever. Once pointed out you can practically smell the estrogen and stroking and “you go grll!” attitude that permeates the female part of the building. But at least we have mixed company which keeps them somewhat in check. I can hardly imagine the horror that an all-female department (like HR) must be. And I can tell you that those HR b*tches think they hung the damn moon.

    They guys are all working. Well (obviously) except for me. And now break’s over – back on your heads!

    Like


  17. on November 22, 2011 at 2:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)

    lzozzzozlzozozlzlzo

    here is ho wowmenz calcculates there looks scoroeoe lzozozlzl

    http://www.cafepress.com/greatbooksformen.582539788

    Like


  18. Feminists are talking about the low self esteem of ugly chicks and old hags. IOW, they’re talking about themselves.

    Like


  19. Great post. Whenever a European girl asks me if I have Facebook I cringe because I know the self-esteem problem will be exported throughout the world.

    Like


    • But you know, Krauser seems to have broken through, he seemingly developed his own facebook game.
      Not being that skilled, I concur with and have witnessed the dangerous effects of facebook ego swelling. One or two pretty pictures, and girls get 100’s of omega-drone followers, hanging on their every word.
      The dreaded next step is complacency. The girl gains weight, and is like, but I have a pretty face, too pretty to have to work out. Or they do the facebook fat-girl pose, hiding the pudge.

      Like


  20. It’s pretty staggering how social networking has skewed the dating market so much. Many women are now receiving validation around the clock, even as they sleep. You have the 5s thinking they are legitimate 8s. You have the 7s -10s thinking all of the guys who surround them aren’t even worth the ground they walk on.

    Like


  21. I think this is a rare miss. I think the reason for the phenomenon you accurately depict is that women’s self-images tend to be so precarious and based on the last thing that happened that they are forever fishing for validation less the abyss of self0doubt overtake them, whereas men are much more comfortable with wherever they find themselves in the social hierarchy (apart from freaks at the tails of the distribution.) Many FB posts from women are so obviously validation fishing (and try denying it to them in “public” and see what happens) that it seems to me their self-image is a bucket with hole in the bottom that must be constantly filled.

    Like


    • I agree – women seek endless validation, but an infinite supply will never be enough. I use to get jealous when GF’s sought validation, until I realized how meaningless it really is to them. It’s like a gaping hole in their souls.

      Like


    • Indeed. Women appear to be receiving validation, and they appear to be lapping it up, but I doubt they have such warped self-images on an instinctual level. Referencing Kurzban on this one: people have strong instincts for social lying, including seemingly delusional self-esteem. While our culture brings this out in people even moreso, it’s a perfectly normal human behaviour. I doubt it really affects behaviour all that much, even though it may appear that way.

      Remember, shit people say has little effect on their actions. My money is on female hypergamy being a byproduct of female economic empowerment, not social media gratification.

      Like


  22. Tried facebook for a few months. Shit is just a giant female gossip engine. Crack for females. An endless game of gossip, snooping, who’s dating who, who got fat, etc….

    Like


  23. Interesting about Facebook.

    I am on, but all is hidden to all except my ‘friends’ and as I only have genuine friends on fb I constantly fail to respond to requests from females to fb friend them. Air of mystery.

    I propose the following Inverse rule: The more fb friends a woman has, or the faster she acquires friends, then in reality the less number of real friends she has. i.e. you can tell what women really think about her.

    Like


  24. Top 5 post. So many truth nuggets here I need some more Sweet and Sour sauce.

    Like


  25. A good term for it: “crowd-sourcing self-esteem”.

    Like


  26. Actually Heartiste,

    It is even worse than you indicate, because it is not just Facebook. Any empowered woman will also be on:

    Twitter, (plenty of feedback including from strangers)

    Klout, (what is your Klout score)

    Foursquare (check-in everywhere including your own home and broadcast all of your life, become the mayor of Mcdonalds and leave tips of what you like)

    Empire Avenue (a cross between the stock-market and monopoly where you can pay real money to get monopoly money – oh yes)

    MySpace (good for dating and recveiving endless requests from Beta males – good for the hamster)

    Tumblr (keep a blog of everything you think)

    Picassa (keep all your pictures on-line)

    and so it goes on, and if you don’t get all the references I list – then really you are just so 2009 – and the sad thing is I know a woman who does all that and more. very popular 😦

    Like


  27. What a fantastic article. I actually suspected this years ago when a gf would “disappear” to chat via MySpace. It was actually a way to talk trash with various guys and yet have plausible deniability.

    So, what is the appropriate response? My suspicion is to distinguish oneself by “doing.” We live in an ever more passive society – social media is just another facet. I know so few guys who actually “do” anything – it doesn’t really matter what. And the women I know are even more passive. So, to offer a chance to actually live life, rather than talk about living life on FB, is suprisingly successful.

    Thoughts?

    Like


  28. “Game is a revolution in thought because it allows men to circumvent the traditional avenues of male attention whoring; namely, occupational status and ostentatious materialism.”

    I guess this is one “pretty lie” that you don’t mind so much after all. True, game teaches a loser how to pose as a winner in order to get laid, but reality cannot be cheated–he’s still a loser. Game also provides “men” (using the term loosely) with an excuse for being losers–the notion that real winners are supplicating betas and that the true masculine ideal is that of a garbage collector by day and master seducer by night, like a used car salesman of the sexual marketplace.

    I do not denounce the concepts of game–but I take serious issue with the ridiculous degree of importance you ascribe to getting laid. Sex is NOT more important than making money and the achievement of rational purposes.

    Like


  29. Then there’s LinkedIn game. Gotta have that killer resume, get validation from CEOs and job-post searches, friended by the influential and powerful. Seriously- the only non-female-dominated social network, because it’s professionally focused.

    Like


  30. Concerning the tweet about the banner, I suggest King A to be put in charge:

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/womens-shifting-perceptions-of-male-looks/#comment-288636

    His comment proved a deep sense of aesthetics, which made me question his sexual orientation, and not in a bad way (oh no…).

    Like


  31. “I know so few guys who actually “do” anything – it doesn’t really matter what. And the women I know are even more passive. So, to offer a chance to actually live life, rather than talk about living life on FB, is suprisingly successful.”

    Most Men are still doing things, and advertising those things on facebook, they’re just doing things that aren’t really useful to society. I cannot tell you how many of my male and female facebook friends have mysteriously metamorphisized into avid outdoorsmen, with plenty of pictures of themselves standing on a mountain vista on their FB page. Or pictures of themselves on vacation.

    We have truly become a “leisure society”…

    Like


  32. Speaking of ‘cute puppies’ and facebook fails:
    http://heahea.org/1014-Pinky_is_driving_

    Like


  33. You know what’s worse than that?

    Back when I had a facebook, I subscribed to Jessica Alba because she always posted pictures and they were fucking hot.

    This one guy commented on one of her pictures once that had her and a friend in it; it was so boss. He said, “I’d do either of the girls in this picture! or both at the same time!”

    Do you know how much alpha cred it takes to say some shit like that to Jessica Alba, who still refuses to do nude scenes in movies?

    After four nasty comments from feminist empowerment friends, the guy backed down, and recommented, “just kidding girl. didnt mean to disrespect u. u know i love u”

    What a loser – reminds me of a guy I wrote about who was content to be a beta, not realizing that pedestalizing and white knighting wont land you the pussy.

    Like


    • somehow, I doubt this impressed Jessica Alba. assuming she even looks at her FB page.

      Like


    • It doesn’t take any alpha cred to say anything to anyone over the internet.

      Like


    • “Do you know how much alpha cred it takes to say some shit like that to Jessica Alba, who still refuses to do nude scenes in movies?”

      Lol the rest of this post sounds serious but this part must be some sort of joke.

      Alpha cred? For commenting on a facebook photo posted by some PR drone? Really?

      Like


  34. on November 22, 2011 at 5:46 pm Concerned Alpha Male

    LinkedIn reeks of dudes in cell phone holsters. . .

    Like


  35. Hmm.

    She changed SOME player’s grades, but not ones that would have changed team eligibility.

    I wonder why…

    http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/blog/prep_rally/post/Coach-8217-s-wife-charged-with-illegally-changi?urn=highschool-wp8971

    Like


  36. uh’s ability to score with underage chicks

    and the rise of (anti)social media

    are inversely correlated.

    Like


  37. dont knock facebook. when i first created my profile, all the friends of my ex’s friended me en masse. ive hooked up with so many of them. one of my favorite FB hookups was with the mother of my high school ex-gf. she is such a milf, and was newly divorced. right after i accepted her friend request was to message me the address of her new place and only thing else she added was “you wont regret it.” lowest effort lay ive had to this day. could this have happened prior to Facebook? i think the value of social media for men is to hook up with women who weve met previously but were in an LTR or married at the time.

    and i dont bother to update my profile. i also agree with the guy above who said uploading pics with girls hurts you more than it helps you. i had a backlash of girls saying that i became a player since getting out of college. of course i didnt stop when they called me on it, and only let up once they stopped bringing it up. but if you can avoid getting into that situation, you should. if i could do it again, i would have uploaded only a very select few girls, the “best of the best” if you will, and stuck mainly to pics of family.

    Like


  38. Zero Tolerance Man’s blog got hacked, but he has started a new blog at:

    American Woman Bitch by the Zero Tolerance Man

    Zero Tolerance Man has the most powerful anti-feminist blog on the net, because he is directly attacking feminist women and showing what worthless cunts they truly are.

    Here is from his “Why Did I create this website” page:

    Because most American women are worthless toilet bowl turds. They are nothing but parasites feeding off the hard work of men. Are men better than women in the USA? ABSOLUTELY. The only thing American women are good for is nagging, complaining, and spending men’s money. Most are not even worth fucking. They suck in bed and thus, have absolutely no value to the good men of the USA.

    Please send a link to this blog to all your friends.

    Like


  39. “Future anthropologists will study this era as one in which the sexual market operated in near complete freedom, with all artificial constraints tempering female sexual prerogative removed, and many of the impositions on the full expression of male sexuality removed as well. ”

    Not really, under natural/free market forces, sluts wouldn’t be provided for and hence they wouldn’t be able to behave the way they do. It’s only with the coercion of the state that sluts can still get child support, alimony, single mother welfare, which enables them to behave the way they do. They wouldn’t be getting that stuff voluntarily from men for their behaviour.

    Like


  40. It’s Nobel prize, N-O-B-E-L, not “noble”.

    Damn americans can’t get anything right

    Like


  41. on November 22, 2011 at 9:56 pm Laughing Shadow

    I think this post is a bit wrong in its analysis of first causes. Women do lack self-esteem, not because of any patriarchy, but because they don’t think very rationally, and it is difficult to develop self esteem, when your life reflects a continual inability to get from point A to point B.

    The reason women post so much to support other women is that all women know this about each other. They know that other women post pictures of puppies to get attention, and they give it with the implicit understanding that they’ll receive the same when they post something equally frivolous when their own self-esteem tank is yet again running low.

    If you’ve heard women bitch about friends that turned out “not to be great friends”, this failure to fall in line when their low esteem cried out for reinforcing is almost always what triggered it. I admit it’s a fine psychological line, but I think women feel “entitled” precisely because they lack self-esteem, not because they have too much of it. Get a woman one-on-one to talk about her self-confidence, and the insecurities flow like wine.

    Like


    • “Women do lack self-esteem, not because of any patriarchy, but because they don’t think very rationally, and it is difficult to develop self esteem, when your life reflects a continual inability to get from point A to point B.”

      A+

      Like


  42. George Carlin had something to say about the Self Esteem Movement.

    Like


  43. The font is good. “lies shouldn’t be a different color. The picture itself is gay. You should look for something cold yet expressive, nothing flowery, and it should have sharper colors too; you trend toward these blurred images. Your message is one of clarity, so should be its masthead.

    Like


  44. Facebook presents excellent opportuinities. Find the pic of N. Spungen ly-ing dead on the slime encrusted floor of the Chelsea Hotel bathroom on which she bled to death after being stabbed by her crazed lover “Johnny Rotten” (its online) back in the late 70s.
    THAT should be your profile pic.

    Like


    • It was Sid Vicious
      – not the story
      of the Johnny Rotten
      – Johnny Rotten, Rotten Johnny

      “There is no future, in England’s dreaming.”

      Like


    • It was Sid Vicious, not Johnny Rotten. What are they teaching you kids in school these days..?

      Like


  45. This post is silly, males can use this in the same way. Females get that kind of attention because they’re attractive or social, or both. Men can EASILY do the same.

    Like


    • Sure, there’s no need to use logic or real world examples to try and back up your argument. You’re a woman, so everything you think is automatically true.

      Like


    • Which cave of which mountain range did you just roll out of?

      A woman writes anything – an opinion, an accomplishment, a criticism, a heartbreak – on Facebook and the GoGrrl choir and the beta-orbiter altar boys are there to tell her it’ll be OK or that she’s such an awesome person or that she’s so “hawt” even though she’s a size 18 with bad skin and oily hair.

      Men do the same, barring high achievements or undeniably heart-wrenching shit, and he’ll get nothing. If he displays any sensitivity at all he’ll get called a fag in due time.

      Like


      • Size 18 with Bad Skin and oily hair? Strong social circle of other trolls also. It’s her friends get over it?

        Cause men shouldn’t display sensitivity, especially on the internet shits for vaginas…… Men, could post a sick ass picture of a concert, Or him jumping off a cliff into a lake, or grinding a rail, or snowboarding.

        Jesus, needs to make a post on how to be cool. Bashing and complaining about the inferior gender is pathetic.

        Like


    • on November 23, 2011 at 5:06 am Green Gangrene

      Yeah, if they start being gay.

      Like


    • In all seriousness, why would they want to?

      Like


    • You miss the point. Girls thrive on how much attention their facebook is getting, but men thrive (or should) on how much attention their cocks are getting. Just sayin

      Like


    • “You miss the point. Girls thrive on how much attention their facebook is getting, but men thrive (or should) on how much attention their cocks are getting. Just sayin”

      This is true. No, I am not a woman, I am a straight male. I don’t need to provide examples because, I don’t care to make you think I’m right. (I am, I know plenty of girls who facebook stalk guys just as guys do. They’re usually attractive and social dudes.)

      It just seemed like complaining , which is unacceptable for something so trivial.

      Like


  46. Hey Rossy,

    I am longtime reader and lurker of your blog. I have a burning question for you and that is; why are white males in aggregate not attracted to black women?? I am a slim (5’4 120pounds, 21 years old) African woman. People tell me that I am attractive and that I favor Naomi Campbell. I attract all sorts of men but never white males. Even the liberal white males don’t approach me. I tend to wear my hair in a long afro hair style do you think this can be apart of the problem. Do yo suggest that I seek out older white men?? Please let me know. Sorry for all of the questions.

    Like


    • long afro style? uhhhh good luck getting a white guy with that

      Like


    • pics or gtfo.

      But anon is right–last black woman I dated was about your size. She wore her hair in a style I can only describe as a hilarious punk rockabilly synthesis (first thing I negged, hah.) The long afro sends a subconscious “Irish need not apply” vibe. That’s never deterred me, of course, but it is what it is.

      Like


    • C-hizzle. You turned the whole comment section bold with your sassy blackness. Dayum, girl!

      Take heart, sister. Your naturally athletic body and best-aging of any race makes up for your kinky hair and purple areolae.

      And look. Race is simultaneously an untouchable subject and yet the obsession of our country. Your skin color is — whether it’s fair or not — emblematic of your stunted, sociopathic, savage culture. Our ability to speak truthfully to each other is hobbled irredeemably by white guilt and uppity black revanchism, like we owe you something, like we are personally to blame for your embarrassing dysfunction. It is a drama we understandably are encouraged to avoid, despite how pretty you are.

      Further, there is an urge in all of us something the opposite of diversifying, and this urge militates against our unofficial civic religion of multiculturalism. So it has become generally impolite to admit, even to ourselves, that we want our kids to look like us (don’t you?). Your dominant set of alleles muddies up the cream. I have blue eyes that would straighten out your afro, but blue eyes are recessive, and I want my children to have a shot at sharing this feature (not to mention the ability to hail a cab). Hint: your liberal friends would vote for Dick Cheney before telling you any of this; they don’t even have the nerve to tell it to themselves.

      If you show signs of transcending this dynamic, you will get more attention from us. You don’t have to “act white” so much as you have to give up the insecurities of former slaves, and somehow express that in your demeanor. You want the world to be colorblind, you have to start with yourself. The idea that we can “judge men … by the content of their character” while having a Black History Month is nonsensical. Either you are judged on your merits or you are not. No (literal) brownie points because your great great great grandfather bailed my great great great grandfather’s hay.

      Finally, I don’t dig on chocolate. Before you speculate about my latent anti-Africanism, know that I don’t dig on orientals either. De gustibus. And no matter what the regime insists, this is still a free country, especially in the area of sexual commerce. You might be able to foist a MLK day on me, but you can’t make my cock believe “black is beautiful” just because the left embarked on a racialist self-esteem movement. Afros are objectively less beautiful than gold-spun hair.

      Don’t let my prejudice get you down, though. Yes, I am prejudiced, just like you and everyone else — I make prejudgments based on general types. A human being could not otherwise function. What gives your natural attractiveness its opportunity to shine is your ability to work within, around, and through prejudices, both the rational and irrational kind, rather than this pipe-dream that regards prejudice as a defect to be overcome. Of all things, that is your primary stumbling block, what keeps blacks from entering equally into any dynamic, especially the sexual one: we understand and are comfortable with the irreducibility of prejudice, mostly because we haven’t been historically disadvantaged by it like you have.

      That is the biggest cultural advantage we caucasians have over you. We know that the more one categorizes oneself in a subset (for any reason, even for justifiable reasons!), the more the limitations of that category will affect him. In that way, your very inquiry has contributed to your frustration. “I am a slim (5’4 120pounds, 21 years old) African woman.” White people (esp. Americans) hear “African” in the alien tones of another race making their common, tired old claims against the race that has dominated the planet for the last five hundred years and invented modernity; we see your complaint on your skin before we’re allowed to consider your beauty. You have insisted on it.

      Like


      • “We must realise that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mould them to our program. The terms ‘colonialism’ and ‘imperialism’ must be featured in our propaganda. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavour to instil in the Whites a guilt complex for exploiting the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sport and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

        —Israel Cohen writing about the communist party’s objectives in “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century”, published in 1912.

        Like


    • Somewhat relevant to your question..

      Like


  47. […] On the contrary, their self-esteem is TOO high, thanks to everyone around them fluffing their egos c… Published: November 23, 2011 Leave a Comment Name: Required […]

    Like


  48. Don’t care that I’m sounding like a broken record: as usual, CH is 100% accurate with this post.

    “If you want to know why so many women so readily whore for attention, the answer is simple: because they can.”

    For the aspiring players out there: if you think that FB is a good tool for your game, or you put a lot of energy into trying to make your FB “cool” or DHV spike your game, straight up: your game is weak.

    Facebook is mostly for entertainment, and there is some value in networking with friends.

    I laugh when guys try to tell me they Facebook close some chic at a party or bar and that they hook up with the chics later. So lame. I just call them out and ask “ok show me a chic you’ve recently nailed on your FB, ok now show me your txt thread in your phone.” Silence, frustrated facial expression. Exactly.

    It’s also pathetic when guys (always beta) post shit sucking “you look pretty” bullshit comments on some chics FB thinking it’ll help them hook up.

    I only add women to my FB if 1) I never intend to game them or 2) after sexual line has crossed, or 3) there is association value with a chic I’m gaming. In rare occasions if I’m out of town. But I always try for #close, never FB.

    In fact I’ll even go as far as to say if you are pulling lots of ass, adding women to FB will make things more difficult in immediate and periphery social circles as chics will post your whereabouts and troll your page and stir gossip. Further, I’ve had to use the block feature for certain FB friends (bartenders,servers) so they’d stop hating on my ass.

    Her: “Ripp do you have FB?”
    Ripp: “no, let’s stay in touch though. You’re an area code (XXX)…”
    Her: “XXX-XXXX”

    Like


  49. Feminist kill man and dance. Watch now before it is removed by youtube.

    Like


  50. I like the banner. The picture is a little blurry, but it’s good. The font is perfection. “Lies” is a little hard to read though, maybe a brighter red? I think it’s the best one yet.

    Like


  51. “The blog banner is in an experimental stage. Thinking about doing a rotating banner pic. Thoughts?”

    If people are willing to pay 50$ for your photographs I’m sure you’ll able to surprise us with an amazing banner. Can’t wait!

    Like


    • $50 is cheap. “People are willing to pay” $4.3 million for this:

      http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/lot_details.aspx?intObjectID=5496716

      For serious.

      P.S. Dollar sign goes before the numeral, Ninotchka.

      Like


      • King A, I love you for putting quotation marks around everything I say …

        Like


      • Sarcasm?

        I don’t use scare quotes, or, while we’re at it, sarcasm. They are crutches for people with more indignation than rhetorical skill. I can understand why you’d find someone quoting you directly insulting … if indeed that is what you’re trying to communicate: your apparent sarcasm muddles your point. (Are you beginning to see how these crutches weaken a person’s ability to communicate?)

        I use quotation marks the way they are intended, i.e., to quote someone exactly. Anyone interested in communicating well uses punctuation exclusively for their original function. I know proper usage marks me as an outlier, especially when I’m talking to an audience of dullards whose highest understanding of the purpose of quotation seems to be Bennett Brauer’s.

        Like


      • Oh, OK, I’m sorry then. I thought you are annoyed by my poor English and I was sure you’re trying to remind me of that every time you quote me … (which wouldn’t really insult me because I’m well aware that my posts are full of mistakes I only notice when someone points them out).

        Like


  52. that was sid not johnny

    Like


  53. This is a good thing for veterans of game/ alphas, but of course, bad for lower status males.

    Like


  54. I’m 60 years old. I game 40 year old women (shooting fish in a barrel). The exact opposite of this posting is true for gaming women over 40. I have been bombarded with phone numbers and date offers. Especially on internet dating sites such as Match.com. My thinking though is that this exception proves the rule.

    Like


  55. Sent your post to henrymakow.com and rense.com
    Will get a lot of page visits.
    Spread the message !

    Like


  56. Forgive me for veering off topic but this is so Beta of the Year creepy:

    ‘It’s the most romantic thing anyone’s ever done for me’: Katherine Heigl’s husband gets tattoo in homage to his wife and daughter

    From the article:

    Heigl was initially reticent about her husband of almost four years getting the inking, tweeting she was ‘not so happy’ with the Sagittarius symbol design.

    ..but wait, theres more…

    He was accompanied by Katherine while he had the painful procedure done, where she tweeted updates and photographs.

    ‘I think he might cry soon,’ the 32-year-old actress teased. ‘Just keep doing your yoga breaths! We’ll get through this together!’

    Like


  57. Heh, you ended up going to her parents for Thanksgiving, didn’t you.

    Like


  58. Today, it is insidiously easy for a woman in her peak attractiveness years to attention whore.

    yeah, similarly, it’s a shame that these girls are monetizing their looks (see e.g., the story of the red headed bar wench of a few months back) until they’re hitting the wall. That hurts most guys, rendering a good number of girls untouchable, and leaving the girls untouchable and past their prime. Basically, they’re riding the cock-carousel until it grinds them up and spits it out.

    Like


  59. My ex has self esteemed herself to being 36 with a shit personality, exhausted SMV, single and childless, with few options short of a man in his mid to late 50s, and I’m not even sure if that will happen for her. Given she wants children really badly, I’m thinking it’s turkey baster time.

    And yet she still believes George Clooney is going to swoop down out of the skies and whisk her away to never-never land.

    Like


  60. Roosh had a good post about this; something about dressing up like Jesus some Halloween and having everyone’s full attention, analagous to being a hot chick. Good post, Roosh. Captured the sentiment well.

    I think it’s still in his archives.

    Like


  61. “Anonymous
    Does leaving a neg on a girls profile actually make you on those white knights? Sometimes I feel like I am no different than the WK when I tease a girl online in Facebook. She is eating up the attention (along with 5 cheeseburgers).”

    I was wondering the same thing!

    Like


  62. on November 23, 2011 at 4:51 pm More Proof of the Chateau's Teachings

    Note that an older woman wrote this regarding George Clooney (older man, younger woman pairing).

    http://shine.yahoo.com/love-sex/8-ways-george-clooney-stacy-keiblers-relationship-feels-000900074.html

    Who thinks jealousy is the major inspiration for the article?

    Like


  63. It seems to me the problem is what it has always been, men. If no one shops at the store it goes out of business. Good luck with that.

    Like


  64. Actually women are setting themselves up for a “crash” when they start to wither away with age. Much like a model who had all the attention when she was young but now won’t even get a glance from the younger guys she used to love. Then when they are older and post on facebook, no one will care.

    Like


  65. Wow. Is this girl crazy or just an average attention whore? http://mobile.twitter.com/theshypharmd

    Like


  66. The Middle Class Liberal, Well Intentioned Blues from National Lampoon 1969. Better now than ever before. Brilliant satire. I really miss that magazine. It was the Southpark of its day.

    Like


  67. on November 23, 2011 at 7:36 pm Go on, get married. I dare you.

    More full-on marriage/divorce ass raping:

    http://tv.yahoo.com/blogs/yahoo-tv/hulk-hogan-divorce-details-public-210908388.html

    Like


  68. Any website where a woman can post a picture and people can write comments = mirror, mirror on the wall

    Sad fucking shit.

    Like


  69. All the same, they seem to be on some level aware of that missing je ne se quoits, that little missing piece, somewhere between software code, the fuel injection system in their leased Honda Accord, and that really heavy couch they ordered from crate & barrel.
    That missing piece is male competence, or male strength.
    Else why else would they need continual ego massages in need of constant reaffirmation?

    Like


  70. The blog banner is in an experimental stage. Thinking about doing a rotating banner pic. Thoughts?

    That would be cool. The blog’s shifting identities have become something of a calling card. One thing though, you have to keep at least one thing constant over the life of this blog. “where pretty lies perish” should be sacrosanct. (yeah, I remember this was tweaked with briefly circa early 2008 but wisely kept as-is)

    Like


  71. “The evolution of co-operation, Make or break? Social networking tames cheats”:

    http://www.economist.com/node/21538658

    Like


  72. FB is great as long as you keep some privacy about yourself, don’t post what you had for lunch (or things of similar interest level) and don’t admire girls in your comments. Rather the opposite is true, you can show the whole world, what a cocky/funny/interesting guy you are…just the dose of your posts makes the posion.
    To me, it’s great because it allows interested girls to contact you “just like that”.
    Vice versa, you can start a short chat with a girl you like – and after 3 minutes, you stop it, because you are so busy/have to save the world/go to a party or whatever – leaving her wanting more. Next time, SHE will start the chat.
    From here on, proceed as usual…

    Like


  73. Hamster Spin Time!

    SN’s are such shit for extroverts and needy pple. Fuck them and fuck their incessant posting. Special note: most of them are good normal people and all. However, introverts dislike social networking and have little time/ patience to devote to soft media. Do these pple have jobs and things to do in their lives? Nope! It was reported a while ago that pple would rather have facebook access over a raise at work. A devotion to the social life over being productive is why the BRIC nations are rising superpowers.

    We are doomed due to that plus another unfortunate level of ass kissing…Now chics who emote, post pics, make endless comments is normal as women talk more than men but we are quickly approaching a queenship era where women require worship, affirmation and status (see eventual hypergamy) 24-7, hence we have posts like these.

    Introvert women even fall into SN’s. I ditched mine as I have a tendency to quickly expense being forced to deal to friends, family and random people pestering me with comments, emails, pictures, requests, games, etc. I have no time to “like” something. I’d much rather use the “dislike” button. The emotionalism and the laziness of SN’s are turning America into overly-sensitive-soft people – no longer pple who pay attention to freedom, liberty or economic trends.

    It is why negging is a needed tool in your (you men) arsenal against feminism and use it on facebook. Can she take some innocent play words or slight insults? I doubt it.

    Not to play the slut card but chics with hundreds of male friends have probably banged at least 20 of them. I know a couple women who actually worried about past flings running into each other on SN’s. Disgusting but true. Equality never existed: the guy with 200 friends could be semi cool but the girl with a few hundred friends might be questionable if you know what I mean.

    Like


    • Come on man, thats pure black/white stuff what you write here, you mix up a lot of hardly related issues in just a few sentences
      Most here (incl. me) agree with post, but it’s still everyone’s personal choice if and -more important- HOW you use SN like FB.
      To doom FB for everything wrong is foolish…

      The stupid chics and guys that post every hour an update about their current state of mind/emotion/lovelife are useless anyway and would be useless even if FB would not exist. People with ambitions automatically restrain themselves concerning the usage of FB and the like, because they have a real life going on an things to get done.

      If used wisely, FB helps to stay in touch with good friends (meaning real-life friends) abroad and also gets you girls (if you aim for that).

      Like


    • You wrote:” but we are quickly approaching a queenship era where women require worship, affirmation and status (see eventual hypergamy) 24-7″

      I write:” As it has always been, the guys who refuse to worship women are the ones who get the good chics” – that wont change, so relax and enjoy life

      Like


  74. I think you’re making posting pictures of your pets, etc. bigger than what it really is. I think nowadays it’s more of simply sharing with friends and family. Pets do funny things, and they’re cute. People don’t do it for their self-esteem or ego. And yeah women naturally comment alot. That’s just the way we are, there’s nothing wrong with that in and of itself.

    As for posting pictures of yourself and whether this leads to bloated self-esteem and ego, I can see that happening. Then again, it depends on the picture. I don’t see how a simple face or face to shoulder portrait leads to inflated self-esteem. Speaking of self-esteem, I think it’s a pretty big stretch to say that American women suffering from low self-esteem is a myth. Come on now…….

    And if you think only females post pictures of their pets, then you haven’t been around the net that much. Check out tumblr. There’s a whole account dedicated to pictures of men and their dogs.

    Like


  75. This is the worst kind of tripe. I diss men who deserve to be dissed. Period. Most men I find, are either politically bigoted and women haters, or they are just freakin lazy. I am a Daddys girl. Don’t like it, try to catch him. If you do, I’ll give you a golden apple. So far, my nephew is the only one who has.

    [Heartiste: Your comment makes no sense.]

    Like


  76. Chicks live online. This is an inescapable fact and something anyone interested in game should understand.

    To ignore it is to ignore reality.

    Chicks will blog and microblog about everything.

    After months of gaming a girl in my social circle, we met up for drinks one-on-one.

    She knows I’m seeing someone,but she’s cool enough not to ask.

    But after the drinks she’s all flirty, major IOI’s, I’m giving lots of kino. I end it abruptly to leave for another appointment.

    Next thing I know she’s posting subtle messages about “affairs of the heart lead to drama” and stupid stuff like this.

    They’re all attempts to seek attention, mostly from her orbiters to ask “What do you mean?” to which she can respond with some dismissive rejoinder.

    It’s all about attention especially in Asia.

    Like


  77. @ kronos1978

    Good points, like I said, I was spinning furiously on my hamster wheel, I’m not totally serious with those comments. FB like most SN is reaching its saturation point between privacy invasion, creepiness and finding out that the more pple around you, the more annoying life is.

    BTW, to those who celebrate, happy belated thanksgiving

    Like


  78. This nonsense does not end with a girl’s attractive years. Mothers continue to attention whore on social media using their kids once they come along. It is a very disgusting thing to behold.

    Like


  79. […] Heartise: “Dealing With Nasty Bitches“, “Social Media And Female Self-Esteem“ […]

    Like


  80. Man 1: Just got nominated for nobel prize
    You like this.
    Man 2: cool story bro

    fixed that for ya.

    Like


  81. Congress has re-authorized funding for CIA program “the Facebook”

    Like


  82. Chiza
    Hey Rossy,

    I am longtime reader and lurker of your blog. I have a burning question for you and that is; why are white males in aggregate not attracted to black women?? I am a slim (5’4 120pounds, 21 years old) African woman. People tell me that I am attractive and that I favor Naomi Campbell. I attract all sorts of men but never white males. Even the liberal white males don’t approach me. I tend to wear my hair in a long afro hair style do you think this can be apart of the problem. Do yo suggest that I seek out older white men?? Please let me know. Sorry for all of the questions.

    Excuse me troll, er, I mean SISTAH; but why do you want to serve as some white males sexual toilet?

    Like


    • Black women, unfortunately, have a bad reputation that I think might scare off dudes who would normally be interested. I admire your open-mindedness and wish you luck. You’ll find Mr. Right (or should I say “Mr. White” hehe), eventually.

      Like


  83. “Too much self-esteeem”.

    Indeed. But not limited to women. This is a trope on which all sorts
    of obnoxious – or even criminal – behavior is based.

    While there may well be people with too little self-esteem,
    they do relatively little harm to anybody other than themselves.

    The really bad cases – from people who are merely obnoxious
    loudmouths to truly violent types – are the ones loaded to the gills
    with self-esteem, and who believe that it is OK – for them – to do
    anything.

    Thor

    Like


  84. I’m a female and see this all the time. The worst are the dating bloggers. They have this stable of social misfits that follow their every tweet and agree with them. If anybody expresses even the slightest criticism of the blogger they all rally around her. I watched this happen a couple of weeks ago and snickered at how lame they all looked. Blogger A was having one of her daily public emotional meltdowns because she tweeted out how she was walking around naked and someone decided they had had enough of her constant attention whoring, created an anonymous Twitter account and told her to put her clothes back on. Within minutes her posse of equally obnoxious dating blogger friends all demanded that everybody report the person as spam. Then a few of the guys that kiss this blogger’s ass started threatening to kick the ass of the anonymous tweeter. So macho.

    I’m more embarrassed for the guys who feed in to this crap. It’s obvious they can’t get laid to save their lives and think telling some chubby/emotionally unstable/ maladjusted dating blogger how hot she is will help them score points.

    Like


  85. This post. Amazing truths. You know I often get asked why this bugs me, why should we care what they do on facebook. It does because we have to deal with these kinds of people. Especially women. This level of highly exaggerated unwarrented self important, makes any encounter with them incredibly frustrating, and not just when gaming them.

    If you meet them anywhere, ANYWHERE, the fishbowl they have created for themselves to live in is visibly thick. (And shiny thanks to the beta white knights constant polishing) I’ve personally not found one with the brains or conversation skills to back up the extravegent and attention seeking profiles they run.

    As it happens i stubbled upon one such female facebook addict after i first read this post and had to come back and rant a bit. I dont think theres anything anyone can do for most of these women. They are too far gone in la la land. Its a shame really.

    http://imageshack.us/content_round.php?page=done&l=img21/217/usim.jpg&via=mupload&newlp=1

    Like in that above image, that chick has over 2000 friends, who she clearly has no concern for for, and yet it got approvals from the very betas she is refering too. Do they not realise its them shes dismissing?

    As for the comment left by that Vanessa chick, nail on the head. You should see the spinning hamster rationalisation after that. Proves this articles point nicely.

    Like


  86. Its funny. I recently uploaded some tracks that are going on my new album to my soundcloud, it gets advertised on FB. Didn’t attract any attention but from one buddy of mine living overseas. It didn’t make a ripple in my FB world.
    Still all the semi-attractive women earn a million internet dollars for every status update and bar pic.

    Like


  87. Good info. I’m not a player, or an alpha, or anything like – – I’m just a blogger who likes draw comics and talk about nerd shit. I’m constantly trying to find ways to grow my readership, and I have noticed that my female contemporaries have a FAR easier time getting attention online, thus being able to promote their product. I’m beginning to wonder that if I were to take down my pictures on my blog and get rid of any trace of me being a dude, would I be doing better? Hmmm.

    Like