What A Future American Right Party Can Do To Win

Dissolve the Republicans. They are worse than useless; their “me-too”ism knee-jerk quickness to dance to the Left’s funeral dirge composed on their behalf is leading them right into a hole in the ground. A future party of the right is going to have to fight a different fight — one that cuts out the beating heart of leftoidism itself and squeezes it to a mash: the propagandizers.

Commenter Porter at Mangans’s explains how to defund (and defang) the Left’s army of indoctrinators:

Dissolve their barbell on both ends. Both the very rich and their client-class eaters skew heavily democrat. A cunning Republican (I mean this, of course, hypothetically) would very publicly offer a grand bargain that bargains only him: Punitive, confiscatory, outrageous taxation on incomes over whatever figure, combined with meaningful cuts across the welfare spectrum, including elimination of the earned income tax credit. I’ll offer cuts to your constituents in exchange for higher taxes on your sponsors. It’s simply fiscal prudence with a little extra help from the wealthiest Americans.

Free the Cable Guy. Push legislation that unbundles cable packages and offers choice to the public in what channels they wish to pay for and receive. This would end the involuntary subsidies from cable customers to the left’s fringe media projects. Let each channel be subject to market demand…and let MSNBC drown.

And this isn’t as much a rep/dem issue as it is one of stanching the bloodflow to a tick…401k retirement accounts represent a torrent of tribute to Wall Street. End it. The left loves the Community Reinvestment Act. Give them more community reinvestment. Require 401 monies to be managed by institutions local to the business or employee. Much of this would flow into CDs at smaller regional banks where subsequent lending activity would occur. Wealth remains local and decentralized while Goldman bonuses are slashed to seven figures. There are no losers.

This is the way to seriously harm, if not kill, the mind virus that is the modern Left. Forget following the oh-so-sincerely-helpful advice from Democrat quarters that fielding minority candidates and assuaging women with feelgood pablum about free birth control and dropping opposition to electorate-altering amnesty is the way to success for Republicans. Would you take advice from the executioner on how tightly to knot the rope fitted around your neck?

Yes, Republicans could be more successful if they became more like Democrats (and even that is debatable, for what good is gimmedat lite compared to the real redistribution?). But then where is the Right except existing as a dangly, vestigial Kuato providing comic relief for the behemoth Left? What is the point of having an opposing party if its success rides upon how well it can mimic its ostensible ideological enemies?

No, ignore the plaintive wails for reforming the “right”. Hit the enemy where it’ll hurt them the most, even hurt them lethally. Suck dry the money spigot that breathes dark life into the Propagandizers and Indoctrinators. Do this, “””Republicans”””, and sit back in joy as the wails of the Left echo like a cacophony of squealing pigs being buried alive in your ears.

Of course, the reps of the mainstream right won’t do this. Many of them don’t really want to win; it would interfere with their cocktail glass clinking time. And, oh god!, don’t raise taxes one iota on those über rich Democrat non-patrons! But if by some miracle the right found its balls, if the spirit of Khan suddenly moved them to action, the above recipe to regain some serious power will work… at least enough to staunch the enveloping, suffocating demographic tide for a decade or two.

And then it’s GAME OVER MAN. GAME OOOOOVER.





Comments


  1. Tear up most of those “free trade agreements” that have been all the rage and you can kneecap the libtards in the republican party at the same time.
    But I have a hunch that anyone who seriously moved to construct a new political party on any of those points would get the kennedy treatment in a hurry

    Like


  2. Yeah this isn’t the original Heartiste.

    Like


  3. Gimmedat.
    Now gimmesomemore.

    Like


    • Generally speaking, I consider myself to be on the “right” side of things. However, “right/left” is ultimately subsumed by the ability of non-“right/left” entities to print fiat money out of nothing, as is conclusively proven by this hard core Swiss scientific gathering and parsing of irrefutable data: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf

      If you are genuine in your concern over these issues then you owe it to yourself to read the full findings of this study. Failure to acknowledge this data is to willingly choose rat-in-a-cage status for the duration of your spiritual journey in this plane.

      Like


  4. The day the money dries up for the left’s pet projects of destruction is the day we hear nothing but wailing and the gnashing of teeth. I can hear it now…

    “The right hates minorities, women, children, the poor, the elderly, education, kittens, love, happiness, and whatever other groups that need to leech off the beta white males.”

    The people that accomplish that would need balls the size of Jupiter, aloofness never seen before in humanity, and live every moment as an amused master.

    Like


    • “The people that accomplish that would need balls the size of Jupiter, aloofness never seen before in humanity, and live every moment as an amused master.”

      Not at all. It’s very easy to intellectually disarm leftists – if you know a few basic things.I have debated leftist ever since I stopped being one in the early Eighties, and the only thing I’ve ever needed to remain undefeated is being able to say that every individual has a right to exist for his own sake and is not a means to the ends of others.

      There is no double standard in morality: if some men are to be used for the ends of others, then they are (a kind of) slaves, and that is morally contradictory.

      I am not saying that this moral contradiction doesn’t occur all the time. I am only saying it can’t be defended rationally when attacked.

      You see, what appears to be the lefts greatest strenght – their (pseudo-) morality – is in fact their greatest weakness. If you challenge their “right” to use some individuals for the benefit of others, and know how to avoid a couple of traps, they’re absolutely helpless.

      Of course, they’ll start throwing epitets at you – “egoist!”, “fascist!”, “reactionary!” – but if you just calmly stand your ground and defend your right to not be a sacrificial animal while granting this right to everyone else
      they’re unable to win.

      Think it over, then practice it in discussions with leftist. You’ll be delighted with how weak they are.

      Like


      • I agree with Ulf. Case in point, a discussion I have had for decades, although only rarely quite in the open, especially in Sweden:

        On major issues:

        Leftie: “But surely we agree that it it the state’s/government’s duty to take care of people who cannot take care of themselves?” (With minor variations). Answer: “No, why would it be?”.

        At this point the leftie’s hot-air balloon deflates. But be prepared for some abuse.

        On minor issues, to the leftie:
        “Do you really believe that xxxx is so important that it justifies taken
        money from people by force, by threat of overwhelming police/military action.?”

        Thor

        Like


      • Exactly exactly. Another phrase I use: If somebody else has to give it to you, you don’t have a right to it.

        The “right” to health care is the OBLIGATION of providers to give it to you. Med school’s a bitch, and if you go through it, you have the right to use, or not use, your skills howsoever you choose. Pseudo-rights force those who have spent their time and money to devote their time and money to others.

        Government is the use of force. Sometimes force is necessary (jailing rapists, etc.), but even a touchyfeely program like Head Start could never exist without the involuntary confiscation of stuff somebody else has earned.

        The left has successfully framed government to mean “cooperatopn.”. It’s anything but.

        Like


      • “If somebody else has to give it to you, you don’t have a right to it.”

        There is beauty in simplicity.

        Like


      • I don’t know where you live but not 1 out of 100 of the young people I talk to would scrap folkhemmet before they’d gouge out their left eye.

        Like


      • So? Then they are in a perfect numerical position to be able to take care of themselves and leave those who want to be free free.

        Like


      • I would add: if you are so concerned about them, why don’t you adopt a poor family personally and help them out? Either there are more than enough people to take care of all the poor families, or a majority disagree with the idea. And if a majority disagree with the idea, the proper democratic response should be to end it.

        Like


      • Leftism plays on people’s laziness. Actually helping others yourself is soooo time consuming. Far easier to have the Government do it on our behalf.

        Like


      • … the only thing I’ve ever needed to remain undefeated is being able to say that every individual has a right to exist for his own sake and is not a means to the ends of others.

        Somebody should write a novel with heroic characters that embody that philosophy.

        Like


      • Here Here! 🙂

        Like


      • Who are you?

        Like


      • $ 😉

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 4:24 pm Hopeless Romantic

        The rot of Islam and Christianity were grandfathered in through Judaism. The Abrahamic faiths, all 3 of them, are a major problem for the rest of the non-Abrahamic world.

        Thank god Buddhism is the fastest growing religion in the West.

        Like


      • Hopeless nitwit eh? Name fits. All three of the religions you besmirch advocate each helping others. It is the lazy and mendacious that stretch that to advocating government do it. Not surprisingly these are exactly the same people that work to secularize their religion because the rules are “too hard” to follow also. Buddhism? Really? The grave of innovation, new ideas and freedom. I’ll pass.

        Like


      • Yes it’s easy…so easy that the leftist still control the media, education, and society.

        The right doesn’t have the organization skills the left has.

        Like


      • Nor the Will to Power. Conservative academia let in lefties in the 60’s to be fair and tolerant. Then the lefties got in, took over, and refuse to hire any conservatives.

        Any classes interpreting literature through a Christian framework? Nope, it’s all about homophobicsexistracism. Ever had a philosophy class taught by a proponent of Ayn Rand? Me neither.

        Like


      • Fuck that kikess cunt.

        Objectivism,Randianism, Libertarianism and any of its variants isn’t right wing in any meaningful way.

        Like


      • “Objectivism,Randianism, Libertarianism and any of its variants isn’t right wing in any meaningful way.”

        True. So? Why be right wing?

        Like


      • Besides, the Founding Fathers weren’t right wing, either. They were Classical Liberals.

        Like


      • …Besides, the Founding Fathers weren’t right wing, either. They were Classical Liberals.

        they were mostly very logical, rational, reasonable sane – very sane – men.

        whatever you call it they are completely different from today’s liberals who are mostly dysfunctional people who want everybody to be just as dysfunctional as they are

        one example; those who are into fisting, want schools to teach kids about fisting

        how fucked up is that?…

        Like


      • Besides, the Founding Fathers weren’t right wing, either. They were Classical Liberals.

        Therein lies the rub mate.

        True. So? Why be right wing?

        Because it is a simple bow to nature and she won’t slaughter you in the long run when you pour out a little libation to her in the short run.

        Like


      • Thank god

        Like


      • It’s easy to say, when you are able to say it; that doesn’t mean they will give a chance to say as often as you would like.

        In WW2, the US didn’t have the organization that the Germans had. But skills can be aquired.

        Like


      • Jews are mostly leftists and they own most of the media. The phony, subversive neo-cons/jews fail to mention this even as they claim liberal bias. Cue the accusations of anti-semitism/holocaust denial/nazi collaborator

        Like


      • Naw, you’re safe… here at the chateau, the shabbos goy, fellow travelers, useful idiots, and cognitive dissonance agents invariably spend their wrath on me alone, when I dare mention it. 😉

        Like


      • Just curious if anyone has seen a gender breakdown of the Jewish vote in the presidential race. Obama got 68% of the Jewish vote, which I suspect varied widely by gender. If he got 85% of the female Jewish vote, then perhaps enough that he didn’t even get half of the male Jewish vote. Anyway, I suppose the number is out there somewhere, though I haven’t been able to find it.

        Like


      • I suspect that figure is artificially low.

        Besides… Jews do what is best for Jews. They aren’t concerned with anything else. Candidates only matter if they further Jewish interests.

        If only Whites did the same.

        Like


      • on December 1, 2012 at 10:46 pm Anonymous Rice Alum #4

        Search for ‘steve sailer exit poll’ and you should find what you’re looking for.

        Like


      • Skewed by gender, albeit not quite as much as I thought: http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/11/heres-other-exit-poll-data-that-nobody.html

        40% of married Jewish men voted for Romney, the group which presumably disproportionately includes the powerful “zionists” “overrepresented” in Hollywood and Wall Street.

        Only 23.3% of single Jewish women voted for Romney, a smaller share than he got even of the “bisexual” vote – I guess the Charlie Crist defection didn’t hurt him badly in that category. That having been said, somewhat surprisingly to me, they were more likely to vote Romney than single Hispanic women, and Hindus in general.

        Like


  5. The republicans won in 2010 because they ran on small government libertarian or semi libertarian principals. They lost in 2012 because they ran on, (or in some cases allowed the debate to be framed by the left) neocon and social conservative principals.

    To the extent the R’s have a future it’s a libertarian one. The time for Sean Hannity self contridictory conservatism is over.

    Also I wrote a related blog post a while ago on what exactly is modern conservatism.
    http://landsharkattacks.blogspot.com/2012/05/so-what-exactly-is-conservative.html

    Like


    • The GOP actually listens to us best when 1) they don’t have a president in office, or 2) it’s not a presidential election year.

      2010 was the last time this situation occurred. Before that, 1994 and 1998 under Slick Willie.

      Like


    • Another easy one is to draw the disction between “should” and “should have to.” Example:

      Martel: Why should I have to help the poor?

      Lefty: No man is an island. We live in a rich country and should help those less fortunate, etc., etc., etc.,

      Martel: You just made a great case for why I should help the poor. Now, why should I HAVE TO help the poor?

      Lefty: Uhhhhhh.

      Like


      • Another great question to ask Lefty is: “So you want to limit government to only helping the poor.”

        “Eh… eh… No…”

        “Of course not. You want power for lots of things. Then why do you always keep harking back to the poor?”

        “Well, we can’t really say that we want to control the producers of material wealth, can we?!”

        Of course. The left uses the poor as human shields when they storm the castle of individual freedom. That’s about as tasteful as when real killers use people like that. They should hear that – a lot!

        Like


      • Don’t forget the children. That’s a favorite human shield for big government types both on the right and the left.

        Pretty much if you hear the phrase “Think of the children” you know somebody wants you to be giving more of your freedom and your money to big brother.

        Like


      • 🙂 Of course, the children, where would they be without the children…?

        Like


      • they abort them

        Like


      • And the right is also fond of using the bible and flag as a shield

        Like


      • Indeed. I heard once somewhere the only real difference between a Republican and a Democrat is Republican’s version of big brother is wrapped in a flag and holding a cross.

        Like


      • Or course, if they really cared about the poor, they would support *gasp* free markets.

        The poorest parts of our country are the inner cities, which have been almost universally goverened by Democrats for the past half-century.

        There’s no way in hell a poor person with above-average intelligence could ever start a business in Detroit (even one that requires little start-up capital). You need tons of money, powerful friends, and lawyers to navigate through all the regulations.

        An economy can be ever-growing when left to its own devices. They see economics as zero-sum, where one person being too rich is the cause of someone else being too poor. Therefore, the solution is redistribution.

        And then when we redistribute everything, there’s less of everything to distribute, so the poor end up even worse off.

        Not a bad thing, though. When everyon in the country except Queen Pelosi and her friends are starvin at least we won’t have any “income gaps”.

        Like


      • “Or course, if they really cared about the poor, they would support *gasp* free markets.”

        I disagree. Many lefties really do care about the poor, even with the wild-eyed fanaticism endemic to their dispositions. Unfortunately, their senses of cause-and-effect are so distorted that they equate acts committed in the name of wanting to help the poor with actually helping the poor, and they tend to believe their own BS. This is particularly prevalent among those who have no long-term time orientation (i.e. not-so-bright folks) and is manifested by the phenomenon noted by Thomas Sowell that policies’ effects are often not felt until long after enacted, by which time the original enactors are too far away to receive their properly assigned blame. See also: California.

        There’s a reason that lefty economic philosophies persist even after all the empirical evidence that they’re the most sure way to destroy prosperity. They sound really, really good to the uneducated and inexperienced.

        Or, rephrased, we again need barriers to voting.

        Like


      • There are 3 types of lefties: those who want power (The Anointed), those who want goodies (The Entitled), and those you describe who really do care (The Benighted).

        The third group is the most reachable, the anointed are damn near impossible. Each requires a different approach.

        Although you’ll probably never convert one of the Anointed, you can frame yourself according to circumstance so as to humiliate the shit out of them, therefby converting more accessible witnesses.

        The Benighted require a much softer approach.

        Like


      • @ retrophoebia

        What sounds good depends on your definition of “the good”. If you consider service to others and equality of outcome the moral ideal, then of course you’d want (and expect) these economic policies to work.

        You don’t need barriers to voting; you need to limit government to the protection of individual rights.

        Like


      • Wow let me guess, you’re one of the people that get to vote, right?

        Q: How can we rain in gubmint spending?
        A; Kill a leftard.
        Q Do you think food stamps or aircraft carriers should be cut?
        A Throw a libtard in the ocean.
        Q: So you have any more– detailed plans or recommendations?
        A: Nah. Bring da movies.Kill a lefty.

        Like


      • The poorest parts of our country are the inner cities, which have been almost universally goverened by Democrats for the past half-century.

        One word: race.

        Secondarily, Whites haven’t been allowed to truly govern minorities. They’ve been running wild. Hence: poverty.

        Like


      • Inner cities are a disaster even when white Democrats run them. The error is leftism, not race. Blacks were making enormous progress until the War on Poverty.

        And it’s not the Middle-Eastern and African immigrants that are making white Sweden institute ridiculous bullshit like this:

        http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/girls-with-guns-not-dolls-in-gender-neutral-toy-shop/story-e6frf7jo-1226523307879

        Like


      • Martel: “Inner cities are a disaster even when white Democrats run them. The error is leftism, not race. Blacks were making enormous progress until the War on Poverty.

        And it’s not the Middle-Eastern and African immigrants that are making white Sweden institute ridiculous bullshit like this:

        http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/girls-with-guns-not-dolls-in-gender-neutral-toy-shop/story-e6frf7jo-1226523307879

        Exactly. We were perfectly capable of adopting leftist ideas with a minimum of jews and a complete absence of arabs and blacks.

        Forget about race. It is ideas that move the world.

        Like


      • Inner cities are a disaster even when white Democrats run them. The error is leftism, not race.

        Leftism doesn’t help, but yes, it is race to a far greater extent, as witnessed by city after city and country after country where negroes hold sway in numbers greater than 35% (or whatever the accepted “turning point” is considered nowadays, when some whites are still present).

        You can’t govern those who are ungovernable, and you can’t build with those who only know tearing down.

        Like


      • Exactly. We were perfectly capable of adopting leftist ideas with a minimum of jews and a complete absence of arabs and blacks.

        True, but the shit doesn’t really hit the fan until race becomes a factor.

        Places like Scandinavia, no matter how left-leaning, are nonetheless virtual havens until the population is no longer homogeneous.

        That this has to keep being repeated, though not rocket science, is tiresome.

        Like


      • “Inner cities are a disaster even when white Democrats run them. The error is leftism, not race.”

        Is that why Mississippi is so great?

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 4:14 pm Hopeless Romantic

        Hey, what’s wrong with girls with guns?

        Like


      • “True, but the shit doesn’t really hit the fan until race becomes a factor.

        Places like Scandinavia, no matter how left-leaning, are nonetheless virtual havens until the population is no longer homogeneous.”

        “Haven” if it doesn’t bother you that the purchasing power of the average Swede is less than that of the average Mississipian (our poorest state).

        The issue is tribalism. America was able to kick Europe’s economic ass because individuals of whatever class or ethnic background were allowed to succeed, whereas in Europe, born a peasant, always a peasant. In the old South (where Old World traditions remained strongest), even among whites there was substantial stratification. Poor whites were treated better than slaves, but the aristocracy excluded them from any real advancement.

        Leftism reflects this tribalism perfectly. It just decided to back the tribe of the “oppressed” instead of the “oppressor”. Initially, they represented the tribe of working-class whites, opposing their capitalist “oppressors” from above but also minorities and immigrants below. Nearly every leftist movement, from gun control to organized labor to the pro-abortion movement, had racial motivations. Marx, Woodrow Wilson, and Margaret Sanger all despised blacks.

        Later in the last century leftists began to realize that they would benefit more by incorporating minorities into their coalition than they could by keeping them excluded. The tribe the left presently labels as evil is the WHAM (white, heterosexual able-bodied male), but it’s still entirely a question of what group you belong to, not your worth as an individual.

        Individualsm is Americanism. If you suck, you suck, and I don’t care what color you are or if your ancestors came from the same country as mine. Thomas Sowell, a black, is the most brilliant social commentator alive today (his columns are nothing compared to his books), and any theory that believes he is in any way inferior to Harry Reid is pure horseshit.

        Like


      • @ Greg Eliot

        Me: “Exactly. We were perfectly capable of adopting leftist ideas with a minimum of jews and a complete absence of arabs and blacks.”

        Greg: “True, but the shit doesn’t really hit the fan until race becomes a factor.

        Places like Scandinavia, no matter how left-leaning, are nonetheless virtual havens until the population is no longer homogeneous.

        That this has to keep being repeated, though not rocket science, is tiresome.”

        The only reason things has hit anything in Sweden is fundamentally because of the i d e a s of aryan Swedes. Our “race”, if you believe in that nonsense, haven’t been able to save us. Multiculturalism, PCness, moral relativism preceded mass immigration by decades.

        Like


      • Bullshit… Muslim “yutes” weren’t committing nearly 100% of the rapes in Sweden 40 years ago.

        The only places that preach multi-kulti are those that haven’t experienced it fully.

        The Swedes and other selected whites, having not had to struggle for generations, were natural proving grounds for left-leaning… where the helping hand you were encouraged to lend was reaching out toward someone that might actually have been your brother or sister, or at least looked and acted enough like them for that sort of altruism to make sense.

        Let’s knock off this “race doesn’t matter” bullshit.

        Like


      • … Places like Scandinavia, no matter how left-leaning, are nonetheless virtual havens until the population is no longer homogeneous.

        That this has to keep being repeated, though not rocket science, is tiresome….

        How can I say this?

        I think leftism causes damage – eventually and inevitably – but at a much lower pace in places where the majority is white ( and/or it causes less damage)

        But when you add race or third world immigrants to the mix, it is like leftism on steroids.
        The decay is going at a very fast pace and the damage is more , how can I say this? more deep?

        Like


      • Inner cities are a disaster even when white Democrats run them. The error is leftism, not race. Blacks were making enormous progress until the War on Poverty.

        Ummm…. Race is still the issue. White Democrats are pandering to the niggers; not ruling them.

        Yes. Because nobody had any compunction about policing and “oppressing” the savages except “White” Democrats.

        Exactly. We were perfectly capable of adopting leftist ideas with a minimum of jews and a complete absence of arabs and blacks.

        So? Who said niggers were responsible for getting Whites to swallow Jewish poison? White people are stupid too.

        Forget about race. It is ideas that move the world.

        Duh. And only Whites and Jews have any fucking ideas.

        “Haven” if it doesn’t bother you that the purchasing power of the average Swede is less than that of the average Mississipian (our poorest state).

        I call bull shit on that. I’ve never been to Sweden but I bet they are perfectly well off regardless of what the numbers say.

        The issue is tribalism. America was able to kick Europe’s economic ass because individuals of whatever class or ethnic background were allowed to succeed, whereas in Europe, born a peasant, always a peasant.

        The peasantry was all but gone everywhere except in Russia by about… the early 19th century.

        I think the mass devastation of WWII that we side-stepped had something to do with it. Also the Mass Bay synthesis of commercialism and Christ.

        In the old South (where Old World traditions remained strongest), even among whites there was substantial stratification. Poor whites were treated better than slaves, but the aristocracy excluded them from any real advancement.

        So what? Are you a fucking Leveller or a Libertarian? Is there a difference?

        Some of us are right wingers. Not free-marketeers.

        Individualsm is Americanism.

        That is a completely incoherent ideology as well and we are watching it unravel. Interesting times.

        If you suck, you suck, and I don’t care what color you are or if your ancestors came from the same country as mine.

        Brilliant analysis. Really deep brah.

        Thomas Sowell, a black, is the most brilliant social commentator alive today (his columns are nothing compared to his books), and any theory that believes he is in any way inferior to Harry Reid is pure horseshit.

        Um… You are mixed up.

        A)That is incredibly hyperbolic. I can’t begin to find the words.

        B)Not even many “racists” believe that a black with a higher IQ, better manners, etc. is “inferior” to a retarded White hick.

        Get a grip.

        Like


      • @ Greg Eliot

        “Bullshit… Muslim “yutes” weren’t committing nearly 100% of the rapes in Sweden 40 years ago.”

        I am not sure that’s true. But if it is, it is the ethnic Swedes who doesn’t report or punish it.

        “The only places that preach multi-kulti are those that haven’t experienced it fully.”

        I don’t disagree.

        “The Swedes and other selected whites, having not had to struggle for generations, were natural proving grounds for left-leaning… where the helping hand you were encouraged to lend was reaching out toward someone that might actually have been your brother or sister, or at least looked and acted enough like them for that sort of altruism to make sense.”

        What I say is that the rot started with leftist ideas long before any mass immigration. To the extent that integration fails, it is because of the welfare state, not because of the race of the immigrants.

        “Let’s knock off this “race doesn’t matter” bullshit.”

        I won’t. I agree with Martel: I would much rather have the good immigrants (those who work hard, don’t kill their daughters, etc) than a lot of worthless ethnic Swedes “who might actually have been my brother or sister” but who undermine our society in the short or long run.

        Like


      • ha ha ha.your penance is to go to SBPDL and read every Deyroit post on the site. yep,if those negroes would get rid of the Democtars,then shit would get fiexd…riiiight!!:)

        Like


      • Martel: You just made a great case for why I should help the poor. Now, why should I HAVE TO help the poor?

        (((shrug)))

        Like


      • If it”s a lefty shrugging, just say “You’re entire economic philosophy is based on people HAVING to help the poor. So, if you can’t tell me why we should do that, then you obviously don’t know what the FUCK you’re talking about. Therefore, shut up for a few minutes, let me talk, and you might learn something.”

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 4:15 pm Hopeless Romantic

        Well over here where I am (USA) our entire economic philosophy is based on people HAVING to fund the Military Industrial Complex.

        Like


      • Which in turn ensures the resources necessary for your economy,

        punishes unfavorable economic decisions of foreigners(africans, and middle eastereners in particular),

        protects your interests(failed in Iran, in 1979, but made it everywhere else)…

        In short for a country like your an army of such proportions is a must. Tough you are about to cut the dependability of the Middle eastern oil, and the importance of such an army will gradually diminish as far as energy security is concerned.

        Though the price of your arms is indeed too blown up.

        Like


      • It was Atlas shrugging.

        Like


      • I am Howard Roark!

        Like


      • Re: Relative ‘buying power’ of Swede vs. Mississippian.
        I suppose this corelates to what we might call ‘Standard of Living’.
        The average Mississippian -let’s call him ‘Tracey’- (or any other American, for that matter) will likely have about 3 times the disposable (??) income left over at the end of the month vs. The Swede (Lars).
        He will likely spend it on gas,booze, video games and Walmart.
        Tracey lives in a trailer or the shotgun shack on the back of his mom’s property, drives a pickup (nearest grocery store is 10 miles away), his erstwhile maroon & grey baseball cap (Ole Miss) is now a lovely shade of 10W40 mixed with Cheetos and Slurpee. Tracey is 30 lbs. overweight and chainsmokes (‘occasionally’). but thinks of himself as ‘athletic’ because he religiously watches football on the 72″ plasma screen TV he scored Thanksgiving night at Wallyworld. He’s got an industrial size fridge and a couch big enough to roadblock an interstate, but can’t spell ‘doublewide’. His one and only traveling experience is a motel in Hattiesburg. That was WILD!
        Lars owns a radio, on which he listens to 1 of 3 stations in his apartment on the 7th floor. He takes the stairs because his daughter told him he was getting fat @ 6’0,160 lbs. Lars has never owned a car in his life, but has been to Mauritius, Mexico, Hawaii and pretty much all over Europe.
        Every so often, he takes the ferry to Germany or Poland just to get drunk on the boat. Lars gets about 3 months or so of vacation time a year. His 18″ TV shows 2 channels, which he finds sufficient, since he plays the violin for a hobby and likes to take walks in the park to feed the squirrels. His fridge is the size of 2 milk crates. Whatever disposable income he has left goes into a bank account.
        Who’s got better ‘buying power’? You make the call.

        Like


      • What are they each fucking?

        Like


    • Obama won in ’08 because people were a)sick of Bush. b)McCain was bald ond old and c) Americans seldom put a guy from the same party into office more than twice in a row.
      The Reps won in ’10 because the party in power usually get their asses kicked in mid-term.
      Obama won again in ’12 because Romney is a Mormon billionaire, unelectable by a majority.
      The next pres will in all likelihood be a Republican. Even if it’s Pluto the cartoon dog.

      Same old pattern, repeating ad nauseam.

      Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 4:17 pm Hopeless Romantic

        “Obama won again in ’12 because Romney is a Mormon billionaire”

        One good thing about Mormons is that they are respectful of other religions. The Utah Mormons helped to fund and build a Hindu temple almost 2 decades ago. Romney could have used this in his campaign to get more votes from a wider range of people.

        Like


      • Maybe so, but others find them creepy.
        Can you honestly see anyone in MA,CA, NY,NJ, FL,OH or any other populous state with lots of electoral votes voting for a Mormon?

        Like


      • Romney was governor of Massachusetts, you know…

        Like


      • and Steve Young would get plenty of votes in California if he ran for office

        Like


    • on November 24, 2012 at 10:53 am Montgomerey Draxel

      The GOP won in 2010 because Obama wasn’t running. The get out the vote by inner city blacks is insane, and when added with the voter fraud – you get 99% of eligible voters casting ballots for the D’s in some city districts.

      Did people really think the blacks were going to let the 1st black President lose? The GOP needed a superstar to win and they ran a competent but lackluster RINO.

      As for 2010, the blacks couldn’t be bothered to get out of bed to vote, no one was offering smokes and malt liquor… and the get out the vote buses weren’t taking homeless voters to three different polling stations.

      Like


  6. It’s funny that Republicans are now where Democrats were during the Bush 43 years. Democrats bemoaned their lack of a coherent message machine, the lack of a donor matrix, lack of strategy, etc. How could people vote for this dumbass Bush, they wondered? Now it is the mirror image on the Republican side.

    I like Chris Christie, and I hope he runs. Watch his weight…if he starts getting slim, you know he’s going to run.

    Like


    • Fuck Chris Christie. Fat fucking RINO Jersey gasbag.

      Like


      • Christie is the epitome of everything the Republican party is about. I am sick of seeing people calling American politicans “RINO”, (as if the party’s standard colour didn’t give you a clue). And the party didn’t “lose it’s way”. It was “red from the start” as Alan Stang titled his essay on the subject, still up on newswithviews. Goldwater, Paul (the elder) and a few others are the only “RINOs”.

        Like


      • yeah he smoked obama’s pole.

        Like


      • Second that. Crypto-socialist scum bag

        Like


  7. Larry Auster is wrong – Obama’s reelection is the best thing to have happened to American Right. It’s like there are jets of oxygen of awakened minds amidst the carbon monixide.

    Like


    • I happen to agree, to an extent. Except for Obama packing the courts with more leftoids, I think it’s good for us that Romney lost. It was good for us that McCain lost too. As long as Establishment RINO presidential candidates continue to get slaughtered, the GOP has a chance to get taken over by sane people.

      Like


    • The race riots that would surely have ensued in nearly every major city would have done a lot to wake people up as well. And it sure would have been fun to watch Tm Wse tear himself apart like Rumpelstiltskin in his blog reaction.

      Like


  8. If you want to hyper-focus on the money-bags of the Left, remove the tax-free status of “charitable foundations” and other 501(c) tax-dodges. That’s where the ultra-rich stash their money so it can grow tax-free, with their spawn profiting from it for eternity as they sit as trustees and directors of the “non-profit” operation.

    The Left is the party of inherited wealth. The Right is the party of self-made wealth.

    Like


    • Indeed. Much feminazism and other plagues from the left were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation et al.

      Like


    • There’s also a great piece on how the state income tax deduction is essentially a hidden subsidy for wealthy blue states and individuals (link: http://t.co/aZmlpL5x ). While there’s an argument for simply capping the deduction, I’d say nix it. Hit ’em where it hurts.

      http://t.co/aZmlpL5x

      Glenn Reynolds aka InstaPundit, who semi-periodically links to Heartiste, also regularly throws out the wealth tax and Hollywood tax (i.e. film excise tax) out there as acid tests for those who are for the wealthy ‘paying their fair share.’ Fun stuff to use in casual rhetoric.

      Like


    • That way Warren Buffett could get to pay the taxes he longs to.

      Like


    • except for Dubya and Romney

      Like


  9. I read or heard somewhere that the difference between dems and repubs is that for dems politics is life and for repubs it is only a past time. The gop is made up of a bunch of weak kneed pikers and the dems sure know how to bitch slap ’em around.

    I did vote for romney for the sole reason that I felt with him in office there may be some breathing room to get a serious asskicker into the white house to not reduce but to seriously cut government programs, departments etc. I will never again for for anyone, if I vote at all, who does not believe in and can not articulate why free market capitalism is superior, federalism is the law of the land and a strong self defense is in our best interest. With regard to a strong self defense, I did support the Iraq invasion and the effort to ‘democratize’ them, however I see that that effort was a mistake. A strong self defense means to me that anyone who fucks with us, we go in, make the rubble bounce and get the fuck out.

    Like


    • The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is how they go about destroying America.

      Jobs: Republicans want to outsource your jobs. Democrats want to replace you with masses of low skilled immigrants.

      Taxes: Republicans want to use your taxes to reward rich CEOs and corporations for sending your jobs overseas. Democrats want to use your taxes to reward Shaniqua and Guadalupe for having 6 kids.

      Immigration: Republicans want Mexicans to ILLEGALLY come into the country so farms and corporations can employ them at slave wages and depress your wages. Democrats want Mexicans to LEGALLY come into the country to get more votes for Dems and more money for unions, teachers, cops, firemen, hospitals, while depressing your wages.

      Morals: Republicans want to turn your sons into cum sucking whores. Democrats want to turn your daughters into cum sucking whores.

      Like


    • The gop is made up of a bunch of weak kneed pikers and the dems sure know how to bitch slap ‘em around.

      the GOP = the Beta Party

      Like


      • Pretty much. The Democratic Party is the effeminate aloof guy who gets all the girls and the GOP is the guy sitting in a corner with a hand in his pocket and his drink up to his chest wondering what they can possibly see in that fag while his two days a week lifting weights at the gym gets him nothing.

        Like


    • Funny. A very “liberal” friend of mine is _maybe_ starting to see things more cleary. A rapacious i.e. standard divorce (no kids) may have cleared his mind somewhat. From memory “they are taking about the cliff and indiscriminate cuts on the near horizon. But I think I would rather have that
      than discriminate cuts and taxes, as it seems that I am usually among those discriminated against”.

      Thor

      Like


    • “I read or heard somewhere that the difference between dems and repubs is that for dems politics is life and for repubs it is only a past time.”

      A fundamental truth. The parasites must control the producers of wealth; their life depends on it; so they devote their life to it. The producers of wealth don’t need the parasites; unfortunately, that doesn’t mean that the parasites can’t hurt them; so, they should realize the danger and take action.

      “The gop is made up of a bunch of weak kneed pikers and the dems sure know how to bitch slap ‘em around.”

      Only because they share the same view of morality.

      Like


      • This is because to a lefty, politics defines your entire moral compass.

        Rape Juanita Brodderick and that’s fine because Clinton was pro-choice. Call Obama a “negro” like Harry Reid, and that’s okay because he’s progressive on race issues. Al Gore’s house uses more energy than many small towns. John Edwards can exemplify capitalist aristocracy because he blabbers on and on about the poor. The list goes on forever.

        Lefites think righties are immoral and righties think lefties are stupid. The truth is the opposite.

        Like


      • Actually, I think that morality comes before politics. The leftist people that you name above get excused because leftist believe they are altruists at heart. Righties dont get excused because when they say that they are altruists they are not believed.

        I agree with the last sentence.

        Like


      • To them morality=politics. A poor person/minority/gay etc. has no chance in hell of achieving anything in this life unless the government paves the way for them. Therefore, more government is more more moral. It’s impossible to care unless you agree with them politically.

        Of course, even though Romney probably gives more to charity in a year than all the Dems in Congress have given over their lifetimes counts for nothing. You see, charity is just a band-aid on cancer. Doing things for poor people as an individual counts for nothing. It’s much preferable to be like Joe Biden who doesn’t give jack squat because he wants to make everybody else give.

        Power. Power. Power. That’s all. Nothing else.

        Like


      • Doing things as an individual doesn’t count because the person who does that still retains his autonomy. What they want you to admit is that you don’t have the right to the wealth that you have produced.

        Power, yes. Because they know that as parasites they’re essentially worthless.

        Like


  10. Bring standards back to the franchise of voting. Reward the middle class and above for working hard and building the nation with the vote, and leave the welfare state Idiocracy underclass out of the process. Does anyone believe that the Founding Fathers envisioned a great nation of homeless people, EBT moms, and the barely literate voting?

    American “Democracy”: The God that Failed

    Like


    • Does anyone believe that the Founding Fathers envisioned a great nation of homeless people, EBT moms, and the barely literate voting?

      this reminds me of what Justice Antonin Scalia said to Charlie Rose last week, which goes aproximately like this ( paraphrasing ),

      I don’t think they wanted the constitution to mean whatever a judge, in the future, would say it means. It is not a breathing living document.

      Like


  11. Haha, you have no idea what you’re talking about when it comes to politics.

    You should stick to pretending like you’re an aloof anti-feminist slut shaming egomaniac.

    Like


    • Be honest. The idea of having a GOP primary candidate call for a large temporary tax on the rich, for not having done any better to defend their wealth than give us the likes of McCain and Romney and Santorum, would appeal to many and get lots of press.

      Make it so the Romney kids can’t inherit more than a million from their dad. That might wake them up and get them starting to learn what small government should mean.

      Like


    • “Haha, you have no idea what you’re talking about when it comes to politics.”

      Someone’s projecting…

      “You should stick to pretending like you’re an aloof anti-feminist slut shaming egomaniac.”

      Revealing. This couldn’t be criticism unless you saw value in having such a disposition. Come out of the closet man, you wish you were an ‘aloof anti-feminist slut shaming egomaniac’ too!

      Like


  12. Right Wing Populism.

    If that doesn’t work. NorthWestFront. Migrate or die.

    Like


  13. Force those caught hiring illegal labour to mow city park lawns. Preferably at gunpoint.

    Nationalise the oil/natural gas industry while you are net exporters. Make sure that the benefits stay within the states.

    Cut back immigration (except for a few STEM positions).

    Like


  14. Cut back immigration (except for a few STEM positions).

    No STEM immigration either. I like the rest of what you said though.

    Like


  15. I don’t see the Republicans having much influence at the national level other than keeping a holding pattern in the House of Representatives to prevent further insane spending bills, but even this isn’t guaranteed. My hope is that ObamaCare enforcement will create a Constitutional crisis as the many states who have passed laws against it are confronted by the feds in 2014. This will be the opportunity for Americans to demonstrate true civil disobedience, perhaps in the face of federal troops sent to enforce the laws requirements.

    I just don’t see Obama backing down from his signature law and after getting shafted by Congress and the Supreme Court, Americans don’t have any recourse left than tangible resistance. Perhaps an organized income tax boycott? Would the Feds put a million middle class citizens in jail? They can try, but it won’t be pretty. We can’t put our faith in political leadership to save the country. It’ll take massive action by ordinary citizens, much more than the Tea Party was ever capable of. Shame to see such a promising movement turn out to be a dud. People lost hope after the Republicans were handed a victory in 2010 only to sell out every step of the way since then. Boehner has got to go first.

    Like


  16. The very rich skew heavily democrat? Are there stats to back this?

    I suspect if the GOP wanted to raise top marginal tax rates to 95%, the Dems would demand they be raised to 99%.

    What income levels are we talking about here?

    Like


    • The idea is that the rich let us down by not supporting individual freedom when they had the money to put forth good candidates and defend them. So we may want a candidate in the primaries who will put real fear in them.

      Like


      • OK. I get your point. It’s not a question of which party the uber-rich currently skew toward. It’s about saying that the Right is no longer the party of the rich, but the party of the middle-class. I agree that the richest Americans are not likely socially conservative and it that sense represent the left wing of the GOP. So yeah, maybe the right could win some working class Obama voters if they made it clear that Wall Street isn’t welcome in the party anymore. The right could ARGUE that the Dems are the party of Wall Street — and make that argument self-fulfilling — even if it isn’t true today.

        Like


      • This is essential. Crony capitalism is NOT capitalism. It’s what Rand described as “The Aristocracy of Pull.” End corporate welfare NOW!

        As far as Romney not being able to relate to the little guy, that’s because he gave every impression that he felt guilty about being rich. The rich guy who’s not ashamed of it can get along with blue collar folks no problem. The self-conscious rich guy come across as awkward and is resented.

        Guilt, as we know through game, is repulsive. Others thought there was something wrong with Romney for being rich because Romney HIMSELF thought there was something wrong with being rich.

        If we listen to this guy, liberalism will die. It’s about seven minutes long, but worth it. It’s how game and politics should mix.

        Like


      • Your inverting reality. Romney doesn’t feel guilty for being a trust fund kid. His 47% percent comments and giving gifts remarks is what the public found repulsive.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 4:29 pm Hopeless Romantic

        I and many of the people I know are small business owners. I asked a few friends in Massachussettes what Romney did for small business (and I’m talking less than 50,000 per year) while he was governor in Mass and they said “nada”.

        His idea of “small business” is probably drastically different from your’s and mine, although he chanted the “small bidniz, small bidniz” mantra through his entire campaign.

        Like


      • Typical lefty frame. Small business doesn’t need us to do stuff for it, it just needs us to get the fuck out of its way.

        Like


    • Find a top 100 richest americans or whatever then look up each person’s political affiliations.

      Like


    • Find a list of the richest Americans and look up their political affiliations. There are no hard stats on the subject, for obvious reasons. And why the fuck aren’t my posts showing up?

      Like


      • Actually I read a Forbes article a few months ago that showed that – contrary to popular belief – there are more filthy rich Democrats than Republicans

        I may have saved the link somewhere

        If I find it I will post it here later

        Like


  17. PA,

    you always need a few immigrants and it is to your advantage to attract the most talented few (not the richest, the most talented). And they are genuine refugees who need help and who will be loyal because they have been helped (I have seen examples myself).

    The problem is numbers, as long as immigration is not mass immigration it is fairly harmless. The problem is when governments elect a new people by letting in too many. This drives down wages (especially for the poorest) and reduce national cohesion.

    Like


    • The problem is “family reunification”. It’s why we get all the trash from Latin America we do. Although, Canada’s slant toward Asians poses its own problems.

      Like


      • corvinus
        The problem is “family reunification”.
        —————–

        No, the PROBLEM is, every white guy wants to get his; Mexican, Thai, Brazillian… ________ (fill in the blank) GIRLFRIEND in and then shut the door behind them.

        And you wonder why you’re not taken seriously.

        (((shakin my head)))

        Like


    • “you always need a few immigrants”

      Oh, really?

      Like


    • Another thing that should be completely shut down is “refugee resettlement”. This involves not just the U.S., but other English-speaking and Nordic countries, too. Shipping in Somalis and other detritus from Africa because they tore up their own homeland is one of the dumbest ideas ever.

      Like


      • corvinus

        There are a few genuine political refugees who you should let in. E.g. Iraqis who put their lives on the line to help you and their families. You need to give the message that you take care of your friends. Most refugees are either frauds or have other options much closer than the United States.

        I think the solution to family reunification is to give the right to who ever you admit, but not to those who that person picks.

        So someone who gets a STEM position or who was an Afghani interpreter for the CIA gets to take in 10 people (you actually don’t want people who will not take any one with them, this selects for sociopaths with worrying long term dysgenic implications). These 10 people do not get to sponsor any one.

        Or the first guy can select 5 people, these five can each pick one person.

        Like


      • I don’t care. If they want to come in one at a time, that’s fine, until the goings-on in their homelands blow over. But they have to go back. And no relatives. None. And inviting in 10 relatives will only make them want to invite their relatives.

        It’s best for all involved if they stay in their homelands. Europe is Exhibit A for what happens when you let in “just a few” Muslims. No.

        Like


      • No Iraqis helped American citizens that I know of.

        Maybe they had some kind of deal with the military to upend their own country but we don’t need to give them anything for that.

        We don’t need them.

        Like


      • if you welcome a person who is willing to betray his people to an invader, don’t be surprised when he calls Al Sharpton on yo ass.

        Like


    • Somalis are genuine refugees but they’re hardly desirable. Adorno, Marcuse, etc., were also genuine refugees, but hardly desirable and did us the great good favor of spewing cultural Marxist poison into our institutions of higher education. Asian STEM majors are a mixed bag, since at best they’ll go back to their own countries to use their knowledge, but at worst they’ll stay here and engage in espionage for their respective motherlands. We shouldn’t let crazy cat lady sympathy for the teeming masses dictate our immigration policy, but rather we should ask, Is this good for the nation, or bad for it?

      In time, I wouldn’t have a problem allowing top tier White Europeans to immigrate to America, but America needs to clean house before it can consider that.

      Like


      • We shouldn’t let crazy cat lady sympathy for the teeming masses dictate our immigration policy,

        that is Exactly what the left is suffering from!

        have you seen documentaries on those ladies?

        Not only are their house filled with cat feces but financially those women are going bankrupt taking care of all those cats, but despite all this if you show them another homeless cat with a cute sad face she will not be able to not take it in her house!!!

        It is a completely irrational behavior that is completey driven by emotions

        And that is EXACTLY what the left is doing, that is EXACTLY what the left syndrome is

        they are taking in more and more immigrants even if we are bursting at the seems, even if third world immigrants are bringing decay and even if we are going bankrupt helping them

        the cat lady syndrome is exactly what the left suffers from.

        It is all about feelings and reason is rejected

        Like


    • “he problem is when governments elect a new people by letting in too many.”

      Only because of the present system of democracy.

      “This drives down wages (especially for the poorest) and reduce national cohesion.”

      But real wages will rise when production increases, and that will keep everyone but the leftists happy.

      Like


    • @AKAHorace
      “governments elect a new people”. Oh yes. And in California, another way of achieving this is now standard. Mainly, a bipartisan Gerrrymander. OK, this is not technically “electing” people, but then nor is immigration. But the fact remains that those in power pick people to re-elect them.

      After the riots in East Berlin, the Pankow regime explained that the people had lost the confidence of the government, and could redeem itself only by doubling their work effort. Berthold Brecht, although himself a leftie and East German luminary, then put it out on the samizdat/rumor-mill
      “…warum auflöse die Regierung das Volk nicht und wähle sich
      eine anderes?”, i.e. roughly “why doesn’t the government dissolve the people and elect itself a different one”. The exact wording is unknown, as there is no official publication for the obvious reason.

      Thor

      Like


  18. Off Topic but I just fast forwarded through the film Bachelorettes with Kirstin Dunst. In it a guy refuses sex with a slut because he says they’re both drunk and he really likes her and wants to do a relationship right. She’s like “I don’t care, I want sex now. What the hell are you saying”.

    But when she sobers up they get into an LTR and it supposedly turns out that he did the right thing by being a gentleman when they were drunk.

    Where do they get these beta screenwriters?

    Like


    • those stories appeal to women for many reasons,

      – the whore in the end is not so ” whorish” because all she needed to stop opening her legs to everyone who would have her was simply to find the right man,

      so men are to blame for not having noticed that underneath the whore was a good woman good for long term relationships

      it is all about being not accountable; the female brain is wired that way.

      – it is also a sort of fairy tale kind of ” pretty woman” with Julia Roberts, in the end even whores can find their knight in shinny armor
      and most women like fairy tales as they are more like children than men are

      – and since most women believe they deserve a multimillionaire who is very good looking ( like Richard Geere in that movie ) again it appeals to them

      there are probably other reasons

      Like


  19. game and politics; with this damn blog i don’t even need a gf lollz

    Like


  20. you always need a few immigrants and it is to your advantage to attract the most talented few

    STEM visas are for run-of-the-mill engineers whose main purpose is to drive down STEM wages. Real talent is home-grown white American.

    And they are genuine refugees who need help and who will be loyal because they have been helped (I have seen examples myself).

    Rather than insulting you here for your soft-minded nice white lady desire to bring more Congolese and Somalians to small towns in Vermont and Minnesota, I will just say this: letting in white Cubans and Eastern Europeans during communism was a win-win. Letting in non-whites is suicide. And they will not be grateful. On the low end, they will down-assimilate to Black Ghetto. On the high end, they will assimilate to white-hating upper class leftism.

    (PS: I am a “genuine refugee” as well)

    This drives down wages (especially for the poorest) and reduce national cohesion.

    Post-65 immigration drives down the only thing that matters: the average female attractiveness of America’s general population. All else canbe worked out.

    Like


    • With a few exceptions – the ideal would be to allow just white immigration: irish, english, german, italian, portuguese, polish, white latin americans, russians, spanish… you pick!

      P.S.: I’m a white latin american (portuguese, spanish, irish descent) so you can se I’m fucking biased lol

      Like


      • While immigrating only ‘white’ people may be good for social cohesion in the short term, it’s probably much more important today to discriminate based on intelligence, skills, political disposition, willingness to assimilate and serve the nation. Dysgenics among all races living in the US due to indiscriminate immigration and welfare policies is probably the biggest problem America faces for the long-term future.

        Like


      • Uh-uh on dysgenics of immigration. Very roughly speaking, the further away the source country, the better the average quality of immigrant. On average.

        Another twist is that immigrants from highly egalitarian (not necessarily poor) countries tend to want to immigrate to less egalitarian countries such as the US. Highly educated mmigrants from more-or-less third world countries, which are not only poor (although poverty is relative) but also in almost all cases very unegalitarian ) rarely immigrate to median-egalitarian countries such as the US or more egalitarian countries found in Western Europe.

        In decades of work as an engineer in the US (I am originally from egalitarian but not poor Sweden) guess how many Mexican-trained engineers I have met (not counting those who got into the US before college age)?

        As it turns out, the number is zero. Reason being, in Mexico, an engineer is not only RICH relative to the population in general, but even RICH in terms of income relative to the cost of living. AND he commands respect as el Señor ingeniero.

        Note BTW that the feds have passed laws to make it especially difficult for engineers to practice as independent consultants, the drive was on in 1987 (under Reagan no less) to proletarianize engineers to increase tax revenue.

        But the engineering departments I have seen are typically about half immigrants, from all over the world. Just not Mexicans.

        Like


      • Unfortunately for you, MacCool, there are people on this thread who wouldn’t regard someone with Portuguese and Spanish ancestry as “white”. Only “Nordics” would qualify. Sorry to disillusion you.

        P.S. I’m not biased or bothered either way since I’m African – Lol!

        Like


      • Yet another negro telling a white man who’s going to accept him… LOOOZLZLZOOOOZLZLZLZOOOOLL

        Like


      • Hey John, how would Greg have responded if you did not tell him you are nonwhite?

        Ive seen it happen on VNN (a thread about it usually opens about every 6 months or so)

        The arguements always starts by one white person questioning another white persons QUALIFICATIONS to be a white person.

        And the thread always ends the same way.

        With them all agreeing to hang a person who looks like me from a tree.

        Thats how they reduce conflict among themselves; they find one person they can ALL agree is qualified to be mistreated on the basis of color.

        your mistreatment is how they solidify their unity.

        Like


      • I think I understand now where you get your hare-brained ideas, thwack… you frequent VNN and think that those miscreants represent true white thought and WN.

        They’re for the most part antiChristian clowns that don’t happen to like dark people… as opposed to the antiChristian clowns around here that don’t happen to like light people. 😉

        Like


      • These VNN guys, don’t tell me – they’re Led Zeppelin fans?

        Like


      • What is wrong with Led Zeppelin?

        What am I missing here???

        Like


      • Hi thwack,

        Hardly mistreatment – simply youtube-level banter.

        Like


      • Canadian Friend,

        Panic not – you’re not missing anything. Simply free-association responding to thwack’s comment – “all agreeing to hang a person who looks like me from a tree”.

        It reminded me of “Gallows Pole”.

        And there’s nothing wrong with Zep.

        Like


      • I thought being a fan of Led Zeppelin had been added to the list of things that make us evil white racists

        I used to play bass in a band that played half a dozen Zeppelin songs and I was beggining to think that was now some sort of hate crime or something!

        in liberal-bizarro-world everything is possible…

        Like


      • Canadian Friend,

        Not at all. However, I understand that on stormfront there are some deeply conflicted Led Zep fans who have been informed that their favourite band are verboten because of Zep’s black music roots. Same applies to a lesser or greater extent to Elvis, Stones, Beatles, and even early Jethro Tull.

        Like


      • yeah I know we are told again and again that blacks “invented” blues and rock’n’roll and blah blah blah

        but who invented the electric guitar?

        a white man

        so one could argue that black people would have never invented blues if a white man had not invented the electric guitar ( and the amplifier and the speaker etc…)

        It is kind of a chicken and egg thing except that most stuff on this planet has been invented by white people…

        Like


      • Canadian Friend,

        “so one could argue that black people would have never invented blues if a white man had not invented the electric guitar”

        The blues were first played on the banjo which arrived from the “dark” continent.

        Like


      • I have heard that before but as far as we know there was no blues on the dark continent, the blues was and still is not something that is part of African tradition

        the blues began appearing after blacks were in contact with whites and it only appeared in the USA, so it is seems to be a combination of factors and some of those factors were only found in the USA and with whites.

        maybe the blacks invented blues but only after whites influenced them with something else that was absent in Africa

        we have a similar phenomenom in Canada with a hand weeved sash called ceinture flechée.

        The new and different weeving that appeared in the 1700s is attributed to north american indian but they only began doing some of this new and different hand weaving after Europeans introduced them to wool sashes

        had European wool never been introduced to Indians, Indians would have never developped a hand weaving and would have never developped new sash different from all European sashes.

        and just like the blues one people ( or one race ) would have not created it without what the other people ( or race )
        introduced them to.

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        It is kind of a chicken and egg thing except that most stuff on this planet has been invented by white people
        —————
        Did white people invent white people? Some white people say white people came from black people; is this true? If so, should everybody hang themselves from a tree since we invented you?

        Like


      • blacks did not invent whites

        no more than single cell organisms invented multiple cell organism

        it is evolution that gets credit for that

        the internal combustion engine, now that is an invention

        there is another type of invention; all that the left has put into your mind

        and since the left is mostly a white thing – that is why we call them white liberals – well although leftism is an evil invention created out of self loathing and to destroy western civilization and capitalism, it is still whites who get credit for it

        whites are very creative even when it comes to bad things.

        leftism is one example but what the Nazis did is also very creative, it was completely wrong and evil, but no one can deny they were creative super geniuses

        I am a race realist which is not to be confused with wanting to hang anyone from trees.
        I said it before and I will say it again, i do not hate black people but I hate what is going on because of leftism and all its lies.

        as a matter of fact I am a realist in everything not only race, I hate lies , pretty or not.

        and I love debunking or exposing the lies of the left including all those embellished stories about black people.

        the origins of the blues are blurry and we know there is absolutely no blues in Africa. zero, none, niet, zilch, squat, nada.

        blacks and whites probably have both contributed to creating the blues, it was a combination of factors but we know there is no such thing as blues in Africa.

        it was created in the USA and does not originate from Africa.

        blacks are not devoid of merit but the left wants us to believe if it weren’t for blacks we white people would have nothing and that is the most absurd lie I have ever heard

        did Issac Newton figure out gravity and the laws of physics because of blacks?

        Did Louis Pasteur figure out how to kill bacteria withouht affecting food because of blacks?

        Was the lazer invented thanks to blacks?

        what about batteries, transistors, computers, the internet?

        really the internet was built on the back of black slaves?

        can’t you see this all an absurd lie the dysfunctional left is brainwashing everyone with?

        Whites would have developped western civilization and all of its marvels even if they had never ever been in contact with blacks.

        slavery – as wrong as it was and let me remind you it was not done exclusively by whites or exclusive to america – was a drop in the ocean as far as helping build western civilization

        only a small number of whites owned slaves, most of the work was done by whites who’s lives were not much better than slave’s.

        stop believing the lies

        the left is a bunch of highly dysfunctional mentally deranged people lying trough their teeth out of self loathing and other mental problems

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        blacks did not invent whites
        ——————

        OK, how about bipedalism?

        did we invent that?

        Like


      • Let us all give thanks to the Ottoman Empire for allowing us to put those two feet up in comfort.

        Like


      • if everybody on the Earth was white, it would be a bloodbath.

        Like


      • I’d choose bloodbath over Babylonian gulag.

        Like


      • Sure, just look at white on white crime, it’s out of control.

        I’m terrified of other white people. /sarcasm

        Like


      • What I meant is that if white people didn’t have nonwhite people heads to slam through plate glass windows and hang from trees…

        They would do it to each other.

        But the result would be much more violent and brutal because they look the same.

        When you look the same as another person, its much more difficult for you to accept mistreatment from them.

        This is why black people are so quick to kill each other.

        Like


      • You’ve got it backwards again… just think of how truly horrendous black-on-black crime would be (it’s already at beyond comprehension levels) if black-on-white crime wasn’t taking some of the heat off the ghetto.

        Like


      • Greg,

        niggers rob white people because they have the money (and they give it up easier because its easier for them to get)

        Black people, on the other hand, kill black people over dumb nigger shit like “he dissed me”; he looked at me the wrong way…”;

        (((shakin my head)))

        Like


      • niggers rob white people because they have the money (and they give it up easier because its easier for them to get)

        If that were all that they did to white people, there’d be a lot less to complain about.

        But that doesn’t wash… no matter how allegedly “poor” they are, the satellite dishes and wide-screen TVs and bad rides and $150 Nikes still somehow find their way into the ‘hood.

        If you’re poor in America, and of sound mind and body, you just ain’t tryin’.

        Like


      • A bloodbath like in Rwanda?

        Like


      • Exactly! Canadian Friend

        And its not just about mistreatment. I once had a job where I was promoted to “crew chief”; guess who had a problem with it?

        The other black guy on the crew. He became very difficult in order to show me: “you ain’t in charge of nothin… what, you think you white now? you think you better than me? you wanna fight…”

        He had no problem with our white crew chief.

        Much as I hate agreeing with Greg, some niggers are just fucked up and need to be written off as a loss.

        Like


      • No. A bloodbath like the former Yugoslavia.

        Like


      • It is unfair to compare our bloodbath which have been very well documented along the centuries and milleniums to those of a people who did not have a written language thus never recorded their wars and other events

        it is not because they never wrote about it that it never happened,

        if the massacre of Rwanda happened at the drop of a hat a few years ago, it is reasonable to think that along the centuries and milleniums blacks in Africa have had many other massacres such as Rwanda

        I am not saying blacks are worse, I am saying all races have had large conflicts in which a lot of people died

        we documented ours in great details they did not as they never invented a written language.

        we are comparing apples to oranges

        Like


      • There is such a thing as oral history.

        Like


      • Oral history is totally unreliable as every new person from following generations who tells the story either adds or forgets details and the story keeps changing.

        while a book that was written a hundred or a thousand years ago always remains the same no matter who reads it.

        Like


      • Canadian Friend
        while a book that was written a hundred or a thousand years ago always remains the same no matter who reads it.
        —————
        Yeah and that works really well when its a lie. Would you rather have your children listening to stories SPOKEN by Greg Eliot, or consuming jewish filth from books and movies?

        Like


      • The autobiography of Greg Eliot, as told by him:

        “I was born a po’ black child…”

        Like


    • Double plus one thousand on this one.

      Like


  21. fuck the rich, even as an aspirational type, President Goldman Sachs Obama pisses me off. The GOP is the party of the suburbs, people smart enough to escape city corruption.
    Try articulating that.

    Like


  22. PA,

    you think that real talent is home-grown white American ? You Americans would not have a space program without the Nazis. Have you looked at the data on race and IQ ? I am not saying that you want to swamp your country with Asians, but if you pick the best in Science and Tech a disproportionate amount will be Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The last two are not a security threat.

    As for refugees, you are right Congolese and especially Somalis are bad news. There are plenty of good non whites such as Burmese, Karen. Picking someone who is a genuine (and yes, they are mostly frauds) Colombian political refugee means that you get someone who has risked being tortured to death extremely slowly for their political beliefs. You want people like that interbreeding with your native population, whether they are left wing or right wing is unimportant over the long term.

    (If that last statement sounds weird look at Michael Portillo, a bigoted Tory who is the son of Spanish communist refugees from fallangist Spain. )

    Finally if you don’t care about the welfare of all americans including the poor you don’t deserve your own country. And while post 65 immigration has been a political, social and economic disaster it has given North American better restaurants and sexier women. Do you really prefer sisters from the hood to some Vietnamese or Brazilian woman ?

    Like


    • The question is not as simplistic as just I.Q., if you want to America continue to be America it have to be white, preferably anglo-saxon majority (ask your founding fathers). And there is a lot of white brazilian women, look at Gisele Bundchen, our south is full of that:

      Like


    • Well, heartiste’s observation some time ago about Vietnamese women having perfect asses is the truth.

      Like


    • I’m not PA. But from my perspective you’re arguing America is just a place on a map, of random people, with no history, traditions, values, and culture worth anything. That’s BS. America’s history, culture, values, and traditions are inseparable from its people. Who remain Anglo-Saxon/Celtic/African. Yes America is relatively young, but how WE celebrate Halloween, or Christmas, or something as trivial and homely as the Charlie Brown Halloween-Thanksgiving-Christmas specials means something. And no, the Mexivasion and the millions of fat, squat, and homely Mexican women (and men) who throng here are NOT Americans. Any more than if and my family and descendants lived in Mexico for a hundred years WE would be Mexican.

      Like


    • The idea that white Americans can’t do anything and that we “need” immigrants to make any real advances in science and technology is pure horse hockey. The space program received a boost from taking in von Braun, sure, but it appears you have never heard of Robert Goddard, a white American rocket scientist who actually did get our space program going. Besides, von Braun was German, an ethnic group closely related to white Americans.

      Arguing for immigration on the grounds of sexier women doesn’t pan out either. Most immigrant women are hideous trolls, and many of them are grossly fat as well. I agree that Southeast Asians are less problematic than Africans, but Burma is reforming right now and we shouldn’t be stuck with them.

      Like


    • Along with the sexy and civilized Vietnamese and Brazilian women..we have also gotten much more atbst unattractive and at worst gene pool poisoning men and women from Honduras, Haiti, Somalia, Ethiopia, Liberia, Pakistan, Morocco, India, etc. Yes, we have gotten some good Thai, Indian, Vietnamese and Mexican restaurants…but we also have gotten chinese stores selling homeopathic remedies made from fetuses, Salvadoran bodegas selling guns and drugs in the back, Muslim run night clubs that don’t employ white men, and remove white women from the dating pool. I would take an America where Cracker Barrel was considered an exquisite dining option if we could get rid of the aforementioned issues brought about by Third World immigration.

      Like


    • You Americans would not have a space program without the Nazis.

      not true

      the USA was only a few years behind and would have caught up quite fast even without the help of the Nazi’s technological advances

      by the way, the jet engine was developed by a British who sold the idea to the Germans (before WWII of course).

      Like


  23. The GOP had a chance, but they blew it by nominating some nut case Mormon. Ron Paul was their only hope. Vote for Rmoney? Not in this life, and I’m a registered Republican. If I had to choose between Rmoney and Obama, I would have voted for Obama. But I didn’t have to. I’m registering Libertarian before the next election. The GOP needs to get rid of sociocons like Sean Manatee.

    Like


  24. “Finally if you don’t care about the welfare of all americans including the poor you don’t deserve your own country. ”

    Democrats kind of suck on pretending to be something that they aren’t.

    Like


  25. From the book of Isiah, 43rd Ch, 2nd verse
    “When thou passeth thru the fire thou shalt not be burned; neither shall flames kindle upon thee..”

    Like


  26. “Colombian political refugee means that you get someone who has risked being tortured to death extremely slowly for their political beliefs.”

    Wait. Who are these Colombian political refugees you are talking about? You mean the Marxist rebels?

    Like


  27. I was in Brazil in the Amazon once. There are regions with dirt poor blond settlers hacking down the rainforest.

    Like


  28. A first step – and I wish I had thought of it first – is to do a Wisconsin.

    In this case, all the Republican electors stay home, and then the
    Electoral College does not have a quorum. And the presidency falls to
    the speaker of the House.

    Demand it!

    Thor

    Like


  29. jerk,

    They are both left and right wing.
    Being left wing does not mean that you are safe from the guerillas, they have a history of killing other left wingers (including three American activists who were Sioux working with Colombian Indians back in 99). Left wingers are in definite danger from the right wing paramilitaries who are known for torturing people to death very slowly. I know a left wing Colombian refugee here in Canada. He had worked in the Colombian Amazon where he said the paramilitaries were para by night, army by day. He also said though that most of the Colombian refugees in Canada, left and right wing, were frauds.

    He would meet with other “left wing refugees” and at first they would be very friendly. He would start to relax with them and they did not know of people that he knew, their knowledge of events was derived from newspapers. After 20-30 minutes conversation they would become distant and he would never hear from them again.

    My own experience supports what this guy says. I knew four friends/acquaintances who were right wing refugee frauds. They would say that the guerilla were after them and pass some money to a local official to produce a letter backing them up. This is not to say that they are not genuine right wing refugees, my social networks were probably too low for me to run into them.

    Like


  30. Heartiste is showing basic business savvy by diversifying his product. Notice how he includes these social concern essays to offset the Interpreting Girl’s Texting essays, which while informative to younger bucks tend to cause older men’s interest to become flaccid.

    Like


  31. Hi Jerk,

    Right wing refugees have to leave the country because of the guerilla. If you had a lot of money or land in the wrong place the guerillas would try to extort it from you by kidnapping you or ideally your children. There was a limit to what the Colombian government could do for you, they could not fully protect everyone. The richer you were, the more effort the two guerilla groups (FARC, ELN) would make to hunt you and your family down. While the guerillas did not control most areas , they were supposed to have eyes in many places.

    A lot of people in this situation were not officially refugees; they moved to the states, getting in as investors or because of family connections and ran their businesses from there. People use to half-joke that the country was being run from Miami. I only had a couple of contacts at this social level (one of whom I was sleeping with for a while but she did not want me to meet her friends, I think because she was ashamed of me).

    As I said above the only right wing refugees that I knew were frauds from a lower social strata, but the real thing definitely existed.

    Like


  32. American “conservatism,” a word I use with much hesitation because genuine conservatism is practically dead in the United States, will never prevail. And here is why.

    Politics in the United States, both conservative and liberal, are descended from the same ideologicial prototype that has its origins in the Enlightenment. One is simply more evolved than the other. Because both conservatism and liberalism in the US share the same ideological premises, conservatives cannot criticize liberals because they essentially believe in the same political concepts that characterize the Enlightenment ideals.

    To illustrate, Sean Hannity can’t bring himself to say that large scale immigration, legal or otherwise, from the Third World has practically turned the United States into a one-party state represented by the Democrats, and that conservatives should have implemented a white majority immigration policy to prevent this disaster. But to do so would violate his political beliefs of freedom and egalitarianism, which all lamestream conservatives believe in (just like liberals), so he stupidly announces to the entire country that the GOP should legalize 10 million+ future Democrat voters.

    As far as I’m concerned, “conservatism” in the US is a lost cause. Revival can only take place when the system collapses.

    Like


  33. “way to seriously harm, if not kill, the mind virus that is the modern Left”

    Make not owning a television a status symbol, sort of like not buying lottery tickets.

    Like


  34. Lived and worked in the U.S. for a total of 15 years between 1985 and 2010, mostly in California, Nevada, and Washington state. Have now returned to Canada where I grew up, and where there is now, amazingly, Conservative federal government. Am a small-c conservative across the board — fiscally, socially, foreign-policy-wise. Would have voted for Romney if I were an American citizen because Obama and the Democrats were/are a major disaster, but understand why he lost.

    Here’s some of the reasons why. Republicans for the most part act like they are allergic to ordinary Americans making decent wages. Romney probably would have been a decent president, but working class white Americans see him as a country club Richie Rich. He couldn’t overcome the severe fuckups of recent Republican policy, to wit:

    -allowing in a tidal wave of low-skilled low-IQ immigrants who drove down wages, dragged down lower-income neighbourhoods, and voted for the Democrats

    -ditto for the un-American H-1B program that brought in cheap Asian techies to displace Americans in the Silicon Valley industries that also support the Democrats

    -standing up like tigers for the interests of Wall Street and Hollywood, both of which are solidly Democrat

    -wasting America’s blood and treasure fighting overseas wars “nation-building” for unworthy people who can’t be built up beyond what they are

    -doing nothing to rein in the enormous costly military-defense establishment which by the way is badly infected with liberals and leftists

    -wasting money trying to educate the ineducable, for example the ridiculous No Child left Behind nonsense

    -making no visible effort to stop the racial spoils system, and in fact reinforcing it in places like mortgage lending

    -ditto no visible effort at breaking up the left-wing stranglehold on corporate media

    I could go on, but those are the main ones. Incidentally, the present Conservative federal government of Canada is populist; it’s the Liberal Party which is more identified with toney private schools and clubs et cetera. It was actually formed from a group called the Reform Party that split off from the older Progressive Conservatives led by 1984-93 Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, who was in many ways Canada’s version of George Bush (both father and son, actually). They went on to do a sort of reverse takeover of the remains of the Progressive Conservatives in 2003, and then took power in 2005.

    Don’t give up. In spite of all his defects, Romney was close, and he actually won a majority of under-30 white voters, a fact you’re not likely to read in the Washington Post. Things are NOT going to get better in the second Obama term. How do I know? Because we’ve had these type of governments in Canada, and the effects are always the same.

    Like


    • At least Canada is still about 75-80% white. I am rather more pessimistic that the U.S. will be able to return to a sane type of government once it’s done with the current Dem binge and repudiating the neocons.

      Like


  35. Women demand equality so give it to them. They piss and moan till the cows come home about health care being a “woman’s issue” because they out consume men by 30 – 40% for medical services throughout their lifetimes, and in addition, they outlive men by roughly 5 years. Simply say that 50% of all health care funding must go towards men. If it sounds farfetched, it is not, it is exactly how every other civil rights program works. Checkmate them at their own game.
    As for Sandra Fluke, I say give her all the birth control she can eat. Buy her blocks of it so she can suck it like a salt lick. In return however, mandate the Federal Government must set aside and equal amount of money towards research for a male birth control pill. We are probably no more than a decade away from having several viable options. Just make it real clear that they cannot have one without the other.

    Like


  36. >> Punitive, confiscatory, outrageous taxation on incomes over whatever figure

    No can do. Gates – Soros – Buffet don’t have income. They BORROW against long term assets and pay NO income tax. Plus, they get to deduct interest expense.

    The income tax exists for one reason : to shaft anyone trying to accumulate wealth.

    Like


    • One other reason: to ensure that Federal Reserve Credits (a.k.a., U.S. Dollars) stay a monopoly that’s perpetually impervious to competing currencies. It was not an accident that the US income tax started in the same year as the Federal Reserve.

      Like


  37. The tax code and government regulations in general unfairly benefit the rich and the poor while screwing the middle class to make up the difference.

    Like


  38. Alphas with game are like alphas with guitars: they’re fun to watch, and you can learn a lot from.

    But both should really shut up when they wander off their subject of expertise.

    — IOW, I am about as interested in hearing policy recommendations (“Punitive, confiscatory, outrageous taxation..”…WTF?) from this site as I am from my favorite musicians.

    As Billy Connolly said, “Shut the fuck up and play!”

    Like


  39. America will be freed by Europe.

    Like


    • Europe can’t save itself.

      Like


    • Nonsense.
      The essential parts of Europe are even more fucked up.

      Like


      • Not really. Demographics are bad in Europe but no where near as bad as the US. Major European cities still have significant native populations, even among the younger demos. You still see native kids in places as dismal as Brussels, Paris, London, Berlin. Can you imagine going into a public school in NY, LA, Chicago, SF, etc and seeing large numbers of old stock Anglos?

        Like


      • Right.

        Europe, the land of 30 year old students and 50 year old retirees. No wonder they gotta import niggers; somebodys got to do some actual work.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 5:02 pm Hopeless Romantic

        thwack, are you NOI? Moorish Science? Orthodox Muslim?

        Like


      • No.

        why do you ask?

        Like


      • Go to Europe and see for yourself who does the actual work.

        Like


      • Europe is too fucking expesive (see retirees and student above)

        I’d rather go to the Carribean and fuck some toasty women on the beach.

        (flexes in front of the monitor)

        “Im tan, rested and ready” — Richard Millhouse Nixon

        Like


  40. I think America’s only hope is for a financial collapse that will make the Crash of ’29 and subsequent Great Depression look like a bull market. I think it will happen with the rising debt and deficit spending and what Obamacare will do to businesses.

    I predict that by the end of Obama’s second term that unemployment will be at 15%, the Dow will be less than 10,000 and that the dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency. It will be so bad, that the media’s efforts to spin the blame away from Obama and the democrats will fail miserably.

    Let it all burn so we can start all over again. Plus. with such a horrific economy, it would have the added benefit of so many illegals leaving for Mexico.

    Like


    • I more or less share your hopes, just because we need a dose of reality in this country. However, if America contracts, the rest of the world will likely revert to its bad old ways. That will make America a much more attractive place in every way. So, our collapse might be delayed by global collapse.

      Like


    • Skilaki,

      I agree, it seems a collapse is inevitable.

      have you heard of the Cloward Piven strategy?

      I am no conspiracy theorist but watching Obama I often think it is possible that is what he is doing;
      overwhelming the system to make it collapse , then while the system is all messed up install a new system ( as it is much easier to do in times of crisis) this new system might be radical socialism or whatever Obama’s handlers have in mind ( obviously the goal seems to be to remove the USA as the power of the world to make a more “equal” power to the other nations )

      maybe this Cloward Piven thing is just a silly idea, but why else is Obama doing all sorts of things that are sure to cause a collapse of the US economy???

      everything he does is bad for the economy and keeps doing more

      It is impossible that he does know what he is doing, this has to be intentional.

      I’m just not sure as to why he wants to cause an economic collapse of the USA.

      Like


  41. […] What A Future American Right Party Can Do To Win « Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  42. Is is too early to name the JERCs (or better, JERKs) who mostly replaced the WASPs as the Elite Ruling Class and who unlike the latter hold a grudge and are genocidally hostile toward the majority of those they rule?

    Like


  43. “Punitive, confiscatory, outrageous taxation on incomes over whatever figure,”
    “Require 401 monies to be managed by institutions local to the business or employee.”

    These two are just idiotic. For one, even if your goal was to soak the ultra wealthy the best way to do it would be to raise long term capital gains taxes. However, that would be very bad for the stock market. But suppose you do succeed in soaking the private sector rich, then the power elite will just shift their focus to control over public funds. It’s far more difficult for the productive rich to do that because the government is already dominated by the rapacious and myopic, so in the end they will be the ones hurt most.

    The financial sector is the central planning apparatus of the free market. Whether it is the result of convergent evolution with command economies, or a homologous structure as conspiracy theorists might suggest(and perhaps with good reason), it is what it is. If local bankers were better at managing funds than those on Wall street, why wouldn’t people entrust their money to them? This destroys the economies of scale that centralized finance allows. In fact, it ignores the whole purpose of a bank, which is to take your checking accounts and use them to back bonds, or to take corporate profits and use them to provide mortgages.

    In addition, all of the smart traders on Wall St. make their money by arbitraging the difference between the Federal Funds rate and the yield on treasuries. They won’t be able to do this after the Fed contracts the money supply, which it has to or else hyperinflate, but for now the existence of overnight money lent at 0% is a source of endless free cash for investors to play with.

    Maybe large financial institutions are a breeding ground of evil, and a threat wherever they appear. Frankly, I believe that the idea of money itself is the problem. But the fact of the matter is, Wall St. would probably be much less corrupt if they didn’t have free money from the Fed, which meant that they were no longer dependent on the capital provided by the savings of the average person, which could then be plundered with impunity.

    Like


  44. skilaki:
    >I predict that by the end of Obama’s second term that unemployment will be at 15%

    Real unemployment is already above 20%.

    Like


    • We’re already close to Greece/Spain unemployment levels, it’s all held together by government programs.

      When the government loses the ability to fund them that’s when it gets interesting.

      Like


  45. The GOP isn’t the only surrender monkey that is a mockery of a once-great institution. Vatican II is ensuring that it is no longer Europe’s faith:

    “Pope appoints six cardinals who will elect his successor”
    – Pope Benedict made six non-European prelates Roman Catholic cardinals on Saturday, chipping away at the old continent’s domination of the elite group that will one day elect his successor.

    The new cardinals, ranging in age from 53 to 72, are from the United States, India, Nigeria, the Philippines, Lebanon and Colombia, and the decision to choose no Italians or Europeans looked like an attempt to counter criticism that he has in the past neglected the needs of the developing world.

    Like


  46. TRADITIONALISM AND GAME Good song, good video. Must watch it to the end though. Effective traditionalism embraces fun.

    Like


  47. Another fantasy article AGAIN!!
    Pure capitalism is just as bad as poor communism, hence they will never exist. Whether they know it or not the majority of people and readers of Heartiste are recipients of some form of government social program.

    Bar emotional issues such as gay marriage, abortions etc, the two parties are basically the same. Unemployment figures would have been their current levels and will probably go down in the next 4 years whether it’s Dem or GOP in power.
    The only Major difference is Health. Healthcare is inelastic, basic levels of economics will tell you health care is expensive in private hands.

    Health spending as a share of GDP
    US 16%
    UK 8.4%
    Public spending on healthcare (% of total spending on healthcare)
    US 45%
    UK 82%
    Health spending per head
    US $7,290
    UK $2,992
    Practising physicians (per 1,000 people)
    US 2.4
    UK 2.5
    Nurses (per 1,000 people)
    US 10.6
    UK 10.0
    Acute care hospital beds (per 1,000 people)
    US 2.7
    UK 2.6
    Life expectancy:
    US 78
    UK 80
    Infant mortality (per 1,000 live births)
    US 6.7
    UK 4.8

    US is richer per head than UK, but still falls behind in health care. Yes hospitals are ‘nicer’ in the US than UK but the level of actual care received is the same.

    As to the question is ‘why should I help the poor’ then answer is simple, the government actually protects you from the poor.

    Like


  48. Embrace free healthcare in order to win

    Like


  49. Health spending as a share of GDP
    US 16%
    UK 8.4%
    Public spending on healthcare (% of total spending on healthcare)
    US 45%
    UK 82%
    Health spending per head
    US $7,290
    UK $2,992
    Practising physicians (per 1,000 people)
    US 2.4
    UK 2.5
    Nurses (per 1,000 people)
    US 10.6
    UK 10.0
    Acute care hospital beds (per 1,000 people)
    US 2.7
    UK 2.6
    Life expectancy:
    US 78
    UK 80
    Infant mortality (per 1,000 live births)
    US 6.7
    UK 4.8

    Like


  50. Add to the list: forgive student loans, repeal copyright laws.

    Like


  51. I recommend the right arm itself with ropes and lamp posts. Seriously, unless you’re going to do something about getting rid of the vermin and parasites all of your other efforts are in vain. Perhaps I’m overreacting, but my view is that the situation is so far gone that nothing besides pulling a Full Hitler is going to work. And things may be so far gone even that isn’t going to work.

    Like


    • True dat.

      Like


    • libruls lefties, kill kill kill. Solve evvything. pinkos.
      see, I don’t buy any lefty stuff. We’re smaht. doan listna lefties. leftards.
      no guns? they doan lahk guns killa lefties. we smart. can fool ME!
      see I splained it all. alla problem solvd. murkan idol on tonight.kill kill kill.lamppost solution. how come no noe see

      Like


  52. The plan outlined in this post will never happen…except for maybe the “tax the rich” part.

    Elections have consequences and the Democrats control the Senate and the Presidency. The Republicans right now are in a hell of a bind because if nothing is done & they let Budget Control Act of 2011 take place, taxes still go up along with spending cuts to programs that they like. More than likely they will just agree to “kick the can down the road” for a few more months and agree to something later.

    I don’t know if there is any easy solution to the current problem the Repubs have. My gut tells me that the GOP leadership will not change until it is too late. They are still stuck with a 1980s mindset despite the fact that the country has changed radically both racially and socially. I also don’t think a new “third party” is viable right now either, at least until it becomes clear that the Republican party is finished.

    Like


  53. This article largely mistakes beltway Republicans for heartland Republicans. Like the legacy media, those in the “commanding heights” of culture misrepresent those for whom they presume to speak. It is a matter of party decapitation, not comprehensive transformation.

    The decapitation is already occurring via the spontaneous revival of constitutionalism among perhaps 1/4 to 1/3 of the populace. Their sitting out of this election was a mistake but nevertheless will help to “heighten the contradictions” and carve out the dead-weight on the GOP apparatus.

    We are a two-party system. The ever-changing Republican party represents and always will represent one-half of the electorate, the Democrats the other half. When either slips substantially below 50%, it instinctively adjusts to steal at least enough to accomplish parity. That is the permanent design of American party politics. It means disembowling the husk of the out-party (like a taxidermist replacing the rotting parts of the stuffing) and refreshing it with new substance.

    What fringe elements like us have to understand better are the internal workings of the small-r republican or “federalist” system. It is the most efficient mechanism ever devised to balance factions against each other (See Madison, Federalist No. 10). We can grab and defend elements of sovereignty without requiring domination over the remaining 70% — if only for practical purposes: the totalitarian prospect always implodes in the space of a generation. That path requires an emphasis on locality, states’ rights, and a robust 9th and 10th amendment revival. Elements of this are already evident in the retention of the house, thirty governorships, and 57 state assemblies. Should our enemy’s ragtag rainbow coalition find the wherewithal to deny us this limited separation, then we begin to contemplate secession and/or revolution — always a free people’s option in the vest pocket, albeit nothing we need to do more than contemplate for now in the acquisition of political leverage.

    But on the national path, other goals must be pursued. In other words, guerrilla tactics such as expressed in the OP above are appropriate when conducted out of the spotlight, but they can never form the basis of a strategy, which necessarily enables national compromise. It is not a compromise of principle or position by any stretch, but it is a strategic cease-fire on enough wedge issues with our 75% white brethren to present a united front. We all, for example, want to revive constitutionalism for our own purposes. But to hash out that end-game before we get to square one is the way our united enemy has divided and will continue to conquer us. This is why I have no issue with this community’s self-destructive libertinism, except in its attempt to make it preeminent to the cause, which would doom it from the start. Gather ye labial buds while ye may, I say, but leave some space on the plate for the revolution. CH strikes a decent balance, in deeds if not in words.

    The battle lines, drawn by ignorant do-gooder liberals, will fall largely along the borders of race. That’s not the way I would have wanted it, but it is the way our enemy has insisted. For the first time ever this year, abject race baiting has proved electorally effective. We can choose to engage the war they started, or we can cede the field. That means the number-one objective is to get over the white guilt that our enemy has used to effect a policy of our slow eradication.

    Half of our 75% are actively in denial of that reality, even while the mockery of “old” “white” “men” proceeds apace by white people themselves. Half of the remaining are too squeamish to contemplate that reality, and half of that remaining are too distracted, too complacent, too jejune, or too jaded to fight with some risk to themselves (such as the “ever at poolside” proprietor of this site).

    That means the remaining ten-percent or so have our work cut out for us, beginning with the persuasion of allies closest to us, and the progressive, diminishing, and cumulative outreach to enough constituencies until we achieve 50.1%. Note, this isn’t a patchwork quilt of sovereign interest groups, as practiced on the spoils-distributing left, but rather a series of concentric circles divided by intensity but united in the most general of principles: individual liberty, separation of powers, and the right of association.

    Samuel Adams, Henry, and Paine; Bowie, Travis, and Crockett would recognize our predicament. They would have harsh things to say about our manhood. Fortunately, as game and “androsphere” sites have demonstrated in microcosm, this deficit of testicular fortitude is remediable.

    Matt

    Like


    • A prophet receives no honor in his own country… and a man’s enemies will be those of his own house.

      Only a remnant will remain, but that remnant will suffice… God’s Will, above all else.

      Like


  54. Gee I wish this was a game blog instead of a jizz-soaked corner for conservative circle jerking.

    Like


  55. The Repubs should propose a highly visible tax on the ultrawealthy – say a one-time wealth tax equal to 20% of individual assets over $100 million. This cripples an overwhelmingly liberal activist class and defuses charges of favoring the rich.

    Argue for the narrative that US immigration policy since 1965 has been a war against the working class perpetrated by far left politicians seeking voters and their wealthy sponsors seeking cheap labor and propose a “temporary” moratorium on immigration as an “emergency” measure until unemployment falls below 5%. Abandon policies targeting illegals and instead target their employers, surrounding the policy with touchy feely language about exploitation of workers. For further cover, have a policy of zero population growth based on environmental concerns.

    Disown neocon foreign policy by proposing closing foreign bases and cutting military spending, speak in vague terms about securing borders and ports during the election and then move these resources to the Southwest post-election victory.

    The policies together allow the Repubs to portray themselves as populists and get the anti-immigration policies in place necessary for long term viability. Taxes would not rise permanently but the immigration policies could be prolonged indefinitely when the Repubs discovered – shock! – that anti-immigrant policies are wildly popular so long as surrounded by the necessary BS rhetoric. As demographics improved, further shifts to the right would be possible.

    The media will of course portray the Repubs as racists but that will be the case regardless of the policies proposed. Repubs will have outflanked the Dems on being anti-rich, pro-environment and anti-war and put them on the defensive.

    Like


  56. Well, this election has done something for me. I now consider myself to be just one more hypenated American; European-American. That makes me a bit sad, but I am cheered by the fact that I am a member of the largest ethnic minority in this country. Now, where is my free stuff?

    Like


    • on November 24, 2012 at 9:44 pm Hopeless Romantic

      Gramps, if you have an EBT card you can get a free cell phone. That’s about the only free thing the US gov will give you. Well, that along with free books from a library and possibly free internet usage in some of those libraries as well.

      When the US gov starts giving away free cars, let me know. So far its only been very basic old model cell phones.

      Like


      • EBT is free stuff, genius.

        Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 1:49 pm Hopeless Romantic

        Besides EBT and outdated cellphones, what other “free stuff” are people getting?

        Besides, have you ever seen the amount of GOOD FOOD a grocery store just throws away? I’d rather see all that good food utilized than go to waste.

        Like


      • 1. Free bump in line at all job applications and academic institutions. Massive sliding scale to your conduct and output at said institutions.

        2. Freedom to walk anywhere and act like a rude, stupid 12 year old, and not have any non-black person correct you, or even have the ability to demand you leave.

        3. Free propaganda so that anytime your worthless, stupid, violent people have a statistically bad time due to your own shortcomings and behavior, they will blame everyone else.

        4. Free riot to riot, loot, and rape, and have your asses non-prosecuted and forgiven and protected and explained away as “caused by discrimination and poverty.”

        5. Freedom to commit violent crimes against non-blacks en masse and statistically out-of-proportion to your population size, but should a non-black defend himself from your chimping out and win, have the non-black person be rounded up and hung by a lynch mob (see Zimmerman, George and Jena 6 for recent examples).

        6. Freedom to ruin every single neighborhood you infest with a population of more than 15% of the total local population.

        And those are just off the top of my head, darkie.

        Like


      • Whorefinder made 6 points. And they are all true.

        Were they always true?

        No.

        Well then, what happened? Who is to blame for this mess?

        Like


      • who is to blame for this mess?

        mostly white liberals

        those are the ones who should be hanging from trees ( figuratively of course )

        Like


      • lol. Another leftist who doesn’t understand economics. Get a clue on food production and opportunity costs and subsidization, son.

        Oh, and we’ll add “subsidized and welfare housing and government shelters” to the list of things that are free/low cost for niggers due to Obama’s government.

        Like


  57. Dude, seriously. I’ve been visiting this site because my usually tight game has been lacking the past couple of months, and a reformed beta aquiantance directed me here. Relax with the fucking politics. It’s like you’ve gone nuts since the election.

    I’ve dug through the archives. When it comes to game, you’re the best. Utilize comparative advantage, which pushes every party to perform tasks that they are best suited to perform.. When you post about politics, there is a huge opportunity cost in that we are reading some shit that we can go somewhere else to read, when we could be reading what you have to say concerning game. Trust me, there are much smarter people than you writing about politics. When it comes to game though, I’d prefer to get my info from you.

    Like


    • “*Whine whine whine* I’m a lefty bitch pretending to have game *whine whine*”

      Go suck a nigger’s dick, son.

      Like


      • “When you post about politics, there is a huge opportunity cost in that we are reading some shit that we can go somewhere else to read, ”

        Where would that be? I don’t see any place talking real talk like this. Instead it’s still lovey dovey multiculti bullshit.

        “Trust me, there are much smarter people than you writing about politics.”

        Smarter people trying to iron out how we can pander harder and faster to things like feminism.

        Like


      • Shit dude, you’re clever

        Like


      • Your mom called, but I couldn’t make out what she was saying with Obama’s cock in her mouth.

        May you witness your mother raped by a pack of niggers.

        Like


    • Last time I checked, there was no entry fee to this blog. I.E. CH can post about whatever the hell he wants to. Find your center, or move the fuck on. Hard truths are well… hard. I’m seeing reactions like yours and some of the other leftards above all across cyberspace where many blogs I read are now staring intently at the 800lb gorilla in the room (pun intended) in ways that, quite frankly, appear to scare people. When a large contingent of alpha white males seems to simultaneously start to be angry and organized. Well fuck… I would be scared too because historically speaking, the world has shifted seismically at times when this occurs. We tend to shape reality in this way when a cause forms. You can look this up in any non-revisionist history book for more evidence than you’d ever need.

      Like


  58. There is only one solution to destroy leftism:

    rape, pillage, and murder.

    Leftists hate western civilization and romanticize the animals and the barbarians. The only way to deal with them is to treat them as an uncivilized person would—-which is to slaughter them.

    Like


  59. Not sure if completely OT:

    Straight Men Respond to: “Gay Men Will Marry Your Girlfriends”

    Like


  60. Politics? You right wing nut jobs never cease to amaze. Ever think the two party system was a sham?

    Like


    • Let me copy and paste Iain’s reply from above. The Left has no arguments — only insults. Anonymous is no exception.

      Like


    • Well… isn’t that what we are discussing here.

      The left-right paradigm is perpetrated and manipulated by the Tribal overlords of illusory money, beholden only to Mammon and global dominion. That the dual system is a sham should be obvious to the reaonably intelligent observor who invests a modicum of effort in his search for the truth.

      The contemporary versions of both parties fail to address – nay, aggresssively undermine – the interests, now exceedingly urgent, of Aryan men who seek individual freedom, self-responsibitiy, sanctity of private property (including money earned), respect for the unqualified right to keep and bear arms, and the ability to live and work among their own kind.

      I accept these notions as ethically axiomatic, requiring no justification to other ethnic or racial groups. Still, as a matter of interest, I posit that an independent, exclusively Aryan society that abided by the NAP (non-aggression principle) while maintaining its capacity for lethal self-defense of homeland, kith, and kin and engaging in friendly trading relations with other societies would benefit the non-White races as well as its own.

      Like


  61. Good ideas.

    But I think that a new American Right wing Party should push Freedom of Association as its most important issue. In fact, I would support paying blacks a reparation payment, gay marriage, and increases in government services, but in return we would demand total freedom of association.

    You could even give in to open borders as long as Whites (or blacks, Jews, or whoever) are allowed to have their own communities and institutions. If you have towns that want to let in waves of mestizos and Africans, then that would be their choice. They can be enriched by diversity. If people don’t like it they can move out (but who would move out of a town enriched by diversity? Only nazisthatwanttokillsixmillionjews would move, right?) Meanwhile some towns, counties, villages, neighborhoods would take measures to maintain an ethnic makeup that its populations wanted.

    I wonder if the left would approve of the following: What if the top 10% of earners were taxed at 75% of income, a universal healthcare program was passed, education spending was increased by 50%, gay marriage was passed, and marijuana was legalized BUT in return total freedom of association was implemented that permitted Whites to have their own communities and institutions. Would the Left (and NeoCon globalist types on the Right) approve of this? I don’t think they would. Because when it comes down to it, the Left isn’t for the working man, or for equality, or champions of the disenfranchised,at their core they’re anti-White.

    Anti-Whiteness is the cornerstone of modern Left-wing politics.

    So called “anti-racism” is really just a code word for anti-White.

    Like


    • “You could even give in to open borders as long as Whites (or blacks, Jews, or whoever) are allowed to have their own communities and institutions.”

      I’m pretty sure this is largely reflective of what the founders had in mind; the communities were known as “states.”

      Like


    • Anti-Whiteness is the cornerstone of modern Left-wing politics.

      So called “anti-racism” is really just a code word for anti-White.

      I agree but it is mostly anti-white male

      and male is the key word here

      that is why the multi-headed monster that is leftism has one head that is called feminism which is basically hatred of white males.

      only whites ( heterosexual ) males are an non-protected demographic group under leftist establishment run nations

      females, gays, colored immigrants, they are ALL protected , but not the heterosexual white male; he is the one everyone hates

      leftism is anti-white male

      Like


  62. on November 24, 2012 at 8:21 pm Adolf Socrates

    The only reason why the typical leftist is contemptible is he lives in a fantasy world. Such people keep saying that most whites are too dumb, too primitive, too ignorant, and too evil to be left alone: that the moral thing to do is to improve them, by force if necessary. And they are absolutely right. So they have the premise right, it’s everything else they don’t get. They don’t even get that their premise applies to the vast majority of humanity and not just heterosexual white males or whatever. But a lot of you guys don’t have your premise anywhere near the ballpark, so I wouldn’t be so quick to judge.

    The problem isn’t government. The problem is the U.S. government. There’s a difference there that some of you might want to acknowledge in your rhetoric. Take a look at the Nordic countries to see how it’s done. If they had eugenic policies as well they’d be fine pretty much forever and would at some point colonise the galaxy, as a hobby.

    Basically, the redistribution of wealth, welfare, big government, forcing babies to listen to Mozart, and so on, all of it is great and would be even greater if coupled with eugenic policies, but not so great when applied to whole populations that won’t be able to do anything for themselves ever because no one has a realistic plan regarding how to actually improve them. Affirmative action is just another way to dumb society down to their level — exactly what shouldn’t be done. It’s improvement that should be done, and you can’t improve anything by lowering standards. Any leftists here? I want to ask, how on earth does turning a first-world country into a third-world one help anyone? Isn’t the opposite what we should be doing?

    Ayn Rand. All you need to know about her is she is in hell now. She admired child-killers like William Hickman and thought eugenics was too humane a way to get rid of “parasites”: let nature do the dirty work, with all the needless suffering that that involves. And nevermind that nature will get rid of the Stephen Hawkings of this world just as readily as any other cripples. No, really, she was a failure as a human being and her ideas were rubbish.

    Like


    • Steven Hawkins actually does productive work, he’s not a parasite.

      You are confusing Darwin and Rand. As usual attacking straw men and conflating one thing with another.

      And yes, government is the problem, not just the US government. It was their government that decided to let the black muslims into the country and give them GOVERNMENT assistance.

      Things improve when you let the losers lose instead of letting them run things.

      Like


      • on November 27, 2012 at 3:31 pm Adolf Socrates

        The rulers treat the voters like livestock because they vote like livestock, talk like livestock, work like livestock, eat like livestock, watch livestock TV shows and listen to livestock music, argue over livestock issues, use livestock logic, think livestock thoughts, and protest like livestock when their rights are abused.

        The question is no longer about whether to start a revolution in a barnyard to free the animals. It’s about whether to do something to make them more like humans (eugenics) and how exactly to govern them in the meanwhile.

        If you are patient with the leftists and other “enemies”, you may have some effect on how the last two questions are resolved.

        Like


      • Peter South
        Steven Hawkins actually does productive work, he’s not a parasite—————————
        Yeah, but he got a whole lot of HELP before he ever produced anything other than shit and buckets of drewl. Should everybody get help? or should it be a lottery based on skin color? In addition what should be the delay in our return on investment?

        Like


    • Along with a eugenic policy a program of socialization is required that instills a sense of destiny in the folk. Cultural Marxism, or equalist, or anti-White pollution would be outlawed, the same way its illegal to pollute rivers and oceans. I don’t think it’s necessary to tax at the same level of the Nordics. The German model is better.

      Like


    • I want to ask, how on earth does turning a first-world country into a third-world one help anyone?

      you are asking a rational question that deserve a rational answer to people who see everything through emotions,

      the typical liberal would filter this through his emotional brain and tell you that it is a nice thing to do to help poor third world immigrants EVEN if the way we do it fails and in the end we are all poor.

      It is the thought that counts!

      Liberals tend to not be very rational, that is why now they have been in charge everything is in decay.

      Like


  63. Finally someone who gets it. Excellent post.

    Like


    • I was going to write a retort to these fuckholes, but somebody else already did it for me:

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-21/guest-post-statist-thugs-and-rocks-they-crawl-out-under

      Sweden? Norway? The most feminized pantywaist countries in all of Europe as an example of “how it’s done”? You’ve got to be fucking kidding.

      Like


      • on November 25, 2012 at 8:46 am Adolf Socrates

        What? Somebody else already wrote on this topic? I must rewrite my entire philosophy!

        Like


      • The libertardian golden age was the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. If ever there were a bunch of sociopaths it was the industrialists who paid a nickel a day and dumped their toxic waste in the rivers and streams. These are the people who sent the national guard to kill women and children when the coal miners got to uppity when they asked to be paid in actual US dollars instead of company currency that was only accepted at company stores.

        Many of the top industrialists today, who libertardians want to eat the corn out of their stool, are the people who organize global government at the BIlderberg meetings. There’s an FBI program called “infraGard” that gives the heroes of capitalism the opportunity to “share information” with the FBI.

        I can hear the libertardians now:

        FREEDOM!!!! All Hail Alisa Rosenbaum!!! Down with statists, those fuckholes won’t let us pollute the streams no more. God damn statists are failures as people because they won’t let us work 8 year olds in the factories.God damn statist nazi commies who want 40 hour work weeks need to celebrate their FREEDOM to work 80 hours work weeks at a dime an hour. What’s wrong with these fucking fuckholes? Hail Rothbard!!! Freedom!!!

        Like


      • If you know even the basic tenets of libertarian thought, your post belies it.

        By definition, someone who sends armed agents of the state to attack coal miners exercising their right of free association cannot be libertarian. There are few, if any “top industrialists today” who are even remotely libertarian, given corporate subidies at the expense of tax payers and government-enforced regulations that quell competition and destroy small business. Bilderbergers and libertarians are as antithetical as they could be. Libertarians generally oppose govermnent at all levels, but explicity so in a centralized entity or at the global scale. Most especially is libertarianism opposed to a monetary system involving coercion or fraud.

        Like


      • Unions were necessary a hundred years ago because employees were mistreated

        but now that unions are very powerful they have become drunk with this power and have become the tyrants; they want more and more and more and do not care if the people who pays their salary – be it a private enterprise or a government – goes bankrupt, it is all about me! me ! me ! and wanting more! more ! more!

        same with feminism, there was some abuse going on ( not as much as feministst claim though as we know now ) and women needed to do something about it, but now feminists have a lot of power they are drunk with this power and have replaced a mild tyrany with a bigger one.

        the oppressed have become the oppressors
        and this is true of almost everything supported by the left

        what was true in the 1800s or early 1900s has now changed, you can not compare has role have been reversed

        Like


      • I just ignore them and move on.

        Like


  64. on November 24, 2012 at 9:56 pm Hopeless Romantic

    “But if by some miracle the right found its balls, if the spirit of Khan suddenly moved them to action…”

    You mean this guy?

    Like


  65. I have sometimes wondered whether the Democratic party may be vulnerable to subversion….

    Think about it. Demographics basically ensure Democratic hegemony from 2016 forward. If you want to be involved in politics and have an impact, you might as well join the Democratic party….outside of solid red states in middle America you might as well shoot yourself if you join the Republican party.

    Suppose a group of dedicated manosphere type social conservatives joined the Democratic party….could it possibly open up with a social message parallel to that of the mainstream Democratic line, and subsequently win a socially conservative, white male demographic that the Democratic party will find themselves having to cater to? This is some seriously conspiratory shit but it’s not much more far fetched than living in the late 70s and thinking the Democratic south could vote en masse for Reagan.

    Like


  66. […] Heartiste’s usually wise, insightful, and excellent blog has a pile of silly advice: What A Future American Right Party Can Do To Win […]

    Like


  67. Someone was defending STEM immigrants and got a beating from PA. I would like to add another point.

    Did anyone here noticed that bonds from Sony and Panasonic were downgraded to JUNK status? I mean JUNK. They weren’t Investment Grade since the crisis, and this week both were rated JUNK

    This says a lot about the smartness of Asians. We are talking here about the creme de la creme of Asia, its Northeast corner, and after two generations being coccooned by American power Japan is deflating into irrelevance.

    Take away whites, and Asians cannot created anything by themselves. CHinese had gunpowder for a thousand years Asian men are a huge drag for any white country

    Like


    • ========================================

      I wouldn’t sell the Japanese short altogether, and they do have quite a few notable patents dating back to the 1930′s…

      But the Asians, especially the Indians, are certainly not the powerhouse intellects they’re made out to be, from my experience in technology fields… for every one that was worth their salary, there were five or six merely competent, and a not insignificant number “faking it” until sussed out after several months… it takes that long in bigger corporations because mid-level managers in technology are often untrained in the very tasks they allegedly manage.

      Like


  68. Larry Auster is wrong – Obama’s reelection is the best thing to have happened to American Right. It’s like there are jets of oxygen of awakened minds amidst the carbon monixide.

    I have to disagree. Obama’s reelection buried the American right… Now the only way out of this mess is for America to break-up just like that other proposition nation, the Soviet Union, did a generation ago

    Like


  69. “…And this isn’t as much a rep/dem issue as it is one of stanching the bloodflow to a tick…401k retirement accounts represent a torrent of tribute to Wall Street.:

    Didn’t Wall Street overwhelmingly donate to Romney’s campaign, Wall Street loved Romney. Ending 401K’s is not going to do a damn thing to the left not when jackasses like Romney say he is going to make life so miserable for illegal immigrants that they would self-deport. He forgot he needs Hispanics to win some swing states, Obama has deported more illegal immigrants than Bush did, but he’s not talking about it. The right wants their nominees to repeatedly talk about everything controversial :taxes, immigration, abortion & then wonder why they lost.

    Next time chose better candidates. The right would have defeated Obama if they nominated Jon Hunstman Jr or even Ron Paul.

    Michelle Bachmann, Hermain Cain, Rick Santorum sound bat shit crazy to any normal person. Newt Gingrich and Romney are 2 faced dirty liars, Etch a sketch anywhere the wind blows moddasuckas!!!

    Like


  70. A whole paragraph of one of my comments above was eaten by wordpress. This is why the last paragraph makes no sense

    Like


  71. Follow the recommendations in this post, and I guarantee that the Republicans will be the big losers for the 2016 election as well (they’ll probably do fine in 2014, as turnout will be lower and low turnout always benefits the GOP). Might as well face it — demographics are changing, and short of ending suffrage for women and minorities, there’s little the GOP can do but end the hard right line its been taking. I know, you conservatives think the party has been way too liberal, but compare your average Tea Party candidate to Reagan and you’ll see that the Tea Party Republican is more conservative by far.

    Like


    • Look, the only way out of this rut the Republicans will find themselves in is to become more pro-liberty. Get the idea and message across that government shouldn’t be involved in many of the affairs it is involved in today (and will be by 2016)!

      If Republicans go liberal, they would become irrelevant, as the Republicans will never out-liberal the Democrats! By becoming more liberal, the Republicans would open a void by disenfranchising the libertarian, “do-it-yourself” contingent and allow a 3rd party to rise to equal power (optimistic), or squeeze out the Republicans (pessimistic).

      Instead, if the Republicans go libertarian, they would in essence be countering the Democrats’ move toward centralized authoritarianism. If we do not get a check on the Republican party, the Democrats could very likely bring us into a 1984-lite scenario with a strong Democrat party and two relatively weak Republican and Libertarian lame-duck parties.

      If America goes one party, jump ship asap as all hope is lost!

      Like


      • I could maybe get behind that idea if they would actually go libertarian. There are so many posers in the Tea Party. Look at Michele Bachmann…carrying around Ayn Rand (and I highly doubt she’s made it past the first chapter of Atlas Shrugged) and in the same breath talking about banning porn. And there’s plenty more just like her.

        Like


    • The sexual demographics are not changing. They will always be the same.

      Like


      • You’re right in the sense of pure male to female ratio, Woland, but there’s more to it than that. More single women these days…and single women are more likely to vote for Dems and married women. So the basic sexual demographics may not have changed, but the impact of women on elections has.

        Like


      • *more likely to vote for dems than married women

        I hate when I catch myself making typos

        Like


  72. on November 25, 2012 at 10:08 pm Beautiful Truths Ignored

    Ignoring all its other merits, the comments from Porter alone make Mangans a great blog.

    Like


  73. The Republican’s only hope, with the Democrats’ full acceptance of Bolshevik-ism, is to move more toward libertarian principles. I would go so far as to say a full Ron Paul “Revolution” is in order.

    Liberty is popular, and many people who supported Ron Paul didn’t vote for Romney. I know a couple who voted for Obama because in their minds they saw him as the fastest route to boil the pot. I personally voted for Gary Johnson as I refuse to buy into the lie Romney was presenting. That fool is a Republican Slick Willie and was sellin’ the party voters a bag of lies!

    In all honesty the torch of liberty has been slowly fading for a half-century or more. The people, generation by generation, grow up on chemical sterilents and mental retardants, are majorily spoon-fed propaganda and ‘proper’ conduct, and grow more dependent on the state welfare systems. As people with shrinking options and a growing buffet of distractions, they panic and cling on to something safe and familiar, taking the easiest and least-painful path. Satiating the short-term want takes precedence over realizing long-term need. This is one of the reasons poverty is hard to escape for many people.

    Like


    • We already have a “fuck whitey” party for SWPL assholes. What good will another one do us? Trying to peddle it as liberty isn’t fooling anyone with the brains god gave earthworms.

      Like


  74. 1. The Republican party isn’t forever. It was only formed in the mid-19th century, when p[previous parties (Whigs, Know-Nothings, Federalists) had petered out. The Republican party can be torn down and replaced by the Tea Party or some other organization.

    2. The Right today focuses on FDR’s New Deal as a huge loss, Waterloo-style. But the second great Waterloo-like-loss for the right was when Buckley, et al. abandoned the people of the South and stood for de-segregation, even if a business was doing it on its own merit (i.e. non de jure segregation).

    Abandoning the right to bar people from your business allowed social chaos to develop, and was a huge win for the communist-led Faggot/Nigger/Feminazis forces.

    If you want to destroy the welfare state today, individual Jim Crow must be brought back first. Once people can self-determine behavior again in their monetary/business lives, they will see how non-black environments in work are infinitely more productive and peaceful than ones with blacks in them. And once that occurs…..the non-blacks will resent subsidizing lazy, shiftless, violent blacks. Bingo, the welfare state will recede.

    The Civil Rights Act must be repealed, as well as it’s descendants.

    Like


    • “The Civil Rights Act must be repealed, as well as it’s descendants.”
      ————–

      OK, but the key is, all the programs to help black people were only done to artificially increase our level of consumption; especially, our ability to take on debt. Matter of fact, I call the “Civil War”, the “War to make Black People Need Money”.

      Like


  75. […] [What A Future American Right Party Can Do To Win] […]

    Like


  76. It has been said that feminists seek to prevent the formation and existence of “males spaces” in order to prevent the formation of dissent against feminism. Is it possible that leftists promote integration for a similar reason?

    For example, look at how much time and energy us men spend fighting each other right here on this site?

    Our only saving grace is that this is a safe place to focus on game.

    In a public school, all the different groups would spend all their time informing on each other.

    I suspect prisons are integrated for the same reason.

    Prevent the formation or existence of “safe” spaces where men may conspire.

    Like


  77. Debunking the femens, french style:

    http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Les-FEMEN-ni-putes-ni-soumises-15096.html

    (pictures are enough to understand).

    Like


    • I speak french

      basically it shows evidence that two of the women were prostitutes,
      in other words fake protesters hired by some weird feminist group.
      not a grassroot thing at all.

      and it shows that those women who claim to be neither subserviant nor whores are in fact whores ( well two of them are for sure )

      feminists are dumb

      Like


  78. I’d like to see the right demand redistribution of free time. Require the nothing to do takers to do some housekeeping and landscaping for the time pressed taxpayers.

    Like


    • I think we should tax fame, status, and power as well as wealth.

      How many fame whore Hollywood lefties and status-conscious Demonrat shitheads would want their fame, status and power “redistributed”?

      Could you imagine how nuts Scumbag Jon Stewart, Billy “the Ugly beta” Maher, and Will ” I hate middle America” Ferrell would be if they were no longer famous or be ble to didactically tell America how to behave whilst being interviewed?

      They’d probably join Al-Queda.

      Like


      • If Hollywood stars -and they are almost ALL liberals – had to share air time with less fortunate actors and show hosts…

        well cows would fly

        they would never allow that , they are far more the so called evil 1% of rich than Romney is.

        they do not even deserve the money they get unlike Romney

        too bad most humans are too dumb to see this obvious fact

        no one – on the left – ever noticed that no Hollywood stars participated in the Occupy Wall street thing because, well as I said those stars ARE the evil 1 % !!!

        liberals are so brainwashed words escape me

        Like


      • None of them participated fully, or at least to my knowledge, but there were plenty of celebs involved in Occupy to some extent. Roseanne Barr, Susan Sarandon, Mark Ruffalo and Michael Moore are a few examples. Although honestly, I think Michael Moore would help their cause more if he kept his fat ass at home.

        Like


      • The reason most of them are lock-step lefties is because non-liberals keep their opinions to themselves, if they know what’s good for them.

        Except for very few exceptions who have already established themselves (e.g., Eastwood)… because once you’re pegged as “not one of us”, the jobs and opportunities dry up… and it’s an awfully tough business to catch a break in to begin with… extremely dependent upon networking and getting in with the “in” crowd.

        I’m sure there are still some naive babes who think talent is all it takes, and the left-leaning just happen to be the lucky ones with the majority of talent. :rolleyes

        Like


  79. Amazing circularity and arrogance… no solutions..no intelligent analysis of figures… just an echo chamber of the lazy saying “left, liberals, socialists” over, and over, and over…congratulating themselves…

    Stick with the game stuff. The paranoia symptoms include the grandiosity to think your complaints are useful ideas.

    Like


  80. Off-topic, but the message is getting out:

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/24/war-on-men/

    Like


    • A female friend of mine just put that article up on her Facebook. She also is the only person I know in real life who actually uses the terms “alpha male” and “beta male” in the CH sense. I wonder if she reads this site.

      Like


  81. What would you guys say is the age cutoff for sleeping with college aged girls? I’m 25 and feel like the door to prime poon is quickly shutting. Would an in shape 30 year old guy be able to pull in a nightclub?

    Like


    • You’re asking two different questions; puling with college-aged girls, and pulling with them in a nightclub.

      Either way, the answer is around age 120, if you go to the right nightclub.

      Like


      • Well, I don’t know where you’d meet them aside from clubs. Online is futile if you’re not an 8 in looks and under 30, and girls are super uptight about being approached during the day.

        I never see guys over 30 with hot young girls when I go out. Mid 20’s seems to be the oldest they’ll go, with few exceptions.

        Like


      • When young chicks hang out with or look for older guys, they prefer to go where older people are, not people the same age.

        Like


      • Dude, bartend/bounce in the college neighborhood. Perfectly ok to bang every girl there even at age 99. In my college neighborhood, I regularly saw a 40+ Asian bartender going home with college honeys.

        If you don’t work in a college neighborhood, you *can* pick them up at college bars, but you need to recruit the staff to your side. College chicks do get skeeved out by older, loner males who only pop up at certain times and no one knows; unless you’re Sean Connery circa 1962 or Bill Murray now, you’ll get little help, but then again, Sean Connery in 1962 wouldn’t hang at a college bar. Bill Murray would.

        To do the hang out, try out a few college bars and find one that you like—and the staff seems friendly. Come in regularly for a few weeks on Sun-Wed (slower nights in college) and chat up the bartenders and wait staff and bouncers (and owner, if around). Know their names, be a good guy.

        After a bit, they will know you, you’re drink, and that you’re a good guy. So if you start coming in on busier nights, they’ll serve you first, and if a girl seems shaky on how “creepy” you are, the bartender will cover for you, as will the waitstaff and bouncer. The owner buying you drinks is a clincher. Your creepiness disappears if the staff covers for you.

        The best is if a female bartender is buddy-buddy with you. She gives female and bartender social proof. Once she tells a girl how cool you are, you’ll be seeing the inside of a dorm room’s ceiling for the first time in years.

        P.S. This is a good plan in general (i.e. even for non college girls), which is why I have a few bars where I’m a regular rather than a wide slice of bars I ramble into. A staff member who vouches for you is gold, Jerry, liquid gold.

        Like


      • Online is futile if you’re not an 8 in looks and under 30

        Online is futile if you’re not female. There.

        Like


      • If you’re willing to give the money to the girl instead of the friggin restaurant, online is the furthest thing from futile.

        Like


      • Online is a wealth of young women. I’m a hideous 33 year old man and am dating a cute (7ish) 23 year old college girl from the interwebs.

        Like any interaction with women, you just have to do it right and not be a beta creeper. A non-opener opening email, make them chase you, etc.

        The internet is a treasure trove for those of us too poor and anti-club to go to clubs.

        Like


  82. Thirty years from now, the Republican party will have split into two right-wing parties — an economic one, and a social/racial one.

    The economic party will be a con game, using a charismatic multiracial demagogue to attract poor people of all stripes. (Imagine a deceitful Cory Booker funded entirely by crony capitalists.) He’ll bait-and-switch these people into voting against their own economic interest, which will become even easier as the quality of our education declines. This will be the party of war. This will also be the party of big government.

    The social/racial party will be solidly white, incredibly ignorant, mostly regional, and irrelevant on a national level.

    Like


    • You’re already irrelevant on a universal level.

      Like


    • Sweetheart, Michael Clarke Duncan was a worthless nigger who deserved to die. And fat in animal food does not cause heart disease, sugar & carbs do.

      Don’t cry too hard when denying these truths, sweetheart.

      Like


      • Whorefinder, how many black prostitutes did you maim over the holiday weekend? Did you stuff the turkey with dressing made out of their innards? What does it feel like to crush a black woman’s windpipe with your bare hands?

        Like


      • how many black prostitutes did you maim over the holiday weekend?
        —Dunno, but your mom was one of them.

        Did you stuff the turkey with dressing made out of their innards?
        —Just Michael Clarke Duncan’s, Sweetheart.

        What does it feel like to crush a black woman’s windpipe with your bare hands?
        —-Does your mom count?

        Like


      • How many women have you killed?

        Like


      • Again, does your mom count?

        Like


      • My mom’s already passed. How many whores have you beaten in the last year?

        Like


      • My mom’s already passed.
        —How did you find the body so soon? I hid it extra well….I mean, nothing!

        How many whores have you beaten in the last year?
        —Does your mom count? She was selling on the corner when I picked her up….

        Like


  83. Jon Huntsman might have actually beaten Obama, but only looney theocrats and plutocrats are allowed to have a voice in the GOP. Rational conservatism is verboten.

    The Democrats will win again in 2016 because Republicans are too dumb to get this. Maybe the GOP will be dissolved by 2020. We can hope.

    Like


  84. Your blog used to be good, but now whenever I read it it’s covered with thinly veiled white supremacist nonsense. Really disappointing

    Like


    • Not as disappointing as seeing your country turn into a 3rd world shithole, though.

      Like


    • Translation: “Why won’t you support Mein Obama, the savior of us all! Keynes! Redistribution! Feminazisms! Fagism! It’s all whitey’s fault! I suck nigger cock!”

      Like


    • Yeah, not even thinly veiled either. And given the low quality of comments like whorefinder’s above, this blog is being somewhat hijacked by lunatics.

      Like


  85. The information disseminated to people is controlled. It doesn’t matter what party far right or far left makes it to the national podium. Everything people see or read is controlled.

    Look no further than Ron Paul’s presidential run and earlier, Dennis Kucinich. The only thing the most people know about Ron Paul (if they know his name) is that he “can’t win” and is “a nut”. The only thing they know about Dennis Kucinich (if they know his name) is that he “saw a UFO”.

    The U.S. populace has had several chances to vote 3rd party. Ralph Nader, Ron Paul, Gary Johnson. Gary Johnson got 1% of the vote in 2012 Romney vs. Obama puppet election. So either the voting machines are rigged or people are not voting third party.

    Like


  86. on November 27, 2012 at 1:37 pm youareallwankers

    The best what Republicans and rightie white politicians in general can do is learn some game

    The trouble is in current West lefties and gimmedats appear as “cool kids”.
    White men take a role of nerdy, reliable beta guy who is always used and abused, because he wants to be liked.

    This is a gameplan for white race :

    – Apply David X `s 2 rules

    1st Rule – Who cares what they `re thinking ?

    2nd Rule – I am the most important person in relationship

    then apply some more tactics in every day llife

    – do everything to pay as little taxes as possible , consider becoming selfemployed
    – refuse to do business and giving your money to enemies of your race , build network of friends and business relationships inside your race
    – support people of your race

    Like


  87. on November 27, 2012 at 1:39 pm youareallwankers

    In UK, which is becoming more and more PC multikulti hellhole most of the blacks , asians and other dark races already applying above tactics

    why whites don`t ?

    Like


    • It’s a matter of our Achilles heel… a sense of justice and fair play, with a touch of Christian charity.

      Like


  88. on November 27, 2012 at 1:44 pm youareallwankers

    This is how to use game agains the political enemies :

    agree and amplify

    Enemy (if is black) – You are racissss !

    You : Yes , but you are racist as well

    Enemy ;????

    You: Because you attacking me for being white

    Like


    • Good read. Interesting insight into how the GOP has intellectually deteriorated in recent years. The circumstances of right-wing big shots suppressing dissenting voices and Fox News playing thought police are thinly veiled secrets at this point, but it’s always worthwhile hearing from a former high-profile insider.

      Like


  89. Republicans haven’t really started digesting the issue as of yet. In no particular order, here’s a few things they will need to consider become they regain the lost ground or at least stop the bleeding:
    – They should pledge allegiance to the union of the states and not to grover norquist
    – Attempts to get rid of science-based, public education will not fly, ever
    – The people whose position in life does not involve a silver spoon since birth are not necessarily moochers
    – The republican party is supposed to be liberal; those who forget it, don’t know their roots. Perhaps the circumstances have changed over time, but there’s a
    snowball’s chance in hell that Lincoln would have declared himself a Republican today.
    – Additionally, “conservative” shouldn’t mean bigoted and inflexible, there are elements of policy such as fiscal responsibility, welfare reform or small business promotion that can certainly be championed; if republicans devoted one tenth of the energy to the former rather than protecting counter-productive, outsourcing-heavy, mega-conglomerate interests then their voice would certainly be heard
    – It’s a perfect time to follow the common sense approach and close down the non-essential military bases scattered around the world, vote in favor to end the wars and shut-down the secret and not-so-secret American concentration camps.
    – The phrase “Ronald Reagan” is not a synonym for “Common Sense”, neither is “Sarah Palin”
    – Stop repeating false mantras, there is no correlation between taxes for the wealthy and unemployment in the last 30 years, I looked at the data, perhaps Republican strategists should do that too
    – The government is independent of any religion by an unambiguous constitutional proclamation. It is not Christian or Muslim or Cargo Cult. The basic ethics of the Western world owe far more to Athenian law than to subsequent middle eastern developments.

    Like


  90. Obviously you know nothing. If you compare the contributions at this election, the “rich” are getting their dick sucked by you all. Go ahead with your plan, you will get gagged by the collective dicks of your rich rising up in protest.

    BTW, TheShrike makes sense, no matter his party affiliation.

    Like


    • In an economic crisis the rich are barely affected while the average joe and the poor are affected a lot.

      voting for Obama was voting for an economic crisis ( even the main stream media is not able to conceal this fact anymore ), thus the average joe and the poor voted to punish themselves

      and the rich are laughing all the way to the bank no matter who gets elected

      Like


  91. Rand Paul 2016

    Like