Sinead O’Connor: Proof Of Women’s Rapidly Declining Sexual Market Value Trajectory

Sinead O’Connor’s first marriage at age 21: 5 years

Sinead O’Connor’s second marriage: 1 year

Sinead O’Connor’s third marriage: 8 months

Sinead O’Connor’s fourth marriage at age 45: 16 days.

Sez it all, really.

(The typical benighted SMV trajectory of women is even worse when you consider the quality of men with whom Sinead progressively got hitched, which, if photos and lifestyle status are any indication, demonstrates that Sinead had to gradually settle for ever more beta lovers.)





Comments


  1. Though I don’t disagree with the spirit of this post, the following phrase describing her second husband:

    “Nick is not the type of man who will go for money, he is a principled socialist.”

    doesn’t exactly scream “alpha.” Not to me, at least.

    [heartiste: alpha is a state of mind. money matters less than you think in delineating alpha from beta. status, on the other hand…]

    Like


    • I’m more of a libertarian-minded individual, but I come from socialist parental lineage to a great degree, and I always find it more fun to meet women in socialist circles. Even if you aren’t a socialist, having any intellect over an IQ of 100 makes you AMOG among all the typical beta “find me a leader” socialist schlubs. Don’t knock those circles — most of the gals are batshit crazy, but they’re poor and skinny aplenty.

      There’s 100 guys to every gal in the libertarian circles, so the cock carousel opportunity is way bigger it seems.

      Like


      • You look for women based on political doctrine?

        Like


      • When asked why he robbed banks, Jesse James replied, “Because that’s where the money is.”

        Like


      • I think that was John Dillinger no?

        Like


      • Willie Sutton, apparently. Google is our friend.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Sutton

        Like


      • No, but I get invited to a billion libertarian-oriented parties annually, and I usually ask “So I get to hang out at a sausage party? Where’s the party part?”

        I get invited to maybe a dozen or two liberal/socialist/Marxist/even-commie parties annually, and I tend to go to all of them if schedule allows. I just went to one in the hell-hole of Orlando, out of the 70 people there, I’d say that 40 were women, and more than half were tolerably good looking and fun.

        As said below/above — if you’re a bank robber, go where the money is. Willie Sutton: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Sutton

        Like


      • One of my friend put it well, with this simple axiom: Date to the Left.

        It works for him.

        Like


      • I certainly do. Liberal women often look to their uber-alpha, deal closing, number crunching, shotgun owning boyfriends for leadership.
        I’m not saying, necessarily, that real men need to be Republicans, just strongly implying that.
        Plus,political arguments can sometimes be good spice to a me and lawyergirl stew.

        Like


      • Makes sense, given that studies cited here and elsewhere in the manosphere show that women just love them some State, especially since it rids them of the unfortunate necessity of having to actually put out for a beta male in order to live off his money. “The government needs to pay for this/that/whatever” is something I’ve heard from more than one of them.

        Ironically one such gal I dated suddenly became wealthy. She’s tried to do good/charitable things with the money in this and other countries and is now learning (due to all the corruption and roadblocks it puts in her way) what a plague the State really is. Another was smart enough to recognize socialism (e.g., the status quo) for the crock it is and all I had to do was hand her a copy of “The Road to Serfdom”.

        Like


      • I really enjoyed the follow-up:”The Road To Betadom”

        Like


    • Who has more status?

      A small time musician whose popular in the club scene of his city but only makes 40k/year, or a boring cubicle drone making 100k/year.

      A NYT writer whose name is known to millions everyday but “only” makes 200k or an investent banking VP working 80 hours a week on boring ass shit making 800k/year.

      How you make the money is as important as how much you make.

      Like


      • Mmmmhmmm. Is that musician pulling in a steady 40k, or 15k one year and 55k every couple of years? I have both a BA in music theory & an MBA in finance, and I could easily tell you what’s easier, as far as supporting ex-wives, girlfriends, and a party lifestyle.
        Yes, cubicle jobs blow, but not

        Like


      • Cubicle jobs blow, but not as badly as not having groceries, a newer car, and heat.

        Like


    • Agree that alpha is a state of mind; it’s the “principled socialist” part more than the failure to grab the cash that sounds beta.

      I just didn’t see anything in the article you cited that made it sound like the 2nd husband was an alpha; to me he sounded like a 29 year old Welsh tabloid writer (sic). Who knows, maybe he’s a 6′ 4″ ex-rugby player with a twelve inch cock…but I didn’t pick that up.

      Like


      • While there are a lot of beta socialists (fuel for the socialist state) there are some people who fancy themselves leaders once the revolution happens.

        They tend to be wildly promiscuous and have lots of access to women because there is so little alpha competition. It’s not a great recipe for a relationship.

        Like


    • “Nick is not the type of man who will go for money, he is a principled socialist.”

      lmfao – all socialists do is go after other people’s money.

      Like


  2. This reminds me of a song: “Nothing Compares 2 U [at 21].”

    Like


  3. Modern lefty “socialism” is pretty beta though.

    Like


  4. Too bad this guy didn’t wait out her releasing another greatest hits or something — he could’ve gotten some nice spousal support in the divorce.

    Like


    • Was thinking the same thing, but to hold on that long he would probably have had to, at some point, give it to her in “the difficult brown” as she once so eloquently put it. He must have realized that even an alimony running into the millions couldn’t buy him enough coke and hookers to expunge that stain on his psyche.

      Like


  5. The first link highlights and even bigger problem that is becoming increasingly prevalent. Yes, we are well aware of the fact that as women age, their prospects decrease. It’s safe to assume that this woman in particular has enough of a shady past, that she would never land a desirable male.

    But on to the bigger problem: the tat placed dead center on her chest. I’m seeing an increasing number of women with chest tats. A chest tat is like hairy arms, man-jaw, beef curtains, etc, all rolled into one and multiplied by a factor of 10 for sheer masculine intensity.

    Like


    • Tats are an abomination and they should be forbidden by law to put them anywhere near their boobs or vagina. Abortion, yes. Boob/vag tats, no.

      Christ, I’m old enough to remember when tats were something only sailors and bikers did (and women thought it was silly). You could probably chart the decline of this once great nation by the number of tats given to women, if someone were to collect the data.

      Like


    • – chest tat
      – face piercings
      – dyed hair (usually pink or red, often black)
      – slouching posture
      – vampire anything
      – mac products
      – menthol cigarettes (or camel crush, or parliament)
      – black shoes + white socks

      = excellent blowjobs, pure monstrosity otherwise

      Like


  6. I think this is why that study that alleged that married women were happiest when they married a guy a few points below them on the looks scale was correct. You’re only going downhill, baby, so you need to, as engineers would say, prestress that load bearing member. So, that when the girl hits the wall, there’s not so much of a drop off but a leveling. This extends to pretty, famous women too. Sure, a Mila Kunis could snag an apex alpha male actor now…but in 10 years…it will be splitsville (how many hot ass bitches has Tommy Lee been married to?). JT’s always going to be JT, but Britney ain’t never going to be Britney again. This is why Hollywood marriages don’t last, or are rare. That female fame and money can’t be leveraged very far into the future. How do future Sineads find happiness? Realize the wall is coming, there are only two apex alpha females out there who maintained high SMV, even though they too haven’t been able to hold on to Ashton or Brad (exception to the rule, proving the rule: we’ll see about the skeletal angelina too). Whatever they did to stay hot, you should do too. The Hollywood, famous me would never get tied down to even a Mila, but my real world self would shit kittens to do so.

    Like


    • Heartiste needs to explain to me why women hate being with betas yet are at their happiest when the guy looks worse than them. Doesn’t make sense to me at all.

      [heartiste: because a man’s looks are of limited usefulness as a measure of his betaness or alphaness.]

      Like


      • So are you saying if you want a real hot chick, you are better off being a 6 or 7 with above average looks and alpha tendencies rather than being an 8-9 guy with alpha because hot girls are too insecure to be with a hot guy? That probably explains all the ugly guys who get hot women.

        Like


      • wow, you really decoded it, pm.

        Like


      • All things being equal, a guy who’s a 7 on the looks scale and is a big ballin’ player is going to get as much puzzy as a guy who’s a 9 on the looks scale and who is an equally big ballin’ player. Once you get to that level of alphaness, your looks become more and more irrelevant.

        On the other hand, if those two guys are beta shmucks installing carpet and playing WoW, then that’s where looks come into play somewhat more, but still not all that much as compared to women.

        Like


      • What about height? Does lack of height for a man not factor into both looks and alphaness?

        I could probably unpack this question a little better, it is probably a post in and of itself. The question of whether height is an alpha limiter. In other words, take your classic alpha male, but then make him 5-5. Is he still an alpha male? Is the female perception of height as male dominance — and the consequent lower valuation of shorter males — render lack of height an un-overcomeable ceiling on alphaness level?

        I hope that the above paragraph isn’t gibberish. I could probably articulate it a bit better.

        Like


  7. LOL I knew this post was a’comin.

    Like


  8. Seems like most of your links are to stories on the 4th marriage

    Like


  9. Sinead, bottom line, is way too damaged for any man now. Her bludgeoned pussy and tattoos are way too scary for a typical mangina. For someone like me, she’s simply gross. Imagine exposing your best friend to those two loosely hanging, bruised prosciutto-like pussy lips hanging down there, knowing how dirty and used up it is. Enough to make alphas shudder.

    Like


  10. i laughed my ass off when I saw the getting nmarried article and then the divorce story had me think a posting that showed her doing a kind of craigs list thing requesting a husband and she was posting up her standards. It may have been here. I knew she was asking for too much then.

    Like


  11. At least she lost weight for her wedding.

    Like


    • Which she will promptly regain.
      I never found her hot to begin with when she was in her prime, and doubly so when she shaved her head. The big fucking tat on her chest just puts the brown icing on the shit-cake.

      Future young women, PLEASE do not think of getting those big-arsed tats like that, front or back, because in 20 years, that is NOT going to look attractive.

      Like


  12. Spanky McFarlane married Elmer Fudd?

    Like


  13. You missed this gem:

    ‘I am a 21st century full woman and proud of living it. I am in a very good and happy and strong place in life so I am doing fine. The marriage was 16 days. We lived together for 7 days only. Until Xmas eve. And we haven’t been awful to each other. ‘

    ‘So while I feel sad for my husband, and sad to be the cause of sorrow to yet another poor man, I’m also happy that I know we weren’t horrible to each other and he is better off free. And that I can be me.’

    Like


  14. Suggested first dance for her next wedding: “Nothing Compares To You, Except Maybe The Other Four Guys I Married.”

    Like


  15. […] Heartiste of Chateau Heartiste puts it: Sow-nead has been married 4 times; each time with the marriage being to a wussier guy and for an increasingly shorter period of time. […]

    Like


  16. Can anyone say “Fucking Car Crash in Slow Motion?!” Holy fuckin’ fuck, boys and girls(?)! I’m particularly ‘ma’fuckin’ young, so when I elucidated myself as to how how Sow-nead once was, I truly understood the tragic (and admittedly fast-as-fuck) descent of her desirability.

    As a small conciliation to whatever poor invertebrate she latches onto next, isn’t she really into anal? 😉

    Like


  17. Wow, she’s ugly as shit

    Like


  18. I dunno guys, I’m still thinking Sinead’s penchant for ass loving anal penetration is the common thread in all of these “marriages”.

    I mean really, how many times can a heterosexual male take short-haired boyish Sinead ‘O Conner’s puckered chocolate starfish for a ride before he begins to question his sexual preference?

    [heartiste: heh. she did say it was a “difficult brown”. makes me think you’d need to bring along a machete before setting out to explore. 16 days of that will break any man.]

    Like


  19. Hahaha, excellent observation!

    Like


  20. Why only 16 days? Kim Kardishan lasted 3 times as long.

    Like


  21. I saw her in concert in 1990, one of the closer rows to the stage. She was jumping around and her tits popped out of her tube dress. The were very nice. Then.

    [heartiste: ouch. she was definitely a cutie back in her heyday, singing that prince song and radiating that 21 year old face (readers may wish to consult youtube for confirmation). cute enough that even her horrible shorn head didn’t detract too many points from her fuckability.
    but now.
    even the pope laughs at her.]

    Like


  22. That goddamn song was so slow and boring, the video was pure suckage, and I’m not convinced any chick can pull off the bald look, but if one could, it wasn’t her. Yechh all around.

    Like


  23. Isn’t a man beta just for marrying a hairless woman?

    Like


  24. Sinead has gone from being a vaguely cute young batshit crazy attention whore to being a fat old batshit crazy attention whore. Why am I supposed to care?

    Like


    • Well said. I know her type, and they’re all alike. Beauty is a woman’s power and O’Conner didn’t use her power responsibly. Now that she is no longer attractive, her antics are just sad.

      Like


  25. You just know what’s coming next, right? About two years and then she has her Religious Awakening and makes the rounds of the talk shows going on about her relationship with Jesus. Pretty much her whole life has been an epic shit test aimed at God and the Catholic Church.

    Like


  26. on December 30, 2011 at 9:51 am Anti Blue pill

    Me,after looking at the pics…

    Like


  27. I though Sinead was already an ordained priest or something? Glad to know that others think what I’ve always thought of her since day 1: She be bat-shit motherfucking crazy. There’s just always been something about her that made me recoil.

    Like


  28. […] Sinead O’Connor: Proof Of Women’s Rapidly Declining Sexual Market Value Trajectory […]

    Like


  29. How did she find ANYBODY to marry her? She is absolutely disgusting.

    Like


  30. I think that women can hold on to their attractiveness in their older age, but they have to change up how they present themselves. So many older women try to be that young 20 something and it looks pathetic, serving only to highlight the fact they are old. Helen Mirren is a good example of an older woman who kept her shit together. Ladies, don’t try to be sexy like you were back in your hey-day; instead, cultivate mystique, maturity, and a classy sense of style. O’Connor doesn’t seem to be doing any of that.

    Also, not to be rude, but having kids will ruin your body. There are tons of kids out there already who need help. If you were to adopt, you get to hang on to your looks longer and you get to help a needy kid. Win/win situation.

    (And yes, I know there a women out there who had kids and kept their shit together, but there are not a lot of them)

    Like


    • on January 4, 2012 at 10:49 am You're all crazier than her

      You’re actually suggesting that one of the primary reasons to adopt should be to keep your body hot in line with men’s idea of attractivesness, just so you can have the privilege of being desirable to the apparently batshit crazy men on this comment thread? Seriously? You put a disturbing level of importance on beauty. You honestly thought Sinead’s antics were amusing when she was hotter, simply because she WAS hot? The pretty negated the crazy?
      I don’t think I’ve seen a more frightening comment thread online than the one on this post. If you’re all examples of the typical male, I think I’ll stay single.

      [heartiste: you make a point. if you’re gonna have kids, it makes more sense to have your own kids. biological imperative and all that. but sinead didn’t get that gross from having kids. the biggest moral failings were her craptastic lifestyle and her inability to push away from the table or push into a pair of running shoes.
      women who watch their weight and respect the desires of men (most feminist cunts loathe male desire) do very well at staying in shape after pregnancy.]

      Like


  31. Nothing compares 2 the wall.

    Like


  32. Marriage is back on boyos! More fodder!!

    Like