Speaking Power To Truth

A malignant white leftoid decided to try and get himself arrested for a nuisance crime to prove (in his own mind) that police “stop and frisk” profiling of blacks and hispanics is wrong because it presumably lets a lot of white Manhattanite would-be criminals off the hook.

Wearing a suit and tie and carrying a couple of cans of spray paint, he had a hard time getting arrested. Even after tagging a public building in full view of security cameras, he still couldn’t get arrested (a cop at the scene was bewildered by the leftoid’s brazenness, and who can blame him), so he turned himself in, where he discovered that white cellmates had fewer bruises on them than non-white cellmates from what they claimed (always trust a con) were altercations with cops.

Naturally, the leftoid is humblebragging about his revealing exposé of the criminal justice system and, I’m sure, he’s now a hit at Upper West Side parties where he has cashed in his anti-white status whoring points for beaucoup feels. But all this moron did with his campy street stunt — aka criminal tourism — was prove that criminal profiling works. There are so few suited-up white men in NYC spraying graffiti (the number doubtless hovers around zero) that one of them carrying a can of spray paint isn’t cause for suspicion. The one white guy who does get punished for it is a performance artists who intended to write about the experience in The Atlantic. His race commits so few petty crimes in New York that he had to force the issue to get any notice from the law. So, the cops were right to ignore this buffoon.

Leftoids are fond of reciting their religious belief that blacks committing nuisance crimes — like trespassing — are handled more roughly by cops than are whites doing the same. What leftoids always fail to consider is that cops have good reason for the putative double standard; a black kid running across a suburban lawn is more likely to be heading on his way to a home invasion than is a white kid criss-crossing backyards. Those crime stats… they just don’t lie.





Comments


  1. The drollery will continue until the artistic skills improve.

    Like


  2. There are whites in manhattan?

    Like


    • “There are whites in manhattan?”

      You bet. More all the time. The liberals have been working hard to ethnically cleans NYC. This helps explain its Vermont levels of murder.

      Like


      • *cleanse

        A silent e is an unwanted e.

        Like


      • on December 19, 2013 at 10:20 am Perpetual Motion

        Very stupid comment.

        First off, liberals HUG the kind of black ghetto filth that we don’t want. They don’t ethnically cleanse them; they increase their welfare and promote their propagation.

        Secondly, there are very few whites in NYC. NYC public schools have 85% non-white students. The very few normal whites you see in Manhattan during business workweek hours commute from the clean white suburbs, I.e. Northern Jersey, Connecticut, Long Island, etc. Whites that actually LIVE in Manhattan are a dying breed, and even then, they are not the normal folk (i.e. super rich celebrities, models, etc.)

        Don’t post when you are this retarded.

        Like


    • Yeah, but now that DeBlasio is mayor, who knows how long that will last.

      Like


  3. Leftoids are impressed by statistics. There’s some leftoid-endorsed low-income projects he can walk through in a suit and tie spraying paint to gather more data.

    Like


    • That’s because they don’t really understand them but they know it makes them look smart because it’s math and stuff.

      Like


  4. Blacks have more bruises generally because they ass up more and subsequently have to get tuned up. All cumstain had to do was resist a little and the cops would have showed him there unbiasedness.

    Like


  5. Wasted $71.97 on a pay dating site: http://itriedmatchdotcomexperience.blogspot.com/

    Like


  6. lets be honest, tribalism/segregation/etc is a valid biological strategy. successful too.

    Like


    • Of course it is. Neighborhoods that become accustomed to “diversity” are easily penetrated. We are used to the profile of the Boston bomber and no alarm is raised. White neighborhoods used to blacks are to be preferred by black burglars. Blacks have grown accustomed to predatory “Pay Day” loans and other whitey scams. The first defense of an invader is gone. Its a grand day for fuck heads.

      Like


      • That’s why Obama wants to force “affordable housing” and “affirmatively furthering fair housing” into good stable white neighborhoods.

        Like the real estate brokers, he loves the churn.

        Like


  7. Why the suit and tie? If his point is about “racial profiling,” why lend an opportunity for “sartorial profiling”?

    Like


    • Because if he dressed like a thug and got treated like a thug, he wouldn’t get to feel so smug.

      Like


      • Because if he dressed like a thug and got treated like a thug, he wouldn’t get to feel so smug.

        Exactly. His claim that he wanted to show “Whites don’t get arrested” falls apart completely when he has to dress in a suit and tie to avoid being arrested. A White dressing like a criminal would cause suspicion, just like a Black dressing like a criminal. A Black dressing in suit and tie would be treated with less suspicion, just like a White man in a suit – in fact, the Black in a suit would probably be treated much better.

        What the socialists pretend to not know is that Blacks get preferential treatment all the time, especially in schools. Especially in college. They know that they can hand in a crappily written paper, and the teacher will still let them pass. Though I am heartened by the one story I heard of a teacher, a White woman no less, telling a Black guy in a college class, “This paper is terribly written. Do not think that I will let you pass just because you’re Black.” Everyone in the class knew exactly what she was talking about, because all the other teachers were walking on eggshells around the Black students.

        Like


      • Great for that teacher……a breakthrough. But, I presume she was fired for this brazen attack on PC orthodoxy?

        Like


      • Probably depends on which black dude it was. If it was one of the “top black students” one dare not mess with their halo. The Establishment has invested a lot into creating these winners and foisting them on us, and they don’t appreciate your causing trouble on the way to coronation. But if it’s one of the blacks who is mostly ignored while all the attention goes to the selected ones — you’re probably on safe ground.

        I reported a Selected one once, for cheating. Well documented, clearcut case. I am strong, that’s why I lived to tell about it. But the trouble came from administration. Other black students didn’t mind, they were probably tired of eating this guy’s shit.

        Like


      • +1 They also have incompetent black staff. Informed students avoid their classes like the plague.

        Like


      • When I started dressing more appropriate to my age I noticed other cavemen stopped making hostile faces and threatening postures.

        Like


  8. Lol. Let the bullsh-t ensue

    Like


  9. Re the bewilderment of the cop witness. Engineer/construction project manager types have been known to mark nascent work sites with spray-paint.

    Like


  10. Leftoids biggest problem is that they have too much time on their hands to do a bunch of freethinking on human nature…because they aren’t actually doing anything productive like dealing with people outside their bubble of freethinkers and yes men. Then they unleash their ignorance onto the real world where us “rubes” who are actually in the know on how humans interact have to put on their dumb yokes through force of government.

    I’d be more afraid of dealing with people from gated communities than living with poor folks.

    Like


  11. These leftoids should learn about Bayes’ theorem. It won’t hurt.

    Like


  12. Actually, the crime stats do lie, CH. White crime statistics are inflated by the inclusion of Hispanics in our demographic.

    Like


    • on December 18, 2013 at 12:22 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Although, oddly, somehow Hispanics are *not* included as Caucasian in the statistics regarding black-on-white crime.
      Interesting, that.

      Like


    • Ah, the Zimmerman Inclusion.

      Like


    • True. And it’s the darnedest thing: Latinos are only included as Whites when it comes to perpetrators, to increase the number of “White” perpetrators in FBI statistics. But Latinos are NOT included in the White victim category, so that the number of White victims will look as small as possible. This is all done on the same page in FBI crime statistics. Amazing.

      Like


      • Yes, that is true. Amazing in one sense, but not when you consider the relentless program that’s been underway for the last 60 years or so to undermine Whites and everything about our civilisation.

        I pray that some day the worm will turn….

        Like


      • on December 18, 2013 at 2:04 pm The Burninator

        That’s interesting. I’m not doubting you, I’m just curious if you have citations you can supply that back that up? I’d love to pull that out and throw it in a few progressives faces from time to time.

        Like


      • Read Culture of Critique for starters, by Kevin MacDonald. Extremely well researched and footnoted. It explains it all from an intellectual standpoint, at least as far as the subversion of the US is concerned.

        Like


      • Those are also the stats they throw at us in sociology class. Go figure.

        Like


      • “Us” in sociology class? I hope you’re not majoring in that shit? It’s an ill-defined field that’s just an excuse for leftisms.

        Like


      • And it’s important. Latinos and blacks hate each other. They are scrapping for the same affirmative action goodies, which are in too-abundant but still limited supply.

        Like


  13. Frisking policy comes down to Signal Detection Theory: you’re trying to find a signal (a criminal) among the noise (innocent passerby). So before being stopped, a person can be either, and the police have to decide which one he is. There are two types of error a policeman can make:
    1) frisk someone innocent (false positive)
    2) don’t frisk someone carrying an illegal firearm (false negative)

    In this scenario, the two types of error are not equal. The consequences of missing an armed criminal (potential robbery/murder/etc) are greater than the consequences of frisking an innocent (hurt feelings). So it is understandable that the system has shifted to a detection paradigm with lots of false positives and few false negatives. Add to that prior knowledge (crime rates correlate with ethnicity) and your detection algorithm can be refined even further.

    Also, for the graffiti experiment to be done properly, the hippy would have to compare four groups:
    white guy in suit vs white guy in whigger vs black guy in suit vs black guy in ghetto wear. So far, he cannot claim any increase in effect size and link it to a cause (dress or skin color).

    Like


    • You think the dork had any interest in actually conducting experiment? He set it up intending to prove what he did, and would still have distorted “results” if they hadn’t confirmed SWPL narrative expectations. All leftists are Lysenkoists.

      Like


    • Another application of the theory, slightly more complex perhaps, is detecting where the Wall is.

      We have data something like the following:
      1. Women realize they aren’t getting marriage offers any more when they are 35.
      2. It takes five years in today’s extended dating market for people to start expecting marriage offers.
      3. Guys sometimes seek relationships with Cougars because they’re easy to pump and they are willing then to dump. So the woman isn’t told clearly that she is past the wall until she is way past it.
      4. Data are often confounded with the presence of children from old fucks, which certainly reduces a woman’s desirability and effectively adds to her equivalent age.
      5. Women are told they can have it all and feel empowered, so they don’t believe the signals they are receiving.

      In my view, guys determine where they wall is by their willingness to propose to women who are, by that point, quite likely to say yes. But guys don’t write about this. So the evidence we see in most media is from women complaining, getting cats, or otherwise showing they can read the writing on the wall (it’s written on the backside thereof and paradoxically gets clearer with increased distance.)

      I think the wall is at not much over age 30 even today. Women just keep insisting it is, but that’s because they lie to themselves and others, see e.g. points 2, 3 and 5 above.

      By the time a 33 year old woman meets a man and it gets “serious”, she’s starting to age and he will never actually propose. When that happens, it means 33 was too late.

      Like


  14. “Those crime stats… they just don’t lie.”

    The past 50 years have been dedicated to obliterating 5+ millennia’s worth of hard-earned wisdom about the differences between the sexes, and 2+ centuries’ worth of hard-earned wisdom about the differences between the races. Civil rights martyr Emmett Till was supposedly murdered for “whistling” at a white woman. In reality what happened was: 1) he bragged to his Mississippi hick cousins about regularly f-ing white women back in Chicago 2) was egged on by them into proving by it by scoring with the pretty, young shopkeeper’s wife 3) went into the store and made a crude proposition to her, probably grabbing/groping her at one point. Now the whole sad story is prima facia evidence of white sexual paranoia in general, white men’s feelings of sexual inadequacy in particular. The liberal press of the day tried drumming up sympathy by painting Till Sr. as a war hero who gave his life fighting the Axis. They dropped that line after it turned out Daddy Till had been court-martialed and then hanged by his own army- for raping 2 Italian women, murdering a 3rd.

    Like


  15. The only reason Bloomberg could get away with Stop-n-Frisk is because everyone knows NYC is where the Good Whites live. There’s no way in hell a southern mayor could get away with such a policy.

    Like


  16. The opposite experiment has been tried.

    They dressed a black man in a suit and tie, had him speak clearly in an articulate way.

    and he got elected President of the USA…

    Like


  17. [H]e turned himself in, where he discovered that white cellmates had fewer bruises on them than non-white cellmates from what they claimed (always trust a con) were altercations with cops.

    Pigmentation camouflages contusion.

    Coincidence? Or a naturally occurring criminological efficiency?

    Like


  18. Here’s a little test for the White socialist: walk through Harlem at night with a large camera, recording your surroundings to “prove” how safe it is to walk through a Black neighborhood that way. Believe it or not, two female socialists did this in Rinkeby, a Stockholm suburb that is more than 90 percent non-White. They were going to show the film in class. They were quickly robbed and lost the camera.

    Two other White women had their minds set on going to see a gospel choir perform in Harlem one evening. They told a cab driver to take them to the address, but the cab driver – who was Black – refused, saying, “I will not be responsible for driving two White women to Harlem.”

    Was he racist? Did he hate Blacks? Or was he simply aware of crime statistics showing that 90 percent of interracial rape is Black men raping White women?

    For an interesting perspective, talk about Black crime with non-Whites, for example Indians, Iranians, Vietnamese and Chinese. They are thoroughly “racist” by New York Times standards, meaning they aren’t afraid to state clearly what they see. Talking to non-Whites outside the West about dusky crime is thoroughly refreshing, shows over and over again that you belong to the world’s vast majority in this issue. Only White Westerners have been brainwashed on a daily basis, the rest of the world prefers to survive.

    Like


    • Absolutely true. If I may say so I’m well travelled and can confirm that in particular the East Asians regard blacks as borderline human and are totally baffled by the West’s tolerance for them. I carefully explain how this came about…and who has been responsible.

      Like


    • “Was he racist? Did he hate Blacks? Or was he simply aware of crime statistics showing that 90 percent of interracial rape is Black men raping White women?”

      And the other 10 percent of interracial rape is Mexicans raping white women, while the other zero percent of interracial rape is white men raping black women.

      Like


  19. Kelley Thomas. White homeless schizo who mouthed off to the cops. Beaten to death. The Fullerton, Orange County CA cops who beat him to death are on trial. One cop is White, the other Hispanic.

    So yeah, people with a social network that “has their back” can’t be treated like a scumbag. But Whites without pull can. There was a guy in Long Beach who was shot to death, he was drunk and on his front porch holding a hose. Mouthed off and got shot. He was White also.

    Like


  20. on December 18, 2013 at 2:05 pm The Burninator

    I’m not in the habit of posting like a fanboi, but I have to say that I agree with this article 100%, and its an interesting bit of news I hadn’t heard until now, to boot.

    Like


  21. The statistical and logical errors would be blatantly obvious to the partygoers if details of the stunt were mapped onto another context and analogous conclusions drawn and depending on his social status he’d either be a laughing stock or quietly whispered about.

    Like


  22. Numbers from the estimable La Griffe: http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/prison.htm

    “An adult black man is seven times more likely than his white counterpart to reside behind bars. Paradoxically, the largest disparities are found in political domains controlled by liberals — the leaders in the struggle for racial justice. By examining how criminal behavior is distributed within the races, the paradox is resolved showing it to be an unintended consequence of liberal benevolence and goodwill.”

    Like


    • Thanks, that is an excellent read. Very insightful. My favorite line is, “one man’s bias is another’s perspicacity.”

      The conclusions make so much sense.

      Like


  23. […] A malignant white leftoid decided to try and get himself arrested for a nuisance crime to prove (in his own mind) that police “stop and frisk” profiling of blacks and hispanics is wrong because it presumably lets a lot of white Manhattanite…  […]

    Like


  24. Stop and Frisk ……(i.e. stop and frisk Negroes)

    planned and institutionalized homosexual sex abuse of Negroes.

    primarily white cops are ordered by white and Jew politicians to place their hands on the pockets, waist, backside areas of Negroes, looking for so called contraband and weapons.

    The only weapon they are obsessed with is the negro penis and its potential to annihialte the genetic reccessive Neandthal hybrd.

    What type of sick fucks use the power of government to instutionalize homosexual sex abuse of Negroes – under the guise of “preventing crime”.

    Oh i forget. The genetic recessive Neandthal hybrid has a genetic tendency towards sexual pervesion and organized violence.

    Stop and Frisk = homosexual sex abuse: instituted by the genetic recessive Neandthal hybrid HOMO Jew – Bloomberg.

    please stop your obsession with the Negroes’ body and penis.

    Like


    • OK I’ll give this a chance. Please prove:

      (1) the cops sexually molest the guys while they frisk them. And it wouldn’t hurt to explain how an overwhelmingly heterosexual PD is willing to touch the black guy’s privates.

      (2) that frisking these guys isn’t significantly reducing crime. It started, crime went down. It will stop, now crime will … ?

      Like


  25. […] Leftoids are fond of reciting their religious belief that blacks committing nuisance crimes — like… […]

    Like


  26. Family Man:

    1) A man touching another heterosexual man’s private parts – uninivited = sexual molestation. Period. (especially and in particular when under no reasonable cause or suspicion of crime).

    – Why would an overwhelmingly WHITE male and heterosexual PD do it ?
    -a. anything to keep the paychecks coming.
    -b. “following orders…..” (Nazi)
    -c. sociopathic perverts: the type who is typically attracted to the kind of jobs which allow them to do thing that without the badge would be crimes. (a genetic tendency in genetic recessive neandethal hybrids).

    2) reducing crime ??? the only crime the friskees have committed is being Negroid (i.e. the only true Homo Sapiens Sapiens – and thus having the penis with the genetic potential to annihilate the recessive hybrids).
    -Of course, then we have to determine what is “crime” – defined and then enforced by the recessives of course.
    – “loitering”: standing around minding your own business.
    -“vagrancy”: see above
    -“looking suspicious” – looking like a Negro
    -“possession of contraband” – possession of small amounts of plants/herbs (probably 90% of said “crimes”)
    – “possession of weapons”: determined to be a “crime” by the recessives – gentile and jew in urban areas, but said laws being in contravention of all natural law and the second amendment.

    Like


    • on December 20, 2013 at 4:16 pm Gordon Freeman

      Nigger moron too stupid to comprehend the stupidity of its own nigger thoughts.

      I love how niggers pretend to understand the concepts of ‘recessive’ and ‘dominant’ genes and then just because it makes them feel good, they pretend that ‘being a nigger’ = dominant. Because in their gorilla minds, they feel like they’re dominant, and the word “dominant” is spelled the same in both cases… so they must be genetically dominant too (even though this makes 0 sense as ‘being a nigger’ isn’t caused by a single gene)… and furthermore, this fact itself must prove that they’re “dominant” in the other sense (because they’re spelled the same, remember.)

      Like


  27. I kept walking and reached a bodega near the Rockaway Avenue subway station. Suddenly, a young black man started yelling at me to get out of Brownsville, presumably concluding from my skin color and my suit that I did not belong there.

    Nah, I’m sure it was just random yelling.

    Like


  28. noone,

    he was expressing his 1st Amendment right.

    Like


  29. Isn’t this more of a case of disguising yourself as someone legit isn’t suspicious? For instance, if I looked like a repairman going in and out of a house, I’m sure not many people would think anything of it.

    Like