Just A Reminder

“I say that inner beauty doesn’t exist. That’s something that unpretty women invented to justify themselves.” – Osmel Sousa, honored guest of Chateau Heartiste





Comments


  1. on November 8, 2013 at 11:49 am Jonathan Christopher

    Are those women???

    Like


    • Something is seriously wrong with your group when Amanda Marcotte is the best looking one in it. I honestly can’t tell if the one on the far right is a dude or a chick.

      Like


      • It’s a chick. If it was a dude, it’d have more chin stubble and a neckbeard.

        Like


      • i actually think the dyke to her right (our left) like mine looks better than marcotte. i honestly wouldn’t even be surprised to learn that aMANduh had a little penis somewhere close to her ladyparts.

        Like


      • i actually think the dyke to her right (our left) like mine looks better than marcotte

        She has more feminine features (no man-jaw) but (and I can’t believe I’m saying this) Marcotte actually looks like a woman with her long hair and lipstick.

        Like


      • The Jewess on the far left has a big rack.

        Or maybe she’s Cherokee?

        Like


      • So true. Contrast is everything. Thought, “One in the middle is okay, feminine at least,” then realized who it was.

        So flip the contrast: if one of these ogres were placed next to a beautiful women, they could truly be interpreted as monsters. It was these sorts of juxtapositions of beauties and hags which undoubtedly fueled the imaginations of the Brothers Grimm, Mary Shelley, Edgar Allen Poe, and other writers of classical horror.

        Like


      • brutal née to a woman: “You make me think of Edgar Allen Poe.”

        Like


      • on November 9, 2013 at 9:25 pm Modern Primitive

        The cheerleader effect in action.

        Like


    • Looking at the tranny in the blue dress, the manjaw with crimson lips, or bowlcut mcbangs in the back there….it’s hard to say really.

      Like


    • The one with fake red hair and glasses has a reasonably attractive face, apart from that…ugh.

      Like


  2. can’t we call sociopathy, opportunism, and self-centered rationalization inner beauty?

    no?

    Like


  3. Rude and unnecessary to show their picture. If I was related to any of them, I would find you on street and show you how Alpha I am…..enjoy most of your work though.

    Dan in DC

    Like


    • Lighten up, Francis.

      Like


    • These are professional feminists.

      Like


    • if I was related to any of them I’d skip Thanksgiving.

      Like


    • So you are going to beat some CH ass for a table of feminazi butch bulldykes? Got it… makes total sense now.

      Like


      • hey, he said that his sister was a ugly bulldyke. check your privilege, jay!

        Like


      • I’m not going to do anything but comment from my office. I do think it’s rude to mock someone’s unfortunate appearance. If I cared about any of them it would be a different story. You can still have manners and know the deal.

        Like


      • > “I do think it’s rude to mock someone’s unfortunate appearance.”

        In general I completely agree with you.

        And yet, part of me wonders: Could there be some underlying Darwinian evo-psych truth at work here?

        So that, on average [with plenty of exceptions – but ON AVERAGE], most of the time, with respect to most of the people you will meet in your life, maybe you really can read a book by its cover?

        I.e. when we see one of these, ah, young ladies, might we have something deeply embedded in our genes which causes the hair to stand up on the back of our necks and causes that voice in the back of our heads to say, “Uh-oh, this one could be a problem”?

        And, ON AVERAGE, might that voice actually be correct?

        And yes, if true, then it would definitely have to be called an, ah, “ugly” truth, but, hey, there’s a reason that they call this the Dark Enlightenment.

        Like


      • Ugliness spreads from the core.

        Like


      • Simple heuristics.

        Like


      • Monstrum in fronte, monstrum in animo.

        Why cite that hack Darwin when Nietzsche already uncovered this verity explicitly? You overestimate the enemy, romanticist. A philosophy that enthralls the great unwashed doesn’t necessarily imbue it with integrity. Ideas built upon lies and errors are houses of cards.

        Beautiful young girls make themselves ugly all the time — piercings, tattoos, short hair, nasty disposition. It is an expression of their soul manifesting itself on their appearance. Any one of those women can dignify themselves by indulging in femininity, rather than cursing it through their fashion and attitude selections. Make-up, hair, modest clothing, and a soupçon of sweetness will go a very long way, turning them from hideous to average.

        Now what does that have to do with “evolution” and “survival of the fittest”? These are the mental contortions Darwin congregants play with themselves in order to be confident in their unexamined dogma. You are giving their creed undue recognition by, like them, confusing the terminology “evolutionarily consistent” with simple “truth.” How is it true? Pro Aristotle, “I have observed it” will suffice for our purposes.

        Let me venture this possibility: you reject Darwin dogmaticism but thrill to its supposed exposition of “dark” and difficult-to-swallow truths. Well, so do I. But given that its epistemology is suspect, I don’t have to genuflect before its idols. But I empathize with a further discomfort you will not name, which is, men jealous of their freedom reject dogma, even true dogma, in all its forms on the general principle of bowing before no authority but themselves. Chase that instinct. Darwinism is feminism is atheism is nihilism is omegas in labcoats trying to tell men like us, preposterously, Whom are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

        Matt

        Like


      • Dork enlightenment: Losers who kick people while they’re down. How heroic.

        Like


      • What would White Fang do?

        Like


      • No its not rude dummy,as these are NOT kindergarten teachers,critical care nurses,nice working class sales girls,small town housewives…these are FEMINIST CUNTS!! Did you not get the memo,asshole??

        Like


      • Now, a real alpha wouldn’t get phased that these women are a bit pissed off, because he got him a nice bitch at home who isn’t. He would bemusedly observe, “They’re a little irritable, don’t you think?”

        Hissy fits over abstractions are for bitches.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2013 at 1:12 pm The Burninator

        How’s that armor fitting, Dan? Did you go with full plate & mail combo, or did you settle for the more breathable and comfortable lorica segmentata?

        Like


      • I think you have the concept of white knighting confused but you do seem to know a lot about medieval times….is it all the role-playing games?

        Like


      • on November 8, 2013 at 1:27 pm The Burninator

        Well, Dan, these are apparently actual dyed in the wool feminists. They are crusading (if you’ll excuse the pun) to convince women to hate men. As such they are legitimate targets for *any* kind of ridicule that can be heaped upon their pointy heads. When you intervene to defend them, using some vague appeal to “lookism”, you are in fact displaying the white knight tendencies so often noticed on your average beta schlub.

        My knowledge of medieval armor and terminology comes from spending time reading and studying Western history with some level of attention to detail. I’m also quite fluent in other eras as well. I even, gasp, speak other languages, as confusing as that may seem to you. Not everybody thinks that intelligence is a weakness, as you seem to, Dan.

        Now go suit up son, there are passels more anti-male, man hating feminists to go out and joust on the behalf of. Don’t touch their proffered silk handkerchief though, that just can’t be healthy.

        Like


      • Read what I wrote and stop trying so hard.

        Like


      • The only thing anyone here is trying (and failing) to do is stop laughing at you, bucko.

        Like


      • No.

        Like


      • Hey Dan, are you the one in the foreground in the blue dress?

        Like


      • on November 8, 2013 at 1:36 pm The Burninator

        I read what you wrote, Dan. The response was measured and accurate.

        At this point this is your problem. Maybe one of them will give you sex, if you keep it up!

        Slainte

        Like


      • I was not defending them. I despise their politics. Better ways to attack them then mocking their albeit unfortunate looks. They’re helpless, humorless, stupid women and CH is a smart, funny guy. Why punch down?

        [CH: because i’m a menace to propriety.]

        Like


      • If they were genuinely pretty on the inside, we wouldn’t be mocking them. You don’t see Mother Theresa’s photos up here being mocked. These people suck, and they’re crappy haircuts and clothes and overall appearance is a reflection of their contempt for Western Civ. Eff these ugly hoes!

        Like


      • Did the elephant man go around taking selfies?

        Like


      • on November 11, 2013 at 1:57 am Hugh G. Rection

        Mother Theresa is kind of a cunt actually.

        Like


      • Is one of your languages Irish?

        Like


    • Internet toughguy … glad to see it making a comeback after dying out in 1999.

      Like


    • Not just any old tough guy, but an internet tough guy!

      Do you even lift bro?

      Like


    • Which one of them are YOU? Blue dress??

      Like


  4. Wait. Which would you rather have? A decent intelligent attentive loyal wise “5”? Or a conniving evil gold digging “10”?

    [Ch: dichotomies are rarely that false.]

    I’d take the “5” anyday. She’s inwardly more beautiful, enough to overcome the 5-point SMV difference.

    [i’d take the decent intelligent attentive loyal wise 10. lucky for me, the odds of that are better than there being a 5 with those characteristics.]

    Like


    • The 10. Cos when she goes nuts I can dump her for a decent intelligent attentive loyal 8.

      Like


    • Do you see a “5” in this group?

      Like


      • With lots alcohol , bad lighting , and something slutty on….I am still not sure is there is even one 5.

        This is a hard case(in that low SMV was not a self inflicted act of fat acceptance) , but then many of them might be good with it since I am sure one or more is lesbian.

        Like


      • Dunno man. If I have a few pints on board and I see Amanda Marcotte in bad lighting with something slutty on.. I’m thinking Plausible Deniabilitah. I probably wouldn’t tell you about it though, unless she screamed out something truly bizarre.

        Like


      • There was a time when I considered any and all justifications. When I am able to reach and rescue, I will. If asked I can provide a willingness to my ability. However if I were to observe someone fall out of my reach, I just can’t. To fly to their overtures, and seductions from the Bosom of Abraham…”I just can’t”…I know in my demon filled heart that I would first fuck the dead souls in Hades… with my will bound in the trunk.

        Like


      • The tranny in the middle might rate a 3.5.

        Like


    • Wait. Which would you rather have? A decent intelligent attentive loyal wise “5″? Or a conniving evil gold digging “10″?

      And what if those numbers were reversed?

      In my experience, there’s nothing intrinsically “decent, intelligent, attentive, loyal, wise” about less attractive girls.

      Indeed, probably the nicest ones I’ve come across were the lookers… go figure.

      Face it, the universe just ain’t the place to look for justice.

      Like


      • Every beautiful woman I’ve known has been a compassionate people-pleaser. No exceptions. As has been noted by many before me, it’s the midrange women who are nasty.

        Like


      • “In my experience, there’s nothing intrinsically “decent, intelligent, attentive, loyal, wise” about less attractive girls.”

        Well said.

        “Inner beauty”, is that the female equivalent of “Nice guy”?

        Like


    • on November 8, 2013 at 12:16 pm The Burninator

      Well liquid, you clearly don’t understand women then do you? A 5 has every chance of being as lying and coniving as a 10. Women are women are women, their nature is immutable and known. You can have your 5’s and tell yourself that she’s honest and pure, I know different and will stick with 8’s and 9’s. At least my lying conniving bitches are hot to look at when I fuck them. Good luck with the un-boner worthy “good girls” who will eventually stab you in the back and treat you like dirt.

      Like


    • If I wanted to talk to a decent intelligent attentive loyal wise “5”, I’d call my mom. But for sex? The “10”, any day.

      Like


    • on November 8, 2013 at 12:18 pm Rumpole Stiltskin

      There’s gonna be something nice about doing the 10 then kicking her out half dressed with the remainder of her clothes in the stair well.

      That picture in the post…
      This is what you want your ass to look like if you ever get sent to prison. No worth a pack a candy cigarettes combined.

      Like


    • [i’d take the decent intelligent attentive loyal wise 10. lucky for me, the odds of that are better than there being a 5 with those characteristics.]

      This was my say as well, but it got swallowed by the forum software.

      Like


      • You guys – CH & GE – seem to be making the same Darwinian evopsych point that I was trying to make above: What if you really can judge a book by its cover?

        At least on average.

        What if the “5” were, on average, more likely to be a little stupider and a little grumpier and a little more prone to, say, screaming and cursing and domestic violence?

        What did Mr Hobbes say? “Nasty, brutish, and short”?

        Boy, I don’t even enjoy thinking about stuff like this.

        But that’s the Dark Enlightenment for you – it’s definitely not for the faint of heart.

        Like


      • Right. Darwinist seculars should be the last men to believe in a fitness mix-n-match.

        Like


      • “Boy, I don’t even enjoy thinking about stuff like this.”

        Why? What makes this problematic?

        Like


      • I’m not a Darwinian Nihilist.

        I’m a Romantic.

        I want to live a life in possession of Freedom of the Will.

        I want to believe that – within limits, but within those limits, via a sufficiently determined exercise of the will – folks can pull themselves up by the bootstraps and become something other than what their conception should have predetermined them to be.

        I guess the key point here, though, would be the qualifier, “within limits”.

        Can a naturally cold shrewish hateful vengeful and HIDEOUSLY UGLY woman – who had all of those qualities burned into her biological nature when she was created – somehow receive an act of Grace [or some similar inspiration] and thereby become something better than what her genes would have otherwise dictated her to be?

        I dunno.

        Plus I’m a hardcore White Knight by nature – I just can’t help but feel sorry for the ugly chicks.

        And as I’ve said here many times at the Chateau, I’ll take an HB7, packing a few extra pounds, but with a bright cheerful optimistic personality, over any HB8/HB9/HB10, whose heart has been consumed by The Darkness [where, presumably, the consumption by Darkness was via an act of choice – an exercise of her will – rather than simply the inevitable emergence of a quality which had always been innate to her nature.]

        I just really hate this idea that folks are necessarily doomed to be what their conception predetermined them to be.

        But I’m not a fool – if there are deep dark ugly horrifying Truths to be learned from Darwinian Nihilism, then bring ’em on – let’s learn what they are.

        Just so long as they are Truths, and not Lies.

        Like


      • Ah. Predestination of this sort does seem cruel.

        Like


    • I’ll take the 10 for 10 minutes. I certainly could remain friends with any of those women in the photo, if something else held my intrest( it rarely does) , but I would have no desire to form a pair bond or mate with them. Its ugly but true. But there might be one one or two 5s in that photo at best its got some 2-4s. There are more things in this world than sex, especially in that context.

      Nature is not cruel so in this case. There is a reason why we are attracted to beautiful women. They are fit to endure the task. Mating with breastless narrow hipped women would lead to more infant mortality and death.

      Like


    • We have a saying here: “Every woman is going to become crazy with time so pick the hottest one” So I live by this!

      Like


    • The question you are really asking is this: because I — without trying — am higher value than a 4-5, assuming that you are a male 7+, the 4-5 will pick up on this and treat me like a king with minimal effort on my part.

      For a 10 to do the same, I will have to make an effort, and making an effort carries with it a chance of failure. If I fail, the 10 will treat me poorly. However, what you fail to realize is that if you lacked value to the 5…the 5 would also treat you poorly. It’s all value.

      Like


    • Bang the 10 while the 5 cooks you a meal.

      You know fat chicks can cook, right? Deeee-licous1!1

      Like


      • Im unsure if my sample counts but the fatties I know cant cook at all… its all processed microwave food and eat out

        Like


      • even add that nowadays finding a girl that knows how to cook is an uncommon thing, and young girls learning how to cook is looked down upon.
        Among my friends a lot more men that cook than women.. weird right?

        Like


      • no, they can’t. thus, fat chick.

        Like


    • @liquid chords: Au contraire! -You’d be surprised how many fugs are ferociously-nasty people with a hair-trigger for that meanness.

      And equally as surprised how many adorable California ski-bunny cheerleaders have personalities as sweet as they look.

      Like


    • That question is not as stupid as everyone is acting, but it’s not necessary. Take the ten and, as my grandpapy used to say, train her up how you want her.

      Like


    • It’s also worth mentioning that 10s tend to be meaner to unattractive guys (ie, betas and omegas) than 5s for the obvious reason that they get hit on by them a lot.

      Of course, CH has a wide range of readers, and for natural betas trying to become alphas, or lesser alphas going for greater, this might make sense. I think for those of us with more moderate natural talents (spergs and so on), it’s more sensible to look for nasty stuff like feminism, etc to avoid, and simply ignore 7s and up. Obviously a nice 10 is better than a nice 5, but we obviously can’t all have a 10.

      Like


    • Lesser betas and below rarely hit on 10s; they are more likely to just worship them from afar, giving them a wide circle of deference. The bitchiest girls tend to be ones on the lower edge of passable attractiveness. Especially ‘fives,’ who resent being seen as attainable by betas.

      A lot of uglier girls also carry a default bitch-shield as sour grapes. I’ve interacted with more than one youngish stuck-up fat pig who gave me — a man leagues above her in SMV — nasty attitude.

      Similarly, since most non-white women are below white men’s attractiveness threshold, they are anti-white — especially if they are academics or feminists. Conversely, the rare attractive non-white women are very pro-white. See Michelle Malkin.

      Like


      • Agreed.

        And as negative as it sounds, this is a good rationale for a CH-style-sociopath’s disdain for fatties and ugs; -instead of being Mr. Happy & Fun with Everybody.

        -As you outline, there are plenty of Ugs who mystifyingly will make you regret even being conversationally-pleasant to them in the least, with their warpig ‘sass’.

        It gets worse if you take it one step further with a chick you see regularly at her job, etc.

        Without leading her on abit, be Mr. Happy Conversation. And then watch her go thermonuclear 2-3 months later when you refuse to pick up the ‘hints’ or ‘windows’ she throws out there about her [yeeeesh!] ‘potential availability’. -Passively letting her know it’s never going to happen as an order-of-magnitude-higher smv guy.

        Makes you regret even being positive in their general direction at-all.

        Like


      • Indeed. Merely being civil to fugs often leads to “high hopes” on end… and when it’s not reciprocated, well… as the saying goes, hell hath no fury… watch your back.

        Like


      • PS: 90% of the fatties and ugs in my experience have responded this way.

        So there’s my bit for shooting holes in The Myth of Equalism.

        Like


  5. on November 8, 2013 at 12:18 pm The Burninator

    What in the hell is this a picture from anyway (serious question)? It honestly looks like a meeting of Social Science lesbian feminists from any given community college. Am I close?

    Like


  6. Dont be so rude with those women. They seem well over 28 and smashed -not hit- the Wall with terrible results. They are beyond good and evil.

    If they all entered a very hardcore gym, hormonal and diet routine, in six months they could be 5s. Maybe.

    Like


    • Nope. Half those women could be 6s almost without effort if they weren’t pointedly making themselves ugly. Even the androgynous one, with just a little bit of haircut work, could come across with that “short-haired sexy Russian-jewish-chick” vibe if she wanted to.

      This isn’t genetics, it’s choice.

      Like


      • Definitely. Growing out a short haircut, losing excess weight, and using some makeup will make a huge difference. It might not get them to a 9 or 10, but it would take them out of the warpig abyss. Just looking well groomed and feminine goes a long way.

        These women WANT to be physically unattractive to men, or at the very least they absolutely do not care. Most of us– men and women– care how we look and want to be attractive to the opposite sex, so we make efforts to do that. It’s healthy. Deliberately making yourself unattractive, or not giving a damn either way, is just not normal.

        [CH: dropping all efforts to keep up appearances might be a normal response by a person so low on the SMV totem pole that only herculean effort will make any difference worth mattering.]

        *credit to CH for “warpig”

        [porky’s VII: the feminist roundtable.]

        Like


      • dropping all efforts to keep up appearances might be a normal response by a person so low on the SMV totem pole that only herculean effort will make any difference worth mattering.

        This is correct.

        Most heterosexual feminists are ugly women who simply cannot accept their low SMV. Desirable men pay them no attention, and it infuriates them. Rather than accepting the fact that they’re never going to be hot babes and just trying to do the best they can, they turn to feminism to assuage their egos. The most zealous converts will abandon all efforts to improve their looks (degree of zealotry is inversely correlated with SMV; the mediocre ones will “objectify” themselves while hypocritically denouncing “objectification”).

        Like


      • “Even the androgynous one”, happycrow?

        That doesn’t narrow it down much, man. Could you give me a clue?

        None of them has any “short-haired sexy Russian-jewish-chick” potential that I can see. I’m guessing you’re talking about Orange T-shirt, but I then look at the bags under her eyes and the yellow horseteeth and the early-stage double chin and I think I can’t possibly be right.

        Or is it Ms Right-Handed Baby of the Group, next to her? But then she doesn’t look even slightly Russian or Jewish, to these tired old eyes.

        Like


      • Birth-control glasses are real. A little effort can go a long, LONG way. None of these gals would stand out at a club or in a crowd of truly attractive women, but with just a little work, they’d be liberated from incipient-cat-lady status.

        Like


    • Post-wall women trying to force their dogma onto pre-wall women.

      Evil, I say.

      Like


  7. Yeah, I’m really not up with dissing people who through no fault of their own didn’t win the genetic lottery.

    Like


  8. I’ve ridden my share of butterfaces in my lifetime, but man.
    I think I’d hand the reins back to the stableboy here.

    Interesting tidbit: gender studies departments in Europe tend to be a bit different, and ahead of the Cathedral curve. You won’t hear “silly…I’m a woman, you’re a man” as the justification for why an AMERICAN gender studies student wants to ride your joystick…

    Like


  9. this is as close as these broads have been to a cock in years!

    Like


  10. Sousa is so gay (can see it in the video), it seems so strange he would influence the market in this direction… european designers try to make women boyish

    Like


  11. the second from the left looks to possibly have potential; she looks bangable but i can’t tell if her shirt sleeve is naturally loose or if it is tight against massive-hidden-arms-curl-bro-arms

    Like


  12. Do you think the individual ratings are influenced by the group as a whole? The girl with the short hair in the middle doesn’t seem all that bad… but she’s definitely surrounded by some unfortunate looking women. Generally speaking, does a cute girl seem less cute if she’s in a very unattractive group? Does a 5-6 seem hotter if she’s surrounded by 9s? Just curious.

    Like


    • on November 8, 2013 at 1:41 pm The Burninator

      Can’t speak for others, but for me no, each woman is judged individually. Collective influence doesn’t really come into play. Plus the rating is a function of how one presents oneself as well (hence why women can up their rating by growing longer hair, keeping in shape and wearing nice makeup). The middle chick shows every sign of angry-soccer-mom-short hair bobbed tomfoolery that throws her rating down several notches in my estimation.

      Like


      • “angry-soccer-mom-short hair bobbed tomfoolery” –love this.

        I guess I figured guys quickly evaluate a group of girls and if the overall first impression is “ugh” (like here)… he would look less closely– and less favorably– at the individual girls.

        [CH: beautiful girls radiate more beautifully when they’re surrounded by war pigs.]

        Like


      • “I guess I figured guys quickly evaluate a group of girls and if the overall first impression is “ugh” (like here)… he would look less closely– and less favorably– at the individual girls.”

        ============================

        I tend to do that. If there is one knockout in a group of (let’s be kind) plain Janes, I’ll notice her for sure. But one moderately cute one amongst plain Janes? I might well miss her.

        Like


    • No actually, it’s the opposite. A woman can improve her perceived looks by surrounding herself with uglier women, and she can lower her perceived looks by surrounding herself with prettier women.

      Like


    • Amy you’re right short-hair theoretically could have a nice figure and looks healthy. One has to assume that give THAT group of friends she isn’t a sweet little pervert given to submissive, daddy-fucking style sex.

      More like the kind in my experience want to ride you like an object while remaining emotionally detached, a true sport-fucking bore devoid of romanticism.

      Like


  13. I wouldn’t be able to get it up for any of them.

    Like


  14. Goddamn those bitches are hot, amirite broslices?

    Dibs on the fiery vixen with the yellow teeth and pronounced jowls.

    Like


  15. I used to work with one of these girls for a while and know her very well. I know of the others well enough. You are indeed so spot on with your assertions of them.

    Like


  16. on November 8, 2013 at 12:57 pm Cigars, Whiskey and Shiney Shoes

    Who’s the AMOG?

    Like


  17. Sisterhood of the Traveling Angst

    Like


  18. “Sign of a changing America: conservatives no longer like the police. http://moonbattery.com/?p=39016

    Good thing the cops were on hand to keep him from exercising his male privilege to go die in a fire trying to rescue a kid.

    Like


  19. The fact that outer beauty exists doesn’t mean that inner beauty doesn’t.

    Like


    • on November 8, 2013 at 1:53 pm The Burninator

      The problem with that however is that it is usually the ugliest of feminazis who instruct us to look for the beauty inside, all the while spitting hate and bile at anybody who doesn’t agree with their every anger filled missive.

      These women are just those kinds of women, as some on this thread have pointed out. Your assertion thus seems rather irrelevant in this context.

      Like


    • I used to try to find the inner beauty in women. But then I found out that people sometimes frown on cutting them open to look for it. Who knew…?

      Like


    • Do you suppose there is some link to a heavy beard and inner beauty in the erotic sense? The hormones on the inside appear on the outside like the rot gives rise to stink.

      Yeah I know what you are saying, but its been said over and over again. What is no longer being said is that the standard of outer beauty has some role in our existence that is not consciously understood.

      Like


    • The fact that outer beauty exists doesn’t mean that inner beauty doesn’t.

      It does, but 1) it tends to correlate with outer beauty despite what Shallow Hal suggests, and 2) it can’t give you a boner.

      Like


  20. on November 8, 2013 at 1:23 pm thelastgood14u

    Those are women? Holy f**ck!

    Like


  21. http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/the-rant/Content?oid=1104355

    A columnist I typically enjoy reading decided to share his story on how the object of his affection spent decades marrying other men – including a member of his band – before finally deciding to settle for him once she was a much older multiple divorcee with a couple children. I’m sure he’s told how romantic his story is by those he recounts it to, yet I felt a tinge of disgust for him while reading the piece. The beta mindset he clearly displays doesn’t help.

    To be fair, it has been an eleven year marriage so far that he is claims to be happy to be a part of, and perhaps it’s the best he realistically could attain even though it resulted in no children of his own. I’m more inclined to believe that his limited perspective and unfortunate lifelong infatuation with this woman led him into an arrangement most men would agree is undesirable. The column may serve as a prime example of the rationalization employed by beta providers to convince themselves their lot in life isn’t so bad. The rabbi’s little joke on him seems to have sailed right over his head, but considering that beta providers fulfill a necessary role in society, perhaps it’s for the better.

    Like


  22. They’re all getting good and liquored up before the midnight group-fisting session.

    Like


  23. The caption underneath that image on the page of origin is: “Freethinking feminists rule.”

    Rule what?

    The deepest pits of somewhere-or-other?

    Like


    • “Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.”

      First thing that came to mind, and gets more and more appropriate the more I think about it.

      Like


  24. Spot the alpha

    Like


    • The guy sittin’ on the stack of black chips to the tune of about $400K that I can see. Oh? You meant that broke ma’fucka in the background being groomed?

      Like


      • lol! broke ma’fucka … that’s dan bilzerian, a dude I’ve often thought was worthy of his own CH post

        [x] legit don’t give a fuck persona
        [x] armed to the teeth
        [x] legendary instagram
        [x] “racism” controversy
        [x] haters (in legion)

        Like


  25. I don’t think “inner beauty” exists either. It’s total BS. I have never met an unattractive person who wasn’t bitter and mean-spirited. It makes sense – if you’ve been treated badly your whole life due to your looks, the pus of resentment boils inside you. I’ve known unattractive people who pretended to be nice to extort niceness from others; it’s a social necessity, not a reflection of “inner beauty.” The people with supposed “inner beauty, character, and mind” had no substance to back it up.

    Like


    • I know lots of ugly people. They meet ugly people, marry ugly people and have really ugly kids. But they are nice people, generally. Salt of the earth.

      Like


  26. Inner beauty is reflected in your outer features.

    (physical deformities are obviously omitted from this category)

    Like


  27. The one in brown at the far end of the table, could be turned I think. That she is smiling in a relatively normal way at least gives me hope.

    Like


    • She has, as my very sardonic Hungarian hottie use to say (and had me LMAO) about ugly women, “a very unfortunate face.” It is that EE humor thing they have this sort of appreciation for dark comedy lost on our bright & cheery 1st world women.

      Like


  28. The one in the middle with the blue dress is Hugo Schwyzer, isn’t it?

    Like


  29. Greta Christina ( front and center) – Enjoy her little kitty ditty she wrote.
    http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/11/05/saturday-nights-alright-for-biting/

    Like


  30. The real question is… are they hideous because they’re atheist, or are they atheist because they’re ugly?

    [CH: i suspect (though i can’t prove), based on observation, that atheists are uglier on average than most self-identifying groups. i’ve met plenty of good-looking irreligious people, but they never went on about their disbelief in god.]

    Like


    • (or feminist…)

      Like


    • As an atheist I hate to actually agree with this, but it’s true in my anecdotal experience. In college and grad school I got minorly involved with several atheist organizations. Why did I stop? Because they were all full of losers, nerds, hyper-nazi-femis, etc. Just unhappy, ugly people in general. Me and a friend — both atheists and both red pill — came to the conclusion that generally, a hot girl is a god-fearin’ girl.

      The only atheists who are normal and well-adjusted — -read: non-ugly — on average seem to be self-identified ‘agnostics’ or whatever-the-fuck-non-confrontational-label they give themselves.

      Even girls who are smart — if they’re feminine, they will have some sort of hippy-dippy spiritual bullshit that they believe in. I used to not like this, but now…I realize that the correlation with femininity is so high that I love it. It’s an easy way to screen out the mannish girls.

      Like


    • on November 8, 2013 at 3:35 pm ProudFeministGirl

      Cynthia is both Bisexual and Catholic :O

      Like


      • Bisexual, Catholic… and like I said in that other thread, there are choices we all have to make when it comes to what we do with ourselves in the sexual marketplace. I am not stupid enough to think that there wouldn’t be massive consequences for me, my children, my extended family, and my relationship with God and/or the Church, if I married a woman.

        And none of that makes my above statement not true. I brush against these circles quite frequently, and trust me, it’s always a semi-horrifying experience. If anything, increased exposure to these people only serves to enforce the stereotypes. Most non-normative women are miserable, ugly, hateful bitches.

        Like


      • on November 8, 2013 at 8:30 pm Carlos Danger

        Men would be more accepting if they were allowed to participate. I’m thinking both of you naked in high heeled boots and on leashes and me with a riding crop…

        Like


      • Whatever gets your hard, honey. Got no problem with a guy joining in.

        Like


      • on November 9, 2013 at 8:12 am Carlos Danger

        Good, let’s make this happen then, shall we?

        Like


      • Get thee to a nunnery!

        Like


      • My sister is an Irish Catholic dyke nun. I SO know what you mean!!

        Like


    • CH I believe this is true because ugly people are more likely to be left alone (lonely) and have more time for deep introspection. Generally any deep thought person tends to be uglier, on average, than the hotties who are having fun every minute.

      Like


    • Hungarians or e.g. czechs are mostly atheists.Do you claim the women there are ugly)?

      Like


      • From what I can tell. most Europeans are gleefully secular and couldn’t give a shit about the existence of a god either way. “Atheist” is a label hateful people give themselves in order to set themselves up in opposition to basic American decency. It’s an issue of attitude, not personal theology.

        Like


      • My bro said that Prague had markedly few attractive women compared to Moscow or especially Kiev. And apparently Czech and Hungarian obesity rates are somewhat higher than in neighboring countries.

        Also, Czech atheism is a fairly recent 20th-century phenomenon. Even in 1989, almost half of them were still Catholics.

        Like


      • Most Dutch are atheist too, and the Swedes are trick, they claim to be Christian Protestant, yet they don’t go to church nor consider religión important on surveys, and Hungarians are still pretty Catholic.

        Like


  31. That chick in the red looks like roosh

    Like


  32. Inner beauty is real, but people like Marcotte don’t have it. That’s the irony, not the supposed non-existence of inner beauty. They might strike out at men, calling them shallow, even though they would probably benefit from shallow treatment of super-shallow men who can overlook personality.

    Like


  33. I’m happy I have no fucking idea who any of these people are. This is some kind of pop culture phenomenon I’m happy to have skipped.

    Like


  34. an example of “taking a picture with her ugly friends to look better by comparison” gone horribly awry

    Like


  35. Inner beauty is no myth. I’ve *known* women with inner beauty. It’s interesting that as I roll the footage mentally, they’ve all been knockouts to look at.

    Like


  36. It looks like a photo from the StarWars bar.

    Like


  37. I assume those are trannies

    Like


  38. So let’s not use “inner beauty” when describing kindness and good character. It’s too loaded. Ugly=inner beauty … not true, which is what many people delude themselves with.

    Like


  39. There are trannies out there who put them (and many women) to shame.

    Google Trechada Petcharat

    Like


  40. on November 8, 2013 at 8:27 pm Carlos Danger

    Say, isn’t that red head with the glasses Jerry Lewis?

    Like


  41. on November 8, 2013 at 9:59 pm Corporal Hicks

    The photo shows the inherent “smugness” of the typical American woman. There’s no use talking AT ALL to this type of genetico-cultural monstrosity. They are as friendly as a pack of feral dogs in a burnt-out post-apocalytic urban guerrilla zone.

    Move on.

    Like


  42. If Medusa gazed upon the hideous visage of the creature at far left, she would turn into stone.

    Like


  43. many of these … will be in Springfield, MO, for Skepticon. Perhaps some courageous soul willing to make the trip and endure the painful droning would demonstrate Game on susceptible members of this crowd. The results would be entertaining.

    Like


  44. Inner beauty exists,it just doesn’t substitute physical beauty at all.Both are important.

    Like


  45. Here’s the irony…if a guy came over to the table and dropped the “Apocalypse Opener” (come over now) those 2’s and 3’s would probably become offended and indignant rather than pitifully grateful that someone….anyone dumpster dived and gave them a rare chance at getting banged.

    This is why game is so vital. A medium knowledge of game would be able to approach, disarm the mother hen in the foreground with the gray hair.

    Neg the cock-block with the glasses and page-boy red hair and ignore the 5 with the long hair and bright red lips in the middle.

    That would be my target. It wouldn’t be that hard; First date, museum, frame control battle. Text game escalation. Second date, drinks, then bounce, then back to my place, bang her.

    Then she’d be in “love” with me. When I ignored her texts she’d become obsessive and start guilting me. Then report back to her friends who would all cackle in agreement at what an asshole. Then the cockblock in the red hair would be mildly intrigued enough to add me on Facebook…Her opener “Big lips says your a jerk….” Me; “yah I’m the one your mom warned you about….” And it would be on.

    Like


  46. Wow, Alton Brown of Iron Chef and Good Eats really let himself go. That’s him in front in the blue dress right?

    Like


  47. on November 9, 2013 at 5:37 am AlmostAnonymous

    I’m finding this hard to masterbate to

    Like


  48. Congrat CH …well you just ruined my lunch and I’m feeling sick now.

    Please use always a WARNING when showing such a creatures

    Like


  49. When you try to attract a girl who looks like this, they can give you bitchy treatment back, because they think you are only hitting on them because they seem easier (cuz they’re ugly).

    Like


  50. Take a second look at the picture; all of those women could be decent looking if they chose to make a modicum of effort.

    Instead the embrace their inner-ugliness. That’s what truly shines through, here; the hairstyles and frumpy clothing are symptoms of their inner life, and its through their smiles and eyes that it truly shines through.

    As other commenters have pointed out, these girls would be hell to game, throwing up road blocks and arrogance at every turn, because the reject the feminine. If they embraced the feminine, their scores would go up by 2-3 points, partly because they’d be dressed nicely, but mostly because they wouldn’t have the soul-sucking zombie smiles of HR department ladies on their faces.

    There are no ugly women – just lazy women.

    Like


  51. That group is roughly in the 9-10 range. Aggregate.

    Like


  52. Fuck you , I’m trying to eat

    Like


  53. Perhaps Inner Beauty is like External Intelligence.

    Like


  54. off topic, but it reminded me of one of many chateau´s rants about american women and my idiotic friends who now regret marrying them.

    http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/how-saying-no-to-mcdonald-s-might-lead-to-dad-losing-custody-165611460.html

    Like


  55. Funny enough I dont see any terrible victims of poor genetics in this picture.Just a choice to be ugly.

    Like


  56. Those broads are awful….

    you can actually see a bit of the Neanderthal peeking through….

    Like


  57. on November 9, 2013 at 7:10 pm Amanjaw Marcuntte

    Boner graveyard.

    Like


  58. You guys are just jealous. You wish you could look as handsome, masculine, and virile as Amanda Marcotte.

    Like


  59. Who is Armanda Mar Cunt trying to attract with the lipstick?

    Like


  60. So why is Amanda Marcotte so hated here? I just know about her through this site. What has she done/said that’s so bad? I’m not going to read her feminist blog. Had enough of that BS in my school days. I would appreciate it if someone can give me a run-down of her shenanigans. TIA.

    Like


    • on November 10, 2013 at 7:54 am Holden Caulfield

      The executive summary is lies, lies, fabrications, distortions of truth, and more lies.

      Like


    • Well, first, she’s awful. But I hate her mostly for her role in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Hoax. She’s a white feminist stereotype for whom the ultimate symbol of evil is the white male (straight) frat boy. Oh, and she’s a Stalinist who looks like a tranny.

      Like


    • She’s probably hated most for her continued persecution of the Duke lacrosse players, long after it was obvious the “victim” was lying. The accused were privileged white men, and therefore to her, they were rapists per se. It didn’t matter what the facts actually were. It was a stark example of how vicious and irrational modern feminism has become.

      Like


  61. inner beauty is not an idea invented by ugly women to justify themselves (yeah it is sometimes used that way). read plato sometime

    Like


  62. I was going to say that making fun of these women was a little harsh until I saw Amanda Marcotte in the middle of that herd.

    That woman radiates inner ugliness

    Like


  63. Feminism, noun: A support group for unfuckable hags.

    Like


  64. I see guys dating “women” like this and it just makes me feel sad. They obviously can’t find them physically attractive so what’s the point? I mean seriously, I would vomit if I touched one of these women. I’m not gay by any means but there are dudes I’d rather make out with than one of these creatures.

    Like


  65. Wow, dude, that’s really harsh – I think you could’ve tried a little harder to find a more seriously-fugly photo than this one. The four on the left ain’t model material, but I bet they look pretty decent naked. Shit, the two in the middle even have some cleavage going on. Give these girl a Jenny Jones makeover (i.e. slutty clothes + makeup), get rid of those 3 dudes on the left, have a few drinks with the ladies and I bet you’d go home with one of ’em!

    Like


  66. I’ll just leave this here: http://www.boredpanda.org/vanishing-tribes-before-they-pass-away-jimmy-nelson/

    The jungle people have tons of eye-catching ornamentation. The tundra people are dressed in a manner that is functional, but the best it seems have, even in that harsh environment, gone to the trouble of making their women beautiful. I can see how Ghenghis Khan came from a woman who was probably not unlike the Kazakh female.

    The men are hard, and the women are beautiful, what has modernity done for us?

    Like


  67. Amanda Marcotte was born in 1977! By the looks of her, even under favorable light as in the picture, I would guess 40 years old at least!

    Like


  68. Actually it was an ugly man, Socrates, who invented the idea of inner beauty. As usual, women only borrowed it.

    Like


  69. One word gross

    Like


  70. Not coincidentally… they are all overweight and lack any sort of effort in their appearance, which include being completely obvlivious to fashion sense. They probably blame men for not being attracted to them. Which is why they are feminists.

    Like


  71. Since observing two women in my office over a period of about a year, do you really mean there is no “worth” to inner beauty, even for pickup artists? These two women were about 25 years old, roughly the same build (5,4″ and petite, maybe size 2’s). Both were single and were ‘good girls’ and became close friends. I sat right next to them. Girl A was, I think, objectively more beautiful than Girl B. Long beautiful hair, beautiful face, clear skin. Girl B had somewhat broken out skin, glasses, braces, short hair. Both were very feminine, dresses/skirts, etc. There are a lot of single people about that age in my office and the other office on our floor. I was fascinated to see how the prettier girl almost never got approached and Girl B was constantly approached by men both married and single. They went out a lot on weekends together and apparently the same thing happened.

    My take on it (I’m a woman) – Girl A, the prettier one, had an absolutely sour venemous hateful attitude about life in general and the vast majority of humans. Girl B was the girl who never has a bad day, always fun, smiling, pleasant, high energy. It appeared to me that most of the men, pickup artists or not, didn’t care to try to get past the barbed wire with Girl A no matter how beautiful she was. Girl B was not unattractive, so there’s that. It was interesting to see Girl A actively try to sabotage Girl B; she never seemed to get that it was likely her attitude getting in her way. Or maybe I’m wrong?

    Like