Comment Of The Week: The Dark Triad In Practice

taterearl writes:

Narcissism = higher value in yourself…taking women off the pedestal
Machiavellianism = pretty much game…using women’s nature to get what you want
psychopathy = aloof and unconcerned when a woman gets flighty with her emotions

You don’t need to turn into a serial killer to get women…just understand these personality traits do have some benefit to your personality.

The Dark Triad are the component parts of the one overarching attitude that most defines and forges the successful womanizer: overconfidence.

***

Runner-up comment winner

Jacob Ian Stalk has this to say about that:

The Dark Triad is the clarion call that has replaced outmoded concepts of honor, virtue, chivalry and self-sacrifice as the organizing principle which motivates and galvanizes the post-society American man. It is the ultimate expression of untrammeled individualism. A society crumbling into atomizing modernism is both symptomatic of growing psychopathy in the population and causal of more people turning toward the psychopathic dark side. When truth is exiled, the allure of cold-blooded self-concern is evident.

This, right here, is the result of 50 years of feminist influence. Decivilisation. Decivilisation by the hand of the Mother Goddess and her evil handmaidens. That’s Game – a roadmap to her altar with Google-Maps-direction-finder efficiency.

Game is like a gold ring through a pig’s snout – it lures unwary men onto the altar of the sacred feminine. Feverishly we mount her handmaidens and cast the pearls of our manhood before her swine.

No need to wonder how to get there, or look for street signs. Here’s the way, spelled out for us in 100 words or less. Go straight to the Devil. Do not pass God and do not collect salvation.

Fights to the death for a womans favour is the only possible eventuality of Game. When men unbind from each other and abandon brotherhood feminism has won. Man is reduced to his animal nature. If feminism wins, the Alpha will be kept in a cage, released only to kill the Beta, then used for sexual gratification and breeding stock.

A better roadmap to the jungle doesn’t exist than right here in these pages. The blogger knows it. The reader knows it. And the Devil knows it. If our last rallying point is a pact with the Devil then We. Are. Done.

It’s a strange mental contortion when getting all the sex and love from pretty girls one could want is considered a victory for feminism.

My take on this issue which crops up regularly on this blog can be summed up in a simple rhetorical ploy:

What do you call a man who sacrifices for a country and a culture which is indifferent to him at best and hates him at worst?

A fool.

I say, bring on the jungle.





Comments


  1. http://hetexted.com/text/1353092037

    CH Principles in practice

    Like


    • on November 16, 2012 at 6:44 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozlzo ^^^^

      someone needs to post my text at hetexted.com:

      http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/great-books-for-men-greatbooksformen-gbfm-tm-gb4m-tm-gr8books4men-tm-lzozozozozlzo-tm/

      3 EZ STEPZ: How 2 Handle FLakesz and Flakey Flakerz in da ERA of da TEXT MESSAGE attention whorez zlzlzozozz

      dis is from hearteites blog on FLAKEY FLAKE ERA WE LIVEZ IN where everyone flakes zlzozozoozoz while da gbfm sits at home and waits for da chcix who cflaked flaked on your asssss lzozozzolzolzol:::

      how 2 counter da flakey flakesz in THREE EZ STEPZ

      1. 9 PM: da gbfm sends out a mass text 2 all my ladies:

      “lotsa cocksa 4 u lzozlzlz.”

      da gbfm then gets back dozens of messages:

      lol
      wtf

      ok
      haha
      ???

      kewl
      wat?

      2. da gbfm waits and hour and sends out to everyone again:

      10 PM: “srry wrng #”

      da gbfm then gets back lotsa texts

      awwww
      lol
      too bad
      u got my hopes up
      damn you

      ur loss

      3. da gbfm then waits ’til midnight and texts to everyone:

      12 Midnightz: my place 30 min.

      den da gbfm sits back and watches the parade arriving on his door camera monitor while he watches da espn highlights and reads homer’s odyssey. ding-dog ding-dong they ring da gbfm bell one by one hoping to touch da gbfm’s ding-dong zlzozozzozololzollzo but if they are under an 8 da gbfm just ignorez & reads his boookz zlzozoolzz

      at 1 am a hot hottie shows up and da gbfm hits the buzzer and lets her up.

      da gbfm saves lotsas times and money while the betas liquor her up at the bars and da gbfm gets to hang out with homer instaead of goldidggers and douchetard boobie-men manboobz at all the clubs these days lzlzllzlzl

      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do nottry this on your own as da GBFM needz you out there buying them drinkz all night and getting them dinnerz as i don’t want no hos eating my puizzaaa and heinekinz beerz!!!! we all have our part in this so please please respect yo!!!!! lzozolzolozzzz

      Like


      • Only one hot hottie?

        I guess you would only need one, technically.

        Like


      • The neg is, despite all contemporary “game faggotry” that tries to teach betas that which they can NEVER master due to inherent lack of exposure to pussy, which CAN be turned down, still a gold standard of the alpha male. Mystery was spitting it when many readers hadn’t grown pubes yet, and it is as relevant today if you can do it with the utter lack of interest it truly requires. There will be a dozen supplicating beta males out trying to out jockey each other for a chance to penetrate a pussy that looks just like the other 100 slits in the packed club that night.

        You, of course, know differently. She will adore the attention she gets, but at the end of the day in a brain subjected to 100,000+ years of evolution that will NOT be undone in 50 years much less 5 centuries she knows only one thing. I’m bored by these supplicants. That guy just told me, via text, that he wants to deposit his sperm into other women and sent this to me by mistake he needs my egg.

        Don’t try this at home betas, GBFM is right, you will FAIL because you are posers and you are fake. I have had two girls (read: whores) suck my cock at the same time trying to draw sperm out of me. But then… I’m pretty alpha, and called them whores as they were. You dream of this life, and you should but you will never achieve it. My best advice is, shame these sluts back into the Dark Ages. That is your last and best hope to spunk your paltry DNA into a hole willing to receive it.

        Like


      • Makes sense!

        Like


      • 1) the honourable GBFM replied my posts #lifecomplete 2)lolzlzlozlzozz @ GBFM in action!

        Like


      • on November 18, 2012 at 1:22 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozozozzlzozozlz 2nite da gbfm is letting 2 hotties inz zlzozozozozozo no butthext thoug as i don’t buttehxt like da neoeoncocnth favorite son tuvker max rhemsyes with godlamn sax da heroic sectriev taoper of buttehxt zlzoozozzo

        Like


  2. Though a part of me is inclined to agree with JIS’s prose, I cannot fathom wasting any more of my efforts, time etc in vain attempts to be “righteous” or good or whatever for some fucking shit bred society that will just leave me dead where I stand once I have drained all my energy to be upright in its midst.

    Family? Kids? No fucking thanks.

    Bring on the Walter E Kurtzs of the world so we last remaining men can have worthy opponents to clash against.

    Like


  3. […] The Dark Triad is the clarion call that has replaced outmoded concepts of honor, virtue, chivalry and self-sacrifice as the organizing principle which motivates and galvanizes the post-society American man. It is the ultimate expression of untrammeled individualism. A society crumbling into atomizing modernism is both symptomatic of growing psychopathy in the population and causal of more people turning toward the psychopathic dark side. When truth is exiled, the allure of cold-blooded self-concern is evident. This, right here, is the result of 50 years of feminist influence. Decivilisation. Decivilisation by the hand of the Mother Goddess and her evil handmaidens. That’s Game – a roadmap to her altar with Google-Maps-direction-finder efficiency. Game is like a gold ring Source: Chateau Heartiste   […]

    Like


  4. What do you call a man who sacrifices for a country and a culture which is indifferent to him at best and hates him at worst?

    A fool.

    ——

    And thus we live in a time when selfishness never looked so good. And the hilarious thing is, it’s rewarded and lauded by WOMEN. It’s as if crossing over to the other side gives you this universal pass to seek whatever makes you happy and you can do no wrong. Let others sacrifice for the greater bad.

    Like


    • on November 16, 2012 at 6:46 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      rnecoconservatism: why do jonah goldberg and charlotte allen and teh weekly standard hate on/ignore true heroes and classical marriage and men’s rights and shed love on Tucker Max who films butthex with girls without the girl’s consent? butthexx!! lozlzlzlzlzlz lzlz!! goldberg says we need more feminism & family killing! lzozl!

      March 10, 2010 12:00 A.M.
      Where Feminists Get It Right
      Women civilize men. ’Nuff said.

      The reason strikes me as fairly simple. Women civilize men. As a general rule, men will only be as civilized as female expectations and demands force them to be. “Liberate” men from those expectations, and Lord of the Flies logic kicks in. Liberate women from this barbarism, and male decency will soon follow.

      –http://article.nationalreview.com/427383/where-feminists-get-it-right/jonah-goldberg

      hahahahah! what goldberg is saying that is if his wife didn’t lay down the line, he would be a beasty man alpha male, smacking women around, as that is in in true, deep, neocon nature. lozllz! he admits it! and then he projects it on teh entire world as neocons do to justify their pre-emptive, illegal wars! lzozll!

      What jonah goldberg forgets to mention is that women committed over 50,000,000 abortions/murders (by their choice alone) since the fiat class’s Roe vs. Wade, as well as the fact that women originate over 2/3 of all divorces. This si why the fiat necons love women, as women serve their destructive quest for power.

      This is because divorce and abortion are huge neocon profit centers, which also serve to dehumanize humanity, kill the family, grow the STATE, and make them all suck on the fiat teat that Jonah Goldberg et al dangle from The National Review. lozzllz!

      How come Jonah never talks about this:

      This one-page site has more links about the brutal tyranny that a man can be subjected to once he enters the legal contract of marriage, and even more so after he has children. What was once the bedrock of society, and a solemn tradition that benefited both men and women equally, has quietly mutated under the evil tinkering of feminists, divorce lawyers, and leftists, into a shockingly unequal arrangement, where the man is officially a second-class citizen who is subjected to a myriad of sadistic risks. As a result, the word ‘marriage’ should not even be used, given the totality of changes that have made the arrangement all but unrecognizable compared to its intended ideals. Suicide rates of men undergoing divorce run as high as 20%, and all of us know a man who either committed suicide, or admits seriously considering it during the dehumanization he faced even though he wanted to preserve the union. Needless to say, this is a violation of the US Constitution on many levels, and is incompatible with the values of any supposedly advanced democracy that prides itself on freedom and liberty. There is effectively a tyrannical leftist shadow state operating within US borders but entirely outside the US constitution, which can subject a man to horrors more worthy of North Korea than the US, even if he did not want out of the marriage, did not want to be separated from his children, and did not want to lose job. Any unsuspecting man can be sucked into this shadow state.

      And this:

      http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/

      Before you take the plunge there are a few things about marriage that you need to be aware of. The institution of marriage as we know it is no more. It has undergone drastic changes in the last 50 years. What used to be a life long commitment, unbreakable barring the most severe circumstances, has been relegislated into something new entirely thanks to the lobbying efforts of radical feminists and the divorce industry. In trying to to make divorce “fail-safe” for homemaker / lower-earner spouses, the bad ones included, they have made marriage “unsafe” for virtually everyone else.

      Marriage today is a temporary union of two individuals where the exit costs are highly asymmetrical. What does that mean? It means that upon the dissolution of the marriage, one spouse generally makes off like a bandit, while the other is pushed into a life of unending poverty, abridged civil rights, and being two paychecks away from arrears, contempt, and prison.

      http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/

      Why doesn’t this bother Jonah: “4. Decriminalization of Adultery – Adultery is no longer a crime. However the failure to pay alimony to an adulterous spouse is. Go figure.”

      How come Jonah & his neocon elites never stick up for the common man, who, btw, is dying on foreign shores for their unconstitutional, undeclared foreign wars?

      he fundamental thing that everyone is missing is that the neocons are exalting beta males such as tucker max as alpha males, while ignoring the true alphas they send to foreign shores to die in their wars.

      charlotte,

      please allow me to draw your attention to usmc Corporal Jason L. Dunham.

      http://www.jasonsmemorial.org/about.html

      “On April 14, 2004, 3 days after Easter Sunday, Corporal Dunham was manning a checkpoint in Karabilah, Iraq, when an insurgent leapt from his car and began choking Corporal Dunham. A scuffle ensued as two Marines approached to help. Reportedly, the last words from Corporal Dunham were, “No, No. Watch his hand.” Suddenly, the insurgent dropped a grenade. Corporal Dunham took off his Kevlar helmet, dropped to the ground, and covered the explosive as best he could.

      The blast seriously wounded all 3 Marines. Eight days later, Corporal Jason L. Dunham died at Bethesda Naval Hospital from wounds he received in the incident. He was 22. ”

      now the funny thing is that to the neocons the greater hero is Tucker Max, even though true heroes such as jason et al. are dying in the neocons’ war.

      Now our foxy Ms. Allen could have used the precious space in the Weekly Standard to give a shout out to a true American hero–Corporal Jason L. Dunham.

      But instead, she regurgitates tucker’s lies and corporate PR, as douchebaggery makes aging neocon’s ginas tingle, while true american heroism leaves them dry:

      “Tucker Max, 33, six feet tall, extrovertedly good-looking, and usually photographed latched to a girl, a bottle of booze, or a cheeseburger, is an honors graduate (in three years) of the University of Chicago. He has a law degree from Duke University, whose admissions committee was so impressed with his academic record that it awarded him an academic scholarship. . . Max is famous as a blogger (tuckermax.com), and his website is replete with stories like the ones above, all involving graphically rendered bedroom exploits (if your definition of bedroom includes vans, offices, and the great outdoors), massive quantities of alcohol, and copious vomiting. He is the author of several books, including The Definitive Book of Pickup Lines (2001, out of print but selling for close to $200 on Amazon), the 2006 blockbuster I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, and the forthcoming Assholes Finish First. Beer in Hell, a dramatization of some of his website yarns, became an indie movie hit in college towns last fall. ”

      Tucker lies about his height & success & films buttsex without the woman’s consent, and thus the weekly standard exalts him, while rejecting and ignoring all those true heroes jumping on grenades in their war.

      http://www.quotabletuckermax.com/

      http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/

      Like


      • Good post. You should use this style all the time.

        Like


      • I agree.

        The only problem with most of his posts are you have to be an avid reader willing to bypass the facade of ineptitude.

        He should write like this under a different name, and continue his tirades as before all the same. Always informative.

        Like


    • As a former U.S. Army veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, I can tell you an increasing percentage of military men feel this way. The reason is there is little hope for a civilian man wanting to have a lifelong good marriage with his wife surrounded by his biological children who love and respect him on his terms or at least genuine compromised terms. Everything is on her terms as far as the marriage and children are concerned. U.S. military men know their chances of having a lifelong good marriage with his wife surrounded by his biological children who love and resepect him on his terms or at least genuine compromised terms are even less than a civilian. This is why the dicorce rates for the U.S. Marine Corps. and the U.S. Army are between 70-75% and the suicide rates for these branches of service are the highest in recorded history within the past decade.

      I am glad that I never married nor sired children. I advised the same to my fellow Soldiers. I also told them to always use condoms so they wouldn’t get diseases or babies. At the very least if they could not avoid marriage, I told them to wait until after they deployed to a war zone and after the age of 25 at earliest as a well as after age 30 at best because both war and maturity would change them. Few listened. Many paid the price. Virtually all admited that they should have followed my advice in retrospect especially if the relationships with their wives or baby mommas plus children went badly. Even most of those who had good relationships with their wives, baby mommas and children admited that I was righteous in my advice.

      Like


      • on November 16, 2012 at 9:56 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlzozozolzolz

        yeah da womnz publisherz and charlotte allenz at da weekly stabndard standadth igonore the true alphas jumping on grenangdesz and celebreate scetriev taper pof butthext tucker max rheyems with goldman sax because he makes tehir ginas tinegelzozozlzzooo

        why are women publishing and promoting tucker max?

        MCCOY MOUNTAIN
        ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

        Ms. Priscilla Painton
        Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief
        RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

        “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max’s controversial ad campaign. Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

        Dear Ms. Painton,

        I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-… “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background. Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

        “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”
        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-loc

        Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040
        http://tuckermaxdocuebag.blogspot.com
        http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

        Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First. At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

        “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””
        –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

        Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

        http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-

        Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.
        –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max
        http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-q

        “OK, we can try anal sex, but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hila

        Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

        Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

        “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

        Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

        Ms. Painton—do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

        What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

        Like


      • Well said.

        Like


      • This guy has a hard on for tucker max I think

        Like


      • I think you mean GBFM, not me.

        Like


      • Ya the windbag that keeps writing about tucker max that rhymes with Goldman sacks .

        Like


      • “Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;
        And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” – John 8:31-32

        Like


    • Women quite often applaud men who ‘do what they want’ ‘follow their desires’ and who are ‘in charge of their own pleasure’…..the doublethink involved in paedojustification,rapistlove, and thugcummery is MINDBLOWING TO BEHOLD.

      There’s nothing you can’t do no matter how outrageous if you shrug it off as ‘just being yourself’….chicks dig that circular bullshit logic. It’s their logic after all.

      Like


  5. I say, bring on the jungle.

    It is a fools game to sacrifice for our declining civilization, but then again even tigers get eaten in the jungle. Personally, I’d say grab a chair poolside and watch it all burn, but once the rubble cools we probably ought to try to build something worthwhile to replace it.

    Like


    • This platitude is getting a little tiresome around here.

      Like


      • Accordingly, LeLe claims that bitches are breakfast.

        Though I don’t think he’s out of line, such an attitude can become tiresome to cater to.

        However, because his name begins with an M, I will have to stand by him.

        Like


  6. Bitches and champagne

    Like


  7. Chivalry and honor were expressions of a good which is beyond time. Chivalry has lost its relevance, but a practitioner of game need not necessarily discard the ideas of goodness and uprightness. You can fuck girls and be good! Really!

    And the devil has his place in our souls, as well as the world, and that is good too. You can be a charming bastard like Lucifer and still be ultimately good. Trust me, I’m a philosopher. I think that giving up on society and focusing on your own needs and wants is the most nihilistic depressing and unhealthy way you can live your life. Ultimately a person with any higher cognitive ability at all will need a creative outlet or some higher principle by which to live in order to stay functional.

    Our culture may be going to hell but it needs keepers of the flame to shine a light through the dark of the night, if I may indulge in some casual poetry. Childish nihilism will always be fun if you want to spend your life like the clap-having retards on the Jersey Shore show, but it’s a soul-destroying life and there is more to aspire to.

    Like


    • “You can be a charming bastard like Lucifer and still be ultimately good.”

      Here Eve…eat this juicy delicious apple. You’ll get everything you ever wanted. That God fellow just doesn’t want you to have any fun. While you are at it…make sure that beta you are with takes a bite too.

      Like


      • Good opportunity to rewrite religion.

        “And so Adam plucked the fruit of the tree, cause it looked damn delicious. The viper whispered at him, but Adam said “nah. my snake is better. (in deliberately lowercase speech).

        He then slapped Eve on her exposed glute, laughed a deep belly laugh, and spit seeds at her. The river floweth from her Garden.”

        And with that, feminists everywhere couldn’t stand to let Adam be the ultimate badass and from then on decided to claim the reputation of the true original seducer. (Because from what I have seen, women absolutely suck at seduction)

        Like


      • Adam fell because he failed Eve’s shit test. He obeyed Eve rather than God Himself. What does that tell you?

        Like


      • “Adam fell because he failed Eve’s shit test”

        Eve didn’t shit test Adam. When God questioned Adam he blamed what he did on Eve and Eve blamed the serpent. It is the classic excuse of “You made me do it. You’re the cause of my problems,”

        Feminism is based on blaming the problems of women on men and much of the Manosphere has returned the same foolishness toward women.

        Like


      • When God questioned Adam he blamed what he did on Eve and Eve blamed the serpent.

        That’s true, but the lameness of it all is because he failed Eve’s shit test. God therefore put curses on all three; on Adam for failing, on Eve for shit testing Adam into doing something Adam was forbidden to do, and on the serpent as well.

        Like


      • Lucifer was the original game master. Let that be a lesson to you guys about “women’s intuition”.

        Like


      • When I was in Afghanistan, I could cause Afghan soldiers to laugh when women thought they were just as good as men and better. I could do the the same with Taliban men too. All women would act offended. Some women would truly be offended. Most women’s GINAS TINGLED as they were insulted yet surprisingly turned on as long as noone called them out on their GINAS TINGLING. Ring a Ding-Ding!!! I simply asked a rhetorical question which is, ” Oh!!! Daughter of Eve, has the Snake tricked you again?”

        Like


      • Did you have discussions about feminism with Afghan men when no women were around?

        Did they see it as one of the flaws of the United States and Christianity?

        Did they even know what feminism is?

        If not, when you told them what it was did they start laughing?

        Can you direct me to a good resource where I can read 1st person accounts of soldiers experiences with the people of Alphagangstastan?

        Thanks.

        Like


      • I mainly did it with Afghan men who were soldiers or contractors or merchants on our side who spoke English well. I would not say they were necessarily opposed to feminism per se and they had some understanding of what feminism is. They did not regard the kind of feminism we have as a flaw of Christianity, but they did regard it as a flaw of the USA. This does not imply that they regarded feminism as a bad, but they definitely viewed the kind we have in the USa with all its poor effects as a bad. They all knew feminism would be a joke in Afhanistan without running electricty and washing machines plus refridgeration. They also knew that feminism was upheld by the strength and kindness of men. They knew turning women into sluts like we have in the USA is a bad idea as all want a good wife. Taliban men were much more firmly against feminism. I don’t know where else to direct you as far as soldiers first hand accounts.

        Like


    • I agree with that, Arty. The Dark Triad traits might be a good servant in some ways, but they are certainly a poor master. If you try to live without any transcendent moral principles – whether they be of the ancient or religious variety – then you’re just going to become a miserable person.

      Like


      • “Chivalry and honor were expressions of a good which is beyond time.”

        Let’s not fall into the Harlequin-romanticized version of chivalry.

        Chivalry was a code of conduct that rich men (knights) used to woo extremely wealthy women in order to elevate their status, i.e., MEDIEVAL GAME.

        Knights didn’t need game for pussy because they could rape peasant girls left and right. But they needed game to get money, i.e., get the wealthy girls.

        Chivalry was also code of conduct that allowed rich men (knights) to reduce their chances of getting killed in combat, i.e., encouraged other rich men to capture and ransom other rich men instead of killing them.

        Like


    • “You can be a charming bastard like Lucifer and still be ultimately good.”

      Taking some kind of power and rejecting the responsibilities coming with it is what teenagers do. Adults, not so much I’m afraid, Mr Philosoper™.

      Like


    • “He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see.” – John 9:25

      Like


  8. Welcome to the age of the sociopaths!

    Like


  9. Haters of Game-ology will soon start showing up here to chant, again and again, that Real Alphas are leaders of men, builders of nations, and so forth. And I suppose they will feel all warm inside for having done so. IMHO, they will be guilty of being lazy and un-imaginative.
    I mean, it takes no brains at all to notice that some men become prominent and that other men seem to follow them. After all, this take place in public; even on TV.
    What goes on in the female hind-brain and in actual fuck-situations is very much NOT out there to notice at a glance. That stuff is almost by definition very private and routinely lied about.
    The notion that virtuous male endeavors and gina-tingles are linked is in fact nothing more than hope-driven guess work done by guys who have had few, ahem, “Data Points” of experience with feral female lust.
    Indulging in clue-less guessing not doing yourself or the world any favors.

    Like


    • @Rum — agree with you.

      Expect a long, verbose rant from King A on this one.

      Like


      • Sounds exquisite 🙂

        Like


      • Send him an email, Kate, and ask him to post something tonight.

        Like


      • Jealous much?

        Like


      • No…but if the world can see email correspondence between Petraeus and Broadwell, and between Allen and Kelly, why shouldn’t we see the King A – GeishaKate emails?

        Could be a great chance to see King A game in action.

        Like


      • The verboser, the better… says I.

        Like


      • on November 16, 2012 at 9:08 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

        Agreed.

        Like


      • Why does it seem like King A rubs so many people the wrong way? He’s just one man? He addresses some valid concerns some guys have about game… he’s not trying to shut down the website…

        I admire vigorus debate and King A is a great rep of a different position. Are people afraid he’s a white knight or something? Are people afraid he’s gonna sabotage the chateau and end game forever? I don’t get it? Sure, the debate sometimes gets high spirited, but thats because we are men. Lets not mistake it for anything else.

        Like


      • Nigga please… WE are men, you are untermensch, never forget that. You get our scraps because we are benevolent rulers in spite of your hatred and inferiority. That being said…. King A is an odd subject to me. He has a lexicon, a didactic, and a command of English that at the very least rivals CH or perhaps in some ways, exceeds our host.

        But he brings and bears a message into a place that falls mainly on deaf ears. Namely, he decries the categorizing of the modern feminist woman as the whore she is, useful only for the pleasures of the flesh she ascribes to, in pursuit of a more noble goal. So he comes to a site meant to shame whores into either just admitting what they are, or attempting to convert them back to “women” in the classic sense of the word.
        A paradox, to be certain… I LIKE his ideas, I simply think his methodology is not flawed and relevant in the context of modern society. Ergo, women in the 21st century West ARE whores, by an large.

        How then, do we reign them in. CH is a sign of the times, and he will not change in spite of arguments from minds equal to, or superior to his own, with a language to match. Find a different way…

        Like


      • He’s a verbose buffoon.

        Like


      • Agreed, Tertullian. King A is high on his own puffery. He manages to bring all topics back to this chimerical creature he calls “manliness”, yet manages to evade most, if not all, empirical evidence for his positions.

        My guess: He’s an unemployed Ph.D. in the liberal arts. Hence the derogatory attitude towards undergrads, community colleges, etc. Hence the holier-than-thou attitude. Hence the constant literary allusions.

        Like


      • King A’s comments are writing in search of a point.

        Like


      • Part envy of intellect, part anti-Christian sentiment, part leftist/shabbos goy intolerance and political bias… and a large dollop of short attention span.

        Except for Tertullian, anti-King A posters are pretty much no-account dweebs who constantly get their heads, such as they are, handed to them on this forum, yet keep coming back in their flaccid attempts at opinion validation from the other fellow travelers… most of whom are probably their own sock puppets.

        Like


      • “Why does it seem like King A rubs so many people the wrong way? He’s just one man? He addresses some valid concerns some guys have about game… he’s not trying to shut down the website…”
        .
        First, because he’s not spewing NAZI garbage is why. The moment he’ll start, watch his admirer numbers skyrocket.
        .
        Second, he talks old-fashioned values and no one likes that here, UNLESS they are in a marriage or looking to get married.
        .
        Third, he is a bit religious, and there are many atheists posting here, and they don’t believe in GOD and don’t want to hear about him either.
        .
        In short, you got to give people what they want, or they’ll not vote for you. Thank goodness, he isn’t the type to pander to anyone. He’ll say what he thinks is right, even if it falls on deaf ears. You got to admire a man like that.

        Like


      • @ Nitelilly….”not spewin Nazi garbage?” ummmm perhaps I am confusing King A with another poster “Had too many shots of whiskey” but I recall some of King’s A posts…lozzzzzlzozlzozlozzolzoz hardly “Not..Nazi-ish” to me

        Like


    • Lead these jokes of men?
      Build on this crooked toxic foundation?
      Produce so you can steal from me?
      Let it burn. Let it all burn. Then we may live again.

      And now you know why Ancient Greece produced so much and kept such a tight rein on female sexuality. Bitches be trippin’.

      Like


  10. Those are some eloquent words from Jacob Ian Stalk. Yet he forgets that men who are informed about the true nature of female sexuality, and can take full advantage of that nature are more able to make rational choices. More rational choices are never a bad thing.

    Certainly there is an equilibration that needs to happen, and is happening thanks to places like this one, but he’s delusional as the feminists if he thinks that alphas are going to be caged.

    Such delusion is all too common in the religious set. It’s not hard to make one error in judgement when you’ve already made a massive one by handing over your sovereignty to some religious zealots that attempt to control how people live.

    We are not entering a new dark age, but a new age of light, based on understanding of true human nature, based on science, reason, and logic. Ironically, acceptance of science, and of human nature, leads us to be more tolerant of our humanness.

    Like


    • Let’s hope so. Any era where Oprah reigns supreme as a cultural icon deserves to die a painful death.

      Like


    • “We are not entering a new dark age, but a new age of light, based on understanding of true human nature, based on science, reason, and logic. Ironically, acceptance of science, and of human nature, leads us to be more tolerant of our humanness.”

      You would hope so. Yet some of the commenters here prove otherwise.

      Like


    • Wish I had a buck for every poor soul that was subsequently starved or murdered after the heralding in of “a new age of light…based on science, reason and logic” by self-righteous, historical illiterates. Talk about zealotry.

      Like


  11. Paradise Lagoon/ The Admirable Crichton encapsulates simply no end of Heartiste commentary — particularly WRT alpha, beta and omega roles.

    And the gals operate exactly as per Heartiste’s dictums: they promptly flutter around alpha — and promptly, too.

    The plot shakes up the social order — and the gals re-jigger their lust rather promptly.

    As ever, the betas and omegas wait patiently for the alpha to toss ’em the scraps.

    Such is the great game.

    ‘Woman on top’ only works for one generation — and for lesbians.

    For, it’s a losing combination, one that grates upon XX even more than XY.

    They are left in a princess world — without a prince.

    That’s not a dream; it’s a nightmare.

    Consequently, divorce is pandemic. The rose is off the bloom.

    Like


  12. “Fights to the death for a womans favour is the only possible eventuality of Game.”

    Isn’t a fight to the death kinda beta? Smacks of one-itis, pedestalization.

    Like


  13. “It’s a strange mental contortion when getting all the sex and love from pretty girls one could want is considered a victory for feminism.”

    Women being purely sexual beings, the more time you spend chasing them, and the less time you spend on something else, means they win. And they are winning big time, right now. Even here.

    At some point, you’re gonna have to give men something else to look for than just pussy. Or you’ll end up in a very strange position where feminism will thank you for your job.

    Like


    • Interesting point drawn from Weininger. Notice the amount of male prostitution in the media now. Like that tv show Hung, or Californication where Hank Moody is running around like a sucker. Still serving women.

      Like


      • The manosphere has evolved from its “baby phase”, where people were trying, failing, and learning. Right now, it’s in its adolescent phase: it’s got some power, but doesn’t want the responsibilities coming with it. I’m confident we’ll get to the adult phase, even if it takes time. The fun will still be there, definitely, but game will relate to the big picture (call it society or whatever you want).

        Whether you like it or not, at some point you’ll have to let go off the babes (not all of them though, don’t worry), and you’ll have to get your hands in shit. Your country, your life, everything comes from the effort of some other guys, there is no reason why we wouldn’t get through our own shit.

        We’ll get there.

        Like


      • But they’ll scream out, “HE’S GETTING LAID!”

        I notice Roosh making the transition too.

        Men serving the needs of men instead of the needs of women. Being more than stupid oxen or Boxer the Horse in Animal Farm for a woman to buy a house in the suburbs. You ready for a real revolution?

        Like


      • A full scale economic collapse will make the manosphere grow up pretty quick. The Greatest Generation and Baby Boom came after a depression.

        When the females lose their safety net and big daddy government takes a nosedive…where are they going to run to?

        Like


      • the babyboomers are the fucking problem.

        Like


      • We’ll get there.

        Not for a long time yet, and probably not for longer than you can think possible.

        Until the groundswell occurs, not only is any overt action more likely than not futile, but it is helpful to keep in mind that those who lead charges against enemy positions most often end up dead, even if their side ends up “winning.”

        Like


      • You don’t need to charge anything or do any overt action, that’s the beauty of it. Just withdraw, and let the women do all the work. The groundswell is already occuring. Look at the dropping marriage rate and skyrocketing bastardry. Give it time.

        Like


    • Or you could flip the switch and make women chase you while you spend time getting your nuts off on another woman lolololololzolzolzolzolz

      Like


  14. I don’t get the alpha = “leader of men” argument.

    If:

    Alpha = Apex of masculinity

    And:

    Women get to decide what is masculine (just like men get to decide what is feminine)

    Then:

    Who is the alpha?

    The “leader of women” PUA who keeps a revolving harem/plates/fuckbuddies/etc.

    Or

    The “leader of men” 4-star general with an ugly wife and oneitis for an aging manjaw who may or may not have attraction for him still.

    ???

    Like


    • on November 17, 2012 at 5:54 pm Thinkingaboutit

      In the past (recent historical as well as evolutionary), there was no difference between the two. A leader of men was someone who could wreak violence on all around him, and force women to submit to him, and then prevent other men from taking them for a spin. Only now, with extraordinary restrictions on violence and a society of abundance, has “leader of men” become a basically useless position. Male dominance is based on exercising force over others, and “civilization” works against that – allowing slack-jawed, lily-livered metrosexual cowards to become more alpha than an honest-to-god General.

      Like


  15. I think the Dark Triad is more than what taterearl or Heartiste wrote.

    The Dark Triad is deliberately corrupting yourself into using others for your own gain. Using women for sex is one kind of corruption, but to really be a successful player you need to learn how to use anyone should the need arise.

    Like


    • I suck at this. My only strength is being unusable by others. 50% of the battle though!

      Like


    • Hold on there. “Using women for sex” is for guys who need or want nothing else from women. If a person’s needs or desires are for more than sex with a female, they can be just as determined with hard core self interest in mind, to “use” women for companionship and baby making. It’s about deciding what you need or want from people, and not allowing people to suck your time and energy who are not providing that. It could also be about setting a standard for yourself and not allowing other people to pressure you to deviate from it.

      Like


    • The mark of a man’s character is how he treats people who cannot possibly be of use to him. – source forgotten, maybe someone can help out with attributing credit.

      Like


  16. The problem is that no matter how many logical arguments one offers oneself…it just feels wrong. Like there is some natural God given law out there that says you can’t embrace the void. That’s why you write the posts you write. No matter how much one wants to sit poolside, no matter how good the arguments for doing so are, it just leaves one empty. An emptiness no amount of snatch can fill.

    Like


    • True…while I agree that Christian men need game, I would also argue players need God.

      Like


      • Golf clap… most droll.

        Like


      • God Game. Worked on the Virgin Mary!

        Like


      • on November 19, 2012 at 5:33 pm Demarcated Values

        Ahahaha.

        I’ve been saying this for ages.

        Back in Catholic school I was reprimanded for such a bold statement (around age 7 or 8, I believe).

        “Didn’t Mary have sex with an “angel” while her husband was sleeping?” No wonder Angels are so powerful, but their wings don’t work. They don’t even need to fly to spread their demon seed in the dark, claiming they’re of the Light.

        “Don’t worry babe, it’s God’s Divine Will. What’s your husband’s name? Yeah, have Joseph raise the magical child you as a forever Virgin [in the Lord of Host’s eyes] will raise. The kid will be the Son of God, after all. And because you’re Theotokos, you needn’t worry about being chastised for deciding to be raped by an Angel.”

        The Lord of Host’s. The one who has Mastery over even those who allow Him to be welcomed into their home. After all, God sent Him to ‘aid’ you on your journey, while he’s busy awakening your wife/girlfriend in the other room, or while you sleep. A thief in the Night. God. Your Father. His Son. The Holy Spirited bond driving them apart & together as they slowly cognize the dissonance of reality. He Who as an Angel Comes & Goes, leaving God Incarnate in His Wake. Game.

        Something like that. I’d assume. No wonder Jesus had the Madonna/Whore complex we’ve all adapted, and no wonder it’s worshipped still. Cause whether He’s seeing His Mother as a Virgin, or attributing value to a prostitute of the same name as his mother like a Whore who’s actually a Virgin [In God’s Eye’s] to be treated equally – think SlutWalk is like being a Priest who actually believes what he’s preaching….He’s still missing the point that despite being able to get drunk, those who aren’t God’s Savior according to His Mother’s cuckoldry and rationalization of said adulterous treachery, are busy fucking his Mom claiming they are God. His Mom being Your Mom being Mary’s. Like Jane’s. Hence Mary-jane, like Marijuana, like who gives a fuck, it’s all the same…Laziness. Lies. Lotharios. Debutantes. Players. Angels.

        And so the cycle continues.

        Like


      • Blaspheming fools, take heed, if you would become wise:

        31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven unto men.

        36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

        37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

        Like


      • on November 21, 2012 at 7:05 pm Demarcated Values

        One must speak with the Devil’s tongue to lead astray the Wicked.

        Like


      • From what hoo-doo Crowleyesque fortune cookie did you dig that out?

        Like


    • Much truth in this. I’m a lot older than most here at 57. I did the whole Alpha thing back in the 1980’s and believe it or not, like anything else endless strange pussy grows stale after a while. All it does is divert one from the crap that’s going on all around you, I realized that at 30 and hung up my spurs to work on me. That lasted a whole 3 years before I fell into the pussy trap again, forgetting all I’d learned about hypergamy and marrying the “One” at 33. That lasted 24 years, my life became hers and the kids until Uberhypergamy kicked in at her entering peri-menopause . So here I am again, starting over….I think I need to find me a MANestary this time….

      Like


      • I feel for you, brother. 44 here and fresh out of a marriage with a perimenopausal black hole of physical and emotional frigidity. I would have done a lot of things differently in hindsight, but once my 98-year-old grandfather remarked on a sudden investment failure, “You gotta keep looking forward.”

        Like


    • Old movies are a great insight in humanity. Here are a few lines from the classic Casablanca that I was watching this afternoon:

      “Rick: Don’t you sometimes wonder if it’s worth all this? I mean what you’re fighting for.

      Victor Laszlo: You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we’ll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die.

      Rick: Well, what of it? It’ll be out of its misery.

      Victor Laszlo: You know how you sound, Mr. Blaine? Like a man who’s trying to convince himself of something he doesn’t believe in his heart.”

      and

      “Rick: Last night we said a great many things. You said I was to do the thinking for both of us. Well, I’ve done a lot of it since then, and it all adds up to one thing: you’re getting on that plane with Victor where you belong.

      Ilsa: But, Richard, no, I… I…

      Rick: Now, you’ve got to listen to me! You have any idea what you’d have to look forward to if you stayed here? Nine chances out of ten, we’d both wind up in a concentration camp. Isn’t that true, Louie?

      Captain Renault: I’m afraid Major Strasser would insist.

      Ilsa: You’re saying this only to make me go.

      Rick: I’m saying it because it’s true. Inside of us, we both know you belong with Victor. You’re part of his work, the thing that keeps him going. If that plane leaves the ground and you’re not with him, you’ll regret it. Maybe not today. Maybe not tomorrow, but soon and for the rest of your life.

      Ilsa: But what about us?

      Rick: We’ll always have Paris. We didn’t have, we, we lost it until you came to Casablanca. We got it back last night.

      Ilsa: When I said I would never leave you.

      Rick: And you never will. But I’ve got a job to do, too. Where I’m going, you can’t follow. What I’ve got to do, you can’t be any part of. Ilsa, I’m no good at being noble, but it doesn’t take much to see that the problems of three little people don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. Someday you’ll understand that.

      [Ilsa lowers her head and begins to cry]

      Rick: Now, now…
      [Rick gently places his hand under her chin and raises it so their eyes meet]
      Rick: Here’s looking at you kid.”

      In the end the alpha gives up on the dark triad and gives the woman over to the beta so he can go save her and civilization.

      Like


  17. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/13al11/i_dedicated_one_full_year_doing_everything_to/

    “We met in Paris 1.5 years ago, spent an awesome time together for a few months, waited for each other for almost a year, she came for Christmas, we had a great trip to the US/Canada. For one year, I did everything to help her move to France and get into a Master’s program here (I had to rewrite all of her cover letters, etc.). We spent every single day talking online non-stop. I met her parents, she met mine, it seemed serious. And after only two months here, i.e. as soon as she’s met other people, she vanishes and won’t even talk to me at all. As in, she kisses me one morning going to work, tells me we’d talk later, I come back from work, all her stuff has disappeared. Her breakup text seems to say that everything about our relationship has always been awful even though that’s the exact opposite of what she’s always said. (She was telling me that I was perfect and that she loved me until the very last moment.)

    I feel stupid now. I shouldn’t even have waited for her for so long, she could have come to France for a semester 6 months earlier through her university, but she didn’t want to. I should have understood that meant she didn’t really want to be with me.

    I’m sure some redditors who’ve had to deal with worse things can cheer me up?”

    Like


    • Looks like Boxer the Horse got turned into glue after outliving his usefulness.

      Like


    • No offense, man, but that’s just pure puke.
      Waiting for each other for a frickin’ year, daily email marathons, helping her with everything but breathing – why don’t you just just cut off your own dick and introduce her to some guys who are taller, hotter, younger and richer than you?
      Same result, just faster.

      Like


    • I’m sure some redditors who’ve had to deal with worse things can cheer me up?”

      Yeah, well… you’ll always have Paris.

      (Casablanca game)

      Like


      • Let me get this straight,

        your girlfriend left you in Paris, and you are still in Paris, and you want us to cheer you up?

        Nigga please!
        miss me with that simp ass thirsty nigger bullshit. (((shaken my head)))

        Like


      • Few better places than Paris to FTOW.

        Like


    • “Hypergamy doesn’t care…”

      Like


    • LDRs don’t work. Avoid at all costs.

      Like


    • Oneitis….another one bites the dust.

      Like


    • I made the mistakes of actually clicking that link. It has been rare in my life to see as much supplicating beta cuntitude in a single place as the respondents on that thread. My testicles shrunk approximately 7.35% just by reading all of that. Men like that get what they deserve I have zero sympathy.

      Like


    • Did you at least have her pussy? You didi right? at least you had some damn good French ho sex. Cant beat that right? I mean,she didnt put you off,make you wait,right? You’re too smart for that…

      Like


  18. Just felt the need to post this here. It has no relevance whatsoever.

    http://screen.yahoo.com/flip-side-bar-000000587.html

    Like


  19. I think this is a false dilemma between virtue and game. There’s no virtue in being a cog in a machine that is working against you.
    Broadly speaking, virtue means to foster a society worth living in. Treating a shit society like shit is perfectly virtuous, as long as you’re also fostering the existence of a good society. It’s possible to do both.

    Like


  20. Heartiste is English?

    Like


  21. Here’s a wife who understands men age much better than women:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/opinion/the-petraeus-effect-on-military-marriage.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

    Note how she compares a man in his 50’s to Cary Grant, and a woman to an old version of Tony Curtis. And how she clearly notes that, at 22, she could easily get laid by many high status men while her husband couldn’t (although she still hamsterizies it was partly due to their environments), but now it’s definitely reversed.

    Sounds like her husband, though, either is a beta or acts beta enough to assuage her cheating fears. His multiple deployments probably help hide his betaness enough at home so that she’s still gaga over him. unless he’s smart enough to play the game to keep himself from divorce.

    The Petreaus story probably sent 10,000 military wives to the botox clinic and the gym. With good reason.

    BTW, Cary Grant is the ideal to shoot for as you age. He was never considered a super-good-looking guy as a young man (always just average for Hollywood) he carefully controlled his career and persona and kept his self-respect. Voila, at 50-60 years old he could have nailed a bobby soxer.

    Like


  22. LOL. Paula Broadwell’s cuckold hubbie wrote a letter to the NYBEtaTimes, begging for advice from a mainstream

    “My wife is having an affair with a government executive. His role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership. (This might seem hyperbolic, but it is not an exaggeration.) I have met with him on several occasions, and he has been gracious. (I doubt if he is aware of my knowledge.) I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity. He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort. My issue: Should I acknowledge this affair and finally force closure? Should I suffer in silence for the next year or two for a project I feel must succeed? Should I be “true to my heart” and walk away from the entire miserable situation and put the episode behind me?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/magazine/a-message-from-beyond.html?_r=0

    http://gawker.com/5959398/did-paula-broadwells-cuckolded-husband-write-a-letter-to-chuck-klosterman-aka-the-new-york-times-ethicist

    Like


  23. on November 17, 2012 at 1:45 am Bharatiyaa Brouhaha

    “psychopathy = aloof and unconcerned when a woman gets flighty with her emotions”

    Thats apathy, not psychopathy.

    Like


  24. on November 17, 2012 at 5:00 am it's always found - the secret is out

    Went from “never gonna have sex with you [again],” to fuckkng in my car, her worshipping my cock, and her being afraid I wouldn’t call her again. That’s how dark game works.

    And we’re I to explain the rest of it you’d all cower in bewilderment.

    I am Dark Game incarnate.

    Like


    • Please explain. I want to learn how to do the exact same thing.

      Like


      • on November 17, 2012 at 10:19 pm it's always found - the secret is out

        I won’t because then you’ll not have learned by experience. I can’t because you are not me.

        Be transparent in your causality, and remain statuesque in your caged Panther’s movement’s visibility.

        Be happy you’re alive. Do not fear rejection, and laugh at graves dug too deep, & rattle palaces built for princes who in velvet sleep; dreaming of the day their concubines won’t be fucking you – who is their real Master – in knowing Truth’s liable to Word’s exchanged.

        A currency of ineptitude.

        Say ‘yes’ when you want. Say “No” when you can. And never bend over or remove your eyes from those who glare curiously in return, as a response to them; do not be furtive.

        A glance down is to submit, and bold glare is to acknowledge, and with a smile – and what words accompany said stare – is to admit you both know the same Truth’s no more burdensome than Ignorance is to bear.

        Just do whatever you feel like. Really. If not, find a way to. And don’t use power to manipulate the weak, just acknowledge the lack of balance, and let those who wish to speak, speak. And those who wish to act, act. You control only yourself, not how others see you.

        Or just illustrate the Rubiyat & then you’ll find your way.

        I’ve explained nothing but what you need to know. And seeing as people have already found me under different names I can’t say who I am. Let alone explain in depth what you’d need to know.

        Think: Game is bullshit. It is the Truth. I am Game. It is a joke. She is cute, I’d like to know her name. Think no further, as the results are always the same.

        Like


  25. “The Dark Triad are the component parts of the one overarching attitude that most defines and forges the successful womanizer: overconfidence.”

    Agreed, academically. To qualify overconfidence:

    The art of exhibiting these qualities is commonly misrepresented by being a deliberate asshole; a ‘caring asshole’. Irrational overconfidence, or ‘cockyness’, doesn’t hit the mark.

    Calculated arrogance, effectively demonstrated pre-selection, a refined non-reactive attitude to shit testing and a mysterious self-serving aloofness comprises the “attitude” described above.

    Uncalibrated “overconfidence” is try hard. Yielding true overconfidence at the correct moments hits the mark:

    “Listen. I don’t know you…and you need to understand. I’m one charming mother fucker.”

    Like


    • I either missed your earlier posts or you were gone for while…..at any case; it’s good to read your posts again.

      Like


  26. A light to us all, there are times when the editor is simply wrong. Nothing wrong with that. The editor is a human being whose gone before us. That he’s been before us here (game), does not imbue him with godlike knowledge of “there”, and often enough, “there” is where we find ourselves.

    Case in point. The ruling class is the ruling class because the ruling class is evidence and outcome based. In marked contrast to this, the middle and lower classes are increasingly atavistic the lower we fall on the totem. The editor is so saturated in his own atavism this bleedingly screaming empirical real-world distinction has escaped even his dispassionate notice.

    Ergo, while middle and lower classes privately (middle) or pubically (lower) worry about irrelevant details like skin color, that is for example where it comes to thinking of the right mate choices for their children, the ruling class are thinking of whether they can arrange the chance meetup of their own spawn with Xi Jinping’s daughter at Harvard. Don’t let the specific case cited mean too much to you … it is the general here that matters. To understand the mating priorities of the ruling class, read the NYT wedding announcements. The ruling class, long ago, figured out, (pedigree = important) AND (pedigree race). To the degree that the lower classes self-consume over a glitch in their own programming, then it is to that degree that the proprietor is correct: the ruling class indeed has no scrupples watching the lower classes Darwinianly self-destruct and clear the way so that superior genes may flourish.

    Which brings us to Jacob Ian Stalk:

    “If feminism wins, the Alpha will be kept in a cage, released only to kill the Beta, then used for sexual gratification and breeding stock.”

    Stalk, is, in a word, correct. The outcome, writ large, of the female mating algorithm, an algorithm that has far more ancient roots than our recent simian ancestors, is the elimination of resource-wasting beta males and the containment of alpha males. The outcome isn’t so great for the alpha on at least two counts. For one, as the proprietor has noted, hot chicks seem to be a product of generations of beta-male selectivity acting on a female population. i.e.: take out the betas who impose high reproductive standards on females for access to a lifetime of resources, give the alpha FEMALES their unrestricted access to alpha males with no impositions on what they must do to satisfy men in order to have that access … and the mating-class alpha females will start to look a lot to alpha males like, themselves.

    Manjaw anyone?

    And that’s just the best that alphas can have it when feminism wins because when feminism wins, alphas are kept around to breed because all other utility of men has vanished and, once they’ve served their (breeding) purpose, they are generally discarded. The female collective has no use providing finite resources, resources that may be necessary to sustain productive working betafemales or mating alphafemales, to sustain the worthless life of an alphamale who has already given up the one thing he was ever valued for.

    Like


    • “For one, as the proprietor has noted, hot chicks seem to be a product of generations of beta-male selectivity acting on a female population. i.e.: take out the betas who impose high reproductive standards on females for access to a lifetime of resources, give the alpha FEMALES their unrestricted access to alpha males with no impositions on what they must do to satisfy men in order to have that access … and the mating-class alpha females will start to look a lot to alpha males like, themselves.”

      This belies a very poor understanding of the operation of sexual selection, and by extension, sexual dimorphism. More masculinized males reproducing does NOT create more masculinized female offspring, it creates more feminized female offspring. Thinking that more alpha sex make masculinized females is a category error. Male and female testosterone levels are controlled by completely different hormonal processes. Moreover, understand that testosterone in males and progesterone, the master female hormone, are both controlled by luteinizing hormone (LH)

      What this means, for the less scientifically inclined, is that when a woman fucks a high-T alpha, she’s really selecting for high LH levels. So she will have sexy alpha sons, and if she has daughters, they will be hot and feminine, because they’ll have lots of progesterone. Now it is possible for a woman to have both higher T and high progesterone, and you end up with a Paula Broadwell. But, as I said, the high T levels in women are not driven by the same axis.

      Examples from the animal world: the African Lions have large, masculine males, and smaller, more feminine females. This is sexual selection for high T alpha males at work, with the result being stronger sexual dimorphism.

      Now the opposite happens in the Hyena, which has larger, more dominant females, and smaller, more submissive males. Key: this is the long-term consequence a beta-male sexually selected species. The female hyenas almost always select and mate with out-group males from other packs.

      So you little bitches (paging King A, Greg Elliot, et al.) who whine about hypergamy and cry about “society” crumbling” and who want to go back to the old method of female sexual suppression–you guys are actively pushing for a human-hyena world. The active suppression of female sexuality for several thousand years is what got us in this predicament in the first place.

      It was unrestrained female sexuality that led to the development, via sexual selection, of strong, high T alpha males in the first place. This is the world of Lions, the the world that Heartiste, Ya Really, Rollo, and others write about. It is an acceptance of hypergamy, perhaps begrudgingly, but acceptance nonetheless.

      You want to be a hyena, you snivelling betas? You can, futilely, try to stuff the genie back in the bottle, protect “traditional marriage,” and fail at trying to restrain hypergamy. Or you can be a lion, unleash your inner beast, elevate your T to its best potential, and embrace nature.

      Like


      • Any counter-arguments from the King A gang?
        Cause Revo scored some heavy points in here.

        Like


      • Sorry, I see no “heavy points” here.

        The lion/hyena analogy has a lot of sound and fury for the shallow of thought, but signifies nothing in its inability to withstand a harsher light of scrutiny for the ultimately more complex human condition.

        That said, I myself have never denied nor lamented hypergamy… that would be like bemoaning gravity.

        Nor have I ever advocated female sexual suppression… beyond the slut-shaming that most of the members of the chateau appear to likewise support, as common sense would dictate.

        In short, there’s nothing to counter here… it’s merely another ‘net forum example of bloviating by a South Park attention span-addled stranger who projects wrong impressions upon another man, rather than actually paying attention to what the man said.

        As far as self-styled Coeur de Lions who call other men “little bitches” from the safety of their keyboards, well… that befits more the style of the hyena… though it’s the lion who laughs now.

        Like


      • The active suppression of female sexuality for several thousand years is what got us in this predicament in the first place.

        Maybe I lost something in translation ( my first language is French after all ) but it seems to me we have both systems simultaneously,

        Feminism puts women in a position to do the choosing of males; like hyena society where they do favor betas ( just like women like betas because they are good docile and good providers )

        but feminism has also put women in a position where they can choose to be very active sexually – or to be precise; they can chose to make themselves available for sex – which attracts alpha males, who then do the choosing; like in a lion society.

        I suppose just like inflation and economic slow down can exist at the same time, they are not exclusive, as in stagflation, both lion and hyena society can co-exist?

        well… liberalism has pretty much messed up everything so why could that not be happening?
        it is a sort of anarchy where everything goes…

        Like


      • “Feminism puts women in a position to do the choosing of males; like hyena society where they do favor betas ( just like women like betas because they are good docile and good providers )

        but feminism has also put women in a position where they can choose to be very active sexually – or to be precise; they can chose to make themselves available for sex – which attracts alpha males, who then do the choosing; like in a lion society.”

        This is half-correct. Under feminism, women do choose beta males–to be material providers, but they also have the option of choosing alpha males to donate DNA. Hence, GBFM’s immortal words: beta bucks, alpha fucks.

        It was actually under traditional marriage where divorce and adultery were expressly prohibited, this is the environment where betas were protected by social constructs from alpha interlopers. Hypergamy was restrained.

        Like


      • Yep, I’ve been laughing since I read the responses to this thread. You agreed that hypergamy is a natural law, much like gravitation.

        The point is, our civilization has been defying natural law for millenia, with destructive results. It was necessary to engender technological progress, but that age, for better or worse, is coming to a close.

        What comes next won’t be the end of the world, it will simply be the end of the beginning. We are going back to a mating system that closely resembles that of our foraging ancestors, except with less violence, as you pointed out in your post below.

        Like


      • on November 19, 2012 at 6:22 pm Demarcated Values

        Where I lead, they will follow.

        Where you go, another will have gone.

        What you see, another is blind to.

        Who I am, others think I am not.

        Women care about perceived value, men desire actual value.

        Whether a Lion or a Hyena, one will find a way to do what one wants. Unfortunately, whether a Lion or a Hyena, other Lion’s or Hyena’s probably know how to make you do what validates what they want.

        Just ask the Magus.

        Like


      • I don’t think traditional marriage is the problem here, but rather the feminazi revolution and betatized males on both ends of the political spectrum. Yes, Republican men are only slightly less beta than Democrat men, and that may be just because they don’t see the point of voting for the women-and-minorities party. Otherwise, they’ve been betatized almost as bad.

        Back in the Middle Ages, when traditional marriage was theoretically strongest, men would marry girls over ten years younger than them and keep them knocked up constantly. Men in general were mainly alphas. Betatude came along with feminazi revolution. So the Middle Ages was a “lion” society, just like every other human society throughout history that was not in decline. Even the average “beta” from 100 years ago would appear surprisingly alpha to modern bitches, because he hadn’t been as polluted by feminist propaganda.

        Like


      • The other gaping hole in this whole lion/hyena analogy is that, should a man act the veritable lion nowadays, forcefully driving off opponents and securing his woman’s sexual loyalty with whatever the human physical or mental equivalent of the lion’s post-coitus clawing of genitalia might be, well… the state would then enforce its much-touted legal monopoly on violence upon said man… and tout de suit. at that.

        No, my friends… if anything, all-too-much of PUA culture nowadays resembles more the slinking, snarl-posturing, opportunistic scavenging of the hyena.

        Like


      • Rigorous mate-guarding is a feature of highly K-selected societies, and, due to the breakdown of the old paradigm, we’re headed towards a more r-selected realm, where mate guarding is a superfluous expenditure of energy when there’s hotter, younger, tigher, just over the horizon.

        Further, if a man does deign to remain loyal to one woman, force and the threat of violence is not needed for mate-guarding when one has Charisma. C.f. the concept of the Alpha Widow, Five Minutes of alpha, et al. In an era of sexual freedom, such as our current milieu, overt mate guarding tactics are de facto DLV behaviors, and come off as wickedly beta.

        Like


      • I don’t think Revo mentioned mate-guarding at all. Alphas don’t need to guard their wives. Rather, the wives need to guard their alphas!

        Like


      • Apparently you guys were in agreement with me all along, then… namely, the lion/hyena analogy was ill-conceived.

        Like


    • That the ‘elites’ are different is understood, but things like ‘arranging meetings’ between their spawn and other ‘elite’ spawn very quickly leads to inbreeding and all its’ rather hideous incarnations. Those are definitely NOT ‘the best genes’…….
      One of the main reasons there are far fewer monarchies today than there were a few hundred years ago – they ran out of people to intermarry who weren’t already first cousins.

      Like


      • One of the main reasons there are far fewer monarchies today than there were a few hundred years ago – they ran out of people to intermarry who weren’t already first cousins.
        ——————-
        And thats why princess Di was fucking that sand nigger. Royal women know they gotta get some fresh genes in em to avoid another “herp derp”.

        Like


      • Instead of a “herp derp”, Di was shooting for a “herka derka”.

        Like


      • From the Urban Dictionary: herp derp:”A phrase said by idiotic morons who think they are cooler than they actually are.” Whoa.

        Like


  27. OK Dalton,

    but is all this supposed to occur in a safe white world produced by white men?

    I ask because feminism only “blew up” at a time and a place in the white country where white women were most secure and had the most resources.

    You think white men are going to maintain this for nothing?

    Are you a white person?

    Like


  28. bring on the jungle

    Civilization was created out of the jungle by men who knew how to be both out-savage the savages and treat with civility the civilized. The real question is how to do what our fathers did.

    Look at George Washington, or Jefferson, or Alexander Hamilton (I deliberately picked Jefferson and Hamilton because they were near opposites in ideology and politics – but they were both true men). Every one of those men were scholar-warriors, idealist-pragmatists. They conquered a new world and broke away from the chains of the old.

    Heartiste, you are RIGHT to say “bring on the jungle”, insofar as it is nothing to fear.

    Alexander Hamilton would have looked at the jungle and smirked because he knew that he would be the king of it in a year. The difference is that men like Jefferson and Hamilton knew how to use and carve out a civilization without losing themselves to the softness of the same.

    But the current generation of men know only civilization or they only know animalism. Either they wallow in ethereal nonsense or they act without any higher goal. Neither is a complete man.

    Like


    • Excellent… especially the final paragraph. Well-done.

      Like


    • “Truthfully, in this age those with intellect have no courage and those with some modicum of physical courage have no intellect. If things are to alter during the next fifty years then we must re-embrace Byron’s ideal: the cultured thug.”
      Jonathan Bowden

      Like


  29. “If our last rallying point is a pact with the Devil then We. Are. Done.”

    A haunting point. I believe that most men at heart truly want and would be happier with a young wife and family than to play the field as a successful gamer. The latter is soul destroying.

    Game is a counter to feminism; but on feminism’s heartless and de-civilizing terms. It’s fighting darkness with self-aware darkness.

    I would prefer a movement of light that is aware of the darkness.

    Like


    • Banging feminist sluts won’t solve the problem…it just reduces their value. The only way is to let the feminist system collapse and then rebuild it patriarch style.

      Like


    • No, game could only have come about due to feminism. Game is the tails to the heads of feminism. No feminism = no game, like how The Joker needs Batman. It’s yin and yang. In a pre-feminist society game would have just led to a multitude of shotgun weddings or outright murder by angry fathers/brothers. The whole marriage concept that lasted for the past 3,000 years or so before feminism was invented to placate betas. Marriage has *always* been about beta males, because without it they simply wouldn’t get laid. And not getting laid leads to destructive, or at the least, non productive males.

      I don’t have access to the study right now (I’d have to do more digging than I feel like on a sat night), but there was one that showed — in a contemporary American context no less — that in environments where men outnumber women, criminal activity and violence (including against women) increased. Basically, when very few men are having all of the sex, violent societies emerge. We’re already seeing this with the rise of mass shootings. Feminism in its purest form ensures that only alpha males/men with game get laid. Granted, there’s still a huge marriage industry out there and betas still can get regular sex that way, so we’re not really in danger of degenerating to pre-civilized societies and their level of violence (read Steve Pinker’s “Better Angels of Our Nature for the history of it).

      Like


  30. on November 17, 2012 at 2:36 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    O. T., but timely:

    “We regret to observe, however, that, within the past day or two, there have been signs of a tendency to raise a cry which we do not hesitate to pronounce
    pernicious in its immediate effect, and charged with the seeds of the gravest evils in the future. If the party makes its fight upon the cry “this is a white man’s city,” it cannot also make its fight on the issue of good city government. As surely as the sparks fly upward, if the “white man’s city” flag be adopted as the banner of the Democratic party in the fight, it will be used as a cloak to cover Democratic party sins after the fight is over. If the Democratic party is to win not because it is more worthy of support but because the Republican party contains the colored vote, we shall have a brutal and insistent demand for a clean sweep of Republican employes of the city, no matter how faithful and efficient they may have been, on the same plea. And experience teaches what kind of influences determine the character of the new appointees that any party puts in when it engages in the business of a clean sweep, whether it be called by the name of “spring cleaning” or by any other name.

    (Fabian Franklin, “A White Man’s City,” People and Problems, 1908).

    Like


  31. […] untrammeled.  This is America today:  a land that is utterly shameless about narcissism.  Heartiste thinks it has a lot to do with feminism and the rise of unchecked female self-absorptions that is […]

    Like


  32. on November 17, 2012 at 4:12 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    O. T., again, but somewhat relate to my previous comment:

    “They’d been working 14-hour days, six or seven days a week, trying to reelect the president…”

    Like


  33. on November 17, 2012 at 4:29 pm Confused-cious

    “What do you call a man who sacrifices for a country and a culture which is indifferent to him at best and hates him at worst?

    A fool.”

    Ok now I am not getting this.

    1. You said you were getting laid all the time because of the feminism and their whole hurr durr, “empowerment” of women….I think the hook-up culture is the best thing that ever happened, no longer do we need to buy the cow. So that is a bad thing, how?

    2. So you want to have the same benefits that society and the government as women have? Why? I thought the Alpha male can play and roll with the punches. He does not need the system.

    Like


    • 1. It’s a bad thing for SOCIETY.

      2. He is rolling with the punches, retard. PUAs are men who turn lemons into lemonades then piss on the tree.

      Like


      • on November 17, 2012 at 10:30 pm it's always found - the secret is out

        Lolz and you can pick them out in a crowd.

        PUA is equal to feminism. It’s Masculinism plus a handkerchief.

        I learn more and more that my honesty is something I should hide. I never wanted to learn how to get women, I’ve always known that. I just wanted to learn how to keep the women I wanted. And I always knew that too, until I believed what the manosoapoperasphere says about women is pretty much true, except that it isn’t, because it’s ever evolving, though never changing, society crumbles when those who are able to keep it runnin fail to observe the deficits existing, thankfully we have pseudo democracy we can learn to ignore or change public opinion about.

        If you want a virgin be Mormon or join a religion. If you want pussy hit on every waking cage. If you desire a family then make one and expect it to reflect why circumstances governed that choice you made.

        Semantics. This is all semantics.

        You want pussy? Then get it. Don’t cater to their protestations and don’t enforce your urges. Just let it happen.

        Trying to make sense of the inevitable is like trying to sleep after an Ego Trip to the brain’s intake’s uploaded via the blood-brain-barrier being crossed by cocaine.

        Like


      • This last post seems written by a woman. Normally the men conceptualize and find out solutions not just go with the wind, that´s what the women do

        Like


      • on November 19, 2012 at 6:28 pm Demarcated Values

        I know what that is.

        To a degree, you are correct. The voice certainly was of a woman. Though only as far as you can see, on screen.

        Wake up.

        Like


      • “2. He is rolling with the punches, retard. PUAs are men who turn lemons into lemonades then piss on the tree.”

        then why would he bash the system that is working for him and is drinking lemonade from?

        Like


      • Society treats men unfairly. PUAs make the best of it, then pisses back on society.

        What part of that don’t you understand?

        If someone kicked you out of your house and forced you to live in the forest, are you going to thank them for making you a stronger person or will you most likely shit on them when you see them again?

        Like


      • But they didn’t kick him out of there house. They delivered food to the house and then made him promise to call the delivery person the next morning (spoiler; he wouldn’t)

        Like


      • The fallacy of your argument comes from the belief that society’s embrace of feminism was a good thing for men because all men want is pussy and feminism made pussy cheaper.

        Like


  34. I just don’t like the idea of this country turning into exactly what it’s turning into. Not for any hypothetical descendants of mine or any others.

    This is a beautiful vast continent and I don’t want it to go to Hell any more than it has. The Founders saw promise and potential and those who believed in their vision held onto the nation for as long as they could and it’s been in constant decline for over a century.

    I don’t want to see it fall into the hands of the heathen whose great great grandfather was killed in order for the white man to control it. A continent without free and masculine white men to rule it is a sad continent indeed.

    Like


  35. “I say, bring on the jungle”
    would this jungle not leave our continent (hesitate to say ‘civilization’ any longer) vulnerable to other societies who still restrain the feminine urge, and reject the Western influence? Say, the Umma?

    Like


  36. When i ask myself why is it that the dark triad is so irresistable to woman,i come to one conclusion,could it be that the dark triad is corelated with a larger amount of some talents that male person with DT usually has:Hemingway,Picasso…etc,maybe the whole thing is biologicaly implemented in fem brains…

    Like


  37. “Is liberal white guilt really just a form of “altruistic punishment” against other whites who are more self-sufficient?”

    Sailer says that “white guilt” is in reality white status posturing. I say, not exactly. White guilt is really white pity.

    The pity that goes back to European missionaries in Africa wringing hands over the depraved natives, to German crowds going ecstatic over Obama’s speech in 2008, to Peter Biehl shaking hands and dining with his daughter’s black killers, to SWPL girls pitying black single mothers.

    This visceral pity is rooted in Africans’ different physical appearance and their apparently childlike mind. The pity had its limits though. It only kicks in when blacks are humble or remote. When blacks are confident and posturing, the pity changes to hate, or more precisely, into survival imperative.

    [heartiste: makes sense. and remember… pity is a form of contempt. but i also think there is something to the theory that liberal whites attempt to impose guilt on non-liberal whites to make sure they play ball with the redistributionist directive. so it’s not so much about cleansing their own guilty liberal souls, but more about keeping the rebels in line by passing the guilt around.]

    Like


    • I think it has to do with the fact that SWPLs hate hate HATE hierarchy. One group of humans placing itself above another is “oppression”, case closed.

      Like


    • Maybe white people feel guilt because they are guilty?

      Like


      • Naivety and ill-placed philanthropy, while not crimes per se, are invariably punishable offenses…

        Especially in societies where disparate peoples clamour for their piece of an ever-diminishing pie.

        Like


      • Perhaps black people only give when they’re feeling guilty, so if white people do it, we look guilty to them.

        Like


      • what country you from?

        what?

        Like


      • Ever do something nice for a person, solely out of the goodness of your heart, only to have them ask suspiciously:

        “Why are you doing this?”
        or
        “What are you trying to get?”

        There are some individuals, and races with more of said individuals than others, who do not have an abundance of kindness within themselves… (call it Western honor and chivalry, call it Christian charity, whatever)… so they find it suspicious in others… and then their hamster starts spinning a yarn about “They must have done something bad!”

        Like


    • It’s posturing as well as jelousy of those who don’t buy into the bullshit and wishing they were as cavalier. It’s the same reason these retards responsd to anti income tax arguments with “Ooh so you think everyone should pay taxes but you??!” “SO wesley snipes believes he’s too good to pay taxes eeeehhhHHH?!”

      They’re just pathetic and average.

      Equality is a myth.

      Like


  38. Hanna Reitsche owned a clitoris that was about 8 and a 1/2 inches long, She put it down her left pants leg, most of the time. Unfortunately for all concerned, her natural girly vag was tragically short. Genetics sometimes miss-fires and goes wrong,
    She got what she wanted. a lot, but it hurt…

    Like


  39. At least the french still have balls:

    http://www.france24.com/en/20121118-anti-gay-marriage-protesters-clash-feminists-femen-paris-civitas

    “Members of the Ukrainian-based feminist group Femen were pepper-sprayed, hit and kicked by anti-gay marriage protesters in Paris when they tried to disrupt a march against a proposed law to extend marriage and adoption rights to same-sex couples.”

    Like


    • Members of the Ukrainian-based feminist group Femen were pepper-sprayed, hit and kicked…

      And bitch-slapped, I hope.

      Like


    • Ahh Eastern Europe. Where even the ugly feminists are more feminine and better looking than American women.

      Like


  40. I have a question of advice. I’m a bi guy but I’m mostly into men. I don’t like the idea of totally ignoring women, but given how unpleasant they are in the US, and that even in other countries there are difficulties, should I simply not try for them at all? I don’t have enough motivation to put a lot of work into getting women and my own experiences as well as these blogs make me think it’s not worth it.

    My gay-side options are decidedly limited by the way. I know there are gay dudes who have free and easy sex and 100′s of hookups but I can’t do that because my tastes are set. I’m only interested in straight muscular young men. Obviously I have to pay them. There are only a couple of countries where you can do this easily (with genuinely straight/handsome guys).

    Personally I’d like to have a relationship with a woman and even turn mostly straight but they are so unpleasant that it’s starting not to be worth it. If you had the desire for men, would you go totally gay in the present circumstances?

    Like


  41. Women = manipulative lying sluts

    Thoughts?

    Like


  42. I’ll never say that virtue’s benefits are eroding or declining. For all the derision this blog tosses at betas, the pure cold fact is that betas built civilization. Virtue is what beckoned us from the jungle and forged us into men from the animal species homo sapien. What gives beauty to a life beyond the thrill of sexual conquest is mission, and every man must find a purpose to hold and to cherish; yet, the nature of life is strife — your vision will collide with mighty resistance. From the uninitiated, from the jokers, from the women, from society. Remain unmoved by the onslaught, and never show mercy to the evil, the ignoble, and the cretin. So long as you are true, the world is yours.

    Yet, to stay still against the breaking wave, a man must have power. A man must develop his mind. A man must bring his body to its peak. A man must reserve loyalty only for his purpose — nothing else. A man must be willing to do anything for that cause. The Triad is power. Like any power, it only becomes dark in the service of something base. But juxtaposed to something noble, the Triad is blood through corded muscles of virtue.

    A man is indifferent to women because they will never override his primary purpose. To him, a woman fulfills a biological impulse — and plenty of them exist. A man wields Game to effectively enforce the rules of virtue — it is another means to punish the wicked (passing shit tests is only about remaining true and impassive; you are a titan and she is a gnat). If the triad is psychological power, then Game is the demonstration of that power. Other women —and men— can only respond to power. Without power, your vision is nothing — regardless of its merit.

    A fool sacrifices for a culture who hates him.
    But only a coward would remain out of the fight for everything grand in this world.
    Virtue is worth defending, by any means necessary.
    Betas supplied the ideas, historically, and the alphas enforced those ideas with power.
    Here and now we can combine virtue and power.

    The tools are here to recapture this culture’s glory, step by step. Engage a woman for casual sex, then when you tire of her, explain in clear terms that her sluttiness removed her from all considerations of commitment. Game allows you to do this. Build a wide, impressive social circle, and rule it vigilantly — punish liars, punish cheats, and punish the cowards. Game allows you to do this. Target attention whores to orbit your social circle, then perpetually shame them and their attention — whoring ways. Yes you can, with game. Show your friends, who possess virtue but lack power, the way. Game allows you to do this.

    Like


    • on November 19, 2012 at 7:08 pm Demarcated Values

      I have a lot of respect for this comment. If every male could think this way, we wouldn’t have needed Game in the first place.

      There is absolutely no way to even know anymore what a quality woman is, because there are zero standards that exist for both men and women, beyond what perceived value exists in the minds of those who seek out said power.

      Game should mature beyond it’s childish point of men sharing how they got laid (like women do) and into something that fosters the growth and respectable treatment of both men and women – who are worthy of said respect.

      I have a lot I want to say on this subject, but ultimately, nothing will change, because in order for most men to comprehend the sheer gargantuan nature of this issue, they need first experience the darkness that they were sheltered from before Red Pill Awakening.

      I see no solution to this, as I know no man who ever listens to anything beyond his own advice. Few, so few, are capable of what the Insider speaks of above. He is right. But, that never has changed anything. For every man who shames a slut, another will embrace her. So the cookie crumbles. And a cake’s taken. And it’s eaten.

      Like


      • If we are bound by the laws of supply and demand, then hypergamy is bound to respect virtuous power more than power buried inside of a vagina. There are many, many betas for every alpha, but so it is, that there are many, many amoral, non-judgmental alphas for every righteous, true alpha. Women will always crave the attention of a powerful, virtuous man over a powerful man without virtue. Someone who makes the ideals we cling to and hear repeated real is someone who will make the world around them listen.

        Like


  43. News at 11, woman kills two beta males and gets pregnant by alpha in prison…

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/Europe/Vienna-woman-who-killed-sawed-up-2-men-froze-remains-put-on-trial/Article1-961439.aspx

    Embrace the dark triad, or face the consequences…

    Like


    • Heh, heh…. “Vienna” woman, Goidsargi Estibaliz Carranza Zabala,

      LOOOZZZLOOZOZOZOZLLLLLZOZOZ

      Embrace the dark triad, or multi-kulti, face the consequences…

      Fixed it for you.

      And don’t go bringing oranges to the apple grove again.

      Like


  44. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201211/sexual-signaling-nightclub

    Blog post about scientific study on night clubs.

    Of note:
    -Night clubs are meat markets, that is, they are made for single people to hook up. Only 20% of patrons entering the club did so as a couple but almost double that would leave as couples.

    -Out of all approaches in the club only around 16% were initiated by females, ergo, if men want to get girls they need to do the approaching, you can’t rely on women to do all the approaching as they won’t.

    Like


  45. “If our last rallying point is a pact with the Devil then We. Are Done.”

    Yep; just look at where niggers are today and see what a “I don’t give a fuck bout nobody but me” future looks like white man?

    Like


  46. The “angelic” bride from the NYT wedding announcement tweet, 16 years later:

    Bethany Yarrow

    Like


  47. you dudes think the world is going to get “darker?” no, the world is going to get gayer. behold the gay apocalypse!

    Like


  48. This is an epic read for dark triad game. The author brought his wife to dinner on purpose to the restaurant where his young lover was a waitress. An excellent, if longish read.

    http://www.esquire.com/features/ESQ0201-FEB_INFIDEL

    Like